Good morning, Ford. This is the continued Board of Elections Hearing Sorry. This is the continued Board of Elections meeting from last Tuesday to adjudicate challenge provisional ballots. Um I since we're on YouTube and Facebook, we were asked to introduce ourselves and start with me. We'll go around the room, include the board. Uh Alan of Sitnik Assistant County Solicitor.
Lisa Michelle, assistant county solicitor. David Voy Elections Division Manager. Bethany Hallam, Board of Elections member. Sarah Mirano, County Executive, Board of Elections, Chair. Champ Demarco, Allegheny County at large member of council Gotcha. Thomas Breathham with the law firm, Dylan McCanlis, King, Coulter, and Graham. I'm here on behalf of the state GOP and Dave McCormick for Senate Committee. Thank you. James Baker, council for Casey for Senate and the Democratic
Party. On board, before we begin, I'm going to have mister Boyce Warren and for anybody else that's going to testify having sworn. I think Dave will testify or respond to questions. I do. Sorry. If the board recalls last week, we voted on different categories and had the disposition of different categories. The first category was if somebody was not registered, it was a no count. And I'll hand it over to Lisa Michelle who did a lot of work. Personally, to resolve the number of
problematic, not registered down to maybe none. And I'll let Lisa explain in detail. Good old goose neck. Good morning. Um there were approaching 2 thousand not registered challenges by the Democratic Party. A little over 1800. Um the party was able to provide further documentation based on their findings. We we can thank you. We confirmed again the the three
cohorts that they provided after each additional day of review. Um and we located approximately 70percent of the nearly 55 of the folks who were actually registered and inaccurately noted by our registrars as having been not registered for one reason or another. Um of the ones that we've not located I spoke with the the Democrats this morning. It appears that there were double challenges. They were challenged by one party for
lack of registration but also challenged by the other party for perhaps missing a signature which is an item of vote. It remains outstanding. At the conclusion of this hearing depending on what happens with those other categories. We'll go back and review and find out if there are any other non-registereds that are not otherwise impaired by a challenge. And if so, we'll conclude those in the votes. So how many How many are still in play? How many did the Dems withdraw? How many did? So, they withdrew all but the the fifty-five that we've located, that
they've submitted. Almolisa I'm sorry if I could if you don't mind. Could you review those numbers for me again? I was having a little bit of a difficult time. Yes. The total challenged for not being registered was 1, 64. Okay. Of which we've we've had submissions of approximately 55 from the Dems and we've we've located nearly all of them. Lisa, I'm just
going to I apologize. I'm going to repeat just so I'm I'm hearing great. So, 55 of the 18 hundred and 64 there was an allegations they were registered We have located. So, there was actually I can get you the the actual numbers. There was 11 on one Twelve on another sheet and approximately 50 on another sheet. Two of which had already voted. We have located 55 of that. So we some of those others, the remainder
actually fall into two categories. So, that they were not registered but then you would also challenge on other bases. Okay. And of the fifty-five have those been reviewed by the Republican Party representatives. You're welcome to review them. We set them as well. Okay, thank you. I just asked that I have an opportunity today to to review those brief I'm sure we can get through them quickly. Thank you. So, I'm going to ask my colleague a question. So, for adjudication by the board today, how many are left to
be most of the challenges were withdrawn as these folks were not registered because it was a high point pointer. The one of the drone. Well, I think that they would fall under Alan. I think they would fall under the remaining categories whether or not there were signatures by the judges of election or signature by the voters themselves and once those are resolved, we can we can locate those in those other buckets. Sorry, we're having a hard time hearing. Yeah. So, as I was
saying, there was a category of not registered but additionally, there are other bases for challenge. Some of them for being not signed twice by the voters, not signed fully by the the precinct judge of election in the minority inspector. Some of the, so, they weren't just set aside for that for the reason