the Allenville Land Use Board in which formal action will be taken on the items listed on the agenda and upon any other matters which may properly become before the land use board. The requirements of the open public meetings act have been satisfied through posting on the public bulletin board and in the municipal
building and in the burough website and by publication in the record on January 13, 2025 with copies being sent to the Rididgewood News and the Herald Loops. Certain agenda items will be open to the public for comment andor testimony. The board will advise the public when such
matters are open for their comment and their testimony. Before we begin, if everyone would join me in sales to the flag, please al to the flag of the United States of America and to the republic for which it stands, one nation under God,
indivisible, liberty and justice of all the >> vice chairwoman Bergen >> here. >> Board member Walo >> here. >> Board member Petrino >> here. Board member Dallow >> here. >> Chairman Sico >> here. >> Board member Butler >> here.
>> That's it. >> Thank you. >> So we have um the mayor Andy and >> and alterant they're all absent. >> All right. Next on our agenda is approval of the September 17th show 25
meeting minutes. Um, I've reviewed them. I know they've been reviewed a couple other times. Does anybody have any comments, changes, additions? Okay, seeing none, uh, may I have a motion to accept? Please make a motion. >> Thank you. Second.
>> Okay. >> Vice Chairwoman Bergen, >> yes. >> Board member Wala, >> yes. >> Board member Patrino, >> yes. >> Board member Dallow, >> yes. >> Chairman Sico, >> yes. Board member Butler, >> yes. All right. Next on our agenda are the
resolutions. Um the first resolution is application file number LB 2025-09. Resolution 25-22. The applicant is Keith and Jennifer Bachetti, 414 Kentterbury Avenue in
Allenale, block 411, block 3. The application was in addition to a house in a deck expansion equivalent 270-64B parenthesis 270-63A parenthesis 3 270-54D and 270-B
council I'm going to ask you for a briefing on this resolution a residential application for the board um that was approved by the board at the last public meeting we discussed a series of standard and unique conditions to be imposed. They included the standard verbiage of all fees and
assessments to be paid. All recommendations of the August 15, 2025 engineer report shall be complied with. The unique conditions include a few others that the porch shall not be enclosed. That no new exterior mechanical units would be installed. Um
there was existing exterior mechanicals that were previously showed to clean the standby generator. They're going to remain in their current locations. And we talked about the property walkway being adjusted to accommodate that non-movement of that equipment. Uh we discussed no lighting of the rear deck.
Um new lighting would be limited to the front porch areas adjacent to the doors and all detailed on the approved plans. Nothing beyond the approved plan details. Landscaping plan was requested to be revised subject to the satisfaction of Mr. Breland's office. The applicant was
asked to investigate um the satisfactory nature of the utilities that service the property. Um and that would be subject to Mr. Breland's ultimate review and sign off as well. There was another provision storm water management implementation. We discussed that at length with this
applicant. Uh we talked about the site drainage and the water recharge chambers their location on the plans and we noted that um they were part of the Vancle engineer report. They were subject to Mr. Gland's continual review during post approval resolution compliance and they
might be amended and modified by Mr. Greeland's office during post approval review as he deems necessary. So those are subject to Mike's ongoing review. We had a scrier error in the engineer report that we talked about being modified reflected at the breakfast will be one not two stories. Uh, and that was
it for this one. By way of the unique conditions and the laws out that we had the resident that most impacted the divided causes custom for sure. Yeah. Yeah. >> All right. Any discussion on the
resolution? Okay. Seeing none, may I have the motion to approve the resolution as detailed and written? >> Make a motion to please. >> Thank you. Do I have a second? Second. Thank you.
>> Bergen. >> Board member Walo. >> Yes. >> Board member Patrino. >> Yes. >> Board member Dallow. >> Yes. >> Chairman Shereo. >> Yes. >> Board member Butler. >> Yes. >> All right. Second resolution that we have is application file number
LUP2025-10 resolution 25-23 the applicant responti 101 Austin Avenue in Allenville block 506 lot one and was believed the con a
construction of a one-story addition and an enlargement of an existing deck. Uh the applicant came back before us in question it council against please. >> Similar to the prior application and residential application this applicant
appeared close statement with alphabetical council for their bulk relief. The standard conditions were incorporated to the approval including all fees and assessments to be paid for issued compliance with Mr. Breland's August 19th 2025 report. Uh we discuss unique conditions on this that are
memorialized in the terms of the improvement including any new exterior material mechanical equipment shall be screened and will comply with all yard setback requirements uh because they were not fully u identified on the planet that we saw. So they would have to meet the yard requirements or else they'd be back here for further relief.
The applicant confirmed that no existing street trees will be removed that as a condition of the approval. Uh there was an issue with the segregation of the in-law suite. We wanted to ensure that it would not ultimately turn into an illegal two family. So we had parameters
as part of the approval and they're going to be held to be plan details where it is accessible from the main portion of the dwelling to the the in-law areas if you will and we have a conditionalized the addition shall remain open and accessible to the existing residents shall not be utilized
as a second separate dwelling unit. Um and just to confirm the board did not grant relief to modify the use of the property to a two family residence. There was no use relief granted. Any attempt to utilize the same would be illegal and enforceable for you code enforcement. >> That's all that
>> it is. Yes. That's all condition of the approval. Uh similar conditions related to utilities that they have to confirm to the satisfaction of Mr. Breland's office that the integrity event has been stand proposed conditions. uh and the same application of the prior matter about
storm water management implementations it's subject to Mr. Veland's ultimate review and if Mr. Vland identifies during post approval reviews that stormwater management controls need to be modified or amended it is subject to his ultimate discretion on this application we also discussed the
applicant obtaining a soil movement permit and submitting a plot plan. >> Thank you. Any discussion? Okay. Do I have a motion to accept the resolution as just detailed? >> I'll make a motion to accept.
>> Thank you. Second. >> Thank you. >> Was that second? >> Second. >> Vice Chairwoman Bergen. >> Yes. >> Board member Warala. >> Yes. >> Board member Petrino. >> Yes. >> Board member Dalo. >> Yes. >> Chairman Suro.
>> Yes. >> Board member Butler. >> Yes. Third resolution application file number LUV 2024-4 resolution 25-24 Allenel rehabilitation and healthcare 85
Haritton Road Allenale New Jersey 07401 block 601 lot 7 construct an 8541T addition to a non-conforming assisted living embarrassing and skilled nursing. Um,
this one we have a explain what certainly what we have how we have to go. >> Certainly. Thank you. >> So, so this application after a series of public hearings over the course of a year was ultimately denied by the board uh on a motion to deny which which
passed. The applicant required significant relief. There was D1 use fairance relief. There was uh additional use variance relief for Florida ratio of non-conformance for the proposed structure. There was a number of bulk variance items that were sought as well and there were existing non-conforming
conditions that some of which were being exacerbated, some mitigated and others were not being modified at all. So there was D relief, there was C relief, there were waiverss. After the applicant went through all of their witness deck testimony at the conclusion of the public hearing, the board was not
compelled to vote affirmatively based upon the proofs presented by the applicant. So, the application failed and the vote was accordingly. Um, it was not a split vote. There were, I believe, two votes in the direction to vote negatively on the motion. The motion was
to deny um but the motion passed and the application was ultimately denied by the applicant for this proposed expansion of a facility in a residential zoning district where it exists lawfully but uh was not permitted to be expanded following the conclusion of the testimony and prosecution of the
applications. Chairman, >> thank you. Thank you. >> Okay. Is there any discussion on the resolution or what we just heard and that we're all clear? All right. So then, may I have a motion,
please, to accept the resolution as written and just detailed by council? Make a motion. >> Thank you. Sorry. I'll second. >> Thank you. >> Vice Chairwoman Bergen, >> yes. >> Board member Wala, >> yes. >> Board member Petrino, >> yes. >> Board member Dallow,
>> yes. >> Chairman Crico, >> yes. Board member but board member Butler. >> Yes. >> So, we're through all the resolutions. >> Um, we're going to go right into the public hearings right now.
Um the first one is the application file number 2025-12 Michael Mall in Marino 246 Park Avenue in Allenale block 2206 lot 7. It's the application is for construction of an
attached deck. Um while you've been forest before so >> I have. >> You know the drill. Yep. >> We have to still swear to you but this is this is a new application. It is a new application. We're not going to proceed with the previous one. Okay. It's a just
a deck instead of the expansion. >> Yeah. Excuse me. Thank you. Please state your name for the record. Spell your last name. Provide an address. >> Michael, 246 Park Avenue. >> Raise your right hand, sir. You swear to affirm the testimony you're about to provide to be the truth. The home truth truth. >> I do.
>> Thank you, sir. You can apologize for those financial parts. That's not the wor. >> Okay. So, so um again, you've been before you did, you know, you went through your last application. Okay. So, that is now >> off the table and you're doing something
correct. >> You're before us to do something different now. >> Correct. Essentially, we are here or I'm here um uh apologies my wife's saying, but um we have um instead of going hunting the kitchen out, we just want to put replace the deck that is already
pre-existing in that space. Um it doesn't have anything to do with the previous plans because we were going to be building out on the house itself. uh both the second floor and the first floor, but this is just basically replacing a deck that is
not really suitable um for for use at the at this particular point in time. Um and um it's going to have some of the same problems we had previously, but they're it's a much smaller situation. >> Um the deck already pre-exists and
>> the deck already exist. >> Yeah, we already have a deck there. It's just going to go a little bit more closer to the into into the um into the driveway uh which would have been home which would have been a part of the house and we've done the addition.
So I just perhaps I just just want to get around it for me. We currently have a desk. We got to replace the desk make it slightly bigger. if you ever do the work that we talked about. >> I It's perhaps I know they're two independent things, so I have to ask.
Yeah, you were going to volunteer to go ahead. >> We're we're not going to be proceeding down that path. And if we were to, it would be completely something different because of what happened. >> Okay. Okay. All right. So, okay. I'm I'm clear.
uh board. I mean, we've all seen we've all seen the plans. Um we're very, you know, as I as I as I said, the applicant is very familiar with our process here. >> And >> go ahead. No, please. Please.
>> I mean, it looks almost the same size. Are you >> the same size? It's really >> It's still hidden behind the house. It's not protect, you know, getting out from the side. It just looks like you're going back just a little bit. >> It's really maybe maybe I think it's three and a half inches. You can look at
the plans. I don't think it's any further much more further. It's actually no further than lever uh deck itself. >> If you look real close, you can see there's a dash line on the the plan that shows the existing flip of the deck. >> You're looking at
I see. Okay. >> Yeah. In in the plot plan. >> Yeah. No, it is I mean it is it is technically slight it is larger than the existing deck and it's going to increase the nonconformities that currently exist. So
you know as a result of that we didn't prepare an application but we reviewed a report to review the application and visited the site but the zoning officer was unable to issue a a zoning permit because >> exasperating is exasperating some non-conforming conditions.
>> Okay. and it's going to be, you know, essentially located too too close to the existing garage and uh, you know, it's not an an exact replacement income. So, it's a slight alteration,
>> but but in your opinion, not necessarily any >> still going to be located behind the house. Uh, I think when you drive down the street, you're not going to even realize that was changed. Other than this deck is going to look nicer than the others.
>> Correct. That's the law. M >> you cons you're conceding that. So, so New Jersey state law is is it's actually smart in this regard. When you come in for an application before a board, whether it's residential, commercial, and it contravenes a prior approval
where they both cannot live harmoniously together, where if you overlay one or the other, they contradict and conflate and augment it. You have no problem with the condition of the approval that says if and when you want to revert back to your old approved plan, you will succumb to the jurisdiction of the board and
return to the board to prosecute that application. Correct. >> Yes. And I I believe that the the plans would only last one calendar a year anyway. So, I would have to do it anyway. And I don't have any plans of redoing a deck within a year. >> The sunset provision aside, yeah, this is this is the actual case law. But yeah, so um if you're fine with that
condition, I think it's got to be imposed anyway, but I don't want it to be a surprise to you. >> It would be fair and I'm aware and it would be part of the That's a resolution as well. That's fine. Okay. And then as far as um I mean the only the only the only
thing that I see is the property behind you and you already have there's already landscaping there. So you know to to our engineer's point from what I'm seeing that you want to do is nobody's going to know that you're adding 34 in. I mean not until you replace it.
>> Yeah. not whatsoever. >> It's not like you're creating a new outdoor entertainment area. You're just replacing one with one that's slightly board members. Any questions? >> Okay. Um uh anybody in the public any comments on
what we just heard here relative to this application? Okay. Seeing none, I bring it back to the board. Any further discussion? Okay, I am satisfied with what's here.
Um, engineering, I mean again, Michael, >> no, I don't think there's any uh we don't our office doesn't have any concerns. It's, you know, it's a deck. It's not considered improvements coverage. It doesn't trigger the threshold or a plot plan or a soil
movement. So whatever action I think the board takes will be the end of my involvement and then they'd be able to apply for baselines. >> Okay. And all the footings everything else here that's proposal could >> by the be reviewed by the code official.
>> Okay. >> Okay. Um All right. Do I have uh if there's no further discussion? >> Yes, sir. >> Okay. Uh a motion to approve. I'll make a motion to approve. >> Thank you. Do I have a second?
>> I'll second. >> Thank you, >> Vice Chairwoman Bergen. >> Yes. >> Board member Wala? >> Yes. >> Board member Petrino? >> Yes. >> Board member Dallow? >> Yes. >> Chairman Crico? >> Yes. >> Board member Butler? >> Yes.
>> This will be more res don't you need to do but officially understood. All right. Appreciate your time. Thank you. Thank you. We're going to see. All right.
Next on our public hearing application Paul 2025-13 James and Bayard oil 415 Canterbury lot I'm sorry lot 410 lot 3. The application is for the additions and renovation of
an existing single family residence seeking relief of rear setback pursuance 270-54D. Um thank you for coming before us and it. Most of us on the board were like mixing up some of the addresses here because we
just heard something about your neighbor or last month, right? >> Yeah. >> So, having said that, um I I know you'll be testifying. Well, you will be testifying as well. We can swear you all in way.
>> Okay. So, we'll start with everybody's name. Um Mary, name and address for the record, please. Barry Scros architects 240 was present Allenville. >> I don't know if that's on. Can you just >> Thank you. >> Mr. Bo, could you just provide your name
and address for the record, please? >> Boil 415 Drive. >> And James Bole, 415 Cbury Drive. >> We can scream all at the same time. We can do it up. You all swear to that the testimony you're about to provide be the truth, the whole truth, nothing but the
truth. >> Yeah. >> Thank you folks. >> M your license remains current in good stand in the state of New Jersey. >> Yes, it is. >> Thank you. >> Um so this application is actually um a revised application from um a previous
application back in form 22. Um there was a a larger um uh proposed renovation back in 2022 and we're actually coming back with a smaller plan. That renovation was approved. Um the project got put on hold. Um and now they've kind of reassessed and we're coming back for
something that's smaller. So you'll see that Mr. Reink um I don't know if you distributed it to everybody, but there was a letter from >> uh No, I didn't, but I was >> Well, we're going to go through it. You'll go through it. >> Yeah. So there was the again you know we visited the site reviewed the
application we didn't generate a new report for this application because uh a previous application that was a little bit larger in scope was approved by the board. Uh we will probably go through some of the comments that we had in the previous uh application process just to
make sure the appropriate uh comments are addressed in this one and if the board should approve the application that those conditions get carried through. >> Okay. Thank you. >> Um so I'll go through the application and then as I I'll note any differences from the previous application so you're
aware of that. >> Thank you. >> Um the pro post application we're here for a very setback. Previously we were here for a sideyard setback. Um but we're not building on that side and now the selling requirements have also changed um thinking that that um we
don't need to apply for that sideyard setback. Um the house sits on a very irregular um shaped lot. The the road is curved there. So the house sits in the the innermost point of the curve. It sits for just over 40 ft in that point.
Um and it's not rectalinear at all and it's kind of like a high capoid shape. So the back left hand if you're the front door or the back left hand side of the property there's a chunk of property that's kind of unusable because of this irregularity.
So, um the house, you know, is kind of square to the curve of the road. Um the lot is slightly undersized as well. Um the proposed addition, we're going to um reconfigure some of the first square space into a guest suite and we'll be
closing the new family room out the back of the house and a new deck. Um that um that that design and shape and size is the same as um the city is not approved to. We're asking if right now the rear yard setback is 45.5 and we're
requesting a 36.9 rear yard setback. Um on the second floor, that's where the the largest change is. Previously, we were going with a primary suite over the existing kitchen and living room kind of a house. Kind of a not really a third
floor, but in it's a split level. So, in split level terms, it's that third floor. >> Um we revised it. We're just going to expand the second floor over the over the existing garage. Um so we're going to expand the primary suite in its existing location. We'll add a fourth
bedroom on that floor for um the third child. Previously we were adding a total of 1122 ft. Now we're adding 604 square ft. So the bulk of the house has come down quite a bit with the reduced size. Um the total square foot of the house at
the end of the day is 3404. Um again the irregular shy shape of the lot and the nar the house is placed kind of on the the shallower depth of the lot. So that's why we're seeking the variance for that rear yard setback to be able to
construct the um the family room and the deck. It's also should be known that the backyard here is the golf course. >> That's what happen. >> That's what I was going to ask you to make sure detailed. >> Yes. So, um, and the other thing I want to note too is that we're still well
below the allowable floor area ratio. Um, we are allowed to have 22.9 and we're at 16.78. So, the house is still in keeping with the scale of homes in the property. It's just that the way the property is shaped, it's really causing us to have
that um that variance request for the rear. Um, and this is um, you know, obviously we've shrunk it and it's very efficient way to add onto the house. If we were to go out to the left or to the right, we'd be at plus side there are variances. But if that was too much for
the neighbors going in the back where the golf course is, there's no back there. So, it makes no sense for the community. They don't see it from the front of the house. So very minimal impact to the overall um or the the
organized the work that you're doing over the garage side. Okay. Um a little in the render room. Can you explain what is over again? Um what's over the living room?
The living room and uh and the kitchen are on the left and we are just providing a dormer there. A little bit of clear story light. Yes. No no floor area over that area. >> Previously we did have that whole area built out but we've removed.
>> So again just just looking at the plants everything is on the right hand side. Yeah. >> Looking at the house. >> The only thing on the left hand side is the back is the deck and part of it is covered. So in the rear elevation, you'll see the move.
>> Um, and I did note as you pointed out as I was setting up to back up the property. >> Yeah. Well, it's probably a new fire, but it's just that you're >> move it so it's more centered
>> because the house has two fires, but yes, do you have uh Mr. Is there anything that you wanted to bring up right now? uh and given what is occurred. >> Yeah, I mean this is this is certainly
um I I would consider this less impactful than the previous proposal and that wasn't considered to be a detriment. You know, we had asked some questions uh that maybe we can get some answers to on
the previous application. Uh you know, the applicant as part of the application there was uh you know, color renderings. We assume that the the addition in the house to look similar to the to the renderings both in materials and color
um and uh the existing landscaping will remain to the degree that it can. Is there any plans for supplemental landscaping and then if it's >> um in the front? Probably not. You know, Drew will add more stuff in the back.
>> Okay. But but and then you'll try to maintain whatever landscape that you that you have there. Any any exterior lighting proposed associated with this exterior doors of walls gone the exterior doors to the
>> you see anything runoff wise? >> Uh we we had asked them to uh consider addressing the uh the downspouts. as as part of the previous approval. And we would ask them to again consider
doing that as part of part of this application else come the uh the highlights. Can I ask you maybe this is just the way to drew it. Um on page on SK12
I'm not centered on this required but I'm asking if the height is can the height go above the >> um >> I don't know I'm asking you from >> you have to go three feet above anything within 10 ft. So we'll we'll double check that that we're going to comply
with all that. >> Okay. >> You're talking about like the overall height of that sh that chimney it may need to be a little higher. >> Okay. So, I got a double test. >> All right, that's fair. Um, the rest of this as as all those pretty thorough
um, please other items that need to be done here. Really don't have much more to add. >> Just as an aside, this section fireplace
is probably going to be gas fireplace. Yeah, I did not know. I did not know that you had put in there the um contractor something about looking at putting gas in there. It was something. >> Yeah, I don't know if there's details on it. I'll always find students when we
come to you guys. Board members questions comments I'm on to SK2 is I'm reading this correct because I'm not looking at it here is that doesn't look like you're any closer to the houses
adjacent left or right this 87 I mean that whole deck if you move doesn't exist disconnect. >> Oh, right. So that Yeah, we're not closer at the 33 and the 48.5
>> are >> Yeah, that 87 to the left. The deck is going to be in that in that area. >> So that's the the net addition is that extension that goes out of the back. >> Correct. >> Right. So that that's like in the list.
It it actually is shorter now because it was probably better with Philips back or the house. >> Correct. Like that back nothing's getting closer than that back weird way.
None of these houses like them and their names parallel to each other. Has there been any dialogue? >> When is your We'll come to that. We're going to come
to that be on payroll here very soon. >> And I can't nobody we in 2022 there were no there were no I don't I don't know that's allowable but there was nobody there to visit.
>> Yes. more just they're aware and understand the impact is minimal project really the most minimal way to build this part all the properties back here
>> the way the houses are sitting >> you take that into consideration I businesses. >> Um, anybody else from the board any comments on what we just heard? >> They said you said the F it'sn't
over what it should be. It's just right. Um, members of the public Feel free to come up, state your name, any comments on this application or anything. Uh Tom Fritz, 420 Canterbury Drive. Um I
was here, as you know, last month. >> You swear testimony about >> I do. Thank you, sir. >> Yeah. >> So again, I was here last month to support machetes, which you guys approved. Thank you very much. I think this is just another case where it's just going to beautify the neighborhood
as you guys have pointed out. I guess I educated him pretty well. I think you've been in the club a number of times. Um nothing in this club conforms, but um everything works pretty well and um I think what they're going to be doing is a beautiful addition to the neighborhood. Um in actuality, they
probably have the biggest property in Allenale in the club and it's still nonconforming. So, and uh they got three kids. They need the room. place in employee to approve their uh application which it sounds like it's owner's goods.
>> Thanks. >> Thank you very much. >> Is there a specific chair you want us to reserve for you next month? >> Yeah, but you said something about being on the payroll. Volunteer by >> So just just remember this is all volunteer not. >> They may pay you but not
>> I think you guys come here to lose weight. It's like 110 degrees. Okay. Power bills now. >> Yeah. Any other members of the public? Any questions, comments? Okay. Seeing none, I bring it back. Any questions, comments on what we just heard the
application itself? Okay. Um Mary is always these are always my the renderings and everything else. And we know what we're looking to help.
So, I appreciate that. Thank you. And the board app. >> Yes. >> Exactly. >> Okay. Um, can I have a motion to approve? >> Motion to approve. >> I'll second. Thank you.
>> One minute. No, I think Mike mentioned that you know all the prior conditions of the prior approval carry forward unless modified here the applicant agreed to that about the condition that these renderings will be actually what's developed in the field relative to
material and colors the existing landscaping main and the front off measures and control subject to your review Mike is that >> yes that's pretty much it >> okay and you're very you're very >> thank you all Now again, let me just make it right. Uh a motion given
everything that we just heard from council, >> I'll make a motion. >> Thank you, sir. >> I'll second. >> Thank you. >> Vice Chairwoman Bergen, >> yes. >> Board member Wala, >> yes. >> Board member Petrino, >> yes. >> Board member Dallow, >> yes. >> Chairman Cer, >> yes. >> Board member Butler,
>> yes. >> Mary, you know the drill. Okay. All right. >> Thank you. >> Good luck. >> Thank you. >> Wow. >> All right. I open it to the public for
any questions, comments. Seeing none, I bring it back. >> Okay. Uh any other businesses? Nobody here from the council will be able to say anything. Um I don't really have anything to put out here. I just you know this
I I I know that there's a lot of you know there's some comments going on and small thing about um guardian angel etc etc. I personally went to one of um to one of the things to one of the sessions last night and listened. I don't know if
anybody here plans to do that. Um, John 31 spot was with me last night. >> Yeah. >> Yeah. >> Um, it is what it is. Listen, it's an informative session. That's all I can say. >> There's one tomorrow night. >> There's one tomorrow night at 7:30 by 7. No, I'm sorry. 6 o'clock. There's one
tomorrow at 6 o'clock. It goes roughly two hours. Okay. And that's all I'm going to comment and set. Just have to go and listen. Okay. Okay. Any other comments? Anybody on the board? Seeing none, wow, 40 minutes. 40
minutes. Okay. >> Two applications. >> Two applications. So, I just want to say how much I appreciate the board coming out tonight. I know it was so short. Thank you for everything. Um, our next meeting is >> November
I think it's 15. >> Two weeks before Thanksgiving. >> No, I'm sorry. November 12th. >> Okay. So, we're real early next month again. Um Oh, okay. because next month because of >> the league. >> Yes, because of League of
Municipalities. But I also think the schools are closed probably Thursday and Friday. This stuff be um what do we have? What do we What do we What do you think we have? >> We have two residential applications at night. >> Okay. All right. >> Actually, one is residential, but it's
owned by a corporation, so they're calling it commercial. >> Okay. And we probably won't have a session. So, okay. So, again, the Wednesday of that uh of November. Um, one other thing that I just want to point out, um, L's
been proactive is trying to set up next year's meetings. Um, we've always tried to do these meetings on like the third Wednesday. That's kind of the way we've always done this for many years. However, with the holidays coming in there and Linda's been doing a great job
making sure that we're taking into consideration not only board members but the public coming before us. Some of the meetings are kind of scattered. Okay. Um perhaps well we'll still be able to vote on them but I just want to prepare everybody that they're a little early
much like we're doing for next for next month's meeting. Okay. Um but it all has to do with the school calendar. So just everybody has a heads up. Okay. And we'll vote on those. You can probably vote on them next month. >> I was planning on doing that so at least everybody knows in advance, you know,
for planning vacations and everything. >> Okay. So, um perhaps perhaps Linda, what you could do is when we put out our packets for next month, you could throw that in there. >> Okay. >> All right. Maybe we can just you just review it, provide comments. Okay. Other
than that, I'm done. 43 minutes. Okay. Thank you, everybody. Okay. Okay. Do I have a motion to adjurnn? >> Thank you. Do I have a second? >> Second. >> Thank you. All in favor? >> I you have a great night. Thanks for
everything. See you in a moment.