Good >> morning. We'll call the January 14th, 2026 meeting to order. We'll start with roll call. Community development. Present. Police. >> Jason Wartman, Police Department. >> Public Works. >> Dale Smith. >> Fire. Jeremy Holderfield Fire Department. Building. >> John Hansen.
>> First item on the an uh agenda is an annexation of property. Uh Amir Hamza is the project manager. >> Good morning everyone. So this is a property at 21104 Roxburg's Road and along with a parcel to the south as well
adjacent and uh Orange County has determined through a letter that they that this does not create an enclave due to the access of the property from Rock Springs Road and total a total area for both sides combined are are a total of
3.45 acres. staff and applicant are available for further comments or questions. >> All right, I believe the applicant's in attendance. Do you have any to address the DRC? >> Yeah, good morning. How you doing today? I'm Lonnie Groot representing the applicant and I'm pleased to be here and
answer any questions that I possibly can. I'm not sure there aren't any questions to be generated. This pretty simple, straightforward annexation and the county's on board. So, whatever I can answer, I'm here to do. What is the intended use of the property?
>> The the intended use candidly, the property's been offered for sale several times and there's been deals that have been almost consummated and the issue became is the property
annexed. So, the current owner has no intended use except selling it. So, whoever buys it will buy it subject to current comp plan, designation, uh zoning, district assignment, etc. and we'll take it from there. That's as straight as I can be.
>> Okay. Thank you. Any other questions for the applicant? All right. Hearing on community development has nothing further. Police. >> No comment. >> Uh public works. >> All the infrastructures there. No comments. >> Okay. Fired. >> No comments. Thank you. >> Building. >> I don't have anything. Thanks.
>> Thank you, sir. >> Okay. Thank you much. I do want to y'all have the the response time for you guys is just I've worked with lots of cities and counties and you guys are amazing how responsive you are. So I really appreciate that. >> Thank you very much.
Next item on the agenda is a special exception of 335 South Hawthorne Amir's project manager. >> So this is a special exception for multiple uses on the site on the property of 335 South Hawthorne A Avenue. Um it's just uh there's some uh
uh group home group living facility special exception uses and then uh place of warship and then manufacturing light manufacturing and then the list goes on multiple uses and the intended uses to market the property for these multiple uses that under the mixeduse downtown
zoning which is the property zoning allow these uses require a special exception permit but the yeah again the zoning is a mixeduse downtown future land use currently is commercial and total site areas 2.42 acres. Staff and applicant are available for further
comments or questions. >> Any questions? The applicant is here, Mr. Cooper as well. Um, community development has nothing. Police, >> I have nothing. >> Public works, >> no comment. >> Fire, >> no comments. Thank you. >> Building,
>> any questions, comments? Nothing. >> I don't have anything. Thanks. >> Nothing. Wow, that's amazing. The streak has been broken. All right, thank you. Next item is Wild Oak Sea store major development plan. Jean Sanchez, project manager.
Good morning. This is a proposed uh convenience store as well as a gas station, auto automobile service station um on Wild Oaks. I think you guys recently saw this lot. Um
so north is pointing on the side here to the west rather but it looks like the building is uh designed or the buildings are designed to be up towards Kelly Park Road um which meets the intent of the formbbased
code site design. Um I did have some questions um on here. I wanted to make sure we clarify the uh the narrative of the scope on the cover sheet. Um and also this was submitted as a major development plan but the I think the
cover the cover sheet sites um construction site plan. So I was a little confused. I don't recall that we approved an MDP for this portion just yet. Um so in any case um I'll I'll
yield some time to the applicant if they have any questions or concerns about our comments. Um, I don't know. I don't think I've received comments from public works yet, but that might be because this was submitted as an MDP and usually I get construction site plan comments
from public works. So, um, so yeah, the applicant is here to answer questions from DRC or um if they have any questions about the comments. >> Yes. Good morning. Um, this is the MDP uh submittal. We will correct the
construction verbiage on the on the cover sheet with the resubmitt. Um, there has been no other MDP approved before. Um, one of the questions that I wanted to ask you all about, there was a
comment about providing wheel stops along the parking that is heading towards the building. Um currently we have ballards that are proposed in lie of those wheel stops which we believe meets the intent of the code of still providing the required sidewalk width
and also providing some protection from cars going up onto the sidewalk. Um so we are requesting uh approval to use the ballards in l in lie of the wheel stops. So, I've I've checked with uh with our planning manager and he's fine with the
it has to be decorative ballards. Um so, yeah, that's fine. >> Okay, perfect. Um and then um this this might be something that we have to take off into a separate meeting, but there's um comment number three, parking rows terminate directly
into drive aisles with no visual cue for pedestrians. Um there's a there's a request to add raised crosswalks or contrasting striping for the pedestrian path. Um we have the the sidewalk along the front of the building and um we do
have the the striping for um the parking stalls. I'm just I'm not quite sure what's what's being asked. So it wasn't clear to me on um the site plan I was looking at. I'm concerned when they go through and
and you know make purchases and this happens all the time. There has to be some sort of pathway that you can probably connect sidewalks to perhaps somewhere here on the
islands, the fuel islands. Um, I'll look a little further and kind of clarify my comment, tell you what I wanted to, um, kind of convey. Um, but I just saw towards the back there were parking spaces up here that either that are for
the convenience store as well and whatever commercials units you're going to have on here. Um, there's something that terminates sidewalks I thought over here that I saw, but I'm not quite sure. There's nothing here on this ingress egress to
the private drive. So, that's what I was talking about, but I'll I'll reconvey that to you, make it more clear. Perfect. Um and then um additionally on reinforcing the street edges, stronger visual separ separation between fueling operations
and public facing areas. Um right now we have code minimum landscape and just asking for a little bit of extra clarification on what additional enhancements are being requested or what our options might be. I think it's all about
>> um one comment for um public works. I did see the emailed comments after the letter went out and um there's the request for geometry on the driveways and just wanted to clarify we do have uh dimensions of widths and radi on there. Um looking to clarify uh what you would
like to see on the resubmitt. >> I must have missed it. I didn't see them on the sheet that I was looking at. >> Okay, perfect. We'll we'll direct you on the response. Um, no further questions. Thank you. >> Any additional questions for the applicant?
>> John, you have no questions. >> Oh, you're starting with me. Yeah. No comments. >> All right. We'll work backwards. Fire. Yeah. Yeah. >> No comments. Thank you. >> Hope it works. >> No comments. >> Police. >> No comments. >> All right. Thank you.
>> I know, right? People are awake. >> But I like it that way. >> Yeah. Yeah. All right, next one is shops at Eastshore Multifamily. Uh, Jean Sanchez is the project manager.
>> So, um, this is the construction site plan for the multif family. Um, a couple of you weren't here at DRC when the MDP for the multif family was issued approval. Um, so this is the construction site plan. Um, as you all
know and notice out there, uh, things are moving along in that intersection. Um, I did have some comments on here just because it's been a while. I'm not sure. I don't think I saw Jordan Draper, the applicant here, but I did have some
um kind of housekeeping comments um because I needed them to site the PD on this as well as insert the master plan just so everybody knows every time they see this that it is part of a master
plan development. So, um, other than that, I don't really have additional comments for here. This is supposed to be age restricted. Um, it's an age restricted multif family. That is I'm not looking at you for whatever reason, Dale.
>> She looked at me first. So, >> exactly. Um, but yes, I don't have any other questions other than that. The this entire site really has been cleared and masqueraded already. So, um it's just kind of uh uh
dropped in in the correct parcel. So, >> all right. It doesn't appear like the applicant is here. Um Jeremy, >> I had a question. There was something Just refresh my memory. It might have been corrected. I'm just trying to check in on it. There was something about phasing this thing at one point, wasn't there, they were talking about with the
buildings. Am I confusing his >> phasing? Yeah, they were phasing like trying to get one building open and trying to get moving forward with >> I don't know if this was We had some apartments that were that had sequencing plans. >> I'm pretty confident it was this.
>> Is it very confident it was this one that was brought up? I'll check in on it with >> I don't recall that. >> Did Jack do that? Jefferson. >> They did. >> They did. It might be Jefferson Apartments. You're thinking it's across the street. I'm confident it was this one because it
was concrete block apartments or for the for um elderly or a restricted community. Sorry. Um and they were trying to, if I recall, were trying to get one phase open and then continue construction on the other buildings, but
the buildings connected. They weren't separated, which would make more sense with this property than those. So, that's what my I'll check in with the contractor on and find out where they're at. That'll answer my questions. I don't ever remember a discussion like that for this one. >> It might have been offline. So, all right. Thank you. >> Okay.
>> All right. With that, uh, the applicant's not here. So, uh, community development has nothing further. >> Uh, police. >> I have no comments. >> Works. >> Yeah. I mean, this reduces the number of units. So, it reduces the, you know, impact. So, I have no comments.
>> All right. Fire. >> No comments. Thank you. >> Building. >> I don't have anything. Thanks. >> Okay. The next one is crossroads at Kelly Park phase one, two3 and two master infrastructure mass grading plan
revision first Jean Sanchez project >> planning has no comments other than to really just bubble the proposed revision. Um I don't know if public works released comments just yet. Dale, have you guys
released comments on this? on >> I checked this morning >> on Medicine Oaks. >> Uh this is Crossroads. They had >> I I had no comments. I mean what they were doing was just extending the storm water system. >> Okay. >> You know, north and you know I looked at
everything. It's a very goodation and it was requested by the county to pick up on Detroit. I had a comment on there to uh bubble the proposed changes and I wanted a new um complete set of plans rather than just the sheets that were
replaced because this is going to replace the construction site plan for for this project the one that was previously approved. So, >> and I I thought I had put a comment in there that said no comments. This is a matter of modification. >> Okay. >> And open gov.
>> All right. >> All right. I believe the applicant is here. Uh, do you have anything for DRC? >> Okay. All right. Hearing nothing. Community development has nothing further. Fire. Anything additional? >> No comments. Thank you. >> Police. >> No comments. >> Public works. >> No comments.
>> Ability. >> Yeah, we're playing games. >> Making sure everybody's awake. >> Madison Oaks, uh, major development plan. First Middle Genius project manager. Okay. So, this is the second uh Madison Oaks uh multif family proposal. Um it is
part of Wild Oaks. It's kind of in the central area of the Wild Oaks um development. Uh I did issue the comments. This was um reviewed by our consultant um outstring fellow.
um he has worked with us with developing the uh land development code and comp plan amendments for wild oaks. Uh so if you have any questions, feel free to to directly you can directly email him and copy me and Bobby if you'd like. Um but
yes, that's it. >> All right. Uh the applicant's here. Do you have anything to add? Um yeah, just just one quick note from the planning side and we'll we'll reach out to Alex, but um
let's see what comment uh 6B about the setbacks exceeding the maximum 20 ft. Um we're going to want to talk through that a little bit more because immediately the first 10 feet of the property is a
Duke easement. Um so we've thereby pushed our 10 feet of landscape behind that um 10 foot. So that gives us basically 20 feet of our property is is taken up before you can have some buildable area without
intruding on the um the 10 foot landscaped area. Um there is a section in the KPI for modification of standards with a 10% dimensional. Um, so we want to maybe work with you all on, you know, 10% of the 20 feet. So seeing what we
can do to get to a 22 foot setback because of that. Um, you know, we don't want to be putting our trees in the in the Duke easement. We can't put the trees in the Duke easement. Um, so just kind of working through that one. Um, so that'll probably be coming through via email from me.
Um, and then on engineering public works, there was a request for the calculations. Typically, we've been providing these at the CSP phase, confirming that's still acceptable. >> I understand. I'm good with it. I just put a comment down.
>> Um, and then I believe that the architect was going to ask a question as well. We'll put that in with Alex in the email to Alex. They had a question on um, one of the comments. >> All right. Any questions for the applicant? Okay. Community development
has nothing further. Police >> have no comment. >> All right. Public works. >> No comments. >> Fire. >> No comments. Thank you. >> Building. >> All right. Thank you. >> That brings us to discussion. Any items for discussion? >> All right. Hearing none, we're
adjourned.