Good morning. We will call the February 25th, 2026 DRC meeting to order. We'll start with roll call. Planning is present. Uh, police, >> public works, >> Dale Smith, >> fire, >> Jeremy Holderville. >> Building John Hansen. >> All right. First item on the agenda is Northwest Recreational Complex Tennis
and Pickleball Courts first submitt. Amir is the project manager. >> Good morning everyone. So this is a submitt by the city surprisingly. Yes, the city. Uh private >> yeah for yeah the city uh for pickle
ball and uh tennis courts uh at 2500 brush uh road and um the future land use is parks and recreation and the zoning for the property is office staff and uh staff is available for further comments and questions. >> A morning at the improv with a mere
home. >> The applicant is in attendance. Uh would you like to get up and kind of explain the project to the DRC? >> So we're representing kind of the first phase of a two-phase effort here. The first phase is going to be to build the
storm water ponds and the parking area pedestrian connections. The second phase will be performed by Halas who's going to come in and build the tennis courts and the pickle ball courts separately. There's going to be just a little bit of grading so that we everything harmonizes
in the finished product. So, with the project, um, most of the comments seem to center around landscaping and lighting. That lighting is going to be put in by Duke afterwards. So, we'll be able to provide the photometrics for that. But right now, the proposed plan was for the parks
department to have staff installing landscaping after the construction was completed for trees within the islands and shrubs to create buffering against the houses in the subdivision to kind of the northeast. Um, so I think that's going to be the
main item that we would want to discuss is, you know, if we can get waiverss to the landscaping requirements and if not, how we proceed. >> Okay. I know the code requires the submittal of a landscape plan sign and sealed by a landscape architect or uh
like professional. Uh we would have to take a look at the code and see if there's any type of mechanism for waiver. A waiver has to go before the the city council for something like that. Um is there I know you had mentioned the plan to do buffering and stuff adjacent to the residential. Is there like a plan that's been put into
place yet or anything like that or >> uh Chris Richtor, parks administrative manager? Um we were planning to work with Donnie, our parks administrator, um to look at what options we have. Uh there is already trees kind of on that northeast corner um where the
subdivision is, but just adding some supplemental. Um and then there's been also some talk to add uh some additional uh trees or shrubbery on the south side uh or sorry east side uh by the water plant. So nothing in in depth, but there
is plans to kind of obscure from the core lighting, the houses, the noise um that's been in discussions. >> Okay. All right, let us take a look at the code and do a little bit of research and we can get back with you on that. Any members of the DRC have any questions on this?
All right, hearing none, planning has nothing additional. Uh, we just owe you some information. Um, police, >> no comments. >> Public works. >> I'll provide some comments later. >> Okay. Fired. >> No comments. Thank you. >> Building. >> Thank you very much. >> Thank you guys. >> Next item is go ministry construction
site plan second some metal. Uh Jun Son is the project manager. >> Good morning. Um this is a CSP for church uh property located on Rock Springs Road. The size of the property is 6.73 acre. The size of the proposed
building is approximately 11,000 square ft. Uh the current future land use is commercial. Zoning is community commercial. Proposed uses church which is permitted and proposed the number of seats is uh 400. The prop
properties within wikipa protection area and >> looks like the applicants in attendance. Yes. >> Uh good morning Pedro Martinez with Bquette Engineering 1000 Legion uh Court Orlando, Florida.
Any questions on the comments that you received or anything you would like to discuss or does any DRC member have any questions for the application? >> Um I did had a question on planning on the last submittal for the green building standards. Is that something that we have to provide on the
engineering set of plans or in the architectural >> um section? >> Okay. >> And then I actually have a question. So did you submit an environment studies? No, that was that was one of my comments here. So, this comment was not provided
during sufficiency >> uh or in the subsequent submitts. So, if this is something that it's needed, I just wanted to confirm whether it's an phase one ESA or species report. >> It is required. Okay. Because the properties keep a protection area.
>> So, it would be a phase one ESA. >> Okay. Yeah. But we'll we will work with uh with the client to provide that environmental report. >> Um the other comment that I had here is the owner authorization form from the adjacent properties. I think there's an
access easement to our property. >> Okay. >> So I need to work with the with the client to to provide those documentations to the city. >> I think the other planning comments are are very straightforward. um some of the the striping to be on the parking plan
instead of on the site plan. All of that we can we can do. >> Okay. >> And then from my understanding I think that we didn't receive any comment from any other department except for fire. So on fire the auto turn on sheet number I
believe is eight I think is a mislabel. We called it out 47.65 65 instead of 56. >> Yes sir. I see that's updated. Um I had a question regarding so there was a
change on this with the parking lot on the south side that parking spaces are gone now. They've been limited. >> Yes. Correct. The current site plan is the way that it's that it's being proposed. We had to increase the size of the pond. So we got we got rid of some parking spaces. We're still in compliance with the minimum parking
spaces for the church, but the rest is is just gone for the because of the pond. >> Okay. All right. Thank you. >> So, yeah, that that question with the vehicle turning, we're going to address >> the other comment from fire says that um
you were concerned about the south side of the building, the length of that parking. >> That was the parking lot I was talking about. I was concerned with the length of it, what it was because it was over 150 ft. We were going to require >> correct turnaround access point, but um now that you've eliminated it kind of
canceled that question. >> Yes. Okay. >> Thank you. >> Thank you. And uh we acknowledge the we'll do the BDA DAS test prior to to final. That will be something that the GC will coordinate. >> Perfect. Thank you.
>> Have the GC confirmed with me prior to that? >> Yes, sir. >> Thank you. >> So yeah, hopefully we'll respond to the planning and fire >> uh comments and resubmit as soon as we can. >> Okay. Thank you. Any questions for the applicant? additional. >> Yeah, I finished up my review late
yesterday, so they didn't get posted. I'll give you a copy. >> Okay. >> But, you know, a couple of things. The ponds are going to have to be fenced due to the depths >> and you'll have to comply with, you know, planning and zonings, you know, the type of fence that they'll require
for that. Uh, the way you've got the water lines, the portable lines, and irrigation plumbed, we're going to have to have a discussion with that >> because I could not find a line for you to tie into in that access ement. It looks like you're going to have to take your water line all the way out to Rock Springs. >> Okay,
>> which that's where your water meter is going to have to be your portable meter. So after you do your wet tap, you'll have to come off with two T's and then continue with your fire line, you know, to the site. >> We we had on our current survey, it shows a little bit east of our western
property boundary, a gate vault. We're not entirely sure about the size of that gate. We we thought that it was a stopout, but in case that we need to connect to Rock Springs Road, we can we can do that. If we find the the access easement and maybe we'll have to record an utility ement to go through those properties and connect to Rock Springs
Road. >> Right. Well, you were going to go out there for the forest main anyway. And what I saw on the plans, yes. >> You know, for those two buildings, they were like one and two inch line. So, it's not enough to get your fire protection. >> Okay. >> And then your water line, because it's not a loop system, will have to be a
10in line instead of the 8 in on their ship. Okay. So, are are we going to receive those as an additional >> comments you right after the meeting? >> Okay. Perfect. >> Okay. >> All right. Any other >> has nothing additional. Police.
>> No comments. >> Public works. >> No other comments. >> Fire. >> No comments. Thank you. >> Building. >> Nothing. Thanks. >> All right. Thank you. We'll look for the resubmitt. All right. Thank you so much. I appreciate it. >> Any items for discussion hearing? None. We're turn.