Um, welcome everyone. Today is Monday, September 15th, 2025, and this is a regular meeting of the City of Asbury Park Planning Board. Chairwoman Carzac, can you please call this meeting to order? This meeting is being held in compliance with the Open Public Meetings Act, chapter 231, Public Law 1975.
Adequate notice of the meeting has been provided to the Coaster and Asbury Park Press by publication of the annual meeting notice and posted on the municipal Bolton board and municipal website. All notices are on file with the board secretary. Official action may be taken on the following matters before the board. The meeting is being recorded
by APV. Please join me to salute the flag. Pledge allegiance to the flag of the United States of America and to the republic for which it stands. One nation under God, indivisible, liberty and
justice for all. >> I will now take roll call. Um James Banano >> here. >> Councilwoman Clayton >> here. >> Jim Henry >> here. >> Jeremy Hoffman is not present. Uh Mayor Moore is absent this evening. Jen Solder
is absent at the moment. Daniel Shaneo is absent. Bob Zuckerman is absent. Kathy >> McLaclin here. >> Absent. Not here. >> Okay. Was not expecting that. Um, Vice Chair Gonan
>> here >> and Chairwoman Barbara Kerzac >> here. Uh, today the application is for 1st Avenue. Okay. >> Good evening, Madam Chair, uh, board professionals, and ladies and gentlemen
of the board. My name is Kevin Kennedy, and I'm here tonight on behalf of the applicant. Uh, as you are undoubtedly aware, this is a continuation from our hearing from, I believe it was August 4th, and we had a very active night. I think we had the
entire night. We appreciate that. Uh we heard testimony from our engineer, our architect, our landscape architect and our traffic engineer. And my recollection uh was that at least uh two of the more
uh pressing issues were um about garage door and having an audiovisisual system uh alarm system. And Madam Chair, I think there was a straw poll. Well, it wasn't unanimous, but I think the majority um opted or preferred the uh
the alarm system. And I think as is always the case, uh there was a request to have uh some more uh lighting details all showing all light sources and um uh identifying all all of those uh
important details. uh we had submitted revised plans and I personally thank the board professionals for a very very very quick uh turnaround on that so we could be here tonight and u madam chair what I would like to do unless you and the
board members feel otherwise is just recall my engineer and then uh to talk about some of the changes recall my architect to talk about uh some of the changes and then uh rest unless you all feel >> yes because there's a number of items that we also had that we wanted
modifications to the plans. So, we should see those. >> Perfect. So, uh without any ado, I'll call up uh Doug Cleland, our engineer. [Applause] >> Hey, how are you? Please raise your right hand and Sam as well. Do all of
you solely swear or affirm testimony about the truth and the truth and nothing but the truth? >> Yes, I do. >> Okay. Starting with Doug. Please identify yourself for the record. >> Sure. My name is Doug Klland uh with Insight Engineering and the civil engineer for the applicant. And >> you're still in good standing with your
license here in the state of New Jersey since August 4th? >> Yes, sir. Okay. >> Tom Miller, board planner. Okay. Sambakia, board. Thank you by all the things on Doug's desktop. Don't
>> burn your eyes. I >> live like that. >> I normally have three monitors. >> I have anxiety. >> It's much more spread out. >> Are you getting anxious? >> I am right now. >> So Doug, you're under oath. You're the board engineer. You were here at the
first meeting and you uh recall what some of the uh board concerns were. Why don't you uh talk about the revised plans and uh those things that you that you addressed in response to board concerns? >> Absolutely. So, uh wanted to go through
a summary of the changes that we made from the last meeting. We heard the board's concerns on a number of matters. Um and I've summarized them here. So, I'll go through the various things that we changed as they relate to uh the site and then I'll let the architect speak
more about changes to the building. Um, so first was in the uh on near the corner of 1 Avenue and Langford Street. I'll zoom this in here. Uh, we eliminated a walkway that used to go
from the parking entry out to the public sidewalk that's been eliminated to make room to expand the rain garden into that area. So that helps reduce uh our proposed impervious coverage and it also helps us to provide some additional
detention as it relates to storm water management. Uh secondly, the gas meters were relocated. Um also on 1 Avenue right in this area here u is the location of the proposed gas
meters. There is it's behind the proposed fence. I'm going to zoom in a little bit more. There is a fence there. There's a line here for our proposed fencing as well as uh landscaping uh that'll fully surround it and it'll be
entirely screened from from public view. Um and then also our lighting plan was revised. Uh if you remember, we discussed originally we had 3,000 Kelvin lights in the propo in the uh proposed parking garage
um which would have required a design waiver. We've eliminated that and changed them to 2700 Kelvin. Um that eliminates the need for the design waiver. Also, I know there was some concern about what the garage lighting would look like
uh if you are were a pedestrian walking along the sidewalk or a car within the roadways. U so we did some we made some changes to uh alleviate some of those concerns. Uh the mounting height of those uh garage fixtures was increased
to 11 ft. So they'll be tight up against the ceiling. Uh and also and I'm sure the architect will speak more about this. Uh there was some modifications done along the uh the parking garage openings along Langford and along first
uh so that there was a louver installed um to to hide the source of the light so that it won't be seen if you are on the sidewalk. And I know that's also the case. Uh I believe the header was made larger along this uh open portion of the
building along this common property line um to the west. So uh in my opinion the the source of the light will be hidden. Um it won't be visible from from public view. Uh and also as I mentioned we changed the lighting temperature to
2700K >> and was and I know that we're looking at this view. I'm assuming that the the plans were actually changed as opposed to just this. >> Yes, we did resubmit uh our site plans. We revised them in uh record time, got
them back into the board. >> I noticed. >> Yes. >> All right. So, all that's in the new plans. Okay. >> Correct. Yeah, we tried to and we tried to take care of as many uh of the engineering comments as we could um given the short amount of time. But yes, that was one of the items we definitely
changed was the revised lighting design. Um, also along Langford Street, the two pedestrian entrances, we did add a couple of benches adjacent to either side of uh the pedestrian entryway. Here
you can see a a bench to the north and south here. And then also um on the other side, same thing with the pedestrian entrance way. There's a bench on either side in addition to uh a bike rack. And
we didn't install a bike rack. We we're not proposing a bike rack on the corner of Langford. And second, because that is the location of our internal bike rack and we thought it would be uh sort of redundant. Um, there's plenty of bicycle storage with
within the within the garage there and but we did add one on the corner of Langford and First, >> excuse me, >> yes, >> for the record, Jennifer Sers is here. >> Uh, Kevin Jennifer missed about 5 minutes of testimony. Do you mind that
she continues to participate without >> No, I don't. And welcome and and just by way of very very brief review. I said we were here earlier and we uh had the plans revised. The most uh pressing in my mind concerns were uh uh a need for
garage details and the alarm visual alarm system and also uh the board properly wanted a lot more lighting details and to make sure that there'd be no excess lighting and reduced lighting. And what um Doug here, our engineer, testified that the plans have been
revised. the lighting uh the intensity of the lights has been reduced so that it is uh compliant and uh he did expand the rain garden. So I think we're calling it up to date. >> Thank you. I apologize. >> All right. And speaking of which the
that was my next item was the pedestrian alert system. So it's uh both visual and auditory. It'll be installed on the exterior face of the building uh near the near the garage entry. Uh as was discussed at the last hearing, uh you
know, there is a a a good distance from uh the driveway exit, the curb cut, the sidewalk where where people will be walking um to that garage door, but we heard the board's concerns and obviously safety is always paramount. So, we went
ahead and added that alert system and provided that detail on the plan. Uh and then finally on the corner of Langford and second, I think we already had that the ADA ramps properly designed on first and Langford, but we also
modified the ADA ramps along second and Langford so that the uh detectable warning strips will be perpendicular to the cross existing crosswalks that are there. >> And in plain English, I think that was there was a concern that there'd be no rounded
>> Yes. So we did have yeah before this we had a uh a rounded detectable warning uh around the the proposed curb radius here. So instead we have separate ramps uh with that ADA detectable warning strip u in line with the perpendicular
to the crosswalks. And that that's basically the summary of the proposed site changes. I will note too, we did revise the uh the street tree street tree street tree street tree street tree street tree street tree street tree street tree street tree street tree type um in accordance with recommendations from your planner um and that's been indicated on this exhibit as
well as the submitted site plans. >> And Doug, one more question for you and I this might not be for you. If it isn't, I apologize. I think there was a discussion about um having some type of security or secured entrance through the stairwells in the parking garage. some type of fob system. Is that for you or
will we have our other witness talk about that? >> Uh probably more for Dan, but yeah. >> So, any other uh questions or comments? >> No, that's that's really it. Um those are the changes that you know represent
what we made to the to the revisions to the plan to address some of the board's concerns that we heard at the last hearing. >> All right. I have a couple of questions on um >> we have uh can can you go through one more time what the garage door is going to look like or is that someone else?
>> That's >> I'll let the architect >> architect will deal with the garage door and the material of the garage. >> We did add a garage door, but I'll let him talk about the material and the type of door. We'll >> do that. Okay. >> There is something in the engineering report about um freestanding signs and that you're that the applicant is asking
for requesting a waiver. Um, that is on page three of the Avakian report. Number two, I was just want to make sure that we're ask you're asking for a waiver, but I want to make sure that that freestanding sign is not going to be in
the right of way of the city. >> Don't. So, we're not proposing any freestanding signs. >> So, then so then you I think it's on an awning, is it? >> Yeah, I can speak to that. >> Okay. So, you'll speak to that. Okay. Um
they're also requesting a waiver and this is Sam. This is they're requesting a waiver for storm water plan off-site storm water plan. Is that okay? >> The off So that's just that was getting back to last week. Um just as long as they're saying it's dimminimous and it was received. >> Okay. So that was okay.
>> Okay. Um just a moment. We've got all the lighting and the shielding that you spoke about. Uh there is there was number there was a number five of them. Hang on 11.
Okay. Um groundwater recharge. They're saying that this section of the report should be provided. It's the very first item on page five. >> Is that a that should be a uh resolution condition? So due to the So that's saying that they don't the applicant is not subject to ground recharge because
of where they are. >> Okay. So they're okay. So we don't need we don't need that as a condition. >> Correct. >> Okay. So that's it. Okay. Um there's also another requirement on page seven of 11 that you have uh of watering.
Testimony should be provided about um watering. >> Yeah. So that that just to clarify. So that might also be a little bit more enforcement, a little bit extra for our end of inspection. But what we constantly keep seeing is great landscaping plans put together and then
during construction, they're just not watered correctly or we always talk about the gator bags and the tree bags. Um it's something that I'm trying to be more adamant about in our letters. So you all hear it first and >> we're trying to get their plans to be more detailed. >> Right. Right. So that should be part of resolution compliance.
>> Yeah, absolutely. And to to be honest, it is um and it's there. I just it's I'm just trying to be more adamant about it now so we keep following it. >> Happy to have it. >> Happy to have it. >> So if I make the subject to compliance without standing recommendations in both
letters that'll cover that for you. >> Yes. Yes. Thank you. >> Okay. All right. Anybody else have um anything else? Any of the board members have anything else for this witness? >> Yes, I do. >> Okay. >> Uh you indicated that the gas meters are
going to be uh installed uh inside the fence uh along the First Avenue uh where the fence returns. Um that's an open area. If you'll recall
your plans, that's a um picket fence on that return. Would it be better to put a uh stockade fence along that first avenue? >> Well, I'm sorry. >> Just for that that >> I thought it was a
>> 10 or 12 feet or whatever it is. >> Because it's screening parking. >> If you look at the >> we we >> we are proposing that's the open style portion of the fence and then along the >> the property line that we share with our neighbors, it's solid.
>> Yes. Um, but we are also enhancing it with quite a bit of landscaping, four seasons landscaping that'll be there all year round. Um, but it, you know, it's >> Well, I throw this out, >> I'm asking the question, would it be better to have a stockade fence for that
uh little section along First Avenue uh to hide the meters? I don't know what other board members think, but I if we were trying to hide the meters, >> I would think that it might be more appropriate to put that stockade fence.
>> Well, you know, we do like to have open style fences on street facing frontages in the front yard. You know, this is not the same standard because it's redevelopment plan. Um, they do have
actually. Yeah. Thank you, Doug. Uh evergreen shrubs >> proposed along that uh frontage behind and in front of the um the picket fence. Um,
maybe instead of the whole thing being uh a solid stockade fence, we do like a screen panel like brothers. Would that be >> okay? So, it just sticks out. >> I'm pointing out that those meters are going to be visible.
>> Yeah, we don't we don't want them. You're right. We don't want them. Maybe maybe the uh the landscaping uh should be put in just inside the uh the fence to block the view of the meters. >> Yes.
>> I'm just asking for >> Yeah. The only the only opening we have is a small gate to allow for the meter reader to get back there. >> Yeah. >> But besides that and you know if you're looking on it head on from the sidewalk, you're not going to you're not going to see the meters.
>> Okay. Doug, just real quick, I know you added um and we're we're happy for it. The auditory and the visual the pedestrian sign. Did you say you put a detail on the plan? I don't I might have missed that distance. >> Yes, >> it is on. Okay. >> Should be on the detail sheets. >> Actually, could we go back to the gas
meters for a second? >> Yes. >> Is it just regulators for the building or are they individual meters for all of the units? They are actual gas meters >> for all the units.
So I am going to recommend that um you have the option to install a screen panel perpendicular to that wall to screen the meters in the event upon once we see how it's built. >> Mhm. >> How high they go.
>> Right. Well, always we we've had the experiences most recently where the fences weren't high enough. The meters were >> sure the speed. >> So, we just may have to make sure that they're hidden. >> The possibility is to put the meters
along the uh westerly fence and uh just screen maybe I don't know what the dimension is there, but looks approximately 20 ft. Maybe uh just screen the uh solid fence for uh 10 ft and then pick up with the picket
>> uh from there >> just so it's screened. >> Yeah. I'm just not sure if we have an option of where to put them. >> Right. >> We you know you know what we want. We don't want to see the meters. >> We're we are happy to agree to work with the the board and his professionals to ensure that
>> they are completely screened. >> Fence is best. >> I understand that people like manscaping. and we recognize that and we understand you know what we want. >> Yes. Yes. >> Okay. All right. Um I don't know if someone can tell me I know that there's
an item on uh on four of 11 of the Ivakian report where it says um about water quality and it says that that that uh they're proposing pvious payment for the proposed meek motor vehicle service. What is that? Where is this motor
vehicle surface? So that is >> because that that allows you to comply. I just don't know where it is. >> Do you want to show? >> Go ahead. >> Sure. Tell us where that is. I'm going to go to >> because obviously we want you to comply and we know you're complying. I just don't know where.
>> Yep. >> So there is motor vehicle services essentially anywhere that's driven on by a car. uh there's a few instances where the proposed uh parking stalls actually protrude beyond the building.
>> So in that in that case where a vehicle may be parked and you know we all in a perfect world cars don't uh you know drip any oil on the ground but we all know it happens. Mhm. >> Um so in that in a situation like that where there is open to the sky above um
all of these spaces which are open to the sky above are pvious pavement um so that that water can be treated by the pvious paving system uh before ultimately being you know discharged throughout the rest of the storm water. >> Okay. Great. Great. Thank you.
>> Y >> thank you. >> Anybody else have any other questions? board members, professionals, >> the that exhibit you showed us. I don't think we have since market the color exhibit. >> Did you submit a new exhibit?
>> We did update the exhibit. >> Okay. So, let's call it uh >> we would be at A6. >> A6. A6. What What's the title? >> 101 First Residential uh 101 First Residential Landscape layout. >> Okay, great.
>> And we have a date on that. It is dated 812 2025. >> Okay. >> Thank you. >> You're welcome. >> All right. Since there's nobody, anyone from the public, any questions? No. Okay. Next.
>> Thank you. >> All right. If I uh could, Madam Chair, I'd like to call Dan Zenedo, our architect. >> Yeah. Is Dan going to talk to us about the car share? >> The car share and the sign.
>> Well, we'll definitely talk about the sign and we will talk about the car share. Good. That's on my list. >> Great. [Applause] Please raise your right hand test about given this matter. The truth, all truth, and nothing but the truth.
>> I do. Please state your name for the record. >> Daniel Zenetto. >> And you are licensed architect of the state of New Jersey, correct? >> Yes. >> And you were in such capacity on August 4th of this year and you're still in that capacity today in good standing
with your licenses. >> Correct. >> Great. Go right ahead. [Music] >> Okay. So, these are the plans that were submitted to the board, the revised plans. >> A7, these are revised architecture plans.
>> And Dan, just what's the date on them? >> 81125. Um before before we get going I think that we probably because they're revised we did not bring in the engineering plans because we didn't really view them >> wasn't that was the land he testified from the landscape
>> right right that was that one but we also received >> and that's already part of your packet >> it is pack part of the packet and that's part of the application >> so is this >> so is this >> this was submitted >> well you're testifying from this correct
>> I want it identified Okay. Anything that's testified from should be identified. >> Okay. >> We're good. >> Great. >> Okay. I will try to breeze through the uh the changes since the last presentation on the uh the ground floor plan. Uh the
only difference is the area that we were speaking about um along First Avenue. Oops. where the gas meters are located. So what we did was we infilled the wall
between or the area between the two columns here and designated that as the gas meter location. So this was open. We're creating a wall here to allow the gas meters to be mounted to the building. And also as uh the civil engineer
testified the the entry to the the parking area along first a into the the vestibule here. We eliminated that entry along first a along with a walkway to create a larger bio retention area.
the floor plans. Uh on the second floor, this is the courtyard level. We added privacy fencing for the the residential units that face the courtyard. So, they now have a a private
uh courtyard area that's fenced and separate from the public area. Now skipping up to the fifth floor. The only change here is uh the change of
the door to the common terrace was previously shown as a sliding door. Uh for accessibility that would have to be a swing door. So we made that change. Now the the main changes that we did architecturally had to do with the facade on the ground floor level, the
parking level. So we revised the size of the openings to better relate to the windows on the floors above. So now you'll see everything aligns. We also adjusted the head heights to bring them down and we adjusted the type of screens
that we're using in the openings so that they have a more closed off louver at the top section of the opening and then the vertical pickets at the lower section. >> So in plain English that is I think Donna my notes reflected I think you were looking for better balance. Is that
that's what that's all about? That was to better relate the openings to the the openings above and also to better shield the garage lighting from pedestrians >> which was a very big concern for >> and I have another exhibit that will
better illustrate that. Um this also is the garage door. What's proposed here is a metal coiling door. Um so it has horizontal slats. Uh it's a anodized aluminum, but uh we can do a black
aluminum that matches all of the the trim on the building and um it's 20 ft wide and 8'6 high and that's going to be a high-speed coiling door. So the hope is that uh
when a car pulls up that door opens quickly so we don't have queuing into the roadway. I don't know how anybody else on the board feels about the color of that that they wanted want it to be like you'd said that you'd given some choices of colors that if you wanted to match the
the side of the building there that >> you can also skip down to um an image of that side of the building. Here's a view with the door when it would be
closed. So, it's it's horizontal slats about 3 in or 4 in. >> But the color is matching the the the metal work on the building. So, >> okay. So, that's what it's going to be as opposed to it could be this or it could be that. It's going to be that. >> That's what we would recommend.
>> Okay. What is it called? >> The door. >> The color. Oh, it just black anodized. >> Anodiz, >> right? >> And we did update all of our calculations to ensure that with the reduced or yeah, the reduced opening
sizes, we still complied with all of the natural ventilation requirements for uh parking garage. And we do. And then along the west elevation of the building, we did drop the top of the opening
so that um there's also a reduced opening size. And again, that was to shield view of the fixtures within the garage. So that the top of that opening is now 8 foot. And those fixtures are up at 11 ft high.
Um to help illustrate some of these viewpoints, we have a section, building sections with line of sight shown. Um so this here is along First Avenue. A pedestrian standing on the sidewalk
looking toward the building. you know, would have to look far into the into the garage before they would see a light fixture directly, a light source. So, what what's happening here is we have a screen
on the exterior wall in the openings where we have a louver up top. So, it's a tighter, you know, louvered section and then we have the vertical pickets below that. So, we're taking our sight line from the bottom of the louver into the building.
Right. We have similar diagrams for each of the rightways. So, Second Avenue you see here again looking far into the building before you see those light sources within the garage.
And then on Langford, you know, we're not set back as far from Langford. So, you're still looking, you know, into the garage before you see those fixtures. And it's, you know, I think it was in response to another project in the city,
um, that had maybe a very tall garage where as you walk by it, you would see those fixtures. But I think here, you know, we're not an overly tall parking garage and we're doing our best to to shield um, view of those fixtures directly.
And these are all just updated images uh, with the changes. So, all the openings have been updated and um we've added the garage door and we added the additional buyer retention on First
Avenue. And if there are any other points to touch on um the signage. So we only indicate one sign and that's the address sign on Second Avenue above the main entry. And
we're currently illustrating that as a 10in high lettering, you know, cutout letter mounted to the face of the canopy. Um what is this? When we calculate the square footage, it
comes to about six square ft. Um we don't think that it's an overly big sign for the elevation and you know the main entry of the building. I think it's what we would prefer if if it's agreeable to the board to have a 6
foot six square foot address sign on Second Avenue. >> All right. If it's not, then then this is a design exception. How's everybody feel about it? >> I don't have a problem with it. This is
>> Yeah, it's a large building. >> All right. So, that's going to be a design exception for that. Okay. >> Okay. Excuse me. A quick question. I'm sorry to go back, but the courtyard said there's interior fences now for to give
a private space for those. Um, you one, two, three, four. >> Yes. So each of the each of the residential units that directly looks into the courtyard on the second floor
will have its own private courtyard area, terrace area that is uh separated from the open courtyard by a privacy fence. >> And does do you know yet what type? I just saw in the rendering like a black do you know what type of fencing that
will be? Um, I think it would be it would match the the solid fencing that we have on site. >> And I apologize in here somewhere, but the height of that
>> it would be a 6 foot uh 6 foot high privacy screen is what we call it. >> Thank you. And is there they have access from their unit to that? There's one of these. >> Yes, you'll have a slider from the the living room, the living space. >> All right. All right, I can see
>> opening into the the terrace. That is updated on the the drawings. See this unit here has a slider at the living area where these are casement windows. Um,
can I say six feet solid? >> Solid. >> I mean, that feels a little confining for, you know, that's where their windows are. I mean, again, we want to provide them some screening from the public aspects of the courtyard, but
they're now they're kind of stuffed in a little box >> as part of why it's what's the dimension. >> What would be the option, right? >> It's eight 8t >> 8t from their window. They would have a fence.
>> Sixoot solid fence. >> Sixoot solid fence. So it's like >> what what other options would we have? >> Maybe we go with something that has a little more openness. >> Um maybe and it could be like a a metal
mesh rather than you know pickets like a typical fence but more like you know screen panel like we used on the HBAC. What do you what do what is the board has some you know it's a little more maybe a little more openness so you get a
little more light and air passing through that space. >> What do you think, Jen? >> Yeah. No, I think it'd be great if there was an option just to make it a little more less um boxed and feeling. Um >> no problems if that's the pleasure of the board.
>> Okay, let's add that. >> Yeah. But the only problem is I think it needs to be decided what it's going to be. >> Yeah. Tell me. >> What do you think the >> um 70%
or 50? I mean >> I think 70 will be fine. It's just having a little bit of light and not um an air. I mean that'll do it. So about 70% coverage >> or what would you call it? >> So maybe 30% openness.
>> All right. 30% openness >> minimum. >> Okay. >> Then we would want to do more. >> Yeah. Yeah. >> Okay. Anything further, Dan? >> Uh, just the uh the average square footage of the the COA units, the
affordable units that was uh asked to be added to the plan and we will add that. Um, just to let you know, we meet the requirement. The three bedrooms average 1,157 ft. The two bedrooms a average 914
square ft. And the onebedrooms average 677 square ft. >> So now we have So that is compliance. >> That complies. >> Okay. So now we know what they are cuz that's on page 12 or 14, item 10.5.
So now we know what it is and we asked for you to provide that. So now we have it. Um, while we're there, um, on the item 10.3 right above it, um, I know they said, "We recommend that the final configuration
be subject to approval of the city as part of the applicant's affordable housing agreement." >> And we would doing that. >> Yes. Yes, ma'am. >> Okay. All right. Right. That's on 10.3.
>> Yeah. Uh, how about the the car share? Where did we land with that? >> Is that you or >> I I can speak to it. >> Sorry. >> We waved it. I just want to make sure that that's that we're we're we're in
agreement that you don't want it. So, do we have to put it in as a resolution in resolution compliance? I'm just bringing up the things that might be in resolution compliance. >> I appreciate that. >> Correct. them that we were going to make a condition that the four car share spaces are optional. >> Yes, but it has to be in resolution
compliance, right? It it can't just be we're just saying >> that's all. >> Right. It's in the plans. >> They can have them if they want them. If they don't have them, >> right? >> So, is that something we put in resolution compliance or you just put it in the plans? Where does that belong? >> It'll be a conditional >> condition. Okay.
>> Yeah. I'll put a condition. That's what we want. Now, we can uh have the option >> of design for car share spaces. >> Yep. and and we thank you for that. We we recognize the >> issues with Okay.
>> And we're talking about conditions. I see on the renderings you still have the green roof on top. Has there been a decision if it's going to be a green roof or solar? >> So, the renderings are are strictly just to illustrate the area of the green roof. We don't know yet if that's going to be vegetated roof or it will be solar
panels. Um I think it's kind of a condition of um when this gets built and you know who builds it and the pricing of either of those systems. So we don't necessarily want to commit to one or the other, but we will comply with the uh
redevelopment plan. >> Um Dan, can you um did you guys pick a balcony light? >> Balcony light. a light fixture for the balconies and >> uh so the the fixture for the the roof terrace
um this is what we plan to have for the the roof leveled uh private terraces and these are you know full cut off wall-mounted lights um they would be 27
7K color temperature and you know it's the the lowest power outage that they power output that they offer. So [Applause] >> So it's for the balconies and the the roof deck.
>> This is for the the roof deck. I don't think we were proposing lights on the on the balconies. >> Really? >> I had balcony. I wanted I want a light. >> Sorry. I I guess they're not. >> Yeah, you're not. >> Oh, they're not they're not covered
balconies. >> Are those >> Okay. >> See, they're light fixtures. those light fixtures or is it something else on the wall? >> The only place that we're showing fixtures see
there's nothing on the elevations. Maybe it's just a elevation. >> Yeah. >> Um Second Avenue elevation. We show them up on the fifth floor for the larger terraces that are set
back, but um the smaller balconies along the building um we don't show lights. So, they won't have lights and you'll use the wedge fixture on the pastes. >> Yes.
Dan, anything else to add? >> Uh, no. >> Madam Chair, if the board or public has questions other than that, I don't believe I have any further witnesses unless the board >> has questions. Anyone on the board have
any other questions or concerns? for this witness. No, professionals, no concerns. Okay. Public, no concerns, no questions. Okay. >> Okay. Thank you.
>> Who's next or are we done? >> Madame Chair, I respectfully rest. >> Okay. Um I don't >> I was going to call you your honor, but >> you can even call me Barbara. Um, I guess that we'll open it to the uh
to the public for comment. Open public session. >> Some moved. >> Second. >> Close public session. >> So move. >> Okay, sir. All right. Uh, any comments
from the uh board before we uh >> All right. All right, Jack, you're on. >> You're on. Okay, you're on. >> Uh, adding two two standard clauses at the request of professional staff and
Michelle. Uh, it's required to try to have everybody have a preconstruction meeting with the city professionals >> in addition to that staging planet. >> Yes. >> And there's a standard affordable housing clause that's going to go into all resolutions from this point going
through. Uh, so uh the others are, you know, subject to any requirements outstanding in the reports in compliance. Uh we've already taken care of the four car share spaces at the option of the option.
Uh let's see the we're going to have an installation of a quote screen panel uh close quote to screen the meters if required after review by Donna's office and engineer
>> and yeah the engineer >> yeah review and make sure it works >> make sure that it's >> once it's built >> yes high enough and >> okay that's fine okay >> and we understand the the intent >> the intent of that and the fact that it's after the fact as well
>> garage door finish uh to match uh the other metal uh bridal work throughout the building elements and black anodized metal. Okay. Uh the signage it's going to be a design exception. Uh design is
uh as proposed is 10 in high a total of six square feet versus two feet two square feet permitting. So it'll be a design exception for that. There are no variances. Um the uh screen fencing in the courtyard area from the back of the units
facing the courtyard. We're going to revise that that 6ft fence from a solid to 70% solid 30% open. So there's >> minimum 30% >> minimum. >> Yeah.
>> And I think it'd be solid between the units. >> Yeah. Mhm. >> It's just on the courtyard. >> Yeah. Um that's right. >> Anybody else have anything else? >> So, from last time I had a
pre-construction meeting with the immediately adjacent neighbors. >> Oh, >> yes. >> You want that as a condition? >> I had it written that as a condition from >> Right. said we said work with the neighbors on pre-construction. >> So, I think there was things with like fences and trees right on the propert. >> We have no problem with that.
>> Right. And the only other one I had was they're going to install solar or green roof to comply with the sustainable roof requirement. >> One second. >> Right. We do it. It'll be either one. They haven't committed to which one. >> Right. >> But we will comply. >> Yes. >> Okay. What was the last one? I'm sorry. Uh they'll install solar or green roof
to comply with the sustainable roof requirement >> comply with what was the last part of that >> sustainable uh roof requirements per the re redevelopment plan. I would suggest >> uh I have some notes from the first meeting. Um you're doing a lot
consolidation. >> Yes. >> And a street vacation. >> Yes. Okay. Uh did the crosswalk change? Do you need to mention the uh vacating of the alleyway? >> Yeah, >> that would be by the city.
>> Yep. >> Okay, that's it. Anybody else? >> No. Okay. >> Madam Chair, my uh thanks to you is that uh uh no summation is necessary. I appreciate the time. I appreciate your
extremely uh dedicated and thorough fashion with which you all and the board professionals have reviewed this and I respectfully request approval subject to the uh conditions. >> All right. Can I get a motion to approve this application with the resolution the
compliance items that we've just mentioned? >> So move >> second. >> James Banano, >> yes. >> Councilwoman Clayton, >> yes. >> Jim Henry, >> yes. >> Jen Ser, >> yes. >> Vice Chair Gunnan, >> yes. >> Chairwoman Karzac,
>> yes. >> Good. >> Thank you very much. I'm glad we could get this turned around this quickly. Thank you for the professionals and for you guys, too. Was >> that was really nice >> for us to get this turned around so fast. Okay. All right. Motion to adjurnn. >> So move.
>> Second. >> Second. All in favor? >> Yay. >> Congratulations.