Adequate notice of this meeting of the mayor council was sent to the Aspberry Park Press, the co-star, our official newspapers, and posted on the burrow's website. Take roll call. Councilwoman Donovan here. >> Council McKenna >> here.
>> Mayor Becca Fusco >> here. >> Councilman Delasio >> here. >> Councilman Moroni >> here. To the flag of the United States of America and to the republic for it stands one nation under God indivisible with liberty and justice for all.
>> Please remain standing for a moment of silence for our troops, their families and all first responders. >> Okay. Thank you. Okay. going to we're starting off with workshop and it's my understanding
that I need to read this DPMS4 water shed inventory report. Okay, so let me uh let me do that. I got it. Yeah. uh of Delmare and all
New Jersey municipalities are permitted to manage and treat municipal storm water under NJMS4 which stands for the municipal separate storm sewer system municipal permits including but not limited to storm water
design collection treatment infrastructure maintenance activities required per its permit to meet its permit obligations Belmar and all municipalities were required to prepare and file an MS4
watershed inventory report with the NJD. An interim draft of this WIP phase 1 assessment report was completed for Belmar Burrow and filed prior to the January 1, 2026 regulatory deadline.
A copy of the phase one inventory report is available for public review on Belmar Burrow's stormwater webpage which is https I'll just leave out the slashes www.belmar.com belm.com
departments DPW stormwater management- stormwater-management. This current draft report will be modified to include additional storm water infrastructure data, also completed for Belmore Burrow and
review comments and input from NJD, Belmore Burough staff and the public. As part of the permit process, two semianual public meetings are required to make the public aware and to solicit
questions or comments regarding the WIP plan. Questions or comments regarding the WIP report may be directed to Belmar Stormwater Consultant who is Terrence Vote
uh PCME uh at he's at ru.com that those are our um engineers and his address is Terry T R
Y.vote vote vo gt at reve I think that's supposed to be.com two future additional phases of the wip report will be necessary the phase 2 watershed assessment report which is due
January 1 2027 and the phase 3 watershed improvement plan report which is due December 31st 2027 additional Information on both of these future plans will be provided by NJD
>> and we just have to open it up to public comment if anyone has comments or questions about what the mayor just read. >> Okay, moving mine. Uh, anything else for workshop today? I think we there's a there was a couple
questions that we had about the overlay zone for the ordinances. Can I ask those questions now? >> Uh, sure. I think that's a good time. >> Right. Okay. So, Councilman Rooney, did you want to ask your question first or Councilman uh Delasio? I we're all a little worried about this.
>> So, uh, two of the resolutions, uh, involve reszoning some of our, uh, areas. So, basically a mixeduse overlay. And Fran, if you don't mind, I'm going to ask maybe sub questions directly to you. Mixed use overlay, so I understand it is that we have these zones uh that
are currently either residential or business district um or seapport redevelopment zones and part of the um rules with the affordable housing and all those things now require some mixed
use overlay zones. Correct. Well, this is part of the set McM we serve brand McMad and Scotland. We serve as redevelopment affordable housing council holdover for for the burrow. So um to answer your question, these overlay
zones are part of the settlement agreement that was reached with the burrow and fair share housing center to address its unmet need. So these two ordinances are part of like the comprehensive settlement package for round four. So, it doesn't have so much to do with affordable housing regulations. I'm not sure if that's what
you asked as far as this is what the bureau agreed how it was going to meet and resolve its fourth round obligations. >> You're using the proper terms. Thank you. I think couldn't get out of the right. >> There's no regulations requiring this. It's part of settlement. >> So, I I guess who came up with these
specific areas? Was this between us and fair share housing? Was this between us and the judge? Uh who were they? >> This was between the burrow their sharehousing and the burough planners and uh the program judge. It's capital
P. Uh the program was part of the fourth round instead of going through the courts and also the special adjudicator. So this was part of the negotiation. probably one of the final issues to resolve the fourth round was how the burrow was going to meet its unmet need obligation and fair share was not
comfortable or satisfied with what was uh initially presented. So as part of the negotiations back and forth with special adjudicator different uh uh overlay zones were presented. >> Okay. So we approve there's one overlay zone that was already created which is Main Street. Main Street overlay is
already done >> third round. >> Okay. That was third round. This is fourth round. >> Correct. What is our as a council and mayor, what are our avenues if we say okay this is I'm looking at for example uh 2604 the mixeduse overlay zone and
the way it's worded allows multifamily or business in a lot size of 7,000 or more. Um and it would it would you know include attached family uh town home style in a pretty heavily residential
zone. So, if I'm a resident in that area, I'm kind of concerned that my lot, not only my lot, but my neighbor's lot can now be sold and multifamilies be put up in that area. Um, I think Main Street is, you know, Route 35. Those are areas for, you know, again, areas need a
redevelopment or some possible, you know, apartments or mixed use. Uh, this area specifically is is quite concerning to me. So, what is our recourse as a someone that hasn't been up here for, you know, the last three years of incredible litigation and all the things we're going through? What is our
recourse if we don't agree with this specific area in general? >> Uh, in order for the the judge actually this past week uh issued an order and a decision approving the settlement agreement. So if the and a conditioned on the burrow adopting everything that
it said it was going to do as part of the settlement and these overlay zones are what was negotiated to be part of the settlement. The you know one of pulling one overlay zone out individually was not sufficient. So it took multiple overlay zones in order for the bureau to satisfy its unmet need
obligation and um get through the program and also get approval from the special adjudicator. So if the bureau doesn't adopt any of the ordinances which are part of the settlement package which include the overlay zone ordinances and the affordable housing
ordinance then um it would jeopardize the settlement agreement like then it wouldn't be um fulfilling its obligations as part of the settlement agreement with fair share housing center. >> Can I follow up on that? So if that happened what would happen next? the uh settle the approval from the judge is
conditioned on the bureau doing that. And if the bureau doesn't do it by March 16th, I know everyone says it's the March 15th date, but the judge noted in her decision that March 15th is a Sunday, so she's given everybody till March 16th, the bureau would immediately be stripped of its immunity and be exposed to builder's remedy lawsuits.
>> Would you say it would make the possibility of say a large construction building going on Ocean Avenue more likely? There are developers that have been you know one developer in particular that that as part of the decision yes to answer your question as
part of the decision that the judge issued last last week this the beginning of this week uh there as you know there was another challenge there were three challenges to the burough's housing element and fair share plan one from fair share housing center one from 7th Avenue and one from a developer for
104th Avenue which is the dovita the ocean avenue site the 7th Avenue um challenge was withdrawn One, the fair share housing challenge was settled via a mediation agreement conditioned on all of this legislation being adopted. And
just this week, the judge dismissed the 104th Avenue challenge, conditioned on the bureau doing everything it had said it was going to do. >> And so if we did not do that, a vote against this would almost essentially be a vote in favor of the Ocean Avenue
project. A vote against this would would uh jeopardize the settlement and expose the burrow to builder's remedy suits. >> Thank you. >> Um I have a quick question. Were these zones discussed publicly prior to to them being shown here? I
mean, was it discussed so that the people in these zones know that they're now in an area that's susceptible to development? >> This is the opportunity. There'll be a public hearing and they'll go before the planning board. So, no, they have not been presented. This is the first time they're being presented today as they're
being introduced as part of the ordinance. >> So, we're voting on it for the first time and nobody's aware of it at all. >> Well, you're introducing it like any other ordinance. It's being introduced today. It will be sent to the planning board since it's part of, you know, consistency review. So, the planning board will be reviewing it. I think it's
March 4th and then it comes back for final adoption >> on the 10th. Thank you. On March 10th. So, there'll be a public hearing and final adoption on March 10th. and the planner would be here at that time. >> It's also important to recognize that
the overlay zone is an optional zone. In other words, a builder, if they got enough property there, could opt to build under the overlay zone, but they don't have to. They could still build under the current um
zoning laws. The other thing that's important to recognize is the before we we came up with this, we had um developers who were basically going to the court and they're basically saying, "Oh, the town should do this to meet its
number. The town should do that to meet its number." And it was pretty clear from the court that they said, "No, the town, the burrow decides what they want to do in terms of meeting the required numbers." And I think we all agreed that
this was the the path of least resistance because other than doing this then we were going to wind up with developments in other areas which we thought were were going to be overall we'll say harmful but not not really um
in the interest of the residents who live in those areas. So this was like the path of lease resistance and we were very fortunate that I think fair share housing uh and the and the uh the um
master special master agreed with us and the court agreed with us that this is a practical thing. Nobody it could be 10 years before someone uses the overlay ordinance. you know, we don't know. It might never be used, but it's an option
that's there to uh to help us meet our affordable housing numbers. >> Yeah. I don't know if I can comment here, but as a a resident of 4th Avenue, that's why I'm here. Um it wasn't clear in the amendment to the redevelopment
plans where the overlaying zones were. It looks like there was appendices that weren't there until recently. I know there was an announcement that um you put that out there and you could come to the bureau to get, you know, printed out or it was out available on PDF. Looks
like it's updated now. I agree with you that the preference would be to have overlay zones that are away from Ocean Avenue where we would lose build a remedy suit to develop a fourstory
uh you know development on Ocean Avenue. So is as a resident of 4th Avenue, I 100% agree that would become a thoroughfare for a 30 sto, you know, fourstory, 30 apartment complex on Fourth Avenue, you know, is someone that has four young kids. I don't want cars
zooming down Fourth Avenue to get to a complex. So I would agree that having overlay zones where they can meet the affordable housing is what the residents want. And a few people here, I know the meeting was rescheduled from Tuesday, but from what I heard, that is not
something that many residents of Belmar want in terms of a four-story development on 4th Avenue on motion. Fourth Avenue. Thank you. >> And and you know, and it's likely that if if this whole deal goes south, we're going to see many many more developers
coming into the town saying, "We can get you the numbers. We can get your number. We can get your number." And you and this council will be dealing with with you know basically be going back to square one negotiating with all these
redevelopers to try to to try to come up with numbers and they're going to say to the court well you know we can give them the number but we have to build a six-story building. We we've we've gone through that already in the in the third round so we know what's going to happen. So I think this is the is the the path
of least resistance. I think it's going to be um you know we were very fortunate that the court agreed to this and I think it's in the best interest of the burough that we move forward and we vote on this and approve this I'm sorry just to kind of follow up on
what your com was and and Councilwoman Donovan I haven't heard anyone in support of of precisely what has been proposed on 4th Avenue before. So, no one's saying that's what we want, but I'm also trying to look at this and saying, okay, if I live on 13th Avenue and I'm in a residential zone, you know,
is this an area that I like for multif family either. So, you know, there there's I don't think there's there's no easy answer. We're in we're in we're in these settlements and I'm not saying, you know, voting no on one thing would be okay, I now approve of something else. Uh it's kind of you have to look
at each area specifically. Um and and and that's why I was asking the questions about where these zones even came from. >> Um >> we should have this is not really a public session here, but >> yes, it's fine. I I I just say that I agree with you.
>> As I said, the PDF that was available on the website didn't actually show what the overlay zones were until recently. >> So the first would like a copy of them first. >> Two two things actually. Sir, I'm sorry. We didn't get your name and address. The clerk is asking.
>> Sure. Sean Karens's 284th Avenue. >> I'm just going to come in here though, too. If we don't approve this too, there's still a very good possibility that you'll have a humongous building on that site because the developer will
come in and there'll be no there'll be no uh overlay district and they're going to say, "You know what? We don't have a builder's remedy." They're going to go to court and they're going to say, "I could build a humongous building here and satisfy it and and the court could
turn around and say, you know what, I'm going to approve it." So, what I'm trying to say is not approving the overlay zone is not really protecting the residents in that area. It's actually opening them up to more more of a possibility that something will be
built there that will be even bigger than what's allowed under the overlay zone ordinances. >> I have a different question. How many ABS in Belmont don't have some type of multifamily housing on them? I'm
on AAB. There's plenty. Um, and is there a different def is there a technical definition for multif family that I'm not aware of because Okay, just making sure. Um, >> go ahead. I know you said sorry if I did not.
>> Isn't the the concern that if we don't approve it to the mayor's point, all zoning ordinances are out of the question. So you could have a two-story multi-development on multif family or apartment complex on 4th Avenue, but if we don't, then a developer could
potentially say, well, we want to do six stories on 4th Avenue or Ocean Avenue or 13th Avenue and then to meet the need, it gets approved as opposed to what the ordinance is at the master plan level, three stories or two and a half stories. Isn't isn't that the concern? Uh yeah,
as we've presented in the past through the presentations, if there's a builder's remedy lawsuit, the bureau loses control of its zoning for a particular site. And I just want to also note that um we're it's not only the compliance mechanisms that would be
shifted or rejected if this is not um you don't it's not only the compliance mechanisms that would be called into question if the settlement doesn't go through. The numbers are recalculated as well. Right now the the DCA number for the burrow for its prospective need or
new construction was 43. Through negotiations the bureau negotiated that down to a realistic development potential of 14. If this settlement doesn't go through this 14 which is being met fully by the 7th Avenue project. If the settlement doesn't go through the bur would be backed its 43
obligation. >> I was going to ask you so this this then becomes the unmet back to zero. I'm sorry, 43. >> The 43 is the is the um is the obligation that DCA assigned to the burrow and the burough then took a
vacant land adjustment and negotiated to get down to a realistic development potential of 14 which gen then generates the unmet need which is now being met through the overlay zones. Should the settlement not go forward, the bureau doesn't get to keep the 14. Now you're
back to your 43 that you have to now meet with actual units. It's not unmet need that can be met through overlay zoning. It's 43 units that needs to be met with actual projects. >> One more followup. I swear >> we have mixed use overlay zones. Now we
have an unmet need with a vacant land adjustment of 14. >> When we meet that 14, can these be removed? >> No. Your 14 is what your realistic development potential is. That's sort of the adjustment to what your obligation was. So you now have to generate 14 new
units. That obligation is being met through the 7th Avenue project. Yes. So the the balance of the 43 is not doesn't dis just disappear. That's what is the unmet need. So the difference between the 43 and the 14 is what's your unmet
need. and the way you uh develop and you're now required under the affordable housing act to develop a plan to meet and address that unmet need. You can't just say, "Okay, we have unmet need." In the third round, it was sort of like, "We have unmet need. We'll get to it. We'll put together an
ordinance." It wasn't um nobody really pursued it. And now for the fourth round, they're much they're reviewing that in a much more strictly. and they're saying you have to develop a plan, a credible plan that's going to be accepted by the program and the judge as to how you're going to actually realistically address your unmet need.
And that's where these overlay zones came in. And we didn't start with, you know, all these overlay zones. We they were sort of like, okay, this isn't going to be good enough back and forth. Okay, we have another overlay zone. >> So now we're down to 29, right? >> Yes. >> 43. And so now I'll ask that question
again just with the right number. If we hit our 29 with or without using these mixeduse overlay zones, can they be removed >> if we meet the unmet need? That's interesting. Um, it's something that uh it seems like it I would have to look into that. I don't want to Yeah, that
but it's not a situation that I've encountered yet because this is all new for the fourth round. So, I would have to look into that and I can for the next meeting. >> One more question. I can't have the public coming up and doing a construction. You know, >> but we don't have to meet that need until 2035. Yeah, you have until Thank you.
>> That's the point I was going to make. When we when we uh do this and the court gives us the order, the burrow is is basically set for the next 10 years. So, we will we will be basically um solving
this problem for the next two and a half administrations coming up. All right? They will not be in the position that we were in back in 2023 where nothing was done. So I mean this is the opportunity to guarantee for the residents and for
the burrow that there will be some stability in our redevelopment over the next 10 years. Um, and you know, obviously there's going to be I'm I'm sure there's some mechanism where they keep checking and seeing how we're doing, but we could in fact over the
next 10 years, we could build affordable housing, which would which would, you know, take us into the future, you know, anticipating the fifth round. So, I mean, and let's not forget during those 10 years, we're also going to be increasing the amount of money in the um
in the trust fund. So, I mean, they we're going to have many opportunities over the next 10 years to keep building affordable housing without having to deal with builder remedy suits. And I think that's the advantage to to getting
this done now because uh it will really guarantee that we're in the we're in a good zone. We're going to still have our zoning ordinances. Uh there's going to be a lot of things that can be done to improve affordable housing in in the burrow over those years and we're probably going to have the money to do
it from the affordable housing trust fund. So I mean I think that's the the one of the other benefits of of approving this now. >> I know you don't want me to comment again but >> we're actually going to hold a public session on these when they're when
they're heard. This actually isn't even being heard. This is a workshop. This is the first it's fine, but obviously Councilman Delasio, you have construction business. >> I don't know if there's a conflict of interest in you voting on this going
>> up to the attorney or not. >> We need to stop the public session at this point in time. It's not even on what we're talking about publicly. I can deal with that >> with Councilman Delasio, but but we we need to cut this off at this point.
>> Okay. Uh any other from the council any other comments or or things to talk about in the work session? Um >> thank you friend for all the explanations. I mean we're here early
today so we could stay you know until till 6:00 if we need to. Um I guess there are no more issues for the for the work session. So let's move on to petitions. Do we have any petitions? I did not receive any.
>> Okay, then let's go on to the approval of the minutes. >> And I have a motion to approve the minutes of the January 27th meeting. >> I'll make that motion. Second. >> Councilman Donovan, >> yes. >> Council McKenna, >> yes.
>> Councilman Delasio, >> yes. >> Councilman >> yes. >> Mayor Buckusco, >> yes. >> And can I have a motion to approve the minutes of the February 4th meeting? Motion. >> Second. Councilwoman Donovan, >> yes. >> Councilwoman Kenny,
>> yes. >> Councilman Delasio, >> yes. >> Councilman Moroni, >> yes. >> Mayor Buckusco, >> yes. >> Reports of council. Um, Councilwoman Donovan. >> Mayor, um, I want to start off with
thanking DPW again for all of their very hard work. Um, Superintendent Mustau was kind enough to text me some some fun stats just for you guys. Uh we had the day the storm was about to hit 17 plow tracks, three frontend loaders, and 23
employees on standby starting at 3:30. Um it has been incredibly gratifying to see all the incredibly good work you've done. I we've gotten so much good feedback. I'm sure all of us have from all the residents. So kudos to you. >> Thank you. Thank you.
>> Thank you. >> Support. I just want to put out a little reminder to everyone. Um, obviously we all know that the parade has been postponed, but please remember to shop local, particularly this Sunday. I know so many of our businesses um throughout the burrow uh rearrange their schedules,
redo appointments to accommodate the parade. Um, and so if they could use a little extra boost of support from you, I'm sure every single one of them would appreciate it. Um, on April 17th, we will have an MVC event here in Belmar. You can work on your license renewals,
Real ID, um all of your standard MVC affairs. Um we will get more information out to you um through Burough channels. Um Dine and Discover March 8th, 11:30 to 3:30. We have over 20 restaurants participating and our favorite, the trolleys. So, um you can still buy
tickets. They are available online and I believe in most of our local retailers. Um we have new ebike rules here in New Jersey. uh council president Kenny and I worked on Belmar's uh ordinance, but at the time I remember our chief Scott was
frustrated. >> Frustrated, good word. Uh because of the lack of coordination with what we were seeing on the local level with what the state actually was supplying. And so now all electric bikes are categorized as motorized bicycles, which means for us
or for you, depending on what you have, you need to have a driver's license, um, state registration and insurance. And this will apply to all ebikes with a deadline to register of July 20th. So get that together.
Um, two other big things. One, um, Assemblyman Sean Keen has put forth a bill, and this is my first time publicly talking about it, but we are looking to promote it that will help our businesses when the bridge goes out and it will lower the taxes that they have to apply
in those businesses while the I believe sales tax while the bridge is under construction there. Um, it has only just been introduced. So um we are thankful to him for for supporting us and supporting Avon and we hope everyone can support it as much as you can contact
your leg well we'll contact your legislators but if you know people in other districts around the state please ask them to ask their elected officials for support and speaking of selected officials supporting us the biggest news um our representative Chris Smith we
have a $1 million earmark that his office has sponsored and has been approved and is in the final budget for Silver Lake. Um, huge, huge news. Obviously, this also had support from all of our federal officials. So, thank
you to our senators as well. But I know his office worked very hard on this. He worked with our environmental co uh commission uh particularly Diane Belo who is our chair, Gary Hener, who has been taking this on as a passion project. So, we are very excited because
as you all know, we have this planning grant we're working on, but this will really be what enables us to take a plan into action. So, thank you very much. If you have any questions, please contact me, >> Council President Kenny. >> Thank you, Mayor. Uh, again, thank you
so much to DPW and everybody helped get through the storm. I hope everybody is loving the sun melting all the snow as I am. Uh, okay. I don't have as much as council um councilwoman Donovan has, but recreation summer basketball signups are
starting March 1st for grades 2 through 8. The Easter egg hunt is March 21st. Um grades one from ages 1 through 9 years old. Starts at 11:00 a.m. on the Fifth Avenue Beach. Rain date is March 29th. Summer camp signups, I know everybody's
always anxious about summer camp, starts March 11th for Belmar residents. additional if additional spots are available they will be open to non-residents after March 11th. Please check the burough website on summer camp so that you can get the latest information. Um and also junior guards
is full so we are full to capacity for the summer for junior guards which is such an awesome program that Belmar does every year. Um also there is is a a sign outside for shredding. If your business has a lot of paper shredding please look at these areas. We are not listed as
one, but like Avon is uh M um I think Neptune Town, Neptune is Neptune City. So there's some adjacent towns for shredding if you have a business and you need to shred some stuff. Here it is. Uh so pick this up and this will be I think posted at the front doors of the burl of
burl. And uh that is all I have. >> Thank you. Uh Councilman Delasio. >> Okay. Uh the Harbor Commission had a meeting on Tuesday the 17th and that rehashed some of our financials that we had um the a presentation for at our
last meeting uh two meetings ago rather the February 4th meeting we didn't have one um and we're trying to figure out some of the electric breakdowns of the harbor uh and the marina area uh to figure out how much electric is being used uh throughout each area. Uh we also
discussed the fuel prices, heard some concerns from the commercial uh boating uh you know uh the commercial boats, the fishing boats. Uh and we're working through um some of that with them. Uh what they needed to understand is that some of the um increases we were
proposing were for capital funds to then put in reserve to then repair the marina instead of hitting, you know, onetime fees and having put possible large repairs at the marina. Um but we heard their concerns and we're working with them on that. Uh lastly, we had a
planning board meeting on uh February uh 9th which I unfortunately missed. Uh that and that was the final hearing for the Mark bill project uh which is between 6th and 7th along river road across from Klein's that was approved uh part of the declaratory judgment
settlement. It's 139 units as I spoke of last meeting. Uh coming up planning board is March 4th and we are going to hear the amendment to the housing element and fair share plan which I believe is mostly what we we were just talking about and some other amendments
and that's on March 4th. Uh the planning board meeting is at 700 p.m. >> Thank you uh Council Member Ronnie. Um I'll join the chorus of thanking Billy and his team. Uh we really appreciate it. Um they kept the firehouses nice and
clean as well. Um we did have duty crews at the fire companies as well. So the people staying over there so that response was uh still satisfactory. We did have a couple of uh calls. So that was interesting. First time I'd ever driven a fire truck in the snow. Uh that was interesting. So thanks to everybody
involved. >> Thank you for your service during that time. >> And of course I I would be remiss if I didn't say thank you also. But you know, but um uh you know, you missed that. You missed that one. >> Sorry about that.
>> Yeah. But um you know, as as I I knew they would and they did a a great job. Okay. Okay. Let's move on to then the public session for the resolutions that are on the agenda. >> Has a comment or question about a
resolution on the agenda? Please step forward. State your name and address. Done. Can I have a motion to close the public session? >> Motion. >> Second. >> Favor. >> I have a motion to approve the
resolutions as listed on the consent agenda. >> Second. >> Councilwoman Donovan. >> Yes. >> Councilwoman Kenny. >> Yes. >> Councilman Delasio. >> Yes. Council member Moroni, >> yes. >> Mayor Buckusco, >> yes.
>> Okay. Um, next is second reading and public hearing on ordinance 20261. This is an ordinance amending chapter 25 setting revised construction permit fees. This is open for public hearing. If anyone would like to comment on this
ordinance, please step forward, state your name and address. Have a motion to close the public hearing. Motion >> second. >> All in favor? >> And can I have a motion to adopt ordinance 20261?
>> April. >> Before we do that, Council is going to have a conflict on this. So, how do you want to handle it? Or just not call his name? >> I'll not call his name.
>> Yeah. Okay. I think that's That's >> Councilwoman Donovan. >> Yes. >> Councilwoman Kenny, >> yes. >> Councilman Moroni, >> yes. >> Mayor Becca Fusco, >> yes. >> Uh, next we have first reading and introduction on ordinance 2026.
This is an ordinance amending chapter 39 affordable housing um to address the requirements of the fair housing act and the uniform housing affordability controls and to comply with the bureau's round four affordable housing obligations. Do we have a motion to
offer the ordinance for first reading and introduction? >> I'll make the motion. >> Second. >> Councilwoman Donovan. >> Yes. >> Councilwoman Kenny. >> Yes. Councilman Delasio, >> yes. >> Councilman Moroni, >> yes.
>> Mayor Buckusco, >> yes. >> Next is ordinance 20263, an ordinance amending chapter 40, article 5, zoning districts of the revised general ordinances. Do we have a motion to um offer this ordinance for first reading and introduction?
>> I'll make a motion. >> Second. >> Councilman Donovan, >> yes. >> Councilman Kenny, >> yes. Councilman Delasio, >> yes. >> Councilman Moroni, >> yes. >> Mayor Becca Fusco, >> yes. >> And then we have ordinance 20264. Is it
also an ordinance amending chapter 40 article 5 zoning districts? Um, do we have a motion to offer this ordinance for first reading and introduction? >> Motion. >> Second. >> Counciloman Donovan. >> Yes. >> Counciloman Kenny,
>> yes. >> Councilman Delasio, >> yes. >> Councilman >> yes. Yes. >> Mayor Buckusco. >> Yes. >> Okay. >> Now we're on to the regular public session. If anyone would like to make a comment, please remember to state your name and address first.
It's a Friday afternoon. I got to come up. Claire Hayner 18th and B. Um I also just want to say thank you to DPW not only for the streets being immaculate. Um I was out just getting a little bit of extra off and one of the guys stopped
and said um you okay and I said I'm good just cleaning up a little bit and they said okay just want to make sure and I hate plowing the driveways in but we have no choice which is totally understandable but it's all clear and
thank you have a good weekend. >> Thank you. Any other comments? Okay. Can I have a motion to close the public session and adjourn the meeting? >> Motion. Second. >> All in favor? >> I