The TV can be >> Okay, we'll go. >> Good evening. Um good evening. So, uh because we are uh a quorum of council not present, we will not be convening our regular meeting and will not take any official
actions tonight. However, uh so no motions, votes, or deliberations will occur. We will receive public comment. We will make some informational announcements and accept reports. Um any matters requiring an official council action will be placed on a
future meeting agenda. That being said, please rise for the pledge to the flag. >> Pledge allegiance to the United States of America and to the Republic for which it stands, one nation under God, indivisible, with
liberty and justice for all. >> [clears throat] >> Hey, uh the clerk will call the roll. >> Mr. Raymond. Mr. Callahan. >> Present. >> Mr. Colon. Ms. Daniels. Ms. Quiñones. >> Present. >> Ms. Laird.
>> Present. >> Thank you. Uh we're going to be starting this evening with a presentation of um two citations. We I I'm aware one of the citation recipients is here. Uh so, we're going to start with that one. Um [snorts] whereas the residents of the city of
Bethlehem have served have been served by a dedicated, diligent, and talented member of the Bethlehem Police Department for 20 years. And whereas John Casella, who started with the Police Department in 2007 and retired in 2026,
has during the course of his employment provided the utmost in reliable and outstanding service to the Police Department and the residents of the city of Bethlehem. Now, therefore, be it resolved by this council of the city of Bethlehem that Sergeant John Casella be extended
the gratitude of the city of Bethlehem, which has benefited from his two decades of service and the special contributions he's made to promote public safety and to protect the lives and property of Bethlehem residents. Be it further resolved, now that John is retired, he can relax and enjoy all that
life has to offer him. And be it further resolved that John be extended every good for a long and satisfying retirement. Mr. Casella's uh Sergeant Casella, if you'd like to come up and accept the citation. >> [applause] [applause]
>> And if you want to make any remarks, you're welcome to take the podium. Yes, thank you. Thank you for your service. >> Thank you. >> [applause] >> Our second citation is for uh the retirement of Captain Nicholas Lechman, and I don't believe I see him present
[clears throat] tonight. Making sure. Okay, so we will put this in the mail for him uh right away. Congratulations to him as well. Okay. Um Um so, we're going to move on to uh public comment at this time
um on items not being voted on. I'm going to start this off though um after the last meeting, we did receive some questions from our fellow council members and the public about what comments are or are not permitted.
Um and so, I invite Solicitor Stewart to share a brief legal's perspective that helps explain the stances that we uh take that we must take as a governing body. >> Good evening, members of council, members of the administration, and members of the public. I want to take a
moment to address the city's public comment rules and the way those rules are applied during council meetings. The city's public comment rules are intentionally broad. They're designed to give members of the public a meaningful opportunity to speak to council on
matters that concern them. That includes comments on city business, community concerns, public policy, elected officials, government actions, and other matters that a speaker believes are important to raise in this public forum. That broad protection also means that
speakers may say things that others find deeply offensive, hurtful, demeaning, or wrong. The First Amendment protects a wide range of speech, including speech that is upsetting, unpopular, or sharply critical.
Unless speech constitutes a true threat, obscenity, fighting words, meaning personally directed face-to-face insults likely to provoke provoke an immediate violent reaction, incitement, imminent lawless action, legally actionable
defamation, or legally actionable discriminatory harassment that denies a person equal access to opportunities or services, unless speech falls into one of those categories, it is protected. Speech is not unprotected merely because it's
hateful, offensive, discriminatory, or painful to hear. It's also important to understand the rules are different for government than they are for private parties. First Amendment protections do not extend to the private sector. Private employer,
business, or social media platform may choose to prohibit offensive, hateful, discriminatory, or harassing language in its own workplace, on its own property, or in its own forum. The city is different. When the city opens a public comment period at a council meeting,
it's bound by the First Amendment. That means the city may not restrict speech simply because it disagrees with the speaker's viewpoint or because the message is offensive. It is the city's obligation to apply neutral rules that preserve order, allow the meeting to proceed, and
protect the constitutional rights of the public. Allowing deeply offensive comments to be heard reflects the city's adherence to its constitutional obligations, not agreement with or approval of the speaker's message. Notably, council also has a local rule prohibiting
name-calling and personal attacks. As a result, it may sometimes appear inconsistent when a speaker is interrupted for violating that rule, while another speaker is not interrupted for language that listeners may find offensive, hurtful, or demeaning.
That distinction exists because the city is bound by the First Amendment. I recognize that this can be difficult, especially when comments cause genuine offense or pain, but the First Amendment necessarily protects speech that is uncomfortable, unpopular, or
objectionable, and council's responsibility is to uphold the First Amendment, preserve order, apply its rules even-handedly, and protect the public's right to address its government. Thank you. >> Thank you, solicitor.
Um so, that being said, I am will first uh work my way through the list of people who signed up in advance to speak. Um Ar- Ardy Curatola is first. Please uh approach the podium. >> Ardy Curatola, 813 Lawford Street. I
like to address city council. Please be considerate for people given 5 minutes to speak. If you see a problem, it would be proper to address the perpetrator after the meeting or upon leaving. If you interject, it may interfere with
the speaker's message. I was cut off at the last meeting when I was about to rectify that if Hitler gave the order to kill innocent people, especially women and children, or if he just let it happen, it doesn't matter. He had murder
in his heart for the Jewish people. If we don't do whatever we can to stop this genocide, each and every one of us who don't do something to end this are as guilty as Hitler. True, the Nazis killed a lot of innocent
people, but isn't that what the leaders in Israel are now doing today? Two wrongs don't make a right, an eye for an eye, a tooth for a tooth. The people today from the Middle East had nothing to do with the Holocaust.
Is it my imagination, but are the leaders in Israel and Zionists of today making all the Jewish people look bad by killing innocent people all over the Middle East? Equally as important of a question to us citizens of the United States and
Bethlehem, are we looking like Nazis or infantiles or supporters who followed Mussolini who got many of his people to support [clears throat] Hitler by supporting a president who has us support a country that's killing
innocent women and children, all people in Palestine, Gaza Strip, all Islamic people all over the Middle East? When a hundred ton ton mis- missile hits a combat jeep in Iran and
kills young US soldiers in their twenties and thirties, keep in mind it wasn't the Iranians who are to blame. It was our president who let us do this. As all Jews want this anti-Semitic hatred to stop, we need to do whatever we can to stop all hatred. We need to
end all propaganda that leads to hatred of all people. God gave the Jewish people the gifts of knowledge and wisdom. I truly have no objections at all upon Jewish people controlling our world like it appears that the leaders of Israel
would like. But only if they would use the other gift that God gave them, the gift of love. Not rule with an iron hand. Now, if all would use their gifts of knowledge and wisdom
by displaying love, kindness, and fairness, I believe that we can actually have a utopian world. Rotten apples are destroying the bushel of the world with abuse of power and greed. It's not looking favorable that
some power-hungry Jewish people place this anti-Semitic label on people that don't believe or act favorably upon their mission. They are actually saying, "We can't behead you or crucify you, but don't If
you don't let us control you, we can castrate you psychologically and have you blacklisted to make it extremely hard or impossible for you to do the things on Earth that God would want you to do." As they did to me in this town that I
was born in and raised in this country that I served for in the military, they can do the same to you if you speak up against their power in any way, shape, or form. If anyone doesn't like seeing me speak, close your eyes.
Hey, I speak the truth. That our government is supporting the leaders in Israel to overthrow other governments and kill innocent people, bomb and destroy the land where they live to control it and
own it like Hitler and the Nazis did to the Jewish people. If you don't act against this, then do what most people do. Close your eyes and close your hearts. Keep in mind that the seeds of hate will only grow more hate.
To sow the seeds of love will grow love and unity. Here in Bethlehem, we need to be an example because greater cities equal a greater USA. >> Moving on to our next public commenter who signed up in advance, Scott Moser.
>> Good evening, Council. My name is Scott Moser. I reside at 58 Kregy Street, Easton, Pennsylvania. I am here to talk about the um deficiencies that appear that appear to be at the uh Walnut Street parking garage with the
fire protection system. I'm here with my co-worker, Bert Macklin. Bert is going to go into detail of the potential deficiencies, but I would like to approach if I could to make sure that Council has a copy of
the deficiencies that uh potentially exist. May I approach? >> You may approach and we'll make sure that all Council members get copies. >> Thank you. Thank you. >> [clears throat] >> Thank you.
And if I could, I'd like to yield some of my time to my co-worker, Bert Macklin, who's going to go into more um detail. And then, the council can follow along with what he has there. Thank you.
>> Five minutes, yep. >> [clears throat] >> Hello. My name is Bert Macklin. Uh I I work with Scott Moser. Um I live on 1482 Pine Street in Argyl, Pennsylvania. And again, we are here to
address the Bethlehem Parking Authority on Walnut Street. Um primarily with the fire protection. This was a bid spec job. That means all contractors needed to follow the same specs that are required for the job. I
have a list for each of you to look over, and it appears the installing contractor did not follow. When a signatory contractor loses a prevailing wage job by a high number, we like to investigate how it happened. Let's face it, the wages are the same because they are already set by the
Department of Labor of current union scale when the job prevails. We stopped on the job when it started and noticed it appeared the installing contractor, Anchor Fire Protection, was not installing the correct pipe that was the spec for the fire
suppression standpipes. We went to the job trailer and spoke with >> [clears throat] >> Mohawk, the general contractor overlooking the project. They said they would investigate, and it may be because the spec had changed, which specs don't change on a
spec bid spec job. After a few weeks, we stopped back on the project and noticed that the installing contractor was starting to install the dry pipe sprinkler system. It appeared the fabrication method that was required was
not being followed. So, we stopped back at Mohawk's job trailer office to talk to the GC, and they said, "Quote, it was not any of our business, and they were not worried about it, and to leave the job immediately."
You would think the GC would be happy for the help to make sure the job was getting done correctly, but it seems they were not. So, we reached out to Steve Fernstrom with the Bethlehem Parking Authority, and he he was
he would he said we would have to fill out a right to know request for the specs required for the fire protection on the job. So, we did just that, and the specs are listed as shown on the list I have given you. It appears they were not being by followed by the
installing contractor. Mohawk they found thing Mohawk said they had found things at the end of the job on the punch list that was not done per the spec. It was the same things we brought to their attention at the beginning of the
job, and they waited to the end to address them. They claimed they reached out to an engineer, and they said it didn't make a difference to the integrity of the fire protection system, but that is not what was required by the installing contractor.
The specs were clear on what were to [clears throat] be followed. Here's a quick breakdown for everybody. Anchor's bid was $573,600. That was in the right to know request. It appears they did not follow the specs that required. They won the bid by
$100,000 is what Mohawk Contracting told another contractor, which was our signatory contractor. After discussing the way the job was done, it is estimated if the other contractor did not follow if did the job the same way and did not
follow the specs, they could have saved the following: 93,500 on material, 87,600 on labor, 24,000 on fabrication. If you add all that up, that's a total savings of $205,100.
So, if if you think about that, the the they could have saved another 100,000, give or take, on the job if the specs were not important. But, they were ready to install everything as per the required specs for the job.
I would like to request that the parking garage is looked over by a third-party engineer to see what all was not done correctly by the general contractor. I feel the city's taxpayers and Bethlehem Parking Authority did not get what they paid for.
Now, if you go back to the line items that is listed on the paperwork that was handed out, um this fire suppression standpipe specs called for a schedule 40, which is a standard weight pipe on the fire protection. Uh the installing contractor
installed schedule 10. Now, the price difference alone for the pipe per foot is is double for to go with the schedule 40. So, they they cut their price in half by not installing what was required. And not to mention the
longevity of the pipe on how it much longer it would last with the schedule 40. So, it will break down and have to replace sooner. Um another requirement was installing pressure gauges at the top of each standpipe. There's three total. Not one
gauge was installed, so when the fire department or anyone puts pressure on that system, nobody knows what is on it. The last thing I'd like to talk about is on the dry pipe sprinkler system, section 3.3, joint construction line H, steel pipe, required cut groove joints.
They did not install cut groove, they installed roll groove. That is also a cheaper option. It is actually over double the price per groove when you install it that way. Now, the engineer claims that it doesn't make a difference that both is acceptable, and he is right. It's an
acceptable method for installing fire protection, but not when it is required in the spec that it needs to be followed. I have 17 years in the trade, and I can be the first to tell you that when stuff starts breaking down and and it's on roll groove pipe that they actually
puts a bevel on the inside of the pipe where the water lays, and it actually starts eat that away. When you do cut groove, which costs a lot more, that there is no bevel on the inside of the pipe. So, it all drains 100%, and the pipe lasts a lot longer. Um
I did list some things on there that you know, if you guys do find merit to some of these allegations, that you know, Mohawk Construction should be liable for liquidated damages. Um beneath that in the right to know request
if you look at Mohawk Construction's bid in that same packet, they never even submitted their non-discrimination clause, which was missing from the contract. Every other bid and contractor that submitted every piece of paperwork submitted it 100%.
So, I mean it's 2026. We all know discrimination is not taken lightly, and they didn't even fill out that piece of paper. So, thank you for your time. >> Thank you. And like I said, we will make sure that your materials get distributed to all of the
council members for review and further discussion later on. Thank you. Right. I have one more person signed up in advance. I am having difficulty reading the handwriting. It is a I believe
uh Geza Something with a B Yeah. Thank you. Sorry. Couldn't read the last name. Yes. Uh can you uh Yep, approach the podium and and please state your name for the record. >> Uh my name is Geza Burkitt Jr. I'm a
lifetime resident of Bethlehem. Um I live at 1903 Hilltop Terrace. This is my It's a Can you now hear me? >> Yeah. >> Yes. This is my first time at a city hall council meeting. My first time public speaking. I'm not very good at speaking,
but I'll try to make it quick and brief. I come to here today on concern of three public health issues. And one of them being I noticed the property in Bethlehem. This is a property here. And a lot of my friends who I go to this college with and college students have also thought about this as an issue.
This public health issue not only affects me, but it also affects others that are maybe college students or maybe renters that are renting these properties. And this is one of them. And I pointed this out to the Board of Health. And I talked to the Board of Health on it. This is unacceptable for
anybody to live in a condition like like this. And I reported it to the public health burden in the city of Bethlehem. I says, "You know, this is a residence that people are going to rent from. They could be myself. They could be students. They could also be other people. And landlords aren't taking
responsibility to making sure the housings the the properties are safe and free of public health issues because this can affect me and other people. No one should have to live in conditions like this in the city of Bethlehem, whether be myself or other people. It needs to be inclusive for all people and
mindful of people's other health and well-being. The other issue I'd like to point out too, and a lot of my friends in public health and in college pointed this out too, the waste landfill. And I know the city is on board with that and saying it's trying to combat it. The
waste landfill that's near the Anderson campus, it's trying to expand into the area where there are trees. But there's a problem with with that and I talked with public health officials on this, too. When you have moisture in humid climates like Bethlehem, uh, Pennsylvania, for
example, where we have high humidity, it creates um microtoxins. Microtoxins create stachybotrys mold. Stachybotrys mold can infect lungs of those who have immunocompromisations, meaning young children and also those 65
and older. If those microtoxins get into the lungs of people, they can cause bleeding. The issue is that this waste landfill is near a million-dollar hospital, Anderson campus. That's not progressive to allow this waste landfill to expand beyond what they're able to do. Now, I'm
not sure what the city of Bethlehem is going to do about this, but the waste landfill does pose an issue to the environment, to the people, and to the community. So, I'm looking to see what the city can do in regards to these issues. The third issue is, and I know
it's been talked about as data centers. Data centers also pose a problem in public health because their expansion is an effect to the environment, the community, and as well as public health issues as well on that. So, I'm not sure what the city can do on these three
issues, but I would advise city to please look into this to see what can be done about these. Thank you for your time and have a wonderful day. >> Thank you. And are you able to, um, give us a copy of the picture that you presented, um, so we can see it a little bit better. Make sure all council
representatives get that as well. Okay. Thank you very much. >> property quite a few times in a matter of 3 years and nothing has been done about it. So, I said, "I don't know. Maybe I'll take it to the city council meeting." A lot of my friends in college said, "You want to go to the city council meeting your very first time?" I'm here. Let me roll. I don't know how I I were
they're also in public health. We talk about public health. Everybody should be [laughter] entitled to a healthy environment. >> Yes, thank you. Thank you very much and and thank you for taking the time to come address council. Okay, so that exhausts the list of people who signed up in advance. I will
now see if anyone who has not signed up has items to comment on that are not being voted on tonight. The left? >> Bill Shire, 1898 [clears throat] Avenue. Uh I followed the discussion on
permitted speech with interest. Um according to Robert's Rules, I think it's rule 13 of council says that in all other instances, Robert's Rules will apply.
And Robert's Rules has two things that I uh sort of touchstones for me. One is someone else is talking. Sorry. Um
it says that you can uh say that someone's proposal is idiotic. >> I'm going to >> Am I getting feedback or something? >> No, I'm going to remind the audience to
please be respectful of the person speaking at the microphone. >> Okay. Perhaps I could be granted a few more seconds. Um you [clears throat] can say someone's proposal is idiotic, but you can't call them an idiot. To me, that's my distillation of one
part of Robert's Rules. And and the other is that uh well, it escapes me at the moment. Let me move on to something else. I talked last time, part one of three, tonight's part two, about the water and
sewer bill. And uh I'm going to spend some more time on that tonight. And I hope but I'm going to dispense with the humor. Um I had this uh imaginary conversation
between citizen Joe Blow and his mayor. It uh a very uh small and unscientific sample after the meeting conveyed to me that uh my point was made but the humor was lost. So, ha I'll dispense with the humor tonight.
I hope I uh demonstrated that the stormwater fee is really a tax on property. And uh in part three, I'll go into the implications of that. The same is true of the recycling fee.
Because if I have no recycling, I still get charged $17.50 every quarter. That's uh $70 a year. And it's because I own property.
And so that is really a tax on property. Enough said. But it's not a property tax. And we'll get into that later. Uh I've done a little digging. I'm I'm indebted to Ed Boscola for um uh
giving me some details about the rest of the water and sewer bill, which are the charges, as they are called, for water and sewer. Uh the charge per thousand where it's gallons
of water, it's $4 and something. That's clearly a user fee. It's not a tax on property. It's clearly a user fee. Same for the $5 per thousand gallons for sewer. But the other part of the bill are
relatively fixed uh, amounts for basically, uh, Ed doesn't put it this way, but uh, to me it's the water connection, to be connected to the system. And whether you use the system or not,
but it's the same for 90%, 95% of residential properties. Uh, and this is a uh, it's called a charge, but it's actually a tax again.
And it's a tax, uh, because you own property and you are connected to the system. I guess if you weren't connected to the system, there would be no charge. But it's relatively fixed now for the other residential properties and for apartment buildings and, uh,
uh, and industrial uses, anybody that has a bigger meter, then they do pay more. So that that's pretty well, uh, uh, nailed down there. I'll start to preview, I only have 2 minutes left. I'll start to preview part
three. The, uh, we've got, you've heard the terms progressive taxes, regressive taxes, and taxes that are in the middle. An example of a progressive tax is, of
course, the federal income tax, where additional income gets taxed at a higher rate if you cross a certain threshold. I spoke to council earlier this year about imposing a new uh level at
energy introducing a new bracket as a better way of putting it at a thousand um at a million dollars a year. Uh and and income above that would be taxed at 50%. Um the presently the highest
threshold is at 600 and some thousand for an individual and it's additional income is taxed at 37%. But as your income increases into those brackets, your overall tax rate increases because the additional income
is being taxed at a higher rate. So overall, you're paying a higher percentage of your income. That's a progressive tax. A regressive tax and I'm going to have to end on that note is something that's fixed for everyone.
And that's it is regressive because people with higher incomes pay a lower percentage of their income for that tax. And poor people pay a higher percentage because it's the same for everyone.
So next time I'm going to apply that framework to the water and sewer bill. So I know you can't wait for it. >> Thank you. We'll see you next time. All right. Uh would anyone else to the
left like to make public comment? Thank you. >> [clears throat] >> Good evening. Alex Miller, 810 Monocacy Street. I'm back once again just to remind everyone that uh the city of Bethlehem's Flock contract for automatic license plate readers will be coming to
an end and up for possible renewal at some point in this summer. I believe we were told at the last meeting, um, for the public as well, um, visit www.noalprs.com. Um, it's a decentralized nonprofit that's working to explain what ALPRs do,
the abuses of companies that produce and install them such as Flock, um. So, yeah, definitely, uh, recommend getting educated, uh, on the worst abuses of a, um, an otherwise terrible company, um.
I think I'd like to use an analogy, um, that might have some distance, uh, given this government's, uh, desire to pour so much effort, time, and capital into parks. Um, if you imagined that, uh, you hired an architect to do design work for one
of your parks, um, and perhaps in the interview you asked them, "Hey, have you ever done any design work on, say, a warehouse or distribution center that's being used to, um, for example, um, warehouse people
for ICE?" Obviously, with 15 of our neighbors being kidnapped last year, we don't want to hire vendors that have done work for ICE. If this architect came to you and said, "No, we have not done any work, uh, for ICE," and then designed your park, gave you a great cutting-edge, state-of-the-art
product, and then you discover that they had done work for ICE, I highly doubt you'd bring them back again to design another park, um. Even worse, perhaps some of their employees did design work in another
park in another municipality, um. Maybe they were caught leering at children, maybe they were asked to leave by the police and refused to leave the town. Imperfect analogy though this may be, this is fundamentally what we would be doing if we decided to renew a Flock
contract because all of these abuses have been perpetuated by perpetrated, excuse me, by Flock's leadership and their employees. Um I really feel like Council has to step up. Um
last meeting, uh as as rough as it was, um there were some glimmers that I I feel that you're you're starting to understand that there are um some gaps in some of the reasoning that's coming from the administration. Um especially around tech.
Certainly with the um you know, data center uh focus that's happening around the valley, several neighboring municipalities, um you're you're going to have to act. Um you're going to have to be the proactive ones.
Um because I I I I am afraid that you are serving as a legislative foil to an executive that is reactive rather than proactive. There are a few plans that have, as we've seen,
implementation that um has been difficult to explain by members of the administration. And to the extent that they have any principles uh or legislative priorities, not many of them have surfaced of late.
Um so again, just here to remind you that um we shouldn't be doing business um with a company, even if it is um federally funded. Um I don't think I need to explain to you the revolving door of federal grant dollars that have supported some of the
worst abuses of the police state um coming out of the Department of Justice. Um this is a well-documented phenomenon that tech startups basically get guaranteed seed money from um the federal government who passes
dollars down to local law enforcement to basically be test pilots for their products and by extension make citizens the test pilots for their products. Thank you. >> Thank you. Would anyone else to my left like to
make comment? Anyone in the broad center who would like to make comment on an item not being voted on this evening? >> Mr. Intalux. >> Mr. Intalux. >> Steven Intalux, 737 Ridge. At [clears throat] one time Packer,
Hillside, Fillmore, Pierce, Polk, Fifth, Berkle, Van Buren, among others, were the sites of single family homes. Owners were permanent residents. Parking for others was next to impossible.
Today, after June 1st until September 1st, parking on the streets is essentially open almost at all places. Why? Because this once stable family neighborhood
is now designated by the city as the student zone. And consequently, the students are gone for the summer vacation, thus freeing up the parking spaces. Since one person can own up to 50 houses
in this area, this means it's highly unlikely that they will ever become single family homes again. Drive through these streets and count the number of yellow doors. They represent a single owner.
Why? More money is made by renting to the transient students. Of all the college towns in Pennsylvania, only Bethlehem has this definition that five students are governed
the same as a single family. This has prompted non-resident real estate promoters to outbid single families in their purchase of these properties. Radnor Township in Delaware County,
the home of Villanova University, Rosemont College, Eastern University, and Valley Forge University does [clears throat] not have this problem. Since they allow only two students per
house, thereby precluding profit from student rentals, hence you have more college dorms and the single family conversions. City Council helped in creating [clears throat] this problem
and is still continuing it. How can Council help How can Council help in this solution? By reviewing and revising its definitions. There are new There are new properties
being built on the south side, as some of these are being built in the designated student zone. Guess what? Guess what they will be. Of course, they will become student houses. Council needs to have the definition of
family revised, preventing student groups from being called a family and greatly limiting the profit of non-resident real estate speculators by renting to them. As a family, since they are not a family
but a transient rental group. It is It is also key to eliminate the designation of student zone. Since it implies no single families should be built in this area.
It is also of great importance that the members of city council be accurately aware of the city make up and of its problems. Know Knowing the city. This aspect was recently brought
to the fore forefront since sometime since since some years back. I referred to students as transient residents and was seriously reprimanded by member of council who argued that students contributed to city equally as
single families. How many of you How many of you have seen a single family hanging a bed sheet from a second story window to support an athletic event? How many of you have seen a have seen a
single family string athletic footwear from overhead wires at the end of the school year? And how many of you have seen a single family litter the sidewalk after a weekend party? I think you get the point.
I think you get the point. >> Thank you, Mr. Antalics. >> Can I have another 30 [snorts] seconds? You mind? >> You may finish your statement given the unusual nature of our meeting tonight. >> You're being overwhelmed by speakers this evening, so but anyway, um
uh The quality of these meetings has deteriorated and one of the reasons is that people at that table really aren't that concerned about what's being said because most of you don't listen and you and also cut people short when they have
only maybe a few seconds to finish their statement, so but that's the way life is. >> Would anyone else in the center like to make public comment? >> I >> Okay, so um
that concludes our public comment on items not being voted on. Um typically at this point in the agenda we would invite public comment on ordinances and resolutions uh to be voted on. However, since we do
not have quorum, we are not hearing or discussing um any items that would be considered uh part of that business agenda. Um so those commenters uh are if I had one person signed up
um anything from this agenda will be added to the next agenda so that we can hear it at the meeting that we will be voting on it. I'm sorry for that inconvenience, but we are not allowed to conduct business when we do not have quorum uh like that.
Um similarly members of council cannot discuss business that we will be voting on or discussing officially. Um however, in uh consultation with our solicitor
um what we're going to do in this unusual evening uh so that we can address the people who took their time out uh to be here this evening or um ask uh or you know, make statements ourselves. Um
I'm going to invite council members to follow the same 5-minute time limit that the public has followed this evening. And um this is very important due to our sunshine rules and rules of uh not having quorum we I will remind you we cannot make any
commitments about future votes or business. We cannot pull members on any issues. We cannot discuss the merits of anything that would be considered pending business. So these 5 minutes that I am offering uh can be used to make announcements
uh general statements and general remarks. Uh that being said, do uh either of the two council members present have comment? Ms. Quiatek. >> Thank you. I um have a uh
an oral report. Is this the time that I do it? >> This is your um announcement, correct? >> Yes. >> Uh >> About the committee hearing. >> Yeah, so this would be this is the section that we're is replacing new business essentially. We'll get to the
announcement about the hearing uh in like a couple agenda items. So, sorry. >> I have nothing then. >> Nothing else. Okay. Mr. Callahan. >> Thank you. I I just wanted to uh say a few things quick uh about the um the gentleman that came here for about the
sprinkler system. I appreciate your time coming here and informing council of the situation. Um when I came to I think all council members when we came to the table tonight we had a memo from Mr. Fernstrom from the parking authority
and his last um his last paragraph was if any council members would like to meet with me to discuss the project operations or future parking initiatives I would be happy to do so. Council members are also welcome to attend any Bethlehem Parking Authority
Board meeting where project updates and authority business are discussed in public setting. I just want to make sure everybody understands this. So Miss Krammes-Smith was looking into this issue on the bids um prior to her leaving council in January.
And then when she left she asked me to follow up on it which I did. And the gist of it is is that the as the gentleman said tonight in the bids that the parking authority requested very specifically
there was specific type of piping and valves that had to be used. There was no substitution. All the contractors that bid on that job bid the same exact way. And then I asked Mr. Fernstrom, well how
did this company Anchor get allowed to switch the spec on the valves and the piping? And he said that to me that there's an official process and form that they'd have to fill out.
And I asked, did they do that? And he said, no. So I had conversations and Mr. Evans said last meeting, why don't I just have a some conversations with the parking authority? I did do that. And then after I I asked for the
I asked for the documentation on all the bids and the specs uh of the uh uh request from the parking authority and they told me I had to file a right-to-know request. And I thought that was a little strange that hey, you know, city council member
and I'm also the parking authority uh liaison. And all I was doing was asking for some some information. So, they said, "Well, if you want it, you got to go file a right-to-know request." Which I then did. Then they came back and they wanted to
charge me $700 for all the paperwork. And I was very blunt with them. I said, "If you think you're going to charge me or the or or the city of Bethlehem $700 to get documentation on what happened." I said, "You're out of your mind." And
within the next day, they emailed me a file which resolved that. But I just want to state that then when I then told the solicitor from Braceland and DeVincent that um that Mr. Fernstrom had told me that no paperwork had been filed by
Anchor to switch the piping and valving to a cheaper valve and piping that it was never done and according to Mr. Fernstrom, they had no idea that that that that was done. That they put in and installed or what were installing a much cheaper piping
and valve which has less life shelf and also was uh if you count labor and materials, $200,000 less. So, when I told the solicitor from Braceland
and DeVincent that I went back to Mr. Fernstrom and Mr. Fernstrom told me he can't have any more conversations with me. All the conversations have to now go through the solicitor at Braceland and DeVincent. So, Mr. Fernstrom's letter here you know, claiming that all council
members are welcome to meet with him and discuss uh things with him concerning the these issues or attend any board meetings. I was told he can't he can't speak to me anymore. And all I was doing was asking very
specific questions about the bidding process. The bids were submitted exactly as required by the parking authority by everybody. And the and the winner of the of the bid anchor didn't even fill it out properly.
So, I don't know where this is where I got the the disconnect with with everything and why I started digging a little bit deeper. So, I'm going to ask I've been asking for 4 months now through the city clerk to Ms. Quietek
who's in charge of the the sub-committee. >> That's that does get to if you're going to make a request that is for a business agenda. >> Right. But I'm just saying that I asked for a meeting. I'm going to formally ask for a meeting tonight uh verbally and
then I'm going to I'm going to send I'm going to I'm going to You got to listen to I'm going to You can't talk. You don't have the floor. >> I can though? >> You're out of time. >> I I agreed to to tell you that I'm going to send a letter to her. I'm going to >> Wait, pause.
>> All right. >> Councilman. >> I won't ask for it here. I'm going to send a letter. >> you to follow the procedure where you send a a memo. >> I will. I'll I'll have >> Follow an official procedure. >> I I will have our city clerk send an official letter to Ms. Quietek asking for a official sub-committee. Thank you.
>> Thank you. Okay. Um I'm going to just pause Is everything all right in the hall? Okay. Thank you. Okay. Um >> a point of order also, real quick? He cannot speak unless you
>> I am sitting as chair of this meeting and will recognize those who do. >> you. Don't speak unless spoken to. >> That applies to you, too. >> Right, and I have the floor. I have the floor. >> The only comment uh
that I would like to make um tonight is that uh one, I do thank everyone who came out to speak tonight. This is an unusual meeting for us. Uh it's the first one in my tenure on council where we have sat without uh having quorum.
Um and but I did want to make sure that we did hear the the from the people who came out uh to share their thoughts and concerns um with us on on items that were not on the agenda. Um
a point to make just so everyone is aware. Um the parking authority is an independent legal entity. Um with their own authority over contracts. So, our city council does not review parking authority contracts. We do not
sign those contracts. We do not adjudicate those contracts in any way. We do have a parking authority liaison um and there are some ties through our community uh development committee to the parking authority, but that is very limited in scope. So, while council is
always uh willing to hear and look into community issues, I just need to make sure that everyone here is aware of the the legal separation between the two entities. Um
that being said, there is a packet here to read. And I think that was all that I have uh to comment back on this evening. Um >> Can I can I make a quick comment?
>> You cannot right now. Thank you. >> I'm yours. >> Um I also am aware that uh as new people come to council meetings, which is wonderful to see, um it's a an odd structure to get used to. Um so when we
move out of public comment period, I am not allowed to recognize other comments from the audience, and so I'm just going to um make that clear. However, anyone who's spoken in public comment or wants to talk to council after our official meeting time ends, we are always happy
to do so. Uh so if you just hang tight for a few more minutes, then we'll be able to speak um with you at after our meeting or our session adjourns. Um so just hang tight for a moment, okay? Thank you. Okay.
Okay, so I'm now going to um move on to accepting some reports. Again, we will not be considering anything that will be uh action item on our agenda. Um I do understand though
uh that the the mayor I will recognize just arrived. Uh do you have anything to report, Mayor Reynolds? >> Um no, uh other than uh I just would make a couple quick updates. Um one is that um
uh we scheduled our uh block parties for the three upcoming uh parks, both Madison Park, Clearview, and Bernie Fritts, which are on three consecutive Wednesdays uh moving forward um here. This Thursday we have our uh complete streets meeting um over at the Fowler
Center at 6:00 p.m. Um and uh I think that probably uh is uh, the entirety of my report. Thank you. >> Thank you. Uh, I'll now recognize Ms. Quiatek for your announcement. >> Thank you. The Community Development Committee will meet on July 7th at 6:00
p.m. in Town Hall. The committee will discuss one agenda item, the 2026 Fair Hearing Report. The committee will hold the annual financial accountability incentive reporting or Fair Hearing required by Article 349 and review economic
development incentive reports submitted by the administration. The meeting will be for informational purposes only and no actions will be taken. Hillary G. Quiatek, Chairperson, Community Development Committee. >> Thank you, Ms. Quiatek. The rest of the items on the agenda this
evening cannot be considered and will be added to our July 7th meeting agenda. Uh, so at this time we will adjourn this session and if anyone would like to speak less formally with members of council, then you're welcome to do so. Thank you.
>> Let's see if I