behind you. And then I saw Crazy. No, I know. I know. Good evening everyone. I'd like to call to order the village of Biscane Park Code Compliance Board meeting for Wednesday, June 18th. It is
now 6:01 p.m. If the clerk would please call roll. Jannie Anderson here. El Blentontosy Hammer Michael Lop here. Oh, sorry. Durant C Grant present. Rafael Gutierrez. Vanessa Cherry
present. Good evening once again everyone. This is a meeting of the village of Biscane Park Code Compliance Board. The board is authorized pursuant to chapter 14 of the village's land development code to ensure compliance with the vill's code of ordinances. The members of the board
are citizens and residents of the village of Biscane Park. We volunteer our time and are not paid for our services. The purpose of each hearing is to give any alleged violators the opportunity to contest the decision of the code compliance officer which resulted in the issuance of a notice of
violation and to determine whether a violation of the villages code has occurred or is occurring. We are not authorized to dismiss violations based on hardships, ignorance or the fact that others may be guilty of the same violation. These hearings are conducted
in a quasi judicial manner. Our responsibility is to act much like a judge in a court and that is to hear cases presented by the villages code compliance officers and to hear contradictory arguments presented by the alleged violators. We are not authorized to change the code. The village
commission is solely authorized to enact or revise codes. Conversely, neither the commission nor the village manager have the authority to overrule the findings of the board. Pursuant to chapter 162 Florida statutes, orders of the board can only be appealed to the circuit
court of Miami date county, we have the authority to assess and order the payment of civil penalties, to issue orders having the force of law, to command whatever steps are necessary to bring a violation into compliance, and to assess administrative costs. In order to make a finding upholding the code
compliance officer's decision, we must find that there is substantial competent evidence that the name violator was responsible for a violation of the relevant section of the code as charged. All documentary evidence by the parties must be submitted for placement in the
hearing file. No documentary evidence will be considered unless the alleged violator or code compliance officer submits a copy for the hearing file. Each party shall have the right to call and examine witnesses, to introduce exhibits, to cross-examine opposing witnesses on any matter relevant to the
issues, even though that matter was not covered in the direct examination, to impeach any witnesses, regardless of which party first called them to testify, and to rebut the evidence against them. If you intend to address the board and have not signed in, please
do so. And anyone wishing to address the board tonight, please stand, raise your right hand so you may be sworn in. You are reminded that board is this board is a quasi judicial board and giving false testimony can be penalized. No. Okay. Please raise your right hand.
Do you swear or affirm that the testimony you're about to give would be the truth, the whole truth? Nothing but the truth. We have any additions, deletions, or changes other than the one we got early? Um, yes, we have an addition
and it will be 5.1 for the address 820 Northeast 111th Street. Right. Okay. When you're ready. Good evening. My name is Dorian Grant, code manager, village of Biscane Parker Compliance Department.
Our first case is under new business section 7 and it's item number 7.1. Address is 821 Northeast 109th Street. Case number C25-0182 for Peter
Leanov and Danielle Ayalo. We are here for a finding of fact. They have in fact complied with this violation. and they were found to be in violation of section 6.3.4 garden bulky waste um that was left to overflow in an enclosed uh trash area.
Uh this violation was left unattended to for several months and this is why we needed to bring them here so we can put a finding of we we get a finding of fact and uh put this on the record as offense number one.3.4
forward. Does that include bulk waste and not just yard debris? Because I have to be honest when I am reading in the NOV the whole description is yard waste
which is not the documentation we have. And if you look further in tonight's agenda, we also have a yard debris I'm sorry, I shouldn't say yard debris, a debris violation, and it is cited a completely different code.
Okay. So the reason we use this uh particular uh section is because it covers both bulk waste and um garden waste. Okay. They because my concern was the only portion that's
visible in in terms of the notice of violation all references yard waste. That's how the ordinance is written, but they are including bulk waste in there. Want to make sure. Thank you. You're welcome. Other questions from the board? Yeah,
Dorian, you said that they're in compliance now. It up. However, I had been to the property several times over several months. I would say about three months, spoken with the property owner. um while I was on the property at the
first time she actually called um Great Waste and she was talking to them while I was there to pick up the trash. I went there I think the next day trash was still there. I went there three weeks later trash was still there and more trash. I went there and the following month trash
was still there and then this last time is when we had to escalate and and bring the case to the board. They complied after they received the notice to appear. All right. So right now there the pictures are not representative of the way it work the way it looks now.
Pictures. Yes, that's how it looks. I did pass there a couple of days ago actually this week and it does look clean. They I'm sorry they are or are not in compliance at this point. They are in compliance at this point. We want to put it on the record because the violation went on for so long. Sure. And
in case there's um the violation repeats, we would like to have it on the record as a second offense. Right. because I see the first pictures of documentation were March 11th of 2025. So, we're talking three months. Well,
let me ask you a question. The the uh the orientation of the pictures is that this that the uh is looking from 8th Avenue. Yes. So, 8th Avenue is a a north south street, right? Okay. So, um, the
the wall that the trash is behind is also facing 8th Avenue. They have an enclosure, so you can actually see it from 8th Avenue when the trash is like high, but you have to get onto the next street and on to be able
to see that because it's enclosed. You wouldn't see the trash from the street. I had to go on the property because they had garbage containers the first time that were overflowing. Okay. So, what what do you know? We've got several pictures with at several
different stages. We are we talking about one of uh violation and if so, which one? Well, the date the violation progressed. We started with a verbal. I spoke with the property owner like I say and we included the
picture so you can see the how the the the violation progressed. So, we I went there several times. the first time like I say I spoke with the property owners the boxes that are in the enclosed uh area were there rained on and it was a
really bad site. So when I went there the second time which was I think the following day or the day after trash was still there. It wasn't picked up. No. No. And when you went and the trash wasn't picked up, this was the day that
after you spoke to the homeowner, right? What was your question again? The trash you said you went out the next day. Went the next day to make sure cuz she was speaking with Grey Waist, right? You went out the day after that, but it wasn't. And well, your understanding from the phone call you she was she was she was talking to Grey Waist. I could
hear her. Okay. All right. Maybe we do have to swear in the witness because you didn't take an oath because you weren't going to testify, but it sounds like you might want to. So, why don't you stand up and take an oath?
Yeah, the officer is just showing me another picture from December that he took. The trash was there in December. I I was in the officer at the time for the area. area. So there's two wherever can you see? I think there's a gentleman in the back with a hat on right here. Is
there a lady? You can go to the gentleman over here, sir. Sir, on the phone. Stop calling. Were you going to testify? Because you came in after they took an oath. So why don't we just do two at once? Just raise your hand from over there. Just raise your right hand. Do you swear or affirm the testimony you're about to give would be the truth,
the whole truth, nothing but the truth? Yes, sir. So, what I'm looking at is a progression of the size of the pile, right? That started back in December. Yes, we have another from December, which I wasn't aware of because I took over the the
zone. We're looking at seven months through rain and through everything else. And do do we have a picture what it looks like today? It's in the in the file. I didn't see they did clean it up. They did remove everything. The last picture I have shows the trash in it.
Yeah, the last one. Yeah, I got March 11th and I got April 4th. I don't see a date on this one. Yeah, the last one doesn't have a date. Have they have missed adding it, but I I can testify to seeing a compliance
picture. Okay. Okay. In the meantime, why don't we ask if you would folks identify yourselves and your relationship to the property? Um, Peter, owner of the property. Danielle, owner of the property. Yeah, it's been clean. Yeah, we cleaned
it up. I have a photo on my phone if you guys want to see, but it's cleaned up. What I'm interested in is that uh What's your name, ma'am? Yeah. Danielle. Uh, is it okay if I call you Danielle? Yeah. Okay. that you were the conversation
that was referenced. Uh, yeah. So, I Well, let me ask a question. The conversation that was referenced, did do you recall being having a conversation with with Dorene? Yes. And she gave in the number for Great Waste. Um, I spoke with them on the phone. They sent me a
text message to send the the garbage to them. There was no response. And then I followed up with them a month after to come pick up the garbage, and there was no response. and I followed up with them a third time and they didn't respond which was why the pile kept growing. When was the
conversation? I believe this was in March. March, April. So, it still was already three months into it. Correct. See, the point is, ma'am, even if Great Waste didn't fulfill what they should have as fast as they should have, you cannot
keep that plow growing. Correct. You have to find a way to make arrangements. Folks do all the time. When the piles get to be a little bit larger, you find other haulers. You do what needs to happen because even Great Waste is not going to pick that up for the regular
charge. I I got a I got a qu question. Were you still going? No. Okay. So, how long have you lived in the neighborhood? Almost three years. Two. Almost two years. Almost almost three years. Three years. Yeah. So, do you know what the garbage schedule is? That Monday is bulk
trash. Yeah, we do. Did you ever put the the garbage out on Monday? Uh, yeah, we did. We we the pileup was my our cleaning lady comes and we told her to put everything in the bin, but couple times she put it out there and we just kept on procrastinating mainly because
like we're doing construction, so we have a a tear down coming up here in the next couple of weeks. And so our whole idea was just they were to come in and gonna dispose the waste alongside with the rest of the structure. So I mean if because it looks like there's just like
a bunch of boxes and stuff. It looks like you could have gone out in the morning and just put it out to the side on a Monday and probably in about two or three Mondays it would be all gone. Did was that ever something that came across your mind? Yeah. Yeah. Moving forward we'll do that. Okay. Yeah. I'm just trying to understand why, you know, it
was that long and and you had a conversation with with the village, right? And I'm just just trying to wrap my head around that fact because none of this stuff looks like you got to pay extra for anything if it just goes out in certain intervals. Yeah, we paid we
we we paid to get it removed. I mean, as soon as I followed up with her on the Great Waste and they weren't going to respond. We're just kind of waiting. We're also, you know, not present majority of the time. We do travel and we do have a lot of work. So, we just kind of let it build up and you know, we thought it wouldn't be a big deal cuz
again, we have the whole tear down coming up. Um, but after after I texted her like, "Hey, are we going to get any update here? Great way is going to come." We were going to wait on them. And so, we had already called somebody to come pick it up and then I believe um Raphael came and gave us the notice and
so the guys pretty much came and picked it up the next day. So, so when you said the neighborhood that are next to them on the other street are very close to where the trash is. Now, when trash is left like that for a long time, it becomes a health issue, a health hazard.
So, it wouldn't affect them. It would affect their next door neighbors. And that was my biggest concern. And that's why I kept going back to make sure that they cleaned it up. Well, I'm not mistaken. I think that the house across the street, you're saying on the on the other side of of 8th Avenue, that's a backyard of a of a home, I think, that's
been vacant probably for about seven or eight years. So, in fact, in fact, we had some them here because they had the uh the fence that wasn't four feet high and then we made them get a a fence around their pool. Remember those guys? That's an
empty house. So, I I appreciate the concern, but I'm just looking at it and saying, you know, you at your argument. At any rate, I mean, it was a pile that and it actually backfires to make the pile get bigger and bigger because you put out a little bit each week. You don't pay extra. So, if there are no
other questions or and anything else you'd like to wrap up, sir, ma'am. Nope. We'll keep it clean. Ready for a motion? I'd like to make a motion on case number CE-25-0182 that a violation did occur. It's now in
compliance. Assess a fine of $250 and administrative fee of $250. I'll second. I have a motion and a second. All in favor? I. Any opposed? Motion passes 40.
Okay. By um say August the August the 1st. I'll second that. All in favor? I I. Any oppose? Motion
passes 4 zero. Thank you. We're free to leave. Yeah. Oh, thank you guys. Section business47. already two abandoned property.
What number is this? What number is this, Dorine? What number is this? But as of today, they're in complaint. Yeah. I mean, compliant couple of days, but I guess he was there today to check it. Yeah.
I'm sorry. So, would you identify yourself in your room? Yes. Hi, how are you? My name is Marcelo Nunes. I'm not the property owner. I am I've been renting the property for the last four years. Yeah.
Um any questions from the board? Wait, I didn't see the picture. Is there a picture of what it looks like now? Yeah. I mean, is this registered or is this just Yes, sir. Yeah. Um, I can explain about the car. I know it looks a little different. Look like an outdoor like
lai. I, um, this is a regular four van. Then I purposely build that way because I my spare time I teach autistic kids to swim and that's how I take them to the pools when we go inside of the parks in South Miami. So the reason was the way it was before is then we're cleaning
stuff out of the house and end up pulling everything there to take to rent a trailer and go pick that up and eventually pile up. I also have a video in my phone showing me looking at the tire exactly the way allegedly was flat and putting a tire gauge on the tire to
show them was 40 PSI. That's the that tire I think does 45 maximum just to show them it's Yeah. Yeah. I have I have a video here to show because it's it see the the tire is it it has a a belly but that's the way the tire is. You can see
in the video. So it's not then the tire was flat. It's just the way the tire sits. Some cars are just like that. So um if it's if the court needs to see I have the video here as well. We're actually not a court. We're a board but it's quasi judicial. I'd like to see it.
Absolutely. Yeah. So here you go. Sorry about the Instagram. I'm going to need you to to text or email that video to the code officer because that needs to go in the record. Absolutely. No problem. But this is of
course what we what it was. I mean Dorian, do we have a picture of it without a tire? I don't see without a tire. It's Sorry. Uh Michael, it's actually this one.
It's it's it's 19 ft. It's a regular van. Then all what I did was to take it out the back and make into the open area. It's a regular passenger van. It's a E354 passenger van. Regular 15 passenger van. Passenger, sir. It's a
Ford E350 passenger van. regular like those the ones that have the regular seats or 15 passengers. It's a regular vehicle. It's a Yeah, it's a regular vehicle. It's not It's no commercial. This the car is 19
ft. My my Escalade is 21. So, it's not it's not um it's just it just looks different. So, but show show the witnesses picture. This there appears to be a picture in June 6. No, there is a tire right there
where the bottom just sticks out. And you can see from the video from today the same thing. Did you change the tire? No, it's the same way. I never even put air. I just
went on that and I put the gauge so the the board could see it. You might be looking at the back of this. I want to look at this one. Yeah, that's okay. Because that's a different that's a different rim is this one. This one
sticks out like this one. That one goes in. Yeah. also I moved the car on the driveway. So when he was first there, he could only see one side of the car. So even looking at the June 6 picture, you can see a tire
underneath there. I have not seen a picture without a tire. It was was never without a tire. Yeah. It's just the way the car sits like that. This yours? Yes. Yes, sir. I mean, unless another board member has seen a picture with that attire, I don't
see one. June 6. I mean, if you look at it closely, it looks like there are no further questions. Yeah, I I got one. Is the vehicle uh uh tagged and registered? Yes, sir. Was always it um expired 26.
Yeah. Yeah, we got that sticker, too. I like that. Okay. On case number C-25-0345 that the vehicle is in compliance. Close the case. A second. Uh first and a
second. All in favor? I any opposed? Motion passes 4 Z. Done. Uh Jenn, Trust me, I know we It's an ongoing problem. Thank you. Next item is uh 6.3 in old business. 6.3
in old business. It's for the address 981 Northeast 113th Street, case number CE-25- Z0064. Renee Alvarez. Um we are asking for an intent to lean. Um the amount of
fine that has been fines that have been running is $12,250. Permit has Yes. $12,250 as of today. I have no idea. The permit has not been issued. Um, they
were found to be in violation of section 16.14.1 double fee permits. They installed an air conditioner without first obtaining permits. We checked with the building department just before we came to the hearing and they confirmed that Mr. Alvarez applied for an electrical um
permit instead of a mechanical permit. So, the the reviewers rejected his permit. So, as of today, we have no permit on file. But when was that permit um asked for? Date of the permit.
He applied for the permit April 15, 2025. And the comments, the comments I think have passed. Yeah, it shows back to waiting for him to resubmit. They had sent him comments through the
system and he needs to sub to resubmit a mechanical permit. That was told in the comments. It was in the comments. Um he had an electrical contractor. Let me clarify that he had an electrical contractor submit a permit that should have been submitted by a
mechanical contractor. So this was sent back to him in comments I think about month ago, but they haven't heard from him. And you haven't heard from it in the last month since it? Yeah, it shows as of 4:15 waiting for applicant to
resubmit. That's two months ago. Okay. I've been give us a second, please. Yes. Give us a sec. Okay. And and and uh is is this a a whole house air conditioner or or room? Sure. Air. No, it wasn't. It's not. It's
a Is it a mini split? It was It's a mini split. Yes. Okay. Pulling the permit first before you and I admit as my ignorance. I thought since it was Can you use the microphone, please?
Again, your name. Yes, we know who you are, but your name and your relationship to the property. My name is Renee. Um, I'm the owner of the property and as we discussed before, there was a flood. time, you know, 3 ft of water in my house because of the that thing. So,
I got the check. I replaced the AC because that's what they asked to do. But I didn't know. And and again, I know that that's not an excuse. I'm just letting you know that it wasn't like I'm trying to hide anything, right? Is more just that I didn't know if it was brand new. I knew I had to put I had to get a a permit. I didn't know that to replace
one. I didn't. So, I I submitted to the electrical and I guess that was a wrong thing to do, right? because that's what I was told that I need electrical. So, okay. Well, you didn't have a contractor. You were doing all of this on your own. Yeah. With a friend of mine that's a photographer, right? But he's also he works on all the condos on on um
on Aventura. So, he know he's a a very, you know, a very good friend in the sense of that he's also a professional person, right? Not a mechanical engineer, but he's not a mechanical engineer. No, he's not a mechanical engineer. Right. So, I talked to So, I've been calling around uh mechanical
engineers. They all want to charge me $1,500 $2,000 just to I know. I know. Got to do it. I know. I know. But I I finally found guy a guy. He's going to charge me$500 for his to sign off on it. Um his name is Ariel Triumph AC. He's going to pull the
permit this week. So, I have someone already there, but everyone else has just literally charged me more than what I paid for the unit itself. And was less than Yeah. So, you have someone in place now? Yes.
Who's going to validate the plans, do what needs to be done, who will handle the application? Yes. He's going to he's going to pull a permit tomorrow. I just talked to him today. He's going to apply. He still has to go through a review. He's going to have to first apply. He's not necessarily, but you understand it's not a matter of just
applying. You have to see it through. It has to be paid for and generated. That that gets into questions sometimes. It's only a permit once you paid it and you have it. Right. So, I have a question about how long is it taking now to get
if everything's in order to have this permit um approved by the mechanical engineer? Pretty quick 12 days. About two weeks. Yes. About two weeks. Does he have to go back? Is there any need of going back to PNZ? Well, I
would say yes. Yes. Yeah. just because it he submitted the wrong you know the wrong contractor had the wrong problems. Yeah, that was by 21st. Yeah. I was thinking July 22nd, the day after 23rd.
Okay. Is it two days afterwards? Wonder. Terrific. Make your motion. I'm sorry. Do you have anything else? Uh no, that's it. Yeah. Well, I I would want to say one thing is that, you know, I know you professed ignorance of the process, but also when
they told you in April 15th, you know, that's why it's $12,000 because you got a daily fine. No, but instead of making a phone call and say, "Hey, what do I do?" You would have known that. I didn't know. I thought that I thought again and I'm not going to When it's finally, right, then staff can guide you through
the process to apply for a fine reduction. Can't happen until it's done. Until it's all done, right? the penalties issue. I just didn't know that they were charging me every single day either. I thought since I came here to work on it. But if you called they would have I know I again just for the future.
I am unfortunately a hillbilly when it comes to this sort of stuff. So it's like uh you know if I could fix it myself that's what I do you know. And on case number C-25-0064
owners here and is working to bring this property to obtain the necessary uh permit. I'd like to give the property owner I'd make a motion to give the property owner until July the 23 to have
a uh pulled paid for uh permit. I mean fully implemented permit by July 23rd. If not uh direct the village to move to follow link. I'll second. All in favor?
I I. Any oppose? Motion passes 40. You've got a month. Okay. Thank you so much. Thank you, Renee. Next item is 7.3. 7.3 is for the address 931 Northeast 107th
Street. It's for case number CE25-0183, Haralu Henrietta Andrich Hova. I hope I pronounced your name right. I'm sorry about that. But we're asking for an order of enforcement in this um in this particular case. Uh they were found to
be in violation of section 6.3.4 garden bulky waste. Um it there was a large trash pile that was left on the side of the property for a very long time. I passed through several times again and trash wasn't moved. I also
would like to put on the record that this is a short-term rental. They have the license. Yes, they do. It's a licensed short-term rental, but the pile has been removed at this point. Am I correct? Correct.
Um, you said this is a short-term rental. Yes, it is. It's a homesteaded property. Is it homesteaded? It's not homesteaded. No, it's a duplex that's rented out. Yep. It's homesteaded.
Yeah, it's homestead. Yep. Do is that the the Because they have two of them next to each other. Is that the one that once you live on the one side and then they rent out one side? It's a duplex. Okay. Go up. Questions from the board?
Sir, if you would identify yourself in your relationship to the property. Yes, I'm the owner. My name is Ilia and residing at the property. Um, so I was away and the property management company was taking care of that. um I mean of day-to-day operations and unfortunately this fact of the yard debris has been
overlooked and um as soon as I came back end of May and I've been actually advised by uh one of the cut compliance um workers that that is situ I mean that has been issued violation which is I didn't receive in the mail um again
maybe it was lost I don't know what the story is but even before issue before notice of appearance was posted it's been cleaned by myself and I took it away by myself in several trips in my truck to take care of that. And again,
it was done before notice of appearance because I I didn't know that it was notice even issued. But of course, the trash was there. So, I mean, it's critical that you It's unfortunate, but it's critical that you stay on top
of the people you're paying to take care of your property because it boils down to you being of course, and this is why I'm here now. So, I'm I'm taking care of myself from now on. And uh I just want to point out that property is located 107th Street and um it's all fenced out
by Clusia, which is live fence. So it's not visible when you go one direction at all. Am I correct during but it was there. I'm not saying it's not. So it was um you know we had to do prevention because of the hurricane. We
had issue that the tree was falling into the pool causing outages and like so it was a lot of stuff we have to cut in our own expense. $2,500 contractor didn't take it. They just cut it. So Uh that's another thing our ordinance also
requires if you hire tree trimmers contractor any type of landscaping contractor they must take that's the debris and this is why we changed the our contractor for the for the bigger company who can take care of that and also I mean probably I'm not going to be
the first one but two cubic feet of uh garbage debris it's u I know it's not responsibility of the village because we subcontract the company who does that uh but it's very questionable how they measure the two two cubic feet because seems like if it's uh 1.9 they just
wouldn't take it and they just leave it there. Uh we've been having this issue before. I'm not saying this is particular issue in this regard. Uh but this is why I said you know I'll do it myself. Meanwhile my father we took care of it. Any other questions from the board?
In case number C250183 a violation has occurred. Assess a $250 fine, $250 administrative fee, and close the case when the fines are paid. Give the property owner until August 1 to pay
the fines. August 1st. August 1st, but I don't have a second for discussion, but Okay. only um it's been brought into compliance and all understand
and that from what I'm looking at it was on this property and not in front of it. Yes, it was inside the property on the side and it is visible when you're on um not on 107 when you Is that Griffin? When you're in
Griffin, you can I could see that from from a mile away and uh it's inside on the property. It's not on the swell and it was there for over a month. I I would consider dropping the admin fine. Not Not a problem. But I would
like to stick with the citation fine because in fact it did take a couple of months to come to compliance. Yeah. But I would like to add the board if you don't mind that all this landscape I mean not it's not going to change your decision probably but uh this is the
best looking landscape in this street. I promise you. And we spent so much money and this is one of the best looking properties there. Now I don't want to offend anyone. All properties are beautiful. But in this particular street, this is the best landscaping. I will support that. He does maintain his properties very well, and I'm surprised
that he left the trash out for a month. I will amend my motion. Before you do, I just want to just put something out there. Um, first of all, with the diff the distinction, I think in my mind with regard to this in the first case is that the one was trash.
This is, you know, brush debris, which does is not as offensive. Number one. Number two, you know, I thought that when we were kind of going through, you know, these these meetings and we were talking about enforcement that one of the things that we wanted to make sure that we did was
at least make sure that we recognize the work that the uh co-compliance officers are doing, which is why we wanted to stick to that $250 uh administrative fee. Um, you know, I so I I don't know. I mean, to me, if I were weighing, you know, dropping one or the other, I would drop the the fine
aspect of it. um butressed by what what the homeowner just said as well. That's fine. I just there needs to be some level if you prefer that I amend my motion and we charge the admin fee versus the violation fine. I am totally
fine with that. That that's what I'd like to see done. I think that the village has spended time to uh notify the property owner and take pictures and bring it to work with the time that I will amend my motion that
in CE25-0183 a violation has occurred. We will wave the violation fine, assess a $250 administrative fee to be paid by August 1st and other than that close the case after
the fine is paid. I'll second. All in favor? I oppose. Motion passes 40. Thank you, sir. The next item is 6.9. It's for the address 11503 Northeast 11th place. It's for the case number
CN-22-116. Sandra Patricia Corzo. Um, I'm sorry, I was busy writing agenda number again. 6.9. What was okay and again the address is 11503
Northeast 11th Place the case number is CN22-116 Sandra Corso we are here asking Miss Coror to give the board a progress report on her driveway. She has a very unique situation with her driveway. You will
remember she has appeared before this board before. Um, and we had violated her for the driveway, but she'll explain. She'll give us a progress report. If I'm reading correctly, it looks like the last communication
is May 20 May of 2024 and apparently they are still waiting on the bills. Has anything changed? Yes. Go ahead. If you would identify yourself and your relationship to the
property. Hi, my name is Sandra Corso and I'm the property owner. Um, yeah, I met with uh Miss Grant. Um, unfortunately due to um I have a health condition and I felt ill and I had to stop working due to the condition that I
have. So that's the reason why I stopped. Um, I I explained everything to Miss Grant. I actually broke my records, my health records and that's the reason why I had to stop I had to stop working and I had to stop my business. I had to
close permanently. Um I did went to her I'm going to stop start the permits and all that. Um I don't know if I had to explain what I have. Um truly I I empathize. My concern is how we get this
solved because this case actually started in December of 2022. Yeah. No. And when I started everything, when I got my with as you can see. I'm sorry. Go with me. No. And and when I started and I came and I did everything and I started working with you guys and I did
everything that I was supposed to do. No in the beginning to do a break. No. and and I came and I did I the the moving of the driveway last year and I came and I did all that but unfortunately I have epilepsy and I started having episodes
on a monthly basis last year when I did that I started having them in June when I was going to start the work I started having them June July and then on all that so I stopped working and I have my own business so do I apologize you just
have a second to ask yeah what do we know exactly what is missing. So yes, it was indicated in the plans. Um when she came to the office, we did pull what the comments were in the from the
building department and we gave her I think there was a misunderstanding between what the building uh department was telling her and what planning and zoning was telling her. And this is why we brought this case as a progress report. The fines on this case have run up to $110,000. Now I needed Miss Corzo to come and
explain her health situation. Yeah. Which I brought everything here and that's the reason why basically I stop like between all that it it was crazy for me because that's something that I didn't have like my my episode happened like no no like every like a year every
three years something like that. It wasn't something so recently. So so where we are now is the permits have expired that she had applied for at the time. We are starting over. We have all the information and she knows exactly what she now needs to submit. We are literally starting over with the permits
um process. And what I'm going to do is I had two permits. Remember the driver and the slab. So since my situation changed, I'm not going to do the slab because that's basically I don't need that's not something that I'm not in violation. So the slab I'm going to leave it alone. Uh so I'm going to do the driveway. I had the contractor that
I had on file revise the contract that I did with him. So that's why I haven't submit the the permits because he's going to send me a new one so I can submit it with the the form that you guys sent to me. So I wanted to talk to you about that so that way when I submit the permit we know that it's only it's
going to be one. It's not going to be two. So the other one I'm just going to basically leave it alone. What you need to do. Yeah. So I'm gonna So that's why I wanted it to say it. So we basically just forget about one for now and do the one that I need to do. Misso, I I have a
question. So, as you reasonably anticipate right now, in light of your condition uh and and where you are presently, uh is is do you foresee that you'll be able to to go forward with getting this permit and then getting the
work done as you just indicated? We like I have I'm still not able to work. Well, I mean, you're not doing the driveway, are you? Huh? You're not doing the driveway, are you? Well, I I was able to pull up some funds and No, no. I mean, you're not going to be digging up the driveway and doing it. You're having
somebody do it for you, right? Yeah. No, I'm not doing it. No. That's So, that's my question. My question is simply, do you reasonably anticipate that where you are right now that you'll be able to go through the process, the permit gets done, and you'll be able to get the guy to do the driveway? The driveway. Yeah. So, I'm going to be submitting the per
like I was explaining to her, I had to redo all my finances and all that. So, I'm going to be doing the driveway. I'm not I'm taking some things off that I was planning to do so that way my finance can work with what I can do and take all these things out and take care
of what I'm supposed to do. Just real quick question. Um this is for the village. So basically the previous plans were they good to go or so well they expired? They expired but
they w the per the permit wasn't issued. So she was in process if you remember. Well, this is the driveway that had the oak tree and that I had to move. I remember the tree were not issued but they were in
process. Go ahead. Had it gone to PNZ and it did go to PNZ. They approved the existing plans. It was approved. Everything just needs to be resubmitted. Wait a minute. So it should be an easy process if
nothing has changed. Absolutely. Are you basically keeping my question to you now are you keeping the same format? The only thing that I'm not doing is the slab. Okay. And that's I just taking the thing that I was going to do to for the tree the slab that it was putting the
pressure on the roots. That's not I'm not going to be doing I got I got that ma'am. So is it realistic to say three um and this is for the village also for um B&Z three hearings would that um be sufficient time? Correct. Okay. Yes.
And and right with that with that all of that said we would ask the board's lenency. We're not supposed to ask for lenency to stop the fines from running until she goes through this process. She had a major health issue and the fines are at
110,500 as of today. If they can stop the fines today, we will make sure we work with her to go through the process and then she once the permit is issued, she can come back and apply for I look at it this way, we should stop the daily fines, set the deadline that you've
suggested, then if that deadline isn't met in the August meeting, we can decide whether to reinstate the fines. But yes, it's enough at this point. Stop them. And like I said, I I was I mean, I came I did all that and I wasn't
going to stop do like if I was going through all that. Got it. It was just Yeah. Zip it right now. No, but like I said, I just want to make sure that the slab is something that I'm not that I'm not going to do. Okay. So, yeah. Okay. We got it. Okay. Okay. Okay.
All right. I'd like to make a motion um on case number CEN-22-116 um to uh request that the village stop uh assessing the daily fine, give the property owner until August the 6th to have a fully issued um permit and paid
for uh by August the 6th. If not, um the fines are to resume uh with the as of date today. A second. I have a first and a second. All in favor? I. Any opposed? Motion
passes 40. Okay. You have until August 6th to get your permit completely in place. The daily fines are now stopping, but if you don't meet that deadline, the daily fines will resume back to today's date. Okay. So, submit the the permit
and I can do everything you need to do. Okay. So, once I submit the permits, I can just start the work. No, you have to have a permit. Okay. Yeah. They has still has to go back before P&Z. That's why we gave you three meetings. That's going to be about
uh uh two, four, six, a month and a half, almost two months. August the 4th is the last meeting. So, you have three meetings you can attend to. Okay. Because I'm dummy when it comes to this. So that's why I want to help you. Okay. Cuz I'm a dummy when it comes to that.
So I want to make sure. No, you're fine. And good luck to you. This and then I just get the permit or you got to go through PNC. She'll walk you through it. But you'll get it. I'm sure. Then I start. Then you start. Let them start. Then after the
Thank you so much. Good luck. The next item is 7.2. 7.2 is for the address 867 Northeast 118th Street. It's for case number CN-23-337. It's Louis Henrique Samosa. We're asking
for an order of enforcement. They were found to be in violation of chapter 5.6 off street parking. The driveway does not meet standards. As of today, we do not have a permit issue. If I'm reading the notes
correctly, it was approved in November of 23, but in April of 24, there were additional items that were required. And it looks like the last communication
is January of this year. Is there anything more recent than that that we know of? No. So, six months. So, correct. This is another one of those cases that have fallen through the cracks because they applied for the permit and there was the
assumption that they've applied for the permit and everything is good but the permit hasn't been issued as of today and and what was the specific reason why it wasn't issued there is ask for more documentation
pages I believe the uh value of the project I believe was what was missing. I'm looking for that. I can't find it. It's been on hold um by the Yeah, it's April the 11th. It was on 2024. It's
placed on hold by the building official market value of the work. Right. That's April and last year. Oh, I see. So 14 or 14 months there's been no further communication.
So the only was missing was saying the job is going to cost 5,000 or 10,000 or whatever. Right. So the building official will look at the the overall numbers and if it's below what the estimates are
he he he doesn't this is another prove it actually a three-year-old kid opened in uh June 7th of 2022 that when it started and the notice of violation a year, not quite a a little
over a year later. Okay. Questions from the board? None. Sir, if you would identify yourself and your relationship to the property. Uh yes. Good evening. Uh thank you. Uh speak up if you can hear. Sure.
Thank you. uh Luis Samosa and uh I'm the property owner. You explain sir why uh you were asked back in it looks like April of last year to provide the uh reasonable market value
of the work and there's been apparently no communication with the city. Yes. Um so um back in 2023 um when I quoted the project it was uh
so that uh I I calculated the project uh from the standpoint that I was going to do a lot of the work. Uh and so what you see there is uh the
cost of material um and without cost of labor. Apparently the city doesn't have it because that's what they're asking for. And that's that that that's what I'm struggling with is that it seems like
you went, you know, through a football analogy, you're on the one yard line and they just asked for how much is it going to cost and you didn't provide them with how much it was going to cost to get in the end zone to get your permit. No, no, no, no. Uh basically I did the calculations based and if you can see in the application itself I did
calculations for for the the area and uh what I was I thought was going to be needed because if you look at the application uh uh have that sir that would be under planning zone we're here.
Uh I can I can show you. No, it's just the violation that we Okay. So, so in in there, um it states that it is for uh repair or uh of the driveway or uh uh uh
fix or let me just pull up. So, I'm not sure you're you're understanding, sir. We don't need to know the calculations, the cost. We don't need to worry about we're trying to determine why the hangup. This is case that started two and a half almost three years ago. Well,
three years ago. Yes. There's a tiny missing piece that's been missing for over a year and okay, we need to figure how you're going to get into compliance. So, yeah. So, what happened was that
after the got the approval, um I started I went in and started uh cleaning the driveway. Wait, wait. You never got the approval. You didn't get the permit. They said there was one thing left to do. They needed you to just provide how much did you say think it was going to
to to be. How much was the cost going to be? I believe what you're saying is that you put some kind of a a number in the application. Yes. Okay. Let's set that aside for a second. Did you ever did did you receive a communication from this from the village that asked you a question to respond to? Um it was mixed
communication that I received. I received a communication where there was uh and I I I just I saw that um basically to update the amount in the in the application and and resubmit
um the application with the updated amount. All right. So you got that right? But then later there was a withdrawal of that request. There was what? A withdrawal of that request by the village as well. Yes. Okay. Hold on a second.
Dorene, what? So, Mr. uh Samosa, yes. Said that uh that he got the communication that he needed to submit the the estimate, but then he said that he received a withdrawal of
that request. Do you have any record of that? Yes. Okay. Well, it was just basically he was told that a permit should be for a new driveway. Yeah, but that was in January of this year. January of this year. That's not a rever. Okay. In reality, there still is
the responsibility. Yes. Of every property owner to follow through. If you get a piece of information from the village that you're not understanding, that's not jing. You've got to follow it. You've got whether it's on team,
whatever it takes. You don't let something sit for over a year. Wait, Mr. Samoszi, see see the the the application itself is for a repair and replace. So it stated 1,800
and that's what was approved for a a repair replace not for a new drive is new because what replacing is new, right? And that was justified using the
following image that was added later as an attachment. And that uh basically I like to show you because what sir I don't mean to interrupt it but I am um the it it's from what the reason we're
here is you do not have a permit right. I didn't and it's been since um uh uh 2022 uh since you were given a courtesy notice. The last communication was in April of uh April
11th, 2024. Um, and we're here now. So, what's happened before, what you submitted, okay, is somewhat irrelevant. At this point, they're saying you need a new driveway, which is basically has been the case, repair or fix, whatever
is or replace. It's still a new because it was over 50% deteriorated. Yes. But but let me let me sir just finish. Um so that's where we are now. It's not about what's there. What can we do to resolve
this? Do you have your um uh documents ready and can you move forward with submitting a um a permit or about how long? Where are you? Yes. So um just so bear with me one second please. Um, so,
uh, in 23 he got approved and he didn't get approved. No, no, he got approved. Yes, that's what I mean. No, I didn't submit a permit uh request. I didn't submit that because
I know that the permit uh is three months, six months and and expires but I Yes. is here because but I haven't requested a permit. Did it
fall through our cracks? Is that or his cracks? I haven't I haven't requested a permit. Okay. Basically, just make sure basically once I got the approval on November 6 that uh the the the the driveway and you got to start over. Yes.
But please bear with me one second. after that session then one goes and gets a permit to then do the work. So I didn't do that part because the the
the landscape of the driveway was not ready for it. And in December I started doing some cleanup of the of the of the of the driveway. What happened then in January? By the by
January, at the beginning of January, I got uh a health I I got diagnosed with a a condition and the doctor told me, "Hold it." So, I hold back and then still with that in mind, I I
knew I went in and I had to cut trees. The the trees I cut the trees we understand. Bear with me one second, please. Bear with me. I need you to wrap it up. Yes. So the the hurricane season came in. I cut all the trees. I cleaned
everything preparing for then be able to apply for the permit to then be able to do do the work. That was in 2024. Now you're now in 2020. I had a family member who was diagnosed with a terminal
condition and I have been dealing with that until this march where he he passed away. Okay. So in in the midst of all of this uh I try to clean up and I I try to
uh uh handle that. But I knew that if I go in and I I I get the permit and I'm not ready, the permit will expire and it will continue doing that because I I was not ready to carry on. So realistically
speaking, would you be able to have everything in place, properly applied for, paid, etc. by August 6th? That would give you three planning and zoning meetings to attend and have the permit
hopefully approved and paid for by August 6. Can we realistically do that, sir? I Yes. You you you want you want me to get the permit and then then do the work do the work before the get the permit by August 6. Yes. Yes.
Before August 16th. But you got to start over again. You know that, right? You got to start over. Do you mean start over? You got to resubmit your permit because that one's expired. It's like old milk. It's over. This This is Yeah. Over. Yep. You got to start over. Yeah.
Really? But this is active in the system. It's oh it's the same plan. It's nothing. It'll be easy. It'll be easy, but you got to go through the process again and and and and it will it will be um you said three sessions from now.
What I'm saying, sir, it would give you the chance if your first trip to planning and planning and design review doesn't get approval, you have two more meetings to do what they need you to do for approval. We try to give several
meetings on things more complicated and driveways can be complicated. So realistically speaking, can you get everything you need together and apply and obtain that permit by August 6th? That's eight weeks
from today. So okay. uh and uh first planning if you get with the village within the next week or so then you'll be able to have um move forward July 7th July 7th but you have to have all your your new permit and your documentation
to the village um by probably by the end of June. That's two weeks from now. If not, then there's one on July 21st, which you would need to have your documentation there by about July the 10th. So that would approximately,
right? Yes. And then if you failed to do that one, there's a third one which would be August the 4th, and you would need to have the information there by about July the 23rd or 24th, somewhere
around there. always uh a week or so before the um hearings they have to have. So So and and what why is this uh not uh have to deal with Yeah. So that you deal with staff at village hall in the
building department. That is not us again. You're here in front of us. We need to determine if there was a violation how to get you into compliance. those technicalities you deal with the planning, excuse me, the
building department. Okay. So, if there are no more questions, I will there anything you understand now? We really need to go. I want to be clear. You need to go into village hall, meet
with the folks in the building department. that they will help you to see what you've got to fill out. Again, got to go online and do that. And then you will hopefully make that first planning and design review meeting just in case there are problems, you'll have
two more meetings. Okay. In I'm going to make a motion in CN23-337, a violation has occurred. Assess a $250 violation fine, 250 admin fee, give the
property owner until August 6th to pull and pay for a proper permit. If not, a $250 daily fine after that. I'll second. First and a second. All in favor? I. Any
opposed? Motion passes 4 Z. Thank you, sir. Next item 6.1 in old business for the address 640 Northeast 115th Street. This for case number CN-24-625,
Ricardo Jose Lucenna and Johanna Lucenna. They're here for a fine reduction. They have lean fines that have accured to $44,750. They were found to be in violation of section 16.13.1
building permits required. They had constructed a structure in the rear of the property without first obtaining permits. The building uh department had given them a choice to get permits or remove the building. They chose to remove the building and are now in
compliance. An affidavit of compliance has been filed for the violation. I have to say, um, anybody got it? I'm going to make sure everybody's on the same page.
Okay. Uh, I have to say I feel like this property owner has shown good faith. When you look at how quickly they paid the violation fine and the admin fine, it had to be the second they got the order because our meeting that month was the
6th. It was paid by the 14th. They've come into compliance. They took the structure down. really when you consider some of the other things we see in very short order. I'm going to go out and put on a limb and say I'm perfectly
comfortable with the $2,000 offer. Yeah, I was reading over on the request what they were were the reasoning behind what happened with the contract and I did notice that the fin was paid and the administrative fee so quickly. Yeah.
Very quickly with the 3% added I I feel there's been total good faith. If anybody else were discussion, I concur. $2,000 is our recommendation as well. Um, nobody has any other questions.
Would you like to add anything? Nothing more than an apology. I just want to thank you both very much taking advantage of compliance for showing such good faith. Much appreciated. Thank you so much. So I make my formal motion in
CN24-625. The property has come into compliance. The property owner has offered a fine reduction paying in the amount of $2,000. I would vote that we accept that. I'll second. Pay by date.
paid by what? August 1st, right? Okay. Paid by August 8th. All in favor? I 1st. Thank you. August 1st. All in favor? I motion passes 4 Z. Thank you both. Thank
you very much. Have a great night. Thank you. Thank you. Good luck. Next item 6.4 4 for the address 11320 Northeast 11th place. It's for the case number CN-24-274
JNB Management Associate LLC in favor of the registered agent Vantipool Jason M. We're here asking for an intent to lean. Outstanding fines are $41,750. non-compliant as of today. Onto the
record, P PDWS-25004. Um, the permit has been issued. However, the driveway has not been installed. Was May of last year. Weren't we here on this property for another reason? Yes. I think that it was a Was that you that
was here? That was I didn't come to the last meeting. Mother-in-law. Okay. Well, I thought another young man came and he was like a contractor and he said, "I'm the new guy on the job and I'm gonna take care of things." Was that you? It wasn't me, but it was our contract. The new one, David. Yeah.
Okay. Okay. I haven't seen much done after that. April, April 21st. 2025. The comply by date was November of last year. The permit was issued April of this year. I mean, it still looks like it's getting
I mean, it's still like is there anything happening to it to the property? Yes, we we're limping towards the finish line for lack of a better term. It's finances. Would your name and your relation Jason um co-owner of the property? um we've been limping towards
the finishing line because finances of course have been the biggest issue for us dealing with the hard money loan and keeping that going and not in foreclosure and stuff like that. So right now um as of last week the property has been painted and the backyard has been turf has been put
down. So not turf but um sod sorry. So, we're getting ready to get it listed, but as you know, with renovations, driveway is usually the last we had the construction fence in place. Uh, up until right now, it's still in place.
We're um getting rid of that probably when, where would you think, probably about next week. Um, then we can start laying the the driveway cement down cuz there's still work going on on the outside of the property and driveway would have um probably been the last
thing. I actually have the permit is pulled like you said of as of um April. I have a proposed um new layout because we took the suggestion of the permit uh the driveway company to put it off to the left side of the property. I don't
know if you have access to the permit but we want to move it closer to the property to or if you make that sort of a change you're going to have to start all over again. Can that's why I wanted to just bring an example. It's the same way they're going to do the driveway. I mean, the same foundation, the same
everything. It's just shifted a little bit. That makes all the difference in the world because setbacks have to be looked at again. Move that driveway. You're going to start all over again. Can Can I show Can I just show you guys
what what is there? We have six copies of Unfortunately, so that doesn't change anything. It can be the same identical material, but if you're putting it somewhere else, you've got to do theations all over again.
Can't do it on this permit. Yeah. The thing is, I think what they're saying is that you got to go through the process. But my question is is that you said that uh you got the the the sad in the back, everything is done in the outside. I guess ex almost because that's why we
couldn't do the driveway previously because if we do the driveway we have to take the fence and then we're going to get fined because the house is not fenced you know we had to uh I mean not prime uh how you call that my
own personal opinion for whatever that means what you're wanting to do makes sense but problem is you have to start it again but but you you said that it's usually the Last thing is everything done on the inside in the back and you're just going
to almost. That's what I said. The exterior we we're pretty much done with everything that needs to be done on the inside. It was just like countertops and stuff like that. And we do have to connect the septic. So that's still some exterior work that needs to be done. Um,
if y'all don't mind, I'd just like to make a suggestion because we're only here for for the driveway and I must admit I I think for the value of the property um going back I mean would would do it. So we did when we did this
with the previous um res property owner and that was to allow them till August 6th and suspend the daily fines. because I believe there's still daily fines. Yeah. No, they I think they have been stopped. The daily fine sort of
stopped when Oh, yes. Okay. On that. Well, uh to um Well, August 6 have to resubmit a new um revision. Does that have to give us the six? You basically got the same format.
You're going to have to do your survey or whatever as well as the walkway, I would think. Yes. Um, so that's going to give you the same amount of time as about 8 weeks. That would be my suggestion. And then if
it is not done by August 6, then we don't move. Will this need to be going go in front of another hearing? PNZ. PNZ. And when is the next one? Well, the one that you'd be able to make would be July 7th would be the next. But there
are three meetings between now and the date we've given you. So something goes Oh, we're we're trying to get it done as fast as possible. We need to get the June the 23rd, but you wouldn't get that documentation in
already. You have that hearing. Um, and I don't know if you have all your drawings and everything for already there. So that's why I was suggesting July 7th gives you a couple weeks to get all that stuff together. Uh that would be the first one and then
if they needed something you know you could get it to them back by July 1st or if you can't get it all there you could work with the village on that but that gives you three meetings and they meet every two weeks have your documentation in about a week
but right now there's no way we can we can have an exception at any point to get us we're just trying to give you an opportunity if you want to make a change otherwise just go on and do what we go ahead and do it but we're giving my suggestion would be I wouldn't try
because no no what I'm saying is like just go with the first plan or or going with the first plan that we I mean I I think that we have been already approved terrific but yeah but it's taking time and we're trying to we don't have that much time on the loan we're trying
because the loan going to be ending by September we need to do something fast So, right. I mean, you can by the green light. No, but we have to repeat. You know, I'd still like for y'all to make up your mind. If I may make a motion, please. Before you do, I just want to
ask one question. When the construction fences around it, that that that's not a, you know, get out of jail free card where they they still got to come into compliance with the driveway or is because it's ostensibly still under construction, right? It's a construction site. Yes. So, why are we I mean, I'm
just trying to understand why we're here on this one. is an active construction site and we're going with the driveway when I believe I believe this driveway violation was issued when Yeah. And driveway while it was still under construction though. Yeah. And we've been and everybody know me and the and
the city because I've been I've been telling them you know the driveway is last. We cannot do the driveway if we still have the fence around. But even before we had start having to have the fine even after even last week I always
go sorry hold on a second on the type of project that they're doing if it's a brand new house then the driveway comes last because they have to build the house but this structure has been there for a very long time and they've yeah we issued violations for different things. They've been under construction for at
least how many years? It's been a while. I know a while different things. They didn't come and get one permit for construction for everything. That's what I'm saying is then, you know, once that fence goes around, doesn't it kind of, you know, put all that stuff in, you know, on hold
until the end? The drive the driveway, I would think, but the fence didn't go uh the fence didn't go up until after the order of enforcement, right? Yes. See, there was no no the fence been there.
The fence been there for a long time. the the con the construction fence. Yes. Cuz I remember we issued violations for the fence, the white little picket fence in the back. Yeah. Because you said several issues because you said the white pick and fence needed to be painted and then I think few of the
thing was done and we everything we fixed. Everything they give us we fixed. Because I'm I'm thinking that this violation is premature. I mean I don't know that it's violation. No, but I I think we're trying to stop it, helping
rectify all of it. It's already there, right? Okay. Was from enforcement was from August the 7th of 2024. It's about a year. So, it's just coming back. Notice notice lean and doing like not to
lean. Give them an opportunity either to put in the driveway, remove the fence and all if you felt ready to and to be eight weeks. So, if you're close enough to being that do we have to have a fence?
Quick, let me ask you a quick question. Your permits are for interior um renovations. I I would have to check. There was some on the outside. We look it up because I'm I'm thinking the reason why they might have issued the violation for the driveway is because
their permits were for interior work. So that driveway would have been in violation. You don't need a construction fence to do interior work. Okay. But they added on something. We have a septic did a garage conversion. Yeah. They asked us
to put the the fence construction. Yes. I think they got in trouble because it wasn't up or something at one point. Exactly. We we almost got fined because we didn't have a fence and then we came and put the fence and then they and then you know we cannot do a driveway with a fence on it and we cannot take out the
fence. We cannot take out the fence if the work outside work is not done. I'd like to help you, which is still just giving you some time and you can if if you're unable, you need to talk to the village about coming back and asking for
an extension or something. But my motion given that you're seem to have things in place and want to to do something a little different, this will give you an opportunity for you to decide. But if I may make a motion on case number CEN-24-274,
that um we give the property owner until August the 6th to have a um the driveway installed. No permit. The permit has permit. No, no, no. They
have a permit. They could they listen to have the driveway installed, but we can't give them the rest of the permit just All right. Well, your original All right. Um, give them
till uh it what I want to do is give them till August the 6th to start something. Well, well, maybe maybe we should just do um have this reset to August.
I'm thinking what what would you think, Dale? Um that we table this in the August meeting by then you will have decided are you going forward with what you already have or are you redoing
and then I mean those fines are still out there and if things don't start to happen in a more timely manner we do have the ability to put an intent to lean which makes I know your financing and everything difficult so you want to get moving but rather than back and
forth give you folks some time figure out what you want to do. Come back for our August meeting with this. Is it August 6th? Okay. Can you be available? Please be available for the August meeting. For the August 6th
meeting, if we decided if we decided to change the to move the driveway at this time, we're going to have to have the permit for that time. You're going to have to a new permit, right? So, if you're thinking that, I would suggest
getting one of the PN planning and design review board meetings between now and then. But that also gives you time to make that consideration. Are you just going to go with what you have and move or flip it? And then you
have three meetings you can go to. But let's table this for the moment suggested and we come back in August meeting. Yeah. or you come back in August and say we decide to go with the first way and it's done. I have a question. Most of your permits are
expired. Your remodeling permits, your work for the outside. You guys need to go to the building department and tell them what your plans are with that building. Are you going forward with the work? Are you selling the property? Because I don't see
right. So, I don't see how installing the driveway will result and then you're selling it and then you need to have a clear plan of what's going on with the property and then we can go forward from there. Yeah. I would like to table this.
Yeah. To give you an a few weeks to decide what are your plans you're going to put on the market to sell it. Yeah. I'm not telling you what to do, but I'll second that. Well, my motion would be on case number CN-24-7
um to table until the August. Second. All in favor? I. Any opposed? Motion passes 40. We will see you folks in August. Thank you. Thank you. Good luck. Thank you both.
The next item is 610 sorry 6 point 10 1 0 6.10. The address is 11638 Northeast 7th Avenue. It's case number CN-24-21. Patrice
Cohen and Elizabetha Font Fontton Panton intent mount outstanding is $27,250. The plans that were submitted by Mr. Cohen for a carport were not accepted by the building official. In fact, the
notes um say um if I'm not mistaken that those are not real plans. They are not actual plans. It was like something that was pulled from and I'm paraphrasing or quoting somebody else may have been pulled from online or maybe from they're
not sure but they say those plans were not authentic. They didn't have a architect seal so they they cannot be reviewed at all. So Patrick Cohen, yeah, I had read it because I believe basically it said P plans are not signed
or sealed, but in any case, please do not um please do not consist with the unprofessional approach to the project. These are not real structural plans as required, which I quickly learned. made it very clear over and over since this
started and it's like I don't know what else they can explain. Patrice Cohen, 11638 Northeast 7th Avenue. Yes, ma'am. Now, this started a while ago and every step of the way the village has explained what they needed
and you keep reiterating it's sold at every Lowe's and Home Depot. That is so not relevant to the case. There are still requirements. You know, if you buy this in Billings, Montana, that might be one requirement. You buy it in Dade County, it's got to follow the proper
structural rules which have been explained to you. Can can I explain the situation? So, I came here, I wanted the permit. I told you that last meeting that was here that I had deposited the plans. I'm not
an architect. I found a cheap architect. I got screwed. I deposited the plans and you guys gave me a certain date from which the fines would start. Okay. I went I called I went to the office that day of because I had received online
saying that the pl my permit would be available. The plans are under review and would be available on that exact same day. I went to the building to get the permit. They told us it hasn't been reviewed yet. And I even spoke to Raphael. I say, "Hey, I don't want to start getting fined." I submitted the
plans on time. At that moment, I didn't know that the plans were bogus. So, I back and forth started with the uh I think the engineer from the city saying, "Okay, this needs to be addressed. This needs to be addressed. This needs to be addressed." And I started relaying that
to the bogus architect that I was dealing with. This needs to be addressed. This needs to be addressed. Point by point, I think there was like 12 points. And ultimately, we ended up with three missing points. the survey that wasn't stamped, the signature and the stamp from the architect that was
bogus. That's when I started realizing that I was getting screwed. And every time I'm paying and then there was also um the metric he was the sizing he was giving it to us in European sizes versus American sizes. I had to get a new survey done. In the meantime, I got rid
of that architect engineer and I got a new engineer to start from scratch and I got a new survey. And now I showed uh Raphael, I'm getting those new plans tomorrow. I want to get this permit as well as you. I don't want this off my plate. Now I remember seeing Raphael and
told him, I don't want to get fined here. I submitted the plans and I'm going back and forth with the city. I'm working with you guys trying to fix this. I shouldn't be fined. He says, "No, no, don't worry. I don't know what was happening. I'm in that department at that time if the person analyzing the plans." And then that back and forth
happened for about six weeks of back and forth between me, the guy from the city to address each issue. You weren't providing what was necessary. I'm like I said, I'm not an architect. So I take what he was telling me this needs to be and I send it to that is why the daily
fine started. You were not providing what was necessary by the appropriate time. As it is, when we first heard this case, and I remember because I made the motion on it, we did not assess a citation fine nor an administrative fee
because we were giving you the benefit of the doubt. And here because I had submitted the plans that day that I came here, those plans and like that's the proof that I want to get this done. I'm not going to spend, you know, how much money I spent so far and with bogus architects and I have to start all over again. But again, as we all know as
homeowners in your city, it falls on us. Absolutely. And I I agree with you, but if if the city person in charge of the city took to the last day where the day where you guys are going to start finding me to start analyzing the plans, I mean, if I disappear, I ghost the city
and I don't submit anything and there's no back and forth, I understand. But I submitted the plans from before the fines were supposed to be levied and I've been going back and forth and I had confirmation from Raphael that I wouldn't get fined on a daily basis.
here. You were told the fine didn't begin until March 1st. You were told on February 19th. Plans are not signed nor sealed. So, it was two weeks before. Yeah. And I I could submit you guys evidence that I sent it
all this information what you guys were the guy was telling me. I was sending it to the architect. Like I said, I'm not I can't sign. If it was up to me, I would have signed off on this a long time ago. You didn't know until after the fines started. I didn't know I didn't know what the city was saying
about those plans until the fines started that before the fines even started. If you look on the system, it said you're going to get an answer by the from the city
communication with you. Okay. But then I resubmit new plans what I what I got from the architect and it goes back and forth. Okay. Okay, we go receive your plans. We're going to analyze them, get back to you by this date. There's a back and forth happening. This lasted like six weeks. Oh,
the signature is not acceptable. Yeah. And then at that point, I started new plans with the new architect. And what is the status of that right now? I got an email when I was coming in that I'm getting it in 12 hours. So, if I do get it tomorrow, I'll
combine. But even then, that has to get approved. Exactly. And I have to wait for the approval of those plans. But now I took another a legit architect that's not going to And this architect, you told him that he
needs to have, you know, plans that are sealed, sealed, signed, every everything needs to be because I went through this. I spent two grand on the other architect. Cost me more than this this stupid cardboard. This is a nice cardboard. You just everybody loves. But the problem is it's not a standard
carport. So it's like everybody doesn't really know how you don't see it everywhere. But I'm like, come on. It's a purple. I said to someone earlier tonight, the advantage to pull in your permit first. Einlight 2020. You have any other
questions? I would like to make a motion that in case CEN24-21, we give the property owner until July 23rd to have a fully executed and paid for permit. If not, the city files the
intent to leave. I'll second. All in favor? I. Any opposed? Motion passes. Thank you. Can I ask you a question though? 23rd, sir. Okay. And what if there's a new back and forth? What if something new? Because these are new plans that I'm getting done. Talk to these fine folks. Okay. And they can
bring you back for an extension. But I am I ask Raphael. I see them all the time. I been with Whole Foods. Who was the second? Who seconded the motion? Thank you guys. Have a good morning. Thank you. The next item is 7.8. 8 and it's for the
address 11505 Northeast 11th Place case number CE-25-0355 Miter 2 LLC in care of the registered agent Cabrera Rioto L we ask
he wasn't May I read the case and then he gets sworn in before he can speak please asking for an order of enforcement they were found to In violation of section 16.14.1 double feed permits, they installed a driveway without first obtaining
permits. Please raise your right hand. Do you swear or affirm that the testimony about to give will be the truth, the whole truth, and nothing but the truth? Yes, you can pick up the Oh, there Dorian. So, has the permit been applied for?
No, they haven't applied for a permit. Has there been any has there been any communication with the village? We have tried to reach out to them several times. I actually spoke to someone onsite um and they said, "Oh, we're gonna get I spoke with you, right?" Yes. We're gonna get the permits and
so forth back and forth, but I see that the property is now for sale and we don't and we don't have a permit for the driveway. Just looking at it, I'm going, you're going to have issues with PNZ.
Yep. because it doesn't even come to the swale and then that pave stuff in front doesn't come up the code either anyway that's just no that's okay apply so I did have Oh I'm sorry
uh my name is Rio I'm the owner of the property so I did have uh GC do the whole thing because I had first gotten this violation I remember way back when I paid the fees way you installed the walkway without the driveway Right. So I
we got a permit. I believe it was for both. Um that's what it was. I believe and different times. It was separate times. I only have one walkway and then a driveway. No, I understand. But I think you guys had bundled it into one.
We had a separate violation for the walkway. Yeah. Okay. I think I only have one notice running on the property for that. There is I because I paid whatever I needed to pay and I've come to every single hearing that I've been notified on. Did
you get the permit for the walkway? So I had a GC. He went to the city and he ended up not doing anything. Just took the money and run. Have the permit? No. And to be honest, I'm just going to rip it all off. I don't I don't have time for me to put in permits or any of that.
I'm just going to put landscaping on it. Um, and that's just going to be a much quicker way. I, you know, was coming and figuring, oh, doing the math in terms of time, and it's just not going to be enough time. So, I'm just going to go ahead and rip it off and just put, you
know, landscaping, saw, and all that other good stuff. You're still going to have to deal with those lanes at some point. Well, that I'm kind of curious because I I've come to every single one and I paid everything on time the last time
violation fine and the administrative cost, but when you don't get the permit, you're still in violation. I see. Okay. Even though that they told me it would stop if I paid on time the $500, but it would tell you that.
Okay. I see. So, how I don't even know what lean I have to be honest with you. You've been sending correspondence to the address in the text. The only correspondence that I have is the like the notices of coming
here. That's the only things that I've gotten to the registered agent. Yep. I'm every single I'm sorry it has come out. send them out certified and the mail comes back. However, we do
quote the property with every notice. No. And I I see it, I take it and I come here for these, but I don't have a notice of any type of lean. I've never received anything for that. I'm genuinely saying I've never got that notice. We do a hearing like this for
intent to lean and once we get the order, they give you time to correct. Has it shown that I've missed one of these meetings? Because I've shown up to every single one here. gotten an order force after meeting. Right. Right. And you would have gotten an order enforcement which would have given you
told you what your administrative costs were. Yeah. What your fine was and what your daily fine would be if you if you don't comply within a certain period. You didn't have the permit within that certain period after the day after that your fine would start to run. So from what I understand you don't have the
permit. So your fine for the walkway has been running since the day after you were to have the permit full I mean fully issued. I see. So even though I that's not what's for us right now. Okay. I will because I it be honest I was kind
of new to me. I did pay the 500 on time. I think I it took me like a week to pay it. So you want to go in and check things. Okay. Okay. Let's get to the driveway. Well, let me go for it. I've got finished. Any questions from the
board? Well, uh, no questions. I'd like to make a motion in case number CE-25-0355 that a violation has occurred. Assess the fine of $250, administrative cost of $250. Get the
property owner until um, August. Yeah, August the 5th. I was going to be July 25th, but August the 5th. August 6th, I mean, um, to have a fully issued and paid for permit. If not, a $250 per day fund thereafter.
I'll second. All in favor? Well, hold on before I So now, what if he what if he rips everything out like he said he was going to do? Village, if that's the case. Okay. But right now, he has he has a Right. Okay.
Right. So, when I take it out, what's the next step? Who do I go to? I can email you. Correct. Yes. I I Yeah. I just want to make sure you realize you have to have some type of parking and I
don't know if that in well in front of the the in the swale parking that's there. Is that up to code also? Has he been cited for that? Is that swell parking there? Yeah, there's there's a lot of barking in the front. That's why I'm not really needing
it. I don't know. I'm not saying I'm just saying I don't know if that means Yeah. Now I remember the swell area which was there park which was a parking space uh from before it hasn't reached its 50% deterioration. However, the
driveway needs to be done right. Right. Right. Yeah. I'm just going to rip it off. The approach is is not done right. Okay. No, the Yeah, I'm just going to rip it off 100%. So Oh, then you'll still have to install a driveway after you rip it out. Even though there's
plenty of parking in the front, you could fit like six cars there in the front. Just did the Yeah. Yeah. He needs that one then he's either way. Either pull the permit, right? That's not Yeah. I'm just telling have the permit pulled. Yes. If it's removed, that's solve the
issue. That's with them. Right. Sure. That's my motion. I second. Okay. And Jamie second it. I would like for you or have you get with one of the code enforcement officers. Yes. Because if you remove that driveway, I'm looking at what's existing. You're going to have a problem because it is not properly
boarded. And you remove that um driveway, you still got a whole section that is not properly boarded. Bordered bordered. And it needs to be Yes. It needs to be It needs to be in everything
needs to be the same. So you can't like put cinder blocks. The rest of it is one long nice piece of concrete. It needs to be uniform. That's the word I was looking for. Okay. That's not So I'll just get with them. And so we what we'll do, we can help you out. We'll site you
for maintenance once you remove the driveway and put a violation for maintenance just so we can follow up with you to do this front parking area correctly. Fair enough. Okay. Thank you, sir. Thank you. I'll vote I'll vote I on that motion
that was second. I didn't vote and J. Yes, we got that. Good luck. Thank you. On Friday, not tomorrow. We close tomorrow. At this point, we'll move to the addition part of the agenda, which is
five, section five, and um it's 5.1. The address is 820 Northeast 111th Street for case number CE-25-0477. We issued this violation today to Reyes Investments
820 LLC in care of their registered agent Reyes Raul. We are asking for an emergency order of enforcement. Um they have had multiple violations of parking construction vehicles on the median on
111 and 8th Avenue. We've received numerous complaints. This is a hot issue with the elected officials and um others uh residents. Um and we have tried verbal warnings. We have spoken with Mr.
Reyes um on several occasions encouraging him to have his construction vehicles parked in front of vehicles. Now the median is destroyed and we are asking the board to issue an order for him to fix that median immediately.
My concern is much as this is painful to see to see that the total disregard of so many for many don't we have a legal responsibility notice
I'm concerned that this will get kicked in a in a normal situation yes we can we have to give them um time But we are also as code officers allowed to discern where where we can um give the violator
um a violation for immediate compliance but without noticing even I'm not talking about going forward. I'm talking about even notice to get to um yes he did acknowledge receipt by the way. I'll just put that on the record. We emailed him and he replied saying he was going
to send someone. Um, I would have to clarify that, but we we wanted to get the order because it's an emergency order and we couldn't wait 10 days. We we had to give it right away. We did not. But the manager is aware. I
mean, I I'm really torn here. I want us to proceed. But I think we all do our best to focus on making sure our cases are solid and irrefutable. And my concern is is the definition of emergency.
I just can't make myself view a median as an emergency. And that's just me. I'm waiting for everybody else. No, I was just I mean because I my my issue was I not
an issue but I just I see commu maybe communication but there was no citation and were the vehicles um uh cited um I mean were there vehicles given a citation by the police office? So when you read the communication you'll you'll
notice that that um email that came in came in on a on a Saturday. So we were not available to issue evac. What did the police when the police when the police got to the scene as um the chief explains in the email they had moved the vehicles ah
that's right the other side. So they had to see they had to find the vehicles on the median for them to issue a citation. So and then I see because I see where um we had new codes or ordinances in for November. Um where are we with the signs
and and I I see the communication to the I guess the construction coordinator or manager or property owner or so that with the signs um I know this um
was passed by the commission um a while back but we we were waiting for the next budget season to be able to get allocation for the signs. the code budget is very used up and um we it's it's a huge
expense um for the signs to issue fines for the entire village and for every construction um site that's uh right I thought and I I don't know but I thought at one time on on the properties um being there was construction that they had to post a
bond uh for such things that's that got brought Yeah, do not remember the legalities, but I do remember two different of our village attorneys over a period of time explaining how we can't do that. And part of the problem,
I'm guessing also was proof who did it. Prove. Well, this is pretty much proof right here. I can see the vehicles on there, right? In this case, and because we have so many construction sites going on, right? Um, Mr. Re submitted photographs uh this afternoon
of another site that had a lot of damage in the median had to res after he finished construction. So this is not a new thing. You know it's the only issue with code is most of this stuff is happening when we are not here weekends
and late hours or we are not able to find them to issue the violation. And also when a violation happens like that on public property being done, you know, we we we see I mean I see it I mean I even see it around where I am right now
with some of the construction that's going on, right? as well as the residents who are currently um driving over the medians that so in this particular property we have received several viol um uh complaints um from the residents that live um on
that street and um how does everyone feel? Uh I have my concerns but it's up to all of you. Do you want to proceed with this? Do we want to perhaps consider having the attorney in and
calling a special meeting quickly as possible. I I'm hope What about um I I don't mind making a motion and and um on on the case and then uh uh with
with with the attorney approving mo or or weighing in on the motion with the attorneys. That makes sense. But before that happens, during um you know, an emergency is considered an exigent circumstance, right? Like if your house is on fire, that's an emergency. What
What is the village's What is your interpretation of the emergency that rose to the level of an exigent circumstance in this case? The sheer number of of complaints that we we've received and the level of the damage that has been done to the to the uh median. I view emergencies as life
safety. Uh a tree falls in the middle of the road, you know, these sort of things. Direct. So when I say emergency order, let me explain. I didn't we were not looking at the order that we are get get
getting as the emergency pertains to the actual violation. The emergency was we are issuing a violation that is immediate and we need that emergency to bring it to the border so we can get a quick order. Okay. place. And the reason why you did that
was because you've been overwhelmed with complaints by village residents that are in and around the area. Frustrated and and for as with good reason, right? I mean, and and I would just also like to point out that I believe on that 111 street they own two properties, one of
which is completely empty right now and there is parking on the side of their road. Right. They they have two construction sites owned by the s the right contractor and they have space in the swell where they could park. But as you can see the picture that was sent by one officials
was they were they had their equipment right they they even offloaded bricks and and blocks. They were using the median as a work site. I think the median literally as a as a like the work site. That's absolutely we cannot encourage
it. We cannot and our police officers can't sight them. So police officers can give them they find them on the median if they find the vehicle on the median on arrival. They didn't. But we have pictures of them. Well, that was the
code. Right. Right. That's where we can call the cops and say, "Hey, can you come over here and give these um uh uh give these vehicles a citation?" Just a recommendation. Before I can You can ask the police for a record. They've
cited not in this particular situation but before. I know they've been cited for knocking on the median is will the developer fight this because how do we justify not giving them 10 days notice the meeting? That's my
core concern. Anybody like to restage that? I'm all ears. But that's my because we can't justify it as an emergency. as far as what we usually think of emergency and we didn't give 10
days notice. I mean I I I think that in these times in this climate you know the issue of due process is uh is at the forefront of everybody's mind and uh you know I I I share in that concern although I would point out for the record that it there was an
acknowledgement that he received the notice. Um I do have one other question and it says I mean when when um a permit is applied for and pulled and all by a contractor is he are they made aware of the notice um of section 194-1
is that the the notice of that's notice never mind but the um our new code which uh 18.9.4 yeah 18.9.4 or that they can absolutely not park construction vehicles on the median.
Yeah. Do we give them when they get permits? I cannot confirm that. I I would check with the building department and see the paperwork they give them because I but however, as code, when we're driving around and we see one vehicle, we immediately approach them.
We tell them to remove the vehicle from the median. This particular contractor has a lot of um construction sites, so he's aware. Yeah. Is aware. Yeah. But I just wondering if they're because if we don't have the signs if when they're applying for the construction permits if
they're if it's made of made aware of the um section 18.9.4 because if they are then that is something to consider. I'll discuss it with the manager where we can add something to the package um before
we get the signs um done. I believe the signs will be done. I'm so sorry. The signs will be done in the next budget season. Yeah. Yeah. Well, that way this would would have Yeah. would negate the need for the signs at this point because
every they would all be aware and any existing construction sites um have a letter um uh uh posted for them or uh uh sent out certified mail to whomever um advising them because if that was done on this and we if I knew that they were
notified of the ordinances and and receive, you know, notice, then it's like, okay, you know, you can't ignorance. Yeah. Do we want to make a motion?
Um I I I'm I'm now in a agreement. I It's just I don't see where it rises to an emergency level, but I would like the village to bring it back next. them and bring it back next month after they've been properly um given notice
and and um and advised of the violation as well as the uh well they they've been noticed now the notice of violation specifically says and uh um bring it to move it to the July meeting to the July meeting so they have had ample time to
um hopefully rectify it by then I don't I don't want to see it kick back you know I want we have to set an example And we only do that if we do it cover everything the right way. Yeah. So my motion would in case number
C-25-0477 is to table this to give um to allow for adequate time. So July meeting allow for adequate time uh for the uh property owner to be noticed for the meeting.
Second. All in favor? I passes 4. Although I think your instincts were right, Dorian, but I just think that it doesn't rise at a level we should just, you know, but but I I I think you're
I understand. Yeah. Next item is uh 6.2 2. And this is for the address 767 Northeast 114th Street. The case number is CEN-23-284. Address for property owner 767 Northeast
114th Street LLC in care of their registered agent Angling Randle. they approached um our department um to request to stop the approval of the fines because they have
now obtained a a driveway permit. It's been issued and it was issued May 27, 2025. Um we were hoping they would be here tonight, but they're not here. They are requesting um for the cruel wall to be stopped. So they just applied for the
permit. They No, the permit has been issued. Issued. So shouldn't the Oh, and the fines have stopped. So, wouldn't it stop to do the fines have stopped, so they they So, they're good. There's nothing for us to do and
then have a um come before us for a fine reduction if they see fit or pay the outstanding clean. You know what? I'm sorry to interrupt here, but it does it looks like they haven't stopped, which they should have the day that the um the
permit was issued. It's issued 527. And if you look 527, no, it said that today's day 18, which it shouldn't have. No, it so we have to So, we have two calculations in there. One for today and one for the date that the permit was issued because we just wanted to be sure
what the board wanted. And um on the date that the permit was issued, we have a $98,000 50 fine. It should stop at the the 98 should be. Let me look at the order of enforcement.
Yes, it's okay. I had question marks on my after my review and I had down here 98250. As of 527, there shall be full compliance with the stated provisions of the code of ordinance. Yeah, that I wanted to make sure the board looked at
both dates and told us which I definitely want to make sure when we do the orders that they need to be more specific specific. I'm guilty of signing the ones that read that way and I think for most clients they're looking at that going and what exactly does that mean?
Yes. What does compliance entail? Learned the hard way to be very specific in our motions and in the orders are written. So, correct. But yeah, I I would definitely be in favor of we stop
it 98,000 per make a motion to that. Okay. In a cen23-284 violation has occurred. The owner has now come into compliance. Stop the daily
fines as of 52725, the date the uh permit was issued. I'll second. All in favor? I passes. Next item 6.5.
It's for the address 1140 Northeast 8th Court. It's case number CN24-156. Uh property owner's information is protected under chapter 119 of the Florida statutes. We're asking for an order to abate. Uh, this property owner
was found to be in violation of section 8.4.7B lot maintenance and cleanup purpose and intent. They have an excessive and unattended growth of weeds, brush and brush brush branches and other overgrowth in the rear of the
property. We already have an order of enforcement and we asking for an order to abate so the village can get to the back of that property and clean it up. This is the the one that we've been coming here for. Any more information on the guy? No more information. However,
the village has moved um to start with the abatements. We just removed the vehicles uh couple weeks ago. So, nobody's living there, right? They the it's unhabitable. Right. Okay. Okay. Would anybody like to make a motion?
C-24-1 make a motion to have the the village issue an order to abate uh to clean up the excessive undergrowth weeds and bushes and property. I'll second and bill the owner. Yes. Or
build the property. I'll second. All in favor? Any opposed? Motion passes 4. Did we use the language um and assess the cost of abatement as a
lean against the property instead of build the owner? Right. Because he's an MIA against the property. So against the property Yeah. Yes. Yeah. Yeah. He said against the property. Yes. Thank you.
Next item is the same property address and same property owner. This is case number C-25-0360. We asking for an intent to lean. Um they were found to be in violation of section 9.20 abandoned property on private
property. There were several derelict vehicles that were on the property. Uh the village has gone ahead and abated uh the violation. Um, at this point we have $2,500
in fines that have acrewed. Um, yeah, I noticed that we didn't uh Well, I do have a question because I wrote down here and should I make my motion first?
I'd like to make a motion in case number C-25-360 um to direct the village to file intent to lean for the $2,500
as of 618 plus the applicable filing fee. And what I would like to do, I know we've already had a previous administrative cost, but could we order another a second administrative cost because or is
that part of the filing? The administrative cost. You had to bring this back before us yet again. Yes. Each time we're coming back on these issues, it's an administrative fee. The filing fee is strictly only to file with the courts county, right? So yes,
um had these issues been rectified, you would not be here before us and the village has had or um the code officers and personnel rather have spent time and so on these intents I would uh like to
see we I don't see why we're not ordering an administrative cost for this hearing. the board can absolutely Well, that would be my motion. The $2500 as of uh June the 18th was an additional
administrative cost of $250 in the applicable filing fees. I'll second. All in favor? Any opposed? Motion passes 40. Next item is 6.7. Same address and same property owner. We're asking for an
intent to lean for $450. This was uh for a violation of section 8.4.13 eminent public health threat. Um because of the condition of this property, there has been
um animals and insect insect infestation affecting the neighboring properties. um gone to the extent of the next door neighbor finding dead animals in their swimming pool is the neighboring property the the the the old people that came in that one time. Yes. And then
elderly people who is bedridden. So they have every kind of raccoons. So we did the village did abate and we have put poison all around the property to kill animals and we are asking that we
lean the property for the cost of abatement. If there's no further questions I'll make the motion. In the case of C25-0364 violation has occurred. file the intent
to lean for $430 plus applicable filing fees plus an additional $ 250 admin fee. I'll second. All in favor? I opposed. Motion passes 4. Yes.
The next item is 6.8 8 for the address 11460 Northeast 10th Avenue. It's for case number CN-22-106 Carlos Colazo and Lordes Rosario. We asking for an intent to lean. The amount is 13,750.
To date, the property owners are non-compliant. They were found to be in violation of chapter 5.6 off streetet parking. They applied for a permit uh for the driveway but never went through with it. This case was issued in 20 in 22.
No permit and still in violation. Right. And I you see where the building department told them what they need to do March the 11th. No question. Case number C-22-106.
Um the violation remains and President move village move to lean amount of 13,750 as of 618 plus administrative fee of 250
plus. I'll second all in favor I. Any opposed? Motion passes 40. Next item is 6.11 and it's for case number 11801
Northeast 10th Avenue. It's for case number C25-0088. This is for 1801 Northeast 10th Avenue LLC in care of their registered agent Leantis Fraios. We're asking for an intent to lane. The
amount is $5,500. They were found to be in violation of section 8.4.7 lot maintenance. They have um garage door that has not been repaired. We have not heard from anyone. We have gone to the property several
times. Um no one has reached out to us. You see it's no homestead property as well. What's going on? It's vacant that. Yeah. And the owner is not here just like the last one. Did
show up? No. No questions. Take a motion. U like to make a motion on case number CE-25-000088 uh that the violation remains and move that the village have direct the village to uh move to file a lean for the amount
of 5,500 as of 618 plus administrative fee of 250 and a filing fee as applicable. I'll second all in favor I I opposed motion passes 40.
Next item is 7.5 for the address one13 Northeast 10th Avenue. It's for case number CE25-0216. Nadia Dorov and Edith Rosies. Um Miss Nadia is asking for uh continuance. She
needs more time to repair the driveway, the aspel driveway. Um she had other violations that we issued and she has come into compliance with those violations and we are asking the board to give her more time. Did she give you ballpark as to how much he asked for 60
days? She asked for 60. I gave her till July. I I recommended July a month now. Um has she pulled a permit? Does she need to? This is maintenance. So, she won't need a permit. The driveway is not uh 50%
deteriorated. So, she just has to fill it with asphalt. It's an asphalt driveway, so she has to fill the cracks. So, let's say July it. Let me ask a question. So, is are asphalt driveways still permissible in Biscane Park? Yes. Okay. because I just
saw a new one put in on somewhere in 9inth Avenue and I was like I didn't even know but two yes they are allowed commissioners fought really hard for that not to be but yes they're still legal okay so you said
July July a month yes one month one month so July July she asked for 60 you gave her 30 that again she she asked for 60 you give her for more time but I you know
no I I recommend 30 when you board can give her how as much time as they they say fit with that um it's a difference yeah no one else no other comments I'd like to make a motion on case number
C-25-0216 uh that violation has continuous uh give the property owner until uh August
the 1st of 2025 to come into compliance administrative cost of up to $250. If not, uh $250 per day contract. I'll second. All in favor? I oppose.
Motion passes 4 Z. That was a 250 admin by August first or 250 for a day there. Next item is 7.6 6 and it's for the address 11410
Northeast 11th Place and this is for case number CE-25-0442. The owner is Carlos Alberto and Magda Catalina Arango. We are asking for an order of enforcement. They were found to be in violation of section 9.17
criteria to determine abandoned property. They have unregistered vehicle. One unregistered vehicle on the property. Um a and it's um what do they call them? It's an old
Ford truck. Antique. Oh, it's an antique. Going to call it ancient. An antique Ford truck. Have you had any communication with the with the owner? Yes. Um the owner, the property owner called and said they out
of the country. and asked for time. However, I do not recommend giving them time. Well, just do the order of enforcement as they you regularly do. This is because this Ford truck has been there for a long time. We have done courtesy
notices, verbal, no compliance. It's been a it's been a while. And what what did he say when he called? He says he asked to give him more time to register the vehicle. Right. register. Well, registration, I mean, it looks like it was last
registered on a July of 2023, right? That's when it expired. Expired. Yes. If he was wanting to register it, it's hard to believe two years. Did he say he was going to register it? He was going to dispose of the vehicle. Say that again. Did he say he was going to register it or he was going to get rid of the
vehicle? To come on Zoom and explain. He He really didn't be He wasn't very specific. He said he wanted to come on Zoom and ask for more time to comply. So I I don't want to mess up his words. He just Well, I mean, he's not here, so
he's not, you know, so it's hard to take that into consideration because he's not here to testify. Other questions? I'd like to make a motion case number C-25-0442 that a violation has occurred. fine of
$250 plus administrative uh cost of 250 and for the property owner to um bring the vehicle into compliance or have it removed by July 6th for $250
per day fund thereafter. I'll second. All in favor? I opposed. Motion passes 4. Next item is 7.7 same property and same property owners. The case number is CE-25-0443.
We asking for an order of enforcement for accumulation of trash, junk, and debris that's on the property, non-compliance. We asking for an order of enforcement. And these pictures that we see uh with the stuff on the side that's visible
from the street. Say that again. It's visible from the street. Yes. visible from the street. Yeah, that's a there's a lot of um little items all over the property.
There are no questions. Do we have a motion on case number C-25-0443 violation has occurred excessive fine of $250 plus $250 administrative fee uh property owner to remove um and come
into compliance by July 6th or $250 per day. I'll second. All in favor? I any I you're Is that a no? No. I that was saying I I was Yes. Motion passes 4 Z. Now I'll
just like to bring to the attention of the board that July 6 is a Sunday. Would you like to change that date or would you like to leave it as the compliance date? Well, July 7 is a Sunday. July 6th. I'm sorry. July 6 is a Sunday. Reason I said
they need to come into compliance by July 6th. So come Monday, y'all be checking. That gives them a weekend, the full weekend. Monday, if you are out there and you see us not in compliance, we commence. Got you. Take the day off.
There's Tuesday. And those were all the cases we brought before the board tonight. Has everybody had a chance to read the minutes? I did. Any concerns, questions?
I didn't find any, but Jamie, you're you may have She has the eagle eye. Not not big though. Um, bear with me. Okay. Agenda item from the minutes. Agenda item 78
where it says you guys a sec. Is there another one that another thing that you emailed us that was after? Say that again. Did you Did we do the other one that you emailed to us? Yes. Yes, we did both of them. Okay. Thank
you for asking. How was the fine reduction? The first one, right? Okay. The the sentence reads, "The property owner was given until June 25th, 2025 to come into compliance by ensuring a fence permit is issued. It
was a gate. And that's going to be probably two different kinds of permits. So I would No, it is the same. A gate. A gate is considered part of a fence. There's no different permit. It's a fence permit. Okay. So we don't have to differentiate.
I was a little neurotic about that one. Than that I think we're good. If not, I'd like to make a motion to approve the minutes of May the I'll second. All in favor? I I motion passes 4.
One very very quick discussion. I promise. When we have situations like we did where we got that last minute um fine reduction request. Oh, fine reduction. Yes. Really critical that we get that new backup because when I
thought that I'm like, okay, I think that's already on the agenda. Yes. And it didn't show any compliance on what we already had. So, as you agreed, agreed. A bit of a back and forth because that's critical. We don't need the whole thing again. But that and the new stuff that
offers clarity for you. Yes. Yes. Yes. Absolutely. Quotion. Well, no. My only discussion which somewhat did in in one of our things is the uh assessing an administrative cost whenever to follow
lean because to me it's like the previous administrative cost was for the effort of having the hearing and doing a ruling and now we're here because it still wasn't resolved or paid for and we're having a hearing and all of the paperwork as well as calculating the
fine up to Hey, that requires some time and and the costified now, right? So that is great idea. Makes sense. I agree. We are fortunate to have a really good clerk that work. Vanessa who
has been doing how is it going so far? Jobs. Yes, including PND professional, terrific attitude and quick follow through. Please know how much we appreciate that. Yes, she's very good. Motion to return.
Second. All in favor? Good night everybody. Thank you.