I think I already know there's a baby. >> She's actually the oldest village. >> She lives right off. something yesterday and I garage and so she goes around and picks some
good stuff. So >> I would be surprised. >> Oh yeah. >> Yeah. I would be surprised if she gets to children who
don't show up anybody. two bags and one and only right. So actually I should give away of all come to So at the ocean
at Absolutely. that will work specifically featuring or >> with small variations. It's very difficult to work with because if you don't fire it enough,
it's as clear as this and if you fire it too much, it's exactly like paper. So he wanted to work with it. So he worked out how to get it properly, you know, to the proper temperature that
you get the best which is not with the manufacturers to and it really they came out. >> Wow. >> It needs a better bulb. If it had a better ball, you'll see more of the
peach tones. It's too bright a bul. >> Oh my god. That is just >> the blue undertone. It's such a bright light that mix up too much. >> If I had a place for that, you didn't have cats. >> My cats. It's a very heavy bay, so the
cats have not bothered seats. >> Oh, one of my little baby seats today. with the other two boys. One of them had worked his way up into a wall detector.
>> Well, what husband one week after surgery, >> I would call >> what he had to do is block it off. So he got on his ladder and he put cards out. >> Should not be on.
So So, so >> my kids, >> which I can shove down, but I'm trying to get on a little
noise at How's everybody? How are you? I told him process, but I know some of it has to grow old. I have I have a dog. My ear is just like >> really I sort of do the shave.
>> Yeah, but intelligence. >> Yeah. Good evening everyone. >> I'd like to call order the village of whiskey alliance board meeting Tuesday,
February 24. Time is 6:01 p.m. Clerk, please call ro. >> Janie Anderson. Blinton, >> Bertos, Judy Hammer, >> Michael Lonard >> here. >> Green C Grant. >> Gera,
>> Vanessa Cherry, present. >> Did Vanessa Cherry say I here? I didn't hear. >> I >> She's here. Okay. >> Okay. Good evening again, everyone. This is a meeting of the village of Biscane Park Code Compliance Board. The board is
authorized pursuant to chapter 14 of the vill's land development code to ensure compliance with the vill's code of ordinances. The members of the border citizens and residents of the village of Biscane Clark. We volunteer our time when we are not paid for our services. The purpose of each hearing is to give
any alleged violators the opportunity to contest the decision of the code compliance officer which resulted in the issuance of a notice of violation and to determine whether a violation of the villages code has occurred or is occurring. We are not authorized to dismiss violations based on hardship,
ignorance or the fact that others may be guilty of the same violation. These hearings are conducted in a quasy judicial manner. Our responsibility is to act much like a judge in a court and that is to hear cases presented by the villages code compliance officers and to hear contradictory arguments presented
by the alleged violators. We are not authorized to change the code. Village commission is solely authorized to enact or revise codes. Conversely, neither the commission nor the village manager have the authority to overrule the findings of the board.
Pursuant to chapter 162 Florida statutes, orders of the board can only be appealed to the circuit court of Miami date county. We have the authority to assess and order the payment of civil penalties, to issue orders having the force of law, to command whatever steps are necessary to bring a violation into
compliance, and to assess administrative costs. In order to make a finding upholding the code compliance offic's decision, we must find that there is substantial competent evidence that the name violator was responsible for a violation of the relevant section of the
code as charged. All documentary evidence presented by the parties must be submitted for placement in hearing file. No documentary evidence will be considered unless the alleged violator or co-co compliance officer submits a copy for the hearing file. Each party shall have
the right to call and examine witnesses, to introduce exhibits, to cross-examine opposing witnesses on any matter relevant to the issues, even though that matter was not covered in direct examination. To impeach any witnesses regardless of which party first called them to testify and to rebut the
evidence against them. If you intend to address the board and have not signed in, please do so. Anyone wishing to address the board, including anyone on Zoom, please stand and raise your right hand so you may be sworn in. You're reminded that this board is a quasi
judicial board and giving false testimony can be power. >> Please raise your right hand. Do you swear or affirm that the testimony you about to give will be the truth, the whole truth, and nothing but the truth? We have none.
>> Good evening. My name is Dorian Grant. I'm the co-director for the village of Biscane Park. The first case is in section six, old business. And it's item number 6.2 is for the address 720 Northeast 117th
Street. Uh property owner is Green Products RC 360 uh- Lawnfunder LLC. Representative Mitchell Hman Associate believe is on
Zoom. Um this particular property went into foreclosure. Uh there were several violations um and that were accumulating leans. Um leans were not priority leans. So we
lost um the leans in the foreclosure. We could not um get any money. We could not get any funds uh in the foreclosure. The the property was sold at a much lower price. So what there was no gain in the foreclosure for the village. However,
per our legal department, all the violations and all the orders of enforcement survived. So, we the representative is here so we can disclose um to him officially what the code violations are. We have presented them with the same information
that we presented to the board. However, we just wanted to make it official um so they know >> there is of the 17 listed, there is one that is not a fine. is hard cost. >> Correct. >> Does that have a different legal
scanding than the fine? >> Absolutely. This is hard cost. It cannot be reduced. Um it's $750. It is an abatement because we the the village cleaned up the property. >> How do you want to handle this? You want to First of all, sir, thank you very
much for zooming in and taking the time to be here tonight. I appreciate it. We all do. Uh, how would you like to go over? >> Um, I would like to go ahead and read the cases onto the record
>> and then state amounts. I'll go ahead and read all the cases onto the record. The first case is CEN-24-655 for overgrowth. This is a civil citation with a $75 outstanding amount. Second case is CEN24-594
overgrowth. Outstanding civil penalty $25. CEN24-382 trash cans outstanding civil citation $25. CEN23-438 for trash cans. Outstanding civil
penalty $25. CEN23-437 overgrowth. Outstanding civil penalty $25. CEN24-654 pool maintenance outstanding fines $14162141,621.19.
I say that right. It's a large amount. And the next case is CN-24-653 swimming pool water clarity standards. Outstanding amount $141,621.19. Next case is CEN-24-652.
Safety barrier for the swimming pool. Outstanding amount as of January 23rd, $611.19. Next case is 24-596 red driveway uh walkway maintenance. It was overgrown. We issued a violation, a notice of violation instead of a civil
citation because of the extent of the violation. Outstanding amount $611.19. Next case is CEN-24-381 383 for a fence that required a latch um left the pool area open and unsafe outstanding amount $611.19
CN-24-381 for exterior paint outstanding fines $611.19 CN25-1011 overgrowth this was the abatement for $750
C-25-1014 repeat violation for water clarity second offense 13,000 um $15,000 outstanding as of today case 25-1015 second offense pool safety barrier
$15,000 outstanding next case 25-1016 pool maintenance the second offense 13,000 outstanding. Um there's a two there are two outstanding permits um that were left
open. PM-17-0024 mechanical permit for AC that they were trying to install but never closed the permit. There's $395.92 outstanding. And then there's an expired paint color approval EP-24-23.
No outstanding amount for that one. of all of these that you just which are still not in compliance. >> Um we recently >> How many of them in compliance? I should probably say
>> I would say um the civil penalties have to be paid the way they are. Uh we the property still needs maintenance. We recently abaded the property. So I would say as of today it doesn't need cutting. However, it needs to be cleaned up. There's dry vegetation and other things
that can be uh cleaned up and need to be maintained. >> What about the swimming pool issues? The >> swimming pool is the main problem that we have. It's still >> still not clear. >> It's not maintained. The water is green. It's >> not.
>> So, it's at risk for a child falling into it and drowning. That's correct. >> Let me ask a question. Dorian, it has his property changed hands. >> Is there a surplus? Yes, there was no surplus. We >> There is no surplus, but we have a new owner. >> Yeah.
>> Is that the new owner on the on the on the TV there? >> Okay. So, I mean, I saw it. Is that John Hearn? Is that our old John Hearn? Okay. So, he's back now. >> Our legal. >> Okay. >> Our years ago, then he came. >> He was up in Coral Springs. The same guy
that was in Coral Springs. >> Hearn. Okay. All right. So um I mean I see what his recommendation is. What what is your recommendation? What what is the number? What are you asking for?
>> We have all these uh cases open. I would recommend that they go ahead and comply with the violations and then come back and ask for >> okay >> needs to be secured. The pool needs to be cleaned. >> That needs to be taken care of for
safety. It's a safety issue and it's a major liability for the property owner. >> And when did the property change hands? >> Um January is when they filed the the new look like >> January 12th.
It's like January 15th. >> Yes. >> And the new owner hasn't done anything to secure the pool. >> They haven't done. >> And have you had any conversations? >> They have been in touch. They've been finding out what they need to do. So, we decided to bring them here. So, and we
give them this update. >> Okay. >> I'm going to ask you to please identify yourself and your relation because we would like to hear from you. >> Yeah, absolutely. Thank you and thank you for your time today. Um I'm Mitchell Harmon. I'm with Rock 360. Um also on
there as Loan Fundder LLC. Um I'm a representative um today and um yes I mean so we did recently come into this property. We weren't aware of any of the um citations or fines until recently when um the leans came up. Um obviously we want to sort this as soon as possible
especially considering the safety issues. Um so there's we've already had our uh contractors go out on site. We have bids um that we can submit um however as a proof kind of a forward momentum. Um we have bids to drain the
pool, secure the pool, secure the gate and everything and we plan to act on this uh immediately. Um the other option or the other thing we kind of wanted to uh bring to um the group today is um we can have this uh so obviously we just
took possession. we had to foreclose on this property and we have a buyer who is a professional builder who could close in a matter of days. Um, and they honestly may be better suited and a lot faster than we may be um because we're a nationwide lender um to uh abate and get
this property compliant. Um so but but the issue is obviously with $300,000 worth of fines that's not going to be possible. So, I was just wondering if there was any options for us to um transfer this property as soon as possible to have that professional builder um go out and take care of this property.
>> Well, here's my number one concern. Your organization has been in possession of this property for just over a month now. That would seem to be more than enough time to do the obvious, and that is at the very least to have secured that
pool. That is a It's an extraordinary danger. I mean, it is truly an accident waiting to happen. And in over a month, there's been no effort to at least get that done. Then talk to the city. Come like you are tonight in front of the board. See what
can be worked out. But that alone should not bombard us to tell you to go do that. >> But usually we do not allow for fines to be decreased until the issues have been complied with. So if there's no compliance
>> right now, >> yeah, >> obviously we secure that property. >> If there's no compliance, I don't see how we can decrease because our own regulations require things to be in compliance before we can decrease the
fines. >> Yeah. Read, please read John Herren's letter. >> I mean, Mr. Mr. Harman, I I have to echo uh Miss Anderson's point on the fact that you've been in possession of this for over a month and the pool issue is
still not resolved. What What is your what what is your what your plan for taking care of that? I mean we have a unsecured pool and there's ch lots of children in this community and you know people are walking around all the time and it's not secure which means that
anybody could get in that backyard and get into that pool area >> and the neighbors have young children and the mosquitoes are just horrible >> understood. Yeah, absolutely. So like uh we just got the bids in um I think
within the last 24 hours for the pool. um we're going to approve those and um get those contractors out there immediately. Um I think that's the next step no matter what. Um securing that pool and then also the gate as well. >> Yeah. I mean you got to secure the ability for anybody not to pass through
that area to the pool. I mean that I mean you're going to have to block that off like yesterday. >> Absolutely. Absolutely. >> I'm sorry. Is there any reason the village can't secure the pool and then build a bottle?
>> This has just gone on on too long. >> Right. >> I can put that in front of the village manager. It's a process for us to go before um the commission get bids first. We have to get bids and then get approval from the commission. >> And in the meantime,
>> in in the meantime, I think we can get this done within the week. Um, I mean, is there any way that you can just give us a few more days, we can get this done and report back to you? >> It's up to a week sounds good to us. >> They can do it within a week. What we
don't want to do as a village, and I represent the village, um, we do not want to get into their process of convincing this property to someone else. >> Um, we don't know if it will happen. We don't know >> exactly. So >> we have to deal sir right now with your
organization is in possession. You are the owner. What happens tomorrow, the next day, what you choose to do from a business perspective. >> Yes, >> we will deal with at that point. But we have to deal with this tonight. And as
my board member just said, safety is a paramount. Now ring just a slight aside. Do I understand though that the leans are gone? That means the fines are gone. No, >> are not gone, >> right? The the orders of enforcement still stand according to the less.
>> Okay. Okay. It's only the leans >> that are reported. >> However, the court has important that issue um still stand because when you buy a property, you buy everything that
>> that's what I thought. Okay. I misunderstood. Okay. >> By the problems as well. >> All right. By this time next week, can we count on that property being secure? >> Um, yes. We're going to uh approve the
the bids now and um follow up daily with the vendors to make sure they're out there. We we'll get this done as soon as possible. >> As soon as possible. As soon as possible. Within the week. >> The date, sir. I don't want as soon as possible. You don't know how many times
we hear that. >> Understood. Understood. Um yes, by next Tuesday, um we'll do everything in our power to get this done. >> Okay. So, by Tuesday, March 3rd.
>> Yes. So if we do attain compliance by that date, we'll schedule this case for the hearing on the 18th so they can come and ask for relief funds. >> That works. That's it.
So, at this point, we have set up a that the pool will be secured no later than Tuesday the 3, and that this property owner will come back to us at the March meeting, the 18th,
with a report on what has come into compliance and what, if any, fine reductions he can appeal for. >> Okay, >> that sounds good. And actually, if it's okay, I might just want to double check with y'all. Um, what we'll be doing, uh, I'm looking at the list now. Um, we're
going to drain the pool, uh, install a vinyl pool cover, um, that secures the top of the pool, and then we're going to be taking care of the gate. That way, um, uh, no one can enter. Is there anything else that, um, we would like to see done? >> Um, if they could pressure clean the
wall, would they? It looks really bad. Pressure clean or paint it. >> Okay. And the um the walls of the entire home or what specific walls? >> Um it's just the exterior um wall. It's
not a very big house so I I don't think it would take much to >> Got it. >> I I front if they can do the front because it's right away. >> Yeah, that that would sur >> technically all visible. >> Yeah. All that we can see from a public
right away needs to look good. the vegetation, the dry vegetation on the yard has to be removed. >> Okay, got it. Well, we'll take we'll take care of that. Thank you so much. >> Yeah. No, I guess
I mean to clarify the pool and making sure it's secure that comes in the water and the gate and then the pressure clean. by March 3rd, the pool will be secured and
drained. Uh, and the property, any part of the building structure that's visible will at least be pressure washed. Any debris in the yard to be cleaned up
and kept clean. Second. >> Then the property owner will come back at the March meeting as a progress report. And what if any reductions you may be eligible for? >> Second.
>> All in favor? >> I. >> Any opposed? Motion passes 4 zero. >> Thank you, Mitchell. We'll get in touch. All right. Thank you everyone. Thank you. Good luck. >> We appreciate your help. Next item is in section seven
and it's item number 7.8 9 and 10. The address 11:07 Northeast 117th Street. First case number C-26-00009. Owned by B Park 110 LLC in care of their
registered agent Eval B. Uh we are asking for an order of enforcement on this case. Um they were found to be in violation of chapter 5.6.1 6.1 A1 to two off streetet parking. The driveway does not meet
approved design standards case. I'll read all of them. The the first case is the only one that is an order of enforcement. The other two have complied. So 11:07 same address case number C26-0010
same property owner. Um there be in violation of section 8.4.3.1 4.3.1 tarps on the roof. This uh case is in compliance. The next case, C26-001 0011.
Same property owner. Um found to be in violation of section 8.4.3.1g. Sterial wall of the house needed to be painted. It has been painted. Cases in compliance.
Is this a house that was like behind a bunch of vegetation and then the vegetation got removed? So then it >> Yes. >> revealed all of the things that you >> It's covered in vegetation and they've cut everything down. >> Is this the same owner or is it a new owner did that? >> It's the same. Well, they they bought it
from the lady that had the 50 Cats. >> Oh, yeah. >> So, it's a new owner and the new owner took down the vegetation. Uh we were hoping they were here uh before and they were supposed to apply for development permits uh to develop the property,
demolish that house and develop the property. But we've seen quite some time and the village manager now has instructed us to issue violations to all um properties that don't have any development permits are vacant and are not maintained. So it's not just this
property. You'll be seeing a lot of other properties Okay. >> Okay. So, should we take nine and 10 first since you >> Yes, please.
>> case number CD-26-0010 that the property is in compliance and I move to close >> second. I all in favor I I Um I think the next one case number
C-26-000011 um that the property is in now in compliance and uh close >> second in >> favor >> I oppose motion passes through So, Dorene, before we get into talking
to the um representative or the owner, what if any conversations have you had about the driveway or the the property's intent? Because I know that you said they here before you we're going to develop it. What's what's the plan now that you understand? >> Talk out to him and he's been very
occupied with other things and this is the first time I've seen him in a long time. so he can explain what's going on. >> Okay. >> Hello. Good evening. How are you? >> Question to the property. >> Sure.
>> I'm the I'm the RA and the uh is RA Val Zevel. I'm Randy Angland. Uh one of the owners of the property. >> You're the registered agent. >> Uh Val is the registered agent, but I'm on the Sunb Biz as being one of the directors for the company.
Randy England. >> Randy, England as in the country. >> A N G L I N as in England. >> Oh, England. Okay. >> Yeah. >> So, what's up with this property, Mr. England? >> So, we purchased it, I think it was sometime early to mid last year, and the
intent at that time was to move forward with the development of of the Can you guys hear me? Otherwise, I guess it's still >> the sound. >> You could just sit there like and use that, right? There's this
one. >> No, you can't speak that right. Perfect. >> Can you guys hear me? Okay. >> Go ahead. >> So, we purchased the property sometime early to mid last year. The idea was to
move forward with development on the site. Um we were in the process of ordering um you know getting the the permit permitting together and everything. The world changed over the last year. Uh costs went up and kind of crazy. Uh we've had a couple other homes
in the area that has not been able to sell on Northeast 8th Avenue. Um we kind of held off to see where things were from a cost perspective. >> Uh at this point we've decided to move forward with the construction. Hence we've cleared the site um all the
different things. So right now the two open items which is the driveway itself um I believe it's just the driveway possibly the pay that'll be rectified when we submit for our permits for construction. We've already began assembling the different permit
applications from all our different disciplines plumbing electric. We I was hoping to have it done before this meeting but I would anticipate it'll be completed by within the next two weeks. I'm I'm requesting a 30-day extension to get everything done and I think that'll to submit the application for
development or building and then at that point I believe we'll be in compliance. >> Well, considering how much work they've done since we issued the violations, I would recommend that you give them the 30 days. Great. >> Have you come back come back at our
March meeting and give us an update? Yes. >> Development obtain all necessary permits. No. We may have to push them to April because March 18 is not three weeks from now.
>> No. >> Would it be would it be to submit the permits because I don't you know we wouldn't be able to obtain them within 30. >> Let's just do it as a perhaps submission that he >> he's at least started the process rolling then we can make a decision from
there based on what he comes back and tells us because yes no way in a month he's gonna have fun. Not going to happen. Should we give him till April? >> Uh let's waiting is at least according to this. Let's let's check to be sure.
Yeah, it would be the 15th 18th. I I personally weigh heavily what our staff says about working with you. So if they think we should give you more time, I think that's a good thing to do. And um >> good with that,
>> right? >> Yeah, they they did a lot of >> May I may I clarify? Is that for submission or the actual permits itself? >> That would be for the driveway. for the driveway. >> Yes, that's all we're talking about at
this point. >> So, so >> you're going to be >> Yeah. >> If they're developing a property, >> what he's here for is only the driveway. >> Correct. Uh we can keep this violation open. If they submit the permits, then
this becomes secondary. >> Exactly. >> In the development permits. >> Yeah. Right. sense, >> but we can't just not have this. This has to be what we're dealing with and then things come back with in April.
>> Yes. >> So, I believe the order should be for them to either submit or obtain development permits. Right. So submission would be March. Are you
correct? Correct. So if they want to give the order for submission only that would be up to the board. Now new construction takes a long time. So we you would have to give them enough time to be able to go through the process
which may take 90 days to months for them to get the development permits. I would rather set some coran two months out because we've seen too much of what happens. Now that may mean in April we
have to chart another course but at least the general >> progress report every two months. >> I'm sorry progress report every two months. I'll second. >> In favor? I >> passes 4 zero.
>> April. >> Yeah. April. >> April 15th. >> And if not, >> I do have one question. I do want to put up You have to get a >> that you have to
>> um along with your permit application for that your plan your demo plans or some sort of developmental plans. You can't just put up a construction thing. >> Thank you. >> What's the other property address on 8th
Avenue that you guys didn't And what's this one going to look like? >> It's twotory. I think it's going to be similar in design. I think these turn out good. They're right here. Make a left. >> They're both on the west side, right? >> Yes.
>> Okay. There. Yeah. There's this sugar cube one and then there's like a more one with pitch roofs. >> Did neither one of them sold yet? That's the one on 117th and 10th. >> 117th and eth the two on 8th. The two new constructions on the west side of
the road. >> Well, good luck. >> Thank you, sir. >> All right. Have a good evening. >> You too. >> Next item are in section seven. New business. >> I ask for pause. Just a second. I gotten
someone who signaled me that audio is not coming through. Is there anything we can do? Is that beyond >> the audio from the speaker or and >> YouTube? >> But ours or just the podium
>> that YouTube? >> Yeah. >> I mean there might not be anything we can do. That's unfortunate because we actually do have some folks who watch >> people watch this. My goodness.
>> Okay. Anyway, >> wow. >> Just thought I'd let you know we should probably move on on that note. Next >> have to go on um is texting it to come in to the computer. >> Okay. Next case.
>> The next case is in section seven no business and it's for the it's item number 7.3 and it's for the address 859 Northeast 115th Street. First case number is C25-1012
Elena Abab Aga Beova found to be in violation of section 16.14 double fee permits. A construction dumpster was parked in front of the yard without first obtaining a permit. Second case, same address, case number
CE-26-000029. Same property owner. We're asking for an order of enforcement on on that case as well. It's the same section in violation. This is a second offense. >> Are these two different dumpsters? >> That's correct. >> At two different times.
>> Two different times. >> Is the house under construction to your knowledge? >> Um they were they were renovating. Yes. So they had the dumpster the first time, we issued a violation and then they had it the second time without getting a
permit. >> And what communications did you have after the first and before the second? >> I mean after the first before the second. >> Are you presenting this property, >> sir? Are you representing this property?
He his English is not his English is not that good. Um Ukrainian sir I I need you over here. It needs to be recorded. Sorry. Thank you. What?
>> You put it back. Thank you, sir. >> Wait, did we ever get the answer on the communications after the first violation and before the second one? >> Uh, excuse me. Uh, yes, I did. Uh, had a
conversation with his son and he um uh he was going to go ahead and apply. They did apply. But they applied for a dumpster and the fence. So, uh, the building department
declined that application. So, I reached out to his son and I said, "Hey, you can do that. You need to do for the first one. You just do it for the, uh, dumpster." >> The first >> The first one. Yeah. So, um, he agreed that we're going to go ahead and do it.
Didn't happen. So, then few weeks later, there's another dumpster. Um, again, I reach out and I say, "Hey, um, there's no permit on file." So, um, we had a conversation back and forth and
they promised me that they were going to remove the dumpster that day. Um, so it didn't >> it wasn't removed. So the one day I reach again and I said, "Hey."
And then w with regard to the um to the the rejected initial permit by the building department, was it because they tried to do it in tandem? What why did it get rejected? I thought you said that he did apply and it got rejected.
>> The mistake he made was apply for both fence and damite in one permit. It was supposed to apply separately because they are two very separate things. But then when he was told it was rejected, did he did not? >> They did ex No. >> And do the one by itself. He didn't do
anything. >> They didn't go ahead and >> but there was an initial effort made. They just messed it up and then they didn't go back and fix it once they were told. >> We're told after the rejection, they explained to them why it was rejected and they were supposed to submit correctly, but they didn't.
>> Okay. At least it was an effort on the at the front end. >> Yeah. Then now you sir you live at the property >> because you're renovating still but you said I think before you came up here you represented that your wife had said that
she was going to do it tomorrow and I think that she told you Dorene that she was doing that. She reached out and told you that >> she spoke with Raphael. >> Raphael >> who will come in tomorrow and >> point is we have two one is one thing
too without a permit having a hard time finding an excuse for that sir. Well, without a valid permit. I mean, they there there there appears to be an effort. So, it's not like they just did it without trying.
And there's been recent. >> We have a responsibility. If we find out from the village what we've done was not the correct way, we don't just drop the ball and say, "Okay, I tried." You got to go back in. You got to do it right. Even if you have to go over to village
hall and beg for help. >> Dorian, what is your recommendation? They have been in violation two times. They were told the first time that they were in violation and that they would have to pay double fee permits to apply for the permit. So they did go ahead
like you say and try but they didn't finish the process. So they are still in violation and then they went ahead and made the same uh mistake the second time. So they were in violation two times and they should be penalized twice.
Any other comments? Anyone like to make a motion? for them. They can get it in a day. They just have to pay the fine. >> But we we have to just allow that time to order. I'll second.
>> I agree. >> All in favor? >> I >> I a no m. >> The motion passes 31. I agree. I I agree. I'll second. All in favor? I
>> I opposed. >> I'll ask the board. Would are they going to get two separate permits or will they just do one double fee permit >> for the dumpster? >> It will be two, >> right? >> Okay. So, for the first one double fee
and >> Okay. I will have to tell the building department. So, one double double Thank you, sir. Good luck from here out. Next item, section seven. >> Has she been sworn in?
>> No. >> Please raise your right hand. Do you swear a firm that the testimony you about to give would be the truth, the whole truth, nothing but the truth? Just wanted to mention before that um YouTube is not working. >> Hear it.
>> Oh, it was there. It was on their end. >> Thank you. Thank you. >> Say that again. >> It was on their end. The problem was >> maybe here. We have no idea, but she tested it and it worked. >> Thanks so much. So section seven in new business item
number 7.1. The address is 519 Northeast 118th Street is for case number C26-000020. Property owner is NCC Renovations LLC in care of their registered agent Hernandez.
We asking for an order of enforcement. They were found to be in violation of section 8.5 of the unsafe structure Miami date county code. This property has been declared unsafe by the building official of the village of Biscane Park.
Say next 27.2 same property owner same address. The case number is CE-26-0021. We're asking for an order of enforcement in this case. They've been found to be in violation of section 8.4.1. 4.10 accumulation of trash, junk, and debris.
Uh there's so much overgrowth, trash all over the property. >> Is it still in that condition? >> Yes. >> Have you had any communications with the homeowner or who's in charge of it? >> Were you able to speak with them? I wasn't able to communicate with them. I
>> I been communicating with Raphael. >> Raphael. >> Okay. If you if you would, your name and your relationship to the property. >> I'm Oina Fernandez. I'm Candelario's sister and I'm one of the property of the Yeah. >> Wait, you're of the property? >> You're an owner of the property? >> Yes.
>> Okay. But before that, before we hear from you, Raphael, um what communications have you had on 7.1 and two with that property? So since the violations were were issued, there's been no communications.
>> Okay. >> So the initial um communication was Huh. on Facebook. >> No, I issued a violation, but they spoke with you before they they gave you like an idea about what they wanted to do
with the property. >> No, my husband, but it's the same. Yeah. They they can't build or they can't build the size at all two. >> Yeah, that that's a short story. I'll
explain a little better if you want. >> Sure. Uh we bought this property on May uh of 2025. We own I live in the neighborhood right here in the uh 127. >> Ask you to speak up.
>> Yeah. Sorry. >> I'm sorry. >> I live in the neighborhood in my house and we started investing in the neighborhood when I moved in. We bought the house that is right ne right in
front of us. We planned on selling the house. We remodeled everything um that was put on sale, but it didn't sold. So, we had to rent it out. And we were supposed to use the money from that
selling to actually build this new house. During that process, we did some uh research on the property that we bought. It is a house that is to be demolished, but we didn't know that it was unsafe. When we bought it, there was
homeless people living in the house. So, what we did is to clean up the the the property outside and inside clean it. It's not somewhere that you want to go. And we just um put wood on the windows
and doors so nobody could get in. So, I was surprised because there's no trash in the property. There's a lot of I imagine vegetation because we literally don't even pass by. So, this is when we noticed that we had to send somebody to maintain basically and we apologize for
that. Um, we don't know what we're going to do yet. We don't want to sell, tell you the truth, but we know I'm doing the variance for my pool and I know how that process goes and it's been like a year and something already. So, for a new uh
house, I imagine how long it's going to be, but we are waiting to have the money actually to actually do it. But I don't know how what I what I have to do to keep that uh maybe empty, but with no um
committing any violation because that's not something that I want. So, you you tell me. >> Well, let me ask you a question. Um, Raphael said that you you represented that you're not able to build a new house because the lot's too small. Is that true? >> During the research process, we noticed
that we need a variance in order to do something to actually make it make it as an investment. Uh, if we build exactly the same size the house that we have now, it doesn't make sense because it's really too small. We need a twotory, but
the the the the property is a little it's triangle. It's a little complicated. Uh so we know we're going to have a hard time developing that, but we will do it because nobody else will buy it anyways. >> It's not that you can't build you cannot
build as large a structure as your >> or make the numbers work. We need to build a 2,000 square footish house with a pool and in that property is not feasible with all of our ants. >> Have you discussed it with the PND department? >> We didn't yet because we
>> before you dismissed it completely. it would probably benefit you to discuss and like I said we want to go through that process because we don't have that many experiences developing but any developer could tell that before buying
so nobody will buy it from us we know that we have to do it at least have the plans approved uh for selling the plans once they're approved but the plan is to do it oursel but we we going to need some time >> Dorian what what about the um the ISS
issue with the uh with the trash and all that stuff. >> Let's handle that case further. >> Okay. Yeah. >> Considerably more involved. So there's no obje I'm saying I would have appreciated if I heard that story before coming here. I heard some of what uh
Raphael had told me and the reason I never issued violations was because I was under the impression that you guys were working on coming to apply for permits. What happened was the building official was inspecting a property next door and then he saw that property and called me over. So I'm not able to go on
the property on my own as a code officer, but with the building official there, he has more rights than I do. We went around and saw the property and saw how compromised it is. >> So that's why he had to declare it unsafe. Um what you can do is have an appointment with the building official.
he can >> speak with you, do the research with you and tell you exactly what you can do or cannot do with that lot. >> Okay, that that will be amazing. And in the case that we need to wait some time until we do something, what is the the
the the way to go? Should we put like a chain fence to >> So that meeting is really important because it's been declared unsafe. He may give you the permission to put a fence around it while you go through the process of the variance or demolition or
whatever you decide. >> We also I imagine we can also submit a demolition permit only for the demolition. And >> the thing is our code on construction fences is very clear and planning and design >> construction. I'm sorry
>> that is for construction, >> right? There has to be some type of >> there have to it it has to be concurrent with either a demo permit application or a building application. And our planning and design review board is adamant. They
will not grant a construction fence without one of the other two permits going with it. >> And my concern is what happens after if I do the demolition and I have that chain uh fence for construction. Once I've done the demolition, what happens?
>> So once you do that, that property comes into compliance. All you have to do is maintain it. Make sure it's cut and clean. You don't have to do anything with the lot. >> So it could be cleared and then you'll be fine. >> When I'm cleared and it's good >> as long as with a permit >> in what we like with a permit
>> as long as you keep it in what we like to call a parklike setting. In other words, don't let it overgrow. Don't let it accumulate. >> Yeah. We don't I understand that if that is the situation, I can believe that because I literally never even passed
by. So yeah. Yeah, that may be the situation. >> Concerned the building official was that as you stated, there were people living in there. There are squatterers living in that property and something happens a fire that building crumbles. It's a huge liability to the
>> Yeah, that that was a situation before. We made sure that everything is sealed now. Are you in a position in the meantime to to to go for the demolition permit and to raise the place or >> I think that's the only option
>> cuz once you do that then your problem is solved until you figure it out >> that this was unsafety. I think that's yeah that's what we should do. >> Due diligence before you buy >> now now we know
>> on the U item 7.2 to the trash, etc. >> Well, I I didn't um I think that we jumped back to to seven. I think we were trying to talk about 72. Then Dorian talked about 71. We just talked about it, but I was still had the unresolved question about, you know, she you had
represented that there was debris. >> Yes. >> She said that she was surprised that she didn't think that there was non-organic debris there. So, >> she hasn't been there. Uh when we bought the property, Rafael called us and told him told us >> uh no
>> February 18th, last Wednesday. >> So all that vegetation, all that vegetation, all the stuff on the ground, >> I mean to me it looks organic. It's dry vegetation, >> right?
>> Not trash, >> right? >> The way the ordinance is just lump everything in one, >> right? Like non living >> clean it up. >> Mhm. >> Yeah. Basically It's essential
>> that broken concrete >> is a broad term but consider all the debris >> on you would like to make a motion on >> I'll I'll make a motion on 7.2. I don't know what to do about 7.1 on
CE-26-000021. I will say that an offense uh has uh has occurred and I would like to give a $250 fine and a $250 administrative fee. Um we give them 30 days to clean it
up. >> That's 7.1 or 7.2. >> 7.2. 7.2 >> until March 17th. >> March 17th. to have the property cleared
up. Otherwise, a $250 daily fine. >> Second. All in favor? >> I >> I Any opposed? Motion passes. >> Okay. Now on to 71. >> You understand that? >> Okay.
>> It's got to get secured somehow. >> Yes. Now, obviously, if you're going to opt to build rather than demo, that's a much lengthier process. And the construction fence
and I know they do not like to make it. >> No, you can they can apply for their demo permit. They have time even with the demo permit if they are having issues with money. If they have a permit in place, they may have up to six months to a year.
>> Thank you for reminding me. >> How long? 60 days to a year. >> Six months. And it can be 180 days from what I understand. >> So perhaps would be >> at least have the demo permit that would allow you to put a construction
>> six months. >> Then you can apply for another six month extension >> extension if you're not ready to demo. And then once the house is raised and it's move removed, then the fence can come down and just maintain the lawn. >> Just maintain the grounds. Yeah.
>> While you go through the villian stuff. >> Basically, you want to keep the property the way you would want the property next to you to be kept. >> Analogies. >> So maybe you should visit it once a week to see what's going on there. >> Does it make you sad to go by? Is that why
>> responsible for that? But I it's me or whomever it is. But yes, yes, you're this is reasonable. >> Yes, >> that'll be a help. >> Huge. >> Yeah.
>> If there are no further questions, I'll make a motion. In case number C26-000020, a violation has occurred. Assess a $250 fine, $250 admin fee. Give the property
owner until March 31st to pull demo permit to a pull a demo permit and a construction fence permit or a $250 daily fine thereafter.
I'll second that. All >> in favor? >> Let me ask a question before that. Your intention is with that existing structure that it has to come down no matter what you do. Okay. >> Give them 60 days um on order instead of
30. >> You were saying March 31st. You think it needs to be longer? >> Yes. April. >> Okay. >> End of April. >> Let me res let me >> amend. >> Amend. Thank you. My motion. from March 31st to April 28th to obtain
a demo and construction fence permit. >> A second. >> Second. >> All in favor? I. Any opposed? Motion passes 40. >> Go ahead. >> When you submitted for uh or something
like this, uh do you need an engineer? >> Yes. But could you come to the village hall? Yeah. Okay. >> To the building department. I'll have you speak with someone there. I'll give you all the information. >> Amazing. Thank you so much. >> Tuesdays and Thursdays. >> Tuesdays and Thursdays.
>> Next Thursday. You'll be able to meet one of them. >> Amazing. >> Yeah. We have one of the building officials coming in tomorrow. So, if you want to come. >> Okay. I might pass by. >> Leave him with your number. I'll call you when you come. >> It's It's right there. >> Oh, the phone number you said. Okay.
I'll call you. That's it. Good luck. Don't worry about good night. Next case on the agenda is in old business section 6 and it's 6.1. Address
is 690 Northeast 113th Street. Is for the case CE-25-0746 for the Church of Resurrection. Mhm. >> We were going to ask for an intent to lean on this violation. However, they have paid the fine and the case is now
in compliance. We asking that you close this case. Yes. Second. All in favor? >> I. >> Any opposed? Motion passes 4 Z. >> Next two cases at 6.3 and 6.4.
Property address is 821 Northeast 120th Street. Case number C25-0763 for BP120 LLC in care of the registered agent Robin Winer. Um the second case is
C250795 same property owner. We are asking for an extension on the order of enforcement the compliance date of January 25 as the permits are still in review. They are working on them. he
uh planning and design review approved. They are in building review right now. There were some things that were rejected that he had to work on. So, the fines would start running January 21st, but we're asking for an extension from that date to whenever you decide. So, he
can go through the process without running fines. >> Realistically, >> 30 days, >> um 60. This is >> he says >> this is getting
>> um and the reason I say this I I think I had given you the reason at the last hearing. We have new people working in the building department. They're learning and things are a little bit backed up. They're not moving as fast. However, this particular case whatever you recommended 30 I'll go with the 30
because this case has been >> it's quite >> it's a long >> rather go back to a tighter deadline. >> Yes. Even if it means moving it again, then constantly putting those deadlines out there. Do you see what we're dealing with? >> Yeah, this this this particular case is old.
>> Very old. >> Yeah. >> They don't take it seriously. >> Where where is the owner? The owner is not here. Have you been in communication? >> We have been in communication and I I was hoping that he would be here tonight, but he's an attorney. Maybe he's in
court. >> Never know. Okay. If there are no further questions, I'll make the motion >> in C25-0763. Agree for the uh to give them an extension of time before daily any daily
fines would come in until March 31st, 19th of this year. >> To do what? >> Second. And >> to do what? To come into compliance. Come >> in to have their permits. >> Okay. daily >> as of April 1st. Right.
>> Judy and J and J. All in favor? >> I any passes score zero. Okay. in C25-0795
agree to the extension of deadline to March 31st and >> because there's more they have to have the um >> the permit in place right the demo permit
>> I know when I first read Yeah, they have to demo. >> Yes. >> Okay. In C25-0795, my motion is that we extend the deadline to March 31st of this year for them to
obtain their permits. If not, the daily fine will kick in as of April 1st. >> Second. >> All in favor? >> I opposed. Motion passes 40. I also just wanted to add that he has paid all the uh administrative cost and fines on both
cases. >> Thank you. >> Good. >> Next case is 6.5 for the address 951 Northeast 111th Street. This for case number C25-0913 for Patricia Castella.
This was a we are asking for uh a dismissal of this case and rem to remove all fines. The property owner had a valid 2025 landlord permit. They had applied in an older system. So we were not able to we didn't access it much
later. So it was our no questions. Second >> in favor >> I motion pass this. >> Next item is 7.5 and it's for the
address 920 Northeast 108th Street. It's for case number CE-26-0028. Property owner is Ilan Hamami. Uh he requested for a continuence of this case found to be in violation of chapter 5.6.1A1
off streetet parking. The property doesn't have an approved parking service. He is going through some medical issues. He submitted um I believe two letters um for the board to consider to give him a little more time because his
continues um 30 days. That's kind of where I was thinking. So >> he asked for three years, but >> the three-ear continuence >> or he asked for
>> three years. So I had to explain how this works. Um >> usually if I remember correctly, it was January of 2023, which was the actual deadline for these driveways tax.
So >> we can um you can give them 30 days and and we can bring them for progress. What's >> I would again because of the way things have been working lately. I would prefer extending it simply to continuing it to
March's meeting and let's see where we are from there. But I would really like to not push it out further. Comments from the board. >> Is it would everyone be okay with continuence to the March meeting?
>> Yep. A second. >> Judy second. All in favor? >> I. >> Any opposed? Motion passes 40. >> Next two items 7.6 and 7.7.
address is 981 Northeast 113th Street. First case number is CE-26-0013 for Mr. Renee Alvarez. First case, uh we're asking for an order of enforcement found to be in violation of section 8.4.31g
exterior wall paint. Um he had applied for a paint color approval, but it has now expired and he hasn't painted his house. He came before the board and you allowed him to go ahead and paint his house because he had this permit that he had
applied for a night before. However, he hasn't done anything. Uh, it's expired now. This is an absolute prime example. And when we get to discussion, we can go over the new phrasing that will
incorporate a potential second daily fine if work's not done by the end by the expiration of a permit. This is a perfect example of why. So, Hey, bless it. approval.
Let's go. I'll second. All in favor? >> I. >> Any opposed? Motion passes 40. >> The next case is for the same address and same property owner. Case number CE-26-0014. They were found to be in violation of
section 8.4.10, 10 accumulation of trash, junk, and debris. There's a trash pile in their backyard, which keeps getting bigger and bigger. Um, when I issued this violation, I spoke with the
I spoke with Mr. Rene's child and explained the violation and he would she said she would explain to the dad um what they need to do. What we've seen is the pile in the backyard just getting bigger and bigger. I mean, non-compliant.
>> These guys came at one time because they had the fence, right? The fence in the back. That concrete fence. >> Even the fence didn't really hide because it was a little fence. >> Yeah, it was a little fence. >> It's not like you're in an interior lot and you can kind of do whatever. It's there for the world.
>> Yeah. And that fence wasn't a privacy fence either. >> It's another Okay. Any questions? Anybody like like to make a motion? >> Um, yeah. I'll make a motion that a
violation has occurred and assess a $250 fine, $250 daily, I'm sorry, administrative fee and a um give them 30 days to comply.
>> Two weeks. >> The trash pile is big. Two weeks to come. >> Two week when? >> 13. >> March 13th. >> Okay. To comply. Otherwise, $250 daily fee. Daily fine.
>> I'll second. All in favor? >> I. >> Any opposed? Motion passes 4 zero. The last case on the agenda tonight 7.11 is for the address 11215 Northeast 8th
Avenue. It's for case number C25-10007 for Sylvia Barcelona. You're asking for an order of enforcement. They're found to be in violation of section 8.4.3.1F uh property maintenance of the roof. The roof is discolored and they haven't
cleaned it. >> Any conversations? >> Any communications? >> Raphael. What what was it? What was she upset about? Did she say Did she disagree with what you said? Uh
We got you. >> Did she get a courtesy notice ahead of the notice of violation? Oh, it's sorry, I remember. Sorry. Yep. What' you have to say about it? There are no more questions. Who would
like to make a motion? A second. All in favor? >> I. >> Any opposed? Motion passes. >> Before you go to the minutes, I just wanted to on behalf of the manager inform the board that there will be two ordinances that are going for first
reading on March 3rd. The first ordinance was recommended by Pox and Wreck. It's a no smoking um condition while you're in the park. >> Um I say automark. >> No smoking
>> in the car park. >> When the park >> park >> car >> No, no, the park. >> Am I allowed to say that's fantastic? >> That second ordinance was recommended from our department and it's um for
artificial turf. Um thank you Judy. Um we are recommending that um some guidelines be put in place while the state does not allow uh local jurisdictions to stop people from using artificial turf. We just needed to make
sure that there was some guidelines for people to follow. So they don't just do whatever they want to do. So it's going for first reading. both of those before we get to the minutes.
Dorine and staff have everybody should have ample amended order of enforcement and then this is the way you'd like to have it though. Well, the order of enforcement the part I really want to
call everybody's attention to if you remember we've had the discussion and we had it again tonight of people who Okay, they sort of comply and get the permit and that's it. They're done. Nothing goes beyond that. So if you look down to parts
um one A, A, and B where partial compliance is obtained by obtaining the permit, the daily fine is held in obeyance. Then B most important if the work not completed is not completed by the expiration date
of the permit an additional time will be assessed etc etc etc so that I guess we do need to read into every one of our motions then am I right >> so I'll keep my cheat sheet with me because that becomes important because we were trying and you'll see when we
get to December's meeting it's still been clunky and Vanessa has to try to figure out exactly what we're trying to say and it's not easy. This will kind of refine the language where yes, there's a daily fine if you don't comply at all.
But if you do comply by pulling the permit, that's really only partial compliance. The point is to get whatever the project is done in which case the daily f I love that terminology the daily fine goes into obeyance and it only comes back if you don't finish by
the expiration date or are approved to extend the permit. >> So I I'm I see in 1B there's a blank for for the the amount of the fine and then it says if a request for an extension is not made then 250. So I guess that's the
default number of 250. Is there some uh you know um range that we're talking about for 1B because we've always talked about 250 for fines? >> 250 is the standard that chapter 162 allows. Um now if the board wanted to do
more, they can. >> Or less. less. It's up to you, but 250 is like the minimum >> because the problem with going less is they tend to look subjective. When we stay with the approved
fines, then it does not open that can of worms up. Wait a minute, my violation really wasn't as bad as that one. And back and forth and >> how come they got 150 and I got 200? And I think for a long time now we've been
able to stay out of any foray of selectivity or targeting or whatever. And part of that is being consistent with our fines. >> And also once compliance is achieved, we've been really good about dropping
down especially on those daily fines. So that I mean I've talked to people who said, "Oh my god, I've got to do my driveway and I've got only this much time because they're going to give me fines." And it's like it pushes people.
>> Yeah. No, I just didn't understand if it would Yeah, because it's the same, but we have a blank there. Is the blank there because of the option, >> right? >> Would go to 500. >> Okay. But it doesn't say so it's it's a
it's a lump sum number because it doesn't say it just will be assessed period. Is that per day? Is it per total? I mean how are we doing that? >> So the board has um when you read your um conditions you have an amount.
So we would just be putting in a lump sum number there. >> Yeah. >> Yeah. And I would really not necessarily >> No, no. I'm just saying that the discretion that we're exercising is between $ 250 and $1,000,
right? That's why it's blank. And right >> the discretion, but the discretion not to go below 250 but up to a th00and. Great. >> Interesting.
Daily. >> Yes. >> Right. Okay. get him to figure on the actual amended order of enforcement a little bit cleaner. Are
you wanting us to use this one or this one? >> That one I think I like I like it nice and clean on the amended order of enforcement. >> I think what we were just trying to make sure I I remember we were stumbling all over
the way to raise that. You of course did a wonderful job as everyone had the chance to read the minutes. Okay, let's do January 1. December's going to take a little longer.
Anything in January? I thought 718 was Michael. on the second. >> So they they like to go both of them like big time. Which one? >> Like to do what? Go at the same time. >> Yeah.
>> Sorry. Um I wrote that Michael >> Did any write anything different? I had Michael had many times. >> We can change it to Michael.
>> Wait, wait, let me check. Which room is this? January. >> Y >> January 7.18. 7.18 >> was a meeting. May 21st was a meeting. The item number is 7. 18.
Here it is. Never mind. >> That works. >> And I have a motion to approve the minutes with that one change. Nice. Okay. A second.
>> We second. All in favor? I. Any opposed? Motion passes 4 Z. Okay. Be bear with me. In December. Okay. 6.3. Actually, Judy's motion was to resend
the daily fine completely. Not just as of December 17th. >> Completely resend the daily fine >> 7 I'm sorry, 6.3. >> Made a motion to resend the daily fine as of December.
>> But she we write down all the daily points. Remember, we didn't just >> Oh, so nothing else was assessed. Okay. So, we'll take that out. >> We didn't just stop them as of December 17th. There were some issues, I believe.
>> Oh, yeah. We may have heard this differently. So, she rescended the daily fine or was it everything? >> Just a daily. the violation fine and the admin stay paid but all the daily fines were
rescended. So it says made a motion to resend the daily fine as of December 17th and then the assessed violation fine plus the admin administrative fine will remain. >> But see by saying received it as of December 17th it sounds like whatever
dealing fines had approved to that point they had to pay and that wasn't the intent. >> Okay. So we remove the date. daily. >> Okay. So, we we said resend the date >> all the daily fine period >> or the date. >> There you go. Exactly.
>> The administrative and the violation. >> You got it. >> Okay. Now, going on to the clunkiness where we, you know, we're trying to do all work to be completed.
>> 7.4. Okay, the fifth line, all work to be completed by the expiration date really needs to come out of that area >> under 7.4 before line number five where it reads all work is to be completed by
the expiration date of the permit needs to be removed from that area. Do you want that to come in after the daily fine by saying all work to be completed by expiration
date of permit or $250 daily fine will commence day after expiration. That's not how we're going to say it going forward, but that's how we said it in December, >> right? >> We're going to have a now, but in
December, we were still trying to work 7.14 Starting on the fifth line, starting with all work to be, I would suggest removing everything after that. And instead, if
compliance not achieved by February 17th, daily fine of 250 will commence on February 18th. Then all work to be completed by expiration of permit or 250 daily fine
will commence day following expiration if compliance is not achieved by >> February 17th. A daily fine of 250 will commence on February 18th. All work to be completed by expiration
of permit or $250 daily fine will commence day following expiration. Does Vanessa get combat pay for this? >> I know she gets my undying gratitude, but that doesn't help.
>> Okay. some cookies. >> I make a moon. I make a moon pel. I'll have to break my waffle cookies. Seven 716 >> 7.1ies help.
>> Nobody makes brownies like you. Nobody. Or stuffed mushrooms. Okay. On to 716. Um >> same principle done on line five from the words all work to be completed by. I
would suggest removing those and say if if no hang on bear with me. Uh okay. If compliance not achieved,
daily fine of $250 will commence as of February 18th. All work to be completed by expiration of permit or $250 daily fine will commence as of date following expiration. And basically it's the same thing on 17.
Principle if compliance not achieved. I think we all thank you for coming up with much cleaner, crisper language. I mean, the point is to achieve what was not happening, but the point is also to
make it understandable for everybody. >> So, we don't want this to land on our largest table and >> Uhhuh. >> Yes. >> throw out all the cases. >> Yes, ma'am. I was gonna ask for um discussion and
you know anybody have any issues you know at the moment you want to um If anything changes and you come back, hey, nothing's going to change.
I may pretend that may only be there, >> right? >> I would I would All right. You know me. I >> I don't know. >> You know me. >> You'll be here for >> and March is the 18th.
>> Uh yes, sir. >> Should be good. >> Okay. You're still good with that? >> Did anybody? >> No. >> I haven't got a phone call. Wow. >> I made a phone call and said, "Holy
is our meeting." >> And I still And I still went to bed last night and was like, "Oh my god, did I have a meeting tonight?" >> A phone call. But then again, I'm the one that requested it. I sure better remember it. >> Oh, Vanessa knows me.
>> Okay. Any other discussion? Any any >> I better be. Yes, we are going through all of those actually this on our list this year. Uh we did that last year. We went through expired permits. We found a lot of stuff that wasn't moving. We're going to do
that one more time. We've just been busy cleaning up. I mean, so, so this last one with the guy that didn't, you know, over in 113th there, uh, or one Yeah, 113th, you just happened to come across that one again because he had another violation and saw
that he had that expired permit. The one with the expired permit. You just came across that because there was other violations. Is that >> Oh, no. That was a paint permit. You mean um >> Yeah, the paint permit >> by his When I drive around, I pass by
his house all the time. So, but so that one you just happen to just happen upon versus going through the files and seeing >> he's right here. I always >> Okay. Right. >> I'm not happy with him at all. He's a
great gentleman, but he has to >> very nice man. >> Very nice. Well, we need a motion to adjurnn. >> We do need a motion to adjurnn. >> I'll make a motion to adjurnn. >> Second. >> All in favor? >> I
Oh.