Good evening everyone. I'd like to call to order the village of Bisciance meeting of Wednesday, May 14th. The time is 6 o'clock. If clerk would please call the role. Jenny
Anderson Dale Bluntin Roda Beronto Judy Hammer Michael Lat here Darin C Grant Raphael Gutierrez Vanessa Terry present and good evening everyone this is a
meeting of the village of Biscane Park code compliance board the board is authorized pursuant to chapter 14 of the villages land development code to ensure compliance with the village's code of ordinances. The members of the border citizens and residents of the village of Biscane Park would volunteer our time
and are not paid for our services. The purpose of each hearing is to give any alleged violator the opportunity to contest the decision of the code compliance officer which resulted in the issuance of a notice of violation and to determine whether a violation of the
villages code has occurred or is occurring. We are not authorized to dismiss violations based on hardships, ignorance or the fact that others may be guilty of the same violation. These hearings are conducted in a quasi judicial manner. Our responsibility is
to act much like a judge in a court and that is to hear cases presented by the villages code compliance officers and to hear contradictory arguments presented by the alleged violators. We are not authorized to change the code. The village commission is solely authorized
to enact or revise codes. Conversely, neither the commission nor the village manager have the authority to overrule the findings of the board. Pursuant to chapter 162 of the Florida statutes, orders of the board can only be appealed to the circuit court of Miami date
county. We have the authority to assess and order the payment of civil penalties to issue orders having the force of law to command whatever steps are necessary to bring a violation into compliance and to assess administrative costs. In order
to make a finding upholding the code compliance officer's decision, we must find that there is substantial competent evidence that the name violator was responsible for a violation of the relevant section of the code as charged. All documentary evidence presented by
the parties must be submitted for placement in the hearing file. No documentary evidence will be considered unless the alleged violator or co-compliance officer submits a copy for the hearing file. Each party shall have the right to call and examine witnesses, to introduce exhibits, to cross-examine
opposing witnesses on any matter relevant to the issues even though that matter was not covered in the direct examination. to impeach any witnesses regardless of which party first called them to testify and to rebut the evidence against them. If you intend to
address the board and haven't signed in, please do so. Anyone wishing to address the board, please stand, raise your right hand so you may be sworn in. You are reminded that this board is a quasi judicial board and giving false testimony can be
penalized. Clerk will swirl anyone in please who will be testifying tonight. Please stand and raise your right hand. Please raise your right hand. Do you swear or affirm the testimony you about to give will be the Okay.
Testifying. Okay. Do you swear or affirm that the testimony you about to give will be the truth, the whole truth, and nothing but the truth? folks haven't signed in yet. If you would sign in the the log. Do we have any additions,
deletions, withdrawals? No additions. None. Soon as we're ready, please call the first case. Good evening. Dorian Grant, Code Compliance Department. The first cases we'll call
tonight are in section seven of the agenda. These are items 7.8, 7.9, 7.10, and 7.11. They for the property located at 1015 Northeast 114th
Street. First case number C250195 belonging to B Park K2 LLC in care of their registered agent Amaya Amaya 1D. This first case they were found in violation of section 16.14.1 double fee permits. Two brown
metal gates were installed on each side of the property without first obtaining permits. Hello, how are you? I'm Matias Haramu. Oh, sorry. Do need to give us a sec. Promise
you installed. Have Have they applied for permits yet? We checked the system just before we came uh to the meeting. There are no per permits for the gates as no questions from anyone on the board.
No questions. Sir, if you would identify yourself and your relationship to the property, please. Okay. I'm Matias Haramo from Improvement Developers and the owner contact me this week just to see if I can help him to
resolve all of this because he had another contractor and he is these violations and now he wants me to help him with this for the two brown gates. I'm going to get the permit
and I'm going to get the permit for the fence around the pool too, like the pool part. Okay, we we need to do one at a time. Okay, the idea is to get the permit for that like the chop drawings and get the permit. Okay, he just
approved to me the estimate and all my work to do it. Okay, questions from the board. I have a motion case number C-25-0195 that a violation has occurred
set a fine of $250 $250 administrative fee and uh ordered that I mean to have an issued permit for by June the 25th
or a $250 $50 for there. I'll second. We have a motion and a second. All in favor? I. Any oppose? No. M motion passes 50. Okay, sir. You have until June 25th to
actually obtain the permit. Not just apply. Okay. To have it obtained, paid for, etc. Okay. I have a question about that. In order to get the permit, I need to have like three planning and sonic
meetings, right? Just one now. It's not three like before. No, I mean, go ahead. You just have to have one PMC meeting if they approve it. Correct.
That depends on whether or not you before it was like three meetings no matter what. Okay. A more complicated project. That's to be expected. Okay. Okay. Good. June the 9th and June. Yes.
No. No. That's perfect. I I just want to be clear because in the past with the other projects that I did, it was like three meetings planning and no matter what. If you're doing an addition, if you're doing a major rena, that has many more moving parts. So, and you do have
two meetings anyway. Perfect. So on to agenda item. The next agenda item 79. Before I read the next agenda item, I just wanted to bring to the attention of the board that this property has been in construction for a very long time. There's been a change of contractors and
this contractor before us is a new contractor. The next item is 7.9. Same address, same owners. We were going to ask for an order of enforcement on this case for a dirty pool. The uh property owner um however has complied. This case is in
compliance. Yeah. I was first of all I'm going on any given day with the mango tree in my in my yard. Yes. I'm going I have an an avocado next door that does worse than this. Yes. I
hate to admit. and he needs to his pool guy is going every week to clean it and pull the chemicals and no we we understand no no no questions I'd like to make a motion case number C-25-019 that the uh properties in
compliance and to close the case second I have a motion and a second all in favor I I any opposed motion passes 4 5 I'm Sorry. Next item is 7.10. Same address and same property owner. Case number
ACE-25-017. We are asking for a code uh for an order of enforcement. Um property owner was found to be in violation of section 8.4.5.4 for a construction fence. The construction fence at this project is has not been maintained. It's torn. It's
in pieces. Um, we did see at the reinspection that they tried to put it together, but it's not up to our acceptable standard. So, we are still asking for that order of enforcement. Go right ahead. Okay. The idea is to go
and fix the the temporary fence screen and tie that and leave it ready this week. That's the plan. But it can't go back to Yeah. No, no, no. They to fix that. It's got to be fixed. Okay. Question is it not? Well, they do
already have this. The fencing that's not the issue. The fence exists. Like a It is permitted, but it looks like this. Yeah. It's like I think with the time of the construction that where they it get ripped and the wind and but now that
I've been there, I'm going to tie it and put a Okay. Okay. Can I get a motion? Yeah, basically we're looking at May the 1st, sorry, May the 14th. So, it's plenty of time to fix it. So, I'd like to make a motion in case number
C-25-017 that violation has occurred $150. Um, I'd like to wave the administrative fee on this and come into compliance by uh May 21st. Um, bear with me. Uh well, if you won't
have the order by then, May the 28th, that's two weeks. That should work. Yeah. May the 28th for $250. A second. All in favor?
Second is Judy. Any opposed? Motion passes 5. Okay. So, there is a $250 fine. We are waving the normal administrative fee. You have until May 28th to get the
fence completely repaired and up to par. If not, a 250 daily fine will kick in. Next case, 7.11. Same property address and same property owner. Case number
C25-0199. We're asking for an order of enforcement. This is a safety issue found to be in violation of section 18.3.7 responsibilities of owners. Um they are required to have a barrier around a swimming pool on a construction
site in addition to the regular construction fence. Now the problem with this property is the back of the property doesn't have the construction fence. there's a small chain link fence that's falling over so the neighbors or animals are not um
protected. Again, this is a safety issue and we need an over order enforcement in the record. Now, my first question is would that enclosure require a planning and design review board meeting? It should have been in their um original
permit when they applied for because this is brand new construction. Right. Right. Right. that should have been in their original permit. If they don't have it, they would have to apply for another permit burial. I I'm uncomfortable knocking it out far enough for them for even unless you think they
could they would accept a walk-on this coming Monday, but it looks like a pretty heavy schedule it because I don't want to push this out for a June meeting. Not a life safety issue, right? So, I would like to make it an
relatively immediate. I mean, I do have we do have to allow for the time it takes to get the order of enforcement out, but beyond that, I'd like it to be put up and deal with planning and design review. It's a walk-on hopefully. If
not, then an after the fact. Go ahead. Okay. Yeah, the idea is to put a temporary fence, a construction fence in the back just to create the pool barrier. Our code requires the additional one around the pool even
though you have the construction fence. That doesn't quite satisfy the code particularly because as Miss Grant was explaining, the back is not even a regular construction fence. Okay, but question if I put the one around the
pool Why I'm going to need the the temporary fence in the back? Because you already have the chain link fence. First of all, a temporary fence at a construction uh site is required. You have to have the entire
circumference of the property. But it has a fence right now. Fence, not just the chain link. You have to cover it in the mesh. Okay. Now, the reason why you have to uh protect the swimming pool is you have workers working there. The pool is a fully serviced swimming pool. If
someone falls in there that can swim, it's a high liability. So, you are required to protect the swimming pool to have a barrier around the swimming pool as well during construction. It can be one of those temporary fence too. Okay. All right. There are several we can we can come to the office and we can show
you which types you can use. Yeah. like that the ones you just No, I'm going like the same temporary fence that I'm going to put I'm going to put it there with the bags and and just to protect the area and that's it. Yeah. And even sorry. Sorry. Because it's a
temporary fence that's going to be removed like you need and it's in the back. You need permit for that. No, I you already have a permit for a temporary fence and I was thinking and I may be wrong but you could clarify with the building department. You may have
already had a fence uh I mean a a permit for the barrier when they applied for the initial permit. Okay. Swimming. Yeah. Because the idea is to put it this week, leave it ready and then I can go with the pictures. Yeah. In the in within a few days would be ideal because
it's a safety issue. Okay. Ideally, yeah, we'd like it immediately. Yes. So, because the idea of this one is not just the temporary. The idea is to apply in the permit fence for the two gates and
the new fence behind the house in order to have the the properly pulled barrier. That's the plan. The board can issue an order to have you put the the temporary fence right away and you can come back and apply for an after the fact. Yes.
Okay. Okay. Good. We do have to legally we'd have to give him a date to make it, you know, of the situation. I'd like to go ahead and make the most um on case number C-25-0199
uh that a violation has occurred um and just ordered direct property owner to um secure by issuing permit by June 5th.
secure the pool by June the 5th or $250 per day thereafter. Reason I'm not assessing a fine or a administrative cost because if it's already been approved by a permit, it's
already submitted. It's just that it hasn't been installed. So, he may not be a violation. It just hasn't been installed. I guess it is a violation. It is. That was motion to rationale. So it's a fail.
I'll second for discussion. My concern is the June 5th. The reason that June 5th was because I I would have preferred given like May I was thinking May 23rd, bear with me, which is next Friday. If it becomes a
planning and design review issue, it can go after the fact or perhaps if staff would be amendable to trying to get it as a walk-on versus giving him all the way till June 5th because pools make me very concerned. Too many things can go
south very quickly and is honestly after the fact we would double No, but we put that as part of the motion. Would you mind? Yes, I I will take the motion to secure the pool by May the
23rd $250. We have a first and a second. All in favor? I I. Any opposed? Uh me motion passes 5-0 and there should be no double permit. Correct. That that would be part of the
motion. Okay, sir. You have till next Friday, please. Yep. That's the plan. Thank you. Thank you. Have a good one. Thank you. The next item is also under new business section seven and it's case number
7.1. It's for the address 660 Northeast 121st Street. Case number C25-0351. Property owner is Thomas Mark Spear Junior Trust. Um Thomas Mark Spear Junior Living Trust.
They're asking for an order of enforcement. They were found to be in violation of chapter 19.1.3 vacation rental license program. They were renting this property as an Airbnb without first obtaining a permit. I would like to enter onto the evidence.
Police report number BP25041200343. This uh complaint was brought to attention by the police department. There was criminal activity at this property. And um a gentleman has been arrested with attempted murder and is in jail
now due to the criminal activity that happened um at this property. Um we are asking for a higher penalty. This is a precedent case. We encourage short-term rentals
um to follow certain strict guidelines. this property owner did not follow any of those guidelines and so happened that someone would have been killed at that property. So, so the criminal activity for which somebody's incarcerated the murder was
attempted murder was while it was being utilized as an Airbnb compared to this. This is a little incidental but have they applied for the license? You applied for the time? Yes. Did you pay? Yes. Okay. At the time. At the time there was no,
but he did pay today. Questions from the board. If you would, sir, your name and your relationship to the property. Uh Thomas Spear Jr. I'm the owner. It's your turn. I I don't have much to say. Uh I I had no idea of the incident
other than the police department reaching out to me. It happened when it was when it was being I'm sure what that was like in the middle of a residential neighborhood. Sure. No, I mean I was shocked and uh I definitely apologize but uh it was uh through Airbnb and uh I
have turned in the permit and I have a sk inspection scheduled for Friday. There are no further questions. Who would like to make a motion? Make a motion. It's number C-25-0351. The violation has
occurred. Fine. Administrative fee of $200. Have the um permit issued by It's already been issued. We just need to do an inspection.
Okay. I'll second for discussion. Um, considering the magnitude of what happened here, considering the amount of police time and everything involved, I'm not comfortable with 250 as the administrative fee. Uh, under normal
circumstances, the work that these folks put into it, 250 barely covers. Under this case, I think we have to look at the possibility considerable more effort by staff,
police, etc. But isn't the administrative fee for what Dorian and her department does, not the police? That's a different bucket, isn't it? Can I ask if I'm if you're comfortable sharing
because you did share that you felt this should be a little more significant with the thousand violation fine. I think the 250 is reasonable with the $1,000 fine. I think the $ 250 will cover administrative cost.
Is there a second to my I'll second? All in favor? I. Any opposed? Motion passes 5. Is there a pay by date? Uh pay
by June the 5th. That's three weeks. going to put a daily fine if it's not paid by June 5th. Intentally, if it's not paid, I'm sorry. Right. Right. Right. Right. Right. For intent. All right. Thank you, sir. Thank you.
Next item 7.2 for the address 690 Northeast 113th Street. Case number CE25-0341 Church of Resurrection. We were going to ask for
an order of enforcement in this case for a faulty air conditioner that uh created a offensive noise for the neighbors. Um they are now in compliance. I inspected the property three times and I didn't hear the noise. Uh but they're here to
speak. Uh first of all, I want to uh make sure that you have the right address. It's uh 111. [Music] Dorine, I got a question. This um this observation, it looks like it
was by a resident. Is that what that is? The next door neighbors um the way their property is situated, the church um I'll say the south side of the church um is very close to their backyard. So when they're sitting out there as a family or
having events, they can they could hear the noise of this um air conditioner. I have to say that we were going to subpoena a witness which is the uh if there was no compliance which is the complainant. However, we didn't subpoena them because the I went there to listen
and I I didn't hear the noise. Um I heard the recording of the violation and it was pretty loud. It was really bad and very offensive. So, what's the difference between when you went out there and when they were recording? What I heard on the recording and when I went
there, the decimal was completely low. Wasn't I It was an offensive. Was it fixed? Was it changed? It was fixed. I sent her the invoice. Your name and your I got I got another question though. I have another
question. There there's also an indication that it's not in compliance with the required setbacks. Is that true or false? I haven't seen the air conditioner. I issued the violation from what I heard. I haven't been on the property. Okay.
So, that's not before us. Okay, that's fine. Go ahead. Okay. My name is Dioselina Montangz and this is uh Father Ortes. Um the problem was fixed. The the issue with the air conditioner was that
uh one of the fans, it runs with three fans cuz it's a big air conditioner and one of the fans was the problem. So, got fixed. Um and uh that depends also if the lady was in her room that she could hear
less. I know that they also do parties almost every weekend and we don't say nothing. Um, but that's just uh we right when uh we found out that that was making noise cuz of course we're not there. Um, when we uh noticed that it
was making a noise, immediately we we put it we fixed it. So, I sent her the invoice and it's fixed. You got the invoice? Okay. Yeah. I'm looking to see the um the complaint was filed on on uh what May the 20th I mean April 20th and
comply by date of of May the 4th and it seems to be in compliance and if that's case on case number C-25-0341 that the property has been brought into compliance and close the case second all in favor I motion passes 5.
Thank you. Thank you. Was the second who seconded the motion? Jamie and Michael both. Yeah. Good one. Dale made the motion and seconded by Michael
in unison. We'll pick. Next item is 6.5. It's for the address 11 1921 and 23 Northeast 12th Avenue. Is for case number CN-23-339 Arlet Roma and Jean P Jean M
Pierre. We are well doing the official records still show them as a property owner. So we have to put them. Okay. So we are asking for a revised order of enforcement. The initial order was
issued with a $500 penalty which was $250 to50. Um the resident uh did their due diligence and they did pay the $500. However, the permit for this driveway has still not been issued and we are asking for this order to be revised to
add a daily fine. revised to add a daily fine. The the permit has not been issued. There has been no we did back in April 17th of last year, but
let's if you look at the April 17th enforcement, there is a daily fine. That's why I didn't quite understand What had happened was because she pulled the the she pulled the permit before that
date, it was sort of considered compliance. I mean, she applied, but it wasn't issued. I realize we're parsing words here, but when I see the word pull a permit, to me, that means you have the permit. No, it does not say apply for a
permit. Correct. So, and the April 17th of last year very clearly says um pull pull the necessary permits. It doesn't say apply, right? So, those daily fines should have kicked in from
April um I'm sorry, from the 20th of June of last year. So I saw that there was Dorine. I saw that there was it looked like substantial amount of back and forth with uh with uh the officer planning and
designing review board. That's correct. He has been to the planning and design review board several times and was working on getting these plans um approved. However, at some point this fell through the cracks and there has been no activity. And this take a look
at communication from I'm assuming this is the building or one of the building inspectors on September 26th. There were four major things missing including a survey that is well 35 years old. Right.
What what I see here in terms of that planning design was that the last you know back and forth was around last summer in August. Is that true? Correct. And what's happened since August till now? Nothing. She paid the fine and that was it.
Again, maybe I'm parsing words, but when I see the word bullet permit, pull and apply to me are two really different words. A permit hasn't been pulled yet. Correct. Applied for but that's where
Dorene is asking just for us to read you the order to say obtain. But pull to me means obtain a permit. It doesn't just mean apply. If we meant apply, we would have said apply. Right. And Dorian, are those four major items that you talked about that were missing from the
application, are they still missing? They're still missing. Okay. And the time has elapsed um where the permit would even be considered. It's expired. She would have to start a fresh. So there is no permit technically.
And is this a homestead property? You saying? No. Okay. there was any rental move forward as it's as it is. I believe we can if if the board wishes we can stay with the original order and just calculate the
fee from that date moving forward. Well, I would I would prefer us to be more specific. My motion would be in case number CN23. I'm sorry. Anybody have any more questions? Okay. Hi, I'm Arlet. the owner of the
property. Excuse me a moment. Okay. Anessa, was was she sworn in? I do need to swear you in, please. Okay. He wasn't swearing. This gentleman and the one in the back so they could all swear together. I believe these two
gentlemen. Were you here when we did the swearing in? No. I was in here. Yeah, I Yes. would if you're going to testify, we do need to swear you in. Right hand, stand up if you think you work for it.
Yeah. No, he already sworn it. It's the one in the back. Oh, you not in. Okay. So, please raise your right hand. Do you swear or affirm that the testimony you about to give will be the truth, the whole truth, and nothing but the truth? Yeah. Okay. But ma'am, identify yourself and
your relationship to the president. I did that, but I will already again. Arlette Roma owner, property owner. Last May, I applied. I brought the permit, I mean the survey, and they said the survey was good and they gave
me a special form to complete, which I did. I attended several meetings and with the contractor, everything, the plan, everything. And they said everything was okay. And they had approved it in September. Then they
came back and denied it and they said the survey was too old. The survey was too old. Why they didn't tell me that from way before? I've been coming here meeting back and forth, back and forth, back and forth. But to me, this was such it was
not organized. And I was asked to pay $500, which I donated $500. So the thing is I need to know what's happening. So now they asked for a new survey which I had to get money to
pay for the survey and I think this is so unfair. Okay, very unfair. I'm looking at very unfair and I I don't like people using their power to charge people. This is so unfair. I'm looking at the various
back and forth communications regarding this already and approval. Yeah, there was an approval there. May I explain? So, she did go through PND. I remember the case. Well, she did go through PND. Yes. However, hold on,
ma'am. When permits are submitted, going through PND is one part of it, right? So even though she was approved there during the revision, one of the um engineers found that the survey was old
and legally he could not use a a survey that was 30 something years old and that's why we had to ask for a new survey. Yeah, I understand. But from the beginning that person should have been looking at it and told me this is No, that's not how it works. That's not how it works. After it goes through planning
and design review different stages, different reviewers or so it may pass here but when it reaches here something is wrong it will stop right there and ask you have to ask. So now I'm going to be trash again. It's my this is a joke. My experience
doesn't necessarily unfair. I know anytime we've done anything major, even if planning and design has approved it, we're always told, "Okay, but you've got to wait for mechanical review, reveal instruction." So, they've always been
very good about communicating with the property owner that yes, you made it through this phase, but this phase is still coming up. And it's clear, ma'am, I don't know if you have this anymore, but welcome to look. There are four
items, okay, that are of September 24th, 26th I believe are still outstanding. So the main the main item is the survey which I submitted the survey in the plan. I I uploaded it this month and there's also the pvious
impervious calculations the driveway radius there are se there are other issues. Okay, that could be done would have they wouldn't have done it without the survey. So, I went and got the survey. I paid $700 for the survey. So, I got the survey and I submitted it and I have a
copy here. You You have the new survey. I'm sorry. You had the new survey on file. Uploaded the survey. When did you upload it? Sometime this week. Okay. So, she she probably uploaded it in the old system we have in
your system now. And I have a I have a copy. We'll go back and look and and make sure we get that survey onto the other side on new program. We still are dealing with the fact that the compliance date was June 19th of last
year. I was going to say there's an ongoing fee running. So, I'm waiting for you to amend your you were going to make a motion. I mean, I understand everything, but there was there was already a violation. We needed we needed the property owner to
have her time. But no one has ma'am if you have anything more you'd like to wrap up with because then we're going to proceed. Okay. Proceed with whatever you're going to say. Well, let me just ask um the witness. So, you got the surveys. You got one of the four items.
What about the other the other three? I have the survey with the plan in it. But don't they have to look at it to see if it's uh good or not before we proceed with the rest the remaining? Well, I think it's what are the remaining that we need? The revised impervious uh
calculations calculations including the front yard are incorrect. Was that you'd really need to talk to building building? Okay. That's not in our purview. Okay. And I'll do you have any um have you been before the
the planning board since you got your new survey or or gotten on those? She just uploaded it last week. Mhm. Okay. uh make a motion in case-3-339 that we uphold the findings of the April 17,
2024 order of enforcement, which did require a compliance date of June 19th of 2024. If not, the $250 daily fines were to begin as of the 20th, 2024.
What is it? She was just reaffirming um I'll second the motion. She was just reaffirming that the order of enforcement uh stands and that you have a daily fine running at $250 per day of
2024. Um once you get everything done, then you can come in and ask for a fine deduction if so choose. $250 from per day. So how much is that? I I don't have the calculation.
Yes, ma'am. But they will. This is actually unfair because you power to bill. Hold on. I don't understand it. Hold on. Hold on. Bear with me a moment. Once the property comes into compliance, you can come back in front of us. Final
and you installed the driveway. Everything is done. Please go in, speak with the staff, apply for a fine reduction, but until such time as not only are your
permits pulled and paid for, but until the work is done and final, yes, the daily fines will acrue. We can deal with it once everything's done. You come back here. The fines can be reduced. That's what she's saying. once you do the work.
Yeah. But what I'm saying is there shouldn't be no fine period because because I've been in compliance. I applied for everything. You just like it says approved and I got uh a contractor everything and then later on disapprove
because I didn't have the survey. We're not in compliance. But again after it's done after it's just chaos come back with a fine reduction request. Okay. I have a motion in a second. All in favor? I. Any opposed? Motion passes 5.
So, what other stuff that I need? Just collecting money, paying money for people. No, it's those four items there to you guys. The next item is 7.3. I'm sorry. 73. 73. Miss Allette, you can
come to the office. We can talk. It's finished now. So unfair. All right. We you can come to the office and we'll go working hard. Thank you. 7.3 for the address 840 Northeast 116th Street. It's case number
CE-25-0350. Mario Manzaniro, I believe this property owner has changed. Yes. Um we are asking for an order to abate after the fact. Uh there was an eminent public health um threat here. Contents of an entire house were left on the side
of the street. Um trees were chopped. It was a huge mess. You can see from the pictures. We issued a violation right away. We had to abate because um you know, we had public officials and and neighbors complaining. Some of the the
trash was on the neighbor's side and um it was a really huge pile. Um the city abated for the amount of $99320. Correct. I would like to um enter into the evidence into evidence invoice number
389797 from a village contractor. Um the invoice is being distributed. Now you said this was this owner or the previous owner? So it was in between conveyance that this happened. It was
the previous owner actually. So before they moved out. Oh, sorry. Okay. Um to answer Michael's question, this happened we believe during conveyance as they were changing owners. The the tenant was asked to leave. So he moved out and just
left everything there. Now we did explain to the new owner that as the owner, he is responsible for this amount. Now, if he wants to speak with the old owner and negotiate between the two of them, that would be outside of what we can. The city needs to be reimbursed,
correct? This the city had to abate this right away. And you're just asking for the invoice to be satisfied. We are asking for the invoice to be satisfied for the board to issue an after the fact order to abate because we abated without an order. Um, anyone on the
board? Go right ahead. So if you would identify yourself. Sure. My name is Atil Agnil. I recently actually we recently purchased two properties in Biscane Park. Uh with this 840 Northeast 116th Street uh while I was at the closing at the title company. My understanding is
that rather than moving out some of their stuff, the previous owner just left it on the street. and I was at the property either the day after or two days after that. I took the pictures and I directly sent it to the seller's agent because I don't have any direct
communication with the uh previous owner and he explained that he was going to pass the invoice to him but I guess we received the invoice so I can today. Perfect. So I can pass it to them but if not my understanding is this is leanable on the property. So regardless, I got to
pay it if Okay. All right. Probably paying Chase. Yeah. Yeah. We would just ask that they give him some time to pay. So what do you think that like if you uh
got the invoice, which you will get now, what do you think is a reasonable time that you can get the other seller if he is going to pay that? I'm going to send this right after this meeting to the sellers agent. So, I'm hoping they should like within a week or so, they should get an answer from them and if
it's not fulfilled by then I can go ahead and pay it myself. June, would you say June? I'm sorry. Sure. That sounds fair. That sounds fair. Yes. Sure. I'll make a motion in uh CE250350
uh to um to issue an order uh for $93320 uh for the abatement from Great Waste and Recycling Services LLC that was build to the city uh by June
5th this year. to leave. If not, intent to lean. I'll second. Have a first and a second. All in favor? I. Any opposed? Motion passes. Thank you. And where can I obtain the copy of that invoice? Oh, perfect. Thank you so much. You're
welcome. Thank you. Thank you. Next item is 7.7 77 77 and it's for the address one3 Northeast 115th Street. It's for case number CE25-0271. Property owner is 103 Northeast 115th
Street LLC in care of their registered agent Adorno Aran R. We are asking for an order of enforcement. Um this uh property owner installed a driveway without first obtaining permits
were found to be in violation of section 16.4.1 double fee permits. They applied for a permit and I would like to enter onto the record PDWS-25-000025. Um, they have not yet paid for this permit. They have not yet paid the Have you paid for the permit? I
told my contract to pay for the permit, but we did. Oh, okay. My There's no payment for PNZ, which you're supposed to go to PNZ first. There's no payment for that. And there's that's this case has not been scheduled for PNZ. So as
so they haven't paid the uh the filing fee to be in front of uh paid the fee to flow to PND. So it's open. Okay. I wasn't aware that we have What is PND? I'm sorry. Planning and uh design review. That's your first step to getting a permit, sir, is to go in front
of planning and design review. And there is a fee. I believe it's $50. $50 to get on their agenda that has to be paid. And then when your permit and if your permit is approved, that's then the payment. I can gladly pay that. Pay that tomorrow, I guess, at the office.
You come to the village. Okay. Because you've already been set up with the number. You pay the $50. They'll set you up for a meeting. That's right. It will be for PND. I wasn't aware. I'm sorry. You will have that per That will now be the next one you could hope for is um June
9th because this week they'd already they wouldn't make it. No. No. So June 9th would be that for all of us to consider June 9th would be the first time they could end up. So he's chasing the after the fact right now, right? He's just going installed and everything, but they have to go back now
and go through the process of having their plans re reviewed. Yeah, I have to say trying to beautify the neighborhood. Yeah. Any questions from the board?
Nope. Go right ahead. tomorrow and then the next meeting will be June 9th. I won't be able to attend June 9th. It's my birthday that uh those days. Um wouldn't you rather I won't be in Miami. Can it's there's no way to squeeze me in earlier or not then have to be late. It wouldn't be before us and and from what I understand you don't have to be in
front of P and planning. It's just recommended. It's recommended but if you're not able to make it at that meeting definitely won't be for the next right it do you recommend I be there? I don't want it to be okay. It just particularly I'm going to be honest with you. I really feel
like when something is installed ahead of the fact it becomes even more important because there going to be questions that they can't necessarily answer without you there. So I'd rather and I and I won't make it to the next upcoming meeting. You have a contractor
another representative they can come there. Yeah. It's going to cost you more money. I rather just he's already charging me enough. June 23rd would be the next meeting. Okay. Okay. I guess two he can make a decision whether he's going to be at either one. Well, that
but just for us we have to push the date. I won't be a man in two months. Perfect. Perfect. Okay. If you anything else to say? Anything else? All right. In the case of
CN25-0271, a violation has occurred. It says a $250 fine, uh, $250 admin fee. Obtain a permit, pay and obtain a permit by June
25th. If not, a daily fine of 250. And there are total 500. You're saying, sorry, sir. Total 500. Okay, sir. And there are double permit fees because of after the fact. It's a fine of 250 admin. fragment of
250 until June 25th to obtain and pay for that permit for 250 daily. Okay. Well, I've already applied for the permit, so it's a matter of just going through the design board. Correct. It has to be issued for Okay. So, I'll pay that tomorrow then. Okay. Has to be paid
for and issued. Okay. Okay. Do I have a second? Sir, on I know you someone submitted for you. response will be after it goes through review planning uh and design then building will have to review and inspect the driveway. Okay.
Once we get that compliance first step I'll come back tomorrow. Okay. Okay. Thank you. Appreciate it. All in favor? I I seconded it. Next item is in old business. Section
six of the agenda. 6.3 is the item. The address is 108 Northeast 114th Street. It's for case number C25-0149. Property owner is 748 development for LLC in care of their
registered agent or mentor George H. We are asking for an intent to lane of $500 that remains unpaid. They were found to be in violation of section 18.4 permitted days and hours for
construction 7:25 a.m. and creating loud construction noise. questions from the board. Sir, if you would identify yourself and your relationship to the property. Hello, my name is Carlos Bordagna. I'm one of the owners of 748 and currently the contractor for the
uh construction. Um this lady in the corner next next to uh the construction, she called the police on us a 100 times in the first 30 days. Um then we finally had a long chat. We had an agreement and um probably a week
after this happened uh in which I I exchange I usually exchange uh phone numbers with the neighbors you know around the constructions and I let them know if anything happens they can let me know. I sent a text to everybody saying that I was going to start a little earlier because um if there was no
problems because we had a 12hour shift on the main pouring of the concrete roof um and there's no way to do it in two phases. We you have to pour it in one day. We did interrupt you and I apologize for that. Um this was for pressure washing. Okay. But it wasn't it
wasn't a pressure washing. It was it was a pump which is similar. is a water pump for the concrete. And usually they have to be set up like 30 minutes before the concrete arrives. Uh and that's why we set it up at 7:30 cuz the concrete was going to arrive at 8 with, you know,
ideally to finish around 6:00 p.m. uh rushing it. Um and they said it was okay. Uh every neighbor said no problem. And then apparently who's the neighbor on both sides and across the street and the lady that called 100 times? the lady
that called Han, she said, "Okay." But then who called the police was the uh the husband. And then they came out when the when the police was there. They came out and said, "Hey, I'm sorry. I she didn't tell me that you texted." And I was like, "Okay, but I already got a fine." Unfortunately, neighbors don't.
It doesn't matter if neighbors are okay. If you're going against the ordinance, it has nothing to do with your neighbors. No, I understand. Abide by what the code requires. I understand. I just think I just um it was a 12-hour shift. it was impossible to not make it
before or after hours. Um, and I they don't they they let me know like right right on that day. They told me like they called me 6 a.m. and they said, "Hey, six, seven trucks of of concrete. If we don't start a little earlier, we're going to finish at night." Uh, so it was like no, it was like a no choice
kind of thing. Uh, we never we tried to not go over, you know, before 8 through 5 and but um, it happened. I just I had the uh chance to talk to the neighbors and it happened. What happened?
I have any questions to the property owner with um how long will it take for you to pay the $500? Um right now you already have a notice of um it's already place. So we're just coming if
um can you pay it by uh June the 5th if not? Yeah, paying is not a problem. I just think it's a little unfair. We're paying we're paying we're paying thousands of dollars to build. We're building four homes in Biscin Park. The city has ordinances that there's certain
hours that we're allowed to do construction and that is to ensure that people don't get waken up woken up at and well you did I know you thought you were doing the right thing and polling the neighbors but the neighbors can't give you permission to not follow an
ordinance that's the problem only the building official if you came to the village and asked the building official for an exception he's the only one allowed to give you an exception, right? Okay. June the 5th is good. I I'd like to go ahead and make a motion in case
number C-25-0149 uh to direct billies to move to lean $500 plus the applicable filing fees if the uh outstanding fine of $500 is not paid by June the 5th. We'll second.
All in favor? I opposed. Motion passes 5-0. Dale Judy June 5th to pay. Yes. Yes. The big one. Not the one standing by
across the street from Yes. The Taco Bell. If you pay, at least you um save on the filing fee. It looks like a drive-thru. It looks like a Taco Bell is right through. What? I'm sorry. Did
you say what? I said if you pay If you pay it by June the 5th, you don't have to pay the filing fee. That's some savings. Yeah. Thank you. Appreciate it. We try. Thank you, sir. We have 119th. Yeah, similar.
East of That's right. Yeah. Yeah. They're kind of the same. Yeah. Yeah. And then we're starting the low cabin now 121st. A lot of people watch. Oh man. All right. Thank you guys. You have a
good day. The next item is 6.4. It's 10921 Northeast 10th Avenue. Case number CN-23-282. is for Marie Rodri and Fetto Pointville. We asking
for an intent to lane. Um this is a driveway violation that um they last order they were given until April 23rd to ensure a permit was issued. As of today, May 14, 2025, there
is no permit issued. And just kind of a reminder, this case was opened May 6th of 2022. As of today, the fine, which has been running
at $250 a day, is at 5,500 and we're asking for an intent to lean. Questions from the board. Go right ahead, sir. If you would, if you would please identify yourself and your relationship to the property. uh FTO point, one of the owners of the
property. Where is yours, sir? Um well, basically, um I've applied for the permit. I paid for um it was different revisions that kept coming up. Um I came to the office a few times to try to
um resolve. Um, I end up paying for additional for the continuation of the permit again. I reapplied and I paid for that. I think I I think that was this morning um to try to solve this issue here.
There wouldn't have been an a permit paid for and twice obtained if there were still revisions to be made. No. Right. But you saw something that came through this morning. This morning? No, I haven't seen anything. I haven't seen submit something this
morning. Yes, ma'am. I have never received a call. I mean, yeah, we would have to look that up, but when I checked this when I was preparing the agenda, I didn't see anything that was there, which is a few days ago. Okay. And um while we've been back and forth with
PND, what the board asked for was a permit issued, and so far the permit has not been issued. I was just going to say that's great, but we're that's not what I mean is here basically to see what can be done to
resolve this as far as um whether to follow a lean and because you have fines still going fines $250 and and PND had denied what they
submitted on September 23rd of 2024, right? And then I resubmitted it again as well. Um, I'll be honest with you, I came down the office because I on the on the messaging board. I can't problem that other people here are
having. You guys have a screen set up and when you go down to the office, there's nobody there to help you. The only thing that they tell you go on that website. I understand when a new era of technology and everything is, but if you know sometime it it takes a human interaction to say, "Hey, listen. here's
this, here's that. And I've been to that office three, four times, and I've gotten, don't get me wrong, I'm not here trying to bash or disrespect anybody, but what I've gotten is, well, here's a number and here's a website. So, I've gone back to that website and implemented what information I felt like
I think that was uh relevant to the situation. I'm not here to deny that it's not done. I'm not here to say that. me as someone who is not I I refer to myself as technologically challenged. So it's not that I don't empathize with
you, sir, but the problem is this has been going on for three years. That's fine. I understand it. I'm not I'm not and I'm not I'm not ma'am I'm not I'm not dis uh uh um trying to say it hasn't been. I'm just telling you what the the fact of the situation is. And if I I and
I have gone down there and I have submitted several uh paperwork like I said I paid for the permit three times now. So when the permit is denied sir and and you submit I'm reading the notes. Yes. Miss Maria asked what she
needed to do in October and there's an email replying to her that she could be scheduled to go back to the board November 23 November I believe. Right. So in order to have the paperwork that we asked they were asking for submitted back to the board. So when you
come to us in the office the ladies or the gentleman that's there is going to tell you here's where you need to go submit the paperwork so that they can schedule you for the meeting. You don't submit that paperwork. You came to the office. I remember one day I saw you they gave you the papers and you walked
away. Ma'am and I'm again I'm not you know to your your your job or you know again to anybody. I'm trying to not, you know, being um combative. Um is all I'm saying is what they giving me is the same thing they've always given me. Here's a website and go put these
papers. Well, if I'm if I'm if my thing is if I'm submitting the same papers and nobody's giving me directions, all they saying is here's a letter and here's a website. Go submit. Well, I'm submitting papers. Am I submitting the right ones? Something was denied at PND. You have to
read the notes from PND to understand what was denied. So you can submit what they are asking you to submit. Code cannot tell you what to submit. PND is who can tell you what to submit. Reading D u the building clerk's notes from
September 24th. Your design plans were denied at the Monday, September 23rd planning and design review board meeting. Due to the proposed plans for the driveway does not show the new driveway extending toward the street. And I and please bear with me, sir. Just two more sentences. I promise. Please
comment below or reach out to building etc etc to be scheduled for future planning and design review. Um Marie Rodri did say I want to revise the plans. Could you please provide guidance? That's the last anybody. Right. And then I and I resubmitted
those those plans again on the website. Um when did you submit them ma'am? Uh I mean I don't have my computer in front of me. I what I did was because the thing is it said it's not showing. I had the survey. I I did the drawings and I went to the side. It says it's not
showing um the the the street that like this. It's not going showing all to the street. Okay. So, all right. So, we I extended and I put notes street which you could actually see on the on the um
on the drawing on the drawing. Right. So, then I resubmitted those. I resubmitted it back. Did you receive anything back? Um, obviously not. No, the only thing I got back was the same thing. They're saying that it wasn't but I I I resubmitted
those two or three time and then a third time is probably when you saw me going back in the store like, "Hey, I I'm I'm at a standstill like I need help." Well, what way I look at it right now is that's yes, you may need help, but what's before us is whether we proceed with directing the village to file an
intent to lean. Currently, that's outstanding. you still have work to do with regards to getting a permit and you do have a daily fine which after everything's completed we would strongly tell you to I'm don't recommend anything I would suggest you talk to the village about coming back for a fine reduction
whether you do that or not is up to you but right now there was already an order in enforcement and there is now just outstanding fees whether we should move to place a lean on it or if we want to allow him
hold the le hold the money. It was still I mean don't authorize a lean or request a lean until given an opportunity to go to a code hearing and there's two come we've come this far it's already been three years I'm comfortable extending to
June 25th right me too that he because the daily fines are still acrew it right I'm comfortable saying permit by June 25th or then an intent to lean if that permit is not obtained and paid for by
June 25th. I I that's that was what I was getting at because really we just already have everything here. Exactly. If you're trying to work to get it done, we're just going to try to help you. If I could if I could get a permit tomorrow, I could help me and my cousin will come by and we could pour the
pork another month, sir. Okay. So, if you want to make it or I'll make it. I'll make it. I'll make I'll make the motion. In CEN23-282, violation has occurred. The property owner is working on coming into compliance. Give the property owner
until June 25th. You have obtained and paid for a permit. If not, the village to file an intent to lean for all outstanding fines and filing fees. I'll second. All in favor? I I Okay. So,
you got a month to to Okay. And and and you know, if you're having issues, you know, still go down there. You know, if you're having issues getting, you know, things on, just just be a squeaky wheel. Okay. All right. Thank you, sir. Thank you. I
appreciate it. Good luck. I would like to bring to the attention of the board that we have a visitor. He's a candidate for city manager, village manager. I just learned that his name is Mr. Leo Casio. I'm sorry, I pronounced it wrong. North Bay Village. Yes,
lovely community. North Bay Village. He is the I would I read I googled believe me. Nice to meet you. Thank you very much. I
I appreciate you coming and sitting in that. I'm a little neurotic about saying the more people who come, the more sit in the audience and see for themselves, particularly those who are applying for positions such as you are,
the better it is for everyone. So, thank you so much. Thank you for coming, for taking the time. Thank you for letting us know. I was wondering when we were going to bring up this case. No cases yet. Okay.
So, old business section six of the agenda and it's item 6.1 for 805 Northeast 115th Street. It's case number CE25-0152. Daniel Lopez. We were going to ask for an intent to lean
Um they were found to be in violation of section 18.4 permited days and hours of construction. However, they came in this morning and paid the fine. We would like to ask the board to close this case because you had said it on the April order do the intent to lean if they
didn't pay. They did pay. So we asking to close the case. Great. Right. Okay. Well, if there's no question on case number CE-25-0152, um the property is I mean the fines have been paid and move to close the case.
All in favor? I first motion passes 5. Next item 6.2 for the address 915 Northeast 118th Street. It's for case number CN-24-697 Kanzang Gregory Campell White. We are asking for an intent to lean. They were found to be in violation of
section 16.14 double fee permits construction of a fence to the rear of the property without a permit. uh called staff has since filed an affidavit of non-compliance and they are asking for an intent to lean
$5,000 as of today. So they still have not paid for the and this has gone on bigger than first order was back in December. We gave them time
again since March. They were to obtain the permit by April 23rd. I'm ready for the intent to leave. Did Did you uh did you have any contact with this homeowner? He came to the office. He did pay the administrative fee of 250, but still
didn't get the permits. Didn't pay for the permits. He paid the 250 administrative fee for the order of And there's still the daily fine. Daily fine still. And and he had noted or they had notice of today's hearing. Yes, they did. Okay.
Okay. No other questions. In case number CN24-697, uh, violation has occurred. The property owner has not yet come into compliance. The village to file an intent to lean for all outstanding fines and any filing
fees. I'll second. All in favor? I. Any oppose? Motion passes. 5 Z. Next item is 7.4. Uh the address is 885 Northeast 111
Street for case number CN-24-493. Oliv Pierre Anzena Maria Aub Vald Dana Dama we are asking for an order of enforcement um they were found to be in violation of
section 16.14.1 actually they did when we went back today can we have that picture for the board please um they had installed an non-conforming gate on the eastern side of the property facing 9inth Avenue
without first obtaining permits. Eventually, this permit was cancelled. The owner decided not to get permits for the um gate. He decided to remove the gate. He he decided to remove the gate and cancel the permit. We um inspected
the property today for compliance and he has planted hedges. Hasn't removed the gate but planted hedges over it. So this will be up to the board if they want to consider that compliance. I was still a gate there. Yeah, correct. Very clearly
gate has not been removed. Very clearly. But how's he going to get through? So it's somebody else's I Okay, I got to give him really credit for ingenuity. Um not sure how to phrase that. Okay. Was it was the gate still
operable? It was before he put the plants there. Even if it wasn't, it's still there and it was put in without a permit. Well, he canceled it and said it was just going to be part of the fence. Cancelled the permit with the intent of just removing the gate. Removing the gate would have
been compliance, but he we've had that before. But is this a substantial equivalent, I guess, is the question. I mean a gate is for the purpose of what is ingress and eress through a area critical thing. So we'd have to
remove the Oh, because there's no fence around it. It's just the uh for the carpass. Oh, okay. Okay, there are no further questions. Do I have a motion? On case number
C24-493, final violation has occurred. assess $250 fine, administrative cost of $255 and direct I mean and have the property owner either remove the gate or obtain an issued
permit by June the 25th or $250 per day fine there. I'll second. All in favor? I motion passes. I 41 or opposed. Yeah. Michael. Yeah.
Said no. I meant no. Motion passes 41. It was Dale and Janie. Sorry for the motion. Second. Second was Janie and it was 41. Uh June 25th. Joe. The next item is 7.5 for the same
address and same property owners. This case number is CEN-24-498. They're asking for an order of enforcement. Double fee permits. Section 16.14, installation of a non-conforming gate to the front of the property facing 111th Street without
first obtaining permits. Now, they did apply for a permit and I would like to enter into evidence permit number 24- 43. However, the double fee permits totaling
$541 have not been and paid have not been paid. But if they didn't, the permits were approved. They however have not paid the double fee, which is they don't have a permit. they remain non-compliant, right? Because a permit shouldn't be
issued if they haven't paid the entire That's correct. Even though it was approved, they haven't paid for it, meaning the permit has not been issued. Nope. Make a motion on case in CN-24-498. Violation has occurred.
of $250 plus administrative cost of $250. Uh have the date either removed or an issued permit by June the 25th of 2025 or $250 per day fine.
I'll second. All in favor? I. Any opposed? Motion passes. Next item 7.6 is for the address 981 Northeast 113th Street case number C25-016 for Renee Alvarez. We asking for
an order of enforcement. He was found to be in violation of section 16.13.1 exterior paint. The exterior wall needs to be painted. It's in very bad condition. He has uh since applied for a permit and I would like to enter
into evidence permit number PP25-000015. He has however not painted the house. When did he have the permit issued? The permit was issued April 21st, 2025. So six months six or three
months? Six months to paint. So So we need to really table. But why table it? would just come before us if the permit expires again. Yeah, that's right. I mean, he's in compliance right now just for the permit. Compliance would be painting the house.
And this is this is also the same guy that had the uh the concrete fence. Yes. He had the in the air conditioner. Right. And he came down for he Yeah. Yeah. for the AC. So, it sounds like he's because he's done all the stuff on
the past violations, but he's and he's got a permit now, but he just hasn't done it. Yeah. Yeah. Well, really once he has the permit, he's got six days. What a permit. No, six months. I thought Yeah, I think
permit, right? Six months. So, isn't this premature? Well, it was it is premature. Well, it was a notice of violation was issued. So now it's just if he's in compliance. It it's just um correct. It's just to wait for him to
paint and like you say maybe wait for the I just have a question. When did he request the um the permit because it said to obtain uh paint color approval by April the 11th. Did he did he got the permit? April 21st.
Oh. and he applied it. I just Yeah, I'd like to close it. And no questions. I'd like to go ahead and make a motion on case number CE-25-0168. The property is in
compliance by having a permit issued and to close the case. Second. All in favor? I. Any opposed? Motion passes 5. It's Dale and our website says 60 days for the
paint permit. 60 days. 60 days. Okay. Well, we didn't tell we didn't say give a date. So, Right. Right. April six months. I thought not still within though. Yeah, he's still in compliance. Yeah. Yes. Work has to be
completed within the moment. Yes. So, we'll keep an eye and we we would bring it back if anything. I thought it's a little bit short. The next two items are
7.12 and 7.13 in new business. Address for the first C I mean address for the both cases is 11401 Northeast 8th Court. First case number is CE25-0360. property appraiser information protected
um per chapter 119 of the Florida state statutes. We are asking for an order of enforcement and order to abate two orders. This property has been found to be in violation of section 9.20 abandoned property on private
property. Several der derelic vehicles have been parked on the property. They have flat tires and they've been abandoned for an extended period of time. If the board uh recalls, this is the same property that we are we will be asking the county um for a demolition
permit. It's an unsafe structure. Is there anybody living there? No, nobody would live in that house. There's a tree growing inside. Yeah, I know. But we I think the one of the meetings a few we didn't even know if anybody was there or not with the old and the guy that came. a police department did breach um the
house and I was there when they did the breach. We went inside and there's no there's no way anyone would live there. Does it look like anybody has lived there recently? It just looked like an abandoned house. Now, this this property is very interesting because when when we
issued the violations and um had PD go over to breach, the the power was on, water was on. We had to request um North Miami to turn off the water. FPL turn off the
water. So it was being paid by someone. The grass in the front of the house is always still. Yeah. It's the mailbox for the landscaper. This was a property that guns it. Correct. There was a lot of um
ammunition and a lot of firearms that PD is keeping safekeeping. Electric still on. Yeah, nothing bad can happen that with that, right? And their neighbors had to come and complain about what was it like
critters or something side. Yeah. A couple other neighbors who are right. Yeah. So, this this property has I can't even imagine. I cannot imagine. We have taken several steps including um
reaching out to the county to um ensure that they resend the homestead exemption because no one lives in the house. Once we get that um I believe it will give the village more um more power, more room to be able to go to the county and
ask for the demolition permit. That's what I was going to ask. Did you think talked about that last meeting or the meeting before having the building inspector start the process? We have um taking it to the county's unsafe structures board. Correct. We are doing
multiple things. There are a lot of legalities because the property owner is alive. It was confirmed that he's alive by family members. Um so there are certain protocols that we have to follow before we can actually. Do we do we know where the property owner is in? Yes, we
do. Is he protected or something? His information is protected. So we cannot Okay. A lot but there's no contact with him about like anything. Believe family members did try to contact him. We did contact family members. The police department did um and there are a lot of
me mental issues. Mental health issues. I have met all of you. Yeah. and in the background that I'm sure I know nothing about. You've really gone above and beyond with this case and I'm I'm sure it means a lot to the surrounding
neighbors because they're living with this. We can't fix it right away, right? Sure. We can help right now and and let's do it. Ready to make a motion if Okay. -25-060 that a violation has occurred.
assess a fine of $250 plus $250 administrative fee. Have the uh vehicles removed by May 28th or $250 per day fee thereafter. I'll second. All in favor? I. Any opposed? Motion passes 5. For the
second order, there will be a f a fee that will be incurred by the police department to remove the vehicles. And we're asking that an order be put in place so that that amount can also be le leaned against the property. I'm sorry.
What was the deadline? 528 gives them two week. And should we make the abatement part of that motion or two separate motions? I believe we should you should have two separate motions just because it will be
a different amount and it will be completely different action right not to confuse the two and and get and take the vehicle we hope you want to do that one okay in the in the case of C25-03
360 the village to go ahead and abate and charge back to the property owner for all incurred costs and fees. Are you asking for an administrative fee also? And added a 250 administrative fee to
any other fees incurred in that abatement. Yes, I I will second that. All in favor? Any opposed? Motion passes. 50. Um well, could could I should we also um
ask if we're doing that and there um the abatement and the administrative fee, should we go ahead and put um and direct the village to proceed with filing a lean? Yes. Well, we we will have to come for an intent to lean a second hearing. All right. For procedural due process.
Okay. All right. Thank you. Thank you. Long-term good idea, but probably not infuse too much. We want to make sure we do this right because there's a lot involved in this. We have two
motions. The second motion, Jamie and Dale. J and then what happened? Yes. Yes. Motion. The next case is 7 point. Bear with me a second. We have someone who just in Renee Alvarez.
Oh, that's quick with the gates. Um, may I finish this property and then we can talk to him because you already rolled on his cases. Okay. We don't need to swear him in. That's the only reason I interrupt interrupted you. Okay. If the board still wants to speak with him
even though you've ruled on the cases, we would have to swear him. Okay. The next item is 7.13. It's for the same address. Property owner information is protected under 119 of the public records of the
Florida stat Florida statutes public records. It's case number C25-0364. We are asking for an after the-act order to abate and intent to lean. In this case, there was an eminent public threat. There's a lot of disease
carrying animals and insects insect infestation uh which is affecting the neighboring properties and um we had to hire a pest control company to go and abate which they did. they abated
um and the cost of that abatement is $180. I think that's in the evidence already been submitted into the evidence. We are asking for an after the fact order to abate and intent to lean. Any questions from the board? Okay, nobody has any questions. I'll
make a motion. in CE25-0364 uh the property the violation has occurred the village needed to go in and abate that health safety issue charge back to the owner all incurred charges for however long
that abatement continues because it is pest control and um file an intent to lean is there going to and a 250 administrative fee. So it's 250 admin well that's what
I mean all all costs incurred in the in the intent to lean all costs in the debatement for however long that needs to go on plus a 255 filing fee. I second that. All in favor? Any opposed? Motion
passes 5. I'd like to bring to the attention of the board that the property owner for 885 Northeast 111 Street is here. The cases have been heard and ruled on. Um,
case number CN. Oh, item number 7.4 and 7.5. Address again is 885 Northeast 11th Street. This was for the gates. Do we just tell him what was ruled on? Yeah. May we swear in first in case he
say something? Yes. Please raise your right hand. Do you swear a form that the testimony you about to give will be the truth, the whole truth, nothing but the truth? Yes. notes. All right. So, you had
two cases. The first one was the gate on the east side on 111th. No, one nth. On 9th. Mhm. Um, that one apparently is still there. I removed I removed the door entirely because it was
welded on. I had removed the other day. Um dated today, sir. And there is clearly Oh, that's 11th. Sorry. No. Oh, that's 9th. Sorry. On 9th. Yes. Yes. And there's
clearly still a gate. No. No. I'm removing the gate. They're coming to remove it this week. Our ruling was there was a violation. There is a $250 fine for the
violation. There is a $250 administrative fee. The gate needs to come down by June 10th or I'm sorry, Juneth. No, it was June 25th. June 25th. June
25th. It was remove gate by June 25th. Sorry. Or or have an issued permit by June 25th or a $250 daily fine. So there's no fine now. Right. No daily. And he has an he has an administr he's
fine. So far it's $500. If it's removed or and permits issued by June 25th, there will be no daily fine. But right now it's just administrative cost and a and a violation. violation fine, right? Okay. There's a 2. So, you did do work
without a permit. So, there is a $250 violation fine. There are costs involved. There is also a $250 administrative fine. If the gate is either permitted, that you pulled and
paid for a permit, or removed by June 25th, then there will be no daily fine. Okay. And on the second case, same situ same essential situation.
$250 fine, $250 for the administrative costs. Remove or pull a paid for and approved permit by June 25th or the daily fine will kick in. Okay. I have a question regarding the 111th is will be
removed because you already see the hedges are put up. It's because I had problem finding hedges. They were really low for privacy reasons and that's already done. The gates getting out. I was just waiting for somebody to come remove it for the east side. Yes. On one on
Ninth Street. Sorry. Yes. Yes. Sorry. I always get it mixed up. And the one on the the one on the 111 that's parallel I believe you say English is not parallel or yeah yeah yeah on the side last time
I had came here they told me if I remove the door itself it shouldn't be a problem with the the railing that's there that's when it gets into the structure and what you have to do for a proper permit that is the building department. So, the permit has been
approved. You just have to pay. All you have to do is pick it up and pay for it. Okay. Okay. I'm just making sure. Understood. Guess what? $541 outstanding for that permit. Okay. And I this gate
is going to be removed. And for that, if I would like to add the door, is there a possibility to put the door back? That's building. Okay. And do you know you know the process? Well, there there's going to be two hearings before
June June the 25th. Right. There is Okay. So, I just need to come pay the pay the permit and already been approved. Now, if you want to make changes to go back,
okay, revision. Okay. So just come pay that and then pay pay for the on ninth street. Yes, sir. Ninth Avenue, sir. And and remember on the two cases, you do
have road fines. You have 500 on each of the two cases. Those two also have to be paid. No worries. That's not a problem. [Laughter] That's not a problem. If you want to give me a discount, I'll take it.
I think you can get the discount if you have it done by the 25th. There you go. It doesn't get bigger. No. Well, it does get bigger. It's not done. Done. No, it's going to be out by then. But the hedges is not a problem. No,
look. Real good. Okay, perfect. All right. So, just does it looks great. Thank you. Thank you. You've done a really nice job. Thank you. I'm trying I try to keep it not too modern, not too square, and not too still has some character.
It still has some character. Thank you. It's always easier to pick up the phone and ask. Trust me, you can ask anybody that has been in there. Know me because I come and I do the permits myself. I do everything. When I was putting that back gate, there
was another person there before. They told me I can replace the gate. It's not a problem because I already had a gate. Bad advice. Really bad advice. Yeah. No, no, no. I now I'm aware but when I was putting it because before
putting it doing my driveway doing anything I did, I came to the office, sat down. Most of them know me. When they see me like he's back again, he he knows He's back again. So, I asked everything and that's why me when I put the rear
gate, my wife ordered the gate and she's like, "I want a gate here." And when the guy came, he's like, "Haha." He's like, "The same high as the hedges." I thought it was going to be they called me back because it was above six feet. I was like, "Maybe they let it go because it doesn't it's not bothersome. It's not an ugly gate or something." But that's why
I left it. And when you had called me last time, I had told you with business problems in Haiti. So, I was stuck over there and here. So that's why I had all this issue. But normally I'll pull all my permits. Everything is done by me. I I do everything. I was basically my GC
at my house. Thank you. So again, it was a beautiful job. Thank you. Thank you. Now I'm going to I'm going to try to do a couple more in the neighborhood. Keep it class. Good. For both. That's the double fe,541.
Yes, sir. Next item is under 7.14. It's for the address 11801 Northeast 10th Avenue. Case number is CE25-0088. Property owner is 11801 Northeast 10th Avenue LLC in care of
their registered agent Lionontis Fra. Did I pronounce it right? To something something. So, we are asking for an order of enforcement on this case. Um, what they have found to be in violation of section
8.4.7 lot maintenance and cleanup. Um, the garage door has been pried open and it's been like that for a while. I've been to the property several times myself. Um, my biggest worry is uh we've had several properties in um the village
that have vacant um squatters going in in the property. So, the drive the garage door is pried open and I'm hoping that the property owner can repair that quickly, but we haven't had a response. Nobody has been in touch with us and
um the door still remains unrepres issued um February the 7th and the notice of violation March the 11th. No response. No response. No response. No questions. I'd like to make a motion. They're with me. Just Okay. I was No, I was just going to make sure there was
another address. I have one important question to put you on the spot, Vanessa. Do you think you can have the orders done by Friday? Because that could make a difference in the dates you want to give. If you can't be honest that No, no pressure. I just rather you be honest
and say, "No, that's not working. Can't have them done that early." So then you know okay I just wanted so you could build up the date if you wanted to know more when the orders will be done they may well that would be 58
okay on case number C-25-000088 that the property is in violation assess the fine of $250 plus administrative cost of $250. uh have the um
the garage is to be secured or repaired by uh May 28th. If not, a $250 per day fine thereafter. A second. All in favor? I motion passes 50.
Last case on the agenda 7.15 for the address 12025 Northeast Fifth Avenue is for the case number CE-25-0148 Mor Schneider Bar Oz. They were found to be in violation of section
16.14.1 double fee permits. They had installed an aluminum carport be before obtaining building permits. They have approved permits and I would like to enter onto the record permit number
PB24-0013. They are now in compliance and we're asking that this case be closed. Correct. No questions. I'll make a motion. CEN25-0148. A violation has occurred. They have since come into
compliance. Close the case. Second. All in favor? Any oppose? Motion passes 5-0. Okay. Are we good? Yes. In the discussions. Nine. She's going to go. Oh, no. On. Hang on. Yes. Under the
minute. Under discussions. I'll just get that out of the way. There was a reminder for financial disclosure forms that are due by July 1st, 2025. So all board, I'm always used to the village clerk
would send us a notice, would send us a link. I found out the hard way last year, thank God I still have enough time that this doesn't do that. So that's why I wanted to get that reminder on there. You guys, you got to go to the state website.
Don't count on a reminder. I just I can't remember. I just Googled state of Florida financial disclosure form. I'm sorry. You did last year. I didn't get a notice last year. I didn't get a notice last year. So, don't count on it
because in speaking with this clerk, it's not something she does. So, we need to just go in Google State of Florida financial disclosure form. form one as far as I remember correctly. But again,
we have till July 1st, but I didn't want to wait and like I was right at the wire last year. Oh, I I came on after July. That was that was my preaching.
Oh, okay. The minute I'm sorry, going to be at the June meeting. Judy Judy won't be at June meeting. She is going for his important birthday. So, my motion would be to
approve Jud Judy's excuse absence. Absence. My motion is to approve and excuse Judy's absence in June. Second. All in favor? I I No oppose. Go. Have a great time. Okay. Has everybody had a
chance to read the minutes? Yes. Any corrections, changes, etc. I have Poor Vanessa. When I went in to sign the orders, I'm like, Vanessa, we didn't do that. Yes, we did. We did. Was two on
the same property. So, we split it. I didn't write it down. I neither neither did I. So, that's I made the motion. Whatever. But 250 for both properties when Vanessa reminded me.
Yes, 6.5 D Michael for the and I don't pardon me for interrupting because I have one on 65 also on 65 where it says if no compliance is achieved by June 15, 2025, the fines will revert to the original amount. It
should say the daily fines will resume. That's another one. Go ahead. I'm sorry. I interrupted. I It was about Dale. Mike goal. Um on 72 72. I really must have missed Jenny
was on Zoom. Yes, she was. Okay. How'd I miss that? Okay. Thank you afterwards. I'm thinking I do remember the person who was on Zoom and I didn't think it was Jenny. Thank you afterwards. Any
other changes? Correct. Okay. Can I get a motion to approve April's minutes with those changes? I'll make a motion to approve the minutes of April 16, 2025 with the um amend amend amend amended motion.
I'll second. All in favor? I any opposed? Motion passes 40. Any other? Motion approved. 5. Remember last month I was zeroing
everything was four zero. Yeah. Any other discussion? Anything like if not motion to second. All in favor? I motion passes 5.
Thank you everybody. Terrific meeting and staff.