Yeah, now it's on. Okay, thank you. Oops. I don't know. Yes. Amen. Hello. Hello. You know when we're ready. >> We're ready.
>> I'd like to call to order the village of Biscane Park Code Compliance Board meeting of Wednesday, March 18th. The time is now block. Okay. >> Okay. If the clerk would please call the
role. >> Janie Anderson >> here. >> Dale Benton >> present. >> Rodolf Bontos. Judy Hammerberg, Michael Michael, Darin C. Grant, Rafael Gutierrez, Vanessa Cherry, present.
Uh, good evening once again. This is a meeting of the village of Biscane Park Code Compliance Board. The board is authorized pursuant to chapter 14 of the village's land development code to ensure compliance with the villages code of ordinances. The members of the board are citizens and residents of the
village of Biskin Park. We volunteer our time and are not paid for our service. The purpose of each hearing is to give any alleged violators the opportunity to contest the decision of the code compliance officer which resulted in the issuance of a notice of violation and to determine whether a violation of the
villages code has occurred or is occurring. We are not authorized to dismiss violations based on hardship, ignorance, or the fact that others may be guilty of the same violation. These hearings are conducted in a quasi judicial manner. Our responsibility is
to act much like a judge in a court and that is to hear cases presented by the villages code compliance officers and to hear contradictory arguments presented by the alleged violators. We are not authorized to change the code. village commission is solely authorized to enact
or revise codes. Conversely, neither the commission nor the village manager have the authority to overrule the findings of the board. Pursuant to chapter 162, Florida statutes, orders of the board can only be appealed to the circuit court of Miami Date County. We have the
authority to assess and order payment of civil penalties, to issue orders having the force of law, to command whatever steps are necessary to bring a violation into compliance, and to assess administrative costs. In order to make a finding upholding the code compliance officer's decision, we must find that
there is substantial competent evidence that the name violator was responsible for our violation of the relevant code as charged. All documentary evidence presented by the parties must be submitted for placement in the hearing file. No documentary evidence will be considered
unless the alleged violator or code compliance officer submits a copy for the hearing file. Each party shall have the right to call and examine witnesses to introduce exhibits to cross-examine opposing witnesses on any matter relevant to the issues even though that matter was not covered in direct
examination. to impeach any witness, regardless of which party first called them to testify and to rebut the evidence against them. If you intend to address the board and haven't signed in, please do. Anyone wishing to address the board, please stand and raise your right
hand so you may be sworn in. You're reminded this board is a quasi judicial board and giving false testimony can be penalized. So, anyone needing to wanting to speak, please to be sworn in. Please raise your right hand. Do you
swear all form that the testimony you're about to give will be the truth, the whole truth, and nothing but the truth? Where do I just want to say for the record board member Michael Lenard is present. >> Are there any additions, deletions, or
changes to the agenda? >> No additions. >> Do have one. We need to vote on Rodolf was uh absent last month, but let's put that at the end. Okay. >> Just before discussion. Okay. When you're ready, please call
your first case. >> Good evening. My name is Doren Grant. I'm the co-director of the village of Distain Park. The first case on the agenda is from old business and it's under section six, item number
6.2. 2 >> 6 >> 6.2. The address is 717 Northeast 119th Street. It's for case number C25-25-0582. Paola Amago
and Sheain Mule. This case uh is here for an intent to lean in the amount of $500. They were found to be in violation of section 8.4.3.1F property maintenance violation is now in
compliance. I'm happy to report. However, they haven't paid um the fines. We have since filed an affidavit of non-compliance and we have been in touch with the violator. >> Any questions from the board?
sir, if you would introduce yourself and your relationship to the property. >> Uh my name is Paul Omeglio. I'm the owner of the property. Um I spoke yesterday to uh
Mr. Gutierrez Raphael who was very helpful in explaining to me what was going on. Um, I called the office multiple times. The last of which being on
December 10th, left a message, got no call back. When I spoke to Mr. Gutierrez, he asked me if I emailed the office and I said no, but on the order of enforcement, there is no email. There's only a phone number given. So,
it was really the only way that I could have gotten in touch with you guys. I had when I called, I left a message saying that I had an appointment for the 23rd for the roof to be cleaned, which it was done. And here we are.
>> But the roof is in compliance. Am I correct? >> Violation is in compliance. Yes. >> The problem, sir, is the two fines are still unstandable. Yeah, >> I understand you're in compliance, but you weren't at the time we heard the case.
>> Both the $250 citation fine and the 250 administrative fine. >> Well, we're not in compliance at that point. >> The compliance was supposed to be by January 13th and the the house was in compliance by the 23rd of December. But
it wasn't in compliance when you were given the notice of >> I understand. But when I was calling to inform you guys that I had an appointment for it, I received no call back from and I repeatedly called and there is no anything else on here other
than a phone number to reach you guys on. There's no hey, email us here or anything else. And I travel a lot for work and obviously these meetings are held in the evening because everybody works. So, you know, I I don't know what
else to say. >> You really wouldn't have been coming before the board. >> This police call either via phone, email, or going to the office. Um, but the notice of violation was in July 17th. >> Correct. But what I'm >> We didn't enter an order of enforcement
until December 17th, >> and it wasn't until after that time um the uh on said December 23rd is when it was um clean. Yeah. So >> between the 17th of July, sir, and when
we finally heard the case in December, you had said five months. >> Well, when the when the notice I guess when the notice first came, I wasn't in town and I was try, like I said, I travel extensively for my job. So when I
realized what was going on, I got it taken care of. And the frustrating part for me is that the only way I could have gotten a hold of somebody other than coming here, which I can't I mean during the during business hours it's very hard to do is a phone call because it's the
only thing that's provided in the things that are sent to me is a phone number. >> So what happened when you called? Did did you leave a message? >> Yes, the phone call the last message was a minute long. >> Dorene, did did you guys get a message? And yesterday, just as a side note, yesterday when I first called and got a
hold of somebody and asked about the process, the advice that was given to me was I should Google it >> from our office. Correct. And then I finally got the phone number for Mr. Raphael who was extremely helpful and polite and actually emailed me this
yesterday. And you know, I came that's that's why I'm here. Well, I'm still waiting for the answer to my question. Dorine question again, >> which was he said he left like a voicemail, like a minute voicemail, and he never got a phone call back.
>> We would double check uh when phone calls come in. We have four people that answer the phone. If any of those people didn't answer the phone, that's when it would go to voicemail. >> The call was on December 10th at 4:14 and it lasted a minute.
>> D was when? on December 10th. That was the last call I made. >> Notice of violation >> at 4:14 and it lasted a minute. >> The notice of violation was given. >> I'm saying to you that was the last call I made because that's I'm I'm not saying it was the only call I made. I'm just
saying that's the last call I made because I had to go into my call logs to try to find the call. >> The frustration sometimes we'll go through trying to reach people we need to reach. We're still talking five months. >> Okay. Well, If All right. What's my what what are my
options at this point? >> Um there is $500 outstanding in fines. It needs to be paid to avoid an intentional lean. >> And if I receive a lean, what are my options? What happens? What what are the repercussions of a lean?
>> Have to discuss with your mortgage company. I suspect >> an encumbrance on your title. So in 15 years when I sell the house I have to deal with a lean. >> Whoever buys the house if you don't pay it will have to pay that. >> Okay. >> And at the time it may not be $500. It
will have to be acrewing interest at 18%. >> It'll be 500 plus >> plus the filing >> plus a filing fee then plus an additional administrative fee. So, >> oh, it's so it's it's a $250 fine plus a
$250 administrative fee is what it says here. >> That's what you currently have, >> right? And what's the administrative fee for? >> How much time does it take to do all of this >> 50 covers staff postings everything that
goes into a $500 out fee? >> Okay. But I I I understand what the fee Okay, >> your choice. If you want to put a lean on your home, have the inumbrance, >> have whatever that may or may not do to your credit. That is absolutely. >> So, it affects my credit as well is what
you're saying. >> Potentially, yes. >> Potentially or it does. >> Yes. >> So, you don't know. >> It's your risk. >> So, you're I mean, you're telling me that it goes against my credit or you're telling me that it goes against my house?
>> You need to borrow. You need to take a loan. city much more difficult. Again, your choice. >> It's your home. >> Okay. >> So, I I understand that there's a $250 uh fine. I understand what the fine is
for. And if I'm paying an invoice, I should be able to know what I'm paying the other $250 for. >> Explain that. >> Well, I'd like a breakdown of it. I could ask for an itemized invoice, can't I? Um I don't >> can't I I mean is that is that not fair?
>> There is not an itemized breakdown sir. >> Well what's what's the rate per hour >> are the two fines and >> oh it's two fines. >> The administrative >> So the administrative fee is not a fee it's a fine >> that's what you just said
>> word the administrative fee and the citation. So, I have a fine for $250 and an administrative fee that you can outline to me if >> if I may. I believe you acknowledge you received the order of enforcement and in there it states what it is. It's a $250
uh fine that is assessed and uh administrative fee of $450. So, >> no, it was going to be a daily fine if it hadn't been in compliance. Compliance wasn't met by January the 3. avoided that by coming into compliance prior to
that. Right now, we're at a $500 uh request to lean. If it goes into leaning forward with the motion, then we would be um I would make a motion for
>> for um an admin an additional administrative fee for the processing of the documents there and the filing fee would >> um so >> so then you're saying it'd be more than $500 that the lean would be for. >> Yes. >> Okay. Um, I don't know if you would like
to if if you >> I just don't understand why I didn't never got a phone call back. >> Okay, >> that's the only that's the only thing I'd like to know. >> Explain. >> Why I didn't get a phone call back is my question. >> I can't answer that. What it can do is with regards to what you hear for us
today, you'd like to take up with the village manager, the code um uh uh director right over here um tomorrow or next week, by all means, please do there. Once you call that 800 number,
there are a number of numbers. It's 8998000. I'm sorry. There are a number of numbers. One is for code. You can also ask for an operator. >> It calls. Yeah, it's number one for code >> there and it goes to someone uh directly. So if nobody is available,
leave a message. I cannot answer those questions, but I would like to make a motion and I would like to give you an opportunity to pay. So in my motion on case number CE-25-0582 that uh the property is now in compliance. There
are outstanding fine and administrative costs of totaling $500. Direct the village uh to move to file a lean plus the administrative costs administrative fee of 250 and the filing fee accessible I mean the applicable
filing fees. uh give the property owner until >> April 1st to pay or proceed with filing delay. >> A second one in favor >> I >> any opposed mean >> motion passes 5.
>> So if you paid the 500 >> thank you for your time you've been very informative I really appreciate it if not paid by December. Thank you for your time. Thank you. is under section 8 of the agenda. Fine
reductions and it's item number 8.1. It's for the address 11872 Griffin Boulevard. It's for case number CE25-0426 for Jacle Marqu Runquist. They're asking for a fine reduction.
Outstanding fine is $10,000750. $10,750. They are offering $50 and we are recommending $500. And our recommendation is based on the fact that once they received the violation, they
started working. um they were able to get the permits and get this uh violation uh corrected within a short period of time. So we are recommending not 10%, we are recommending $500.
>> Because as I see it, this case did start with a courtesy notice. >> Yes. >> Before you went to the notice of violation, then >> when we heard the case, >> April 25th, >> I'm sorry. April 25th, 25.
>> And when we finally heard the case, we gave until October 7th, >> right, >> to obtain the permit. It looks like the permit was not applied for till 3 weeks after that, >> right? It was within a within the month they applied for the permit. And Jacqueline lives in another state, so it
did take her some time. Go back and forth. >> Just kind of wanted to get the timeline. >> Yes. Out there. >> Any questions from the board? No, I basically um wrote out the same thing going the courtesy notice back on April 5th and the first order
enforcement office with the compliance by October 8th. >> Okay, sir, if you would. >> Okay. My name is John Marquette. I'm representing my sister Jaclyn Marquette
Runquist who is here. The only reason in this particular case we're a little bit picky about it is the form very clearly says because this is financial negotiation that if the homeowner which I'm assuming is >> that's yes that's her. Do did you want her to speak?
>> Lady sitting in the audience they have to state that they've given you permission to do the negotiation. >> I'm of course happy to comply with whatever. Yeah sure >> you would ma'am. >> Absolutely. >> This is my sister Jaclyn Marquet Runquist. So all >> Yep. And I've talked to Vanessa and
probably one or two of the other ones. And I will state in a really nice respectful manner, people don't return phone calls. So just so you know. >> Okay. Um >> Okay, you can sit down. >> Okay. So >> Oh, I'm not going to sit down. >> So
we're here for the reduction and I I appreciate the consideration. Uh but then we're also here because we for some reason have another violation which is beyond my comprehension. We we got a we got a we got a we submitted we got a permit on a driveway in January middle
of January. We got a notice that we're in violation again. I don't understand. >> And we got an inspection that we passed the inspection. So we didn't know there was anything till but we don't know what for. Did
>> we hear the bond reduction first? >> Okay. >> There's nothing else before us besides >> so there's some confusion. Yeah. So maybe we got some notice it doesn't seem to conform to our records. So maybe it's just a misunderstanding. Okay. >> What we have to deal is with the fine rejection,
>> right? >> Of course backlash people. >> Okay. So well the recommendation I appreciate the consideration. So what do you need from me further? I'm
>> going to be perfectly honest sir. Um, as far as a new survey being needed, because your previous owner didn't leave one, unless surveys are less than a year old, you still would have needed a survey. I'm going through that right now. >> It was a very difficult Sorry, interrupt. It's also very difficult to
get at the time. Uh, because there was a tremendous amount of rain going for several weeks. We couldn't get anyone to come out and do it. And we discussed this when I was here before. >> I'm going to say I'm not comfortable with a $50 offer because >> it's not $50. She said 500.
>> No, no, no. But you're offering free Okay. Sorry. >> We don't We don't negotiate. >> All right. Sorry, I misunderstood. Okay. You sir, >> I apologize. Okay. >> Are we have to vote up or down on what you propose to us? >> Okay. Understood. >> I'm not comfortable. As you see, our
basic citation fine is 250. The time involved with staffs in dealing with a case that's come back in front of us a couple of times and got a little bit lengthy I would not be comfortable with $50.
>> So, I think we need to vote on it. >> Okay. >> Okay. I will make a motion that we do not approve of the $50 offer. >> Second. >> And that's in case number 25-0426. >> I'll second. All in favor? >> I.
>> Any opposed? Motion passes 50. basically just denied the offer of $50. >> You can make another >> You can make another uh request. I I can tell you from my standpoint, I know that there's others on the board that also
historically have put a lot of credence into the recommendations of the >> of the village um of Dorine. Um I think that is that five 5%. >> Right. So that's that's less than 5% of what the amount is.
>> The usual recommendation is 10%. But considering that this driveways take a long time, the permit uh process and everything and they did make an effort to do it within a shorter period of time. And >> so so in reality, had that not occurred,
your recommendation would have been a little bit more than $1,000, right? >> 10,000. Okay. Right. Okay. >> So, on our behalf, we sincerely appreciate the consideration and we accept that if >> $500. >> Yes. >> Motion to accept.
>> I'll make a motion on KCE-25-0426 to accept the $500 offer from >> a second. A >> motion and a second. All in favor? I >> we have a pay by date. >> Uh yeah, a pay by date. Um
>> by the by >> by April 1. Yeah, you can't the office. Well, >> you got to by April 1st. >> Will April 1 work? >> Yes. I'll I'll deliver the payment on your behalf. >> Okay. >> Yep. That's all. Thanks. This is just a
side note with regards to deductions for the audience and for anybody listening that some of the criteria that we do listen that we do look at when doing this is um documentation whether the property owner was cooperatives during the process and all uh whether there was
extraordinary extraordinary hardship uh whether it is homesteaded the number of days of the violation whether a respondent um is a uh or the property owner is a repeat bio and has been before the board multiple times
and the total cost uh the administrative cost to the village cooperating. We appreciate it. Yep. >> Thank you. We appreciate the consideration. Parking should only be on the driveway. >> Okay. >> Versus where >> is that what the issue the issue is about? I have no idea.
>> No idea either. >> Yeah. I mean uh >> we've got it we >> we got we we got a notice in the window. I was just shocked. you know, >> you did the work. You gave us a permit. So, we don't know why we're here. >> Oh, no. >> So, >> you're here for the fine reduction, >> you know, right? So, for clarity, so
listen, we understand the fine reduction and which we of course we appreciate, but we were notified we had to show up because of our driver wasn't in compliance. >> So, there was a courtesy notice issued first and then there was a notice of violation after a period of time and after the notice of violation, there was a period of time that passed
that you had to comply. >> But, but we had this violation two weeks ago. We've been in compliance since January 15th when we got our permit approved. My understanding >> it's the same violation you you have another violation. This was a notice for you to come to this hearing. >> Okay. So that so we've addressed everything then.
>> Yes. I understand. Thank you. We appreciate the consideration >> and and if the payment isn't made before the 1st of April, then it goes back to the original fine. >> Understood. Thank you. >> Thank you so much. Good day.
The next case is in section six and it's item number 6.12 is for the address 12025 Northeast 8th Avenue. Case number C-25-0592. This property is owned by Andrew and
Liss Wilson intent to lean $500 unpaid. Um they were found to be in violation of section 8.4.3.1F 4.3.1F property maintenance exterior walls and awnings that needed to be cleaned and paint and or painted. >> My name is Andrew Wilson. It's my wife
Lameise Wilson. >> No worries. >> If you would. >> Okay. Um >> questions. Are they in compliance in terms of the actual citation Bible? Um, there are pictures before you that show
that they had painted, they had made effort to paint the house. However, they could have done a better job if I'm being honest with the paint. >> Appreciate the awnings have been washed. Those are in compliance. >> Thank you for the honesty on the painting job.
>> Still working on >> We would call it a partial compliance. >> Okay. >> From the board. No, because I do see where um it looks from the original pictures. I I see where is the the base of the base of the home
>> and um and the upper parts of the home. It's uh under the window sills. Yeah, it's it's it hasn't been done. >> And I see >> and and just for additional clarity, um my apologies for additional clarity.
Okay. >> I see two different total sheet and and the reason we did that was if the board was happy with the photographs of compliance, we would have gone with the $500. But if the board sees non-compliance, then we would have to
calculate the 250 daily fine. And that what that's what we would present to you. >> And just sorry for clarity, this email exchange on September 11th of 2025. Uh the blue the blue ink is yours and the
red is his, >> I believe. So >> pretty much mine. Any emails probably from me. >> All right. where it says you didn't post it on my door and you had your administrator email it to my husband only and where it says I absolutely did
not post the notice at your door. I gave officer Gutier his clear instructions to not posting your property. Is that yours? >> That was mine. Yes. >> So then he said the last time he was at your property there was a problem when I visited your property your last words to me were get out of my house in a hostile manner. That >> yes.
>> And who was that? Who said that? >> I did. >> Okay. I did. >> Okay. >> I think we need to deal with the present. What is the board's feelings regarding the pictures that we we're
looking at? >> I just don't see where compliance has been met. I see where it's there's an initial effort because I do see around the meters and all it appears that all of that has been painted. >> May we speak now? May we say anything?
>> Sure. But I I haven't finished and I'll I'll be finished in just one second. And then underneath uh at the base of the uh the foundation of the home, the same thing. It's uh >> right. U it's not just from a a splatter up. It's
consistent all the way across. Um, so the upper part and the lower part and it's just been looks like the middle part and around the um that uh addition where the door is on the side of the house.
It Yeah, I you know I guess we can wait for the homeowners, but I'm just trying to figure out if it's still in progress or if this is done. But I'm looking at the pictures of the 11th. While there's obviously been an improvement,
still not there in terms of findings for what? >> We're going to be there very, very soon. I promise you, because we have a commitment to work on the house since we bought it in 2021, right, June? We've done the roof. We have new doors. I
mean, we bought this house, it was in shambles. So, we have done everything that we can. Now, what we're doing this year, and I'm so excited about that, is that we're going to do the windows. So, we're going to take all the shutters out, and that's when the painting is going to happen. It's gonna happen probably in this year. I've explained
this to so many times. I have so much passion for this house, and I want it to look like the best house ever. >> I totally love seeing your enthusiasm. We need that. But I've got to I've got to remind you, ma'am, it also
things have to kind of be ever a way to have conform so that the neighborhood is not looking at issues that have been existing now for many many years. We're just trying to get this inked along whether it's more pressure washing would
clean it off whether you've got to go back in and paint a little more. Okay, >> but we really need it to move upward again. I don't want to diminish your enthusiasm. Okay. >> I appreciate >> you'll be able to do that. We're too happy about it. Yeah. >> I'm sorry. >> Yeah. It's good.
>> That you are recognizing that I'm trying to fix the house because in 2025 we did the roof. That was huge for us. >> Oh my god. Yeah. >> We did all the doors. This is not a small house, right? >> And I don't know if you guys I'm sure you know the geography of this game park. >> Oh yeah.
>> Not that this is going to stop me from doing anything to my house, but this is where I live. This is around where I live. I live next to dilapitated houses that have been there for 20 years and you cannot give me a year. >> That's not >> that's the one next to us. Where where
>> the house and then there's that's that other one that I see from my window every day. >> We're working on those too. >> Yeah. Yeah. >> That's North Miami, isn't it? >> This part >> on the board. >> It's so sad. >> Those homes are in litigation. so
completely >> which I understand and it has nothing >> I know that doesn't make you feel any better >> but it you can't give me a little bit of time when you see that I have done things I haven't just bought this house in 2021 and I'm not doing anything >> I'm actively doing things and putting
more money into it and trying to make it the best even though every single morning I wake up and look at the bee house which I have bees everywhere and I have cats everywhere and I have roaches everywhere because of it and then this which is the house besides us. Nobody
sees what's happening to this house, but I do every single morning. And I The reason why this lady was kicked out of my house is because the attitude, the disrespect. I let you into my house. >> Yeah, let's not go there. >> Yeah, I think you're right. Let's not go
there. Exactly. >> It was mentioned. >> May I ask a question? Yes. >> When do you think you could have this uh completed? Because like I said, it's a good effort, >> right? But it still needs to and and if you have the code come by, they can show you what they're talking about or we
extra pictures. You can >> appreciate that. Yeah, come down. >> Or you might have to go by the village to see pictures because I need these days these um >> let me answer your question about when are we going to do this? So we are in 2026. >> Okay. Not to get personal or anything,
but we're putting finance together so we can do how many um we have 35 windows. We're talking to people about doing our windows. We have hurricane shutters. So, how can I paint, right? And then take the hurricane shutters out and then do
my windows and then paint again. I don't know how much money you guys think I have, but I'm doing frame. >> So, what I'm asking and I would have asked of um what's his name? The manager in September when I went and meet with him is give us time. Let's communicate.
Let's not try to be like, "Here's a notice of this. Here's a notice of this." Nothing that was sent for me in an email was ever recognized. I am so I'm so sorry. I don't mean to be personal. I don't want to cry, but this is a little too much. I'm trying my
best. >> Understandable. It is a very large home with financial outlay, but we're dealing with enough homes, let's face it, unfortunate litigation and that we just hands are tied.
>> We want to kind of encourage everybody else to >> step up the game a little bit. So, >> we sure am. >> What? >> We sure am. I'm sure timewise. What are we looking at timewise? >> We are looking to be completely 100% honest. The windows will be done from
now till probably when Christmas starts just so because the permits all that. But now till the end of the year, this whole thing will be done. But but the fines are going to continue to run. >> The fines when I've done everything I have >> because and and I ran into this with my
house. My house was a disaster when I bought it and I was working on the inside, working on the inside, and I got a citation for the outside. And what they said was basically your neighbors don't want to look at your house looking like this anymore. And you need to take a little bit of time and money out of
what you're doing. And I did. I did touchup work. I didn't paint the whole house. >> I did touchup work that made it look nice enough that the city was satisfied and it didn't break the >> I was trying not to do that but just to
slap on a band-aid. So, I was trying to do a little bit better. I I would appreciate Mr. Gutierus's um if you were to stop by and maybe show me what we can take care of and I will more than happy be able to do that. >> That Raphael that would help me and help everyone else think. >> One thing in September I got the awning
painted. I didn't just clean the awning. I didn't just slap. I got it painted. I have I paid $500 to have it painted. So, I'm doing >> sometimes even a band-aid. >> Okay. So, what do we need to do? Because I don't think a fine is is >> if that's got to stay in place for the
moment because when everything is done and your palace is gorgeous, as I'm sure it's going to be, >> thank you. >> There will be time for you to apply for a fine reduction. Now, this is where we have to be until we start And
>> and so just so I so we're totally clear, the initial um courtesy notice that's usually sent out in the beginning was sent back out in October 2024 and it was specifically for the awning only. And then it went from the awning, it escalated. We got uh information about
cleaning the roof, repairing the roof. It was for a different property, picture of a different property on 10th Avenue, I believe, or or 8th Avenue. Um it was a different address with uh do the you know we have too much garbage on the roof when we just done the whole roof.
So there was a whole mixup in that and then several backto-back violations which had still the roof um the roof violation roof of every building and structure shall be maintained in a waterproof condition. We had the newest roof on the block in in this uh in 2025.
And so to get that down down down the road to go from a courtesy notice escalation from an awning to now a lean on a property seems a little excessive. >> Yeah, it's all right. No problem. >> It looks like we are at the point where it's the painting. >> That's what I want to add.
>> Wait a minute. >> Yeah. >> So, um Raphael, does this is this in your opinion will pressure cleaning do any good to resolve the issue that's currently still outstanding? >> No. >> No. So, it needs to have
>> Okay. >> Okay. If you could mean if you show if you can show me the areas, please. >> You can you have it um uh painted in 60 days. >> You want us to paint the house in 60 days? >> Well, you've already partially painted the house.
>> Paint what what what he sees as >> mandate is we're calling, >> right? >> I will make my best effort to do that with with Mr. Ger's help and >> Yeah. Okay. Absolutely. If you go to the paint store and you give them a >> I have it all ready and just in case
>> an accurate of what the faded out paint is, they can usually match up to that >> rather than going if you go with the original paint, it's going to be bright or if you go with the new paint, it'll go bright. But if you can get them an accurate chip of the paint, they can
usually do a color match to that so that you can get something that's very very similar and won't stick out. >> I want to be careful with the chipping of any building because if you guys see that then I'm going to get another little >> Now you get it like at the
>> right. Understood. That's right. >> Very lower levels. >> Oh, speaking light. Hey, I wish we would get a little bit more than 60 days if it's possible. >> Well, you normally do. Um Oh, well, what I'd like to do is go ahead and and if
there um u what I'd like to do is do what we've done on the previous case, which is to stop the daily fine. Right now, only it's already up to 10,000 something if it's not um brought in compliance. Go back. >> Daily fine.
>> You have a daily fine going on. because you were the order of enforcement was to have everything done by February the 5th. >> Really, honestly, what what you're seeing there might be even a mistake because the village issues notice of
violation for people and gives it and says things that are not true like if I made this notice of violation, >> right? >> Yeah. I don't mean to interrupt, right? But you would you should have received the order of enforcement that was signed on January the 21st of 20. There it did
say that you were there was a $250 fine $250. We did see that. Yes. And uh by February the 4th >> and that's when the right and that's when the pictures were sent and I took the pictures and then unfortunately there was no communication back. I know
you guys might have been busy um whatever the you know the problem was and then we get the notice to appear for lean. So there was a there I would have hoped to have a this conversation in between but yeah >> that you did take the >> Yeah. Thank you. I appreciate it. >> Sometimes it's a help for all of us.
>> These you guys are good and nice. >> I have the back and forth, >> right? >> Um >> right. And the respect for each other. So with that, I would like to go ahead and and um make a motion on case number C-25-0592 uh that we um
stay the daily. >> No, wait. No, we stay it. We just hold it. It's in obeyance. >> Got it. >> For um in agreement to 60 or 90 days? >> 90 days. >> 90 days. uh to bring the property in to
compliance and uh advise the uh code officers. >> Okay. >> Um >> so the code officer is going to tell us exactly what to do. Is that what >> and if not to resume the daily fine let's go back till today. >> So 90 days
>> get property into compliance. >> Sounds good. >> And then >> come back in >> Yeah. Once all that's done and and you know the code will bring it back, uh you'd let them know and they'll um then you can ask for a fine reduction once it's brought into compliance.
>> Right now it's uh >> fair enough daily fines up until today. >> One of the things that I would recommend because when you come for a fine reduction, we're going to look over to Dorene and we're going to ask what her recommendation is. And one of the things
that we take into account is the uh the cooperation between the two. And what I'm seeing in the file is far from cooperation. So from this point forward, you know, that's what I'll be looking at in terms of determining the fine reduction. So hopefully with with Mr.
Gutierrez and and and with this grant, we can bring it into compliance and you're coming coming back and we take a fresh look at it. >> Okay. >> And I'll second. All in favor? I motion passes 5 and I want to thank both
of you very much. >> Thank you and it makes such a difference because we can't we can't answer for you. >> We really needed you here for this input. >> Thank you. >> I appreciate Yeah. Thanks for the time.
>> Not >> Yeah, understood. >> Not that I don't Well, I'm sorry. I didn't hear the the last part. Not that I don't what? >> Not that you didn't have other places you'd rather be. Well, you know how it is. >> Thank you. Thank you so much. >> Great property. >> Thank you. Appreciate it. >> Yeah, it's going to be awesome. It's
going to be amazing. Very soon. >> Good luck, guys. >> Thank you. Have a nice evening. >> The next item in old business is in section six of the agenda. It's item number 6.1 for 670 Northeast 119th
Street. It's for case number CN-23-454. Timothy Kelly. This is a progress report for a driveway. >> Hello. Hello, sir. How are you? >> Good. Good. >> I'd like to mention that there is a
driveway permit in the system that's been applied for, but it's incomplete. >> Basically, it's a 10 by 10, but we got the survey. >> No final. I'm sorry. There's no issues permit. >> No.
>> However, they have been in touch. We have been working with them and getting updates from Mr. Timothy who has a very severe medical hardship and um his son and daughter have been coming in and updating us. Mr. Timothy isn't doing
very well and I'm glad that he's here today to speak for himself. >> I can speak. >> Okay. >> No, no, no. I'm glad to see you here, sir. >> Okay. Thank you. Yes, definitely. >> All right. It's basically a a 10 by10 part of the end of the driveway that I
have to have concrete poured. So, I had a delay, of course, but I'm going to be doing it this week. All I need to do is to submit and get a permit. I've already got a survey first. >> Yeah. But I had to get the survey first, >> right? >> So, I had to save my money for the survey. Then, I'll get the permit this
week and we'll do it. >> Okay. Can we just I'd like to make a motion to on case number C if if you have nothing else to say in case number C-23-454 that um we uh uh
reset for a progress report in uh to have the thing >> uh you'll have to go >> yeah uh to have a to have yeah to have a permit issued uh by June the
18. >> That would give you several planning and zoning meetings, sir, if you have to go. Give you time then to pay for the permit. Because remember, if what we're really looking for is to guide you toward compliance, just getting the
permit is a big start. You'll have six months to install the the uh driveway once you get the permit. So, you will have until June 18th, >> okay, >> to obtain a permit. >> Okay.
>> I should have it this week. If not, sorry, guys, but a $250 per day fine. >> I understand. >> If if um there are any complications, you should notify the code officers and all and request an extension if
>> Okay. I don't think there'll be any problem >> with the process. >> Okay. Once I get the permit, I'll be doing it. But the code officers will keep us appraised of what's going on. So keep in keep in touch with the code officers. They will keep us appraised.
>> All in favor? >> I passes 5. Thank you, Mr. Kelly. >> Thank you. >> Thank you. >> Good luck. >> Thank you so much. >> Two two. Next item is a new business section seven of the agenda and it's item number
7.1. It's for the address 685 Northeast 119th Street. It's for case number C-26-0061. Um this is for Barbara Robin Wger. >> It's okay. >> I tried. >> I know. >> We're asking for an order of enforcement
found to be in violation of 16.14. Oh, we are not asking for an order of enforcement. I I apologize for that. We were going to ask for an order of enforcement. However, >> I can >> um Miss Barbara had 24 hours to apply for a permit. Unfortunately,
um our system didn't um save her application, so we were not able to see it. She did however bring evidence uh which was satisfactory to us that she did make the >> the day she got the notice. So, Well,
did well because it's a mechanical permit, she has 24 hours in which to apply for a permit. She she's allowed to install um an AC unit without being charged the double fee permit, but and she did it within the >> That's something any of us knew.
>> Yeah. So, by Florida law, you have 24 hours cuz AC is needed. >> Yeah. And my elderly mother was with me, too. So it's not like and we waited the whole weekend plus holiday. Of course it breaks breaks on a holiday weekend.
>> President's Day weekend. >> Yeah. >> So on the 17th we got it installed. Um I think Vanessa you came by, right? >> I did. >> Oh, you did. Exactly. But on that day I called, we put everything in the next day. Then it's actually went in when we
had everything on there. Yeah. >> Everything is fine. We're asking for a dismissal of this case. My motion. >> All right. >> Motion in I'm sorry. Anybody have any questions? >> My motion in case number C26-000061
is that we dismiss the case. >> I'll second. >> Thank you. All >> in favor? >> I motion passes 5. Thank you so much. >> Is the second Judy or >> Judy? >> Judy. >> Thank you. So, where's your accent from?
>> Austria. >> In South Africa. Okay. >> Look, look over here. South African, too. >> Um, I was born in Zambia. We have to talk. I I'll pass by. I'm
South African, too. Oops. >> Good evening. Good night, guys. My friends, >> that is a very good thing to know that has to reinstall an air conditioner. You do have >> they do have hours if >> you think about it. Yeah. In South
Florida, >> with septic, you also have a leeway like that. >> Yes. you can take care of it and then and then get the permit and after something new >> we do have someone on Zoom so I'll go ahead and call that case um it's in
section 6 and it's item number 6.7 the address 1210 Northeast 120th Terrace case number C2-0687 property owner LNA Northeast Properties Inc. Anthony Wright in care of the
registered agent Jeffrey Fineberg. This is an intent to lean found to be in violation of section 8.4.3.1 F property maintenance for a roof that um was observed to be have discoloration
and some loose tiles. Like to mention that this property is nonh homesteaded. Mr. Anthony Wright is on Zoom >> and Dorene the pictures that are taken that show the back of the house is that is that visible from the street >> from
>> the question is >> were those pictures were taken of the back of the property. Were those pictures taken from the street? >> Were the are the pictures vis is the roof visible from the street? The the pictures that we
>> It appears so. I just want to make sure. >> Okay. Okay. So, you took these photographs from the street of the front street and the back street. Okay. >> Hello. >> Property owner at all is >> he's on Zoom. >> Yeah. But
>> before we get to the property owner, um was there any uh previous contact with the um village during this period from November I mean from August of 2025? >> Absolutely. He has been in touch with Raphael. >> Well, that that was that was since the
order of enforcement because I see we have an order of enforcement. Um, so it was after the order enforcement that there's been contact and where are we now, >> Raphael? >> After the order of enforcement, um, I I
just started having contact with him today. Today I spoke with him >> since the order. >> But I believe there was another communication prior to this. Was there an email or something? Right. >> Yes. >> Has he been sworn in?
>> Hello. >> I remember. >> Can you hear me? >> Can >> Okay. Good. Good evening. Thank you very much for your time. Um, >> I'm sorry. We need to swear you in, please, sir. Sure. No problem. Raise your right hand. Do you swear or affirm that the
testimony you about to give would be the truth, the whole truth, and nothing but the truth? >> Yes, ma'am. >> Okay. Thank you. >> Yes, we did get a a violation after the the the the tenants sent me the document. I live out of state and I have
my mom was a 84 year old with mental deficiency and so we're part owners of the property. I'm just I'm representing both of us at the same time. Um, we did I did um talk to Mr. Rafael and we talked about getting a contractor out to
paint the roof and take care of it. And I did contact someone. I assume that they had >> Sir, I apologize. I'm going to interrupt you a second. I will be honest and admit to hearing issues. So, if I could ask you to speak up a bit, please. >> Sure. Sure. >> Thank you.
>> Um, can you hear me now? >> Yes, sir. >> Beautiful. >> Thank you. >> Yes. No problem. Um I did um after getting a notice of um from the code enforcement I did speak with Mr. Raphael about some options that we had and one
of them is to get the place painted and get the tiles removed. I did pay someone to do that and thought it was done. I paid the person and it wasn't done. I live out of state and I have my mom was a 84 year old lady that I used to live in Florida that I took with me back
across country and we've been trying to get back over in in Florida ever since. And there's always something. But the one the after I spoke with him, I looked into getting a roof, what's wrong with the roof and if we can get it repaired
or replaced. We did the repair job on it and that's why the tile was piled on it. I then talked to the contractor about removing the pile and taking them away. Um, I paid for that thought that was done and he was supposed to come back and paint the pl paint the roof, wash and paint the roof and it did not come
back. As of yesterday, all the loose tile were taken down and removed off out of the property. I did contact someone Monday and they told me it was raining and that they would come and paint the property. We the price I get to replace
the roof was between 41 and $49,000. I just don't have that kind of money sitting around. I did since the initial contact with Mr. Rafael manage to save up to $20,000. So, we have half the money set aside and we're hoping to save
the next. Um, as you all know, living in Biscan, taxes were pretty high. So, we had to make sure we get that taken care of in November, December. Um, what I'm asking you for is for some leniency and understanding and um that this is a huge
chunk of money to come up with at one point. I'm not sure if there's a lean on that property right now, but whatever it is, I'm not here to argue with you. The roof is bad and we need to make sure it's fixed. What I'm asking for is some understanding from a a person who is a
citizen in the community for I think we own the property since 1994 and we've always been good steward of the community and we just hit a a bad patch right now with family health issue and people not we're paying to do the work
that's not following through. Um, in terms of our finance, why we get to this point, the person who's living there, we have one family member and one person living there, and they're they're delinquent in the payment, and we're trying to work through that. Um, that is my issue from the financial point, but
it it does impact how well we pay for our finances. I'm asking for you to um give me until May, which is less than 90 days, to come up with the rest of the money so we can get the property back, repair, paint it,
and and and um be a part of the community, >> sir. Are you are you comfortable that if we would give you 90 days that would take it out to June 15th that you could obtain your permit and
get your contractor in place by then? >> I will get it done before that. I'll be happy to get if I have to fly from where I am and come out and get the permit myself. I will definitely get it done. I I Yes. I don't like being in this position. is it's not um over the nine
years that we have owned the property, we have not come to your in front of the board for anything. So, we've been good steward. And yes, the answer the short answer is yes. >> I just have a question for clarification because I think we're talking about two things. Number one, you mentioned about having the h having the roof repaired
and painted and then you mentioned about having it replaced. Is it your contention that you're planning to have the roof painted and re repaired and painted? Is that why you're saying you could have that done by May or you're planning to
have it um the roof replaced? If so, then we would I I would suggest that you um with what Miss Anderson said, a um a compliance date of sometime in mid mid June. Um
>> so what what what is it that you're actually requesting? Repair and paint or new roof? the roof is in bad shape and I listened to the previous um homeowners and and what you're saying and aesthetically it needs to be painted.
That's just um what do you call a band-aid for now? The the root replacement will be for the 90 days. So >> yeah, Band-Aids on roofs normally don't work. >> No, I'm saying I'm saying the the roof looks bad. We will wash it and paint it, but we will replace the entire roof by
May. No, you mean well we we I would suggest that um because you have a permitting process and there's a little delay. So I would suggest we we we'll give you more time for that if if you're stating that you plan to have it replaced.
>> It will be replaced. It must be replaced. Yes. >> Then there's then there's if you're going to be replacing it by May, there's no need to paint and repair it before then. Just do it all in one fell swoop. >> It looks pretty bad. it. I I saw a picture of it from the front and I Okay,
I I appreciate your generosity. I am going to accept the extended time to replace it, but in the meantime, just not to be stuck out like a sore thumb, I already have someone that I'm going to be paid to paint it. So, it will at least look acceptable, but it will be
replaced. That is the >> Yes. >> I I also recommend if you contact um Mr. Gutierrez Yes. before you finish paying people. He can check and take a look and see if the work that you paid for is
being done or you can contact if it's a full permit for the building official. They should be able to tell you whether it's it's in compliance or not if you're going to redo the roof completely. >> Thank you. Yes, we I'll do that. I have his contact and his phone number. We
chatted today for a little bit about the next step and yes, we appreciate that. I understand it. >> I was going to say if I may make a motion because I would make a motion, a twofold one. Number one, um given uh to
put in stay the daily fine given the property owner says he will have it painted by May the mid May um uh May 15th >> um and then have it. So, my motion would
be on case number CE-25-0687 to stay the daily fine of $250 uh to allow the property owner to have the roof cleaned and painted by May the 15th. Um if not, the daily fine will
resume uh retro back to today. And well, no. Yes, it will. And then uh the property owner has indicated well there's no further no need to go
any further because if you don't do that it's up to him whether he wants to have it repaired. >> Right. Exactly. Sir I want to make sure we do understand you you still intend ahead of replacement to repair and paint the roof. >> Yes. We need to we need to get it
painted. Yes. It's not >> I want to make sure we got it correct, sir. So, I want to make sure it's clear that it just to be clear, the roofer that I had initially got on there said it doesn't make sense for us to put the tile back on if we're going to replace the roof because it needs replacing. So,
so the the the it's like it's like repairing something that's need spending money putting good money after bad. So, the roof need to be repaired and I'm asking for the extended time to get it. I'm sorry, repaired. replaced,
>> sir. >> If you make the if you make the property look up to code, >> yes, >> we're fine with that. >> Okay. >> If you want if you then decide because if it falls back in disrepair after this, then that you you would get another citation. >> Okay.
>> But right now, we're just holding off giving you um um till till May the May the 15th to come and bring it up to >> code. Okay. >> You would then um once that's done, if you choose to uh bring it before us
requesting a fine reduction, you could get with the village on how to do that. >> What is the fine reduction at this point, sir? >> No, you you >> What's the fine? What's the fine now? >> Well, right now you're up to 12,000 dollars. So a but after a project comes
into compliance and is final, you have every right to come back and request a fine reduction, sir. >> So I I heard that another gentleman was talking about a lean on the property. Will a lean be put on the property? >> Not right now. We're >> now not by the village. >> Okay.
>> Oh yes. >> Yes. Pardon? >> Can't guarantee there isn't something else, but not by the village. >> No, not right now. But if you don't come into compliance by May the 15th, the daily fine will revert back to today and we'd request that the village move
forward with placing the lean. >> And if I get the place washed and painted, how soon could I come back and talk about the the the the fine that's there? >> If I get once you're in once you get in compliance, you speak with the code officers and um the village rather and
ask for a fine reduction, but you have to be in compliance. So once you've um painted it and brought it into compliance, um make sure that you call the village so they can um uh do file an affidavit of compliance, meaning that you you've brought it into good order. >> Okay. >> Okay.
>> All right. Thank you very very much for your time and your patience and your explanation. I really appreciate it. >> You're welcome, sir. So right now it's um you're at $12,000. If you don't um bring it into compliance by May the 15th, then it'll revert back. Your daily fine will revert back to the day. Okay.
So, it be 12,000 plus a daily fine up until moving forward. And the village would then um move uh move take steps to um place a lean >> if I don't pay if I don't pay the fine, right? >> I have a question. >> Yes, ma'am.
>> Once you don't come into compliance, sir. >> Yes. >> If you don't fix the roof and make it look nicer. >> Yes. Once he cleans and paints, if he does, can he come for a fine reduction or >> Yeah. >> If if it's brought up to code, yes.
>> Okay. Do we take the vote? >> Okay. >> Got a first and a second. >> Oh, >> I'll second. >> I thought you >> I thought I did, too. >> Okay. All in favor? >> I >> I >> motion passes 5. Vanessa, did you get
that or shall we repeat it? Okay, >> thank you for it. It >> it is pretty simple. >> Yes, >> we're staying the daily fine. >> Okay, >> as of today, bring the property is to come into
compliance by May the 15th. If not, the village is directed to proceed with filing the I mean the fine is to revert back to today and the village is directed to um proceed with filing the
lean and the applicable filing fees and administrative >> in compliance means cleaning, painting, repairing the roof. >> He can do whatever he can replace it by then if he wants >> but but at minimum clean it and paint it. That's minimum
>> what compliance means. >> Raphael, speak out, please. >> In my opinion, the roof needs to be repaired uh replaced. Yeah. If he if he proceeds to repair it, then he needs to pull a permit because the the extent of the damage on the roof will require a
permit. So when he comes >> by repairing, not just washing and painting. >> No, it needs to be repair or replace. >> So are you are you clear in that that it's not just a matter of cleaning and painting?
>> Okay. >> But it got to be either repaired or fully replaced. >> Can I get an extension on that? because I need to come up with an additional $20,000 between now and May 15 to >> that's what I thought we were getting
>> well track. >> The re the reason I did it the way I did is because of the testimony that it had already that the back part had already been repaired and it just hadn't been >> painted those tiles. >> You can see the back >> the back has been repaired and the tile
has been removed off the property. >> Yeah. So there's no leakage or anything there. The front needs to be painted because it's it's brown or black or or mildware sections of tiles missing >> because the tiles were taken off to
repair the the the I I'm not a roofer. Whatever the the main um membrane is to stop the f stop any leakage. We can revisit the case um May at the May hearing and see where he's at. They the
order is clear. If they don't comply, you can remove the clean and and and paint. We don't have to put that in the order. He can just come into compliance by May 15. If not, the the fin reverts.
However, however, he can ask for an extension on the May 15 deadline. You're okay with the motion? >> Absolutely. >> Okay. >> And Mr. Wright, you understand? Please keep in touch with our code people because if you need more time, they can
grant you that. >> Great. So, mainly the by May, no later than May 15, get it all painted and clean and then we figure out the money to replace the whole thing. That's what we're at. Minimum. Is that what I'm hearing, please?
Or should I contact code >> enforcement? What you heard? what my order was to come into compliance. Compliance can mean a number of things. If the roof needs to be repaired, you need to take steps to have it repaired or or replaced. That may require a permit. That's the case, you're going to
need to ask for an extension. >> Okay. >> Um the testimony of the um from what I'm not testimony, from what I'm hearing from the code officer is that the roof >> will need a will most likely needs a replacement.
>> Okay. more than repair or paint it. So, >> um >> you you may want to go ahead and and and p start your action to have it done. And if you can't get it uh approved by May the 15th, request a an extension. >> Okay, great.
>> We're very critical that you stay in touch with the code staff. >> I will. >> If you need to come back on our May meeting to ask for an extension, please do so. >> I will. Thank you. I appreciate it. The communication part's really
critical. Thank you. >> Yes. Thank you. Appreciate it. >> That's all right. >> Yes. Have a good day. Make >> it a little convoluted, but >> please >> did good. >> We're trying to get >> ma mainly because of the prior one we had stayed and I just wanted tonight,
but um I don't want to set a precedent for saying >> in the cases we've heard tonight, I think you you put forward exactly the right thing. We had to at some point you got to kind of stop. They're trying to move forward.
>> Okay. Excellent. >> Thank you, Mr. Wright. >> Thank you very much. Have a good day. Appreciate your time. >> Next item is in section 6 and it's 6.3. Address is 767 Northeast 114th Street. It's for case number CN-23-284.
Property owner is 767 Northeast 114th Street LLC in care of their registered agent Randall Angling. Um we are asking the board to reinate the original order of enforcement
and the daily fine retroactively. This is because Mr. Um, Angling appeared before this board and he was um we you stopped the fines from running on May 27.
At that time the total fines were at $98,000 250. He did apply for the permit but the permit has since expired and the driveway has not been installed. But we are asking that these fines be reinstate
reinstated retroactively and the order of enforcement um be updated that way. >> Has there been any communication with the propert? >> Yes, he actually sent in an email asking for more time, but I will leave that up
to the board because this case has been on the books since 2023. because I'm not comfortable with more time because more time should have been asked for during time of the permit. Then he could have come in and said,
"Well, I'm having a contractor problem or whatever." Not the permit is long and now he No. >> Well, no. I'm in agreement too. Um and and if I if I were to make a motion, it would be to reinstate the fine retro back to 5275
or to the date the permit expired because if we did say I mean did you pull the permit? >> When did the permit expire? Actually, >> you have to keep consistent. You're 100% right.
>> It should go to the >> order. Um, >> the permit expired November 23rd, 2025. And I have to mention that we've already filed a lean on this property even
though the board stopped the fines on May 27. >> And when you said that he he contacted you to ask for more time, did he give a reason why he needed more time? It hasn't been done up to now. >> An email that was passed around, he said he wasn't able to make it because he has
a medical emergency in the family. >> And how long was the permit in place for? It was in place for six months and and it expired in November. >> November. He has 180 days to be able to
reinstate it. However, we are not sure if that's what he intends to do. And this email was today at 2:32 and he said he had a a very serious medical emergency, but he doesn't say whe whether it occurred over the course of the six months that the
permit was in place or the approximately four and a half to five and a half months since it expired. Is that correct? >> That's correct. >> Okay. the whole six months of the permit plus all the time since then if he could have come back to you guys come back on the
agenda we could have dealt with it but only after getting the notice. No, >> I I this one looks like a drag your feet I have an issue with. >> But I do agree with Dale. We I would I would not going back to May
>> but in keeping consistent with doing things now go back have to permit it. >> So this email says that the reason or at least if I'm reading it right, it indicates that he's not coming to tonight's meeting because of a serious
emergency medically and then he gives out what his plan is. Is that your understanding of it, Dorine? >> Am I what? Is your understanding that that uh that this email that was sent
>> to Vanessa and you were copied on at 2:32 was he was indicating that he was not coming tonight and they indicated the next paragraph that a close family member had a serious medical emergency um and he apologized for the sh short notice but it was a recent occurrence.
So, did he ask for a continuence or is he just saying that he was not going to be able to attend because >> No, he he he's just saying that he wouldn't be able to be here. >> Um, regardless, I mean, I I uh >> doesn't change my >> doesn't change my opinion
>> opinion. Even though we may have a new um contractor, you know, they get it done um then >> we can now guess there are issues to deal with the lean. I mean, but that can be easily adjusted, I would think,
>> once there's compliance. >> Um, well, if nothing else, I'd like to make a motion on case number CN-23-284. Um, move move to reinstate the daily fine retro to the date the permit expired of
May the 23rd, 2025. >> It's November. >> I mean, November, I'm sorry. November the 23rd, 2025 uh with the daily with the daily fine of $250. >> I'll second. >> I have a motion uh motion in a second.
All in favor? >> I. >> Any opposed? Motion passes 50. Next item is in section six and it's 6.4 for the address. 930 Northeast 119th Street, case number
CE-25-0877 for Hubert Leune, asking for an intent to lean. They were found to be in violation of section 16.14.1 double fee permits. The detached garage on the property has been converted to a
living space without first obtaining uh the required permits. Now, there was an order from this board to have the tenants vacated by the building official or declare the building unsafe. The
tenants did vacate. I did the inspection myself and the tenants are not there. However, we have no permits in the system to reconvert this um back to a garage. So, the violation is still open. is still non-compliant and there is the
fine has run up to $7,250 as of today. >> Any questions from the board? >> If I may, if I may add, I have um I have tried reaching Mr. La Lejun um several
occasions and he's not returning my phone calls. I also spoke with um his um former property manager that she came met with us that she was going to handle these cases. Uh I spoke with her today and she said she's no longer involved.
>> Okay. If there are no further comments or questions from the board in case C25-0877, uh the village should go ahead with processing the lean in the amount of $7,250
as >> $7,250 as of today. The daily fine will continue to acrue an additional $250 admin fee as well as the filing fees.
>> I'll second. >> All in favor? >> Any opposed? Motion passes 5. >> Next case is for the same address and same property owner. It's case number CE-25-0878 in Tentel Lane found to be in violation
of section 16.14.1 double fee permits. They installed high impact windows and doors without first obtaining building permits. >> Did they apply for an after the fact permit? >> There are no permits in the system as of today.
And once again, they're not uh the property owner is not responding to um my phone calls. >> And you attempted to contact him not only about the last violation, but also about this one, >> correct? Yeah, they they've had quite a few violations. So, I've been >> Are there tenants in the two?
>> This Yes. Yes. And this is a non um >> and homesteaded property. >> It's a non homestead, but they're claiming homestead. And when we and when we last spoke with the property the former property manager when she came to the office and sat with us and the
building official she mentioned that this property owner owns over 30 properties in D county. So he's a landlord who is aware of what he needs to do and he just hasn't made any effort
to comply. Any questions or comments? In CE25-0878, the village should go ahead with the intent to lean in the amount of There did it again. Thank you.
$7,500 plus an additional $250 administrative fee and all filing fees. and daily fine is to continue >> and daily fine to continue until compliance is met. >> I second. >> All in favor? I. Any opposed? Motion
passes 50. >> We'd like to add that we will inform the property appraisers office of the homestead exemption being claimed on this property. Next item is 6.6. It's for the address 1505 Northeast 11th
Place. New owner's name is RBI Mortgage LLC in care of their registered agent Rosenberg Cummings. Actually, yes. Cummings PLLC. There are two cases that we had brought
before the board for disclosure of all open and building cases uh to the new owner. This case just went through a foreclosure and has um the mortgage company is now the new owner. um our legal department advised that the leans
that we filed on this property are no longer valid. However, the orders of enforcement are still valid. So, we were hoping that they would attend um the meeting tonight so that we could disclose um the two open cases for a driveway
that was installed without permits and a walkway that was installed without permits. Fines are up to first case $148,000 250 and the other case is $52,500. Can we refile on those?
>> We cannot file unfortunately um these orders of enforcement. If we were able to disclose them to the new owners, we could ask for compliance and they could come and ask for reductions and maybe pay 10% to the village.
However, we cannot file a lean on these properties. That would be >> forclosure. >> We would have to reissue the violations and start over. >> This is the one where the guy put in the little walkway from the front door and the the driveway and it was without a permit. He said, "I'll just take it out.
I'll take it out." And he never did. >> That's correct. >> Okay. >> No permits in the system. >> Nothing. And uh now the property has gone back to the mortgage company. >> So, we are really left with letting it keep
approve and bring it back to us. Next, we >> hopefully hopefully they will reach out to us. We have lost the leans in the foreclosure. >> Um we'll keep the orders of enforcement on the files. Hopefully someone will reach out to us because without them
reaching back out to us, we haven't given them any service. You know, they they're not informed, >> right? >> This is why this was important for us to disclose to the new owners. at least last month the new owner representative >> 720 >> he zoomed in >> he's aware
>> so we were able to >> he has complied really oh yes they've done a good job cleaning up that property swimming pool cleaned and everything sorry it's not on the docket but we will >> could we bring this back next month for disclosure
>> correct we can do that next month we'll try as again to reach out to them and see if we can get in touch with someone >> if not if there's if they don't show up then could we refile No, >> we will reissue the violations to the >> reissue violations. >> Yes, that's right, but not the
>> uh do you need a motion on that? >> Um this was a disclosure. You don't really have to do a motion >> back in um >> um continue the case to next hearing, >> right? >> Cases.
Motion to continue. Vanessa wants a motion to continue. >> Make a motion. Case number two. >> There were no case numbers. We didn't include case numbers. We did. Oh, they're in the in the package. >> Oh, in the package. All right. Case
numbers 25-355. Make a motion to continue the case for full disclosure. So that's >> and continue. >> I'll second. All in favor? >> I.
>> Any opposed? Motion passes. 5 Z. The next four cases are 6.8, 6.9, 6.10, and 6.11. Address is 1210 Northeast 11th place.
First case number C E-25-0859 property owners Brizzo Fen LLC in care of their registered agent Miami Accounting and Tax Services LLC. We are asking for an intent to lane. In the first case, they were found to be in
violation of section 18.5 construction fence requirements. The permit has expired and there are no development permits in the system. No demo permit and the fine has run up to the up to $7,500. >> Any communication?
>> Yes, Raphael. >> Uh yes. Um he uh the property owner sent an email uh this afternoon, this evening at 5:20 and he is
uh he's asking for a 30-day extension to allow us to complete all outstanding items in full compliance. He's asking for a 30 days extension. So, if I can read the email, I can show
it to you what he's saying. Uh, I said, "Dear dire dear directors and members of the board, I hope you're doing well. Over the past six months, we have been making every effort to address all notices of violations related to the property. Our original intention has
been to proceed with demolition. However, we have experienced delays in obtaining the required permit. In the meantime, we have taken steps to improve and maintain the condition of the property. These efforts include clearing
vegetation from the roof and pressure washing, cutting overgrown grass and weeds, and removing debris from the lot to keep it clean and early. Given these circumstances, we kindly
request a 30-day extension to allow us to complete all outstanding items in full compliance with the city of Biscan Parks requirements. We sincerely appreciate your time, understanding, and consideration of this request. Please let us know if the extension may be granted or if any additional information
is needed. Respectfully, Sebastian Sentano sort of work with all these cases at the same time. Does anybody mind? No, I was going to suggest the same thing because I think >> I'm going to ask everybody I'm sorry, Tail. I'm gonna ask you to take a look
under agenda item 69. Take a look at the last picture and you tell me if effort's been made. >> Oh, >> well, yeah, I I understand. And it it from what I from what I'm hearing No,
definitely hasn't been. >> Yes. Can I uh we do have the latest pictures that I took this afternoon that you guys don't have. So, we can share that. >> Um so, but meanwhile, I believe what I understand he's just asking for a 30-day extension, right?
>> And if he doesn't meet, my motion would be to um uh uh direct the village to um to allow a 30-day extension and if no compliance or permit issued to direct the village. Let's see where our meeting is next
month. Our meeting next month is the 15th. I would give him until April 14th so that we get it. No, >> it's changed still. >> I'd like it forward on I'd like it so that he has to come back at that meeting.
>> Well, no, I I mean I would suggest that we go direct the village toward >> Okay, I got you. Skip the step. You're right. no reason to come back because they haven't um taken care of the issues by either having a demolition permit or resolving the outstanding issues, >> right?
>> Just to proceed with the lean. >> And that's is really important what um the member just said because what the order of extension does, it wipes out whatever fines have run because it extends the compliance date. member. So,
it's better what to do it that way because we already have fines running on this case, >> right? Continue with the >> continue with the fines. Let them comply and then we can come back and ask for >> Exactly. different different than the I wasn't um suggesting that we stay
because that was different issues before. Right now, this is um an ongoing thing >> and it has >> I apologize because I was half listening because I was looking at the picture. If we do an extension on that new form that we have to do that effectively does what
for the current fine? >> It will wipe out the fines because what we have done with an order of extension is extended the compliance date from what we had in the order of enforcement to the date that you are going to give. >> That's what I thought you said. That's what I thought I heard.
>> My mot if I make one would be to um >> my motion would can may I make the motion >> for Yeah. Go ahead for that case. Yes. On case number 25- 0860. Uh 25- 0861
>> 859 >> two 25- 0859 25- 0860 25- 0861 and 25- 0862.
uh direct the village uh give the property owner until May the 15th to bring the properties I mean to comply with the order of enforcement if not um
direct that's not an extension direct >> is an extension >> doing that pushing on >> right >> we change everything's gone >> so you can deny the request for extension Okay. >> And then the order of enforcement just
say waited. >> Okay. Thank you for clarifying that. Thank you, Jamie. Also, I misunderstood. I don't Well, in those cases, the ones previously mentioned uh to deny an order of uh >> extension
>> and to allow the uh daily fines and to remain >> uh as is. Uh >> yes. simply to deny them the motion for extension >> and
the village may uh request um >> no you can bring it back for to file for a motion >> we go ahead and we because we came for intent to lean they requested since you've denied the extension we can go ahead and file this lean >> okay >> when they're ready to come back after
compliance they can come back and ask for reduction >> so the same it's basically what we normally do Okay. And the cases and direct the village to move forward with filing the leans um u plus the $250
administrative study and filing fees on each of the previously mentioned cases. >> I'll second. All in favor? I. Any opposed? >> Motion passes 5. >> Yeah. a little bit. >> No,
>> yeah, we saw it. >> The the roof looks better. The front as far as the front looks presentable, the grass and overgrown. It's just the inside the property where >> you need these back.
>> Next case is item number 7.2. 2 is for the address 920 Northeast 108th Street case for case number C-26-0028. Property owner is Elan Hami. We were going to ask for an order of
enforcement in this case which was continued from February 2426 for a medical hardship found to be in violation of chapter 5.6.1A1 off streetet parking. The property does not have an approved parking service.
Now, Mr. um Hammani has reached out again and said, "Please present the letters that he has uh to show the board that he is still enduring a medical hardship and it will be out up to the board to uh continue this case again for
a progress report or issue an order of enforcement with time to comply. It's 7.2 on 920 Norththeast Wednesday. >> Given new business 72. We seem to be getting conflicting
information in terms of what the doctor said now what the gentleman said and >> the doctor said the city should do his driveway for >> well that too forgetting that part skipping that little detail. Um have you
spoken to this gentleman? >> Yes you've been to the village and we have spoken with him and he's called and emailed several times. I mean, does he understand he's halfway there just by getting the
permit? He will have six months after that complete installation. I'm trying very hard, and I think we all are, to be empathetic, but as you saw at March's meeting, the commission and the
manager are getting push back from people who immediately upon getting noticed as to what was going to be required, did what they needed to do, put aside whatever issues they're dealing with, and got their driveways. And now they're still seeing
significant number of properties not in compliance, and they're starting to push back. So, it's kind of a broad-based fairness issue. Everybody's got issues they're dealing with personally, but when people have come forward without even being cited,
just with the initial notice of what they needed to do and gotten it done, you know, they're looking at these things. >> Yes. In fact, I just did a whole report on driveways that was sent to the commission. Uh we have a list of properties that have driveway violations
that have a lot of hardships. Now, while it's difficult for us to go and speak with a man like this who is enduring battling um life-threatening illness and tell him to install a drug, you know, we are we have to follow the law and we are
bound by what the laws of us. I mean, the only thing we can is give them more time. But sometimes we have to release this board to allow us to >> it's going on everybody got notice in
what 2022 >> right >> the deadline on the ordinance actually was January 2023 if I remember correctly >> and to be clear in this particular violation you'd mentioned it but I don't think it's applicable to him from what I've looked at in these various letters
that he's made part of the public record um so I guess he's waved his HIPPA Um he's uh it's not a life-threatening condition that he has. >> Psychotherapy. >> He's psych. Yeah, it's it's >> he sent another there's another letter in there where he says he's battling
cancer. >> Well, I see a letter from Mount Si that he's made part of the public record dated January 2026 that indicates he's a cancer survivor. But I I don't see anything that he is got a life-threatening condition. And
also for the record, and I don't know whether it really makes a difference one way or the other, but this February 9th, 2026 uh letter from a a licensed medical health counselor uh is addressed to the North Bay North
Bay Village, not to our village. So I don't know if he's got something else going on there, but this is not addressed to us. And then also for the record, the January 20 30th, 2026 Mount Sinai medical record that he's made part of
the public record is not addressed to anybody other than city officials. I don't know if that's North Bay Village, >> but it up at the top. Generic letter. >> Oh, yeah. Generic letter. There you go. >> Oh, I mean, I'm a cancer survivor, too.
So, you know, how much >> when was he? That's what I asked. When was decided? >> Um, >> I have >> the notice of >> January 23rd. >> I'm sorry. >> This year
>> of this year. >> This year. >> Yeah. >> So, that's three years after, >> right? And his property is very unique the way it sits. That's probably why it wasn't it wasn't issued right away. Um
maybe at the time when we issu I'm thinking at the time when we issued he still had gravel on on his um parking surface but now it's completely gone. This is over 50% deteriorated. >> You see this is a homesteaded um >> he lives there. >> Yes.
>> On one side. >> He lives on one side. He does. >> And even at that they were only supposed to homestead half of >> half. Um Um, in case number C-26-0028 that violation has occurred, assess a fine of $250,
administrative fee of $250. the property owner until June the 18th, 2026 um to fully issue permit if not a
$250. >> I'll second >> you. We have discussion. Did you want to add like you've been doing work to be completed by the end of >> Yes, I do. fully issued permit. I was thinking that
cover but and all work is to be completed by the expiration of the permit. >> Yes. >> If not there's two days. >> Do you second? >> I second.
>> All in favor? I. Any opposed? >> Motion passes 5. Next case is 7.3 is for the address 11308 Griffin Boulevard. It's for case number CE-25-0608 for Rinada Ciba and Pierre Prat.
There's a progress report found to be in violation of section 8.4.3.1F tarps on roof. Now there's an email from an attorney. Did they include that email? There is a public adjuster thing that says I'm the
public adjuster helping the homeowner, but there's no name or any other information about that public adjuster. >> Correct. >> Does appear to have >> No, it's the same >> same thing
reply from me. >> Oh, okay. Kelly, got it. The one we got today does show Yeah, my my 7.3 was it changed or something? Because my 7.3 is about a large trash pile from the side of the
property. >> Oh >> 25. >> No, what happened was Yeah, I got out and I had to go back in. Sorry about that. >> Michael, he's looking at an agenda. That's old. >> No, it's Yeah, I I went to the one above
it. Sorry. 7.3. All right, I got it now. >> So, it's a similar case like the other one we've had where they have to go to court and so they can get their adjusters to pay
for the rule, but it's an ongoing case. So, this is a progress report. Do we have an order? No, we don't have. >> So, this case just gets continued >> up to the board. Who is the uh
public adjuster? Does it say >> there's a parallegal attorney, >> but there's no public adjuster recently? >> So, um has the property owner other than sending these an a progress report
update? Has property owner been in contact? Where are they? Are they in court? >> Yes, he was here for for the first hearing. >> He attended the wife. where we had the order of enforcement >> right >> of back in September uh 17th of 2025 we
tabled until now >> now they're saying but >> other than that letter we haven't had any other >> so we don't it is if they're actually in litigation or >> are they on the docket >> notice of violation >> but as we as we learned concerned with
the case on on 11th place and Michael was able to explain these are cases that tend to stay in long. >> Yeah. No. Well, if it's in a litigation, it could take years to resolve. That's the thing because you know you it gets assigned to a judge and that and you get
a calendar, you're one of probably, you know, 50 60 cases. They can only try one case at a time. So, it depends. You might have to get it continuous. There is a push in Florida that allows that requires the judges to get cases worked through the system within the standard track is 18 months but they can go from
18 months up to you know two plus years as a just a matter of getting through the litigation process to the point where you can go to trial. So I don't but again we don't have that information to know whether it's even been a filed case or if it's just a claim
know so I don't >> I can reach out to them because they are right across village hall. I will knock on the door and find out where they are if they are in actual litigation or >> and get a case number. you know, get the case number if it's them versus citizens or, you know, whatever insurance company
is and get get the case number if it's I assume is filed in Miami date county then, you know, you can look at the docket >> um and and and let and maybe u uh let them know that they really should be at the hearing because the way I'm reading
this is this is for them to provide a a progress report which they did, right? doesn't really say a lot because you know the next time we may move make a different motion and if we don't get >> input from the property owner as to where are we and what's going on.
>> Okay. >> Example tonight was the couple from avenue >> having them here and having that back of course made a huge difference. >> Makes a difference. Absolutely difference. I know it's hard. I know nobody wants to be here, but sometimes
it's necessary, and this is another one of those sometimes. >> Yes. >> Well, um I'd like to make a motion on case number C-25-608 to um table this and for a April progress report.
>> I'll second. All in favor? >> I motion passes 5. Next case 7.4 for the address 11403 Northeast 8th Avenue. It's for case number CE-25-0929
Lavanta LLC in care of their registered agent Ernan Adonir. We are asking for an order of enforcement. They are actually non-compliant. Um they have not paid the landlord's
registration. Now, our code clerk thought they were compliant because they did have an application in the system. However, when she researched more, she found that they have not paid for the permit. So, they are non-compliant. >> Case number C-25-0929
that a violation has occurred. Assess a fine of $250. administrative fee of $250 uh property owners to comply by April the 1st, 2026 uh for a $250 per day fine thereafter.
>> I'll second. All in favor? >> I. Any oppose? Motion passes 5-0. >> The next case is for the same address, same property owner, and it's case number CE-26-0074. We are asking for an order of enforcement
with double fees on this safety uh hazard violation. They were found to be in violation of sections 11.9.1 swimming pool protective perimeter fence. There's no safety barrier around the pool. And
even after talking with um having a conversation with them, they haven't made an effort to secure the swimming pool. In fact, where the latch sits um on the gate, there's more damage as we speak today. And I'm very worried about
this. They also removed the the posting that we put there to alert people that there's a safety hazard. Yeah, >> they took it down and then the gate has some um straps missing. So this this is
a worrisome. We need a maximum penalty on this to make this property owner do what they're supposed to do to secure the pool. >> And let me ask a question, Dorine. The uh the picture that's that's on here that shows the view into the back of the pool area, the pool is full of water,
correct? >> Yes. And it doesn't have a pool fence around the the pool, nor does it and and it has a disrepair uh fence that's adjacent to the building. >> Yes. >> And in addition to that, I think I see also a uh a toy floating in the pool.
Correct. So in essence, it could be an attractive nuisance for a a child to um to to go towards that through this hole that would be big enough for an an adult a large adult to go through. >> Very unsafe situation. Yes.
>> Okay. Just want to make sure. The only way we can go higher than the 250 is if the board finds the violation to be irreparable or irreversible in nature. >> What was that?
I have to turn to so glad you're the only way according to the approved fine sheet that we can go higher than the 250 is if the board finds that the violation is irreparable
or irreversible in nature. But before Michael answers, could I add to your question >> please? >> Which is um >> can we do um do the do the uh violation do the fine retroactive to the notice of violation as this should have been taken
care of comply we can't no they have to be they have to be given time to So we answered the second part of the question. The first part of the question I I don't know what the standard would be if it the irreparable or irreversible
>> right >> in a safety hazard situation or health hazard situation irreparable or irreversible is I'm sorry. >> Well, what we've done in those circumstances, but mostly they've been
either abandoned properties or whatever is that we've gone in and and taken care of this and abated the problem, right? I mean, I guess these people are living there, right? >> Tenants living there. >> This is not a homestead. >> Oh, okay. So, why don't we just debate
it so we can get somebody out there to do it like now? >> We you can uh give the order to a bait and I'll present it to the manager tomorrow. >> Yeah. In addition to the fines. Yeah. I'd like to see us go in and debate it. I This makes me crazy. We are the number
one drowning capital. >> Oh my god. >> I spoke with the owner um he uh this week and he said he was going to take care of it. and never did. So,
>> and we we will notice that the it's getting worse. It's now open. There's something there's an opening. Before it was just the latch >> and they removed the warning the red warnings that we put. They took those off. >> That could have been the tenant that did that, right? >> Yeah. I don't know. The tenant is not I
spoke with the tenant and he wasn't too happy that the property owner is really not keeping up the property. >> Okay. I I will >> I saw some other things. I don't know. >> Paint the pain. Yes.
>> Oh, right. Right. Right. >> I'll ask for an if you can issue an express order for the abatement because the manager also has sometimes depending on the size of the project has to go before the commission to ask for three quotations and approval. However, if
this board expresses how severe or how urgent this situation is, then maybe the manager may be able to bypass that and then go back to the commission to just report it. >> It's a few weeks before the next commission meeting. There is no time.
>> Wait. >> No. Uhuh. Take No. So much can go south. >> Yeah. I think our public works department may be able to repair it. Okay. See, sorry. >> They could put a board up.
>> Yes. >> In case number C26- 0074, a violation has occurred. Assess a $250 fine, $250 administrative fee.
Ask that the village abate the violation as soon as possible and charge that back to the property owner. >> Well, but perhaps the village obey it. >> That's the only reason I hadn't thought about
>> my thought is the village is not going to go rebuild their fence. They're going to put a piece of plywood up there and take care of it. And they still need to go in >> and repair their fence. The city's not going to get uh permits to repair.
>> I understand. We're not here for the for necessarily for the fence to hear or replace, but it's >> barrier >> which is not there which is a violation. >> Once the um the village abates it, then
they can come before us >> bring that back on another. >> So that then there'll be no daily fines. Is that what you're saying? >> Yeah. We just deal with the safety aspect. The fact that the fence needs repaired will be Point number two. Okay,
>> I'll second. >> All in favor? >> I motion passes 50. Vanessa, would you like me to repeat that? >> Okay. In case 260074, violation has occurred. Assess a $250
fine, $250 admin fee. The village to abate the safety issue as soon as possible. charge all costs back to the property owner. And second,
next item is 7.6. says for the address 11853 Griffin Boulevard case number C-25-0921 property owner is Louis Ira Rori Rafa Harris we're asking for an order of
enforcement there were found to be in violation of section 16.14.1 double fee permits a construction dumpster parked on the front of the yard was uh put there without permits and there's still no permit in the system as of today.
>> Is a dumpster thing you're talking about? This white thing with the wheels on it. >> Yes. >> I mean, it looks like a trailer. It doesn't look like a dumpster. >> Things that like um roofing companies when our roof was done, the dumpster look like that. It wasn't just
stereotypical huge green thing. They a lot of you know, it depends on what's being done. They'll use smaller things like this. >> And I did question Raphael. I almost pulled that case myself because my understanding of a dumpster is a rolloff. However, I went and read the code and
the code does include a trailer. >> Does a trailer have a license plate on it? >> Most trailers should have a license plate and lights. >> So, what if it was a trailer and would it be a violation? >> Yes, because they are using it for construction debris. >> How do we know that?
>> We see it. >> We saw the roof was being done and that's what >> Yeah, they had a roof permit. They had a roof permit. The roof was being rep um replaced and the uh debris was being put in that trailer. >> The exact kind of we have
>> I don't see. Did you take any pictures of roof debris in the dumpster? Do you have any of those? He has another picture that shows >> Yeah, he has a trailer that >> thing's been there for years. It's like
a refrigerated trailer or something. I mean, to me, I don't see a difference between the two. As I see the picture now, I see a picture of a trailer that's not violated and a picture of a trailer that's violated because of the representation that there's roofing material in there, but I don't see roofing material in there or evidence of
it. If we have a picture of it, then I would certainly consider it. But based upon what I have here, I don't see, you know, anything other than a trailer here. >> Let me see if I >> if I saw another picture that >> that show that we're using it for a construction degree. I did question it
myself because we could have used a different code. The trailer is not allowed. >> It's either way that it's still a violation, but the code is different. >> But that's not before us. didn't use that particular code because
there was construction happening on >> and again roofing contractors use the smaller >> the smaller >> pullable thingies they're not the big jigundo things that have >> do do you have one >> the only picture I have um there's a
workers helmet >> I see that >> it's incriminating evidence Yeah. >> But but I I have to um I mean my testimonial is that I did witness the debris inside the trailer.
>> Okay. But you when you witnessed it, you were there with your camera. >> Yes. And I didn't. Yes. >> Okay. >> And I spoke to the owner property. I spoke to the owner as well when um when I observed the violation. I went up to
him and um because we've been having this this property has become a little bit of a uh problem with the trailer. There's another trailer that he puts then he takes it out then he puts it back in. So it's like we're playing a
little bit of a cat and mouth game here. Yeah. So um yeah, it was a trailer. Excuse me. dump the dumpster. >> I have informed public works to go to
the swimming pool tomorrow to make sure that we can fix it as quickly as possible. >> You need a motion. >> Those were all the cases we had tonight. Is there a motion on the last >> seven? Oops. >> Right. >> The motion.
>> Okay. In E25-0921, a violation has occurred. Assess a $250 fine, a $250 admin fee to the property owner until April 1st to pull the proper
permit or $250 daily fine. I have a motion and a second. All in favor? I. Any opposed? >> Opposed. >> Motion passes 41. Those were all the cases we brought before the
board tonight. >> Thank you very much for your hard work. >> Yes. >> A second. >> February. We have to vote on >> You're not good. Poor thing. When we change dates. All right. I'm warning. I
don't I'm going to tell you right now because we have another date change and we do like you to be here. Um >> personal experience I can empathize with you. Now I was going to say to Rulo I from personal experience I can empathize about just it
>> instead of May 20th it's May 13th. We'll >> remind you again in April. Tell your wife to remind you >> something here. Are we going to make excuse? >> Absolutely.
>> Given given that we had changed the uh >> I came close. I ran into Vanessa and she said, "We'll see you tonight." And I'm like, "What?" >> A second. >> In favor? >> I. >> Motion passes. >> What's the date of the April meeting and the May meeting?
>> April was the fifth meeting, which for the record I've stated that is a possibility I may not be here. >> Okay. >> I'm trying to make it, but I may not. >> And May is when? >> May is on the 13th. >> I will be here.
>> Yay. I will be here for that. >> Yeah. >> Okay. >> So far, I'm good with the red. >> Okay. >> No, May the >> 13th. >> Um, >> okay. Now,
>> well, what says minute? Okay. Now, I would like to apologize to Vanessa because she had asked me that at the beginning of the meeting I should inform the chairperson and the vice chairperson that they haven't been speaking into the microphone. Did she
tell you? Okay. I forgot. She She was having a hard time transcribing her minutes. >> Did a great job. I >> absolutely >> I just had one question and I wasn't sure if it needs to be in here if I may. >> Yes. >> 7.3. Who desent it? It says there was a
uh 31 approved 31 was there at the center wasn't >> yes >> there was okay >> I think it was me >> right it wasn't >> it could have been >> it was Michael
>> I I just I just wasn't sure >> I didn't have it >> wasn't here >> and it was >> all right I I wasn't I didn't have it noted um and then my other was I had um was it Janie on 7.8 Judy or Janie who
did the second 7.8 was it Janie or Judy that >> I have that it was Judy >> okay I'll go with that and that's what's on >> the second was Jude Judy >> 7.8 Eight. I have should be Judy. Is that what you have?
>> No, that's why I was asking because >> Judy 7.6. I have anybody else? Okay, I have a few or Vanessa. Okay. 6.3.
Uh, this next to the last sentence. All work is to be completed by the expiration date of permit or $250 daily fine to begin acrewing day after expiration. Same situation on 6.4.
All work is to be completed by the expiration date of permit or $250 daily fine to begin acrewing day after expiration. 7.6. The property owner was given until March 14, 2026 to come into compliance by
ensuring that the paint color is approved or daily fine of $250 to commence as of March 15th. Where it got confusing is because the March 15th is down here with the work to be completed by the end of the
expiration date. That >> March 15th should be deleted in favor of um $250 will commence following permit expiration. it was approved on the 14th, the daily fine. And I'm sorry, if they don't get
it on the 14th, then the daily fine starts on the 15th. That's the way we always do. But just the 15th is down here under the work having to be done part. I'm sorry, completed. 7.8.
April 18th is a Saturday, so I'm thinking we probably meant April 15th for the deadline. And you'll be happy to know that's it. Well, most likely due to the fact that I wasn't clearly speaking into the microphone.
these microphones. I mean, I really try, but your instinct when you're speaking to someone is to turn your head and therefore >> um I I I'm just wondering what's the criteria for a construction fence if a
house is being gutted um and there's a pool in the backyard and all the windows and doors have been removed and it's open. Um, should there be a construction fence? >> There is a problem with that property. So, tomorrow the building official and I
will be working at that property. What that property owner did was instead of applying for a master permit, he started getting small little portions of the inside. So, when you're doing interior work, you do not need construction fence. However, it was shocking to me when I went to the property after you
reported it that the entire property has been gutted. Uh yes. And the chimney um I'm I'm familiar. I knew the previous owners. Um and there was a chimney that was a a structural >> Yes. Oh, there's a lot of problems.
>> So in addition just to being open to the pool and to the canal in the back. It's a deep pool too. >> The loadbearing walls have been removed. It's we have a lot of stuff we are working on over there.
>> I'm going there with the building official tomorrow. first thing in the morning. >> Yeah, I was just mainly concerned about the fact that I Oh, it's a deep. >> So, we have spoken with her. The permit will be reviewed for for the fence at
the next at the next PND by the next PND. I actually told her she can because there's a safety barrier issue, she can actually install the fence and we can continue with the process of reviewing the permit. So, hopefully they'll have it up soon.
The reason is that's another safety hazard we have right there. There wasn't an expectation even from the building inspectors for that place to be that open. All the windows are out. All the doors are out. That is like an external demo literally.
>> Yeah. And anybody who just wanders inside the roof could collapse on them. >> Oh yes. It's there's a problem there. It's a big one. But we're working on it. Any other questions, discussion? Motion to adjurnn. >> I'll make a motion to adjurnn.
>> Second. All in favor? >> I. >> Thank you everybody. >> How's everything going?