Sorry, what's your name? From the building village. Um motion to excuse Scarlet and Edward David. All I motion carries. All right, we'll go with the applicants that are here and we'll go in order of
the agenda. Okay. So, first will be 5D10840 Griffin Boulevard. That's for garage door. Hello. It's like a bronze bronze door. bronze window frames. >> It's and it's highlighted in there under
mocha brown page three. >> Okay. >> Pablo on paper favor say I. >> I. Motion carries. >> Thank you. >> Have a good night. All right. Next will be uh five uh G12023 Northeast 8th
Avenue for a pool. Are you still trying to sign us in? It's live here, right? All right. So, this is old business, right? >> Yeah. Did we? So we
>> So if you go down, he has it loud. >> Yeah. So basically he moved it 10 and then it's still the same distance of the house, but he made it narrower seat. >> Yeah. So motion to approve. >> All right. So we have a 10 foot side
setback and then the lot coverage we're still good at less than 50%. It's in the second bottom. It's at 44.2 total code. >> Okay. David Pablo on say I I
>> Mhm. Thank you, sir. >> Uh David Pablo. >> Uh 5G. Yes. >> Y. >> Okay. Next will be 6 A 665 Northeast 17th Street for a driveway. Just pull it up real quick.
That's gravel. Yeah. >> Okay. So, build up of Oh, is this the the the little Spanish house that didn't have an approach or
something? Is that Is that like a little like a little mission house? Yeah, but it's an old house that they remodeled to make Yeah. But I think the issue is they kept coming back and they didn't have the approach. >> Yes. >> Yeah.
>> Okay. So now you're going out to the street. >> Yep. >> Yeah. >> Motion to approve. >> Okay. David Apollo on previous say I I Okay. >> Thanks for uh correcting that, sir. So, it's it's we're zoning, so we're
approving it. It'll have to go through the building department. I would imagine it's going to take week or so to >> Thank you. >> You too. Thank you. Uh, next will be uh 5e 105 northeast 15th Street or pergolo
or 6, sorry, 6. Okay. So, the pergola looks like it's a 12 by 16 proposed pergola 15t from the property side property
line. Okay. What is this proposed shed? Okay. Yeah, because you can only have one shed. So, if you were going to do a new one, you have to get rid of the other one. All right. So, but the proposed pergola, it's looks like it's just a met slatted design pergola.
Yeah, I see. I see it. Yeah, just lot coverage and I think we're good. Is it on an existing slab that's there or are you putting a slab in? Okay. Lab. Okay. Um audio.
Sorry. There's like a lot of pages. So, um, >> so did you want is it towards the bottom there's a handdrawn thing. Did you want the pergola on the left hand side or on the right hand side? Is there the west side is the side
that's closer to the shed, correct? >> Yeah. Is the >> Yeah. Yeah. >> Back of this property faces north, I believe. >> Um but is it on one of the prop on one of the drawings showing it on the west side because I >> Yes. Yeah. If you go to page uh what is
this? Um 20 of 31. >> 20 of 31. >> Yeah. I see new location. >> Yeah. The the side of like there's very nice pictures and everything below it, but it doesn't the side of the property
be no closer than 10 feet. It can be no. Okay. We just need that noted somehow. Um because right now you have it on the other side at 15 feet. Um but you know you could do up to 10. So um as long as you're willing to up document I guess
that dates right like you just have to take that one page the survey where it's written on it says new location and just put a line that says far away from the property line. >> Another thing to confirm. So it's going to be
>> so is this page just because that was like found that had other dimensions and 12 by 16. >> Okay. >> Okay. >> Well, the next page has the right
dimensions, so that's why I just wanted Edward Lea joined the meeting for the record. Um, >> so do you have a did you know the dimension from the property line? How far are you planning on putting it? >> 15 feet. Okay. So, so motion with that
>> motion motion pending uh petition >> which will be 15. She's saying 15. Okay. Um David Pablo on favor say I. I. >> Motion carries. >> You just upload to the portal like a the survey again with a date on it and just
put the dimension on it. Okay. All right. Thank you. >> Thank you. All right. Next would be uh 6F107. Bless you. 10733 Northeast 9th Avenue. New construction. >> Hello, gentlemen. You have drawings for us.
>> Yes. >> Yes. >> Yeah. >> Okay. Okay. So you guys asked for some numbers for some detail. So we brought those in today. >> There were some notes about >> a lot of coverage. They added this.
Hopefully that's clearer. Total impervious area at 4737 you're at six maximum allow cover 65 you're at 4,69 >> that includes AC terrace garage entry carport So are we total of
this Your total is 63. >> Yeah, it's Did you say AC and then you say AC again? >> Yeah, the total 13.73. So that com
And then there was >> one thing on the alo going to go back to decide if you were going to put any type of gate on that side or not. You're gonna have a separate. Um, was there a height thing?
Is that your top 16 top? Very top of the house. Finish Finish floor. >> So your Z you're considering 00 is at 86 GB. Okay. You're but you're still
That's the That's I thought you had something. >> Yeah, I think we >> the survey that we have is with the tree because I ordered it. >> Was there pulling out some of this material?
It's not being called out in the number one calling it out yet because we don't have the exact >> Yeah. >> Yeah. I mean, this is this this is what we're going to be working with, right? >> No.
>> You're showing like different types and stuff. >> Yeah. I think it is the sex. And this is the one where your your your address is on 9th, but you're calling your front door over here on
your mail. >> Yeah, it's back for that separate plan. Is there any way to get the demo? It doesn't go. >> Okay. >> All right.
>> So, we got to come back here. You don't have you don't actually have >> Yeah, but make sure that it indicates that it goes and it's allowed to existence right here. Stop right there.
>> Yeah. >> I mean, that's a gray area because I thought it had to be I thought it had to be permanent because that there's an issue with that one up on 119 straight that keep blowing over because all they did is put sandbags at the front the base of it. All right. So, can I get a
>> Can I get a motion on this? >> Yep. >> So, the third hearing we don't have to come or we have to come. >> We're about to vote. So >> can I get a second please?
Alo David I motion carries. >> Thank you gentlemen. Thank you. >> We did we did 5 D 5G 6 A 6E.
Yeah. All approved. And then Then 6E 6 and 6. >> Uh, it just started now. >> All right. So, we'll go back. I have the minutes from our meeting of April 6, 2026. How about Ed? All paper say I. I. Motion
carries. Okay. Old business. A 555 Northeast on 18th Street. Root. So, this is the one we couldn't figure out because of the different 100 pages here. We couldn't figure out what roofs they were doing and and they had I think they
had flat roof and tile roof mixed together so we couldn't Hold on. This is the house on the corner of of 5A 555 Northeast 118. Oh, hold on.
Hold on. I'm sorry. Maybe I'm thinking of the wrong property. Yes, this is the metal roof. We're questioning the small second building, I believe. Yeah. So they do have on page number
pages Everything else says that it's 412, but those are probably significantly steeper than 412. So, if you look at page number 91, they are adding two 2x6 boards to give
the space for overhang on that structure on the left. I think that's what we had concerned about. >> You talking about the mansered roofs kind of stuff? I would assume if that's what they're planning on doing because of their
I motion to approve. I want to see what they do. You're referring to P uh picture on page number 85. Yeah. Yeah. So, if you look at page number 96, that structure does have the a necessary
overhang. It's just that the pitch is like 90 degrees or something, you know? It's like way the hell up there. It's going to look like a I mean it's going to look like a store. >> We should put a sign on like says shulas
or something. >> Ed Pablo >> all say I I carried. >> All right. Uh 5B 670 Northeast Center 14th Street or pool >> none of business.
>> It's clouded on the You know what I think it is? I think this is the one that they didn't have a survey, so we couldn't tell where it was going. It just had um page number two. It didn't have It was missing page number one.
>> Well, if you read the bottom thing, it says that changes Okay. >> David Pablo. All say I. I. >> Next would be um old business 5C 10803 Northeast 9th Avenue. They wrote the first one in and then put
all the other ones for the product. This is the first prototype. >> It's all the one. Where is the schedule? What page? >> I see the schedule, but I don't see the I don't see the correlating floor plan. That one.
Okay. But they're all this. Oh, this is a for sun room. >> So, it's just a sun room in the back. Oh, I see. It does. was actually approved. David Pablo on say I I motion carries.
Next um 5e10001 Northeast 9th Avenue. Revisions 5e 5 E 5D. We did. We approved it. >> Why is this a revision? They changing the type of material they're using from the flat that it says
revision, but when you click on it, it says root. like some other edition area. Okay, David Ed. All in favor say I. I carries. Next will be uh 5F11818
Northeast 7th Avenue. Pool. Another pool. this one. Hold on. So, this is a tool and then it's a very taken me a long time to download. Did we already approve or disapprove
this this permit? I still I don't even see a survey here. Where where It's time. I mean, I said they were here to actually explain their quest for a variance. >> Also, just an FYI that pool there also,
I guess, another part of the five foot set back to the pool. >> Yeah. And there's got to be a fence in between that pool edge and the side setback which has the the has a minimum at least three feet.
>> That's not so I mean I have she just handed me a copy of the variance application. All right. I I it is in there.
>> Hello. I have property here for sir. >> Okay. All right. Just give us a minute. We'll come to you. All right. So there is an application for variance. There are special circumstances or
condition affecting property such as strict application of the code depriving the applicant reasonable use of his her land. The properties on a corner lot and therefore subject to a more restrictive permit interior lot. Um the strict application of the required corner lot setback expansially
limits the usable backyard area and creates a practical hardship for installation of customer residential pool. Okay, so that's answer the question number one. Um, number two, the request of variance is necessary to
preserve and enjoy substantial property rights, specifically the ability to install a residential swimming pool as a customary accessory improvement to a single family home. Without the request of variance, the owner a reasonable residential whether or not you have a pool or not is considered for depriving you of
reasonable use of your property. Um okay but um number three granting the variance will not be detrimental to the public welfare or interest to neighboring properties. The proposed pool will remain within the subject property and will comply with all applicable permitting safety construction inspection requirements.
The requirement requested limited only to the setback relief necessary for the proposed school location. Number four, the proposed variance is the minimum amount necessary to allow the reasonable use of the property. A 22
by 22.90 by 8 foot45 is the minimum amount of pool necessary for reasonable use of your property. Due to the corner lot conditioning setback restrictions, the request relief is limited to what is necessary to permit installation of the
pool in the proposed location. I really wish this person would have been here to talk to us about this. >> Well, that's that's your choice. You get to your your your decision is based on whether you feel that you're they're making Well, that's I mean that's another
discussion because I mean there is a there is a on on some corner lots there are practical uses of putting a pool in and the the commission has been favorable and allowing people to do it.
My concern is is They're asking for it to be five feet from the side property line. Uh like I said earlier, there's a three-foot minimum setback for a fence. So that means there's going to be two feet between fence and the water line. I
don't know if they're really >> So to me it would be like they should come in and talk to us and say, "Hey, listen. Why don't you move this thing closer to the prop the pool the pool closer to the building because then that's a little bit more reasonable than sticking it all the way out almost to the property line. Um >> what is the position between the
building and the pool? >> So you have five feet plus the pool is 9 10 ft. So there's 15 feet between the bu the structure roughly around 15 feet and the pool prop water line.
>> Yeah. The question is, is it reasonable minimum amount necessary putting it out because technically they're asking for relief on 20 almost 26 feet into the side front
setback. Not 25, not 20. That considered minimum amount necessary to allow for the enjoyment reasonable use of the property. We've already denied this before because
of the location, right? So, this has already been denied. So, this is the application for variance. Okay. So, this is just a recommendation. Um, so the first question, um, yeah, I mean, your point being is that
they're they're their argument is that there that the property has a more restrictive setback requirement. Bought it with that setback requirement. You know, it doesn't no other the interior lots have a bigger backyards, corner lots do not. So, it's
not restricted. It's just they have different setback requirements backyard area. Um so the thing is is do we we all get to make our own our own recommendations and we and we vote on it as a board. Um I
guess I'll start off I don't not buying the argument they're making number one. Um I I I'm number two I still kind of question whether or not pools are are necessary to preserve substantial property rights
but because of the fact that our community is allowing people to put corner lot more favorable to say yes to number two. Um number three I think is a it's I don't think it's going to be injurous to the neighboring properties. So I would say yes to number three. And then number
four, I'm hung up on the fact of this is the minimum amount necessary reasonable use of the property. So I'm going to say I vote I would vote no on one and four. My recommendation >> after recommendation is that
>> no they should be here to talk to us. Yeah, that was I mean it's just difficult to release without it's like doing project. I mean on the four points Pablo you I
mean you are you >> a position >> I'd almost rather sit let's table this thing and have them come back and talk to us >> I agree I mean I would rather talk what do you Yeah. So, do you want to make a motion to
table this and we ask the the resident to come back at the next meeting? >> Yeah. Because I mean the fact of the matter is they paid money for the variance part for this and so I think that yes I motion to table this.
>> We would like to speak to we want them to >> I I I I agree with side pools. I just think that there's >> I imagine somewhere too in the code if you apply for a variance you're supposed to be there maybe not necessarily
>> David Pablo all in favor say I so we are tableabling it we're going to request the applicant Okay. Um, the gentleman that just arrived, we're going to do that next. 6 I1806 Northeast 8th Avenue for a demo for a
shed. See deck. So motion to approve. All he's doing is destroy shed. >> David Ed, all in favor say I. I. Motion carries. >> You have to blow it up.
>> Knock it down. >> You have to send us a video of how you do it because that's cool. >> Yeah, if you borrow my truck. >> Thank you, Z. Thank you. the thing with theion where the giant piece of metal went flying through the
windows of the building next door and like >> Oh, really? on a mandarin thing. >> The mandarin? Yeah. >> Oh, what happened? Giant chunk of metal went and blew out all the windows of the building.
>> Was it somebody's apartment? >> Oh, it was a lobby >> where where a bunch of people were watching >> watching the watching it. That's the tear 50. This is the tear down. $150 to tear down. All right. So, we got next is um 6B 1780
Northeast Center 12th Street windows. Window number one is 35 by 20. One panel. One panel. Are they? No, because he's he's on a corner. So, the the numbers one and two are facing 8th Avenue.
But but my question is is do they match the other windows that are in bed the other two bedroom? Well, these are bathroom windows. Seven, eight. They're horizontal rollers. Let's just do Google Street View. That'll probably help us.
>> Yeah, that's what I'm looking at. So, all of these windows have the little um mutton. >> Yeah. Um so, mutton versus purebreds. That would
be the other option. Um but yeah, so right now they just have those like 1980s frosted glass cubes and I think where these windows Those are the pieces getting
850. Oh, >> oh, we're not getting the public official. Yeah. Um, want to make sure they match. >> Well, the only way that they wouldn't is if they didn't have the little M like on
them. And I don't see anywhere that >> But you actually are able to see a picture of the house. >> Yeah, that's what I was already looking at. And that's why I told you like what they have is they just have things like >> frosted glass cubes. >> Okay. >> In there opaque.
>> But the ones to the left and right are are those What type of windows are those >> ones with muttons? >> No, they're horizontal roller. Okay. Then they're correct. >> Yep. >> Okay. >> That's why like when when a window has like all the muttons on them, I can't tell which direction it's move like what
what it's doing. replacing the the concrete glass blocks with windows that match the rest. Okay, got a motion. >> David next would be uh 6C 850 Northeast 118 Street
or fence temporary construction's taking down another one. motion to approve. >> Um, that was David Pablo on say I I and then we have the next one which is the fence for the same property. 850 Northeast on 18th Street.
>> Oh, the one's the demo. >> Demo fence. They're both the same. So, can I get a motion on the second one? >> Okay. David David Pablo say I I Okay, that's 850 Northeast
become our biggest lot land owner here. Uh 56G 11339 Northeast 8 Court free roof. The demo one, if you go into it, has like all these tree details.
>> Um, we are at 6G, but I'm also going back and looking at >> We did six already. >> We did. That's the new construction. That's the people that were just here. That's a nice little tree survey. >> Yeah, motion.
>> Motion to approve. David Ed I. And then next will be finally uh 6H 11400 Northeast 8 Court another roof. Reap
to approve. David Ed say I. All right. Next meeting is two weeks. We have a timeline of our >> is it two weeks the 11th? >> May 4th. >> Okay. Do we have a timeline of the next time
that um or did you already send out a personal batch of changes for the permit? >> I haven't had a chance to do the memo already sitting in my inbox. So I will have it for the next meeting for us to review and send it up and we can schedule our second meeting.
Our next meeting is uh May 4th. Any other business? >> Day. >> Huh? >> May the fourth be with you. >> Motion to adjurnn. Please >> David Pablo say I
very much victory. >> Thank you. Next.