--------- . All right. >> We're now going to resume the meeting with item number 20 . These are certificate of completion so there's no presentation. We'll go straight There's no presentation for this. So anyway, request
authorization to issue a certificate of completion for the successful completion of all county phases four and five respectively located in the South Boston neighborhood in accordance with a cooperation agreement by and between the borough and Old Colony for Bonds limited partnership dated September
20th, 2022 the Phase four Cooperation Agreement and the Cooperation Agreement bind between the Boston Redevelopment Authority doing business with the Boston Planning and Development Agency and Old colony five months limited partnership dated September 14th 2022 Phase five Cooperation Agreement This is a
certificate of completion. >> We'll get a summary at the end of the meeting but motion is in order to move second roll call for a vote. Ms. Bennett Mr. Sheppard Dr. Landmark All right. Mr. O'MALLEY All right. And the chair of I Motion Passes item number 21 Request authorization to issue a certificate of completion for
the successful completion of the new Sweeney Field located at 600 Parker Street in the Mission Hill neighborhood in accordance with Section C dot six of the Cooperation Agreement by and between the Boston Redevelopment Authority doing business in Boston Planning and Development Agency
and Wentworth Institute of Technology dated May 22nd 2023 A motion is in order to move second roll call for a vote. Ms. Bennett Mr. Sheppard Dr. LANDMARK All right. Mr. O'MALLEY All right. And the Chair Vote Time passes Item number 22 Request authorization to take all steps
necessary to assume the rights and duties of the city of Boston Transportation Department pursuant to all transportation access plan agreements Tapa entered into by the city of Boston Transportation Department and
any and all other documents and agreements entered into the city of Boston Transportation Department pursuant to Article 80 of the Boston Zoning code including without limitation to execute any and all documents that the director deems appropriate in connection with the transfer of the tap A
program from b t d. Thank you Madam Chair. Members of the board Secretary Connolly Ms.. Director Shen I'm here to request authority to authorization for the assignment of all existing transportation access plan agreements or Kappas from the Transportation Department to the Planning Department.
As you may recall at the August board meeting as part of our Article 80 reforms we approved the authority for the Planning Department to execute All TAP is going forward. This will transfer the authority to implement and enforce all existing tappers from the Transportation Department to the Planning
Department. We will as always continue to work closely with our colleagues in the Transportation Department public works and see. Thank you and happy to answer any questions. Thank you. All right. Question and comments from board hearing and seeing that a motion is in order.
So moving. Second roll call for a vote. Ms. BENNETT Hi Mr. Sheppard. Dr. Lance Mark Mr. O'Malley and the chair I motion passes. >> Thanks, Jim. Item number 23 request authorization to enter into affordable housing and affordable Rental Housing Agreement and restriction for the proposed creation COVID 19 inclusionary Development rental
units and ten residential voucher units located 25 to 39 Harvard Avenue and 410 r Cambridge Street to take all relief actions Andy Thank you Madam Chair Director and Secretary Paul he and members of the board i'm Andy Feldman, housing policy manager with the
mayor's office of Housing. The proposal before you tonight is to authorize the BPA to enter into a housing agreement for the board approved Article 80 be Project A 25 to 39 Harvard Avenue in Allston. This development proposes to build 170 rental units after
receiving board approval. The proponent requested a change in the composition of income restricted units in the project maintaining the same total number 29 which is equivalent to 17% of total units. What a different mix of income limits and voucher units. After reviewing the proponents
request, the Mayor's Office of Housing in consultation with the Planning Department agreed to a revised IDB commitment. The proponent anticipates that construction can begin shortly . Therefore the vote in front of you tonight will allow the agency to enter into a housing agreement to dedicate the units
agreed to in the revised proposal. >> Thank you and happy to answer any questions that you may have. Thank you. Questions or comments from the board. Hearing and seeing none A motion is in order to move the second roll call for a vote. Ms. Bennett. Mr. Sheppard. Dr. Lance Mark All right. Mr. O'MALLEY All right. And the chair votes I motion
passes. Thank you. Item number 24 Request authorization to co petition the City of Boston Public Improvement Commission to discontinue a portion of Stuart Street and the South Cove Urban Renewal Area Project Number Mass R Dash 92 The taking
Pozole and adopt the order of taking for the taking parcel in connection with the project and to enter into and enter into an executed deed to UUGB22 12 Stewart property owning LLC
and to enter into an indemnification agreement and to take all related actions. QUINN Thank you Madam Chair. Members of the board Secretary Paul Amos and Director Shen The proposal before you to authorize the BPR to petition the Public Improvement Commission for a discontinuance
adopt in order of taking and authorize the Director to enter into agreements with the proponent of the 212 story street project in the Bay Village for this parcel this project has already been completed and is fully open and occupied As with the second discontinuance and taken for this project deemed necessary to account for an additional
area of encroachment discovered when the property was surveyed for an as built plan Specifically the articulated facade treatment of the building encroaches over the property line onto the layout of Stuart Street by approximately 6 to 7in the total area of the additional taking covers approximately 43ft2 of land area.
That concludes the presentation for this update and I'm happy to answer any questions the board may have. Thank you. Questions or comments from the board Hearing and seeing none A motion is in order. A second roll call for a vote, Ms.. Bennett. All right, Mr. Shepherd. >> Dr. Landmark. All right, Mr. O'Malley. All right.
And the chair votes I'm passes when item number 25 Request authorization to issue a scoping determination waiving further review pursuant to Article 80 B large project review of the zoning code for the proposed construction of 78,370ft2 of research and development space 1800 square
feet of commercial space and 39 car parking spaces located at Building 108 at 108 Third Avenue. And to enter into a cooperation agreement and to take all related actions. Sara Great. Thank you and good evening, Madam Chair. Members of the board Director Shannon Secretary Paul he Ms..
My name is Sarah Peck and I'm a development portfolio manager in the Development Review Department. We're here before you this evening to discuss the proposed Building 128 project. The project is located on an approximately 41,000 square foot site in the Charlestown Navy Yard neighborhood and includes the construction of an
approximately 99,600 square foot building with 78,370ft2 of research and development space 1800ft2 of restaurant and cafe space and 39 below grade parking spaces. On March 7th, 2023, the
proponent filed a project notification form for the proposed project pursuant to Article B of the code The BPA then sponsored and held a Virtual Impact Advisory Group meeting on May 15th, 2023 and a virtual public meeting on May 17th 2023 both via Zoom.
The public comment period then ended on May 31st. An additional public meeting and IHG meeting were held on June 23rd 2025 via Zoom. At this point I would like to hand it off to my colleague for Delvecchio to present the planning context for the project followed by a presentation from the development team.
>> Thanks everyone. >> Thanks Sara. Thank you. Good evening Chair Rojas Secretary Please miss members of the board and Director Chen My name is for Delvecchio and then Plans Review Assignments Project. Next slide please. I'm not going to the nightmare when I realize I have the wrong script so I'm going to be going
off the slides right now. This project is located in the Charlestown Navy Yard in the historic monument area. Charlestown is composed of three different areas as that local area is located and is well connected to transit Located near the Community College Station as well as various bus routes. Next slide please.
This is a summarization of the different regulations and areas that we've analyzed over the course of reviewing this project as this is within the historic Charlestown Navy Yard and follows under the National Federal Historic District area.
Thank you. And I will now hand it over to the Proponent team in order to present the project in more detail. >> Thank you. Great. Thank you. >> Good evening, Madam Chair. Director Shan Secretary Paul Heyman. Members of the board.
My name is Michael Parker. I'm with the Gain Tour B law firm here in Boston. I'm here on behalf of Powerhouse partners Jeff Lewis and Luca Brown. Also with us tonight is Jason Forni from Brewer Court. I have to thank Sara and Ford
and a lot of other people too BPA for getting us to this point with building one away. >> The building 128 story is actually a 5050 year story. It's a feel good story actually . It started back in 1974 when
the federal government was turning over a large portion of the Charlestown Navy Yard to the BPA. And though I wasn't in the room apparently during this initiative of base closures, President Nixon was presented a
slate of potential candidates to close about a dozen of them and his response was loaded with profanities. I don't care what you shut down as long as the first one is in Massachusetts. Oh apparently that was because
Massachusetts was the only state that didn't vote for president Nixon in his 1972 reelection. >> What President Nixon did know is how well things would turn out. I've personally I have lived in the Navy Yard for 25 years and have watched it turn into a
vibrant community. We have over 4000 residents now transit rich as Ford and talked about. We have a bus that goes every 15 minutes, touches some part of the yard that goes to North Station Sullivan Square
downtown all points in between . Traffic looks bad. You can jump on a water ferry and get to any neighborhood in downtown within ten minutes. And if you want to rely on walking north Station is a 10 to 12 minute walk from the Navy Yard. >> As far as services a lot
of essential services have popped up. So just to name a few here we have a small grocer. We have a YMCA reasonably priced fitness center hair salon dentist to daycares. A new preschool just came in to the yard. We have a dance studio.
We actually have an immigration law firm that is very helpful to all the researchers and students that are working at the campus within the yard. We also have two beautiful parks Shipyard Park and Menino Park. Shipyard Park.
We have a fantastic outdoor venue called the Anchor that attracts somewhere around 500 to 600 people every Monday night for free salsa dance And it's my favorite day of the week because I see so many happy people smiling. They smile at me. We say hello.
They're dancing. It's really nice to see. And I say all that not to brag about my neighborhood but just to let you know the amenities that the occupants of the new building one away will enjoy when they occupy back to the old building 128 story.
The million or so visitors to the Navy Yard until a couple of years ago when they view the old building went away. I think I don't think they could imagine that during its heyday it supplied the power to build and repair some of the
most sophisticated vessels that ever hit the water. Fenced off heavily contaminated. Dilapidated To say that it was an eyesore is a gross understatement. Just falling in on itself. The BPA a couple of years ago
demolished the building fully remediate, remediated the site and issued an RFP for its redevelopment powerhouse Power . Powerhouse Partners was successful in securing that.
They will be entering into a 99 year lease with the BPA and putting forth a new building. One await that you're seeing here today. Finally for context, the new proposal fits the Navy Yard like a glove. As far as use the 78,000 plus
square feet of research and development, 1800 square feet for restaurant and parking sits adjacent action surrounded by the life sciences and teaching campus. As far as design it lies within the historic monument area.
Very heavily regulated National Park Service Review Mass Historic. It's fully compliant with local zoning so it aligns perfectly with the Navy Heart Navy yard design and scale. So with that I turn it over to
Jason to do the heavy lift here for the presentation. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you, Michael. Good evening. Jason Fournie from Bruner Court Architects in Boston. The design goals for this project really stem from the fact that we're replacing a
building that a lot of people probably wish was still there. It was a beautiful building. So we're acknowledging the massing and sort of the spirit of that power station celebrating the history and the character of the Navy Yard using compatible and sympathetic materials and then
working to reinforce the urban design quality and character in the streetscape bringing active programing to the ground floor at a very high quality. This is a building that really doesn't have a back. It has four fronts on different sides so we're working that way. Next slide please.
Here is a view of 1913 of the power station as it stood and as Michael said, it provided electricity and steam to most of the Navy Yard. It was built over time as shown in the next slide and six incremental phases.
So there was a little bit of everything going on here at that time. But what was really important was sort of the spirit and volume of the massing. Next slide as described before the building that the proposed building mostly contains tenant space for research and
development but also some spaces that activate the ground floor such as a cafe and other spaces One level of parking below and 80 bicycle parking spaces. So a quick walk around the building. Next slide shows the Third
Avenue facade continuing the regulating lines from Building 107 which is our neighbor a connector in between and then working to make the upper part of the building feel light and airy. Next slide shows the rope walk elevation And here we're honoring the spirit of the
building by sort of recalling a series of arched windows that these were mostly blind arches in the original condition. But this would be a really nice facade along the the flirtation walk. The next slide shows on The view from from ninth.
And here we're looking at kind of the two original two brick volumes that recall the original the original buildings. And again sort of light and airy material that floats up between them and rises above
the the roof lines there. And then the last elevation is from the courtyard. As I mentioned before, there's sort of two fronts to this building. One that faces the courtyard between building one seven and 108 and the rope walk. This is where a lot of people
would come to the building from public transit. The bus and the orange line. Next slide shows a slice through the building a section. This is for tall stories for the research and development used for the penthouse above for mechanicals and parking
below. Next please. A section in the other direction. And then I'll leave you with a series of views from around the building here. We're looking at the open corner on ninth and third which has a green space. We also use this to navigate
the grade change in terms of resiliency. The first floor is located several feet above the sidewalk and so we're using this space to help navigate that in a graceful way. The next slide is the same view but from the street level seeing the two brick volumes
the clear arched entrance into building 108 and the light and airy volume sort of dissipating above. The next slide shows the view from coming from along the flirtation walk looking to the
east. And the next slide is the same view along the the flirtation walk looking in the other direction. Next slide please. Here we're looking at the entrance getting a little bit closer and you can see how we're working with landscape
elements to get up to the ground floor. Next slide shows the view along Third Avenue And here we have worked with the city to widen the sidewalk and include some street trees. And what you're seeing between
building 107 and 108 is the opening up of part of the facade that takes you through it from Third Avenue into that courtyard. So kind of opening up and creating some porosity along that street which is a pretty long facade.
Here is a view of the plan And again this is a building that has four fronts and we're working really hard to hide services. Parking is is below grade office off street loading is off street and we're even including a trash room for the a neighboring roadblock
building because it sort of exists now in open enclosure . So really trying to beautify this part of the Navy Yard looking at the way that we're working with on plot for Martin Design Group is our landscape architect to really think about
how to gracefully move through that corner park. The cafe opens right on to this . And then last slide is looking at the entrance on the other side doing a similar thing with landscape that makes up grade change and a clear entry.
And those two entries connect through the building. So that's what we have for tonight. I'll turn it back to Michael to close it. Okay. Yeah. Any questions? Yeah. Okay. Your presentation over Presentation for questions or
comments from the board? Yes, Through the chair, please. Just beautiful project. My question to you would be do you have any an anchor tenant for this project? Yeah. Jeff did you and Speaker? Yeah. No thanks.
Ryan. Can you repeat the question of the air conditioner by an anchor tenant? We do not yet. So we're we're hoping to obviously pound the pavement and find one. But you know the biotech industry and life sciences is tough But you know and while
it's tough on real estate, I'm not going to stand here and bet against Boston. And as far as life science and biotech in the future. So I agree with that. And with that being said, if this project was approved and went through zoning, do you see yourself still building out the
space or still searching for a tenant before you guys continue with construction? So we would when we don't have to go through zoning we are compliant. But number two yes. So we would we would continue through the design effort at
the same time of going through immediately starting to search for tenants and financial partners and and going on there whether we break ground on construction or not prior to finding a tenant that depends on the overall life science market state.
Number two is sometimes there's specific aspects of a building that you need for a tenant and you want to make sure you're hitting that just just about right now because that's not that's not a cheap fit out at all. Thanks. Thank you.
Additional questions or comments? Hearing and seeing none A motion is in order to move second roll call for a vote. >> Ms. Bennett I Mr. Shepherd Dr. Lance Mark are Mr. O'Malley All right And the chair But I motion passes Just a comment.
>> I do like every side of the building as a front of the building Like I appreciate that And the courtyard and all of the breaking up and everything that you creatively did there. >> I was very pleased and intrigued as I reviewed this prior to the meeting.
Great. Thank you. Congratulate. Thank you. Item number 26 request authorization to issue a determination waiving further review pursuant to Article 80 8-6.1 of the zoning code for the proposed notice of Project Change and Construction of 221
residential home ownership units, 202 residential rental units and five car share spaces located at one Mystic Avenue and to enter into an affordable rental housing agreement and restriction and Affordable contribution agreement Stick all related action.
>> Sara oh oh sorry. It's actually actually going to be me Excuse me. I think Yes, Thank you Madam Chair. Director Shane Secretary Bell He Mr. and members of the board I'm Andy Feldman housing policy manager with the Mayor's Office of Housing. Tonight I'm here to request
your vote on an affordable rental housing agreement and restriction and an affordable housing creation agreement for the board approved project at one Mystic Avenue in Charlestown. This development proposes to build 423 total units after receiving board approval and 2023 the proponent reached out
to the city with a proposed change in tenure as well as IDB commitment Given the current market conditions, the total unit count was reduced from 503 to 423 with 221 condo units and 202 rental units. Under the new proposal the
rental portion of the project will include 13% of rental units restricted at 70% of AMI and 70% of excuse me 7% of rental units set aside with households for households with Vash vouchers or in the case that Vash vouchers cannot be
procured restricted at 80% of AMI for the condo component. The proponent would make a payment in lieu of onsite units into the IDP fund the exact value of which would depend on the sale price of the condos but which would be approximately $18 million. I thank you and I'm happy to
answer any questions that the Board may have. >> Thank you. Questions or comments from the Board You've piqued my interest with this internal EV car share program five vehicles First of all how many how many parking spots are there going to be? >> It's five parking spaces. We have the development team
here as well in case there are additional questions and I've just I've not heard of . So this will be a car share. So this would be you know, Zipcar type not Zipcar but this would be an internally run car sharing with five EVs And residents can sign up and they pay for is there like a
membership or and that's intriguing I kind of like and I hadn't heard of that before so I look forward to seeing it Success Hopefully we can grow beyond five to Thank you Okay Thank you. No questions or comments right? Hearing and seeing none emotion is in order so second will call
for a vote. Ms. Bennett Mr. Sheppard Dr. Lance Martin O'Malley All right. >> And the chair votes I motion passes. Thank you. Thank you. Okay. Item number 27 request authorization to enter into an amended and restated affordable rental housing agreement and restriction for the creation
of four inclusionary development units located at 1121 Dorchester Avenue and take all related actions. >> Andy Thank you Madam Chair Director Shane Saratoga where he Ms. and members of the board I'm Andy Feldman, housing policy manager with the Mayor's office of Housing. Tonight I'm here to request
your vote on an affordable housing agreement for the development at 1121 Dorchester Ave in Dorchester. This development consists of 21 rental units. The project originally proposed three IDP units and a payment into the IDP fund for the
remaining partial unit due to issues that arose during construction and the floor plans changed resulting in modest changes to unit sizes. Given that the proponent requested a change to the IDP obligation resulting in four four IDP units instead of three and no partial payment I
Therefore the vote in front of you tonight will allow the Agency to enter into an amended and restated IRR which will supersede the original Aha Thank you and happy to answer any questions that you may have. >> Thanks Sandy. Questions or comments from the board hearing and seeing none A
motion is in order so move roll call for a vote. Ms. Bennett. Mr. Sheppard. Dr. Lance Mark. Mr. O'MALLEY All right. And the chair votes I motion passes. Thanks, Andy. And I'm going to move to item 20. So Mr. Shepherd recuse himself from this item.
I'll go ahead and begin reading it though. Request authorization to issue a preliminary adequacy determination waiving further review pursuant to Article 80 B large project review of the zoning code for the proposed construction of 204 residential
rental units and 274 car parking spaces located at 990 American Legion Highway and issue a certification of compliance under section 80 B-6 of the zoning code upon completion of the Article 80 review process and to enter into a cooperation agreement
all related action. Sara Great. Thank you again Madam Chair. Members of the board Director Shana and Secretary Polley. Ms.. Once again my name is Sarah Park Development Portfolio Manager and the Development Review Department. We are here before you this evening to discuss the proposed 1990 American Legion Highway
project. The project is located on an approximately 14.1 acre site located in the Hyde Park neighborhood of Boston. The project includes the construction of 204 residential rental units located in nine detached two and three story
buildings with 249 parking spaces. The project will also include a freestanding amenity building and leasing center for residents On June 4th, 2021, the proponent filed a project notification form with the BPA for the proposed project pursuant to Article 80 B of the
Code the BPA sponsored and held a virtual AG meeting on July 28th, 2021 and a virtual public meeting on July 26th 2021. The public comment period then ended on August 27th and the BPA issued a scoping determination on November 19th,
2021 excuse me. The proponent filed a draft project impact report with the BPA on May 6th, 2022. The BPA then sponsored and held a virtual IAG meeting on June 8th, 2020 to and a virtual public meeting on June 13th. The public comment period ended
on June 20th. The proponent then filed a final project impact report with the BPA on December 15th 2020 to the BPA then sponsored and held a virtual IAG meeting on January 17th, 2023 and a virtual public meeting on January 11th, 2023.
The public comment period then ended on January 27th of that year. The BPA issued an adequacy determination disapproving the project on February 3rd, 2023 and the proponent filed a supplemental filing on March 8th, 2023 and the BPA then issued a supplemental adequacy
determination disapproving the project on May 6th, 2023. In May 2024 the proponent commenced litigation in the land court against the BPA alleging that the BPA improperly had failed to approve the project under Article 80.
On April 10th, 2025, the land Court ruled that the proponent must submit its revised project to the BPA and that the BPA must conduct an expeditious review of the proposed part of the revised proposal. The land court's order also made clear that the BPA cannot impose changes to a zoning compliant project that would
make it non-compliant. >> Subsequently on April 17th, 2025 the proponent submitted the revised project to the BPA. On May 16th, 2025, the BPA asked that the proponent provide additional information
about the project by submitting an updated Final Project Impact report on June 27th, 2025. The proponent filed an updated final project impact report. The Planning Department sponsored and held a Virtual Impact Advisory Group meeting on August 26th, 2025 and a
virtual public meeting on August 27th 2025. The proposed project was introduced to the Boston Civic Design Commission on August 2nd, 2022 and was referred to the Bccdc Design Subcommittee for further review. On August 19th, 2025. The Bccdc Design Committee
reviewed the project further and recommended it for final review and recommendation. On September 9th, 2025 the BCCDC issued a final recommendation that the BPA board not approve the proposed project. At this point I would like to hand it off to my colleague Ted Schwartzberg to present the
plan in context for the project. Thank you everyone. >> Thank you. Thank you, Sara. Good evening, Chair Rojas Secretary Paul Humus and Director Sen. My name is Ted Schwartzberg. I'm Assistant Deputy Director for Planning Review at the
Planning Department. Next slide please. >> On this slide I'll review the planning and zoning context for the proposed project. The proposed project is located in a neighborhood shopping subdistrict of the Hyde Park Neighborhood Zoning district governed by Article 69 of the
zoning code. Following a neighborhood planning process, Article 69 and Map 12 were adopted by the Borough Board in January 2012 and subsequently by the Zoning Commission in February 2012. The proposed multifamily
residential use is allowed per zoning. On the right hand side at the top of the slide is an aerial image taken in April this year showing the proposed project frontage along American Legion Highway. The lower image on the right side is taken from the proposed
proponents recent August 27th public presentation. This image in the lower right corner shows frontage along one public street American Legion Highway along this street. There is an amenity building and a residential building To the rear of these two buildings
are eight additional buildings . Planning department staff do not recommend zoning relief if the Inspectional Services Department finds that zoning relief is needed including if it's needed for the provisions of section 69 DASH 30.12 of the
zoning code which states that a dwelling shall not be built to the rear of another dwelling accessory building or main building. While planning service while planning staff do not yet know if the Inspectional Services Department will find that zoning relief is needed for the
provision governing buildings built to the rear of other buildings. This proposal illustrates the importance of maintaining a nimble and up to date zoning code. The work of my colleagues that you heard about this evening leading zoning reform initiatives across the city
seeks to ensure that Boston has a contemporary and effective set of land use regulations that correctly encodes the built environment that our playing initiatives envision. Thank you and I'll now turn it over to the proponent to elaborate on their proposal.
Thank you Ted. Thank you very much. Cheryl Huss Secretary Polygamists. Director Shen and members of the board. Ms.. Okay.
Excuse me. So to start off with this is a satellite view of site and we're just going to give further context to the site. As previously mentioned, we're on approximately 14 acres here in Hyde Park American Legion Highway bounds this site to the northwest.
There is a neighborhood shopping center and retail center to the north undeveloped land to the northeast and a kind of homes and a vacant land to the south and southeast. >> Next slide please. >> So this is another view.
This is looking southwards an aerial showing that shopping center now in a different orientation And on the bottom left of the slide with the exception of that northeast corner adjacent to that shopping center, this site contains a significant natural
setbacks on all edges. Next slide, please. Thank you. Here's another view. This is more to give context from the street level. On the left hand image is a view of American Legion Highway approaching the site from the north.
The right hand is traveling further north to the driveway entrance of American Legion Highway. You can see that driveway entrance on the right. >> Next slide please. So this going the opposite way on the left hand side is a view of American Legion approaching from the south and then
traveling further south. On the right hand image is the driveway entrance. >> Next slide please. >> So this concerning the existing conditions the project
site is currently vacant with a previously developed access road on site. And you're seeing this American Legion Highway At grade is where the site starts and slopes upwards by about 72ft to the highest point constituting
a significant grade change. We are seeing a lot of challenging topography on this site. Next slide please. >> Now this is the the further background as Sara went over we
have been working on this site with our team for almost five years now. And so we've included that planning history here recently . We have submitted our revised FPI here on June 27th for what you're viewing today. As far as the current proposal goes.
And we did recently attend ISG meeting public meeting and two BCCDC meetings this month and last month. Next slide please. >> So this this aerial view is showing the the proposal as I
mentioned for 204 residential units. We also have a residential amenity building of about 8000 gross square feet 220. We have 226 parking spaces for project residents and employees plus an additional 23 spaces on
the site driveway for parallel street parking. Next slide please. So on these next two slides are some site plan images. In coordination with our team at Hefner Architects, the site
has been developed as a series of buildings nine buildings. We laid them out around a central roadway running from American Legion Highway. On the left of that screen to the right hand side through Jubilee churches adjacent parcel which is not part
of this proposal. Next slide please. >> Now this is another site plan. This is more illustrative showing the that this roadway is running through the the site and meets the city's public roadway requirements per per
their request. And additionally about 58% of this site area which is about eight acres is usable open space where including playing fields, playgrounds and a dog park which are all accessible by the sidewalks throughout the site and as well
as that roadway. >> And we'll show more renderings of that later. Next slide please. So these next couple of views are for cross sections and elevations of this proposal. And you'll see particularly on
the top top image it shows that showing that great change of about 72ft from the left with the entrance on American Legion Highway to the southern edge of the site. Next slide please.
>> And another notice that our design team we stepped these buildings to allow for a better integration with the existing challenging topography. And we aim to minimize the amount of site disturbance from that. Now on this one we have some
several selection of elevations . As you can see, these buildings we're proposing are about 2 to 3 stories tall each. We are keeping the heights to a residential scale fitting within the context of that neighborhood. And each building is varying in
size about 20 to 28 units. Next slide please. >> And this is just another another view of different elevations. Our design is trying to keep massing and materials consistent with the residential neighboring context.
We're employing a mixture of lab siting board and Ben at all buildings to keep it consistent. Next slide please. So to wrap up, this is a series of renderings from the street level for showing the experiences of folks on the
ground. This this perspective is from the middle of the site facing southwards. We're aiming to minimally minimally change the grade to allow streetscapes throughout the site that are going to be fitted with canopy trees with
parallel parking as mentioned with a safe crossings and spacious sidewalks As you can see here. Next slide. Now this is just another view from the north of the site facing east. Similarly, these are buildings
Frontages and open spaces are filled with layered plantings. We are catering to those experiences and will continue on the next slide Please. >> This is another view from the north of the site that's actually facing southeast down
the main site driveway showing similar perspectives. Next slide. And this perspective is rendering from the middle of the site we're facing southeast showing just an example outdoor space.
These open spaces similar to this one are woven between all nine residential buildings in order to provide a consistent experience for all residents. Next slide.
And as previously discussed, this proposed project includes a new traffic signal American Legion Highway and it will create about 300 construction jobs and 15 permanent jobs. And as previously mentioned consists of 204 market rate
rental units. Thank you very much. That concludes our presentation. Okay. Thank you. As as was the courtesy that we gave earlier to elected officials who who came to give their testimony I will will
also take counselor but then I see you now on on the zoom so you're free to unmute and the floor is yours. >> Thank you Madam Chair. Members of the board. My name is Enrique Pepin. I'm the District five Boston
City Councilor proudly representing the neighborhoods of Hyde Park, Mattapan and Roslindale. I was testifying in regards to 99 the American Legion Highway. I would like to state my opposition to the 99 the American Legion Highway proposal a proposal with a
history that is putting this body in a as a district council of this area. I must communicate the overwhelming opposition this project faces in the community from the extreme environmental devastation it will cause the lack of affordable housing units it has and the minimal community benefits it would
bring. Neighbors have rallied support and put pressure on the mayor and the city to purchase the land from Jubilee Church at a fair price which I truly hope will could become a reality soon. But I also understand I understand the history here
of the involvement of the residents and the proponents here today. I and there has been a lot of back and forth. And what I want able to see in the future is that there's some sort of an agreement made either land swap or purchase of the land between private and public funds.
Again, I just want to be able to to state that the way that it is presented right now the lack of affordable housing there's complete stripping of it and also many benefits. I cannot support this as it is today. I understand the decision that it has to be made today by the
board based on prior litigation . So I understand that. But I do hope that one day in the near future we can come to a solution and be able to put the community on this one. So thank you for your consideration. Thank you, Councilor. Appreciate you. Okay. Do we have any other elected
officials that. Okay, good. So now will now move on to two board questioning comments. Do we have any you know, anything from board? I'll start.
This project seems to be universally unpopular. I mean we we've heard from several city councilors and other electeds today There was
an incredible number of community comments included in the board package. I don't think in my time here in two years I've seen so many oppositional comments a no vote from the CDC, objections from
design staff at BP, APD, BPA. And it's just honestly kind of baffling to me that the developer hasn't been able to be more responsive and work toward a solution with those
constituencies. I think the most distressing thing to me is is this huge tract of land being built out without any affordable housing . I understand that the community would like to preserve it as open space.
And I think the city should entertain a purchase if it's feasible. But if it's going to be built out I, I, I think it's a huge loss and it's particularly distressing to know that the
developer at one time showed the feasibility of putting affordable units on the site but then because of the regulatory process that that would require withdrew that those those units and so I do I
I the courts have spoken and I think for me it's it's I'm concluding that I need to vote yes for this project and sorry I need to vote yes out
of respect for the judge and the court order But a yes vote does not for me support the project itself. I do find some solace in all of the work that the Planning
Department is doing to updated zoning and Article 80 process so something like this can happen that that something can't be built by as of right That is just not a good project for the community or for the
site or for the city. And yeah I just want to note for the record that again the community interest still alive to to purchase the site. I don't think it's too late for
this developer to move more substantially toward some of the goals that all of these constituencies have. And so I would hope that that's
what would happen as things as things roll forward. Thank you. Yeah, just no comments from the board. >> I would echo the comments of board member Bennett and I'm reminded of a college of professor of mine who when I
was first done our first day of class said it's very difficult to get an A in this class and it's very difficult to get an F in this class. And I've extrapolated that on zoning issues in our work here. It's very rare that we find a project that has unanimous support although we have and
it's also very rare to find a project before us that has virtually no community support And sadly that is what is before us now Our hands are very, very much tied in this because of the courts. I agree with what Kate said out
of respect for the court out of preserving the integrity of this board and this body. I am forced to vote yes. This is a project that is not something that I think even meets many of the minimum
standards that we expect when we take these votes. I am hopeful the process will continue and other opportunities for community to weigh in and help shape this will will continue as well.
But the the the lack of affordability the the lack the removal of so many so many trees we're talking about open space. This is a this is a beloved area So it's putting this board in a very, very, very difficult situation But it's where we
find ourselves. >> And that's why I unfortunately will be voting yes. Thank you. Interesting comments. >> And if you want to I would just echo what my colleagues have said and I keep asking
myself why what the justification is for approving this given that it seems to fall so far outside of the mission that's been stated by
this board, this agency and the mayor. And thank you, Dr. Mark. All right. So I'll give my comments here.
So we we have received a large number of comments from the community and and in my case actually going to to the meetings and experiencing what this process has been like at
least recent process on behalf of the board. We want you all to know and I'm speaking to the community that we have listened to all of your feedback and we greatly appreciate your commitment to this process to this neighborhood, to your neighbors, to our planet.
We as my fellow board members have have mentioned are in an extremely unique situation due to the order of the land court. We are ordered to conclude the article 80 review of this
project today and on behalf of the Board I want to assure the residents that we wish the proponent had been more responsive to the numerous concerns raised by the community, by the staff especially concerning the loss of open space massing of the project design choices and even
whether this design was consistent with zoning or the principles of vision of what we are trying to do in this city. >> We also wish as prominent proponent had maintained the community benefits that had once been a part of this project. We find it exceptionally disappointing that the developer took advantage of the
unique timing of this filing to remove all of the affordable units from this project. If this project were filed today, the city's zoning code would require that it include income restricted units under the inclusionary zoning. But we don't have the power to
force this issue on this project And while we are dismayed by the developer's choice, these are choices Our hands are tied. Again, due to the court order the Planning department was forced to move this project to
our consideration today At this meeting the board must move it forward to be in compliant with that court order even though we do not support this project and it's considered in its current iteration time period. Echoing with my colleague long
time colleague Ted Swartzberg said this project reminds us of the importance of maintaining a nimble and up to date zoning code. >> The work we are doing right now the city's zoning reform initiatives across the city
will ensure that Boston has a contemporary effective set of land use regulations that correctly correctly and codes the built environment and our planning initiatives and our vision going forward for the city. This board remains committed to continuing to work with the Planning department staff, with
the community, with our neighbors to achieve this. >> This is my ten year anniversary board meeting and I have never had to say these
words before. I have never participated in community meetings be they IHG be they open meetings that were like what I participated in for this project and that's working on thousands of projects over
the past ten years. I've never experienced anything like this and I have to again just reiterate. >> Due to the court order the Planning department was forced to move this project to our consideration today and the
board must move it forward to be in compliance with that court order even though we do not support this project in its current iteration and so with that a motion is in order So
moved. >> Second roll call for a vote Ms. Bennett I Mr. SHEPPARD Oh no, no. Mr. SHEPPARD Recuse Is Dr. Landsberg opposed? Mr. O'MALLEY I to me in
compliance with the court order the Chair votes I so it complies with the court order This motion passes the. We're not going to move on to
item number 28 request authorization to issue certification of approval pursuant to Article 80 Small project Review of the Zoning code for the proposed construction of 42 residential rental units including seven inclusionary development
inclusionary zoning units, 19 car parking spaces and 42 bicycle parking spaces located at 1740 Hard Park Avenue. And to enter into a community benefits agreement to take over related actions. >> Emily. Good evening and thank you
Madam Chair. Members of the board Madam Secretary and Director Chen we are here before you today to discuss the proposed 1740 High Park Avenue project. I thank you for your time today . The proposed project consists of the construction of a five story residential building
totaling approximately 43,319ft2. The building will contain approximately 42 rental units 19 off street parking spaces and 42 bicycle parking spaces. The small project review application was filed on June 30th 2025. A public meeting was held on
July 22nd 2025. At this time I am happy to turn it over to Michelle from the planning team to discuss the planning context for the project followed by a presentation from the development team. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Have any?
Good evening Chair or Secretary Pulliam as members of the board and Director Shen my name is Michelle Yee and I'm the planning review team planner assigned to this project the proposed project at 1740 Hyde Park Avenue is located in the Hyde Park neighborhood Zoning district within a local industrial two subdistrict.
While this area zoned for industrial uses, the proposed project will now continue The emerging mixed use cluster on Hyde Park Avenue So due to its location near the MBTA commuter rail station, the proposed project also falls within the boundaries of the Fairmont
Indigo planning Initiative released by the BRT in 2015. This initiative envisioned this area as a future economic center highlighting opportunities for infill housing, transit oriented development and continuous streetscape improvements. The road project aligns with these goals as it now
contributes new housing and further activates the emerging mixed use corridor Along this section of Hyde Park Avenue. The existing building is is not inventoried by the Massachusetts Historical Commission as a historic structure although the neighborhood in which the proposed development is sited
is within a Boston MHC historic inventory area, the revealing natural area several surrounding properties are individually inventoried by the agency as well. >> Next slide please. >> Within this figure the proposed project is compared to the existing zoning the pink
highlights the maximum height and setbacks that could be built within this area. As you can see the current zoning designation is not consistent with the emergent mixed use cluster that has been recently established along this portion of Hyde Park Avenue The current zoning dimensional regulations assume lower scale
industrial building typologies with higher law coverage which limits the ability to provide much needed public realm and open space improvements in residential redevelopments So any relief is recommended as the greater heightened density aligns with the local planning context and will bring many
public realm improvements including improving the sidewalk and streetscape on Hyde Park Avenue and will include for new street cheese. Thank you and I'll turn it over to the development team to present the project in more detail. >> Thank you And thanks Michel. Thank you, Ebony.
Good evening, Madam Chair and Mr. Board. Madam Secretary Director Shan Attorney John Padini here on this proposal 1740 High Park out is in a really unique situation. It is literally on the rebuild train station I know board
member Shepard is familiar with that area very much. >> I'm going to be brief because I know you guys have had a long emotional night With me tonight is John Garland and Ashley Lunt who are the team architects with this and it's
just a property that is this stretch of high park and this kind of underutilized commercial uses Right now what we're seeing a lot in high parking is instead of having the underlying local industrial type activities going on, we're
getting a lot of transportation uses. We're getting a lot of bus companies. We're getting a lot of taxicab companies that Don allowed to park in towns like Brooklyn overnight. >> So they're moving to High Park But that being the case, we appreciate the opportunity to be here tonight And at this point I'm going to turn over to Ashton to walk you through the
plans. >> Thanks for allowing us to present. Thank you. Good evening, Director Shen Madam. Madam Chair, members of the board. My name is Ashton Charlotte. I'm with GE Architecture and Design and I'll be taking you through the presentation this evening.
>> As previously mentioned, we are proposing a 42 residential apartment building in Hyde Park along Hyde Park Avenue adjacent to the Greenville train station . Of those 42 units we are proposing 18 of them to be one beds, 22 as two and two as
three bed units. And 17% of those will be affordable. Four of them as one bedroom units and two of them as three of them as two. We are in addition to the residential. We are also proposing outdoor
patio space and amenity roof deck as well as roughly 500ft2 of residential lobby space and lounge below the streetscape street level. But on the site we are
providing 19 garage parking spaces 1 to 1 bike storage. Consistent with Boston's bike guidelines and public realm streetscape improvements also consistent with Boston's complete streets. Next slide. >> Zooming out.
You can see our site there highlighted in the red box noted as site. And the front we have the high park have highlighted in red and in the rear we have the MTA access road. We're really proud to be bringing a project like this to a neighborhood A portion
of this neighborhood that is currently blighted and light industrial and in concert with some of the other recently approved developments in this area. We feel that this will help stitch the community back together. Next slide.
>> Looking at some of the existing conditions, the top two images we have going down Hyde Park have the image to the top right is looking right at the site. You can see it's light industrial use as it is today. And the bottom two images we see along the access road
looking at the rear of the site. Next slide please. >> Looking at some of those developments we have our site again highlighted in the red. We have the larger development across the street 1702 Hyde Park adjacent to us to the
right of the red box and 40 Sprague Street which is currently under construction adjacent to the Greenville station. Next slide. Looking at this plan, we have our building in light orange at the bottom of the page. We're really excited to be
creating this level of urban continuity and the area along Hyde Park Ave that has currently been so blighted and and have this use you can see the street trees in front of the building running along
the in front of the adjacent 1702 and the projects further down there down the street. Next slide looking a little more closely at our site you can see pushing out into Hyde Park Ave we have the cycle track and then the forest proposed street trees buffering
the pedestrian space. That space being wide enough for two pedestrians to walk by each other directly in front of the building We have proposed a lush green planter space as well as site seating that would be constructed from
the salvage WPA wall. Next slide. >> Looking at this again in section hopefully getting a better sense of what that streetscape would feel like and also its compliance with Boston's Complete Streets guidelines. Next slide.
This is the typical first floor plan. The main entry to the page top left As you come in you have the lounge amenity space and then you have a mix of ones two and three bed units all around the central core. Next slide the material palette
of this building we're proposing a crisp white fiber cement siding with warm accents along the building at the top and at the base also at the base marked in the letter C we are proposing above masonry
brick and you can see some of you can see the four street trees are opposing and some of that streetscape improvements. Next slide. Next slide please. >> This is an image looking down Hyde Park Ave. You can see 1702 in the
background and you can also see more of that streetscape improvement that has been proposed. Next slide And this is looking the other way down Hyde Park Ave 1702 here in the foreground And again with the streetscape improvements. Thank you. And we'll be here for questions
. >> Thank you. Questions or comments from Well, actually before we do that I believe we have do we have Councilor Pepin correct? Yes. There you go. >> So the floor is yours.
>> Thank you, Madam Chair and members of the board again my name is Enrique Pepin to the council for this. I rather represented this part of Boston. Thank you for the opportunity to testify on another project. I am in full support of 1745 out not only for the much needed housing units but also
for the exciting opportunities and needed benefits to the area of the of this busy street. I've heard directly from students especially students from the Academy of the Pacific Rim who is right nearby who say that they don't feel safe at the moment walking down the street in terms of the conditions of the old and
unsafe sidewalks. So this project does presents the opportunity to create new, safer pedestrian pathways and wider High Park Avenue benefits that I'm very excited to see in the area. Just yesterday I was at the State House with Rob Consalvo advocating for the Zone one
eight pricing at the regional station. So we're also trying to make sure that on the transportation front where we're accommodating as much as possible just we see a lot of potential in this area So that's why I'm in full support. >> Thank you Councilor. Now board questions or comments
come in through the chair. I'm excited to see development in that end of the High Park area. As you drive down High Park Ave once you start it and pass shores in a sense you kind of ask yourself whereby add a little bit and you know with
the new development going on in the High park area I think it attract small businesses over there and get a lot of foot traffic in the area. Places to eat and things of that nature which would be great for High Park. So I appreciate what you guys are doing and it does look beautiful. Thank you.
>> Thank you. Yeah, I'll I'll echo that. I'll begin if Councilor Pepin is still listening to wish him a very happy birthday yesterday. >> Oh, my God. >> I read they Councilor he shares it with my wife so I'll never forget it. I don't really know And yeah, I
mean, I do have a question. Is there any PV panels on the roof? It looks like that would be a superb location for definitely the building to come up and then introduce yourself and all the things. >> Yeah. Good afternoon. My name is Jonathan Garland with Jgc Architects.
There's definitely PV It will be PV ready so we'll bring solar infrastructure up to the court and I know that has to be so I guess I'm just and I'm going to support this project but I would urge you to be beyond ready because I think it's a great opportunity Just give out situate in the ground and it'll help. >> I mean the committee
conceivably enough to you know, power the lights in the common areas. So I think it's I think it's a sharp building. As a lifelong resident of Southwest Boston from West Roxbury, Roslindale, I love to see Revill having its moment. There's a lot of really exciting projects happening down there And I also
appreciate and you can read into this what you will but attorney Paul Genie is someone who's from that neighborhood as well. I appreciate your work and always bringing folks together to build support for these projects and I'd say the same I see Joe Hanley sitting in the audience as well as as we've seen tonight That's not always
the case. Development can be hard but when there's a good project and we really engage our neighbors often the result is a better a better product and a better project that we can all support and this is clearly one of them. So I look forward to the success. >> It looks like it'll be a great a great opportunity.
>> Thank you. Just no questions or comments. All right. Hearing and seeing that a motion is in order so moved. Second will call for a vote. Ms. Bennett I Mr. Sheppard Dr. Lance My answer mainly I and the chair of I motion passes. Congratulations. Good luck. I'm rooting for you. >> Good job.
Okay Item number 30. Request authorization to issue a scoping determination waiving further review pursuant to Article 80 B Large project review of the zoning code for the construction of 78 affordable senior housing units and amenity spaces located at
1198 Center Street also known as 1200 Center Street. And to enter into a cooperation agreement in connection with the proposed project to take all related actions. >> Camille. Good evening and thank you Chair Rojas members of the board Secretary Paul Hymas and Director Shen My name is
Camille Platts Acosta and I'm a senior project manager here Before you to present the proposed Article 80 B large project located at 1198 also known as 1200 Center Street in Roslindale also known as Hebrew Senior Life Project Site is located on a new tax law
currently used for surface parking at the intersection of Center Street and Walter Street in Roslindale. The proposed six story building will include as mentioned, 78 deeply affordable senior housing units. There will be shared amenity spaces that include staff offices, multipurpose wellness room reception, male package
rooms, a library and a fitness room. The project notification form was submitted to the Planning Department on June 25th of 2025. A virtual public meeting was held on July 23rd of 2025 which was distributed to our Roslindale mailing list as well as advertised in both local
newspapers. It was well attended and received very positive feedback. I will now turn over to Jason McDonald to take you through the planning context before the development team leads you through the presentation. >> Thanks for your time. Thanks. >> Hi. Good evening. Chair Rojas and members of the
board secretary, Bohemians and Director Shen. My name is Jason McDonald. I'm the assigned planner to the project. As I mentioned this sorry this is site is part of the larger Hebrew Senior life facility which is made up of multi-story buildings providing all different sorts of care for
seniors. It is located within the veterans of Foreign Wars Parkway Green Belt Protection Overlay District Mouthful which calls for early communication with the city of Boston as part commission and the other neighbor and context would be the Arnold Arboretum Park and
the four story residential building across Center Street. There. >> Next slide please sir. The proposed seeking relief for some dimension of violations. The proposal is in line with the city housing goals
of providing affordable income ,restricted housing while adding to the elderly stock or the stock for wiser and more experienced neighbors. It's now the filing process. Through the filing process the project has become contextually appropriate building and provides a valuable use and
service to the neighborhood. And I will now pass the proponents to present this project. >> Thank you. Thanks. Good evening. My name is Carla Chaffee from Nixon Peabody. I'm here on behalf of Hebrew
senior Life. I'd like to thank Camille and staff so far for getting us here today. I'm here with Deb Morse who is the vice president of real estate at Hebrew Senior Life as well as our architect Laura Homesh from PCA.
Our civil and landscape team are available virtually If there are any questions I will be very brief but I did want to share a remark that was made by Secretary Ed Augustus at a recent ribbon cutting for another H. S l project in Brookline with
54 units of affordable senior housing. He shared with us that the faster growing population of individuals without homes R is our senior population. So this project really speaks to that need in the city.
We will be providing 78 units of deeply affordable housing 16 units at below 30 am I and 62 units below 50 Am I Hebrew Senior Life has been a partner
in the Roslindale neighborhood for over 50 years providing rehabilitation services and care and much more on its campus. We're very excited that we're utilizing an existing asset
that is very underutilized with parking that is not needed for the campus and we're turning it into something that we think will be an amazing asset for the community and for our senior population here. So with that I'll pass it off to Deb Morris who will speak a
little bit to community engagement and the support we've had so far. >> Thank you. Thank you. >> Good evening. I'm Deb Morse with Hebrew Senior Life. Thank you, Camille And thank you to your colleagues throughout the city including staff from the Mayor's Office
of Housing and Staff from the Boston Housing Authority. Additionally, we are grateful for the engagement with the Longfellow Area Neighborhood Association. Walk up Roslindale Sophia Snow place counselors Weber and Pepin.
Representative McGregor and State Senator Rush. The project has been immensely improved as a direct result of their advice and insights. Their overwhelming support for our proposed program of service of providing services, enriched housing for extremely low
income seniors has been deeply gratifying. Laura Homage from P.K. will walk through the design process for you. Thank you. Good evening. My name is Laura Homage. I'm a principal at PCI and will walk you through the building.
I'm very happy to be here. Thank you all. Welcome. You're very welcome Here. Thank What you're seeing here is the context of our site That tiny little spot right there in Orange is our site. We are nestled within the community of Roslindale right up against the Arboretum Worth
Center and Walter Street intersect really early on throughout the throughout the process. Our charge from Heber City in your life was to create a gateway to their community that is currently there. It was really clear within a few community meetings that we were also creating the gateway
to Roslindale Center. So next slide please. >> This is a view an aerial view of the site. What we are doing is occupying an existing parking lot on Heber Senior Lives site. It has 67 parking spots on it.
Now we've done extensive traffic and parking studies to demonstrate that we will We are meeting the needs of parking for not only the community that we're creating but also the community that exists. If you'd like to go to the next slide please.
This is the existing site again a lovely parking lot, lots of opportunity to improve. Currently there are some dcr improvements that are underway. We have integrated with those and I can I can if there's questions about that I can I can dig in deeper.
Next slide. >> Again, a view of the parking lot. We must love our parking lot a lot but there's a lot of views of the parking lot. Just to give you some context of , you know, a parking lot. Yes, We're we're drastically
improving the site with this building not only with the needs of the community but also just the what will be seen. It is a 78 unit building parking on the ground level a little bit underneath the building, some of it a little external drop off area
utilizing a an existing fire line up into the site is six stories with a lower area that drops down to the center, drops down towards the center of Walter and Center Street
really connecting down And there's some views later that'll kind of demonstrate that. Next slide please. This is our landscape plan again integrating nicely with the dcr improvements creating not only a common space outdoor
space right directly outside the front door but also a number of spaces around the building itself. There's a bit of topography on this site and so we're really managing some of those things providing areas for if seniors are walking around and walking
across the street to the arboretum which this does enable an accessible route to be able to achieve a pathway to the arboretum not to mention the DCR improvements which are you know, basically taking an area right now that is really
difficult to cross. So we've connected all the way around our building. >> If you'd like to go to the next one please. >> We took careful consideration given we were adjacent to the arboretum to be inspired by the arboretum itself using textures and
colors and it's all fiber cement and metal panel. Typical products for a building of this type but really trying to be inspired by by the arboretum itself. Next please. This is it's hard to tell but this is on the inside of the
building. It really like another other projects that have been presented today. It really is A44 sided building. We really do not have a back area. >> So next one please. This is a section through our building. We do have predominantly one
bedroom units with some amenity space on the lowest level that supports the the sense of community that is necessary for seniors. That's a very important aspect of combating loneliness ness which can be a contributor to
health decline for for the senior population. Next slide please. And this is a view from center and Walter Street Center Street going off to your right and Walter going off to the left
of our building. And this is the entry main entry right off of the corner there. We do anticipate that this would be open to the general public as well. We've had some conversations with folks across the street of severe snow encouraging them
to cross over engage with us and then also have better access to the arboretum as well. >> Next slide. These are just continued views. We could probably keep going rather quickly just to move things along.
Very similar to the elevations trying to make minor moves to enable some ability to provide different textures on the building. The building will be passive house and fully electrified cool.
And I think I guess the thing on and I think that's yeah great great I believed it Councilor Pepper and you also want to speak on this you. >> The floor is yours I well I
bear with me I agree it. This is the last one I testify on the Thank you again Madam Chair. Thanks to the board I'm excited to be in fu support of this project. My staff and I have participated in a number of meetings with Heber City in your life the Arnold Arboretum, the Longfellow Area
Neighborhood Association neighbors as well as with Councilor Weber. I'm always happy to support a for affordable senior housing because it really is a public benefit to make sure elders can safely age in place. This is the type of housing that we actually get the most requests on from from residents
where they're looking for opportunities to downsize and just find a place to use to call home here and in the city of Boston. I'm proud to support a project with this Affordable housing probably benefited that was taken through a community facing process that was both honest and robust. So thank you so much for your
consideration. >> Thank you. Thank you, Councilor. Questions or comments from the board and I'll jump right in. Having grown up at 1385 Santa Street literally a block away from this building, I know it quite well. My family has received care at the Hebrew Senior when I was the Hebrew rehab was the night
And I think this project is just absolutely superb. I'm a little envious of Councilor Pepin and Councilor Weber. I was pushing for years when I was on the council to get more deeply affordable senior housing in West Roxbury in Roslindale and this is going to be wonderful. We've heard some concerns from
some wonderful neighbors at the Sophia Snow house. I appreciate you know, their beautiful view of the arboretum. They're still going to have other opportunities And I think this is actually a really, really sharp looking building. >> So did I have it right that you're going to rebuild Because right now the sidewalk ends,
the sidewalk is going to be continued So folks will be able to make that right down Walter Street beautiful. That's because that's very dangerous obviously. And as you mentioned, there's some street safety renovations happening currently. And then in terms of the parking I know that's the front load I'd assume most staff and visitors would park in the back
lot. There's enough room there to accommodate moving those cars over as well as residents that may have their Yes the more some Heber City life we've we've done internal and external parking studies and there's plenty of excess parking for everybody good so when you say this is and this
is I support this project wholeheartedly I guess so since I have you here as a as a captive audience you will often see a ton of cars parked along Walter Street. Those aren't your employees I assume those are folks using the are they are not Hebrew senior life employees We've done I've personally done a lot of walking up and down Wilder
Street to see who those are and they're not Hebrew senior life experience Fair enough. I think this is great. I love that it's fully fully passive house I am sure there will be a very very long waitlist of potential residents once you get once you get running and just having the the
also you know as those of us with parents aging in their homes to have access to such great quality care literally right next door and with the falconer and a block or so away is just is just tremendous So this is I think this may be my a project of the night so thank
you folks for your great work and look forward to its its completion Yeah yeah I would just echo Matt's comments We've had some very controversial project tonight and it's just so refreshing to have what I would call a slam dunk.
You know here it's filling such a such a need. It's a great location. I also I live a few blocks from here. It's the perfect location for this project. It looks fantastic really Kudos to you and your team. Thank you.
Just no questions or comments. >> I'll just I'll just echo and I just want to design like I just want give a shout out to the design. You know our our team but your team right that all work together has a very like tree house feel I'm getting the arboretum and the I just I
think it's just again really really really great refreshing exciting and with that emotion is in order So moved. >> Second roll call for a vote. Ms.. Bennett Mr. Shepherd. Dr. Lance Margaret Mr. O'Malley and enthusiastic I Yeah and the chair vote I Motion passes.
Congratulations. Good luck. We're rooting for you. Yeah. Item number 31 request authorization to enter into an affordable housing contribution agreement for the 617 Dorchester Avenue Project formerly known as 20 Boston Street in connection with the
payment in lieu of 2.3 for on IDP units and to take all related actions. >> Andy Thank you Madam Chair Director Shin Secretary Ibrahim Ms. and members of the board I'm Andy Feldman. Housing Policy manager with the Mayor's Office of Housing. Tonight I'm here to request
your vote on an affordable housing and creation agreement for the proposed development at 617 Dorchester Ave in South Boston. This development was originally proposed as an Article 80 small project subsequently replaced by a smaller project consisting of 13 condo units which did not trigger Article eight.
The project does trigger it however and is requested to fulfill its obligation by making a payment in lieu of on site IDP units which comes to 2.34 units I Therefore the vote in front of you tonight will now be agency to enter into a corresponding agreement to collect the corresponding
payment. >> Thank you Happy to answer any questions. Thank you. Questions or comments from the board Hearing and seeing none Emotion is in order so moved. Second roll call for a vote Ms. Bennett. Mr. Sheppard. Dr. Lance Mark. Mr. O'Malley I and the Chair votes I motion passes. Thanks, Andy. Item number 32 Request authorization to issue a
certification of approval pursuant to Article 80 Easement Project Review of the Zoning code for the proposed construction of 30 home ownership units including five IDP units approximately 783ft2 of commercial space and up to 18 car parking spaces and 32
bicycle parking spaces located at 43 Preble Street to enter into an affordable housing agreement and to enter into an A community benefits agreement and take all related action Stephen and Senior tonight Stephen Okay. >> Good evening. Thank you Madam Chair, members
of the board Madam secretary Paul Smith and director Shane My name is Steven Harvey and I'm a senior project manager at the City of City Austin Planning Department And I want to thank you for your time this evening. The proposal I bring to you today is 43 Public Street located in South Boston on
January 5th, 2020 for the city of Boston Planning Department received a small project review application from the proponent. A proponent is proposing to construct a new four story residential building with ground floor commercial space. The new residential building will contain 30 condominium
units with a 783 square foot ground floor commercial space. Five of the 30 condominiums units will be affordable units. The project will also have 18 vehicle parking spaces and 40 bicycle parking spaces. Virtual public meetings for the project was held on January 29
,2020 for November 18th, 2024 and on August 18th 2025 the virtual public meetings were advertised in the local papers and via email If approved by the board this would allow the proponent to construct the proposal after receiving approval from the City of Austin Zoning Board
of Appeals and completing the Boston City of Boston Planning Department's Design review process I would now like to pass it over to Alana. Alana is a planner for the proposal. She will touch on it the resources and guiding staff's review of the proposed project
and key considerations once Alanna completes her slides. The project attorney George MORANTE will then run through the rest of the project presentation Once the presentations complete George Alana and I will answer any questions put forward by the board. >> Thank you once again for your time this evening and
Stephen good evening. Chair Rojas Secretary Polly Miss members of the board and Director Shen my name is on a Hames and I the planner assigned to this project. Next slide please. >> Here we go. The proposed project is located in the South Boston
Neighborhood District within an L five local business subdistrict pursuant to the underlying zoning articles of the Code. The project site is also located within the coastal Flood Resilience Overlay District or C fraud which requires any new construction to meet resilient design standards.
Next slide please. >> The proposed development site is located at the Southern edge of the planned South Boston Dorchester Avenue or planned dot AB study area within proposed use zone three Residential and select first
floor retail. The plan sets forth guidelines for building dimension and use derived from community input and envisions this area as a buffer or transition zone between the commercial centers along Dorchester Avenue. The residential uses south of the study area and the open space to the east in Berkeley
Park. Suggested heights or maximize nearest to the Andrew and Betty station and to the west of Dorchester Avenue within the study area. Topping out at around 300ft east of Dorchester Avenue along at around 300ft sorry east of Dorchester Avenue along
Preble Street The plan recommends building heights up to 60ft. Next slide, please. >> Plan Dot AB was adopted by the BPA board in December of 2016 as this plan was not codified into zoning. The proposed project while plan compliant will still need to
seek zoning relief from the Board of Appeal while the existing zoning was compared to the proposed development site more relevant to the site during the review process was the community and board vetted as the proposed zoning as per plan dot out This plan calls for again up to 60ft in height at the proposed site and
increased density relegating the zoning for zoning height and setbacks suitable for relief after board approval and zoning Board of Appeal approval of the required zoning relief. The proposed project will continue in design review at the Planning Department. Thank you And I will now turn
it over to the development team to present the project in more detail. >> Thank you. >> Thank you Ilana. Thank you Stephen. Good evening, Chair Rojas Secretary Billie Miss Members of the board. Director Sheehan My name is George Morante I'm the attorney for the project. I'm really just going to
transition to the project architect in light of the length of today's meeting and the and the hour. I will just say that we believe this is a good project. It is certainly transit oriented development. During community process a number of I wouldn't call them concessions but adjustments
were made in direct response to community input. We went from I think 42 units originally down to 30 dropped the story height from 5 to 4. This is very close to Andrews Square Redline but there is parking for the 30 units
because it is still so Boston. So with that I think that Nicholas Landry, the project architect is logged in and I see Nick and I'll turn it over to Nick for the presentation of the project plans. Nick Thank you. George. Good evening.
Nick Landry from DRC. I'll walk us through the plans tonight. We have a proposal for a new 30 unit residential building that includes some commercial space and on garage parking below the below the building total of 18
parking spots. The 30 units are broken down into one, two and three beds. We have 13 one beds, 16 two beds and one three bed and we'll go to the next slide please. So I think we've we've been
working with the BPA on this project for for a little over a year now and we can go to the next slide please. >> So currently the project is sandwiched between Wendler Street and Rogers Street.
Preble Street along the bottom. We currently it's a it's an auto repair facility. I can go to the next slide please. And what we're proposing is is again it's going to be a 30
unit building which we're also going to be relocating a bus stop. You can see that too on the Preble Street side of the plan there. And because we're in the climate resiliency zone, we've we've had to elevate most of the first floor above that floodplain. So it's a bit of a Swiss watch.
There's there's some commercial space in the center of the plan which is elevated. There's a bike room which is at grade on the top of the plan and the residential entry is on the bottom of the plan. The garage parking is kind of tucked around off of Rogers Street. And then we have an elevated
open space in the rear that will be used by the tenants of the building though. The next slide please. So this is a view from Preble Street And you can see there's there's the where it says 43 That's kind of the entry to the commercial area. There's a ramp there that's
used for the commercial space and for the residential components of the project. And we've we've worked with the Stevens team to kind of break down the facade into different materials so it fits more within the neighborhood context
. If you go to the next slide please. Is the rear elevation. And again I think this has been said before every one of these facades has been treated with with care. Given that we are right you know, we we're very tight neighborhood here.
There's there's a lot of there's been a lot of input from from the neighbors the. And you can see there's there's this rear courtyard area is going to be accessible from a ramp and and stairs on either side of the site Go to the next
slide please. This is the Rogers Street elevation. You can see that that big glass area on the front. PREBLE Street is on the left. The front of the building is on the left hand side of this elevation. The we've added a lot of glass and to the entry area to kind
of to emphasize that residential entry And then the garage entry you can see is kind of tucked there corner go the next slide please. Thank you. And again you know this besides been treated with care there's there's a bike room with a lot
of light for security on the right side of this Preble Street is on the right side of this elevation And go to the next slide please. >> And now this is a view kind of looking from travel Well at what will be that residential entry the next slide and that's
in this is the the same view as proposed with that residential entry there see from the street in the front Rogers Street on the side Yeah And I can turn it back over to George and Stephen . Great Thank you. And to conclude the presentation. Yes that concludes the
presentation. >> Thank you. Questions or comments from the board? Just say a couple of things. One, I appreciate you got condensing it a little bit to be brief as the hours like getting late And George I was negligent not mentioning you and I was talking about some other attorneys who I know really try to focus on community support even on
controversial projects. I know that's been something you've been doing very successfully as well. >> So thank you for that. And just very briefly, five affordable units what's the breakdown in bedrooms Those five we have two one bedrooms to two bedrooms in the in the
entire building there's one three bedroom unit and that is an icy unit. Oh good. That's good to hear. >> I appreciate that. Great. Thank you. Great additional questions or comments. All right. Hearing and seeing that a motion is in order so moved. >> Second roll call for a vote Ms..
Bennett. Mr. Sheppard. Dr. Lance Mark O'Malley All right. And the chair votes I motion passes. Congratulations. Good luck. And I Yeah, right. Item number 33 request authorization issued determination waiving further review pursuant to Article 80 B large project review of the
zoning code for the notice of Project Change related to the proposed construction of 144 residential rental units including 19 type units 101 car parking spaces, 152 bicycle parking spaces located at 181
through 185 West first Street 190 and two six West Second Street and to enter into an affordable rental housing agreement and restriction and and a cooperation agreement and to take all related action. >> Stephen good evening and thank you Madam Chair members of the meeting Madam Secretary
Polymath and Director Shen My name is Steven Harvey again I'm a project manager senior project manager at the City of Boston Planning Department and thank you for your time this evening. The proposal I bring before you today is 181 West First Street located in South Boston on December 19th, 2024 we received
a notice of Project Change and PC for the 181 West First Street proposal originally approved on April 17th, 2012 2014 they approved Project Call for the development of a 97 unit residential building with a 4000 square foot ground floor
retail space and garage parking for 115 vehicles. The new 2024 proposal calls for the construction of a six storey residential building containing 144 rental units with 19 affordable units. The proposal will also contain
100 parking spaces and 176 bicycle parking spaces pursuant to Section 80 B-5.3 of the Code I hosted and Impact Advisory Group AG meeting for the proposal on October 7th 2020 for a public meeting on
October 29th, 2024 and a joint AG public meeting on September 11th, 2025 If approved by the Board this would allow the proponent to construct the proposal after receiving approval from the City of Boston Zoning Board of Appeals and completing the Planning Department's design
review process. With that said, I will shortly turn it over to the project's attorney Joel Hanley, who is representing the 121 West First Street team. However, before that occurs my planning colleague for will present the planning context for the proposal once the
entire presentation is completed Joel Ford and I will take questions from any any and all questions from the board. With that I also like to add that this proposal we received a support letter from Councilor Flynn's office regarding this proposal and we thank him for
his support. Thank you for your time this evening. Thanks, Steven. Thank you, Steven. Good evening. Chair Rojas Secretary Lemus members of the board and director Shen My name is Ford Delvecchio and I'm the planning reviewer assigned to the project with the right script.
>> I was just going to say got the right script This next slide please. This is the right slide. Thank you. The proposed project 181 West First Street is located in an evolving area of South Boston where industrial parcels like the site of the proposed project are being redeveloped
and primarily multifamily residential buildings with active ground floor uses. The site has excellent transit connections located approximately point four miles away from the Broadway Red Line station which also serves several local bus routes. These transit assets support residential development around
the station Proposed project site is located adjacent to an existing community garden and park as well as a larger street park approximately 2.2 miles away. Next slide please. While the proposed project exceeds zoning dimensional maximums planning and urban design staff work together to
refine a building massing that is contextually consistent with the ongoing evolution of West Second and West First Streets. Staff review also focused on the improvements to the surrounding public realm including new widened sidewalks upgrade street intersections for enhanced pedestrian safety and the protection of the district. The addition of additional
street trees to create a robust canopy around the site perimeter. >> Thank you And I will now turn over to the development team to present more detail as some Thank you. >> Thank you. FORD Thank you, Steven. >> Last but not least. Yeah. No never least every project is like But here we go.
Good evening, Madam Chair Members the board secretary appointments and Director Chen Attorney Joe Hanley from McDermott. Coty Miller and Hanley. I have the pleasure and honor of representing the proponent Peter Zachary Inox who is a
local, well-respected and experienced developer in South Boston and this particular part of South Boston. I'm hoping that the process we went through and what I've heard earlier tonight will lift your spirits because this
project and what you'll see here was originally approved in 2014 long time ago. And so the notice of Project Change and Article 80 and the staff with the BPA in the community really helped to make
it a lot better. In 2014 there was no coastal flood resiliency overlay district and the project at that point was 97 units with no affordable because it was a zoning compliant project. So we have spent the last year
working with the PTA and the community and the elected officials on how we can make this better and also utilize this modern planning and new policy updates to really provide something that will transform a site that is that
fails to contribute to a really important part of South Boston. And so our development team you'll see some of the other consultants that we worked with also here with Erica Bushman who is our project architect And I'll quickly go through a
few of the slides here and and then I'll hand it off to her to show you how this all comes together. So next slide please. So just some of the metrics here and I spoke to the 2014 approval this is a pretty big
site. It's a little over an acre and large industrial site which you'll see that has sort of a derelict nuisance building there Now and has some soil contaminations all of which is a big benefit that we're
investing in and converting and so we are looking to update this with a large project that would have more units less parking, more sustainability. But I think more importantly it
reflects the values of the community and planning principles And you'll see here the units the overwhelming number of these units are two and three bedroom family sized units and they are full size
units 144 19 income restricted units again in the place of none before 100 vehicle parking spaces and 152 bike parking spaces responsive respectful scale of varying
heights and massing taking advantage of the change in grade but also respecting this transition location between the industrial and the residential and less lot less than 60% lot
coverage So that we can provide also our own courtyard open space. The other thing I'll say that has changed since 2014 is there was a DPW lot next to us and as part of a development that was turned into a community park
Mahoney Park it's called on Second Street and also a community garden. So we have worked very closely and I just want to thank the friends of the Park. We've worked closely with them and Seth Reisman and the Bccdc because of the scale of this this project has really gone
through extensive scoping to make it fit and work with the community. So next slide please. You'll see Just to take you quickly around you'll see the lovely building with the graffiti There the pink building It was at one point
And as for asphalt plant it is obviously distressed and you can see that the intersection of C and First Street this site runs it's a through site so it
runs to West second and to West First Street along C Street. Why that's important is the grade goes up and as you go to Second Street you go into the residential section of the neighborhood what's called the lower end of of South Boston.
And so we're using the grade and respecting those existing as built conditions to kind of step down in a way and during heights and massing And to the west is the now community gardens in the park And we've done responsive
measures there to mitigate and offset those impacts And you can see the current situation not just the status of the site itself but also the sidewalk are inadequate and narrow and not accessible.
We're making a huge investment in the public realm as directed through the DPD in the process So a lot to a lot to be to be pleased about And and I want to thank the members of the AG who who provided a lot of guidance many of whom supported this as
well as Councilor Flynn and the South Boston elected delegation. Next slide please. So we're within a watershed which is also consistent with modern planning. You'll see in the little orange sash there within the radius is
the site immediately nearby is the MTA's Broadway train station and not only are are we programing this as a transit oriented program but but also you know, enhancing pedestrian
connectivity and safety in and around the site and the final thing that I'll say and hopefully maybe Member O'Malley will have a question but I did hear that a comment about you know whether you're ready or
whether it's either ready or for for renewables. This is a really exciting sustainable development. It's a net carbon net zero project all electric. We are also committed to 100% renewables for the common load
and also through the green 100 program to install of those meters We have installed PV kilowatts on the roof from day one and it's also both LEED and Passive House Certifiable So
we're really excited that the really the dividend of all the work of this agency in planning over the years and with the community that we're able to deliver something that we think will improve the status of the neighborhood at this location. >> So I'll ask Erica to show you how it works. Thank you.
Thank you. All right. Thank you, Chairman Board members. Okay. So this is a overview of how are the massing of our building fits in the neighborhood to the south along Second Street we
have the residential and then there's the transitional zone which is the block that we fit in where our building is relative to the in height to the other buildings around it And then we're along First Street is the industrial zone
So next slide please. Thanks. So this is our site plan So you can see from a land view how we fit in around the park and about first second and then see
street We put a great we put a great deal of effort in that West Wing abutting the Mahoney Park and making sure we didn't add any additional shading to the park from the first project
and we cut the building back to create that parklet area. So to add more outdoor amenity spaces for our tenants and then also to open up the side of what 86 West second so that
they can still get light into their sampling. All right. Next slide please. Oh, and then this slide shows the relative heights in the
height of our building in relation to the buildings around it we are keeping in line for with the buildings along Second Street and where they align with the buildings on either side of us. The fifth story is stepped
pretty far back. So you in when you're on the second Street you would not actually see it So it still looks like a four story building And then which you can see in the top slide would the sightlines arrow and then along
in that top elevation along First Street there is a proposed project across from us that will actually be taller than our project. So yeah so next slide.
So this is a view looking into our little parklet and it gives you an idea as to how private it is from the street and we've also put attention into making it a little more private from
Mahoney Park so that the tenants aren't being you know, don't feel like they're in a fishbowl or so this is our building from the corner of C in Second Street and this Yeah
And then this is now first and C Street This is looking up First Street So you're looking past Mahoney Park to our
building down first and that's it. Okay, that concludes our presentation. Thank you. >> Thank you. Thank you. Questions or comments from the board? I think he already answered Answered your bigger electrical
question on the table. Oh now you're just Yeah, that's good work. >> Good work. You know, very very you know appreciative of the time and the consideration and and I can definitely see you know again
the thought the alignment to what it is we're looking to do in this particular area of the city But the city in general and it is 2014 So you know before my era of that first but it's really it just missed it
But but I appreciate right the evolution and how you know we moved along with the progress right And and the city and all the work that we've done and the plans in the area and and
the vision. So again just appreciative of of the the consideration I see it So with that a motion is in order so moved. Second roll call for a vote. Ms. BENNETT Mr. SHEPPARD Dr. Lance Meyer Mr. O'MALLEY All right.
And the chair votes I motion passes. Congratulations. Good luck. Thank you for item number 34. Contractual payments. >> I need a motion to pay our bills. I move that we pay our bills. I second that movement. All right, let's see. Roll call for a vote. Ms.. Bennett.
Hi, Mr. Shepherd. Dr. Lance Mack. All right, Mr. O'Malley and the chair. But I Motion passes. Please pay t jÑ And finally, item number 35 Director's remark Director Shen Xi Shen the floor is yours. >> Good evening. Members of the board. I'd like to start my report with a summary of the
development projects that we approved tonight. There were five new development projects 354 residential units that will be delivered with these projects of which there are 109 income restricted units
highlighted by the 78 Hebrew Senior Life project. hat This represents a monetary investment of about $280 million and it will deliver
about 635,000ft2 of which the majority 460,000 would be residential when constructed these projects would put approximately 570 tradespeople to work and create 290 direct jobs and about the same 290
indirect jobs usually I would say that we are all very we celebrate the projects that we approve but there is a and I would say an unusual occurrence which is that we had to approve a project that I think uniformly fails to meet our
minimum standard of approval And I want to concur with the sentiment of the board this evening regarding the approval of 1990 American Legion Highway project. This project is evidence of the limitation of outdated zoning
code even though that was adopted in 2012. It doesn't take into account all of the components that the needs of the community and and in this particular case with a I would say a developer that's
unwilling to actually work with the community to maximize the benefit of additional density but also preserve and community space open space that could benefit the larger community shows the limitation of this kind of outdated zoning.
It's it's also consistent with the work that we and the Planning Department will be doing which is to continue to rezone reform of zoning code and maintaining a dynamism that
we would approach zoning in the future. We will be constantly checking to see where zoning is appropriate to the times and we will continue that work for years to come On downtown Zoning Clearly this is a piece of work that the department and
the agency before it had been working for a number of years. I want to thank the board for adopting this new zoning for our downtown neighborhood which I see as a really balanced approach to stimulate responsible growth especially in this particular time. This new zoning would
strengthen protections for the downtown historic and cultural assets. It will streamline pathways for adaptive reuse of buildings and enable the essential housing and mixed use density that downtown very much needs to grow as a vibrant and more
inclusive neighborhood. The zoning also prioritizes the ability to build new housing and mixed use development in response to the ongoing housing shortage enabling increased density at the center of Boston Transit Network where it can be
best supported. These updates we are with these updates we're able to eliminate outdated land use restrictions to encourage new and diverse businesses like coffeehouses, bakeries, fitness facilities and entertainment uses to fill empty storefronts and help
drive foot traffic that the downtown desperately needs. I want to especially congratulate our staff who have worked so hard to on this initiative for the last six years. This effort is a great example of the patience, persistence
and professionalism of our staff led by ably by Kathleen on offer and also Andrew Nahmias This has allowed us the staff has allowed the work to
create new zoning that would that would adapt the downtown to the current moment that we're in post-pandemic. I also want to thank the community for all of the input here. It was actually a level of unprecedented engagement even though I know many people
are dissatisfied but in my many years of you know, associate with planning in the city this is a very high level of engagement and there were many, many adjustments made and actually I would say that many
of the input actually helped them make the proposal more balance in the end. And I would say that there were many, many letters but about in the end it was almost half in support and half on the other. And I think actually this
notion that we have genuine disagreement on what the best policy might be is a part of the it's representative of the vibrancy of our of our community in that we engage in a debate about what are best
ideas to for the future of our city. This zoning update will now need to be approved by the zoning commission and we look forward to a public hearing next month in front of the zoning Commission for its adoption. One of the nicer elements
of today's board meeting was the the effort and initiative we have on Winter Street, this exciting event coming up next month that will be opening a kind of tactical urbanism along Winter Street in Downtown Crossing. Thank you for the board for
approving it. This event will be will be known as color flows on Winter Street and I already I think the staff showed the sort of little brochure that we created to promote this which will actually bring additional activity and foot traffic
traffic into downtown crossing . Winter Street will be transformed by colorful art installation, food trucks, interactive events and cultural programing. This is part of the city's Boston broader effort to reimagine how our streets and pedestrian zones can be safer,
more engaging and enjoyable for all And it builds off of the recommendations of Boston Design Vision which this board has had a presentation on which was adopted last year and created by our very talented Urban Design division
programing in the winter street. This color flows will take place daily from 11 a.m. to 6 p.m. and will also include three large scale events over the course of six weeks. We've also been coordinating with some of the downtown businesses so that it will
hopefully enhance foot traffic to some of the existing restaurants along Winter Street and Summer Street. I invite board members to join me at some point to all experience this tactical urbanism. I'd like to conclude by
highlighting the Board's approval of two certificates of completion this evening and and to celebrate the many benefits that these projects will have delivered. The first of course is old colony phase four and five and
it will provide a total of 208 units of deeply affordable homes available to households earning no more than 60% am I? It will also provide and improve public realm that include pedestrian paths, open
spaces and courtyard. And finally the new Sweeney Field Project in Mission Hill provides will provide $156,000 in linkage funding towards affordable housing $24,000 in
linkage funding towards job training. And of course there are a number of improvements to streetscape and pedestrian realm around the project site as well as some adjacent streets working with the Tobin Community Center for Mission
Hill Youth. There's been a summer youth sports program that has been subsidized by this project Project also upgraded computer equipment and lab in the mission Maine Community Center.
It's also delivering training for local residents for employment in the construction Trades. And then finally there are some additional programs that will serve Boston's youth. So I always love to end with the certificates because it's
at the end when these projects are completed that the community can see the full benefits of these projects that you as a board have approved. I went on thank you for your patience tonight and supporting these important projects that will continue to make our city
vibrant and more inclusive. >> With that I conclude my report. Thank you. Great. Thank you. Dr.. All right. Well, that was the last item I need a motion to adjourn this meeting So moved. Second roll call for a vote. Ms.. Bennett, I saw Shepherd Dr. Lance Meyer, Mr. O'Malley and
the chair votes I motion passes. Meeting adjourned. Thank you very much, everyone And we'll see you next month. >> Thank you. Thank y Part: 2
was like I've never had a touch test. One, two, three, ten, nine, eight, seven, six, five. And yeah, my blood test is one, two, three.
>> One, two, three. One, two, three. One, two one, two, three.
All
right. Good afternoon, everyone. My name is September 2025. I might have a little bit of help with someone coming through. Okay.
September 18th Industrial Corporation of Singapore. Look at this. The agency is hosting public meetings in a hybrid setting for a health, safety and accessibility of Boston residents. Hybrid means that our board meetings are conducted in
person at City Hall in our board room here in the ninth for virtually via Zoom and Boston City TV. For more information visit the public good This meeting is being recorded. Please be audio and video
recording of this meeting is being made and broadcast the Boston City TV which is a part of the City of Boston Office of Cable Communications at 613 and provides 2006 two is also being cable.
Now if there's anyone in the audience who is reporting this meeting, I ask that you please identify yourself now. Anyone recording the you identify yourself in Sidney Scanlan and do something else.
All right. Okay. Very much. Anyone else who's recording Great. Fair. Thank you.
Okay. So we're already starting to do them. And we'll begin with the real problem is that Mr. Shepherd President Dr. Landmark. Mr. O'Malley here and the chair of the room has his presence. Item number one request
authorization for the approval of Office 14.25 one meeting. Motion is in order. So move second. Roll call for a vote. Mr. Shepherd documents my card, Mr. O'Malley and the chair. >> But tie item number two on properties to include a request
for proposals for the city of Boston Secrets relating to planning services in connection with a sale to 50 events in 2026. Lord. Madam Chair, members of the board.
Sale 250 is a major maritime celebration marking the 250th anniversary of the United States. Event will bring tall ships from around the world to Boston Harbor on September 21st, 2026. Within 20 class F tall ships in
five Navy ships are expected to participate in a ceremonial procession through Boston Harbor that's historically drawn. Millions of spectators throughout the city. For sale to 50 ships are expected to dock in the seaport
with additional vessels stationed at other participating neighborhoods from July 12th through 15. Ships will be open to the public for viewing. Over the past several months stuff working for sale to 50 corporate conventions in many
of our cities. Markets in place to 50 talk shows. Part of the event is merchandise for tourists and sailing physicists who are expected to visit the city
of Boston through a summer event 2026 Supply RFP intends to organize a trip. Food and beverage service providers to provide testing
services on city so up to 50 events. This support local businesses from the city to act as vendors FDIC and PDA companies have just to be effective applications of the fees received.
This process would be contributed to the fun for Boston neighborhoods. The funding to educational, professional and artistic programs for residents and visitors to the city. The fireworks City's Office of Arts, Tourism and Special Events. The Board of Directors
appointed by the mayor. We're asking to the Commission to enter into an agreement with the city to participate in the vending program. I'm happy to answer any questions. Thank you Lawrence and comments from the board. Very excited hearing and seeing
that is in order. >> So second roll call for Mr. Sheppard. Dr.. Hi Mr. O'Malley And the financial crisis. Item number three request authorization to issue an invitation for bids for Armory services on FDIC on properties in the Raymond Allen Marine
Park for a period of three years with two one year extension term options one. Thank you. >> I'm afraid today to ask for authorization to solicit bids for an arborist Services at ABC Own Properties in the Raymond L Flynn Park. Tree care work will be on an as
needed basis authorized by staff through our court process . The invitation for bids will be publicly advertised pursuant to master #0.30. Including advertising on the PDA website the State com by system central register and
through other channels as appropriate. The resulting contract awarded to the responsible and most to market price The awarded contract for term three with the two extension options that
may be exercised discretion. >> I'm happy to answer any questions. Thank you. Questions or comments from the board. >> Right here on CNN Emotion is in order. So moved. Second roll call for a vote. Ms.. Bennett as a shepherd doctor lands my vote, Mr. O'Malley. And the chair votes. I'm a passes.
Thank you, Lauren. >> Thank you. Item number four I request authorization to issue a request for proposals for a contractor to provide outreach recruitment and career exploration services to support the Boston Climate Institute. >> Thank you. Thank you so much, Madam Chair
Board Members My name is Jodi Sugarman President I'm a deputy chief And once again once again just somebody someone listening to the board meeting on the phone. If you are you can it or okay we're just going to give it a go. >> Okay. My name is Jodi Sugarman
Rosann. I'm a deputy chief in the city of Boston Worker Empowerment Cabinet which includes the Office of Workforce Development And I am here today to request permission to advertise initial request for proposals for a contractor to provide outreach recruitment and career exploration services to support
the Boston climate Jobs Alliance and August 2020 for the Economic Development Industrial Corporation was awarded $9.8 million for climate workforce grant from the Department of Commerce. National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration for
November for the City of Boston sponsors of workforce development to create the Boston Climate Jobs Alliance which is a coalition of 30 stakeholders including training providers, educators, educators, service providers, communication experts and employers.
The alliance work is doing approximately 12,000 jobs committed by 13 employers to family sustaining coastal and climate resilience occupations over the next three years. Workers trained unions are already being placed in jobs
that help advance coastal strategies With this request the proposal perhaps more important is to partner with expertise in workforce development and community outreach to provide opportunities to explore opportunities for the training and employment opportunities
offered by the Alliance. The estimated contract about 120,000 over three years with the option for it will be supported by the climate ready workforce backed by the GDC, by the RFP. If approved today it will be
released on September 22nd. Thank you. Thank you. Just such a big fan of the Boston climate Jobs Alliance and all of the efforts here but are there any questions or comments from the board You're
going to say not a motion is in order so moved. >> Second roll call for Ms. Bennett. Mr.. Mr.. Sheppard. Dr. Lance Mark. All right. Mr. O'Malley I had motion passes. Thank you. Thank you so much for your support. Thank you. All right. Item number five request
authorization toward $500,000 grant from previously accepted ARPA funds to see community capital and enter into a grant agreement outlining the use and conditions of the funds to support small business lending and financial assistance for Boston based businesses particularly those in neighborhoods Partial to
Displacement Ameena Thank you. Good afternoon Madam Chair. Members of the Board of Directors Madam Secretary, I'm sorry We have a request before you to authorize a grant of 500 previously accepted ARPA dollars to go to community
capital And we have the pleasure of having people actually present. Okay. Thank you. Members of the board Shagun for the last 1354 days and counting
I've had the pleasure of serving as the chief of economic opportunity and inclusion for the city of Boston. So great to be here Here And I ask you for support for administrative support Small businesses throughout the city. To date the EOC cabinet has been able to distribute more
than $35 million to 1500 plus small businesses across the city of Boston across all 23 of our neighborhoods. More than 70% of those businesses owned by women and people of color. This initiative because those dollars have run out before federal employees We have this
fire in our budget that we want to continue to see capital which is a fire that is able to be more flexible with how they support small businesses to create a loan loss reserve program that will allow them to award a multimillion dollar fund to small businesses across
the city of Boston. So we're asking your support to prove this grant to them. They're already working with us on our scale program which is $10 million initiative to help build the capacity of small businesses to be able to bid on city contracts. We've already been successful in awarding many of our
contracts to businesses owned by women and veterans and people of color And this is another opportunity to support many of our businesses that are now struggling. Unfortunately with some of the economic turmoil across the world. Yeah, I'm happy to answer any questions on this. Thank you very much. Thank you for your work.
We follow it closely. You know, very supportive of this this use of our public funds and the strategy and vision that you have you're executing here. Do we have any questions or comments from the board? >> Yes. Just briefly, Madam Chair and thank you Chief.
Good to see you and obviously fully support this. It's obviously so much a part of the mayor's vision to support small businesses the economic engine of any city I'm curious about maybe this is probably worthy of a longer discussion but given the fact
that so many federal dollars are beginning to dry up and I'm curious what the approach has been with some of the recipients and could use these to more and more scarce Unfortunately. Is there any preparation discussions or forecasting in terms of their budgets and
support that they should receive from us the folks that are already receiving support or that might receive? Well I know for instance because even we get the question at some city council hearings of what are we going to do now that all these federal dollars are drying up? This is actually one of our efforts to leverage what federal funding we do have to
expand our support. So rather than putting out a $500,000 program, we're going to support an entity that already lends money to leverage those dollars to give out many, many more than we could ever give out to be able to support. After that we're talking with our philanthropic partners on
what more we can do to build on programs that we've launched in previous years so that pool of money will be used for existing programs and sort of to help buttress it And then figuring out opportunities to tap into that right community as well. >> Very good. Thank you, Chief. Thank you.
Thank you. Additional questions or comments Hearing and seeing None Emotion is in order So moved. Second roll call for a vote Miss Bennett Eyes or Sheppard Dr. Land's Mark. All right. >> All right. And the chair votes. I think I think you should go. Thank you all very much.
Item number six personnel Mike Thank you, Madam Chair. Members of the board, Madam Secretary and direction. We have a number of items Reconsider ation of if you actually to have the exact details included in the forms. We have three contracts in the
office of General Counsel except Richardson and the Director's Office chart while in the Administration division Zachary We have one internship at the Office of General Counsel John So and we have one
other state travel request It's requested you may have Great Thank you. Questions or comments from the board I just want to say welcome to the contractors and interns and appreciate any of your questions.
Motion in order so moved Second for Mr. Sheppard or Dr. Lance and the chair every time she passes this. Okay. Thank you Mike. The FDIC agenda I have a motion to start with your seat making
so moved second roll call for a vote misspend Mr. Sheppard. Mr. O'Malley. All right. Future time assets. Okay. We're moving on to the next section meeting. Thank you for joining the September 20th, 2544 meeting at
this time the last and planning involvement interest, safety and accessibility of Boston residents Hybrid means that our board meetings are conducted in person at City Hall and the board room on the ninth floor and virtually via Zoom and Boston City TV. For more information and update
visit Boston Plans org The open public meeting requires that I notify the public that this meeting is recorded. Please be aware that the audio visual recording of this meeting is being made and broadcast by Boston City TV which is a part of the City of Boston Office of Cable Communications and Expenditure
26 Channel 13 Channel 962. It's also being livestreamed at Boston HQ. We have to do this again. So I ask I ask if there's anyone in the audience who is reporting this meeting to please contact us yourself Now just your name and affiliation
. Thank you. Thank you and welcome. Okay so begin this meeting. We will start with the roll call. Ms.. Bennett. Mr. Shannon Dr. Lance Marquez. Mr. O'Malley here and I The
chair I'm okay. Do we want to before we start the meeting We do have the officials in the room. I would like to as is customary and give the opportunity to
speak and testify about any project or matter. I'd like to come to the to the podium and the floor will be yours. >> You know whoever gets there
first You got my first Thank you Chair So I submitted a letter outlining my concerns from the zoning amendments to a project coming up later A plan
to expand on a few key points to that but I just want to read the letter into the record for anyone who may not have seen the letter. Yes. So September 15th dear like the plan I'm writing to express my opposition to the current plan
proposal which is scheduled for this Thursday. Today I express concerns about elements of this plan for several months now if my position has not changed well that is critical to Boston's growth.
This proposal raises serious issues that must be addressed first in historic preservation The parking plan is up to 700ft in areas west of Washington Street including the Ladder blocks and Park Plaza
neighborhoods. >> These areas contain historic landmarks, national treasures and culturally significant buildings. This height allowance departs drastically from existing zoning and threatens the historic character of these neighborhoods. Protections for these sites
remain inadequate and there is insufficient analysis of shadow traffic and infrastructure impacts. Second affordable housing and equitable development The plan still lacks enforceable commitments to on site affordable housing, workforce housing or a middle income
housing. Boston faces a worsening housing crisis and new development must contribute meaningfully to housing affordability rather than primarily benefiting developers. Thirdly, community input and transparency. For over six years residents
and stakeholders have participated in good faith planning efforts. Despite this many voices remain unaddressed in the current proposal. I continue to advocate for a transparent community driven process and meaningful
oversight to ensure that downtown development reflects the needs and values of the Bostonians impact on residents and public spaces. The lack of rigorous analysis foreshadows infrastructure and neighborhood impacts raises concerns for residents, small businesses in public spaces
including the Boston Common in the public garden. This plan risks irreversible harm to downtown. I urge the board to reject the current proposal or delay action to rules to allow revisions that first preserve
the historic fabric and character of downtown neighborhoods include enforceable commitments to affordable housing and equitable development and lastly reflect community input and provide transparency for residents. I remain committed to ensuring
that downtown grows responsibly balancing development with preservation and affordability and equity. Thank you for your consideration and I will just finished my original notes For now I want to be very clear that I believe downtown is the right place for heightened
density. Housing is one of the most pressing issues we face and our building trades want to see more work? I agree with them on the need to create opportunity and growth at the same time we need to make sure this plan is done responsibly. Residents have raised valid
concerns about shadows and they want assurances that the areas where height does not belong are not swept into the plan. That is not an unreasonable ask and it deserves real attention Before moving forward. There is a reason that so many of my fellow elected officials
are here with me and residents and neighbors that this zoning amendment to address their concerns. It is clearly not in a good place yet. The board should not pass it until the community can be more supportive of it and until the city demonstrates it has done the necessary work to balance
housing, jobs and quality of life. Thank you. Thank you. Thank. Good afternoon Madam Chair and
to the members of the board to the Director and to the Secretary and to someone I've admired and respected for 4040 something years. Ted Lands I'm honored to be here. I represent downtown Boston
proudly represent downtown Boston for the last eight years. I also worked here in downtown Boston prior to this as a probation officer at Suffolk Superior Court for nine years went to high school here and
Don at Don Bosco in Chinatown I know this area as well as anybody. I'm opposed to the latest version of planned downtown. I'm disappointed in the community engagement process Over the last year city
residents and members of planned Downtown Advisory Group continue to emphasize their frustration that this latest amendment to allow Towers 500ft in height and close proximity to Boston Common the public garden was
another departure from previous versions of the plan a key area my constituents highlighted to me is the failure to require on site affordable housing which not only provide access to workforce middle market and
income restricted units we so desperately need. >> Concerns remain on the distinct character of the different areas of downtown Boston removing height limits across key corridors and
historic preservation as well as of lack of any shadow study or impact analysis that has yet to be shared with the community and stakeholders. Negotiate neighbors and advisory groups who worked in partnership with the Boston
Planning Development Agency to provide community input over the last years, continue to express disappointment with regard to a lack of respect in their efforts. It is critical that the downtown Boston neighbors in
other neighbors such as Beacon Hill Back Bay I represent the Back Bay as well. I represent represent a small section of beacon Hill. They should be part of the process. They should be respected. In addition it has come to my
attention that city officials, developers and select community members recently met and held a private meeting here at City Hall. I wasn't included in that meeting. I don't I don't know what the latest version of that meeting was since I wasn't included as a District two city councilor
that represents the majority of downtown Boston, it is critical that the public process be respected. Duly elected officials be included to represent the voice of their constituents and small businesses as well. I continue to believe that the
residents of a neighborhood must be heard and respected during these critical times. I'm sorry to say that didn't take place given the concerns my constituents have regarding the impact to historic sites
tourism the the height I strongly encourage the BPD to reject the proposal and or allow for more community engagement There has to be more community engagement Residents
need to be heard. They need to be respected if they are not respected. This plan will impact the city negatively for years to come. It will put a bad taste in people's mouths when residents feel like they're not respected
And I agree with them. There's still time to get this right and I think I speak on behalf of my constituents the Bay Village Neighborhood Association, the Beacon Hill Civic Association, Downtown Boston Neighborhood Association, Freedom Trail
Foundation, the Friends of the Public Garden so many other neighbors the Neighborhood association, the Back Bay and in others it's about respect And that's what we're here today for is asking a little bit of respect from the city
and give my neighbors an opportunity to have their voices heard. >> Thank you and hi Chair Rojas
Secretary Ibrahim as Chief Shannon, members of the board today I speak in support of plan downtown as both the chair of the committee on Planning, Development and Transportation and as the only city councilor that lives in a downtown neighborhood Today is an important moment in deciding the future of our city whether
Boston will thrive with the resources and amenities to support a growing population and sustain our infrastructure . I need to lend my voice to what I believe is a necessary step to solving the housing crisis here in Boston too, it's not easy to stand up for your principles when there are competing ideals at play.
I love our parks and historic spaces deeply. The Boston Common in the public garden are treasures that first made me feel at home here I know that housing affordability and availability is one of the top issues I hear from my constituents The future of downtown matters to all of us. Our city is facing challenges
vacant offices, struggling small businesses and declining foot traffic that affect safety and vitality. This plan helps us address those issues head on while still preserving the character of our historic districts and protecting our beloved green spaces. We need a strong and vibrant downtown which will benefit
every neighborhood and this plan will help ensure that happens. Public officials and residents have spent six years shaping the plan revising it in response to community feedback. While some have expressed frustration that the process and they didn't feel heard. I see clear evidence that
resident input has shaped the draft before us today Nothing is perfect but this plan strikes a balance between much needed housing and investment while preserving the scale of our historic districts and integrity of our parks. The Downtown Boston Alliance, which has been central to stewarding safety and vitality
in the area, supports the plan. Their work in guiding 20 new business leases in 2025 including nine City of Boston Space grantees shows what happens when we invest in downtown plan Downtown will help accelerate that momentum drawing tourism and bringing new energy to the neighborhood.
The plan also sets clear expectations for housing. It encourages residential development and adaptive reuse of office spaces requires 20% of new units to be income restricted and supports new jobs in construction and related industries For a city that is committed to
sustainably reaching 800,000 residents, we cannot afford to leave downtown out of the equation concentrating housing in an area with world class hospitals shopping, entertainment and robust transportation network is exactly how we should be growing. I understand that the concerns
about historic preservation I represent 40% of Boston's historic District's residents feared that the January 3rd threatened the scale and character of the latter districts in Washington Street In response planning reduced the heights allowed in those areas and expanded lower scale height zones around Old South
meeting house ladder blocks and Park Plaza. This change is reflect reflects meaningful responsiveness and a balanced approach. The zoning plan strengthens protections for the Boston Common and Public Garden by explicitly stating that state's shadow laws these laws were won after years of advocacy and
exist for a reason when exceptions are made As with Winthrop Square Tower in 2017 the result that as a result there cannot be reverse. At that time only Councilor Zaken Wu and Jackson oppose the exemption. I will not support making new exemptions.
In fact I filed a resolution to affirm the Council's commitment to upholding these protections . Some have expressed fear that this plan will lead to skyscrapers that erase the human scale of the downtown. If there can be no height in the downtown where can there be hide the reason for building up
in a concentrated area is because the infrastructure to support dense living environment already exists through the Article 80 process. Other amenities and mitigation will be secured through individual project proposals. >> This plan this plan to take the downtown from primarily 9
to 5 neighborhood to to an intentional residential neighborhood but more amenities that will support that growth. We need to encourage development. We need to be nimble and extract investment even even in the face of high interest rates rising construction costs our
city our city relies heavily on property taxes to fund essential services. With more than 70% of Boston's operating budget coming from this single source when commercial property values decline as they have since the pandemic, the burden shifts to residents Zoning needs to
reflect the reality of on the ground and restricting the usage of and size of parcels will drive investment away. We need to be nimble for the market. This plan therefore is not about zoning or height. It is about ensuring that Boston's financial stability is there And it's also about
making sure that we can continue to fund schools, maintain safe streets, keep our parks clean and deliver the services our residents depend on Some of those in this room asked me to do those things every single day and that's why I think it would be it would it would be a disservice to the
residents of Boston if I came in opposition to something that we need so dearly. >> While I do not represent the downtown, the revised plan is balanced and thoughtful. I support its direction. I believe in a Boston that grows including and that means
including in District eight I will continue to advocate for a city that grows with care, with respect for history and with room for everyone. And I'm going to speak on one more item please. Okay. Dear Terre Haute and members of board, thank you for the opportunity to testify as a city councilor for District
eight where the Groundwater Conservation Overlay District encompasses the majority of its neighborhoods as well as a trustee of the Boston Groundwater Trust. I'm here to speak in support of tax amendments to Article 32. The ZBA has essentially acted
as a rubber stamp for Article 32 cases. These changes will remove this procedural redundancy while maintaining rigorous oversight. The Boston Groundwater Trust will continue to issue no harm letters and BWC will still require groundwater recharge systems. I want to thank the Planning
Department ISC, BWC and the Boston Groundwater Trust for their diligence in crafting these amendments and I'm very happy to see this move forward. I believe this reform is in the best interests of the city and I urge the EPA and the zoning commission to adopt it. Okay. Thank you both. Thank you all. Thank you.
Thank you. Council again. Yes. Representative Livingston. Representative Livingston. All it is is online and I'd like to take a. So we're going to take Representative Livingston. I see you on the camera there so we'll take you next.
The floor is yours. >> All right. Thank you. My name is Jay Livingstone and I serve as the state representative for the East Suffolk District which includes the Boston neighborhoods of Beacon Hill Back Bay, the West End in the Fenway District also includes two of Boston's most iconic landmarks the
Boston Common Public Garden. I'm here to ask you to reject the plan Downtown Boston Draft zoning proposal and rework it because the current plan could result in depriving Boston common public garden of crucial needed sunlight.
Moreover, a strong coalition created a workable plan to double current zoning heights except at critically sensitive areas more than a year ago that could be used instead to meet the goals of this zoning without the negative impacts of the park. I understand that only elected officials are allowed to speak
during this hearing So I'm testifying today not only on behalf of my office but also on behalf of many constituents and stakeholders the Beacon Hill Civic Association, the Neighborhood Association of Back Bay, the West, the Fenway Civic Association, Revolutionary Spaces, the Freedom Trail Foundation and
most importantly the Friends of the Public Garden and have asked me to speak in object to this zoning proposal on their behalf. I've also uniformly heard objections from my constituents on this proposal. I speak for all those particularly as they're not allowed to speak at this meeting.
First I want to express why the Boston Common Public Garden are so important. Both are iconic parks that are intertwined with Boston's identity. When Boston is shown on national TV it's very common for it to be an image of one of these two parks.
Visitors travel from around the world to visit the Boston Common America's first public park in the public garden. One of the most beautiful parks in the world. The parks are enjoyed as public green spaces by thousands of residents daily. I'm one of those lucky enough to use the parks daily.
I typically typically on my commute walking to the statehouse from Back Bay through the public garden in common in my family like so many others are constantly using the parks as our green space for soccer for baseball. In other outdoor recreation spaces the first time in fact
the first time my oldest son walked on his own it was to chase a ball on the grass in the public garden. My experiences are not unique. These spaces are part of our lives which is why I worked so hard to represent and preserve them. I want to thank Mayor Wu for the time and effort she has
personally spent on this proposal speaking with stakeholders and other individuals to understand their concerns. I'm never surprised and always appreciate the mayor's hand on approach to receiving community input. That said, unfortunately I fear the proposal will allow development that will have a
significant detrimental impact on the Boston Common and Public Garden particularly the heights the plan will allow on Washington Street in the Park Plaza area. If this zoning proposal is approved it will be permanent and available for additional
development projects. For Mayor Wu and for future administration Whether or not future mayors respect and appreciate the parks like our current mayor does Because of this I oppose this plan. Plan zoning currently is a
155ft along Washington Street and Boylston Street to allow the maximum sunlight for the grass, the trees and flowers of the common public garden that are needed. As I mentioned, I understand this zoning hike could be doubled to 300ft while maintaining the same level
of protection. The zoning proposal however, would allow development up to 500 up to 700ft in places which will be full if built. Significantly negatively impacts these treasured green spaces.
I know the zoning plan specifically references the state's shadow law as a limit on it on the site. That is not enough. While the state's shadow law was a novel limitation in our state to protect the Boston Common and Public Garden it has
proven to be porous at times and it's not always provided the protection people anticipate. It's a document that was heavily negotiated political process decades ago and contains numerous exceptions. It is not true that it will prevent the backs start
of protection that is claimed. If you want to protect the sunlight on the Boston Common Public Garden, this proposal can be approved. Indeed this zoning proposal came out of the fight about that shadow law that was referenced earlier for the
morning tower. It was hoped that the zoning process would allow more downtown development while providing more guarantees for the sunshine on the Boston Common Public Garden. Instead, if you approve this proposal the process will result in the greatest threat
to Boston common to public garden have ever faced. There is a better way in mayor who has creatively shown that to us through different projects in Boston. I also represent the Back Bay fence in the Fenway neighborhood. The area around the fence has
faced increasing development pressure. Mayor wisely instructed the Parks Department to conduct a thorough study on the Back bay fence plant animal life how residents and visitors use the park. I understand the report that resulted which is fascinating to read will be used to
determine in a fair thoughtful way whether future development proposals will or will negatively impact these interests identified to determine whether or not they should be approved. That thoughtful data driven approach should and could be
replicated here. The Friends of Public Garden several years ago produced a similar model for the development around the Boston Common Public Garden Garden called the Sunshine Wall. The Sunshine model would allow more development in certain places than the proposal less
than others but it would guarantee the future sunshine on these essential greenspace shares of the Boston Common Public Garden so they could be enjoyed for generations to come. I urge you to reject this proposal Instead work towards a framework along the lines of the Sunshine Law and we'll
secure our parks for future generations while still meeting our housing needs. Thank you for taking me out of turn. >> Thank you for your time and consideration. No thank you for your participation and your representation of your constituents.
>> So. >> So you missed the earlier So if we're recording I just have to do this thing where you just state your name and affiliation If you're if you're recording it as possible. Perfect.
Thank you. All right. Anyone else Recording, recording, Recording. >> Okay, cool. All right. Thank you. Good afternoon, Madam Chair. Members of the board. My name is Louis-jacques Natali and I work for Chairman Michael Watts. Unfortunately you could not be here tonight but he has
prepared a letter expressing his opposition to the downtown masterplan. I want to start by thanking everyone for the effort that has gone into the downtown masterplan. As you may recall, this initiative was agreed upon as part of the mitigation for amending of the shadow law as it pertains to the Winter
Square project in 2017. >> I especially want to recognize the Downtown Boston Alliance and the and the downtown Boston Neighborhood Association for their engagement and leadership over the past several years. >> You have remained committed to shaping a downtown that is vibrant, welcoming and sustainable.
Your dedication has been critical to the process. Downtown has faced significant challenges over the past decade and COVID 19 hit the area particularly hard. Many businesses struggled. Foot traffic declined and the energy of the neighborhood was deeply affected. Throughout this period
residents and community groups stepped up to bring life back to downtown. >> Most recently they worked closely with the mayor's office and the public safety officials and the other elected officials to ensure the area remains safe. Active and more residential friendly. Their efforts have helped
create a sense of resilience and hope and laying a strong foundation for the future downtown. I support many of the goals of the downtown masterplan. The commitment to revitalize in downtown. Fostering collaboration among residents, businesses and city officials and enhancing public
safety is commendable. The vision for a more vibrant and livable downtown is something I have supported from the beginning. That said, there are aspects of this proposal that I cannot support most notably the proposed changes to the sky
zone along the right side of Washington Street have raised concerns for me throughout this entire process. Many residents feel the zone represents an overreach and could significantly impact the character and the scale of the neighborhood. These concerns have been raised in previous letters and discussions and I continue to
share the residents reservations regarding this component of the plan. Another important area of concern is the preservation of affordable housing in downtown Boston. In the past proposal proposals have not consistently ensured that off site affordable housing remained within the
downtown planning zone which has sometimes allowed growth to occur at the expense of the accessibility inclusivity. It is critical that going forward any offsite affordable units created by developers remain within the downtown planning zone and are not relocated elsewhere. Downtown must remain affordable
and accessible for all residents including those who have long called this area home and those who are seeking to live and work here in the future. Affordable housing is not optional. It is a critical part of thriving equitable downtown. In closing I want to once thank
the downtown Boston Alliance the downtown Boston Neighborhood Association and the PTA staff for their dedication Hard work. >> I also want to acknowledge Mayor Michelle Warner team for taking on such a significant project and prioritizing downtown as a central part
of Boston's growth and future. >> While I cannot support the iteration of this plan, I deeply value the effort and collaboration in the leadership that have gone into it. I am confident that with continuing judgment we can create a downtown that balance of growth inclusivity and
affordability ensuring a vibrant, accessible and sustainable downtown Boston for everyone. >> Thank you. Okay, Thank you. >> Hi, Madam Chair. Members of the board.
My name is Hailey Walsh speaking. I'm chief of staff for Senator Nick Khan Speaking on his behalf. Senator Collins would like to be on record along with his colleagues in opposition to the proposal. Throughout the process community members have raised valid and reasonable concerns. We agree with the concepts of economic development and
housing creation but believe like my colleagues and the community here today that some of the heights are too high. We look forward to continuing the work to find solution to housing crisis and ensure our building trades can put people to work. We share their commitment to creating new opportunities and driving responsible growth. >> Thank you.
Thank you. Okay. >> Okay. We have Ms. Gomes with the floor is yours for one. Take yourself off mute. Good afternoon Madam Chair. Chief Shannon, members of the
board. My name is Manuel Avila Gomes and I am State Senator Lydia Edwards, district director and I'm speaking on her behalf today Senator Edwards would like to go on record that after having heard from many of her constituents the mayor's office, Chief Chen and other elected officials about plan downtown she neither supports
nor opposes this plan. Senator Edwards believes that the proposed zoning has good potential as it will create 9000 jobs and is expected to create 2500 residential units of which 20% will be income restricted Making this the
largest amount of middle class income housing units to be created in downtown in generations. Given that Senator Edwards is deeply concerned about housing options for the middle and working class in downtown, she is supportive of the proposed zoning Changes plan to help create homes for the middle and
working class. However, the plan has not address all the concerns that she has previously submitted to the Planning Department Earlier this year specifically around the commercial development and the accountability for developers, Senator Edwards is concerned about the ability
of small local businesses such as hardware stores and small grocery stores owned by people of color and first generation Americans to compete for space with big box stores and chains. She's concerned that there will no longer be a neighborhood at the end of the plan when it comes to accountability for
developers. She is concerned that the development will occur building by building but the zoning will be collective. She is concerned about how developers will be held accountable for building their projects on time, accomplishing their affordability goals and pleading projects So as not to
end up with projects that are approved for construction but remain unbuilt like so like Suffolk Downs in East Boston. Senator Edwards would like to would like to ask the board for more time to refine plan downtown but she realizes that that eight years of deliberation has been a long
time for this discussion. She is thankful for your continued partnership and she knows you understand the importance of creating updated zoning that represents community perspectives and needs. Thank you. Thank you Mr. Gomes Councilor
Councilor for letters about that The floor is yours. I see that you want to unmute and yeah thank you. Just confirming you can hear me . Yes confirmed. Excellent. I'm here to speak solely on the components of plan downtown within the confines of district
one geographically speaking without getting specific into names of the boundaries or the perimeter that was specified in the plan. But I'm here in strong support of the proposed zoning amendments within District one in respect to my colleague from District two which affects
government center State Street and portions of the Wharf District they the update strikes the right balance between protecting Boston's historic and cultural assets while also allowing appropriate growth in the very heart of the downtown business district as
outlined in the recent zoning update, the only new area eligible to reach 700ft is already built out with towers above 500ft making it the epicenter of downtown's commercial core. Concentrating additional height here ensures that growth is
contextually appropriate, avoids impacts on sensitive areas and supports Boston's long term goals for housing and economic vitality by enabling height where tall towers already exist and are served by major transit hubs such as Government Center and State
Street Station. This plan advances several key urban planning principles transit oriented growth, housing production, contextual development and protection of historic and open spaces. More importantly, the rest of District one sees little to
no change in allowable building heights. This reflects a balanced approach that both respects neighborhood character and embraces downtown's role as the economic and cultural driver of Boston in the region. For these reasons I respectfully urge the BBA to
adopt with the proposed zoning amendments concentrating height and growth in government center and State Street is the right strategy to deliver housing sustained economic momentum and ensure the downtown Boston's continued vitality. Thank you. Thank you Councilor.
Do we have an elected officials that would like to speak in the room? Okay, so just for context right . We take elected officials out of order. You know if they so choose to to give public testimony So
that particular item that we just heard about is not on the agenda till later. So I've got a lot of agenda items to get through before we get to that ones I just want to be clear like the order of operations here So I agenda item number one Yeah Oh Russell
does a representative Holmes has his hand up So would you like to give public testimony now? If so you can take yourself off mute. We're happy to take you out to turn. Thank you very much Madam Chair
and board. I actually have heard all the testimony so far be about downtown Boston. My testimony is about 990 American Legion. >> Should I just wait? No, you can. You're welcome. >> You're welcome to to say that Now if you Thank you Madam
Chair and board and Director Chen I am testifying in regard to 990 American Legion because of my strong concern of the many changes that have happened over the years there has been obviously many emails, phone calls and the like from
constituents but I've been a part of this conversation since the developer and I and Jubilee went out and just walked the site along before the proposal had gone in. My concern is deep deeply concerned of the community
benefits that have now been removed. When we began this conversation I said to the neighborhood groups what the developer was saying to me the entire time and that is that it was an as of right project and the entire time I've been trying to have a
compromise between a developer who could build as of right and a community who very much wanted the city to buy all of the property and keep it as is. And so I am here just not to give a long testimony but to
say that I am not supportive of this latest design. It removed all of the things that from the beginning of this project that I thought were good concessions for the neighborhood. There is now absolutely no affordable housing.
Not only did I advocate for affordable units but I advocated for affordable units and affordable homeownership which is no longer in the project. There is no path at all which was another great benefit that was being considered. There is no overlook any more on the project and then there's
no upgrades for the for the bus stop that was going to be in area and now the developers and while the community benefit is a you're going to get housing and you're going to get in the new light that's going to come in And I'm still clear that the
new light is simply because he needs to get his all of his new tenants in and out of that property. So now bringing no affordability and nothing above market rate is is going to destroy that neighborhood.
There is no gated private neighborhood anywhere remotely in the high park area and that's essentially what this brings. And so I am opposed to this project and really I really am disappointed that Jubilee is
allowing this to be done in their name even though Mr. Noone will say that he has now been put in this position because of how much money he has spent to court and everything else a developer is still follow through with those
commitments and definitely when they're doing that in the name of the largest black church in all of New England I said from the beginning when some people were saying that we should go in and have this property taken by eminent domain. I was a strong no to say and we're going to go to the
largest black church in this all of New England and take something from from them. But I am now a strong no to say this has been done wrong and I'm certainly hoping Jubilee in the end will use this name and this influence to bring a project that delivers the
promises that they committed to for this community because that's what they should still deliver. Thank you for taking me out of order and I appreciate your time. >> No thank you very much, Representative Holmes for your continued participation in this
process. Again, this is an agenda item that is now 28 away from now but duly noted recorded and appreciated. All right. Agenda item number one get there Request authorization for
the approval of the minutes at the August 14th, 2025 board meeting for the and for the executive session meetings of the September 11th, 2025 board meeting A motion is in order so moved. Second roll call for a vote Ms. Bennett Mr. Shepherd Dr. Lance Mark. Mr. O'Malley and the chair
votes I motion passes Item number two Request schedule for authorization to schedule a public hearing on October 16th, 2025 at 5:30 p.m. or at a date and time to be determined by the director to consider the proposed master plan for planned development Area number 156 Austin Street Lots
redevelopment and the proposed Building B Development Plan for Planned Development Area number 156 Located in the Charlestown neighborhood And this is just a request to schedule a hearing So a motion is in order. So second roll call for a vote.
Ms. BENNETT Mr. Shepherd and Dr. Lance Mark All right. Mr. O'Malley And the chair votes I another request for scheduling request authorization to schedule a public hearing on October 16th, 2025 at 5:40 p.m. or at a take a date and time to be determined by the director to
consider the proposed Second Amendment to the amended and restated master plan for the planned development area Number 51 Hood Park and the proposed Development Plan for 25 Super Test Street within planned development area number 51 Hood Park and the proposed
development plan for 15 Super Test Street within the plan development area Number 51 Hood Park located in Charlestown neighborhood a motion is in order so moved second roll call for a vote Ms. Bennett Mr. Sheppard. Dr. Lance Marker. Mr. O'Malley I and the Chair
votes I motion passes Item number four I request authorization to enter into a license agreement with Orange Barrel Media LLC as the operator of an electronic sign to be located at 51 Brookline Avenue for a term of one year with a one year optional extension Terms and to issue a
design review approval of the electronic sign permit and to take all related actions. Eric afternoon Madam Chair. Members of the Board Director Shannon Secretary will you miss My name is Eric Boatright. I'm a senior architect in the design Review Division of the
Planning Department. I present to you for approval a license agreement with Orange Barrel Media allowing a new electronic sign at 51 Brookline Avenue opposite Lansdowne Street. We also seek your approval to issue the design review approval for the proposed signs
Building permit application. The project is within the Lansdowne Street Entertainment District which is as outlined in Article 11 an area that allows for electronic signage as a conditional use. The project will be designed to conform within the zoning code. Variances to the zoning code
will not be required. This permit will expire after eight years at which time the board may choose to renew the permit for an additional eight years or to not extend the permit. The license agreement will be made with the proponent like agreements for other electronic signs in the city. The agreement will be automatically renewed annually
for up to eight years. The city will receive an annual fee plus a share of the revenue generated by the sign 10% of the display Time will be noncommercial public service content limits on the brightness animation and hours of operation will be consistent with the zoning code Design
guidelines As stated in Article 11 the proposed signage will feature an electronic display facing east surrounded by an architectural frame giving the signage a more significant presence at the intersection. The proposed signage will replace three conventional
billboards on the roof of 51 Brookline Avenue. The proposed sign will also stay within the limits of the property of 51 Brookline. Okay. Thank you. Questions or comments from the board I actually have a couple
of Madam Chair Thank you Eric. Appreciate that. I am not a fan of billboards so I appreciate that Electric billboards often mean fewer stationary billboards So it's a trade off. I think we need to consider very briefly. It's a it's about 10% revenue of the annual revenue would be kicked back to the city.
You know ballpark what that would be? I don't know. It's it's 10% of the of the broadcast time will be dedicated to public service control I see I say okay And then the portion of the of the revenue is to be negotiated
that that would in the city would negotiate that with the firm And then when you talk about noncommercial time that 10% that would be a amber or a large street closure as festivals public service announcements correct Yeah anything that the city might want to advertise we can submit to them to to broadcast on
their sign and community members could also bring their consent to to the to the screen as well Yeah okay Yeah I mean I'm supportive of this Just more curious because these are rare so it's good that we're having these conversations appreciate the work that I do.
Remember the first electrical sign that I approved had a lot of questions So now I appreciate appreciate that any additional questions or comments? Right. Hearing a thing not a motion is an order So moved. Second roll call for a vote. Ms. Bennett Mr. Sheppard. Dr. Lance Mark.
>> Mr. O'MALLEY Right. And the chair votes I motion passes. Thank you, Eric. Item number five request authorization and for bre own properties to be included in a joint request for proposals within with the City of Boston to seek bids relating to vending services in connection
with sale to 50 events in 2026 Warren members of the board and before you again to ask for the inclusion of VRA properties for the vending program for the sale to 50 programing with the city of Boston great It's the
same motion before I can repeat it if you like fully understood no need to repeat but a motion is in order so moved. Second roll call for a vote Ms. Bennett. Mr. Sheppard. Dr. Lance Mark. Mr. O'MALLEY All right. And the chair votes I motion passes. Thank you, Lauren Item number six request authorization to
execute a license with Boston Playhouse Realty Inc for the use of approximately 2978ft2 of adjacent of land adjacent to the Charles Playhouse on Warrenton Street for a period of five years commencing
October 1st, 2025 and ending September 30th 2030 with one five year option extension term list. >> Thank you Madam Chair. Good afternoon members of the board. Since 1995 the PTA has licensed
approximately 2978ft2 of a 5693 square foot parcel located at 8486 Charles Street in adjacent to the Charles Playhouse on warrants and street to the Blue Man group whom I'll reference as BMG before. The Remain and Land is licensed
as a community dog park from the Bee Village Neighborhood Association. The current license agreement with BMG scheduled for expiration at December 2025 allows BMG to cancel the license with 90 day notice If BMG performances are discontinued at the Charles
Playhouse. BMG has ceased performance is at the Charles Playhouse effective July 6th, 2025 and has accordingly exercised the 90 day notice to terminate the license in a letter dated June 23rd 25 excuse me June 20th, 25
Boston Playhouse Realty Inc owner of the Charles Playhouse is bullish on the re-use of the Charles Playhouse and has reached out to the PDA about entering into a new license agreement for the continued use of the mobile trailer onsite that BMG has agreed to leave behind to accommodate their
shows and operations. BPA intends to enter into a license agreement with Boston Playhouse Realty Inc and the license terms shall begin on October first, 2025 and expire September 30th, 2030 for a term of five years with one five
year option term at the conclusion of the initial term . Following a recent market analysis I've been there with the thing that wrote and it's at the time that you're presenting so just take a step . Thank you.
Yeah. BPD intends to enter into a license agreement with Boston Playhouse Realty Inc and the license terms shall begin October 1st, 2025 and expire from the 30 2030 a term of five years with a five year option term at the conclusion of the initial term.
Following a recent market analysis, staff has determined that the license fee under the new license agreement will begin at $4,938.04 per month for the first year. The license fee will then increase annually by 3% should the option be exercised. The new market evaluation will
be conducted to assess comparable rental market rates over the term of the license shall receive no less than 314,676 and fixed rent. Thank you and I am here to answer any questions. Thank you. Questions or comments from the board.
All right. Hearing and seeing that a motion is in order. So moved. Second roll call for a vote. Ms.. Bennett. Mr. Shepherd, Dr. Landmark is normally all right and the chair votes I motion passes. Thank you very much. But before we do the second one I want to announce for the record we have Catherine
Carlock from The Globe who is online and recording the meeting. So we just record that into the record. All right. But item number seven request authorization to enter into a lease agreement with DiMeo construction company for the
uses for the use of suites 109 and 110 located at two Boylston Street for a period of eight months commencing October 1st, 2025 and ending May 30th 2020 six Liz. >> Thank you. To boylston Street also known as the China Trade Center was built in 19 and 1887 is a
designated Boston landmark and is listed in the National Register of Historic Places. In 1993 the BRI purchased this 80,000 square foot sixth floor Class B office building in a serves as a symbol of the city of Boston's commitment to revitalize Boston's Midtown and
Chinatown area. DiMeo Construction D-s.c. Who I'll refer to as Moving Forward was founded in 1938 and has steadily grown to become recognized among the lead and construction organizations in New England. DCC was hired by St Francis House to lead the renovation
and development of their downtown location and are seeking to extend their existing lease for their daily operations to manage this project. DCC will also share office space with ST Francis House while the renovation is ongoing . St Francis House current and
soon to be developed building is adjacent to the Trinity Center. The tentative lease terms will be for eight months commencing on October 1st, 2025 and expiring May 30th, 2026. Included in their terms will be an option to extend for an additional six months. Also a 30 day written notice to
terminate should they leave prior to the lease term. PPD staff conducted an analysis of the Chinatown Midtown Class B office market and determined that DCC will pay the market rate of $31.50 per square foot for Suite one and nine and
Suite 110 during the term of the eight month lease, BPA will receive $55,902 in fixed rent and I am happy to answer any questions you may have. Thanks so much Les. Questions or comments from the Board. Hearing and seeing on a motion is an order so moved.
Second roll call for a vote Ms.. Bennett. Mr. Shepard. Dr. Landmark. Mr. O'Malley. I am the chair of this I motion passes. Thank you, Liz. Item number eight request authorization to enter into two license agreements with TFC 30
Winter LLC and BCB three LLC for the use and activation of the exterior of the property at 30 Winter Street for a six week placemaking activation event as part of the Design Vision Tactical Urbanism Project. Commencing October 1st and
terminating November 16th 2020 five. >> Breeze High Thank you Madam Chair. Madam Secretary and members of the board. Back in 2014 of December you all adopted the design vision
as a way to help guide guide future design strategies and inform how the built environment is shaped to elevate the quality of design. I put together a slide show so we could have some imagery as I speak through this so I can go
to the next slide. >> And through the design vision process we engaged with hundreds of Bostonians asking them what they love most about their neighborhoods. This informed place was the design opportunities for streets open spaces and housing to help us reimagine the design
of the city. Next slide We identified Winter Street in Downtown Crossing as a placemaking opportunity to enhance safety, improve pedestrians experience and stimulate the local economy
of downtown through vibrant design interventions. >> We're calling the event colorful A winter and it will run daily starting early October and during the
pedestrian zone hours which is from 11 a.m. to 6 p.m.. And as you said it would be for six weeks and it would feature public art programing can be lighting games pop up food and beverage garden food trucks and
more for all ages. We'll be using the exterior of Theo Winter which is owned by TFC 30 and that will be our primary area where we serve the food and beverages which will also have additional seating
some planters planting in the lighting. And it will be operated by a partner food vendor who has the second lease license agreement that we were entering and they will obtain all the necessary permits and insurances to operate that space.
Next slide. This is just kind of showing some of the visual public art programing that we're hoping to do which is currently happening now If you pass by Winter Street in Downtown Crossing. So we'll be activating the full
length of the street. There will be some seating along the edges and during the event will bring out foldable chairs to expand activities And also there'll be some custom
vinyl decals that we'll be having on storefronts vacant storefronts along the street so folks can get that art experience. And through this planning do the planning on this event we've engaged with different went to street stakeholders who are all excited about the
positive attention and the sense of community that a student will bring. That concludes my presentation and I'm happy to answer any questions. Thank you. Questions or comments from the board. Seems really cool. >> Thank you. Yeah and there's a really great
like poster thing here. If you couldn't see it on the slide I just really encourage us all to see our It's already there. I love hanging out there and seeing the activation and this is just again so exciting to see and having community
gatherings, spaces and arts and particularly the decals that are on the vacant storefronts as we search for you know that the right solutions and tenants and doing that of like having arts and arts and those you know decals and and hopefully
to promote other artists and local artists. I'm just again honestly way excited about this and it's super supportive So there's no other questions or comments. Motion is in order. Solo Second roll call for a vote Ms. Bennett. Mr. Shepard. Dr. Landmark.
All right, Mr. O'Malley. All right. And the chair votes. I Motion passes. Thank you. Thank you, Chair. Okay. Item number nine request authorization to extend the tentative designation status to a joint venture between Asian Community Development Corporation and the Community Builders for the redevelopment
of Parcel P dash 12 C locate at 292 Fremont Street and the South Cove Urban Renewal Area Project Number Mass R Dash 92 for a period of 12 months through September 30th 2026 and continue negotiations with the developer to facilitate the long term ground. Liz Ben.
Thank you Madam Chair. Members of the board I'm a real estate development officer in the real estate division here we are requesting board approval to extend the tentative designations status of the joint venture between Asian Community Development Corporation also known as ACDC and the community builders known as TCB Together being the
RE developer for the redevelopment of Parcel P12 C located at 292 Fremont Street in the Chinatown neighborhood and to continue lease negotiations with them to facilitate the long term ground These parcel P12 C is an approximately 29,000 square
foot site located in the South Cove Urban Renewal Area. It is comprised of two contiguous assessor parcels of land within the blocks bound by Fremont and Washington Streets and Oak Street West and Stuart Streets. It is abutted by land use for a
YMCA, a hotel parking and other commercial retail uses. The original proposed proposal included 119 units all of which were proposed to be income restricted after an investigation into the feasibility of adding additional units to the program was increased to 132 income
restricted units due to the current funding availability affecting affordable home ownership developments. The developer is reviewing the proposed project Feasibility. The current proposed plan though is for the development to include 100% affordable rental units All rental units
will plan to be income restricted at rents Affordable to households with income levels ranging from approximately 30% of area median income to 80%. Additionally, the proposed project will incur and will include approximately 20 500ft2
of ground level community commercial space for rent or for purchase 132 bicycle parking spaces and a new blue bike station at or near the site Since receiving their designee tentative designation in September 20th Extension
of September 2023 the developer has applied to the HLC or Executive Office of Housing Livable Communities Funding round secured City of Boston's Mayor's Office of Housing Funds completed 70% drawing drawings
began Massachusetts Bay Transportation Authority Zone of Influence review began and began lease negotiations with staff regarding the long term grounds during the requested 12 month extension the development team plans to achieve the following to enable staff to
recommend final designation Secure EO HLC funding from the state, complete construction drawings and design review Complete the bidding process Complete ground These negotiations with our staff and begin construction closing process.
Thank you. I'm happy to answer any questions. Thank you. Questions or comments from the board. Look, I just want to you know, wish the you know, developer everybody I know is working really, really hard to to make this happen And so the extension makes sense.
We're talking about 100% affordable housing and the 32 eight 3,280% of am I So there's a lot of things that need to get cobbled together to be able to make this happen. So I am just, you know, sending positive energy and cooperation
all around so that we can get this over the line. But and in and for right now this is a request for an extension and a motion is in order So moved. >> Second roll call for a vote Ms. Bennett Mr. Sheppard Dr. Landmarks Mr. O'Malley I and
the chair votes I motion passes. Thanks so much, Ben. >> Thank you. All right. Item number ten request authorization to amend a contract with Coastal Marine Construction LLC and an amount not to exceed $550,000 for the improvements to the East facing seawall of Long Wharf and the Central Wharf District and to
further execute any change orders that may be required to complete the work as deemed necessary by the director in an aggregate amount not to exceed 10% of the amended contract amount. William Thank you. Good afternoon Madam Chair. Members of the board this matter was before you last month when you granted
authorization to amend the design contract with cloth engineers. The engineer of record for this project. As a reminder when we were restocking and resetting the granite sea wall we learned that the top slab that supports the granite pavers had several large voids underneath it. Obviously those were unknown
unforeseen conditions. Since we amended the engineer's contract they have done their investigation. They have detailed repairs that are necessary and we're ready to get the contractor to implement those. In fact, they started earlier today. So let's hope for a favorable vote. >> We had an original contract
of $1.83 million. We're requesting a 30% increase in the amount of $605,000. That includes a 10% contingency of 55,000 for a total contract award of $2,433,776.40.
Happy to answer any questions you may have. Okay. Thank you. Questions or comments from the board. Hearing and seeing that a motion is in order. So moved. Second roll call for a vote. Ms.. Bennett. Mr. Shepherd. Dr. Landmark. Mr. O'Malley. And the chair votes I motion passes Item number 11 Request
authorization Execute a contract with G I consultants Inc. for Engineering Design Services for the Shipyard Park Waterfront Repairs Phase three of the flagship wharf Bulkhead and the Charlestown Navy Yard for a contract amount
of $575,995 and to further execute a design contingency for $88,000 for a total contract amount not to exceed $667,995. >> William thank you again. This matter was last before you of May of this year when you granted authorization to issue
the request for proposals for which GE has submitted. As a reminder, the effort seeks to repair the 1980 still sheet pile bulkhead that is located in the Charlestown Navy Yard between Pierce four and five. This area is known as flagship wharf. It was built in the 1980s is 30.
It's ten years past its useful service life. The engineer will repair will design a repair or replacement of the seawall. The RFQ is issued June of this year. We had 60 participants who downloaded the solicitation for proposals were received. The most advantageous was from G.I. The proposal fee was
$579,995. We are requesting a contingency of 15% in the amount of 88,000 for the total contract award of $667,995. And this is funded from the city of Boston's capital budget. They gave us $4 million for
both the design and the construction. >> Got it. Questions or comments from the board? Hearing and seeing none in motion is in order So moved. Second roll call for a vote Ms.. Bennett. Mr. Shepard. Dr. Land's Mark. All right, Mr. O'Malley. I am the chair but I motion passes. Thank you, William.
Good luck. You very much. Good luck. >> Okay. We've got a lot of work to do. People like and I know we're going through these like fast, but I do want to just because we have an audience today, you know we receive all of these memos, comment letters,
everything So it may seem like we're going fast, Right. But we you know, a lot of due care and consideration is taken and read in preparation for this meeting. So I just feel compelled to say that. But item number 12 request authorization to issue an invitation for bids for
arborist services be our own property citywide for a period of three years with two one year option extension terms. Lauren thank you very much. We believe the trees on Bray property also should be taken care of So we're asking for an IP to advertise for that.
I believe that as well But but let's take a motion is in order and let's let's I move okay Second right Roll call for a vote. Mr. Bennett. Mr. Shepherd. Dr. Lance Mark Mr. O'Malley and the chair But I motion passes item number 13. Thank you. Line item number 13.
I request authorization to extend a contract with Brightview landscape Services LLC for landscaping services at Charlestown Navy Yard through November 30th 2025 for a contract amount not to exceed $75,000. Chris.
Good afternoon Madam Chair. Members of the board Madam Secretary and Director I'm here today to request a contract amendment with Brightview Landscaping Services LLC for the landscaping services at the Charlestown Navy Yard. We are seeking to extend the current contract by 197 days
with an end date of November 30th 2025 at additional cost not to exceed the 75,000 that you said in light of I'm sorry we are we are requesting an amendment to increase the current contract amount from
$196,796 to a total not exceed $271,796 for the current term. I'm happy to answer any questions. >> Thank you. Questions or comments from the board Hearing and seeing none A motion is in order so moved. Second roll call for a vote Ms. Bennett eyes for Shepherd Dr.
Lance Mark Mr. O'Malley I and the triplets I motion passes Thank you. Item number 14 A request Authorization to amend the contract with gone green electrical Electric Company Inc set to expire January 10th, 2026 for unanticipated electrical services at Brown
Properties in the amount of $75,000 for a new contract Total value contract value of $300,000. Chris Thank you again Madam Chair. I'm here today to request an amendment to our current contract for legal services on BRCA and properties On November 17th 2022 the BRCA board
authorized the director to enter into a one year contract with Green Electric Company with two one year extension options and amount not to exceed $75,000 per year. The current contract is scheduled to expire on January 10th, 2026. However, due to an unexpected increase in the volume of work
needed to maintain and upgrade our properties, the allocated funds have already been fully utilized given the anticipated workload in the to ensure we can continue addressing ongoing electrical needs, we are requesting an amendment to increase a contract by an additional $75,000. The total cost of this contract is not expected to exceed
$150,000 for the term. I'm happy to answer any questions. Thank you. Questions or comments from the board Hearing and seeing none A motion is in order so moved. Second I'll call for a vote. Ms. Bennett Mr. Shepherd. Dr. Landmark All right, Mr. O'Malley. All right. And the chair votes I mentioned passed. Thanks.
Thank you. Item number 15 request authorization to adopt a minor modification to the Charlestown Urban Renewal Plan Project Number Mass hour dash 55 Regarding parcel hour dash 50 9B2 located at 24 Washington Street and Charlestown. And to enter into a new land
disposition agreement with the developer. >> Yes, thank you. My name is Max Houghton. I'm a policy specialist here. Fellow members of the board Cheryl Hoss Secretary Paulette Ms.. Director Shun, before you as a resolution asking you to authorize a minor modification to the Charlestown Urban Renewal Plan for Parcel R 50
9B2 also known as 24 Washington Street in the Charlestown neighborhood of Boston. The purpose of this minor modification is to authorize residential uses on the parcel enabling the redevelopment of the site into a single family home. Accordingly, the resolution also asks for authorization for the Bureau to enter into an
amended and restated land disposition agreement or LDA with the current owner of the parcel. The parcel is currently in use as landscaped space and off street parking as part of the PDA is consent to this regulatory relief changing the parcel from restricted open space to residential uses An incremental value payment has
been agreed to by the proponent team and documented in the memorandum. The deal structure described in this memorandum was reviewed and vetted by the policy and real estate teams and was determined to be appropriate for the circumstances of this particular transaction. The proponent team has worked with the PPD policy design and
planning staff to discuss their plans and it is the opinion of our team that the proposed land use of the project is aligned with the appropriate planning goals of the neighborhood. Thank you for your consideration. >> I'm here to answer any questions. Thank you. Questions or comments from the board Hearing and seeing none A motion is in order so moved.
Second roll call for a vote Ms.. Bennett Mr. Sheppard. Dr. Landmark All right. Mr. O'Malley Right. And the chair votes I motion passes. >> Those may do it after There I don't know. 16. Request authorization to adopt a minor modification to the
Charlestown Urban Renewal Plan Project Number Mass R Dash 55 regarding parcels P dash 15 B-1A and P dash 15 B-1 be located at 103 168 New Rutherford Avenue and Charlestown. Max thank you.
Before you is a resolution asking you to authorize a minor modification to the site or renewal plan for parcel P 15 B one located along 102 168 New Rutherford Avenue and also known as the Austin Street Lots in the Charlestown neighborhood of Boston. The purpose of this minor modification is to authorize
the intended uses of the proposed project on these lots which are described in the resolution as well as clarifying the boundaries and names of these parcels. Specifically the North lot will be named as P 15 B1A and the south lot will be named as P 15 B1B These parcels are currently in use as parking lots and
primarily used by the Bunker Hill Community College. Thank you for your consideration and I'm here to answer any questions, questions or comments from the board. >> Hearing and seeing that a motion is in order So second roll call for a vote Ms. Bennett Mr. Sheppard Dr. Lance Mark All right. Mr. O'Malley And the Chair I
motion passes Item number 17. Thanks so much, Max. Request authorization to petition the Boston Zoning Commission to adopt text amendments for Article 32, Article two and Article three and the zoning code to make ground water conservation overlay district regulations
more legible and remove the conditional use permit requirement for substantial rehabilitation projects subject to the regulation. Kathleen Good. Good evening Tara House Secretary Bohemians Dr. Shen and members of the board I'm Kathleen on offer. I'm the deputy director
of zoning. I'm here in presenting on behalf of Jack Helgerson who led this effort on the zoning reform team. He's on his honeymoon. Congratulations, Jack. I'm also joined by Christian Simonelli who is the director of the Groundwater Trust and was an important partner in us
developing these amendments And I'm going to turn it over him to introduce the reason for these changes. Next slide please. >> Thank you, Kathleen. Good afternoon, Madam Chair. Members of the board Director Cristian Simonelli, Executive Director of I Want to Trust I know you have a lot before you
so I'll be pithy. The whole purpose of the groundwater conservation overlay district is to prevent interior deterioration and promoting infiltration or restoration of groundwater levels in the Phil Land areas of the city. So in short we've mapped areas of the city that are on filled land that have wood paneling, support structures.
The purpose of the G Code one is to ensure no negative impact and to install groundwater recharge systems which in turn reduces surface water runoff and water pollution. What this does is it protects the value and structural integrity of the land and the buildings and the recharge systems that are approved are
designed and installed to efficiently facilitate the water and infiltrate the water into the ground to keep the groundwater table above the tops of the pilings, keep the pilings wet. Next slide please. >> So the Article 32 zoning boundary is defined on this map
and is in yellow. I was actually last before you in 2021 where at that time we expanded those boundaries to include four areas of the city that we hadn't previously captured. This iteration really is to clean up some of the language and remove an unnecessary burden in regard to substantial
renovation. So when you look at the G code there are applicable projects that need to one incorporate the groundwater recharge system . In other words, just capture an inch of surface water, an inch of water over the area of the building, put it back into the into the ground year and again an entry and recharge system which is approved by the boss
of Water Sewer Commission and two that the project engineer certify no negative impact on groundwater levels. What does that mean? Somebody comes in and wants to install underground parking put in below grade space. Everything needs to be waterproofed watertight elevators to have no some pumps, nothing to take away the
groundwater and that's certified in that letter. The applicable projects again require approvals from the bus water and sewer commission US and ultimately the zoning board of Appeals. Next slide please. So the four triggers when an applicant goes for a building
permit one is dig down which was really the original genesis of the G Code The whole purpose of the G code when it was first draft and then 2005 and adopted in 2006 was to notify Abutters and make sure that anybody digging down anybody doing any below grade work have no negative impact on the
groundwater table. >> Groundwater recharge was added right at the tail end before it was approved and that was to capture the water to put it back in the ground. So a lot of people just think it's just capturing the rainwater and it's not it's twofold. It's capturing the rainwater one and then two certifying no
negative impact. So when an applicant is triggered for g cod they can get hit either with want to dig down which is below a certain depth to light coverage building out anything greater than 50ft2 paving which is defined as anything resurfacing existing or or repaving of a
new paving of a lot And then four is the substantial renovation and that's really the biggest trigger And the most common trigger And that's really what these changes that we propose here today is really going to streamline the rehabilitation That again is defined by the 50% of the assessed value of the physical structure which is again cited
by Estie. I want to thank you for your time and I'm going to turn it back over to Kathleen to finish this up. Thanks. Thank you. So we're coming together with these amendments with the groundwater trusts basin Water and Sewer Commission and Estie working together under the
mayor's charge to think about what our opportunities for permitting reform that can help speed up good projects and remove red tape from processes While we're keeping the strong rigor and policy needs we have in place. I immediately identified the
EPA review of G Cod as one of those items because the technical compliance of G cod is conducted by the Boston Water and Sewer Commission the groundwater trusts and I asked plans examiners not the Board of Appeal. So the Planning department then looked at our database of all the variance requests that have
happened since 2022 as we report to you on a twice a year . We found that there are 119 ZBA cases that had a G Court applicability since then. And of those cases 72 of those cases had some other zoning violation or need for zoning
relief and so would need to go to the Board of Appeal for those items. But 47 cases had only the g cod citation that was sending them to the Board of Appeal. The Board of Appeal process takes about 6 to 9 months just to get on to the agenda. So that represented a pretty
significant possible set of changes. Of those 47 cases that had only a G cod citation, 36 of them were substantial rehabilitation really pointing out that this was the most important area of focus. Next slide please. >> So currently the existing
process for all four of those projects that you've got applicability that Christian walked through the dig down lock coverage paving and substantial rehabilitation is that they file a building permit application at ESD but the escape Plans examiner reviews that application for all components of compliant
with the zoning code and the building code including God. A refusal letter is issued based on any zoning violation that's found or particularly their particular debility for G Code review And then the proponent needs to file for a conditional use in order to
begin the process to get on the Board of Appeal agenda. They go through a notification process including mailed legal notice newspaper ad notice run for the board of Appeal agenda and sometimes a button meetings I'm and at that same time the Boston Water and Sewer
Commission and the Groundwater Trust do extensive technical review for compliance with the provisions of the G card. Then comes the Zba hearing as e-Bay tends to operate as a rubber stamp on these cases on issues of just the g cod
because of the rigor of the water and Sewer Commission and the groundwater trust review and then the building permit is issued. So that's the processes that exist currently. >> Next slide please. Well and so I don't think I
want to try to connect Well, we'll speak extemporaneously. >> Yes. For those first three types of projects. So the dig down the lot coverage and the paving we're proposing to keep that same process So they would still refuted a C refusal letter
still need to go through the Board of Appeal process and then move forward to a building permit. And we came to that decision and looking at both that those can be cases that have some other aspect of zoning relief that are going through the Board of Appeal process and where write changes that are
made with that other element may impact the decisions they make. We also heard very clearly from members of the groundwater trusts representing civic associations in the area that the a butter notification and mailing of the Zba hearing is very valuable to them for those
larger projects. So we did identify this as a key thing to think about with permitting reform is how to think about how we continue to improve notification for a project so that we potentially in the future don't have to rely on the Board of Appeal process to provide the notice
that neighbors want and need. >> So for those three projects this process will continue to be the same when someone files it will continue to undergo technical review by the groundwater trust and Water and Sewer Commission and follow the standard process for moving through the ZB. >> Next slide please.
For substantial rehabilitation projects we're proposing a new process where it would not be need to go to the Board of Appeal for conditional use. So when they file their building permit application they would include technical material that are forwarded to the Boston Water and Sewer Commission and Water Trust to
do the exact same review that they do today as part of the appeals process. So Estie as well as the Boston Water and Sewer Commission and Groundwater Trust will do the exact same review as they do now. >> If a project that falls into substantial rehabilitation has
another zoning violation or need for zoning relief it will of course still go to the Zba. And once those technical reviews are complete and compliance is assured it will go forward to getting its building permit issued. Next slide please. >> So besides this procedural change for a substantial
rehabilitation projects which will greatly help many of the building re-use and office residential conversion projects that we see in the groundwater conservation overlay district area. We've also proposed a series of other small administrative changes that help make this
section of the code easier to read. That includes making sure the map is directly accessible within the article so it's easy to see making sure that definitions are clear and overall shortening the text about 33% to make it a little easier to read. Next slide please.
So throughout this process we worked very closely with the you know, all of the reviewers ISG, the groundwater trust and Bus Water and Sewer Commission. They were in valuable in terms of thinking through both the policy issues as well as the permitting workflows that this
represents. I particularly want to thank one of the co-chairs of the groundwater trusts Rob Whitney who is the Beacon Health Civic Association's representative on this process as well as Elliott Laufer who represents neighborhood Association of the Back Bay on the Ground Water Trust and is a former director
of the Groundwater Trust. For their sustained participation and really digging into the technical details as well as the drafting of these changes. In addition to hosting a public meeting on these items we also offered to every neighborhood association and the groundwater conservation Overlay district
to attend one of their meetings. I went and did that for both Jeffrey's Point and the Neighborhood Association of the Back Bay and are excited to bring these forward for what they would mean in terms of advancing permitting reform across the city. >> Thank you. Thank you. Do we have questions or
comments from the board? >> I have a brief comment. I just wanted to take this opportunity to acknowledge and thank Kristian Simonelli for his incredible leadership as well as Elliott Laffer. I know founded the Groundwater Trust many, many years ago. I've had a number of jobs through the years. Christians had one. And I've gotten to work with
him in this capacity. And between he and Elliott, just the decades of service and one of the most important boards in our city that very few people actually know about I mean the work you do is yeoman's work. So Kathleen, as persuasive as you are and you are I'm voting for this because if the groundwater trust is for it, so
am I. This seems like it's a no brainer. So thank you. Thank you, gentlemen and to your teams as well for such great work. >> Great question. I would just add that I'm appreciative of this and all of the efforts that the department and the city are making to try to streamline the
permitting process. I think it's critical and there's been a lot happening on that front. So just appreciate it. Thank you. Questions or comments? I want to echo my board members. This is one that I always go through with a fine tooth comb.
You know, when I became aware of this and I want to thank you as well for your you know, the clarity of your communications and your education, the videos of really helping me, you know, for 10:01 years like really understand this very
complicated technical matter that is crucial. And again, just really appreciative of your work and the thought around this as well as all of the challenging questions and things that come before this and the care that's
taken with what are all the things that could go wrong and you know all us by taking this end and you know, identifying that in this particular area this is something that we can do and it will be helpful. So with that emotion is in order. So moved.
Second roll call for a vote. Ms.. Bennett. Mr. Shepherd Dr. Lance Mark. All right. Mr. O'Malley. All right. And the chair with I motion passes. >> Thank you very much. Okay. >> All right. So these next two items we are in this is a plan downtown zoning items.
So I'm going to read them and they're going to be presented jointly. We're going to vote on them separately. So I'll read them first. We'll have a presentation, do some question and answer between the board and and the agency. And yeah, so that's just a
little bit of the order of operations next So first item number 18 request authorization to adopt an amendment to plan downtown that includes downtown historic context design guidelines to guide the design development and review of projects that
enhance downtown's unique and historic fabric. That's item number 18. Item number 19. Request Authorization to petition the Zoning Commission to adopt text amendments for Article eight and a new Article 31 to establish Skyline Districts and to adopt text
changes throughout the zoning code to ensure Article 31 and Article eight are reflected consistently and adopt MAP amendments to zoning maps 1A1C1G1N. And one H to implement zoning
recommendations from plan downtown Andrew Good evening Chair Ross Members of the board Director Shane and Secretary Paul Humus My name is Andrew Nahmias from the Planning Department and I serve as project manager for Plan
Downtown Tonight I am seeking authorization to adopt amendments to plan downtown along with text and map amendments to update downtown zoning. Next slide under consideration this evening our three planning and regulatory pieces to help
grow and revitalize downtown. An amendment to plan downtown originally adopted by this board in December 2023 which includes new historic context design guidelines and new strategies to prioritize housing growth. This also includes a zoning
text amendment introducing new Skyline zoning districts based on the goals of plan downtown and a zoning map amendment that applies these new districts to the downtown area. Next slide. This effort is part of a six
year planning and zoning process that began in 2017 with a state bill that mandated a comprehensive downtown planning process to address development pressure downtown and guide growth. As part of revisions to the state charter regulations, the result was the Plan Downtown
initiative that included zoning recommendations, open space and ability and policy recommendations and design guidelines to enable the growth and preservation of the area. The zoning process builds on that effort and over the past year and a half the Planning
Department met with hundreds of stakeholders through public meetings office hours and responded to over 900 comments to draft zoning. That strikes a balance between protecting downtown's historic identity while enabling it to
grow and meet the critical housing needs downtown and the neighborhood needs to grow. Next slide. These amendments capture key themes heard throughout this multiyear process. The amendments strengthen
historic preservation and opportunities for adaptive reuse. Reduce hurdles for barriers facing new and existing businesses and prioritize critical housing growth in our city center. The zoning also reinforces the city's commitment to the
state's shadow regulations. Next slide. >> The changes presented tonight apply to the downtown areas between Boston Common and Public Garden and the Greenway including lower historic areas like the ladder blocks between
Tremont Street and Washington Street. The historic areas of the Worth District and the taller more commercial areas of the financial district. Next slide. >> Plan Downtown proposed two types of framework areas within these boundaries enhance areas
to affirm existing historic fabric and growth areas to encourage large scale mixed use development. It became clear through the zoning process that additional emphasis is needed on housing growth across both zones.
The amendments to plan downtown introduces additional language outlining the strategies needed at every scale to prioritize housing. Next slide The zoning builds directly off of the areas defined in plan downtown.
It introduces two new zoning districts called Skyline Districts That includes Sky low and and Sky sky. Although districts are distinguished by areas of cohesive historic buildings ,the district includes a historic overlay denoted at
Skyline ADT that tailors the specifics scale of building height and dimension overlay regulations to the small historic scale of the downtown area. Sky districts are characterized by the city's most significant
job housing and entertainment density. These districts are regulated, regulated, regulated to maximize opportunities for future housing and mixed use growth and ensure that new development enhances the vitality of the city as well as the public realm.
Next slide. >> These two districts are mapped downtown to align with planned downtown framework and were refined and adjusted based on the feedback we've heard throughout the zoning process since the plan was adopted.
Next slide. >> The Schuyler ADT District covers some of downtown's most significant historic areas including areas along Washington Street the ladder blocks around the Old South Meetinghouse Landmark and Park Plaza.
Next slide. These boundaries were updated and expanded through several drafts over the past year working with stakeholders and the Office of Historic Preservation to address concerns and include additional lower height areas and historic
sites. Next slide. >> While the dimensional controls of the skyline ADT District help maintain the smaller historic scale scale of these areas, the zoning adds
additional tools to incentivize investment in historic buildings. One of these is a carefully limited option for planned development areas to link new housing with the preservation of landmarks and other historic sites. As part of this limited eligibility for planned
development areas or PDS, CDA is must be at least one acre in size include a designated landmark devote at least 60% of the project to housing and commit to preserving both the landmark and others historic buildings in the area.
Development Controls Building preservation Site Specific dimensional regulations such as maximum allowed building height will be set through the PDA process that includes planning review and community input. Very few sites in Schuyler DC
can meet the one acre and landmark requirement but this limited tool creates an incentive to provide much needed investment in landmarks and historic buildings that often require larger scale resources for preservation.
Next slide. >> Expanding beyond just the skyline ADT District Zoning introduces additional measures for both Sky low ADT and sky districts to prioritize adaptive reuse.
These measures support the continued success of the city's ongoing office to residential conversion program. To date the program has successfully created 824 units of new housing across 22 buildings.
>> Several of these projects, however, have faced outdated zoning barriers that have required variances to precede the new zoning eliminates these hurdles, creates incentives for adaptive reuse over new ground up construction while also allowing enough flexibility for
additions and electrification upgrades needed to bring existing buildings up to new energy code. Next slide. >> To complement these changes the amendment to plan downtown adds an additional chapter to the plan's existing design
guidelines. This new section provides site specific context on the history of different sites and areas downtown. It sets expectations for how buildings especially tall structures should be shaped based on their contexts and to
mitigate impacts such as wind. Next slide. >> Hand in hand with safeguarding the unique character of some of Boston's most historic areas, the zoning also makes room for new development to meet the urgency
of our housing crisis. As the most transit accessible part of our city downtown is a critical location for focusing new mixed use and residential density. The Sky District helps unlock underutilized sites like parking garages and parcels
above or adjacent to T stations to enable much needed housing and street level activity especially along the Washington Street corridor. The review of large projects through Article 80 will continue to assess and mitigate
project impacts including wind and shadow and as part of that review. These additional design guidelines will help enforce context sensitive building design and enhancements to the public realm. Next slide.
>> For the first time downtowns zoning will also prioritize residential development and residential units are allowed in all districts. Large research labs and hotel uses are subject to an additional approvals and
process of review as conditional uses in the Washington Street corridor where we've heard concerns about development. We further limited heights to 200ft except that if the how the site delivers housing and
throughout downtown office uses over 250,000ft2 will be conditional subject to additional review and approvals to ensure every opportunity to include housing as part of any new large scale office and mixed use development.
Recognizing downtown dual role as Housing and Job Center This additional review will sunset and on January 1st 2030 unless the zoning commission after evaluating its continued impacts on downtown decides to
renew Next slide. As part of this housing growth all residential residential projects must deliver affordable affordable units in downtown in compliance with inclusionary zoning.
Producing affordable housing at a scale not feasible in other parts of the city. >> Inclusionary zoning requires projects to be 17% income restricted and an average of 60% Am I When an additional 3% of units reserved for people with housing vouchers?
Affordable units are required to be on site and any offsite units must still be a half a mile of the project ensuring that affordable units stay downtown. Offsite units require special approval from the Mayor's Office of Housing and a greater
percentage of affordable units. >> The zoning also allows and affirms needed and prese types of affordable housing and services including shelter facilities, supportive housing and lodging housing that are valued and essential parts of downtown Today.
Next slide While creating more opportunities for people to live downtown, the zoning also takes critical steps to support new and existing businesses by eliminating outdated land restrictions to help fill vacant storefronts and make a
more vibrant city streetscape. These restrictions allowed uses like millinery shops and lamp stores but not businesses like fitness uses and escape rooms and also created extra hurdles for coffee shops and any other
small retail with takeout. I learned through this process that millionaire shops are shops very specific in the current code but we will now make that more flexible to include new and exciting businesses that we want to see.
Next slide The zoning takes additional steps to also support a more lively and active public realm by introducing new dimensional and change of use restrictions. These include measures to reduce the size of large blocks
a requirement for ground floor outdoor and many space for large lots to expand the public realm and the limit on the amount of ground floor plank While a building can have the zoning also mandates that upper storey setbacks must be at the
height of adjacent historic buildings so that they both reduce impact on adjacent sites as well as wind impacts on the public realm. Projects downtown will also be subject to a lower design review threshold starting at
20,000ft2 to ensure that projects continue to comply with the new downtown design guidelines. Next slide. Finally the zoning is designed to protect downtown's treasured green and open spaces
particularly the Boston Common and Public Garden. >> The zoning further reinforces state shatter regulations directly including reference references to state law as well as critical airspace limits in the code. Again state shadow regulations
supersede and are stronger than zoning as they can only be changed through the action at the state level. It is important to note that these zoning changes changes do not allow heights up to 700ft outside of where they were already allowed or the area
outlined in yellow on the map which is hard to see but it's the area around Washington and State Street where buildings are heights over 500ft representing the scale of the
financial district today. Next slide. >> In addition to introducing the new Sky and sky loaded districts, the amendment makes smaller map updates to ensure consistency with these new zoning changes.
These include removing the green light overlay district moving portions of the existing Midtown Cultural District, a village protection district that closely resembles the Bay Village neighborhood structure structurally into the Bay
Village neighborhood shopping subdistrict and adjusting the boundary of the adult entertainment district to align with the parcel boundaries and remove it from the Chinatown Neighborhood District Because there are no adult entertainment established establishments there today.
Next slide. >> Together these amendments support new opportunities for new growth, investment and housing downtown at every scale by reducing outdated barriers to businesses small and large. Strengthening preservation
of our most historic streets and structures and enabling new housing both in new development and office to residential conversions. We are building a downtown that is more vibrant, livable and inclusive for generations to come.
So concludes my present, my presentation and happy to answer any questions. Okay. Thank you very much for your presentation. Questions or comments from the board. I'll start Madam Chair. Thank you Andrew And to your team. I know this has been a long time coming and I wanted to
thank the residents who are in this room and those who aren't on this forum who've been deeply involved in this process. I respect the work and the passion that's gone into this conversation. I am I've been around a while. I was around in 2017 as a
member of the Boston City Council when it came before us the vote to dispossess the old Wrentham Square garage. I support it. I support it proudly then as I do now because I knew the trade off would mean tens of millions of dollars for parks, for affordable housing etc. And that's largely what spurred the
conversation that we're in right now with the downtown plan. >> I will be supporting this amendment and this zoning petition for very similar reasons. I believe that this is the
right thing for the city. I believe that in the time that this process began eight years ago we have seen a pandemic that no one saw coming And that's really had such a profound impact on the downtown neighborhoods. And we need to tell the folks in this room you live in see it
every day but using new tools to help spur development helps spur more housing to help spur more activity with protections in place that will allow for historic preservation. I think it's a well-balanced and thoughtful plan and that's why I will be supporting this.
So thank you, Andrew and thank you to the folks who have come out tonight. Madam Chair, thank you. Yes, through the chair And thank you, Andrew. Thank you to you for all the work you've done. Probably 6 to 7 years of going through this process. Just a lot of work And I
commend you and I commend the mayor for everything they've done for this for myself being with labor on the creation of jobs for young men and women that are coming out of the trade schools such as Madison Park or the pre apprenticeship programs like YouthBuild.
This is an opportunity for them to be able to live in afford to stay in the city of Boston and also just the men and women that are part of the construction move as well post-pandemic. You know we've seen the foot traffic in the downtown Boston area, you know, dwindle and
like you said with new tools such as office conversions and then even the office to dorms conversion with Suffolk law going on right now, this is something that can revitalize the downtown area which is, you know, the engine for the city
of Boston. And I definitely think I will be approving this project as well. QUESTION Comments? Yeah. I think clearly they're strong feelings on a lot on all sides of this particular proposal.
We see them all. We've seen the hundreds of comments. We see the electeds letters. We've seen the letter this morning from Mayor Wu and Director Shen.
For me this you know, it's it's not perfect but it does thread through an incredibly complex array of variables and factors And I think it's a good
approach and so I, I thank the the staff for all of the work that you've done. I think it's been an amazing effort on the part of the staff. I thank all of you that are
participating even if tonight's result is not the result that you want, I hope you will keep participating and I hope that the city will continue engage in a really productive way even as this framework goes forward
. You know, it's critical that we continue to test to test it as we go with the community And I think that, you know, the department is is prepared to do that And I and I hope your your really will follow through on
that. Thank you. I also commend the staff for the work that you've done on this. I think it's been extraordinary really and very complex.
I do wonder what the implications would be for tables in this for 1 or 2 meetings in order to address the range of issues that have
been brought before this board which apparently still remains somewhat unresolved And I know we're working in a difficult and complex time for development financially and
otherwise And yet I'm taken by some of the responses that we've heard that suggest that there may still be areas of refinement that could be
addressed in a short time period and to make the overall plan more acceptable to the communities that are going to be impacted.
So I'm curious as to what the implications might be if this were to be deferred for a short period. I think as many have noted, this has been a very long and
extensive process in which we put in a lot of time especially this year on the release of three different drafts of the zoning to work with different stakeholders to find a balanced approach Listening
to both small business owners, property owners, preservation stakeholders and residents And we really feel this strikes the strongest balance between what we've heard and also the critical needs that we see as
being in many ways time sensitive for downtown as we continue to see the barriers for projects like Office to conversion projects as well as small business zoning hurdles
each year And how is that impacted by the timing of the vote now in terms of and so I'm you know I think that's the
first draft of this zoning is is released over a year and a half ago and during the time that we have been considering refining working with stakeholders to improve the zoning, we've had eight small businesses spend time at the
Board of Appeal That's about 6 to 9 months for each one. So at least four years of permitting delay time to get people into needed vacant retail spaces downtown there is a 70 unit office residential conversion project going to the Board of Appeals next month
that where this zoning to pass would have avoided that 6 to 9 month process. And you know everyone in this building is working hard each day to work expeditiously to get more projects in the office residential pipeline which as you all know has an expiration
date because of the need to really get those projects going and because of the tax incentive. So we do feel a lot of urgency around particularly early what this means for small businesses for those office residential conversions that we see are
really timely and overdue while simultaneously knowing that any large scale development that happens as a result of this zoning over the long term is going to go through extensive community vetting and processes through Article 80 including
coming before you as a board. So you know, I think for me the urgency is really in those small businesses and those office residential conversions. That's where we see that. >> Could you elaborate on what those Article 80 provisions might be?
I mean if this board were to approve this proposal in its current form, what is the next layer of community input that would be possible So
immediately they would have the opportunity for direct input at the zoning commission next month where there would be a full public hearing held on the item And I think that's very important to highlight. Any time we bring an item that we know there are significant
interest before the zoning commission we plan to hold a very long meeting to ensure that everyone can directly participate in that item through their Article 80 process. Right. So I'll start with the large project Article 80 be they would go through the full
impact and community impact analysis as well as the community process So our project managers would post all of that information publicly, hold all of the public meetings that they hold for any ITB project, hold multiple public
comment periods and do the incredibly detailed analysis of impacts that happen on any project. >> So every portion of building design in downtown that is particularly relevant to the issues of shadow and wind and the way that those impact
adjacent buildings and the public realm. So much of that analysis is so site specific to what a building is designed to be and what it's next to that that Article 80 process through having it's I think at this
point 22 different components of analysis. Well at a really rigorous and technical way look at each component of that And the second one and the areas that have PDR eligibility would it be if a project came before you
for an AC review or a PDA it would need to go through the full process including public comment period all of the impact analysis that happens in the ADC process A public hearing before you here at the
board when you adopt a PDA as well as at the zoning commission to carry that forward. So that is a very a even more measured process to lay that out. And then finally, you know one of the things we're excited about in a zoning is we think
it probably creates more pathways for is the small projects to happen which generally haven't happened in downtown because they had caught up at the Board of Appeal. It's felt too convoluted. So those will go through the same process of site plan
review design review impact analysis They're come before you as the board for a vote including the public meeting and public comment period there. >> So part of what we've done in this zoning is try and really carefully identify elements that because they represent a performance
standard, because they represent something that is incredibly site specific and about evaluating impacts on neighbors where we are really confident in the rigor of the Article 80 process as a key part of being able to continue
to bring this forward. And finally I'm curious as to what kind of feedback you've received on the proposal from the development community. Well, I think like like all
zoning proposals we bring forward I think sometimes everyone's like no one's happy Then maybe the staff is happy. Someday I'm going to have a proposal that makes everyone happy. You know, I think the business
community does see what this means in terms of streamlining small projects. It does provide really clear expectations for what we want downtown. Right. It sends a very clear message that we want you to come to us with residential proposals. Some of them are concerned
about that, Right. Just either because they currently own a large commercial building or dream of in the future being able to develop, you know, a commercial project downtown in the future. >> But we have received positive comment that while I
may disagree with that policy intent, it's very clear and laid out in the zoning that it's there. So I think that's that's you know of the mixed you know, feedback we receive from the development community that's probably the most prevalent strain of it.
People make sure the yeah and I, I also think it's really important to that point of small projects the right one of the things we're most excited about in this morning and you know you asked about
future projects the one I feel the most urgency on is that there is a currently a teenage social service provider in downtown who is looking to build supportive housing units that would have to go to the Board of Appeal where this
zoning not to pass who feels a lot of anxiety around what that means in terms of potential a button challenge or legal process who if the zoning moves forward will be able to immediately move forward with zoning approvals in the next funding round and get one
of the most essential uses we need in downtown and place. So when I think about the types of projects that are going immediately to show up in the next couple of years, it's things like that. It's those types of needed projects and it's the small businesses. Thank you.
I do want to recognize that we have councilor here who is on and as as a courtesy as I did to the other elected representatives I offer you councilor me here the floor to give your your testimony.
Good evening members of the board. You know that when I show up here it's something that I deeply care about because I make it a practice to not participate in development projects because I believe deferring to the district counselor is always the best practice as an at large city
councilor. But this particular project that I'm here to speak on behalf of I know that councilor but being is also in opposition of it. We know that 990 is this for 990 or is this for downtown zoning? Well I also I'm going to do
both. Okay. Yeah. Okay cool. That's okay. Yes, totally cool. I'm I'm going to get so I think that the downtown project while I have not been in the weeds, I have heard from a lot of constituents that they're not happy with the process. They don't want to turn Boston
into New York. And having lived in New York I know what they mean by that. So I think that there's an opportunity for us to pause and reconsider And I do I would like to speak on line 90 if that's possible as well. Yeah. Okay. So we've heard from thousands of residents across the city
and they have sent comments they have called they've come to meetings over the last five years who have been in deep opposition of this project. You know, I know that I know that we have a lot of work to
do when it comes to community engagement And you know, we're here talking about the issues of climate. There's some concerns around utilizing green ledge as as housing and all of that And I understand the both the need
for housing and the need for development but I also want to be super mindful that folks are concerned about the massive heat island after you know, 14 acres of land will be cleared out and blasted to make way for a suburban style gated community that does not belong From what I understand in High
Park this land should be purchased by the city of Boston to remain It's in conservation and then there are financing options that we can buy it and we can monetize the CPA and the flow green bond partner with the legislature and and in the
city of Boston We must save this land in the time of climate crisis And I'm just really encouraging the board to not vote to build this project, to pause and to let us to put our heads together so that we can come up with a funding
strategy to make Jubilee and the developers whole while we're also saving Green Ledge woods And you know I'm really hopeful that we can get to a place where we need to be And I also understand the competing interests. But at the end of the day, you know we really need to stand
firm and what this moment is calling for and that is for us to really think outside the box to really engage community in ways that make sense. It is not lost upon me that it's been five years and we're still having the same conversation and I'm really hoping that the BPA will pause
and reconsider. Thank you for allowing me to speak. Thank you Councilor Here process okay so I think in an fairness and recognition right of all electeds who came to speak here today and the
concerns and the and everything I do want to I do want to have a response right from the agency of these of these concerns around around the risk to to Boston Common to the
public garden to historic preservation affordable housing You know there's obviously we're weighing lots of different you know comments here Right And I just want to
have I want to have a response to those oppositions and in what you know, again, I'm trying to understand what the presentation is and then what the what the concerns are coming Right.
Because I do see some some some great things in there that I think address some of these issues. But I want clarification, right? So so please somebody whatever that should be just to address those those that very real opposition and understanding
of why we think that, you know, this does more good than harm. Right. Specifically to Boston Common Public garden the shadows affordable housing and then the building height turning into New York like situation in
right because again I'm seeing heights in various areas on the map so just clarification on those points please. Great And I forget I'm going to request if you don't mind going back like 2 or 3 slides to that
map that shows the gray and the blue So keep going back. So I think one of the first questions you asked was about shadow on the common and I think one of Right the critical things that we have done in this zoning is make sure that
we are directly referencing And anytime we're talking about building height in the zoning code, the state charter regulations that set very clear performance criteria for what type of shadowing is allowed in this area.
And so we've really right as we were tasked with by the state legislature in 2017 we have really endeavored to directly empower those regulations and directly clarify how important they are to the process.
And the second piece of shadow right is not it's about the common and the public garden. It's also about our other public spaces like post office Square right Other areas of the city And that is where we find that the Article 80 process is really crucial because that
lets us look at specific aspects of building design and orientation to measure any impact of shade or shadow or conversely on the other side priorities for sunlight where we can really identify on a site plan why that's important
And we're very confident as a department that we have full sort of power to analyze those impacts through Article 80 and achieve the outcomes that are needed in downtown for this to protect our public realm not just in the public comment and public garden but on all of our
downtown public spaces and streets. The second piece you asked about was affordable housing so inclusionary zoning Article 79 everyone's new favorite article in the zoning code set a really clear requirement that
inclusionary zoning needs to be provided on site. So the expectation and the idea there's not a guarantee it's provided on site. It has to be provided on site. >> You're only allowed to go through an exception process. It's very sort of carefully a special exception to not
provided on site and it has to be located within a half mile of the supposed project. So unlike some of the projects recently in downtown where affordable housing and IDP contributions went to other neighborhoods, it would need to be directly invested in projects in downtown the types
of limited opportunities where that might be desirable include ones where include some mix of offsite inclusionary zoning might be able to fund lower affordability levels than is required There Inclusionary zoning such as leveraging that
funding into an all affordable project that's an office residential conversion to reach those lower aims than the 60% that's required in inclusionary zoning as a city. You know when we look at downtown, when we looked at the economic analysis that helped
inform the office the residential conversion incentives, we saw really clearly that downtown is one of the places where we think our inclusionary zoning in Article 79 can really deliver those units at scale And that is a really a central part
of what we need for a vibrant and thriving downtown. The second piece is that affordable housing downtown takes a lot of different forms. It's not just inclusionary zoning, it's the shelters. It's trying to expand the amount of supportive housing
and other models downtown and its lodging houses and the ways that that help might meet need this zoning in addition to sort of legalizing the physical form those buildings will have. So they don't need variances They are directly says those uses are desired as part of our
downtown and allowed so we think that's a really important part of what this zoning plan is advancing for affordable housing I think your next piece was about historic preservation and we're really grateful to our colleagues at the Office of Historic Preservation
including the director Kathy Cotter us who worked very directly with us on refinements to this zoning map. They also worked very directly with us on their approach to the limited enabling of PDAs to make sure we were thinking of that tool as a way to directly invest in historic
preservation downtown. >> They share our sort of vision that as you see in the design guidelines that Andrew brought forward that thinking about preservation alongside development is top priority for downtown and something important to every
possible project downtown. >> They also really helped us think through and ways that we strategically sat the dimensional regulations of these zoning districts So they're aligned with existing buildings and because of ways that we have created provisions
that allow extending nonconformity, they create incentives to retain smaller historic structures as part of larger development that may occur So we're really trying to make sure we're tackling this on kind of all fronts that we
have possible in zoning. I'm the Office of Historic Preservation and their team has also been working on what are the non zoning tools to make sure we're continuing to advance historic preservation downtown. And one of those was the recent Landmarking of the Corner bookstore within their study area. So it's always important that
we're pairing the policy options and tools we have that are not zoning along with zoning changes and have been coordinating to do that. >> And it was your last was that we're turning into New York building heights everywhere. >> Yes talk about it. So I think one of the most key
things I would highlight is and then the vast majority of the area where rezoning these heights are not changing. They are the same maximum height that they are currently and that's because of the FAA Height limits from Logan really have been a hard cap on the possible heights downtown and
that's true. They will continue to be so in that core of the financial district, the area where you would see the potential for tallest towers of New York, these are the exact same height limits that are in place today currently.
I also think right along side all of the regulations that we put in you know, New York's approach to downtown development is very sort of form neutral. They have a phased cap. They trade on it. They also just passed some
changes in midtown focused on encouraging residential development. We've taken a very intentional strategy with some of these form requirements to make sure that we're building in space at the ground level to get that finer grain and the preservation of existing buildings as we see is incredibly Boston specific and
part of what it means to be Boston's downtown. Okay. Thank you. And then the last one that I did not throw in there is is the concern around a community process. Right.
And having opportunities for input throughout you know, throughout this however many years but also you know, specifically more recently and these like amendments and series of amendments And it's a
lot to be reading all of this stuff but we've been keeping up with all of it the various drafts that have happened, the iterations and what compromises or what how has input that you've taken resulted in any
change in in in those drafts? >> Just tell me more about that Right Yeah. >> So I think one of the most important ones is by we made significant over the course of these drafts refinements to the zoning proposed zoning map
that significantly expanded the mapping of the silo districts across all of sort of the area bordering Boston Common and Boston Public Garden. That also meant meeting and talking to stakeholders about
specific properties like the Boston Park Plaza and moving that into the Schuyler district. >> So I very like that map evolved really directly in response to comment received from residents some of the changes that Andrew identified
in the other map changes like moving property into the Bay Ville neighborhood district or into the Chinatown neighborhood districts Those were directly in response to requests and comments that we received from those neighborhoods and those stakeholders.
The really big changes are the way that the incentives are now very starkly targeted at residential development on the Washington street corridor and again very much focused on the east side of that corridor as you face in the financial district.
So we went from a use neutral proposal that would have allowed height where whether that project was a residential project, a mixed use project, a hotel, an office to a project where height you know that's similar to the other some
of the other buildings in that corridor is achievable only for predominantly residential project An office proposal in that corridor would now be limited to 200ft. So that was a very big change and a very clear policy direction and the sort
of statement of in areas where we're adding height what we think is important to achieve. >> Okay. Thank you. I do want to thank our elected officials for being here to be the voice for your constituents and and grateful for the feedback that you shared as
well as the presence of constituents here today. I also want to acknowledge for the public watching who may have only heard comments from their elected officials today, you know the board received hundreds of comments attend these meetings and hears them
and and including comments and of of support right that were not reflected today in the comments and that's okay or no there were some there were there were definitely some with councilor a few a few councilors And so we are
balancing that and taking all of those into into consideration of all of this holistically. So that's just for what it's worth. But but I do want to let you know that we take the feedback seriously. I'm grateful and have observed
observe the process a process over over all of these years and and observe the process and engage with the community and the expectation of the type of like dialog and back and forth and compromise that that
I think really does exemplify what the best the best of the city even if we don't agree on absolutely everything because we're going to see some other projects today that don't exemplify that and that's
that's for the later agenda item and that's that's for that But but I just want to just acknowledge and thank everyone for their participation And I'm so sorry sir, there is no public comment on this. No, there really isn't an opportunity and I have to maintain order And I just with
respect with respect I that yes, I'm sorry. I do have to I do have to, you know, abide by the the rules of engagement here and my responsibility to to maintain that in order. But I deeply like respect here
and you know here read all of it We all have had more than a front row seat in in throughout this process throughout this seven year process of how it is so you
know with that and and everything I am calling for for a motion so moved second calls what I am calling for two separate votes there are two
items So what we're going to do is I'm going to read the first item and then call for a motion and then read the second one. So item number 18 request authorizing and to adopt an amendment to plan downtown that includes downtown historic context design guidelines to
guide the design development and review of projects that enhance downtown's unique and historic fabric. >> A motion is in order so move second roll call for a vote Miss Bennett eyes to shepherd Dr. Landmark Nay Mr. O'Malley All right.
And the chair votes I motion passes Item number 19 also related to this request authorization to petition the zoning Commission to adopt text amendments for Article eight and new Article 31 to establish Skyline districts and adopt
text changes throughout the zoning code to ensure Article 31 and Article eight are reflected consistently and adopt MAP amendments to zoning maps 1A1C1G1 and and one H to implement zoning recommendations from plan
downtown A motion is in order so moved. Second roll call for a vote Ms. Bennett Mr. Sheppard Dr. Land's Mark I Mr. O'Malley I and the Chair votes I motion passes Thank you. >> Thank you.
Let the room roll clear again Thank you for your attendance Participation We're actually going to take a look. Yeah. It's time. Okay. We're going to take a brief five minute break so we'll resume at let's give it a couple extra. Let's resume at 610. We've got a we've got a well
resume at 610. Hey Ed, good to see y