Good evening and welcome to this meeting of the Boston School Committee. I'm chairperson Jerry Robinson. We will begin with the pledge of allegiance. I pledge allegiance to the flag of the United States of America and to the republic for which it stands, one nation
under God, indivisible, with liberty and justice for all. I want to welcome everyone who is joining us tonight in person on Boston City TV and on Zoom. I'm going to ask everyone here in the chamber to please
turn off the volume on your laptops or other devices so it does not interfere with the audio for tonight's meeting. Thank you for your cooperation. Tonight's meeting documents are posted on the committee's web page,
bostonschools.org/schoolcommittee, under the October 29th meeting link. For those joining us in person, you can access the meeting documents by scanning the QR code that's posted by the doors. The meeting documents have been translated into all of the major BPS
languages. Any translations that are not ready prior to the start of the meeting will be posted as soon as they are finalized. The meeting will be rebroadcast on Boston City TV and posted on the school committee's web page and on YouTube.
The committee is pleased to offer live simultaneous interpretation virtually in Spanish, Haitian Creole, Hverdian Creole, Cantonese, Mandarin, Vietnamese, and American Sign Language. The Zoom
interpretation feature has been activated. Zoom participants should click the globe icon at the bottom of your screen to select your language preference. I'd like to remind everyone to speak at a slower pace to assist our
interpreters. We'll begin with the approval of minutes. I will now entertain a motion to approve the minutes of the October 8th meeting. Is there a motion? >> So moved. >> Thank you. There's a second. Second. Thank you. Is there any discussion or
objection to the motion? Is there any objection to approving the motion by unanimous consent? Hearing none, the minutes are approved. We will now move on to the superintendent's report. I present to you our superintendent, Mary Skipper.
Thank you, chair. Um, I'd like to begin my superintendent's report by congratulating you on being presented with the 2025 Sister Margaret Leonard Hope award from Project Hope earlier this month. For those of you who are not familiar with the organization, uh, this
is a Roxberry based project hope which provides individuals and families impacted by homelessness support with job training, child care, and housing. Chair, thank you for all you do. as we said last night for children and families of our city and congratulations.
>> Thank you. >> We'd like to give a brief uh follow-up to the October 8th meeting where we shared the district's state accountability results in Massachusetts comprehensive assessment system data or MCCAST for school year 2425.
We reported at that time that the district is moving in the right direction. Boston's data shows encouraging progress in literacy for grades three through eight with more students meeting or exceeding expectations in both math and in ELA across nearly all student groups. For
grade 10, ELA and math remain areas for continued focus. Overall, in the state's accountability system, the district was deemed to be making moderate progress toward targets and was not identified as requiring assistance or intervention. Earlier this month, all of our school
leaders had the opportunity to meet with our regional teams in PLC's or what we call professional learning communities to review the state's accountability data. They looked for gaps and started to develop plans for the next 45 days for each of their schools based on where
the gaps are. Later tonight, the transformation schools team will give their first update for the school year 2526 and will share the data for this group of schools. Last night, I had the honor of joining many of you and Mayor Woo at the state Boston's first state of
the schools address at the Jaziah Quinsey Upper School. It was an opportunity for the district, the city, and our entire BPS village to celebrate our progress and to recommmit ourselves to the work ahead. I felt such a sense of renewed hope and possibility for our
students, families, educators, and staff, and confidence that our partners in the business, philanthropic, community, and nonprofit sectors will continue to build our BPS village. It was a proud night for all of us. It was an extra pep in step for everybody
today, I think. um you know here in bowling and in our schools from the venue itself, the new Jaziah Quinsey Upper School uh was just amazing to see uh auditorium with stars on the ceiling and the performance of the participating
students to hearing about the numerous accomplishments highlighted in our mayor speech. Everyone there had a reason to feel invested in our collective determination to do our best for BPS students. I want to give a quick update on BPS
global travel. In BPS, we have broadened our focus beyond global travel to include global experiences that are deeply connected to the curriculum and aligned with each high school's academic pathways. We are thrilled that nearly 250 students from nine high schools will
participate in global learning experiences and explore different parts of the world during the spring semester. This spring, 10 students from Boston Green Academy will travel to Costa Rica for a transformative service learning experience focused on sustainability,
environmental stewardship, and global interconnectedness. The Boston Arts Academy will bring 12 students and four teachers to Dominican Republic during February break for a community service trip. The experience will allow students to contribute to
local communities through home building, school support, and cultural exchange projects. The program supports BAA's mission to foster cultural awareness, empathy, leadership, and global citizenship with special significance for students who have
familiar ties to the Dominican Republic. In April, the Snowden International School will have 10 students traveling to Taiwan for an immersive Mandarin language and cultural experience. Upcoming trips also include Boston Latin School going to Paris. Uh many students
uh there in the trip will also go to to Italy, Kenya, and Peru. The Dearborn where 13 students will be going to the Dominican Republic. The Mary Lion High School, 27 students to Paris and Amsterdam. New Mission High School has a trip going to Costa Rica, Boston Latin
Academy, and Brighton are also in the process of planning trips. Um, I know that when I sign authorization for these, I'm very jealous. Uh, that our students are getting so many worldly experiences. Um, these are the kinds of things that sometimes we don't celebrate enough in BPS. And so, just wanted to
share since I know the committee no longer signs off on the the global travel. Uh, a few other bright spots. Uh this morning the city celebrated Boston Reads Day, part of Mayor Woo's new literacy initiative that we kicked off on September 8th, the first day of
kindergarten. There were more than 450 volunteers from across the city who read to students in every BPS classroom, K2, first and second grade, uh including our own Sher Robinson who read to second graders at the Nathan Hale Elementary
School in Roxberry, the school she attended as a BPS student. Pictured here is Kristen Mwain, who's the senior adviser and director for the mayor's office of early childhood at the Shaw Taylor Elementary School. Led by the mayor's office of early childhood,
Boston Reads brings together BPS, the Boston Public Library, the Boston Health Commission, and community partners. This initiative aims to streamline family access and deliver a more cohesive literacy experience citywide. From story
stops, which we know Chair Robinson is a part of, um these pair short stories with Boston landmarks, activities in neighborhoods throughout the city to story starters that ask engaging questions for adults and children to use as story prompts. The campaign is
designed to create a culture of reading throughout our city. Uh, I look forward to not just having it be about this one day or this one week, but actually all weeks. Uh, and I look forward to continuing to read to students next week and continuing collaboration with our partners to make reading engaging and
fun and would love if school committee uh joined in in that as well. Over the past few weeks, it's been a thrill to attend opening celebrations for three of our schools. the Carter School in the South End, the Sarah Roberts Elementary School in Roslandale,
and a newly renovated PJ Kennedy Elementary School in East Boston. Uh, thank you school committee members for coming to these events. True celebrations uh of our long-term facilities plan and all of the joint work the city and district are doing together on our facilities. On Friday,
September 26th, we cut the ribbon on the brand new Carter School, which serves students with complex disabilities and learning needs. The upgraded facility will expand the Carter School's enrollment capacity from 25 to 60 students, and I believe it's actually
full, and allow for new early childhood programs. On Wednesday, October 8th, I joined the members of the merged Philick and Sumner elementary schools to celebrate the opening of the new Sarah Robert School in Rosendale, serving students in grades
K to6, including two strands of Spanish dual language programming starting in K1 and rolling up each year. The nearly $91 million renovation totals $ 109,000 square foot and includes updated classrooms and kindergarten spaces,
specialized STEM and music, a rebuilt cafeteria and dining area, new systems, a new vestibule, nurses office, a media center, and refurbished auditorium, which the auditorium beautifully blends the old and the new of the two
buildings, and outdoor improvements. The highlight of the event was hearing from the descendants of Sarah Roberts and all that the school meant to them. On Monday, I attended the ribbon cutting for the newly renovated PJ Kennedy School in East Boston. The more than $16
million renovation means that the PJ Kennedy building now meets the needs of this special school community. From improvements that can be seen like the new entrance, main office, expanded kindergartening space, and music room to the less obvious improvements, but
really important ones like air conditioning in every classroom, new lighting, security cameras. These upgrades breathe new life into an old building, and ADA accessibility was prioritized across the entire project. Also earlier this month, I joined the
Curly K8 School in Jamaica Plane for a ribbon cutting celebration for the new playground. The renovation was funded with a million-doll grant from the City of Austin Community Preservation Act funding, which was written by current and former members of the Curly Family
Association. The project goal was to create an inclusive play area for all grade levels. The playground features an inclusive play area for for all grade levels with both an active social zone and a quieter zone for varied
opportunities for play. Um, and that was an amazing one where after we cut the ribbon, the kids just rushed the playground and just were having so much fun on it. Um, Deborah Elementary School community closed out the Hispanic Heritage Month 2025 with a celebration
of the artistic contributions of Hispanic and Latino culture on Friday, October 17th. Students in kindergarten through 6 treated families and staff to performances featuring upbeat dancing and colorful artworks. On Saturday, October 18th, I visited the
annual citywide college career and STEM fair at the Reggie Lewis Center here in Roxbury. Each year, the event showcases the many resources available to students to help them get prepared for, enrolled in, and through college. This year, more than 800 participants visited over 140
exhibitors from local colleges and universities, as well as employers offering internship opportunities, STEM agencies, and local organizations that offer free college prep services. It was a fun atmosphere with interactive exhibits, music, and food. Uh, our 12th
grade students had the chance to get support from their financial aid applications from professionals and learn about scholarship opportunities. There were very long lines for the 360 degree booth where students learned about the BPS vision of the graduate and
took a roving video in graduation regalia. Uh, it was very popular site. Uh, I even got to participate in a live podcast hosted by Holland Tech students. Um, thank you again to the students and school leader Dr. out a street for including me in that. Special thanks to the BPS Office of College, Career, and
Life Readiness and our partners for really what was a tremendous day for our young people. Uh BPS Food and Nutrition Services was notified that it's earned the good food leader silver status from the Center for Good Food Purchasing last week, a
national organization that manages the framework used by public institutions to shift their food buying to support local economies, environmental sustainability, workers, animal welfare, and nutrition. Considered a national leader in
providing students with fresh, nutritious, locally sourced meals, BPS was selected for exceeding national benchmarks in several categories, including nutrition, reinvesting in communities by spending 18% of its food budget on locally sourced products,
investing in small and midsize local suppliers, and nurturing relationships with New England growers. BPS's silver status is based on the cent's independent assessment of BPS food purchasing practices for the 2324 school
year following the baseline assessment of the 201920 school year published in 2023. Before we close tonight, we'd like to share a video from our communications multimedia content team about the district's leadership in creating
healthy school environments. This work was featured on the global stage last month when our director of planning, engineering, sustainability, and environment, Katherine Walsh, a BPS alum, presented at the United Nations on the district's groundbreaking air
quality management work. Katherine shared BPS's successes and lessons learned with international leaders, policy makers, scientists, and health experts at the Healthy Indoor Air, a global call to action inaugural side event held during the UN General
Assembly at its headquarters in New York City on September 23rd. Uh, Katherine managed the installation of 4,400 air quality sensors in schools districtwide and the creation of a public dashboard that provides real-time
data. The scale and scope of the initiative made BPS a world leader in school air quality management and led to Katherine's recent presentation at the United Nations. Uh, so with that, I think we'll show a quick video. It is my great pleasure and honor to welcome you
to this very special event, healthy indoor air. >> I was honored to be invited to the United Nations to represent Boston public schools. >> During the first two years of the pandemic, Boston made the courageous decision to modernize its existing
manual IQ testing program. We were the first school district in the world to invest in district-wide monitoring program for indoor air quality. We are reporting the data from those sensors live on a public online dashboard and we
are using the data to make evidence-based decisionmaking to improve our school facilities with health and well-being in mind. >> We have students that I'm just seeing the alertness level increased. We're seeing the engagement within the
building increase. We aren't seeing people looking feeling fatigued. >> We've been able to educate the community about behaviors that they can take in their classrooms to either >> I think Catherine really believes and and shares for all of us that the importance of having these resources in schools will make it for a better
learning environment for all our students. Everything we wanted to do to take our vintage building and make it new and exciting and sustainable, she has been with us from the air quality sensors to the water bottle refilling stations to the freight farm to the outdoor classroom.
>> Caring about sustainability and having that as a career has been just such a part of my identity. It's probably one of the most salient parts of my identity. So being able to go to work and live out the values that I have and believe in the mission of Boston public
schools and believe in the values of sustainability and equity. The fact that we're able to show what's possible here and that other districts can relate it is very motivating. There's nobody better to be um presenting to the world
um the work of and value of healthy sustainable schools um than Catherine. >> We tried to just do the right thing in Boston and it's led us here as part of a global network and it's a privilege to be part of that network um with schools. So,
thank you Uh you can learn or anyone can learn more about the district's progress in this area uh on our website. And uh with that, Chair Robinson, it concludes my report. >> Right. Thank you, Superintendent. I'll now open the floor up to questions and discussion.
Anyone? Go ahead. Dr. Yeah. >> Um, based upon the um the the efforts that we have at the fair, which I think are um are awesome. So, I'm thinking about the STEM fair specifically. Do we track how many of our students actually
do get enrolled in some of those programs or >> uh so I can I'll double check that with Beth, but I'm pretty sure that we do track who attends the fair and then where they go um be it to uh you know uh
continue on to the next year's science fair like we know how many of them continue to uh present at the STEM fair uh year after year but then additionally I think your question is more do they does that lead them to further involvement in STEM activities.
>> I'll ask her that question that specifically if they go that granularly to it. >> What I do what what I know is that every year uh it's bigger and what what I appreciate about it is um the depth of when you walk around and you're actually looking at the presentations of the
students, you can see the change of quality in the youngest students going all the way to the oldest students. And many of the older students articulate 10th, 11th, 12th grade their involvement with like Harvard Med or BEu, right? So
they they're able to articulate um who helped with their project or where they could take those ideas. Um I think for us with science, we're trying to push back into the curriculum as early as possible that exposure. And I've noticed a quality quality difference in the
youngest students as well. Thank Thank you, Superintendent. It's great to see all of the um workaround facilities across the city um both in terms of the new buildings as well as the um testimony from Katherine. Um we did hear
from parents at the last school committee meeting during public comment about some concerns they were having around the Dorchester Fieldhouse and some of the environmental work that was happening there. Just wondering if there were any updates on that project. >> Yeah, so I'll ask Dr. Pina to come up.
>> Thank you. >> Good evening. Um members of the committee and public joining us this evening. Um, regarding the fieldhouse work, um, we were able to send out communication uh, to the both the school leaders, the staff, family, students, just reassuring them that the testing that was going on um, was appropriate,
was safe, was contained, and there really wasn't any um, concerns or negative impact on the school whatsoever. So, we're going to continue to monitor, work closely with the construction company um, and the um, school leadership on the ground to make sure that we're overly communicating the progress dayto-day. Um but the levels
that we're seeing around the testing u have not proven to be any issue um whatsoever. >> Okay. >> Thank you. >> Anyone else? >> One congratulations on last night but also these updates particularly on
facilities. It's exciting. I am going to just circle back to questions I've been having for a few weeks. um any update on how you guys are processing graduation from last year and how we can start to wrap our head around it even as we wait for the sort of final vetting from the state and then also any enrollment
updates that you want to give us on our our current numbers. >> Well, I'll start with the enrollment. Um I think what we're seeing currently with the enrollment and with us October is a very fluid month I think as we've indicated. Um, but we're definitely seeing decline in enrollment and we're seeing it very specifically around our
newcomer population. Um, which is roughly about half of what it was last year. Um, we will report out in the November one when we have when we run the number at the end of the month. Um, but we're definitely seeing that. Um, we have been really making just a
tremendous effort with phone calls, reassuring families, you know, um, of our multilingual learners. we're a safe and welcoming district. Uh really working school by school to identify extra supports that families may need or students may need.
>> Um and then on the newcomer, you know, we're again not dismantling any of the programming we're doing for new coming, but we're trying to shift >> um in the event that we start to see those numbers come back up again. >> Um but that is that is probably the
highlight of it. Um, we also know that this cohort and actually the next several are smaller. Uh, that's a consequence of both COVID. It's also a consequence of people not having more than one or two children. So, uh, as a result, we anticipate those cohorts. We
did in our enrollment projections account for that when we were thinking long-term facilities plan. um we may at some point going forward need to adjust that further if enrollment trend were to continue in that direction but right now I think it's a little too early to say that but in November we'll give a better
rundown on it but that's the highlight or low light whichever yeah >> the reality >> yeah the real light >> the the reality and on graduation >> uh graduation I can ask Monica I know that we were working with the schools as we explained on graduation we know that
we graduated um more students based on the June numbers percentage-wise. Uh and then the the summer cohort was actually very robust, but it was smaller because we graduated so many in June. The challenge for us is that that stati the statistic
that the state gives us. It's a 4-year cohort average and it takes into account students that had been there since the previous nth grade. But Monica, I don't know if there's anything additional that you have for me. Uh I don't have the numbers directly in
front of me. We're doing a little technical troubleshooting at the moment. Um but I think uh what the superintendent mentioned um yeah just put that back up. Yeah, sorry. Um
having some broadcasting issues. Um so what the superintendent mentioned um we have seen just sort of a higher number of graduates this year. Um, and I can follow up and get you what those numbers are that we are seeing, but we do wait
until the state publishes the official sort of cohort graduation rate um that we've mentioned, which usually comes in the spring. Um, so we're in the process right now of reviewing that data and finalizing our fall report to DESIE. That is what they use to then um aggregate the rates across the state.
Jim, >> great. And one more question too, not about graduation. As we are seeing the sort of first trunch of MAP data come in and sort of as we're pushing as a body to be more data focused, are there any
trends that we're seeing in early student outcomes as we're starting the year or at least the the the gains or losses from summer? Um I don't have anything readily accessible that I can share at the
moment, but I think um we really use the fall numbers as sort of a baseline as students are transitioning um into their school and then um look at both the winter and the spring for that growth. Um but I think uh we can follow up and
look at sort of the growth between June and the fall um as well as year-over-year for students who have been with us. But I think um the focus of the quality school plans is looking at who has come back to their building for the fall um and looking at the students who are in front of them at the
moment and sort of planning for them. >> Great. Yeah, it would be helpful to discuss it, but also as we're thinking particularly going into budget season on the summer investment, like how much are we sort of holding off on increased sort
of summer brain drain that happens by the the programming that we offer and can we see any of those trends in the in the map data? >> And the map the map fall data does have a growth score. Yeah. um as compared to I don't know if it was a year from the previous fall or from the spring
administration, but if students took it at all last year, there is a a growth rate that could be could be helpful. >> Yeah, we can we can for the students who are returning, we can definitely give that. Um let's see if we can commit to that for the next meeting. Yep. Just to
be able to share at least in memo form for the committee. >> Yep. >> Thank you. >> One question. I'm happy to hear the great news about what's going on with food service, but my question is more as we are becoming more and more aware of
what may be facing our families in November, does the district have any plans or working across the city with regard to food issues for our kids? >> Sure. So I um I think what chair is referring to is that SNAP will uh be
discontinued um for what we believe to be about 20% of our city population. Um which is a statistically very high number. Um we have been very active in this. Uh we actually are have sent a memo out um to the school leaders today
uh with a list of the state agencies and resources um to support. The city is also in dialogue right now talking about um being able to connect families to different kinds of food banks and other supports. Uh it's a very active conversation and I would anticipate over
the next few days that more of those resources will come out. For us, we want to emphasize students should and can eat a healthy breakfast and lunch and should definitely take advantage of that. We're also looking at our Saturday and Sunday programming where we get quite a few
families uh and they come as families uh to that programming uh being able to do some distribution there as well. So we're trying to work with our partners to see their capacity to be able to do that. >> Thank you. >> Anything else before we move on?
very quickly just an addendum to uh what uh member Brandon Hernandez and member Rachel Scar um mentioned regarding the type the type of issues that that uh they raise. I like to see the breakdown
on the classification of students particularly in relation to disability the disabled students and uh students multilingual students. Thank you. >> Thank you. All righty.
Thank you all. I'll now entertain a motion to receive the superintendent's report. Is there a motion? >> So moved. >> Is there a second? >> Second. >> Thank you. Is there any discussion or objection to the motion? Is there any objection to approving the motion by unanimous consent? Hearing none, the superintendent's report is approved.
We'll now move on to general public comment. >> Thank you. The public comment period is an opportunity for individuals to address the school committee on school related issues. Questions on specific school matters are referred to the schools to the superintendent. Questions on policy
matters may be discussed by the committee later. The meeting will feature two public comment periods with the first comment period limited to one hour. After one hour, anyone who hasn't testified will have the opportunity to do so at the end of the meeting. We have 33 speakers this evening. Each person
will have two minutes to speak and I will remind you when you have 30 seconds remaining. Please feel free to email your comments for distribution to the committee. Speakers may not reassign their time to others. The times the time that an interpreter uses for English
interpretation will not be deducted from a speaker's allotted time. Please direct your comments to the chair and refrain from addressing individual school committee members or district staff. Please note the comments of any public speaker do not represent the Boston
public schools or the Boston school committee. Please state your name, affiliation, and where you live before you begin. If you're on Zoom, please sign in using the name you register with for public comment and be ready to unmute and turn on your camera when it's your turn to speak. Please raise your
virtual hand when I call your name. To support interpretation, please speak slowly and clearly. We will start with our in-person speakers. Uh the first speakers are Christa Magnus, Rosanne Tang, John Mud, Dedra Manning, Alexis
Rickmmers, and Jill Santos. Christa Magnus. My name is Christa Magneson and I live in Jamaica Plane. I'm a BPS parent of two students who attend the O'Brien and I am also an organizer with the Massachusetts Education Justice Alliance. There are many aspects of the proposed
changes to our exam school admissions process that raise deep concerns in me. But tonight, I'm going to stick to the shallow and insufficient family engagement process and let other people discuss the gross inequity, the backsliding into segregation, and our continued overemphasis on exam schools to the detriment of all else. So, to
state it plainly, the BPS engagement numbers are embarrassing. BPS held two webinars with no mechanism for discussion of any kind. submitted questions may or may not have been addressed and the chat was closed. The feedback form, the main mechanism for families to reply to the proposals in
the webinar, garnered a mere 326 responses, 81% of which or 264 were actually from BPS families. This is from a district with nearly 48,000 students. We are proceeding with a change when BPS has managed to solicit feedback from
less than 1% of its community. The Coalition for Equity and Exam Schools has created a petition asking to extend the current decision timeline and create a meaningful community engagement process. We have collected 316 signatures, which is just 10 fewer responses than BPS, and we don't have
access to a full contact list of BPS families. The school committee and BPS families are being asked to move forward knowing that the community engagement plan is insufficient and performative. The coalition also held a community discussion to talk about these proposed changes. And the overwhelming response
from our attendees was, "What's the rush?" They want in-person meetings held across Boston, meeting people where they are and engaging them in actual conversation. And they want real outreach. Why didn't BPS use school or parent councils to spread the word? Why was there not even a robocall about webinars?
At the state of the school's event yesterday, we were told that BPS is a collective effort. Chair Robinson said, "We need all of you." Superintendent Skipper referenced her button that says it takes a village. Mayor Woo asked Boston's institutions to get involved in our schools, but our families and students are the heart of our BPS
community and have been denied the opportunity to be a genuine part of this process and to have real conversations about the effects of these changes. They deserve that chance. Thank you, >> Rosan. I'm Roseanne Tongue and I served on the exam school admissions task force. As
DEI initiatives are eliminated nationwide, Boston seeks to open exam school gates wider to the already privileged, amplifying their advantage under the guises of compromise and merit. The coalition for equity and exam
schools answered the question for each group, what is the percent change from the current policy to each simulation. The report refutes BPS's conclusion that there is no appreciable difference between the two simulations.
Invitations to multilingual learners, economically disadvantaged, black, Latina, and BPS sending school students would drop. These negative effects would be greater for the 50% test weight than for 30. For economically disadvantaged,
they would drop 10% and 8% respectively. Grove Hall and Roxberry invitations would be 10% or more lower. West Roxberry invitations would be more than 10% higher. Both recommendations would
result in a significant gain of seats for groups already over represented and a significant loss of seats for underrepresented groups. The coalition's analysis concludes that if Boston's leaders push through either recommendation,
exam school enrollment will regress towards pre2021. We are eager to know how city leaders respond having received the coalition's report. Meritocracy is a myth that allows people to absolve
themselves of responsibility for injustice. The proposals before the school committee will move us away from equity. It's baffling why the city won't take as strong and inclusive stand for lowincome communities as it has for
immigrant communities. Thank you, >> John Mud. Uh, my name is John Mud. I'm a resident of Cambridge, a longtime education advocate in Boston, and the grandfather of a student at the John F. Kennedy
Elementary School. In her state of the school's address, Mayor Woo pointed to many achievements we take can take pride in. But her cursory, almost casual endorsement of inclusion for multilingual learners was deeply disappointing. The evidence is clear on
the failure of BPS to educate multilingual learners to meet state MCCAST grade level content standards under its strategy of assigning multilingual learners to gened classes with ESL which has been codified in the
inclusion education plan. For a district that says it is datadriven, evidence-based and student outcome focused. This is especially ironic, even tragic for students. I have presented research evidence that every program for multilingual learners
that uses home language and instruction leads to better outcomes. Where is the evidence that inclusive education works for multilingual learners? Please ask for it. Anyone can easily Google the Kier and Thomas graph which shows clearly on the basis of the most
extensive long-term research in this area that every program using home language instruction produces better outcomes than English immersion with the SL and anyone can also search for the more recent 2015 research paper by
Rachel Valentino and Shan Rearen that validates these conclusions. I also analyzed BP at Desi data on the success of equitable literacy. The results are far from encouraging. What student outcome data can BPS show to the school
committee that its approach to equitable literacy is increasing literacy and equity for BPS students? I urge you to ask, as some have said, how long do we continue to implement failed strategies before we change? >> Your time is
>> Thank you. Next speaker Manning. >> Good evening. My name is Dearra Manning. I'm a Dorchester resident and single parent of two public school students. I want to start at the outset to say that
this decision is being made in a vacuum in a sense that there has been no data on student academic outcomes as a result of the policy changes 5 years ago. This these proposed changes eliminates the double penalty for non-title one
students who live in tiers three and four, but it will continue to suppress enrollment for families who live in tiers three and four. Putting together a construct that makes it more difficult for students in tiers three and four to access a publicly funded educational
opportunity seems to be something that the school committee should be against. Seats should be based on a proportion of the applicants in each tier. If any changes in applicant numbers in any given year, the policy would then adjust to provide the same percent acceptance
for each tier. Tears are crudely drawn as evidenced by a $10.2 million home that is in a tier one neighborhood. The least resourced applicants in any tier could received modest number of points
to reflect the likely disadvantage of their previous educational experience. This is something that has been advocated for by member Cardette Hernandez. Suppressing enrollment in tiers three and four will eliminate educational
opportunities for lower and middle families in these neighborhoods. Citywide seats will likely go to high resourced families. Please do not suppress the enrollment of families who live in tiers three and four, including
metco students of color, parochial, and charter school families. Thank you. >> Thank you. Our next speaker is Alexis Rickmares. Good evening. My name is Alexis Rickmmers. I'm a resident of Jamaica Plane and I'm an attorney speaking on
behalf of the Center for Law and Education, a nonprofit advocacy organization working to ensure highquality education for all students. We oppose the superintendent's recommendations for a new exam school admissions policy and urge the committee to vote against it. The original goals
of the existing policy are to quote increase racial and economic diversity. While the new plan not only omits this language, it also fails to state a cohesive goal promoting equity for all. Not only is this a departure from the existing policy, but this move is at
odds with the state's commitment to equity. It is worth being explicit here. Admissions committed to equity and increasing access for marginalized groups has been legal and remains legal. In the wake of the Students for Fair Admissions Supreme Court case in 2023,
schools across the country rushed to rid their admissions policies of quote DEI, which effectively removed policies aimed at increasing all types of diversity. That case did not require a roll back of DEI at the higher education or the K12 level.
Additionally, our attorney general's office put out a guidance directing schools in Massachusetts to stand strong against federal intimidation and keep promoting diversity, equity, and inclusion in our schools. Supreme Court president also tells us that factoring in systemic barriers such
as zip code and income status is legal. >> 30 seconds. >> Thank you. For nearly five decades, the court has rejected the notion that a policy is unconstitutional merely because it yields a racially disperate outcome. The seminal case, parents involved, confirms that schools may pursue diversity through facially
neutral means, specifically that schools may adopt strategies such as sight selection or attendance zones to reduce racial isolation. The proposal shifts from clear goals to a plan with no cohesive mission. Therefore, reflects an unnecessary effort to comply and advance. Thank you. Your time is up.
Thank you. >> Our next speaker is Jill Santos. >> Good evening. I'm Jill Santos testifying on behalf of CFJJ and as a part of the Coalition for Equity and Exam Schools. By now, I hope you've read the Front Page Globe article that reads, quote,
"Amid Trump's DI DEI crackdown BPSI's policy that could roll back diversity in exam school admissions." This article properly contextualizes what's happening in light of ongoing attempts from the federal government to undermine public education and equity, and we cannot let this happen here in Boston. We commended
Mayor Woo for her courage when she sat before Congress defending Boston's right to be a home for everyone. Now, we urge both the mayor and the school committee whom she appoints to have the same commitment to inclusivity when it comes to Boston students. Boston needs to combat attacks on diversity, equity, and inclusion by recognizing that some
students face more barriers to opportunities than others and enacting policies with explicit goals to create pathways like for black and brown students. >> Can you just slow down interpretation? >> Sure. Lowincome students, multilingual learners, and students with disabilities. These recommendations
would do the opposite and reverse the racial, economic, and geographic diversity achieved by the current policy. Boston needs to make policy based on evidence instead of the intuition of leadership. If the superintendent's recommendations with 50% test weight is implemented, invitations to black, Hispanic,
economically disadvantaged, multilingual students, and students from BPS schools would drop even more than they would for the 30% test weight. Yet at the last meeting, the superintendent claimed that the difference in testing weight would have quote no significant change. This is unacceptable. There's no reason to make changes that would only further
reegregate the exam schools. And we expect an honest assessment from the district about what the data clearly tells us. Important decisions that impact access to educational opportunities must be made collectively through discussions like our coalition held centering the voices of those who hold identities that are
underrepresented in the exam schools. I ask that you not vote through a policy that has been developed without the meaningful input of the community. Boston has a history of standing up to injustice and I implore you to not let Boston be another chapter in this national story of backsliding on educational equity. We urge you to po
pause the vote and keep the policy as it is. >> Thank you. Our next speakers are Hanin Cherno, Sharon Kun, Jen Rosewood, Natasha Telsford Williams, James Nunan, and
Stephanie Shapiro Bergson. Harin Cherno. >> Good evening. Thank you. My name is Harn Chernau. I'm a parent of two BPS lums and I was also the vice chair for the state board of ed and I'm currently the vice chair of the state board of higher ed. I'm here today to ask the school committee to vote down recommendations
for changing the exam school admission process. My son, Simon Cherno, was the student rep on the exam schools task force that came together in 21 to implement the current reforms. That process engaged parents, advocates, teachers, and students from across the
district. Even with COVID, the district managed to create opportunities for the public to authentically weigh into the larger process. We saw each other. We saw district res reps. We raised difficult questions and requested and received multiple simulations. The
school committee has a major conundrum. On the one hand, you are committed to the goal of equity and opportunity and on the other hand spend a disproportionate amount of time on three schools. One of which has a $71 million endowment providing its students with a
level of athletics, drama, music, and debate unimaginable in any other BPS high school. So when the public hears that you're voting for reforms, the data show further close the door to BPS students across all neighborhoods,
accessing these seats and replacing it with a system that ends up privileging students outside of BPS and quote unquote the top 20%. It is deeply troubling. In 2012, when adopting a controversial school assignment model
that impacts all Boston families, the district committed to a public review every three years. In 13 years, only one review has been completed. But when it comes to exam schools, four years into a 5-year plan, the district is once again spending resources and time redoing that
system. What was passed in 21 led to some initial gains. What is being proposed now will result in backsliding or zero growth for our most marginalized communities. Why the rush? I join others in urging you to retain the five-year plan and the time to engage in a robust
community process. >> Our next speaker is Sharon Coons. >> Hi, good evening. My name is Sharon Coons. I live in Roslandale and my two kids are at the Sarah Roberts. The oldest is in sixth grade. I have testified before a school committee once
before in 2020 when my son was in first and I argued then as I do now for the need for greater equity in access to the exam schools. So for that reason, I do oppose the proposed latest round of changes. But more than that, I'm so frustrated that we are still arguing
about this insanely complicated point system. And I'm starting to wonder, is this by design? Pitting parents against each other, fighting over seats in exam schools distracts us from the bigger picture, which is not complicated at all. Every child in Boston deserves to
go to a high school that is respected, that is diverse, that offers a wide range of programming. >> A little louder. >> That offers a wide range of programming across all levels of ability and a full complement of extracurricular activities. For too long, we've accepted
this notion that a highquality high school education is a scarce resource, and that's just not acceptable. So, are there good options in BPS besides the exam schools? We don't hear about them from the district. I asked a representative of the district about
this, and he said, "Well, we don't want to overpublicize the early college programs and the other high schools because we don't want to overpromise and underdel." But right now BPS is underpromising and underd delivering and it's driving families from the district.
So to my fe fellow parents out there I ask you >> let's not allow ourselves to be divided fighting over these complicated formulas. Let's come together and focus on a very simple truth which is that all of our kids deserve better. And to Superintendent Skipper and the members
of the committee, please use your leadership to redirect our attention away from these three schools. Let's focus instead on making sure that every family knows their kid can get a great education in BPS in high school, no matter what they scored on their report card when they were 10. And if that's
not the case, then let's focus all of our energy and resources on making that happen. Thank you. >> Our next speaker is Jen Rosewood. Good evening. My name is Jen Rosewood and I'm a former BPS educator and
current BPS parent. My kids went to the Nathan Hale and the O'Bryant and my younger son just started at BLA. In the spring of his sixth grade year, when my older son and his classmates were finding out about their school assignments, I remember his confusion
and sorrow when two of his friends, one of who is black and one of whom is Dominican, did not get into the OB or any other exam school. All three boys had worked hard in sixth grade and had expected to all get into their first
choice schools together. At graduation, despite their joy and pride in finishing elementary school, I remember the boys visibly distraught and crying at the prospect of losing the friendships, connections, and diverse, inclusive community that they had grown up
together with at the Hail. I strongly oppose the proposed changes to the exam school policy. And if you value diversity and inclusion, I recommend you oppose it, too. It makes no sense to me for BPS to continue to engineer segregation by design. And let's be
clear, that's exactly what these changes would accomplish. The argument that the current point system isn't equal is based on a simplistic definition of what equality truly means. True equality or equity is equality of opportunity, not discrimination and resource hoarding for
a small and exclusive group of schools. All BPS schools should be fully resourced >> 30 seconds >> and should fully accept all students regardless of challenges due to their family circumstances and not based solely on grades and the MAP test which is known to be biased and skewed.
Poverty, homelessness, and DCF involvement are not a reflection of a child's intelligence and say nothing about their academic potential. Penalizing children for these adverse experiences which are entirely out of their control instead of supporting them to gain access to better opportunities
is mind-boggling and bizarre. Keep the policy the same so instead of focusing only on three schools, you can instead fight for full and fair funding for Boston's 30 plus other high schools. Thank you. >> Thank you. Our next speaker is Natasha
Telford. Tell us for Williams. >> Good evening. My name is Natasha Williams. I'm a lifelong resident of Dorchester. Uh and I am a parent um who supports the proposed changes to the exam school's admission policy. Uh my brother and I are both children of
immigrants and first generation college graduates who both attended a BPS exam school. The education we received through BPS helped shape our success and instilled in us a lifelong commitment to this city. My brother and I continue to live in the Grove Hall neighborhood where we were raised. However, we've
both been unable to choose BPS for our children because many of the schools in our zone continue to underperform. As a result, my son attends an independent school outside of the district and my niece attends an outofd district school through the Medco program. We remain hopeful that our
children will one day have the opportunity to attend a BPS exam school. Yet, the current policy sends a troubling message that families who make educational choices that they believe are in their children's best interest are not welcome to return to BPS. The current approach could result in further
declines in district enrollment and limit deserving residents access to a high-quality education. I urge the committee to adopt the superintendent's recommendation, recommended policy changes, and ensure that all families who remain deeply connected to our city
are always welcome and valued in Boston public schools. Thank you. Our next speaker is James Nunan. >> Good evening. My name is James Nunan. I live in Roxberry. I'm an associate professor of education and a parent of
two students at the Nathan Hail School. I'd like to speak to you tonight about the values that you bring to your work on this committee. I trust that each of you in agreeing to serve has a deep commitment to educational equity. I'm grateful for that commitment and I share it. It takes courage to work for equity
and justice because these values, while they are right, are not always popular. But five years ago, amid a national reckoning with entrenched racism, this committee marshaled tremendous courage in charging a task force to recommend more equitable admissions policies for Boston's exam schools. I teach about the
fight for school integration and the benefits of racially and economically diverse schools. The research on this is unambiguous. The benefits of diverse schools are large, broad, and longasting. and not just academically but socially on post-secary attainment, lifetime wages, poverty reduction, and
more. Importantly, the benefits extend to all students. For policymakers who care about equity, there is no better policy to enact your values than one that maximizes student diversity. And yet, despite these findings, resistance to diverse schools is fierce and
unyielding, which is why it takes courage to stand behind them. Diversity in exam schools peaked in the mid 90s thanks to a set aside from the federal court. Faced with a lawsuit from agrieved white families in the9s, the then school committee quickly abandoned
that set aside, moving to a raceblind admissions policy. Diversity in the schools plummeted. That is until 2021. The revised policy championed by this committee combining academic achievement with an effort uh to account for the
systemic and historical injustices had an immediate and positive effect. Diversity on multiple dimensions has increased in sociopolitical climate that bra that is brazenly hostile to equity efforts. It will it will require courage to resist the forces that will pull us
backwards. But I trust and hope that together your values are up to the challenge. Thank you. Thank you, Stephanie Shapiro Burson. Thank you for this opportunity. I'm Stephanie Shapiro Burksen from Right Up the Street. I'm the mom of two BLS
students, a 2025 grad and a current junior, the class of 2027. a significant class in this conversation since it was the first class to enter under the initial exam school entrance policy change. Back during the 21-22 school year, when his first class when this
first class entered, the banter from adults outside of the building was loaded with hateful and false claims. But inside the building, the class of 2027 is regarded as one of the greatest classes to pass through the doors of BLS. The students themselves have a very
special bond between them and everyone around them knows it. Their bond elevates the experience for all inside the building. The statistical data points have shown that the shift in the exam school entrance policy has indeed taken a step toward equity with the exam
schools being mo more representative of the district. But here we are again. This time though, in a climate of ICE raids and other assaults on the freedom of our own student body, where nearly one out of two BPS students speaks a language other than English at home, and
where unhoused students make up about 10% of our BPS scholars. Now is when you want to make a change, a change that could reverse some of the strides made. There's not yet been meaningful community engagement that includes the voices of families who stand to be
further disadvantaged by the proposed policy change. The process has been difficult to access limited outreach and English only materials and little time for communities to understand implications of these changes. If BPS is a community that is actually dedicated
to equity, then it's so essential now in our current climate more than ever that you postpone this vote until you've done your due diligence for meaningful community engagement. Thanks again for the opportunity. >> Thank you, Stephanie.
Our next speakers are Kuang Tran, Minuen, Za, Gong, Jing, Shang Shin, and TWang Tran. >> Hi, good evening. Um, my name is Ken
Kan. Um I live in Quincy. Um I am a first grade bilingual teacher at the Vietnamese dual language program at Ma Elementary School. The first few comment from three school community are all about access to program like mine. Right now matter matter and quincy bilingual
programs are all zoned for homebased assignment. We are asking for citywide assignment allowing more student to learn in both their home language and in English. As a bilingual teacher, I witness firsthand how our student thrive when they see their home language and
culture reflected in the classroom. Our Vietnamese families always tell us how affirming it is for their children to learn in an environment where their heritage language is valued and celebrated. Currently, enrollment in our program is restricted by school zone boundary. The
current system exclude many Vietnamese family who live outside of our school catchment area. Many family are eager for their children to participate in this unique educational opportunity. As a teacher, I regularly receive messages from families across Boston
asking if there is any way for their child to enroll. Sadly, I often have to tell them no. Um, expanding the program to citywide enrollment would remove this barrier and ensure equitable access to all Vietnamese student in Boston, no matter where they live. Citywide
enrollment would also strengthen our school by creating fuller classroom, stronger community of network of families and broader culture exchange among them. >> 30 seconds. >> I urge the school committee to adopt citywide enrollment for all bilingual program. Doing so would ensure that all
families in Boston who desire this opportunity for their children can access it. Um, thank you very much for your considerations and for your ongoing commitment to the success of all Boston student. >> Thank you very much. Our next speaker is Minwen.
>> Hi, good evening. My name is Minuin and I work as a paraprofessional in Boston public school Vietnamese dual language program at the matter elementary which is the first and still the only Vietnamese dual language program in the city. Boston's Vietnamese community was
once concentrated in Dorchester but because of housing affordability and ongoing development many families now live in different parts of the city. Research shows that the dual language immersion is one of the most effective model for English learners and it also
benefits do English dominant students. Still fewer than one in 12 English learners nationwide can access this opportunity. In Boston, the need is especially urgent. Our program has only 22 seats each year. Family come to us
eager to enroll, but because of limited capacity, we're forced to turn them away. For me and my students, this program is deeply meaningful. I see children light up when they realize their home language is valued and celebrated. And for many,
this is the first time school truly feels like it's for them. That sense of belonging builds confidence and that confidence fuels learning. That is why I'm here today to share my experience and emphasize the importance of expanding access. A citywide model would
open doors for more families, strengthen outcomes for students, and reflect Boston's commitment to equity and multilingual education. Thank you for your time and for your support for our students. >> Thank you.
Our two next speakers, Zu Yao Gong and Jing Xiang Shin, will need um support in Mandarin. Our Mandarin interpreters are on Zoom. Um are you there
on Zoom? We have two inter Oh, here. Yes. So, can you please speak slowly and sentences so the interpreter can interpret? Okay. >> Sentence by Watch out.
[Music] That was done. [Music] ESL. [Music] Fore speech. What you doing?
[Music] [Music] [Music] Thank you. >> Thank you. Our next speaker will also need support in Mandarin [Music]
G. foreign. Fore! Foreign! Foreign! Okay. Foreign speech. Foreign speech. Foreign speech. Thank you. >> Thank you very much. Our last in-person speaker is payw.
>> Hi, good evening everybody. Uh my name is Paywan Yu. I am a fourth and fifth grade ESL teacher at Josiah Quinzy School. Um so I speak Mandarin, uh English and Japanese. Most of my students are newcomers from China who speak Mandarin. I believe students
ability are best recognized when their native language is valued. All my students come from come with strong skills in their home language and a bilingual classroom helps them use these skills to learn English. I have seen students making fast progress, stay
motivated and continue learning even as they enter middle school. I believe bilingual teachers can better support trans languaging education. Bilingual education is not just about language. It is about equity and inclusion. Learning in two languages helps the brain
strengthen academic growth and build confidence. Students are proud of their language and culture and they carry the pride into all areas of life. The two students who just spoke today are a great example. Um I have also seen how bilingual pro
programs build community. Older students help younger ones transition to new to new grades and families feel supported when school provides educational and community resources in their native language. This creates a sense of belonging that goes beyond the
classroom. That's why I'm asking for the assignment policy to be changed to citywide for bilingual program schools like Josiah Quincy that can offer bilingual Chinese instructions. Uh this will allow more students to build a strong academic foundation in two
languages, improve outcomes, and strengthen Boston public school as a whole. So please support making JQ Yes a citywide school so more students can benefit from learning in two languages. It is best for our students, their families and for BPS. Thank you.
>> Thank you very much. We will now transition into our Zoom um testimonies. Please raise your hand when I call your name. Our first group of speaker, our first speakers are Truong Tuk Tucker,
Ting Yan Chan and Jessica Tang Tucker, please accept the prompt. Hi, can you hear me? >> Yes, we can hear you. >> Hi, my name is Chuku Tucker. I am an active member of the Vietnamese dual
language committee. For many years, I have worked closely with the Vietnamese families living in Boston. Through numerous conversation and home visit, I have learned that many families want their children to attend the Vietnamese
dual language program at the mother school. However, they could not enroll their children because they live outside of the limited enrollment zone. Since 2021, the Vietnamese dual language
program have grown significantly. It now has more than 15 bilingual teachers and paraprofessionals who can support bilingual student especially student with special um needs or with disabilities.
The program now has bilingual learning specialist and a bilingual speech pathologist who can provide services in both Vietnamese and English for Vietnamese speaking families. Bilingual
education is vital. It preserves our language culture and family connections. For families with children who requires special education services, the dual and language program offers the most inclusive and supportive learning
environments. Have you have heard that um only one language program at the math elementary with 26 seats per grade level. The number of Vietnamese student in Boston
are far exceed this capacity. So, I'm here today to represent my community and urge the school committee to revise the district enrollment policy so that families across all Boston neighborhoods may enroll their children in the
Vietnamese dual language program. This policy change would >> Thank you very much. Your time is up. Thank you >> for your consideration. >> Thank you. Our next speaker is Tin Yan Chan.
Please accept the prompt. In Chan, please accept the prompt. We will continue with Jessica Tang. We'll come back the Jessica Tang. Hi, good evening everyone. Uh, my name is Jessica Tang and I am here uh not uh
with my union hat on or with my teacher hat on, but I'm here tonight as a parent. Um, and so as an educator, I I have been a longtime advocate for bilingual education and am u proud to have supported the many different
efforts whether it was for uh the dual language Haitian Creole or the Vietnamese Haitian Creole um and longtime supporter of the Spanish dual lingual programs as well. Um, but tonight I'm here as a parent uh because I have a four-year-old. He just turned
four and missed the uh cuto off um unfortunately. Uh, so we have another year of daycare before kindergarten. Uh, but he's enrolled in a bilingual Chinese um, uh, daycare right now. And it has been incredible to see him become
bilingual and learn Chinese. When my parents came to visit and my great aunt came to visit recently, he was able to communicate with them in Mandarin. And as someone who grew up bilingual, I know so much of the benefits of being
bilingual. And um here he is. Uh and um and I I'm so thrilled to see how much uh Chinese that he's been able to learn and would really love for him to be able to continue that bilingualism in Boston public schools when he is eligible u
after um next year in 2027. Um but right now the Quinsey school is uh based at home base >> and not available citywide and uh we do believe that there are a lot of families not just myself uh but other families in the daycare actually too who would love
to be able to access um a Chinese bilingual program in Boston public schools. And so making it citywide and making the other dual language programs citywide is uh is a solution that I think would really benefit more students
in Boston public schools and families uh like myself and the ones that also go to his daycare. >> Thank you very much. Our next group, our next speakers are Juan Hua Chen, Lena, Ian Chan, Bernie Wilson,
Lesie Parker, and Mike Hishman. >> Our next speaker, Juan W Chen would need support in Cantonese. >> Yes, sorry, I'm trying to find a problem.
Excuse me. Can you please speak louder? Hello everyone. I'm saying >> you can start. Okay. [Music] Okay. Hi, I'm Chen. Um, I'm a mom. I have a
son who go to JQ. Yes. Um, once he switched to the school, he's able to enroll in a bilingual program. I have seen his improvement significantly. Oh, mommy. And then we have a great communication with the teachers and um the
communication between the parents and the teacher. It's um it's so much easier. [Music] I I would like to urge JQUS um to expand its uh policy to accept other students
um citywide because JQs is the only school in the area that offer dual language program. This is a this is very important and um policy change that will benefit families like me and that will enhance our
children's education in the future. And this change of policy will enhance students performance and also will elevate um the whole educations for the entire BPS to family um to family to students. and
to the entire BPS community. This is a very beneficial uh way of doing it. Thank you so much. >> Thank you. Thank you, Anna. Our next speaker is Lena Ang. Can anyone hear me?
>> Yes. Speak a little bit louder, please. >> Hello everyone. My name is Lean. I'm a second grader at the M School. I live at Dchester Boston. My first language is English, but I speak English and Vietnamese at home. I
am in a dual language program. Why is this important to me? This is important to me because it will help me connect with other families and communities. We can talk to our relatives more easy and learn about the culture
and traditions. Learning two languages makes my brain stronger. Studies show that kids in dual language programs do better at solving problems and remembering things. I want to be able to travel easy when I
visit my parents' home country. Being by Lincoln helped me in the future cuz when I grow up, I'll have more job opportunities to pick. In short, dual language programs help us become smarter, more open-minded, and
more connected to the world we are on right now. Please make more bilingual schools for everyone. >> Thank you. >> Thank you. >> Our next speaker is Ian Chan. And then after Ian Chan, we're going to try
Chan again Chan. My name is Ian Chan. I am a sixth grader at the at the Aquincitzia school and I live in Brighton. My first language is Chinese. We speak
Chinese and English at home. I am in a regular education program. I am here today because I am losing my first language. This is important to me as I want to feel connected with my
family in my own language. Others should care because without my first language, I feel disconnected with my family. This is important to me as I want to be able to keep talking with my relatives in my native language. This is
important to the community, too. As even though I can't go to a bilingual program, I want other kids, younger kids, to be able to speak their native language and communicate with loved ones. I wish I got I have gotten the
program when I was in kindergarten. So, I just want to say I want to be bilingual because it's better for me and for my community. So, make sure other kids go to the bilingual school even though it's far away. Thank you.
>> Thank you very much. >> We will try again with um Tin Yan Chan. Hi, sorry I'm not sure what happened earlier, but hello. My name is Tiny Chan. I live in West Roxbury. I was a bilingual student at the Quinsey Elementary before No Child Left Behind
ended bilingual education in Boston. I have taught for 13 years in the SEI bilingual program at the Quinsey and I am also a parent of a K1 student in the Chinese bilingual program. who speak Cantonese, Spanish, and English at home, and I have the unique experience of
having been a student, a teacher, and a parent at the Quinsey School. My child would not have had the access to the only school in BPS that provides instruction in Chinese had I not been a teacher at the Quinsey. BPS allows children of teachers to attend a school only if there is no waiting list.
Therefore, I waited until July after school assignments were finalized to get a official word that she was able to attend the Quinsey. It is not fair that students who live outside of the Quinsey school zone do not get to maintain their native and first language in an academic setting. As a child, because I needed
the bilingual services, I was able to go to the Quinsey even though I lived in West Roxbury. This helped me further develop my native language skills and feel connected with my culture and the Chand community, which enables me to now teach in a bilingual classroom using Cantonese and Mandarin to help my
students learn English while maintaining their heritage. I am here to ask that assignment policy change to citywide for bilingual program schools like the JQEs, which is the only school in the district offering instruction in Chinese. This change is important so families like
mine can send our kids to this school and have a stronger academic foundation to be biiterate. Changing the policy will mean that our students outcomes will be better and BPS will be better. >> Thank you. >> Thank you very much. Our our next
speaker is Bernie Wilkinson. Good evening. Renee Wilkinson with SchoolFax Boston. The proposed exam school admission policy shows that the Trump cloud of inequity and lack of regard for historically marginalized
communities now hovers over Boston leaders and is leading to foggy and harmful decision-making. Do not backslide and resegregate Boston schools. Before Congress in March of
2025, the mayor reminded the nation that Boston is the first in public education and a haven for people of all cultures and backgrounds. This day, today, we need the words of city and district
leaders to align with actions that will allow for equitable representation of Boston students in exam schools. to the school committee members as an equity-minded and data focused body. Do
not vote in favor of the proposed policy. delay the vote and launch an authentic launch an authentic community engagement process that includes BPS resources like
the racial equity planning tool and the abandoned school-based equity roundtables that need to be reinstated. We are asking city and BPS leaders to live words that they share with the nation, live by the words that they
share with and use equity tools that they have put into place, but need to activate with consistency and transparency. We need an equitable policy for exam school admissions. And let this be a
moment to reset for BPS thoughtful community engagement so it can be a foundation for overdue actions that need to be discussed by the community with fidelity throughout the district. Thank you for your time. >> Thank you very much. Our next speaker is
Leslie Parker Sproul. Leslie Parker Sproul, please accept the prompt. Hey, you can start. >> Oh, hi. My name is Leslie Spraw. I'm a parent of two BPS elementary school students and a third child who left BPS system this year after not getting into
an exam school. I support the proposed exam school admission changes. They aren't perfect, but they're moving in the right direction. I agree. Pre-COVID, the admission was not equitable and changes were needed. However, the tears and points have created new inequities and are punitive based on where students
live and where they go to school. Worst of all, some of our brightest and highest scoring students are shut out from the exam schools. And then, like my son, they are leaving the district and potentially taking younger siblings with them. In school year 2425, tier 1 students needed a composite score of 65
to get into BLA and tier 8 students needed a score of 97. That's a 32 percentage point difference. How is that maintaining rigor or creating a fair path for all students in this city? The proposed changes are moving us in the right direction. These changes ensure a
path for our highest performing kids. That top 20% citywide will have a path to a school and they'll maintain the spirit and the rigor of those schools. And still the majority of those spots, 80% of the spots will be allocated based on the tier system. And this will ensure
that students from socio all socioomic tiers and neighborhoods will have a path as well. The fear-mongering from other public presenters tonight about the backsliding of the racial and socioeconomic makeup of the schools does not seem to be true based on the simulations that BPS provided with the
top 20% citywide. It is a very clear goal for our kids to understand and work toward and it's very clear for families to understand. Exam schools are not for all kids and we need to accept that. And lastly, I just want to say that whatever policy is made this year, I hope that BPS keeps it for many years to come so
families can plan and know and also so you can just stop this whole smoke and mirrors thing. As someone said earlier tonight, you keep changing the exam school process every year and and we're fighting over three schools. We need to start focusing on all the other high schools in the district.
>> Thank you. Our next speaker is Mike Hushman. Mike Hushman Dodchester. The BPS is a racist institution. Under the leadership of Superintendent Casilius and her chief equity officer,
Dr. Gransson, the BPS made important advances in promoting equity. The most courageous move with strong support from the school committee was to make the elite exam schools more diverse. Many privileged families have worked
tirelessly ever since to reverse this policy. Even though white and Asian students remain over represented in the best schools, under the misleadership of Superintendent Skipper, with the support of the school committee, the BPS has
moved aggressively in a racist direction. Any decision to change the exam school's admission process, which would be at the expense of our black and brown children would be racist. I doubt that the superintendent would make any
proposal without the consent of the mayor. November 4th will be election day in Boston. Our citizens will elect the mayor and the city council, not the school committee. In defiance of the will of the people and the city council
who voted in support of democracy, boss Woo by herself has unilaterally deny the citizens of Boston our democratic rights. In a few months, we may have three new appointed members on the committee.
>> 30 seconds >> is the sole decider. I want to thank Mr. O'Neal for his many years of service. On a personal note, I want to thank him for his kindness. I endorse the reappoints of Mr. Kadet Hernandez. I am impressed
by his critical independence and his courage to vote no. Assuming that Mr. Kadet Hernandez wants to be reappointed, it will be interesting to see what Boss Wool will do. I hope that my personal endorsement will not be held against them.
>> We deserve to have an elected school committee. >> Thank you. >> Thank you, Mr. Heisman. There you go. >> Our next speakers are on Zoom. Cheryl Buckman, Ruth Bra, Magda Hernandez, and Sunni.
Cheryl Bachman. >> Good evening. My name is Cheryl Buckman. I'm a parent to a seventh grader at the Ruth Batson Academy and a parent lead for the Denver. Each of Boston's neighborhoods tells a story. In Colombia
Point, the Paul Denver has been a beacon of courage, care, and innovation for generations. As we prepared to close the Denver in June 2026, it's more than just shutting a building. It's a pivotal moment for
our city's commitment to equity and education. Long before the terms like equity and multilingual learning became common in Boston public schools, the dev centered immigrant families, English learners, and students with disabilities.
The school faced real challenges. State receiverhip, leadership turnover, chronic underfunding. Yet, it also pioneered an inclusive education classrooms with co-eing models that made students and families feel seen, valued,
and supported. I urge the district to honor the dev's legacy by taking these steps. Listen to families, educators, and community members through shared decisionmaking. Tell the full story of the school's
impact, not just test scores, but real progress and the culture of the pride and resilience. Document and replicate what worked so other schools can benefit. Preserve school's history through a public
archive of memorial. reinvest in inclusive education and support communities the de served. The de dreamed of a Boston where students could bring the their whole selves to school and succeed. Closing the school doesn't
have to end that dream. It should inspire us to build on it. Thank you. >> Thank you very much. It seems that Drew Brock is not in the meeting. So we will continue with Magda Hernandez.
Magda Hernandez. >> Uh can you see me? >> Yes. Hi Magda. You can start. Yes. >> Oh, great. Um good evening. My name is Magda Hernandez and I'm a lifelong Boston resident who now lives in West Roxberry. I'm a Boston Latin School
alumna and my two sons graduated from BLS in 2022 and 2025. Although my sons were accepted to BLS before the modifications to the exam school admission policy, I've followed the policy changes with interest. I'm
grateful that Superintendent Skipper and the school committee have continued in their efforts to improve upon a policy that on the one hand has brought more equity and geographic representation to our exam schools, but on the other hand
has introduced unpredictability and confusion for Boston's families. I was heartened to learn that the revisions under consideration are similar to the general policy outline discussed during the summer of 21. Modeling shows these
changes would yield classes that preserve the gains made toward equity and access while achieving a more straightforward and easily understood policy. A citywide round of competition for seats ensures that our highest
achieving students are not shut out of exam schools from the outset. As the current policy stands, school-based bonus points are too broadly based and arbitrary. Upper income students attending high poverty schools should not receive bonus points. What was more
troubling were the instances of lowincome students who attend a low poverty school and missed what might be a life-changing opportunity to access an exam school simply because they didn't receive bonus points based on the school that BPS assigned them to. I strongly
urge the school committee to vote for a familyfriendly policy that preserves equity and addresses many of the inequities that have been created by a well-meaning but flawed policy. Thank you very much. >> Thank you very much.
Our next speaker, Sunonny Pie. >> Sunny's not available, but he says he's at a BPS robotics family class shout out BPS family activity. >> Perfect. He can send the the written.
>> Um that concludes public comment for the f first hour. >> Thank you. Thank you, Miss Parex. And thank you to those of you who spoke this evening and shared your perspectives. Your testimony is very important to us. Our first action item this evening is
the grants for approval totaling 51,275,187. Now I'd like to turn it over to the superintendent for any final comments. >> Uh great. Thank you uh chair. Um so tonight there are seven grants for your consideration totaling more than $51
million. Um, the largest is a group of continuing entitlement grants, title one for nearly $41 million that will support more than 42,000 economically challenged students at almost all of our schools with a variety of services, improve
instructional quality, provide supplies and enrichment, addressing persistent equity gaps through family engagement, and providing uh support to families. Title two for $2.5 million to support excellent teaching and learning and the
development of a diverse principal pipeline. Title three for $2 million. These are approximate uh to support multilingual learners English language acquisition by supporting teacher professional development. expanded out of school time learning opportunities
and parent literacy training and title four for $3 million to provide access to enrichment and wellness programs and technology especially for high school students who may be at risk for dropping out of school or increased absenteeism. The remaining three grants total more
than $2 million and will do the following. They'll support our goal of a fully electric bus fleet by 2030 through an electric school bus rebate. They will serve 12,000 students in 22 schools and the Boston Student Advisory Council by supporting cultural experiences and
they'll support the salaries of two hub coordinators. Uh so cheer Robinson, we'd ask you to introduce for a vote and support all of this. Miss Macha is here uh for any questions for the committee to have any questions. >> Thank you Dr. Hawkins.
>> Um thank you for for this. Um I think I have the same question that I generally have which is when do we review these for um the particular uh program evaluation.
So I'm I could look at specifically title 4 part A grant where it has very specific outcomes increasing student participation from 55 to 68%. Um how are we measuring that? where do we see that just to know that whether or
not this investment is actually making good on it. Um and then similar to some of the other outcomes um prop proposed by some of the other grants um saying improved English language acquisition as measured by what like how are we
actually coming forth and saying like we know that this is actually working. >> Yeah. So Marcela, do you want to just um give Dr. a sense of how the grants office collects the data points that are attached to each of the grants. >> Good evening everyone. Um yes, so for
title 4, >> she's right into the microphone. Marcela, >> there you go. >> Can you hear me now? >> Yep. >> Okay. So for act for for the actual title 4 application we have to submit smart goals. So we can provide at the time of the evaluation the the
entitlement programs have an evaluation um compliance requirement built in. So we could provide that at the time we submit it. So you can see that um I >> we can share with committee the the
federal grants are very strict. So they have um very specific metrics that we need to submit and then uh meet. So we can we can provide that. Um Dr. Hawkins always asks good questions about making sure that on the grants that we're clear on what we're using for performance
metrics to meet them. So if we can provide that for the title grants that would be wonderful. >> Yeah, that's actually in the spring. So that actually happens in the spring when we are required to submit that. >> Okay. Yeah. I think you I think just for the body the concern is generally around
where do Yeah. Like where do we get to see it? Um is it and is it does it get posted either for us directly or does it get posted for families to say like hey we invested in this particular program and it shows this um so that people can
see what the ROI essentially is. I think what would be helpful, Marcela, is if you could provide to the committee last year's >> and what we submitted for documentation and proof in the spring that we met those benchmarks. >> Yeah. >> Great. Thank you. It's a great question.
>> By the way, these were the title dollars that were somewhat delayed. >> That was my question. >> Kind of really want to get them through. >> Yeah, I know. We get it. >> We receive those dollars. Are those dollars in hand? Uh I I believe that yes they are in hand and um yes they are they are appropriated. Yes.
>> So they are ours. They are appropriated last. >> That's why we want to get them. All righty. So >> mentioned in the coffers. >> Okay. All right. So if so Okay. So if there's no further discussion I will now entertain a motion to approve the grants as presented. Is there a motion?
>> So moved. >> Is there a second? >> Second. >> Thank you. Any discussion objection to the motion? Is there any objection to approving the grants by unanimous consent? Hearing none, the grants are approved. Thank you. Our second action this evening is
Superintendent Mary Skipper's employment contract approval. Before we begin the contract discussion, I'd like to invite the superintendent to offer some of her thoughts. I realize this process might feel a bit new as it's been quite a while since the committee last did this.
>> Um, sure. So, thank you, chair. Um, so I I think as I shared last night, uh, serving as the superintendent of the BPS, uh, has is just a career and a life dream. Um, and certainly, uh, something
I will always reflect back on as, um, the height of my career, especially somebody that's come up through the system as I have starting as a teacher. Um, I just I get to the work I get to do is so important to me. um working with our
students and our families and our staff and the work that we do as a body um particularly around our achievement and opportunity gap work. Um the dialogue we've had at this die is to um talk about student outcome and pressing on
student outcomes um for me is how I've always lived my career uh regardless of the role teacher principal regional soup. And so I think it I I find it both an honor uh and certainly will put my
every fiber of being um to doing that work. Uh so I just um I had a bunch of notes prepared but I will just say um thank you for that consideration. Most importantly just thank you for giving me the honor of sitting on the dis with you to do this work.
>> Thank you superintendent. So I'm going to go through the the timeline. Chair, can you look too right? So during the July 9th meeting, as a committee, we unanimously approved the superintendent school year 2425
performance evaluation. With our full faith in the superintendent, we determined to renew her contract and the committee approved me as designate to represent the body during contract negotiations. The negotiation team was composed of members of the mayor's team,
legal counsel as well as myself. The contract slide to Okay, thank you. This the contract of employment is structurally similar structured similarly to the contract we approved in 2022. As I highlight the details of the
superintendent's new contract tonight, I will refer to the superintendent's current contract as the 2022 contract and the contract we are voting on tonight as the 2025 or new contract. I'll now begin the updates.
The term of the contract is 5 years commencing retroactively on July 1, 2025 and concluding on July on excuse me on June 30th, 2030. The retroactive July 1st date means the fourth year of the
superintendent's current 2022 contract will be included as part of the new 5-year term. Prior to Superintendent Skipper, the Boston public school experienced nearly 10 years of churn in our leadership. The
instability made it extremely difficult to move forward a consistent strategy and make largecale change. A 5-year term put Superintendent Skipper in line to lead the district through 2030. This provides stability with an experienced
leader in continuity in our strategies, something we've not had in a long time. Under the new 2025 contract, the superintendent will receive an annual salary of $324,643 for the 202526
school year. This represents a 3% increase from the 2024 school year salary of $315,188. For clarity, under superintendent's 22 2022 contract, she earns a 2.5%
salary increase upon receiving a proficient or exemplary rating on her annual performance evaluation. After the July 9th performance evaluation approval, Superintendent Skipper received a 2.5 increase, moving
her annual salary from $315,188 to $323,68. Under the new contract, the 3% salary increase is calculated from the 202425 school year salary of $315,188. The 3% yearly increase in salary will
continue throughout the term of the contract provided the superintendent receives an overall rating of proficient or exemplary on her performance evaluation. Under the 2025 contract, the superintendent receives an annual
annuity in the amount of $60,000. This is deferred compensation which may be used at the superintendent's discretion to find to fund any qualifying or non-qualifying annuity. Under the 2025 contract, superintendent
received $1,500 annually for supplemental dental insurance, 26 days per contract year, 30 paid vacation days per year, in a monthly travel allowance of $650. As a board, we collectively believe Mary
Skipper is the superintendent to continue moving forward the transformational work we are taking on in Boston public schools. This contract leads the way for sustained leadership, but continuous leadership is only impactful when the leader is effective
and positioned to make change. Superintendent Skipper has demonstrated her unwavering commitment to the education of Boston's youth. With over 16 years in BPS and many more years in education, serving as teacher, school leader, and administrator, she brings
invaluable experience and expertise at all levels of the system. During her three years leading the district, Superintendent Skipper and her team have writed the ship. We are no longer We are no longer under a state improvement plan or Department of
Justice supervision. We have laid a strong foundation with the on-time performance of our buses now consistently over 95% and a long-term facility plan in place to provide our students with the physical spaces to support a full education.
We have high quality instructional materials in every classroom with the professional development observations and metric in place to make sure our students are doing the heavy lifting. With the foundation laid, we are poised to move academic performance and student
outcomes forward. We still have a lot of difficult work ahead of us. Superintendent Skipper understands we have large expectations. She has large expectations, too. Together, we are squarely focused on student outcomes. And Superintendent
Skipper is the person we want leading this work. Thank you. And I open it to the committee for final comments. Um, thank you, chair. Um, and as you stated, consistency of steady and highly capable
leadership is so important. It affects the stability of our school leader workforce, which then affects teacher retention, all of which impacts student outcomes and student achievement. Um, I know that inputs can take some time for student achievement to follow. Uh, I'm
excited for the strategic planning process for us to set some very measurable and attainable but ambitious targets for 2030. Um, and I was excited by the message at state of the schools last night about the urgency of this work. Um, so I look forward to
supporting you, Superintendent Skipper, in any way that we can to accelerate outcomes for all students in every school in BPS. I guess we're going in order. Um, thank you so much for for your service and um,
I echo member scarret. I we want to see you here till 2030 and beyond. Um, and at the same time, it's a generous contract and we're making a big investment in you. Um, we have heard a lot about the inputs that are going to
move the system forward and I I'm ready for conversations about outputs and um to have realistic conversations about actual goals that we want to see and meet year-over-year. And so um I'm excited about that process, setting some
real goals um over the next few years and to support you in realizing them for our kids. Thank you. Um I mean I think we we talked about it last night. Um the importance of consistency and sort of seeing that
slide of the uh the differences that we've seen in seven years and how much change that the system has endured and how much our families have endured as a result of it. Um, so, um, I can say that, uh, being able to watch you, but
also be alongside you and visiting schools and hearing presentations and just hearing your perspectives, um, even on the things that are, you know, none of this is easy. Um, so I commend you for showing up every day um, for this
and I I I hope to be around to um, walk alongside you in that process. Um I am excited to uh roll up my my sleeves with the opportunity and achievement gap um work. So um yeah, we look forward to
having you here. [Music] >> Me continue to stay, will you? >> Okay, chair, can I just say one more thing too? I think there is also an opportunity in this moment for us as a
body to support you in a different way as well. I'm thinking about our evaluation process and um the sort of I think two things. The real evidence of our inability to fully
be calibrated around what we think is good performance. I think you know this. If you had a school with a set of assistant principles who had such a range of feedback and um and ratings for an individual teacher, there would be
some real work around norming around that. I think we need to do that. Going from highly effective to developing in areas on one team means we've got to get tighter around what we want to see. Um, and so I'm excited for doing that because I think that's the best way to support you to be like these are our real expectations and you can only do
that with those goals. And so both of them very real particularly as every year we have an opportunity to have a conversation around um where the outcomes are. >> Great. Thank you. >> Okay. If there's nothing further, I'll
now entertain a motion to approve the extension of Superintendent Mary Skipper's employment contract until June 30th, 2030 as presented. Is there a motion? >> So moved. >> Thank you. Is there a second? >> Second. >> Thank you. Is there any discussion or
objection to the motion? Miss Pavox, will you please call the role? >> Thank you, Chair. Dr. Alkins, >> yes. >> Mr. Kadet Hernandez, >> yes. Miss Polano Garcia, Miss Rachel Scar. >> Yes. >> Mr. Tran. >> Yes.
>> Mr. O'Neal. Miss Robinson. >> Yes. >> The motion is approved. >> Thank you. Superintendent, your Skipper, your continued leadership is an investment in Boston's children. We understand how complex it is to shift the tide. It's
not one factor, but a combination of many. We're not in this alone. As you say, it takes a village. Superintendent Skipper, we look forward to our continued work together. We we will continue to push you, your team, and ourselves to deliver bright futures for
all of our students. Once signed by all parties, the 2025 contract will be posted publicly. And now we will transition to our report. Do you want to take a few minutes break? Did you say? >> Yes. >> Yeah, that would be good to take a stretch. We take a few minutes break and
we will be back in a few minutes. Thank you. >> Yes. only report tonight is a transformation accountability update for school year 2526. Let's aim to keep the presentation
within 15 minutes. And I'd like to remind our presenters to please speak at a slower pace to assist our interpreters. Lieutenant, I invite you to give introductory remarks. >> Wonderful. Thank you, chair. Uh so shortly u you'll hear our transformation schools update for school year 2526. As
a reminder, transformation schools are BPS schools identified by the Massachusetts Department of Ed elementary secondary education or DESIE as requiring assistance or intervention. At the October 8th meeting, our team shared the district's accountability results for schools and districts across
the state and the school year 2425 MCCAST. This evening, we'll share the transformation schools, several parts of it. MCCAST and accountability analysis from 2425, strategy review for school year 2526,
and presentations from our amazing school leaders of Tech Boston Academy and the Dearborn STEM Academy. Um, yes, you can clap for them. They're great. >> Uh overall, we're seeing signs that our improvement strategy is showing positive results. At the same time, there's a
clear need to focus our resources and energies on specific schools and learning areas like low student achievement and high chronic absenteeism. Transformation schools data shows a three-year trend of slow improvement in accountability percentiles. In fact, it's the third
year in a row where we have seen more schools making steady improvements than schools losing any ground. Of the district's 41 transformation schools given accountability percentiles, 18 schools improved their accountability percentile and eight remained level. 12
transformation schools have now improved their accountability percentile to 11 or higher. Five transformation schools rose to above the 10 percentile and only one BPS school fell under the 10 percentile and into the transformation category.
This year six schools will be leaving transformation status. This is the first time we have formally exited any transformation schools in recent years. uh and those are the Chidik, Curly, K8, Grrew, Holmes, Filbrick, which you know
has now been merged with the Sumner uh into the Sarah Roberts and the Perkins. I'll now turn the meeting over to Mike Sabin who's our executive director of school and district transformation who'll give the presentation. Along with Mike are our outstanding school leaders, Pat McCclary from TVA and Darlene
Mcernel from Dearborn STEM. So Mike, >> thank you Superintendent Skipper, Chair Robinson, members of the school committee. Thank you for the opportunity to again present an update on our transformation schools. The guiding approach in our work with
transformation schools we call continuous improvement. From year to year and throughout each year, we use observations and data to identify where our strategy is working and we strengthen our efforts in those areas.
We identify areas that are not yet improving and we make adjustments. Please consider today's presentation through this lens. We will present successes and link them to our strategy. We will identify challenges
and share thoughts about needed changes. We see here the current list of transformation schools. As Superintendent Skipper mentioned, only one new school, Connley Elementary, will enter transformation status this year due to their desi accountability
percentile slipping below 10. This is the lowest number of new schools added since the system was created in 2018. We can also see 12 schools listed in bold font
indicating they have earned accountability percentiles over 10. As the superintendent mentioned, six of these schools, Cheddick, Curley, Grrew, Holmes, Filbrick, and Perkins have had
percentile ratings over 10 for multiple years and will be exiting transformation. The progress of these schools shows how the BPS strategy can work. We should mention as well that the
Frederick Pilot Middle School is now closed and the Clap Lion High School and Excel High School will either close or merge at the end of this year. The number of transformation schools is starting to go down.
Before moving ahead, let's review school demographics. Transformation schools serve a higher percentage of low-income students, students with disabilities and English learners than non-transformation schools.
Our schools have higher percentages of black and latinx students. It is a critical issue of equity that we provide these students with the best possible learning experience. I will use the language of tears to describe our approach to school improve
to school support and improvement. Over the past three years, all BPS schools have been guided and supported through common structures. the regional teams, the BPS approved curriculum, the
QSP, the universal expectations, our professional development offerings. Schools in need, including all transformation schools, receive tier 2 targeted support in the form of regional
attention, funding for instructional coaches, hiring support, strategic planning support, and more. And finally, schools that are not yet showing improvement in student learning andor school climate.
These schools may need more intensive or tier three support for their leadership teams, their teachers, or at times their students. They may need prioritized operational attention from BPS central offices.
Strengthening these intensive supports are tier tier three supports is the current focus of the transformation office and the division of schools. On slide seven, we begin our summary of transformation school performance
with an eye to identifying areas of progress and areas of need. A reminder that accountability percentile involves multiple indicators such as MCCAST growth, MCCAST achievement, English learner progress on
access, chronic absenteeism, and some high school specific indicators. Accountability data from the past year, as the superintendent mentioned, is again promising. 18 transformation schools improved their
accountability. Eight remained level and 15 declined. This is the third year in a row that more schools have increased their accountability than have gone down. This trend of the majority of schools
moving toward higher percentiles each year suggests that our core improvement strategy for transformation schools is bringing some positive results. However, the data also shows the need to intensify tier 3 supports for schools
that are not yet moving. Student achievement measured through MCCAST is the most heavily weighted indicator as it should be. Slides 11 and 12 share MCCAST growth in literacy.
Math growth for transformation schools is in the appendix and additional data on achievement growth and more is in the linked stoplight report. We can see here that fewer than half of our transformation schools showed
literacy growth over 50. While we continue to have literacy bright spots, this growth is simply too low. We are working with the Office of Teaching and Learning and with individual schools to better address
this challenge through intensive coaching and adjustments to our curriculum implementation. We do have achievement bright spots. For example, slide 31 in the appendix, we can see that 75% of transformation high
schools had growth over 50 in math. On slide 32, we can see the access scores for our English learners showed significant improvement at all EL levels. Reducing chronic absenteeism
is another area of important work and progress. Overall chronic absenteeism again went down last year for transformation schools at all levels. Individual school data is available in the stoplight link.
However, slides 14 and 15 make clear that there is still an attendance gap between our transformation schools and our non-transformation schools. This attendance difference alone is one contributor to low excuse me to low
growth and achievement. So to summarize, we see evidence that our improvement strategy is having a positive impact. For three consecutive years, more schools have increased their accountability than have gone down.
Absenteeism continues to improve. English learners are making increased progress, and high school math is an area of strong growth. At the same time, we must develop more intensive support for schools that are not moving,
continue or accelerate attendance improvement and accelerate growth in literacy. This is the hard, urgent, and important work ahead. I'm now proud to turn the presentation over to our two school leaders so they
can illustrate the improvement within their schools. I'm proud to introduce our first speaker, Pat Clearary from Tech Boston Academy. Thank you, Mike, and thank you team and everyone. I want to thank you all for
inviting us here tonight. It means a lot, not just to me, but to our school community to have an opportunity to just talk about some of our greatness. Um, starting off with slide one, which is what's great about Tech Boston. When Commissioner Martinez visited Tech
Boston at the start of the school year, I greeted him with the question or the comment, I know what you were thinking. What makes Tech Boston Tech Boston? And the answer I gave him was love.
Tech Boston was founded on a strong student support model and that has remained at the core of everything we do. The number one thing people highlight when they visit our school is the strong sense of community.
The Tech Boston mission has always had two equally important pieces there to provide an environment that is both nurturing and challenging. As you enter the classrooms, you will
find a world of AP, early college, grade level texts and tasks, students doing the heavy lift. You know, Mayor Woo's new favorite uh thing to see, but it's real. As you step outside at the end of the
day, you see a field, Keith Lovefield, loaded with student athletes, coaches, supporters. Football, soccer, track, baseball, softball, cheer, even some lacrosse sticks. At Tech Boston, we provide both nurture
and challenge. And our students rise to that challenge together. My next slide is about the strategy, right? Transformation. Three years back we were that accountability rating of five. So what's happened to get that
five to eight that 8 to in our life an 11 they might think nine and now this time around 14. How do we keep moving forward? Um we continue to embrace the daily expectation in all TBA classrooms. Students are reading, writing,
discussing, using high quality grade level texts. Students are doing that lift. We add additional academic culture moves. Partnerships with UMass, 75 students currently enrolled in college courses right there at TBA Early
College. We increased the number of AP offerings and every freshman in our school is going to receive their first UMass credit by the end of this year. That's motivation. Um, we also know that raising or rising
to an academic challenge sometimes requires support. We implemented a daily intervention block for students where all students get that individualized uh support for what they need. We
expanded our student advisory model and meet with students daily with their adviserss. We leaned into professional development for educators. And this past year, our our main focus for educator development was supporting multilingual learners.
And our access test scores have been have never been stronger. Every grade level improved on access testing and every grade level exceeded desi expectations. That it relates directly back to our PD plan. And for this slide, the last thing
I really want to talk to, and they're behind me, coaching our coaches. And that's a big plus from the transformation team. I strongly believe that the support of our transformation coaches has been the number one driver for our continued improvement. Our
school has strong, hard-working, committed educators, but we all have a lot to learn. Our coaches make it possible for our instruction to match the quality of our materials. They lead the work of our ILT, our
professional development planning, and our community is grateful. And we're grateful to the Darborn coaches. And this slide, I'll go quick. Right. This is just that graph just talking about um or letting people see where
some of those improvements have happened year-over-year. You've got um year-over-year gains in map reading and map math, but that's growth gains. We're seeing growth and
and often not at that number Mary skipper wants me at 60 plus when we're accelerating. So, our achievement is not where we need to be. We see a growing and stronger year after year student sense of belonging. our family survey
results keep rising with uh support for our school and once again the schoolwide improvements in access testing and what I didn't uh put up there year over year over year we continue to decrease our chronic absenteeism
and finally and this one I'll be quick right how do we keep moving forward how do we keep improving and improvement is what we do it's why we have this team uh so it's time for for us to accelerate. It's time for us to hit the gas. So, for
every area that we've been working on, we have a new move to make. So, those are the next steps aligned completely with the learning that brought us here. Um, and we will just be invested in continuous learning, continuous growth,
and we will do this with love. Thank you, Pat. Thank you, Tech Boston team. Next up is Darlene Marano from Dearborn STEM Academy. She is joined by the Dearborn Literacy
Coach and a key member of her literacy of her leadership team, Isabelle Perez. And on behalf of Dearborn, we apologize for having gone over our time, but we respectfully request a few extra minutes to hear about another great success story. >> Tag boss.
>> Well, it does. Okay. >> Good evening. My name is Darlene Marano and I'm the head of school at the Dearborn STEM Academy. Before I start, I want to say that 27 years ago, I started teaching English
and history at the Woodro Wilson Middle School where I met Mr. Pat Clary. Since then, Pat has been a kind mentor, a thought partner, a consistent collaborator, and a trusted friend.
Thank you, Pat. The Dearborn STEM Academy is a proud open enrollment Boston public school right here in the heart of Roxberry, serving approximately 572 amazing students in grades 7 through 12.
Our mission is simple but powerful. We want every student to graduate with the skills and the confidence they need to thrive in college, succeed in their career, and make a difference in their communities.
Next slide. At DSA, we've seen firsthand how a strong, vibrant school culture and climate paired with highquality teaching and engaging learning experiences can truly make a difference in student attendance. And the results speak for
themselves. Our daily attendance climbed from 87.1% in school year 2324 to an impressive 90.1% in school year 2425. Even more exciting, our chronic
absenteeism rate dropped from 45 No. Yeah. What? >> People on the screen on on Zoom can actually see it. >> And you have people from your school that are asking to see it. So, we're just going to stop to make community.
>> That's nice. >> There it is. No, it shared that. >> It's like it shared. >> Yeah, that worked. I think You see something? Yes. But they see this. It's so quiet.
>> I know. >> I still had a couple more pages. I love that your staff is watching, darling. >> Yeah, it's great. Hi, Mom. >> It's okay. >> I can hear it. Yes.
>> Can you drop it back in the in the chat? That's a great idea. Can you drop Yeah. Can you drop it in the chat? >> No, >> that is a terrible idea. >> That's what I'm send.
It's actually a terrible idea. >> Maybe a terrible idea. >> Sister Reasons. past my bedtime two nights in a row. Seriously, I feel I'm feeling [Music]
see this slide. What you would see is >> Yeah. And here it is. >> But it came up. >> We probably have to make a call on this soon. We're good. Okay. Great. Thank you.
Go ahead, darling. Okay. Uh, let's see. >> Start with the thing about >> our daily start. Yeah, let's turn back to talking about Pat. Um, let's see. Our daily attendance climbed from 87.1% in school year 2324 to an impressive
90.1% in school year 2425. Even more exciting, our chronic absenteeism rate dropped from 45.4% 4% to 33.2%. [Music] The last graph is a comparison of the
daily attendance by grade level. And as you can see, there have been some gains. This progress is a testament to the dedication of our students, our families, and staff working together to make DSA a place where everyone wants to
be there every day. Our next slide is going to be presented by our transformation coach. And we've just learned that this is the first time that a coach is presenting. And I'm happy to introduce Isabelle Perez.
>> Uh, one of the areas that we noted that needed improvement that has also been talked about tonight is our multil- language learners. Knowing that we have a large population of multil- language learners, 24% of those language learners in our school being of Cape Verian descent, we knew that it was important
to look at what how they were performing in this metric. One of the biggest moves that we did was to uh send out a message to staff that multil- language learners were all of our responsibilities. And so as a community, we really started to put
in the work around investigating what strategies best support those students. And we've been uh very happy and excited with the gains that we see on the screen right now. Our middle school on access testing uh they had a uh rise in 10.3%
points. Our high school at 5.5. And what we have seen that those numbers have helped uh our accountability overall in the last four years. We started at a two and we are currently at a 16 which marks a 14 point uh rise in our accountability
score. >> Some of these improvement strategies have been again looking at the curriculum using HQIM really uh including everyone and understanding the data and how it works. a climate and culture team that has really made a lot
of strides in creating events that pull the community together. Home visits, phone conferences, back to school cookouts, attendance letters, a whole staff working at 100% together with the same vision. Um, and we've seen what
that collaboration can bring about in the results. And lastly, what's next? Our next steps focus on deepening the use of highquality instructional materials across all content areas, ensuring that every student, whether they need
additional access or additional acceleration, is supported. We will continue to strengthen concrete supports for English language learners and expand our attendance initiatives to sustain the gains that we've made this year. In addition, we'll enhance writing
instruction across all subject areas and further develop our pathways to graduation, college, and career readiness. Finally, we'll reaffirm the use of data with students to build their understanding and investment in their own growth, all while maintaining
consistency in our practices and expectations schoolwide. At DSA, we let our community know that you matter. We believe that we have something really special going on and I want to make sure to spread the love. So, the last thing I want to say to you
is please join us on Wednesday, November 26 at approximately 800 a.m. for our pep rally and our community potluck. Great. >> Thank you so much. >> Thank you so much, Darlene, Isabelle, and Pat. Your work and the work of so
many of our other schools is a model and an inspiration. Before moving to questions, I want to briefly touch on one final area of progress. In collaboration with the office of human resources, we have prioritized
recruitment and early hiring. We can see in the table on the left that thanks to hard work by school hiring teams, the vitally important early postings for transformation schools and concentrated hiring support from the
district. We have dramatically accelerated the pace of early hiring at transformation schools. We are committed to hiring and retaining the best possible educators for every transformation school classroom.
To close, we have shared the specific budget allocations provided to the transformation schools for your review. With that, we thank you and we look forward to your comments and to your questions.
>> Thank you, Mr. Sab and thank you all for your presentation. I'll now open it up to questions and thoughts from our members. Good. >> Hello. Thank you so much for the presentation and it's good to hear your both of your stories of of success. I
think um some of the questions I ask will be the same that I always ask as you know. Um tonight's update on transformation schools. I think it's both really encouraging and at the same time really sobering. Um, we see movement, six schools exiting, small
gains on accountability percentiles, strong examples in places like Tech Boston and Dearborn and the Homes, a school I have been tracking really closely. Uh, but we also see a system that's been transforming for years
without truly transforming outcomes for a lot of our kids. So roughly a third of our schools uh serving the highest concentration of black, latino, low-income English language learners, disabled students remain in transformation. And I'm been thinking a lot about how like that's not a
substrate anymore. Respectfully, that's that's the district's core operating reality. Um and many schools have been in some form of intervention or turnaround for five to 10 years spanning
multiple superintendent, state designations and new models. Uh even as growth improves slightly, achievement remains stagnant or declining. Um high school absenteeism exceeds 50%. Uh and so the first
question I have is about elementary schools specifically. The schools exiting are all elementary schools, smaller elementary schools as well. Um which raises questions to me around under enrollment, our stretched footprint, um and how they might be
structurally tied to low performance. And so I'm sort of throwing this to you like how much is that connected are like and how does the transformation strategy align with right sizing the district? >> So I think there's an there's definitely
embedding in there. I think that um we see and I think we've pointed this out with the exam school structure we see a concentration down right through selected schools into open enrollment schools. um and with that higher
concentrations of special education students, multilingual learners and high need students. And so I think in general when you even look across the state, you see that high schools are the last ones to exit uh whether it was turnaround or underperforming. It's just a harder
benchmark. It's also the one grade that they're judged upon which is the 10th. So um there is some structural things there for sure. Um, I do think the complication this year with the high schools in general, and we saw this
statewide, was that in the change of statute for MCCAST, uh, the scores all went down, right? Both literacy and math. And, uh, we believe that that's far less about performance of students uh, and ability
rather than just not seeing the relevancy of taking the exam the same way. Um, so I I think that plays into why there's fewer high schools making those 2-year gains above the 10 percentile in movement. That
said, our high schools actually performed higher than state average across the board. Um, and so we actually saw some glimpses of good things in the data, but we are still going to have this tension point going forward with that one marker of 10th grade, right, of
connecting it to the relevance. Uh in terms of the right sizing, I think it is again um one of the complications of right sizing the district is that we have allowed over decades this funneling down of students to where when you close
a school uh such as we took on with Excel and with Lions there's high high concentrations of special education and multilingual that we then have to in some cases build programming for. Y >> so we can't actually closing isn't just
the answer. It's also you have to create programs which was why we did body east, why we did next, why we're reinventing the alted system. Um and it adds to the complexity of right sizing the system for sure of how fast we can go because we have to get kids into high quality
seats. >> Yeah, that makes a lot of sense. I will say separate advocacy moment. I think this is also one of the conversations as we're talking about competency determinations like I as a body a member of this body won't won't feel comfortable with us saying the kids aren't taking the test seriously and
that's the results. So we do have an opportunity though not recommended to make MCCAST a part of the competency determination and so something for us to consider if we believe we are not going to be able to see high schools moving out unless this the test is higher
stakes. Um the data transparency question I have is just around um something that you said in the presentation. Map growth is listed as an expected measurable impact. Um but at the same time no map data appears in the presentation. I am obsessed with this
data point. I think we are leaving a lot on the table in our conversation. Um so I guess I'm asking why is it not included? Uh, what do map trends tell us about day-to-day learning gains and can the committee receive regular updates that include MAP alongside MCCAST data
to assess real-time progress? Thank you. I'll try not to give the same answer. So the reason for it not being included in this presentation is that the most reliable data, the most statistically reliable data is the state data from the
previous year and the accountability percentiles and the accountability data is what determines transformation. So our start of year presentation in the given window of time we have focuses on that and the issue of map and whether we share it or not is a complicated
question because it is not intended to be um used as a public facing data point that would be used to judge schools. It's meant to be used internally as a school improvement tool and we do value it and use it that way. We look at
schools at their progress. we look at their start of year starting points and we're increasingly going to use them for this more intensive intervention that we need to do in schools that are not moving forward. So one question is about its presentation publicly at the school committee. I'll defer to others on that
decision, but the other is about how we use it and value it and maybe it's empty reassurance, but it's a very valuable source of information for us that we use in our planning. >> It's and by no means it's empty. I know that the system uses that data I've watch even in my son's school like I
know how important it is. I it's one of those two it's a yes and two things can be true moment. Uh while we don't want it to be high stakes we're at the same time acknowledging that we think data is dipping because the test isn't high stakes anymore. And so both can happen
where we and as also people who make the budget decision like we need to understand where things are moving particularly as we're making tough choices about where we where we allocate resources. >> Yeah. I mean maybe another way to kind of approach that Mike is to just talk
about the correlation of MAP to MCCAST. >> Yes. And I think to move away from the 10th grade data for a moment where there was a very large change in state policy. There was no change in grades three to eight. Yeah. We we don't in any way discredit or even feel confusion about
the data in grades three to eight. It's the same as it's been for many years and we value it and we can compare it. And so I think an important thing to to recognize is that MCCAST is our summitive assessment. It's public and we value it. We see correlations. For
example, the highest growth that we see in any school and it's an outlier on the charts is from the grew school this year. was extremely high in math and in English. I make I say that publicly because last year it was the lowest and we talked about it. This year it was the
highest. It was among a handful of the highest schools in the district and we could spot that happening on their MAP test. We were talking about it through the year. We saw the work they were doing in classrooms and we saw the evidence in the assessments and we weren't therefore surprised. So there's
a throughine for the data that we're using but not sharing publicly. and the summitive data at the end it's statistically correlated but we also just see practical correlations monthtomonth >> that makes sense it's just hard and again I'll say it's it's a third of our
system >> that is trending in in good ways because of the hard work that you guys are doing but overall in a way that is really concerning like as a parent there are sometimes schools many of us wouldn't send our kids to because we're worried about the existing outcomes and so to
know that we're not tracking that data publicly closely feels to me like why? >> Yeah. So, I do think that's like a good to me a jumpoff point to talk a bit about the there's a there's a group of schools that we know um based on some
stagnation of various data points and I think it's similar to a group that you're talking about um that we need to increase to like a tier three service. Mhm. >> Like we did some piloting of this last year with a couple schools. We were able
to actually unstick them for the first time in like 5 years. >> And so Mike, it just might be worth talking about like how we're thinking through that >> like the and we're talking about those schools like in 5 to 10 years of of some sort of status. >> Correct. that we just see regardless of
the supports put in there, we don't see the needles moving or we see such chronically low low performance that it it has to be met with a sense of urgency. >> That moves us a little bit away um from the MAP testing. But just before moving,
I would say you're not hearing us say that we see the MAP literacy scores going up and the MCCAST is not. Of course, >> we see a through line and that's why we're realizing we need to make adjustments in certain places. So, it's
it's not that it isn't showing us what's going on. And I I I imagine Pat and Darlene and Isabelle would also see the through line there in in their own work. In terms of the tier three supports to schools, this is hard work. schools that have been um having trouble making
measurable improvements. It's not just flipping a switch, but an example that we're encouraged by, and the school teams get 99% of the credit, but is Madison Park, which was a school that was in the first percentile since 2016.
>> Yes, >> that's concerning. >> Yeah, >> it's in the first percentile since 2016. >> So, accountability percentile one. And that school moved up to three this year. That's a small step. There's no satisfaction from anyone. But there is evidence that a school that had been at
percentile one for the longest time is moving. And we actually have moved other than Mel King, which newly has an accountability percentile, we no longer have any schools in percentile one. A few years ago, there were I don't remember the exact number, but three, four, five in that percentile. So, we're
seeing slow movement, but it I appreciate Chair Robinson reminding us several weeks ago, last night, this is urgent. We're not claiming this is a destination that we've arrived
at, but we also have to recognize we're starting to see ways to move schools forward and realize exactly where schools need more help. And those are the adjustments we're trying to make now. So, and and so I say this because it is
there's literally like three points. There's the point that you stop the skid, there is the point that you redirect, and there is the point you accelerate. >> And I think that that is for the first year, we're seeing that some of the intense strategies we put in place for
those schools that were either skidding or stuck are actually moving them to that next level. Um and the challenge now is that instead of one or two focusing in that way, we have more like
six or seven that we have to do that with. Um and so that may mean me some realignment relative to resource but it is with an intentionality that when when somebody asks about that school and supports that school needs everybody all the liaison the regional soups the ops
leaders Sam Anna everybody says that school takes priority and I think it was with that intentionality that we were able to unstick Madison we were able to that in addition to Paul is a really great leader and he's the first one to come in with an instru instructional vision that's really like holding to it
in a long time. So we definitely share and this was something Mike and I spoke about at length last year which is how what led to us doing this wraparound with Madison with Mel King. Um, but we need to as the leaders know, right? Like
focus, strategy, and >> acceleration. >> Acceleration, right? So, like they know that that's where we're at. You saw it in Darlene and Pat's presentation, right? That those were the the echo points. Um, and so I think like that
will be something to come back to school committee with in our next presentation or update to just kind of update on what are those specific supports that we're able to accelerate with. >> It makes sense. And at the same time, while there's certain schools who are
ticking up, you have schools that are trending down, you know, that had higher scores in 2022 than they have in 2025 and significantly lower um percentiles. What is the what happens in terms of
accountability internally for the system? the supports we're offering the 13 million we're spending on transformation supports as well as everything else we've put into the system like where's the accountability from your end for the improvement >> yeah so I mean this is the regional network right this is where the regional
soups are looking at that data with the leaders trying to unpack it understand what happened what direction it's going the school's going why it's that way and then making adjustments sometimes that may be in how they're using the central supports of the network sometimes that
may be in the budget of the school allocating to reading instruction or reading intervention or high dosage tutoring. But those adjustments like all that data has been being looked at since ALI in a really really intentional way.
And then when the regional model is in action doing the PLC's, they're looking in those classrooms for what the leaders and that ILT have sort of said, these are the strategies we're trying to implement. And Mike, feel free to chime in. No, nothing more there.
>> Yeah. No, I'm I and I'm I'll hold this maybe this will be the thing I keep asking next time, right? Just about the shared accountability systemwide more than just your office. Like there is it is our systemwide strategy and I'm really holding that. It's not just Mike
Sabin's work. It's really our entire system. The majority of our schools are in transformation. We talk about three schools at Nauseium, but this is actually the majority of our work. And so I'm holding that um and running out of time, but I you know I feel the
crisis of it and the excitement of what has been happening. >> Thank you. >> Thank you. Um, >> yeah. Uh, thank you for the the presentation and um, I share all of the the thoughts and the complexities of
each side of this too. And I think I was really curious sort of you all started to speak to it a bit about like what is going on sort of like the day-to-day of the the tier three intensive support because I'm concerned about the 15 schools that over a year have gotten
progressively worse and I'm trying to understand it's not even strictly correlated to chronic absenteeism. Um, are you finding that it's a I don't know uh inefficiency in how the the professional learning is being done? Um, are there any particular trends that
you're seeing from classroom observation tools? either the lack of use of that just h how are we h what are you all finding particularly in these schools as they're as they're >> that's a hard question because each school is a very unique community and
I'd actually after I try to answer we might want to hear from Pat Isabelle and Darlene about what they altered in their schools to make progress and be schools that moved forward But I I don't want to oversimplify things,
but if there's a great teacher working overtime in every classroom in a school, we're going to make progress. So the question is what teaming structures, what leadership structures, what professional learning structures
and coaching, what community culture and climate is needed to attract, support and retain great teachers over time. And when we create that stability over time, schools will
make the steady incremental progress that we're seeing in those schools. Not to say there's not great teachers in classrooms in every school, but that alignment of a strong team of individuals and teaming structures over
time, working to continuously strengthen strong points and address challenges. Getting that in place in every school is is what we need to do. But each situation is different. So I can't give you a simplistic answer about
what we don't see. But the consistency of highquality learning and highquality culture building is shared by the schools that are progressing steadily. So trying to get that forward momentum on the culture of schools
and the classroom instruction. That's what we're trying to help make happen. And thank you for that because I think also from a a systemwide perspective, what I what I wrestle with is how do we as a body create realistic benchmarks
for then when we have to decide we need to take a different course, right? Um and that's not something that will be answered this evening. Um, but it's just something that I think wrestling with because I like I hear you and I
understand even like a policy change, you're not going to see the data on that for at least 5 years. I think it's the same thing. You need consistent um consistency within this. Um, so it's just just naming what I'm holding like as like as we're as we're talking about
this. Um because our accountability to families is to be able to provide as as we've heard from in in public testimony just being able to say that every school provides quality like options. Um, and it's like at the same time, you
acknowledge that there's quality work that's going on in every school despite whatever the outcomes are, but I still can't confidently go to families and say like, "Yes, this is an outcome that you should be proud with, like proud of as a
family." So, it's it's it's it's it's it really is complex and it's just I think it's just for us as a B um to to discern and um a little bit more Yeah, I mean the other part that I would sort of add is
the most important thing when we look at data of a school that swings um is to be able to understand why. So for instance, in a single strand school, you may have a teacher or two out on leave who are dynamic teachers and got
incredible results. And you get somebody in that is certified and capable, but they're not able to do what that other teacher did. And all of a sudden that single strand school, two of your grades, the test just went down. And so
that's just important for us to know, right? when we look at it, at least when I look at it, that's what I look for. What you'll also see is sometimes in schools that are prek to 8, when the exam school rush has left, you
go from three strands of balanced testing to one strand of students who may not be your strongest test takers and all of a sudden those grades sink on MCCAST, right? So sometimes there are just there's you know member said
structural sometimes there are structural issues that almost predict the data and then other times there are things that are happening that to me are the ones we really have to like peel the onion back because they're the more troubling like where there's instability
in leadership >> where there is uh an adult- centered culture where there is a student problematic culture like students don't have a sense of belonging. Uh there's no there's a
very strong correlation of chronic absenteeism and what kids can and can't do on MCCAST. Like it's just so clear. And I think you see that in the transformation schools, which is why we've worked so hard on the chronic absenteeism to to get at that because no matter what we're doing, if kids are not
there and buying into it, they're not going to show it up on the test. So this is really like when you talk about the 108 schools, we have to literally go through those schools and um what I will also say is that um
in most of the I think you saw this with state underperforming schools, right? And Dearborn's like a great example, right? Like you've been listed with the state for how many years? >> Almost 10. >> Yeah. And like it has been in the last
like really three years of like the intensity of the transformation network that you are showing progress right that's how complex the issue can be but that is why we do believe that the way we're approaching transformation is the
right way to do it but we need to do it faster more sta like I think more consistently like that's the unlocking that we're looking for um and fix some of the structural issues that go well beyond a
leader's control. But this is a great conversation as a body for us to have and I think it's an opportunity to understand the structural barriers that exist in our schools. >> So are within those 15 schools that we
saw, are we seeing any particular correlation of their climate? um and how it's actually being rated or surveyed. >> I I don't want to get too technical on the numbers, but one thing to just remember about accountability is
every time one school in the state goes up, another one goes down. It's set that way. And so it's not that alarming. If a school goes down one accountability percentile, it could just mean something changed somewhere else in the state.
It's the schools that are steadily declining or are very low and not improving that we're thinking about. So that number 15, not a good number. We do not like it and we absolutely expect that won't happen again.
But I don't want to say that those are schools that the district should be most concerned about. Your highest school could go down one or two points. It's the schools that are say below five and unable to rise or the schools that are having multiple years of decline. Those
are the ones we should be concerned about. And that multi-year data is it's public. It's at the Desi website and it's in the stoplight report that's linked as well. I I hope that make I hope that answered your question. Thank you so much. Are you good?
>> Um, thank you so much for the for the presentation. I really appreciate how much data was in this report and how driven you are by outcomes um as a whole team. I particularly appreciated slide six that just has the expected
measurable impact across multiple indicators. I actually think um to member Cardette Hernandez's point that um so many of our schools are um are in turnaround um there are some things that could be applied districtwide and I
think that this type of list with specific multi-year targets could serve as a model for how we're looking at all of our schools progress over time. So thank you for this thoughtful list. I also appreciate the celebration of some real bright spots and I was actually at
the homes today for Boston Reeds Day um one of the schools that's making very consistent progress and watched two incredible pair of professionals lead expertly internalized illustrative math lessons. Um it was really really
impressive. Um I just wanted to say something about student growth percentile too because um my understanding is that student growth percentile is calculated by looking at students with similar performance the previous test administration and seeing
how much that student improved compared to similarly situated students. And I think it's a really important number for us to keep our eye on because we know that schools exit a lot of kids at grade seven and there may be students who had
very lowcaled scores for MCCAST etc. But every student has the opportunity to grow um at a high rate regardless of their starting point. So while proficiency may be a lagging indicator, um I really appreciated seeing um the
student growth tracking because every student has an opportunity to participate in that um and to grow above 50%. Um my question um to our school leaders uh transformation coach, so great to hear
from you. Um, and you're both an example of something we talked about earlier, which is what consistent, highly skilled leadership looks like, um, and what it can achieve. Um, I had, um, I really appreciated some of the specifics about
what's happening instructionally and programmatically for students related to teaching and learning at your two schools. um particularly intentionally rigorous coursework with required dual enrollment for all freshmen and the and the AP bio class that we heard about from the mayor last night um for 9th
graders I think is so important. The rigor of courses that students take in high school is one of the biggest indicators of post-secary success. I'd love um to hear more about the writing tasks at the Dearborn. um I saw that was listed as something that was important
and wondering is that coming from um like an extension of the HQIM or something that you all have added on. Um I wonder if additional writing is something we can all continue to think about in terms of moving these scores. So would love to hear a little about that. Um so it's very interesting
because um we we had our progress review today and so we discussed a lot of this information and one of the slides we presented was our MCCAST data from last year and it included very specifically each grade level and um the area on the
MCCAST and how our students performed and they performed they could have done much better and so it was one of the things that we decided that we wanted to make sure that we discussed with our staff. So, it's very interesting. Um, Mr. Fernandez, um, when you talk about
transparency and what can actually move a school, making sure that every member of our community knows what our scores are. They know what the targets are. We are very transparent with every member of our community so that everyone knows
this is how we're performing and as a staff, we can work together to rise above and to see better student outcomes. And so in in presenting that information to our staff and making sure that our students understand where they are, we've decided that ensuring that we
focus on writing is something that we do and it's very important to us and that we track our progress. And so what we've decided so it's not an extension so much of the um of our curriculum in that our staff are using their curriculum to pull
formative writing assessments, but what we've done is we're tracking their progress. So we give three formative assessments each year and um we track it so with our own internal tracking system so that we're seeing how students are perform performing in um creating um a
clear paragraph in creating looking at evidence and analyzing that evidence in reasoning and in conventions. And so in order to in doing that, we're seeing students make progress over time and we're identifying areas where we can do better and where we can do more succinct
teaching. I don't know if that makes sense. >> It's very helpful. >> Did you want to add? >> Um I just wanted to add that we're also looking at writing across content. So again, it's that shared kind of lift around the work. Writing doesn't just
happen in ELA or ESL or history, but it also has to happen in math and in science. um because we know that assessment is looking at that and we are a STEM school so it's important that we share that vision around writing and that that lift for all of our kids. So having that writing across the content
so a kid can experience contentbased writing every hour of the day is uh what we hope and what we can start to see um will move our data. something that you just mentioned in terms of the transparency of where students are with the data with your
whole staff um brings me to a question about um how families are involved and informed about students performance in these key areas. Um I saw like home visits and conferencing related to attendance. Um, and this extends to a
question I asked um during the overall accountability presentation a few weeks ago in terms of how much we are um treating parents as partners and understanding the data and how they can help us accelerate outcomes. So I was wondering if not just at your two
schools but um Mr. Sabin if there were other places where you saw that work being done. >> Thank you for that question. Um there's a lot of variability across schools and there's a lot of best practices going on in certain schools as
we've heard and as you've commented on schools you've recently visited and there's other schools that need to to learn from their their colleagues and I actually think it's a bit of a dilemma that the transformation office is thinking about both how can we best seed ideas in schools from other schools
what's the way to do that the regional structure does that well but we might not have yet quite the way to do that outside of the regional structure. We don't want to weaken the regional structure, but there's schools that can learn from each other. So, that's something that we're thinking about. And
then in addition, it's interesting having gone from being a school leader and very family oriented to being a central office department leader and trying to think about where can the voice of the families and the students inform our work as well. So while you didn't exactly ask this, it
raises a dilemma that we're facing as a central office department, which is how can we help schools and how can schools help us uh to amplify the voice of families in this whole process of school improvement. >> Yeah, I would also say um and you know this better than anyone from the high
school side, right? But at the high school level, it's so important that students themselves are engaged and understand what does a particular assessment score mean? Where does that put them? How is this all building toward where they want to go and what they want to do and
either helping them get closer to that or they're further away from that? And I think that's an area at the high school level we continue to try to work on. You saw it bit in Darlene in Pat's presentations. Um and then at the elementary level, you know, one of the things um the mayor spoke about last
night was just the the story and the observation of the Otis and the change of what is getting sent home for parents to work with. We're do we're trying to do more curriculum nights for parents so that they actually understand what we're teaching, what the skills are, and then at home, what are the kinds of exercises
they can do with children um that actually reinforces that. So, it's a it's an area we definitely want and need to build muscle in and I think it just requires different strategies at the different grade levels. But it's a great point, right? Because this is the whole
village and parents are incredibly important part of that village as are students themselves >> and these assessments are not um different schoolto. So it it does seem like something that could be centrally supported and take that lift from school
leaders and and school support teams in terms of webinars, pre-made letters, exercises that could support when the MAP scores go out as just an attachment or the MCAT scores go out with just a letter from Desi. Um that's definitely
something that could be a district-wide initiative. >> Um just one more question I think. Um, talking about the use of map data and the ways that you all use it internally, wondering how much you all are using it
to seed um, really high growth classrooms and whether there's an opportunity to capture that instruction for learning in a larger group, whether the whole region or the district, whether it's through video or visits. Um
are are is map being used to identify really high performing teachers who get outcomes and growth for students? >> That's me. I'm out of time, not you. >> Oh, that is a great question. Looking at
bright spots within one's own system is probably the best way to learn. And it also talking about changing mindset is the best way to change mindset because it's happening with our own students in our own schools. We identify on MCCAST and on MAP high growth schools, high
growth grade levels in certain subjects and then individual high growth teachers. And we're trying to develop a more systematic way of visiting those locations. There are a lot of them. So, it's hard it's hard to visit them all
and but we have undertaken um starting these visits. We've already been doing them on on the MCCAST highpoint both schools and grade levels and there's a lot to learn from that. So, I think your question just reinforces how important that is and also how can we broaden the
number of people who are part of those visits. It's important to not just be a small little group of people that then try to say what they're seeing. but that many of us get to participate that and see what the high impact uh learning looks like
question I have two questions one is can you talk a little bit about the intervention block that you're doing and how that works and the question is are other schools doing that as now
this time. All right. >> Yeah, that was the good news, right? That um when we're rolling out all of this messaging to teachers, HQIM, grade level test, uh text and tasks,
they all have in the back of their head, I'm on board, but I don't know if I'm 100% there. I don't know if my students are 100% there. So what we found a couple years back we built what we call our rise block. other schools would say
win blocks and it does tie back to at least individually to MAP scores um in some places also just um what teachers are seeing their own assessments and I have a as you've been hearing a really cool team
>> of support MTSS supports um academic team that have looked at every individual student like worked with the the seventh grade team to create, you
know, what grouping students by need. Grouping students who are at the maybe they're really on grade level in math. how can we push them further and setting up those groups and then giving the teachers tools where they can whether
it's likel um you know online platforms that they don't they can put in front of the students they can track them but they don't have to go home and plan because they're also their math teacher or their English teacher um it's you know I'm
saying all this with you guys right behind me >> you're doing a good But I have it. No. What am I missing here? >> Sorry. As well. >> It's really looking at math and literacy and what each student needs in those
domains whether or not they are below grade level at grade level or are placed in an advancing group. And I was saying in terms of data points, we are looking at map data, MCAT data, assessments and classroom assessments for clear teacher conversation observations, social
emotional needs. So every single student is assigned a block based on their own individual profile for our intervention. >> See, isn't that better than hearing from me? And other thing yeah and except for me to end on a high note what happened at the
grew I mean that is except >> it grew >> it grew but where are the lessons learned for all of us critically around that kind of growth in a short period of time and you know and how are we sharing
that information but also celebrating that and helping others to understand what's possible. >> Clearly, the school leader and the school faculty are the ones that should be answering that question.
>> Um, and we each have our answer through our own lens, but I'll venture to give you an answer. So, I think the school leadership and the regional staff supporting them were relentlessly focused on improving
instruction every day and meeting the needs of individual students in every classroom. And that meant two things. It meant making sure the delivery of the core curriculum was clear and on grade level, not at a
reduced rigor. and then that individual students were known, identified and received the extra support that they needed. So they made sure every student was challenged and supported and they made sure that every adult was part of a
team focused on delivering uh the best instruction they could. And what's exciting about it is that it worked. That's not really a mystery, but it's hard to do. And we give great credit um for that to that school staff under duress because that had been the school
with the biggest reduction the year four that created the year before. It created a lot of pressure for them and for their community and they rose to the occasion. Kudos to school leader um Michelle and kudos to the whole team and every teacher and student and family member there and other schools can accomplish
the same thing and we have other schools that we anticipate will show dramatic improvement like that. Yeah, my question is how do we create that urgency within the whole district? Because if it's possible in one place clearly with
the very same demographics of students that are struggling elsewhere, >> again, it gets back to it's it's about the adults and we and I said our mantra here is student outcomes won't improve until adult behaviors do. And the group
is a perfect example of adult behaviors changing and look what they were able to to accomplish. >> Well, I'll say we appreciate your messaging and we feel the urgency and our schools do too and um we're
expecting to be able to report on bigger gains in the future and I hope that we can and I anticipate that we will. the size of the group. >> It is a small school. I don't know if it's in the 200s or low 300s um offhand, but it's a small school. And member Card
Hernandez, to return to something you said before, we're seeing smaller schools with the BPS strategy and strong leadership are moving faster, of course. >> And so there's some patterns that we're seeing. One of them is that our literacy
curriculum needs more attention and support. Another is that our larger elementary and K to8s need more attention and support. But the acceleration of these other schools is going to allow us to concentrate our support in a smaller number of areas.
And that's that's what happens with students as well. If your core strategy is starting to work, then your extra help is concentrated on smaller numbers of people or smaller numbers of schools. and that's when the whole tiered system starts to work. So, I think we're
feeling that that's starting to happen. And hopefully we can um I'm optimistic, I would say, that we can concentrate these supports and help schools to do what these two schools have done and many others. >> Cruise 200.
>> Yeah, it's a it's fasc. [Music] They're under 250. I think one of them's 280 or something. So, >> but these two schools with these two schools at the table with us are two of are two sizable schools. So, >> and it's different. It's harder. I mean,
it's different to move those numbers. You're moving more kids. >> Yeah. >> Yeah. Did you have a >> No, I I mean, I I had more of a I guess this is a a random uh question. Um, but I was particularly interested in how
your schools are approaching um, leveraging community partnerships within the work. Um, definitely been a fan of like the Dearborn in all of its partnerships and with academic institutions, but also the surrounding communities. So, I'm kind of wondering
um how our transformation schools are leaning on community partners to support them um in the work and if that's something that we think about systemwide as well. >> I can speak to the Dearborn. Um one of the things that we we want to
make sure to do is to invite everyone into the everyone from the community into our school. So any events that we have, any opportunity to both showcase our students as well as ask for support or give resources to families, we bring
our community partners in to help us do that. We do have partnerships with places like the Kathleen Kathleen Stone Island, formerly Thompson Island, who's worked with our school for many years, specifically working with our middle school on um some expeditionary learning
experiences on the island that are tied to the curriculum that they're using, open sad in science. And so that level of partnership you'll see in some of our partners where we're closely aligning the curriculum that's being taught to our students with the experiences that
they're having outside of the classroom. Other partners, other community partners will donate. So there's different levels of partners. So, we have partners and we just had a partnership with Chick-fil-A, believe it or not, where they're donating gift cards for us, which, you
know, that's not something, and that's another topic that we can talk about another time because gift cards, food, those sort of things are really good incentives for our kids and we do want to reward them, but unfortunately, that's not something that we can do through our budget. So, Chick-fil-A has donated gift cards for us to use as part
of our attendance initiatives. All of those little things that they can give us and support us with really do help us push and really um help to support our kids. >> Yeah, we have some really really strong
and great long-term partners whether they're educational partners like UMass Boston and um we also have uh Crossroads Youth Development is with us every week.
uh was today, Wednesday. I don't >> they were here today. They're with us every week delivering um our SEAL lessons in our middle school so that our teachers while they're delivering that, they can meet up and have their MTSS meeting where they're identifying the
students who need more. Um so we're it's like a a win-win right there. We work with Young Man with a plan. Bam. we have city year in our schools and um offering high dosage tutoring throughout the day.
um partnership is huge and then another part where I talk about that um or superintendent skippers acceleration that's one of our areas uh this year our entire school is broken up one member of
every grade level 7 through 12 in our specialized programs someone from every grade level is on a team that uh is working six hours a month towards blank and one of those teams is our our partnership action team. And so they're
spending uh they're getting together, they're looking at who our partners are and who our partners could be, and they're then reaching out, inviting them in, getting them in front of the the appropriate grade levels. Uh we've got
um the apprentice learning program, Julie. Today we had our eighth graders go out for that first time today on on the job uh visit. I see them come back a little late today, but with big smiles their first day on the job. So, these
are the the partnerships we have get us to where we are. >> The partnerships that are out there that we haven't found that connection are going to get us to where we need to be. And I think this model, this action team model that we're doing with our staff,
because we're doing it with multilingual learners, we have a a parent engagement action team now. Um, I really do believe that's a way of taking something that we believe we do pretty good and getting it to that place that will get us um those
results. So, we're gonna grow. We're going to grow like the grew. >> Yeah. There's also this there's two um kind of interesting things now that I like think about like your schools in particular, but like um one I think uh Darlene and Pat are
really really good in at leveraging the schedule >> and the schedule is money, time, resource and so I think that is something we're working on particularly with the high schools in thinking about
seven period day as opposed to six and what kinds of opportunities that opens up for things like customized blocks. But the second thing is both of them are examples of schools that had a structural disruption and that was their sixth grades that were off cycle from
our grade configuration. BGA would fall into this category. So what would happen is they would partially fill their sixth grades. They would have to stretch their resources across those grades and then they would get an influx of seventh graders that disrupt
by the nature of adding kids in the culture of the building they're trying to establish. They have now since both lost those sixth grades and become 712s. And that's been an important point of stability in both of their schools. And so again, the structural challenges
sometimes like we underestimate them, but they're they actually are they design for what the outcome is. And so we're trying to eliminate uh whether it's schools that are seventh
and eighth grades that become very small and then you get the stretch on that end or schools that are off cycle and end at a grade that does not lead to a feeder somewhere. We're trying very hard to identify them and to work to either complete their grade sequence or to
remove grades so that they can fit into the system. >> Yeah. Tonight we've had a lot of conversation around um choices, the the distribution of our students,
who our students are, >> who their needs are, and it feels like a patchwork quilt and that you make one decision over here and later on you figure out how it's impacted another decision over there. Um particularly as we think about budget going forward next
year and knowing that it's going to be a tough budget, where can we have a a safe and honest conversation about what is our district? Who are we actually serving? How are the needs of these various
groups conflicting, pushing, supporting one another? And how are we going to be able to come up with a budget that is really equitable? You know, I mean, I hear parents saying, "I want citywide opportunities for
program X, Y, or Z." And the question is, what is the cost of busting you from Madapan to East Boston or whatever to get there? Um, you know, each of these things has a choice. You know, yes, we want to give people as much choice as
they can, but they have to understand in a system that those choices are pushing and pulling us and we will have a finite pot of dollars. Um, and so I feel I feel like, you know, in every group that has
a particular focused audience is doing the very best they can with the students that they've been charged to, but how do we bring you into this broader >> conversation as well? because it will
come down to us in a budget vote at some point. But I feel like particularly right now there's so much more information and honesty of conversation that we're going to need to do >> even just given the various things that we've been hearing in the last couple of
meetings. >> Yeah. I mean I think we'll have some really deep interesting conversations about budget. Um, and when you have tight budgets, it causes you to have to really go back to your core work, right, and go through that
alignment. And that's the processes we've already started. Um, at the central office, schools will certainly go through that as they get projections. Um, and so you're right, chair, right? Like they they all have trade-offs. We'll have to talk through those. Um,
and how we accomplish and stay with the core work we've laid out. Um but at the same time uh we do it with a a mind to um equity across the district. So this is the problem with the stretching of the resources like in general. So it's
um but I do I just I know it's late for the leaders. I do want to let them go. They're going to have our our students coming with lots of energy first thing in the morning. So um uh if you guys don't have anything else for them at least. Thank you all and we look forward
to the next nice job on the >> Miss Parvik. >> Does that include me, Superintendent? >> I think you're included in that. >> Thank you very much. >> Thank you, >> Miss Parvik. >> We have two speakers
and they are both going to need Spanish interpretation, >> Cynthia Sto and Maria Lena Pereira. question for you. Don't let anyone want to ask publicly. Remind me to ask the vote. I'll forget. photo.
>> Good night. [Music] International School. >> Good night everyone. Uh my name is Cynthia Sto. I'm a mother of three kids that go to BPS Blackstone School. Tonight, I want to share something
that's been affecting me as a mother. Uh, one of my daughters, uh, has big goals for her future and she's very dedicated. She took two tests uh in order to be admitted on an exam school. However, for
uh being a student that's learning English language, she did not qualify to get into the school. It was not due lack of her abilities. It was because she was not able to fully understand a test that was presented for
her in the English language. Uh being the disappointment on my daughter and her sadness was very painful for me as a mother because she couldn't get to the school that she wanted to get in. be honest. >> As a mom, I would like to see more
opportunities for her kids cuz the language shouldn't be the reason why their dreams are turned off. >> Our kids' dream shouldn't be dependent on a test that really is not able to portray their skills and abilities.
So tonight, I'm raising my voice on behalf of every mother that has been facing this same situation to ask uh that the policy for exam schools do not get modified. in order to limit
the opportunities for students. Our kids deserve a real chance to achieve their dreams regardless of the language that they speak at their homes. Thank you for listening to me and have a good night. Pereira.
Next speaker, Mariana Pereira. [Music] Good night to every member, to every committee. Um, good night to every committee member. Um, I live in Dorchester and I
have one of my daughters in the BPS system. Tonight I'm talking to the committee as a mom because I'm worried about the change of the policy for exam schools. It's really hard to notice that the
policy for exam schools it's about to be changed without um the students family and community being heard. Uh we would like to see more opportunities for every of our kids, but
we still see lot a lot of differences in privileged kids, especially white kids versus um are kids, Hispanic kids or kids of color? inclusion.
Education should be a right and not a privilege. The kid should be valued for their true worth and not their potential. It's breaking my heart to know that this decision will be taken without equity
and inclusion. The kids, the children are the future of our city, are the future for the world. And we really need to provide opportunities that is based on their talent, not the color of their skin.
Thank you tonight for listening to my voice. >> Thank you all. Um, new business. >> I just I'm going to just repeat the ask that I made earlier. I am really advantage
>> in um some sort of more meaningful conversation around map assessment data like if we're pushing for outcomes focused uh body then I think we have to be intram data focused as well um so I'm going to push for that and then I really
loved the way uh Dr. Sab presented this I think the spotlight schools and given the concentration of schools that are in transformation it might be nice even if not as a full presentation but to identify a cadence for that type of progress update
>> and maybe it's aligned to map testing cycles >> I take that down >> thank you I I also have one uh request while I understand that uh Uh we we've heard today from number of
Asians uh bilingual students in a dual language program um appearing before us to ask for a consideration on on enlargement enlargement of the catch catchment zone.
While I understand that, you know, um transportation cost may may play a big role in it, but I I would like to have that policy. You know, I I think that is a policy question. I like to to have
that put on the table so that we can uh try to look at it and and discuss it and see where it it goes. >> That's great. Thank you. >> Yeah. I've I've asked my team um to put together for you to start that conversation, a memo that would um show
you the enrollment at the >> bilingual programs. Many of the ones that testified tonight are full. >> Wow. >> Um already with the current homebased system. >> Um but then also to project what possible transportation costs we would
incur by doing that. So we'll try to give you some information to start that conversation. What I heard was that the mother school is still pretty much uh open. >> M is full. >> M is full. >> Full. >> I say open. >> Yeah. >> It could be interesting too to see and then of the programs which have
available space and then what it would cost for transportation if you're just projecting on on availability. >> Mather is full like I'll just give you an example. Mather is full on the English and the Vietnamese side. Um,
Blackstone is near full on the Spanish but not near full on the English side. So, each school is slightly different. And, uh, Josiah Quinsey Elementary is not a bilingual program as it currently
stands. It's a one-way. Um, and they do have some space, but it is the first year of that program. I know it's the first year of the program and what we've found in general is it takes a year or two of uh parents knowing about it and kind of talking about it to generate it.
So, but we'll share all that information with you. I know that um Chief Gamir has that and so we we'll share all of it. And just on a related note to that, um during the accountability presentation, we talked about following back up with
specific data that compared MCCAST performance by type of program uh and instructional setting for multilingual learners. Um which seems ripe to see um whether there's difference in outcomes for the bilingual programs versus other
types of structures. We have the access data which I think we shared broken down broken down I know I've looked at it but broken down by the setting uh but we can do the similar thing for MCCAST as well. Um yeah so we we we'll we'll get that
for for sure. I'm also just going to think a little bit with the team about the map data and how to preserve the while while preserving um the team's desire to use the data formatively
um understanding the need that and as an interim measure would like to sort of understand where schools are. I think the other thing that's complex with the map in general is we see particularly at the high school level like the bulking up of all the assessments in the spring
and the it's just testing fatigue and so I think the team is having some internal conversations about whether it makes sense to continue to do the cadence of testing that we do um because it's not necessarily reflective of growth or not growth. It's much more reflective of how
many tests can a kid take before they're like, I don't care as much about that test. So, >> as a parent, I love it. >> Yeah. So, I think that's like what we're those are the kinds of conversations that we're taking a look at, right? Uh like just just also um just as a note
I want to make sure that in between like meetings that we are also reaching out um kind of miss our BAC representative um and like talking about >> I am meeting with the new they has a new BSAC representative has just been voted in. I will meet with that person and
they will be with us at our next meeting. >> Good to hear. >> Yes. >> Yes. This is the first time BSAC actually followed the state policy >> in choosing a member which meant that member had to be chosen and voted in by
the student of the district. So they've all had their and so we have a new young woman who will be joining us. She's a junior from Brighton. >> Cool. >> I've not met her yet, but but we will she will be with us at our next meeting. We look forward to it.
>> Don't worry. We've been pushing on them. >> All right. I look forward to it. This is essential for raising that student. >> Yeah. Yeah. Very happy that she'll be joining us next week. All right. So, the next school committee meeting will take place in person on Wednesday, November
5th, 2025 at 6 p.m. If there's nothing further, I'll entertain a motion to adjourn the meeting. >> So moved. >> Um, is there a second? >> Second. >> Is there any discussion or objection to the motion? Is there any objection to approving the motion by unanimous
consent? hearing none. The meeting is adjourned. Good night. The next question