to order the L sport meeting Beach United States of America and to the stands na indivisible andice all the 48h hour notice required under the open public meetings act has been
met and notice of this meeting is emailed on January 31st 2025 and published in the Asbury press the coar and the coaster a copy has been placed on the bulon board in the bur office and has been filed with the B um mayor is
excused this evening um Council here Miss Hernandez here uh Mr Mayor here um Mr Murray is excuse this evening Miss Mahoney here uh CH Carling here miss SAR
excuse this evening Mr wish here um Mr Mayor is excused this evening Mr CL here Mr morette here and miss ladyy here and also president this evening is an Marie Roso our board attorney Geral our board engineer and
Christine Bell our boarder um I forgot to list it on the agenda but we do have to swear at Mr wisho because he wasn't here at the last okay that's what first just let me say I'm sorry obiously I was I was parking twice in the parking
lot yeah we we'll swearing Mr wish that's okay James uh do you have the O Allegiance in front of so just raise your right hand and repeat after me I James wishbow I James wish oh okay do you solemnly swear
that that I will support the Constitution of the United States do solemnly swear that I will support the Constitution of the United States and the constitution of the state of New Jersey and the constitution of the state of New Jersey and that I bear true faith and Allegiance and that I will bear true
faith and allegiance to the same and to the governments established to the same to the governments established in the United States and in this state in the United States and in this state under the authority of the people under the authority of the people and that I will faithfully impartially and justly
perform all of the duties and that I will Faithfully partially and justly perform all the duties of office of class 4 board member for a 4-year term expiring 1231 2028 of office as a class for board
member for year ter expiring 1231 202 according to the best of my ability so help me God according to the best of my very good thank you sir congratulations you need to sign one and then I'll wish it
okay uh welcome and thank you for attending the February 20th 2025 Bradley Beach land use board meeting the board will observe a 10 p.m. time limit uh there will be no new applications or new testimony uh that will be started after 10 p.m. without the polling of the full
board if an application is not completed during the meeting a continuation date will be announced by the board attorney i' would like to maintain the Civil environment for the public and I request no calling out from the audience everyone will be given an opportunity to
be heard after the board and its professionals and their staff have completed asking questions of a witness the meeting will be open to the public for questions only of that witness this will be a time there will be a time for this is the time for questions only and
not for comments if you have a question please raise your hand I will acknowledge you to come to the podium before asking your question please state your name and address and spell your last name uh and please direct your questions at the witness if a person
from the public is represented by an attorney uh he or she must speak through that attorney all attorneys should register their representation with the board at the start of this hearing after the board and its professionals have finished the questioning the applicant and before the
board takes action on the application I will open the meeting to the public for comments this will be a time to speak on the application of the same procedure I previously described for questions as followed and all members of the public who wish to make a comment will then be
sworn in under oath by the board attorne attorney pleasee be aware the applicant attorney has the right to cross-examine any members of the public who who may make comments written statements or letters from individuals who are not present petitions or speaking on
anyone's behalf is not allowable under njsa 40 col 55 d-10 D written statements from the public cannot be accepted as they cannot be cross-examined public participation in this meeting will assist the board in making decisions we hope that this
public hearing and your attendance will be a rewarding experience for all and thank you for participating in the process um as for agenda I do want to add a an item for conferencing for under new business um we'd like to just conference
with the board on U having the the notice uh prepared 10 days in advance but also posted 10 days in advance so we want to have a discussion about how we can better serve the public by getting getting the notice on the website so uh
we did want to have that conversation mpal luse law requires that all documents be presented uh and and available at the burrow Hall um and the ml in that regard was written far before
the internet so we'd like to see if it's more convenient for the residents of Bradley Beach to be able to access those documents 10 days in advance so we just wanted to have a little discussion amongst us um I know Mr Freeda your letter was dated January 28th so there
would be plenty of time for that document um the the I think the issue is is really the scanning of the documents especially large format and so we like to make it as easy for our secretary as possible so we'd like to see if if we
could um uh talk about adding a checklist requirement that would require a zip drive along with the hard documents so that it would be easier for our secretary to load those documents in so if anyone has any comments on
that the only and that's that's fine I can certainly request that um I don't know that that's part of our adopted checklist um but you know we've been kind of changing the number of uh plans that we need and so on and so forth for
those who don't paper but um sometimes the plans have to get revised so if they submit me the the drive the first time if they're deemed incomplete or Jerry asks for additional technical information before they're deemed complete to get scheduled then I don't
always you know what I mean then they would have to bring another one to me or um I mean so you're saying every submission they need to bring a Thum Drive yeah I think that that's the the most expeditious way for the board for you and for the public to get the
documents sure you happy to hear from the I'm an architect here tonight your name Donald pass okay but we we don't use a lot of thumb drive things for our projects we send PDFs so why would a PDF not be
accepted um that's that's how we've been handling it so but the PDFs can't be loaded to the town site or no they they can so I just don't get them I get them I'm SC Ling around asking for them because I put it in the when I send out the scheduling letter I outline
everything that I need 10 days in advance I get the plans I get everything else but they everybody always forgets the digital files and I have it in bold and everything else but I'm always chasing down the PDFs okay and that's that's really the I mean how far in
advance do you really know the the schedule um this particular matter I sent out the scheduling letter for the hearing on it's well in advance because they have to have at least the time to
provide the 10day notice so I give them time so it's really just the revisions would be the issue that be yeah if there's any revised plans or anything in advance of the hearing um sometimes people show up with them um
there's time it's not always you know I don't want to I mean I try to post something that's in final form I mean there's definitely no issue with having the agenda posted 10 days but the actual documents that go along with it I I can't promise that
it'll be 10 days okay well let's you know I just want to have a conversation we can talk about um you know possibly revising the checklist which me be especially for timelines another gent in the audience Al 512 I'm more resident of nor
New Jersey where I am the chairman of the Planning and Zoning Board were combined and we do it with thumb drive and if you don't make the date you don't get hurt it's just that simple to serve the residents we're not there to serve a
developer we're not there to serve anybody else everybody in the burrow has the right we a little bit big a burrow to review this and come with questions or send questions in and then we wa use M neg and his firm their review letters
come in that goes up everything goes up so it's an open honest transparent transaction that's done so everybody can talk about it review it come and complain you like which is you're right but in the year 2025 it's on the
internet and it's just fair and yours is posted 10 days in advance 10 days in advance if you can't make it we reschedule you just that simple if you want to get your project done you'll get it in just that simple if you're the applicant you're paying
professionals you pay the fues make them do their job just like we do make our profal get the engineering letter get the attorney get everybody to get their stuff done on our side do your job to just that simple and this is way it's
fair to everybody in barage thank you Mr car uh yeah I mean there's there's really no hardship I mean all the work is done on the computer in the first place it's actually more laborious to get printed copies and actually send them so it's very easy to you don't even need to send a thumb drive you can share
VI a Google drive there ways file sharing there's so many different ways of accomplishing it in so it's instantaneous you know as soon as it's done you know when you're finished with your file you have the digital copy as well there's nothing to do so there's ex
more work so there no nobody to scan yeah that's what we're trying to make it as SE as possible for our secretary Mr pass you um I just Norine oon resent I just wanted to um maybe support what Mr Park
just said but I my career is in digital files on on the graphic and creative side and it's so much easier to just send links and use a Google Drive it's I would not pursue the thumb drive in 2025 so thank you very much for the notes we
appreciate it and you know we'll have continued conversation on that to just make it seamless and get the information out to the public uh the next item on our agenda is correspondence uh I know we did rece a letter from a previous applicant and um there I know some folks
wanted to have a little conversation about it um it was uh it was unfortunate that um she had to go through the whole process and and exceed her eser and uh but uh I'd like to see if we can make this a kind of a teachable moment as to
how we can tighten things up in the future um T TJ to with that I'm new to this board I've been on boards for probably 20 years and I think for the board members is a teachable moment to know what the applicant has come up had
to face to get in front of us and when you look at the the fees and the escos and all they had to pay it's so important for the board members to recognize what people have gone through to get to us to respect that yeah and the other thing I wanted
to to mention is that um you know should we send a letter to the council recomend a zoning change for the to allow the ribbon driveways I don't know enough about it yet that's sep TJ yeah I think that
would I would recommend you know because we have seen them I feel like a few times recently where we never have before so that might be a end of the year annual report um issue that you know when we review the types of cases
we've had over the past year the types of variances people have come in with and the types we've denied and approved you know we draft that as a board and then send that up to the mayor and counsel and that might be the
appropriate venue if it's to see if it really is you know an issue that more and more people are coming up with or if it is just the one or two we've seen recently and um will you be preparing the report okay yeah okay and just so
you know our our letter everyone Heards it was my letter but it's actually our letter so you guys can get the benefit of us one letter from both the engineer and the plan perfect will you have that for the next meeting you think y okay that' be that'd be fantastic I mean
apparently there was a there were some that were approved a few years before by a different zoning officer that were new construction so that that kind of didn't really look so if we can straighten it out once and just not have a residence can I also make a mention a number of
times the past um chrisy could probably tell you people come to the board to challenge The Zing officer's decision and when they do they also prepare the application for variances because they want they don't want to lose any time
sure right so now if the board doesn't uphold the zoning officer's decision and they move on through the permit process well we've already had to spend our time doing the review to be ready for that night so they can't complain about
that is that is an issue you know I understand that yeah no for zoning determination you you still have to pay your es yeah no absolutely Mr n you no my question was was whether or not the 2024 assessment of the types of cases of
that memo because of the change of the board I didn't know that had already happened in December or if that was forth coming but you answer that question so thank you thank you um so then uh we will uh move on to our uh next application which is the only one we
have tonight uh so this is L Bo can we take care of the meeting minutes first oh absolutely um it it's just the approval and Adoption of the meeting minutes from our reorganization and our regular meeting of January 16 20125 just need somebody make a motion uh make a motion
we approve the minutes from the previous meeting on the 16th of january2 okay Miss Hernandez yes Miss Mahoney yes um Mr yes uh Mr Mayor yes chair yes Mr F
yes Mr Warner yes and miss lady yes thank you okay moving right along our application tonight is uh single application uh langage board 24-4 bulk variances for coverage for the proposed residential addition the Robert
and Eva West block 7 lot 11 58 nework Avenue the the applicant is proposing a one-story addition to the east side of the dwelling with new concrete walkways which requires a new variance for building coverage at 37% where 35% is
permitted so good evening one one second Amry do we want to sare everyone at the same time or what's the preference yeah we we'll swear all anyone who's going to testify in Mr West okay so all stand Mr West
will you testify [Music] no so so we'll we we'll do the swearing in and then you'll identify yourself from the record and then you will identify yourself you swear to tell the truth the whole truth and nothing but the truth so help you guys yes I do your
name sir and your position pass very good sir your name name Robert West and and your address 58 New York AV okay so you the owner of the property that for that application
correct and your wife is present today yes very good oh swear you swear to tell the truth the whole truth and nothing nothing but the truth will help you got sorry to do you want to be do yeah we
should swear pleas and both swear to tell the truth the truth and nothing but the truth will help you guys I do I do Jerry fra thank you Mr Mr P could you put your credentials
on yes licensed architect in the state of New Jersey since 197 um I testified before this board education Master architecture degree from un of
Michigan and practice p men that's perfect we accept those conventions thank you sir I'm sorry could I just get your first name please thank you very much just just a brief St even members of the board my wife and
I bought our house 5 years ago after visiting Bradley Beach for many many years the house was originally our weekend house but after retirement it became our house we found out shortly that it was a
little bit too small particular the side entrance which we use extensively uh we bring our grand children in dog very bad weather rainy conditions makes it very hard to get in that door leads to a small basically 2
and 1/2 by 2 and 1/2t Landing which goes down to my basement or up to the main living so we find ourselves drying cleaning and taking coats off the hats off on this little Landing we needed more space we had we
uh found Mr pman who draw some C uh we hope brought some full support of the we have full support of our neighbors one of which has sent a letter to the the neighbor directly to the east of us the basis or will face the new addition is
in complete support and has uh endorsed it for us in closing I just want to say that we love back Brad like to stay here basically forever turn over P for any technical
information thank you sir as per my statement we can't really accept the corre so I just want to make that clear Mr pass um the cues from my clients um they need this vestule and for me the
challenge is always uh made something that looks like it belongs with the house uh it accomplishes their goals and I always try to uh abide by any zoning criteria in this particular case unless
I made the vle 49 or something Square fet it wouldn't work so trying to keep it as for them as I could but not without too much violation and so going through the
process uh there a lot of existing nonconform but the only one that we violate with the addition is a lot coverage amount so um 35% is the committed um coverage of building we're
at 33.6 now and by adding this 98t pie one story addition which allow them to do the things you're over by about 49 or so
sareet so that's why we're 37% so it's 2% over and the lot is actually the other part of it is it's an extremely undersized lot it's a
28597 foot lot where 5,000 is permitted or required by that so short skinnier less square footage so in all aspects by bul the front yard of
the of this new piece it needs a front yard setback which is an average which we have calculations for it meets the sidey setback and the rear yard setback Again by putting on this 98 foot addition we violate ordinance by 2% so
this is why we're here we go through all the drawings technical stuff but I'll leave it there for the moment sure if you can see by the elevations I I I tried to keep the addition the same roof slopes and the Gable end very similar to what's there
you know matches the SL so we're trying to keep it so it looks like it was always there the door is in the back not the front that's what Cent wanted and it still looks fine it's 70 by 13 Mr P in your EXP experience in in
this design process did did you use the impervious coverage as kind of your back stop to back into the size of the U you know first I started with the design of something and then I look at it where I know where I am existing and propos and I realize both those things where can I
go with the addition where can I go with the pur coverage and so I got one and not the other because I'm the in purchas coverage is 59.6 or 60 is low so and we had to add some some Paving everything around this thing so there
was some Paving you know concerns but try to keep it and I I just have one question we don't have a floor area ratio ordinance here but I'm just kind of curious why you wouldn't go up from here that second story on it yeah it
wasn't asked of me to do there are windows on that side that were block bedroom windows so it just wasn't necessary okay yeah great good question any questions from the board Mr n u yeah I have a question on
the the um pergola that was identified in in um jer's review um is that considered a permanent structure is that an ancillary structure and I'm not I haven't have the opportunity to look that up but is that also considered in that calculation for both structure yes
it's calculated as part of a roof structure so the house the porch and the pergola were existing roof coverages building coverages then we added the bested to so so that is part of that calculation that's that's my
understanding and then then similarily that is also in the impervious area sorry similarly that was an impervious calculation as well right I mean some of it's double d right I mean a house the perola and the porch are both impervious
and slab underneath the perg which is part of the her obviously yes so all that was taken into account yes thank you I do want to point out a couple things on the report here um the height of the fence
these are the things that were mentioned in the report first of all mention VAR which we are seeking 37% with 35 in required uh defense height was not given as the height
the FR yard existing is 4T side yard is 4ot requirement it is 4T and this these are existing not changing
next uh supposed to include the average of the this particular lot aage set so aage set
1239 this onmar engineer average what it turns out to be is instead of 12.39 remove subject property were
12.78 all told the addition well piece thanks for terfy um C it mentions 591
above 35% sare footage so if you subtract that from 48 I 98 which is on my chart you know that you can't build something that small worse D said about
the about fence and revise the plan if you to show all those Heights back that's unless the board requires I don't think it's necessary I appreciate that Mr so and we're not
granting M we're not granting variances for the pre-existing conditions yes I I was going to ask him a little bit more so that I get it correctly in the U resolution so I'm meute to the board I have to make sure that the witnesses give me what I need to write the
appropriate uh resolution so you you were talking fast the fence of the existing the height of the existing fence where the gate is is 4ot and it should only be 3ot uh I think it's
allow you said in the front yard in the front yard three correct so front yard is so that's an existing condition and you're not changing that fence in any way corre okay so so that's just an existing condition we don't
approve that necessarily members of the board existing conditions will be noted in the uh resolution but the board is not not granting those variances they exist
already I'm going to be a little technical here okay go ahead there's a 4ot fence that runs along the property line up along the parking space across can you please State what the direction of the property
line North Southeast okay the property line it is the South property line okay going from east to west approximately [Music] approximately 15 ft is a fence on that
property 4T high now it turns Northbound about 16t okay 4T but at the 12 78t Mark it's no longer a front yard
VAR front yard and it and it does not violate the side yard variance at that point either because 4ot is permitted on the side four foot is permitted on the rear yard
so so my question to you what I see on the survey and I gather on the plan is there's a chain link F fence that exists on the western property line and then it says vinyl fence on the Easter property
line are those both defenses of Mr and Mrs West or are they neighbor fences uh I have to defer that to Mr West can you answer that question is the chain link fence your fence the
chain link on the west side I believe is ours they were all their move up house per say uh I believe they are our okay well the point about this is I we really don't need testimony on it if you're
making no change to it it will be the remark in the resolution will be existing non-conformity the board doesn't rule on that one way or another we're not going to approve it because if you ever take that fence down we want you to comply to
whatever the fence is so so when you take a fence down you have to go to the zoning office and get a permit and you don't have to come to the board if you do a compliant that the other nonconformities which Jerry's report does itemize uh are things that again
they're lot width lot depth whatever those those are existing and they're not changing correct correct the the only variance you need which is the only new variance is building coverage correct and impervious is changing because
you're putting a little bit of concrete in but you're not over so that's not a variance you're under the requirement of 60% okay so the the existing the existing conditions as noted in Jerry's
report members of the board are uh lot area uh Frontage they they should have 50 foot of Frontage along norc Avenue it's 46 ft correct sir correct okay another is the depth they should have a
100 ft it's 6238 ft and the the sidey yard setback bags you have you have two measurements that you do under your code which is not usually the case but you have two measurements uh both of the measurements
are under what is uh allowed so both of them are existing non-conformities but not being changed go ahead you you have saying the side set back on the west side right is
Ex on the east side put the addition 23.3 what the 7 foot possition 16.9 however that is in conformance with 20% okay so this one is conforming
correct okay thank you I don't want to get that WR uh and then of course the only variance we are considering is the maximum building coverage 35% the perola Jerry had a question about the per and
you testified okay do it in the letter it's in the letter and that's his comment e the height the height is 10t so it is yes
nonconformity it's there already you're not changing all right okay P four number four add I can that um what is the board's usual habit
for like I just heard Jerry say it's usually in the resolution you if if if Mr West conditions and those would be added to the resolution and do you want a revised plan Mr fre I leave after Mr um in this
case I don't know that that would be necessary um I think that's something he could just review during resolution comp right what'll happen is will come out have to do an inspection etc etc etc accounting for what the board has for conditions make sure they been address
okay before they get okay if necessary I create constructions I put construction and that would be per that would be very awesome thank you the construction I'm pretty sure I can speak
my there are any plans that change any of this landscap okay any um is invol like ask question about that one but uh judging by the fact that this addition is 11%
of discussion so the board understands um Bradley Beach has tremendous problems with water um leaving leaving the site our main goal is to make sure that doesn't go to neighor problem it comes out at least comes out
to the street um as small as this is I wouldn't necessarily disagree and the property on that side is plenty of room uh maybe we can just put in one small wet well take some of the roof leaders on that side and put them into that so
that some of the water can get into without going out to the street it would be helpful so this is a measure As A and B on as well a b and c in my letter you'll see them on every letter do yeah because those are kind of things that you know over the years I've learned
from the town that we need and always be sure that we protected for those three things this is a very minor one in this case and if the board's prerogative is to wave it that's fine I take no offense I just want to make sure it's there
I'm being that there's 16.9 ft on that side you know there is room normally we get applications where it's 4 can't do it so would one suffice for you Mr yeah if they can do maybe you can pick up the water off the addition and maybe part of
the roof there is there a roof let me give you a little history of what that roof is so the roof is front the back Peak there's a gutter across the front that's taking all this roof from this Bungalow shaped house into this front garden area just in
front of the porch a landscape area to the steps just to the west of those steps that's in the back go the back corner drops down to the ground my Cent wraps around the sort of dry thing
around this from before you bought that this new addition again for front cutter be a leader and that can go driveway she the driveway which if they don't like
it whatever you can take that down side it's got crossr so let me ask a question because we don't want to create a problem there's no problem now I imagine is there a problem now is there any icing or anything in front of the
house so my recommendation would be then if the board would consider that to that to W that is probably not necessary okay okay board that well anyone has if any board members have questions for Mr
before we get there so the board knows um the burrow constantly has code enforcement to this issue um one popped up today in another part of to the burrow has also spent a lot of money putting in um perforated systems to
clean up these big problems that we've had over the years and you may have noticed in the South part of town where we do the whole sewer work um there's a lot less of these iced areas because we put in perforated systems and cing into the uh collection drainage
system again that's why the notes Here is to have this discussion and if the board is comfortable enough I can tell you I would be in this case to be work that we pull the board on any comments on that I think that's very
reasonable so none of the board members have an objection to yeah I was Sayes anybody object to it right right because then when we make the motion it will include the waiver of this great so there's no we
appreciate Mr arrest my case um did any board members have any questions for Mr West because I did miss that yes um so you had mentioned that there's no change to the fence but there is adding fence add a piece of fence
well and a gate you're adding a fence and a gate so yes so but that has to be in compliance and yard 3 ft in the front be uh in front of the first vertical wall okay once you get behind
that it's a little the front yard basically is if you strike the front wall of the house straight across front yard then you upside okay and I also happen to notice having gone through this with a neighbor
um where if this fence is indeed the your client's fence it's actually the east side yeah one on the east side and the back yeah yeah so could be problem somay not
our thank you um if no other board members have questions of Mr West from Mr passman I'll open it up to the public any members of the public like to ask questions of Mr West or Mr passman please step
forward uh seeing none I'll close the public portion and uh then I'll open up the public portion for comments uh of the applicants um and our professionals U if anyone has any
comments or please step forward Mr just give your name and address last name put 512 Newark Avenue um we've lived next to the West for the five years that they're here um absolutely wonderful neighbors they've uh made
amazing improvements to to their home including their dogs and their grandchildren um they've always participated in uh whatever the our tight little new Avenue 500 block has been involved with u we had a problem
with uh our neighbor behind us where there was a in front of board they participated they came they showed interest um and they sold their home nor to come down here um I think that whatever they'd like to do and it's not intrusive of any of us I think that it
should be granted thank so just for the record can you please state your name and spell your last name and give your I think you said 512 you want to s in um for the comment yeah okay well you made your comments already so do you swear that the
comments you already made true to the best of your knowledge I do thank you sir thank you um so just just your full name sure you spell it differently it's r a p a p o r t okay and your first
name thank you sir very wellc appreciate I appreciate the board time any other members of the public I would make a motion to close the public I have a question sure so sir can
you give some planning testimon this why the plan why uh the variant should be granted by the court I'm not a liced plan I understand testify as a LIC plan but I can testify
that I can help you out a little like me too um so in your uh opinion as a professional architect I think you well I think you stated earlier that um
the uh this was the smallest you could make this vesal area to really be usable is that correct that's correct um and you also provided testimony that the lot is um about half the size of what's
permitted in the zone district and typically we say that you know um building coverage is a ratio so if you have a smaller lot you could have a smaller home um but I think you also
provided testimony that um the square footage of uh this Edition is pretty minimal right what is the square foot it's under 100 square fet um so I think that uh we could go with both the C1 and
the C2 in this case uh the C1 perhaps a hardship would be um the size of this lot that is severely undersized I think your testimony spoke to that and the C2 would be um that this provides a better
zoning alternative from the underlying zoning uh because I think the testimony was you know they like to walk their dogs they just need some space to um take their coats off things like that um and given the size of the lot the shape
of the lot um the additional coverage is a better zoning alternative in this instance comping with the coverage requirement and having a smaller unusable
space on that not Mr is that a rectangular [Music] lot yes it's more like a bom void so it is an unusual sh I just want to that the C1
asly yeah slightly um do do I have any comments from the board have you completed your testimony Mr West yes okay um do I have a motion from from the board I'd like to make a
motion to approve the application second I'm sorry who was my second yeah if if we could all put our proofs on the record as we vote um it's not simple yes no so put your comments on the record with your vote that would be great M um
Miss Hernandez um yes I don't think that this addition is to miss m I vote Yes um it's not encing into the side setb and it's dious yes thank you Mr wish uh yes and the same as
my previous two board members small small clost uh councilman Wiki uh yes the U impervious was met although there could be modifications done to the perola or removal of the perola I don't think that
would be appropriate in this case and therefore I would um got minous uh impact of the building coverage I'm Mr K uh yes um I appreciate the the
applicant's uh attempt and to uh minimize any other variances that uh could have been had they decided to go even larger so this impious and also the setback um it's also great to hear that
people within 200 ft noticed there was no negative comments on positive Mr War yes um I just think it's just a completely reasonable request that looked at the property seems like
something that fit really well so yes Miss Lady yes I agree as well for all reasons that everyone else did it as well uh Mr Mayor yes it's a minor ask and chair con um I do like the uh
the way Mr set up his letter the pre-existing variances and the one variance that's being requested so I believe that uh this one variance may be granted without substantial detriment to the public good um this one variance will not substantially impair the intent
and purpose of our Brad zoning plan or Zone ordinance the side setback change from 23.3 Ft to 16.9 ft remains substantially more than the 9.2 ft required by the ordinance so I would vote Yes
thank you for all in favor thank you [Music] up [Music] good night everyone