everybody. Nat. Hey. Hey. Hey, hey, hey. You can all stand for the pledge of allegiance and I'll lead that. I pledge allegiance to the flag of the
United States of America and to the republic for which it stands. One nation under God, indivisible, with liberty and justice for all. Okay. Okay, this is planning and zoning board
LPA which is advisory board of the county commissioners will have the final recommendations and uh on on all items today. Um items on today's agenda will be heard by
the commission on July 17th at 5:00 p.m. at the same place. Uh when a motion ends, any kind of split vote or roll call vote will be taken to ensure accuracy. As a reminder, each member needs to make
who makes a motion or second needs to turn on their microphone. So the voice will be on the recording. Speakers for the public comment on agenda items will be given three minutes. At this time, is there any board members that have had communications with
anybody regarding anything today? Seeing none, I'll turn it over. Thank you. Item H1, Lindy, Inc. represented by Kim Rosena requests a conditional use permit CUP
for IU1 under application 25Z 00017 located in district 1. Yes, ma'am. Was such a short presentation I I got sidetracked. Uh my name is Kim Rosena. I'm here on behalf of Lindy Inc. Um with
me is Michael Ashton. He is from Texas. He's the uh government affairs director. Correct. Yes. Um and he is here to tell you a little bit about Lindy. I know you, many of you have heard me about four times now. Um, regarding Lindy's expansion, Lindy has been a natural gas
gas production facility since 1966 in Mims. It's on a Hammock Road next to the river, Wy Road way up North Mims, 8 miles from the county line. I was here back in January uh just for the zoning, the heavy industrial zoning and the
future land used to make the land consistent. Uh this board voted unanimously to approve the heavy industrial use and land use. And I told you we would come back with a conditional use permit when we're able to get a site plan and that's what we're here for today. Um with me also is Bruce Moya, the engineer of record. He's the
one who drafted the the site plan. So if you have any specific questions, uh this is basically just expanding the plant. They're taking another plant they're buying and moving it here so they can increase production. Um this is needed because of all of the launches at the space center. uh SpaceX particularly,
you all have seen the letters um of support for this because they need this to go forward. They need to be able to get the um gas they need to to launch these rockets. So, this is a conditional use permit. Uh the county code requires a conditional
use uh for heavy industrial unlike most conditional uses. There's no criteria. It just says you must have one. That's so you can look at the site plan. You can ask questions if there's conditions you think need to be placed on the conditional use. That's where this comes. Instead of a binding development plan, it goes on a conditional use uh uh
approval. So, as I said, this um fusion land use and resoning was approved by you all January 13th unanimously, went to county commission, was approved unanimously at county commission on February 6th. Uh the purpose as I said is to expand this and I know you've heard this before
but uh Michael is going to talk about Lindy and tell you what it does and then we can go through the conditional use uh standards and requirements. So I'd ask Michael to come up and thank you. He's got a PowerPoint if you want a printed version. I have those as well. You just hit the make sure it works. Let's try it
out. Should work. Enter. There we go. Okay. So thank thank you uh u members of the board. My name is Mike Ashton. As introduced, I do government relations for Lindy. I really appreciate you taking the time. Just really briefly, I want to go over a little bit of an overview of Lindy, what this project is going to be doing. Uh Lindy is a global
industrial gas company. Uh you see up on this slide some of the end users that we have. Um what we produce in this facility particularly is going to be oxygen, nitrogen, and argon. This is a very foundational uh product for the aerospace industry, electronics, food
and beverage, medical services as well. So, um, let me just kind of go to the next one. This is what we call atmospheric gases. So, this is the air that we breathe. You know, it's 80% nitrogen, 20% oxygen, and then about 1% argon and other rare gases. So, what we're doing, it's pretty much capturing
the air that we breathe, cleaning it up, and turning it around for sale. So, let me give you this is a schematic of of the facility that we will be uh building that is already exists today in Mims that we'll be expanding to. um and this uh condition on this conditional use permit. So, I'll kind of walk you
through a little bit of the process. Uh what we do again is we take the atmospheric gases that we breathe today. Um what we're trying to do is is focus on oxygen, nitrogen, and argon. We uh strip out any impurities, anything else that's in the air, vent that. But then
we take and and cool in our cold cold boxes using uh gravity pressures and really cold temperatures to separate the oxygen, nitrogen and argon. And so we put it into a liquid phase and then we stored it at these different um storage
facilities and then we have a loading bay. We put them on trucks out for distribution. So that's essentially what the what the process is. There is no chemical additives into the process. So it means a very clean facility. if we have any um upset as far as a power outage or something like that, we can
just vent it back up in the air because it's the air that we breathe essentially is what we are processing. So, it's a very from manufacturing standpoint, it's a very clean process. Wanted to give you kind of a side view of it. There is a there is the cold box does have a height of about 135 ft. Um
but it kind of gives you a side view of what of what we are looking at from the facility. Um, this is a picture of our existing facility that's at MIS today. Again, it was produced started in the 1960s uh with NASA and we've been able to expand
that to continue to grow, but we're really excited about this opportunity to um to double the size. Um, just kind of get a little schematic of of where we're going to be. This to the picture on on my right is the existing plant up to the north. You see the two rectangular
locations? That's where the existing plant would be going in. This is property that Lindy owns. And so this is the this is the area that we're looking for expansion. Um to my left is kind of a little broader view of where this is located off of WY Avenue and you see Route One as well. So we feel it's a
very good look location. Um and we're we're really excited for this opportunity. It's going to bring about 20 new jobs and this is about a $90 million investment for for our company. So really appreciate the time. um open up for um happy to have any questions
answered or anything that you might have because you're the technical guy. Let let me get a anybody on the board like to talk to this gentleman here. Okay. How that are along wy okay now you have a current operation so I assume that you
you've been doing this how long's that other plant been there? So it started up in 1960. Okay. So then we've had we've had um some expansions there. We today we chucked about 40 to 45 to 45. Um yes, we do store trucks at our site. Okay. Um another question. What
are you going to do with the surplus materials that you don't use? You going to just let them back up into the air? So that's that's the purpose of the storage facilities. So this is we do have these storage tanks. So these storage tanks will will load up the the big one on the on on my left is
nitrogen. the the tube ones are kind of oxygen liqufied oxygen and the small one is argon. So we are able to store them um in these in these in these facilities where we put them on trucks. However, if we do not have a market, yes, like if we do have too much oxygen or if we produce
too much, we would vent it. You'll vent that. What about the other gases that are in breathing air? So that you're not going to use. So th those those are kind of so those would be regular that are already in the atmosphere today. So those would be any impurities that we
find like NOx or any sort of um particulate matter and so we would vent those back out as well but in higher concentrations not necessarily because we we're we're taking them right in and then they're separating at at that moment to be they're vented out. They're vented out
at at that at that moment and then they're and then the oxygen, nitrogen, argon are captured and pushed along. But right right when the c right when we use the vacuum to suck it in, we we vent any impurities right there. So it's not any concentrated matter. We do not need um a state permit for error for this
facility. Environmentally, you mean? Environmental. Yeah. Yeah. Okay. Um you dumping anything? No, you're not dumping anything. Okay. So you don't have any pond? I noticed on Well, we do we do have we do have waste water. We do have retention ponds. We do have waste water
um because we have cooling cooling tower facilities and so in order there's a lot of heat concentration that is utilized in this so we do have some of that waste water I don't necessarily say we're dumping it but we do have to capture that waste water. Yeah. Okay. Um I'll
assure you that stays on site. Yeah. Are you going to house any people on that site? So what you mean by housing as far as like offices and facilities? Not at this site because of our existing site already has the offices that are required and needed. All right.
Okay, that's all. Thank you. Anybody else? I have a question. So, WY Road is paved, but the that section of Dixie Way or Hammock or whatever it is right there is dirt. Is that correct? That's correct. Okay.
Okay. That's all. Sorry. All right. Okay. Okay. So my question just is so with these trucks leaving like you know and I know they're not going out one after another after another, right? But like I know traffic in that area does back up.
Are we thinking about u you know stop light? Is there you know anything like that in the works? Yes. Well, what what we have done and this is our commitment to Commissioner Delaney. We've had a discussion with Commissioner Delaney. Um, and part of that I reached out to
Florida DOT and we've we've begun having that discussion. I talked to um just a couple weeks ago I talked to a team there about the expansion and what that means for additional trucks to that intersection. Um they did a study a few
years ago upon Lindy's request for the existing facility and they did not find any need but now that we're doubling the capacity additional trucks they are going to evaluate additional study and that's kind of our request and so that is that is ongoing discussions that we
are working with DOT especially because it's going out with these chemicals right so that that that's the fear factor there we wouldn't want anybody running into having an accident with that completely understand. Yep. Yes. And that that's that's a that's why we we commissioned the study in the first
place. We feel confident in our truck drivers, but as well like we know how accidents happen and occur. Um we do also very um you know accidents can happen, but I want to assure you that these tanks have multiple layers to make sure that nothing can get out and and
then they're also like is they're also can be vented very quickly out in the air in case there is an incident. Okay. I have a question. Okay. Yeah, it is. So, you're taking air and out of that air, you're taking nitrogen,
oxygen, and argon. And then what isn't in that group of three you're putting back into the atmosphere? Do you know about what percentage of the whole cubic footage of air that you're taking in
goes out as not one of those three? Yeah, it's it's I don't know exact percentage but it's very very very small. So like less than one less than one because because argon is 1% and we're capturing that in order to produce it. There also is we can capture neon
zeon and and another gas as well but it's some of the particulate matter particularly that we will be venting back out. Okay. Thanks. Yeah, it's very very small trace. I I just got two small ones. I'm sure you've got every EPA
permit that for one of these plants in the world. You've got them. So, um, you know, we've got a plant that's not yours that's in North Merit Island and it's generated some concerns with the the neighborhood there with some of
the sounds now that are created. When it was built, I think after yours um it was rather quiet. When you fire once a a year, it's not too noisy. And now today, it's much noisier. Are your
sound differentials different with a newer modern Moore plant than than the old one is there on North? So, so I'm going to take you to and I I do the US. Let me take you to Wisconsin because we're building another facility in Wisconsin kind of closer to a
neighborhood and we've talked about the noise factor. This is a manufacturing facility. We're being we're 247. Uh we had a lot of discussion at that public meeting about about noise. I would say that our newer technology does have efficiencies to mitigate that. But
what we did in Wisconsin was kind of build some burrs around it to do some mitigation for that to reduce the level at the fence line. Um we we knew that the local organization can't remember the exact number but they had a a a noise figure that we at our fence line
we were able to get below that. Yeah. Um and I I would say it's going to be very similar here. We don't we do purposely cite it where it's around industrial area. Um but I would say that so from a efficiency standpoint or newer technology is better. But I would also
verify or classify that this is a manufacturing facility that will have have some noise but we should not reach the threshold of any requirement. Right. Right. Yeah. Because what's happened there in Merit Island when they built that plant there was nobody there then everybody came and now they don't like
it. It's like when you move to the lake, right? And you you like it at first but you don't like the boats now. So we we have a little bit of excitement up there. But but we and we have done in other locations we've been able to put kind of fencing or some noise mitigation measures around if that's that's
necessary. Thank you. Okay, Mr. Chairman, I have another question. Ron, yes. Um, you the plant operates 24 hours a day, correct? Yes. Do your truckers operate 24 hours a day? Yes. Okay. Yes. So, they'll be going out early in the
morning and late I mean, you know, 2 3:00 in the morning. Yes. is is whatever our customers need, but in this case for SpaceX, they require quite a lot, especially for launches and so um and so we we do make sure that we have that capability, but they they will be for
regular customers, yes, it will be 24/7. Okay. Thank you. Like for for if I can just clarify for hospitals for instance, usually they have some storage facilities on site as well. So we can deliver oxygen on site to a hospital, you know, fill up their storage tank so they don't require it at a certain time.
So we can kind of make sure that's scheduled in. For instance, Ron, that almost equates to just two two vehicles every hour if they just run all night long. So it may really it's the fact that you run at night, that's got some pluses, I would Yeah.
Is this is this what the plant currently produces? You're just um making more of it. Yes, exactly. This is exactly what the plant currently produces and would be making more and it's based upon the demand primarily from the aerospace industry. How much of the wetlands was going to be
affected? How much of the wetlands? Less less than an acre with mitigation credits or by itself. Mitigation mitigation credits. How much without the mitigation credits? Yes. How what's that? What's that? I'm sorry. without the migration credits like how much as a whole will the wetlands be
affected? I can answer that. Okay. Um if you're the harden report that's in your staff and in the package says it was 5.6 acres that was done in October of last year before they actually had the design for the site plan. So what's actually being impacted is about an acre
of wet a half an acre of true wetlands and then you have the 25 foot buffer. So, it's a full acre that they will get a mitigation credit for of about $240,000 to cost, but there's only one acre total they have to mitigate and it will be in the mitigation bank in this area, the Yellen, I believe it's called.
Thank you. Good. Any more questions? Um, Bruce, do you want to Are you next? I think I'm sorry. I have one more question. And clearly if these you're already producing these so you have you
know safety precautions everything in put in place but I mean like I you know and I'm reading you know we had some people who said they you know they're concerned because it is there are some residences around this and zoning for residential right around this area. But
so I'm okay with like the Lynn, you know, but when it comes to the nitrogen, I do get frightened. Then maybe you could just calm ease my fears and tell me what happens and how you make sure that we don't have like any of these leaking vaporize because when I read
about this it says when ignited causes boiling liquid expanding vapor and it can uh bring about massive fireballs and you know I mean there is there's a lot of like negativity and connotation to this. So if we're making more and we've
got residential areas around us Yes. It makes me very nervous. Understood. So, let me I can talk a little bit about some of the precautions we have. First off is that um you said key key point there is when it's ignited. So, this this is if if you vent it, it will go right up in the air. It's very light
materials. It will go right up in the air. And so, that is the precaution that we have. If there is an accident, we would vent it right away before it could be ignited. So, that's kind of the idea behind some of the safety precautions from a business p practice. Obviously, we want to contain everything that we
produce here. So, it's that that containment is very very important. If we are if we have a leak, then we're we're pretty much wasting the money, the product that we have. So, all of these storage facilities, our cold box, are multi-layered so that we try to do everything we can to prevent that leak
because the value of the product. So to get really into it, if even if one of these tractor trailers were to get an accident, you know, it would have to penetrate really deep into that to that tanker in order to expose any of the oxygen or any of the any of the gases to
leak out and and to ignite, if you will. But then once that accident happens and there's a case like that, there is a there's a switch would immediately um vent up into the air so that all that would be eliminated in the process. If that makes sense.
Yes, thank you. It does make sense. So, I guess my next question of course is have you had any leaks so far with the existing we we have we have not and we have a um I think we're up to almost 10 years where even our trucks have not had
any incidents where major incidents that that would classify as something that would have a potential leak. Can I we have obviously some fun fender benders and those but that has been we our safety record is very very strong and I can get you some more information on on that.
Thank you. Can I build on that for a sec? Kim, you done? Um I'm sorry. Can I ask Can I build on that for a second? Go ahead. Um the nitrogen when you vent it out, does it go So I'm not a scientist so I don't know how it lays in the air. Does it go to the ground? Does it go up?
Does it stay right around it? Because I think I was reading about the nitrogen and how it can and maybe I have it confused with one of the other elements. Does it does it bring oxygen like like you can suffocate from it if you're exposed to too much of it?
Not that I'm aware of. These are atmospheric gases. So does it go up? It go it goes up. So it wouldn't like settle down and go into a neighborhood or around an accident or something like that. not not like a processed gas that we would have such as hydrogen or carbon carbon dioxide or etc. This is this will
be kind of this atmospheric gases are light. They'll go right up and there's there's not side effects to that for the neighborhoods. No, because it's the air air that we breathe. We have 80% um nitrogen around us that we're breathing on a daily basis. So, okay. I read probably exactly the same thing that you
read and it does say the hazard would be as as fix. So, I'm sorry, but work with me. Thank you. Thank you guys. All right. And as it evaporates, right, that it displaces oxygen in the air which can lead to suffocation enclosed or in
poorly ventilated area. So that's why I wanted to know if you had the safety precautions already there because that I read the exact same thing and that is obviously, you know, a concern to the average citizen and to the people who live or going to potentially live around
it. And I think the key there is poorly ventilated. I mean, I'm I'm thinking of an instance in our facility or on the streets where we are an open air environment where the ventilation immediately would go would go up out if you're in a closed facility with a lot of nitrogen. Yes, there are some dangers
there, but I don't foresee that in this and know we have safety precautions in our plant that that would not occur. I don't see that would be an instance in the public. Thank you. Okay. Uh let's get back to the roads issue. Sure.
What I'm not familiar with the area that much. Which roads are unpaved in your near your site? So Hammock. So if you see this up here, you got you got Wy Road and then and then the H
hammock road going up to where our facil our expansion facility would be. So it's just Hammock Road that is uh unpaved. Yes. WY is WY is yes. Wley's and hammock trail is hammock trail trail now still
road. Uh do you have any plans to pave that road yourselves? Um I if if Yes. If our truck ours if our trucks are going on it. Yes. Like um Yes. Oh, okay. You want to you want to
come and talk? give you a chance to I've seen that facility and when the trucks leave the gate they're on probably less what less than 100 feet of dirt road before they hit WY right but this is further north so they're going to have more of a dirt road to travel on yeah
right now Hammock Hammock Road uh basically stops a couple feet north of the intersection with WY uh right at their driveway. So when they come out of the existing facility, they come right out. But the new driveway is going to be up past that ditch. So we're going to
pave it up to the next driveways. So any driveways we put on Hammock, we're going to pave up to. And if you look, you can kind of see what Yeah, it makes sense to do that. We'll have to. It is a county right away and they will require that. Okay. Thanks, Bruce. You're welcome.
Thank you. Bruce is here. Can I ask a question about the noise? Yes. Yes. Thank you, ma'am. Um, Jones Road, which borders the property, is one of the few parks that we have in North Bard. Very few parks we have in North Bard. Um, I I was out there not so long
ago and you can definitely hear the noise. And expanding the plant closer to the park on Jones Road. I wonder if it might make it unappealing for north people in North Bard to continue to visit that park based on the noise and I know you were talking about some noise
mitigation strategies. Do you are those in place or is that just something that you're going to consider doing? That's something right now we'll consider doing. Um and so yeah, we can have more discussion of that. I am not aware of it uh having any impact
um that far north because of the green field that's around. So, the two rectangles where the facility will be coming in and you say right above Jordan Jones Road. I was I was out at Jones Road a week and a half ago um at the park and it's very loud at the park. Okay. It was it was really weird cuz on
a hammock I didn't really hear it so much, which would be your residential side, but on the back side where the park is, it was very loud. Okay. Okay. Then that that's something that we'll definitely want to make sure we have in consideration. I'm not aware of that. So, I appreciate it. Kim, are you done with your
presentation? I just have a few comments. Okay, I'm gonna Let me grab the audience real That's what I've been trying to Is anybody in the audience like speak for against this? Seeing none come up, please. I just handed out the site plan um that shows the road that
Mr. Moyer was talking about. If anyone had any questions, that is that is a binding site plan. That's what you will see. That's what you will get. There may be some minor tweaks when there's more engineering. Um, but that's the whole purpose of this conditional use permit. I I did want to draw your attention. If
you look at page 51, the aerial map, you can actually see it here pretty well, too. This isn't a this isn't a residential neighborhood. There's very few homes around here. Uh, there are I can see three in the picture on page 51. Uh, also too, and when you compare it to
that site plan, there's still a quarter of the property. It's 21 acres that's not being developed to the north. So, there's still quite a bit of buffer, natural buffer there as well. We still need to meet performance standards. If the noise level is too high at the property line, then something will have to be done because we still have to meet
all performance standards of the code. I also wanted you to look at page 53, um, the wetlands map. Um, most everything to the west of the existing site is wetlands and it's residential. It won't be developed. It can't be under Bard
County code. And the property to the north, uh, Lindy actually looked at purchasing that to move to the north. It's almost all wetlands, so that didn't make it possible either. It's currently residential. So, not a lot can be built around this in the way of residential,
but again, if there's a noise problem, they have to fix it. So I did want to mention that. Uh I did want to also mention where the existing site is already has the conditional use permit for um heavy industrial was granted a long time ago. This is just the 10 and a half acres to the north part portion of
this site. The other items I wanted to mention uh in the staff report is that they mentioned there's no concurrency problems. There's water, there's sewer, there's everything they need. the raid the road will be paved up to the new entrance up there and anything else
that's needed if rightaway is needed whatever um they're committed to doing that as well. So with that we would ask that you approve the conditional use permit. If you have any other questions we're here to answer them as well. You know Kim one thing that makes me look positive of this is the fact that it's
got a track record. It isn't like they're just coming into town and we're going to see what they've got. But to 1960 you say he he said 1960s probably says 66 but they're not always correct. Great. I mean at least you got a track
record. You've had no explosions. Okay. Was there any comment from Red Fish Ranch just north of you about this going in? I don't even know what they do up there if they just fish or if it's a restaurant or it's it's a boat launch.
Just a boat launch. Just a boat launch. Okay. All right. Mr. Okay. I'm not move. Any more qu What's pleasure? Go ahead, Ruth. Go ahead. You want to make a recommendation? Um,
I can recommend for um we recommend approval with um the county commission requiring a stoplight at US1 and uh WY Road and noise mitigation for one of the
few parks that North Boulevard has. That would be my my motion. Okay. I would second that motion. How's that? You can't put any
That's a state road. You can't require that. There's no way for us to dictate that. It It's going to be hard to justify if you got two vehicle, two trucks every hour and you got a total of 90 during the course of 24.
I I did want to mention we have employed LTG to look at this. They're looking at the crash reports. They're talking to FDOT. If there's something that can be done or needs to be done, such as lowering the speed limit, LTG is looking at that because we did commit that to Comm uh Commissioner Delaney. I've been in touch with Josh Black. So, we are
looking at that. I just don't have anything to report other than there's only 10,000 trips a day at that intersection. So, I I do have that report. Thank you. And we need a motion. Well, you have one. You have to vote on the one that just came up because they
put the stoplight in there and it's gonna Okay. Do we want to vote on this uh on the the what Ruth brought up is so there's a motion in second on looking at looking at
not requiring I think. Is that true? Looking at then yes. Yeah. Okay. There's a motion second on the floor. All in favor signify by saying I. I. I. Any opposite like sign.
Okay. I guess that pass. So you just you can take a look at that. Now we need the motion on the uh on the whole item. That was for that was for the signal. I think it was approval with that. Was that with the approval? Okay. I'm sorry.
All right. Wait a minute. approval with the light and the noise um with the boundaries, but she can't put the light in, right? But then we kind of amended it to looking at putting a light in. So, I
think what we've done is we No, you can't do that. Yeah. No. Well, so would did we amend the motion to uh approval with looking at putting a light in and and um requiring noise uh reduction or
noise boundaries. If needed. If needed. If needed. That's kind of open. That won't work. Okay. Okay. So, my understanding of what the motion was was a recommendation to look at putting in a
traffic light and noise mitigation. That was my understanding. That was my understanding as well. For the record, if we want to if we need to clarify that, let's let's do that. Okay. Sorry, I apologize. I I meant for
approval with those things. If I didn't say that clear enough, then we have to vote that to look at those things. So, you're not willing to amend your uh your original motion? I'm I'm willing to make a motion for approval with them looking at the light and noise mitigation for the park.
It's kind of open-ended though, just looking at it. I don't know the proper way to say it. I'm sorry. You don't want it as a condition. Do what you would Would Would you want it as a condition that they They said I can't You can't make it a condition for the lighting
at it. It might be if if the study warrants those that it be included in the cup. It sounded like the applicant stated that they were doing some studies on the traffic and that they were potentially looking at the noise impacts. Okay. So, if warranted then
those things would be included in the CUP. That's a better way to say it then. I would say so. Yes. Okay. So, if warranted, I would recommend approval if warranted while they're looking at it for um the light and noise mitigation for the park. So, you're amending your
your motion. Okay. So, if that makes everything better. Does that need a second? I will second that. I didn't realize we couldn't, you know, with the light. So, thank you. Let me make sure we have this right.
We're not there's no way we can mandate a signal there. I mean that that's going to be that's going to be beyond uh our area of expertise, right? That's why I said it based off of
their studies if it's warranted like Mr. S's recommended. But anybody I mean when you talk about signalization and you only got they got 45 there now.
So they got 45 more trucks and now we want to signalize that this I think that's going to be a tougher instrument. I mean I think if the studies right indicate hey this where the we have these trucks
and they're carrying very dangerous you know toxins and if somebody runs into them could be a big problem like if the studies indicate it then the studies indicate if the studies don't then then we don't have you know it's out of our hands but I I just think you know we
should have these studies done the problem with studies I mean they're easy but they're extremely extremely expensive. It's underway. It's underway. Yeah. So before a vote, may I just understand?
So if it was just a blanket approval, they're doing the study anyway to determine whether or not it needs a signal and or noise mitigation. Right. So effectively, we're just memorializing that in the motion. Is that is that
where we If there's a noise issue, then they would be subject to the code. They would have to fix that anyway. If they're required to put in a traffic light based on a study, then they would have to do that. My understanding is this is an approval of this as written and then based upon
whatever those studies come up, that's going to happen regardless. Right. Okay. Motion. So, we got a motion to second. All in favor signify by saying I. I. I. Any in opposition
that passed unanimously? I'm confused. I'm confused. I think that was a yes. I think it was a yes. Next one. That's it. Is there Is there No, that's it. I
thought they had a little tidbit there. Okay. Any tidbits? Okay. I I thought you had one. Yeah. Uh, need a motion to adjurnn. So move.
Motion to adjurnn. The opinions expressed by any member of the public during any period of public comment do not necessarily reflect the views or opinions of the board of county commissioners of Bvard County, Florida, Space Coast Government Television, or the program sponsor and are solely those of the presenter. The board of county
commissioners of Bvard County, Florida, Space Coast Government Television, and the program sponsor hereby expressly disclaim any and all responsibility or liability for any defamatory or slanderous statements expressed by any member of the public during any such period.
Hey, hey, hey, hey, hey, hey, hey, hey, hey, hey, hey.