[Music] [Music]
[Music] [Music] [Music]
[Music] [Music] [Music] e okay if everyone could please stand and Mr Jared could you lead us in the Pledge
of Allegiance sir I pledge aliance to the flag of the United States of America and to the Republic for which it stands one na god indivis with liy and justice for
all okay this is the Planning and Zoning Board looc planning agency it's an Advisory Board which makes recommendations to the County Commissioners who will make the final decision on all these items items on today's agenda will be
heard by the County Commission on March 13th 2025 at 5 p.m. when a motion ends in any kind of a split vote a roll call vote may be taken to ensure accuracy as a reminder each member who
makes a motion or a second needs to turn their microphone on so that your voice is on the record speakers for public comment on agenda items will be given three minutes at this time if any board member has had any expart communication
regarding any application please disclose so now all right I need a motion for the approval of the pnz minutes from January 13 2025 so move second got a motion by Logan a second by Debbie all those in
favor say I I any opposed that pass unanimously and I noticed we have some new members on the board Melissa I'm going to I know you've been here a few meetings but but if the new people if you would just state your
name and so everyone kind of knows who you are Ruth we can start with you yes ma'am Ruth Amato all right thank you for coming Melissa Jackson all right thank
you Jared Atkins and we're pretty good down here well thank you all for joining the team and here we we go Miss Tina Miss Trina Trina Mr
chair item H1 and H2 I'm going to read into the record together however they will need a separate recommendation Cameron and Courtney Parker request a smallscale comprehensive plan Amendment 24s 18 to change the future land use
designation from res one to 2 and2 acres to Res res one per 2 and a half acres to Res one application 24 ss018 located in District 1 item H2
Cameron and Courtney Parker request a change of zoning classification from gu to rr1 under application 24z 0068 also located in district one is the applicant here
yeah okay sir if you could come up to the podium here and state your name and address for the record like my address that I'm trying to change no where you reside now uh Cameron Parker in 1945 Tranquility Lane
Titusville Florida and a little bit about what you're wanting to do so uh we just want to change it right now it's uh General use zoning um along with all the lots that are surrounded by me those ones already have houses built on them I don't know if a rule changed or
something but uh it's a minimum of 5 acres and it's only an acre lot um so we just want to build our house on it um yeah all right while you're right there is there anyone in the audience want to speak for or against this
item all right seeing that I bring it back to the board do we have any questions for the applicant Mr John yes I have a question for staff um as the gentleman just said there's a lot of these properties that are still in the GU and are
non-conforming and they have houses on them can we administrate them and have them all changed at one stroke and then we don't have to do one offs every time to have them administratively done you'd have to have the County Commission
tell us to do that okay so can we make a recommendation here on the board to do that um I guess you could um one of the problems is with these properties was that they were done in a survey book and whenever they put the zoning on it um
they put gu zoning the survey book in 1960 the Lots were weren't divided into 150 foot wide Lots they're divided into 140 foot wide Lots so they don't meet the GU zoning whenever the survey book was done so that's the reason he's here
today is because it I understand that I know I do and I'm just concerned that all the neighbors have their homes on the same size lots and they're still in guu also so they're non-conforming and if they want to come for a building permit to do
anything then they're going to be stopped and they're going to have to do a zoning change like he's doing yes or get a variance to the lot size you understand the the issue here I understand you're coming from so most of
these properties here are already developed with homes on them and so the vacant lots are the ones that we're concerned about providing consistency because those are the ones that haven't had a uh residence established on them
yet so if that is your recommendation we can take that to the board and see what they would like to do um but for today we just need to focus on the recommendation for the small scale
and resoning but we can take your recommendation forward to the board I think it would save a lot of time and money if we were to do them all at once yeah mean if it's been brought to our attention that we have a big lot a
big bunch of non-conforming lots that's something that we should deal with before we waste more of our our time and more of our um uh a lot of these lots are non-conforming but then ones like this it's inadequate
to the size whenever it was subdivided so it's not this lot is not non-conforming say that again please this lot is inadequate in size it's not non-conforming it does not meet you mean because of the GU
designation all he's here today he's trying to get it to be able to build a house on it I understand that but his neighbor the crews the canos the Dions The Mulligans the palur and the Riley they all have their houses they're all in gu they're in the same situation that
he is but nobody made any changes no I don't think that it was caught at the time whenever these houses were built okay I built the house across the street from my lot um my helped frame it for Lifestyle homes in
2019 so I I know it's a fairly newer newer house did you change the zoning then no it's not me it's still General use zoning that was approved with a mistake excuse me is was approved with a
mistake approved with a oh okay all right I have a question go ahead um because of the wetlands on the property natural resources mentions that like one home per 5 Acres how do you bypass
that I have to get it mitigated I that where the house sits and how does adding fill to where the house is going to sit directly Ina impact the neighbors so at the time of the when they submit for a building permit a wetland delation will be required at
that time but we do have Darcy here from natural resources and she can speak more about that hi yes so at the time of Permitting they'll need to come in with a wetland current wetlands delineation and then at that point if the lot is less than 5
Acres um and it was established after 1988 then it would be allowed only 1.8% of the property area in impacts however if it's more than 5 Acres or the lot has been legally established in that configuration since
1988 then they can build a house access and septic they can uh mitigate the wetlands meaning they can U minimizing impacts they could impact the Wetland and then get mitigation and they would do that through the state okay so they do proceed at their own
risk without a environmental report ahead of time okay Darcy on on your Maps here it doesn't show that they're in Wetlands oh thank you so it looks like on here that they
do have they're just north of wetlands me look at their soil yeah they're across eie Road eie Street and well and they also have they do have hydric soils on the property so that's an indicator they may have Wetlands so that's why we would uh uh require the delineation so
what we do is a desktop analysis we look at Aerials and soils Maps Wetland maps that kind of thing and if we see something that might indicate that there's wetlands and at some point they're going to have to provide us with that uh environmental report to to identify and quantify what's actually
there which I've done I have done that Mike you know problem I got we we're going to make a decision for other people's Lots throughout that entire subdivision and they may come here and want to kill us because we've modified
their that's not what they want to do I'm not sure we need to get involved in other people people's desire to do whatever they're going to do they know it's gu let them make the decision when they feel like well to get back on track we need
to focus on just I'll make a motion to approve uh hold on one second John item H1 correct yes we got to vote there then go back to H2 okay we got a mo a motion on item H1
by John a second by Erica Erica all those in favor say I I any opposed item H1 passed unanimously no did y'all ask for public comment if anybody yes I did okay thank
you now moving to item H2 I'll make a motion on H2 to approve second who seconded Logan okay I have a motion on item h two by John a second by
Logan all those in favor say I I any opposed that passed unanimously thanks guys all right thank you sir Miss Trina Mr chair item H3 Robert and Michelle matthys
represented by Thomas Brandon request a change in zoning classification from EU and Au to all EU under application 24z 0067 located in District 2 okay is the applicant
here sir if you could come down and get as close as you can to that microphone and state your name and address for the record Thomas Brandon 4326 dividia Drive Melbourne Florida 32934 and a little bit about what you're
want to do Mr Brandon so uh these are clients of mine and they currently have a house it's on rockid drive it's I think it's about 0.9 Acres but apparently the uh the zoning is split on this site U it's partly EU and part Au
and we've been told through permitting and Zoning that we cannot Pro continue to go forward with zoning or with permitting until we've Consolidated the zoning to all uh EU so that's what
they're looking to do they're looking to do a large addition to the home on the property all right while you're there Mr Brandon does anybody in the audience want to speak for or against this item all right seeing that I bring it
back to the board does the board have any questions for the applicant yeah I do how far is that from see it goes across Barns and then becomes coina it is um it's actually is right behind the old um Harvey's Grove
Harvey's Groves yeah it's right there on the river H yeah okay is that is that a how large is that partial then I
believe the whole thing is about 0.9.9 I believe is just under an acre do we have any other questions for the applicant I need a motion I make a motion we approve we got a motion by Henry on item
H3 a second by John all those in favor say I I any opposed that pass unanimously item H4 please item H4 invest bright LLC represented by P Mr Jimenez request a change in
zoning classification from r-17 to r-111 under application 24z 0061 located in District 5 okay is the applicant
here sir if you could come up and state your name and address for the record hi good afternoon my name is Pao Jimenez and my address is 4457 by CLI Road westbound Beach Florida 33406 and a little bit about what you
want to do there Mr am menz um um would like to do a single family home and I would like to I splited already the property and I submit all my paperwork and I have approve of accepting and everything but when I that go to the
Sony they send me a letter I had to do a resoning for that property okay all right while you're there sir is anyone in the audience want to speak for or against this item all right seeing that I bring it
back to the board do we have any questions for the applicant Mr John why are they making you change the zoning on this yeah because right now it's not not conforming and when I buy the property um they told me I came
splitting and do a do the property but when I submit everything I get the from the from the sonning I get the letters so I had to do the resoning to do the single family home but you're going to do it on that whole lot right
no I'm going to split it you want to split that lot yeah that L is already splitting in two parcel it's a half acre is it hang on a sec it says it's a quarter acre here on the
appraisal district yeah because it's it's already splitting it's already been split yeah ah so you can put two houses on there is what you're saying no just one property I already I already have one property and split it to build to building next door a new single family
home it looks like it's this slot just to the no it's the other one right but but this one he owns as well no I know that by the whole you have the both of them no I see that that's why I couldn't understand why you wanted to do that
because they ask him they asked you to do it they told them to I had to change the from ru SL U 17 to Ru
113 hang on a sec here [Music] 10,000 square Fe any other questions for the applicant do I'll have I'll ask staff um this a quarter of an acre
lot right it's 10,500 Square F feet and it's zoned as ru7 right yes that's correct okay and for an R17 can't he build just on that without changing
it so it's not consistent with the future land use currently one of the Lots is already developed with a single family the other one is vacant right so he wants to build on the vacant lot correct okay but the vacant lot
standing on its own is still a quarter of an acre correct okay so why can't he build a house on that quarter of an acre because currently it's not consistent and so that's why he's doing the resoning to make the property consistent with the
zoning with the future land use Excuse me the future land use so this a future land use change not a zoning change no this is a rezoning just a rezoning to suit the future land use correct okay and the lot to the South
that he also owns was that changed before that one's included in this request now I'm confused could you could you explain a little more then please so there's two
tax count numbers 20 28 80036 mhm and 30 33552 one is the property to the North and the only one's to the South so both of those lots are included in this request right each of them are a quarter acre
lot okay and they're both res four right and they're both res four okay and that's the land use that is the land use yes okay and you can build a house on that right on a res four now can you rephrase your question let me try question differently so the
future land use is the same and consistent currently it's R17 everything around it is R17 why are we being asked to consider why is he being asked to reone the property to ru13 because R17 and res 4 are not consistent with each other Ru 113 which I said Ru 1111 but
excuse me R 113 is consistent with res 4 and so that's why we're having him that's why the request is so the current zoning is not consistent with the underlying land use corre in order for him to build a home he's got to have a zoning category that is consistent with the res for land use which is Ru 1113
yes thank you well now I know the reason but okay all right I need a motion I'll make a motion we approve second okay we have a motion I'm sorry back there in the back
Mr Robert approve as second by Logan on item H4 all those in favor say I I I any opposed that passed unanimously good thank you thank you sir item
H5 item H5 Lisa and Christopher Manion request a change in zoning classification from gu to Au under application 24z 0053 located in District 1 is the applicant
here ma'am if you could come up and state your name and address for the record Lisa Manion 5133 coffee cup Lane Mims Florida 32754 and a little bit about what you're wanting to do uh just for consistency of
zoning it's currently gu so when we look at the dimensions and the lot size we're looking to change the Au all right while you're there ma'am is there anyone in the audience want to speak for or against this item okay seeing that I bring it back to the board do we have any questions for
the applicant question you have a road going through the middle of your site is that is that a documented road is it uh does it have an easement is it it registered or is it just a path that you need to get to the house uh when I purchased the
home it was there already um I believe when I put it my GPS it shows up I don't know if that means it's documented or not but there is a I mean it's um not paved it's like um maybe gravel it's like gravel yeah
okay I'm not I'm not sure um when you bought the property did you get a survey yes sir uh did it show up on the survey as an easement uh it showed up on the surve survey but I don't believe as an easement I don't think that would if it was if it was an easement it would
have been on the survey as an easement okay yeah I'm not sure Katrina is that a real Road it's not a county maintained Road okay so it's just your driveway then really but it's named it it yes sir it
is okay I was just curious no one forgets coffee cup Lane no one remembers me but when I say oh coffee cup Lane everybody remembers it's cute I would like to move for approval I'll second
it okay item H5 a motion by Deb a second by Erica all those in favor say I any opposed that pass unanimously thank you thank you that's a beautiful new fence
on that property too thank you sir app thank you on your Highway okay Miss Trina item 86 Frank masteron represented by Jason surl request a change in zoning classification from bu1 and ru- 2-10
with a cap of 6 to R A- 2-6 under application 24z 0069 located in District 2 okay is the applicant here and sir you know the drill by now
if you could state your name and address for the record yes sir good afternoon good to be with you uh and the board this afternoon Jason sirl Grey Robinson 1795 West Nasa Boulevard in Melbourne here this afternoon on behalf of the contract purchaser of the property who
is the applicant um for the reasons that you've heard in some of the other items we are here to uh on a consistency of zoning effort to unify the zoning currently split between bu1 and r210 6 to
r26 honoring the six unit per acre density cap that was passed by the county in 197 3 here with the uh the entire team H happy to answer any questions appreciate the staff report and the thoroughness
that went into it um if there is any public comment I'd ask for some time to respond to it thank you very much all right is there anyone in the audience want to speak for or against this item
okay ma'am we can start with you and when you come up if you could just state your name and address for the record hello my name is Pam Higgins um I live at 100 Ruby Street rockage Florida um our home is right next to this
property um and um this group uh came by about 6 months ago you may remember uh using PUD they wanted to try to use PUD and it was all um uh from you guys um unanimously declined
and then they withdrew their application so now um they're wanting to rezone as you know to the the business unit front part to make the whole thing one but they want to remove the cap six and it
says 2 to six but I'm wondering why we have to remove the cap six part of the designation ation and I know it could be redundant maybe that's the reason but I
think that if they come back again under um future land use which would be res 15 not having that cap six in there um this is a very complicated piece of property it's got all sorts of natural resource
issues and I think not having that cap six designated there um uh would limit discussion about it uh if they came back later so that's one thing uh two is I guess a question is will could we expect
then with this change of um zoning that they're going to come back with a plan that is under 88 units or are they going to come back for future land use at 222
units those are my concerns okay thank you m okay do I sit down yes ma' okay uh sir you said you wanted to speak yes
okay we got a gentleman back there same topic my name is Michael G address 3019 Vera and I'm here
to uh um go over a a a topic that's in the me first meeting when i s submitted
information about the environmental a problems okay and to every developer I know I'm a developer there's ways to get
around what the density is and also uh with buying what we would call for a if you
have wet lenss on it you can buy you can buy mitigate that mitigation credits right so I would say I think you have in in your package from me and if you look
at the the next to the last paragraph it states also the the what the um flu policy is and I can read from you that
this Coastal management element objective s demands that the county limits density within the coastal oh high hazards area to increase to use the
density beyond that limit of six units per acre would violate that objective similarly over half of the uh reference PUD
to the now par parcel is in in a special flood zone area zone AE Coastal flood plane and the number of units should not be increased
okay I know thanks for listening to my way my speech I'm suffering from TMJ so the words don't come out of my mouth like I would have
them do and I don't see why that they can't tell you the the the public what testing they've done on the
property and or are they just rolling the dice and hoping to make it work work all right thank you thank you sir anyone else in the audience want to speak for okay or against this sir if
you could come on up good afternoon my name is Rob solo I live at 605 US Highway 1 property directly to the south of the property in question um it's I appreciate what happened in the past where the their original application was
voted down when they tried to in drastically increase density this zoning application I believe is consistent with what we're accept what is acceptable with a cap of six um I my understanding is that the r26 is a cap of six doesn't
need the additional six cap uh and for that reason I appreciate the the developers uh understanding the need for this uh zoning cap in this region and I do not oppose it I appreciate that thank you guys all right do I got a
question are you in Indian River Isles no sir I'm in the lagona Vista Condo right next door okay is there anybody here from Indian River Isles not that I'm aware of not that I've seen great thank you thank you
sir do anybody else want to speak for or against this item okay sir you can come on back up and I bring it back to the board do we have any questions for the applicant and I'd be happy to respond to
those comments or allow staff to respond to those comments from the public however you'd like to proceed all right well Mr hoop and garden has some questions and then we'll give you some time to respond to the comment very good thank you okay in your application
um it states that you have the the property has two areas that are one's a Buu and the other is residential am I correct in that correct okay maybe there's a visual
we can put up on the overhead that shows it now the commercial is two .88 Acres correct and the remaining residential is almost 12 acres correct okay if that's what you're reading from the application then yes yeah that I'm reading that from that not from your graphic that's not
showing up um it's coming we need we need the either placed on thec or possibly pull up on the computer okay I have I have one of my fil because you can use the overhead okay I I can get out of my files but I
figured we'd have one as part of the it's in the staff report are we able to post the staff report I'm happy to grab it out of my portfolio but well you can start by the current it it is generally speaking yes
it is split um the front part of the property has the the business zoning thank you smaller of the two bear with me here I'll I'll pull it out for you but please go ahead with your next question I I was questioning
number one the current gives you with the far of 75 gives you the um the availability of having 157 multif family units okay you're proposing 88 units
affirmative okay now are those going to be multif family or single family um it is attached single family attached single family I what is that mean this is from the I'm
sorry I'm going I'm going back here just to answer some of the aren't you upside down questions I am both my own L use attorney and audiovisual specialist ah okay that's from the County zoning map
bu1 and you see the line there there's a similar map in the staff report yeah my acreage is 14.6 that's about right um and then there's also a future land use split that is consistent as well okay are these going to be Town Homes then you
said attached single family that's a new definition for me you yeah correct yeah Town Homes Town Homes single story or two story two to be determined based upon
the zoning you're my question correct I'm answering your question yes to be determined based upon the County's requirements for height okay and other F and other requirements so yes we get 30 feet um you also mentioned in in your
application the use of sb102 the live local act correct do you realize that you can only use that on the commercial part correct and that is actually from the staff report it is a possibility that yes the commercial zoning could be used under the Liv local act and could
be um utilized as a tool to maintain an even greater density right because they will give you up to 30 units per acre correct and you've got almost three acres there correct and thank you for that and that would be the development
potential that this could be however um as we said in our application this goes to the uh speaker number one's comment as well we do not desire to remove the cap in fact the application said we um are making this change and in the
renewed application to honor the cap so we're very much living with the cap here okay so the cap would put you at what 712 units on that almost 12 acres pay page one of the staff report gives us
the counts 88 but that would be both properties both properties I'm talking about just the residential here correct I'm I'm looking at my engineering consultant on the team 71 that would be roughly 12
AC right I just did a math thing I came up with 71.5 uh based on six units per acre on the 12 acres confirmed by our project engineer yes yeah but he didn't give his name landed shair okay so you could do
that if you do the the live local you could have 158 units on this property correct but you're restricting yourself to 888 affirmative okay all right just wanted to clear that up thank you thank
you I appreciate that I just want to make sure so so the only place where you're using live local is on be it's on the area we we are not using live local live local is available to any one who qualifies we could and we are not okay
we are applying to unify the zoning at the requested ra 2-6 maintaining the six dwelling units per acre cap from 1973 we are not using live local but we could are you asking to change the the
Buu designation to a residential correct and I you will not be eligible for live local correct I was tongue and cheek later uh earlier when I said that the consistency of zoning was the reason we were here because some of the other applicants and some of the other items had said something similar so yes we're
here to unify the zoning so that the property may may be developed in a uniform fashion okay more consistent with the surrounding area as outlined in the staff report P you'll just take the six units per acre on the total
amount correct because the ra 26 correct and there's a table on page one of the staff report and that is consistent with both the CC and the res 15 future Lage that we have so in theory we could also develop more than that based upon the
future Lage consideration of the rest 15 that was an earlier discussion on earlier day okay that's my questions thank you any other questions from the board to the applicant are you going to do a binding
development plan I don't believe I don't believe we are no it's a straight zoning the um if I may the other two speakers I appreciated the um speaker
3's statement of consistent with the cap and the surrounding area having lived having lived in the tower to the to the one property side thank you for that the environmental issues noted by Speaker number two I would direct um everyone
please to page seven of the staff report okay I can direct you to the header but it has a a very good explanation of of our environmental requirements it's analysis of administrative policy
7 applicant is hereby notified of the development and perious restrictions and the noted regulations of the county so yes we will of course develop the property in accordance with those County and all other government
requirements on environmental items I think those were the only comments that were mentioned daru on board I haven't haven't been appointed to the board to have an opinion I I will say we've come a long
way and we're happy where it is and we think it's compatible and consistent and I think your staff and their staff report I'm just going to run my mouth a little bit here a little you know you've you try you guys have tried to wear us out you you haven't been here
other attorneys have been here to try to work a plan here and I guess I've listened to all those people that live south and north here and it
um it really hadn't been fun so I unless you come up with a defined development plan I'm not real excited about it I just think we can do
X YN Z and then we can move around and do an a b and c and I'm not real sure I'm not comfortable with it that that's what I'm going to there's too many too many variables in this in this piece of stone so I
I I'm certainly not comfortable and I'm but there's 14 others I'm sure that're extremely comfortable so that's my only comment discomfort huh well I just I don't think
it's I don't think it's conducive to the area I mean it just what too many un yeah that's a ton of units I mean I appreciate the comments and my humble opinion it's directly consistent
with the 6du cap that was put in place in 1973 so we we are very much consistent and compatible it's it states as much in the staff report I'd be happy to leave some of the
remarks um that I prepared that go through the F five criteria for rezoning I'd be happy to go through this no you you don't have to do it for me okay because I just want to make sure
I'm doing everything I can here oh yeah than Mr chairman yes sir Mr John I have another question um we don't look at site plans uh here we don't we're zoning um but have you have you put a site plan
together will everything fit 88 units he's right and without going you know three or four stories because you do have height restrictions here a very good question I do know that that plans have been worked on in a
conceptual basis I'm not privy to that I'm just here for the rezoning efforts today and you'll still have a lot more Hoops to jump through thank you and very much appreciated this is really just the first one right correct and it's stated
throughout the staff report so yes we're fully aware of what we are needing to do we appreciate the comments and the sensitivity and I really believe that we've come a long way than where we were 9 months ago when we were before you the first time did you do a traffic study
yet no can I ask a question spend some money see how serious you are spend a bunch of money before they come in front of us Mr s the the property that's developed to the South that's traditional condos is that what that is I'm just trying to look at it on an aerial so it's standard four or five
stories do we know what that's my understanding and I want to say maybe the gentleman who spoke or I know one of the other members that we've spoken to in the past was affiliated with it but I believe it's fee title condos four stories so kind of going to Mr minu what you were saying I look at
it a little bit differently that it's sort of stair stepping down you've got a higher density multif family a true multif family use to the South with a more traditional town home single family attached development directly adjacent to those single family homes kind of creating that nice stair-stepped I don't
know planning buffer if you will um and I like that better than I would like you know straight condos or something along those lines directly uh looking into those folks homes thank you and we agree we and I
believe that the staff report does talk about how this is a transition area between the two so we very much agree with that thank you any other questions for the applicant I'm going to need a motion hold on one second well sir we're just planning and
zoning I'm sorry yeah that would all be done later chairman I'd like to make a motion to approve item H6 second okay on item H6 we got a motion by Anna a second by Deb all those in
favor say I I I any opposed I I I so we've got Henry Ruth Jared and Jared three opposed one two three four okay all right sir good luck with the County Commissioners very good thank
you very much okay item 87 item H7 the Mohan Family Trust dated January 25th 2023 request a change of zoning classification from ru-
1-11 to bu-1 D A under application 24z 000063 located in District 1 also for the record I'd like to note
that this request went before Myra and they recommended denial of the request there were some concerns for Myra the location of AD adequate parking for a future business use the property is the property being
subsequently improved and then resold for for a more intense use resulting in increased traffic and congestion on Meritt Avenue and insufficient information provided on the current proposed requ proposed
use is the applicant here I'm here okay ma'am if you could come up and state your name and address for the record hello everyone my name is caldi moan 5060 Saturday Place Coco
32926 and a little bit about what you're wanting to do miss at this property um originally purchased from my daughter and for her to start a spa business massage therapist General Spa this is your
daughter that's my granddaughter I'm on Grandma Duty right now she's going to get Cry Baby afterwards is that the Gainer estate I'm not sure we purchase it
after year no you purchase the house mhm and the property to the West as well no the you just purchase the house yes isn't that being used now for commercial or something no
is right now have it as residential okay I think the original owner tried to rezone it in to sell it as commercial use but they're from South so they didn't move
forward with it and when I got the property I heard of it but my realtor at that time didn't proceed in any further actions and then moving forward with my daughter that's why I'm here today that property backs
up to the lake doesn't it no it does not it does when you say back up yes okay okay yes I think on the okay yeah I don't know too much of of it but I did see something to the
survey ma'am if you could hold on one second with us here is anyone in the audience want to speak for or against this item all right seeing that I bring it back to the board Mr chairman yes sir um do you have any knowledge that it was a business
before no it was just a resident because I I drive by that that uh property uh often and I remember before it went up for sale I thought it was an accounting office or something in there no it was not okay but I'm I'm familiar with the
property you have a sign on there currently uh advertising commercial Le space at that time yes and then I removed it because I did the residential cuz I didn't know the process or the length of how long the reson was going to take place okay so you've pulled down the sign it's no longer for leas are you
going to or does your daughter anticipate subleasing no okay okay because that that makes it questionable because the sign was up looked like you were trying to um to
rent it out and now you're talking about putting your daughter in there and not renting it out I just want to keep you know it's a house but it has a large parking area yes well originally it was purchased for
her and things didn't work out and then I res I did it back to residential say that again please so originally when it was purchased for her it was going to go into commercial zone for for her to you were going to have it reone yes okay
and then it didn't work out it's a motion because it didn't work out so I did it back residential so when she's ready to come back I'll have it ready again for her but this time officially commercial okay yeah I get teared up when it comes down to her all right what's akm gratitude
for Prosperity akm is their initials it's um my kids name they all Alex Anthony Alina and the middle initial it stands for their father's name and then my last name moan okay and the gratitude
for posterity yes MH yes just the name of an LLC yeah the blessings of it yes all right thank you does that have a mirror Avenue address yes so I have a question so yes um
it's been said that there's enough um parking for people but that was one of Myra's complaints right location of adequate parking for future business use do you want to speak to that I'm hoping to get this property
back to my daughter uhhuh and it's only going to be her with her Spa whatever she's going back to school now to get laser hair removal something like that she's doing but once this is done I would not be leasing it
back to anyone it'll be more for more so for her that was the original intentions of purchasing the property and how many parking spots are there right now there's you have the garage and then you have two in front of the
garage okay M Mr chairman so you're planning on putting it in parking lot eventually when that time comes yes yeah okay in the future yeah Mr John yeah you you have that large area there
to the West yes that will uh accommodate large parking um just down the street from you there's a dog grooming business right yes thought so and on the corner FL right across from BJs there's that flag place right yes and then on that
same street there's also another um hair stylist Spa bu business as well that's going to be competition though no they doing different things yeah okay I don't personally have a real problem with this but because Myra had
said all these you know like unanimously said no you know and that is their jurisdiction it is their area I I feel like they know the area certainly better than I do I live down in the South Shore so I have to defer to people who are closer to
it Mr chairman I couldn't see any rationale behind Myra's objection here I read their report I didn't attend their meeting but um you know their comments were Loca location of adequate parking they for
future use they've got plenty uh increase traffic I don't see that I'd like to make a motion to approve I'll second
it okay item 87 we got a motion by John uh second by Erica all those in favor say I I I any opposed I Jared yes
sir okay that almost passed unanimously okay okay thank you good luck with the County Commissioners yes thank you all right have a good one item8 h8 item h8 billas at River Palms LLC
represented by Edward fleece request a change in zoning classification from bu-2 to ru- 1-7 under application 23z 0067 located in District
2 okay sir are you the applicant yes if you could state your name and address for the record and a little bit about what you're wanting to do okay Ed Place uh offices at uh 1275 South Patrick Drive and Satellite
Beach um the property that we're talking is a 2 7 let me see was a 2.7 acre parcel uh which is presently own bu2 uh the properties North is an is
residential the property South is residential Ru uh 215 and uh r19 we're requesting that it be reson to R17 uh this permits uh 50ft wide
Lots the U owner uh the objective of the owner and it's it's restricted to only six units per acre and that's because it is in the coastal High Hazard area and also the property South it restricts it to no more than six units per acre which
means that we could get 16 units out of if we're going to do Town Homes but we decided to do single family homes and so we've limited to 11 so we it's on a pars it has 11 platted Lots we will also have we'll re replat it to 11
Lots uh and the uh objective here is going to be a very high-scale uh upper end uh single family home development it will be uh there will be a uh it will there will be a security gate uh with it
and uh and and walls on the North and South and also along South River Drive so uh I could go into a lot more detail but I know you've read the report do you have any questions on it well let me take it out to the public real quick I
don't think we have do we have anyone the audience wants to speak for or against this item so so seeing that Mr chair before you continue yes M Trina I'd like to amend the record of what I read into it um this item went before
Myra as well and the board recommended appr proo however they were asking for a bdp to stipulate that the dwelling units cannot be constructed as mobile homes or Condominiums it was a unanimous vote um
again as long as the units are constructed as single family homes I also wanted to point out that um in accordance with um objective seven of the coastal residential densities and
our future land use which states that we should direct development outside of the coastal High Hazard area and so that can be um a part of your determination for approval of this resoning or recommend
ation for approval thank you okay thank you ma'am let me marra did they have anything negative at all they were concerned about mobile homes and Condominiums they they just want single family there and this
particular zoning the R17 it doesn't permit mobile homes um or Condominiums it's for it's a single family zoning but they wanted a bdp on top of that as well right correct to say no mobile
homes were but again the zoning doesn't permit that so times I'm fascinated the most expensive mobile home park is just south of there yeah and in in Bard County and and they're
River and they're concerned about mobile homes yes yeah it makes good sense Mr chairman yes sir I have a couple of questions um does the developer know who the neighbor is across the
street what's a commercial Development Across the street is that the one you're asking it's a gun store pardon it's a gun store okay I don't know if they have a range have any shooting in there yes I think they do okay you're going to put luxury homes across the street from a
gun range just seems strange to me that be a lot of noise the cost of that property is extremely high you know it is very high when you when you're talking about buying riverfront property right so I mean what are you going to use the property for I mean the highest and best
use you could uh do all kinds of industrial stuff on it because of the zoning indust but business no keep in mind that North is r215 at one time was approved for a 24 unit condominium which did not get built fell apart and it
still on r250 yeah uh and then south of that is a mobile home park right uh both residential in character uh there there hasn't been a lot of interest in in doing a a commercial type of
development okay uh is there water and sewer available both are available the there there's a force main uh right in the street this will be done through you know a pump station or whatever is fairly high water table and at one time I think our high water table
or the uh the 100 Year 100 Year fifth year was only be about 3 and 1/2 ft now it's with some of the flooding we've had over the last number of years became you know it's it's much higher there will be a lot of fill required on the site okay so you're going to raise the
site elevation oh yes it'll have to be raised and how is that going to affect the neighbors you know there's a new policy on Meritt Island uh I think it's also throughout the county now you have that new engineering uh study that has to be done in order to uh see what the impact would
be on raising elevations and I've heard about that when I was up at North merid Island yeah that's that's true and that is specific to North merid Island uh right now we are working on another countywide uh flood study to really move to no adverse
impact so when they come in for developing they're going to especially given their low elevation the coastal High Hazard they're going to have to demonstrate no adverse impact on the neighbor so if that requires additional storm water or however they get there through engineering then that's what
they'll have to do and we continue to refine our flood plane data to make it more accurate when Engineers come into design okay and and and because of my compadre here saying that it's a luxury mobile home park to the South we
wouldn't want them to get flooded out no it doesn't matter who is next to them we wouldn't want them to be flooded out just High Prive extremely expensive what about sewer are they on sep is it septic there or is it sewer are you talking about the mobile home park no I'm
talking about you your land no there is a forest man and we there will be a grinder pump station or grinder pump stations installed okay uh for public sore okay hi Henry and you've got what 600 feet of
Frontage overall our our overall Frontage is 5883 Ft 600 okay yeah one last question because John's had the floor but um is that contiguous to the
grills grills restaurant is their northernmost property line contiguous to the Grill's property line that's on 520 yeah but that's I think I understand your question there are five Lots
North between here and the commercial property right okay but the their Northern property line what does it touch that you got a 7-Eleven there and you've got grills
restaurant what would be the 7-Eleven and then there's uh five Lots 250 ft okay not you know 250 ft and then uh these this parcel starts okay so there's a gap in there right now there's a gap in there is I know that property is up
for sale but yeah you talking about this one here hey this one that's good no look no looking at me this yeah okay I'm trying to do it from memory ah
okay so you're going you're going to put 50 by 100 Lots 50 ft by 100 no uh there'll be at least 50 the R1 they'll be at least 50 ft what we have uh what I'm doing what we'll do is make the uh
Northern lot about 5T additional and the southern lot additional as a buffer yeah just as a buffer just as a buffer right plus if you put a wall you want to have a little bit more room to work with okay now these going to be single family
yes okay attach detached detached right detached okay as I mentioned before if we're going to do Town Homes we could have done 16 Town Homes mhm but we thought
the market is better for single family homes and you're doing 11 Lots luxury okay should we ask the paint color you can okay I need a motion move for approval second
second we have a motion on item h8 now do we want to include a bdp I do not need it okay and then we got a second by Erica I'm sorry okay all
right we got a motion by Debbie on h8 we got a second by Anna all those in favor say point of I'm sorry point of order so but are we you said no bdp right but we don't need it because it's
automatic going to R17 okay all right thank you thank you all right thank you oh let's do we want count the do we have a a you didn't hear any was there an A A on item h8 I did
not hear one want to do it again just in case well they they said there's no nay so okay everyone's good with item h8 yes okay that passed unanimously all right thank you
sir I'm good with this if everyone else is meeting adjourned the opinions expressed by any member of the public during any period of public comment do not necessarily reflect the views or opinions of the board of County commissioners of Bard County Florida Space Coast government television or the
program sponsor and are solely those of the presenter the board of County commissioners of bravard County Florida Space Coast government television and the program sponsor hereby expressly disclaim any and all responsibility or liability for any defamatory or slanderous statements expressed by any member of the public during any such
period [Music] [Music] [Music] [Music]