uh let's go ahead call the planning and zoning board for City of Cape canaval to order it's April 2nd six o'clock okay Zach we're waiting on you so thank you you ready right all right
Renee you call roll please board member general core pres Vice chairman price chairman Russell here board member Denny board member stoud present board
member Miller here okay we have a quorum um I apologize to everybody that was here last time and I didn't make it um just got tied up into a situation where there's more traffic than there was
Road and that happens when we have a Confluence of SpaceX gambling ship loading offloading and two or three cruise ships loading offloading so just a perfect storm but we'll do business
tonight okay we've called the rooll we know who's here we at that point in the meeting where we have public participation on anything that's not on the agenda and it'll be something we could not take on action on but we are wiing willing to
listen if you have something to bring forward uh seeing no hand or no one standing I will uh pass over that and we'll go to new business there being no but so we have before us the uh minutes of
December 11 we're going to do the December 11th minutes tonight and then we're going to do oh only December 11th that's all we have I thought we had another set thank you very good okay you have before you
the minutes of September 11th and I'll ask if there are any additions or corrections to those minutes hearing none I'll ask for a motion to approve the minutes I'll make a motion to approve the December minutes
thank you I'll second that motion and we have a second all right and without further Ado I'll just uh ask everybody to say I I I any opposed none okay Renee we passed up that roll call we can uh
save some time on that one see I'll keep that because I got a sign that in a minute first order of business is consideration of a site plan application for multi family dwelling five units on the vacant lot of
Southeastern corner of Orange Avenue and banon Avenue approximately uh Point 42 acres and we'll ask the Mr Burger if you come forward and just just be here I don't have
anything particularly to ask you now just be ready in case we do since you are the uh owner and Zach do you have Conor are you going to take us through the uh packet I'd be happy to Mr Burger would you rather speak first or have me do a brief
introduction please go for it thank you very good all right so essentially the applicant Arthur Burger is working on the behalf of his client to request approval for the site plan application uh these are five multifam units Renee when you have an opportunity would you
be able to pull up the presentation just so we could go through a few selected photos from that site plan uh if you could go to the next page that is the location as we said before it's on the intersection of orange and B Canon it's currently an undeveloped lot
next slide please the Zoning for it is R2 the medium density residential district meaning a number of things including the maximum lot coverage being 35% and maximum height being 25 ft uh all of
which the applicant is in compliance with next slide the Community Development Department has found that this project is in compliance and in accordance with uh you know our comprehensive plan and uh it's compatible with adjacent land uses
therefore aligning it with that comprehensive plan policy lu132 the development is going to feature two bedroom units with each unit containing two bathrooms uh the community appearance board approved this design
unanimously with no conditions on January 15 2025 and as we go through different sort of uh reviews for approval of a site plan the client uh demonstrated compliance with all of them during their
uh you know through their submitt so we've had you know a long dealing with Mr Burger and we found that the project is in compliance and I won't go one through one one uh out of each of these site plan requirements there were no specific
conditions of approval but uh Beyond there being a existing light pole that was to be relocated prior to the issuance of a CER cert certificate of occupancy and to straighten the sidewalk these are both things that were brought
up to the applicant over a month ago at this point and they've agreed to comply with that um just the sidewalk and the light pole two minor things nothing that actually impacts the structure itself so at that point the interm director
Zachary i Colts uh decided to move forward with recommendation to the board of approval for this application and at this point I'd love to hand it off to Mr Burger for anything that I may have missed okay I'll ask the board if they
have any uh begin with uh to my left You' like to ask any questions question okay how about you uh no questions I think it's a good project yeah I okay you on how about you Mr chairman I don't
have any questions but I want to make a comment it's uh great to see another uh partial developed that's just sitting vacant right now just a it's a good thing I was looking at the pictures it looks like going to be traed very
attractive um City attorney do you have anything for us no okay I have a question for you Anthony in the uh minutes of 11 of the 11th which we approved or tonight there's a paragraph
on the second page of that set of minutes in bold said code of ordinance require proposing new development projects have compatible elevation and mitigation techniques recommended by the city
engineer to reduce potential flooding and Redevelopment uh projects on adjacent properties and rights away that's a little paragraph that it has city engineer written all over it that
says that uh I guess any new site plan has to go through the city engineer regardless um so did any anything on this project jump out about site flooding
mitigation uh with respect to this due paragraph in the uh well I should back up and ask has it been enacted into ordinance yet um this the provision that's referenced in the minutes is related to The Perils of flood ordinance which was adopted on second reading by
this by the city council at the last meeting okay so it's in there uh may not be exactly that language but it might have been tweaked before final adoption but the intent and spirit of what's in the minutes is yeah your job was to put
that in intent I get that right so okay no uh nothing along that line jumped up I have to ask on this project okay all right enough said
um if uh are there any comments or additions from the audience uh seeing or hearing none I will ask for a motion to uh approve this site plan either or go ahead I'll make a motion to
approve the site plan as it's written thank you and Renee would you call R chairman Russell for board member Miller board member stoud for the
motion okay all right we have approval recommended thank you art unless you have anything to say I want to thank you but I also want to thank the staff bust well we appreciate that look forward to seeing that come up it's going to be a sharp looking sharp
looking property good deal thank you Mr Burger thank you so well yeah okay we go next to uh item three on the agenda new business consideration of a site plan application for a hotel and
restaurant on 5.75 Acres 8955 Columbia Road that's up south of the port okay who speaks for uh that project anybody in the audience we we're not asking you to make a speech just to be available in case we
have questions you'll be on standby introduce yourself Richard welcome I think we've seen you before here in the chambers uh Connor would you like to take us through the packet and see what we need to pay attention to yes sir if
anything sorry I had a quick question complete set of work Mr stubs can you speak into your microphone again yes Richard stubs stubs arure try it again please Richard stubs STS architecture thank you these these
microphones are let me tell you about microphone 101 most people are scared of a microphone and they back away from it well guess what as you back away from it the power going into that microphone decreases by the cube root another
engineering term and as you know it drops off so so get close to the microphone is the point enough said all right thank you Mr Russell this is the cape canabal Hotel Hotel we've been calling it The Columbia
Road Hotel uh the applicant is Mr Richard stubs uh they are requesting site plan approval the actual Site Area is 2.39 Acres whereas the area of all improvements the project area is 5.75
that's because there will be some roadway or easement you know sewer related improvements that are connected to the project uh it's going to be a 156 unit hotel that meets cape canaval minimum of 150 units for a hotel set
forth in our city code as Mr Russell alluded to this is in the northern portion of the city and it's been more of a unique situation because we've been working with the port and with the developer uh and also some nearby Property Owners to make sure that this
can all work out the uh surrounding area consists of the vacant property owned by the canal Port Authority a parking facility owned by by Tom Hermanson and a vacant property uh with similar ownership the
property if you'd go to the next slide Renee just for some Geographic context is located here uh almost an Oklahoma shaped parcel um and you can see that that long stretch is how it will get
access to Columbia Road on the eastern most side but the hotel itself will be developed in that wider portion of the lot uh one more slide please you can see that it is zoned C1 uh and hotels are a
allowable use for C1 zoning uh as long as they meet that 150 room requirement the community appearance board also approved this design unanimously with no conditions back in November uh the cab also approved an increased Building
height of 65 ft which is above the four stories or 45 ft limitation CIB has the authority to do that pursuant to section 110 624 um as I said before this is a site plan
application we've reviewed it pretty thoroughly and had a good number of back and forth comments between our city engineer the applicant team our Public Works team and our community and economic development team uh they've demonstrated that the site size shape access and internal
circulation are sufficient uh there have been discussions in regard to the access and as I said before on the last one I'm not going to go one through one on all of the uh you know conditions and whether
they're met but the there are a few things that I might touch on one of them being the traffic report uh the applicant team was required to fill out a traffic impact analysis as required by code that traffic impact analysis was
uh reviewed by our city engineer and amended for a few things they made sure to comply with any sort of request by our city engineer the property is unique in that it's located within Cape canaval but accessed through George King Boulevard in Port Canaveral the
property's access has presented some unique challenges but the applicant has made a commitment to continue to work with Port Authorities to ensure safe and efficient Ingress and egress in addition to uh making sure that we can get us easement through
there it is in compliance with our comprehensive plans vision for this lot and the future land use um they've Incorporated mitigative measures such as landscape buffering a pedestrian friendly design they've also
committed to traffic management strategies including a proposed right turn lane Southbound on Columbia Road and valet parking to minimize congestion there were a few conditions of approval on this one the first being
that the developer shall gain inwriting Port Canaveral staff approval on the southernly right hand turn lane uh into the development's entrance again on that south southern way of Columbia Road and that would have to be achieved before a
building permit was issued and the second one that we've been dealing with more recently is the approval of a sewer line extension agreement that would ultimately be recommended for for approval by staff and then finally approved by the city council and that completion of a sewer line connection
agreement would also have to be done before this project were to receive a certificate of occupancy so with those two conditions of mind uh the interim director Zachary i Colts has recommended for this approval and the community and
economic development staff recommend that the board take the action of approving this with those two conditions of approval in mind being the right turn lane and the approval of a sewer line extension uh I think we may have some
additions to the packet that were handed to you all uh one being a fire truck plan showing the turn radius of a fire truck um that was reviewed by the city engineer and determined to be in compliance the original submitt was not
uh but that one is okay now the another one being a comment letter by our city engineer kimley horn and Kyle Cosby just outlining a few comments some of which are related to the Sewer agreement uh
the applicant has you know expressed that they will comply with those conditions of approval but it is something that would be worked out after this meeting and the final of those three insertions being a um description
that was sent out that is going to explain where the the sewer line easement will be located uh we've had discussion with the applicant because originally the sewer line easement was intended on being 10 ft wide that's going to run along the western most side
of the property Renee could you change a slide I think maybe we can find a visual that'll kind of help us there so yeah along along A1A this doesn't show the sewer in its current state but you can get an idea of where it is on the site um it's just along that westernmost side
along the roadway partially in P property hence the easement uh originally That was supposed to be a 10- foot easement but after discussion with the public works staff and with our city engineer the applicant has tentatively
agreed to a 15 foot easement but as the condition of approval comp uh implies that would be eventually approved by city council and there still have to be some negotiations there between the applicant and the port so I know that's a lot of information
but I wanted to outline the conditions of approval now and I'd be happy to touch on them more as we go but at this point I'd like to give Mr stubs the opportunity to speak on the project thanks Conor Mr stub you have anything I I don't have anything to add
to what Connor provided um I I think that he explained the project and and where we are and if there's any questions happy to answer them okay uh Renee would you put up the uh Geographic iic the one that showed the
greenery I think it's there it is that's it that Greenery south of the hotel location that's that's Wetlands uh was there any impact to those Wetlands during the discussions
were they mentioned or or not I know that this was put through a storm water review uh and Mr stubs if you want to speak to you know the storm water measures that you are all are taking for this lot uh i'' be
happy to I'm going to let Greg the civil engineer comments on that specifically thank you and introduce yourself and uh my name is Greg Crawford I'm with Florida Engineering Group uh in Orlando and uh we've been working on the project um if
with from a storm water standpoint what we're planning on doing is using perious concrete with gravel base underneath the uh the roadway in order allow the water to percolate into the parking lot into the ground uh on that uh without discharge uh well we'll still be discharging our site but basically to go
and meet all the criteria for the City of Cape canaval and also for St John's uh riverwater Mana District on that so um that that's what we currently propose to do for the storm water system
okay uh Conor and I'm going to leave you with a a note to put in your files M your job is to keep a lookout on that Wetlands there because we keept getting closer and closer let's just don't encroach on it that's all yes
sir and you might need to go back and read some history because there's is some history behind that there's a long hard slog to get that whole area all even all the way to the river declared Wetlands not to be
developed um and I'm not sure How We Do W if you invade Wetlands you're supposed to do what pay a penalty or provide other Wetland area or what there are regulatory requirements for mitigation but I mean the wetlands
you're referring to and not on the subject property no I know that I know they're just nearby and I it's the first time we've gotten that close and I just wanted to highlight that to everyone detention right the only part of the that I'm aware of of the project that's
going to be located um I'm not going to say on the wetlands but on that's the ports property is the sewer line extension and there's going to be a north south run um you know right from the the southwest corner of that
property and and that line is intended to run south to the southwest corner of the ports property and then run east and it's going to run east to um along the port's uh southern boundary and then
there's um an existing connection that's behind um that hotel okay um that um they're intending to connect to um and that would be serviced by an existing uh
Regional um uh lift station um off of Imperial does any PR does any of that piping AC cross the Whitland well that's I'm that's why I'm mentioning those facts no one has brought to my attention that there will be any Wetland impacts
mhm um but I'm not the engineer um the legal description um is gener we have some verbal approvals of a of of an existing legal description that we have presented to the port that issue hasn't been raised um but I'm I'm sure that's going
to have to be looked at in the field okay well that just just uh raises the question my head that uh sooner or later we're going to want to cross that Wetlands with something some kind of utility or a pipe or a line or who knows well the intentions are to stay along
the outer perimeter of the ports property yeah not not not go bisecting the ports property where you can actually see some of the you know the the Wetland areas on based on that area well thank you for keeping an eye on it that's uh just something we don't
want to get we just don't want to get into that with with the state of Florida it's trouble enough I agree with that and I will add that the applicant did complete an environmental report and a drainage report uh but I definitely think that it
would be in the purview of everyone's best interest to make sure that there weren't any major Wetlands that were crossed through I think like Anthony said due to the nature of it staying as far west as possible our hope is that that is not the case there the wetlands
are further east the the only like wetlands and I put it in in uh quotes that we're we're dealing with is there's a drainage there's a small I guess drainage ditch correct um that's in off the southwest corner of the subject property that we're trying to deal with
um with respect to the alignment of the proposed easement and that that's been a little bit of a challenge lately but I think it's being worked out okay very good to know good all this is just information I felt like it was time that we need to
just dig around that be be familiar with it and and then stay away from it uh with that I'll go to members of the board Mr St do you have any questions I was looking at the expansion of
the yes sir it was originally 10 ft wide and now it's proposed to be 15 ft that was at the direction of the city engineer and our Public Works staff so that they're able to do future maintenance properly so the measurement
for that that is going back that of thead the it directly abuts onto that fot roadway and I think oh no Anthony please correct I'm not well there's a question what f. Road way is I mean the
port I I call it the offramp the offramp the A1A offramp to George King Boulevard um I believe much of that little offramp there is uh Port property the port had acquired the property so it's not F that right away may look like f that right
away but it it's not just out of curiosity I would like to see the straight line diagram that's produced by the state of Florida and just see see how that is see what that looks like on there because that that would mean that would show it being chopped off and belonging to to that makes sense correct
the port acquired um some of that property by uh eminent domain eons ago that's based on my information that I have and um you know I know 15 feet has been recently mentioned um keep in mind the sewer line
easement is across Port property so the port's consent must be obtained and we have not yet discussed a 15t foot easement our discussions have been about a 10- foot easement so that that raises an issue that we're going to have to discuss with the port um and I'm still
perplexed whether or not 15 feet is the entire proposed easement or whether the on that north south part it would be 15 ft and then I do believe that the recent drawings have it go down to 10 ft on the eastwest part Mr Crawford is that
accurate based off your drawings yeah which drawings that is correct uh based on the information we got is that we were going to ride in the road or the portion of the eement that's running North and South along basically parallel to A1A and then the piece that's actually running East uh was to remain at 10 ft which is what we've been
showing on our plans um Anthony do you have that that submitt that they gave today on your desk or no that yes sir yeah I can like read part of it because of yeah it is pretty small I'm not sure what this
shows but just an issue that needs to be needs to be worked out I mean with the port and with the applicant um because this is their preferred my understanding their preferred um sewer line Arrangement and it's the cities as well
is to hook up to that um Regional lift station on Imperial um that's what that's what that lift station was built for is to handle the development to the northern limits of the city um in the unlikely event that we're unable to make that connection with the port you know
another uh location another route would have to be determined uh for sewers sewer uh service you know so you know we're hopeful that this this route it will work um that's the intention um we'll work with the port to make it
happen as well as that other um Hotel owner uh that has to convey um The Missing Link he meant to connect everything together okay so we've got uh we had two conditions before we started this
conversation M now we've got a third condition the uh easement well that is the um second condition the sewer line easement uh extension agreement that's condition what I'm telling you already has been put in writing and worked with
the applicant on so we have the draft sewer line extension agreement I'm just giving you a taste of what those what those terms are those terms and conditions of course have to be approved by the city council um after this meeting because the council has to approve the um the agreement because the
easement at the end of the day is is not the applicant's easement the our intentions are that the port will convey the easement to the city and the city is going to own and maintain that force uh Main Line once it's installed at the developer
expense but I was just going to suggest that we're holding the building permit for condition on the lane turn lane agreement the sewer line agreement and then we've got an easement
negotiation so we can put that in as a third line at them saying we need to see agreement on that or or or what is satisfactory to everybody's it's in the sewer line agreement that's that's the point I'm saying it's already covered it's like incorporated into the the
eement yep that's all in that um agreement very good again it has to be approved by Council that's why it wasn't presented to this board exactly Mr chairman I had something else that I noticed we got this updated uh C13 the Force main plan
and profile I was looking at that and I noticed that uh you're now showing from the packet different from the packet that we got that you've got a htpe sleeve that's around this Force man that uh because going under a driveway somewhere or there's what's the purpose
of that it's actually for the HTP piece that's going to be a section of a um directional drill uh on that and that's basically because there's some conflicts in the area with regards to items that it's kind of tight to get through and we're doing a directional drill in order to be able to get around those items without um any damage or anything yeah
when I when I looked at this I just I saw this update it just jumped out at me and I'm like what what are we doing here so you've got a directional drill that's going to take place one the short portion of that's correct got that's the proper way to do it too I no further questions Mr chair
thank you uh Mr gentle Court do you have any questions um I'm I'm just really curious U you you asked for an increase rooftop facility say your question again I see that you've requested an increase to
65t and and I'm wondering if you're having a rooftop facility up there is that why you increased it um well we increased it to 65 ft uh to accommodate the uh six floors so there is a setback along the A1A uh for that requirement in
the EO District that requires that 15t setback the 65 ft gets us to six stories but the rooftop element is actually going to be part of the sixth floor it's not on a so-called seventh floor okay thank you yep
thank you any more anything else Mr jort no thank you very good okay Mr Miller do you have any questions no okay uh city council do you have any
City attorney do you have anything else uh no sir very good anything in the audience uh I see a gentleman in the audience stand up come to the microphone and introduce yourself my name is Grio 8207 canaval
Boulevard and uh up here the firehouse is right next to it right station 52 that is ACC to to the north of this parcel the Northeast they have that fire facility right it's a they teach there
also they hold the academy yep well yep was jumping out me what I'm concerned about is their response time and the amount of traffic that might be coming in and out of 151 room you know if traffic's going to be backed up their response time to get out you already mentioned that it'll
be set up for firemen to get all you know all four sides to access the building and the property but their response time getting out to go help people is what I was concerned about the width of the road and then they teach there also so there's a lot of traffic going in and out of there for the fire
academy so you're talking about uh egress from the training facility out onto the highway to go other places yes for the career fireman to get out and go help people yeah their response times will be delayed by the traffic I'm just guessing I don't know and I'm not trying
to throw a rents in your guys' ears but the it's just a concern that I think would be brought up prior to it being built then finding out later the traffic plan was supposed to have addressed that it should have gone through all the the right Hoops before it got to us tonight
but I'll ask the question anyway I I can address that Mr Russell so we have had pretty extensive discussions with the fire department our Fire Marshall and our fire chief um at this point the fire department has given us verbal
acceptance uh we've had a list of comments talking about that access talking about safety issues uh I will say originally that the fire department requested that the hotel have a te design uh uh and they submitted a revised plan showing a T
intersection um they added that southbound right turn lane uh partially for the cruise parking business but also to avoid queuing uh because if it queued too far then it would start to impact that fire facility and we definitely did understand that concern and we've made
sure that uh the fire department's been very looped in on this project uh last week we had a pretty extensive back and forth between the developer and the fire department Department to make sure that everything was addressed and at this point the fire department has stated
that they accept the project they re they accept the response comments and they also accepted the fir truck path plan which is in regard to fir truck access to the site specifically um but yes definitely something to be kept in mind uh that's a
rather important facility and we've definitely wanted to make sure that the fire department's been looped on in on it this whole time yes sir okay have for you did we cover your concern yes thank you you did yeah than anyone
else all right I have no further questions I thought it was a good data pack a good briefing and and I heard answers to all the questions I had um well I do have one last question to get up to the observation deck do you
have to uh check into the hotel uh no you don't we have a separate elevator that takes you all the way up so I might want to do that some so all the welcome yep very good thank you okay any other comments Connor no
sir all right I'll look down the line here and I see no indications of uh more any more interest so then I'll ask for any any further discussion all right then the next thing we want to
do is uh submit a motion for approval Mr chairman we got a hand in the audience do we have a hand would yes ma'am would you like to come up and uh speak to the microphone and introduce yourself because we might not know you welcome welcome Mickey come on
up we just want to get you on the on record Kellum 8910 K Lane Cape canaval um um I I just observing in what Mr Kio said about the fire department there's also that parking facility out there for
cruise parking are are they going to change their entrance from that road to the other road so we don't have the hotel the fire department and the cruise parking going down Colombia um I can address that go ahead we'll let Connor
talk to that I think I know the answer thank you councilwoman Kellum for the question um the answer is yes we've been in discussions with the owner of that cruise well yes partially we've been in discussions with Tom Hermanson the owner
of that cruise parking business um he's been involved in every step of the process since I've been here to make sure that things work uh as I said before that right turn lane was put there with his Cruise business in mind
because on cruise days his lot does start to queue a little bit and that will allow people to still access the hotel safely uh in regard to his property he will be changing the location of his uh gate his gated fence
that goes up and down and that's something that's already been discussed between the applicant team and Mr Hermanson uh so he's been on board with the project you know I think he understands that the property is allowed to be developed by right and he just
wanted to make sure that his patrons would still be able to have Ingress and egress and to the extent that we are aware he is satisfied with the current Arrangement thank you um one other question um a while back the council
approved um a facility for the parking that because they couldn't tie into the sewer they had a septic it will they be able to now tie oh I'm sorry to tie into that sewer and get them off the think I was not aware
of that prior agreement Anthony were you um generally um I mean that's a that's a a question we'd have to examine um whether or not um as you know this the city has the ability to mandate um sewer hookups you know with in with
properties with septic tanks when the sewer line when the sewer service is available whether or not this alignment of the sewer makes it available I I don't know without talking to the city engineer okay not to speak out of turn but the septic uh the lift station that
they have to install to uh move the uh fluence to the Force main is probably sized for that project and probably not anticipated to be sized for okay I just hope that we can get the
parking off of the and get them onto the sewer so yes and I will say that generally this project is moving toward the goal of Greater sewer access and connecting our sewer system so in that General regard it's accomplishing that mission yeah because down that end there
wasn't anything but yes and thank you for your comments thank you okay thank you for your oversight M McCollum okay looking around one more time any more uh comments I see
none uh are we ready to make a motion comrades okay can I have a motion for approval Mr chair Mr chairman I'd like to make a motion to approve this project with the described conditions
absolutely thank you is there a second I'll second it thank you we have a motion in a second R Renee call roll please board member General cor for the motion
board member Miller for the motion chairman Russell for Boardman member Strauss for the motion okay we have recommended approval for this uh project that moves us next to item
four recommended for continuance this is a thank you you you may exit if you wish to thank you for coming and we appreciate your attendance yes so Mr Russell if I would be allowed to interject on that uh final
item recommended for continuance uh that was an item that was recommended for continuance back in the March meeting and it remains in that state uh at this point the community and economic development staff did not feel comfortable recommending this uh
application to be heard but we are actively working with the developers uh the applicant rather to allow this to be ready for our next meeting uh which we tentatively plan to have uh or did we already receive the Quorum for that for
late April uh this second uh pnz meeting in April was it April 23rd yeah so at this point we do believe that that project would be ready for a uh planning and zoning board meeting in
late April but that's why we're recommending continuance because at this time it is not ready to be heard okay that's okay we'll uh we won't do it until we're ready um then U that'll uh that'll get us into uh
reports and open discussion uh do we need to make a motion on recommending it or no I can't recall if it was advertised it was advertised yes so I think in our interest okay then a motion to um
continue to the next um Regular planning and zoning board meeting we have a date certain or not yes we have a tenative date of April 23rd uh but we've not received you know verbal Quorum or anything yet okay we didn't put it out uhuh
yeah yeah and that's something that we can talk about at the end of this meeting to try to schedule that next meeting go ahead and just a motion to just continue it until the next regular Planning and Zoning Board this the schedule will be will be um determined
later on determined at a later date okay I'll move that item four for the lot split be uh kept on the agenda until a later time is there a second I'll second that motion all right any further discussion
okay call roll board member general core for the motion board member Miller for the motion chairman Russell for board member stoud for the motion I violated my own personal rule
my personal rule is when we have a motion on the floor I don't ask for any more discussion that's just a license to continue the meeting so uh we should have all the discussion done and complete before a motion is made that's
that's the way I intend to operate okay okay can I ask a question yes ma'am Anthony do we have to have a motion to add these into the packet since the packet was already distributed the new insertions um no um just let I think the
the two additional exhibits that were submitted or three actually yes right um with the board's um you know consent I would ask that the they be referenced in at least the minutes and then we can
incorporate it into the you know the package for so when we approve the minutes next time yeah just yeah just make sure that they're okay referenced in the minutes because they weren't part of the official package okay put put that put some words to describe the that
package and we'll are you asking for a motion tocl just with the board's cons unanimous consent I mean that's fine to to have the clerk U reflect that these additional documents are in the minutes
may ask for consent uh visual consent we okay with that Mr Miller are you okay with including that package yes so done all right yeah good catch which brings us to
the uh anything else open discussion Renee I think you've got a mention of a meeting next meeting I'm sorry I'm sorry yes we uh we're looking to tentatively schedule our next meeting just according to the calendar the next one would be on
April 23rd um this one was obviously a rescheduled meeting from March hence why we're having it on the first Wednesday uh but that fourth Wednesday of April being April 23rd we'd be looking to to have another planning and zoning board
meeting there is the uh lot split that was recommended for continuance tonight that we imagine would be ready by then and also a uh tree ordinance that would have to also get looked at by you guys and so at this point it's those two
items and we'd like to propose for that to be heard on April 23rd I have no objection and I'm available for that meeting I'm also available okay you okay okay very good well Renee will continue to poll everybody to see
who can be available but that looks like we've got a quorum okay anything else that we need to talk about not that I'm aware of all right let's be adjourned thank you