Welcome to the board of health meeting of March 16, 2026. Pursuant to Governor Healey's March 29th, 2023 signing of the acts of 2023 extending certain CO 19 measures adopted during the state of emergency suspending certain provisions
of the open meeting law general law chapter 38 section 20 until June 30th, 2027. This meeting of the Chattam Board of Health is being conducted in person and via remote participation. Please note this meeting is being recorded and will be available shortly hereafter for
scheduled and on demand viewing on any smartphone or tablet. If anyone else is recording this meeting, including the use of AI note takingaking apps, please notify the chairman. Every effort will be made to ensure that the public can a can adequately access
the proceedings as provided for in the order. A reminder that persons who would like to listen to the meeting while in progress may do so by calling 1508-945-4410 and the conference ID is 109664354 pound or join the meeting online via the Microsoft soft teams link through the
posted agenda. While this is a live broadcast and simal cast on Chattam TV Xfinity Xfinity channel 10722, despite our best efforts, we may not be able to provide real time access. We will post a record of this meeting at the town's website as soon as possible.
I'll turn the meeting over our chairwoman um Carol Boyce. Um, it shall be the policy of this board to conduct its meetings under the open meeting law so as to encourage public participation.
Okay. >> Whenever time permits and as part of the agenda item discussions so I'll take attendance when I call your name say here. Ron Wisher >> here. >> Joanna Kale >> here.
>> Carol Gordon >> here. and I'm here. So, we have a quorum and today we have two items on our agenda. The first is a short-term rental update
and discussion with Greg Berman and Karen Chimaza. >> Greg's >> Oh, it's okay. Greg, >> hi there. Greg Berman, your director of natural resources. Uh, apologies I have
to come in virtually today. Usually I'd much prefer just to come downstairs and chat. Um, so what I'm bringing before you today and uh hopefully Judy was able to provide you a copy of the draft agenda report for the select board. Um,
but there is a review process kind of baked into short-term rentals. Uh we're reviewing it a little earlier than that reviewed call for because there is a few kind of uh existing and future costs that are going to be incurred and we
wanted to potentially capture that within the fees. Uh but out of respect to board of health, I wanted to bring it to you for potential comment and then take it to the select board. And obviously during the select board meeting, you know, if they take public comment on this item, you could
certainly uh make yourselves known there as well. Uh but uh it's my thought to just kind of kick it off briefly and then if you have specific questions about the short-term rental um kind of overall status, I think Karen is there
and can fill in any questions. Um but you know the the short of the story is that um Shireen Davis of the select board asked for a review of the policy. Uh right now we have our uh Cadam
short-term rental regulations that say that we have to reasonably inspect um these uh short-term rentals. Karen has been kind of slogging through them in addition to getting them registered. Uh she can fill you in on the exact, you
know, percentage that she has completed so far. Uh but then in July 1st of 2025, the state building code was updated now requiring uh annual certification of every short-term rental by a certified building official. Uh right now there is
a listing uh from HR to hopefully fill this position within community development but that would leave you know an unfunded state mandate uh to bring an additional person on board. And then the real question mark uh right now
is the potential Maggie Hubert Rental Safety Act. Uh this would require somebody from the fire department to go in potentially annually depending on the word. Uh so it would require yet another inspection. Uh so we're not anticipating or or planning for the Maggie Hubert
just yet, but we did want to, you know, assess the fees of the town of Cadam in relation to the other towns on Cape Cod and also what it would actually cost to implement just with staffing needs. Um, so we were able to, you know, put a few
tables together in this agenda report and if you had any questions about them, I'm happy to try to answer them or more likely just pass you to Karen who has all the answers. Um, but basically, you know, potentially exploring your willingness and the select board's
willingness to increase the current fee of $50, which is certainly one of the lowest on Cape Cod, to up to $200, which would still be in keeping with u the other ones on Cape Cod. And the justification for that is the increase
in staff needs. So, with that, I'm happy to take questions or um if you prefer to ask questions to Karen as well. >> Any questions? >> I I have a qu I'm just curious why why
do Bourne, Brewster, and Orleans not have any fee at all? >> So, I think for Orleans, you'll be seeing that coming in the near future. for um Brewster. It's an ongoing discussion. It wouldn't shock me if you
were to see that after next town meeting for them. Also, um Bourne's a little too far out of my general circle, so I'm not sure the status there. >> It says it's a voluntary >> Brewster was actually >> Pardon? >> Yeah. So, I think Brewster was in the Chronicle just recently uh looking at
their short-term rental potential fee. I'm I'm I'm just anticipating uh responses when somebody says, "Why is my fee going up by four times?" >> Right. >> And you know, if there's nothing at Brewster or Orleans. >> So,
>> and I think that state mandate to have a local building inspector, certified building official go out is going to make a change for most programs. >> I think what you put together gave pretty good justification for why the fee is necessary. I'm just
>> thinking out loud in terms of communicating it to the people who have the rental property. >> Yeah. >> So, I have a question. >> Joanna, >> on on the Maggie Hubard Rental Safety Act, how far along has that gotten
>> Karen? Did you want to take that one or >> I can. Um so it has gone before and been remitted to a subcommittee where it has been for several months >> and this is this is sponsored by Senator Sier correct
>> and Luy I believe yes >> okay thank you okay I too think going from 50 to 200 is a lot it's a pretty big increase maybe we can meet in the middle for at least a period of time and also uh with,
excuse me, with the state building code and also the Maggie Hbert rental. Does that am I correct that you you would need to hire someone for each of those to go out and go about doing this? So, we'd have to hire two more two more people.
>> So, for the state building code, there's currently an advertisement for that position. Um, for the Maggie Hubard, it's unsure whether its existing staff and the fire department could cover that or they would need to bring somebody else in. I think we need to see what
that looks like if it is enacted. Um, but yeah, that the state building code has been on our radar for a while and we uh community development is trying to hire for that one. >> Okay. Seems like we do a lot of hiring, but okay. Thank you.
>> Um, I have a question for Karen. How many um how many short-term rentals does the state say the town has? >> So, the state's a little tricky in that they just keep a registration of anyone that has ever registered for the it's
technically the room occupancy tax. So, that's from 2019 on and that's about 1,500. So, that includes prior owners, people that are no longer renting, but also hotel motel. >> Oh, okay. And any questions from the audience or
>> are we to vote? >> I can't. >> Sorry. Sorry. >> Go ahead. >> Are we to vote on this today or we're just discussing it? >> Yep. >> Sorry. I was just going to weigh in or you know mention that also for next steps. Um you you know not not telling
the board when or what to vote on but you know uh this is currently scheduled for the select board meeting on the 24th. Um so after that I would take the select board recommendation and bring it back here to the board of health for
consideration. Uh this is just kind of an early look. >> Okay. >> Just just so you understand is our regulation actually specifies the $50 fee. So, um, in order for us to increase it, we have to actually change the
regulation. Um, which means having a public hearing, um, separate from these discussions that we're having. Um, it may be in our best interest to change the regulation to remove that fee out of it and, um, make it something that could
be done outside of changing the regulation. So we could say the fee has to be set by the select board or by the board of health at a a future time or something. So it wouldn't be a specific fee that every time we wanted to adjust it, we had to have um changed the
regulation. >> Okay, >> that's just something to think about after after the select board >> discusses it. >> So today we're not taking any vote or it's just to review. >> Yeah. and and answer any questions you
had to Karen as as to, you know, inspections and numbers and anything like that. We just wanted to make sure that you are aware, you know, how the how the process is going and >> and also the the the upcoming regulations that we do have to have a a
state a town uh building inspector go out and that's definitely, you know, it's not something our current staff can do. So that's why we see the need for when the building department sees the need to hire a person and it was approved, was am I correct, at town
meeting the funding for that position already last year? >> Yeah, it it's already within this current fiscal year, right? Uh so that that position was added previously. And just um really the one other thing is if you had any questions for myself or
Karen with relation to uh changing the registration dates, but that's in the agenda report as well. Yeah. Do you want to explain that, Karen? >> So, what I've been finding is that most rental property owners start thinking
about renewal at the end of the rental season. So, October, November, at the latest. Um, so I think while we're renewing them, we'd like to think about changing the validity date to align with
the calendar year and allow for renewal as early as November rather than waiting until January to kind of capture the natural cycle >> of the rentals. >> Yeah, I I think I think that makes an awful lot of sense
>> and I think I I like the way it was written up in the document. you know, you can do it in such a way that it really doesn't affect much of anybody since the >> the rental period is really April to October. So, it's uh it seems like it should be a pretty easy logical change
to make. >> Yeah. >> Yep. >> Yeah. The way it is now proved to be pretty confusing to the public. So, >> yeah. Yeah. >> All right. Okay. >> Any other questions?
No. Well, thank you, Greg. >> Absolutely. >> We'll be hearing more about this >> probably at the next meeting. Bye for now. >> Thank you, Greg. >> And our next agenda item is a discussion
and review of the revisions to the solid waste disposal waste regulation. So, um I could start us off with this. Um the last time we met, I presented you with a draft document. Um and uh I made
a few changes to it based on your comments. So, um I'll start over uh just to go through this, but um we added a section 8A, which is a request for a waiver, which is the waiver from the
requirement that you are only allowed to bring in, um waste from out of town, uh from the town of Chadam. So, if you wanted to bring it in from outer town, you would have to get a waiver. Um that's section eight. What did I say?
8A. I'm not I'm not going in order here, but why don't I uh let me go in order here. So, I add sorry to prepare my speech here. Um section six, I added a section called mandatory
recycling. Um there are there's something called Massachusetts waste disposal bans. Um, so I wanted to add something into this to clarify that um there's items that
are not allowed to be um collected and dumped um into our our trash stream by commercial haulers. Um so this is nothing new. I'm just putting it into the regulation to make it clear.
And it basically says in order to protect the environment, promote recycling and comply with mass D waistbands, the town of Chadam hereby establishes a requirement for mandatory separation of recyclable materials from solid waist stream. This requirement applies to all residential and
commercial generators in the town of Chadam. This requirement does not extend to separation of recyclable materials from solid waste generated by the public and disposed in public receptacles. The town of Chadam will inform all generators, residential and commercial, at least
once per year that recycling is a mandatory. It's just a way to educate the public. And the the items just so that you know that they are listed in the already in the regulation but um GLA that are banned are glass bottles and jars, metals, cans, recyclable metals,
plastic containers, paper and cardboard, leaves and yard waste, commercial waste, commercial food waste, and that's really large generators over a half a ton per week. Mattresses and textiles was recently added by D. white goods, large
appliances, construction materials such as asphalt, brick, concrete, clean gypsum, wallboard, and wood, lead acid batteries, and um tires. Um this is something that's uh the the state enforces with commercial generators. Um
but again, I felt that this was a good opportunity to to add it to our regulation just to educate the public on it. >> Where is that showing? >> I don't have that either. uh this part this I didn't this is just a cheat sheet for me that explains about the
waistband. >> Um and I I don't know if anybody in the audience has any concern about that or if Rob wanted to to talk at all about it but we can get back to that. Um >> I just a couple questions. So I brought
this up last time. So it's now mandatory that everybody in Chattam recycles. It's always been mandatory as but it's it's more the way the waistbands are written. It's more at a commercial
level. So large commercial haulers are supposed to separate out um the state could come come in and have people dump loads and if they see that you know a large percentage of it is cardboard or um metal cans or organic waste they
could find the haulers. No, I I I think it it makes good sense, don't get me wrong. Yeah. And it certainly seems very straightforward for the commercial haulers. I'm thinking about the residential >> Yeah. >> people. >> I mean, again, for the commercials is a
way for them to encourage their um >> Yeah. >> their their their businesses, their their people to um >> But Nickerson isn't going to mandate for a resident that they have. >> I didn't go that far. Some towns are
requiring bundled recycling with their with their commercial pickups. Um, that would be a more restrictive thing at this point. And I haven't we didn't go there with this. Um, >> I have one other real quick question. So, what is special waste? >> Special waste is like radioactive waste,
medical waste, things like that. Every once in a while someone who might be on chemo treatment or whatever, you'll you'll get a load that's um radioactive and we have to separate it and um keep it aside till it
gets becomes less hot so to speak. So, so that's that. Um and then the section 8.1 um I added at your request as a condition of permit renewal commercial haulers shall sign an affidavit
affirming that only waste collected within the borders of the town of Chadam shall be to disposed of at the transfer station. Um that will that's the affidavit. If they want to if they want to bring in waste
say from Monoy middle uh Monoy High School they would have to get a variance which is the section that I added in section 8A. Right after that the board of health may consider a request for a waiver from any applicable regulation contained herein. The granting of any
such waiver shall be at the sole discretion of the board. The burden shall rest with the applicant to demonstrate to the satisfaction of the board that the waiver is justified based on good cause, demonstrated hardship, andor clear municipal benefit. So that
hasn't changed since we looked at this last. Um I beefed up the violations and enforcement section and um it's just kind of more in line with all our other regulations. It allows it allows for um ticketing and such. um our
town council is reviewing this. He was going to get back to me. He wanted to make sure the language is correct and um he was so he was working on that and I did not hear back from him before this meeting. Um and then in 9.4 four in the
appeal section. He was going to check what he I said any appeal to sticker revocation will be directed to the director of DPW and I added and or the board of health. He
wanted to see if that was um correct as well and then he may move that section up into the 9.2 violations and enforcement to make sure it's not redundant. So, there's a few things that need to be tweaked here. Um,
but that's basically it. Uh, so the next step after, you know, we have comments would be to have a a public hearing, an official public hearing, and then you could vote on it at that time. So, we can >> All right. Well,
>> I'm I'm happy to answer any questions. >> Any questions? Now that >> any questions from the audience? >> To the mic, please. >> Grant Millie, Millie Trucking. Um, we've been Chav's disposal company since 1928.
First, I want to thank you for working with us. Obviously, this um waiver to the affidavit is a step in the right direction. Um I don't I it's a step in the right direction and I like I said I thank you. I'm just concerned that it appears that every single year we are
going to have to come back and go through this same process um of justifying obviously our municipal benefit as well as um customers of value like the Monoy school system. Am I correct in that thinking? >> Yes.
>> Okay. I'm I'm just wondering if there's a more effective way because I mean it's just Nickerson and I in town that are going to be seeking out these waivers. If there's more a more effective way to go about it um than every single year us
coming asking for, you know, a waiver. >> Um >> could a could a waiver be good for like three years or something? Yeah, I think we could probably tweak the wording to um that would make sense to do something like three years. Um
>> I just need to figure out where to put that in. >> It just seems like we'd be doing we'd be going through it every single year. And I mean Nickerson as well as I we don't have any um anticipated large growth schemes or anything compared to these corporate haulers. So I don't think you know things are going to change from
year to year. I'm I'm not going to go from bringing a small amount of out of town trash to all of a sudden, you know, 20 times what I am now. So, I just think there there might be room for an improvement. But I thank you for making >> I think I think it makes good sense to
make it a longer term >> maybe with a caveat that if anything significant changes in the conditions of the waiver, I don't know. I don't know what that would be if >> like a huge expansion. >> I mean, if Monamoy High School suddenly
started taking in uh trash from three other >> area high schools, you know, then I think, you know, it makes perfect sense to have it for a longer duration. >> Yeah. And you you mentioned the municipal benefit. I mean, I think over all the selectment meetings we've had as
well as the board of health meetings, I think it's very obvious that Ben and I both provide a municipal benefit. So, I think that obviously is a great thing to add to the waiver and a great defensive point for us. So, >> yeah, it doesn't specifically say that it has to be done every year. So,
>> no, it doesn't. >> Yeah, >> I just assumed that. >> So, I I'll have to talk to town council and see what the best way is to interpret it. And >> yeah, or even something beyond a waiver. I don't know if it's as simple as, you know, Ben and I, we both own property in
Chadam. We pay the excise tax on all our trucks. We pay property tax on our trucks. Maybe it's something as simple as, you know, that the taxpaying haulers in town are the ones that can use the dump as opposed to the out of town, you know, guys who are using the dump. I don't know.
>> Yeah, it gets tricky, but Yeah. >> Yeah. All right. There is one more line in there. It mentions MSW being hauled in um open in non-packer type vehicles. And there are two out of town haulers that
haul municipal waste right now in uncovered um vehicles. So >> if we're sticking our regulations, >> yeah, I think they are allowed to do that, but I have to review the the wording in that section. >> Okay. Yeah, it implied that MSW is
packer type vehicles only. No open top vehicles. >> Okay. >> At least from my interpretation. >> All right. I will re relook at that. >> Thank you. Hello, I'm Ben Nickerson from Benjamin D. Nickerson, Third Generation. Um, I
just did some numbers last spring when this meeting first came up and we were talking about the out of town trash problem. Um, so out of the 3,362 total stops we did the week of June 11th
and 12th, uh, 218 of those were out of town. So that's 6.5%. So 6.5% of what we do is out of town. And then only 23 of those stops were commercial. So only 68 of what we do out of town is commercial. Commercial brings in the most weight.
So, just to give everyone an idea of what type of weight we're bringing in uh from out of town right there, it's a pretty low percentage of our our overall uh percentages. >> I think that's good information and I think as part of the the request for a
waiver process, we would ask you to to give us those types of numbers and you know in your request um your reasoning for the request of the waiver and such. So, that's that's good. >> Okay. Thank you. >> Thank you.
Yes, >> Brian Phillips, 374 Orleans Road. Um, I was just kind of curious if you guys could give us some examples of what would be acceptable for these waivers. Um, maybe something like if somebody grew up here, uh, went to the school system and then, you know, bought a
house in Haritch. Would that be an acceptable example of >> I I'm not sure. I mean it we're not we're not giving an exception to individual residents. We're we're this is for the commercial haulers. So um
>> I mean we're not saying that people from Haritch can all now come and get a sticker. >> Well to have them as a client. >> Yeah. I I mean it's up to them to to tell us, you know, what percentage out a town they're doing if it's all of a
sudden it's 50% because I don't know. I mean, and we're not going to ask them who exactly they're picking up and for what reason. Um >> I think it I think it's important to remember how a lot of this discussion started uh almost about a year ago. I
mean it was uh someone brought to our attention their opinion that Chadam was being used as a regional transfer station >> and that a tremendous amount of uh garbage was coming in from outside of
Chadam into the Chattam transfer station. And so we acted to to try to evaluate that and make sure that that was was that happening or was that not happening. So there was a nice analysis done.
We were satisfied that the amount of refuge coming into Chadam from outside Chadam was actually rather small, maybe around 5%. So that based upon that information, you know, we really felt strongly and we
didn't want to penalize um Millie or or Nickerson because of a very restrictive rule. So then we decided that we would come up with a waiver approach that therefore we could keep that amount of outside refuge on a
low basis. So, you know, that way we can look at this on a case-byase basis and as long as we can assure ourselves that the amount of outside refuge that's coming in is very small and that we're not in any way impeding the effort of,
you know, of our local contractors, then I thought it seems like a pretty good solution to us. So, that's that's the reason for the case by case. Well, also the fact that the the taxpayers were subsidizing the trash.
>> They would be subsidizing it if >> we have been if >> the town has been subsidizing because there's been a shortfall. >> All right. So, the town has been subsidizing the trash at the transfer station to
remove it. That's based on the fees, which um >> based on the current fees, >> right? Which is >> another reason for not wanting to take trash from other towns. >> Yeah. >> So, do do we have a waiver form, a particular form that they would fill out
if they want? >> We have not created one, but I could work on that. >> Okay. >> Yeah, >> I think that might be helpful. Maybe give some clarity. >> Well, thank you. That explanation was very uh good and helped me understood. Thank you.
>> Thank you. Any other questions? >> Um, I have one hand up. >> You want to go ahead? >> Uh, yes. It's Elaine Gibbs. Pardon me. Um, one of the local haulers
actually does bring uh refuge I believe from the Monoy Regional School District. Um, which we pay normally 30% of that. Now, the school district generates a tremendous amount of trash, I would assume. So, what is the
arrangement on that? Does Haritch I'm sorry, I have a frog in my throat. Does Harwitch pay the 70% of that or how how's that handled? You know, I have a real problem with Haritch specifically. They have said
that it's cheaper for them to take higher haulers to bring their trash to Chadam than it is to send it off site uh to uh Felmouth or offcape. So I stand by my statements on that. And if we're not
doing audits of the trash disposed, how how are we monitoring that? Is it simply that the haulers say no, it's only 5%, or are we doing audits? Because that's what the board of health was going to do. >> I don't I mean, I can't answer the
question as who whether we're paying 30% of the bill to the commercial haulers. That's a budget question that you'd have to put to monoy school system. >> Well, I guess the question is, is there any specific contract if if One of those haulers is taking the Monoy
regional trash to Chadam and he is getting lower rates. 70% of that trash belongs to Haritch. So I was wondering if that was put in the equation or not. I I don't know.
>> You'd have to ask the the contractors, I guess, and how that that's >> Well, I don't see why I should have to ask. I think that's >> we don't know the answer to that question because we don't collect the fees. >> Um >> we don't we don't assess the fees and we
don't collect the fees. So >> I assume the school is paying um >> they I'm sure Millie has a contract. Yes. And that's that's between them. >> Where they get the money from I have no idea. >> Yeah.
>> Uh well I'm not sure that's true. I don't think he I think he just picks up the trash and brings it in and it's within the 5%. All right, I'll I'll look into it because I think that's a legitimate question. You know, we we have a lot of trash and it's coming from out of town. And I stand by that comment
because most of the surrounding towns do not do that. They they do not allow commercial haulers. And so the only place to go is for those towns to take it directly off Cape themselves or to bring it to Cadam through the haulers
that we have certified. So it's going somewhere and I think it's going to Chadam. But that's my opinion. Okay. Thank you. >> Thank you. >> Thank you. >> Um any other questions?
>> Questions? Comments? >> Comments? Okay, let go. >> Well, Jeff Dykins, vice chair, select board. Um, first of all, thank you once again for your thoughtful uh when you've addressed this very thoughtfully, keeping in mind that these businesses
have been here for generations. I really would really appreciate it. I think the board I can speak for the board, they appreciate it as well. Um, and in terms I I thought we put the local folklore to bed a long time ago about how out of state out of out of town trash was not coming into into Chadam. I I talked to
the DPW director of the select board has interviewed folks and you know these two carriers do a dimminimous amount of out of town trash being delivered um to our to our transfer station. But you know that's what it is. Um talk to talk to our DPW director and that's what he
reports. So, I just I just would really like to put that issue to bed. In terms of Monoy, um those the charges to that Millie would charge Monoy would go into their operating expenses. And we all know that those operating expenses are shared based on a three-year rolling
average. And those those expenses would ultimately come to Chadam in a percentage that is reflected approximately 23% to Chadam and 77% to to Howitch. So I'm making the assumption that those those costs for transfer, you
know, for taking care of the the trash get ultimately subsumed or assumed into the operating expenses. Again, those are shared 2377. So in fact, one could argue that Haritch is perhaps paying even more than more than Chadam to get rid of their trash. And once again, I thank you
very much. >> Thank you. Well, >> I see no other. >> No one else. >> All right. To be continued. >> So, um I
would you like me to schedule this for a public hearing at one of our upcoming board meetings? >> Yes. >> Did we worked on a date? >> Yeah, we did. >> Um if it's going to be May 4th, we advertise it on April 9th and 16th. So
it looks like that public hearing would be May 4th. >> Okay. Would be what? What would be the date? >> May 4th. The public hearing. >> We have to advertise it 14 days ahead of time. >> Be on vacation, but >> Okay. >> You You will be >> We're going to be able to get all the
changes together. >> Well, as long as we have three of you here. >> Yeah. >> Um fourth. Okay. With you. >> I'll be here. I'll I'll be here. >> You're fine. Um I can you know I'll I'll share with you any changes I make based on our comments today and that will you
know if anybody has um that will be posted only right now it's just contingent on getting the approval back from the attorney. Uh yes. And then I was um maybe going to look at the language under the waiver whether it would be you know every three years or
um yeah and just yeah getting the changes from town council on the penalty section and making sure that's all correctly worded. Okay. So, as soon as I have that, I can share that with you. And if we need to
to discuss it again before the May 4th hearing, we can for sure because uh we have a couple meetings in between then, but we have to we have to push it out because we have to advertise it two weeks ahead of time. So, >> Okay. >> All right. So, May 4th.
>> May 4th. Time's flying. >> All right. And are there any comments or future agenda requests? >> Yes, >> I I have one. Um I was wondering if we could address some of the sore hook
hookups that may have been in violations for a little while. Someone had sent me some and uh I thought if we put on the agenda, maybe we can just get some followup, which would be lovely. >> Sure. >> And I have them here so I can I think uh I think you you have a copy, right, Judy or? Uh yeah, that's actually a list that
I generated after she requested those addresses, >> right? I guess she >> kind of answers >> Yeah. >> her questions, but >> Okay. >> If we could just, you know, maybe follow up or see what happens that, you know, like >> Sure. I I can give you uh uh and
actually we're going to um have a new list of sewer connection orders. Uh so that'll maybe we can do it at the same time. Um because what happens is I get a list from DPW. Rob just sent me one. Um we're just working on some um IT stuff
and the best way for us to actually send out the orders, but the board of health does have to approve the list >> and um vote to uh order these people to connect to sewer. >> Okay. So maybe we can cross check that. That sounds fine. Yeah. Give it some
attention. That's great. Thank you. So that'll probably be um well it'll be sometime in April. >> Okay. >> Okay. >> Thank you. >> Yeah. >> And any other comments or requests?
>> Nope. All right then. >> Do I have a motion to adjourn the meeting? >> No, we have to do the minutes. >> Oh, minutes. >> Forget the minutes. Okay. I was going to say we're in a rush. Oh, so Oh, so close. >> I know.
>> That's great though. >> All right. >> Okay. >> I actually the minutes of March 2nd. >> Yeah. >> All right. So, we'll review the the minutes for March 2nd.
Are there any changes or All right. >> I'll make a motion to approve the minutes. >> All right. And you'll second. >> All right. And we'll take a vote. Carol, >> I approve. >> Joanna, >> I approve.
>> Ron, >> I approve. >> And I approve. So, the minutes are approved. Now, do I hear a motion to adjourn the meeting? >> Now, it's your turn. >> I make a make a motion that we adjourn this meeting. >> Second.
>> I'll second it. >> Second. And take a vote. Carol, >> I approve. >> Joanna, >> I approve. >> Ron, >> I approve. >> And I approve. The meeting is adjourned.