[Music] Heat. Hey, Heat. [Music]
Heat. Heat. N. [Music] Heat. Heat.
[Music] Heat. Heat. [Music]
Good afternoon. This is a hearing of the Cham Conservation Commission being held on September 10th, 2025 in accordance with the Massachusetts Wetlands Protection Act and the Town of Chad and Wetlands Protection bylaw and regulations. My name is Karen Latin and
I serve as the chair. Today's hearing is being broadcast live on Exfinity channel 1072 and is being recorded for the ondemand archives available on the town's website. It's being conducted in person, by phone, and by video conference. The agenda, instructions on
how to attend, and copies of documents for review are posted on the town's website. To all participants, whether attending by phone or online, please remain muted unless you've been recognized by the chair. When recognized, please identify yourself for the record. If you're attending by
phone, you can mute and unmute by using star six. If you are online and you are not a commissioner, please keep your camera turned off unless you've been recognized. Indicate that you wish to speak by using the raise hand feature. So that I have a record of quorum, I
will now ask each commissioner to indicate their presence. Vice Chair Paul Johnson, >> present. >> Elise Gordon, >> present. >> Janet Williams, >> present. Eric Hilbert >> present. >> Bob Delvecio >> present. >> And I'm here. So we've established we have a a quorum
>> at this point. Are there any public comments or future agenda items that anybody would like to bring forward? Okay. So before we begin the agenda, Bradford, are there any announcements about any requests for continuances today? And I
know there are quite a few. >> There are several continuences today. Um the first one is a requested order of conditions SE 103721 for 76 Marsh View Road.
Um then the next ones are notice of intent applications SC 10 368 3682 98 Oyster Pond Furlow for Steven and
Haley Natus SC 103730 for 20 L Street Karen Losko SC 102727 for47 Little Beach Road Monoy Rips LLC
SC 103724 186 Strong Island Road David and Judith Doyo SC 103746 202 Lime Hill Road for Lime Hill 22
trust and 10 3740 uh for lot 4 KCO Cove Road Dean Rybeck. Um and then there is also a request um continued request for C certificate of compliance
SE 102663 149 Cotch Pineikut Road Galaxy nominee trust. >> Thank you. At this point Bradford Bower, our Chadam's assistant conservation agent will now lead us through the agenda.
>> All right. The first item is a discussion for the meeting schedule for October. Guess that's me. Okay, guys. I prepared a little bit for you all before we um and we can have a discussion and then decide if we're going to have two
meetings next month or three. So, as we all know, on August 27th, the meeting was 3 hours and 46 minutes. The last time we had a meeting is long or longer was on March 27th, 2024.
At that meeting, we heard the airport. Hence why that one took a long time and hence why we had something Cedar Street pump station that took an hour last last meeting. We did hear 19 properties at
the last meeting. On the 20 on December 4th, 2024, we heard 19 properties and it took just under three hours. three hours is what we're slotted for our meetings. We've been lucky. Most meetings have
been under two hours, even the the ones where we've only met twice a month. Um in August 2024, we had two meetings and then one was uh the third was canceled due to a lack of a quorum and those two
meetings together took three hours and 45 minutes and they heard 28 properties. So um pretty comparable to our August of 2025. Uh we we have so many meetings that have
been even uh under an hour which we didn't used to have. Um, so then looking forward right now on September 24th and the the it has closed as far as new submissions,
we have six NOIs scheduled and then if we continue anything and there's not too much this week um that could add some NOIs there. We have five orders which are all being worked on and we have two
COC requests. So, it's not a terribly um heavy meeting. October 8th, which closes on September 23rd, we have four NOIs and one amended order.
October 1st, which closes on the 16th of September, we have nothing yet. So if we were to continue anything from today, which there isn't a whole lot, um if we decide we want three meetings, that
would be a very, I would imagine, short meeting. Um as I've said to you all before, we are in the office working on trying to come up with ways to be more efficient and cut down on
properties that are not full applications. So Crystal's been doing a a bang-up job um going through everything when somebody uh comes in to submit it to say this is not complete and so we won't be able to hear it. That
will help. Um we are evaluating some other things. Nothing that's written in stone. We're researching with other conservation commissions. So, I can't really get into them yet because we don't really know if they're going to be
doable or not. Um, so having said that, does anybody have anything they want to say as far as opinions or do you just want to go to a vote? Um, what if you just play it month by month
like you just did as far as >> Well, it it's hard to do month by month and I'm not opposed to it, but like we are one meeting away from then the October meetings and we've had to continue some things to October
>> and nobody knew whether we were having three meetings or two. So, which hence was why I had hoped to deal with this at least in August and probably should have put it at the beginning of the agenda only because then a decision could be made and we would wouldn't have to say we don't know how many meetings we're
having. So, um also Crystal you have your hand up so go ahead. So, the problem with deciding as we go is the deadline reflects when we have to submit the legal ad so that it's
advertised for five business days which holidays mess that up but if we are deciding we would have to decide pretty far in advance >> right which is hence why we you know I would say when we decide and I will keep
updating that um spreadsheet that I did with the length of meetings and how many we had and how many NOIs and everything so everybody can see But I I would like to see going forward that we evaluate it at least for maybe three months at a
time. Um be yeah quarterly. >> So um but we do have to make a decision about October which is the only meeting the only month that we have three meetings scheduled right now for the
rest of 2025. So >> Karen, if I might, I I would just like to say that uh it seems to me that what bogs the meetings down as much or more than anything are the continuences piling on top of each
other. And the fact that you and Crystal are working on that should definitely streamline that process, >> right? and and there will be more of an effort to maybe move things to an order faster. In other words, not faster, but
if there's just a little bit of information that we still need, but it's nothing crucial to writing the order, we could start the order pending getting that information. But as long as it's not something that needs to be discussed
and reviewed by us, I'm not trying to speed through things and not give them the amount of time that we need to give it. And that is very important. So, while we want to speed things up and and
potentially move things along faster, if we have a full application, that will help because we've had even last time I think we had a property that said we'll give the mitigate, we'll determine mitigation with the agent later and
that's not fine. You know, we don't do that. So, um I think that that will help because who knows, maybe we could have gone to an order for that property if we'd had everything.
So, anybody else want to say go ahead, Janet. Um I I I I like the idea of um projecting quarterly at least as as a starting point. Um, but I would say that this may not be the right quarter to do that because as I look at the calendar,
we have all kinds of as usual every year strangeness in November and December. So we have >> which are already >> we have a hearing scheduled the day before Thanksgiving and the one right >> on Christmas Eve and so um they all get changed anyway. >> Well, no, we have uh November meetings
are the 5th and 12th. >> The 5th and the >> and December are the 3rd and 17th. You don't have the 26th in November. >> No. >> Okay. >> We didn't when we you and I or >> Yep. >> or No, Elise and I, I'm sorry, uh did
the calendar. >> Okay. So, that's that's that helps. I'm taking these off here. I had them on my calendar from before. >> So, we have the 5th and 12th of November. We have the 3rd and 17th of December. Another hopeful benefit of
this is if we can have more meetings that or more months that are two and I can't say that this will happen maybe we can attract some new members. >> Okay, >> we need three associates. We need one full-time person.
>> So I I just I'm having a uh it I'm not able to I have a hearing on December 24th. I can't delete it. It it was an invitation. So >> Oh, okay. So, Crystal, maybe you can look at November and December's hearing
dates in and in the calendar. >> That's all just by way of saying that we always have to adjust hearing dates in November and December anyway, but as far as October goes, I'm I'm finding this uh experiment. Um I have to say originally I was leaning against it um just because
I thought it was going to make hearings more complex and and longer. And while they have been long, that's not due to it's due to the complexity of the applications and not correct not that they have piled up and it looks like the numbers, you know, are have slacked off
a little bit um slowly >> and they seem to be slacking a bit at this point. I'm happy to keep to keep going through October and see how it goes and then in come middle of October we will nail down November and December and then take a fresh look at the new
year whether we continue with two or three >> December are nailed. >> Okay, >> because they are two meetings a month. Um the only one outside of you know that has to be decided is October. Um, it will give us more months to evaluate too
whether this works. >> And to Crystal's point, we probably should nail down the first quarter as early as October. >> Do it at least November. >> Yeah. >> So, that will be on the docket again um
no matter what we decide here to see how we feel going forward. It is an experiment and you know we're all learning and how it works and hopefully we
you know we can figure out other ways to assist with the the workload that will make it a little bit more um streamlined. >> Okay. >> So, anybody else? >> I'm all for the two two a month. So
hoping to officially ask everyone. So since you just said I'll ask Elise. >> Two or three? >> Two. >> Janet >> two. >> Paul >> two. >> Eric >> three. >> Bob >> I'd like to say two and then we'll
re-evaluate. >> We Oh, definitely are. Okay. And I say two. So two it is. And Crystal that's five and one. So, thank you everybody.
>> So, we are meeting in October on the 8th and the 22nd. I did not even create a folder yet for the first since it was up in the air. So, and that's the one whose um deadline is coming on the 16th. So,
having accomplished that >> Bradford on to the real work. Yes, >> that took longer than I had hoped. But >> first up is a notice of intent for zero Cedar Street, which I believe is now 240
Cedar Street. Um, Cedar Street pump station design, town of Chadam, map 12B, parcel 11, SE 10 3751, construction of a new wastewater pump station. >> Hi,
>> good afternoon. Jeff Greg uh from GHD representing town of Chadam. And um I just realized that in all the applications that I've been doing some of the supplemental information that I actually sent to you, you already had meant to go to the planning board. That was like the lighting and the storm
water report. So I apologize for the confusion. I just realized that I mixed that up. >> But I did send a new landscape plan which I think was the focus of the last discussion. >> Yes. Um, and I think that's really what my understanding was the focus of the
remaining questions before this could go to an order. Is that correct? >> Uh, I believe so. But go ahead. Go ahead. >> Can I ask a technical question? So, I'm looking at the plans and they are labeled at least the the um digital ones as revised, but when I look at them, I
don't see any revision dates on any of them and I can't really tell. Um so a >> so we haven't so the only one that so the only >> drawing that changed was the >> planting plan
>> CS3 I believe >> yes CSO3 >> yes >> does that have a revision date >> um >> really tiny >> no we didn't we didn't uh >> seeing the revision date >> okay that's fine >> we have a there's a plot date at the
bottom >> there's a September 4th at 4M by N natural resources. >> Oh, we don't have Yeah, that that wouldn't show up on >> We were kind of scrambling as we trying to get this from >> the feedback.
>> I think the digital went online earlier than the paper because the paper we just got I just got yesterday >> and that was >> September 4th. >> Okay, I see it. It's way down there. >> Okay. Um but with that, I'm hoping you'll walk us
through the the changes. So, um, do we have the, uh, I don't know if we have an electronic of the >> Oh, yeah, we do. >> Yep. >> Everything's You've definitely got all the electronics.
>> So, so what what they elected to um recommend is a more layered approach and changing up some of the tree types. So along the laser pointer, excuse me. So along
this row right here, they are they are now calling for a combination of inkberry uh holly and um ends up with and then winterberry. So
it's inkberry and then winterberry over here. And then there's some um the winter berry in a layer behind it with a couple uh ink berry on this side. They kind of like switched them back and
forth. And then they went with um >> you've added >> viburnum >> viburnum >> along here. And then they went to um the eastern uh red cedar right in
front of the uh the fence in front of the the station itself. >> The plan I received >> Yep. >> yesterday says it still says Atlantic white cedar. >> Oh, yep. Yes. So we still we still have
the the white cedar. >> Okay. >> All four in the back. That's all in the in the in the wetland itself. >> Okay. >> So the comment that so when we talked with the the woman that had that was represent Teresa that was representing
the butter >> um their main concern was changing the uh the front that they've been looking at because what's in the wetland although she commented as well that you're going to have a lot and they're going to challenge each other for space
and growth. She also understands we're trying to do the three to one replication as much as we can, understanding we're going to have other um uh restoration that's going to be needed outside of that area. So the
focus, the majority of the change was in this area and then um this corner of the property. So basically what fronts Cedar Street Anything else? >> Um the the PL So the plantings on this
side changed from changed to the the Inkberry um >> and then >> we'll play the A's today at 12. >> Excuse me. Whoever's on, could you please mute yourself? >> Thank you.
>> And then >> sorry. And then winter lined with winterberry behind it. >> And then um >> this is actually the >> Yeah. >> And then the eastern red cedar here, but >> for some reason this one looks like it's
the older >> it's different. >> Oh, that's the electrical. Sorry. This is That's the electrical drum. >> That's the electrical. That's not uh >> that's not that. Yeah, that's what was throwing me. >> CS00. >> We're sitting here going by. It's different. >> Yeah. No, CS. >> Yeah. So, they they just didn't update
the the layer on the electrical. We figured the landscaping plan is the one that controls the landscaping. The electrical is really just for electrical and the trees are >> okay. >> The contractor is not building the not doing the landscaping based on the electrical plant. So, my apologies, but
that what I walked through is the one that I'm looking at, which should be the one that you have received. Yes. And it is in the folder. >> Um at least when I looked cuz I was looking I didn't have the printed till yesterday. >> And then the only other change that we
did is that we as as I had mentioned at the meeting the privacy fence um along uh the eastern side we have the privacy fence head up but then when it comes to the angle point then it turns to chain
link and then chain link across the back. That was the only other change from the last one. >> Okay. There was Janet, do you have questions? Because you had most of the questions, but I know we talked about um
>> Oh, and the seed mix. Sorry. >> Replacing wetlands. >> Yep. >> And can you speak to that aspect of the project? So I think we were waiting for um
so the town in discussions with the town the town is willing to to do uh you know restoration offsite and um what we didn't have in time for this meeting is
uh to provide you with the initial restoration that was done at one of the other pumping station sites in terms of um some of the tree plant additional tree plantings that they did in that area. So, um,
uh, so if we said that the town would determine at a later time where they will be replacing this wetlands
in conjunction in determining it in conjunction with the conservation office. Is everybody okay with that? I mean, we've done that with them for other mitigation that they've owed when they could the town couldn't do enough
mitigation at a site. We said it was to to be determined later. We said how many square feet were owed. So that I do need is how many square feet will be owed to us for what you are
removing. >> Yeah. So, I believe that was the and I don't have the number in front of me. I believe that was somewhere around the 1700 square. >> Yeah, that's what I thought, but I just didn't know if if I said 1700 or whoever's writing it said 1700 if that
hit it or was >> I just want to make sure it's not too little, it's not way too much. So, >> and is the and I guess the question for clarification for for our end is is that creation of a new wetland or is that
restoration or mitigation of an existing wetland? You tal the last time we talked about >> I think we said restoration, mitigate, you know, restoration, invasive removal, >> something like that would be okay. Okay.
Um, we just need something done somewhere to make up for what we are losing here. >> Correct. >> Because this is so unusual. >> Yep. >> Yep. Understood. >> I think we can probably put in the order that, you know, they'll require that
they submit a plan, a proposal for a wetland. I don't I don't I agree creation is is tricky science to start with and y not great >> but restoring a degraded wetland um we might want to I think that it that
means more than just planting stuff somewhere um so it's addressing the causes of of >> the degradation and addressing that but yeah we can specify in the order what the proposal should address and then
have that submitted for the commission to approve. I think that would work. >> And you know, we've done that in the past. So, I think we could do that here. Bob, >> go ahead. >> Yeah. >> Yes. There was some talk about uh planting at the 137 pump station, but
that's not technically a wetland, >> right? >> No. >> So, that wouldn't qualify. >> Right. >> Right. But that could qualify. That could if if density continues to be a concern here and you the intent was to get as many replacement uh trees in here
could address that issue and increase the survival rate of what you put in by having some of those trees put in at at the 137 station. >> Yeah. And they're actually doing the rest. They're they're actually doing the the plantings for that the 137 right
now. >> Oh well. Oh well. Too bad. Oh well. I'm glad though. I'm glad to hear that. That >> Yeah. >> addresses the concerns of a lot of the neighborhood. Anyone else? >> I have a note about the wildlife, the river otter. Did we have to look into
that at all or is that >> uh >> Bradford, do we need to >> I think that one was um mainly the focus of the um like spacing under the >> the fence. The fence. Yeah. Yeah, that's what I thought.
>> And and also the the drainage swell is what he was concerned about as well, which we aren't going near. >> Okay. >> And would we settle on four or six inches under the fence? >> I think you settled on four. That's what we ended up changing. >> I think we said four. Okay. Last time
>> four is is >> it is at the top of the retaining wall just as a reminder. So it is >> right. Critters have to be able to go there, get over, go down. Well, some of them can do that. Industrious. >> Yeah. Yeah. Don't don't don't underestimate those guys. >> Yeah. As well as the other the whole
perimeter. Correct. For the 4inch gap. >> Yeah. The entire fence has got called for 4 inch um >> y >> um gap. >> Y >> at the bottom. >> Yep. >> Okay. Anybody else have any questions,
comments? >> So, the lighting plan that we probably didn't need to see, but you did say that I just wanted to confirm that the lighting because I didn't see it on the plan is all manual. There's no automatic lighting systems. >> No. Yeah. No. No. Uh
uh motion sensor or uh photo >> Okay. >> sensors. >> Got it. >> So, it's all they can turn them on. Turn them on, turn them off as they need to to work. >> Okay. Um >> anything else?
>> The site plan has not changed. That's still >> No, we all the other equipment and things we've left the same. Everything is the same there. >> The the pavers, the Yeah, it was really just the it was really the planning plan and I like I said, I created confusion
by sending the additional information that >> I meant to send to another >> um another board. >> It's okay. >> I love it. >> That's okay. >> Um good. >> Anything? >> Uh yeah, to me I just can't help but
notice him because you know it's the taxpayers's job. I mean, it's it's the taxpayers that are paying for this project. And it's amazing to me when the taxpayers pay for it. You get bigger plants and and uh you know, mitigation is more elaborate and and uh I just
don't I don't understand why it's it's different uh than when uh private applications come in for mitigation and and you know, the cost just goes up and up and up. I you know, I just can't help but notice that
>> I think they had less trees. They're bigger, but they're less. But I I get what you're saying. Absolutely get it. But um I guess we could say the town listened and, you know, was more cooperative than
property owners, but who knows? All right, I think we can go to an order. Um, would October 8th work? How soon do you need this? As soon as possible. >> As soon as possible. I mean, if I had it
before October 3rd, that would be great, but I understand your your meeting dilemma. So, >> uh, no. Um, >> I think we could do it for the >> We have The reason I'm asking is we have a the the state funding program due date
is um October 3rd. Okay. >> And Army Corps is waiting is there's other groups that are waiting for the order of condition is they want to make sure that we're actually doing it and so it makes it look better when we've got the order and we can >> put you on for the 24th. We've be
because we've only been having two meetings a month. One of the benefits is we've been able to start orders earlier and have more time to get them done. >> So, uh, if we could have a motion to go to the 24th of September, please.
>> I move that we continue zero Cedar Street to the meeting on September 24th for an order of conditions. >> Second. >> Okay. Elise, >> I. >> Janet, >> I. >> Paul, >> I. Eric, >> I >> Bob >> I >> and I say I.
>> Okay. Thank you. >> See you on the 25th. >> Okay. Bradford. Next. >> The next is a order of condition for the end of easy street. Easy street association. Um there's no map or parcel but SC 103745
proposed reconstruction of existing permitted beach access stairs. >> How are you? >> I'm good. How are you? >> Good. I do have your email. >> Thank you. >> So I think unless you have other things you want to say, I'll go through your
email and we as a group can talk about before I see if they have anything else they want to discuss. Thank you. >> Um the first was uh special condition number five. You said the stairs will be permanent. That was a discussion at the
hearing. Since they were permitted as a permanent staircase, then they can remain permanent. So I crossed out seasonal and all of that and put in the word permanent. >> Thank you.
>> Okay. Then special condition number seven. You said at the hearing the discussion was to maintain 18 inches of clearance under the stairs but not to raise them from their current height to achieve this. I don't think that's what we were saying. We were saying it needs
to be 18 in at least. So, but the revised plan shows that a minimum of 18inch clearance must be allowed under the stairs, but they are reconstructed at their existing height. So I changed
the wording so it would stay the stairs shall be reconstructed within the footprint of the existing stairs but shall allow at least 18 in 18 in see well 18inch clearance under the
stairs. >> Is that okay? >> Yeah. >> Yeah. accept that >> the goal there was >> if they when they do a renourishment they will not put quite as much under the stairs if there's nourishment to be done there so we maintain >> right >> absolutely
>> so let's keep going so we move along um so the condition five under not under special conditions it's under Um uh precondi the pre construction
it says if al applicable all trees approved for removal shall be flagged prior to the preconstruction meeting with the agent. The agent will confirm that the trees flagged for removal have been approved to remove have been approved for removal. You said
you wanted it deleted. If if there are no trees being removed, that's fine. >> I don't really want to remove it because what if suddenly a tree needs to be removed and we've removed the condition. But if everybody thinks
otherwise, we can remove it. >> Yeah, >> it says if applicable. >> I know. >> So if it ain't applicable, don't worry about it. >> Right. any of these other remaining ones. I'm not being difficult about them at all. It was >> right. >> There's no there's no trees near the stairway.
>> I just But yeah, it start when we start >> taking things out then um you can't use it. Yeah. It becomes it messes around with the template. >> It's sort of to protect everybody because if suddenly a tree were removed and we didn't have this then we you know
you could come back and say well you didn't say okay. So then you said B3, B5 and B10 do not apply. B3 says clearing of any vegetation or grubbing outside
the work area in or within 100 ft of wetland at resource areas shall not occur between April 1st and September se 1st. I I mean, >> yeah, >> there's Yeah, I I just I have a problem
return removing that because it it I don't want in case any vegetation is removed, you know, within the work area and we didn't know about it. It's not in the order. And all of these are all of the
general conditions are if it applies, >> okay, >> to the job. >> That's fair. So we already protect everybody against that. >> Yep. >> Same with number five. No material of any kind shall be buried, placed or dispersed in areas within jurisdiction
of the conservation commission except by as expressly permitted by the order of conditions or the plans approved herein. >> Well, that also protects us from them putting anything in that area.
And so I really don't want to remove it, but if everybody says okay, I would. Number 10, I did mark for removal. So that one is um runoff from hardcaped areas or roof runoff shall be allowed to
percolate down through the soils from the surface. Blah blah blah blah blah. >> I've got read the whole thing. It's long. I said that could be removed. I want to make sure everybody agrees. Okay. So, we'll accept that.
Then C one, this is under vegetation and clearing again of vegetation. So again, that just repeats what we already went over. I don't want to remove that.
Uh C6, if approved, any disturbed lawn areas shall be planted with lowmaintenance, drought tolerant native fescue seed mix. Well, if any by any chance anything needs to be plant any lawn needs to be planted, I'd like that in there. Again, I know it says that it
can go on as a uh ongoing condition of the certificate of compliance. If it doesn't pertain, it's not an ongoing condition. >> Perfect. Number seven, I did say because it's invasive plant management and there
is no invasive plant management. I did say think that that could be removed. If everybody agrees it will be everybody. Okay. Okay. Then number
12 I I don't know. I did let's see C10 or not. Okay. Oh, here it is. um the removal again it's invasive plant management you know and you don't have that so I thought that could be
deleted and under D number four >> the C12 also >> that I >> they're related >> that's what I just said C12 and I did 10
I did 1 6 7 10 and 12. They're we've dealt with all those. >> Thank you. >> Under installation of access stairs, um you wanted D4 to be worded similarly to the special condition. It says stairs
shall be raised on post no less than 18 in above. So that is exactly what you're doing. above the existing grade for the majority of the run. The start and end of the stairs may be less than 18 in above grade when approved by the
commission. >> I It's It's saying they can't be less than 18 in. It's I I know, but this is our wording. I'm not going to change it to match a special condition. >> It's semantics. I I understand. >> Right.
>> Okay. >> Okay. >> If you understand what the goal is, that's cool. Well, and I don't think that it conflicts with what we've said in the special conditions. It it just rewards it. >> D7, you say the supports are 6 in x 6 in
support posts embedded 4 feet minimum as shown in the plan. Hence the plan is what we you go on. This condition could be rewarded rewarded to state alterations to the resource areas relimited to the installation of 6x6
support posts driven a minimum of 4 feet into the existing grade. It it says alterations to the resource areas are limited to hand digging of shallow foundation supports for the stair support posts.
I mean we could change shallow to 4 feet but it doesn't matter the size 6 by six or whatever this is a general condition >> I know >> we the specifics are in your plans and that is the plan of record and it is
stated way above that that is the plan of record and rules for everything. I only suggested that because that condition a lot of these conditions we know they're they're geared toward house construction that that conditioned
>> this is geared for installation of access stairs. That's what it's called. It's not for house construction. >> Okay. >> So do we want to change it? So instead of shallow foundation we say a 4ft foundation.
>> Everybody post >> opinion. It's it's a fine tailoring. I I think four feet. It's a general condition. I don't I don't care. >> I exactly this is it's general. I think that's all. >> Okay.
>> Ah, thank you Janet. >> Will you accept all these as I will? >> Okay. Thank you. I'm accepting as I go. But and you said general conditions in the E um 11 and 12 are not applicable.
They say um you know about seaw walls, groins, revetments. I did say they could be deleted. Um anybody disagree? Okay. All right. And that's it. Did do any
commissioners have anything else? I just had one thing. Did you find the homeowners and ask them to refrain from using it as a driving range shooting uh golf balls in the ocean? >> I went down there right after the hearing last time and we removed the
golf balls and the and the um club. He's not aware where where it came from. >> Oh. >> Um >> thank you. >> Don't know, but it's gone. We made sure it was gone that afternoon. >> All right. Anything else? Bob, do you have anything to add?
>> Uh, no. I just want to make sure that we don't uh alter our general conditions too much there. >> I agree. >> And um just have to make sure we put a lot of them back once once >> Oh, no. They're in they're in the template. Um yeah,
>> we we on occasion, not too often, do remove or reward, but under duress really because they are general and it does state that only those that apply to this
this project are are pertinent. All right. Anybody else have anything they want changed? >> All right, then I think we can have a motion, please. I move that we close the hearing on end of easy street and approve the order of conditions as written. >> Second.
>> Okay. Bob >> I >> Eric >> I >> Paul >> I >> Janet >> I. >> Elise >> I. >> And I say I. So you're all set. >> Thank you very much. >> Thank you. Okay. Bradford. Next one.
>> Next one is an order of conditions for 76 Marshview Road. Mary Hope and Robert Hyenstein. Map 8C, parcel S72, SC 10- 3721,
construction of an addition and deck within the footprint of an existing deck. All construction within the buffer zone to a coastal bank. The applicant requested a continuence to October 22nd, 2025. >> Okay. If we have a motion, >> I move that we continue 76 March. I'm
sorry. I'm just curious what the what the reason for this is. I'm This was We last heard this on February 26th. >> So, it's uh why why are we we wrote this months ago? Yeah.
>> Um it is because they do not they're not being heard by ZBA until the 9th of October. >> Okay. So that's why they're continuing to after
the 9th so that because our meeting is the day before ZBA. >> So what is the date is going to 22nd of October. >> All right. Okay. Thank you. >> I move that we continue 76 Barnesview
Road to the meeting on October 22nd, 2025. >> Second. >> Okay. Bob. >> I. >> Eric. >> Hi. >> Paul. Hi >> Janet. >> Hi. >> Elise. >> Hi. >> And I say I. Next. Bradford, please. >> Next is an order of conditions for 141
Absigami Run Amy and Anthony Church map 12E parcel 12 sorry parcel 23-20 SC 10-3718 dock and stair reconstruction.
Uh, okay. So, is anybody here for Absami? >> Uh, you have Dennis Moran and Dan Charmley with Tyen Bond. >> Hi. >> Did you read the order? >> We did take a look at the order and we
have no concerns about the proposed conditions. >> Okay, great. Anybody any commissioners have anything that they found, want modified or added? No, Bob. >> Uh, I have something on the sleeves that
are um in the um in the mud uh to accept the post. Uh I thought we talked about capping those off uh in the off season once the uh structure is removed. >> We did. >> It's in there.
>> Is it in there? >> We definitely talked about it. Yeah, they're cut. >> It is not included as part of a condition. We are happy to include that if you would like. >> Number nine. >> Number nine, top elevation of all securing.
>> Number nine under the existing mudline. >> Yeah, but there's it doesn't talk about um cap being capped off. >> Oh, and capped off in the offse. >> Yes. >> Okay. >> All right. Anything else? >> That's it. Thank you.
>> All right. Uh anybody else? Okay, then we can go to a motion, please. >> I move that we close the hearing on 141 Absigami Run and approve the order of conditions as modified. >> Second. >> Okay. Elise >> I. >> Janet
>> I. >> Paul. >> Hi. >> Eric. >> Hi. >> Bob. >> I. >> And I say I. Okay. Next. Thank you. Um, >> thank you very much, >> Bradford. Next is a fuel change request for 697
Riverview Drive. Paul Roomie, map 8K, parcel C48, SE 10-3706. Proposed yearround proposed rear yard pool terrace. Field change request is to redesign the
proposed project. Most revisions are outside of the 100 foot buffer and the revisions within the 100 foot buffer are slight adjustments to some of the retaining walls, grading and planting areas due to the redesign. >> How are you? >> Good afternoon. Uh Thomas Mkei,
landscape designer representing uh the Rooney residence. Um we're looking for a field change request. The plan was uh the pool area was revised and simplified uh due to cost concerns. So, the biggest change here was that the
pool was rotated so it's tighter to the house and the infinity the uh previously approved infinity edge um on the previous design was removed. So, that allowed us to remove the lower tiered uh
structural retaining wall and that was replaced with a few landscape holders on the new plan to kind of help stabilize the slope. Um some of the retaining walls got tightened up and uh shifted away from
the coastal bank and this uh reduced coverage by about 8 square feet. It's >> always nice >> the um previously approved limit of work and edge of plantings all remain.
So this is uh an improvement to the previously approved plan basically. Uh if you have any questions be happy to answer them. >> Janet obviously >> quick quick just what is the um the total decrease in coverage that
>> 8 ft. I just want to say acknowledge thank you for the side by side and the color coded easy to look at this and say I can see thank you for that. You saved me a lot of time. >> It did. >> I appreciated it as well.
>> Anybody else? Bob, Eric? No, please. Paul. Okay, then we can have a motion, please. >> I move that we approve the field change
request for 697 Riverview Drive as modified. >> Second. >> Okay. Bob, >> I >> Eric, >> I >> Paul, >> hi. >> Janet, >> I >> Elise, >> I >> and I say I. Thank you. >> Thanks.
>> Okay, the next one, please. Next is a field change request for 59 Tippy Run Brian Monik map 15A3 parcel 1- N137 SC 10-3545
shoreline protection project field change request is to address the design changes to the revetman slope accessite additional tree removal reventment cross-section and revetman stair detail. Okay, thank you. All right, who do we
have? >> Danley with >> Yep. Dan Shermickley with Tyan Bond here representing the applicant. >> Um so, uh last time the only item left was the question of the bush in the front yard. Um it's currently burning
bush and it is um going to be replaced with a northern bay berry. >> I see that. Thank you. Um any >> we also added a couple notes just to clarify the tree removal in the back. Nothing changed, just some additional notes for some clarity.
>> Okay. Um anybody have anything they would like to ask or comment on? >> Bob, >> uh that the the particular u burning bush uh is pretty pretty big specimen. And I know it's an invasive plant, but
is there any way you could add three um bay berry in a cluster right where that uh burning bush was? >> Yeah, sure. >> That's that's a non-issue. It's going to be We're replacing a big bush. So, it's fine. >> Thank you.
They're tough to get out. The burning bush. >> I just did one yesterday. Okay. Anybody else have any questions, comments? >> Like this whole meeting was on a burning bush. >> Well, they had to do something to
replace it. >> I told you we're working on it. >> Uh, all right. We can have a motion, please. >> I move that we approve the field change request for 59 till it be run as modified. >> Second, >> Bob. >> I,
>> Eric. >> I, >> Paul. >> I, >> Janet. >> Hi, >> Elise. I >> and I say I. Okay. The next please. Bradford. >> Next is a request for determination of applicability. Um this is at various
locations for the town of Chadam. Um construction of gravity andor low pressure sewer and sorry. >> Thank you. Along portions of the roads listed in
the application, work is to be conducted within the road right of way under the existing road surface or in the shoulder trench to be opened and closed the same day. Uh restoration of road surface within existing paved limits.
So before you start, I just want everybody to know the reason our plans look very different than what we're used to getting is we met before and because it's small areas that are on road that
really are involving road. The amount of plans they would have had to create was quite a few. And so they asked if they could submit these this type you know this for a plan and I said as long as it
is well marked and we understand what the scope is that we could accept it because of where the work is being done just so everybody knows why that happened and in case anybody wanted to ask them. >> Okay. Go ahead. >> Uh Jeff Greg GHD uh representing the
town of Chadam working on the sewer project. Uh the other thing is this is work that's actually exempt through the you know 310 CMR 10.02J for work in uh sewer work in roadways.
However, in the past the town has asked the town in the past had previously submitted these for various roads uh as a courtesy to the commission um so they were aware of of this work. So, we're
we're doing the same. These are all uh in roadways that go through buffer zones to um wetlands. And in one case, I think we're in the buffer zone to the or we're in the 200 foot >> riverfront um which is a little
different for me. So, I'm not not as familiar with that, but >> bigger jurisdiction. So what we did is we submitted um just highlighted the portions of the road that fall within
um those various buffer areas so you have some context of where the work would be because when we come in after they're done they're going to pave basically curb to curb with uh either a mill and overlay or road reconstruction. So, it was just easier to kind of show
it in this in this way. And we're obviously hoping to get um a negative discrimination. So, uh we have some of Black Duck Landing. We have the majority of Oyster Bay Lane. Um again, it's just
the boundary. Then this is the end of Capri Lane. And then then if you go to the next >> then we have a piece on uh Evergreen. And then the next one,
a small piece at the end of Woodpecker Valley at the culde-sac. And then on this one, we didn't have the plan at that time, but it's the extension of Aunt Zilpa's road that goes up and around. It's basically like I
would say probably a glorified driveway um to the two properties that are back here, but there is a um wetland down in that low area. And I believe is that I think that might be all >> I think that's all of them. Yep.
>> So, >> all right. Commissioners, any questions, comments >> at all? Okay. Is there anybody online or in the audience that has a question or comment or anything that they would like
to speak to this project? >> Go ahead. You have to come up and introduce yourself, please. Good afternoon. Uh my name is Alexandra Betleion and I live at 13 Evergreen Lane. It's the first house in off Route
28. Um, my home has been there since the late 1950s. Um, it's up on a hill. There's a gradient down to Evergreen Lane. So, my questions are basically around how the sewer is
going to come in and at what point my home will be connected to the sewer. And I'm not the only one on Evergreen Lane. There's house number 26 and number 36 and 50. and uh I mine is the one that is mostly on
the hill. >> So, are you concerned about the work that they're applying to do or how it's going to work once this work is done for your house? If this conversation is only about
putting in the actual main line that goes up Evergreen, >> then I I just want to know exactly where that will be. Will that be in the middle of the >> of Evergreen Lane? Will that all be able
to be done in one working day? And uh because that is an uphill road as well. And um >> as far as the length of time that they'll need, that's not something that's discussed here. That's determined
when they're working. And you you're welcome to speak to it, but um you know, we just approve whether the work can take place in the areas that they're asking. >> So what I'll what I'll recommend so that
because I know you're pressed for time. >> No. Um, I will give you my contact information and the D, excuse me, and the DPW director's contact and you can put in a request and maybe we can have a discussion or you can put your questions
and then we can respond to those questions for you and then we can see where we go. We are not we haven't finished the design. We just need to get through the first part of the permitting which is because we're doing work we're proposing work in the buffer. >> So, >> okay. >> If that helps.
>> Yeah. Well, my my area is right off 28 and it is down near the conservation area and it's even written in yellow paint on the ground 200 ft from the the river, the creek. So, uh, yes, I would like very much to have more information.
>> Yep. >> On that and we do definitely have more questions because there's a lot of area that would need to be cleared for the whole line. >> Okay. >> The sewer line. Thank you very much. Thank you. And I'm sorry, it's just what
we approve is just the work in that that they're proposing to do that's within the street. So that's what we have to make our decision on today is do we approve or not approve it. >> Okay. >> So that's that's why I was saying if if
you're concerned about your house and the connection that was not part of this. Well, the information that we got originally was just 13 Evergreen Lane. And I I questioned why 13 was the only
house number included on Evergreen Lane because there are three other houses that are also on septic and >> the work maybe that's being done is probably right in front of your house.
When we get the when we get the a butters list from the town, we provided them the figure of that area and then they go 100 feet from that boundary and then right that's what they have to notify for this group. It's not it wasn't intended to notify everybody of the sewer work. It was intended to
notify the immediate abutters to this area. That was what that was intended for. >> Okay. Thank you. I got I got the message. >> No. Thanks a lot. Thank you. All right. Anybody have anything? Go ahead, Bob. >> Uh, yeah. I know what's in here, but
you're going to um apply the appropriate erosion control measures. >> Correct. >> Uh, when you go by these areas, >> correct? >> And everything's supposed to be sealed up within the day. >> Correct. >> Yeah. Thank you.
>> Anybody else? >> Oh, go ahead. You have to come up though. >> Thanks. Oh my god. >> I'm Mary Gallagghan. I live on uh Old Tavern Road and my questions regarding Aunt Zilpa's road. Several of
them have been answered and referred to other departments, but I still have one left. There is a small vernal pool um off of on Silus extension. And I'm just wondering if that's going to be is worked around.
>> Yes. So that we're not proposing any work in the vernal pool or anywhere besides the buffer of the driveway roadway that goes up around >> around it. >> Thank you very much. >> Thank you.
>> Sorry, as I hear vernal pool, I cringe. Um, anybody else? And I don't see anybody with the hand raised online. So I think we can go to a motion, please. >> I move that we approve the request for determination of applicability with a
negative -2 determination for various locations. >> Second. >> Okay. Elise. >> Hi. >> Janet. >> Hi. >> Paul. >> Hi. >> Eric. >> Hi. >> Bob. >> I. >> And I say I. Okay. >> Thank you very much.
>> Yep. Thank you. Next. Bradford, please. Next is uh moving on to notices of intent uh 98 oyster pond furlow Steven and Haley Nadas map 13E parcel 29-11A
SC 10-3682 construction of a beach access catwalk. Uh the applicant has requested a continuence to December 17th, 2025. >> Okay. Can I have a motion? >> I move that we continue 98 oyster pon
furlong to the meeting on December 17th, 2025. >> Second. >> Uh before we take a vote, I have a question. >> Go ahead. >> So is there anyone here who can speak to this or did they express a reason for this continuing to December?
They have not applied to ZBA. >> Okay. >> Still >> so filing. So going forward >> confirming the filings as required are part of the complete application. Hence correct. >> That's why we are getting strict about
it because this is the eighth continuence. Yep. For this property. >> Yep. September. >> So and it is more months. I >> another great question. I tried, we tried to encourage them to withdraw.
Um, obviously it wasn't desired. So, they've put it way out and have been told they need to apply to ZBA. And if they don't, at that point, we could we could decide to deny it. >> We can deny it for lack of of
information. >> Exactly. That's grounds for denial. >> We try not to, but uh they'll be encouraged to either have applied to ZBA and deal with it and let us deal with it or
you know and with or they could withdraw >> or we can deny. >> Okay. >> So that's where we're going with it. All right. You seconded, Eric. >> Second. >> You do. >> Bob >> I. >> Eric >> I. >> Paul >> I. >> Janet
>> I. >> And Elise >> I. And I say I. Okay, next one please. >> Next is a notice of intent 420 L Street Karen Los Coco map 10F parcel
R9 SC 10-3730 remove and replace pond stair act pond access stairs. Um the applicant has requested a continuence to October 8th. >> Okay. I move that we continue 20 L
Street to the meeting on October 8th, 2025. >> Second. >> Elise. >> I >> Janet. >> I >> Paul. >> I >> Eric. >> I >> Bob. >> I. >> And I say I. >> Next,
please. Next is a notice of intent for 53 Little Beach Road, Monoy Rips LLC. Map 16A, parcel H50, SC 10-3747, demolish existing dwelling and construct
new dwelling within land subject to coastal storm flowage. The applicant has requested a continuence to October 8th. >> I move that we continue 53 Little Beach Road to the meeting on October 8th, 2025. Second >> Bob. >> Hi >> Eric.
>> Hi >> Paul. >> Hi >> Janet. >> Hi >> Elise. >> Hi. >> And I say hi. >> Be frustrating. >> Go ahead Bradford. >> Next is a notice of intent for 47 Little
Beach Road Monoy Rips LLC. Uh map 16A parcel H52 SC 10-3737. demolish existing dwelling and construct new dwelling in title five subsurface sewage system within land subject to
coastal storm flowage. The applicant has requested a continuous continuence to October 8th, 2025. >> I move that we continue 47 Little Beach Road to the meeting on October 8th, 2025. Before I say second, is there any
way in the future maybe in the writing you can put down why it was continued so we don't have to ask why? >> Especially since it's been continued. The last time we heard it was July 9th. >> I mean all all continue in general. Just reason why. >> I have a question too.
>> We have a So we're looking at the notes from Sarah Clark. They're scheduled for ZBA on October 23rd. So why are we scheduling it for October 8th? because we've only heard them once and we had questions and issues and so I think they want us to hear they want us to hear it
to see if it's approval. >> We have anything else before they go to >> Exactly. You know the usual. >> Okay. >> You know which goes first? The horse of the cart. >> Second. >> Okay. Elise. >> Hi. >> Janet. >> Hi. >> Paul. >> Hi. >> Eric.
>> Hi. >> Bob. >> Hi. >> And I say I. Next, please. The next is a notice of intent for 186 Strong Island Road, David and Judith Doyo. Map 13M parcel 48 SC 10-3724
construction of an 8 by18 swimming pool and expansion of existing patio seasonal rollout boardwalk seasonal access steps installation of mitigation plantings invasive plant management and native
plant restoration. Um, the applicant rec requested a continuance but did not confirm what date to continue to. >> Right. So, I have a big problem with this one because this is the sixth continuence.
They still have not applied to ZBA. Um they're not even responding with a date to continue to which concerns me that they're even going to apply to ZBA and we just keep continuing this.
>> I'm going to move make a motion that we deny this permit >> for lack of information. We have continued it from February. Well, we did hear it in April, but >> I think that was just a continuence. >> I thought so, too. But
>> I remember the last time we talked it was objections to the pool and >> there was quite a few. >> Yeah. And then I never heard of about it again. >> We and there were some issues with work they'd already done. >> Um so I have no problem with that uh
motion. Um I'll leave it on Is he >> is he? >> Uh Paul is online. >> Oh yeah. Paul, do you have an opinion? >> Uh yeah, you can deny it. >> Okay. Just want to make sure that
because I know who's going to get the phone calls. It's you and Bradford and Crystal. So >> I think the date was um the reason for that was we weren't sure they're going to have how many meetings in October. >> Uh haven't even applied to ZBA. So, an
October meeting doesn't even make sense. >> Yeah. Right. >> Okay. >> If they're redesigning to try to satisfy both ZBA and us, it'll be a new filing anyway. So, let's get this one off the
books and they start fresh with a new one. My motion stands. >> Great. >> Uh, if we could have a motion to deny this. So moved. Second. >> Does he have to do it? No.
>> No, I don't have to. >> Okay. Janet Crystal. Janet moved. Elise seconded. Okay. Bob. >> Hi, >> Eric. >> Hi, >> Paul. >> Hi, >> Janet. >> I >> and I say I. It has been denied.
>> Right. >> Okay. Next one, please. >> Next. Bradford. >> Notice of intent for 202 Lime Hill Road, Lime Hill 22 Trust, map 12E, parcel 4-B6,
SC10-3746, proposed elevated catwalk maintenance of existing path and mitigation. Um, applicant has requested a continuence to October 8th. >> Okay. >> I move that we continue 202 Lime Hill
Road to the meeting on October 8th, 2025. Second >> Bob. >> I >> Eric. >> Hi. >> Paul. >> Hi. >> Janet. >> Hi. >> Elise. >> Hi. >> And I say I. >> Next one, please. >> Next is a notice of intent for lot 4,
Coal Cove Road, Dean Rybeck, map 5C, parcel J4, SC 10-3740. construction of a single family dwelling and driveway within the buffer zone to a coastal bank and removal of driveway with land subject to coastal storm
flowage. The applicant has requested a continuence to September 24th, 2025. >> I move that we continue lot 4, Cole Cove Road to the meeting on September 24th, 2025. >> Second. >> Lee, >> I Janet, >> I. >> Paul, >> I. >> Eric, >> hi.
>> Bob, >> hi. >> And I say I. And I will say the reason that one is continued is so that we will have an alignment with 22 Taylor Pond. So that one there's a very good reason. >> Okay. Next, Bradford.
>> Next is a notice of intent for 314 Coal Cove Road, Sarah and Chara Daily, map 5C, parcel 4, SC10-3739. an after the-act construction of a stone retaining walls and construction of a
new footpath within a buffer zone to coastal bank and riverfront area. >> And who's here for this? Anybody? Nobody in the audience. >> There's someone online. >> I don't see there.
>> Ah, there you go. Go ahead. Um, we've already heard this one and you requested three small changes which I made in the updated plan. So, I I hope that it's ready to go.
>> Go ahead, Jen. >> Can you just uh walk us through what those three changes are? >> Sure. Um there was a mo strip that was supposed to be added to keep the um well let me grab the plan here to keep
invasives from infringing on the mitigation area. There was also some additional planting that was required to go back into the old mitigation area and there you wanted the removal of the forcyia. So those are all in the updated
plan notes. >> Okay. Thank you very much. So I do have a question since you mentioned the forcyia. Your notes say forcyia will be removed from prior mitigation area and nine native shrubs will be planted where there is sparse vegetation throughout
the that area. Um what is being planted there? >> I put low bush blueberry. I know there's already some beach plum there and there's some bear berry, but I felt like low bush would be a good in between >> and just help solidify that slope and
add some species diversity to the plant community there. >> Okay, thank you. Anybody anything else? >> If no, then I think this can go to an order.
So, how does October 8th sound? >> That works. >> Okay, then if we could have a motion to go to an order for October 8th. >> I move that we continue 314 Cole Cove Road to the meeting on October 8th, 2025
for an order of condens. >> Second. >> Okay. Bob >> I, >> Eric, >> I. >> Paul, >> I. Janet >> I Elise >> I and I say I All right. So on October 8th on October 7th you'll receive the
order to review and we will talk about on the 8th. Okay. >> Thank you for your time. >> Thank you. Okay. Uh Bradford the next >> uh moving on to requests for certificate
of compliance. The first one is for 149 Cotch Pineikut Road, Galaxy Nominee Trust, map 16K, parcel one, se 10-2663, demolition and reconstruction of a guest house. Uh, the applicant has requested
continuence to September 24th, 2025. >> Great. Uh, motion, please. >> Can I ask a question first? Um, I saw on your notes, Bradford, that you
had no issues with this property. Correct. >> Why are we continuing, wasn't it? >> No, that's the last one. >> Oh, that's right. >> Uh, David Clark here, if you can hear me. >> Yes.
>> Yes, David. >> Yes. Um, yeah. The only reason why we're continuing if there were any issues um that we're hearing the other project, the new application on this property on the 24th and we could address any issues then. But if there are no issues, I
can't see why you can't issue a certificate of compliance. >> It's two separate things. >> Yes. So this one the um the mitigation plantings for uh this specific order of
conditions appeared to have been planted and then um have since been changed to hostas. >> However, okay. >> Yeah. >> I move that we approve that uh we continue the certificate of compliance for 149 cut road.
>> Second. >> Okay. Bob, >> I >> Eric, >> I >> Paul, >> hi. >> Janet, >> hi. >> Elise, >> hi. >> And I say I. >> Okay. Thank you, David, for clarifying. >> Okay, next one. Bradford.
The next one is a uh partial certificate of compliance request for for Nickerson Circle North Coast Development LLC map 4D parcel D1 CWPN-22-70. Um construction of a local dwelling
within the buffer zone to a state drainage area. Um I there's this one's only a partial um for the construction of the dwelling. Um the mitigation plantings will still be monitored for another two years or
so. >> Okay. Anybody have any questions, comments? Could we have a motion, please? >> I move that we approve the partial certificate of compliance for Ford Nichol Nickerson Circle. Uh,
>> I I don't like partials. >> Does somebody want to second it? >> Second. >> Okay. Bob, >> I >> no. >> Eric, >> no. Okay. Paul, >> I >> Janet. >> Hi,
>> Elise. >> Hi. >> And I say I. Okay. Next one, please. Bradford. Next is a certificate certificate of compliance for nine Chat Harbor Lane, the Deborah
B. Charl boys revocable trust of 2012, map 5B, parcel 9A, SC 10-3470, removal of invasive plant species. I had no issues with this one.
>> Okay. Thank you. Anybody have any questions? >> Nope. Okay. >> I move that we approve the certificate of compliance for nine Chad Harbor Lane. >> Second. >> Okay. Bob >> I >> Eric
>> I >> Paul >> I >> Janet >> I >> and I say I. >> Next please. Next is the status of a field change denial for 97 tilippy run TR 97 nominee
trust map 14 A3 parcel 2-B SE 10-3690 shoreline protection and restoration project uh field change request is to address the design changes and possible violation.
>> Okay, is anybody here for this? There should be. We did request that somebody be present. Um I guess not. They were on earlier. Um I asked that this be put on the agenda
because we denied and had heard nothing. So Paul reached out to um Tai and Bond and
essentially they said it has not been removed. It's been a couple months that they're working on plans to come up with for a new field change request. Um,
I'm concerned because if if we hadn't reached out, who knows when we would have heard. Uh, it is a denial and I don't know how people feel about this. And if anybody has any
opinions on next steps, >> when did we when did we deny it? How long ago? How long ago? >> How long ago? >> That was a couple months. I think >> August >> go back. >> We've heard nothing since then about the
status of the patio. >> I believe it was the end of June. >> End of June. >> No, it wasn't August. Um I'm going back. >> We've had a bunch of talipies this summer. >> Yeah, but this >> I think it was June.
>> It was June 25th. >> Okay. Well, I would just say if they haven't responded, we did not approve it >> as a field change request. It's a violation and it's time for an enforcement order. >> Okay, that's what I wanted to hear if
anybody felt that way. Um the response was that these are heavy pieces of stone and the equipment can't get there because of course now they've planted which was why they put the stone where it was because they wanted to get the plantings in which I have to say under
drought restrictions June 25th wasn't the best time to be putting in plantings but um that's neither here nor there. Um, so I would like opinions as to whether we feel this is now a violation
and we ask the staff to move forward with a violation especially since we asked them specifically to be on this and they were on this meeting earlier. Um, >> in my opinion, lack of response after
direct reach out in the face of a clear vi clear violation of what the plans were supposed to be. >> Well, they did respond. They responded that nothing had been done and they had no plans to do anything. >> I meant today. >> Oh, true. >> I meant the fact that they didn't show up for this.
>> I just wanted to make sure we clarify because >> Yeah, I did >> respond via email. I understand that part, but the fact that you're not here today to talk to all of us about it in the proper, you know, >> I don't disagree. >> I am I I say we proceed.
>> Okay. So, um, can Bob, do you have an opinion or something or >> I mean, if it was at the beginning of our meeting, we could maybe could have made a call to get someone on, but >> Well, they were on that time. Dan Dan was on for I can't remember which
>> for Tippy for 59 Tippy. >> So, and he was he was specifically told by Paul that this would be addressed today and our violations are at the end. And I agree with you. Maybe if we'd put it when 59 and then had it, maybe we
would have but who knows, maybe they would have dumped off anyway. >> Yeah. Um, all right. I think could we have a motion to send this to a violation, please? >> I move that we send 97 Tippy Run to a
violation. >> Um, I'm going to I didn't agree with the it's to me it's the same square footage and it's the same weight whether they're staggered around or they're all in the same place. So, from the beginning, I I didn't have a problem with it uh as the
uh field change or whatever it was. So, I'm gonna pass on this one. >> Somebody want to second? >> Second. >> Okay. Elise >> I. >> Janet. >> I. >> Paul. >> I. >> Eric.
>> No. >> And Bob. >> I. >> And I say I. So Crystal, Bradford, and Paul, if you could progress with that, we'd appreciate it. Next, please. Bradford.
>> The next is a violation notice for 552 Shore Road of Francesco Skeon and Judith Gibbons. Map 16G, parcel 16-T3. Uh, cutting of vegetation on the coastal
bank. And I believe we have Mike Ford online for this. >> We do. And thank you for being here. And I know you you reported this to us at the last meeting. So >> go ahead. >> Correct. Uh I did I did receive uh and
my clients did as well a letter directly from Paul. So they received the letter and I've discussed it with them. it makes a commitment uh on their behalf to get you a restoration plan to be filed with you no later than uh 10:31 2025.
They understand that and um wanted me to be on today to to let you know they agree to that. >> Wonderful. Thank you. So, we will do we need to do any motion because they've already received the letter and and we did say that by the end of
October we wanted a a plan for the restoration. What >> there's no motion? >> No, I'm just making sure everybody's aware. Um they are before us for other work to be done and but I mean they've been very responsive. So, I please thank
the property owners for being as responsive as they have been and um making this process quite a bit easier. >> So, then welcome. I'll pass that on. And your staff has uh been very
accommodating um and uh has has worked with us. So, we're looking forward to to getting you a restoration plan and getting that approved and getting this behind them. >> Great. Thank you so much. All right. >> Okay. >> Bradford. Next.
>> Next is um approval of minutes from July 9th, 2025. >> Right. Now, does anybody have any modifications to the minutes as they were made done by
Crystal? Bob, >> I have an address change uh on the Sears Road and it should be Sears Lane, 70 Sears uh Point Lane, I believe. >> Yeah, it is.
Okay, I can make that. I'm in it. Okay. Anybody else? Anything? Um, nothing. Then can we please have a motion to approve the minutes as modified? Please.
>> I move that we approve the minutes from July 9th, 2025. As modified. >> Second. >> Elise. >> I. >> Uh, Janet. >> I. >> Paul. >> I. >> Eric. >> I. >> Bob. >> I. >> And I say I. So that's been approved and
Crystal I did make the modification to them so they're ready. Um then we need just one more motion please. >> I move that we adjourn the meeting. >> Second. >> Bob >> I >> Eric >> I >> Paul >> I >> Janet >> I >> Elise
>> I >> and I say I a wrap. Thanks. [Music]