Heat. Heat. [Music] [Music]
Heat. Heat. [Music]
Heat. Heat. [Music] [Music]
This is a hearing of the CHAM Conservation Commission being held on November 5th, 2025 in accordance with the Massachusetts Wetlands Protection Act and the Town of CH wetlands protection bylaw and regulations. My name is Karen Latton and I serve as the chair. Today's hearing is being
broadcast live on Xfinity channel 1072 and is being recorded for the ondemand archives available on the town's website. It is being conducted in person, by phone, and by video conference. The agenda, instructions on how to attend, and copies of documents
for review are posted on the town's website. To all participants, whether attending by phone or online, please remain muted unless you've been recognized by the chair. If you're attending by phone, you can mute and unmute by using star six. If you are
online and you are not a commissioner, please keep your camera turned off unless you've been recognized. Indicate that you wish to speak by using the raised hand feature. So that we have a record of quorum, I will now ask each commissioner to indicate their presence. Vice Chair Paul Johnson,
>> present. Janet Williams >> present. >> Elise Gordon >> present. >> Eric Hilbert >> present. >> Bob Delveio is unable to attend and I am here. We have established that we have a quorum. Is there anyone who would like to make any announcements, comments or future agenda items for anything other
than the properties on the agenda today? Yes. You have to go up to the >> Brian Phillips, 374 Orans Road. I was wondering if you guys could talk about the uh maybe have conversation about the trees are cutting down in Kwood Park or at least planning to or if that's outside of your >> Well, we'll have to put it on the
agenda, but I think it's outside of our jurisdiction. >> Okay. >> That's that there's no wetlands near them that I'm aware of. the golf course. There's that uh on holes on hole six. >> Is it within 100 ft of the wetlands? >> No, it's not 100 feet.
>> Then we have no jurisdiction. >> All right. Thanks. >> Thank you, >> Teresa. There go. >> Good afternoon. Teresa Brig with Bluefax Design. Um I was having an email conversation with Bradford and was hoping that we could put on a future an
agenda an opportunity to talk about irrigation. Um, I have some concerns about um some of the irrigation um components that have to be removed from the mitigation area, particularly in regards to sites that are required to put an irrigation well in um long-term
drought issues. Um, I really just am hoping to open up a dialogue with the commission to better understand the commission's concerns about irrigation within the jurisdictional areas and also to understand how as practitioners we can best support the native plant
communities as well as our um clients concerns about significant expense that goes along with installing irrigation wells which then require full irrigation system components. We're we're kind of outside of the days where we used to be able to do tower um overhead towers with
um a a timer from the hardware store. Now we require um significant um amount of drip irrigation to be installed to support our mitigation plantings because we want very targeted irrigation. I think irrigation systems have improved significantly since I've been doing this
um with not only rain sensors but now soil moisture sensors etc. So, I'm just hoping that we can have a discussion at a future hearing after the commission has some time to think about this and perhaps there are other consultants who may want to join the conversation as well. So, be happy to do that at a
public hearing or a separate meeting aside, but just wanted to throw that out there for other business. >> Do you have a preference on a date to do it? >> Um, I wondered if maybe the first hearing in December would give us time to all gather our thoughts and be able to make
>> of course. So that's December 3rd. So we'll put that on the agenda for December 3rd. >> Excellent. Thank you. I appreciate that. >> Thank you. >> All right. Anyone else? I don't see anybody online who would like to. All right. Before we begin the agenda, Bradford, are there any announcements of
any continuences for today? >> Yes, Madam Chair, there are two continuences. Um, both of them are notice of intent applications. Uh, the first one is for 53 Little Beach Road, Monoy Rips LLC, map 16A, parcel H50, SE
10-3747, and 47 Little Beach Road, Monomoy Rips LLC, map 16A, parcel H52, SC 10-3 3737.
Um they've both requested continuences to uh January 14th, 2026. >> Okay, great. Thank you. At this point, Bradford Bower, Chadam's assistant conservation agent, will now lead us through the agenda.
>> Thank you, Madam Chair. Uh the first is a review and approval of January 2026 through June 2026 agenda and deadline schedules. >> Great. Thank you. Right. Everybody has had time to look at it. Um we thought we
would try We're only doing it for six months to see if if you all are willing to do twice a month. Um how that goes. We can always add a third week any month if we needed to if we're starting to find that we're getting quite a few
applications. Uh so does anybody have any comments about um the schedule as it stands? Okay, then we need a motion, please, to approve the I move that we
approve the January 2026 through June 2026 agenda and deadline schedule. >> Second. >> All right, Elise, >> I. >> Janet, >> I Paul. >> Hi, >> Eric. >> Hi. >> And I say I. Okay, so we have our schedule for the first six months. Thank
you. All right, Bradford. Next, please. >> Next up is a requested order of conditions for 70 Sears Point Road, Susan and Greg Shorton, map 11 A1, parcel 7-5, SC 10-3735.
Uh, this was for demolish and renovate a portion of an existing dwelling, addition, two decks, viewing deck, rinse station, and mitigation. Excuse me. >> Okay. Okay. I did get um the email uh
stating that on page 11 G um number eight and nine were uh duplicates. So I removed one of those. And anything else? >> Yes. >> Go ahead. >> No. Good. Yeah. Good afternoon, Tim Santos from Maryland Engineers. That
that's what I sent in. Thank you very much. But I know uh Dylan from Crawford Land Management had a few comments. So, uh, I know he's on, so I'll let him talk. >> Okay. >> Uh, yep. Good afternoon. Don Lance with Crawford Land Management. Um, so we
wanted some clarification on some of the special conditions. >> Okay. >> Uh, number three on page 11F. Um, we just wanted to make sure of what makes for an acceptable permanent visible delineation. I know we've used steel edging for this historically, but I
wanted to make absolutely sure as we make our pricing estimate. >> So, what are you asking from that? The that >> uh >> go ahead. >> Uh just what type of material would make an acceptable barrier?
Uh in the past we've had for delineations um like uh one very low split rail. We've had stone large stones. Um can you think of anything else? Anybody?
We sometimes have allowed a a metal or plastic strip. Um, this may not be a good spot for that because you've got lawn going nearly to the coastal bank and this mitigation area is what forms a a buffer strip at
the top. So, you want to make sure that no landscapers accidentally wander into it. So, something like a 10 12 inch split rail or some stones would probably be better visual for that. Otherwise, they can go they in in the grass. Sometimes they
can't see those little >> it its just has to be visible so that somebody doesn't mow into the mitigation area. >> That's the main worry. >> Okay. Um and then I also wanted to ask
um about number six on the next page 11g. Um, just since our work doesn't go into a salt marsh or mean high or low water or the beach, um, I wanted to ask about the applicability of some of these minimum requirements that were listed
off to be included in the annual monitoring. >> I don't think that they're needed. >> I think it was just missed. >> Usually I'll if it's not affecting I'll delete it, but I missed that. It's gone. Anything else?
>> Thank you. Uh, nope. That's all I wanted to ask about. Any commissioners have anything? >> Yes. >> Yeah, I have one. Um, so I I I caught it on the findings, but I'm realizing now not on the special condition. So, special condition 10
um still has this language. It says trees overhanging the roof interfering with solar panels may be removed. >> And I added upon approval, but removed was the word that was getting my attention. So, I mean, I I understand that they might need to trim trees that
interfere with solar panels, but >> they should be removed. >> Yeah, we changed. Yeah, trimmed. Yeah. Okay. I was going to change that. Thank you. That's it. >> Anything else? Anybody? Okay. And if we could have a motion,
please. >> I move that we close the hearing on 70 Sears Point Lane and approve the order of conditions as modified. >> Second. >> Okay. Eric >> I. >> Paul. >> I. >> Janet. >> Hi. >> Elise. >> Hi. >> And I say I. All right. Thank you.
>> Thank you for your time. Have a great week. >> You too. Um, next Bradford, please. Next is a requested amendment to an order of conditions for 70 Meadow View Road South Kyle and Patricia Lasac map
10D parcel 16-S15 SC 10-3668 proposed addition proposed attached garage and proposed reconstruction of deck with mitigation amendment is to add invasive management and restoration
rearrange approved mitigation redesign the driveway way and add a retaining wall and as well as redesign the front entrance entryway and retain approved rinse station. >> Great. >> How are you?
>> Hi, nice to see you guys. >> Good to see you. >> Caitlyn Cameilleri with Blue Flax Design. Um, and on behalf of our clients, Kyle and Marley Slissac, we're here today. We've submitted a request to amend the existing order of conditions
for the renovation of their single family home at 70 Meadow View Road. Um, and the the following changes are proposed on our plan that we've submitted to you. Um, we'd like to undertake invasive species management
and restoration planting throughout the entire property uh within the resource area and buffer zones. Um, we're proposing to rearrange the previously approved mitigation plan uh and increase
that area from 2100 square ft to 10,434 square ft. And we've uh printed off that previously approved plan that Teresa can hand out to you if you'd like to see the area that we're proposing to rearrange
uh for our mitigation. Thank you. So on that plan, the 2100 square feet is like kind of on the on the bottom portion of the site on the west and we're basically just taking that creating a vegetated buffer strip
instead along the lower coastal bank and um expanding the mitig ation throughout the rest of the site along the coastal bank and within the 50 and 100 foot buffers. Um >> Okay. >> Okay.
>> Okay. Great. Um we're also redesigning the driveway to be instead of a circular turnaround to be more of a squared off layout design so that it functions a little bit better for the homeowners. This will result in um 222 square feet
increase of driveway within the 100 foot buffer and 10 pitch pines will need to be removed for the construction of the driveway. Um and these pitch pines along with four invasive white popppler trees
will be mitigated at a 1:1 ratio. um with native trees. We're actually replanting 15 trees in this uh on this site. We're also proposing to add a small retaining wall beneath the proposed deck
in order to reduce erosion and siltation because that slope is quite steep under the deck. And uh adjacent to that are inground risers, steppers on that steep slope just to help with um foot traffic
access. Uh yes, thanks Bradford. Those will be replaced uh like in place and in kind those timber steps and then we're proposing to add some timber risers just north a little bit north. Yeah, right
there. That's a steep slope. Um and we are also uh requesting to keep the existing lower rin station. Um, and we'd like to do that because the um the
use of that it's used from um because people will walk up the slope and from the water go right to that rinse station. If we're to remove that, they will have to walk up the very steep slope along the east side of the house
to reach the upper rinse station. And to avoid that um that would require steps and walls um being built in that area. And so to avoid that, we're requesting to keep the lower rin station and restore that entire slope with native
vegetation to hold the slope in place. Um we're also redesigning the front entryway and walkway to please u for the homeowners um needs and aesthetics. And um
and yeah, that is what we are proposing. So in total, we're proposing 11,881 square ft of invasive species management native plant restoration for an increase of about 271 square feet of structure within the 100
foot buffer. Happy to answer any questions. Thank you. >> All right. Anybody want to start? Uh, go ahead. >> Um, what are we uh uh boils down to the square footage. So, what are we at now on the
>> coverage from the 50 to the 100? >> Oh, the coverage calculations >> because our trigger point is around 35%. >> I believe we're still under that. Um, but I did not calculate that.
Thanks. >> I can get that for you. >> That'd be great. Yeah, I think you need, as I recall, it was about 34. So, we were we were getting close. >> Okay. >> I'll have to say that when I first looked at this, I I was I was dismayed. um because we spent three I don't know
maybe four hearings trying to work out that mitigation area and get it where it would do something you know really beneficial. So when I looked at this and said oh my god all of that for nothing on the other hand it had been one of the things that we had asked for but it was
rejected earlier to do it along the bottom >> to make a vegetative buffer strip. So that does make a whole lot more sense. And the fact that you are going to um restore the entire uh area above the bank um is also incredibly welcome. But
you are going to retain the the the grassy area at the bottom for the parking of the >> trailers and seasonal. That's just that's >> I I didn't see any mention of that. So I assumed that that was going to stay down. >> Yes.
So the Yes. summer trailer and winter dock storage. >> Yeah, I saw that written there. Um the only comment I would make is that the the other thing we spent a lot of time on was the these two rin stations and we heard all about about coming in from the beach in the car and coming up from the boat, you know, and having to walk
around. But understanding all that, if you had the rinse station over on the other side of the house nearer where the generators are out of the 50 there, then it's easily accessible right from the back of the driveway, right from the top coming up from the boat. And I don't see the
need for two. >> And um >> yeah, we had objected to two before. And I think I understand that where you've got the one located is not going to work well for people coming up from the boat to try to get around to there, >> but I think moving it into a location
where it can be easily accessed either way um would be a a better idea. That's >> I'll say I I'm very against two stations. Um you know, one's in the Outer Aura and
one's in the NDZ. So, um I think you need to come up with where one can be placed rather than keeping the one you have and adding a second one.
>> I think the the second rinse station, the one that's in the outer um aura is it's directly off the master bathroom, so that's where it becomes a little bit awkward. It's part of the house design. Um, and so it's not as easily
accessible. It's also not as easily removed or moved. Um, I guess one question that I have for the commission, we we're proposing to leave this rinse station in place because it is already existing. Um, but if the uh rinse station were to be removed out of the
NDZ, that would be more accessible for family members coming up from the beach. >> Would that be something the commission would be open to? And that's certainly something. >> I'll see what everybody thinks.
>> If if if that brinstation off the master be bedroom is truly being incorporated, then I would say it should be incorporated into the square footage of the structure and treated as part of the structure, not as an add-on. In which
case, it's it's I'm not sure what it is. It's a it's a it's a >> part of the building without a roof. Um, >> right. >> But any improve anything that moves a rinse station out of the NDZ is something that I would I would definitely support. Okay. Shouldn't be
there. >> Okay. We will bring that back to the home owners. Thank you. >> Thank you. >> Any other comments? >> Um, yeah, I'm I'm I'm a little on the flip on that. I think if it's pre-existing, it should still be you able to be used if it's pre-existing. That's my opinion. Thanks.
>> I don't disagree, but then I'd like to see the other one go away. I just don't think that two rinse stations within our jurisdiction is a great precedent. Um, >> you know, we've been very careful about >> they're 40 ft apart in the past.
>> That's right. We just >> most logical area is coming up the top of the hill. >> Absolutely. having a >> it is logical where the one that's existing and that's why I hoped that maybe the other would be removed but
if it's actually that necessary for the master addition then something has to give. >> Yeah. >> I think that's my opinion >> on the >> okay >> on the plan here. Mhm. >> So, the original approved plan, I see
that you've eliminated the circle in the driveway, and the driveway comes around to the garage, >> but there's no differentiation on the plan between the driveway and I guess the lawn area in the back. And the previous plan had some steps in there. And I guess you're replacing the steps
that were there with these inground steppers, but you don't you still don't have any indication of where the driveway ends and the lawn begins. My co Mike pointed that out today. It was a a graphical mistake on my part. Um and so
yes, there should just be a line kind of end like along where that wall is meeting the garage and that's where the driveway will end. Uh we were able with the new driveway design to avoid the need for steps down and so the slope is just kind of like
>> so it's flat and you'll >> flatter. Yeah. And so we'll just like end the driveway maybe with cobbles um to differentiate between the two changes of of the ground. >> Okay. >> Yeah. >> Okay. >> Thank you. And and 10,000 square feet of
restoration, but you know, so I can't quibble too much with the numbers because uh >> um but you will get us a I mean if if you are calculate, we'll have to do a variance analysis. Yes, >> they already are asking for variance because of the mitigation that's going
in >> is in the NDZ, right? >> Yeah. Yep. >> So, >> yeah, I'll get that for you. Sorry about that. >> I have one thing. >> Hi, how are you? >> Hi, Paul. Great. >> Um, what is the material you use for the walkway to the front of the house? >> We haven't chatted with the homeowner
yet about that. It will be hardcape. It will be permeable um dry dry laid and so water will be able to percolate through but the material hasn't been we haven't decided on that yet with the homeowners. >> Okay.
>> So that so that hasn't been calculated into this coverage. >> It has been the like outline of the path >> has been calculated in >> uh but the actual material we haven't discussed yet. >> Okay. if it's brick or if it's granite
or >> Okay, >> thank you. >> Thank you. >> Anything else? >> Anybody? So, obviously we're going to have to continue. >> Okay. >> When did you want to continue too? >> Um, whichever one is next.
>> Uh, that would be next week. >> Okay. >> Of uh Thanksgiving. >> That's right. So, >> so then I would have to have that in. >> So, so we would then have to submit by Friday for next week's hearing. Yeah, we can use that with the coverage calcs and
we will get an answer on the rent station >> have that squared away with the clients immediately >> and if not then you can always ask for continuance to December 3rd be the next one after that. >> Okay. I think we can make next week's >> we can do that. >> Yep. >> Okay. >> All right. Thank you.
>> Okay. I move that we continue 70 Meal View Road to the meeting on November 12th, 2025. >> Second. >> Okay. Elise. >> I >> Janet. >> Hi. >> Paul. >> Hi, >> Eric. >> Hi.
>> And I say hi. Hi. Not hi. >> Thank you. >> All right. So, you're all set. >> Next one, please. Next up is a uh field change request for 150 Goose Pond Road, James and Carolyn
Eldridge, map 6G, parcel 14B, uh local only N-22-45. Um this was construction of a single family dwelling. The field change request is to relocate a path to be outside the 100 foot buffer and add a
retaining wall extending from the rock stairway. Thank you. Is there anybody here for this? Oh, >> hi James and Carolyn Eldridge. >> Hi.
So, we were uh we just got our um exterior of the house all landscaped. Um we just had those heavy rains and there's quite a bit of erosion coming down the slope next to the barn. Um we
don't really want to start planting our 11 red eastern cedars until we can figure out what to do with that erosion. Um, we did move a stone pathway out of the 50 to 100 foot area and we'd like to
continue with that same kind of rock going down the side of the um slope. All right, anybody want to start? I just to clarify. So, there's two things here.
One are the boulders that are going to act as a retaining wall for that and the other are the stone step stepper stones. Right. So right now the stepper stones are in the the hund the 100. >> They're outside. Well, in in the approved plan, they were
inside, but they have been installed >> coming around and then they meet up with there are some boulders there, >> right? Um that are outside our jurisdiction, but is that the boulders that you want to continue along the rest of that? >> Yes.
>> Okay. I was just trying to understand >> from that little stepway up, we want to continue the boulders down. So you have them continuing on your proposal down crossing the line of the 100
uh but stopping short of the 50 and they have that funny little curve around is that following the the grade there the slope there that funny little curve to the left that they that it takes your plan >> basically where the fence was >> the sill fence.
>> Okay. Okay. That's kind of That's long. It's >> It is. >> Uh >> yeah, >> I was curious along that line. Um what is how big is this wall? I mean,
>> we were thinking maybe three foot rocks, three foot stones. >> Okay. Um >> probably going like 40 feet. The barn is 36. So probably just past the barn a little bit.
So, there's a change in coverage and we need mitigation for this three-foot wall that's 40t long. Um, so
I don't think we have any other place to do any more mitigation. See that was all put in with lom and the lom was just kind of washed away. I mean we could probably change it to hardener if but then we have all the plings to
put in. I mean I think the hardener would stay. >> What's harder? it. I think it's something you can put in that sort of glues it so it doesn't Somebody told me to do this. So, it's
just it's dirt. It's hardener that >> that will compact. >> It compacts. >> We have a lot of plantings to put in. So, we'd have to dig out the holes and fill them with lom. >> Yeah. But that's but then but yeah. Okay. That's >> I mean that would stay more than the the lom itself,
>> right? I think we're >> we just had those extreme rains >> mitigation area itself that and I understand this I looked at the slope and said yep I can see that that's a problem. Um but it's all happening in the area that had been set aside for mitigation.
But I guess you know if if it's just going to fail if it's not held up somehow. >> I agree. I just >> what's the point? >> Yeah. >> I struggle with that there is an added coverage that we're not was not accounted for in their
mitigation originally. >> Yeah. >> Yeah. I I No, I think the >> I I get why you have to do it. I mean, I'm not against >> I think with our height restriction um >> we were up so >> we didn't think we would be up that high >> and in order to pass that it really
the angle of it. >> No, I I totally get it. It's just the struggle I have because we >> Well, I'm look Well, the difference is right here. It has it here. So, the total um this is on the Yeah. What they
submitted on the top total site coverage plus proposed dwelling which is now built plus was total 4147 and the restoration was 6630. No, no, I see. 4147 was the mitigation. So what was the coverage? It
would have been >> 1539 plus. >> We could still add mitigation. >> Oh yeah. >> In and amongst the trees >> toward the back. >> And there's a there's an area that I graveled, you know, way back just to so
we weren't tracking in dirt next to the garage, >> next to the barn. And we could take that away because that got counted as ground coverage. And I didn't even realize, you know, that was going to be counted as ground coverage. Is that the area that was originally mulched?
>> Not mulch was on the other side. >> Gravel. >> I remember we had a discussion about the mulch. >> Yeah. >> And then it became >> Yeah. >> Well, >> yeah. Yeah. The gravel. Well, that would >> I mean, if you took away the gravel I don't know. >> I don't know what you'd want to put down.
>> We could put like the ink berries or >> Yeah. Just >> We would still like to have some sort of a walkway there. Oh, you have you're >> that's where >> that's where the um entrance >> that you would use to go to the barn apartment. >> Yeah, there's no you can put the stepping stones through. That shouldn't
be a problem, but you can put in, >> you know, native grass. >> I mean, the gravel is getting covered up right now as it is. >> It's getting Yes. Right. It is. >> It's actually mitigating itself. >> I mean, the whole the whole >> the whole area is mitigating itself. I mean, we have pine trees growing
everywhere. >> Oh, sure. you know, >> that's great. >> But >> y >> um I think if you could mitigate that area, um with you know, more of what you've been
doing, um you know, as you said, Inkberry and I don't know what else you have. Um I think then I don't want to speak for everybody, but I think that makes it a little bit easier to approve the field change. Yeah.
>> Um I just have a problem with forgiving mitigation when we expect others to. >> So um how does everybody feel? >> Oh >> that be okay. >> Yeah, I had no no problem. >> I'm happy with that.
>> Good. All right. So I think we could have a motion to approve with the I would add with the additional um mitigation in the gravel area. I move that we approve the field change request for 150 Goose Pond Road as
modified. >> Second. >> Okay. Elise. >> I. >> Janet. >> I. >> Paul. >> I. >> Eric. >> I. >> And I say I. >> All right. You've got it. >> Okay. Thank you. >> Thank you. >> All right. Bradford. Next.
>> I'm gonna read the next two uh together. >> Yes, please. Uh, next up is a uh two notice of intents for 53 Little Beach Road, Monomoy Rips LLC, map 16A, parcel H50, SC 10-3747.
Demolish existing dwelling and construct new dwelling within land subject to coastal storm flowage. and 43 Little Beach Road, Monoy Rips LLC, map 16A, parcel H52,
SC 10-3737, demolish existing dwelling and construct new dwelling and title 5 subsurface sewage system within land subject to coastal storm flowage. Um, both have been requested to continue to January
14th, 2026. I move that we continue both 53 Little Beach Road and 47 Little Beach Road to the meeting on January 14th, 2026. >> Second, >> Eric. >> Second. I mean, yes, >> Paul. >> Hi, >> Janet. >> I Elise,
>> I say I. >> Glad I'm not. >> Okay, Brad. For next, >> moving on to requests for certificate of compliance. Um, the first one is for 74 Harborview Road. Bruce and Nancy
Pearson. Map 8A, parcel H4, SE10-3529. Uh, this was for construction of a garage addition and new driveway. Um, when I went out to the site last week, there was still uh temporary irrigation, but they notified me this morning that
it has been removed. Um, >> yes. >> So, should be all all set. >> Good afternoon, everyone. Brett Deo from Sissu Landscapes here on behalf of Nancy and Bruce Pearson. Um I do have photos Bradford um for this
morning with the irrigation removed that I can give to you. >> Nicole provided them to me this morning. Perfect. We've got copies. >> All set. >> Any other questions? >> Um any questions? Anybody?
>> All right. I No questions. So >> I move that we approve the certificate of compliance for 74 Harborview Road. >> Second. >> Elise. >> I Janet. >> Hi. >> Paul. >> Hi. >> Eric. >> Hi. >> And I say I. >> Thank you. >> You're all set. Thank you.
>> Next. Bradford. >> Next is a certificate of compliance for 1366 Bucks Creek Road. Bucks Creek. 136 Bucks Creek Realy Trust. Map 8B,
parcel S51, SE10-3514. This was for demolition of an existing dwelling and construction of a new dwelling and implementation of a land management plan. Um, again, this one was all set except for their the irrigation
within the mitigation area. Um, they did let me know that it's being it's on it's scheduled for removal on Monday, uh, November 10th. >> Right. >> Okay. Susan, do you have anything that you want to add?
>> Nope, that's it. >> Okay. >> Thank you. >> Anybody have any questions, comments? >> So, we just put it on hold until it's done. And >> yes, just like we did the last time. What will happen is that when we approve it, uh, we'll hold on to the COC uh, to
filing it until after it's been confirmed that the irrigation's been removed. >> Okay. Can I actually do have a question. Could that be uh with photos or would uh, Bradford come out to the site when we let them know it's done?
>> What would you like, Bradford? >> We can do either or. Um, if you want to send us some photos that that'll be sufficient. >> Okay, great. Thank you. >> All right, we can have a motion, please. >> I move that we approve the certificate of compliance for 136 Buck Creek Road.
>> Second. >> Okay, Eric. >> I. >> Paul, >> I. >> Janet. >> Hi. >> Elise. >> Hi. >> And I say I. You're all set. Thank you. >> Thank you. >> Okay. Bradford. Up next is a COC request for 665 Foxhill
Road, William and Allison Douglas, map 12M, parcel 20-c7 and 20- C42, SC 10-3 3581, proposed steps, stairs, splash pool and deck expansion, paths, landscaping,
removal of invasive species, and planting of native species. Um, this is the one for the house that burnt down. >> Yeah. And it's all been pushed into the new order. >> So everything has been transferred into the new >> Yes. order.
>> So we can uh close this one because we've moved everything in. >> I move that we approve the certificate of compliance for 665 Foxill Road. >> Second. >> Eric. >> I. >> Paul. >> I. >> Janet. >> I. >> Elise. >> I.
>> And I say I. Okay. Bradford. The next. >> All right. Is it all right if I read the next two in? >> Yes, please. Okay, the next two are certificate of compliance requests for 20 Jericho Lane, Mark Le Boitz, 20
Jericho Lane LLC, map 10B, parcel B2, SC 10-3525, installation of an ingground swimming pool and 20 Jericho Lane, Mark Libitz, 20 Jericho Lane, LLC, map 10B, parcel
B2, SC 10-34 467 demolition of an existing dwelling, construction of a new dwelling, and implementation of land management plan. Um, we did not have any issues with this one. >> No, it looks great to me. >> Susan, do you have anything to add?
>> I don't. Thank you. >> Okay. Anybody have any comments? >> Yeah, I just want to say it's beautiful mitigation mix of pollinators. Uh, very it's a poster child for >> mitigation project. >> Boy, I wish we could
That's all Teresa and Blue Flax. >> They left. >> Well, and the customer. >> Yeah, >> they left. So, they don't get to hear that accolades. >> All right. >> All right. We have a motion. >> I move that we approve the certificate of compliance for 20 Jericho Lane.
>> Second. >> Uh, Elise >> I >> Janet >> I >> Paul >> I >> Eric. >> And I say I next. >> Thank you. >> Thank you. Uh, >> and you can do both. >> Okay. The next are uh two partial COC
requests. Um, parcel H13, Captain Null's Way, Minglewood Homes Incorporated. Map 11C, parcel H13, SC10- 3698, construction of a dwelling within a
riverfront area and buffer zone to a coastal bank and construction of a swimming pool within the buffer zone to a coastal bank. Um, the other one is, uh, parcel H13, Captain Null's Way, Minglewood Homes Incorporated. Map 11C,
parcel H13, SE 10- 3722, construction of harbor access stairs over a coastal bank. Um, the first one, uh, so they are partial C coc's. Um the mitigation is
still has like few years to establish. Um the first one we did not have any issues with. Um the only thing I noticed for the the stairs is that um the condition was to have them removed
before November 1st. Um but I was we weren't sure if you had left them in just for the commission to see. >> Yes. >> Yeah. We wanted to show that they were removable. >> Okay, great. Good. That was one of the questions. Anybody have any Do you want
to say anything first? >> No. Um I know Paul I had conversation with Paul last week and he requested um that the buyer um submit a document that they're aware of the obligation for the mitigation and they were happy to
provide that. Yes, we did get a letter saying that they are taking over the responsibility for all of the mitigation because it's obviously not nearly complete and has just partially gone in. Um, anybody have any other comments or questions?
>> Oh, yeah. I don't have any comments about the partial, but I I have to say this the um whoever did the planting needs to some of them I think the ground settled after they did the planting. A lot of plants around the house driveway. So the the earth sunk around them and
the the roots are sticking out like this much on a lot of the plants. So if they're under contract maybe you know whoever planted these things to go over there and put them in otherwise they're going to be replacing them for sure if you take a closer look. And the circle I don't know what they're going to do
about keeping people off the plants in the circle. Maybe some boulders around the edge or something. I don't know. But they're just driving all over it. But anyway, we're only here about the partial on the but I just it would be good to know for the contractor, you know, if he has a contract with these people to do it
right, maybe to have them come back and put the plants in a little deeper and yeah, >> anybody go ahead. While you're talking to them about that, so um I did notice that some of the one maybe two of the
new trees have large portions of the bark missing and I thought the deer were eating it. Eric thinks that >> No, I was talking about the older ones. So, the older ones >> deer are eating the bark off the new trees, >> so they'll die if they don't get them wrapped up and and uh yeah, I've lived
through that. >> Thank you for the heads up. >> Some burlap around them to keep them off. >> And then they will be removing the stairs, the seasonal part of the >> Okay. >> What are the little posts? >> Yeah. >> On the way to the
>> We talked about that. was to well, >> you know, the little posts that are barely stuck in the ground on the way to the >> Oh, uh, it was in the order that the path had to be >> demarked. We had to look it up, too. >> Yeah, >> we were wondering the same thing. So,
all right, then. Uh, we can have a motion. >> I move that we approve the P partial certificate of compliance for H13 Captain Nullsway. >> Second. >> Uh, Elise, >> I. Janet >> I. >> Paul >> I. >> Eric I.
>> And I say I. >> Thank you. >> You're all set. Look at >> that. It's not even two o'clock. >> Well, wait. We're not quite done. >> I was going to say we're general. >> We're very close, but yes, we're working hard to be done by two. All right,
Bradford. Next, please. >> Next is a violation followup for 97 Tippy Run uh TR97 nominee trust map one. 14 A3 parcel 2-B SC 10-3690
uh shoreline protection and restoration project. >> Um All right. We had a meeting last week, right? >> Yes. Last Thursday. Yeah. >> My days are kind of melding together.
And uh the owner was there as well as his representatives, his property manager and Dan from Tyen Bond. And we started here and we had Katherine as a part of it and we had Brian who's from
Woods Hole, right? >> Cape Cod Cooperative. >> Okay. Cape Cod Coop. You know Brian. But anyway, um Greg had could not attend and he had recommended that we have Brian attend. So at the meeting, so um it was
discussed what po what some options might be. Um Dan provided some options and we and Katherine and Brian provided some thoughts, but then we went out to the property with everybody
and um we then uh went, you know, it was good for Brian because he's never seen it. And Brian and Catherine had some recommendations that they are going to put in writing for us, but Brian can't
get them to us until probably January. So, we're going to put this on hold until January. When their recommendations come in, we are going to forward them to Tai and Bond um and he will share them with the property manager and the property owner.
And at that time we will hope I what I would like to do is give them one month to come up with a plan of what they would like to do out of the options or if they come up with something else which they offered some
things different than what our our two representatives were thinking then um you know we'll have to see how our our representatives think about the you know what they think about that as So, that's the update at this point, but the good thing was the property owner
was there and that was a big plus. Um, so we'll see what happens. But I wanted everybody to know that things progressed a small amount and now we're in hold again. >> Okay. Every little bit helps. >> Any questions?
Okay. Well, that's the update. All right. Bradford. Next. >> Next is approval of minutes for August 27th and September 10th, 2025. >> So, the September 10th ones were in our
team's folder yesterday. I didn't get to look at them and now they're gone. So, I think we can only deal with the August 27th ones for approval. And hopefully at the next
meeting next week, we'll have them back. I think they're on the town website, but it's a PDF, so we can't um modify it. And so, um
I just I think we should table this September 10th uh until next meeting on November 12th. So, anybody for the August 27th have any
modifications? I made a couple little changes, but nothing major. >> I made a few. >> Yeah. >> Um, anybody else? Bob's not here, so we don't We're We're pretty good. That
might be why we're finishing early. No, I'm only kidding, Bob. Um, all right. Then if we could have a motion, please, to approve. >> I move that we approve the minutes from August 27th, 2025. >> Second, >> Eric.
>> I. >> Paul. >> I. >> Janet. >> I. >> Elise. >> I. >> And I say I. >> Okay. We have one more motion. I move that we just a comment that struck me as I was reading these the minutes from
August on the 552 Shore Road. Um we bifurcated the the cutting violation from the o from the NOI which is fine but it reminded me that they were going to come back by the end of October with a plan for that. >> But they they did contact us and it was
they asked for uh more time. uh when >> so they are on it and we were aware and Paul asked if that was okay and I said yes >> okay >> so I think >> they were totally forgotten I hadn't made a note until I saw >> that's why they were rather aggressive
with their plans that was >> to uh present so >> thank you all right one more motion >> I move that we adjourn the hearing >> second >> okay Eric >> I >> uh Paul >> I >> Elise I
>> Janet I and I say I >> All right. We are [Music]
[Music]