##VIDEO ID:mZv35Rh91R0## next time I'll I'll wrap it up better too like that thank you okay good afternoon I wish to call the January 21st 2025 annual meeting of the Cook County and grar Eda to order at 401 uh present are Commissioners Mills Benson chlon Anderson welcome and myself kold absent are uh Howard headstrom so first of all uh the agenda we'll cover the actually the agenda for both the annual meeting and our regular meeting uh I wanted to ask if there's any input or or questions regarding the agenda I have a couple of items uh both as it relates to the regular meeting not the annual meeting but one is to add to the executive report uh an update on the One Roof vacant apartment and also the workforce housing grant that was prepared on behalf of the HRA at 1800 West Highway 61 so Heidi can speak to those any other changes to the agenda no all right make a motion to approve the agenda as amended you second terrific all those in favor I I all those opposed motion carries okay so 2025 annual meeting uh election of officers is our next item and the commission uh Commissioners can either volunteer or nominate others for the 2025 slate of officers starting with President I would like to nominate Peter cold as our president I'd second that thank you vice president I believe Howard was in this capacity last year is that he agreable to doing it this year he is then I would nominate Howard I would second that and Treasurer if no one has any issues I'll continue on in that role be delighted make that motion support terrific that leaves two positions that have historically been held by the executive director that being secretary and assistant Treasurer so I'd like to suggest that Heidi be nominated for both of those second terrific uh all those in favor of the Slate for 2025 executive board I I yes opposed okay thank you all taking a stend to committee assignments in 2024 we had uh five committees Finance Personnel Grant review design review and tanite harbor and we're suggesting for 2025 that we retain those five and and add a new one at least in 2025 and that would be uh for the golf course during the sale period so with Finance we've had um Mark and and Howard on that board Steve of course is no longer on the board so there's an opening for the finance committee any volunteers for finance how many committees do most people serve on well we've got um we've got six committees uh three persons per committee split across seven Commissioners so two plus probably I would like to be on the finance personnel and Tech Harbor Finance personnel and Tac Harbor thank you [Music] David I'd like to be on Grant review Tac Harbor and Golf Course okay I'd like to be on Golf Course and I know that Howard has an interest a deep interest in the golf course I've U I've enjoyed being on the the grant committee as relatively new to the community getting exposed to to different businesses I will continue with Grant committee as I did last year thank you so appreciate that okay so must be my turn sure uh let's see um Tac haror for me thank you um let's see it did help with Personnel stuff right mhm are you going on that one you're saying so you do okay oh what about design review yeah what was on that Howard and Mark and we didn't we didn't really I think once last year why say what was his purpose it was just to look over Cedar Grove stuff when when they were presenting yeah so this might be the last year for that committee okay got it thank you that that's helpful okay um so I'll I'll continue doing it we're just looking to fill R so I'll put my name on there too so yeah okay um then um I'll I'll do the golf I give me my three yes a board game here we have well it puts a Spore at the golf course is that okay who's the fourth one you how myself but I'm I can pull off of it and switch to design if you want no no no you go right ahead okay that's perfect I just like just to make sure you got a broad yeah group within that golf chising so thank you I just didn't write down one so where are we light right now we're light on design so if if Howard is going to do design again you think cuz I gotta okay we'll just put Howard and design again if you're gone then you get a sign that's what happens exactly so so we're we're lighted on personel we got two and we and we have two on design but I don't feel feel that's critical we not three at design who do we have finance and person so yeah we're showing um Mark you'd be on finance presumably Finance design okay right now okay and uh Grant review so Grant design and finance is where I'm at so Personnel his only right Dave you were on Personnel you and he's on it now on it again okay so Dave and Tracy so far have raised their hands for personnel but we still have our city person who will be no doubt at our next meeting so we have a new so for sure we have a new member right well hopefully I mean okay it sounds like it should should expect it so leaving a couple of openings would be okay Point let's do that okay okay okay so you've recorded everything as best we can oh ter okay so with that is there a a motion to approve the Eda committee assignments for 2025 some second okay all those in favor I all those opposed motion carries terrific and if we need to we could you know depending on when that new member comes on we could kind of re look if there's in particular sure rebalance is necessary good idea interested in okay taking us on to the last uh agenda on the 2025 annual meeting uh agenda is the meeting dates so the proposed 2025 meeting dates follow our established practice of the 3D Tuesday of the month at 4M here in the commissioner's room of the County Courthouse that leaves us then with the February February the 18th March the 18th April the 15th May the 20th June the 17th July the 15th August the 19th September 16th the 21st of October the 18th of November and December 16th finally any changes or discussion required for that no is there a motion to approve our 2025 meeting dates a motion to approve seconded thank you all those in favor I I all those opposed hey we've got meeting dates all right so with that what I'd like to do is close the the annual meeting for the Cook County gramar Eda at 4:10 efficient meeting uh and call to order then the January 21st reg meeting of the county gray Eda again at 4:10 p.m. same Commissioners present and absence as were for the annual meeting and the first agenda item I'm delighted is to welcome Siri Anderson to the to the board you welcome happy to be here thanks for raising your hand and making the commitment this is fantastic thanks any comments that you wish to make to introduce yourself it's an honor to be here thank you wow looking forward to working with you okay all right well with that uh the minutes from the December 17th 2024 regular meeting were provided in the packet assuming that you've had a chance to review those is there a motion to approve the December 17th meeting minutes so moved okay second second any other discussion Siri I just had a um a note there was um the the comment about the support that was wanted by I can't remember the name of the organization now but everything that they were asking for help doing can be done by artificial intelligence so I just wanted to suggest that some professional development could also help them instead of grant writing it's number B 7B on page the Arts group yeah yep so I'm happy to meet with them and help them learn how to do that if they like good thank you okay with that um all those in favor of approving the minutes of December 17th meeting I hi right all those opposed say nay meeting minutes are approved taking us then to public comments is there anyone in the audience that wishes to approach and make public comments okay seeing none we'll move on to to uh the financials December 24 2024 financials and payments uh of the Eda and Superior National at Luton uh were provided in the meeting packet uh in the appendix uh Mr Shackleton commission commissioner Shackleton you've got any additional information to share or comments uh nothing additional the cast positions for the Ed are healthy uh the year end year to end budget versus what we expected came in roll so close so I was pretty happy with the results there as far as our budgeting is concerned and our expenditures um if I'm going to transition to the golf course uh the golf course had a couple minor adjustments and accounting procedures so the sales are slightly little bit higher cost are a little bit less so the financial look for the year turned out to be a little bit better than what the paperwork you might have would suggest so it's had a good solid year and it's healthy in cash position as well and their off season uh food and beverage is trending in the right direction so there we had three years of growth in that regard it's not you know making a lot of money doing it but it's breaking even and slightly putting a little bit of money in the bank and keeping people employed and the employment situation outlook for the golf course has uh much improved versus last year so we're going into the season with a few more full-time people so okay thank you and I'm sorry any comments regarding payments no okay so what I'd like to do then is Mash these three together if there's a motion to accept the Eda financials the uh January 2025 payments and the December 24 financials for the golf course motion to approve those so moved thank you second anyone second great all those in favor I I and opposed great passes all right that takes us to uh to new business we've got a few resolutions for approval the first one is uh 202- one uh approving the employment agreements for Heath extrom Aaron Davies Garrett emman danne Sheffer and Andy coronis for services at Superior National at Luton in 2025 so you might remember from our last meeting uh that we already approved the corresponding wages and job descriptions back in December December 17th uh Mike Larson has redone the employment agreements themselves reflecting those those figures and in variables and it's those new employment agreements that we'd be voting on okay any um any questions or discussion on that no all right is there a motion to approve resolution 2025-the by saying nay all right motion carries thank you taking us then to our next motion 2025 D2 uh approving the uh agreement for Professional Services with Mike Larsson to provide oversight of the daily operations and Lead correspondence with FEMA for Superior National Golf Course at Luton in 2025 uh this is largely consistent with a portion of his agreement from last year last year also as you might recall included the uh the document that he prepared and and presented to us I think it was in August that was one and done so this is the ongoing um management that he that he provides us is he officially the lay is on for the golf course I in some capacity as far as the Sal is concerned yes that'll be the next resolution but indeed he is yes but this is just for the day-to-day operation of the of the course itself I'll motion to approve support thank you all those in favor signify by saying I I I all those opposed by saying nay great motion carries then taking us to to to the second agreement with with Mike [Music] course especially this year during the the sale so Mike has prepared and Howard and I have reviewed a supplemental agreement that he's he's put forward for for this Activity questions or discussion no a motion to approve as well thank you is there a second second all those in favor signify by saying I I I any oppose by saying nay all right motion carries thank you taking us then to our next resolution this is 2025-the company LLC to conduct our 2024 audit Services I think we're all familiar with red path and the services that they provide um commissioner Shackleton anything to to add here no I mean there we've had a good working relationship for the past couple years so I'm I'm happy to continue with that um costs keep going up wish they didn't but there's really not much we can do about that and I looked I've talked to Brady at the county and he doesn't think there's anything cheaper out there anyway so so I'm satisfied with their services so good thank you is there a motion to approve resolution [Music] 2025-the in favor signify signify by saying I I all those opposed by saying nay motion carries okay next motion next resolution rather um and it was supposed to expire on December 31st 2024 um but after your last meeting after the December 17th Eda meeting um I received a memo from and it was in in your packet um from the new chair of the grand maray apartments and requesting a um extension of this grant deadline to September 30th of 2025 so um that's the item I remember they've done some of their work right didn't they give us a real detailed yeah they did some of their work just they're not finished yeah yeah they're just not done right is that right y so it's not stuck per say it's just taking longer it's just taking longer just a board of volunteers trying to do their best with it so okay and it was a $25,000 Grant um from The eda's Business Development Fund mhm okay I'll support the resolution i' second that terrific thank you all those in favor signify by saying I I all those opposed by saying nay motion carries okay taking us to resolution 2025-the sale of Superior National Golf Course at luten so you might recall from our our last meeting um with I think for the the right reasons we decided to go with an RFP and slow the process down a little bit give give other firms the chance to to bid on this work uh in addition to to northco we um we threw out a pretty wide net there were four proposals four or five that came back that we reviewed four four y so there were four propos that came back we created a matrix of uh scoring to include things like past experience working with government agencies cost um and other items I think that that Heidi can can uh can illustrate for us but landed frankly where we started with with North Co but feel much better about the process and the fact that everyone got a a clean Fair Shake anything to add on that in terms of process um well just that at the time time of The Proposal review um the Eda didn't have an official Golf Course committee um so it was Peter um Howard and Mike Larsson actually were on that committee and reviewed the proposals and um it was it was quite the process um it went out to the proposal or the RFP itself went out to nine um large uh commercial real estate firms that specialize in uh selling golf courses um and it was I thought it was amazing to get uh the response from four um different firms um and um the reason I didn't include the proposal or the um top proposal itself is because it's another 80 pages so if you want to see that the proposal um let me know and I'll print that out and deliver it or email it um however however you'd like to see that um but it was uh the the three um evaluators uh worked very hard on their scoring and um the evaluation was based on um you know what was actually in the RFP document and so it was very um it was fair and um concise and um the in the end uh SVN North Cole uh by far um scored the most points out of the four proposals so that is why um the committee is recommending or why the resolution is is recommending SN North Co what are the terms of this so it's a an exclusive brokerage uh agreement the commission is 6% importantly with a $200,000 floor or minimum minimum okay which takes you you know well over 3 million from a sale point so frankly northco wasn't the the cheapest game in in town but they were the most compelling terms of their capabilities and there's no expiration on this agreement so it just goes and tell it s oh a good question I I believe it's for a year but we can double check that right yeah and we'll also need to uh think through and formalize the stipulations because we're at the point now before it goes on in the market where potential buyers not to be exposed to what stipulations we as the seller want to put in place things like I'm just giving this as an example for X number of years it must remain a publicly accessible Golf Course um as we've talked before we put too many in my view at least if we put too many um ornaments on the tree it'll it'll tip over but we should have stipulations that we think are important okay I'd like to add so I think it important to bring the actual agreement or draft agreement to the February Eda meeting um with all this information that we're talking about yeah okay email it then hm email it then sure yes so do we have an approximate value for it at this point um I'm just trying to get the reference between that 6% sure with um some of the proposals that we got included valuations and take them for what they're worth but it was in the range of 1.5 to just a little bit north of two but ultimately the marketplace will will dictate that that's it there's houses for more I mean yeah exactly like yeah I mean one property it's easily that it's surprising it's uh the cost benefit of owning a golf course is apparently not super high yeah the valuation method used that I saw in these proposals was looking at uh looking at revenue and using a multiplier on the revenue now you could make a a pretty compelling argument but the golf course is not functioning at 100% and maybe there's some upside there um but that'll be for for a a good buyer I think to to sus out and do a pro forma on to see what the potential there truly is and so um and one of the stipulations could be must remain a golf course yeah I'd be surprised if we did not end up with that stipulation publicly accessible Golf Course area yeah I think there were some land covenants also that the Nelson family has I'm not sure what their what their anist to all this yet I'm sure how involved they are what they're going to opinion about this or not so but if they if they the language itself says that it needs to be a golf course otherwise they have some kind of first right okay of the land bag so um so no one has sat I thought they'd had those conversations I think they have had I just not privy to them so I initial yeah there have been some initial conversations and those are those are continuing there is a wrer first refusal which only really comes into effect after we've got an offer to present to them thank you president um I I realized the importance of of amending the um language of the resolution um so in add adding the words um approving the drafting of an agreement or something whatever the Eda thinks but um or entering into an agreement or pursuing an agreement because to your point we'll come back in February with the agreement itself correct including the stipulations okay okay yeah okay very good all right well with that Amendment um is there a motion to approve resolution 20 25-6 a motion to approve second by anybody support yeah thank you oh further discussion if we may yes um and so this this draft or or pursuant pursuing this agreement has a minimum $200,000 so that's our cost no matter what at at the closing with a sale yep so okay okay thank you and then um I need a refresh pressure on what our remaining Bond obligations are there too and so just trying to factor that in with what our did we get that from Brady I thought we the number I've heard yeah take it what it's worth is 1.6 okay that was earlier in the years so I'm not sure exactly where it is yeah today so hopefully our sale price will go right right that we can always say no exact right that's the thing you know if what you what we have offered isn't going to work it's not going to work so yeah okay so I'm sorry to cut you off any other discussion or questions thank you all right well in light of that all those in favor I I I all those opposed indicate by saying nay motion carries Okay resolution 2025-the and I believe in the packet survey doc 127 319 allowing the property owner One Roof community housing to sell the property without restriction and this you might recall from our last meeting is the partial One Roof property that we asked the HRA to to review and provide their feedback on which they did last week uh I actually viewed the meeting online but Jason also sent a an email after the fact so HRA is is okay with the Eda um moving forward and allowing one roof to do this if we're comfortable could I it wasn't an image of the actual parcel was not included in the packet um so I'm just holding it up here um so in luten the 16 unit rental apartments that one Ro of housing owns this parcel is right next to that and it's like a a little um Jason hail was referring to it as a Remnant parcel um and it's just a little above 3 acres it doesn't have a parcel ID because the the uh property was subdivided recently and hasn't been um recorded at the county yet so that's why it's called parcel B um but that's the one I'll pass this down the line so um you can all see it okay is there a motion to approve resolution 20257 a motion to approve any further discussion or questions I I just wanted to for the Public's benefit and just to refresh all of us again the the reason for doing this is because of the difficulties in building there and hoping hoping to kind of focus more on uh Parcels or properties that are more viable for for Housing Development so thank you for that point yeah great and I'm sorry all those in favor by saying I I all those opposed indicate by saying nay motion carries okay taking us then to committee and commissioner reports are there any reports that any of us wish to share at this point all right seeing none oh oh um it's it's further on a direct report I'll just biting my tongue here well you don't have to bite it very long because we're on to to director reports next in Heidi sure so um therefore our items on here um Tekken night Harbor that document is still being drafted and so you will see that um next meeting um and it'll be a more um it'll be a more elaborate or phased approach RFP than originally um anticipated um so it won't just be you know a simple one consultant um strategic planning proposal or RFP document it'll be two three phases different Consultants Etc so uh that's why ultimately it's taking longer to get the document ready for distribution um for the tanite harbor project um number two on the list of directory reports is actually Pat campanaro's spdc reports so I'm going to turn it over to Pat thank you and it took me longer to get up here than give you my report um you saw my December report it's very busy and when we get a new consultant in here next month or the month after I'm handing off a a pretty large portfolio of business there's a lots of stuff going on here um none of which I can talk about of course but I do also do an annual report every year which you've seen as well attached to this report and it gives you my numbers for 2024 and my cumulative year-to date then talks a little bit about what Northland did last year as well so overall it's been a very productive year uh SE several years that I've been here and Northland has had the number one spot in the state of Minnesota for the past three or four years so it's all good very very good news uh the other thing I would share that's not on this report that just came in last night or the night before is the fact that the second round of the promised grants are coming up and we probably will see them in March or April um they've said it's going to be a much easier Grant to fill out and hopefully we'll get some cash brought into Cook County but there are so many people that apply for these grants that they do some kind of uh Lottery system at the end they don't really R rank them and say let's give them to these people until they just pull the names out of the hat so I don't know what'll happen but again a chance for some grant money that's not uh that has no restrictions to it so you could buy you could pay your mortgage you could pay your employees you could do a lot of other things with it as well so that's coming down that's exciting and then Heidi and I have been working together on filling uh this job we have four five thank you five um uh great applicants and we're going to be doing interviews at the end of the month any questions Pat you feel that you'll hire someone some will be recommended by the end of this okay great thank you yeah we have some good good candidates and four of the five our local okay which is great so we don't have to wait for anyone to be transported here awesome all right that's it thanks so much P thank you thank you um third update is related to um what the Eda just approved with the uh last resolution um on that Remnant parcel in Lutsen so those 16 um the the four directions housing project the 16 rental apartments next door to that parcel that Remnant parcel um You probably recall last year I believe it was last year that one roof housing came to came forward to the Eda because they were having trouble um with one vacant you I mean I wasn't here so maybe you want to provide the history you know it um May June time I think it was the beginning of my tenure on this board but one of the units had remained vacant for a period of time and uh one roof was seeking the approval to amend the restrictions around who it can be rented to because it had been on the market for so long evidently there one of these units again that has now come up it's been on the market I think for 4 months if memory serves and they're seeking a waiver on that just that particular unit again to open it up to U someone outside of Cook County I think the idea was that they live outside the county but work in the county was that still how it's supposed to be working I mean I thought that's how it worked out last time they need to be working in the county right um but I think they want to open it up to someone who lives outside the county but comes to coook County to work the employer wasn't a local employee oh that was a deal okay that doesn't make sense okay so actually um oneu community housing approached us again um about this and had some new ideas of how this could be um taken care of so they don't have to keep coming back to the Eda with each separate so uh inquiry and so um what they are working on at one roof is to um draft some sort of language that would provide more of a um not really a blanket approach but more flexibility in the existing covenants um so they are doing that now and um the plan is to bring a resolution to Eda in February for um to learn more about what they're what they're requesting so yeah I mean three ways in that I see one would be never to appr prove any variance at all which I'm not sure I'm all that delighted about the other one would be to do it on a oneoff basis each and every time there's an issue they can bring it to us which might be workable and I think what might be suggested here and we'll see next month is a standing policy that would State something along the lines of if four months or five months or whatever period of time has elapsed then they could rent it out to someone outside of the parameters okay between I mean it's so it's happened twice and I know it's not you know we need this this is filled obviously but we know why I mean what when I still hearing that people are begging for places to live why are these places we can't get people [Applause] into which isn't so much about one roof you know per se but identifying what's going on here they take pets right I think I thought I recalled hearing that or maybe it's a new building I don't know you know I don't I just wonder if there's some other reason or is it truly just because we've asked for a local based employer and local work or I mean what is it that's my opinion um and I've had a two discussions now with representatives from one roof housing and it are it is those covenants that the Eda has in place that they're saying that's the reason why is th are those restrictions they've had interested or they've had applicants but they don't fit into those covenants or they don't do we know like how it's advertised amongst eligible people I see them adverti you know you know the local marketplaces like Boreal or whatever it might be that so I mean I think locals are aware that those units are available if they're looking you know if they're trying so but I think it's l it's loten and it's they're they're newer buildings so they're they're not inexpensive places you know but they're I think their market rate you know is what they are the close to Market rates it just you have to if you're living in gr marray it's it's a 30 40 minute drive one way so that was a a as far as the rates uh the rents um that came up in our conversations and um Brooke is who I've been dealing with there um she she said that she originally got suggestions about appropriate rates from Jason Hae so it appears that they're doing as much um research as they could to set the rates appropriately um but maybe that's another thing that they need to you know do an official Market study or something themselves of if they're if they really are appropriate I I don't think they ever did a real in-depth stud for that what's it called I'm not familiar one roof and there loots and I know one particular apartment complex but I just love to know what I mean I know they're designed to make sure the people locally and employers locally have some options for housing for employees I get that and that's but or is it just because we're missing some businesses you know no loots and Resort or whatever is you know part of it too right now um what's causing this or because a lot of the West uh businesses have put up their own too for people you know Cascade and right blof and whatever is that part of it I don't know well the bottom line is because they received uh subsidies because it's a wor workfor Force housing project I'm sure it wasn't the eda's idea to just put these rules along the rules went along with the subsidy that they received so because it's Workforce housing they uh basically that the goal is to uh they don't want to or we meaning the Eda or the H uh don't want those units rented out for uh as vacation rentals or um second homes so that's kind of the simple way of explaining yeah yeah but to to your question Tracy I think it's not too much to add ask that when we are presented with the resolution next month we also have a refresher on the restrictions right and a recap of where they are marketing these properties and what the rates rates are that'll give us I think a fuller picture of this happening and just if I may just a little more background from the previous uh variants um I I did my darnest to hold that up as much as possible because I was aware of an executive level um person in our community who was desperately looking um and it didn't it it the it just didn't the numbers didn't work out for them and so I thought that was very interesting um and and then of course we went on to approve that variance and opportunity is gone so I think it is worthwhile to to revisit it um and just see where those barriers are and everyone's budget is different right it may not have fit into their budget but it fit into others so yeah it's just I mean is there some way we can make sure it's still fitting what we really want which is housing for people working in our community and all that is there something that's too like Geographic specific I don't know is it like restricted things around the West End or as opposed to somebody who is some a little bit further out I mean we have people driving here from Silver Bay all the time there's there's deputies yeah so okay good discussion bet she'll be even better next month um okay the last uh update I have is uh this just came forward this afternoon actually um so I don't have the the the full history um but what I what I have been told and what I've researched just this afternoon is that uh back or in early to 2024 um my predecessor had applied for a Workforce housing Grant from Minnesota housing so the state housing agency um on behalf of the H because again you know a lot of times the H isn't eligible to apply for funds but the Eda is so uh the Eda applied for funding for uh there's no name to the project yet uh it's just a work it's right now it's being called the workforce housing development project the address is 1800 West Highway 61 that's where it's supposed to be built there's already a developer and contractor and architect and everything in line um the project is uh supposed to be a three-story 16 unit um you know Workforce housing um project so I don't know if the Eda remembers that at all okay that CS well 18 West where now 18 1800 oh 1800 the 16 unit this sounds like um by the public works garage and I can't think of the guys the architect's name right now but um it he didg no it's it's uh it's West End it's by um like uh scruffy dog looks like yeah that's the one I'm talking about the top of the the H for the public works grud is a 16 un and say his name again um the developers Duval Duval okay yeah so that's and I knew he'd been granted the money so so um in September um the H or Eda I'm not sure um uh received word from the state that the uh application was approved and it's a million dollar or a million three somewhere on there um and so now most recently um uh the state approached the Eda saying okay it's time to sign or enter into the loan agreement and and all that all the you know all the paperwork um and so uh basically I'm asking for um permission for Eda president and I to sign this loan agreement agement um because Minnesota housing is saying that it's due very very soon um and uh we met or I met today with HRA outgoing H director Jason hail and he said um you don't need a resolution to for permission to sign this um so just you know ask ask your board and and see and um because I was worried I mean signing a loan agreement um and so um that's what I'm asking for and then um he said Jason hail said you know this is not binding you know we can you know if we sign it and then there's something later we can just you know work it out with the HRA and um a lot of all of the grant Administration for this project will be completed by the incoming H director and so in February when that person is on board then we'll meet again with the state and sort all out sort it all out on who's doing what and and um to move the project forward so so the city you know is offering that property for part of this agreement so um just make sure you I mean Mike's has heads our city administrator heads up on this from the architect or developers side of it but I think you should send him an email let him know that this is coming up from his side and make sure okay that awareness of that he may already but just in case it was in I can know the city has informally done that not formally transferred the right where we just have formally said a not to that so that well you there still has to be a formal and I guess the L last tidbit I would like to add is that this you know because it's upwards of a million dollars like the um the other Grant from uh the energy transition office um for uh the transfer station and uh the technate harbor plan um there is a lot of oversight from the state of Minnesota for for these funds um and so this grant as well will include um uh staff here or a consultant or whoever to be monitoring um and sending reports to the state on prevailing wage so that's a lot of um reporting so every two weeks reporting you know verifying that the contractors building these projects are being paid what they're supposed to be paid which is called prevailing wage so we've got several of those projects on for you to work with going on right now pring W stipulations yeah conversations for Developers so I'd make a motion to Grant permission for um either our director it wasn't a resolution right we no this is not a we're just saying go ahead yeah yeah proceed yeah happy for me to put my name on a million dollar note thank you thank you appreciate our what are we Sig when is the state what what deadline have they put in place for when they wanted that back by the end of this week end of this week okay providing you though time to reach out to Mike Roth yeah it will and I did during that 1:00 meeting this afternoon discussing this I um I must have appeared she must have the State Rep must have seen on my face how I was panicking and she she assured me that there's there will be some wiggle room if we don't get it in by the end of the uh of the week yeah we should be able to meet that but just um it gives us a day won't take that long to mic looped in and no issues so good that's something we I don't know if it requires any conversation for the city next week but then he'll know to do that and maybe it doesn't but okay good thank you thank you any other items that weren't on the agenda that we want to discuss now or ADD no that takes us through the Siri okay all right that takes us through the uh the meeting agenda uh is there a motion to adjourn January 21st regular meeting of the Eda motion to adjourn thank you I don't believe we need to vote on that I've heard it both way so I don't know okay I'll leave it any adjourned thank you thank you at 451 really impressive um speed of pressing 100 pages of two-page documents well organized thanks to Heidi for getting it all together you really did Heidi great job well thank you and and I will I promise to next month um have the page numbers added um because I I yeah saw that my predecessor did that um for you all last year and I know that's helpful when the size of the packets are so huge I just keep scrolling just keep we don't need like bank account Pages no we don't we don't I I think payroll sheets we don't part of into yeah I think that's fine how yeah if someone wants it they can ask for it and it's public information oh okay so one step further than the appendix is yeah leave it out entirely oh okay yeah so you I I mean unless someone really want a public person comes up and says they want to see it or they're missing it or something sure you know but I I've given I giving those documents out to people when they email hey can I take a look at that shirt here you go mm thank you yeah agreed watch us from mexic