le of allegiance and a moment of silence please i pledge allegiance to the flag of the United States of America and to the republic for which it stands one nation under God indivisible with liberty and justice for all
theres if you'll call the roll call please commissioner Coring here commissioner Lekkey here commissioner Barrows here commissioner Franzine here commissioner Lee here all members are present thank you very much open forum
do we have anybody that signed a form to speak today no Mr chair we do not all right thank you very much review and approve the minutes from April 8th 2025 any corrections
i'll make a motion to approve commissioner Franine makes the motion to approve commissioner Lee seconds that motion roll call please commissioner Coring I commissioner Franine I commissioner Lekkey I commissioner Lee I
commissioner Barrows I that motion passes on to number four review and approve the agenda any additions no additions or changes mr chair look for a motion to approve so second commissioner Franine makes the motion commissioner
Lubkkey seconds that motion roll call commissioner Franzine i commissioner Lebky i commissioner Lee i commissioner Coring i commissioner Barrows i that motion passes consent
agenda any items of concern on the consent agenda if not I would look for a motion to approve second motion by Commissioner Franine second by Commissioner
Lubkkey roll call commissioner Lubkkey i commissioner Lee i commissioner Floring i commissioner Franzine i commissioner Barrels i that motion passes number six Minnesota Power zach you're up already
that was quick if you want to you can come up and sit at the table here if that's more convenient for you it's up to you no it's up to you i'll stand i've been sitting for two hours so if you don't mind I'll stand all right uh it's I think it's been a little bit
since I've been here last time but uh a lot has happened with the Northland Reliability Project um Zach could you just do us a favor give us your name for the record please zach Okowski senior environmental compliance specialist with Minnesota Power on behalf of the
Northland Reliability Project so uh I I met a new face so I will give a brief update and give him a rundown and of what where we're at with the project along with everybody else so do we have a click or do you want me just to say that's why you wanted me to sit
there sorry about that thank you uh so as we're aware uh again just for background Northern Reliability Project is a 180 mile line stretching from Grand Rapids area at the Iron Range substation
uh to the Big Oak substation near Becker Minnesota and with a pit stop in between with a brand new series compensation station right here in the Riverton area um it's a double circuit 345 KV kilovolt transmission line uh 90% of it is
located within or paralleling existing transmission lines uh and with the expanded two new substations and this is part of a a MYSO approved regional plan project uh so in February 20 2025 on the
28th uh the P the public utilities commission uh approved the route and with the with the following kind of implementations here uh we did we did increase the the the consolidation and the paralleling of existing lines from 85% to 90% um with the reduction of new
rightway needed uh we expanded around the one of the conditions was to expand around the Swatara to avoid residences um and uh crosses the Mississippi River in in a in an existing rightway rather than creating green space and the rebuild of existing transmission line
here in this in this area over Little Rabbit Lake starting at Cole Lake Way um and then we we were able to go along the west side of the Cailluna Country State Recreation Area and then down in uh the Long Lake area we were able to increase
the use of tax forfeit lands instead of uh um re reducing reducing the amount of private land ownership that we crossed so uh a lot changed since the last time I was here and this was one of them again we got a route permit in hand with with these with the following conditions
so things are getting real uh there's a lot of lot of progress still to be made a lot of permits that need to be given but uh focusing on this neck of the woods a little bit more um as you can see we're able to
consolidate two transmissions lines a a 230 KV and and a 115 KV on one on one set of structures which allows us to take over the Northland Reliability project on the 92 line rightway i I mean if if we want to I I I can do a screen
share with you guys and give you a little bit more detail on how that works it's very complicated the engineers are still designing it but um instead of creating new rightway we were able to utilize an existing right of way by consolidating two lines so it's almost
two projects kind of if you take it into that aspect so um and that's for about 5 miles in Wolford Township and then we were able to do the same thing and reconfigure the existing transmission lines for about 7 miles uh in the Riverton area to allow the Northern
Riability project to stay on the west side of the Cailluna Recreation Area um and then like I said before we adjusted the route alignments down in Long Lake to uh place NRP on on more tax fit forfeit lands um and reduce the impact
on private land ownership there uh right here in the the like I said the collocation of the 92 lines that's kind of uh in this area here um it's by coal lake way down to the Cailluna series compensation station so those two lines
11 line and 92 line will be on one set of structures NRP will take over the right of way of the existing 92 line so no new right ofway maybe just a little bit if we need to but no no 130 foot wide right ofway that needs to be built
here now So so they can coexist so there'll be new structures then that'll much larger correct yes yep because NRP can't be um colllocated with any other line due to the reliability of that line
it's already a double circuit so in order to do that we would need to raise the tower structures up quite a bit so to to get that problem solved we were able to take the two smaller lines condense them into one line and then
have NRP take its spot if that makes sense so you got right now absolutely not right now you have two lines side by side 92 line and 11 line so the right of way is 300 ft wide right if we were going to add NRP we would add had to add another 130 ft so it would
have been three of breast right yep this way we took 92 line and 11 line i could say stack them and then NRP would take its place so there would only be two sets of lines down the 300 ft wide corridor or however wide that corridor
is now so my question though I'm thinking about uh air traffic air traffic so how tall are your structures that are um just under uh 160 140 to 180 ft okay yep just under FAA faa
requirements are 200 okay and we we have been working with the FAA around this area uh and so far so good so Okay yep thank you um again this is this is kind of the adjustment that we took uh around the
the Long Lake area as you can see we we we have a 90° going east and west there and we expanded the we expanded the study area just a little bit to make room for for adjustments if needed but um that little diagonal is almost through uh a lot of t mostly tax forfeit
as well as uh some DNR lands in there and then we were able to push the that where it goes north and south we were able to push that just to the the property lines of of the land owners uh and one of the land owners there had a sustainable forest so
oh I that's me oh oh perfect uh so the the ongoing and upcoming milestones here again we're we're the engineers are are working really really hard especially in this area to reconsolidate all these lines and figure out the outage constraints
and things like that so it's a it's going to be a tiered tiered uh progress here in this area um with a lot going on so a lot of engineering still needs to be still needs to be had uh state and federal local permitting obviously uh we're working handinhand with the DNR
for crossing permits as we speak um we'll start to gear up on the road use and road crossing agreements driveway permitting for uh for this construction equipment and construction exploratory soil borings and then the the big part here is the
Riverton 115 KV sub and um is is getting moved into the 230 sub so that little 115 yard that we have at some point will no longer exist as a substation and everything will be moved down to the Riverton 230 yard
um Benton County substation tree it doesn't really uh pertain to us here um a lot of the stuff construction is actually starting here in October down south in Sherburn and Benton counties on segment two phase one segment two uh so that will actually tree clearing will
begin here uh this winter and and things will start gearing up down there uh as I was saying phase two seg phase one segment two is that green part down below uh starting at the Benton County substation to the Sherco substation and then and that's that's
like I said October of this year into 2026 phase two which would be from the Benton County substation up to our area to the Riverton area uh potential tree clearing um again we're working kind of south to north uh exploratory soil
borings could potentially happen this winter in this area but uh not much construction probably in this area until 2026 27 time frame and then the phase three would be going from the Cayilluna compensation station up to the Iron Range substation in Grand
Rapids kind of a timeline for construction here and how things happen we start with tree clearing uh foundation uh structure staking staking the right ofway uh foundation installation and we assemble assemble the structures wire installation and
cleanup and restoration efforts after that again starting here in potentially 2026 and continuing in the inservice date of 2030 uh field surveys there's a few areas in uh before the permit was issued that we
did not survey because the the permit we weren't we weren't going in those areas so uh there's a there's a few areas along the route that we need to survey still due to the fact that they're new um and then areas that we weren't able to get to either we didn't have access or uh weather or constraints things like
that so field surveys will continue this summer uh starting actually in May sorry uh that's cultural resources wetland delineations birds bats bees and all that good stuff there so uh a little bit uh with the real
estate process uh we did we've been getting right of entry in order to do these field surveys uh that's that's been ongoing uh we are going to go through the easement processes and that's that was actually started in 2024 with uh uh with actually some signings
and that'll continue into 2026 and we'll continue to work with the land owners along that process construction 2025 to 2030 um easements options are created for the land owners and the they're presented to the land owners easement
easement exhibits are finalized and then uh the easements are presented and that's the what we'll have for for the right of way on any given landowner's property what land owners can expect uh again you know during this process construction staking you got exploratory
soil borings things like that we're restricted from working uh 7:00 a.m to 7:00 p.m uh vegetation clearing obviously uh erosion control measures such as silt silt socks and and blankets and uh matting things like that
potentially lane closures but that would be short durations and then we'd work those out with our road use agreements obviously and uh equipment materials crews construction and act basic activity with with construction uh and again 2026 would be the time frame here
in this area that's all I have right now again you can get us on our website uh it's interactive again the maps are interactive everything landowners can call the hotline or email us uh a question or concern and we'll we'll take
care of it uh promptly and yeah the northlandreliabilitypro.com is a has a lot of information and that is all I have any questions Mr chair uh couple things so land owners they um they can get a hold of you either on that phone number or
that email address with any questions or issues that they have yep please do yep and then um when you're talking about stacking the the current lines to make room does that mean you're your goal then is to try to keep the um amount that you're widening it down correct yep
that's to reduce the impacts yep okay cuz in a lot of this area we needed some we needed to deviate away from the line and it would have been or an additional 130 ft of new rightway and and it everything is so condensed here and so you know a little
bit more populated than most areas so it's it's hard it's hard to maneuver and and adjust so the next best thing would be to stack them and you can't stack the 345 KV so the alternative was to stack the existing lines that are there okay
yep okay and that's you're you're confident that you'll be able to keep it in the current constraints or you're that's what you're hoping to be able to do uh we're pretty confident um things things do change but at this point in
time I don't um that it it's the PUC approved route so we need to we need to stick within those bounds um there may be an additional maybe an additional 20 ft of rightway or 30 feet in some areas where the rightway isn't wide enough um but but that would be in my opinion that
would be the the most significant impacts as of right now but yeah we are the engineers are are hardressed to to keep that within the within the existing rightways so and there will be a lot going on over that little rabbit lake in that 115 substation so there's you know
and we're stacking multiple lines in that area and consolidating that so it it'll look a lot cleaner in my opinion cuz right now I think there's eight circuits going over Little Rabbit Lake um there will still remain eight circuits but it won't be boom boom boom boom boom it'll it'll be nice and it'll
actually look I think it'll look nicer in my opinion okay good thank you any other questions commissioner Cory mr chair go ahead yeah hey hey Zach thanks um Zach gave a presentation to
Commissioner Hog and I um Oh gosh it's been last year a long long presentation really good zach's doing a great job just a as I sit here just a curiosity question i guess I should probably know the answer to this but as you're going
along with the line and you need to take somebody's or need to have an easement through somebody's property obvious obviously they get compensated now you're saying you're going to go through a lot of public land are if you're going through county land
are are are we getting compensated the same equally as if it was a private uh or or doesn't it work that way how does that work mike I feel the easement process is somewhat the same right as a as a private land owner
different hi I'm Mike Putney from Minnesota Power i work in the real estate services department um we recently had a chat with um Tom Stra from the land services department here in Crowing County and there is a process
for acquiring easements to cross tax forfeit property in which case I know we'll um end up compensating the county for um like built into the value as timber consideration etc so we will be paying you guys you guys um will
basically be determining the price we offered to engage with a third party appraisal company if needed um if this was beyond the scope of what the county could or couldn't do at this time and um that's still on the table but yeah we're going to pay you guys what you tell us
uh your easement is worth and yeah the timber value etc um will be factored into that so it's not the same as us knocking on you know private land owners front door and sitting around the kitchen table but there is compensation
right Mike or Mr chair and Mike you're Mike you're looking good how's things going with you uh yeah things are good um and as far as as far as with the project uh I would say we've had overwhelming uh cooperation and you know
voluntary cooperation from land owners to this point um we don't have a lot of push back a lot of resistance where we don't think we're going to have to go all the way to the bitter end through the condemnation process with too many folks uh in this county or any others um
of course that's an option that the land owners have and if they want to do that they certainly can um but no it's been really really positive and we've been at this since actually like December of 2023 trying to get out ahead of this as
much as possible in areas that we felt super comfortable with where the route would ultimately be so yeah we've had uh a lot of time to develop relationships with people and stakeholders like yourselves as well so it's been all good and and Mr chair one other just one
other quick question for Mike so um can you remind me if you if you remember off kind of approximately off the top of your head with that new substation Crowing County that's you're you you're going to increase our tax
base by substantially with the line going through and the substation so the taxpayers of Crowing County are going to be receiving uh property taxes or off of off of you
also right yeah you'll be receiving property taxes um I don't know the exact mechanics of how those taxes are determined um I know that the substation facilities as well as the line facilities are taxed as I I believe um
oh what was I trying to say as um oh the word escapes me now of course um like personal property or yeah I think it's a different sorry something different I didn't read up on the local
taxing uh terminologies before coming here but yeah I mean for example when we bought that land north of Riverton um I think we paid $2 million at public auction for that property so I mean that in and of itself was a benefit to
Crowing county obviously and uh as far as logged it off too as far as Yeah yeah you guys logged it off ahead of the sale and that was wonderful we wish you would have uh taken uh all of the the butternut was it butternut trees that
were were discovered on the property but that's for us to handle now um but no uh as far as we're we're looking to build a facility that costs what is it i don't know that facility yeah it's a massive
number and I mean we get text for each mile of line that you know we run through our county so I think when we first discussed this uh with the previous county administrator it was something like 1% or maybe 1 to 2% of
like the overall um county's tax budget for lack of the correct word so you know just Mr chair if you don't mind one more comment you know a lot of people have asked me they said "Well what what are they doing this for what what's this for?" Well as and and correct me Mike
and Zach if I'm wrong um you know Commissioner Lubkkey and I both serve on Crowing Power also and you know with with all the people wanting green energy wind and solar and so in essence you
have to strengthen the grid so if if there's a demand somewhere you you you have to move it from somewhere else to make sure the power doesn't go out and that's what really this is is kind of strengthening the grid am I am I correct on that yeah I'd say that's a fair
representation i mean as we move away from like base load generation specifically coal um as like Minnesota Power is retiring its Boswell facility um up north of Grand Rapids and other utility companies are doing the same um
I think by is 2040 the year yeah that we're supposed to have all the coal generators offline um yeah we're having to rely more on more farreaching or farther away um generators of power so
wind fields um say in North Dakota or southwestern Minnesota um also solar farms that are either in existence or being constructed as we speak um say we're just having to be able to pull power and deliver it from farther away
distances because we don't have those base load generators on the system anymore so yeah it's just I mean I know I've heard Zach at these meetings before talk about we're basically putting in like a new highway system or interstate
system uh from which all of the you know uh distribution lines end up kind of fragmenting off and serving the the local uh residences and uh industries etc but yeah this is just part of
wanting to go away from fossil fuels this is like a necessary next step for us to make sure that we can do that seamlessly and the lights stay on well I sure appreciate you guys Zach and Mike you've you've really been helpful
to me uh in communicating to my constituents so I just want to say publicly that I appreciate both of you we've done an excellent job uh thus far with the project so thanks that's all I've got Mr chair thank you thank you any other questions um just maybe one
more comment Mr chair um Zack it looks like most of the challenger most of the thing will be the height we'll be seeing a a taller pole through those areas is or taller structure through those areas is where I think we're going to see the green thing right yep yep and I tell my
constituents a lot of them that ask about it I says "It's just a big extension cord because we can't get power from down here anymore so we have to get it from up there." Yeah and and you know Cole billion half dollar extension cord if I'm not mistaken or is it gone up higher than that now we're
Yeah about 1.4 maybe right now and in 2022 i know so yeah the local you know coal was localized to where it needed to be and you know it was we we could get by with 230 and 115 KV lines at that point but
if you if you take those localized generators and take them offline well we don't we don't have wind in Minnesota we don't have wind in northern Minnesota we have we have to get it elsewhere we don't have you know solar solar's a little bit further south more prominent down there i know solar's everywhere now
but how do you get that power to where it needs to go and where the load needs to be efficiently well you can't do it with 115 KBY lines anymore you gota you got to beef it up so yep that's all I had sir very good and you can if if your
constituents have any questions on what their structures would look like you know what they're going to be looking at uh we do have all those pictures online so if you want to point them there some good references yep okay well thank you Zach and Mike appreciate it very much thank you done a good job of keeping us
updated so yeah thank you with that we'll move on to land services chris Mr chair members of the board uh we have one item for your consideration this morning uh this is uh a request to review the plenary plat of tiptop first
edition uh this is a plenary plat request for partial number 68210711 that's located in section 21 of Ideal Township uh the request is to approve the plenary plat of tiptop edition consisting of two lots um can we go to page 49 wow you're already on top
of that looks like you knew what I was going to ask you see you have you have to be able to read my mind as you take her spot so just it's not easy to do so she's done a good job so so as a reminder the plaid of Tiptop was approved by the county board back in March of 2021 uh this was a plaid of the
tiptop resort that's off of Rucker Road um this request did require a variance from the planning commission board of adjustment for lot size and build area because uh before they recommended approval of the plat the main facts that the board used to make that decision that there are two existing cabins on
the site currently and then there also is the old lodge from the resort there as well and so um the board put conditions on um the variance that would a be to remove the lodge within 24 months which would be a substantial reduction in the impervious coverage on
the lot um as well as the two existing cabins on the site um would not be able to be made any larger or taller than what they currently are without coming back to the board of adjustment for another variance application request um it's a good it's just important to
remember that these two cabins that are there are existing legal nonconformities and could be rebuilt in their current footprint today with a permit regardless of if the lot were to be one larger lot or to be two smaller lots um it's also
important to note that um while this did require a variance it does meet the minimum standards set by the state in the Minnesota shore rule 6120 as far as 20,000 square feet per lot at 100 ft of lot width at the lake and at the building setback uh so the plan
commission did hold a public hearing on this on March 20th of 2025 and they made a 3 to1 recommendation to the board to approve the plenary plan of tiptop first edition uh the PCB way to develop a finding of fact for you on page 64 and 65 of the packet for your consideration
as well u based on the application submitted staff packet public comments and the finding effect is recommended to approve the plary plat of tiptop first edition um as I just want to note that in the uh we did receive um information from Ideal Township originally that they
weren't uh in support of the request but my understanding is that Commissioner Lupkkey has spoke with the township and they have changed their opinion and are now supportive of the request at hand i'd be happy to answer any questions any questions mr chair just a few comments
yeah in your in your report you had not received a comment as of 3:12 and their their comment came in at 3:11 I think is what it was not approving it um my main concern was it was just to make sure that um the the challenge I faced with
it is is that one cabin that sits almost hanging over the lake you know but after talking to both uh uh the planning commission member and also talking to um Dave Peterson from Ideal I'm I'm okay with the plat so and what you guys are
trying to do I understand it's a negotiation to try to figure out what to do as long as that cabin can't be made any bigger than it's sitting down there correct and the same footprint and they have to still come back for variance for that i'm I'm definitely okay with that and I'll make a motion to approve commissioner Lupkkey makes a motion to
approve the preliminary plat for tiptop first edition per findings of fact discussed on 32025 the application submitted the staff report on site conducted on 3624 and as shown on a certificate of survey
received 212 2025 i'll second it commissioner Lee makes the second roll call please mr chair uh Commissioner Coring go ahead uh Mr chair just to re get my memory straight this is the one that
we voted down or we didn't uh there wasn't there was there was no motion on it right last meeting there was no action okay no action that's what I thought yep okay thank you roll call commissioner Lee i commissioner Coring
hi commissioner Franzine nay commissioner Commissioner Lubkey hi uh Commissioner Barrels i motion passes thank you thank you human resources amy you're up
come on down good morning Mr chair and commissioners i'm here today asking to go out for an RFP for a private Minnesota paid family and medical leave options a little bit of information on it is the Minnesota
Paid Family and Medical Leave Law also known as PFML is scheduled to be effective January 1st 2026 crowing County as an employer is subject to this law pfml allows employers the option to elect either the state administered plan
or a private plan offered by insurance carriers that are approved by the state of Minnesota the private plan benefit offerings must meet or exceed the state plan staff at the county have discussed this concept with an ancillary benefits
broker Dan Oaks from Integrity Benefits and we recommend that the county board authorize conducting an RFP to obtain plan design proposals and pricing options for private Minnesota PFML options the RFP will satisfy Minnesota statute
471.6161 and there is no cost to be part of the RFP and no obligation to go with the private plan are there any questions any questions Mr chair we could do this inhouse if we wanted to we have to either go with the
state plan administered plan so the employee if they needed to take a leave they would apply through the state or we have to do a private plan yeah okay thank you any other questions mr chair just a a couple of comments with regard to this the state plan right
now is estimated at being a cost of about 888% of your annual payroll and what the law says currently is that employers have to cover at least 50% of that cost and we believe we don't even have complete clarification but we
believe that we will be able to negotiate the remaining balance or whatever that split would be with all of our labor unions even if we assume that at the least amount we're going to have to pay 50%.44% of our annual payroll is about
$200,000 so just from a dollar and cents perspective that's essentially two to three FTEEs depending on what you're looking at as far as the employee count or whatever position it might be so while we know that that plan very likely
might be the most cost-effective for us because of the scope of what that plan is offering as far as how many people would be participating in that pool we also know that it would be in our best interest to make sure that we are looking at all options which is why Amy is bringing this request before you to
get a private plan quote to see what that would cost us and potentially have some different cost savings that could be looked at there questions i just want to add too so with the paid
family medical the PFML um leave it's also needing to administer it so how does the state you know administering it with the state plan versus with a private plan you know this is something new for Minnesota and they're still trying to figure things out like we're trying to figure it out
on our end here too and so for employees and what's their experience because they're going to apply for the leave of absence um whether you know and the provider will determine if it's qualifying or not then on our end we still have to coordinate
um that that leave of absence with FMLA that we already offer and then do they use PTO to make themselves whole how does all of that coordinate and stuff too so even though there's a provider providing the benefit there's still a lot of administration work that has to
go on inhouse as well too with this new plan that the state is putting in place so would you describe that as an unfunded mandate yes yes thank you any other questions
i don't hear any i'd make the motion to authorize human resources to conduct a RFP for press and quotes commissioner Franzine makes the motion to approve i will second that motion second by Commissioner Lubkkey
roll call please commissioner Coring I commissioner Franine I commissioner Lubkkey I commissioner Lee I commissioner Barrels I that motion passes thank you very much Amy thank you county Sheriff oh sure
good morning there commissioners morning um I don't really have a lot for you today i'd certainly take any questions if you guys have been hearing anything or any uh uh any concerns from your constituents regarding traffic or any issues that are um seem to be a problem
in uh in your areas um I will just mention while you're thinking about that uh we had a a nice traffic stop the other uh couple weeks ago now or a week ago uh where we had a uh one of our canines Nick uh Sensor and
his dog Rehea made it they made a traffic stop and did a drug sniff around the vehicle and found some drugs underneath the hood that they thought they were going to hide from us which they typically would if that dog hadn't been
Uh so he was able to sniff that out and got a good find on that so we're uh pleased with uh these extra these extra resources that we have to uh combat this stuff so very good any questions for the chair chair go ahead Commissioner
uh just you know I think I've reiterated this before sheriff that over in Garrison um you know a lot of theft you know like the dollar store i've talked to somebody there and and uh I've talked to people
out in the Garrison area i know that Crowing County is a big area to cover and um I don't know what you can do but I don't know maybe more of a presence over there i just just relaying to you that you know there's some breakins and
some stuff going on over there that's not good and people are upset about it you know there's just it's a long it's a long ways from I mean it's close to the county line you know and it's it's just on the edge of the county line and so I
I just I understand if you have a couple people on at night it's hard to cover a county this big so just just relaying you that that that there's some concerns over there about the crime increasing in Garrison area yeah I'll I'll just
mention that we have uh quite a few of our deputies that like to work that area and they've spent quite a bit of time over there uh aggressively uh working in that area i did get a chance to go over there and speak with some of the uh folks as well after uh this was brought
up I don't know maybe a month two months ago and uh there is a definitely a perception of of uh an up tick in crime but I don't think uh it doesn't really factually meet with our um our RMS or
our records management system that uh so it's I think it's a perception but we're certainly there and very visible and wanting to do what we can to uh make folks feel better over there as well so we will continue to do that appreciate it thank you
any other questions for the sheriff all right thank you so much appreciate it thank you county Attorney Stephanie are you setting in for Don i am good morning everyone um I
do not have anything for you but I am more than happy to answer any questions that you may have any questions for Stephanie you're off the hook thank you have a good day everyone thank you county administrator mr chair senior management
team did not meet this week so I don't have anything to report there and I have nothing else on my agenda but would be happy to answer any questions you have of me questions for the administrator did you have a nice day off yesterday i did thank you okay you're welcome
all right additional business anyone have additional business does Renee have any business uh Renee is always busy i do have a a few dates that I think we want to make note of uh May 5th is Cinco
deio day may 6 is National Teachers Day National Nurses Day and Tourist Appreciation Day so we should all acknowledge those days they are very important may 9th the most or one of the
most important one Military Spouses Day we should make sure that we support them and recognize them for for their support of the individuals that are serving our country and May 11th the day we all owe our mothers
something so Mother's Day is May 11th so aside from that I would look for a What uh one thing I You don't like your mother i like my mom where you going uh where you going i believe it's May 1st is all veterans day um wasn't it uh
Victory in Europe Day i think it was Victory in Europe Day i think the administrator is checking it on thought I just a lot of things i thought I just read it i thought I just read it so um maybe I'm wrong well if it is we should honor it i will just say that i
would entertain a motion to adjurnn commissioner Lupkey I will make that motion to makes a motion to adjurnn non-debatable looking for a second second by Commissioner Franzine roll call please commissioner Franine i commissioner
Lubkkey hi Commissioner Lee hi Commissioner Cory hi Commissioner Barrels i thank you everyone commissioner