She will enter. [Music] Good morning everyone. At this time, I'll call the Crowing County Regular Board meeting for October 14th, 2025 to order. If you'll stand for the pledge of allegiance and a moment of silence. I pledge allegiance to the flag of the
United States of America and to the republic for which it stands, one nation under God, indivisible, with liberty and justice for all. Okay, at this time we'll have open forum and first one up I
would like to call on Jeremy Larson. remind you that there's a three minute time limit and give us your name and your where you reside. Uh Jeremy Larson uh 12893 Hesitation
Road, Dearwood, Minnesota, 5644. Okay. And uh me and my son are here just to see if we can uh purchase um some land um from my stepdad and and um yeah and
he was just wondering he's the purchaser and just if he can build a house on it if we do get it. Okay. I think that uh I would direct you to Chris. Chris is sitting in the row over there. So, if you want to have a discussion with him after the meeting, I
think that would be the appropriate person to address that to. Okay. Okay. Yep. All right. Thank you. And uh Ashton, did you have anything you wanted to add? No, not really. Okay. Thank you.
Next up, Kimberly Oliver. Good morning. Morning. I'm Kimberly Oliver. I live at 130 Kelly Ray Road, Briner, Minnesota. Um, I come before you today not just as a citizen, but as a survivor of the systematic intimidation, economic
sabotage along with the constitutional betrayal that I've experienced in this county. I not only speak for myself, but others that are in fear every time we leave our homes to be hunted and stalked by the police officers. We are not criminals per se. We have not
so much as broken the law, but we are targeted because we have seen corruption firsthand through our law enforcement that is not addressed. Um, people that are low-inccome don't have an option to fight for our rights. Uh,
we are denied defective counsel. We are denied numerous of our constitutional rights. Almost every time we have to deal with law enforcement, hunted, stalked, forced into felony plea deals, whatever, because we don't have the financial backing to stand up for
ourselves. We don't have the the financial needs to obtain our own lawyers, our court of important lawyers. It's not acceptable to have them as an akin county community corrections board member as our public defenders. I don't think that's a very
good thing. Um, it's it's very systematic when dealing with these cops and certain people. We don't have our rights. We're denied them at all costs. And I feel that because we don't have
our rights that we are being treated as less than human, like we don't deserve to breathe. And I don't think that's fair. Um, I would like to have that addressed investigations as much as possible because I know I'm not an isolated
incident. We have a very big community of people that are targeted by the police that don't have our rights. We shouldn't have to fear leaving our homes every time we leave because we feel like we're going to be erased. It's not acceptable.
Um, we should have people that are leading by example if they're if they're sworn into positions of our government or judicial systems as well as law enforcement. We don't have our rights. Why is that? Everybody else gets the rights.
Why do we as targeted individuals not have our rights? It's getting to be overwhelming the number of people I've talked to that have had their constitutional rights violated, denied counsel, denied any option to to defend
themselves, to stand up for themselves. We are treated, punished horribly. Um, it's I don't know how to live in this county because every time I leave my home, I'm in fear. It is not okay. I should not have to live in fear by those sworn to protect
and serve. Okay. Thank you very much. Thank you. Anyone else that would like to speak on a subject that is not on our agenda? Yes, Mr. McDermott.
Yes. I supposed to make out a form out there, turn it in. Well, that's the process, but you can go ahead and speak if just remind us who you are and where you reside and then there's three minutes. My name is Pat McDerman. I live at 15806
Miller Lake Road, Crosby, Minnesota. Okay, at the north end of Drumold, just bear with me, please. I'm going to go back to this is going on for 20 plus years
ATV club contacted district 5 uh commissioner at that time by the name of Doug Hog and uh so he promoted uh ATV trails which is good. I got an ATV myself and the
grandkids come up and love to ride on the ATV. And uh problem is uh the county has a contract with the ATV club that they maintain their own trails and uh including
putting up signs and stop sign, directional signs and that was neglected and come uh I guess in 20 plus years.
April 1st of 1920, COVID hit and I got hit with a stroke and uh so I spent uh after flying down to St. or Minneapolis, I spent uh nearly a month in recovery
and uh good thing my wife was able to be my caregiver after 55 years. She's still a caregiver. And the crux of the thing is uh the club will put out signs and when
they put out some of the signs that right in my backyard. In fact uh I had a uh get a variant because I got a smaller lot and yeah your variance is going to be 10 ft behind
away from the the monument that where my my backyard is. and they come and dumped a lot of uh tailings in there. And if I stood on my property, the tailings would have landed on my toes.
And that's where the trail is, right on my toes. And they go speeding through there and finally got them worked it out with the land up arm, Tom Stra, I believe his name is. And uh
so he had uh uh the land commissioner supervisor Gary Griffin don't remember his last name Griffin and they come out with along with Doug Oak. He come out there and and cited
viewed the area where it's at. And uh why should they go speeding by my yard? and they go speed and they they don't put down the township puts down the binder that they use for uh uh keeping
the dust down on the road and like I say it's been going on for years and finally the club went out there and putting some signs up stop sign uh the sheriff previously few years prior to that sheriff put up 10 mph stop
sign he says how do we regulate that there's I said the DNR has in their uh uh books for 18 or snowmobiles. Uh no more than 10 miles an hour past of a fish house by snowmobiles and he went
with that. So 10 m an hour that's too fast even with the dry erosion our both of our bathrooms upstairs and downstairs and downstairs. You gota with the windows open, you got to clean it daily.
And I'm not much of a housekeeper. My wife does it, but with the windows shut when it's snow because it doesn't create the dust. In fact, I talked to Jamie Lee on the phone one time just a few weeks ago, I think it was. And he said, "Well, the club had some extra money, so they
put the binder down, which is a sodium chloride that salt keeps the binder, the dust down on the road." And I can get my website and the cognitive thinking isn't
all all there yet. But it I just got my driver's license last license back. So I passed the medical written test, the driving test. Uh but they restricted me to 10 miles an hour, which is the county dump from my house. And just two days
ago, I think it was they increased after another medical evaluation for the driving test, they allowed me to drive 50 miles past my house now. So, I was able to drive in my wife would not she has no nothing to do with it. In fact, I alienated her because of all this
problem that I've been dealing with. And she says, "Give it up to everybody else. Give it up away dwelling on this." Well, it's a problem cuz I spent like almost a month recovering and she come down and pick me up at the at the Abbott and it
was Abbott. Yeah. And uh we get onto the state property line which is I don't know if you Let me ask you guys with a poll. Uh Mr. Caring, uh do you own a
ATV? Have you ever driven out on those trails? No, I don't own an ATV. Pardon me? No, I do not own an ATV. You don't? Nope. You don't own one. Have you ever driven ridden with somebody on the ATV trails? No. How about Mr. Borrows?
I do not own one. I have been out on the trails walking them, but not riding with anyone. That uh that the area that I'm talking behind my house. Yes. They pointed out where my house was. idea. I don't know that they pointed out your exact house. I just know where the trail
is or the proposed trail. I don't know about Jamie Lee. He's our new commissioner for our district. Did you do that with the sheriff's department? So, after you and I spoke on the phone, I actually spent some time out there with Tom uh on the trails and we checked it out and we were at your place. You
weren't home the day that we were there, but we were we have been through there and I I understand the situation. Um, I've also spoken with the sheriff and they've been out there twice enforcing and have come up with zero violations so far. So, okay. Now, let me comment comment on
that. Go right ahead. I would I'd see these guys. There's one to 15 ATVs blowing through the stop sign at the club. Let me back that up. When the club put the signs up, they just drove. And the year before that, the
power company ran another power line buried in the ground along the road all the way out to uh guy by the name of Jim. Jim uh I I no Jim uh uh
he owned some land along Milder Lake. He's got some shoreline there. And uh they go come out of off the trail which is probably maybe 15 10 15 miles an hour 15 at the very max because it's roller coaster.
So they hit that plow drone. They just gunn it out of there and trail of dust behind them. Everybody's wearing masks, N95 mask and bandanas. Even the little the little kids are right in the back of the UTVs.
And my understanding is they got to have insurance to ride those trails at least on the county road part of that's not a county road that's state land. And uh but the county gave me easement rosemary uh at that time I applied for a a small
lot easement variance and you made a mention back that's 1996 you make a mentioned that that flood plane area back there and we do a site visit that's why I'm
coming and present this problem to you guys to do a site visit out there for these ATV or and when the sheriff gets called, I call the sheriff and report it and I apologize to the county, the dispatcher,
the 911 operator, and I made a terroristic threat that if you guys don't do something about it, cuz my attorney originally, and you've all dealt with him before, most of you did anyway. Uh he said, "You got to make a lot of noise. Bet. This is going to be
get very expensive at over $1,300 an hour. I being retired, I I can't afford that guy. No, no way. But I'm a pleading to your intelligence that uh going to do a site visit and
move the trail either away or enforce it by the sheriff. The sheriff won't enforce it. when you said that he said he's made two calls out there was because of me calling these guys are violating the stop signs that the club put up and I don't know well one I know
when I stop and talk to them Pat you can't do that you can't infringe upon the right of freedom and uh my family says that and they're ready to disown me but uh Mr. McDermott, I've been very considerate. You know, normally it's
three minutes. Um, I understand your issue and I think that, uh, Commissioner Lee and I and we'll work with those clubs and see if we can't get something done there. I've been begging that for years. Well, nothing's done.
We will carry We'll carry the water. There's nothing you can do. You're not going to do anything with them. We will carry the water for for you. So, just be assured that it's going to get addressed. All right. Sooner than later because I not might not be around.
I get it. The odometer keeps moving, doesn't it? Yes, it does. All right. Thank you very much. That's the only time I get correct. We'll move on to number three, which is to review and approve the minutes from
September 23rd, 2025. And I think well, we'll take them one at a time. Motion to approve. Motion by Commissioner Franine to approve. Second. Second by Commissioner Coring. Any discussion? All in favor signify by saying I.
I. I. Not in favor. Same sign. 3.2. Amend the 82625 regular county board meeting minutes. Motion to approve. Motion by Commissioner Franzine. Second by Commissioner Coring. All in favor signify by saying I.
I. I. Not in favor. Same sign. That motion passes. Number four, review and approve the agenda for today. Any additions? Mr. Chair, no additions or corrections to today's agenda. I would look for a motion. Commissioner
Coring makes a motion to approve. Second by Commissioner Franine. All in favor signify by saying I. I. I. Not in favor. Same sign. That motion passes. Number five, consent agenda. Motion approved.
Second by Commissioner Franine. Second by Commissioner Coring. All in favor signify by saying I. I. I. Not in favor. Same sign. That motion passes. Move on to number six. Minnesota Power
34 345 KV transmission line project. Mr. Jankee. Good morning. Good morning, Mr. Chair, members of the board. Um, nice to meet you all. Thank you. Uh, my name is Drew Jenkee. I'm an environmental compliance specialist with
Minnesota Power. Here today to give an overview of the Maple River to Cailluna transmission line project. Uh so the project itself will be jointly owned by Minnesota Power who I represent
um along with Ottertale Power and Great River Energy. It is a new overhead transmission line um at 345 kilovolts approximately 160 mi. Um we're still working through the routing process so
but 160 mi is an approximation. The project will run from Ottertale Powers Maple River substation just outside of Fargo, North Dakota. And the other terminal point will be Minnesota Powers Cailluna substation in Iron.
A little bit of background and need for why we're building the project. Um there's four main main points here, but really starting with enhancing the reliability of the regional transmission system. um increasing transmission system capacity
uh meeting growing electrical demand and enhancing resiliency during extreme weather events. And then this really is going to allow for cost-effective uh transfers of energy at the regional scale. A bit more background on the project. So, the mid-continent independent system
operator or MISO, um, which is the system operator that was established or approved by the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission in the early 2000s. Every so often, they approved these batches or tranches of projects. And so in December of 2024, MYSO
approved trunch 2.1 uh which included 24 projects spread throughout the upper Midwest. And the Maple River to Cailluna project was project number 20 approved in this recent trunch 2.1 batch of projects.
Uh a bit more on the components of the project. As I mentioned, we're looking at approximately 160 mi pending final routing and design. uh will be built on double circuit capable structures. Uh we are going to operate the project initially as a single circuit. However,
both sets of conductors will be hung initially and jumpered together. So it'll operate as a single circuit to begin with and then at some point down the road when that second circuit's ready to be energized, that second set of conductors will already be strung
during the initial construction. Uh and then looking at the substation work, there will be some expansion of the Maple River substation. That's Ottertale Powers substation uh just outside of Fargo. And then on the Cailluna substation end, we don't anticipate any
expansion as part of this project. There'll there will be some equipment additions within the fence in the current graded area. Um and then you know as we progress through the routing process there may be some rework of existing transmission lines that come out of that but we're working through
that and and pending final route approval. Bit on the timeline here. So um really where we've been we hosted an initial round of uh public open houses in June uh and we have another round occurring next week. Um so we'll have two within
Crowing County here next Thursday. one in Breezy Point and one in Baxter. Um so we've had postcards out so we'll be back in the area uh next week. Uh and really looking forward uh we'll be going to the public utilities commission for two types of permits. Uh first one is a
certificate of need which is essentially just like it sounds. We go to the public utilities commission with a fairly lengthy application stating these are the reasons that this project is indeed needed in the interest of the public and our rateayers. We anticipate filing that in either January or early February of
2026. And then the second permit that will go to the PUC for is the route permit, which is where we actually propose a route and then hopefully get approval for that route. And we anticipate filing that later in 2026, probably around
August or September. And then once uh you know during that time we'll we'll proceed with engineering uh and landowner uh engagement for easements as well. Uh pending approval and and in and progress. We anticipate construction
starting in 2029 with the line going into service in 2033. So this is uh what you're seeing on the uh the board here is where we started initially. So you can see the Maple River substation at the far northwest end just outside of Fargo and then the
Cayilluna substation on the far southeastern end um in Iron. We started with a very broad study area and that's what's depicted in gray and then within that we have the blue shaded areas uh
that we identified as potential routing opportunities. We based that on existing high voltage transmission lines to the extent we could uh within that initial study area. And since their uh I guess last round of
open houses in June uh based on feedback we received from both the public and state regulatory agencies, we've refined those initial routing opportunities into preliminary routes. Uh, and that's what you're seeing on the bottom right hand
side of the picture. So, really what we did was cut out a large portion of that initial um area in the southwestern uh study area. Here's that figure a little bit better here. So, this is these are the areas where we've winnowed it down to. Um,
again, we're we're working through uh you know, still engaging with land owners, state agencies, federal agencies as they come up. Um, and these will be refined even more by the time we file for our route permit. I mentioned the Minnesota permitting
process a bit here. Um, here we've got the certificate of need and route permit processes side by side and kind of give you an idea of where we're at. Uh, on the certificate of need front, we will be filing our certificate of need notice
plan. Um, and that is actually subject to or on the PUC agenda for October 30th. So that just outlines who we notify. It'll be essentially all the people within that area that was on the previous figure. And again, anticipate
filing that certificate of need application uh early in 25 or 26, excuse me. Uh we will be uh doing a little bit of permitting in North Dakota. um they have some nuances or differences uh between
the states, but here's a bit of uh background just for awareness. So they're on the North Dakota side, there's a certificate of public convenience and necessity akin to Minnesota's certificate of need and then they also have a certificate of corridor compatibility and a route permit which
is similar to the PUC's route permit process. again a bit on where we've been and where we're going and where we're at. Um I mentioned we started with that initial study area went into routing opportunities. Right now we're in the thick of developing preliminary routes
and that's going to be an ongoing and iterative iterative process um with the intent of identifying a proposed drought next year and uh going into the state for approvals. Uh, I mentioned, you know, we've we've
really refined the potential project area and continue to do so. And really what we're out at these public open houses asking for is what are we not aware of that we should be um whether that's routing opportunities. Uh, more
often we hear about the constraints. So, we want to hear all those uh as well, but those are all subject to engineering constraints as well. So there there's a a lot of balance that's going into this routing process. Uh we will be performing environmental
studies uh a full host of them. Um again we need to get a bit more refined in our potential routes before we send field crews out. But this gives you kind of a a starting list for the surveys that we'll do. We'll do geotechnical evaluations which really feed into the
structure design and which types of structures we can place and where and then getting into more of the environmental uh cultural and archaeological resources, wetland delineation surveys and then any protected biological species and that a lot of that comes through consultation with the department of natural
resources. I think my clicker might have died. Thank you. Uh so this is our preferred structure design. So it's a steel monopole with double circuit capable. Uh what you see there uh there's three
three conductors that hang on either side and each side would represent one circuit. So as I mentioned, we'll hang all six conductors, but they'll be jumpered together and operate as a single circuit initially. The structures themselves are up to 180 ft tall depending on topography and where
they're located. And the right of way width required for these types of structures at 345 kilovolts is 150 ft. As I mentioned, we're we're we prefer collocation and we're actually driven by state statute and policy to route
colllocated with existing transmission lines. And in those scenarios, we have the opportunity to overlap right ofway um about 30 feet. So it would reduce our new anticipated right ofway width to 120 ft off of the outside edge. Again,
certain sight specific constraints could you know uh adjust those numbers here and there. uh in certain instances we may have to pivot to uh some some tubular lattice
towers or just straight lattice tower structures. Uh typically we look at these structures in poor soil conditions um primarily swampy areas. We don't anticipate placing these uh lattice
structures in acultural fields. we should be able to uh stick with the monopole design, but again pending some crazy engineering feat that we can't get over, we're really proposing the monopole structures, but need to keep
those lattice tower options open. Uh this one is, you know, typical pre-construction and construction activities once we do get into construction. I went through some of those initial surveying. Uh there'll be some staking involved with that as well.
And then it starts with foundation installation, standing up the tower, stringing those conductor wires, and then there's a clean up and restoration phase that comes along with any type of project like this. And I touched on community engagement a
bit, but so we launched our website and had our first round of open houses in June. Uh we are going to be back in the area all of next week starting in Fargo, working back towards the Briner area here by Thursday. Uh and then you know there's tons of engagement through that
public utilities commission process as we approach that as well. I believe that's all I have. Any questions? Questions. So here's the way I interpret it and tell me if I'm right or wrong is this
really this project and the other project that's going down to I think Becker down in that neck of the woods. It's more or less kind of strengthening the grid because I perceive there's so much of this green kind of BS that when
the windmills aren't the wind isn't blowing and the the solar panels are covered with snow, you got to have some power. And so you got to be able to go strengthen the grid so you can feed it one way or feed it the other. Is that it's kind of a simplistic
thing, but I is that kind of what it is? Yeah, I'll I'll start by saying I am not an electrical engineer and I don't pretend to be, but yes, the way you described it uh is kind of the need and intent of the projects as a whole. So, you referenced the another project, the
Northland reliability project that was approved in the first trunch of MYSO projects. So, that was yes part of the MYSO process and this is that second round of projects. So, they do work together, right? Um but yes as our generation sources primarily renewable
um with intermittent resources there is a need to increase the broader regional transmission system not only for intermittent generation resources like that but really we have an aging electrical transmission system infrastructure. So it's an upgrade of
that and really it's it's it's big it's it's regional. So myso covers portions of 15 states and the province of Manitoba. So, it's really enhancing the regional transfer capability. That's what these MYSO projects are in for.
And Mr. Chair, I would just say that Commissioner Lubkey and I are on Crowing Powers Board of Director also. And I'll tell you what, people don't realize what it takes when when you turn on the uh light switch or your electric
toothbrush, what it takes to provide that electricity, whether it's, you know, the coal fired plant out in uh Bismar, North Dakota, or it's getting to be a lot of natural gas um kind of um what would you call them?
um kind of they they kick in when when you need extra power. Believe they're peaking units. Yeah, peaking units. Okay, thanks. So, just one more question. What what's the cost of this project? That is a good question. I don't have that off the top of my head. I know
there is a cost assoc or estimated through the myso approval process. Um, I don't have that on the right to you at all because I think the other the Northland reliability project was around $1.3 billion if I'm not mistaken.
Sure. And I wasn't on that project. It'll likely be similar. I can get you MYSO approved or MYSO anticipated costs. Um, but we will have a cost estimate associated with our permit. That's okay. I was just curious. So,
thank you, Mr. Chair. Commissioner Lee. So with regard to the certificate for need, that'll be filed when you finally finalize where the route is most likely going to go. Correct. So the certificate of need application will actually preede our final route
design. Uh we have a statutory requirement to file that certificate of need application by February 7th. there's a one-year um window where we had a right of first refusal option and to claim that we have to file our
certificate of need by February 7th. And so we anticipate routing, we need a little more time to get 160 mi worth of routing designed. So that's why our route permit application is going to lag that uh one year or February 7th deadline.
Okay. I know you've had several meeting or are having several meetings now. You already had one um that we attend in Ironton, but at what point do you start notifying the individual property owners then of
when it's most likely going to go through their area? I'm going to defer. So Mike Putney is also with me. He's our land rights agent with Minnesota Powers. I'll let Mike answer that. Hello. Um yeah, so to your question, we
anticipate getting land agents um out meeting face to face, calling, knocking on doors early quarter 1 of 2026. Okay. When we have a much better maybe not quite final, but a much more close to final idea of where the rout's going to
be. Okay. Um that that's great. Uh, I guess my thing I'll mention to both of you is just um do your best to be as early and as often with our residents as you can cuz
communication is paramount with them as I don't know if you were involved with the previous project but I know that was uh Okay. So you you understand some of the hiccups we had then so just that's my request to you guys is make sure you talk to as much as you can. So Mhm. Thank you.
Thank you Mr. Chair. Um, how much new rightway are you going to need to acquire? Is it just are you still going to be in the same corridor where the transmission lines are now or are you going to be running a whole new route through there? Yeah, it'll be, you know, we target
collocation or parallel routing. Um, in those instances, typically we can overlap about 30 ft on one side. So, in that scenario, we would be looking for 120 ft of new rightway. Um but standalone if we aren't able to
colllocate or parallel route it would be 150 feet wide. 150 feet right away. Um the other thing is is and I don't know if anybody you know when we see the transmission lines we have around the area. Now this is a transmission line on steroids as far as the height and stuff compared to what we
see in our area and where it comes through our area. I know it's going to be a little bit of a challenge where you're coming through if you're coming through DL and stuff like that. when you get up in the in the lakes area, it does become uh observable when it's that high up. And that'll be kind of a a challenge that we'll we'll face as we get through
that. Part of the reason that that some of the other reasons that that we have to do this is because we don't produce as our our production of power in Minnesota has been kind of curtailed by the fact that we have a a nuclear moratorium and aren't building any more plants and we've decided coal is dirty
and we're shutting them down. So to me, I I use this analogy of saying we need a bigger extension cord because we're not producing it right here. And so I think that's uh and but there's also a great need for it, especially with what's coming down the road with the AI and everything in in regards to data
requests, the amount of power that's going to be consumed there. So um I plan to be I think I was at the Pine River one that you had and I'll also be at the Breezy Point one. So thank you. Sounds great. Thank you, gentlemen. We look forward to additional updates as this project moves
along. So, thank you very much. Thank you. Thank you for your time. Enjoy your trip in central Minnesota. Okay. Always. Move on to number seven. 7.1 is the Leler Acres final plat.
Good morning, Chris. Good morning, Mr. Chair. commissioners. Uh we have six items for your consideration this morning. Uh the first item we have under 7.1 is the final plat of Leler acres. Um the parcel ID for
this is 5304 0576. It is located in section 4 of Center Township. The plenary plat was approved was recommended for approval by the planning commission and the board of adjustment on August 21st of 2025 and then subsequently approved by the county
board in September 23rd. Uh we did not receive any township uh comments for this request and all requirements have been met for the final PL application and recommend approval as submitted. We'll be happy to answer any questions. Any questions for Chris?
If not, I would look for a motion to approve the final plat for Leler Acres. I will make the motion to approve. Motion by Commissioner Lee, second by Commissioner Coring. All in favor signify by saying I. I. I. I. Not in favor. Same sign. That motion
passes. Thank you. Thank you, Mr. Chair. Uh, the next request is for the preliminary plat of Axel's Land for the following parcel number 8831 0577 located in section 31 of Plat Lake Township. The request is to approve a
conventional design plenary plat consisting of two residential lots on Plat Lake. The property is located off of South Plat Lake Drive. We go to page 21. There we go. So, this is the location of the property. This is a little bit unique. This is the property being
subdivided, but there's a chunk that is also in Morrison County to the south. Um, and so, uh, this is located, actually, this is located in government lot five, and it's located in section six of Richardson Township. Um, and so this
does have its own legal description. It's a separate parcel of land. And so, um, if we can go back to the um to the plot itself, let's see, how about two?
Yep. right there. Perfect. So you can see here's Plat Lake here and this is lot one. This is lot two. That parcel Morrison County is right here is where that So when um when lot two um is conveyed, there'll be the deed restriction to say that this these two
lots will have to be sold uh together. The plan commission and the board of adjustment did hold a public hearing on September 18th and made a UNAS recommendation to the board to approve the the plat of Axel's land. the the plan commission and board of adjustment developed the finding of fact found on
page 229 and 230 for your consideration as well. We did not receive any township comments for this request based on the application submitted staff packet public comments and the finding of fact as recommended to approve the plenary plat of access. Staff have reviewed the file and concur with the recommendation
from the PCBOA. I'd be happy to answer any questions questions. Mr. Chair, just a curiosity question. How does that work on that that little sliver in Morrison County? Do they I would assume they put some kind of a value. So then they get a tax statement for Morris.
Absolutely do. Yep. There's they do get a tax statement and they will continue to do that. Nothing will change as far as valuation and how that's handled. But I would assume the value isn't a whole lot because they can't build on that little sliver. Uh, I I didn't look at the value, but um I you know I would
um there is definite value to it because without it this is a non-reparing lot here on lot two. So Okay, Gary, you had something to add? Sure. Uh good morning commissioners. Typically what we do when they straddle a county uh boundary line is think of
valuing that whole parcel without that line and then we work with the other county assessor and we aortion the the the value between the two counties. Oh, no kidding. That way so it's still only going to sell for X amount. It's just got a unique uh dividing line in it. Okay.
So you work with them to come up with a value for the whole thing but then a portion out probably that little sliver then I guess. Yeah. This would be like a 2575. More of a curiosity question. Just kind of interesting, unique. Thank you, Mr. Chair.
Any other questions? But if not, I would look for a motion to approve the preliminary plat for Axel's land. Motion to approve. I second that. Motion by Commissioner Coring, second by Commissioner Lubkkey. All in favor signify by saying I. I. I.
Not in favor, same sign. That motion passes. 7.3 is the final plat for Axeland. So all requirements have been met for the final plat of Axeland and recommend approval as submitted. Motion to approve, Mr. Chair.
Motion by Commissioner Coring, second second by Commissioner Lubkkey. All in favor signify by saying I. I. I. Not in favor. Same sign. That motion passes. Thank you. Item 7.4 Four is a land use map amendment request for New Wave
Property Management LLC. This is for parcel number 77190503 located in section 19 of Mission Township. The parcel is located at 13128 Mission Park Drive. The request is to amend the land use map from Shorland and
Real Residential 2.5 to commercial. So if we go to page 260, we can look at the There we go. So here's the this would be Mission Park Drive here. This would be Ky Road 3. This is Spur Oak here. And this is the property that you can kind of see with a
highlight here. The area that you this is the the Shorland district here that you can see. And that's where you see the blue Shorland zoning here. And then this is the Shorland from a coming from the other direction. And that's why this the yellow boundary in between is that area that's nonshorland that would be in
that rural residential 2.5. And what they're requesting to do is to take this parcel here and basically change the zoning on that to match the pink this commercial zoning that's in the area. Uh a commission there was a conditional use
permit that was approved as well by the planning commission um at the meeting that they held on September 18th to allow a commercial storage facility. And by um amending the the land use map here to commercial, it would also allow them to have outdoor storage on the property.
Uh Mission Township did send in a letter to us dated uh September 11th, 2025 and they supported both the conditional use from permit and the Luma from the township. As I mentioned that there was a public hearing held on September 18th and uh the PCBOA did make a unanimous
recommendation to the board to approve the land use map for this parcel from Shorland and rural residential 2.5 to commercial. Um they also developed a finding of fact found in your packet on pages 272 and 273 for your consideration and based on the application submitted
staff packet public comments and the findings of fact is recommended to approve the land use map as submitted. staff have reviewed the file and concur with the recommendation from the planning commission board of adjustment. I'd be happy to answer any questions, questions, commissioner lucky. Yeah.
So, it's in the shoreline district, but it's actually pretty far from water. Correct. Correct. So, uh as a reminder, determination. Yeah, good. That's a great point. Uh so, the shoreline district is 1,000 ft back from a lake and it's 300 feet from a from a stream or a river. And if it's on
the Mississippi, it's 500 ft. That's the extent of the Shorland district. And so that's what this that's what this buffer line is right here shows that thousand foot buffer and then this would be a th00and foot buffer for a for a different lake on the other direction. And so you're right it's it is right at
the you know very edge of the of the Shawn district and part of it is actually out when you see that yellow area right there. Absolutely. Yep. Any other questions, concerns? If not, I would look for a motion to approve the land use map amendment.
Motion to approve the land use map. Commissioner Lumpkkey makes the motion to approve. I'll second it. Second by Commissioner Lee. All in favor signify by saying I. I. Not in favor. Same sign. That motion passes. 7.5.
Thank you, Mr. Chair. The next item uh is for a land use map amendment request for parcel number 9023057 [Music] located uh in section 23 of St. Matias Township. The request is to amend the
land use map from agricultural forestry to rural residential 5 involving approximately 80 acres. Uh so if you look this is the partially in question here that they would like to um amend the map towards. Just for a location this is car road 122. We have 20th
street to the south. We have 90th Avenue in this direction. Um as a reminder the colors the this right here the blue is rural residential 5. The green would be the egg uh agricultural forestry district and then this little area of brown here is rural rural residential
10. And so the request is that they want to have this area here match this here to have that be 5 acre um 5 acre zoning. As a reminder, the agricultural forest district minimum lot size is 35 acres. So basically a 40 um can't be subdivided
um any more than what it currently is based on that. Uh St. Matias did send in a letter dated August 4th of 2025 supporting the land use map amendment request. There was a public hearing held by the planning commission board of adjustment on September 18th and they
made a unanous recommendation to the board to approve the land use map uh for this parcel from agricultural forestry to rural residential 5 involving approximately 80 acres. The plan commission board of adopment did develop a finding effect found on pages 283 and 284 of your packet for your
consideration as well. And based on the application submitted staff packet public comments on the finding effect is recommended to approve the land use map amendment as submitted. Staff have reviewed the file and concur with the recommendation from the planning commission and board of adjustment. Questions concerns commissioner.
Mr. Chair, so uh St. Matias did township supervisors sent a letter of support on this. They did. Okay. That kind of surprises me, but because if I remember the Bill Marshall project, they were upset. They didn't
want it to be 5 acres. They wanted it to be 10. So I've changed their position apparently. Yep. Yeah. We did we received a letter from them on August 4th, 2025. It was on page 279 your packet. Okay. All right. Mr. Chair, Mr. Lostm is
here. Peter, if you want to speak, it's up to you. I if that'd be okay with you, Mr. Chair. I don't know you anything to add. I don't It seems Okay. Thank you. Thank you, Mr. Chair. If there's no other questions
or concerns, I would move the adoption of the Chris, were you done? I'm sorry about that. Yeah, absolutely. Okay. Yes. U Mr. Chair, I would move the adoption of the land use map amendment for the uh Peter Lostramm property. Commissioner second.
Coring makes a motion to approve. Commissioner Franzine seconds that motion. All in favor signify by saying I. I. I. Not in favor. Same sign. That motion passes. Congratulations. 7.6.
And I at this point this is my brother-in-law's property. So I'm going to recuse myself from consideration. So Commissioner Franzine, if you would take over. Okay, Chris. Thank you. The final request today is for a land use map amendment for parcel
number 78340608 located in section 34 of Noki Lake Township. The request is to amend the land use map from agricultural forestry to rural residential 2.5 involving approximately 20 acres. Um if we go to
we go to two let's go to 28 288 the next page. There we go. Kind of give us an idea of where we're at first. So this is uh um highway 18 here. Uh this would be in the area um like where the um Greenland would be located. This is Grave Lake. You have Pinehurst and you
have Amrood Road. Let's go back up to that other 287. So again you have uh the lake over here as we talked about. Here's that buffer area. And what they're looking to do is basically take the area that's in blue
and basically reszone that to our 2.5. It's about 20 acres. And we did not um receive any township comments on this request. So everything that's stay everything that is currently Shorland will stay Shorland. Everything that's out of the Shorland district would be
would be zoned to R 2.5. If you can go I'm sorry. Could you go back to that other map 288? You can again see just to the north that's what that all this yellow is that R 2.5. So there's definitely um 2.5 acre zoning in the area. It's just north of the little creek that comes through that
connects um those two lakes there. The plan commission board adjustment did hold a public hearing on Sep September 18th and made a unanimous recommendation to the board to approve the land use map for this parcel from agricultural forestry to rural residential 2.5
involving approximately 20 acres. The uh plan commission board of adjustment did develop a finding of fact found on pages 294 and 295 for your board's consideration as part of your packet based on the application submitted. The staff packet public comments and the finding of fact is recommended to approve the land use map uh amendment as
submitted. If staff have reviewed the file concurve with the recommendation as well I'd be happy to answer any questions. Uh, Madam Chair, so so what it would be, Chris, is you'd turn on Pinehurst and then you'd go down and take the first left on that dirt road on M A M A M A M
A M A M A M A M A M A M A M A M A M A M A M A M A M A M A M A M A MRO and that that would be how you'd access that property. Correct. Okay. Everything and then once that's 2 and 1/2 acres, they could plot that plot that off and Correct. They'd have to come with a a a
plat or or they would be able because that's in the nonshorland area, they would be able to create five lots every three years without having to actually go through a plat. And that's administrative process that can be approved by the department and doesn't need county board approval. Okay.
Any other questions? And no objections from the township. Uh no comment from the township. No comment. Okay. Uh, Madame Chair, if no other questions or comments, I would move the adoption of the land use map amendment for the Stefan Mr.
um, land use map amendment. I'll second it. Okay, we have a motion by Commissioner Coring, a second by Commissioner Lee. Any other comments? Hearing none. All those in favor? I opposed. Motion carries with
Commissioner Barrows abstaining. Thank you, Commissioner Franzine. Thank you. Thank you, Chris. All right, we'll move on to 8.1, County Sheriff and the JPA for the correctional facility pilot
program. Morning. Good morning. It's been a while since I've had the opportunity to stand in front of you guys. Um, like to take a few minutes to share an exciting partnership opportunity between the Crowing County Sheriff's Office and the Minnesota Department of Human Services, specifically through the
state operated forensic services. Uh, DHS has launched a two-year pilot program focused on improving access to mental health treatment within county jails, particularly for individuals who may require involuntary or injectable psychiatric medications. Uh the Crowing
County Jail was selected as one of the initial partner sites after DHS reviewed survey responses from counties across the state. This means we'll be working directly with the state's forensic mental health experts, psychiatrists, nurses, social workers, and pharmacists to enhance how we assess, treat, and
support inmates experiencing serious mental health needs. This is a nocost partnership. I repeat, there's no financial obligation to the county. Uh the value comes from technical assistance, staff education, and consultation DHS will provide to help us
strengthen our policies, training, and care practices. Ultimately, this agree agreement allows us to bring state level expertise into our facility, build staff confidence, and ensure we're providing the most ethical and clinically appropriate care possible for those in
our custody. I'm requesting the board's approval to enter into this joint powers agreement so we can move forward with DHS on this important initiative. And I brought Anna Anderson over. She's our jail mental health worker and she can kind of answer some of the the specific as she's going to be our point of
contact working with the DHS. So I have a couple questions. The first one being what is our current process if we deem that the individual needs psychotropic meds and injectables?
Well, I don't know if you can speak a little bit specifically to the injectables. Yeah, currently we do not offer um involuntary injectables. If we do have an inmate that is taking an injectable medication, we do special order that from a pharmacy. However,
with um insurance often suspended with an inmate, the costs associated with that is anywhere from $1 to $4,000 depending on the type of medication that they take. And that's specifically the anti psychotropic medications. Uh that
doesn't count insulin which is an injectable as well. So we order it, comes in and then the RN Yep. Our medical provider approves it and then RN would administer that for the patient. Okay. And I would assume that these
individuals are committed then that we're giving injections. Some are and some are not. Interesting. And this is a DHS initiative. It's interesting because in any of your
CBHS and that they have to be committed in order to receive injectable medications, correct? And yet they're in our jails, we're going to look at it a little differently. So if insurance is suspended, who pays
the $4,000 or less, whatever it might be? Well, we typically pay the upfront cost and then we bill the patient or the inmate and that's something that they carry with them as they as they leave. Do we know what the uh collection rate is on that? It's not very high.
Yeah. So, there is a cost. There is a cost. Yes. But it's always been a cost. So, it's not this isn't any different in terms of keeping records. Will that increase tracking what we're doing for the sake of the JPA?
Um, I think minimally I think the DHS will be able to provide us some structure on what that reporting and that recording process looks like. The reason I'm asking is the capacity of our staff to take on
more of that logging the information. Well, unfortunately, we now have the electric uh record system in our medical department now, which will streamline a lot of that processing and the the records keeping. Okay. Okay. And I did see that that's a requirement for this opportunity. So
So I I wasn't going to say this, but I'm going to say it now. My caution is to all of us as board members, commissioners, is that in the mental health world, what I see is that there's more and more chipping away for our jail personnel to have to
deal with mental health more and more. And so this is probably a future thing, but we need to consider and look at what we're being asked to do in our jails, which is more and more of what used to be the mental health
process out there. So I just put that out there. It's just a statement. I don't want to go any further than that with it at this point, but um for the administrator, something to keep on your just remember it as we go forward
because we continue to add they ask us to do more and more and uh I understand the issue with that. I will Mr. Chair, Commissioner. So right now we've had it where if somebody comes in and this is
says involuntary meaning they aren't asking for it. We're saying that we're going to give it to this person because they are who determines that that they're off coming off coming unglued. The wheels are coming off and you decide you need to give them give them some kind of
medication to calm them down. Is that what this is? Well, we're not to that point yet. We don't we don't force medications on anyone in the in the facility. this right here. They're going to kind of help us create what that program and that structure, what that'll be. Yep. Because we've had challenges in the jail
and with jail staff where somebody comes in there and they're not they're a bit unstable and uncstable could be probably a really nice way of putting it. But and there's nothing we can do for that person that's in there under and this is just kind of heading in that direction as as Commissioner
Barrows mentioned that we're heading down a path that really wasn't jails weren't really designed to be mental health facilities. They're they're tending to shift that responsibility from the state onto the onto the counties unfortunately. Thank you, Mr. Chair. Yes,
Anna Troy, when with the implementation of this program, this will be something that's done in consultation with the medical provider, with our CRA team, with our with our folks who are actually working in that realm. So, it will be with our social workers who are seeing and addressing some of those needs, our
medical providers. It would be done in consultation to figure out what the need would be there and how it's going to be. It's not just willy-nilly deciding a co saying we should we should do something here. This is a a pilot program to help identify if this is another tool in the
toolbox to be able to address what the needs are in that realm. Concerns. Any other concerns? Can you um [Music] ultimately it's going to be a doctor that's making that decision, right?
Based off of guidance from staff and and you correct? Yep. Okay. I believe it has to be a psychiatrist that has to make that decision, not just an MD. No, it can be a medical doctor.
Really? Mhm. Then why do we hire psychiatrists and CBH's? You don't have to answer that question. Commissioner Barls, uh, can I I'll ask one more question. Do we have somebody of the two doctors? I think we still
have two doctors that kind of oversee that. Isn't one of the doctors in more trained in this area than the other or or would those be the doctors that would look at prescribing this under this pilot program? Well, I our physicians the the doctors
that we have contracted with that's a little bit outside of their scope. Okay. Um we do have one that specializes with substance use disorder. Um but mental health and substance use disorder kind of go hand in hand to to a degree.
So it'll be another doctor that'll actually be overseeing this pilot program. Well, we wouldn't bring in another doctor. They would they would be getting training. So part of this pilot program will provide education and training and that'll be for our providers as well. Okay.
Any other concerns? Where does the funding for this come from? This the county or the state? The state. Okay. Thank you. There's no other Commissioner Barrows. Um, we've got Steph has a comment or a question I
think she wants to add in. Stephanie, can't hear you. Is your mute on? I didn't want anybody to hear what I was doing before I got called on. Good morning, everyone. Good morning. Um, I took a look at this as did Kelsey.
Um there's a lot of changes that are happening in the criminal world and they're looking at actually having some um commitment type work done on the criminal side of things. Um and like um
Mr. Chair talked about things are happening on the criminal side of things and things are happening within the jails. um that is still being explored and we're trying to figure out the actual avenues
that are happening that way. Um but I think there is an anticipation that we'll actually have court orders um just like in the commitment world and they're called Jarvis orders to um put forth that medication. Um but it
will be through DHS. So, I anticipate either court orders um or something along those lines to um actually do the involuntary medication. It's not just going to be, you know, two people say that this person needs this medication
and it's going to be a 24-hour turnaround. I think there'll be a lot to it because it is through DHS. So, um that's kind of my thought process. Kelsey may have something more, but she read through everything as well.
Very good. Thank you. If there's no other discussion or concerns, I would look for a motion to approve. I will make the motion to approve. I look for a second. I will second that motion. Commissioner Lupkey makes the second.
All in favor signify by saying I. I. I I not in favor. Same sign. That motion passes. Thank you very much. Thank you. County attorney.
Now you can speak. Good morning, Mr. Chair, commissioners. I don't have anything for you this morning, but I'd be happy to answer any questions you have for me today. questions for Kelsey on her first uh visit. Did you have anything to add to uh the
presentation by I don't I I reviewed all the documents that they sent us and I agree with Steph. It's more of a training resource opportunity at this point and I think we'll know more once they kind of come in house. But like Steph said, I think we're going to have more direction on how medications are administered and that sort of thing once we get going on
that. But nothing to add from what Miss Shook provided today. Okay. Thank you. Thank you. I go ahead. I I would just say that I agree with the chairman. I I I think I think all of us on the board here are suspicious, always
suspicious of what's happening with the state. It's always this uh it almost seems like a a carrot and then down the road all of a sudden we're paying for it. And that concerns me because then the only alternative we have is property
taxes. and um a lot of shifting and it's it's kind of spooky. So, thank you, Commissioner Cory. I just want to comment on that too since we're on still on the topic. I I agree with that statement. I think that's the concern for me is one is the cost cuz ultimately somehow we're going to end up
paying for this. I'm okay with it as a pilot so we can see what it's going to do. Um, but I'm also apprehensive about who the ultimate control is going to be on somebody getting forced to receive a shot they didn't want. So,
[Music] I think we need to as a board, and I would say this across the state, we need to be watching this real close, but we also need to put pressure on our electeds at the state level to make sure that there's a more appropriate direction to go rather than through our
jail system. And with that, administrator, your opportunity. Mr. Chair, commissioners, the first item I have before you today is a vacancy on our ENRAT committee on the natural resources advisory committee with the passing of Larry Moses. There is an
atlarge vacancy on the committee and this is an appointment that comes from the from the board. So past practice has been that we have advertised for folks who are interested to submit a letter of interest for your consideration and then
an appointment can be made at that point. So the recommended action before you today would be to advertise the vacancy on the natural resources advisory committee to solicit letters of interest from the public until 4:30 p.m. on November 5th. So do you need a motion on that?
I do. Please move. Motion by Commissioner Lee, second by Commissioner Lubkkey. All in favor signify by saying I. I. I. Not in favor. Same sign. That motion passes. Thank you. And I would like to make a comment. In the comments here, it says the NRA
committee. That's a whole lot different than the ENRACK committee. We'll make sure that gets fixed. Thank you. Um, Mr. Chair, the second item I have before you today is the senior management team report. The senior management team did meet yesterday. We had a very full agenda with different
topics. Our first item we discussed was an update from our continuous improvement committee as well as a project report out on a project that was recently completed with some cooperation and onboarding of folks who are eligible for some services within our community
services department that want we want to make sure that we are reducing the administrative burden that's happening when they switch from one type of waiver program to another based on aging into one or the other. So that was a really good exercise that our program team had
gone through and they provided us a little bit of an update and overview of that project which ultimately does show process improvements, better quality service that's offered to our uh service folks and is a cost savings as well. So all the things we hope to see from our
CI team. We also reviewed the 2026 budget process because we're getting ready to start the 2027 budget process. So, there was some discussion on what worked well with our first venture into the 5-year budget realm. Uh, we had some conversation around what the process
will look like as we move into 2027 to continue that enhancement and grow our CIP, our capital plan from a 7-year plan to a 10-year plan as we move into 2027. So Nia, we got some um ideas and
suggestions for our finance director and we will continue that work into the future. And then we also discussed cyber security which seems to be an ongoing topic that we talk about at almost every meeting. At this point we're looking at things that we can do
to help create our backup plan. What happens if we no longer have access to our computers or our phones? What are the ways that we are going to continue to provide services? What is our backup plan if we don't have access for
anything and how long can we sustain that? What does that prior priority look like for our IT folks to get things stood back up? And we'll be continuing to work through those exercises as a tabletop exercise over the upcoming meetings as well.
And finally, we looked at some we reviewed the refinements to our performance management software templates that we've talked about in the past so that we have those ready to roll out for January of 2026 as well. That's all I have for you today unless any of
you have any questions for me. Any questions for the administrator? All right. Additional business, Mr. Chair. Um, Mr. chair as long as Gary's sitting here. Uh just wondering, I'm sorry to put you
on the spot, but just wondering, you know, it's the 14th today. I believe uh tomorrow is the deadline. And I'm just wondering how things are going with the staff and how things are going and and um permitting. And if you got any updates, I guess I'd be interested in hearing how things are going in your
department if as long as you're sitting here. Sure. Uh Mr. chair, commissioners, uh, frankly going very smoothly. Uh, we've, um, really kept up, uh, second half is usually, you know, quite a bit less than the first half. It seems like, uh, we
could have 20 more staff to process tax payments and keep on top of them, but, uh, it's been going very smooth, frankly. Uh, no hiccups. Everything's operating good. Um yeah, and uh we I think we're past the
peak even though tomorrow's the last day. Usually Monday and Tuesday, this week's usually the busiest, but So yeah. Okay. Otherwise, I don't really have a lot of updates. No, I know it. I I um the only other thing I guess I would say
is if you haven't been down to uh this little park uh or one little county park down south, there's a new trail being put in. I think the boardwalk got put in and installed and uh it's looking uh looking pretty nice. The only thing, Mr. Chairman, is they
put a ballard in where the trail is. I can't ride my golf cart on the trail anymore. So, was specific for one person. I was just going to Thank you. Gary, let me ask you. Is there is there any parks in district three?
Um county parks? No. That's all I just All that's all I need to know. none of district three is within with you know the county it's just the cities Mr. Chair, Commissioner Lumpkkey. Um, Gary, um, I
did have a conversation and I told the, uh, person who talked to was Patty Norard who had been through the Milford mine and she mentioned how great it was and I said, "Well, make sure you send, you know, it's not in the district I serve, but make sure you send Jamie one and and also and she said she had her what it was her grandkids and stuff out
there and she just couldn't believe how nice that park really turned out." So, yeah. Uh, Commissioner Lubkkey, um, she mentioned, uh, Milford and and the one up there. She thought they both were spectacular. Yeah, I think I think she said something like we knew what we were doing. Uh, so I
thought I I don't know if Patty would have said that, but but I'll have to look at that article or that that note she sent me. Yeah. Thank you, Gary. Yeah. Thank you. And Mr. Chair, maybe one other as long as Jory's sitting
there. any any Jory, we don't hear from you a whole lot, but uh how's things in your department? I know we just hired a or you just hired a uh new uh facilities director. So, any updates on anything at all the the sinkhole or uh Sure. I'm I
can maybe Renee wants to know about the sinkhole so they can fill you in, Mr. Chair and Commissioner Kin. Thank you. Uh the sinkhole project uh was connected last Friday. Uh they're continuing some utility work. Uh if it's not covered up already, I walked over this morning and
there's multiple utility lines running through that trench that they had to dig. Uh which did make it rather difficult, but uh Home Big Excavating was the contractor who came in uh and performed the work and they did an outstanding job for us as they have uh uh in other projects that we've had. Uh
that should be getting wrapped up in the next day or two here. They were back filling this morning. Um, so the sinkhole should be behind us now. Uh, land services generator should be hooked back up, which was a casualty of, uh, that sinkhole broke the line underneath
uh, that runs to land services. Uh, they got that hooked up again last week. Um, you asked about one. Oh, the facilities uh, manager position is filled. Uh, Kurt Wilche is uh, the uh, new facilities manager's name. He lives in Mayfield and
he will be starting with us on Monday. So you'll get to meet him at personnel uh Monday morning. Okay. Thank you, Jory. Thank you, Commissioner Cory. I just want to caution you that pretty soon none of our SMT members are going to come to these meetings. I know it that's like that called out
when they're sitting here. So I want to piggyback off the administrator for a second on what she said. This is cyber security awareness month. So we should all be aware of watching ourselves with our emails and any communications that we have. Second
thing is it's breast cancer awareness month and we should be understanding of what happens when these situations take place on any cancer but this month particularly breast cancer. And the last one I have is this is
domestic violence month and tonight there's a the candlelight vigil down at Lyman and White. If any of you are interested in joining, we will read the names of the individuals that have died due to domestic violence. So with that,
there isn't anything else. I would look for a motion to adjurnn. Second. Motion by Commissioner Franzine, second by Commissioner Coring. All in favor signify by saying I. I. I. Not in favor.