meeting. Um it is 603 in attendance. We have Anthony Zachini, Jason Gumper, Elizabeth Stoton. Everybody had a chance to read the minutes from the 61125 meeting. Yes. Any questions, comments, adjustments?
Motion to approve the 611 2025 meeting minutes. All right. Request for certificate compliance DP file number 150-0464. Request for complete
31-10-6A. Our friend David and Elizabeth Bill Kovi Bill coie the plan. You guys can see here that the lawn stabiliz everything was looks good. He inspected
it. I have no issues. Yeah. I'll make a motion to uh give a certificate of compliance for D file number one. Second. All those favored. Certificate on compliance under DP file
150-77 request for complete certificate of compliance of 38 country David Fazino and Lynn Fazino 38 country club drive east mass It's part of a bigger group. Yeah, that this one is
Yeah, part of a bigger. Um, that's the one that went to the site. Oh, yeah. There was a lot of lawn debris dumped. There's pictures of the zone. There's pictures in there. Yep. So, if that's good. Oh, yeah. Let's
see. But this is a partial, right, Alex? So, it'll release that bot totally and any that are address. A partial for that address. All right, I'll make a motion for a
partial certificate of compliance 38 Country Drive. All right. Notice of intents NOI- 20225 23-0 for the dredging of Blackman Pond to remove sediment as well as other park improvements subject to the wetlands
protection act 310 for wetlands protection applicant town of Eto 60 center square east mass 1028 continue from 6. Yeah. Go ahead. Make a motion that we
uh continue to this to August. All those in favor? I Okay. A notice of intent NOI 2025-30 14A for the construction of single family homes subject to the wetlands
protection act 310 CMR10 local wetlands campary construction LLC 128 Federal Street with Springfield Mass 01105 Five. I just hear from the for the land owner
um campaign this single family home. This was part of happy cut off lots of lots at the time. They just showed these stylized houses for each lot. We're here to do a permit for lot 14 which is
approved under the notice of intent for the subdivision. Those are still valid. So we have the flags and Mike put them on the plan here from the original house is in a similar location it was it was proposed under the original notes and obviously there's more detail to it
now. They actually have a house plan. um out of the front loing in the back. This is the buffer zone here. So only the back corner of the house is in the buffer and a little bit of the grading on this side. Subdivision approval showing monumentation along that that limit of
work line. Um this is the wetland that it's closest to this area here. You'll just see lawn um this area that's behind the not disturbed line. It's pretty much open now. There's no shrubs and some grass be
minimal grading really no tree removal required roughly some no disturb markers out there along the limit of work so everybody's well aware of where how far they can go you know once they once they own the house
from the subdivision, but they can be upgraded as as needed to to be, you know, most effective. That's essentially it. walked that subdivision three times. I know, right? Anybody have any
So looks good. Anybody else have any questions? Comment about the wetland permanent. Did you mention permanent wetland marker? Yeah, sorry. I was having a fellow hearing you. Yeah. Sorry. Um I don't know how to speak.
Yes. I'll make a motion to anybody else have anything to add. Make a motion to close the public Thank you. Um, looks pretty good to me. limit. We have like our standard ones that I
want to include any of them. And then We have to read each of the standard ones or can we just say our stand? All right. All right. Three, the following special conditions prior to commencement of any work on the site including any clearing or grading
adequate erosion and sediment barriers as shown on the plans identified in general condition 13 shall be implemented and maintained in effect through out the entire construction phase. It is the applicant and or property owner's responsibility to inspect and
maintain the erosion cementation control measures and to take any additional measures. event and or property owner shall maintain sufficient supplies of sedimentation controls on site to deal with normal maintenance and any emergencies which are
sediment sedimentation control measures. Before any grading or excavating can take place, the applicant and/or property owner shall notify the commission construction meeting with the applicant and or property owner as excavation contractor prior to beginning of
construction. The contractor employee took provided with a copy of this order and thereafter said contractor will be held jointly responsible with the optimum property order for any violations in the penalty shall be as shown on the plans
identified in general condition 13 and attached herein. Permanent limit of work lines shall mean that no grading or clearing shall on the limit of work line with dry materials including but not limited to grass clippings, leaves, brush, cement,
asphalt or ashes, no tree land area. The name and phone number of the person responsible for monitoring erosion and cementation controls must be provided to the commission and event Due to an emergency at the site during any 24-hour period, including weekends,
this person shall be given the authority to stop construction for erosion control places and to oversee the cleaning and proper disposal of waste products. The commission must be notified immediately if the designation shall be left in stable condition at the
close of each working day. Erosion and sedimentation controls shall be inspected at this time and maintain a reinforces necessance with supporting documents submitted with the notice of intent. The department of environmental protection storm water management policy as app
activity described on the approved plans and approved documents referenced in this order. any other or additional activities in areas within the jersey or its agent. You guys get all that
you want to do one for permanent work. It's not It wasn't in there. It wasn't in there. No, that was those were just the general. So yeah, with the uh um the addition of permanent limit, what do they call them? Pylons or concrete pylons?
Yeah. Name is escaping me. Anybody want to second that thing? I second. All those in favor? Hi. Hi. Thank you. Thank you guys. Not quite read out yet.
All right. Request for determin determination applicability RDA 2025 Summers Road and 0 Summers Road. CES parcel ID 95-34-0 and 95-36 protection act and local bylaw applicant
were a farm LLC 8986 Summers Road East Sasso 103 Great. The applicants, uh, Bill and Jason of We're a Farm Parm LLC. Uh, we're here tonight, uh, for the RDA. 96 Summers Road. Um this is down on
Summers Road down near the state line. Um Ensley Drive. Um we are here. Uh the jurisdictional area on the property is in regard to um an old farm. the 100 foot jurisdictional buffer zone
associated there with um currently uh the area has been sort of uh what the RDA has presented as well is a restoration plan uh which depicts some blueberry bushes being planted
in the pond. and then the rest to be lo and seated and reveated. Um I believe Alex or kind of walk the the line there of the pond. So um generally it's the
restoration work within the um so just requesting that the RDA sort of set the delineation of the pond and the downgrading uh within that jurisdictional area. So, it's there's any questions that uh
that answer do around the pond. You want to uh basically reveate, plant some blueberry bushes um just um up adjacent perennial pollinators like kind of like uh bees, you know, get some bee habitat
against the pond here. And then the red um I think you ceased. Yeah, we really haven't done plans when we're going to start working the rest of the property that we were going to come back and see you guys. Um,
a lot of the vegetation has is all natural vegetation there. We do plan on adding, like you said, some blueberries. Think they would grow really well there. Obviously, we won't add them till till the fall. too,
right? But then um we do have bees on uh our property uh flowers and stuff like that would be great. So help Yeah, we can use some help.
Come on. I guess I know we're supposed to have one. What is this going to be? uh in the jurisdictional area. Yeah. The Yeah. Where the where the vernal pool is. It's all
that means kids will go around and look our site walk that the the banks of the father are briefly at some point. come back with. Yeah. Yeah. Right now, we don't plan on doing that. We're not touching it. And
how about so you can see through it. You can see what's happening in that pool. A lot of interesting stuff. We talked about the difference if we were to do that but they circle that area right
garden fence is considered anything lower than 36 in so you can see through it spaced right there today and I spent the last two days hand planting pumpkin seeds for How close did you go to the pond to the
vernal park we're out of the jurisdictional area on anything else my my only point is is within that jurisdictional area it's all now I'm not quite sure that a fence would make a huge difference because there's a
wall of grass and growth at this point. Growth. Okay. I think planned on doing at this point. So if we could just talk about and bomb which is perennial is for our
aviary and it's also for our farm operation. the uh farm pot. We clearly put a lot of work into this, but I I think personally it requires a notice.
Yeah, we haven't done that. No, I mean you've done that. Do you have a response to that? because I thought when he walked and met with you guys out on site, it was decided that an RDA would be sufficient because we weren't looking to
restore it back to what it was per per your guys request. So, um it was my understanding that RDA was always to that area. We don't plan to We have other things to worry about. I can kind of add to that
sort of permanent u improvements in there like if you're going to go into the buffer zone with some parking or some a structure in there. Uh what's being proposed restoration within that 100 foot buffer zone um that's shown on the restoration plan. There's no permanent structures or
impervious area or anything of species between the bittersweet and the prickers that you've all seen or people that came out. Where's Where's the 100 foot? If you can see it, it's uh build right around here.
Right. You want to go in there and disturb that? We don't want to do anything. Yeah. Look, I'm sympathetic to your cause. I mean, I want to see that place. Then we have to we think that what what
we did for, you know, clean when we cleaned the pond is all grown back. and stuff is all bad. Um, nothing was permanent and we're just we just added to it because you guys asked us to,
but if we don't have to, fantastic. Keep in mind this this farm pot was a pig pod previously, so Um and so it can be utilized for irrigation for
the farm purposes. Um a barn pond or a barn purpose. How's the trash? I'm sorry. There's to work with us on a weekly basis there to continue to clean up the land by hand picking trash up that's on the ground.
But having 52 20 yard dumpsters of trash for 20 years this place was left dilapated with no warnings or nothing. No, it's your liability. Yeah, it's any thousand times better
than it was. Sure. Yeah, I believe it. Yeah, I think the the improvement within the buffer zone is is substantial improvement over what was there. It's going to be reb. So to be clear, those those bushes top
and bottom those are to be planted or or are planted to be to be planted to be planted. But if you are not to do that, our understanding was that you wanted them in that buffer song. We
would be happy to work completely out back. Everything that was disturbed is back, right? So, I would like to see it like that outside of the trash. You guys feel about that? Does anyone remember the way back and just
I mean, or do you want them to go in there, see it not disturbed again? Super. And if you guys remember when we came here brutally in the falls because we went in and cleaned it and we didn't come and see you guys because we didn't know any better like you know so we're just
don't clean anything just leave it as it is. We'd be glad to do so. We have other areas that we can play plenty of other stuff to do on that site. Yeah. Yeah. So 25 generally is well not to speak I can
speak from my past experience on the board on some and um me personally if you were just going to leave it alone then I'd probably be fine with an RDA. Okay. You're obviously going to have to put in
uh erosion measures and you could probably make it what you want. Me personally, to go the NOI route, right? And that was our plan. So, our plan was to correct what we did and and leave it
as We do an NOI and a complete plan and and and how we were going to um change the area and make sure that was in compliance of uh we absolutely are and we've been working with the um NRSC and the um and the farm
service agency, you know, to try to figure what we are allowed to do in agricultural um property. So, uh you know, so we're kind of registered as a farm and then find out. All right. Good. And then member of the
Massachusetts Farm Bureau. Yeah. But also Perfect. because you know obviously farming is federally protected and then find out what your uh how much leeway you have with and I'm sure the board would be
me on the board would have a kinder ear farm owner as well. Um, Elizabeth of a negative three, which is basically they're going to leave it alone if they choose to do anything. Ask if anybody else wants to get that
far and then close the club with me. I can speak for everybody. about this in the audience what 16 forms kind of across the street from there. And my only question is we we always seem to be putting the card before
We can't even talk about what the uses of this property are. Been in the planning meeting which we're going to again next week and they keep telling us, you know, I mean what we're doing right now with the pond and I I'm assuming that that's all fine if we needed to to
be further than I have with that. Is there any runoff? We can follow them. Again it see it seems funny to me that we don't have like planning board here about the you know about the uh but I care about
which is going to have an impact happen there in the future depending on use crop. But I you talked about having conservation land. Well, I mean, we can't speak to the future of that
place, any other part of that place. Well, nobody can do that. We only have jurisdiction. I mean, I I've heard discussions here of of the owners saying that they will never put a never put a restaurant there or a bar
through through the chair. Through the chair, please through the chair. Gentlemen, sorry. I'm happy to talk to him about you address for conservation and we're here to talk about the buffer zone and what the planning can't do within that buffer zone but we cannot talk to planning or
future use a planning board question or whatever other you know committees they have to go before. Sorry guys I we just we Anybody else have anything they want to say? Questions? Yeah, go ahead.
Cheflesio two forks road. So on the buffer zone issue there, I guess versus the Yeah. So if they decide So so basically I'm asking to educate us because this is of course. Yep. So basically what area and now it's all grown back to what
it was originally which is native grasses and everything else. So what we're here to discuss is that we've disturb it to plant bushes which is kind of counterintuitive. We don't want to mess it up if we don't have to. If it's all grown back we're going to leave it
as it is. if in the to say what they want to do and we'll see if that's with the jurisdictions and it all also depends too on if it's agricultural farmland use versus that helps. Yeah. Okay.
Anybody else have questions comments? Um, so I'm just just to be clear like is there anything on that plan that you want that that effect?
I was in like a negative three which to that in the comments here. Um, and you could make a special condition saying not to perform any of the work and to leave it alone. Absolutely. Yes. Yeah. Absolutely. We can put that in. Um
plan things then you could just like under an RDA you could approve that they're removing it by hand. So just is that the What determination? Yeah, they're listed um on the third. Exactly.
positive one. Who is saying that? the delineations are accurate. Y that's true flag them. This negative3 says the word is they asked all of these questions. So
you answer you give us all of these determinations. Okay. Unless there's one more on the fact saying that there's no way all four terminations then the questions that were asked right me was a vote on how
so you wish you I've never heard of that before because they they all have You can't I don't know that you can do that. So removing feeling judging or altering requires filing. That's
all right. So it's not a positive one, but if it's multiples we're getting at. Yeah. Bless. moving and dredging requires that future. It's just saying positive one's just
saying the area is jurisdictional. It's not saying confirming it's jurisdictional is really what we're saying. I'm with you. I think the there's they updated the form recently how this different
Oh, you can have multiple multiple something. Well, no. We can actually just say we can do this. So this like a positive 2 a negative yeah I don't feel comfortable I don't
feel comfortable with this showing positive and a negative and multiple positive negative saying that the area is jurisdictional. motion for C the activities a negative saying that they're not subject to file notice
of intent and then for D you are saying that they don't 23 yeah it's right here he wrote it out and then I yeah That's right. Any like you need to specify like what
work you want to allow is not to. Yeah, that make sense. One more each other. Yeah, the only one that make a motion to close the public hearing. Second. All those in favor? I motion pass.
Nations subset A. Yeah, just just make them want them to perform from that restoration plan. So if you don't want them to we have but we have to
because they need to know what they're this is all for that one just that one and if they don't want if you don't want them to plant any of blueberry etc then um we have to tell them and the room that's still what you want me to do
about what? So, and the area is jurisdictional. So, if they were to like go in with an excavator and dig a big trench, that would require a notice of intent. Got it.
Can I just ask question in the uh the evasives if if we can at least if you got We prefer lap because that way if we want to clean it we can but it's not something you're enforcing. Absolutely. Then that'd be great. And if you are
enforcing it then that happens that colony does it probably be better to like later in the year so that you want them to plant the blueberry or is it just leave it the way it is Stay. Perfect. So,
make that in. That was just so apply these to these but no it's So any work that they're invasive they do.
Yep. And they don't have to planes. Yeah. All right. Um any work in this area will be done by hand to remove invasive species only. And the determinations on
A would be positive one, B would be a D would be a -6 D would be -3. Yes, I'll see you be a negative three. So one one positive one two positive 2 a
3g -3 4 second second all in favor You want it to be correct, right? You want it to be correct. Yeah, you're good. You're good to go. Thank you.
Excited to hear about the other one that's at the park. So, that's next. That's getting Yeah. Yeah. I'm sorry Josh. It's all closed. Um so all of you
Yeah. So a positive one determination jurisdictional area. So it's basically within our jurisdiction and if they decided to do any filling or dredging in the future, they have to file a notice of fantish for Resource areas described on the reference plan
are confirmed as accurate. So their delineations are correct. Confirm they're accurate. The resource area boundaries confirmed and its regulations regarding such boundaries for as long as this determination is valid. The negative three is the work described in the request is within the buffer zone which
we said jurisdiction under the path. Therefore, I said work does not require require the filing of notice intent subject to the following conditions which we said if they're going to remove these back. And then the last one is the negative six is the area and or work
described in the request is not subject to additional review our town bylaw on the wetlands. We have an additional bylaw that that's um related to the wetlands protection act. Did that help? Normally I just we're just walk people
lane and turn 100 foot plus the hard line. So not the hard line but it's it's the furthest line 25 depending on what the wetlands look like and where something is situated, what they're trying to do. Um but yeah, sometimes we can go down to 25 but usually
kind of like our Yeah. and it's already grown back from when they pulled everything out before. So, we'd rather just leave it and not sell mentality here, you know, invite people. I know
totally people have hard hearing. You really can't hear Come over and say hello. It's a good question. I can hear you asked about that. Yeah, this could be your last name. Sure. I was just thinking for other people too,
right? I'll talk in the speakers for back here. We get any more 2025-1 seam stream alteration at 633 to 759 Summers Road
has been up. He's applied for cur requirements are, okay, and how that pertains to our jurisdictional area. So that way we don't duplicate efforts or make him go through both permitting processes. But he's making progress. He's actually No, I think that's okay. I agree with that. You guys good with
that? Yeah, sure. Okay. But we have to vote on that or what? No. Um and then uh EO 20221 quarter room 83 uh just our 30 days is up. Um I did have to ask you for permission
to give it another 30 days before we put it back into summary judgement. I think that's fine. are getting requests for the you guys. Yes. Alex, please. is the continuation of Heritage Park. We
do assume they will have all their information. Correct. We can hope. Um do we need to just as a precaution? Yeah. Because they have all their information. We were in our little room over there
and I got yelled at by a lot of people because we have chairs like um we didn't know you were going to show up. That's why I was that was wondering you should probably just ask for a bigger space. Okay, cool.
Anybody else have anything? I'll make a motion to adjourn this meeting. Second. All those in favor?