Yeah, good. Township of Medicine zoning board of adjustment regular meeting of November 18th, 2025 is now in session. Adequate notice of this meeting as require required by the open public meetings act of 1975 has been provided by the annual notice published in the home news and
trabune on December 13 20124 as posted in the main lobby of the missile complex of December 18th 2024. Please join me in the pledge pledge of allegiance to the flag to the flag of the United States of America
for it stands nation. >> Council roll call please. Mr. Mr. Cer >> here, >> Mr. Patel >> here. >> Mr. O'Gorman >> here. >> Um, >> Chabra >> Chabra looking the other direction. Mr.
Mr. Ka >> here. >> Thank you, madam. Thank you, councel. Um, all right. So, good evening, ladies and gentlemen. This is a regular meeting of the town of Medicine Zoning Board of Adjustment. The board is composed of
Edison Township residents appointed by the municipal council who volunteer their time and service to the board. Mispu land use law requires that members successfully complete a land use training course administered by the New Jersey Department of Community Affairs. This board also holds in-house training conducted by our board professionals.
The zoning board abides by the provision of the mis land use law in addition to our board's bylaws. The zoning board is a quasi judicial land use board which differs from the township planning board. Under the miscellaneous law, board members are required to be impartial and not allowed to discuss any case prior to being considered at a
hearing. All applicants will have the opportunity to present their case before the board along with the opportunity for board members and board professionals to question the applicant and their witnesses. The conclusion of the applicant's presentation of the case will open to the public. Residents within 200 feet of subject site will be heard followed by residents from outside
of 200 feet. All residents will be sworn in. They'll provide their name and address, and they'll be given six minutes to comment on the application being considered without the opportunity for a rebuttal. Residents may ask questions of the applicant, the applicant's professionals, and board professionals. The board requests that these questions are asked prior to any commentary being
made on the application. Once a commentary begins, the resident's timer will begin. The applicant will be allowed the opportunity for cross-examination of their witnesses. Under the law, the chair is allowed to stop any commentary which is repetitive or is an attempt to filibuster the board. Further, chair is allowed to stop
any commentary that is irrelevant to the case or prohibited from the board's consideration. Once public portion is closed, all public comments are ended unless new testimony is presented by the applicant. Following the closure of the public portion, the applicant will have the right of summation on their application. Following summation, the case will go to the board for decision.
This procedure has been followed by the board is similar to the procedures followed by boards of adjustment statewide. The Miss Lanuse law requires the board to engage in a balancing act. is not required to strictly apply township ordinances, zoning plan, or master plan. As a board of adjustment, all variances are granted when
appropriately necessary, following all legal considerations. As has been the case of prior boards, this board will see where we're at. If we are in session around 10:30 p.m. I hope that's not the case this evening. Um, I ask that all applicants, professionals, and residents show respect to each other and be civil throughout all proceedings. I ask that
you withhold applause, booing, or interrupting of anyone while they are speaking. The chair will not tolerate any outbursts by applicants, professionals, or the public. Further, since most cases are being recorded by a court reporter, I ask the speakers do not speak over one another. Council, uh,
first case on the agenda, please. >> Case number Z20-2025 on Janana Patel, 3 Bradford Road. Applicant is seeking bulk variances to construct an addition to the rear of the property. The following standards have not been met. Minimum lot depth required
is 150 ft. Proposed is 135 ft. Rear yard setback required is 60 feet. Proposed is 47 ft. Effective property is located in the RA zone designated as block number 557.14. Lot number 36 on the Edison Township
tax. All noticing paperwork is in order. >> Thank you very much. Good evening. >> My name is Joanne. You can bring the >> My name is Joanne Monto. I'm the architect that has prepared the drawings for the client. >> I'm sorry, I can't >> What is your name again?
>> Joanne Monto. >> Monttero. >> Yes. M O N T E R O. >> Okay. >> I am the architect that has prepared the drawings for the client. Angel, >> could you raise your right hand? >> Do you solemnly swear or affirm to tell the whole truth, nothing but the truth to help you, God?
>> I do. >> Okay. Um, and you're going to provide some qualifications. But before you do, is anyone else testifying? >> If the homeowner is required to >> Okay. Uh, do you want me to swear in? >> Uh, yes. If the homeowner could just, uh, raise your hand.
>> Raise your right hand. Pull the microphone close to you. Do you solemnly swear or affirm to tell the whole truth, nothing but the truth to help you, God? >> Yes. >> And state your full name. >> Angelina Patel. >> Okay. >> Okay. Thank you. and um if you could just please provide the board with a brief summary of your background and
qualifications. >> Sure. I'm a registered architect of the state of New Jersey, held my license since 2010 and have testified under numerous boards in the state of New Jersey. >> Your license are current and good standing. >> Yes, sir. >> We'll accept you. You may proceed. Thank you. >> Thank you. Thank you. Um this
application is um in the RA zone and we're seeking a bulk se variance for rear yard setback where 60 is required and we are providing 47 ft. Um there is also an existing non-conforming depth of
the property where 150 ft is required and 135 is the existing condition. The current property has a split level with four bedrooms and three baths, no
basement, and a twocar garage. We are putting an addition on the property on on the building which will leave it at four bedrooms, four baths, and a sun room. The addition to the rear
um is preferred as opposed to an addition toward the front of the property. The hardship exists with this property because one, it's undersized in depth and number two, the position of the house on the property.
The back of the house exit currently exists in the backyard setback. Um, in your drawings, there is a survey that has the the addition superimposed, but I do have colorcoded surveys. I'd
like to give the board might show a little bit clearer the lines. >> Yes. Okay. Does the board have any questions? >> Vice Chairman,
>> uh, in reference to the um minimum lot depth, is it 100? Your drawing on A-2 says 130 ft on the existing minimum lot depth. Is it 130 or 135? >> It's 135
>> is is the current condition. >> So if this goes through, you'll update that drawing. A2 >> um on the the survey, the Morgan survey, it's gonna be >> No, but you're drawing a looking at the
um vice chairman's looking at the architectural. You're looking at the charts, right? Correct. Yes, it's it should be 135. >> Okay. >> Yes. >> Any other questions? >> Mr. Chair, >> Mr. Chra,
>> um I have a question. Um so in regards to I'm a little confused on what the existing conditions are and what the proposed conditions are. This garage is here currently existing or this is proposed. >> There is currently a two-car garage. We are adding a twocar garage. We are we
are building living space within the existing garage and adding a twocar garage to the side of that. >> Okay. And currently the whole house is on one slab. >> It's on a split level. >> Okay. So the existing structure that's noted existing as a um the existing 70
ft that's existing that's not being touched. The existing 70t of the front face of the house is being the same. You're adding 24 feet to it. Is that correct? >> Correct. >> Okay. And that's existing structure is not being touched. It's just the second
floor that's being added. >> Are you referring to A1? >> Yes, I'm referring to A1. >> Can you go to A2? >> The survey on A2. Survey on there. side elevation.
>> Can I provide you with a markedup survey? >> Oh, you do have that, but that's not A2. >> Okay. So, that's not A2. That's um >> that's a boundary and topographic survey.
So, that drawing shows the addition to the right of the two-car garage. >> Okay. So, all the yellow is what's being added as additional. >> Correct. >> Okay. And then there's also that green on that's being added in the other corner. >> Correct. That's the sun room that's just
on the first level. >> And where it says existing deck, that's existing. There's nothing to be built on top of that >> exterior deck. >> Yes. >> Yeah, that is a new new exterior deck. >> Okay. All right. Thank you. >> Okay.
>> Any other questions? Seeing none. Okay. Thank you very much. Do you have anything else to present to your case? >> Uh, no. >> You do not. Okay. All right. So, we will now go to the public. Anyone within 200 feet of subject site wanting to be heard, uh, please approach
Anyone outside your feet want to be heard? Please approach. Seeing none, can I get a motion to close the public portion? >> Motion to close public portion. >> Second. >> Motion made by Vice Chairman O'Gorman. Second by Mr. Patel. All in favor signify by saying I. >> I. >> I.
>> Those nay. The eyes have it. Public portion is now closed and I'll go to the board. >> Mr. Chairman, Vice Chairman to make a motion to approve this approve this application. U. Uh there is no one uh against it from the public. It meets the positive and negative criteria.
I'd like to approve this >> second motion made by Vice Chairman Gorman. Second by Mr. Patel. Roll call, please. >> Mr. Patel. >> Yes. On the motion. >> Uh Mr. Cerrito. >> Yes. On the motion. >> Mr. Chabra.
>> Yes. To the motion. >> Uh Vice Chair Gorman. >> Yes. Chairman Ka. >> Yes on the motion. Congratulations. Unanimously approved. >> Okay. And folks, I apologize. We have one announcement for this evening. Um KZ19 2025 Jessica Las Chan at 286
Central Avenue. It's being carried to November 25th, 2025. Um and renotice is required. So if you're here for this case, uh Z19, 2025, Jessica Las Chan at 286 Central Avenue. It will not be heard this evening. It will be heard on
November 25th, 2025 at 7 p.m. here in council chambers. Um council, next case on the agenda, please. >> Next case, case Z27-2025 VCOS Chararma 36 Rainford Road. The applicant is seeking a bulk variance to
construct a second story addition and add a level to the existing attached single family home. The following standards have not been met. Minimum uh side other sideyard required is 15 ft. Proposed is 5.125
ft. Affected areas located in the PRD zone designated as block number 1240. Lot number 17 on the Edison Township tax map. All noticing paperwork is in order. >> Good evening. >> Thank you. >> Good evening, Mr. Chairman and members
of the board. My name is Peter Wagner. I'm a with Richard Lupo LLC and I represent the petitioner Vicas Sharma. The application concerns a request for a bulk variance to construct a second story and side addition to 36 Rainford Road, also known as block 1240, lot 17
on the Edison Tax Map. Property is zoned PRD, which is the residential single family attached duplex zone. Uh legal notice of application was published in the Home News Tribune on November 5th, 2025 and legal notice to all property owners within 200 feet was sent on
October 29th, 2025. Uh proof of notice has been delivered to the board secretary. We're requesting one bulk variance for construction uh pertaining to the minimum sideyard setback requirement of Edison ordinance section 3763-15.
Specifically, the required width of the proposed sideyard is 5 and 1/8 ft, and the required width is 15 feet. Uh, I'll note that the proposed plans have been specifically agreed to by the neighboring duplex owner, and a copy of the fully executed RAPD attached home
authorization letter was included with the application package. I have two witnesses today. Um, first is Mr. Robert Hernandez, an architect, and the second is John Chadwick, a professional planner. Uh, and with that I would call Robert Hernandez.
>> Your guess is as good as mine. You want to try it? >> Take this one. You take this one. >> Sir, would you raise your right hand? Do you solemnly swear or affirm to tell the whole truth, nothing but the truth? to help you God. And state your using using
the microphone, state your full name. State your full name for the record. >> Roberto A. Hernandez, architect. Uh I've been licensed for 12 13 years. My office is in Metouch, New Jersey, and my license is in good standing. >> Thank you very much. You may proceed.
>> Thank you. Uh so this project is almost three years in the making. uh mostly because uh this project requires agreement by the next door uh neighbor. This uh pro this uh this residence is in a duplex uh residential area in the PRD
zone and um it's it has been very difficult uh to come to this point where uh both homeowners are happy uh with the overall uh not the layout but mostly what the outside of the house will look like. Um,
so this is the residence at 36 Rainford Road in Edison. It's a duplex home as I've explained. Uh, this line here basically represents the border line between my client and the next door
neighbor. Um, currently both homes are uh singlestory in nature. Uh they both have a singlecar garage. Uh my work uh is happening on the right side of the duplex building. Um and the uh the house
footprint is 40 ft x 40 ft uh with an existing 16 ft by 8t area that is carved in in the front uh which is basically you can see it here on the picture. It's an existing covered porch. We uh which we are uh uh we're keeping uh as is.
That was one of the agreements that we uh have with the uh nextdoor neighbor to to retain the existing covered porch and not extend it any further in. Um the house is singlestory in nature with approximately 1,195t
of habitable area plus an existing 267 square ft onecar garage. The house is comprised of two bedrooms and two bathrooms with an open concept living, dining, kitchen area and a laundry room/youutility room off the bedroom
hallway area which is on the left side of the house. Uh currently this is a family of four uh with their son and daughter sharing one of the two bedrooms. Uh frequently Mr. and Mrs. Sharma would have their parents visit from India for about 6 months. I they
and they don't really have uh uh bedrooms for them to stay in. And so he has invested time and money in uh designing a second floor addition uh rather than going out the back uh uh to
accommodate for additional uh habitable spaces. Um Mr. Chararma is a project manager at Bank of America and Mrs. Chararma is a housewife and their children. One is in college and the other is a junior. uh is in junior
junior year of high school. Uh so Mr. Chararma is now working um half of his week from home and uh so one of his bas one of the basic needs today is to have a work from home office and uh and add more bedrooms so that the kids can move
upstairs and the grandparents can you know have a room downstairs. So, due to the lack of space for really a family of six, uh we're seeking to expand the first floor from 1,195 ft to 1,690
square ft, which is an increase of 495 square ft. Uh the uh the added uh area is happening on the right side of the house. uh the next door duplex uh homeowner uh did not allow us to come
any uh you know to towards the front and being that he doesn't have much backyard we didn't really want to add to the back. So we were forced to design our addition on the right side which is where we have this uh minimum uh
sideyard setback not being met where the requirement is 15 ft and we are asking for 5.125. Um if you notice basically the uh property is odd in is odd in shaped and uh as the you would see how basically uh
the property line uh uh is how do I explain it uh the property line widens in the front but it narrows uh in the back. So I that's the reason why I stepped in the addition to maintain 5T plus uh sideyard
on the right side and avoiding um fire rating the wall of the of the house. Um so the extra square footage that is added on the right side on the first floor has allowed us to create an additional bedroom on the first floor.
It has also allowed us to expand the kitchen and to um expand and redesign one of the two full bathrooms, which is what you see on the proposed first floor plan. Um the existing front-facing bedroom is now being converted into a
study room, mostly because of its small size uh and because we're moving bedrooms upstairs. Um, we're also proposing a 5-ft front addition to the garage as we lost a little bit of space when we, um, expanded the bathroom, uh,
one of the bathrooms. Uh, the side addition maintains a sideyard, like I said, of slightly over 5T on the right. Uh, and on the left side, the setback is zero because this is a duplex uh, neighborhood in the PRD zone. Um,
the new second floor on page A3 of my plans uh is a 1,683 foot um second floor and proposes two additional bedrooms, uh a prayer room, um four full bathrooms, a laundry room,
u a laundry room closet, a sitting area, and three exterior balconies. uh one off uh one off the second floor hallway and one per rear uh facing bedroom. We also incorporated a work from home office as I mentioned before uh for Mr. Chararma
who works remotely a few days a week. Altogether, the total square footage of the new home is 3,400 square ft uh excluding the onecar attached garage. As far as the exterior views go, per the adjacent duplex uh homeowner's request,
uh we were able to retain the gable roof that bonds the two neighbor homes together. Uh to be specific, this is where the his uh the neighbor's uh garage meets the front-facing bedroom of Mr. Chararma's uh home.
The entire front face or facade as well as the other two exterior walls are being modernized with casement uh windows with no grills on them. Uh for the main roof of the house, we've maintained the same roof pitch uh as to what is existing with both duplex homes.
Uh we've dressed up the front with a couple of bay windows and culter stone across the 40t plus 14t addition uh width. Uh uh both neighbors will work out a uh roof color and sighting material
uh that they can agree on um to avoid any uh further conflict. Uh and the roofing material is fiberglass and the uh fiberglass shingles and the proposed sighting will be vinyl. That is all
board question. Mr. Hernandez. So yes, I have a question. So the the proposed uh side setback is 5T.125. >> Yes sir. >> Is is that uh fit the characteristics characteristics of the neighborhood?
>> Uh I think the planner may talk uh about that but uh there are homes already where they have this they have encroached into uh the the set the sideyard setback. >> Thank you. >> Thank you >> Mr. Hernandez. you're just reviewing,
excuse me, your floor area ratio certification. Um, so a lot was like filled out with NA. Um, and I just need to get and I also just from reviewing architectural plans, unless I'm missing something here. Um, if you could just give me an idea what's the current current F, what's your
proposed F and then what's allowed? I'm not sure that F is a requirement in the PRD zone, but if the house is 3,400 square foot and I divide that by uh 6,102.72, I come up with 55 5.71%.
But I don't think it's a requirement in the PRD zone. >> Miss Sha is going to check on that. >> And this has been talked over with uh with the zoning officer. >> Okay. He's he's not here. So I just need to make sure before we move on anything that you know I'm not falling into a
pit, nor is the board. Okay. Um All right. All right. Board have any other questions for Mr. Hernandez? >> Yes, Mr. Chair. Mr. Chber, uh Mr. Hernandez, um your it shows that your
addition is the the the foundation for your exist uh your addition will it have a crawl space or will it be the same type of foundation? >> Uh the existing and proposed foundation is slab on grade. Okay. >> All of the homes in that neighborhood are slab and grade. >> Okay. All right. Thank you. Thank you.
Any other questions, Mr. Hernandez? Okay. Um, so we are just we just want to figure out the zone plan just just to confirm what you said. Um, since Mr. Aad is not here. Um, so what we'll do is just came to the train run down the track. Um, I know that you have a planner and then we just may may recall
you um based upon that. >> Okay. Thank you very much. >> Thank you, Mr. Chairman. I'd like to call John Chadwick. I don't know. I'm going to mark these as uh A1. There's only one sheet. Is that correct?
>> Okay, I'll mark it as A1 back. So, Mr. Chad, um council that can raise your right hand. >> Sorry. >> Yeah, I got him. >> Okay. >> Um do you sle swear or affirm to tell the whole truth? Nothing but the truth. Help you God.
>> Yes. and state your full name, please. >> Chadwick. C H A D I C K. >> And Mr. Chadwick, you've appeared to before the board prior. If you could just please give the board the benefit of your summary of your background qualifications, please.
>> Graduate degree from Ruters, a graduate degree from Pride Institute, degree in city and regional planning. I've been practicing uh providing professional planning services to municipalities and
private clients for quite some time. License is current and valid. >> Great. Um we will accept you if you just bring the microphone closer to you just so everyone can hear you at home. >> All right. Better. >> Thank you. Yeah, that's perfect. Thank you. >> Uh you heard the description of the uh
proposed project. The home is a modest home of,200 square feet being expanded to uh 16 got the exact number in any event. Uh the aerial photograph I think has a lot
to say with this application. Uh one of the circumstances of course is it's on the curve of the road on uh Rainford which makes it wider in the front and narrowing towards the back which is where we have our uh setback uh
deviation. Explain how that uh deviation is to be incorporated into the uh design and redevelopment of the home. This is classic C1C2 variants. The C1,
you've heard these probably from planners and engineers for years. C1 is a hardship. We can't expand our lot. There's no possibility of doing that and to achieve the objectives as stated
architect in terms of the plan. There was a C2 variance. Basically, you heard the testimony of the architect. Is this better way of providing more living space for what is
currently a two-bedroom uh two small bath home for a household that basically can six. And by going into the rear, you simply taking up usable backyard space. And you
can see from this aerial photograph, backyards are quite small to start with and you take the opportunity judgment to go and add a second floor
does not change the streetscape whatsoever. New facade of the building is much more attractive than current. And those who've had an opportunity to go through this neighborhood,
same kind of improvements neighborhood was developed in the early 1980s. That PRD zone was a creation of a painting amendment to the
five years ago. Those homes were small modest homes. That's kind of the case. you know great deal of section older sections in the township where they were smaller capes.
They put a full second floor on full bombers garage and the homes evolved with the needs of time serves the purposes of the municipal
appropriate space. It provides an appropriate use. It provides a much improved I believe streetscape to those are the items set forth some of the items set forth purposes of zoning
in the m excellent improvement to the home original deeds. needs required cooperation with your neighbor that he could simply say I don't like it stop the project this case you have a letter attached to
the application saying I approve it consideration being your neighbor has satisfied >> tax zone plan really a continuation of what this neighborhood
>> time. Do you feel that the positive criteria outweigh the negative criteria? >> Absolutely. >> Yeah. >> Does the board have any questions, Mr. Chad? >> Mr. Chairman, >> vice chairman.
So this five foot side setback is that is there other properties like that in the development? >> Well, you can see the aerial. You look at the homes. I I'm not a surveyor, but I've been doing this a lot of years and I've driven through this
neighborhood and you can see on the corners the back parts of the homes are much closer than they are in the front. And that's nature of the configuration of the property. For instance, the home
immediately to our south and west. As you're coming around the corner, see the improvements on that home are quite close to the property line with a fence. You can see
>> 30 Rford. And but as you go through this whole neighborhood where you have the curves in the street with and all these streets are curve linear they're every time you come to the corner the
inside of the corner the homes are wider apart at the front and closer together in the rear and particularly where they've been improved. And you can tell right off the bat which which homes have been expanded over time.
My opinion the five feet the real critical part as the architect explained is a specific criteria in the building code as to firewalls and property lines in different homes. We comply with that.
probably the most important thing from health safety welfare. >> Mr. Chairman, my question is the required sideyard setback is 15 feet and you have 5.125 ft. Are there what addresses have that 5.125 ft in a
neighborhood? >> I can't give you an address. Sorry. >> Thank you. just give you the aerial photograph that shows what the sideyards of immediately adjoining home is and others throughout
that neighborhood. Any other questions? Mr. Ch, excuse me. In your analysis of the neighborhood, have you noticed any similar expansions? Have you noticed any similar expansions within the neighborhood? I think it's throughout this neighborhood in terms of those.
They're not across the street is a re recently completed expansion. And as you drive through the neighborhood, if you knew what the original construction in this neighborhood was, it was basically
one-story structures. And if you drive through the neighborhood, the two-story structure is basically becoming predominant. So over the 45 years from when this
originally development took place, you've had this evolution of improvement and expansion. >> Okay. Thank you very much. Any other questions, Mr. Chadook? >> Thank you, council. >> Yes. So um there was a question a few
minutes ago as to F and there was a comment that F was not applicable to the PRD zone. However, looking at section 3763.1 um subp part uh 16 and I'm going to
indicate that the PRD zone does have an F and the F indicates that it is 25% with a specific note indicating and I'm going to I apologize because I have to read this on my phone. Um
the same maximum residential floor area ratios above shall apply with equal force to all lots which are non-conforming in terms of the lot area as to the applicable zone dis uh zone district requirements. Giving an example a lot
which has an area of 6,000 square ft 6,000 square ft in the RB zone district shall be subject to 44.44 44 residential floor area ratio resulting in a maximum dwelling size exclusive of basement and
attic but inclusive of a garage of 2,640 square ft. It further goes on to indicate that all plans submitted to the zoning uh officer for a zoning permit for a single family dwelling in the including the PRD zone.
uh pursuant to this section of the code will include a table identifying the floor area for the first floor second floor um attic and garage of said proposed dwelling and the overall floor area ratio. So I think um you do need that information. Now whether it's a use
it seems that there is a use but it also seems that that may not be the correct applicable F but it does apply to the PRD zone. So we do need to have an RF certification. and before the board can make a
determination. >> I agree. Absolutely. >> Council, >> understood. Yes. >> Okay. >> What section was that that you found? >> Sorry. >> Section that you found the
>> the because I was online. >> So, it's section 37-63.1. It's attachment one. Edison has it as an attachment. >> 63. 63.1 and subsection is 16, but it's
attachment one. It's in the table. We'll correct the plan and resubmit that. I understand that you you wouldn't be able to vote tonight on the application based on the fact that the that the uh plan needs to be revised.
>> Correct. Um, how much time do you think that uh you would need for the certification? >> Um, I I believe that we wouldn't need very long. Um, would a conditional approval be possible tonight? >> No, Mr. Chairman. >> Uh, I don't think we'd need very long.
Uh, I when when is the next meeting? So, we have a meeting next November 25th, but we are to say we are packed up is an understatement. Um, so December 16th
uh would be our next meeting and we can put you on for old business then. That's fine. I I understand my client will probably be traveling the petitioner. Uh, however, if he is not required to be here, I I will appear on the 16th.
>> If as long as that's okay with your client, it's okay with us. >> Okay. All right. >> Okay. >> I don't I don't want to drag this on, but this is really a fact situation. We make >> Can you bring the microphone closer to you? >> We This is a fact situation. If we make the calculation, give it to the zoning
officer, he agrees, and there's no variance required. >> Okay. But you also have to present it to the board because a part of our duty is as as as members I'm I'm gonna finish. You had your chance to speak, so I'm going to speak. So as members of the board, we have a right to review this
this F certification. So once F certification is submitted to us, it's re be reviewed by the zoning officer and submitted to the board. We could review it and put it on the record at a hearing and then we will continue the case. Okay. Mr. Hernandez, I got I need you on
microphone though. If we um exceed on FR, do we need to renotice uh to be here again on the 16th and uh add to the minimum sideyard setback F.
>> If your if your F exceeds and another variance is required, it is now a use variance. So the notice would be considered defective. You would need to amend the application and present. I think the attorney understands what I'm saying. >> Okay.
>> I do. Yes. >> Okay. All right. So, we we'll endeavor to get that as quickly as possible. Okay. >> And uh and if you could list us for December 16th, I would appreciate that. >> Absolutely. >> Absolutely. Not a problem. All right. So, for anyone here present, for anyone
listening at home, uh this case will continue on, uh Tuesday, December 16th, 2025 with a meeting beginning at 7 p.m. here in council chamber. If you received the notice for this case, uh you will not receive another notice. This will serve as your notice and we'll see you
on December 16th. Thank you very much. Thank you, Mr. Chair. >> All right. So, next on the agenda, uh we have a uh close session. Can I get a motion to go into close session? >> Motion to go into close session. A second. >> Motion made by Vice Chairman Gorman, second by Mr. Chav. All in favor signify
by saying I. >> I. Those nay. The eyes have it. Board will adjourn to close session. We we'll be back to close out the Okay, get a motion to return to public session. A >> motion to return to public session. >> Second. >> Motion made by Mr. Patel, second by uh
Mr. Srio. All in favor signify by saying I. >> I nay. The eyes have it. We board return to session. Uh council, any other business come before the board this evening? >> None. >> Okay. Can I get a motion to adjurnn? >> Motion to adjurnn. >> Second.
>> Motion made by Mr. Patel. Second by Mr. Mr. Srio. All in favor signify by saying I. >> I. Nay. The eyes have it. Word stands adjourned. Thank you everyone. All right. Good job. See you.