##VIDEO ID:d40misxKZng## e e sen it's 10:00 I'm going call to order 
the meeting um please stand and pledge allegiance flaged States the stand this time I'll entertain a motion to approve the 
minutes from July the 1st to 224 meeting I make   a motion second all in favor I okay so at this 
time I would like to remind the audience that   um if you wish to speak please come up and a card 
up here table at front and uh you'll be allowed   2 minutes to speak other and um also please 
turn off any cell phones or silence your cell phones this time Christie I believe 
you have a presentation for us sunshine e it's on there we go now it's on okay so what's 
what's being passed around to you now is just   the memorandum a voting conflict we don't 
actually do a presentation on ethics um and   those types of things so I like to make sure when 
I get this opportunity to speak to the different   boards that they're aware of this form and that 
the requirements as an appointed officer um to   know that when you have something that's going to 
directly affect you or a family member what they   call a relative which is is a father mother son 
daughter husband wife brother sister father-in-law   mother-in-law son-in-law and daughter-in-law or 
a business associate that there's some reporting   that has to be done so i' like to give you the 
form so you have it to review um the main thing   is you you know if it's going to be an effect 
if it's going to have a financial effect on   one of your family members or your relative that 
you be aware of it you announce it um you cannot   vote on it but you can um after you've disclosed 
it you do you can speak to it so you disclose on   if you watch the BCC um uh you'll see that that 
happens um Step Barry is really good at at getting   that out there right out front I don't often see 
other members that's not because they don't have   interest um it just doesn't come up as often as 
it does with Stephen Barry um so he's really good   about getting it out there in front of everyone 
and letting you and making the record so if uh if   you ever have any questions call our office and we 
can help you let you know how you're going to do   it just let us know ahead of time before we get in 
here and this form will help you this is the form   that has to be filled out like I said you can you 
can't vote on it but you can uh be involved in the   in the discussion as long as you've disclosed um 
and on part of that I just want to make you aware   that was this is part of our constitutional 
amendments uh well it is a is part of our   constitution it was amendment number 12 and it 
was um it was a the the people of the state of   Florida decided that this is so important that it 
should be part of our ethics requirements for our officers if you have other things 
you think might be a um a problem   or a conflict let us know because there are 
such things as M misuse of your position we   want to make sure those don't occur 
either and we can help you through that okay Sunshine Law Chris Chris can I interrupt 
in quick question oh sorry yeah as it relates to   this discussion today obviously I have a conflict 
of interest in that I'm employed by Lake View and   Lake View have some applications in process 
so is it just a matter of me filling out this   form and declaring that or well you just want 
to make sure that um um so it would be to the   um the question is I know that's part of your 
company so it's going to be you work for them   is that correct correct all right so then that's 
going to be is a is it a business associate which   means any person or entity engaged in or carrying 
on a business Enterprise with the officer as a   partner joint venturer co-owner corporate 
shareholder um I think on the surface it   certainly looks like it would be something 
that's connected to it um there's enough   people here that you don't have to vote but you 
could be involved in the discussion okay thank you so I guess we did this just at the right time see if I can work my clicker oh no I guess I'll 
just do it remotely I'll do it by hand there we go   okay so you've seen this before this is the pork 
chop gang in the State of Florida for many decades   there was a group of legislators in North Florida 
that controlled everything in the State of Florida   all decisions that were made a lot of decisions 
were made Um poker game fishing uh and not   everyone was present at the time and the public 
wasn't aware of the decisions that were being made   so they became to be known as the pork chop gang 
they went they lasted well into the 60s um until   a reapportionment but with a pork chop gang you 
would meet uh you could meet them in other areas   and come up with the decisions and it could be any 
one or two of them or three of them it didn't have   to be the whole legislature there was a public 
records of requirement at the time um and there   was Sunshine Law in effect at the time but the 
Sunshine Law had been interpreted to mean that   the only time it had to be in the sunshine was 
when the whole body was in session so there was a gentleman um John pen andamp um this is one of 
those things where there was a benefit from there   not being uh a requirement that everybody be out 
in the public the decisions that are being made   John pen Camp was the editor of the Miami Herald 
um I put margorie Stone and Douglas up here I know   that we've heard a lot about the school that had 
her name on it um because of the horrible violence   that occurred there but she's very important 
to the State of Florida she's one of the most   influential people in the history of the State 
of Florida so I always like to put her up here   because I want people to remember her for what 
she contributed and not for that horrible event   that happened at at the the school that was 
named after her but John Penny Camp was making   effort to save the Everglades he was trying to 
get a hold of the property so that he can give it   to the federal government to make it a national uh 
protect it under national law um Marjorie Stoneman   Douglas wrote the book um um River of Grass and 
uh was one that's what part of the reason that   she was so important to Florida history because 
the rivers of grass was a very influential book   that she wrote about the Everglades she was also 
very active in elections um and women's suffrage   so I want to put her in here as well but John pen 
Camp played us played a poker game um there's an   article about it um called The Glades on a bet 
and he played a poker game with the um a vice   president from Florida Power and Light in fact 
it was at the Florida Power and lights fishing   camp and he they were the Florida Power and Light 
and um John Penny camp and another and a number of   people were trying to get this money and trying 
to get the Everglades preserved so that was why   game was set up there was some people from um 
the legislature there of course some of the pork   Choppers and this poker game Penny Camp couldn't 
lose he was just winning he he just kept winning   against the people that the legislatur were there 
and it's according to John Pam's own words Bill   Pierce of patka and shans of Gainesville were 
both there they were leaders of the pork chop game   and on that day that Penny Camp couldn't lose 
finally he was asked by Pierce why don't you   come over to the legislature and get it instead 
of taking it out of our pockets he wanted to know   how much money do you need to stop playing this 
poker game and go away and so he told him how   much he wanted and he was originally going to go 
for a much lower amount but then he decided I'm   just going to I'll just go for it um and he asked 
for the money and and because the thing about the   pork chop gang once they told you you could have 
the money or once they made the deal with you the   deal was done and you didn't need to do anything 
else and so he went over to the legislature got   his money used that money for the Everglades and 
now we have a national uh now it's nationally   protected the Everglades so those were the two 
people that came but it's so important those were   the two people that were so influential on the 
Everglades but it was so important to understand   that before Sunshine Law this was happening 
all the time and although a good thing came   out of it there were bad things that occurred 
so um Emery Red Cross was a representative he   he worked in all areas of government throughout 
his life including being a judge and I believe he   was also a prosecutor at one time but emry Red 
Cross had met with um a a press organization   at the University of Florida and what they had 
pushed was that we need more open government so he   kept coming back to the legislature trying to get 
this passed trying to get this through more open   government and one of the things that really fired 
him up was when I75 was going in in the State of   Florida there was a board that was appointed 
That was supposed to go through and figure out   where the property where the what property should 
be purchased for the purposes of putting an I75   well the board had some friends and they would 
let their friends know what they were selecting   and then those friends would go buy that property 
and then they would make that money um and when   he caught one of that he was pretty hot he was 
pushing it even harder because it was costing   the people people of Florida money um it was cost 
and taxpayers um and it was it was wrong uh it was   very underhanded so it it it it encouraged him 
even more to go after getting this law passed a   better Sunshine Law a better um public records 
law so you see there we have the Public Public   Records law of 1909 um and then in 1967 was when 
the um government and the Sunshine law was passed   that we know it today and it became section 
28611 what had happened was that because the   pork chop gang was running all of the State of 
Florida there was large swas of South Florida and   Central Florida that didn't have representation 
or appropriate representation so the Supreme   Court said you will you will um re uh you'll 
you'll redraw your boundaries because these   people are going to be represented in South 
Florida and once that happened it allowed him   it allowed the legislature to begin to change 
and he was able to get the 1967 government and   the Sunshine law passed it was not until 1971 
I believe when the courts finally started in   started and actually gave an interpretation 
of the Sunshine Law that said no it's every   time you meet with another member it's not just 
when the whole board is in in session because   if they had wanted just they if they' wanted 
things to be the status quo they didn't need to   change anything so that it was I believe it was 
1971 when the Supreme Court made that decision um Florida is significant because of our our 
Sunshine because of our public records laws we   um actually added them to our constitution the 
people added them to the constitution in 1992   that is distinct from our um it's it's distinct 
from our public meetings but they are always   published together now in the government and the 
Sunshine Law handbook so here's what's required   the meetings must be open to the public there 
has to be readable reasonable notice and the   minutes must be taken and promptly recorded so 
you know we we vote you vote on those minutes   and does everybody agreed with those minutes 
but if somebody wanted to see them ahead of   time as soon as those minutes are ready um 
because there it does occur sometimes when   the board takes a couple you know may take a 
meeting off or not be back the next month but   those minutes become immediately available as 
soon as they're ready so it's not they may not   be the official minutes but the unofficial 
minutes should be available to the public and then this just goes through that they 
have to it's all meetings of any board   or commission they must provide 
reasonable notice and then the minutes so it was in 2013 that it was added um 
to Florida statute 28614 that the members of the   public shall be given reasonable opportunity to 
be heard so it has to be on a proposition that's   coming before they can be heard on propositions 
that are coming for before board this doesn't   apply to quasi judicial which I know you don't 
handle but it gets confusing sometimes for the   public because they think they should be allowed 
to speak on everything but when it's a quasi   judicial proceeding which is there's going to be 
a decision handed down not an advisory decision   but an actual decision that's going to affect 
somebody's Liberties or Pro not so much Liberty   but their property um then that has to be open to 
the that has to be restricted it has to be open   but it has to be focused on the proposition itself 
quasa judicial is an exception to that these are   the other exceptions it doesn't have to uh in 
the opportunity to be heard it doesn't have to   occur at the same setting of the action but it 
has to be while the decision making process is   occurring and it has to be reasonable in time 
but that doesn't mean that you can come in and   be ugly um reasonable orderly conduct and proper 
deor and I'm sure if you've watched BCC meetings   there's um you'll find items of of that 
nature that you can see where someone had   to be um reminded of this requirement and then 
the I'm sorry these are the actual exceptions   so emergency um when the county has to make 
immediate decisions those don't have to be   um open to the public I mean I'm sure you're 
aware of what happens and and how things get   started in the county when hurricanes are in 
the Gulf so there's some decisions when it's   when it's baring in down on scambia County that 
have to be made and there there's not time for   public notice or public input ministerial acts 
so you've seen ceremonial proclamations and then   there's an exempt area from 28611 through 286 
0113 I mean it's actually in 286 0113 but that   doesn't apply to advisory boards so you don't 
have to worry about that and then of course   quazo judicial which we spoke about and these 
are just opinions that were written um by the   attorney generals over the years regarding what 
the law is the attorney general is responsible   for publishing um the the book um and providing 
um legal advice regarding government and the   Sunshine Law so these are some of their opinions 
so it says while it's not a direct violation for   members to circulate their own written position 
papers it's strongly discouraged then you've got   the one that says position statements must not 
be used to circumvent circumvent the required   ments of the statute and then finally any 
subsequent postings by other Commissioners   on the subject of the initial posting could be 
construed as a response subject to the Sunshine   Law and we've talked about this before one of 
the most important things that kind of gets   away from us when when this law was past there 
wasn't social media there was just the media so   they dealt with it on paper and now we deal with 
it um in a digital um in a digital array so when   people are posting things on Facebook or whatever 
account they're using using to post their opinions   it's important that no one reply back that's what 
that last one is about if any subsequent postings   by other Commissioners on the subject of the 
initial posting could be confused as a response   subject to the Sunshine Law so you don't want two 
people on the same board responding to each other   it doesn't mean that you can't have conversations 
doesn't mean that you can't be in public together   but you don't want to be responding on digital 
media and you also when you're in public you   want to make sure to avoid any appearance 
of impropriety so keep it a lighthearted   discussion when you're having discussions because 
people on boards are friends and they do see each   other at events they're um con um it's regular for 
people from a particular board to be in everyone   to be invited to event so you just have to be 
conscientious about having conversations with each other there it go and there are penalties for 
violations um you've got the $500 fine it can   be CRI there can be suspension or removal from 
a board and also attorney fees um so University   of Florida as I mentioned earlier it was the 
College of Journalism um that kept bringing   this to the Forefront and now um they have 
the breckner center of the advance for the   advancement of the First Amendment there's 
a lot of great AR um articles in there uh if   if anything ever comes up when things come up 
that are big about public records or Sunshine   Law the breckner center will have an opinion 
on it and it's good to get get in there and   find out what what their information is and 
so this is just um so every year we get a new   version and as you see they they're different 
in sizes the earlier ones I think were larger   because they use thicker paper because the one 
that I carry now is much larger than anything   it looks more like the 2004 book um they grow 
every year exemptions grow every year and that's   why that happens and if you want to know what's 
going on in the current year exemptions the uh   there's at the introduction it lists the Attorney 
General will list all the new changes and the new   exemptions and new exemptions just like you know 
because we live in a digital age because there   are actions that are taken against people that 
are um public officials or even County Employees   or state attorneys public defenders there's a um 
our fire department people's home addresses their   children they still they need to be protected and 
because it's so readily accessible out there on   the on the internet um the sunshine manual grows 
to continue to protect the people that are most at risk and then this is the federal um this is the   so when you send out a request for 
Freedom of Information this is where   this is who's handling it this that's 
the Department of Justice any questions okay well like I said if you come 
up up with anything just you know   how to reach us kath is the the 
number thank you Christie thank you next on the agenda is the opioid budget review 
good morning good morning um so we actually have   received two different allocations of our opioid 
abatement funding now uh in 2023 we received 2,489 26351 and then in 2024 we 
received our second allocation of 1,546 4.98 so the total funding that we 
have received to date is 4, 35,2 66849 of that we have currently 
allocated 1, [Music] 517,000 which leaves us a remaining balance 
to work with of 2 milon 518,000 $78 86 and if you need me to repeat any 
of those just let me know it's a lot of numbers and it looks like our first allocation 
came in July and our second allocation came in   February so I'm not sure really when our 2025 
will come in but I will tell you that we do   report on the state's fiscal year which starts 
July 1 not sure if that means anything as far   as funding goes but okay any questions 
on our current balance any questions anybody okay thank you excuse me I actually have one question 
regards to the allocations and excuse me I   wasn't here last meeting but I was going over 
the minutes and I was noticing that um we had   two allocations to the core program one for 
the 2425 5 25th 20 2025 fiscal fiscal year   um and then we um allocated funding all 
the way to 2026 of 400,000 um 21 $421,500 um so if we're in 2020 why why do we go all the 
way to 2026 already so the reason why we did   that is because the core program is also partially 
funded through the state which goes July 1 through   the end of September I'm sorry August August 
September October it goes so it's July 1 all   the way through the end of June so I think that's 
why we went ahead and allocated that second part   um but the if you go back and watch the meeting so 
the core program was initially funded 100% through   the state we got a notice saying because the um 
State of Florida has now decided to fund every   single county in the state of Florida they have 
reduced everybody's funding and you'll see that in   the community health application as well they were 
also initially funded through the state so there   is a decrease in allocation each year and that's 
what we went over so the funding that the core   team requested is only to keep them whole it's not 
anything above and beyond what they're currently doing okay so that's through 20 26 correct yes 
okay so and the question I have because when we   first started um we were told that we were not 
a how how was it how did how was it put uh Miss   Christie uh we wasn't we wasn't supposed to be a 
what you call it you actually you had said it a a   longterm operational cost type funding for when 
other organizations had came to act for funding   and you know we was talking about how the money 
were going to be used things of that nature and   the question I have now is um you're speaking of 
the core and now Community have been decreased   by the state so now we're going to become a a 
supplemental funding Organization for those for   basically any type of organization now that the 
state says hey you got this other pot of money   over here now use it and the state actually did 
put that in their request that they intended the   opioid abatement funding to supplement their 
core program so you hit it right on the head   right so um but the idea is for uh at least for 
our core team I do know that we're going after   other grants to try to minimize the amount we 
have to take from the opioid abatement funding   so now we're so now we're looking at supplementing 
multiple State organizations through the through   the opioid of baitman the only two we have 
that deal specifically with opioid is the core   program and the only two entities that receive 
that funding is our Emergency Management core   team and Community Health nobody else gets the 
opioid abatement funds right that so far but we   got to stack of applications oh I'm sorry I meant 
from the state not our not right so now we have a   stack of applications so going by that business 
model was to take any other organization to say   hey where you're supplementing these organizations 
why you can't supplement us long term well if they   had other state funding some of these applications 
are to increase their capacity for what they're   currently doing you'll see that in Lake View 
application you'll see that and that's that's okay   cuz they're they're we're not it's not something 
they're just starting up and going hey fund me   100% this is what I'm doing um part of the notice 
of funding availability also was how are you going   going to continue to sustain if this funding goes 
away and the core team is working on that same   plan as well they're working there's lots of opio 
De batment grants out there that we're working on   so that we can minimize how much is coming out 
of our opio de funding everybody would have the   same expectation I if I could I think what you're 
asking is originally you weren't allowed tole you   you were not allowed to replace the funding that 
the county had in place but then when the count   when the funding from the state went away we're 
not rep we are replacing that funding but we're   not doing it in in in Li of the state funding 
it so if the county so if the state is is that   what you're trying to tell him it's not an inl of 
it is an inl of no so if the had a program that   they paid a million dollars for every and it was a 
program a pre-existing program and and the and the   county said okay instead of us paying for it we're 
going to take opioid abatement and and it's just   going to be the same program but in this situation 
it's the state who's in who actually controls the   money and they're not saying they're doing away 
with the money so it's not like it's not like   the it's hard to break it down except that they're 
doing away with the money and in a situation when   the county has it the county would have to go on 
paying it we could give them money in excess of   the million dollars that they're already paying 
but as far as the as far as a state program the   money's gone so you're saying basically is because 
the state says use the money it's okay but if the   county said use the money then it's not okay not 
for it's not a situation where the money would   still be there so if we budgeted a million dollars 
every year and and we decided hey we're not going   to we're not going to budget that money anymore 
because we can just take it away from opio De   batement they can't replace the funding that way 
so in this situation the funding no longer exists   so it's not like we're what we are funding is our 
and it's not going to be a fool because there's   grants coming in but what we're what we're doing 
is replacing the funding from the state that the   state said no longer exist it's the same thing 
chrisy it's just different entity it's a state   it's the same exact process but you're you're 
saying it because the state is not funding it   anymore then it's okay to do because the money 
is coming through the state uh um versus if the   it's basically versus if the county was initially 
funding it this and this County said the county   couldn't say we're not going to fund it take it 
from the OPI board but the state in essence said   and so the state in essence can can do that the 
state can clear us to do it yeah and I think the   word maybe that we're looking for here is we can't 
reallocate so let's just say we had a million   dollars going to stock opioid prevention vending 
machines okay let's say the county put a million   dollars into that opioid abatement funding comes 
we can't go oh we're going to just now reallocate   and pay with opioid abatement funding and save 
ourselves a million but the state can I don't work   for the state state does what state wants that's 
I mean but but that's basically what's what's   happening you said I hit it on the nose that the 
state says well since the opio money is here we're   not going to fund you anymore get it from the 
opio board well and we do still get a certain   percentage of funding we're not 100% floating core 
with opio debate and we still do get State money   the difference is is the state allocation instead 
of going to a certain number of counties now goes   to all of the counties which depleted our funds 
but we still do get some funding there I just see   how this could be um doing foresight um how this 
could get sucked up real fast pass with two or   three organizations cuz you're looking at a half a 
million plus now and as we know over time budgets   grows so what happens the state comes back next 
time and say we're not funding anything so now   you're looking at 7 $800,000 towards one program 
and you're only you know and you're only dealing   with like a million or so you see and then you 
got another one over here and they say and so now   between two organizations three organizations now 
it's basically didn't blew the entire fund up year   after year after year you see what I'm saying so 
now then what do we do then and I think that's   where this board comes into place if that were 
to happen down the road I mean you guys can make   the decision to if core isn't the program you 
want the funding to go to and you think there's   something better you have that ability no core is 
great but the only challenge that I have is that   core is great and they do a great job been over 
there I met with them I went through the program   it's a awesome program but we also have other 
organizations in the community that's also doing   work too that needs funding and based on what 
the action of the state is doing right now I   can just you know how it goes you know when 
they start depleting funds it's only just a   matter of time where they're just going to be 
like almost to like nil to none because this   fund is the money's coming in and they're going 
to just look at this as another way of them uh   well the state and I know the county doesn't have 
really you know a whole kind of lot of Leverage in   that um and I can just see foresight I can just 
see this being really eating up between almost   two to three large situations and then our other 
Community Partners out there kind of like you know   doesn't have a chance I think that's a bridge 
we're probably going to have to cross if we get   there and make some different allocations if we 
need to she's correct it's an allocation question   and that's going to be for you to just you that's 
why you have to watch your budget and make those   decisions it's like any other organizations you 
don't have you don't have to fund them but it   was the recommendation of the state that that's 
that that be the source of the funds so non-funded   non-funded requirements from the state is is is a 
pretty common thing we just usually have to find   way to fund them you just tell the state to come 
on show up at a meeting we got some questions for   them I think you're hitting nail on the headb 
Tommy is that that's what this board is for is   for determining the allocation of where the funds 
go and we are dealing with the limited numbers we   see we've got now availability of 2.5 million uh 
balance and got several programs right here in   front of us so all right so you guys have a couple 
of documents in front of you um and I know that   Miss Danielle did send out the link to the full 
applications um so I'm not sure how deep you guys   got to dive in them but the only thing that I 
printed in front of you so you have the overall   score sheet from the Escambia County Board that 
evaluated the applications and then for each   applicant you have the program summary and their 
budget and I put the budget in there is because   I think that's very important for you to see 
where they're actually putting the funds the   program might be really great but then when you 
break down the budget and you see more than half   of it is going to things like computers and car 
relases and I think that's important for you guys   to take into your evaluations so just looking 
at the the overall score sheet we actually had   seven applicants very good applicants I might add 
um we had Community Health of Northwest Florida   we had lead Inc Lake View Center C program Lake 
View Center Opus program Ministry Village at all   Olive re-entry Alliance Pensacola and Waterfront 
mission all submitted applications for for the   funding the overall scores from the committee uh 
Community Health the the top section that you guys   have is past fail stuff that's stuff they had to 
have in there like prove that they're a nonprofit   prove that you know they've been around for at 
least two years so just basic things that they   had to have um and then the bonus points there 
was a couple of categories in there uh and then   the rankings at the bottom so Community Health got 
the highest they ranked number one we actually had   three applicants that tied for second um we had 
Lake View Center opioid prevention and underlying   Services uh Ministry Village at Olive and water uh 
Front Mission all scored the the same uh and then   the next one which was fifth was Lake View Center 
uh cap program sixth the law enforcement against   drug and violence which is the lead and then uh 
seventh was re-entry Alliance Pensacola so that's   how we scored them I do want to remind you that 
we don't have to award them all and we don't have   to use all of our funding today so if there's 
applicant that we think they could come back   and apply again when we release this again next 
year with a little bit of a stronger application   we can do that so it's kind of up to you guys to 
make the decision on what you want to move forward   to the BCC uh to be awarded for this year and 
then we will release the same notice of funding   availability again next year in June or July just 
like we did this year I know we have a couple of   really strong Community Partners That Couldn't 
apply this time just because they didn't hit that   2-year um Benchmark that I know will be applying 
next year that will bring different types of app   as well but I just wanted to point that 
out to you guys so if let me know how   if you want me to walk through 
each one of these if you have questions I just know it's a lot of information 
that came out just recently you know this packet   to digest and and take all this in uh I don't know 
what process we want to take in doing this if we   want to you know question you right now by that 
you know you present to us stuff or do we want to   is the process come back at a later time you 
know have time to digest this and come to our   own that's up to you folks on on what you need 
to make a a good decision any uh thoughts on   the board yes I I would like to um take some 
time to digest I think um you know cuz I tried   to go to that link and I it couldn't it would 
open it had some type of security things and   I tried to go into it um so this is my first 
time actually seeing all of this is all these   different applications Cy you have something I'd 
rather take a little bit of time additional time   would be Ben that's not that doesn't impact you 
at all no that's just fine whatever you guys need   to do right Dr Williams you have any thoughts 
well yeah I think it's important that everybody   has a good chance to review that I I did uh I 
was able to get through the link it wasn't easy   at first but I I have reviewed it all but yeah I 
think we certainly need to have uh adequate time   view um typically we've been meeting every 
other month but I think that we've been trying   to get this money out in the community for a 
long time so I would recommend we meet again   as soon as possible when people have had a 
chance to review it okay Matt do you have   any thoughts uh I just have one question I see 
some of them have a total amount that they've   requested and Community Health I don't see a 
total amount that they're requesting do you   have that or we just don't I do so for each of 
them Community Health is requesting a total of 500,000 the lake view cat um program is requesting 28,2 4 hold on just a second sure say that number again please for Lake 
View Lake View is 28,2 64 4 for their cat program uh Lake View's opioid prevention and 
underlying Services uh is requesting $349,700 Ministry Village at Olive is requesting 775,000 re-entry Alliance Pensacola is requesting 32,100 and then Waterfront mission is 
requesting 3 38,8 78 and so when you   add all that up did you add all that up to a 
grand total it's just over the amount we have barely okay thank you and whatever you guys don't allocate this just 
rolls into next year it just will be added on to   whoever applies again next year because if you use 
all the fundings up now you really don't know when   your next allocation is coming in I don't and and 
the the next time we'll put this out for folks to   apply for again will be next June or July same 
same time period we did it this year okay thank you with that being said I think 
we're unanimous here we would   like to postpone this and have another 
meeting next month possibly look at the month so you have a motion I have a 
motion yes motion SE that was quick   um she'll need more details and able to 
put it in the meeting minutes motion the   motion I'm sorry motion to table the 
the voting on the applications until   next month while we have a chance to 
review them second all in favor I I I looking at the calendar 11th of November is 
that's Veterans Day cor yeah we're closed y push it out to the 18th right before 
Thanksgiving unfortunately I'll be out   of town well I'll be out I'll be out of town 
on the 4th so Dr Williams may not be able to   vote anyway I was wondering about that would not 
be able to vote at all or you and I are going to   talk about that afterwards okay okay um yeah 
so if I'm excluded from voting then it doesn't   matter but you have in 18th would be okay okay 
what do 18th look like everybody does that work   for you if you want me here okay well I mean does 
it work for the count for the county yeah we set   it for the 18th then just so you know they took 
the attorneys off the advisory boards and we're   concentrating on the on the qu the boards that 
have quasi judicial hearings and that type of thing we have enough of those all right that brings 
us to the election of the chairperson and I do not want it so I'd like to nominate um Miss White 
for a chairperson right I'll second that do a vice chairperson you should vote 
on Katherine White first or if   there's any other nominations all in favor of Kath white I congratulations Kath uh Vice chairperson I guess I'm in the nominating 
mood uh I'll nominate uh Mr Tommy Tommy   White Vice chair all in favor Tommy White you 
you have a serious look on your face sir is   that okay all right wasn't expecting 
sorry vote on Tommy all in favor I I   I congratulations Tommy look at that 
that's two whites at the same time   that is interesting look that won't make things 
confusing at all in the notes I can just see it now all right next thing on the 
agenda is questions regarding the data well I think you guys were a handed 
I believe do you want to did you provide   the data sorry did you provide the data I did 
do you want to give them just a quick summary   of what it is I just confirm Mee so uh part 
of the data is from the core program from um   so the first part is the core program data 
that I just got that um I received um from   them and they have a lot of updates I haven't 
gotten with Joey in the last couple of uh weeks   so that just gives you an overall picture of 
the hotpots what we're seeing as far as opioid   um overdoses it's it continues to be around the 
same range um so and as of July we're already at   uh 1700 so now we're into October so just 
to give you an overall update um what the   zip codes look like where they they are seeing 
the hotpots when the core program and EMS is   is um going on their runs what I also included 
just for you overall just education basis if   you go further on in the packet what we're seeing 
as far as what the state's telling us other usage   with adolescence and our community members and I 
just wanted to paint a picture for you in that so   you know I know this is abatement but where are 
we looking at public healthwise opioid affect   public health so when we're looking at Public 
Health how are we also educating the community   and how is this money being allocated to help in 
that educational process and prevention of all   substances I know we have to focus on o opioids 
but just painting the picture of our community   um so one thing um you'll see in this the data 
Florida for the Florida use substance abuse survey   is from 2022 we will be getting the results from 
that soon I actually have a uh webinar on that on   the 18th of this month so I'll be able to give 
you some 2024 data after that webinar on that   um so it's just an overall Public Health picture 
one thing I did want to include so to also I also   included San Rosa County sorry this was another 
presentation that I gave um just to point out I   also looked at uh motor vehicle accidents so again 
painting a picture of our overall health of our   Community um out of home care for our children 
again what how is just substance use disorder   affecting the whole family just not opioids um 
I think that for this abatement committee it's   a really good picture for you to Envision on the 
headways that we're W making just even with this   abatement money hopefully it will impact all of 
our uh families I put in here drug a arrest as   well again so you know so you can be more informed 
when you're making these big picture decisions for   us in public health any questions with that this 
report um yeah you said in the packet I don't I   don't have it was in emails it was in an email 
it was in an email okay but Mr White I can get   it to you it's just from a other um I also put in 
here some National Data so how we as floridans are   ranking nationally and what that picture looks 
like as well um so I just didn't provide this   information to you just the abatement many I'm on 
other committees that were also looking at this   overall data for our community and public health 
so thank you sorry that you didn't get that Mr   White I may have it's just I may have I may have 
just not opened it and whatnot overlooked it but   uh thank you for everything you do thank you 
thank you if you have any questions uh about   the data or um any other questions you can always 
contact me at sedac thank you mam okay thank you MH any new business come before all right with that we are adjourned   I'm sorry any public speakers okay 
okay we stand adjourned thank you