>> learn about model policies, how they're distributed sample policies. That's correct. And so when things are litigated
or something comes through that the delegation and becomes law like on a July one of each year. We're fortunate to have the SBA who has an
attorney who will put together for a sample policies to make sure we're compliant with those new, a new los each year. So several of U.S. watch
that and then I don't know, that. Sizemore Heizer Did you get a chance to watch the
revenue are? So because anyhow, so we may be referencing that at times when we're when we're talking
because I think from a historical perspective Fairfax County being as strong as we are and have been
historically, I think there's a lot of confidence in the ability to right around policies. But I think that in this age of working smarter, not harder. I think it made sense to for us to as the
chair. And I think my colleagues who watched the webinar agree to pay more attention to what the sample policies are from SBA and perhaps adopt them outright or
edit them, which is our purview. If there's something particularly want to delete or add to them. So so to get started with today. Our last
meeting we left with. Asking superintendent to come back with a plan for us in terms of how to effectively and efficiently tackle policies in
an order that makes sense. And so I'm gonna. Give the Florida doctor E thank you. Miss did a couple things since our last meeting. We didn't have a lot of turn around in bed.
>> I want to make sure that we had something really to be thoughtful about today. First, I want to add to the board's attention, draw you to the if you will, the Excel
spreadsheet by color code. And what we did is went through every policy, the Fairfax County Public Schools has to just be organize, like I feel
like I needed to center my thinking and where we are. So you'll see the 1000 series through, I believe the the 9,000 series. They're all
here. They're coated yellow, green red. If or there's no code in August that yellow or red the red would be more than 5 years outside the review.
Yellow within that 5 year period are close. that was really how I thought about maybe what we need to get done
more timely than others would be obviously read and then yellow. They're also usability pieces. So the other thing that I thought would be helpful for the board is on
the right side. We matched every VSP a matching sample policy so that once we have broader access to SBA, then
you'll be able to have you'll be able to see it on one side. This is what we have as a division on the other side with the SBA has. saw come back to that document in a
minute. The Knicks document, I want to draw your attention to is the document that starts at the top recommendations for review has dates like to 18,
3.18, and so forth. I just handed that to you. And this was my attempt at with spending time this weekend
with Jane has been working on these to put all of what we considered our most urgent policies on actual meeting dates and maybe we could get reviewed. So by the end of the
year, we could be brought current. Obviously today, we're not looking at all these policies. So we have to re calibrate this list and move it all down. A meeting. But I
want you also to note that the back page. To this document has and actually the bottom of the second page, our new
policies from be the SBA that we don't currently have a policy on. So in a maybe for good reason the topics could exist in or be situated and other current policies that we
have or not. Right. So I didn't want draw those conclusions for you as a committee. But I'm happy to look at those, but you can see
the dates. These came out and again, we began to receive the SA the SBA policies. When I joined the division because that's something. I was used
to doing in Pryor State. As we looked at those model policies as what they were called in Washington. And as they came out, we either we had a policy committee which either dismiss
them or worked with some. You needed. It's meeting, but I'm
happy for him. don't know I'm
good. So on the on that page 3, you'll see the date that the SBA came out with those policies. So you can see a lot
of different dates there. And again, these are very possibly these VE SBA policies may include language that's included in some of our
policies. And I didn't have time to do that level of detailed work. But I think we ought to make sure we crosswalk those VSP a policies with Fairfax policies to make
sure there isn't something we're missing. But that is a body of work I would propose. Is started up here shortly. And I don't know that that
needs to be done at this table, but perhaps if this committee deems it important that I can make sure that we have Jayne work on that. But I do. I do think there's some
benefit to doing that. So again, one of asks or directives I received at the meeting was to come back with agendas for each subsequent meeting, which policies with
staff put on. And so that's where we would land on that. Finally, there's a document
that. As the 3 questions from the January 21st meeting and then a second question that says, and this is stamped confidential on the top, which
policies due for review. And 24 need to be prioritized These this goes through cip paperwork. And which policies
have been move forward to the board for full approval. >> Question 3 or topic 3. >> Indicates which policies are overdue for their five-year review. Again, these
are cross referenced in the color chart. Different way of pointing it out. behind that
cover sheet. One of the things you asked for were some template. So we have a draft one and a draft too. Of
possible formats for policies moving forward and these were polled from. Sort of other places and best practice. So this is how policies could
look moving forward. And this is how our policies do like. And I think one of the things that is occasionally.
Confusing about our policy is is we have the summary of changes since last publication. Most other policies and other divisions
don't include that because it's just the new revised policy. So they don't include that piece of it. So I brought 2 drafts. There could be other
drafts. But those where the it the pieces I brought SoFi rate them of a white boards pay. What I would say is you have an overall chart of all of our policies and where we stand.
Also includes our regulations that could sit with the policies. That's one of the questions that's been asked. So this is if you will, the overall. Secondly, we've got a
draft possibility of agenda topics by month. And then 3rd would be this crosswalk between the SBA policies and our policies to make sure
nothing is left on. Attended. And then 4th. We have these temp lutz for what policies should look like. So those were the 4 key takeaways that
I've come back with them would welcome any further direction on. So thank you, Miss Lady. >> Thank you for this work and especially the additional step
of matching the the SBA policies. I also know that when I was on the webinar with the SBA that they have an interesting categorizing of BBB FB do. Those are not
intuitive to me. >> So if folks are confused by that, that was something within nomenclature, if you will, like how they and I I do
believe that those are with, you know, there's a chart trying know what those mean? I don't think those are weeds we need to get into. And I think it really matters. We have the
policy numbers to crosswalk. So I thank you for I think it's fantastic. >> And especially the sample of what we should tackle
moving forward in a particular order so I could add more commentary unless someone has
a particular question before we move. OK, doctor Anderson. Thank you. I'm just trying to
find. One document that Dr. just spoke about okay. >> This is the one that doesn't any designation on it.
The last 2 pages that has. 6, 6, I'm sorry. This is 6 16. 25 and I think the other one is 7, 1, 25. >> Review policies. I'm not sure I understand the dates
that these have come out from the SBA for which we don't have a policy of these about to come out because they >> Identified as 2025, got a
little confused there. If you could enlighten me. At the bottom of page 2 continued to
page 3. not seeing any of it say 25. Right here is says 6 16 25 review new policies from
the SBA. That Fcps does not have. >> Well, 6.16 would be a proposed agenda. For 6.16. Okay. One of those states in
the last com. >> The 23 may and the 19 February. Yes, one of those caught one of those day. I think that these are the year
and month. Of when the SBA release those I see. >> So that OK? So there are some as far back as 2001. Is
that what the one February? >> Is speaking to what I would think. Again, remembering that we didn't start looking at these till 2 years ago. So we would necessarily been
receiving those at that time. So I scripts into the service and we only have we've only had a subscription for the last 2 years. Is that correct? Madam Clerk?
>> Yes, that's my understanding. >> Okay. So that's okay. So unless you have a subscription, you can't have access to this information from the SBA.
>> Correct. It's whole separate dues that we pay in order to have access to this service. So we've got our normal vs, be a dues. And then we have the disease that we have to pay to be part of the
policy services. OK, thank you. >> How did we is Mr. Foster still here. You'll be back. not right now. I just had a question because I knew that
we talked about this previously. That typically will look at policies to ensure that they compliant with any new regulations and
laws. How do we get that information? Typically, if we did not subscribe to this service. And I it's not really asking but that's a question I
will have for him when he comes back. The other comment that I want to make at least for right now since I'm just seeing these is regarding the
traps. I do appreciate the move. Told words having a standard Templet. That's very helpful ause they they've been all over the place. But
one of the things that I do want to say is the and I don't think I I've sehat the the SBA sample policies look like. We're still waiting for access
to to that site because I believe Mister Foss is the one who holes the access to that. So hopefully we'll get that sooner rather than later. But
the only comment that I wanted to make was regarding the summary of changes. I think that's just helpful to keep because it just shows. The changes and really just I
think it's more information because I was so glad to hear during weapon. I what we said in this room. What I know I have said all policies, a communication tool to the public and that's the
direction to the superintendent. So if can, if using this as a tool to communicate to the public, I think it's really important to identify. What is it that we're changing? And so the summary of changes would be
one that I would like for us to keep. But I would definitely like to compare the samples with whatever the SBA has available for us. And my
last question, as I'm looking at this body of work, first of all, thank you. This is very helpful. One of the things that I don't know if I'm scene as clearly. Is a conversation
that we've had about reviewing these policies and clusters as related to the topic. And I don't know if I see that. So if you could speak to that a
little bit because I have a thought as to why this may be, but I wanted to know are thinking in organizing this. I think until we can dig out of
the whole of >> expired policies, I think it's difficult to institute a review like we have to get caught up in. Then said a
review. And I would arguably say that it ought to go in number one by legal. Obviously anything that's changed and now that we're VSP 8 members, we would know that are not the
SBA members, but now getting his policies. We would know that. So that's number one. But the number 2, we would take the largest policy sections and those tend to be
anyhow. You can see for yourself think the 2, thousands, whatever the largest ones are. And those become annual. And then some of the smaller ones so that everything is reviewed every 5
years when you have 9 series, not all 9 are equally large. So I think you'd put your largest ones by themselves and combined some of the smallest ones. My hope would be that we could get caught up this year,
but it may not happen. It may not be till next year, but until we can get caught up, we're not going to be able to have the luxury of a of a thoughtful plan. And I think we've been. We've been
thoughtful and word. We have a lot of policies. I call them random, but they're not in clusters right now because they're just not. And so I
think have to clean it up to do a reset to then move into more pragmatic plan. Thank
you. Thank you. OK, thank you. This really is a lot. >> It can help us progress a lot more quickly. thing I want
to do is further digest this information. All probably have to do that after this meeting. But I think this is a great info. But in order for it to make more sense and this to
use like place where we have all the information. I think, you know, having a candidate seems kind of nitty-gritty, but I think it's important to
say. Like we need to know of, you know, across a spreadsheet like which ones as the S P have a sample policy for. Do we need to know if there's a
regulation? I can't really tell. By the way, it's it's in column right now. And like what are the spa's acronyms? I don't know the definition of them off hand. The date needs
to be in the full month name and the 4 digit year because it looks like it could be within the 31 calendar days. And we just need to know, you know, May 2024 February 2021, cetera. I also think we need
to define what you know, there's overdue and there's in compliance. And then what's the space between that we want to say is coming up for being
of the year? Is it 2 years because what's been identified in yellow. I mean, I see one of them one of them that's not identified is from 2020.
January, right? So we should already have that one in the Just the point being, what do we want identify as needing to come up for, you know, is a 2 years before the five-year
duty. Is it one year before? So I think it would be good to make this this list more specific around that and
really know how many are coming up. One thing I while few things I'm trying to get. I see is a priority for this
meeting. Is. To review the proposed agendas in the handout from the superintendent. So the superintendent recommends like today that we on to 18 on the
cover of that page. Go through what, like 10 or 12? And we are not prepared to do that because right. So let's you know, to 18 is gone. So the
next one is March 18th. So are we starting with those 4 thousands? It seems like that's what you're recommending. know, I would just move everything down.
One. Okay. That's fine. But I also know that there are other policies identified that. You know, need to be prioritized.
For the other hand out. So I'm confused as to why we would start with the ones. That are being suggested with 21 15, which is actually the first
policy ever worked on the board back in 2020. So probably will need that much updating right kidding. So 21 15, 20 to 32. But then on the
other on the other side and the other document we've got 11. 0, 2, 13 10, which is already in I'm not clear what
the proposal is for the remainder of agenda. For the remainder of this year based on these 2 things. So I took the
>> to documents and you should be able to see. On the 3 questions from the January 21st meeting document those
numbers, one 2 as well as the remaining they do exist on the date meeting date like 11. 0, 2, actually went to. The May 27th because it is a priority
to get done this year. But of the things that we feel like we're trying to go with. More students entered early on to prioritize because the May
27th they're sort of less student-centered policies. So that was kind of the thinking in. So all of the policies on the one document are cross walked onto the dates, but
they're an order of kind of that student-centered first and then moving it to Hd so forth. But I'm open to any order. I just put thing together and I'm happy to have
you all. Put it in. Whatever order works for you change the policies. I just came back with a possible draft. >> appreciate cause if I could have a littlt more time just to finish this
questioning if you Dr Anderson, that okay? As chair? If I may, I gave her about extra money as well. Thank you. So this reminds me that one of the things we talked
about last night was having a cover sheet. Why are we receiving the recommendations? Do these policies at these times? And I don't want it to be whatever the board's things that should be Dre. That's how we got into this problem in
the first place. So I mean, knowing that there's no way today we're going to be able to do the policies and February 18th and units like Hunt. I don't know why it's included dazed and we, you
know, so already it's, you know, we need to receive the proposals. I would think, you know what, 2 weeks in advance, at least a week in advance. But for now, we're going to
need to know why are you suggesting them? Is it because there's urgent need? A coach Ange? I think we still have to figure that part out we can talk about that more in this
discussion. All right. Not see a plaque on take a to miss merits. Point. I think that what needs to happen is that we need about these down. I think this was, again, an idea
of a sample of what we could cover in a meeting and I also think we need to look at the calendar and perhaps at a meeting since we don't really
recess until July. Maybe we need to add a meeting in June or possibly. I know we have the South by Southwest, which is 2 weeks from now, but maybe we can get something out.
Either side of that. I don't know. But either way I'm comfortable with it with going with the plan that's before us because it is cross walks. In
terms of And I understand the idea story of the 200's was because of those policies and they're very student facing. So I get it. I don't need to do them in the order because
they are kind of in buckets. When you do that to hundreds. The 200's are supposed to be like minded. The 300 are supposed to be like minded. So we kind of are doing them in buckets but were covering
what's overdue or do this year to get caught up. And I think once were caught up, then we can have, you know, a different conversation. Well, I think it'll be Dre just
referenced. When you look at the number of policies and every in the 100st, the 2, 100's are some that were last week and combined them but that's what I would propose is we just bounce this down. And
then what I would do is I would ask Dr Reid to then bring all these Polish it policies to her leadership team and say these are what review reviewing the
governance that they would should hand them out. I would think in a, you know, based on who they who's who's bucket, they live in and then they would go work with their staff to review them and or red line
them and then bring them back to that leadership team, I guess who would then review them? And then once Dr Reid is comfortable with that. And I think the added step is we
would like a cover sheet for each policy that says that there's a no change because of this. We're changing this because of this. I think that staff can then crosswalk it with SBA model policies. Once
we get the manual printed to make sure that we're, you know, also been compliant with with, you the law, the laws that are in place and then we become to governance and then
my ask of governance would be that we trust staff and we dot don't diagram every sentence at the table. I mean, I think there's a point to where we have to get through policies.
And I think we spent a lot of time doing that. And that's not you know, that that's a direct quote from the webinar from the attorney for SBA. She said if you have a board
committee that's diagram sense that the table you'll never keep up. Well, I think that's us, folks. I mean, I used to say to kids all the time I want to schedule changes. This is not Burger King. You can't
have it your way all the time. I mean, eventually we have to agree to the good of the whole. So that would be my suggested as chair plan, move forward. Just a bump. All this down and then not Dr. Reid say
here's where tackling. Take it to LT distribute REDLINE. Bring it back. Review. Bring
it to us. Thank you. Mystic's
it. So thank you, doctor. Each for presentation and the plan. >> I I believe also discussed about how to
>> March some of this policies together in this under HR under other other grating and other things. what I'm seeing is is a really good
description of how we can fix these and update them and the color code and all that. But if you do this now and then reorganized, the policies are kind of how we were talking
about that. I feel like it's going to be another work we have to do occasionally. So I wanted to see Fig organize
them by going in sections like all the 11, 100's and get tackled them first and then going down in that order, going to take care some
outdated, won some some men. Yellow. But and he's then began streamlined them and tried to baby call some of them in do too many policies.
This is like unbelievable amount Wallace is we have. So
that's my. Take on this. Staff stands ready to support the policy work in whatever fashion you want to do it. >> I just need. The direction
for majority of this committee or the majority of the board in. I would agree Mystics. And if you're wanting to consolidate policies, that would be a different path forward. I don't. how you
would do those at the same time. we that's Certainly a direction we could go. We would want to probably
consolidate and then also consolidate the VSP policies that we don't have for those topics. Into those. If that's
the direction we had. Sizemore Heizer. I really appreciate all this hard work in bringing of this to the trying to. all
of these to figure out all the different proposals that are in here. But I think what I'm hearing is is sort almost a four-step process, right?
There's I'm assuming this list of policies that you have on this document, you know, to 18, 3.18, what stopped the priorities to review? Yeah,
well, there's a lot that are Some of these, the priorities of the ones that are out of date. These are the parties to review. >> first I did have one question. There are. >> To special education policies pending Csd right
now. And I don't see them on this list. So do we need a a CSU? Keep reviewing We can to keep those at a date like that was. To do that. I mentioned
to our governments share and I know they were pending a governance when I was chair. And so I just curious. >> I'm not sure you know, which ones those are. >> I have the numbers in front of me, but it's something
that. Came to governance in the spring. I asked I was chair if they would be sent to if they it commented. ACC had not commented. I think they're
finally taken dcsd in December this year and I don't think they commenting, but they're just kind of floating out there. And I'm it's tough to think those interviewed. That's fine. But I don't want
a csd bunch of work if they're not on this list. So here's what I brought that up before multiple times. But these policies over the last years, I'm just curious, went, but the thought is on those
Sizemore, sorry I believe she you're talking about. 26 70 in. 26 71. Thank you. Thank
you. Yes, thank you. >> You know, those should be on the list as well. So
they're on the red list here and I'm not sure All have have them here.
>> Thank you. I appreciate that. know this is a lot to compile. So I understand things can get missed. But I think the second point I want to make. Well, I actually don't think we should be parsing out each word. Our
oversight role is important because it is a check on to make sure things are are there. So I just want make sure we're balancing that. So would you build update these and figure out where in timeline you think there
should be reviewed? Thank you. Appreciate that. I think it sounds like to me it's almost a multi step process here, right? But first, we need to review these policies that
staff think are important to review the once you have on the stated list, right? And it would be great. I think my colleague mentioned. To streamline our works were not parsing it all out. If we have a cover sheet that explains what the changes are. The
reason for the changes or if there's no change, right? That's recommended. But even beyond that, it would be helpful to know what the staff are looking for in their review because I don't know if for necessary in alignment
with what the staff are looking for versus what we're looking for. And one the policies are reviewed last time it seemed to me the impression I got was staff is reviewing for legal
compliance. Whereas we were looking for a review that was bringing the policy into current best practices. Right. And those are 2 different levels of review. So that may
be why when we get a policy sometimes, I mean, when I look at a policy review, a lot. I personally I want to see not just legally compliant but hasn't been updated to what we think best practices are. And
that might be where why we're making the sausage here sometimes because that review as it happened. So I think you'd be good for us to know what is entailed in the staff reviews that we meet our expectations for when it gets
here. take a go back at some point. Thank you. Thank you. Missus, Miser. Dr, Anderson, for go back. Second, couldn't
answer victim thank you. So the question being, could we look for best practices and legal compliance? >> yes, we could. Clip from a question. The questions. I
think yes. I think what need to know from you, what is your expectation of staff review before it comes here and then see if that matches our expectation?
>> I think first and foremost, that needs to be legally compliant and then it should absolutely be best practice for sure. So I those would be my expectation.
>> then can we resource it? Whatever it is but And then we want to make sure we cross walk it. I think sometimes
policy as I look through this. Is written. For whatever reason we haven't checked. The policies cited. And so sometimes it's actually controversy other policies. So
I think we have to also make sure which is why lady said at the outset. Before I would ever bring a policy to governance to the committee. I want our senior leadership to
look at it first because often policies and other departments that are connected to that policy. And we have to all be in alignment. So those in divisional alignment that is necessary, which I think
sometimes get skipped. >> Take 10 seconds finish this thought. Thank you. So it would be helpful. Dr Reid may be to come back to me or to the government's chair on all
the pieces of what your staff expectation of policy review is so that we wear clear as to what we can expect in that review. So if you could come back with that, that be
helpful. Yes, ma'am. Thank you. Dr. Anderson. Would.
doing 2 minutes. We're into 4. Is there another piece of the agenda? >> Mr. Foster, I I had asked
the question why you are God. How did you receive an alert that we needed to update certain policies since we've only subscribe to the VSP
sample policies for the last 2 years. >> Good afternoon. I want to make sure I understand the
question. So are you asking what we did prior to receiving the policies in the past 2 years? So we work with
superintendent office, other relevant departments and based on the basically what came out of the General Assembly every year, you know, Mr. as the board knows, prepares that
list of relevant, you know, legislation and based on that, we would determine what must be Changes must be made and which are really discretion or.
>> I discussion Arie. So a little bit so that are are board could make. I'm sorry. Thank you. So the policies that are here on pages, bottom
of page 2, 3, that some of the many years out, is it because they did not come out of General assembly work and were perhaps discretionary. This
page. Just trying to get an understanding as to some of these are as far back as 2001. If I'm reading this correctly. Why we don't have these as
part of our policies and whether it's a a huge oversight just because they were discretionary and not necessarily pertaining to any
new regulation or law. Yes, thank you. I do want to. Support what was just scared because I think it was ways
here last time when staff reviews the policy. What I believe that I heard last time was it was just the legal compliance. And we do look at a lot mobecause our role as
representatives of the community is to bring in that lens. So we probably did a little bit more and to our communication to the public as well as our directive to the
superintendent and the policies. So it's not going to be all accomplished by staff because that is our role as the policy-making body for the
division. The other thing that I wanted to raise that I've been on governance, probably this is what my second time with our time. I can't remember. But very often we've been I don't say waylaid
because it has a negative connotation, but the work has had to pause in order to address certain things that are more urgent or just have
come around which we don't have a policy, you know, an example of that has been, you know, the equity policy that the grading policy, where we've taken a huge chunk of
time to accomplish that. And I raise this because I want to be sure that that kind of delay could be part of the conversation with whatever
schedule that we put forward. I don't necessarily see it impacting the schedule that goes through the end of the year. But just moving forward just to leave room for new
work, which may be really essential, but really time consuming. As mayor. So I'm
driving down here. A bunch of processes that so going forward, we can have this clear in the future. I think one of I think a goal to doctors and to your point is at the start of each
committees school year, this we re up our committees that we set the agenda for the whole year. And so your Dr Reid, you propose this, but we should be able to do that. And
then we leave space for the things that come up. And even one of the things I've been jotting down is, you know, we stay in Dr. Maybe you could check We call them the 1000 leak. We recycle thousands.
Are the numbers like what is that? It's not like the financial accounting term like what it just saying. Each numerical theme or how do you? So have the number on the far
left is really the series is what we >> That's That's the word. A comment series got it. I will. So we could at the start of the year, right? We could even do by the end of this year, right? Let's map out what
series we're going to go through. And then there's no scrambling and everyone knows what's coming right wheel of that. So And then we also do things trying identify was
when does the policy get priority over the scheduled series? Will something that's going cause inherent legal financial risk to the school
division or as change the state law that requires a policy be changed before the next go-around. So I think, you know, again, just writing these down and codified the process great.
>> So >> I would love by the end of today if we could figure out what the agendas are for the remaining of this year. The school year. But I am a little
confused because the April 29th agenda has 3 different, serious listed. And so. You know, I want to be sure that we're not you know, things one
of the other is. Priority. Well, we just are there to special ed policies in the wings. I mean, there's lots of stuff in the wings. So do we just say, you know, this is really where we catch ending up in our conversations,
right? Colleagues. They were like, well, we shouldn't really review this policy until we do the whole series. So I want to get clarity. Like is every meeting from here
till June. We're July going to be just basically focusing on one series and then maybe if there's anything that is, you know, outlying that's going to cause us and here at risk, we
had that to the agenda. So that's one question. And I guess it's really for discussion. And could just discuss. >> And then. I also, you know,
regarding the format of the policy, I think. >> We all need to think about that and maybe come back with suggestions and then just make a determination. And just as a
sign, if you want include the summary of changes be concluded at the end. But that also raises another question for me is there are times when I want to see the previous policy and I don't know where to find it like whatever the
version was before the president's version. And so that may be a clerk saying it's a board act thing. I'm not sure. But I think that's important. Or maybe it's on
that Carter Paige and it just lists hears the previous versions. So just to regroup, I would love our input on Ken, are we going to train get today to have each of our
meeting agendas for this school year dedicated to one series, each. Maybe it's 2 meetings for series who knows? >> So if I could respond. With
2 items once were caught up. Like I would love to have annual calendar with the policies. That's what I'm more used to the policies by meeting. That would generally
be a series over the course of the year. So Doctor Anderson's point there would be room within those agendas to pick up something that has legal and financial or reputational risk. And staff can plan for
that. Right? Like we can plan backwards. Just like we do with the eels. Now, every department knows when they've got to have all their data pulled when it has to come to senior leadership when it has a review there. When it comes
from my desk for last review. Before it comes to you. So it gives us of work cycle cadence that makes sense. However, we're not there yet because we still are catching up. So the
purpose of the April 29th having several series. It's because those really are the ones we felt like could pick these up. We might get caught
up with the 5,006 1008 1000 series or at least get the Reds knocked out for those series. So I do think there will be some meetings where
you know, we may have more than one series presenting. If I could respond. When I look at April 29th, though, we have
80 to 58 building evaluation renovation, infrastructure, maintenance. >> Got to be part of the current cip policies that were waiting to do so again, that doesn't make sense to me. Like the whole point is we want to
be looking fanatically. And so. Maybe we start with that series for facilities. And I unclear like are all these the policy each agenda are these
like late ones are the deep ones like. You know, are the sort of proposed for an appropriate amount of work for all involved. So that we can
realistically achieve that schedule. I think that right now we're working with those policies. Well, we wait to
redo right? So we're working with them. Common practice in a two-hour meeting would be to be able to hit that many. But it's the Ward wants to have
more detailed conversations and recommendations. We do need to schedule more meetings or I think that's what we're going to do for him. Want to get caught up with in a
calendar year. Well, basically, like if one of these is like grading policy that hasn't been reviewed quite some time is very meaty. That's probably gonna be very different. Then, you know, are
we keeping to the fire code policy? And I don't have a sense of that because have a sense that we're all these policies are at like we could. We need that guidance to make appropriate agendas that we
can get through. I don't know that I can predict which ones Yeah, I can predict with some certainty but not with. Significant certainty, which
ones you're going to find more. Change. Were they?
Mystic's it? Okay. We would do in this matter about going CDs. And tell you why. just give an example.
>> On one of the policy is on. 21 cities to anyone 50. 21 50 are 21. 51 are 21. 52 are they should be one policy. So when
I say Megan going to see these are the mean to be stock from the first. can start like from Cip itself. And then when working to update them, the
can just put them together into 1, 1, says Prevention of alcohol and other illegal drugs by students. Second on one also say the same thing. Then there is one broadneck
non Alex. An administration are kind, I guess. And tobacco and smoking devices violations. So. What vision was to see. What were those numbers? Again, the ones with
that are after them. The sticks that are regulations and I could locate can take those off the chart. Yeah. Maybe that's why it's confusing. But they all
connect to the policy by of that number right above it. So 21, 50 is the policy. And then 21 50 are 21 51. 21 52 are all
regulations that sit under that policy. >> But if it I think maybe it would be an easier chart. If I took all the regulations out, I just need that from my look because sometimes we've
updated one and not other. >> No, it's fine. It's fine. No invent Cloudy fight this and then didn't make sense. >> so then I think if you look
at looking more in order because when I saw I was like that too many policies we have. But the looks like we don't. But but but I still
feel have one page policy still literally like 2 lines on them and then be have policies. Beach have like 7 to
8 pages did. That has to be some reasoning behind some of those policy that invited people to stand alone policy just. You know, we saw the bar sick leave. One time is was,
you know, just a stand-alone policy could have being. The other duties for that matter. So my point is, as we do the work, just should be to debate, you know, mindful You
know what you're doing here and and and it's going to help the future boards are bored and just make it streamlined rather than just. Checking the
box. I'm not. I just want to be here to just say more lawn. That's not why I'm here far.
Thank you. Sizemore Heizer. Thank you so I think this information. >> Dre, the eve of Eid lady
Eva put together and are clerks. This really, really helpful I think this recommendations for policy is to be reviewed in standard
policy temple. It is very, very helpful. And I think that this makes lot of sense. What I don't. But I think we need to be fleshed out a little bit
more is how we get here. Right in the process for that. Right. And the as I'm listening. Here's kind of how I see it to visit to 2. Thank
you. First, the alignment with what staff reviews and our expectation to staff review. I think that's really important. Rights are all starting with the same baseline of what we're expecting in terms of the policies when they get here. Second, which we talked about book the first time.
Second, I think there's a 2 pronged process going on here that we need to figure out what that to prom process looks like one. The first prong. How do review the policies that are out of date and need to be reviewed by
this is the list that you started with here. But I think what I what happened is as looking at this is the policies that were on the January 20st meeting, which include especially policies. I don't think I've moved into
the the other sheet. the February 28th. And so that's how those policies kind of got. So what we're supposed engage in a 21st, what I'm seeing was time sensitive and pick for a reason didn't then get translate into this
document and that's how they got lost. Mike, my sense from just looking at it and I get there's a lot of different documents here. But if you look at the document that start to the recommendations for policy review, that is
which policies, of you. And there's we're up for discussion. January 21st is possibly too 18. 25, but those are listed for to 18. 25. That
I think. That's the first thing. The second thing I think as we look at our peril processes when we think that the policies review, I think we need to recognize that this first round or view is going
to take longer because some of these policies out of date, right? So it's probably take a little bit longer to get them to in date. And so really thinking about whether the
number of policieson here is realistic and maybe the level of staff review will make these realistic or not. But I'm not sure I would think they're realistic from the number that are on there. But
while we're doing that, we need to be developing up in parallel to us reviewing these policies with Steph bringing back. But we all agrees the level of review we want the
staff to bring back. We need to develop a parallel process with a timeline that could look like once we catch up, what does a regular policy review process look like? And I think you touched on that.
We talked about The series numbers. As recreating that parallel process, including a timeline to it. That gives us the space and time maybe staff
to do it. Maybe, Jane, I'm not sure who to look at. How can we consolidate these to look at the SBA and what may be missing and to look at what may be the S P doesn't have. We may want new right to come
back and say we've consolidated these are recommendations. We've looked at the SBA and then we implant that parallel process after we catch up with the development of that process is going on
while we're catching up. So we don't finish until now. What? That's my $0.2. happy die of the diagram you don't hear. I'm happy to send it out to you. And you waiting in
response just to study our region's comment on the matter. I'm fine with any of the >> We can create a parallel
process. I don't know if it starts in one year or 2. And we need a process to somehow manage all the. 10 or 11
years. Out of compliance policies. I think creating a process moving forward is quite simple. Figuring out how to get caught up is the more challenging part right now to
me. >> And just the calm in the 21st 28th policies that were listed. I following that one. Clarify. So on this sheet
here, the sheet that starts recommendations for policies. There's a bunch of policies listed under number one. It says which policies need review these policies are up
for discussion per January. 21st 2025 Governance Committee meeting possibly to 18 2025. There's a whole series of policies. Listen here, which include the 2 that I mentioned, students with
disabilities. Yes, bill have company. It's the one that the very top of us like >> The very top sentences recommendations for policy is to be reviewed by meeting. Instead, calls. It's the one
that has the 3 numbers. 3 questions, questions for its 3 questions, James. So when you look at that with other following. Yeah, those didn't
get transit it over to 18. So that is kind of got lost. Yeah, over point I will make sure that I work to embed those back in.
>> I think that was a breakdown in communication with Jane because I don't know that shoot. We actually tackle the fact that we didn't actually complete that. not only that out. No, no, I
appreciate appreciate Because because you're right, they they all need to be in there. Thank you. So I'm gonna Go back. I'm going to say not
that it really matters. But I don't care about the summary changes. I think it's cumbersome. I think it's laborious. I don't think that's typical of other systems. I'm anxious to see if
the model policies from the SBA, but I don't think they have it in there. I think at the end of the day, you've got dates and again, back to MS merits point if they're tracked in board action, go
back to that date. Hopefully would think it find the previous version. In terms of review. Just to summarize what I think I heard, I think that I heard Dr Reid articulate because we need to be moving
on this and we do to agree on what we're doing in the next meeting. >> And her team need to get started. So if everyone can hear me because I see a lot of activity going on. Number one,
legal compliance number 2 best practices. Number 3 can week what resources can be operation allies to number 4 division alignment. So that
it's not superseding are stepping on the toes of a different policy. then also cross walking the SBA model sample. They're called sample
policies. I can't think of anything else that I could direct staff to do in a review other than those 5 things repeat them again, legal compliance, best practices,
canopy, operation allies is their division alignments and then let's also crosswalk with the Bsb example. Policies which also further ensure they're legally compliant
because the vsc be a sample. Policies are legally compliant. So that's the one thing. The other thing in terms of obviously, when we're
trying to even now, if something comes to us where we have a policy that puts us at risk legally financially reputation. Ali, it's going to be having to an agenda that's going to have to be a priority. So we understand
that the emergencies happen when when doing your your daily routine. So. >> But I think what we need to do is determine what policies
are going to do it at the next meeting and we haven't even gotten to the sample policies which I think are a cleaner look. And again, I I said I don't think we need the summary changes can sometimes
it's like a page and a half long. And in the policy. I don't think it's needed, but what we can we can look at that. I also think eventually.
>> And this is the thing we've got to get caught up. And so when I talk about not, you know, diagram every sense of the table. There's a there's a
point to which we can't do it like we have to say it checks number one to its best practice. It's legally compliant could be operation allies. If checks all those 5 boxes. I think we have to
think before we could take because we've we've got to move through these. And then once we do that, then of course, they'll be a priority around how we're going to do
moving forward. about time. go to Dr, Anderson, for go back. >> Thank you trying to find my.
>> This is a question for the clerk. Do we have the previous versions of policies in Bor docks or does that just disappear? No, we keep them within ourselves at, but
apparently it was a practice before I even got here. That won't you? Update something to take down the old one. So it didn't cause confusion and you leave up the current 1, One
thing I'd like to and what we have I've talked with the deputies about and looking for new provider other than boarddocs be quite frank, is that you could see all of the old versions in the world that
I came from. You had all the old versions available, including the Red lines so that you could see the changes. So that's something that I would like to do. But
apparently not what we do currently, but I'm sure that's a practice that we could change. I think it's just the way you do things on board docks. It's hard to tell if you have multiple things up there, which one is the most
current >> chair and I know there's not a lot of vendors out there, but the other one that we reviewed during a during one of the conference's. We went to does that meet the
criteria that you just share? >> So there's different versions out there. I know that Boarddocs is actually getting ready to move away from Boarddocs. There's a new
version called Community. I believe that they want us to look at. I came from a granicus pay system and the district and then the candidates pay system. You can build a custom, build it out
so that you could do different version. Okay. Thank you for that. >> I do agree. I don't want us to have, you know, perfection, be the enemy of the good. We have some good things here
that we could begin to do. I agree that having a fulsome cover sheet will be very helpful to eliminate a lot of the questions because when I said and governance first, we settle with all the questions
that we build understanding and then we give thoughts. So if we could eliminate the question asking by having the information be available, I think that will also cut down on time. I believe that
whatever those 5 components, I was trying to scramble them. I didn't get it in time. But in hearing you speak, it makes sense as a starting point, but
it cannot be it meets those 5 criteria and it's done for some policies that's going to be the case. We have to give ourselves the opportunity to communicate. They even said
it. And SBA, the policy is the communication of the board to the public and to the superintendent. It's not just checking off the list, but we could find certainly some ways
of having some efficiencies. And so if there's going to be best practices, if there's going to be just something for us to respond to that is comprehensive that will really cut down the time. And you
definitely started to talk about what I jotted down here as well, which is not all of these policies are created equal. So in terms of managing our own level of success and I
don't know how we do this without getting into them a little bit deeply. I just don't think that each of the I want to I want these agendas to be successful agendas with
the time that we do have. Which brings me to my point of personnel. Very much appreciate where we started. But the school board really needs pick this up and continue with that. Continue
this for perpetuity. I really want to just throw out again that we need a policy person in the school board office that is going to continue to track this work. That is a
good continue to track the square to make sure all of these things online to pull from the SBA, the sample policies because they also said during During that
weapon, I joined the training that you need to have somebody who is going to be detail oriented and really into this regularly. And I can't point to one person who's played has
not already full who can take that on the top of my head because the clerk has 1000 things. The superintendent has 1000 things. Legal has 1000 things doesn't mean they can't
be involved. But in terms of doing that day to day tracking that was discussed. I think we need to have a dedicated
person to do that in office. Okay. So. You the size a house
or does to your point, I hear what you're saying that we have policies that we identified are ready in committee's iteration. But the challenge was, is that? >> The policy was like 10 years old. And then we had
like, well, what about the rest of the series? So, you know, I'm just wondering, there's going to have to be some that are just going to have to continue to be
delayed. And, you know, we have a whole series almost a whole series already reviewed in the cip policies in that series. So could we start with that one? And then map out
when staff can come to whatever the rest of the policies are that have been outstanding. And I think that's something that could be a next step. Not like an official, you know, like coming out of this meeting. What are the directives that
we're all going to do? So one of them could be the superintendent further. We're finding the proposals for the remaining agendas. Knowing that we have to look at them
have to. This is this is when it starts. Dr Reid colleagues. I also think that just like Dr Reid, when you do the presentations about the
strategic plan and the executive limitation, you start with the grounding language. We always see that teacher plan, you know, attendance. We see the executive limitation language. I think that every presentation should start with
but school board policies. The work relates to doesn't have to be an exhaustive list, but it should be. I think the main ones and the cip presentation is really the only one that I can recall that does that. And
that's really what led me in the Sizemore Heizer last year to say, well, wait a minute when's the last time we reviewed it because it's just as important as an eel or strategic plan. So I would
like us to consider even if it's just to say the series. I would like to regarding accessing previous versions. I am not in favor of something custom built because the
history in the school division is it doesn't get updated. So I am not in favor of that. And I would expect the board to be informed of any movement of our technology platform from the clerk's office and the chair and vice chair. What I
think we could do in the meantime, and this would be some labor. Is that for every cover sheet, right, which is actually the landing page for policy. It has the PDF and
then it links to the meetings that are related to that, which also helps because I know people who want to see well, what was the grading policy discussion like? Where do I find those meetings? And then they're searching and
looking. I think that that could solve the because we do need to look at things in the past. I think also one of the things today, I think we
should determine what the standard 10 plate is to look at this and decide today. So I guess in summary, my questions are Heaney determine today
what at least the next meeting's agenda will be. If we're going to start with the series I'm just rains down. And then can we determine the
policy format? Based on the 2 samples given? I guess that's pretty much air moderate or people to come in as you like.
Thank you. Miss Sizemore Heizer. I'll be honest like.
This isn't really a process. The motion that meetinwas too have a meeting when we have a process recognize it takes time to create. And I respect that. This is not a
process. This is just a list of. What meetings polls. He's been review with the next 2
meetings. Yeah, but that's that's a process to review. Is this the process we're going to follow for all of these
meetings? Is that the question some 0 point to be a process of we have. Other policies written. Like the process. My
understanding was not what is the process to review of policy. But what is the process of which policies are going to be reviewed? But this is a process of how to review a policy. Right, as opposed to
what policies are written review like, is it a kid by the thousands series is a bucket by dates like. That's what I think we've been grappling with here. And this
is how to review a policy it's both and obviously didn't hit the mark. But what it was an attempt to do is create a part of process.
>> On how sort of like the how bill becomes a bill, right? this is how a policy becomes a policy. Just for some clarity and then outlining the policies that I would start
with for each of the remaining meetings. I think the January 21st Cluster is a disconnect with Jane who thought we already did those on January 21st, which we didn't. But or that we at the last meeting,
which we didn't because we we've had snow when we were remote and they want on the agenda anyhow. But I think try to come back with once a process to do it. And what are the policies that I would do
to catch up? >> Absolutely. And again, this is a lot of works. It's not meant to be but what I feel is missing in between is what is the process by which we review policies on a regular basis
right at or are we or perhaps and I respect you, Doctor Rita, this is what you want to do. It's fine. perhaps this is how policies get reviewed. These are the ones you recommend starting with. And
each meeting you are going to recommend to the government show which wants to go with and that's the process going forward. But there's a 3rd piece in here, right? It's how are policy count as a policy become a law at Howard
policies reviewed? What do we need to do to catch up with the 3rd piece? Is that parallel process? I was talking about What is a process for reviewing policies in perpetuity. So we're not
looking to you to just say these are the ones. I think this is what caused the problem in the last 2 meetings is. We Seifert statements of well, I don't know why these policies are here. They're disconnect from other
policies, not understand. And that piece is what I don't see here I don't particularly need it. I'm perfectly fine with this process and the list of policies. And if there's a good cover sheet that explains the staff reviewing different
alignment. What stops reviewing. I'm fine you saying these are the policies that need to be reviewed. Let's go. But I think that's what I'm hearing has been the tension in the room. The last 2
meetings. And so I just want this committee to be clear, because I don't want that tension to continue. That's what I'm trying to get out. Are we OK with as a committee? This is how a policy gets
reviewed. You're gonna come back to us with alignment on what that review looks like from the staff side. So we know what to expect and then you're gonna come work with the governance committee chair on what policies need review
each meeting. Is that the process? Because if that's what it is, I'm fine with that. But I want to make call to fine with it. So we don't back down the same Robert hold. This is not what I
expected. I welcome my colleagues. Thoughts on. I'll take a step because it's my turn. I think the bride's actually what we asked for
Doctor 8, I think it is a plan. I would propose that for the next agenda that we review the policies listed currently under to 18. 25 that are in
the 200's. And that we add the 6. 200's from the January. 21 agenda. So Limon 8 to 300
ones. Then we'll figure going to push him too. But will review the to hundreds that are listed here in the 200's that are on the to to the gym. That would be my proposal.
It's been more than is already listed. But again, I think some of these we talk about which ones are required of that of conversations for versus time that hopefully
easier to just, you know, in terms of of changes. You know, I you know, I already share what I what I heard from my colleagues. This was not my
work. What I heard my colleagues were reviewing 5 reasons and for for doctor a nurse repeat them again, you know, legal compliance, best
practices. Can we resource slash operation allies? It is their divisional alignment. And which is your year, does it late on top of another
policy could be combined with another policy and then VSP example policies have we looked at those because those are legally compliant and you know why reinvent the wheel
are being written for us so I and again, in terms of the interpreter, in part, in part 2.80. Perpetuity we have to if
the cell that one by time. And I personally as the chair want to focus on the policies that were listed under specific dates. We may get to all of
them. And it. But, you know, I'd like to get to an approval of a plan and ultimately, I don't know. can look at 3 thousands and perhaps, you
know, move them. If we had a meeting in June or we just roll, we don't get too. And and, you know, we'll see we get through in this particular
order, but I'm not worried about what we're going to do later because we're so out of compliance. And I'm going to say this, the you know, before
Dr got here, we didn't subscribe the SBA sample policies. That's my understanding. The previous boards did did subscribe to And Dr Reid made sure we did.
in so, you know, and I just have to lift that up because they're our sample policies there got the work and make us work smarter and more efficiently yes, we need to be
able to get to those. Yes, need to have the stamp. The sample model policy book printed so we can look at it. But those my thoughts. I appreciate everyone's input.
But we've got one foot in front. The other and you you know, waxing and waning. A little philosophical. Dr.
Anderson, I'd like to make all. Sorry, Mayor. agree with
you is leading. We just got to get into it but said it just lets next agenda for the next meeting. And then we'll see how that and we'll go forward from I would love to do the
cip policies. That series is already started. But it's also a big ones like, you know, it's the low hanging fruit. can kind of go get a win, right? Is a good look. Let's take it easy. I just really
would like to try looking only at those ones in the same series. But even like and then addition that have to be because of rest. So I mean, the agenda for every meeting
can the theories. And then any policies that, you know, have out saying, you know, risk. So that I am in favor of setting the agenda incentives for the
next thing. I also wanted add But we that. Please. And orange here. wanted to share
that. I've been copping all this down have something written that I can share in terms of our process. didn't.
So, yeah. So I'd love to be able to identify which of the And I treat us of, you a lot to be familiar with, like which policies are lower hanging fruit in terms of they
don't need a whole rewrite. it seems to starting with the students is probably going to be a pretty major things that maybe we could start, less.
You maybe I number one that just kind of the basic runnings of the school division calendar, you know, baby and get our feet wet the start something that's a
little more. Yes, but Bolden, first your students. So on. So I would love to get a consensus on. can we agree on what the next agenda should the next night after that? I
love to as a goal June. We have the whole next year mapped And can we determine today the policy format so that Superintendent come with those edits? I did write down
what it seemke everyone's roles are the superintendent, the board, the clerk. So that's thing that best able
maybe that take that as we actually go through work. So.
I'm fine with I saw a green on what policies we want to tackle the next meeting. But that has been a priority. If we're also going to talk. Look
at the samples, then we need to do that. But I see 2 black rtd's up. So I'm trying take articulate back what I'm
hearing in terms of priorities, which is set the agenda for which policies are going to be the next time. I think we've already established how to review that. And the fact we want to cover sheet and it will go
through from to staff back to Doctor Reed to so but I'll get back to their pockets Dr. Anderson. I thought you were
heading towards a motion which I know you couldn't make as chair. So I wanted to just that up because I do want to walk out of conversation being productive and to have a plan for next meeting.
>> And I agree with what you said in terms of let's start with hanging fruit. I don't think the calendar that. think we should find something here
and just looking through this, trying to merge the 2 a little bit if it's not the 3,000. Well, may be that the 2
thousands, I don't well rights, which is coming up. I think we should Abbott Series and make be. What we do next
time. But I really want us to maybe do something a little Can we confirm that Templet for right now could not be out step. I will make motion because I'm trying to call
this together and what I here, and I would really like to see that the SBA sample just That we have the goals, the procedures, the responsibilities be part of
that happening. Can we at least agree on that? motion for those 3 to be part of the temple. Repeat >> Gold well goals that
purpose part because that's what we have right now. proceed response abilities. Those seem to be. Hold. can
show up every policy. That might be others. But just focusing on those 3 full right
now. So is this your motion to also include purpose procedures in response this? Is that costs of list just the
start. Yes. I the question, what's Who would whos 50's it? well look at many of yeah. You
still have the 4. Okay. Many of of the policies that we have. Again, this is what I'd like to SBA have over. How possible? Please component
going back by the just done recently. policy has a responsibility of Division Council do what the superintendent do, what bill, the school That was part of
had it was possibly section equity policy that we just that we did a couple of years ago had that was possibly section there. The office outside the chief equity
office was going to do certain things. So it delineated essentially, which is why thought that was a safe mine
to include. Every penny for the people to speak to by the
second. Doctors question. miss my parents like Speaker second? I think this is where
can just take the next month to allow the superintendent 2 recommend to us. What 2 things is that I needed Anderson, the
SBA as much as sample policies. But if the sample policies to include as you just said, that means to learn more. also if we're going use
that that makes our work easier in the future because we're just going you know, be in that if we're going to pose to then the SBA sample. That
kind of under. That's one of our efficiencies. So you know. What I would like to trying to summarize again, think you
would have got here, it sounds like what we discussed processes that the superintendent is going to come with the chair about which policies that are going to come before governance and
hopefully soon we'll get to series. He's going do things that mislead talked about legal compliance. But I also want mention includes that DVD in my policies because there
paid, but they might have suggestions could be legally thing at the state level. Best practices can be operational lines clear about that. And linemen. But that should happen because we're doing And
then the the S sample policies, I also think at some should think about what needs to be updated per regulations last directly. When do we review regulations to ensure
the policy has with the way we wanted to Then protect staff proposed note the change track change. The superintendent prepares a cover sheet that conveys to the board. The
information includes whites being reviewed. Why made and then it goes to her and clerk. At prior looking at it. So I
there's a process in terms of the 4 men. I at this point and see merit in both the ways have got to lean towards be a simple policies because exist.
So I would be okay superintendent first round with the version in the format she thinks is best. I would suggest yes, B sample. Let's just get it back and make all
the bases. So that was my second motion. But yeah, this item speak to I think I'm on
the same mayor and know Furness and you right My recommendation would be that We are satisfied Reid is
presenting in terms of becomes a policy and policies to review. I don't know are now saying, well, let's do them 1000 series instead of Why I
asked Doctor Reed, thank commendations all ACC. Things need to be reviewed this time a matter for then go for series. That's what I was trying buy for cater process. it's great with this. I was
trying buy Kate to let's do this. Now staff recommends while we do that, let's figure out what the probalooks like we can then use the futures were not getting to
future. England. Wait a second. What one should be review. So it wasn't thing. I disagree it was the 3rd piece that I think we could be developing along the way. But
I don't know why at this point we're saying, wait a second. Let's 2000 visits to Recommendations from staff is the January 21st Fusion. year
out. Let's just out. I would recommend what the now I would recommend let Dre come to the next meeting with first set of policies review. And maybe
recover. She did. You just explain a The dias is here are the steps step up review these policies. Here is what I recommend policy look like.
Looking at the PSP model policies what we talked about and then we could decide at that. It wants see it action. There's something missing
section missing from this I love the idea. makes seem, but I don't put in total. I want to Dre to look at what the policies, which I think is what I heard from Miss Mary
and yeah, and so I don't I don't support this because I that the crosswalk and got these today. feel like I permission to do. I there's a
motion table. the motion that appropriate personally, I think. Alright, Dre, thank recommendations. Please. In corporate the January 21st that were missing or use the best. Take look at model
policies to take a look at what we've here of this process for policy. It's good. Come back next. with the policy the form at matches
that get the feedback on I something missing and come back with a view to policy feedback he started policies. would be my recommendation
kind person now in a vacuum. I can't support this as it Thank you. rise I don't need to
repeat it. I just want see the drive are some of comments. >> I reach So decided to
compare them to see what we have you here. way. But ABC is
that's was extent that. Look at that the products you look
at, SBA temples. Well, just the best thing at the time. I think that Jane did look at
the S but I have person with SBA. So I can't tell you what would have been done in which not but look at them and us. >> Putting the draft together. think the intent of my just to
get a because I think we're going plan around what to do. >> when it comes back to what going to look like. And I looked at dew because they both have procedures in polls
as part of And if it brought to West, that means continue to be. both now thank you for asking the question about the
difference between the struggling as well. But goals and procedures And so that to me that made I was just
looking a way to I'm not married to It was just step in that direction. Based on what
we've today. Mr. Okay. I draft's proposed for the way our current policies and the way the version, the only
difference between the 2 dresses Roman numerals section. I mean, that's really not a difference. So.
Regardless my or the SBA, the has proposed are more aligned with the SBA draft. The biggest thing for it's on last
Francis and their current and the legal So I'm I'm Want because that's do that. I in
clear I don't agree. should be was on a previous meeting agenda. That was a hodgepodge of things. I think we wrecked a should be breeze. And that
is If there's something they've been waiting in, the wings I'm fine. If we want try clean up like they've quite some time. ideally that are
that have But we've got to do full series this is how we're gonna start to really do it. it. Proposed idea would be, I
think that series is as the calendar, but the other are very operational. And saying, you know much or the other? I
think that may be Dre to speak team operation What's to the town if there's 1, 2, that remain from last you know,
must be with that, too. We've got great area. that for a policy, go with one. But the superintendent today, it's
basically a very the whole different that are there. That's You. That's the
question. would be a viable instead of us to determining series that with your old team
they determine a series based sea legal. If no one is an answer that I'm happy me.
senior leadership. I think we want to get a place where we're doing meeting for sure. >> think we've got meeting of that may not possible, which I
think we're all not So this parallel universe to kind of clean up what we plan. Our preferred policy state makes
sense. I think but policies we need to go back there. Some important he says their own city to check these other committees stop their other.
This for different things that are holding policies I don't know who tracks them through processes. But I revised
point. that's or last series like until we get caught and I think we can propose forward five-year plan. It's you in a
thoughtful O, I think we can do committee has policy. They want to make sure If miss them
coming back have something that you really want know. I've heard 80 to 40, I think Was like about the procurement
for the cip couple that related to programming. can see placement, for example, are sitting in a CST. put face
the year. done being comment. That I can back to close Thursday. That's a one center
city with ACS there, too. Right? So and then there are other item committees, right where other policies back. The
staff analysis that. But come in for next week. I don't want those and series. senior
leadership crucial. Definitely can get the most crucial catch up and then come back point. The question just to stars we
have in the past at work Sessions in 2 topics could potentially be that we look
some of these 200 project, for example, 17. 26 a C S and then
perhaps related to So maybe we Do it if we don't get through, least we still if determined
that a priority. amenable to members of the board. Sizemore
Heizer. that's want. It's not they it. I as a committee of Tulsa priority, right? the
things that Well, sure is. Are they picking a student like to These are the and other I just feel over the place that's I'm
not that. I that's how we get out. Some of the drought because the committee, we just
it. my advocacy would be come it priors unless work and we can come up with kind of
whatever it varies. And we. that whenever it's So but know different ideas open that, I
my preference would with it. That's what I'm What's on the agenda? And we hopefully the
team doesn't next week be prepared and perhaps even other wordsmith We get the table. There are certain
things that that up would be b***. stop When say that would be my preference instead of Ida now say this 2000 meant to know they were on previous
one. And saying the pizza with those my only to occasion to to the previous We don't your chair. That's where things I
got. The clerk and told there are and all due respect to the to to superintendent superintendent. That's what I
would say is perhaps the with a look that they've got missed see if any those the way belong on list. And that would that meeting before back into
we think are urging and mean what I personally hesitate the season I think there's lot of all these that could fall
because I would recommend look at list to my all into sea and then come us with recommended
as we get caught government person on bill Thank you. on
that. right. Okay. at the and it a different policy it. with
what you're saying, to come One series I it is. are urgent
need to with repealing some of ones the that they were stand alone. And not series. So I do understand I'm going be
better. Be able tell the is rest are in updated to be appreciate it. And they it's
consideration and used in and that's okay because it press in the really good sick. now,
which is policies to Even proposed once. As of this
matter, if are just we protect you of your choosing point for us to try This Yeah, and have
a full month between now and next So I think have a fleet.
let it the division. alliance. The line policy is next to it. question when we receive a
suite week before Prince meeting higher because it used to the always receive them.
not expect to receive them test. Yeah, I I'm looking
count because the on Tuesday, March 18, perhaps is your perhaps as early Maybe maybe
that maybe 11th of March look week a right so our last
chance. not so get the Because have to know this committee prior. I've If you come back
as long and or maybe say these these ready. the more talked T on. The wealth and is on
occasion. really what for to stay the 17th. We have 20. >> And the 3rd. And that's it
right. Which is I'm okay with the make time to read like my on the committee, OK with the
13th. That's So we are being and time is tight. But I just
that reasonable. How much we're expected to on the 14th and 17th the and be able to talk with each and right so
that we have a They have brace cause of the timetable. Against passed House. There
some that shared. But I mean, I want staff to go work. I
about feet. actually students the state. Let us know. Read I don't need staff to tell can read all the policy starting
tomorrow. Whatever case my notes and then crossed for them want put taking very little time start and do my
work up varies. possible maybe grab cup full space, but it's my commitment will be From
that meeting. no later years and again, ask is that series and not to here because other
teams is policies around those. So it makes sense at the time. 100 units this
request we had need copy I would ask that the to humans
us. Thank you. Would you a He worked out, I just want to
policy. It's very confusing. you. course, said, I that
talked about nation make this is not going to and update. I
you're going just policies can She's going to his pain. They're going look for support to get around it. And that set
this this because created this one. So we are going to doing as we look at certainly date, wind piece of steps that be
other policies around for that purpose. But that have different That I was saying is
that NC is the kind do that. the But then if think that for
time I next may the not get to so I feel like the night, we
should one. At back back People dying. we make if you
look at all items in thousands, like me, time. And
I think that's I the next meeting. The point in the
outline one pitch we're going one's is but offering be more
ample in the And so. My intent look don't know that we're going get all of them. if we can of law a good start for
us. But again, there's a look that in overlap in same
series. Yes, So last question in that we heads to 1000 will be is going run next month.
Chile. Of that, which ones of the to 90 for it in advance.
Just thing 2000. of what because greater priority we do have to we understand importance viewing series. I
would say you would document that the Well, the projected policies today, all of those
200 for today on document that one too. Would The sorry. Henry 21st think those sons.
gold. They're going to looking over policies think I probably
them over top and I'm after he didn't you one of the ones number, think that's You we do
we can ask. They're comfortable with the plan for the next the point power read
that she based a sample these, including SBA. Yeah. just the
conversation, scene from know, is a policy seen looking at
that had at the It's on the