WEBVTT

METADATA
Video-Count: 1
Video-1: youtube.com/watch?v=BRLUrWT3Odc

Part: 1

1
00:00:01.760 --> 00:00:25.920
Mics are on. >> Oh, on the second one. >> All right, everyone. Heather, you ready? Jessica, you ready? >> Can we quiet down? We will call the Tuesday, April 28th,

2
00:00:25.920 --> 00:00:43.440
2026 Farable City Council meeting to order. Our first item is roll call. >> Council member Barnes >> here. >> Dumba >> here. >> Ross >> here. >> Rowan >> here. >> Venus >> here. >> Teal >> here. >> Mayor Spinner >> here. >> Pledge of allegiance.

3
00:00:43.440 --> 00:01:05.360
>> The flag of the United States of America and to the republic for which it stands. One nation under God, indivisible, with liberty and justice for all. Second item is approval of the agenda, Mr. Ross.

4
00:01:05.360 --> 00:01:22.560
>> Mayor, yeah, I understand uh staff is not ready for item 6. Is that correct? >> We we would just like it pulled off the consent agenda to be discussed. >> Okay. So, we're just moving it from the consent agenda to the uh >> to you want it. I think we're going to

5
00:01:22.560 --> 00:01:37.360
wait. >> You want it? >> Just wait. Yeah, I was going to say in the approval of the consent agenda if that's where it can be removed for further discussion. >> Okay. >> We're not going to remove it totally. >> Correct. >> Okay. You understand that?

6
00:01:37.360 --> 00:01:53.200
>> All right. Approval of the agenda. >> So move. >> Second. >> Motion by Don Bouya, second by Ross. All those in favor of the agenda saying I. I. >> All opposed. >> The agenda is approved. Presentation,

7
00:01:53.200 --> 00:02:09.759
introductions. We have none tonight. Approval of the minutes of April 14th, 2026 and April 14th, 2026 special meeting close session and April 14th, 2026 special city council meeting also closed.

8
00:02:09.759 --> 00:02:24.959
>> So moved. >> Yes. >> Second. >> Motion by Barnes, second by Van Sloo. All those in favor signify by saying I. >> I. >> I. All opposed. >> Minutes are approved. Request to be heard. Due to the fact

9
00:02:24.959 --> 00:02:40.959
that we've had a large number of requests to be heard the past few months, um we are now going to implement some change where we are going to hear from residents first. So tonight we actually only have one resident and then we will

10
00:02:40.959 --> 00:02:55.519
hear from non-residents. It's also in our bylaws that this period shall not last more than 15 minutes. Um, many of you are here on the same topic and I truly

11
00:02:55.519 --> 00:03:10.959
believe we all understand you are probably against. So, but would you please come to the podium, state your name and address for the record. First up is Carolyn Schaefer.

12
00:03:10.959 --> 00:03:33.920
Please come forward. And you have three minutes. Carolyn Schaefer. I live at 21110th Avenue Southeast. I've been a resident of uh the east side for over 59 years. I'm here to address the infrastructure.

13
00:03:33.920 --> 00:03:50.480
I'm not sure. AI is ready for us, but we aren't ready for it. If you Google where are the data centers in the United States, the East Coast lights up like one big light bulb. Now, when you put

14
00:03:50.480 --> 00:04:07.920
that many companies in one location, drawing all the energy that they are drawing, I don't think our infrastructure is ready for that. Now, maybe we need some guidelines, maybe some legislation that

15
00:04:07.920 --> 00:04:25.120
says you cannot have uh two data centers within 500 miles of each other. Now, that's just an arbitrary number. Um, and if they are clustered together too much, then maybe they need to take out an insurance company that when the

16
00:04:25.120 --> 00:04:40.720
infrastructure comes down that the taxpayers aren't hooked with it, that the data centers are hooked with it. And I think that's basically all I have to say. Uh everything that I have seen.

17
00:04:40.720 --> 00:05:02.400
The first thing that jumps out is the amount of water and energy that these places will soak up. I just think that uh people don't know what we're getting into. And as you can tell, I am very much opposed to not to

18
00:05:02.400 --> 00:05:26.280
data centers, but the conglomeration where they just jump all together. I can't imagine the people on the East Coast and their electric bills or their water bills. >> You uh Miranda Lamb

19
00:05:35.520 --> 00:05:52.080
Hello, I am Miranda Lamb and I am I live at 4222 Crystal Lake Trail in Farbo. Um it's in a township so technically I am out of city limits. Um, I moved from

20
00:05:52.080 --> 00:06:09.039
Minneapolis actually to Farbo just over a year ago. And I don't know if any of you have lived in the cities before, but there is a hum. It is always and it lives in your bones

21
00:06:09.039 --> 00:06:24.639
and it lives in your blood and it is always there. Now, there are some people who thrive in that hum who love the hum. My family, my four children and I and my husband, we moved away from the city to

22
00:06:24.639 --> 00:06:40.720
get away from the hum. And we want to live where there is no hum. Now, most data centers are located within the cities and there have not been any in rural areas at this time. And so when

23
00:06:40.720 --> 00:06:56.560
people say there is no hum, I've visited one. There is no hum. um they haven't lived with the hum all day, all night, forever and always. And and so

24
00:06:56.560 --> 00:07:12.720
um I just wanted to come here and say that I don't I know that you guys are talking about the I2 distinction at this time and that's what your discussion is on tonight. And what I'm here to say is

25
00:07:12.720 --> 00:07:27.680
that I think that you shouldn't even put data centers on anything having to do with farbo. I don't want farbo to say data center at all. Nothing data center because we don't want it here. We want

26
00:07:27.680 --> 00:07:42.880
to hunt. We want to fish. We want to farm. We want to shop on our streets. And we want to live on our streets. We want our kids to look up in the sky and see the stars. We want our kids to look

27
00:07:42.880 --> 00:08:00.080
and see birds in the streets. I lived in Minneapolis, the north side of Minneapolis. And when they looked outside, they saw concrete and asphalt, and that was it. And maybe some people, and they heard

28
00:08:00.080 --> 00:08:15.680
the hum, and now >> seconds. And now I don't want that to happen here because we're in rural the greater Minnesota area and that's where I moved to. I chose to live here and bring my family here and that's where I

29
00:08:15.680 --> 00:08:44.000
want to be. Thank you. Elizabeth Wright. >> Elizabeth Wright, 5351 Elkton Trail in Fairbell, Minnesota. That's on Canada. I am in favor of a moratorium on data centers. This includes the Archer project. High-ststepping through

30
00:08:44.000 --> 00:08:59.680
existing regulations and using resoning to facilitate future expansion without environmental review is not acceptable. Current environmental regulations must be updated and revised in order to balance technological progress with environmental responsibility.

31
00:08:59.680 --> 00:09:16.000
The rapid expansion of AI infrastructure is creating significant environmental challenges. Data center investments are projected to reach three trillion by 2030, driving a massive surge in land, energy, and water consumption. Building and operating data centers consumes

32
00:09:16.000 --> 00:09:30.880
larger quantities of raw materials that require environmentally destructive mining. Data centers generate significant electronic waste, including hazardous materials such as mercury and lead. Carbon emissions are detrimental to ecosystems and are related to human

33
00:09:30.880 --> 00:09:46.240
health problems including asthma and heart disease. Current re regulations are behind the curve in reigning in this technology. It is critical that outdated regulations be updated and implemented at the state level, the regional level,

34
00:09:46.240 --> 00:10:03.519
county and city level when committing to these mega projects. In the US, data center electricity demand is expected to reach up to 2% of total electric usage by 2028. Already, cooling requirements consume millions of gallons of water daily,

35
00:10:03.519 --> 00:10:20.640
causing local utility spikes and water deficits in several US states. Furthermore, carbon emissions from these centers could equal the equivalent of adding 10 million cars on US highways by 2030 due to heavy reliance on natural gas and diesel backup generators.

36
00:10:20.640 --> 00:10:36.560
Despite their size, data centers create relatively few permanent jobs. Farbo and adjacent communities will bear the pollution and infrastructure strain with little long-term economic benefit. Going forward, I would urge the city to

37
00:10:36.560 --> 00:10:52.160
amplify public discussion. Don't use NDAs because that does not amplify public discussion. And when these projects have such huge potential to affect quality of life in Farbo and adjacent communities. Thank

38
00:10:52.160 --> 00:11:20.000
you, Karen Ziller. back again. Karen Zeller, 16972 Acorn. I wore glasses so you don't recognize me. 16972 Acorn Trail. I guess I'm not totally against the concept of data centers. Obviously, we need them to keep

39
00:11:20.000 --> 00:11:36.000
up with the Chinese. I guess uh we can't let them get ahead of us for goodness sakes. Um, but at any rate, what I feel right now is that there's been just a rush of billionaires hopping in on this whole concept of data centers and and

40
00:11:36.000 --> 00:11:51.200
the technology needed to make them a win-win for the communities in which they're built and the mil billionaires themselves. They've jumped ahead before the technology has been perfected in order

41
00:11:51.200 --> 00:12:08.639
to make sure that the people of Farbo are not bearing the brunt of upgrades to the water treatment plant. Are can our water treatment plant handle 3 to 5 million gallons of water a day extra? I doubt it. Who's going to pay for that?

42
00:12:08.639 --> 00:12:25.040
We need written contract guarantees if we're going to move forward with anything. How about the PABS? Right now, those forever chemicals, there is no mitigation system included in these data centers to prevent that from spewing

43
00:12:25.040 --> 00:12:41.760
into the air, going into the ground, and returning to the water treatment plant. And right now, there isn't a water treatment plant in the USA that has a capability of siphoning out those forever chemicals. Our children, grandchildren, and future generations

44
00:12:41.760 --> 00:12:57.680
will be drinking that. Someday they will be able to do this. They can put some of their billions of dollars into finding the technology necessary to make it a win-win for everybody. Right now, the cart is being put in front of the horse,

45
00:12:57.680 --> 00:13:13.600
and I don't want to see Farbo falling into the trap. I think representatives from the city council should go and talk to people in communities about the same size that have have data centers built in them. Find out the impact on the

46
00:13:13.600 --> 00:13:29.360
residents and it's been in some cases catastrophic, very little water pressure, huge electrical bill increases. I mean, have we investigated this with other cities before we jump into this thing? I just think the

47
00:13:29.360 --> 00:14:06.560
technology needs to we need written guarantees and the technology has to be advanced beyond what it is now. >> Seconds. >> Thank you, >> Megan Benzinger. Megan Benzinger, 5785 232nd Street West

48
00:14:06.560 --> 00:14:23.360
Farbo Elkton Trail here. Uh, so I'm going to say the same thing, but here I'm going to come at it from a financial point of view. So this is what I have education and in multiple degrees in is accounting and finance. And we've we've talked

49
00:14:23.360 --> 00:14:39.279
about the pollution and they lie about that closed loop system. They lie about it because they do need to clean out the lines and the only way to do that they can't dump it into the water. They have to let it evaporate. What is the most dangerous type of particle?

50
00:14:39.279 --> 00:14:55.839
Anybody here in building? >> Yep. Gases. And that ends up in our air. So this is important because we are polluting the air. The air we need to breathe. And I'm I'm with her. I moved out here on purpose. Over a decade ago, I moved out

51
00:14:55.839 --> 00:15:13.120
to Farbo on purpose. I built another home in Farab on purpose. Why? Because of our land. Because of who we are, because of our town, because of our people right here, all these people who care. This is where I want to live. I

52
00:15:13.120 --> 00:15:28.800
want to live in a safe environment, a safe for my children. And I also want to talk about the finances. Ohio is seeing horrible effects of this. They were the first ones to start to allow mega data centers to go close to cities and inside

53
00:15:28.800 --> 00:15:46.079
cities. They've seen 100 to 400% increases in maintenance on their utility facilities. Guess who pays that? The data center doesn't. They paid for the Oh, they try to sweeten the deal. Let me build you this big facility. Let

54
00:15:46.079 --> 00:16:01.759
me cover two years of this. Why don't you give me a tiff? I'm gonna give you a tiff to pollute me. Get out of here. Heck no. As somebody who has to pay their taxes, so do they. And they don't belong here. They don't belong with us. They don't belong getting tiffs. They

55
00:16:01.759 --> 00:16:18.160
don't belong here polluting our air. And in the effect of Ohio, the residents are now seeing on every single utility a 10 to 35% increase. People are in here all day long. We need affordable housing. We need affordable this. We need affordable

56
00:16:18.160 --> 00:16:34.240
that. How are we going to make these utilities affordable when the data center is eating them up and then we're stuck with the bill? There's no plan here, folks. That's our job. That's your job >> is planning. Planning is important. And right now,

57
00:16:34.240 --> 00:16:59.920
there's no plan for these data centers. Archer couldn't even meet the 50point test. All right, we're quick. We're close to the time limit, but Shadurer Spring, I'll allow you to speak. >> Yes. Three minutes.

58
00:16:59.920 --> 00:17:17.760
>> Sodto Spring, 16922 Cabbat Avenue. My home is 2 and a half miles as the crow flies from that data center. But I measured it this afternoon after seeing that all the decisions were made and there was no hope because

59
00:17:17.760 --> 00:17:35.200
I moved to the country 12 years ago out of Northfield which is a very nice town. I moved here for my health. I have chemical sensitivities and I moved here for the stars, the trees and so forth. And those are going to be taken away

60
00:17:35.200 --> 00:17:52.640
from me and I don't even get to vote. I don't even get to help throw out the people who believe that we should all love pollution and we should love having it light and noisy all day long. I will simply add because so much good has been

61
00:17:52.640 --> 00:18:07.760
said here. I will add that AI is a bubble and those data centers will be empty hulks. They will be paved. Our birds will be dead. Our children will be depressed.

62
00:18:07.760 --> 00:18:33.200
And um there's no reason for it. We don't need it. We have lived for thousands of years without data centers and without AI. That's it. We're moving on. So thank you everyone for coming. So next item,

63
00:18:33.200 --> 00:18:53.039
consent agenda items. Consent agenda items A 6A through 6P. Would anybody like anything? >> Yes, mayor. Uh I think uh staff would like uh item 6 pulled and move to the item 8.

64
00:18:53.039 --> 00:19:09.919
>> We just want to discuss it. >> We would like you to vote on the consent agenda remaining items and then we discuss that one separately. Yep. >> You mean in a work session or >> No, just following your vote on the consent agenda. All right, I'll follow along. Whatever she said. >> I would like to entertain a mo. Anybody

65
00:19:09.919 --> 00:19:26.880
else? >> I'll make a motion to approve items A through N and P. >> Okay. >> Second. >> I have a motion by Ran, second by Vance Sloo on 6 A through 6N and P. All those

66
00:19:26.880 --> 00:19:44.160
in favor signify by saying I. I. >> I. All opposed. >> Those are passed. Now, staff would like to discuss 6. >> Yes, thank you, uh, Mayor Spooner. Um, 6 had a contract that was in the packet that was one that hadn't been circulated

67
00:19:44.160 --> 00:20:00.480
back to Inspectron, Inc., the contractor that's proposed with. And so, we got some changes back from them fairly late and got another contract revised from legal at like 5:15. We didn't update the packet. Um, they're the contractor's legal still needs to review it. The

68
00:20:00.480 --> 00:20:16.240
things that we're talking about are there was an incorrect name in there and a few other very small things, but the the content of the contract being everything is $125 an hour. That's the the base charge. And that there's 30 days notice on either party to terminate

69
00:20:16.240 --> 00:20:32.720
is is really the substance of the contract that's most important. And so, um, what I would be looking for is a motion to approve this resolution and to authorize the mayor to sign a contract, um, as negotiated and finalized with the contractor.

70
00:20:32.720 --> 00:20:49.080
>> Will our legal team be reviewing that, too? >> They they have they they gave us comments back at 5:15, and so we just sent those to the contractor. >> Yes, we did. We revised it. Uh, the changes requested are acceptable, but

71
00:20:49.360 --> 00:21:04.320
Okay. So, basically this is only approved if their side accepts it and then mayor will say okay. >> And I'm just going to add um I've been doing quite a bit of research lately on two firms in particular that do this uh

72
00:21:04.320 --> 00:21:21.120
nature and Inspectron is one that was uh highly recommended in a mayor's chat room statewide within the last six weeks or so. So, I'm very much in favor. >> 60.

73
00:21:21.120 --> 00:21:36.799
>> Mayor Spooner. >> Yes. >> I'll make a motion to approve consent agenda item 6, resolution 2026-132. >> Second. >> Motion by Ross, second by Don Booya. All those in favor of

74
00:21:36.799 --> 00:21:53.919
by saying I. >> All opposed. That motion passes. Thank you very much for that staff. On the public hearings, um, we only have one public hearing tonight. 2026

75
00:21:53.919 --> 00:22:10.480
a taxable obligation bond abatement bonds. Jessica Kzer, there are three parts to this. I'm assuming you're going to give us one presentation. >> Um, you are correct, uh, Mayor Spooner. Um, so, uh, four weeks ago at the end of March, you set a public hearing for

76
00:22:10.480 --> 00:22:26.320
tonight on the 2026A taxable general obligation tax abatement bond, which is a lot to say. Um, this is specifically for the second phase of Vioaduct Park and is proposed at 3.710 million. We had previously discussed and

77
00:22:26.320 --> 00:22:42.559
in the budget had uh, 3.6 million. So, the question of why is there an additional 110,000? there are costs of issuance that we have built into the bond so that we don't have to pay for those separately. And so um that is probably the amount that I will say on it and I'm going to turn it over to

78
00:22:42.559 --> 00:22:58.480
Tammy um Omdall from Northland Securities to talk to you more about the specifics. Mayor Council, good evening. Tammy Omdal with Northland Securities. Um a public hearing is required in order to issue tax abatement bonds and tax

79
00:22:58.480 --> 00:23:14.080
abatement is a public finance tool um available to the city to finance certain types of improvements including park improvements. There is no abatement of taxes. That's confusing because the term tax abatement. It is really a tool that

80
00:23:14.080 --> 00:23:30.080
the legislature provides under chapter 469 for the city to consider the issuance and the use of city taxes to finance those qualified improvements. Tonight, the public hearing is necessary and this was properly noticed because

81
00:23:30.080 --> 00:23:47.120
the city needed to identify certain parcels within the city that the city tax revenue generated from those parcels is sufficient to service the proposed bonds to be issued. Those properties, those tax parcels, their tax statements

82
00:23:47.120 --> 00:24:03.679
will look no different than any other tax statement in the city. On your approval and the issuance of bonds that for first collection in 20 certified this year for collection 27 would be a tax abatement levy. That levy is spread

83
00:24:03.679 --> 00:24:21.600
upon the city's entire just like every other debt service levy in the city and the general fund. I know that term can be confusing. have just a few points on the bonds um to cover and then I'll close my remarks. So as noted um the estimated par amount is 3,700

84
00:24:21.600 --> 00:24:38.640
that is a preliminary number. The actual number um could be slightly less or slightly greater than that pending final pricing. The bonds are proposed to be issued as taxable. In most cases the city issues tax exempt bonds because it carries lower interest rate. In this

85
00:24:38.640 --> 00:24:54.960
case, it is to the city's interest to issue these bonds as taxable because the city desires to have naming rights for um the facilities to be financed as well as potential private use by issuance of the bonds as taxable. You have that

86
00:24:54.960 --> 00:25:11.120
ability to enter into those. So there is an advantage to the public and the city to do so. The estimated interest rate, which is preliminary, is 4.8%. That is an estimate. We will not know

87
00:25:11.120 --> 00:25:27.360
that until the bonds are actually priced and sold. Um, Northland is recommending that the city bond rating on these bonds um because it will result in more favorable interest rates. So, we will be working with staff and that was just scheduled today on that process. With

88
00:25:27.360 --> 00:25:43.760
respect to the timing, on June 9th, on behalf of the city, Northland will accept um proposals, bids to purchase these bonds and then at your regular city council meeting will present the results of the sale. So, tonight you are not selling the bonds, you are holding a

89
00:25:43.760 --> 00:25:58.320
public hearing. After that public hearing, there's a resolution to approve the tax abatement and a not to exceed bons that then gives you the authority to approve the next resolution that calls for the sale of bonds. That mayor and council, I'm going to close my

90
00:25:58.320 --> 00:26:17.919
remarks. Happy to answer any questions. >> Uh, mayor, I'm not sure if my question is for administration or the bonding company, but um I see it has an average life of 9.4 years. at $640,000.

91
00:26:17.919 --> 00:26:33.200
So if the taxes go up, just say just pick a number 700,000 in year two, do we keep that extra 60,000 increase or does it automatically go to pay off the

92
00:26:33.200 --> 00:26:51.919
bonds earlier or how does that work? I don't know if I entirely understood the question, but I can attempt to answer and then you can tell me if I hit the mark. >> So, and you don't need to turn there, but there is a finance plan on page five. So, there's estimated um tax

93
00:26:51.919 --> 00:27:08.159
levies associated. These are estimates because these bonds have not sold. The estimated life has to do with the structuring of the maturity. That's why it's an average. The first payment would be in um 2027 and the

94
00:27:08.159 --> 00:27:25.120
final payment will be in 20. These bonds will be callable as well. So if interest rates were to drop and it made financial sense for the city to refund these bonds that you would have that >> So does that mean that the uh payment of

95
00:27:25.120 --> 00:27:41.279
$640,000 is flat for those nine years? you may be referring to the next item. So for the um for these bonds, the 2026A, the current estimated total debt service

96
00:27:41.279 --> 00:27:57.120
payments is about $350,000 a year. I can look ahead and because you had so much information in your packet, you may have been looking at the next series >> and and so to to build on what Tammy

97
00:27:57.120 --> 00:28:12.880
said, it's about 350,000, but there is the 105% levy requirement on this one. So, we're looking at kind of a 370 to 374 375,000 payment annually. And so, that is what

98
00:28:12.880 --> 00:28:29.679
we would be putting on our tax levy. We wouldn't be requesting more than that. >> No, no, but as our taxes just naturally change yeartoyear. Just assume they're going to go up, for lack of a better understanding here. If

99
00:28:29.679 --> 00:28:47.200
they if they go up, do our flat payment do our payments remain flat? >> Yes. >> We get to keep the uh excess. Is that correct? >> Um it's it's a predetermined schedule, so there really won't be any excess. will will know when we sell the bonds what our debt service schedule is and

100
00:28:47.200 --> 00:29:03.039
finance will use that to prepare the tax levy each year with the amount that's due. So it's not an adjustable bond payment schedule. >> No, I know the payment schedule is not adjustable, but I'm saying the taxes are going to go up and down a little bit as

101
00:29:03.039 --> 00:29:20.320
we go through this 9-year period. >> Um I very very minimal in the finance plan. there is the preliminary debt schedule that has that 105%. So there will be some fluctuation of no more than $5,000 a year basically in terms of what

102
00:29:20.320 --> 00:29:36.480
that would look like. Um as the tax base grows the amount of base needed to when you spread $370,000 over a growing tax base it means less to each property um moving forward. >> Right. Okay. That answers my question then. Okay. Thank you.

103
00:29:36.480 --> 00:29:53.760
>> All right. Any other questions? Mr. Ran. >> So to play on his question, so my concern that I've heard from our constituents is that they're getting taxed to death. So how does this affect the bottom line? >> This this will be part of our tax levy. Um uh as you'll recall when we do put

104
00:29:53.760 --> 00:30:10.159
together our tax levy, preliminary and final. We're looking at our general operations, so really our general fund. And then we have other tax abatement obligations which we specifically state as well. And as Tammy said, this will appear under our tax abatement obligations. And then we also have our

105
00:30:10.159 --> 00:30:26.240
debt service obligations for I think three bonds that are three or four bonds that are currently outstanding that will appear in their own section. So this won't be lumped into anything. It will appear, but yes, it will be adding to our our total tax levy um as basically a

106
00:30:26.240 --> 00:30:42.000
payment that is due from the the taxes of the city. >> Okay. I just wanted that made clear for transparency. Any other questions? Any other questions? Right. At this time, I'll entertain a motion.

107
00:30:42.000 --> 00:31:03.120
>> So moved. Second. >> Motion by Van Sloo, second by Don Buy at an open public hearing. Signify by saying I. >> I. We are public hearing. Anybody wishing to speak on this matter, please come forward. >> Once, twice, three times. Close public

108
00:31:03.120 --> 00:31:16.960
hearing. >> So moved. Second. >> Motion by Teal, second by Ross to close public hearing. I >> All opposed. Public hearing is closed.

109
00:31:16.960 --> 00:31:34.159
Questions, comments, anything else? I'll entertain motions at this time. >> Mayor Spooner. >> Yes. >> I'll make a motion to approve >> resolution 2026-124. Second >> motion by Ross, second by Tal on

110
00:31:34.159 --> 00:31:50.720
resolution 26-124 signify by saying I. I. >> All opposed. The resolution is passed. On to the next one. >> Here's Spooner. >> Yes. >> Make a motion to approve resolution 2026-125.

111
00:31:50.720 --> 00:32:05.679
>> Second. >> I seconded by Barnes. All those in favor 125 by saying I. I. >> I. All opposed. The resolution is also passed. Now on to the approval of

112
00:32:05.679 --> 00:32:22.720
municipal advisory services agreement from the city of Fable and Northland Securities. >> So move. >> Second. >> Motion by Duoya, seconded by Vance Sloo. All those in favor of that agreement.

113
00:32:22.720 --> 00:32:43.760
>> All opposed. Thank you very much. We appreciate items for discussion on to 8A. Ordinance 2026-06 text amendment for data centers in I2 zoning area Davis planning manager.

114
00:32:43.760 --> 00:32:58.640
>> Thank you mayor and good evening council. Uh so the item in front of you is uh an ordinance that we have seen before at city council and we recently talked about in a work session. Um the city is bringing this forward uh on request of city administration and the

115
00:32:58.640 --> 00:33:13.919
city attorney. Um and it's for us to adopt what is a a definition for a data center in order to to clearly define that. And through the work session we've made it clear that this is not an accessory sort of data server room

116
00:33:13.919 --> 00:33:31.120
within a building. This is a for-profit enterprise uh sort of principal use for a property. Um and then the other part of it is to make sure that we're clearly outlining where in our city a data a data center would be possible. Um and that would be within the I2 heavy

117
00:33:31.120 --> 00:33:47.360
industrial district. This is the definition for a data center uh which we have retoled very recently uh like state like I said before to focus on uh it being a principal use rather than some sort of accessory. Um and then here's

118
00:33:47.360 --> 00:34:04.960
the land use table. So adding data centers uh as uh to be allowed within I2 as a permitted by right use. Um just to rehash this again, you know, planning commission did review this at their public hearing on uh April 6 where

119
00:34:04.960 --> 00:34:22.159
they did unanimously recommend approval. Uh they did strongly recommend that council adopt uh specific design standards. So something that you would find under chapter 7 within our UDO uh within a reasonable amount of time. That was a suggestion from them. Um and just

120
00:34:22.159 --> 00:34:38.560
like tonight, there were a number of members of the public that spoke generally against data centers. Um we've kind of gone back and forth about this. I won't rehash that, but we have revised the uh definition. Um, so with this revised definition and the land use

121
00:34:38.560 --> 00:34:55.359
table, we are recommending that city council approve ordinance 2026-06. And I'm happy to take any questions. >> Any questions for staff at this time, Mr. >> Okay. Can you go back one slide? Uh, one more

122
00:34:55.359 --> 00:35:12.320
and one more. >> Okay. So the question that the public presented when they were speaking earlier and this is more for Scott is if we don't do anything what what's the negative outcome and I

123
00:35:12.320 --> 00:35:26.800
thought it was in one of your slides but I don't see it now. >> If we do nothing tonight or move forward with some type of definition. >> Yeah. If there's no definition and no no delineation of what district this may or may not be allowed in. It leaves it

124
00:35:26.800 --> 00:35:43.440
open-ended and leaves it a concern that I have right now that it can go somewhere where you do not want it to go. If you go back, yeah, the one slide I say there, there have been a lot of discussion about the state needing to do something here. I heard that from audience.

125
00:35:43.440 --> 00:36:00.079
This is a step to make sure the city's protected until that time. I don't think we're as protected as we can. >> Okay. And that's just the point I wanted to make. That's why we're doing this to narrowly tailor where this stuff can go.

126
00:36:00.079 --> 00:36:16.400
Thank you. Uh thank you. Um Harry will um the planning commission encourages us to adopt design specific design standards within a reason.

127
00:36:16.400 --> 00:36:32.720
I think I think the design standards would also answer a lot of the questions that the public has. Will this be coming up on a work session soon or how how are we going to educate ourselves on the design stand? >> Mr. Mayor, um, Council Member Ross. So,

128
00:36:32.720 --> 00:36:49.119
that is a request or or a suggestion from the planning commission. It is up to city council as to whether or not they would like to look into this a little bit further. Um, and so, you know, at that point, >> sounds like a good a good recommendation so we can figure out the design standards.

129
00:36:49.119 --> 00:37:08.560
>> It's time to look into that once you move forward. here. We have to put as many protections in place without that. And and if the state's not going to act, you have to rec staff to bring something to you. >> Yeah. Because the design standards would

130
00:37:08.560 --> 00:37:26.960
state limitations on operations basically also. >> Okay. Thank you. Um, no. I just wanted to um understand if we are the first leading this. Are we the first?

131
00:37:26.960 --> 00:37:42.480
>> I I wouldn't say by any means the first. No, not at all. Um, there have been some movements with moratoriums. You certainly can suggest move type of uh development like this. Um, right now we're looking at controls

132
00:37:42.480 --> 00:38:02.079
at a minimum at least that we get in place until some you're not you're not the first. You're not breaking ground here by any means. Um, attorney Riggs, if we were to propose a moratorum, let's say it happened today that we're

133
00:38:02.079 --> 00:38:18.800
we're voting for a moratorum and we did not have this wording for the specific zoding. How would we sit? >> Yeah, it's best to have a definition so we can actually deal with, you know, define what you're having a moratorum as without a definition

134
00:38:18.800 --> 00:38:36.720
and won't say it's it's unreasonable, but it it it's not the best position. Definition is going to help. I ask this again. I asked it two weeks ago, Mr. Davis. is anywhere in our code.

135
00:38:36.720 --> 00:38:54.720
Is the term data center in play or where it can be put or anywhere is it in our code? >> No, Mr. Mayor. >> Thank you. So, we are just legally defining it so we can talk about >> correct. Thank you very much. It's time I'll entertain a motion for 20.

136
00:38:54.720 --> 00:39:11.119
>> So moved. >> Second. >> Motion by Teal, second by Ross on ordinance 2026-06. This is a roll call. Heather selectto. >> Council member Barnes. Nay. Dumba. >> Nay. >> Ross.

137
00:39:11.119 --> 00:39:26.160
>> Hi. >> Rowan. >> I. >> I. >> Teal. >> I. >> Mayor. >> Spooner. >> I. Motion. That ordinance passes. On to be. Ordinance 2026-05

138
00:39:26.160 --> 00:39:43.040
reszoning property of the hill block. Once again, Harry Davis, planning man. >> Thank you, Mr. Mayor and Council. Um so this is an ordinance that you've previously seen at your um preceding city council meeting. Uh nothing has significantly changed about this ordinance. So we are recommending that

139
00:39:43.040 --> 00:40:00.079
you approve this for its second reading. Um the addition to this is that there is a summary publication that staff is suggesting. Um this does require I believe a 57th vote. So at least five members of city council would have to say yes to the summary publication.

140
00:40:00.079 --> 00:40:18.720
>> Any questions again? Mayor Spooner. >> Yes, Mr. Ross. >> I'll make a motion to approve ordinance 2026-05. >> Second. >> Motion by Ross, second by Vance Sloo on ordinance 202.

141
00:40:18.720 --> 00:40:34.800
I once again this >> council member Barnes. >> I >> Ross, >> hi >> Rowan. >> Hi. >> Hi. >> Hi. >> Mayor Spooner. >> Hi That is our ordinance has passed. Publication of the summary.

142
00:40:34.800 --> 00:40:51.599
>> Mayor Spooner. >> Yes. >> I'll make a motion to approve the summary publication of ordinance 2026-05. >> I'll second. >> Motion by Ross, second by Roman. All those in favor signify by saying I. >> I. >> I. >> All opposed. That is published. On to

143
00:40:51.599 --> 00:41:09.680
ordinance 2026-07. Approve text amendments for child care in the PI zoning districts. Once again, Harry Davis, map planning manager. >> Thank you, mayor and council. >> Shorten up your title. >> It's all good. Um, so this is uh our

144
00:41:09.680 --> 00:41:25.680
second review of this ordinance to allow uh childcare centers within our PI public institutional zoning district. Uh nothing significant has changed about this ordinance since the last time you reviewed it. Uh and very similar to the preceding item on your agenda, there is another summary publication for this as

145
00:41:25.680 --> 00:41:45.359
well. So with that, I'm happy to take any questions. Questions for staff. At this time, I'll entertain a motion. >> Mayor Spooner. >> Yes. >> I'll make a motion to approve ordinance 2026-07. >> Second.

146
00:41:45.359 --> 00:42:05.599
>> And motion by Ross, second by Vance Sloo. Once again, this is an ordinance. We will have a roll. >> Council member Barnes. >> Hi. >> Dublia. >> Hi. >> Ross. >> Hi. >> Rowan. I >> and a publication of that.

147
00:42:05.599 --> 00:42:22.800
>> So moved. >> Second. >> Ross has got the motion. Second by Vance Loose. >> All those in favor signify by saying I. >> I. I. >> All opposed. Can be published.

148
00:42:22.800 --> 00:42:37.920
On to item D, 2026B, obligation sewer bonds. Jessica Kendzer. >> Yes. Um we discussed in the budget process how in order to complete a number of very large projects uh in the

149
00:42:37.920 --> 00:42:54.240
sewer fund in 2026, there was going to need to be um a bond. And so that is uh what is here before you tonight. There's three different um resolutions. Uh the first one is basically providing that we can sell a sewer um revenue bond,

150
00:42:54.240 --> 00:43:09.760
general obligation sewer revenue bond. The second one is related to something that we have um that's available to us in the uh uh state of Minnesota with the public facilities um program uh which allows us to basically utilize um the

151
00:43:09.760 --> 00:43:25.359
state's credit rating for a public infrastructure project to um help assist the interest rates um that would likely be seen on this bond. And then the third one is the municipal advisory services agreement uh with Northland Securities. Tammy is still here and so I will let

152
00:43:25.359 --> 00:43:41.599
her come up if there's anything more to say about that or for any questions. >> Council Tammy Umdall from Northland Securities again as adviser. The only thing I would add to that the estimated um interest rate on these bonds which are te proposed to be taxexempt is 3.26%.

153
00:43:41.599 --> 00:43:56.400
So I just contrast that with the other because these are taxexempt. First payment would be due in 2027, final payment in 2041. And we are also recommending that the city seek a rating on bonds and Northland will work with city staff on

154
00:43:56.400 --> 00:44:12.319
that process. And the sale date is June 9th. Um we will take bids that morning on the series and present results at your regular meeting that evening. Mayor, council members, happy to answer any questions. >> Questions? Yes, Mr. I have one, but I

155
00:44:12.319 --> 00:44:28.480
believe mine is more for uh administrator Kinszer or maybe one of the directors. But um is the project necessary this year? >> Yes. I'll say the the big one that I think we've targeted this one on is the siphon box replacement. This was one of

156
00:44:28.480 --> 00:44:44.960
the things that was discovered in the floods of 2024 when we had so much extra water coming into the wastewater treatment plant. Um it's essentially the line that gets everything from the north side in under the river and to the treatment plant. Um and that that uh needing to be replaced is very important

157
00:44:44.960 --> 00:45:01.200
for the continuation and ongoing operations of our wastewater system in the in the city. So that's the biggest project that's part of that. There are some other smaller things related to other um improvements uh with some sanitary sewer reconstruction projects.

158
00:45:01.200 --> 00:45:18.000
Um, I can't get too specific on those because they're not my projects, but Mark is available if there's anything further to add to that beyond the siphon box. >> You, you know, I like to follow our bond schedule or bond schedule. I'm just wondering, I I know we have some falling off and I believe it's 2027.

159
00:45:18.000 --> 00:45:32.400
>> Yeah. >> And even some falling off in 2028. >> That's different. So, this one shows up when we look at our sewer um basically cash flow model um because it's not something that we add on to our tax levy. It's something that is built into

160
00:45:32.400 --> 00:45:48.720
the rate increase increases that you approved to go into effect January 1st that paying off this um principle and interest over 15 years is built into that. And I don't know the debt service schedule um for sewer off the top of my head to be able to talk about how this

161
00:45:48.720 --> 00:46:05.079
fits with existing sewer debt. >> Okay. Okay. So, okay. Yes, I did forget that that it doesn't go on the ex levy. It is financed through the uh modern sewer department. So, thank you. No more questions. >> No more questions.

162
00:46:05.119 --> 00:46:32.640
>> At this time, I'll enter. >> I make a motion to approve resolution 2026-126. Sir, >> second. Second by D. We have >> I all opposed. Motion pass.

163
00:46:32.640 --> 00:46:50.720
>> Resolution 2026-127. >> Here Spooner. >> Yes. >> I make a motion to approve resolution 2026-127. >> Second. >> Motion by Teal, second by Ross. All those in favor of the resolution? >> I. All opposed.

164
00:46:50.720 --> 00:47:06.480
Resolutions passed. Approval of SP advisory service. City at Minnesota Northwest. >> Okay. So move >> second. >> Motion by Don Buouya, second by Barnes. All those in favor signify.

165
00:47:06.480 --> 00:47:22.160
>> I. All opposed. Also passes. Item E resolution 2026-1 129. Travis block, you've been waiting patiently. public works. >> Thank you, Mayor Spooner, members of the

166
00:47:22.160 --> 00:47:38.200
council, and members of the public. Resolution 2026-129 is seeking the approval of the plans and specifications and authorizing advertisement for bids for the lead service line replacements, uh, city contract 2026-10.

167
00:47:38.720 --> 00:47:55.920
The slide before you just kind of depicts a general project location where these various replacements will take place. The project is going to consist of 63 lead water service line replacements. 42 of those are from the meter to the curb

168
00:47:55.920 --> 00:48:12.880
stop and 21 are located between the curb stop and the water man. Just also wanted to remind folks uh out there that the property owner does own the service in its entirety from meter to main. Um and for this project the replacements will occur on upcoming pavement overlay and

169
00:48:12.880 --> 00:48:28.880
reconstruction streets. And the reason why you may some may ask why we are doing this is if they are a private line. Well, the money that's allocated by the state of Minnesota, the property owner is not allowed to uh pursue that. So therefore, the city or water supply

170
00:48:28.880 --> 00:48:46.640
system, which is us, has to do that. And we did have a very successful campaign when we did uh reach out to the folks that were putting together this proposed first kind of phase of this project. Very positive response. So very pleased with that. Uh this is just a typical section of one

171
00:48:46.640 --> 00:49:02.559
of the meter side replacements coming into the line coming into the house and the meter and then line continuing into the plumbing. And this is a typical section that just depicts the what would be from the curb stop to the main.

172
00:49:02.559 --> 00:49:18.559
Here's just a couple pictures of examples of kind of what are the common type of replacements we're dealing with on the meter side in in some of these uh locations that we're looking at. These two are kind of a little bit of a less typical kind of more of a finished

173
00:49:18.559 --> 00:49:32.800
area, but the project is such the documents are cons are are put together such that there is a someotment or an allowance to deal with these situations should they you know when we get into those the project costs uh and funding

174
00:49:32.800 --> 00:49:50.160
for the project we're you have 236,59176 as engineering and that's Stantech consultant who is our consultant for this project is working on preparing these plans and specs and the bidding documents and then it leaves us about uh 1.138 they're in in for construction

175
00:49:50.160 --> 00:50:08.000
costs and the funding for this is going to be provided uh by a Minnesota public facility authority grant in the amount of that 1375. So the tenative project schedule is where we're at tonight seeking approval of the plans inspects and authorizing

176
00:50:08.000 --> 00:50:24.720
going out for bid. We have a tenative bid date set for May 21st. That is contingent currently upon Minnesota Department of Health re approval of the plans. They are currently in that state. Our consultants reached out to them as recently as late last week uh to try and get a confirmation. We're unable to get

177
00:50:24.720 --> 00:50:40.240
that at this time. The resolution is structured as such. So the public works director is allowed to revise that bid date. Then when we get approval from the state, then we can revise that bid date and keep moving forward. So we we can stay on our on a schedule and get these

178
00:50:40.240 --> 00:50:56.559
things started here this year. So then we'll be looking at awarding a contract sometime in June or July, then constructing in July or August, looking to be substantially complete with it in October of 2027 and then finally complete in

179
00:50:56.559 --> 00:51:12.240
2028 there June. So, uh, with that recommendation to consider resolution 2026-129 >> questions, >> Mayor Spooner, um, always nice to have the state pay

180
00:51:12.240 --> 00:51:27.680
for one of our projects. Any chance we get an administrative fee out of this? >> Uh, unfortunately, I am unaware that we were able to do that at this time. I think staff time and other things are there one of the un uneligible costs. >> Okay,

181
00:51:27.680 --> 00:51:44.720
>> nice try. Okay, Maddie, you have a question? >> I do. Mr. Black, can you tell or explain if this will affect any of our uh taxpayers as far as if there are being replaced or fixed, will their water bill go up? >> Uh there is at this time there is not

182
00:51:44.720 --> 00:52:01.680
anticipated to be any cost to any of the property owners for this project. That is that is going to be solely funded uh by the state of Minnesota. >> Thank you. >> My understanding this is the first round of this. We could maybe maybe do this the next year and the next year and then

183
00:52:01.680 --> 00:52:17.599
>> that is correct. That's that is my goal and anticipation to align with the state's goal of removing all these by 2033. I've already submitted the one for the next round. Uh working with director Duchain on putting, you know, our next overlay streets etc together. Put that

184
00:52:17.599 --> 00:52:32.400
package together and then in the next month be moving into getting that off of the prior uh the the PPL the project priority list and moving that into the intended use plan phase. So you'll be seeing me doing this hopefully for a long time. >> And then do you see the engineer costs

185
00:52:32.400 --> 00:52:49.760
coming down as as the years go on? >> Uh I I would like to say yes uh as we become more efficient with this. This is uh this is the first round of this. So we're we're all learning a lot uh on this on this project, but I I would anticipate that and that is that would be hopeful. Thank you.

186
00:52:49.760 --> 00:53:07.760
>> Any questions? >> Mayor Spooner. >> Yes. I make a motion to approve 2026-129. >> Second. >> Motion by Duoya, second by Barnes. All those in favor of the resolution? >> I. >> All opposed. Resolution passes. Thank

187
00:53:07.760 --> 00:53:26.800
you. On to bids. Resolution 2026-117 bids for phase two of the vioduct park. Mark Duchain. Thank you, mayor, members of the council, and the public. Uh before you tonight is the first of two bids, that being the Video Park phase 2 site

188
00:53:26.800 --> 00:53:42.319
improvements. These bids were open last Wednesday, April 22nd, and we did receive four bids for the project. The low bid came from Pember Companies. There's a site plan showing you the proposed improvements. Um real quick, so

189
00:53:42.319 --> 00:53:57.760
this is for everything that's kind of colored on the map here. The big white area in the middle, that's the refrigerated ice sheet. That contract was previously awarded to Modern Mechanical Systems last fall to get going on the refrigerated ice package and chiller system. Um, so everything that's included in this package is

190
00:53:57.760 --> 00:54:14.000
what's colored out. Uh, the other white box that's to the left of the page there, that's the utility garage to house the resurfacer and some other small miscellaneous tools. Um, but this would be the landscaping, the utilities, the concrete patio around the refrigerated ice, the second fire pit,

191
00:54:14.000 --> 00:54:29.200
um, and some minor electrical conduits and whatnot. So, this is that bid package. Uh, like I mentioned, we did receive four bids last Wednesday. The low bid came from Pember Companies at just over 666,000. Uh, you can see this is over the engineer's estimate. Um, we found out

192
00:54:29.200 --> 00:54:45.280
late in the game that um the geotechnical engineer had requested some additional soil investigations. And from the time we got an estimate for the soil correction folks to the time the bids went in, um those soil borings came back and indicated that the soils in this

193
00:54:45.280 --> 00:55:00.480
area were um a little more subpar than we had anticipated with the borings that we had. So that increased the soil correction costs. Um there's nothing we can do about it. This is a product of decisions made long long ago before any of us were around and the fill that was

194
00:55:00.480 --> 00:55:17.200
placed down there. Um, so that's the primary result or the reason for the increase in the bid prices from the estimate. Um, but with that said, I again I do not anticipate there being much cost savings. We are looking uh any cost savings in rebidding the project. Um, we are working with the contractor,

195
00:55:17.200 --> 00:55:34.400
the low bidder and looking at some ideas for some value engineering to bring those costs down. But this is within the total project budget for Vioaduct Park. So again, we are recommending approval moving forward. So asking for approval of contract tonight. Uh, this contract will start construction here pretty quickly. The

196
00:55:34.400 --> 00:55:49.760
the low bid contractor, Pember Companies, is the same contractor that's down there working on the 20-in water mane replacement project. Um, they're likely going to finish that project and roll right into this project to get going. So, this one will start sooner than later. And then completion is due by September 1st. That's when we are

197
00:55:49.760 --> 00:56:07.480
required to deliver the refrigerated ice sheet area to Modern Mechanical so that they can get the refrigerated ice sheet done for hopefully a November opening of this year. So with that, I will stand for any questions, but ask you to consider resolution 2026 1117.

198
00:56:09.680 --> 00:56:25.599
>> I'll entertain a motion. >> Mayor Spooner. >> Yes. >> I'll make a motion to approve resolution 2026-117. >> Second. >> Motion by Ross, second by Vance Loose on resolution 2026-117. Signify by saying I.

199
00:56:25.599 --> 00:56:42.720
>> I. All opposed is passed. Once again, Director Duchain, resolution 2026-119, bids on a sewer line project. Thank you, Mayor, council members, and the public. Uh, the second bid tonight is for our 2026 sewer lining project. Uh, this is

200
00:56:42.720 --> 00:56:58.960
contract 202608. Uh, we're looking at putting in a structural liner in numerous existing sanitary sewer mains around town, as well as a segment of storm sewer on Second Avenue Northwest. Uh this structural liner reminder, it gets rolled out into the existing pipe

201
00:56:58.960 --> 00:57:14.799
and it's structurally strong enough that should the existing host pipe completely deteriorate, this structural liner can hold up without the host pipe being there anymore. Uh this is an effective way to uh mitigate cracks and infiltration into our existing sewer systems without having to dig up the

202
00:57:14.799 --> 00:57:31.200
whole road and replace everything. Um streets that are on here are not in our near-term capital improvement plan for street improvements. So, that's why we're looking at making these improvements this way. We did receive five bids uh last Wednesday. The low bid coming from Vortex Services Minnesota

203
00:57:31.200 --> 00:57:47.520
LLC at just under $658,000. Uh you can see for once we again back to good graces here. Um we received very favorable bids. Um there was quite the range here and I think that's indicative of some of these

204
00:57:47.520 --> 00:58:05.200
contractors are full for the year and so this was just a well if we get it it'd be nice bids. Um Vortex on the other hand they have indicated that they do have availability and they really want to fill out the rest of their year. So that's the indication for why we got such a favorable bid on there which we're not going to complain about.

205
00:58:05.200 --> 00:58:21.040
So looking at funding including engineering and inspection costs. So the total project cost is just around $760,000. You can see a majority of this is funded out of our sanitary sewer utility fund and the remainder is out of that storm sewer utility fund for the portion of storms that's being lined. This is one

206
00:58:21.040 --> 00:58:36.960
of those projects that is part of that sanitary sewer bond um that you just all approved here a little bit ago. So some savings on that bond already. Pending approval tonight. We'll work with the contractor to get a construction start date. This contract has a flexible start date. Again, we're

207
00:58:36.960 --> 00:58:56.880
trying to be flexible to get as many favorable bids as we could, but it does have a completion date of November 31st of this year. >> So, with that, again, I'll stand for any questions, but ask you to consider resolution 2026119. >> All moved.

208
00:58:56.880 --> 00:59:19.920
Motion by Teal, second by Duya. All those in favor signify by saying I. I. I. >> All opposed. Is passed. Boards, commission reports, projects. Anyone? >> Um uh presented through the Paradise Center of the Arts and Furbal Foundation

209
00:59:19.920 --> 00:59:36.559
uh this Saturday, May 2nd, is a LA parte for women who care. Um, so they're they're doing a fundraiser for partnership with Paradise Farbo Foundation and Women Who Care and ask that anyone that comes to wear spring

210
00:59:36.559 --> 00:59:52.079
attire. >> Mr. Ross, >> thank you, Mayor. Um, I just want to bring up something that was kind of buried in the consent agenda item list. Uh, Farbo is getting a state BMX race again this summer, and that's that's really a

211
00:59:52.079 --> 01:00:07.760
huge deal for the city of Farbo. It brings in about 800 people and you know families and the kids race and well the adults race too actually. So I just encourage people if you haven't checked out our BMX track it's in South Alexander Park. We have a really nice

212
01:00:07.760 --> 01:00:24.079
track uh here in Farbo and uh bringing this state race in is is a big deal for us. >> Over 160 people. Is that what I read? >> Should 800 >> 800 800 Yeah. >> And I read the kids that won last year.

213
01:00:24.079 --> 01:00:44.240
They're from all over the state. Anything else, Jessica? >> Nothing. >> Nothing. We do have a closed door meeting >> this time. I'll entertain a motion to adjurnn. So moved. Second. Motion by Ross, second by Van Sluss. All those in

214
01:00:44.240 --> 01:00:49.799
favor of adjournment say I. I. I.