got both guys tonight must be slow everyone is the pl board meeting of the council for Franklin today's February 18th at 7 p.m. all rise for the flagship please alance to the flag of the United
States of America and to the Republic which it stands one nation under God indivisible with liy and justice for [Music] all thank you thank you I have before we move to roll call First all the business here
would be Let's uh swear in uh Mr uh Frank cahoot as a uh new member this year or a reappointed member this year Jackie would you do the honors for me please [Music]
stand iank i willfully i Frank follow this word that I faithfully impartially and justly impartially and justly form all the as a m perform all the duties as a member of the township of Franklin as a
member the township of Franklin Bo to the best of my ability to the best of my ability as you solemly swear that I will support you solemly swear that I will support Constitution of the United States the Constitution of the United States and the constitution of the state of New Jersey the constitution of the
state of New Jersey that I will bear true faith and oance of be true faith and allegiance to the same to the same to the governments established to the governments established in the united states in the United States and in this state and in the state under the authority of the people under the authority of the people so help be God
so help be God thank you congratulations Frank thank you and we'll seat Mr uh we'll seat Frank for Mr this evening and now we'll go to roll call please here here
here here here here here here thank you all right there's a amended resolution p1- 2025 before we go to this resolution
uh Jack can you a little background of what's going on here by the way welcome this evening uh thank you Jack he's taken the spot of Kink this evening yes my pleasure to be here with you um we noticed the resolution that have been passed by the board of pointed
C specifically and not the firm and sometimes you do have to out members of The Firm for attendance purposes we want to make sure that the appointment is applicable to the entire so it's anend solution for that you will be seeing
me okay all right with that said uh is there a motion to uh uh approve the amendment to resolution p1- 2025 uh appointing individual anying firm uh and not naming an individual
from The Firm still moved I got a motion second no he's second second okay all right uh call vote Please Mr yes yes yes yes
yes yes yes very good thank you uh we have one application this evening uh PB 2409 Sam Deo Deo Deo no it's de Mayo [Music] okay pleasee raise your right hand
[Music] tell you what you're pre observant even good evening all right uh could you give us a brief a brief overview of uh what you're trying to accomplish here for an application for both variants
in Block 61 4 55 lock 55 landlock single one to landlock ad access
Avenue Ro requir variance positive impact adjustment open not cutting down on the property apparently line put clear already
[Music] field negative impact P Ro residential they have follow and requirements through an application rece file have
[Music] requirements I'm not going to cut down any existing cars lands [Music] and if I know the property I call the
property uhing property has a access road that an Access Lane similar going back to the Jo's Old Homestead and up the street there's another Lane going back that picks up where Lun Mo used to
live there three houses back there so it's not uncharacteristic to that area uh that particular section of town all right uh we the engineers report [Music] please I have one
[Music] [Music] question no we're not there's an existing one there what you are technically three variances
required here one is for the5 in the pr have 100 I do have to note that there a significant Improvement the cons the current lot has zero front they're going to 100 so closer toity taking exting condition a lot
closer variances are one is Ry F buffer um we've the properties far bu look like there's nothing on the property that approach on the requ but
any problem that follows up with that actually be required refle plans documents filed later uh the third one which is actually probably 23 of the comments in our letter may or may not even apply to
depending on how this board wants to interpret the to pel's ordinances require um the Dr I think another District whenever there's two or more residences involved there supposed to be a plus
um so there's several sections of the code requiring to provision I think the intent to that is you have a larger sub not a single be a lot adjustment so to be conservative we stuck this in as a possible various and few questions or
comments on that but if you interpret it as this is only one new home technically not even a new lot because they just adjusting a lot line clust provision might not even apply I do also have to point out that under the clustering provision to minimum block only 100 so if you considered what he proposing cler
actually put home a little closer than the different lot size requirs any anyway the P being strict as they are a lot of require clustering of any
sub whether or not up app up it's kind of gray whether two more board dwellings means the existing dwelling in the new one or new dwellings I personally I don't have a problem with you interpreting it as that only applies to two new dwellings or more and the dwelling is already there we're not the
overall density is not changing here we're not adding New Lots and Old Point behind all the P regulations are frust preserve lands and not subdivision of and we're not see a lot I think your recommendation is correct
the uh the only question I would have what helps the resident the most or it doesn't matter with Finance I I'll put it this way regardless of whatever this board says fin has some Juris this
anyway and that's the purpose of the question where where do we put him in the best position to be able to get through p i I think you can approve as a as a varience if you choose to interpret it that way and I don't know problem that
notar down you okay with the variance so Mr Deo in the packet we see that you have a certificate of filing so you have gone to finance yes Finance to approve this with but we just need approval from the township we got much to bring back for
them afterwards it it's granted and then they'll process and then I'll bring that back to the township event and they seem to not have a concern with the 100 foot of Frontage yeah not one of their
concerns actually their emphasis was on the minimum acreage [Music] single family homes in the pr District may be developed without clustering provided they have a minimum lot area of 3.4 acres and theing
okay all right yeah we don't want to yeah it seems as though it's not applicable at all but nevertheless proba we Grant the variance to remove any ambiguity prot and we're looking at this as a lot line was there was there notice required
Chris on this one there was notice required okay and uh Jackie are we okay with uh the notices no are order okay at this time I'll entertain a motion to open the hearing to the public move move second
all in favor all right we're in public portion is anyone wish to come up up and speak on this matter seeing none hearing none is a motion to close public portion motion to close public portion second second all in favor okay
uh any board members have any questions before we call for a motion no Jack are you okay is there anything else that uh we're missing here no got it Ed Chris any other comments
none Chris everything's in order all it's time I'll entertain a motion on uh PB 2409 2409 I'll I'll make that motion provided that in the resolution the the resolution clearly states that a TW a 50
foot a buffer be applied to lot 55 so that those structures uh would be closer to the property line that's the northern boundary of lot 55 okay what about the the wa varage on
the on the clustering clustering and we wave the clustering or and a lot for and of course we're approving the lot Frontage at 100 ft versus 125 a second I got I got a motion in a
second we call please yes yes yes yes yes yes yes
yes congratulations best of Lu yeah okay all right uh reports we have no reports correct all right uh minutes of January 21st is there a motion to approve the minutes that were submitt
electronically motion to approve minutes of January 21 and is there a second mooving seconded all in favor I I uh uh Jackie no reason for close session or is there a reason for close no reason for session left
[Music] the no I was here yeah nothing okay very good thank you uh board comments any comments uh hearing none at this time I'll entertain motion to adjourn make a
motion motion move second all in favor I thank you for coming out yeah 12 minutes I'm telling you good