WEBVTT

METADATA
Video-Count: 2
Video-1: youtube.com/watch?v=83DF3TAEQO4
Video-2: youtube.com/watch?v=s30qGvOFoww

NOTE
MEETING SECTIONS:

Part 1 (Video ID: 83DF3TAEQO4):
- 00:00:00: Meeting Call to Order and Roll Call
- 00:02:01: Mayor Explains Rationale for Sign Ordinance Change
- 00:08:32: Public Hearing Opened and Closed; Councilor Comments

Part 2 (Video ID: s30qGvOFoww):
- 00:00:18: Call to Order, Roll Call, Prayer, and Pledge
- 00:02:37: Representative Zlotnik's District Update: Chapter 90 Funding
- 00:08:38: Chapter 70 Funding, Student Opportunity Act Review
- 00:13:58: Youth Center Funding and State Budget Overview
- 00:20:04: Councilor Kazinskus's Question About Youth Center Funding
- 00:20:36: Councilor Jordano's Question: Budget Reduction Areas
- 00:25:16: Teamsters Union Letter: Discussion and Filing Motion
- 00:25:51: Councilor Mack's Concerns: Negotiation Team Formation
- 00:28:50: Councilor Kazinskus's Concerns: City Charter Interpretation
- 00:31:15: Motion: Keep Item on Agenda, Request Mayor's Letter
- 00:32:27: Ordinance: Temporary Positions Compensation, First Printing
- 00:33:41: President Tyrus Recusal, President Prom Election
- 00:35:57: Ordinance: Non-Union Compensation Schedule, Second Printing
- 00:37:10: Donation Acceptance Order: Request More Time and Review
- 00:40:20: Transferring Funds for Auditing Department Expenses
- 00:41:47: Resolution Supporting Redevelopment Prior Authorized Funds
- 00:44:29: Ratifying City Auditor's Step Designation Recommendation
- 00:46:08: Zoning Ordinance Amendment: Signs and Advertising Devices
- 00:46:59: Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) Steering Committee
- 00:48:24: Quarterly Community Development and Planning Department Update
- 00:53:14: Council Comments, Remarks, and Meeting Adjournment


Part: 1

1
00:00:00.000 --> 00:00:26.880
--------- Order the meeting of the Gardener City Council and the Planning Board to order for the purpose of a joint public hearing regarding an amendment to chapter 675 of the Kota City Gardener. The joint public hearing notice reads as follows. Pursuant to general laws 40A subsection

2
00:00:26.880 --> 00:00:43.040
5, notice is hereby given that the city council and planning board will conduct a joint public hearing on Monday, April 6, 2026 at 7 p.m. in the city council chamber, room 219, city hall, 95 Pleasant Street, Gardener, to consider

3
00:00:43.040 --> 00:00:59.359
amending chapter 675, the zoning code of the city of Gardner. The proposed amendment involves changing item 11772, an ordinance to amend the code of the city of Gardner, chapter 675, thereof entitled zoning, to remove article 9, thereof entitled signs and advertising

4
00:00:59.359 --> 00:01:14.479
devices, and move it to a new nonzoning chapter to be numbered chapter 665. Information regarding these amendments and associated maps are available for viewing in the city clerk's office, the department of community development and planning, or on the city's web page,

5
00:01:14.479 --> 00:01:31.360
www.gardner gardener-mma.gov. All persons interested in this matter and desire to offer testimony are invited to attend the hearing. TTCF, city clerk. The clerk will now please do a roll call. >> Councelor Brooks, >> present. >> Council Craig Cormier,

6
00:01:31.360 --> 00:01:46.240
>> present. >> Council General Owitz, >> present. >> Council Harder, >> present. >> Council Heath, >> present. >> Council Heg, >> present. >> Council Kazinskus, >> present. >> Council Math, >> present. Council Tone, >> Council Tibbo Munos, >> present. >> President Tyrus,

7
00:01:46.240 --> 00:02:01.680
>> present. >> Mr. Paul Cormier, >> present. >> Mr. Steven Cormier, >> present. >> Mr. Eric Flint, >> present. >> And Mr. Bob Sorts, >> present. >> Both bodies have quorum. At this time, I'd request a report from the mayor or

8
00:02:01.680 --> 00:02:21.920
director of community development. >> Thank you very much, Mr. President, thank you to Councelor Mack for ask inviting me to be a uh co-sponsor of this ordinance before you here today and provide the administration's uh opinion on the ordinance change that is before you here today. Uh as I said in the uh

9
00:02:21.920 --> 00:02:37.440
subcommittee meeting that met on this ordinance item before you. Uh there are no actual uh verbiage changes in the language that before you. the the ordinance that's before you would take the signed section of the zoning code that currently exists

10
00:02:37.440 --> 00:02:53.920
in chapter 675 and remove it from the zoning code and place it into a regular general ordinance of the uh city code. And the reason for that uh is based off of the feedback that we've received from several different businesses who have been looking at opening businesses here in Gardener who have opened businesses

11
00:02:53.920 --> 00:03:10.159
here in Gardener and talking about the different regulations around signage for the businesses that they have and how that's really stunted, stalled or added costs to the developments as they've tried to open up here in Gardener. Uh, as we know through the process that we're currently going through right now, the process of amending a zoning

12
00:03:10.159 --> 00:03:25.840
ordinance is designed to be drawn out because you're looking for increased public input. You're looking for increased uh feedback, but at the same time, you need to balance the public good of getting that, you know, feedback in a longer period of

13
00:03:25.840 --> 00:03:43.680
time versus the experience that's on the ground being happened with the businesses that we have at the moment. And when you balance those to get the greater public good that we have in the end of basically trying to get more businesses in here because it does help us financially. It does help our residents here find ways to stay here uh to work, live and play here. Something

14
00:03:43.680 --> 00:03:58.239
as simple as putting a sign on a business to advertise that business can really make or break a project during its balance sheet phase uh or make someone realize that a business is even there and help that business last longer. Uh and I'll give you a couple of examples as to what really brought this

15
00:03:58.239 --> 00:04:15.120
to life. Um, back in the 2010s, uh, when Tiffany Crossroads first opened, the 99 restaurant had its, uh, groundbreaking in 2018. So, we're going back around that time frame. Uh, Tiffany Crossroads ran into a lot of issues with the dimensions that have honestly not been

16
00:04:15.120 --> 00:04:31.280
updated uh, for quite some time for the dimensions of the signage into the plaza, the dimensions of the signage that could go on the buildings uh, for the businesses that were there. uh adding uh some extra time for cost with engineering, cost with design work, cost with the sign companies to rework the signage that had to be done both for the

17
00:04:31.280 --> 00:04:47.360
entrance in and out of the plaza itself. Uh the signs that could be visible to advertise for the plaza uh and the signs that could go on the businesses that are there. Uh you go back a little bit before that in the 2015 2016 uh time frame, we had the uh Bank of America uh

18
00:04:47.360 --> 00:05:02.000
kiosk that was put in at the Price Chopper lot and the way that the signage around the Bank of America kiosk could go. Uh then in the 2020s, we launched our side and facade improvement grant program that we did through the American Rescue Plan funds. We ended up having to

19
00:05:02.000 --> 00:05:18.080
advertise that we had that sign grant a lot more than we had to do the facade grants. And the reason being for that is uh the feedback we were getting in real time from property owners in the city because the property owners had to be the one to sign off on both the sign and the facade applications was that it was easier under zoning to update the

20
00:05:18.080 --> 00:05:33.600
facades to make the buildings look good than it was to deal with the sign regulations that we had and the review process and everything that had to go with that. It made it so that we uh went through the facade money that was about four or five times more than what we had set aside for sign money in about a

21
00:05:33.600 --> 00:05:50.479
month, month and a half where it took us two years to go through the sign improvement program where businesses we offered uh 2 uh $2,500 per sign to help uh advertise for a business. And we ended up having money left over in the account that got turned back to the federal government because we did not

22
00:05:50.479 --> 00:06:06.240
have people who were interested in that program with the biggest feedback being like, I'd love to do it. I really need a new sign. I just can't go through the process that was there. Uh that we saw with businesses that wanted to do perpendicular signage downtown rather than just uh parallel to the road. We

23
00:06:06.240 --> 00:06:21.440
saw that with businesses that were looking at uh doing illuminated signs and have signs that had some type of light on the back that wouldn't be on all night but just have some type of light that's currently prohibited uh under the current zoning code because you can't have certain illuminations on a sign after a certain time frame but

24
00:06:21.440 --> 00:06:36.319
the businesses end up staying open past that. So they had to go to the old sign where the light shown on the sign rather than the sign itself being lit. There were uh Sawa uh Asian Beastro that uh just opened over on West Broadway was three inches over what the zoning code

25
00:06:36.319 --> 00:06:53.360
allowed uh and had either had to spend money to order a new sign, had to go through a variance process where they had to hire an attorney and spend money that way or just saw the sign 3 in off but that would ruin the lettering uh that was on the sign process that was there. So the sign ended up being almost a year after it was uh ordered before it

26
00:06:53.360 --> 00:07:09.280
was eventually hung up again. And the regulations are there for a reason. I don't think anyone thinks that we should get rid of all regulations when it comes to signage around the city because the the ordinance is there for a reason and we want to make sure things look clean and look good and are done the right way. But that doesn't mean that we're

27
00:07:09.280 --> 00:07:24.720
operating in the best gardener open for business atmosphere. And by moving this from the zoning code into the general code, it allows for a easier turnaround time that we can take that live feedback that we're getting from these businesses

28
00:07:24.720 --> 00:07:41.840
and in some cases a reason why some businesses don't choose to come to gardener because if you can't properly advertise for your business, why would you open your business? And making it so that we can update that in real time so we can be more willing to work with people on a more timely basis. There's still opportunities for public feedback

29
00:07:41.840 --> 00:07:58.400
as this would still have to go through the regular legislative process if it was to be changed. Uh there would still be opportunities for public input in that uh this would still be a public meeting whether it be before uh standing committee, the city council uh the opportunity to uh contact either the

30
00:07:58.400 --> 00:08:14.800
mayor's office or counselors throughout a process for uh input that way. It just makes it so that it's a more uh flexible way of updating the sign code that we have here in the city to make it so that uh we really are uh being amendable to the business community that is taking an interest in gardener but has slowed over

31
00:08:14.800 --> 00:08:32.000
recent years and this based off of the feedback that we've been getting as that slowing has happened. This is one of the main things that comes up in almost every conversation that we've had. So I'm happy to answer any further questions uh that people may have on the matter or uh uh take any feedback to. Thank you. Thank you, >> Mr. Mayor.

32
00:08:32.000 --> 00:08:49.279
I declare the public hearing open and ask councilors or planning board members to hold their questions until citizens have had the opportunity to speak. Does anyone wish to be heard in favor of the proposed zoning amendment? Does anyone wish to be heard in favor of the proposed zoning amendment?

33
00:08:49.279 --> 00:09:03.200
Does anyone wish to be heard in favor of the proposed zoning amendment? Does anyone wish to be heard in opposition of the proposed zoning amendment? Does anyone wish to be heard in opposition of the proposed zoning amendment? Does anyone wish to be heard

34
00:09:03.200 --> 00:09:22.640
in opposition proposed zoning amendment? Are there any questions or comments from counselors or planning board members? >> Council Mac. >> Thank you. Um, as the, uh, co-sponsor of this um, ordinance with the mayor, um, I

35
00:09:22.640 --> 00:09:37.760
just want to highlight again that I think in a lot of different ways, city hall is be trying to become more businessfriendly. Uh, we are trying to, uh, streamline the permit process. Um, and by doing this, we need to focus and make city hall much more supportive to

36
00:09:37.760 --> 00:09:52.360
businesses and not uh, resist or become a hindrance. Thank you. >> Thank you, counselor. Does anyone else wish to be heard on the matter? I declare the joint public hearing closed. Thank you.

Part: 2

1
00:00:18.080 --> 00:00:34.640
Call to order the Monday, April 6th meeting of the Gardener City Council. The clerk will now please call the role. >> Council Brooks, >> present. >> Councelor Craig Cormier, >> present. >> Council General Lawitz, >> present. >> Council Harder, >> present. >> Council Heath, >> present. >> Councelor Heglin, >> present. >> Council Kazinskus, >> present. >> Council Lac, >> present. >> Council Tami.

2
00:00:34.640 --> 00:00:51.520
>> Council Tibo, >> present. >> And President Tyrus, >> present. Those who wish me now rise for the opening prayer and pledge of allegiance. >> Almighty God, we thank you for bringing us together this evening. Inspire us to worthy seeds and sound decisions and direct us towards the attainment of good

3
00:00:51.520 --> 00:01:06.960
city government. We pray to bless and protect all the people of our city and to so guide and inspire us that we may liberate unity and harmony. Amen. Ice to the flag of the United States of America and to the republic for which it

4
00:01:06.960 --> 00:01:26.240
stands. One nation under God, indivisible, with liberty and justice for all. >> Announcement of open meeting recordings. Any person may make a video or audio recording of an open session of a meeting or may transmit the meeting through any medium subject to reasonable

5
00:01:26.240 --> 00:01:42.240
requirements of the chair as to the number, placement, and operation of equipment used so as to not interfere with the conduct of the meeting. Any person intending to make such recording shall notify the chair forth with all documents and exhibits used or referenced at the meeting must be submitted in duplicate to the city clerk

6
00:01:42.240 --> 00:02:01.600
as they become part of the meeting minutes. Is anyone recording tonight's meeting? No response. We'll begin with the reading and approval of the February 2nd, 2026 and February 17th, 2026 regular meeting minutes. Council Cormier,

7
00:02:01.600 --> 00:02:18.200
>> move to wave the reading of the minutes and accept them as printed. >> Second. >> Motion made by councelor Cormier, second by councelor Kazinskus to wave the reading of the minutes and accept them as presented. Is there discussion? >> All those in favor? I. I. All those against no. Motion passes.

8
00:02:19.280 --> 00:02:37.640
There are no public hearings. There are no communications from the mayor. Petitions, applications, communications. Item 11801, district update from State Representative John Zlotnik. I'd like to call the rep up to the podium.

9
00:02:42.319 --> 00:02:58.160
>> Uh, thank you, Mr. President. It's a pleasure to be here again. Um, I think this is the third year that we've had this uh tradition of uh coming to update you all as uh we begin our budget process and uh you won't be far behind. Um so happy to uh deliver the latest uh

10
00:02:58.160 --> 00:03:13.360
from the state legislature, specifically the House of Representatives as to what we've got uh going on. Um so the first thing I want to talk about is chapter 90 and the recent changes uh that have been made to it and the changes that quite

11
00:03:13.360 --> 00:03:30.319
frankly uh need to be defended uh in this year's debate and uh if history is any judge will need to be defended every year after that as well. Um so chapter 90 as a refresher is the uh state uh local aid for u roads is kind of what we

12
00:03:30.319 --> 00:03:46.560
commonly think about it as. Now, um I'm going to give you the a bridged version of my lecture on chapter 90 um because I have a lot of uh thoughts about uh kind of the concerns about it. But the reason I say now it's about uh local road paving is that when it started it was to

13
00:03:46.560 --> 00:04:02.159
help uh local communities purchase um large pieces of equipment that they otherwise wouldn't be able to afford. Uh you know, things for like DPW and road maintenance. It wasn't necessarily for paving. Uh however uh in the decades since as municipal budgets have

14
00:04:02.159 --> 00:04:19.919
continued to be uh squeezed uh by various factors uh in most municipalities chapter 90 is if not the lion share the only source of money that goes towards um local road maintenance. I know until relatively recently uh the

15
00:04:19.919 --> 00:04:35.360
city of gardener almost exclusively relied uh on funds from chapter 90. Um so that creates a few problems. first because when this formula um this is a formula fund uh money goes into it from the state. We we appropriate an amount

16
00:04:35.360 --> 00:04:53.919
um that then gets distributed to all the cities and towns through this formula. Uh the formula takes into account three things. The amount of road miles that exist in your municipality, the amount of people that live within its bounds, uh and the number of jobs that exist there. Um, as you can uh see, this tends

17
00:04:53.919 --> 00:05:09.360
to disadvantage less densely populated communities um and less um uh less densely populated communities uh rural communities and communities that are um less jobheavy but maybe more residentially heavy, right? Uh bedroom

18
00:05:09.360 --> 00:05:25.840
communities and the like. Um and it's been a careful balance uh between those three factors uh for many years. But uh up until last year, for at least the 12 uh previous times that I participate in the debate, um absolutely no changes uh

19
00:05:25.840 --> 00:05:41.919
were made to the way that program worked or the way funding was given out uh except for a year here or there that saw an unusually large uh annual increase. Um other than that, it has stayed basically the same. Um uh myself uh and

20
00:05:41.919 --> 00:05:58.000
other members of the rural caucus have been pushing for uh many many years to make adjustments to that because like all of you know all too well um more rural communities are affected by how little road miles are taken into account uh in that formula. Right? So places

21
00:05:58.000 --> 00:06:15.199
like uh you know gardener and everybody more rural than us um you know get shorted a little bit year after year um because road miles aren't taken into account. Now uh because it's a formula based uh system any flaw and any shortfall in that formula um gets

22
00:06:15.199 --> 00:06:32.319
exponential over time right it compounds that interest compounds uh year after year um to lead us to the point that we are today where almost uh all cities and towns but especially rural ones uh more acutely um you know tend to have uh

23
00:06:32.319 --> 00:06:48.880
lingering issues with their roads or they often times have to uh really get uh strict about prioritization. Um they have to um you know make a lot of tough choices about what gets done. So last year um after I'll say many stalled negotiations about how this should be

24
00:06:48.880 --> 00:07:06.000
redone um the compromise that was born out of this um like I said after many many years was to not touch uh the old formula um because as you can imagine many towns and cities uh benefit uh greatly uh from the old uh formula. Um

25
00:07:06.000 --> 00:07:20.240
so rather than changing that old formula, we said, "Okay, we're going to keep that the same and we're going to keep that the same for the money that we have been putting in um but we're going to create a new line of funding uh that will um much more benefit uh road miles

26
00:07:20.240 --> 00:07:35.599
uh for places like ours." And so now we basically have at least last year two parallel funds. Um and the second fund really benefits uh places like gardener which is why if you recall last year the chapter 90 aotment for gardener uh went

27
00:07:35.599 --> 00:07:51.759
up more than double um in uh in a single year probably probably the single largest increase in that fund uh that the city's ever received. Um you know however um it's not uh a permanent thing. um it is something that uh year after year we're going to have to fight

28
00:07:51.759 --> 00:08:06.960
for and negotiate. So I put that as uh the first thing I wanted to talk to you about because obviously I'm sure it's a lot of concern for you especially now that we're in the midst of pothole season. Um but it is something that we are going to have to keep an eye on uh to make sure that uh we don't backslide.

29
00:08:06.960 --> 00:08:22.560
Um because already in a uh supplemental budget we took up recently, there was a number of members who tried to push to go to an exclusively population-based uh formula for uh road funding, which luckily was defeated, but just the fact

30
00:08:22.560 --> 00:08:38.800
that it was um put forward I thought was concerning after, you know, many many years of fighting uh to get road miles more uh credit. um you know so it is something that we have to stay uh very vigilant about.

31
00:08:38.800 --> 00:08:55.680
Um keeping on with um state funding formulas uh the next big one is chapter 70 which provides state aid uh to the local school district and is uh the biggest uh uh the biggest source of

32
00:08:55.680 --> 00:09:11.600
revenue uh for the city of gardener. Uh the city of gardener gets about 70% of their school budget from the state in the form of chapter 70 um which is the bulk of the uh school-based aid that goes to cities and towns. Uh there are a

33
00:09:11.600 --> 00:09:27.440
number of smaller accounts that um uh you know kind of target specific areas. Um but this is by and large the biggest and by and large the biggest source of funding uh for schools in garden. Um this is the final year FY27 for the

34
00:09:27.440 --> 00:09:41.920
implementation of the student opportunity act. um similar to chapter 90. uh chapter 70 is formula based and when almost 30 years went by from when that formula was first uh put into law

35
00:09:41.920 --> 00:09:57.279
uh to when reforms were finally passed um the compounding of those shortfalls are things that many of us in this room experienced uh towards the later end of our careers in Gardenner public schools and some of the um creativity uh that

36
00:09:57.279 --> 00:10:13.360
different teachers employed um uh to to get through I particularly remember Kathy Ram by hand redrawing maps in the history department that survived from before the collapse of the Soviet Union that she used color pencil and marker um

37
00:10:13.360 --> 00:10:29.200
to uh perpetually update. Um so obviously those are things that we want to avoid to make sure that students have the material and the support uh and the personnel um to be successful. So, um, back before COVID in 2019, the legislature passed the Student

38
00:10:29.200 --> 00:10:45.680
Opportunity Act, um, which has, uh, benefited districts like Gardner, um, uh, quite, um, uh, quite considerably in terms of the amount of financial support that the local school district gets from the state. Um, districts like Gardner

39
00:10:45.680 --> 00:11:02.720
were uh, one of the goals of the of the bill. I'm proud to say that I worked on the bill as I was on the education committee at the time. Um, but we looked at communities like ours that had been um kind of perpetually underfunded by the state um to try and make those uh

40
00:11:02.720 --> 00:11:18.800
big jumps. Um so like I said, this is the final year of S SOA implementation. Um, one of the things that we included in the S SOA that I fought particularly hard for because I felt that it was um, really the most important part to avoid

41
00:11:18.800 --> 00:11:34.320
the situation that we were just coming out of. There was language in the SOA that stipulated that in the final year of implementation, we would start a process to review the chapter 70 formula again. um because uh we anticipated and

42
00:11:34.320 --> 00:11:50.880
has turned out to be the case that um the changes that we made did inject more money into the system and I think more equitably um uh spread it out to the districts that really need the support. Um but uh it was never meant to be a a

43
00:11:50.880 --> 00:12:06.000
kind of one-time cure all and that language was I think very important to include um because hopefully very soon that process will start to continue making uh further recommendations on how that funding uh should be distributed, how much funding there really needs to

44
00:12:06.000 --> 00:12:21.680
be um and where it needs to be uh targeted. just as a quick example that I I really like to use. Um so when the formula was written in 1993, uh the original formula, technology was not a part of what was considered to be

45
00:12:21.680 --> 00:12:37.839
expenses for a school district. So there was zero dollars uh allotted from the state that you could use towards technology. Well, anyone who went to school after 1993 knows that technology was very much a part of the classroom. And by the 19 late 1990s, early 2000s,

46
00:12:37.839 --> 00:12:53.839
uh it was a major component uh especially at the high school level. And so schools had to uh you know beg and borrow from other parts of the budget um to buy computers, to buy uh even overhead projectors, things that weren't accounted for in that formula simply

47
00:12:53.839 --> 00:13:11.120
because the people who wrote it in 1993 couldn't have anticipated what was going to change in the world and in education. And so those of you may recall uh those of you who went to uh Gardener High in the early to early 2000s uh that one of our computer labs at the high school had

48
00:13:11.120 --> 00:13:28.320
labels on the uh actually was etched in uh to the computer said property of NCCI Gardner. Um because the computer lab was handme-down from the local state prison. NCCI Gardner being the North County Correctional Institute. Um so those are the kind of things that we want to avoid. And even just in the six years

49
00:13:28.320 --> 00:13:43.760
since we debated the last formula changes, a lot has continued to develop uh in education, especially coming out of COVID. Um and undoubtedly there are parts of the formula that are falling short. Um and we'll need uh a more thorough review again. Um and hopefully

50
00:13:43.760 --> 00:13:58.880
um we can uh get the votes to do that and obviously put more funding uh into the formula ultimately being the goal. Um so those are the big formulas. Uh, and a little bit of good news before I get into the budget, which there's not

51
00:13:58.880 --> 00:14:15.199
much good news there. Um, so, um, we were able to through a supplemental budget that the House passed, uh, last year, I mean last month, um, include a second year of funding uh, for the city's new youth center. Um, I was very happy to work with the city last year to

52
00:14:15.199 --> 00:14:31.199
provide funding for the uh, buildout and startup of the new uh, youth center. Um, and at the time, uh, I told, um, I told the mayor that I would work very hard to try and get a second year of funding, uh, on the books to, um, you know, fully

53
00:14:31.199 --> 00:14:45.199
fully be able to test out this this concept as it is something new that the city has embarked upon. Um, but I think we all agree, um, is needed, uh, and very important. So, I will say that the House has passed uh, a second year of funding um, and we expect the Senate to

54
00:14:45.199 --> 00:15:02.320
take up that bill um, sometime shortly. Um so we should know uh with certainty whether or not uh that funding is going to be available to continue that as we did in the last fiscal year. Um so the budget picture I guess I

55
00:15:02.320 --> 00:15:17.600
should start by saying it's not all bad but it is going to be a change in course uh from what uh the last several years have been. Um so this is my 14th budget debate. Um and the last

56
00:15:17.600 --> 00:15:33.680
uh six or seven um were pretty good. Uh revenues were up. Uh you may recall that one year uh the state collected so much excess revenue that uh $3.1 billion uh got returned to Massachusetts taxpayers uh in the form of one-time refund

57
00:15:33.680 --> 00:15:50.480
checks. Um, and we've been able to sock away a huge amount of money into our rainy day fund, the state stabilization account, uh, that stands, uh, close to$9 billion dollars, uh, at the moment. Uh, so much so that in the last couple years, we've been able to do, I think, really creative things with the interest

58
00:15:50.480 --> 00:16:07.519
that's generated off that, um, to leverage um, for, you know, matching funds for for federal grants at the state level, um, and free up cash for other things as well. Um, and I will say this too that revenues have continued to trend in the right direction. Um, so far

59
00:16:07.519 --> 00:16:26.320
this year, uh, revenue has, uh, month-to-month exceeded, uh, expectations, what was agreed to last year to set our budget. Um, and that is all, uh, good news. Um uh the thing though is that you know going back to uh

60
00:16:26.320 --> 00:16:42.160
you know FY17, FY18 uh when uh the economy really expanded in Massachusetts and revenues uh with it uh and then particularly during uh the pandemic, Massachusetts as a state and our economy and with it the revenues uh

61
00:16:42.160 --> 00:16:58.480
did really well which is what led to that $3 billion uh tax rebate. Um, however, uh, you can definitely see that some of the steam is starting to come off of that. And I've been around long enough to know that, um, or I should say

62
00:16:58.480 --> 00:17:16.160
to experience what trying to do a state budget in a recession is like that's clearly not where we are now. Like I said, revenues are still, uh, beating uh, expectations. Um but in the past where we saw those um blowing by optimistic uh expectations, I'll say now

63
00:17:16.160 --> 00:17:33.600
we see them uh edging past what were pretty conservative guesstimates as to what we would take in in revenue. Um so that uh picture is definitely starting to uh change, but I would say I'll say that we're we're far better off than where we were uh when I joined the

64
00:17:33.600 --> 00:17:50.960
legislature uh 14 years ago. Um the other piece with that is is that um there are under sort of things underpinning the budget uh that have changed. Um two years ago and now fully implement fully implemented in the last fiscal year uh the state passed an

65
00:17:50.960 --> 00:18:07.840
almost $2 billion uh tax cut package. Um so now that that is fully implemented obviously uh that is revenue that we uh will not see uh going forward. Um on top of that, starting last um uh fiscal year and continuing to this fiscal year, uh

66
00:18:07.840 --> 00:18:23.200
the state has to absorb uh like all of you will as well um reduce spending uh at the federal level and in turn reduce spending uh at the state level. Uh that number for last fiscal year and this fiscal year. And it's a little bit of a jump because

67
00:18:23.200 --> 00:18:39.760
um the federal fiscal year and the state fiscal year don't line up. Um so some of these cuts hit us midway through last fiscal year. Um but over these two fiscal years uh the number for that is about uh $3 billion uh in reduced uh spending. Um so you take that with the

68
00:18:39.760 --> 00:18:57.120
state tax cuts uh that are uh relatively freshly implemented and then uh we're anticipating um more uh state tax cuts um for next fiscal year. Um and the price tag on that could be uh as much as $4 billion. Um so there are going to

69
00:18:57.120 --> 00:19:14.640
need to be some tough decisions made uh both in this round of budget debates to prepare uh for some of those eventualities uh and also hedge um against uh declining state revenues or hedge against uh declining federal expenditure um and then anticipating um

70
00:19:14.640 --> 00:19:31.760
the passage of additional state tax cuts. Um so that is all to say that um like I said the next couple years I think there's going to be a lot of uh difficult choices and re-evaluation of priorities um as we debate uh state um

71
00:19:31.760 --> 00:19:49.039
um the state funding picture. Um so that is uh what is going on at the state from a budgetary uh from a budgetary standpoint. um not all uh great news um not all bad news um but I think like everything else it is challenges uh that

72
00:19:49.039 --> 00:20:04.880
we need to uh work collaboratively uh to get through um so with that I am happy to take any questions if there if there are some and the president will allow >> Thank you repott does the council have any questions for the representative >> councelor Kazinskus

73
00:20:04.880 --> 00:20:21.520
>> thank you rep for the update and for all the information and all the work that you do at the state level to advocate for our city for 14 years it's been so far. Um the community youth center the earmark for last year was $100,000. What was the earmark for this second round?

74
00:20:21.520 --> 00:20:36.799
>> It's also $100,000. >> Great. Thank you. >> Thank you, councelor. Any further questions? >> Council Jer. >> Thank you, Mr. President. Um you talked about reductions in the budget and in your past experience you've been part of

75
00:20:36.799 --> 00:20:54.000
some of these uh debates in the past. what areas are normally um normally up for perhaps I guess for lack of a better term. >> Yeah. You know, um I will say that one thing that makes the situation now a lot different um uh and I think arguably a lot better uh than the situation we were

76
00:20:54.000 --> 00:21:10.720
in uh uh during the Great Recession is that uh not only were revenues uh sliding considerably um but we did not have nearly as much money in the stabilization account. Um I think there was only uh you know $2 or3 billion at the start of the last recession that had

77
00:21:10.720 --> 00:21:28.159
been saved up. Um the approaching $9 billion is is substantial um and gives us um you know considerable amount of cushion um should there be any significant amount of uh shortfall, changing revenue picture, uh changes at

78
00:21:28.159 --> 00:21:44.880
the federal level, anything like that. Um, you know, back then, uh, it was pretty severe and cuts were, um, just about across the board. Um, there weren't any, uh, you know, there weren't any things that were off limits to reductions or, um, outright cuts. I do

79
00:21:44.880 --> 00:22:01.520
think one of the things that's uh I think you I think you can safely say is that you know again because uh because revenues had been increasing so much um uh it was very easy to say yes to things um it was

80
00:22:01.520 --> 00:22:18.720
very easy to fund projects it was very easy to get more funding uh for projects um you know that's where I think we're going to start to see this blunted the most um you know I I'll give a I'll give a kind of local example. Um um the

81
00:22:18.720 --> 00:22:33.919
uh rear main street development that the city has been uh undergoing for as long as I've been in office, if if not longer, it's a very it's a very big project. Um it's gotten many millions of dollars from the state. Um I'll say like

82
00:22:33.919 --> 00:22:49.919
any development project of that size, um you know, there's always issues that come up, right? uh un unforeseen complications, especially when you know when you put a shovel in the ground around here, you never know what you're going to get, right? And that can lead to complications, delays, expenses, all

83
00:22:49.919 --> 00:23:05.440
that. Um what we were able to do, um you know, we were able to get another round of funding for that project, um to bring it to completion, uh fingers crossed. Um that's the kind of thing that I worry about, uh headed into a different kind of state budget atmosphere. Are we going

84
00:23:05.440 --> 00:23:23.039
to be able to do that? Right? or um you know, we've been working for several years on a large uh veterans housing development in the town of Winunden. Um you know, same same kind of thing with anything of that scope, you always have uh some issues. Um uh one of the issues

85
00:23:23.039 --> 00:23:40.000
that we that we ultimately had um shortly after starting construction uh was that we lost a chunk of federal funding. And at the time we were able to replace it reasonably quickly with state money uh to keep it uh you know to keep it going

86
00:23:40.000 --> 00:23:55.280
uh and make sure that we're going to be able to finish it. Um those are the kind of things again uh that I worry about um because uh we've been I think very fortunate in getting funding for a great many uh improvements, developments, uh

87
00:23:55.280 --> 00:24:11.440
chalking off a lot of deferred maintenance projects throughout my district. Um you know, that's where things kind of get get tight is uh um when there's a lot less money to go around. Um, and there's no, you know, there's no big pots of funding that

88
00:24:11.440 --> 00:24:27.440
aren't things like uh, you know, chapter chapter 70 is one of the biggest um, uh, outlays in the in the state budget. Um, the health care system, another big outlay in the state budget. Uh, higher ed, another big outlay in the state budget. Um, and those three things are

89
00:24:27.440 --> 00:24:43.600
the three biggest employers in the city of Gardner. Uh, the school system, the mount, and the hospital, right? And the state has uh invested a a very sizable amount of money um in in Haywood healthcare as I'm sure you're all aware. Um and those are things that obviously

90
00:24:43.600 --> 00:25:00.159
we want to see defended. Not only are they important to the city of Gardener and its economy um but it's important to healthcare access in this entire region. But once you get beyond um you know we can we can certainly uh you know I'll go to my office and I'll get the budget book. you know, you can find this thing that's that's $10 million that well,

91
00:25:00.159 --> 00:25:16.640
maybe we have a values judgment disagreement on or maybe we agree that it's a nice to have, right? Um, but there's not $4 billion worth of nice to haves uh in the state budget. Um, and I anticipate those debates getting pretty tense. >> Thank you.

92
00:25:16.640 --> 00:25:36.720
>> Any further counseling questions? Like thank you for coming. Thank you very much. Item 11808, second letter from the Teamsters Union Local 170 regarding union negotiations between the Teamsters, the department

93
00:25:36.720 --> 00:25:51.919
heads, and the city. I want to update the council that as authorized in our last meeting, I did send a letter requesting an opinion from the Department of Labor Relations and I'm awaiting a response. So with that, I'd like to chain a motion to place this communication on file.

94
00:25:51.919 --> 00:26:07.520
>> Second. Motion made by councelor Hegund, second by councelor journal to place communication on file. Is there discussion? Councelor Mack. >> Thank you, council president. Um I just want to say I'm very concerned about really the lack of clarity and

95
00:26:07.520 --> 00:26:24.000
communication about the formation of you know the negotiating um team and the status of of this process. We haven't we have yet to hear back from the Department of Labor Relations on this issue this issue. But I want to express some concerns. I'm concerned because last year when we started this

96
00:26:24.000 --> 00:26:40.400
discussion, it went in a very similar way. We weren't given much information about what was going on until it was included in the budget and we were expected to vote for it. I think even those counselors who were inclined to support it uh recognized that what was submitted to us was not ready and a

97
00:26:40.400 --> 00:26:57.200
majority of us felt that it was far more than we could afford. Our budget situation this year reflects the fact that we were right and we weren't able to afford what was presented or we aren't. Last year, the finance committee asked many times for information from the mayor on a salary proposal. It was

98
00:26:57.200 --> 00:27:12.720
emphasized any proposal should be submitted by the mayor. The mayor's salary proposal came only after we rejected a first proposal. After rejecting then the mayor's proposal and then reject the rejection of councelor Hegeland's proposal were we forced to

99
00:27:12.720 --> 00:27:29.360
stop our deliberations and efforts to come up with a compromise due to the formation of the union. I think for for the reason for that was as we found out was that the first proposal was really put together by the department heads themselves deciding what they themselves should be paid. This is a unique

100
00:27:29.360 --> 00:27:45.679
situation and different from other negotiations from other bargaining units. So I am concerned that we the city the taxpayers are are being represented in the negotiations by another department head not the mayor which was my main reason for why I feel

101
00:27:45.679 --> 00:28:01.919
we as a council need to be more involved. Currently in the negotiating team for the city is the human resource director and the assistant city solicitor. The mayor at any time can replace the human resource director with himself. If it isn't legally possible for the council to be included in some

102
00:28:01.919 --> 00:28:17.279
way. I will accept that but I don't have confidence given what happened last year as the council's liaison to the union I have I haven't yet been able to get the needed information but it seems like the union is very concerned about involvement as we received the second

103
00:28:17.279 --> 00:28:33.120
letter from what I have learned there are concerns that peers are negotiating with peers which is especially concerning given last year's working group proposal made by and made for department heads we at the legislative legislative ative branch were actively

104
00:28:33.120 --> 00:28:50.080
involved in looking into a viable salary proposal and until the department heads chose another path. We are no different than the legislative branch of government of the school committee in which in which they do sit at the negotiating table with with their um

105
00:28:50.080 --> 00:29:06.480
unions. I look forward to hearing more about this from the department of labor relations. Thank you. >> Thank you councelor Mack and further discussion. Councelor Kazinskus. >> Thank you Mr. President. I have serious concerns about the position that this letter has laid out

106
00:29:06.480 --> 00:29:21.919
when it comes to the city charter. The position in this letter says that the mayor has day-to-day authority over the city clerk, city auditor, and treasurer collector. However, our city charter clearly states that the city

107
00:29:21.919 --> 00:29:38.240
council holds the authority to hire and remove the city clerk, the city auditor, and treasur collector. With that said, the position in this letter is a major departure from the way we operate and what has been the understanding and practice for a long time. This should

108
00:29:38.240 --> 00:29:53.760
concern all of us, the city council and every single taxpayer that we represent. Granting the mayor, meaning the office of the mayor, not any particular individual, that level of authority over financial operations and financial

109
00:29:53.760 --> 00:30:09.440
oversight is a dangerous practice. And I have two points to raise on that. First, if this letter is an accurate interpretation of our city charter, then we should immediately begin discussions about amending the charter to ensure

110
00:30:09.440 --> 00:30:24.960
proper financial oversight. No one position, person, or branch of our city government should have effective control over both sides of the city's financial functions. Period. Second, the interpretation in this letter could

111
00:30:24.960 --> 00:30:41.919
fundamentally disrupt this checks and balances that are in place to protect the public's money. And without overstating it, this would be a serious assault on our local democracy here in Gardner and the intentional check and balance systems that we have in place. I

112
00:30:41.919 --> 00:30:57.120
would like to make a request and I don't expect it tonight as I think it would be better if it wasn't presented to us off the cuff right now. But I would like to make a request and strongly encourage the mayor to clearly state in writing to the city council his position on this

113
00:30:57.120 --> 00:31:13.840
matter in his words because I think that otherwise this letter could be interpreted as speaking for the mayor and representing his position. I don't think that's fair to the mayor and I don't think it's fair for the city council to have to determine whether or not this letter represents the mayor's

114
00:31:13.840 --> 00:31:29.120
position or not. So with that, Mr. President, I would like to move to amend the motion to keep this item on the agenda until the city council is satisfied that the city charter interpretation has been resolved and the mayor has provided a written statement

115
00:31:29.120 --> 00:31:44.960
of his position. >> Thank you. >> Second. Motion made by councelor Kazinska, second by councelor Dur allowance to amend the motion to keep the this item on the agenda until a letter is received the mayor stating his opinion. Is there discussion on the

116
00:31:44.960 --> 00:32:02.799
proposed amendment? All those in favor I. >> I. All those against no. The amendment passes to the main motion uh which is now to keep this item on our agenda and request a letter from the mayor uh to

117
00:32:02.799 --> 00:32:27.360
his response. Is there further discussion? >> All those in favor I >> I. All those against no. >> Motion passes. Okay. >> Finance uh report of standing committees

118
00:32:27.360 --> 00:32:46.200
finance committee item 11776 an ordinance to amend exhibit F of attachment one of chapter 8 of the code of the city of gardener thereof entitled primary non-union compensation schedule by adding a new section 10 to cover temporary positions.

119
00:32:48.960 --> 00:33:04.799
Council journal outs. >> I make a motion to send this the second final printing. >> Second. >> Motion made by councelor journal outs. Second by councelor heglin to send this item to its second and final printing. Is there discussion? This be a roll call vote. The clerk will

120
00:33:04.799 --> 00:33:25.600
now please call the role. >> Council Brooks. >> Yes. >> Council Craig here. >> Yes. >> Council. >> Yes. >> Councelor Harder. >> Yes. Council Heath, >> yes. >> Councelor Hegum, >> yes. >> Councelor Kazinskus, >> yes. >> Council Matt, >> yes. >> Councelor Tbo Munos,

121
00:33:25.600 --> 00:33:41.679
>> yes. >> And President Tyres, >> yes. >> 10 years. >> 10 years. The motion passes. Item 1177, an ordinance to amend exhibit F of attachment one of chapter 8 of the code of the city gardener. There have been entitled primary non-union compensation

122
00:33:41.679 --> 00:34:17.919
schedule. I will be recusing myself due to the appearance of a conflict of interest. This relates to a personal relationship with a member of my family who is affected by this ordinance. In the recusal of council president Tyrus for item number 1777 order of

123
00:34:17.919 --> 00:34:33.599
business the election of a president prom for this item April 6 2026. At this time nomination now open for council promp council generals. >> Thank you. I'd like to nominate councelor Elizabeth Kazinskus.

124
00:34:33.599 --> 00:34:51.520
Motion made by councelor Doward, seconded by councelor Heglin. >> Move to close nominations. Second. Okay. >> Motion made by councelor Dalitz. Seconded by councelor Craig Corman to close the nominations.

125
00:34:51.520 --> 00:35:07.839
All in favor say I. >> I. >> All post say no. Motion carries. Nominations are now closed. When I call your name, please state the name of the council of your choice. Council Brooks, >> Councelor Elizabeth Kazinskus,

126
00:35:07.839 --> 00:35:24.560
>> Council Craig Cromier, >> Councelor Kazinskas, >> Council General Lowitz, >> Councelor Kazinskas, >> Council Harder, >> Council Kazinskas, >> Council Heath, >> Councelor Kazinskus, >> Council Heazinskus, >> Council Mack,

127
00:35:24.560 --> 00:36:03.520
>> Council Kazinskas, >> Council Tunz, >> Councelor Kazinskas, >> have Eight votes for council kasiscus. Council kazus is now elected president for this item. Item 11 1777, an ordinance to amend

128
00:36:03.520 --> 00:36:19.200
exhibit F of attachment one of chapter 8 of the code of the city of gardener thereof entitled primary non-union compensation schedule. >> Is there a motion? Councelor general. >> Thank you councelor Kazinsquez. I'd like to make a motion to send this item to second and final printing. >> Second.

129
00:36:19.200 --> 00:36:35.920
>> Motion made by councelor journal. Seconded by councelor hegland to send the item to second and final printing. Is there discussion on the motion? >> Councelor Brooks. Uh, thank you, Madam President. Um, I guess I in previous meetings I've stated my opinion on this. I I am not in favor.

130
00:36:35.920 --> 00:36:53.839
I don't need to belver the point. I will be voting no. Thank you. >> Thank you, councelor. Further discussion. Okay. This is a roll call vote. The clerk will please call the role. >> Council Brooks, >> no. >> Councelor Craig Cormier, >> yes.

131
00:36:53.839 --> 00:37:09.880
>> Council Dawitz, >> yes. Council Hard, >> yes. >> Council Heath, >> yes. >> Council Hegel, >> yes. >> Council Pazinsquez, >> yes. >> Council Math, >> yes. >> And Council Tunes, >> yes.

132
00:37:10.160 --> 00:37:57.599
>> Have eight yays, one nay. >> Eight yays, one no. The motion passes. Item 11 782 donation acceptance order gardener community action team. >> Councelor Heglin >> move to request more time and keep this on our agenda under unfinished business.

133
00:37:57.599 --> 00:38:13.599
>> Second. >> Motion made by councelor Hegeland. Second by council dur allowance to request more time and place this item under unfinished business council agenda. Is there discussion? Councelor Eglund. >> Thank you Mr. President. Three to the council and we've had this in front of us for a bit. Uh and I think we still

134
00:38:13.599 --> 00:38:29.280
have to some degree the same problem. The letter we received from the law department. My reading of it is that it is in a bit of a gray area. Uh I'm a supporter of GCAT. I was on the GCAT advisory committee many years ago when it was still at luck and they do great work. But whenever we're dealing with

135
00:38:29.280 --> 00:38:45.599
anything concerning the city's financials, we should make sure it's beyond reproach. And the reason we have to take this up is a because the law dictates we should and have to and b because we approve the very language establishing the funds and their parameters. As I indicated before, our

136
00:38:45.599 --> 00:39:00.240
city revolving funds are already quite vague when compared to the um accepted generally accepted standard. If you go on um the state website, you'll see some examples that are far more detailed than ours. So to not be diligent about enforcing at least our vague standards

137
00:39:00.240 --> 00:39:16.640
can risk problems. And I see two issues here. First, we have an order concerning gifts to GCAT which is not a send city entity as agreed to by the solicitor in his letter. So the order certainly needs to be changed to properly reflect what city entity is accepting these donations. Formal orders are not a place

138
00:39:16.640 --> 00:39:33.280
for inaccurate nomenclature in my opinion. Second, the fund that this money has gone into was set up to approve and raise to set up and approve to raise money from a specific source and spend money on a specific purpose. As indicated at a previous meeting, the details of that mun report accompanying

139
00:39:33.280 --> 00:39:48.800
this donation provide no real understanding of their nature. Whereas the other donation details we've received from other departments are quite clear. So even if we're comfortable with that gray area, the legal gray area, the lack of formal organization, at the very least, we should have been given, I think, something to show where the money came

140
00:39:48.800 --> 00:40:04.880
from so that we can do our jobs to verify it's conforming to the rules of the particular revolving fund that we have before us. So I think when we, the finance committee, sent this up in the first place, we assumed this would be cleared up pretty quickly. It's been a couple of months again, so I think this

141
00:40:04.880 --> 00:40:20.480
should be a reminder that we need better details about the nature of these donations, where they were for, from, etc. Thank you. >> Thank you, councelor. Further discussion. Motions to play uh to keep this item on our agenda. All those in favor? I >> against no.

142
00:40:20.480 --> 00:40:38.240
>> Motion passes. Item 11799, an order transferring the sum of $3,588 from auditing department salaries to auditing department expense account professional services council journal.

143
00:40:38.240 --> 00:40:54.160
>> Okay, Mr. President, uh this finance committee met on this item. It is to cover the expenses for the outside services um to assist in the auditing department while we were in the process of searching for a new auditor. Um this along with the previous transfer that we made from the auditor's salary line item

144
00:40:54.160 --> 00:41:11.200
will cover the cost um through the uh end of January 2026. Um Auditor Butler has confirmed the services have been um cut off um middle of March at some point. Um so there will be an additional bill from February through uh March at

145
00:41:11.200 --> 00:41:27.440
some point to uh complete the payment for these um outside services. Uh, finance committee was in favor and I move the order. >> Second. >> Motion made by councelor journal, second by councelor Mack to move the order. Is there discussion?

146
00:41:27.440 --> 00:41:42.800
This >> be a roll call vote. Cl, please call the vote. >> Councelor Brooks, >> yes. >> Councelor Craig Cormier, >> yes. >> Councelor John Low, >> yes. >> Council Harter, >> yes. >> Council Heath, >> yes. >> Council Hegund, >> yes. >> Council Kazinskus, >> yes. >> Council M, >> yes. >> Council Toss,

147
00:41:42.800 --> 00:42:02.079
>> yes. >> And President Tyrus, >> yes. 10. >> 10 years. The motion passes. Item 11803. Uh and item 11806. Uh a motion. Uh councelor Dall allows to make a motion to suspend rule 22 unless

148
00:42:02.079 --> 00:42:19.359
there is an objection. Is there any objection to suspending rule 22 C? Hearing none, the rules are suspended. We'll now proceed with the items. Item 11803. A resolution supporting the redevelopment of prior authorized funds.

149
00:42:19.359 --> 00:42:35.440
Councelor Hegel. >> Move the resolution be adopted. >> Second. >> Motion made by councelor Hegel, seconded by councelor journal to adopt the resolution. Is there discussion? Councelor journal. Councelor. >> Thank you, Mr. President. Through to the council. The finance committee met on this at our last meeting. We were

150
00:42:35.440 --> 00:42:52.720
unanimously in favor of this item. Uh essentially this is um and and given its ceremonial nature is why we felt we could do this in one meeting and and wrap this up relatively quickly. Director Stevens and the mayor put this together and proposed this uh coming forward and I really do want to commend

151
00:42:52.720 --> 00:43:08.560
them again. I think it's a great move in transparency and I think it really would be a great operating procedure moving forward. Essentially, the resolution is just notifying the council that given the um the work at Rear Main Street with the geotechnical fabric that needed to

152
00:43:08.560 --> 00:43:24.800
be laid coming in under budget, there is some extra money from the unexpended bond money that we had put towards that from the new elementary school buildout. And so this will hopefully now cover the expected costs of some national grid work being done there to move some

153
00:43:24.800 --> 00:43:40.960
electrical around uh and get things where it needs to be. that came in higher than expected. Uh but luckily this this difference in the money will help fund that progress. So we again reanimously in favor of this um and I support this happening. Thank thank you. >> Thank you Council Hegel for the

154
00:43:40.960 --> 00:43:56.880
discussion. Council General. >> Thank you Mr. President. I just want to thank again Director Stevens. Um there's a lot of different monies coming from different um all while all from the same grants. There's different parts of the projects going on and what came in under budget, what came in over budget. um and I got a very thorough explanation of

155
00:43:56.880 --> 00:44:13.599
that from him and how um the total comes together with this additional portion um from the that geo um fabric that came in under budget. Um so I appreciated that um and just want to commend him for the work um he's done on this project. Thank you. >> Thank you council's further questions or

156
00:44:13.599 --> 00:44:29.920
comments. Councelor Mac >> I just want to uh comment as a member of the Garner Redevelopment Authority um to avoid any conflict of interest I would not be voting on this item. Thank you. >> Thank you councel. Any further comments? The motion is to adopt the resolution. All those in favor I.

157
00:44:29.920 --> 00:44:48.960
>> I. >> All those against? No. Motion passes. Item 11806, a measure ratifying the council president's recommendation for a step designation for the city auditor. >> Council Mack. >> Thank you, council president. leading to

158
00:44:48.960 --> 00:45:03.920
a motion. The finance committee was in favor of the president's recommendation for the uh new step designation for the city auditor. So with that, I make a motion to accept the order. >> Uh motion made by councelor Max, second by councelor Heglin. Is there

159
00:45:03.920 --> 00:45:19.760
discussion? Councelor Brooks. >> Yes. Uh Mr. President, earlier we adopted the uh ordinance that added this as well as several other positions to the salary ordinance. Are are we to expect something from the mayor on the

160
00:45:19.760 --> 00:45:36.079
other positions that were added where he would say what steps they're going to be on? >> That is by ordinance required. >> Okay. Thank you. >> Any further questions? >> Councelor Kazinskas. And >> and for just to the council's point to the clarification that this is this

161
00:45:36.079 --> 00:45:51.760
action is by ordinance because this is the council president's action on this particular uh position. Thank you. >> Thank you counselor. Any further questions or comments? This will be a roll call vote. The clerk will now please call the role. >> Councelor Brooks, >> yes. >> Councelor Craig Cormier, >> yes.

162
00:45:51.760 --> 00:46:07.800
>> Councelor Dowitz, >> yes. >> Councelor Hardurn, >> yes. >> Councilor Heath, >> yes. >> Council Heglland, >> yes. >> Council Kaziscus, >> yes. >> Council Math, >> yes. >> Council Tbo Munus, >> yes. >> And Tyros, >> yes. >> 10. The motion passes.

163
00:46:08.319 --> 00:46:25.760
>> Economic and community development committee. Item 11772, an ordinance to amend the code of the city of Gardner, chapter 675, thereof entitled zoning, to remove article 9, thereof entitled signs and advertising devices, and move it to a new non-zoning

164
00:46:25.760 --> 00:46:42.640
chapter to be numbered chapter 665. Council Kazinskus. >> Thank you, Mr. President. Uh, we had a public hearing on this item this evening jointly with the planning board, and the next step would be for the planning board to make a recommendation to the council. So with that, I would like to

165
00:46:42.640 --> 00:47:00.400
ask for more time on this item and keep it on the council calendar as is. >> Requests made for more time. Are there any objections? More time will be granted for this item. Item 11773 FY2026

166
00:47:00.400 --> 00:47:16.800
Community Development Block Grant CDBG steering committee recommendations with resolution. Councelor Kazinskus. >> Thank you, Mr. President. I'd like to make a motion to adopt the resolution. Second >> motion made by councelor Kazinskus, second by councelor Heath to adopt the resolution. Is there discussion?

167
00:47:16.800 --> 00:47:33.200
Councelor Kazinskus. >> Thank you, Mr. President. I have made the comment in several the echo dev meetings um with our committee and I just would like to emphasize um and thank uh Amy Uaz, the assistant director um and the economic community

168
00:47:33.200 --> 00:47:50.480
development um department as well as director Stevens for their hard work on the CDBG process. Uh Amy has really reworked and reorganized the entire process and it's really important for the information to be clear about how to apply for those funds for the social

169
00:47:50.480 --> 00:48:06.640
services that desperately need them in the city. Uh and she's just done a fantastic job revamping it. Um and also uh kind of consolidating funds from previous years to get them to be able to be re allocated and used um now. So it's been um a long process and they've done

170
00:48:06.640 --> 00:48:24.240
an outstanding job. Thank you. >> Thank you counselor. Any further questions or comments? All those in favor? I >> I. All those against? No. >> Motion passes. Item 11807, quarterly community development and

171
00:48:24.240 --> 00:48:41.040
planning department update March. Councelor Kazinskus. >> Thank you, President Tyrros. Uh, I'd like to make a motion to place the item on file. >> Second. Motion made by councelor Kazinskus. Second by councelor Cormier to place the item on file. Is there discussion? Councelor Kazinsk. Thank you, Mr. President. The e economic and

172
00:48:41.040 --> 00:48:56.640
community development standing committee met on March 25th where director Stevens provided a quarterly department update. That report was included in the committee's meeting packet and is also available in tonight's uh council packet at pages 91 through 94. I will provide a brief summary of that update, but I do

173
00:48:56.640 --> 00:49:12.880
encourage anyone watching this evening to take a look at the full report in the packet or watch the March 25th committee meeting for more detail. Um, this shift to the quarterly updates is new this year. Director Stevens provided monthly updates to the committee last year when the committee was new, but given the

174
00:49:12.880 --> 00:49:28.319
level of progress the department has made and the scope of the work being handled by him and his team and the department. As chair, I believe that the move to quarter quarterly reporting is well justified. So the report summary is as follows. Uh the rear main street

175
00:49:28.319 --> 00:49:43.520
revitalization project made steady progress um despite some winter and coordination challenges. In the north phase, crews advanced excavation, conduit installation, and utility prep. Cold weather delayed the electrical shed foundation, but concrete work resumed in

176
00:49:43.520 --> 00:49:59.040
late March. A key update is National Grid's revised cost estimate of about $922,000, which was much more above the $260,000 um that was originally expected. But um in response to that, the department

177
00:49:59.040 --> 00:50:15.839
developed a bond reallocation plan, which is now um going to be under the finance committee for review. In the south phase of the project, negotiations continued with the Cumberland Farms property owner to um keep momentum going while they're managing the costs of that part of the project. Uh at Mackie Park,

178
00:50:15.839 --> 00:50:31.280
the project is almost complete with minor welding and landscaping delayed by the weather. Um full completion of that project is expected early this spring. Accessibility items are also being finalized with the architectural access board. For the north central pathway,

179
00:50:31.280 --> 00:50:46.720
the city reached a major milestone by submitting the 25% design, including preliminary engineering, environmental documentation, and layout plans. Mass DOT is reviewing them, and a public design hearing is going to be anticipated later this spring or in the summertime. And the city also applied

180
00:50:46.720 --> 00:51:04.480
for up to $250 in Mass Trails funding. Um, planning efforts have also significantly progressed. Draft sections of the master plan are complete and a full draft is under review. A public open house is scheduled for April 15th from 4 to 6 at Mackie Park with the

181
00:51:04.480 --> 00:51:20.480
library as a rain location. The hazard mitigation plan is nearly is nearing completion alongside ongoing work on a municipal surplus property plan and housing production plan. The redevelopment

182
00:51:20.480 --> 00:51:37.520
authority continues discussions on key Mil Street and Main Street sites um including coordination with the rear main street project. Um for CDBG assistant director Amy Uass has strengthened administration and coordination with service providers and

183
00:51:37.520 --> 00:51:54.400
the state. Um the economic development finance manager Iris Kuifo Mensah has improved financial management. She's closed out older grants and reconciled accounts. Project updates include continued site work at Greenwood Pool and the final improvements planned um

184
00:51:54.400 --> 00:52:09.680
for spring and then the advancement of the Greenwood Pool pavilion into the design and engineering phases. Uh moving forward, the department is preparing for future funding rounds updating the slum and blight inventory and exploring a citywide records scanning initiative.

185
00:52:09.680 --> 00:52:25.520
Uh, CDBG funded program supported 121 students with athletic scholarships, assisted over 1,100 residents with food and emergency aid, provided short-term housing to 24 individuals, and helped 55 people through domestic violence services.

186
00:52:25.520 --> 00:52:42.559
Um, Iris has also made substantial progress reconciling past CDBG funds. Um, she's returned unused funds, uh, corrected accounting issues, and implemented systems to prevent future issues. Uh she's also leading small business support efforts including a

187
00:52:42.559 --> 00:52:57.920
January workshop with the Chamber of Commerce and an upcoming workshop series with the Massachusetts Supplier Diversity Office beginning in late May. So lots of progress with the team there in the community um um planning and development department. And that is it.

188
00:52:57.920 --> 00:53:14.000
>> Impressive. Thank you counselor. Any further questions or comments? >> Motion to place the item on file. Is uh all in favor? I I >> So motion passes. There is no unfinished business. There

189
00:53:14.000 --> 00:53:32.640
is no new business. Councelor comments and remarks. Are there any council comments or remarks this evening? I'll just briefly uh thank Representative John Sonic again for coming to give us a district update. I think it's a a unique and beneficial aspect of what we have going on here in

190
00:53:32.640 --> 00:53:48.160
the city of Gardner that we have a strong relationship between the council, the mayor, the state rep, and even our partners at the federal level with uh Congresswoman Tran. So, um I just want to thank him for taking the time this evening to speak with us. With that, I'll entertain a motion to adjurnn after the closing prayer. So,

191
00:53:48.160 --> 00:54:05.839
>> move second. >> Motion made by councelor Heath, second by councelor Cormier to adjurnn. All those in favor? I. >> All those against? No. Motion passes. Almighty Father who ceased over all as we adjourn, we thank thee for the opportunity of joint deliberation and

192
00:54:05.839 --> 00:54:19.319
action witnessed during the course of this meeting. Bless, oh Lord, all who are gathered here and the people whose representatives we are and do thou attend to our commonwealth until our next meeting. Amen. Stand.