to approve the July 29th meeting. >> Second. >> All in favor? >> I. >> Right. So, the minutes are approved. >> Um, what time is it? It was 4:35. So, >> he was on the phone with um the town council. So, maybe that's what Okay.
Well, in the meantime, um >> you want to talk about the train? Are >> we on? Yeah, we're on. >> Um I I want Tammy to be there for that here for that discussion. So, maybe what we'll we'll we'll move around a little
bit on our agenda and talk about maybe the planning board application because we don't need Tammy for that. getting. >> So, Tim, >> yes. >> Have you um looked at that planning board application that I sent you last week?
>> Yes, I've started looking at it and I'm looking and civil looking at it as well. Um the one question or the one thing we wanted to touch base with and I know they're doing some research on is in this particular instance is
>> the plan review required >> or is it more uh which is something they're starting to think now. >> So so municipalities are exempt for a lot of things. >> Mhm. Um,
we've >> whether it's required or not, that would be up to town council to >> Okay. >> Um, we've done it with all the municipal buildings just just to run it by all the other department. >> Yep.
>> So, we get some other feedback like police chief, fire chief, DPW >> and puts everybody on notice to what's >> Yeah. The only concern that the civil engineer raised on it is whether it wants to whether it needs to be a formal
process or if it's informal cuz his concern on it particularly was if it's a true formal plan review process potential to bring in a butters and what that might mean for the project. >> Um
>> you know what I mean? So, so, so a site plan review can bring in a butters whether we're going to have a meeting public meeting >> can bring in a butters anybody >> right >> so there there's
municipalities especially in Graanby is exempt from zoning so in other words if you're putting this in any neighborhood it can go it can go in place >> mm Mhm. >> There's nothing that anybody's going to do to uh deter it.
>> Yeah. >> It's it's not >> that was more his concern. He wanted to make sure it doesn't open us up to a new risk factor. >> No. >> No. Should not. Um >> cuz I know in other towns they can't.
>> So, so like I said, when it when the application is submitted, it goes out to other department. >> Yep. and then they take a look at it, give a cursor, they'd be see if there's anything that um the two big ones would be other than it
would probably be fire and DPW. DPW is going to be plowing. They want they're going to want to make sure um the site is is going to meet some of their requirements or needs. And then and then the fire department especially
about access and egress with >> right equipment. Anything else that that may be, you know, part of their expertise, >> which probably is a good segue. >> Well, um >> for Chief Anderson,
>> except Chief O'Grady has to leave. So, I want to um have him talk about what happened today and then we'll get to you. >> All right. So, um we all know that there we've been told that there's water in the basement at West Street. So, for the past couple of
weeks, we've been investigating where that water's coming from. And today, we had some drain pipes scoped. And I'll let Chief explain what we found. >> Yeah. So they went to they sent the camera up the drain pipe that's in the
um courtyard and approximately 2 to 3 ft off the building. It goes from a cast which is coming from the roof down and it goes to like a clay pipe and there is at least an inch gap and it's breaking apart. The guy actually pushed on it a little bit and it broke some more so
they could get the camera in so he could make sure the pipe going up to the drain itself on the roof is good. That is good. So, it's literally about a 50 to 60 ft piece of pipe that needs to be replaced for the drainage. And that should >> and it's right where the water's coming in.
>> Right. >> Well, that's right. So, >> to verify all that, too. That roof drain we're talking about, we talked about running a hose or some water up there. >> See if you see water coming in and see what Yeah. To verify that that break is
tied into that that drain. So he's going to come back and >> well someone needs to go back up there. It could be just Jerry or DPW just a and then right just to verify water is coming down that it's coming down from
the roof drain >> as opposed to the drain in the it's also coming from the drain in the um >> should looking at a more pressure and ask maybe a fire department that has a a
ladder to just blow some water in that drain rather than trying to run a garden hose up there and have a trickle come Huh? >> Is that something maybe we you know >> is the uh roof sloped? Is it a slope to to like a
>> I think it's a low slope. >> It's a flat It's a flat roof basically with a minor slope. >> So I don't think it'll be more water. I mean I think you're going to want volume, not pressure. Okay. >> You know, like a 2in rainstorm or something. >> Right. Exactly. That's why I said volume. I mean, we're not going to go up
there with a >> 3/4 inch garden hose and, you know, be there till Christmas gets down. >> I don't think any district wants ladder trucks on it. >> Well, I if you guys want to haul hose up the building, though, that's the >> It shouldn't be an issue. I mean, that either way.
>> Okay. >> Somebody's have to ask DPW or >> you guys to get a hose up to the roof, dump some water in it to see >> to get the water there anyways cuz you're not going to have that much water from any connections at the building. Yeah. I mean, if you guys want to do a
little practice and feed feed a water hose up there and >> Yeah. How soon you need it done? >> Same. Can you do it? >> How's tomorrow? >> Um, I got busy. >> Uh, sooner than later. >> Okay.
>> Cuz we also I mean, we also have to get a price to fix the pipe. >> Okay. >> So, is that going on our budget or is that going on another budget? >> Maybe. Should we go in that maintenance budget? building maintenance budget. I >> have to look in I'll look into it.
See >> just I think the first thing is getting a price. So >> get a price. Yeah. >> Tammy >> goes looking at you know you're right >> cuz I assume that's from that roof drain to the yard drain is going. >> Yep. >> Yep. >> Okay.
>> Just another note. >> Tom and I walked that roof last week. That roof's in pretty good shape. It should be mish. >> Can you hole? >> Yes, sir. >> Can I be our point person? >> I'll work with you. >> Sounds good.
>> Thank you. >> All right. So, um fingers crossed that that's really the only problem that we have with the water in the basement. >> That's excellent. >> Yeah, I know. It is excellent. Um, but >> which is really what Neil and Tim said it probably would have been right from the get- go >> when we found when we found out that
there was water happening right from the get sounds like a blind pipe. >> Yeah. >> But then everything stopped the the project stopped so we couldn't investigate. >> Um, >> is it delayed? You know, like is it raining day and it takes a couple days to talk to the seller? >> It rains.
>> Oh, no. That big storm we just had, we had water in the cellar the next morning. >> But the water dissipates very quickly. But >> it's for the other homies. >> Yes. >> Um, do you still want uh a yard up the wall pulled out?
>> Is she back on the wall? Do you still want to put >> We probably should because that's damaged, so we might as well just get it out of there. >> So, um, Tammy, can can can we get put a work order in for Jeremy to pull um a yard of sheetrock in all those rooms
>> to put a yard? Okay. Yeah, >> basically just remove it for now. >> And we're not doing any work down there anyhow, but let's just get that out so we don't have a mold issue from old drywall that's absorbed water. >> You want me to send you an email? >> Yes, please.
>> Um she wall and all the ropes in the basement. Okay. Uh I will turn it. Actually, we'll tell you why you're here.
Thank you. >> Good to know. >> Okay. So, there we go. You want to take over, Tim? >> Sure. Um, so the main thing that we want to run through with you is the extra
tank that we have for supply for the fire department and whether or not that's still needed or how we can kind of negotiate that right now. Is it a must-have or is it a wishlist item? Because at the moment we're approaching it in an ideal world
as one of our alternate items if we can afford it. >> Okay. So, and then just to catch me up, you are renovating just the minimum amount of space. >> Yes. So, essentially
in here somewhere, just the north wing for the most part. >> Okay. Minus the cafeteriaish. >> Correct. >> Yeah. >> Gym. >> Yeah. >> You know, so essentially you can pass that down. It's got stretch on it.
>> So the north wing and then if you flip it over the hallway essentially back to that main entry. >> Well and and the TA. >> Yeah. >> You end up >> Yeah, it's shown there. >> Okay. >> Yeah. So essentially that strip that
horizontal strip >> I guess like >> um and then what's happening with the rest of the building >> essentially all we're going to do is we're going to have a uh 2hour rated wall separating >> anywhere from the hallway >> separating the renovated from the
existing. We're still going to do an update on the fire alarm devices and um egress lighting, egress exit lights, um signs rather, throughout that space. >> Throughout the new space or the old >> both. >> Okay.
>> But that's really the only upgrade we're doing on the quote unoccupied portion of the building. >> Okay. Um, and I'll just be devil's advocate, but why are you upgrading firearms and stuff
in this? >> Mainly just to since it's unoccupied, we want to make sure that you have detection. >> Okay. >> Throughout that. >> So, I agree there should be detection. And I just so where where I'm going with this and kind of jumping ahead in
regards to the pump and and the tank as well is you don't know what this will be in the future. >> Correct. >> So it's future requirements whether it was storage, whether it was um condos,
you know, pick a you know tire storage. Y >> all that's going to determine what kind of sprinklers, pumps, water flow, all that's going to >> invest in anything in that to me would be a little bit superficial and premature. >> Mhm.
>> Um in regards to the um tank portion and having extra water, I would it would be a nice to have. I mean, if you're doing a deduct alternate for it or something, that's fine. Um, my bigger concern was when you were talking
about renovating, you know, gym, we had bigger space, bigger voids, um, that could could get away from us quicker >> because of should should there be a fire assembly or something. >> Yeah. >> So, um, again, you know, when you start
sizing your pump and your tank, you're going to do your math for your sprinklers in this the occupied area. I would rather see you spend the money in um detection than >> uh the pumps in the in the tanks. Now,
whether that's simply a laser in the in the hallway, so it has a a wide instead of, you know, 15 heads, you're doing one laser and it, you know, I don't know if it mathematically works and it works with code and all that stuff, but I know like in our garage or in gymnasiums, we typically put lasers so that it's, you
know, one sensor basically be gets broken. We used to have problems with the um coming up from the boiler room, whether it be steam, CO, things like that in in the old days. So that that main entering that main hallway, if
you're protecting yourself somewhere there through detection, I think that would be wise. >> Mhm. Um, but as far as pumps, sprinklers, I would keep it to whatever code says is required for the space the use and
>> yeah, essentially as it stands right now in talking with the fire protection engineer, granted this it'll likely change depending on the use that you end up in the unoccupied space, but they said the in order to get the pressure that we
need to tank storage for the actual pump and the system, the 12 12,000 that we're covering versus the 44, there's really not a huge difference from what they found. And so from a
capacity standpoint, doesn't mean that you might if you end up doing the entire thing as assembly that that might change, right? >> At least preliminarily that's what they found. Um, so right now we've got the tank storage and the pump is set up in
hopes that it can be expanded, but we're only going to pipe and do the sprinkler uh distribution for the portion we're renovating >> and and it'll still be an FDC. Yes. >> And that portion. >> Yes. Yeah. We're planning off the north end of the north wing. >> Okay. Kind of.
>> I think Yeah. I think was a print earlier, was it? Yeah. Yeah. >> Yeah. that I mean that >> at this point I think that makes the most sense to keep it as simple and as efficient as you can. >> Okay. >> Cuz you don't you're going to be you
could be wasting money depending on what happens to the rest of the building. >> So you're okay with the tank as an alternate? >> Yeah. >> When you say detection, do you just mean in the occupied or the whole building? >> I was mean the occupied.
>> The occupied. >> Yeah. But if you I mean if you're going to as long as you have detection in the other area um I guess that becomes a question on code is um if you touch the building is it going to
be addressable so we'll know what you know what's >> yeah you're going to need to know what the zones in the existing are. So it would be a question of with what's there can the address be shifted?
>> Yeah. Is the technology take? Yeah. So that's going to be a code thing that's >> building inspector can help you with um >> you might have to upgrade to a certain point in the old section anyways cuz it it's now related to occupied space in the other side.
>> So you could have a fire over here. You got to tell these people here, >> right? But I would I mean I'd be happy to keep it as simple as you can for the most part. >> I would think it has to be addressable. >> Yeah, I think so cuz you need to know where it is.
>> And then the other part is if it's addressable, we talked about it being in the front lobby, right, in the um forer or something when you first walked in. >> Yes. So the question would be >> we're kind of treating that existing
for lack of a better term entrance next to the cafeteria now is more of an exit at this point. So that your main entry would be at the north end >> this now in terms of where we're approaching the rental.
>> So the question is >> your point of entry >> where are you going to >> wherever it wants to be? >> Right. My only question is if if we're going to an addressable panel >> Mhm. >> can we get through the occupied building to the unoccupied building? >> Yes.
>> So there there'll be a 2-hour door or something in the two-hour wall. >> Yeah. We're going to build put two doors essentially in at the corridors. >> Okay. >> So that you can still go through. >> Yeah. cuz that could be frustrating if you had to come to the lobby, read the panel, then run around back to to do something. That way,
>> now you need, and this is something we should talk about, too, is I assume wherever we put your panel, we'd also then put your knock spots cuz those would all want to be locked so that we don't want Joemo, >> correct? Going into those spaces.
>> Yeah, we'd want the Knox box where the panels were access forward. And would you still want that panel off the other end, the south end of the north wing if you will, next to the cafeteria? >> You know, the we're going to put as an emergency exit now. Should we put the
panel there with the knock box? >> Cuz would that be where you would more likely enter or would you more likely enter off the north end near where the FDC would be? >> Probably going to enter where the on the north end that would get house. That's where everything's going to be. >> Yeah.
>> Yeah. I I would without seeing the driveway plan I would guess that driveway's coming around here. >> Yeah, it loops around the top. >> Yeah, it loops all the way around. >> And is this a ramp? Is that Yeah. >> Okay. So, you're talking about the this being the best of view with the panel there?
>> Yes. >> Yeah, that that would work. >> That's going to be your main entrance, you think? >> That is the main >> functionally. Yeah. >> Okay. So yeah, if that's where traffic's foot traffic's driving through, that would be our for the for the uh key box and
panel. >> Yeah. >> And FDC's around the corner, right? >> Mhm. >> Yeah. >> Okay. >> Yeah. Well, that makes sense. >> Great. Anything else for chief? >> No. >> Obviously, we'll be reviewing a further site plan.
>> Sure. at least to get that concept kind of locked in. >> Yeah. Because you just don't know what's going to happen on the other side and every week you hear a different story, >> right? >> So all those mushroom to other mechanical things, >> so um
>> yeah, >> I think it's it's wise to do the 2hour dressable, you know, whatever code makes you do, >> right? >> And then kind of go within that. As far as the water, yeah, it would be nice to have if if we're all of a sudden into a What is the square footage of this? 15.
>> The whole thing. >> The whole thing is 44. The portion we're renovating is now 117. >> Okay. So, so you you start pushing, you know, 40,000 ft is something that could get going, >> right? >> Having a little extra on the site good,
>> but >> All right. >> Okay. Perfect. >> Cool. >> Thank you. >> Thank you. >> I got to go pick up the >> chief at the B. Yeah. Yeah. >> See, you better not get hurt or I'm going to be in trouble,
>> right? >> All right. So, the next thing we can I guess what I want to talk about is the finalized renovation plan. >> Yep. >> Um construction document update. >> Y
>> which includes pump station placement. >> Yep. And then we'll talk about the public water reactivation which I there's really a lot to talk about I don't think but we'll find out. >> Oh and innovating TA's office. >> So go ahead you can start. Finalized renovation plan.
>> So based on going through the scope which is well laid out in terms of where we landed in the minutes. Um reviewed that with my team. Um Sean's already made a head start in terms of updating all the files. So that that's been
shared now with the engineers to move forward. Um, I spoke with everyone on the team over the course of the last few days and got confirmation earlier today that for completion of the CDs um, based on where we're sitting and what they
have um, and availability that we're aiming at this point for the end of September about 8 weeks overall. Um, in talking with Neil, that would put us the first full week, so the week of the 6th
in October to go out for bid. Um, we had talked briefly and I had a sidebar via email with Neil earlier today regarding demo package, a selective demo package and abatement, whether we want to do that early or not.
>> We do. Um, >> we do, do we not? >> Well, let's let's talk through it first because with all the pieces and parts, we're probably somewhere between 2 to 3 weeks before that goes out the door just cuz
we would have to do all the specs related to it um separately. Some of the concerns with that that we need to think about if we decide to go that route is >> how we plan for and what we plan for for
the subsequent uh construction package which will follow cuz the worst thing that could happen is you do some form of selective demo. We get that going and then we find out that the other package is well beyond
what we can afford. It's the worst possible scenario. And what do we do in that instance? How do we plan for that? Does that mean that we're pulling back on what that initial demolition package or abatement package
is to make sure that they can kind of fit within and allow you some flexibility if for some reason whether it's via grants or via town appropriation you need to get more funding that may cause delay before the next piece can happen. The other piece
that we need to consider is there is abatement related to the boiler and depending on the timing of the two pieces talking with the team ideally you'd want to exclude that work potentially so that the boiler can continue functioning
until you get the main work underway. Um the other difficulty of wrench in this is with the envelope and windows and evading those how you would want to approach that because
pulling out all the windows what do you put in their place ideally you'd want whoever your GC is to be the one who's putting in your final replacement in terms of the windows and the wall fill can happen the other way but it's a question
timing too and lead timing. So, do you have that as part of that initial scope? Do you not include that in the original abatement or do you abate and remove the windows, but you put in some kind of
temporary protection in its place? >> Neil, I don't know if you want to weigh in here at this point. The only the only other thing I think that you need to consider is if a hazard is identified in the windows,
you may have no choice but to obey all of the windows if such a hazard exists. So that's the other thing we've talked about that before. That's something else we need to be mindful of. >> What hazard that what what hazard could come up that we haven't already
discovered? >> Cocking issues with the cocking. We're well aware that there's PCBs in the cocking that needs to come out. >> And do we know the extent of that? Has it leeched into the brick andor the
ground? I'm I'm asking. I don't I don't know the answer to the question. If we know that to be the case, then I don't I think we're going to be in a position that we have to we're going to be mandated to abate. Nothing that I've
seen says that when it comes to PCBs. >> So >> other than we know we have PCBs in the company. >> All right. So with that being said, where would what what would we be waiting on to to know that? >> There would have to be another test done,
additional testing done to confirm the limits and that may be a non-starter. So that's probably something that should have been done already. >> Again, the you can go you can operate on the assumption that it's positive and
treat it as such without confirming. The I believe the way the law states is that you you must assume it's positive unless you have proof definitive proof that it's negative. >> So you assume it's positive and don't have to test.
>> Right. Say that again. So you assume it's positive and don't spend the extra money doing the testing >> just to proof if it's negative or not >> cuz we're abating anyways, >> right? >> So and the whole area is going to come
out anyway. So why are we going to spend the extra money to assume I mean to find out if it's negative when it's being removed anyway? That makes sense. >> But you brought up the but you brought up what it's in the soil. We removing
the soil >> pouring the brick, >> right? >> You know, you're talking two extra that's substantial amount of money more brick and soil and depending on how saturated the soil is.
>> Yeah. I the way the way that I've seen it done in the past is they take a portion of the brick around the window >> and assume that it's bought and it goes out with the window as >> waste and gets disposed of accordingly.
Okay, >> that's that's been my experience. >> But all right, the way you were I was thinking the whole entire walls disappearing. Are you talking about a section around the window? >> The section around the perimeter
>> somehow for some reason. Sorry, I was >> Yeah, >> obviously that should be, you know, reviewed with the hazmat consultant to make sure that it's consistent with >> practices, but that's >> we talked about this before way earlier on in the project. I'd have to pull out
the notes that we have on that. Um, but what he what Neil's saying is consistent with what we we basically said we won't test. We're going to assume take out a section of the windows, the brick around the windows, and be done with it. >> What about the soil?
>> We assume negativity. >> I'm going to try and put this as delicately as I can, but why the hell didn't we do something with this when we had the full project before? I mean, if if we have to do soil testing or or we we find out, that's a big game changer.
>> But I think what Neil said, you don't have to do those tests. >> Most people come in and assume and take out around the window. They don't do any testing. >> But you brought up, you just brought up the soils,
>> right? I I have I I have seen it before that when the concentrations in the cocking are significant and it's aged and it begins to leech, it can leech into the soil. I would defer to our hazmat consultant as to what our
obligations are with regard to the soil in and around the windows, but it is a risk. So, we need to do that before we even spend any more time on designing.
I put I mean, we're going to get nickeled and dime with with with professional cost or soft cost and then to go through the whole process and then to find out that we got PCBs in the soil. This that's a whole different
ball game now. And it's and we're talking another 500,000. >> Jim, that that that may have already been done. I would refer back to the I just >> testing that had been previously done in 2015 16 and determine if that has in
fact been already confirmed and that it's clean. If it is, there's no issue. If it isn't, it's a potential risk. Sorry. >> It's okay. >> And I think I think 8 weeks this week. I
mean, we were we were already just about ready to go off to bid, >> right? >> 6 weeks >> for the whole project, >> right? And now we've we've condensed it to let's just for argument sake less than half. And now we're talking eight eight
weeks to get the document. So >> part of that and I can't speak for everybody. I know we have varying levels of if it's still a six weeks or not, but I think if I had to speak for others on
the design team and why they're pushing for the 8 weeks, it's likely because other projects have moved in and this has been caused. That's if I had to guess that's a large spit and how it fits within their other
operations now that it's gone live. >> Okay. So that so that so that's understandable but the cost and so that should be defined based so we're not paying for eight more weeks of of >> redesign and studying and so on and so
forth. We're still down to the basic five or six weeks to get this out. It just so happens it's not >> flowing within the schedule of your team. >> Correct. >> Yes. >> The way what I'm seeing right now is
we're redesigning, we're doing this, we're doing that, and I I see our I see our soft cost going up. >> Well, and I don't know if Lynn had shared it with you yet, but I have issued a ad service. Much of that, at least on the architectural side, is to
recoup the costs that we've done over the last four months in terms of various options. how we've skinned the cat, how we've looked at um ways to cost save, what we've done in terms of scope
gations from that standpoint and the engineering cost that's associated with that as well in terms of additional um calculations they've done with regards to load as well as fire protection. Um
the one concern they have there that might change if we think that award can happen early enough is with regards to the HVAC and the calculations that have to happen there. The primary issue there, which is what he's assumed at
this point, is that there is I think it's a change in the code or law, I can't remember which, with regards to refrigerant that's going into effect essentially at the end of the year. And that means he'd have to change what he had originally speced,
which would then lead to a new um load count for a new piece of equipment. Yeah, I haven't had a chance to go over this with um Tammy or you know, so >> I haven't necessarily shared it yet,
>> but we'll keep that in mind. This increased self cost. >> Anything else on the renovation? construction document update. >> Oh no. >> Um, >> okay. What about the pump station? Is it
definitely It's definitely going >> Yeah, we are moving forward with that basement room. Um, right now and I'll coordinate with uh Chief. Um, we're eyeballing Sean and myself to come back
out on this Friday to the site to the building. Um, and I know that um, at least Robert Paul is planning on coming out soon as well to do additional field work in that room. >> What time your guys is in the morning after?
>> Uh, I imagine we'll come in in the morning. >> You feel great. He's not be around >> on Friday. >> Yeah. No, he's not going to be >> Yeah, >> he has just You still have your um >> I don't know if it ever got found cuz the last time they came out, they
couldn't find it at the office. here. So, I don't know where it ended up. >> What was that? I'm sorry. >> The key. >> I don't know if you've heard anything. >> Well, I haven't heard anything about it at all. >> No. Okay. >> But I have to ask him. >> We'll figure out >> We'll figure it out one way or another >> how to get in. Yep.
>> All right. Um part of the renovation is the TA's office, which is going to be an alternate. However, Tammy has requested that we actually abate that part >> as part of the base. >> Yeah, >> which would make sense to do. You're in
that general >> because eventually she's she's going to be moved into that anyway. >> Now, the question would be I assume when you do that as part of base bid, if you will, you would bait.
Same question. Would you do the windows at that point, too? It would seem like that would make sense. >> Okay. And Tammy, did that select board have any issues with >> Nope. Everything's good. I talked about on the thing and it makes sense to do it the way we're doing it.
>> So, build out what we can with the money that we have. >> Exactly. >> Okay. Um, and then the last thing I have on the agenda is the public water supply reactivation. Supposedly, we're supposed to get a letter from D. Can you tell me
who was supposed to be contacting you? I can call them myself. >> So, I can send if I should I send it to you, Lyn? Hey, I have >> What are you sending home? >> I have the contact of who we've who was on vacation that we were supposedly waiting to get back to
contact you. >> Oh, okay. So, they are on vacation. Hence why they didn't get back to us. Well, supposedly they were going to be back last week, but >> I don't mind reaching out to them if you want to. Okay, give me the contact. >> So, let me see. Cuz they spoke with Mike
Gorski and apparently they were waiting for Andrew Kelly. So, I have phone numbers from both of them. >> Those are all different people, I think, than last time. and uh G. Was it Michael Gorski? Did you
say Gorski? >> Yeah. >> Yes. >> Oh, okay. Okay. Same people. Good >> or same person. We did the consent order. So, >> yeah. Send me that and I'll send it to her or you can just send it directly to her. >> What's your email?
>> Town admin at my name right.gov. >> Uhhuh. I actually haven't been yet. >> Yeah. I wasn't sure >> myself very often. >> I understand that there are times I have to leave.
>> We also um asked McGregor to give us an estimate based on the old consent order what it would cost to get the well up and running. We I have not heard back from them and Jeremy said I should be a contact person. I didn't think it would take them long to do it all, but that's
apparently not a on their top priority list. So, that is in the works. I just hope that the getting the public water supply reactivate isn't going to slow us down. Um,
anything else? Anybody? Anything else? All right. Entertain. Oh, so, uh, do we need to meet next Tuesday? I mean, are we in a holding pattern now? Because I wait for you to get the construction documents out. We're moving through and we may have things that we want to touch base or run
by you. I think we can if we want to move towards just >> two weeks >> every two weeks and maybe do it virtually if that's easier. >> I know it's easier for you and I >> Yeah. >> Um I don't need to meet about the well
about the water pipe. So, >> oh, it's already at all. It needs to be >> decided where where it's whether it's part of your maintenance or somehow folded into our scope. >> All right. >> That's um so we can meet in two weeks
and it can be virtual at this point. I mean, I'm okay with that. >> That'll give us basically four meetings. Two in August, >> two in September before we go to bid. We went to two weeks. Yeah. And there may be >> think would be enough.
>> Yeah. And there may be small things where we whether it's the group or subcommittee that we might want to get on as we get deeper in >> Yep. >> if issues come up. >> So you >> or decisions need to be made. >> So you want to um meet on August 19th?
>> Yep. >> And you two are zooming in. >> Yeah. >> At um 4 or 4:30. 4. I can do four. It's not work screen. >> Uh yeah, that'll work.
>> You said four. >> Four. >> Yeah. >> All right. So then entertain a motion to >> uh one other thing just to confirm. Um when we last met with the schedule >> Oh, yeah. >> up in the air. Um, we have not sent out any notification to uh those that
responded to our original pre-qualification inquiry. Um, I would like to provide notice to them that obviously the scope of the project has been greatly reduced. Pre-qualification will no longer be required, but invite
all of them to um submit proposals and then that would occur uh in October. >> Yep. As long as the committee is okay with that. >> So, you send a personal letter to each one of the people that >> we'll I'll either do a form letter by
memo on our letterhead or I I believe I have the ability to do it via email >> um through the service that we hired to >> proceed the original precall. >> So, I think I have the ability to do it electronically. >> Okay.
>> Which I will I will certainly do. >> Okay. So that should be done by the next meeting, you're saying? >> Y. >> All right. Uh, motion to motion. Second. Second.
All in favor. Thanks, guys. Thank you.