meeting Monday, July 14th. Um to order. Trusty Rodriguez, can you take the role? Absolutely. All right. Trusty Rodriguez is present. Uh Trusty Williams, present. Trusty Williamson, present. Trusty Davis.
Trustee Kopatrick, present. Trustee Melton, present. Trusty Moreno, here. VP Wade, present. President Davis here. We have a quorum. Do I have a motion to approve the agenda? Motion. Second.
All in favor say I. I. Any opposed? Motion carries. First up on our agenda tonight is in celebrations. Dr. Roby. Good evening everyone. And so we are excited to um celebrate our young
people. Um I'm going to invite Mr. Beersford to have the speech and debate team and the work that they've done with nationals um come forward. [Applause] Good evening, Dr. Roby, President Davis,
and Board of Education. I am so honored to bring this celebration tonight of our GRPS speech and debate team. Uh it is an incredible program that I've often thought about deserves a celebration and uh when Miss Anderson said, "Hey, the
agenda is open in the summer." I said, "Perfect." Because they'll have competed the whole year. And so it's an exciting night. I'd like to first introduce uh the incredible volunteer
leader of speech and debate in GRPS with over 26 years of volunteer efforts. That deserves like a volunteer award for Mr. Harris here.
[Applause] He picked up the baton from a different uh leader of the team and he uh just grew it and made it his own. And uh when when I talk about just one year of volunteering, that's over 20 weekends
of competing on a Saturday or a Sunday possibly. And so um incredible service to our GRPS scholars. So so appreciated. and uh I will pass it to him and then really you're going to hear the majority of the celebration from our scholars. So
Mr. Harris. Well, thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Uh wow. First I think the first thing is you should see the people stand. We got people standing up there. But we should have we have team members here and I'm going to
ask them just to simply stand so you can see some of who came with us here. Stand up. If you're on the team, you got to stand up. All right. Um, thank you. What do we say? Somebody asked me, well, is this the
team? And the honest answer is no, it's not the team. We have this past year over 60 students participate at the middle school and high school level. Um we had the similar numbers the previous year. This has been
this has been an incredible year again. Uh there are lots of accomplishments that we could go over of just winning things. Um everything from and from Mr. Shukla right here next to me. I don't know if he's going to mention it, but he was third in the country in middle
school extwards [Applause] at uh Krishna as the first instate in extemp here in Michigan. Uh he's going to speak later on. We have we just have all kinds of
accomplishments and we have awards at debate where we were first in middle school. We were semi- finalists in the novice and a finalists in the varsity debate. Uh these are all some of the accomplishments that happened but they're built on well we could keep
going and talking about that but I don't want to talk about that way. When I was thinking about coming here, I want to underscore that the value of speech and debate is not measured in guilt plastic. Even though we have a
room full of guilt plastic, uh what happens in speech is that we give students a chance to learn a bit more about who they are and who they are
as a speaker. who they are to understand that they have a voice. And in this world where we have where we mediate so much through screens, where everything where the algorithm wants to tell us to do this or to do that, to be able to own our own self, to have the tools that
teach us here's how we do that. And in speech and debate, the way that we do this is by is by doing an activity repeatedly, getting feedback from it, and from that feedback, incorporating it into our
lives. And doing that, we learn a bit more about ourselves. We learn about how we can move into the world and how we can and how we can change things. And like I said, uh we've done this this year because of
foundation funding for our program. Uh but we don't have to pay for but we don't have to cover our registration costs. We can go to more we can go to more events. Uh when we go to more events, we need more parent involvement. Uh we couldn't
do this without parents at all. We had 29 parents step up and be a judge at one point. Again remember we have 60 kids participating. This means parents are stepping up and taking part alongside
their their scholar but this program could not be anything else but for the work of one other person and we need to have her stand up. Margie Margie wave your hand.
[Applause] I'm a flighty person and to have somebody who is disciplined and does all the back backroom organizing is a gift too for the program. So anyway, um the
students are going to talk and they're going to be much more spectacular than I am. And with that I just think of this is Ian Shukla. He is a rising ninth grader and he has some nice words to say. Sir,
there you are. All right. All of you are probably looking at me right now and thinking, "Wow, what a dedicated scholar, speech and debate competitor, third in the country. Wow." But maybe you're imagining me joyfully researching at
midnight or passionately making cases on the weekend. The reality, I had to be dragged like metaphorical heels digging through the carpet to my very first debate meeting. But the thing is, speech debate didn't just help me build skills, it built me. From writing cases with my amazing partner, Verun, to surviving
early mo mornings at nationals powered by only coffee and prayers, somewhere along the timeline, I discovered the transformative power of words. Words that inform, challenge, inspire, and sometimes even win trophies. Often dismissed as just an extracurricular,
speech and debate drives student success. In fact, research has shown that participants consistently outperform in critical thinking, research, and literacy skills that not only boost academic performance in college readiness, but also prepares for a lifetime of civic engagement. But
here's what this program means for me outside of simple classroom advantages. It gave me the opportunity to utilize words to envision and form a clear future that I want to be a part of. drive impactful change and form meaningful connections and cultivate the ability to be able to participate
meaningfully and constructively in a society that often resists the very discourse necessary for its growth. But more than anything, it connected me to a community that celebrates diverse voices. Everyone finds a place whether delivering dramatic pros or doing impromptu practice about the optimal
price of potatoes. We don't just compete, we grow together. Thank you for your time and for considering what this program can continue to do with your support. We don't just raise our voices, we raise each other. And now we're going to give up our seats
for three more scholars as we finish and they'll handle the Q&A with the board. No problem. Thank you. Good evening everyone. My name is Krishna Mano and I'm a rising senior this year at City High School. And I'm so honored to have this opportunity to
be speaking to all of you today. I've competed in speech and debate events since I was in seventh grade, led by the unwavering dedication and compelling commitment of our speech and debate coach, Mr. William Harris, alongside parent volunteers. I've been the two-time state champion in
extemporaneous speaking under his leadership and in the top 20 nationwide for debate. And when I joined GRPS for middle school in 2020, our speech and debate team had just about a dozen students. 5 years later, we saw a team of 60 students, including 14 who
qualified to the national tournament in De Moine, Iowa last month. And as we continue this expansion, not just at city, but across the entire school district as well, we deeply rely on your support as our administrators in order to ensure that we can continue growing
this and making this available for all students. The testimonies you're about to hear are only a few of the many stories that show the impact of speech and debate on the trajectories of students lives. My name is Colette Crowley and I'm a
rising sophomore in GRPS. In preschool, my parents were told that I needed to learn when not to talk. It shouldn't have been a surprise because girls like me are often told that we talk too much.
Like many kids, I learned to quiet myself in middle school so I wouldn't stand out. I stopped asking questions in class and I stopped talking to new people. I stayed silent until I found speech and debate.
Speech and debate has given me the courage to speak up in my classes and in rooms like this. This is what programs like ours in districts like GRPS do. The Chicago Debate League found that among
high-risk urban students, 72% of debaters graduated high school as compared to 43% of non-debaters. Speech and debate changes students lives. It teaches kids like me that we
can ask questions and we can speak our minds because no matter what people say, we never talk too much. [Applause] [Applause]
Hello everyone. My name is Amaya KZ and I go to City High Middle School. When I was given the opportunity to come up in front of all of you and give this speech, I didn't really know how to put my perspectives and experiences into words. But I digress. I knew why I needed to speak to everyone on this
topic. I came to GRPS in my freshman year and join city in my sophomore year. My sophomore year was the hardest year of my life, both academically and mentally. This is something I find rather difficult to talk about because of how personal it is to me. During this year of my life, I was diagnosed with
severe mental health disorder and I was struggling in many ways. While we knew I had this problem for a while, this was the year it truly started to be a problem. I was missing tons of school, failing my classes, and end up having to get some additional help mentally. However, the thing that kept me going the most was speech and debate, and
especially Mr. Harris. Towards the end of that year, I was able to get myself together and try to solve what had happened. I had to decide if I stayed at city or if I left because I knew my journey wasn't going to get much easier and I had to decide if this was the moment I pushed through it or moved
on from it. As you can see, I stayed and this is because of this club which might not always seem very impactful to outsiders, but is so important to the students who participate. I knew I wouldn't be given the same opportunity outside of GRPS. And now this year, my partner Anish and I both placed second
in the state in debate and I was fifth in speaker awards. Without funding, the burden of the cost would rely on the students and their families. However, students like me who wouldn't have been able to go to nationals without the scholarship GRPS gave me and all of the fundraising I did all by myself might be
overlooked or disadvantaged. I have the same passion and drive as everyone else on my team, and I want to be given the same opportunities as everyone else, too. So, GRPS, when you consider if you'll be giving your speech and debate team funding, I hope you remember students like me. Thank you.
[Applause] So, at the end of the day, speech and debate isn't just an extracurricular activity or something for us to put on our resumes. It's how students navigate through our school years and even afterwards to express ourselves, to
discover our passions, and most importantly, to find our community. As is clear from today, for many students, this activity is what makes GRPS their choice. To keep that momentum going and to bring that opportunity to as many students as we can, our team is asking
you for $14,000 for next school year to fund our tournament costs, the same tournaments that set our students up for success. At the end of the day, this initial investment wouldn't just benefit the students. The moment they find their true calling alongside an effective way
to communicate it, the returns they bring to the entire community will be immeasurable. Thanks to your help and support, my teammates and I already feel empowered to use our voice for good. Let's make this a reality for as many students as we can across the district.
Thank you for your time and consideration. [Applause] Thank you to all of you for preparing such wonderful speeches. It's so good to hear from our students and you're all so articulate, much more articulate than myself. So maybe I should join speech
and debate. Are there any questions board members? I just want to say something. Yeah. Yeah. Okay. Okay, first of all, thank you for for gracing us with your presence. I am just so impressed. And actually, I just want to say now that I just noticed, one of my former teachers
is actually back there in the in the audience. She now works for JRPs and it is up to us and you know, and she actually encouraged me to to to you know, take on more and and be own myself as as Mr. Harris said. So, I just want to continue to instill that in our youth
because you are our future and I am just so impressed. Y'all are coming in looking sharp. Your your your speech skills are amazing cuz it's not easy to come and speak in front of a board, right? It's not easy to speak in front of anybody. Um, but you all did an
amazing job and I'm just really proud of you and please keep it up because you are our future and the future looks bright. So, thank you. [Applause] I just also want to add and all of you said it very well along with Mr. Harris
that um it's congratulations on all the awards that is incredible each of you you know you've worked hard and you deserve it but I the deeper value that I think you all recognize you've gotten um and just finding that self-confidence and what you have within yourself to be discerning and confident and speak so
well um you know you're going to carry that with you. I was telling you guys before I was in another extracurricular and we're always jealous of the speech kids because you always always look like you're having more fun. Um but just you're going to carry this with you the rest of your life and whatever we can do as a district to make sure all our students have that it's really incumbent
on us and it's speech it's all different types of extracurriculars. So congratulations guys and just congratulations you're doing great. Thank you. Okay. Thank you so much. Thank you. Okay, we're going to move on to our
public comment for board agenda items only. We will be reducing the time to two minutes based on the number of public comment cards we have tonight. Trusty Rodriguez, can you read us into All right, folks. We're going to
continue on. Um, thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Uh so this is our first public comment section. Uh the first one is uh public comment on board agenda items only. Agendas are located by the comment cards. Um individuals must completely
fill out the front of the card and indicate the specific business on which they wish to comment. Please submit the completed card in the bin on the table at either entryway of the board chambers. Our board assistant will collect the card submitted. We ask the speakers refrain from making abusive statements against our board members,
employees, volunteers, or contractors. Speakers are encouraged to present complaints about a specific board member, employee, volunteer, or contractor through the appropriate process established under board policy 9450 before requesting the board's consideration. Individuals will be invited one at a time to the podium to
address the board. Before beginning your comment, please state your full name. At that time, we will start the timer um located right behind uh VP Wade um allowing each individual two minutes to make their comment tonight. Um, you will need to complete your comment time upon
being notified that the two minutes have passed. Board members, do not respond to public comment. Concerns will be brought to the attention of the appropriate staff. We value your input and thank you for sharing with us tonight. Okay, first up we have Sherry Crogman.
Uh, followed by Lisa Lyn Vander Zwin. Hi, good morning, good afternoon, good evening. I'm Sheri Kroman. I'm speech language pathologist at Congress Elementary and Ottawa Hills High School. I have been in Grand Rapids public
schools for going on my fourth year and 29 years in the profession. Things I love about Grand Rapids Public School, Ottawa Hills High School, and the leadership team, the amazing scholars, the new energy there, and
we have figured out how to meet student needs with lots of supports and services. And you can feel, hear, and see the difference. I love the students and families I serve. My job with gets hugs from lots of littles. and what's up
Miss K from the not so littles. My license as an SLP though demands that first and foremost I advocate for my students. I know as an SLP that our words matter and I was told as a kid that I talk too much um on my report
cards um but our voices matter around our collective table we call school community. I enjoy this role here at GRPS and a union contract that supports my unique needs as an SLP. What I'm not
in love right now with at GRPS is our significant specialed shortage of staff. And this is harming children. It presents lots of legal challenges and stretches services and service providers in
unhealthy ways. it's presenting with emotionally unkind environment for your staff and creates further reduction then in staff and then we're stuck in a vicious cycle and I see I have five seconds left so I'll leave
it with that Lisa Lyn Vanderin followed by Kim Baron Good evening. My name is Lisa Lint Vanderowen. I'm the parent of two CA Frost Middle High students. On May 31st, we received communication that our
principal was leaving GRPS for other opportunities. 39 days later on July 8th, Frost Middle High families received an email with an attached survey requesting feedback on what we would like to see in a principal. The survey closes July 18,
the first day of school is August 18. As much as I appreciate the opportunity to give my feedback and thoughts on who I would like to see in the principal role, I'm very concerned with this time frame. We have orientations and open
houses scheduled for the first week of August starting August 4th. Uh, pending a miracle. I don't see how we could possibly have a principal hired and working by that date. Why did the search for a new principal not begin the moment
Mr. Lunvik resigned? In addition to losing the principal, we lost a skilled and valued teacher to another district in Kent County. They are not only getting a significant pay raise, but they also now have the stability they didn't feel they had at
GRPS. This is just another testament to how GRPS is letting everyone down. And our teachers, students, and families are the ones feeling the pain. We need to do better, and our community deserves better.
[Applause] Tim Baron, followed by Jane Neman. Hi, my name is Kim Baron. I'm a concerned GRPS parent, community member, and former employee. I see the layoff resolution on the agenda this evening, and the time timing of this recent
layoff is confusing to me. Um, districts begin budget discussions in the winter and planning for staff and department budgets happens throughout the spring. Um, why are these staff members being laid off in July? Um, this demonstrates continued reactive decision-making as
opposed to strategic and thoughtful leadership. Um, while this won't seem as eloquent, I want to get in this next part under the two minutes. So, over the last several months, I've been having a lot of conversations with folks who've reached out who have left the district um, in the recent months. And I just
want to um, offer some quotes from these conversations because they don't feel comfortable um, speaking their own truth. So, here are a few quotes from people who have recently left. Dr. Roby told me that she should have warned me in this position that I would have to get used to being slapped around by my colleagues for a while. So, get used to
it. I had an attorney look at my information, and in their opinion, I absolutely have a winnable case against the district for harassment and the creation of a hostile work environment, but I would like to continue working in education, so I don't intend to file suit. I spent so much time in therapy since I left the district. I have so I'm
such a stronger person now that I have some distance. I want to speak up and tell my story, but I'm still too afraid to undo the progress I've made with my mental health. I'm so glad to have left the toxic culture of fear that exists in the leadership of GRPS. Sadly, Dr. Roby supports it because she doesn't do anything to eliminate it. Another one. I
really want to share publicly the reasons I had to leave my position after so many years, but my priority has to be my family right now. I'm too afraid that Dr. Roi and her team will try to sabotage my ability to get another job in education like they did with one of my former colleagues. Everything I do
that puts students first is met with barriers. I cannot get anything done because GRPS leadership puts unnecessary roadblocks in front of everything that is good. I hate having to face I have I hate having to be the face of GRPS in the community. I'm so tired of making excuses for the district. It's embarrassing.
That's time. It goes on. Sarah Jane Neman followed by Sarah Martinez. I'm next, right? Yeah. Okay. Good evening, Dr. Roi, uh, board president,
trustees. I'm Jane Neman, vice president of the Grand Rapids Educational Association. Um, I wanted to speak tonight uh a little concerned about the resolution about laying off two GRE members obviously. Um, and I do second
the concerns about our reactiveness instead of being proactive. Um, we all know that change is needed. We all know that there are issues not only with the treatment of staff but with the pay that they receive. And so I
am strongly advocating that you take a close look at a salary proposal um that was presented a month ago that you consider the fact that we are working on an expired contract in our bargaining unit and that people are
leaving. Uh we had a young man in our building who left the district uh for a $9500 raise and that was without them giving him any of his years of experience. If they had granted him his two years, he would have been making
$1,100 or $11,000 more. um they specifically chose him over 49 other candidates because of his experience that he gathered here at GRPS teaching English language learners.
We have got to stop the churn and the loss of these wonderful, bright, caring educators that really invest in our kids and they have no choice but to go elsewhere
because I mean $10,000. We all know what inflation has done to budgets. We all know that young people have debt that they have bills to pay. Um, and they don't want to leave. They really don't. I had a long conversation
with this young man. He wanted to stay at GRPS, but he couldn't. He couldn't continue to work here knowing that he wouldn't receive a raise for another year. The three-year salary schedule that we have that doesn't allow for raises in three years. It's got to end. So, I encourage you strongly to support
our new proposal. Thank you. Sarah Martinez, followed by Donna Kelly Dbor. Sorry, my shoe broke a little earlier today. All right. My name is Sarah Martinez. I'm a parent at Wellerwood and a
community member. I started going to these board meetings because I was worried about my clo my neighborhood school being closed and I still am and we still don't have answers on that either. Um I saw a bunch of you guys at the no
kings rally and a whole bunch of signs that say if you're not angry you're not paying attention. Well, isn't that the truth at GRPS? If you're not an angry community member, you're not paying attention. I cannot believe this.
A child was shot and no changes in staff. A year ago, there was an auditorium full of people demanding changes in administration. Nothing happened. Emails between administrators were
released and the community got a glimpse of the toxic environment we've been hearing about for years and nothing's happened. I have no personal connection, no vandetta against these administrators. I just see the merit and their merit
sucks. Tonight, just before the meeting, I found out the administrators gave themselves a raise. You gave yourselves a raise, Roby? And you can't pay your teachers? Are you kidding me?
You think new buildings are going to reimagine GRPS? No. We need a new administration. We need new backing. And we need our new board members that want to make change. I want you to be bold and make change.
You board members that don't want to make change, that want us to see the forest through the trees. While we're seeing the forest, it's on freaking fire. I will leave you with this. Do better. Be better. The community deserves better.
Donna Kelly the board followed by Nunes. [Applause] Good evening and thank you for allowing me to speak. As a longtime GRPS GRPS teacher, I'd like to speak on my ideas
on how I would like to see GRPS reimagined. I imagine GRPS as a place where we become more transparent, as a place where when cabinet members are given raises of 8.5% and even a couple of cabinet members receive 13.5% raises
that the rest of the staff that cleans our buildings, handles human resources, and teaches our children are given an equal percentage in raises. I imagine a place where every employee has oversight. I imagine a place where teachers, staff members, and other
students are protected from students who threaten, kick, hit, and assault them. I imagine a place where a higher percentage of our overall budget is spent on instruction, and we are not shamed in the Grand Rapids press by having a lower percentage than so many
other districts. It's embarrassing. I imagine a place where feedback is welcomed instead of being looked at as being disgruntled employee for bringing up issues. I imagine a district where STEM teachers, additional PE time, and
place-based education provide extra planning time for elementary students that is equable to what the secondary teachers are getting. I imagine a time when a teacher can actually get a restroom break before
lunch. I imagine a district where there is more than three weeks between winter and fall testing sessions. I imagine a district where we make increasing school attendance a priority. I imagine a district where we are going to have
training for gened teachers and support for our many sped students that are now in general ed classrooms. I imagine a district where we have a plan and support when students elope from general ed classrooms and those teachers cannot leave the other 25 students unattended.
That's time. I imagine a district where administrators have their offices in our school. That's time. Time's up. Is Nunes followed by Laurel Opericio Fina. [Music]
Good evening board members, Superintendent Roby, and Grand Rapids Public School leadership. My name is Ismalis Nunees, and I'm here tonight as a concerned community member and a proud alum of Grand Rapids Public School. And here we are just over a year after many
of us came to this board calling for transparency, equity, and leadership that truly centers students and families. And yet tonight, we're still asking some of the same questions. We're still fighting for basic accountability. What's deeply concerning right now is
the layoff of Grand Rapids Public Schools only bilingual communications coordinator, a role that meant far more than just translating messages. This person was a trusted bridge uh between the district and hundreds of Spanish-sp
speakaking families. They were the human face of communication. Someone who showed up in community, answered calls, helped families feel seen and included. Let me remind you, in March 2024, over 24 local organizations sent you all a
public letter urging GRPS to prioritize human centered communication, especially for Spanish-sp speakaking families. They raised real concerns about the growing use of AI and said plainly, "Technology cannot replace people. It can't build
trust. It can't build relationships." And yet, not long after that letter, the one person for uh responsible for building that trust has been laid off. Listen, what I know to be true is that this is not right. And I say that as someone who came up through this
district, I know what it feels like when your family isn't informed or included. And I also know how powerful it is when someone helps make the system feel accessible and welcoming. So I have to ask, you eliminated 20 other four positions. If cutting the only bilingual
communications coordinator was on the table, how were the rest of your layoffs decided? How many of those 24 positions cut people were working directly with or in support of teachers, students, and families? Thank you.
Laurel Aaricio Farino followed by Ben Irwin. Hello, my name is Laurel Aparicio Fina and I am here to speak on behalf of some of the statistics that have been brought up um in previous comments. I will be speaking uh with uh verbatim a post that
was made on uh by Kimberly uh Morgan Baron. She says, "I recently received an FOIA request that revealed salary increases for GRPS executives in the community should be aware of as budget amendments
are being considered. 25 GRPS employees were laid off this month and GREA negotiations are ongoing and the district is offering a 1.5% increase to the lowest paid teachers in Kent County. In the comments are the
salaries for executives for the school year of 23 2425. It is worth noting that from the 23 242 uh school year, Dr. Roby gave herself an 8.5% raise and she awarded Cribs and Mitchell each a 13.7%
raise. This is in addition to bonuses received and very generous tax deferred um annuity. In the comments of uh those salaries, there are also comments in the last page of the executive exempt salary schedule
for 2425. You will see the grade 116 is where Mitchell, Cribs, and Johnson job titles are listed. Moving across, you will note that each level equals three years of experience. So, an exempt employee with no experience would be at level one for years experience, one
through three, then move on to level two for years of experience, uh, four through six, and so on. When I compare the salaries of Mitchell, Cribs, and Johnson, they are graduating multiple levels each year of employment. For example, Mitchell has paid at level
three rate in 2023, level four in 2024, and jumped to level nine in 2025. Cribs allow followed a similar path to level 9. Johnson moved up one one level each year, moving from year 8 to year to
level 10 in just three years. I'm curious why these executives are acquiring 15 to 21 years of experience in just one year. We have to do better. Ben Irwin, followed by Gabriel Jazza.
[Applause] My name is Ben Irwin. I'm a GRPS parent of five kids. Uh last month when approving the budget by the narrowest of margins, a number of you expressed frustration both with where we are and a desire to do better. I have some thoughts on where we can do better,
especially when it comes to teacher pay. According to data from the Michigan Department of Education, GRPS has the highest spending on administrative salaries and expenses in the county by far, 46% higher than the county average. And that was before you evidently gave
yourselves a nice fat raise. We had the highest spend on buildings and maintenance by far, which is not surprising since we operate more than three times the number of buildings as the next largest districts, Kentwood and Forest Hills. You might say, well, all the other districts in the county are smaller. Yeah, but if every district in
Kent County were as big as GRPS, but maintain the same ratio of buildings to students as they have now, we would still have more buildings than all but one school in the district. Is it any wonder you can't manage to keep our schools in good repair or provide
adequate busing? So, you spend the most on yourselves and the most on buildings and maintenance. What you're not spending the most on are our teachers. GRPS ranks 22 dead last in the county on
teacher pay. Every other district in this county pays an average teacher salary of $71,000. You pay our teachers $10,000 less per year on average in one of the highest cost of living parts of the county. This is fiduciary mismanagement.
You want to fix the budget, rightsize our administrative and operations spending, and invest more in our teachers. Thank you, [Applause] Gabrielle Josie,
followed by Marta Johnson. [Music] Gabrielle Joseline is first. Yep. All right. Hello. Um I came in today um request upon some staff from Sibly Elementary. I am a parent. I have just
one child. He's actually here with us because we don't have care for him. He's my seven-year-old, the love of our lives. Um he is autistic and we found this out thankfully through Sibly Elementary being so supportive. His
first six months of school was rough. It was so bad that there was a point where we thought maybe public schooling wasn't going to be for Apollo. Um, with working with Miss Maher at Civly Elementary, um, we were actually able to get the care that we needed within 6 months of him
being in kindergarten, which turned his first year of school from a living hell to one of the best years of his life. Um, thank God for them. Um, I honestly am hearing a lot tonight that's very new to me. That being said, I'm afraid that
I feel that a big reason that Miss Maher is leaving CIA Sibly Elementary is due to pay and um I just would love for her to be paid more, you know, like I would love for her to stay at Sibi. She has been a saint in our lives. It was really emotional for everybody when we found
out she was leaving. And I don't blame her. I don't blame anybody for searching for better opportunities for their families and their futures. But it would mean a lot to me and a lot of other parents if the people who mattered stay in the school with us. Um I don't have a
whole lot else to say to be honest. I just came in as a supportive parent because it means a lot to me. I think that the reason we had a discussion about me being here today is because there is so much that my family's been through and so much that Miss Maher and the team has helped us through. Um my
son wakes up every day excited to go to school. his first six months, he had meltdowns every night and every morning. It would just mean a lot to have the staff that we've grown to love and feel so comfortable with with our son to still be in our school today. So, thank you,
Marta Johnson followed by Desandre. Did I say Desandra right? Okay, thank you so much. Uh my name is Marta. I'm a parent of two students at GRPS. Um I have been active and engaged in our district as a parent advocate even
before my kids uh attended the school. Um it has uh been obvious to me for a long time and talking to educators um various support staff um different uh leaders uh other parents and students um that we have a crisis that seems to
continue to not be addressed. Um, one is obviously pay and you've been hearing a lot about that. Um, and it the the reason that I'm talking about this just to make sure it's not an agenda item. Um, is because you're being asked to pass a resolution to increase um either powers or some sort of uh support um for
more layoffs. Um, and I guess as a parent who's been looking at um transfer of I don't know, it's about 167 million from revenue that should have been spent on instruction instead going to capital projects. Um, and and that's happened these last two budget cycles. Not I
don't know if it was this one quite, but the the last two. Um, that's about what we could be uh using to address and make pay competitive for our uh educators. And so I guess what I need the board uh to really be focusing in on is how do we
as more information is coming to light on how um how different salaries are being prioritized and how different investments are being made um how is that centering students? How is that making sure that all of our students are really getting the education, the
support uh and the um staffing that they really need? How are you making sure that you're holding uh the reimagine uh questions and the reimagine commitments? Um holding those and moving those forward and how are we making sure that we can address um this this ongoing
crisis with uh keeping our teachers and our educators that we've worked so hard to recruit in. Please focus on that and not increasing layoffs is basically what I have to say. Thanks, [Applause] Cassandra Thomas, followed by Salem
Turan. Hi, my name is Desandra Thomas and I have a 11-year-old uh GRPS student and I have a 9-year-old student and so I'm saying hi to all the board and everybody else um that's in the building that's advocating for our teachers, for our
administrators. Uh my son go to Sibly Elementary and honestly I knew I was coming to support. I didn't know I was going to speak but after I found out why I'm here I had no other choice but to speak because when it come to Miss Mahart and the staff they they are not
just principles they are not just uh administrators there was my son Destiny helper. Okay they allow my son is a special needs student. Okay. But you wouldn't know it because after they work with him, everybody know him and could talk to him. He understands, he speaks, he
feels. And these were things that he didn't do before he got to Sibly Elementary. Miss Mahar and her staff has been beyond amazing. And I just had to show up even after work, after doing a million things today. I stumbled in
here. Literally, I fell in the parking lot. I stumbled in here because I needed to show you guys this. Last year, my little boy almost died. And when you're talking about Destiny Helpers, this is Destiny Helpers. That was his teacher. That was
Miss Melissa. They showed up at the hospital. The whole staff showed up for us. They did not hesitate to help me in anything I needed to do, you know, and so, you know, they called, they checked on us, they made them cards. These are teachers with a kid who was on life
support, okay? So, whatever I needed to do, I had to be here tonight because I don't call them, and I tell them this all the time. I don't call them just his teacher. Again, I can't stress it enough. They are destiny help. They're helping these children get to the places
where they need to be. Before my son, uh, we live on the other side of town, okay? And if he don't catch the bus, I would have rode a bike to get him there. That's how important they are. Okay? So, yeah, if you could, we need to keep her.
She got to stop. She got turn followed by D Jones. Um good evening Salem Tron um GRPS teacher. Uh a couple things I wanted to address tonight. The first being um the
purchasing agenda and um the GREA layoff resolution under action items. Um it's honestly insulting that the district is asking for the board to approve 10.1 purchasing agenda while then following
that up with 10.2 GRE layoff resolution asking a comp asking to pay for a company outside of GRPS. Um, one of which that has a former executive
director, uh, Mr. Hem Holt as their CEO and president. Um, the price of what the district is asking to pay this outside company is equating to nearly two GREA staff members. That's one way you can probably
prevent the layoffs of the people that are on the grounds. Another way you could prevent the layoffs of the people on the grounds is is with the percentages that you heard about tonight of other executive director members um executive directors
that equate their the two um Mrs. Cribs and Dr. Mitchell their increase between 2324 and 2425 equates to another teacher or GRA staff member. Um, it should actually
be policy that the increased percentage of the highest paid staff should not be greater than the percentage of the lowest paid. That should be our motto, our representation. I also want to quickly talk about 13.1 ad hoc
facilities committee um report. On June 9th, we were informed about Monasuri and their two options. District employees were asked to bring options and numbers back to the July 14th meeting and were told no problem next two weeks. Yet there was no ad hoc facilities meeting
tonight and there is still no update for GR monastery. D Jones [Applause] How y'all doing? I'm D. Jones. Just wanted to speak on uh the equity policy at risk policy and
equal education opportunity. Uh these things are important to me because I was been advocating for esports for a very long time to increase equity uh equal opportunity for students regardless of their background and ethnicity. uh me working with uh the one of our
worst underperforming schools, which is Ottawa Hills High School. Uh with the work and advocacy that I've been doing for you guys to increase the equity and opportunities for students, I'm happy to say that nine students at Ottawa Hills High School received scholarships for
esports. Uh five of those students are graduated high school and were seniors. Uh the Vow Victorian at Ottawa Hills High School actually received a full ride scholarship for esports. And there there are four underassmen that are signing that are already signed that are going to uh colleges and universities
after this next following year. So as you guys continuously uh uh develop these policies, I like for you guys to think about the uh opportunities of increasing equity and being sure that the uh students and that you guys are engaging uh in the best policies
possible for our community and students cuz I've been doing the ground work. I've been passionately advocating. I've been coming to you guys consistently and I'm very happy to say that nine students in uh this time span of this beginning of the season since last October. Uh nine students that's very significant
for just that short time span of just the esports lab just being built. Uh so I would ask you guys to please please please support all policies uh for equal opportunity for equal education uh in tech. And uh I also want to uh give the shout out to the teachers because those
teachers and educators are very vital to our students in the destiny of our students and uh the community and community partners. So please think about paying these uh staff people because they deserve that. Thank you. I appreciate it. Okay, that concludes our agenda item
public comment. So we will be moving on to GRPS foundation report. I'd like to invite um Miss Andrews and Miss Cheney to come forward. Good evening, Dr. Roby, President Davis, education. Oh, I don't have a
presentation, so I don't know what that fun noise is. Um just want to share and it'll be quick and brief tonight. Um the Grandus Public Schools Foundation has obviously wrapped our year and will be coming out with an impact report of the funds that we have distributed to the GRPS school district this year and all
the impact that we hope that have have made on our teachers, principles, and obviously our scholars. I want to share that we are going to be doing some internal work on how are we supporting the district going forward and how we can uplift a lot of the things that are
happening for our students including our teacher miniig grants which will be opening this summer. We want to give our teachers that are heading back to school more time and we're also looking at how the administration um is changing some of the laws. So, if we can provide more
funding to our teachers without having impact on taxes, we are looking to do that as much as possible. We'll also be opening up some community conversations about how we can really impact the work that we're doing and what do we see that we can all collectively do together. So,
that is my report for this evening. Thank you. [Applause] Secretar's report. All right, just a few reminders. Um, uh, that our finance committee, um, is
scheduled to meet on July 28th here at the board chambers at 4:30 p.m. Um, again, board docs, GRPS board docs is where you can uh, find those uh, meetings and agendas. Um, and then also ad hoc facilities meeting is scheduled
on August 11th uh, at 5:00 p.m. in conference room 112 in the library building. That's the the building uh right next to ours. Um and that's all I've got for my report. Thank you. And moving on to the policy
advisory report. Hello everyone. Um, first I want to just thank the committee, all of the attendees that showed up week after week at our policy advisory
um, meetings, the principles, the parents, the translators, interpreters, and of course our board u my board colleagues um, uh, community
members and uh, everyone showed up and had so much great um feedback and I believe we we've um done some heavy work and we are not complete. So since March, our policy advisory committee has met regularly to review and strengthen our
district policies. Um, the group included board members, like I said, administrators, families, community partners, all working together to ensure our policies reflect the needs and values of our school community and the safety of our school community. Um,
to date, the committee has reviewed eight key policies and recommended updates that focus primarily on protecting and supporting our most marginalized scholars and families. These eight revised policies are on our agenda tonight for board action uh with
the goal of having them in place for the start of the new year this new school year. However, um I'm not quite sure that we are ready to vote on them. Um I I would rather them be for review. We do we have some discussion that needs to
happen after I kind of read through them all. I wouldn't recommend them to go for vote just yet. Um would you recommend that this be the first review? Yes, I will recommend that this be our first review, but I but um we we do have
more um two more policies. We plan to reconvene later this month to review additional policies. Oh, sorry. I didn't see. So, this is the first read. So, I do
plan Yeah. I I retract my statement or whatever you want to call it, but yeah. So um we aim to be bring the proposed changes to those uh policies in our next meeting to uh the board in August. But I hope that it be towards at a work
session so we can discuss more because some of the policies we do have like um some board discussion that needs to happen around them. Okay. Overall, um this experience has brought on some um really good ideas
around how the board reviews policies and processes we just talked about in our um meeting before this meeting. And um I would think that this is a new precedence to how we you know work with
our community to um to review policies in our district. That's all I have. Thank you. Okay. So, um, when we get to those action items, we still can vote on the first reading. Correct.
I just want to clarify. I know. Okay. I totally missed presentation of first reading at the end of each and every line. Okay. So, moving forward, uh, we have the superintendent's report. Good evening once again to everyone. Um,
just very quickly, the sinking fund is, um, what we're going to have some broader discussions around this evening. As you recall a couple of weeks ago and in earlier, even this spring, we talked about um, the purpose of a syncing fund. And just for the um general um
communication for our our broader community, it's a syncing fund um bond dollars that can be assigned to existing projects. Syncing funds are needed for district-wide support and um technology being one of them. Other things that are
some um uses include purchase of these are permitted uses I should say um purchase of real estate for sites, construction or repair of school buildings, school security improvements, acquisition or upgrading of technology, student transportation vehicles, um
parts, supplies, equipments used for the maintenance of student transportation vehicles, acquisition of trucks and vans. Um and the last sinking fund millet that the district had approved was in 2011
11. And so um this is outside of our current facilities master plan. It allows us to kind of do some of the other things. And if you recall as we um reached out to our community, which we are extremely thankful for for the $35
million of support for our district facility master plan. You will recall that we have about 600 million in the needs of our district when you talk about parking lots and roof repairs and some of those other things that have um
been in place. And so Kyle Prey, one of our consultants, is coming forward to kind of give an overview if this is something that the board would like to pursue because and if so, um, just as a quick reminder that we have a time frame of what we need to do and when we need
to do it and we need to have that approval for it if that makes sense. And so with that, I will turn it over to Kyle. Good evening everyone, superintendent, board. Thank you. I'm glad to see you all again. It's been a couple weeks. Uh first I have included a slide here around uhformational communications. So
as we're you know if this if we were to go forward with a syncing fund and do anformational communications plan you know we can't use public funds or school time to perform advocacy. You can provideformational materials as staff members and you can engage as an individual or private citizen.
What is a syncing fund? The superintendent did a good job of summing that up. So you can see that information here. I know there was a question last time that we have addressed here. Recent legislation in 2017 uh ch made some changes to syncing fund and included a 10-year limit. So a syncing fund can
only go for 10 years now. Can go for less but only 10 years. And then you see the last syncing fund results there. 52.9%. Yes. Some timeline considerations. We have November of this year. Uh as you know costs can be reduced or split with other
ballot proposals. You can combine uh efforts with volunteers. There is a quick turnaround time because ballot resolutions are due by August 12th. Uh August of next year, you'll have Dem primaries with higher turnout, but there will be higher costs there, fewer volunteers with summer break leading
into election and then two canvasing needs within a year. And then November next year, you'll have even higher turnout uh and higher costs as a result of that. When we think about all these things, best place to start is a survey of likely voters, the stakeholders that
we're going to be going to. Uh we can perform a 400 respondent sample. Uh this would be anywhere from depending on the number of questions and the flow of questions 13 to 18 minutes. And uh many of the questions you may have can be answered from this survey including
ballot language specifics, election timing, millage amount and length and depending on approvals of that uh potential results of a survey could be back early August. So reminder of that August 12th date, the results would likely be here very uh close to that
window. And so any questions around syncing funds? Kyle, can you talk sorry uh just can you talk a little bit more about the breakdown of costs because 400 individuals for a survey feels really
low to me for the amount of money. That's a standard sample size for count for when we do anything uh in Kent County. That's pretty standard sample size 400 respondents. Um, and what's the cost specifically for that survey? The cost would um, we can get you a
specific proposal, but it would range from$25 to $30,000. And that is included in that the 25 to 30k is already included in the proposed $85,000 request. Um, I do not have the specifics of the
request in front of you tonight. Okay. Um, I am here simply for the syncing fund, though I'm I'm not sure about ask the question again. I I'm sorry I didn't try to inter the the I think it's related because the request is coming from Seaf. It's our
next agenda item. The um yes, the the purchasing agenda and that purchasing on the purchasing agenda, I believe we're being asked to approve an $85,000 quote from SEAFT. My my curiosity is
that 25 to 30 is already included in that 85 or would that be in addition? I think that's accurate. I I do think that that's accurate. Yes. Okay. Thank you. Yeah. Is there a way to confirm that? Is there I don't know if I can. You've got it. Yeah. I would like to
know that. Yeah. Could Yeah. Could you speak to just what you know what a sinking fund would bring to potentially bring to the district because of course you know sticker shock right is $85,000 when we you know are struggling to pay our teachers. Um I I
would like to have that be more transparent to just our audience to our community in general. Yeah of course. So as uh the superintendent mentioned a syncing fund is for building maintenance infrastructure technology. When we did it in 2011, you'll recall it was under the moniker warm, safe, and dry. It went
to things like failing roofs, boilers that needed to re be replaced. Sort of those emergency items. Um, it's unlike a bond because it doesn't create that debt or incur that interest. Um, I believe when we did it in 2011, and uh, Bron Cribs would be better to speak to this,
but I believe it was around 5 million it generated annually. I just want to clarify. So again, you said that the last time we had a scing fund, it generated $5 million that could go to those purposes. Correct. So now annually annually. So that those would be funds that we would not have to
figure out how to appropriate out of general funds. That would be dedicated off of this millillage. Five. I mean, again, we don't know numbers this time around, but somewhere around there. Okay. Thank you. I do want to say that the um purchasing
agenda and says that it includes planning, surveys, uh community engagement and communication. So I would assume that the surveys are part of surveys in there. Could you speak as well? Could you just um for our benefit walk through how
public surveys and surveys of likely voters work in whatever detail you're talking? I am not a survey expert. Yes. But whatever they conduct them using uh both landlines and cell phones. It's weighted based on likely voters. So they proportion it based on the likely
voter turnout. And then as mentioned it's a 13 to 18 minute conversation over the phone. It's not just simple yeses and noses. There's logics to it. Um and then the result of that is then quite a lengthy report uh that would give us some insight into some of those
questions you may have. Thank you. Did we do polling when we did our um for the bond? Yes. Um so in 2017 I think it was no no no for um
for the bond there was a a poll and it was maybe two years. I I might be fuzzy on my okay date, but there was like a poll and I rec recall that it was about 400 um respondents and and there were
questions of kind of to to see um the overall tolerance or willingness to um consider a bond and what that would look like. Thank you. And this would give us a good picture of if it would be more
beneficial to have it on the November ballot or the following August. Yeah. Do you happen to have the price of how much more it would be if we were to have it later on? So in in uh next year
primaries or next year general? Oh, you mean like a general budget for the I I don't have a general budget amount for you. Um I you just know that turnout's going to be larger and so mailings and everything else it's going to incur more costs, right? And this if we did decide to do it for November, the cost of the
election is um shared with the ISD. Correct. Correct. Because we already have the county. I want to clarify that November of 2025, correct? The cost is shared with the ISD. If it were to be in November of
2026, it would be correct solely the costs absorbed by the district. I guess I'm wondering if now's the time to discuss as a board the opportunity to maybe simply move forward with a
November ballot initiative. I think we can have that discussion, Amber, when we vote, but if there's any other questions for Kyle spec specifically, let's ask those now. I would be interested to hear if y'all done something recent with another
district just from like I guess it's hard like political context with the landscape. It would be too hard to compare uh you know, apples and oranges. I can say we know looking at May what passed um renewals all but two renewals passed
statewide um and about half of new ballot proposals failed. So the election results that you're showing us right now that is just the city of Grand Rapids. It's just a citywide Okay. Um,
and I I I just want to say to to my colleagues, I do support a sinking fund. Obviously, you know, we What was the last time frame for a syncing fund? 10 years or less. I think we did it for five years. Five years. Okay. So, $25 million
approximately. Yeah, it was. And let Ronda Cribs confirm the exact amount, let's say. Yeah. Approximately, you know, give or take. Um and I I do support that. I also look at those numbers and want to say okay you know that not to say that that was the
slimmest of margins but it's slimmer than one would like correct. Um and so I also just I mean of course that's why we are doing the the survey. Um, and I think we had this conversation about what is the appetite was the language used, right? What is the appetite for
this? Um, however, I I do think this is an overall positive net positive for our district. Um, but I also just am interested to see, you know, what the numbers would look like. And I wonder if 85,000 right to spend at a time when we are so
tight with our budget. Um, you know, I guess I'm just weighing the pros and cons, right? because I don't I don't know what the survey will say but let's say the survey says man we're you know we're not let's try again at a later date right is it worth the 85,000 so I'm just kind of thinking out loud
here for my colleagues and and so I just continue to just a point of clarification the poll specifically if we get those poll results we haven't expended the complete 85,000 correct we will have spent the money for the surveys and polls correct
so 30,000 correct and then the Rest of the 50,000 is for campaign correct mailers and such. Okay, thank you for that clarification. Yes, if we any other questions for Kyle. Is it correct though to say so we would
be spending the 25 to 30,000 in order to prevent ourselves from losing potentially the other 50,000 and then of course if we gain that we're gaining millions which goes right into buildings specifically. Yeah. And technology. in time. Yeah. Thank you. But
which would take funds like add funds back to our general funds. Correct. And so um just so people understand how this would work. Let's and I don't know how much a syncing fund would yield but sorry Dr. Roby can I just ask the
audience to please refrain from talking because I'm having a hard time concentrating on what my colleagues are saying. And so if five years $25 million it using kind of just the last time that
would be $25 million that wouldn't come out of general board dollars. It would be um that frees up other things. And so as even as we've listened to conversations around pay and some other things that provides an opportunity to
have those monies freed up and the monies that would be allocated for buildings and other things kind of the routine maintenance and upkeep of of buildings to be used from that syncing fund. Could you Kyle go back to the slide that shows the deadline just so I can see that again?
That shows what? Sorry. That's perfect. So really the question I'm just trying to wrap my head around this. So the question with doing the survey now is we need to figure out what is again the language we've used before what is the appetite among voters in the city you know not you know they could be
any voter anybody over 18 in the city in approving this. So the purpose of the survey is really to gauge where are voters opinions on this. That way we can time our whenever we bring this forward time it right so we don't spend whatever amount of money on a losing
election item. Correct. Okay. And it can also help with the ballot language, the election timing, the amount, the length, all of that. So we know that whatever we're putting forward, we can, you know, you can't ever assure success in election, but you can get as close as we would otherwise. That way, yeah, we do, you know, get
what we're trying to get out of this. Okay. Thank you. Anything else? Okay. Thank you. Thank you all for your time. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. That concludes my report. Okay. Okay, we are moving on to action items now. First up is the purchasing
agenda. Any discussion? Amber, this is where we Yeah. Um, well, first of all, I'm wondering where within our budget we've set aside 85,000 for something like this. Where is this money coming from?
And so, uh, Miss Cribs is out today, but we can certainly try to get that information for you, but it would be, it would have to come out of the general fund. Um, and I don't want to say it's this bucket or that bucket. Um, yeah. Yeah, I would be curious about which bucket then, you know, which line item
that would come from. And then yeah, I I had sent this in an earlier email, but I'd really like to see the breakdown of what this $85,000 is going toward. I I see that it is lumped in as this would be planning, surveys, community engagement, and
communications, but which of how much to each of those items? Um, and then personally, I'm feeling that we can save up to $30,000 if we just move forward with a November ballot initiative instead of working um instead of the
survey, which would help us decide which month to put it in and which year. I think the Go ahead. I was just going to say the risk with skipping the survey is then like with the language of it. So, we do risk Sir, you can go Kim.
No, I was just clarifying what I What I whispered was that it sounded as though the plan that was presented to us was in any instance whether it's now August, November, that we would go forward with trying to understand what likely voters
would have that support for before we would do it. So I don't think that there was a a there was a plan to jump part of it and just not do the polls. I thought Yeah. No, I I agree. That's that Trusty Williams, that's what I got as well. Um,
and I I would feel comfortable. So, the purchasing agenda does denote $85,000 and I would feel comfortable supporting the 30,000 25 to 30,000 to do the survey, but I'm not quite sure if I, you
know, if we should jump the gun and say, "All right, 85,000 for this entire package when we're not even sure if we want to move forward." Um, based on what the the community might say. I also want to just uplift other ballot initiative that's happening state with
statewide partners. I I was like how how does this work alongside the Michigan invest kids? Uh so if there are other initiatives that do support our district you know we're not also talking about what kind of investment we're doing towards that. I think that's a worthwhile question as
well because those ones in particular would end up on next year, November's ballot, but there is the ISD millage that's coming up this November, which gets into the discussion of who's, you know, the cost of getting on a ballot itself being able to, you know, is it shared or is that ISD would pay
for ballot access? Shared cost shared. Shared. Okay. So, that in itself is helpful. Um, again, I said this at our uh last work session. My instinct is, you know, I want to see November, but I'm these are big
I'm I'm one voter. I don't, you know, I know how I'd vote on the sinking fund this fall if we were to do it. But like I think it is really important to gauge where the public is on this because, you know, maybe the political climate right now, for whatever reason, voters aren't in favor of because, you know, this
would be a tax increase on their property taxes. Maybe voters right now don't stomach that, but maybe we get polling results back and it shows next year they stomach it or whatever. Um, but with that timeline, I'd rather have that information now than later because maybe, you know, November is when the
iron's hottest and if we wait any longer, we're going to lose that. Um, so I think, yeah, I think for me it's a matter of I it's important that we move, you know, quickly on this. Um, just because we don't know what the polling results are going to show and whatever the polling results show, that's going
to inform how we phrase it, how we message on it, how the, you know, how we campaign on it. And having that sooner than later is going to help even decide, do we do it this November, do we do it in the spring, do we do it next November, whatever the case may be. Trusty Davis, would you like to finish your thoughts? Oh, yeah. No, I I appreciate that. I
think um it's worth even uplifting what someone else mentioned that we do consider splitting this cost. I mean with all of the talk that we had about like being a lot more intentional with our spending if we think it's going to cost between 25 35,000 to do the survey. This is a proposal for the whole year.
Like I get the value and just saying like let's just vote it and approve it. But I think it's worthwhile considering do we approve half of it now? So 42,000 and then re-evaluate later in the year when we need to increase that amount. Is that even an option? You can amend it.
You can amend. Um and so as I'm speaking for a a outside company. Yeah, that's what I'm wondering. I don't know that you can we could say yes, this is what we're willing to do or we would like to just do the survey um with the assumption and assuming
positive intent the assumption that they would be a amenable to that. Um, and we might have to come back and then do it again later. But just to make sure because what I'm I think I'm hearing is that people would prefer I'm I'm saying
people the board the general conversation is to expend the 25 to 30,000 to do the survey and once we have those results then to make a decision on next steps which also includes the
marketing the all the other kind of components but again not having the representative from the company I can't say they would be because that would be a contract and an agreement that would have to be negotiated. I also want to uplift the fact that there is a time constraint that we're
looking at as well. And so that is something that has to be considered because if they're going to do those surveys and stuff, we're going to be going right into trying to again create ballot language. And that's another thing that we have to be concerned about like if we are giving them the time to
do the work that needs to be done so that this is done well versus again we take if we approve it, we don't have to expend it. If again we know what we're we've already making our tent clear that we were looking at that poll to determine
whether or not we'll go forward. That's part of the understanding with the contract. If we don't approve it and it does cause some additional lay with that ballot language, then we've spent it and now we're already pushed back to another later date. That's what I was wondering. If we approve this tonight, um we're approving
the possibility of up to this 80 85,000 85 um for the district to spend, but that doesn't mean you have to spend it. If if the survey results come back that it's not going to pass, then couldn't we
decide then not to move forward? I guess I'm going to ask Mr. codle because you would know more on contract language just to come forward and maybe help kind of navigate some of this conversation please. Yeah, I guess that's that's what I'm a little less
comfortable with because if it's a contract we're not approving a contract though. We're approving an amount an amount. Okay. Okay. Okay. Is that we did your work for it. Okay. So the Yeah, we're not approving
their contract. Okay. And we're also not spending $85,000 tomorrow. We're approving up to that amount. We're not sending them a $85,000 check. No. Correct. We're saying you guys, this is what you guys have to spend with this company. Would the contract Oh, go ahead.
I was going to say would the contract then come back to us for another approval then if it's because it's I think right because it would be over over the 28,000 mark. Just pay just the amount release. Wait, could you rephrase it? Sorry, I
misunderstood. So, uh, something only has to come to us. Am I correct? And and only above a certain amount, a certain threshold, which is 28 something changes every year. Public bidding. Yeah. So, then we would have to approve the the amount for the contract then at
a later date anyways, right? Okay. So, it'd have to come to us again for a second time. the contract for for the services for the services because right now we're just approving Oh, we're just Yeah. the amount. Oh, yeah. We're just budgeting. Yes.
Appropriating. I I foul. Thank you. And I also would say that I would um prefer that we do the survey even just for the line item of like language. If we can determine what our community um
would be more apt to vote for based on language that would be of benefit because we're talking about millions of dollars that we could potentially get for our district. Well, even one step further more than just like the language, what do they really want? So if we can craft the
survey like he said to being really a question around what um physical of course talking about the infrastructure what is most valued by our community that would be valuable. Any other comments or questions? I just want to end with seeing as it it
will be it will need to come to us a second time that makes me cuz I was questioning now that you know uh Trusty Williams said oh well we have to do it again. That makes me a little more confident then and only approving possibly what Trusty Davis said is is half um 30 $40,000. I guess we'd have to
choose an amount, but it'd have to come to us again anyways. So, I I'd then be more comfortable in amending that amount to a lower amount. I mean, if that makes my colleagues more comfortable, like I I think there's a lot of merit in doing the survey and I support the sinking fund. Um the
question is what do the voters want? So I guess you know among the nine of us I can support that as well if that's what it took for us to move forward to get towards getting sinking fund. I think um from a
stand a community or or not just community but contractor standpoint is if we approve part of this funds, how are we given good faith that we would say, okay, thank you for the survey, we're going to go to somebody else, you
know, or like how do they how are we giving them good faith that we we'll continue this work with them. If I was on the other end of this, I'd be like, "Wait, you know, so you so you want me to do this part and then then what?" It
wouldn't be it would it would kind of be a little uncomfortable for me as a business, you know, to work with that type of situation. Although I'm I'm good with whatever our
colleagues are comfortable with. I hear you Ari and echo the similar sentiments because I think the contract language could be really intentional to say hey we want to do this in phases uh can we ensure that it comes back to the board
um so then they can have the final say or the next say if we move on to phase two whatever that looks like. So I I could support that. Again I still do want to uplift the other ballot initiatives. I know it's not part of this conversation, but like what our investment looks like alongside that
because I mean statewide efforts to do similar things uh is really appealing to me. Um, so I I just don't want to lose that and I know it's a separate conversation. I just want to continue to have Yeah. One other thing I think I'll just point
out as we're looking at like $85,000. If I'm reading this and I'm seeing, okay, we have $85,000 going to planning, surveys, community engagement, communications for a citywide campaign effectively in Grand Rapids in a non like presidential year. That's a pretty
I don't know. I think all said I like I think that's a pretty reasonable price. I think as we you know whether or not we approve 85 today or not looking at that total cost for a campaign like that's not that's pretty good. I think we're comfortable I mean we can move to a vote whenever the time is
right but I feel like we're comfortable approving this knowing that we are going to have opportunity to amend later if necessary. Do I have a motion to approve? I also don't want to lose Amber's question around the cost breakdown like that still feels really important to me too.
Do you need that in order to I do not need that in order to vote. Thank you. Motion. I guess I'm wondering are we voting on the full 85 or are we still talking about like the 42 unless somebody's making a motion to amend. I I do would I would like to make a
motion to amend it to 40,000. Um again, just reiterating what I've already said. Um just that we are going to come back to this um at a later date. I would I would like to make the motion to amend to 40,000 and moving forward.
Seconded. Am I still able to speak on that? It's already late now. I know that motion. Okay. Sorry. Can you speak? Oh, sorry. All in favor say I.
I. Any opposed? I All right. Roll call. Vote. Yep. Okay. Uh, Trustee Rodriguez. Hi. Uh, VP Wade.
Nay. Nay. Yeah. Trusty Williams. No. Trusty Williamson. Yes. Trusty Davis. Yes. No. Oh, sorry. President. Uh, Trusty Kilpatrick.
Yes. Trusty Meltton. No. Trusty Moreno. No. Uh, President Davis. No. All right, that motion fails. Do I have a motion to approve the full amount? So moved.
Second. All in favor say I. I. I. Any opposed? I motion passes. Okay. Thank you. Um, moving on to the GRE layoff resolution.
Any comments or questions? Yes, I I was not able I was working all day today, so I was not able to understand the context of this. So, if it would be all right just to speak a little bit about the context of this, the timing of it, um, and even why it's necessary, that would be helpful. So,
um, sure, the resolution, this is not a, this is something that we have done as part of past practice. And so, um, the last time that there were district layoffs, um,
for our teachers, it was part of a resolution, I want to say it was 2019 because I wanted to make sure I understood correctly as well. Um, and so it is part of a best practice just to um, and from our legal department that a
resolution should be required for um, certified teachers. Um the two the impact is that um we have staff members employees who are not properly certified and endorsed um to teach in their the
areas. It does not mean that um we are not still working with them to find different positions that they can go in but their current positions they are not able to do as such. So even though there are other open positions we h like it's a process that has to go we have to go through because
they can't just be moved to a different position. Is that my understanding? There's not currently a position that they can go that's available. That's why the layoff and even not through the promise uh all of the pieces that help people become certified in their area, you know, all the programs that we talk about when we
do um you know retention and recruitment. And so what I don't know and I'll have um Mr. Codle who works in HR as legal, but I want to make sure I'm saying this correctly. How I've understood is that
um the staff members have aren't currently certified. I don't know. I can't speak to the specifics of have they had their time has expired for that for the the relight um what do you call it like emergency license certification. That's why I'm
just confused by by how that would work when we have so many needs. Yeah, from my understanding it's please come to the table. Oh gosh. Yeah. From my understanding, their Certs lapsed last year, so they were teaching
without the proper certifications. They lapsed. I believe they got warnings. I wasn't too involved in the whole process. That was more on the HR side of things. But since they lapsed, they didn't get certified and there weren't any vacancies in the certifications that they did hold. We've had to move this
way. So that how does that relate to the layoffs as a whole? Like the list of layoffs separate. That's different. Separate. So the layoff, this has nothing to do with the budget. This has to do with the fact that they are no longer certified in vacant positions that we have.
Typically, we're speaking to the two individuals. Yeah, that's different. So were the other two nonGRA employees? Is that what the difference is? Or is it just because G they are G. They just didn't have
their certification laps. And so the other people that were laid off are not in the layoff list. That You see what I'm saying? How I can see where it's confusing. And so the layoff list is that is something that we've talked about as far as our
process where people were informed um July July 1 and because they are not in um a collective bargaining unit, it it has a different process. does not have to go through what we're just what we're suggesting for this. And even this this
is something that has been previously done. So this is the first time in my history of the district that we've had actual teacher layoffs. It has not happened since 2019. Yeah. That's why I'm surprised by it. Yeah. So what keep now I'm a little because
the other layoffs aren't GRE as far as I'm aware. Okay. They're not I just understood the opposite of that. Yeah. Yeah, they're not G. None of them are G. Okay, that makes sense. I understood something opposite the last time I just asked a question,
but so then this and pardon me if I missed the missed the answer already to this. So this is coming to the board for because they are in a bargaining unit or what is the purpose or incentive of us? Certified teachers to be laid off has to
be approved by the board. But they're not certified. do, but they don't have vacancies in the certificates that they hold. They were teaching in other areas that they didn't have certification for. Yeah. If you I mean, I think it's worth just clarifying the comment as I read
it. The comment as I read it is employee is not that. So, this what we're specifically looking at now in this line item 10.2 is employee is not properly certified, endorsed or qualified to teach as that instructor. Mhm. So to be clear, because these two
individuals are members of or maybe not members, but they're they're subject to their bargaining unit, we have to go through this process. They are non they are they are not non-exempt. They are It has to do with the law, not necessarily CBA. Correct. Okay.
Under law, certified teachers to be laid off. Okay. So it's because they're certified educators. Correct. They still have a cert certificate, but we just don't have any vacancies available for the certificates they had. And they were teaching, if I understand correctly, in different subject matters than what they're certified. Correct.
And they were given the opportunity to do the emergency service before getting all the pieces together. Okay. And for whatever reason did not, as far as I'm aware, yes, it would be helpful if I would like to know that for sure. It would be helpful if that context is provided when we go through this. But
thank you. What are I'm just curious and maybe I missed conversation on this earlier, but other than like voting yes on this today, like what are the other options available to us? Um, if I could recall from a previous
incident when there was a teacher that was working outside of classification, then we were obligated to pay them from um differently and um it was quite um expensive that way and we weren't it was
something where we we were like if I remember correctly it was like because they weren't we were being fined by the state and thus they had we had paid them um differently than we paid the rest of the contract. And so it it was um I feel like this was
about um I feel like it was almost about a year ago. A different situation, but yeah, same it was and we we were we were then beholden to still pay. We would be paying them and being fined. We would have to pay a fine. Oh, the state was finding us because we
were employing a non-certified teacher in that subject area teacher. Okay. And if I recall, that did go on longer than what this did. So I I appreciate the due diligence of the district in bringing this forward sooner rather than later.
Um and so yeah, I mean it sounds like they were, you know, awarded different opportunities to uh maintain that lensure and failed to do so. and they still have the potential to come back and work for the district
if something opens up in in their licensing area. Correct. Yeah. I guess I have two more questions. I I've heard you say, Trustee Williams, that we receive fines if they're not in compliance with this. Correct. Okay. I just want to name that out loud and get
clarity around that. And so how um MDE works is people can get a variance of a license for a period of time and once that variance to teach outside of your licensed area expires then um the
district has to pay back to the state whatever the rate is for that particular position. and that's happened um a couple of times and we're trying to make sure that again we are being consistent in letting people know what their
licensing is but also and we've had this conversation too um all educators receive you have usually a five-year license and it is the educator's job to make sure that they also keep up with their license and making sure that
they're getting their CEUs or sketches as they're called. Okay. And then question number two, do we I I won't say names or even the type of teacher, but to me these are areas where
we need educators. So I'm wondering do we have are there are these now filled or do we know if these roles what they're licensed how they're what they're licensed and there are no current vacancies? I I know I'm saying
um they were covering positions that were but they're leaving that I'm now wondering do we have a full-time person in that role or would that be whatever that portion is I I assume. Okay. So yes. So if
I'm I'm interested in knowing if those positions got filled because we have a lot need to be filled but why can't they be like a substitute teacher in that classroom? Is it is that like would it have to go through a different program? It does go through a different program.
And so um who is our our educ staff? So, if your license has expired and you can still work work in the district, but then it's at a different rate of pay, you're not part of the GRE. Yeah. And you would
have to Yeah. Okay. So, again, just to uh repeat the question, do we know, maybe we don't know at this moment, but it'd be helpful to know we have these are these the reason these folks are being laid off is they're not qualified to preach in their
areas, right? Um they don't hold the license. They don't hold the license. They don't hold the license for the areas that um they've been assigned. And in whatever area they're licensed, they are assuming their license hasn't
lapsed. Never mind this. There's too many hypotheticals. Thank you. Do I have a motion to approve the layoff resolution? So moved. Is there support? Seconded.
All in favor say I. I. Any opposed? Motion carries. Okay. For our first reading of all of these policies, 10.3 through 10.10.
Um, we do have the capability to accept them as a slate. Accept the first reading as a slate. Do I have a motion to approve? Thank you. policies. You know what? Stick around because we're going to talk about policies. There may be some clear. Well, first of all, are there any other questions or wonderings?
Could we just get a um just for my comprehension, could we get a quick summary again of maybe just like in so many few words in each individual policy, what it addresses um and how it fits in the larger hole. like
I understand the language of it but just understanding context of how this gets to goal and I don't know if Thomas is better to speak that whomever but Dr. Whoever what was the question? Just a like I I I'm I'm reading the language of this, but just understanding
it in the context of the the um advisory why we chose this for that. Okay. Like how this fits into the the larger the equity policy kind of well all of them, right? Because if you could summarize impact marginaliz
a reason for each one or for all of them? I don't need a reason necessarily. just summarize like how does you know these are being am I not being clear at all I'm not really and so how I'm that how I I think I want to make sure that people understand with these particular policies this came as part of our work
um as the our new um administration was taking over and then also some of the concerns around um how folks can access our young people and
our our buildings and um and so the task that this board charged with is to look at specific policies because it was specific to around access and um our most I wouldn't say most vulnerable but
people who would feel more vulnerable and to clarify language so that we tightened up and refined language where it may have been a little bit grayer and so what you have are kind of
clarifications related to those those items to kind of make sure that it was and again there's not a way to address every possible circumstance that people may find themselves in but to make sure from a policy standpoint we've tightened
up some of those those um items. Perfect. Thank you. Does that help? That's that's perfect. Thanks. Anything else? Do I have a motion to approve policy 1017,
7165, 8010, 8018, 8040, 8090, 9400, and 9410. Motion to approve the first reading of the previously stated policies. Second.
All in favor say I. Any opposed? Motion carries. Moving on to our consent agenda grouping. Do I have a motion to approve the consent agenda? So moved.
Second. All in favor say I. I. Any opposed? Motion carries. Um, moving on to board president announcements. Um what I would like to
bring forward today is did I miss something? Oh no you're fine. Um is conferences for our board. So the deadline for the cube conference is the
um not the deadline but the deadline for um a lesser rate early bird is early bird there you go is coming up um in about two weeks I believe. Um, and I bring it I bring it up because I
do have Oh, thank you. I do have um two board colleagues that I have asked if they would be interested and they have voiced interest. Um, and that is Trusty Moreno
and Trusty Wade. However, after talking to them, um it came forward that the district will not be sending any staff members out of state because of budget. So, I'm bringing this forward to to the board. Um I did talk to Trusty Moreno
and Trusty Wade about this as well. I know we aren't staff, but it's something to consider. Um I will say that our board budget has been cut in half. Um so to some extent I think we could
determine how that money is spent because we have cut our budget in half. Um if we value a conference out of state um I personally think if that's what we value then that's what we should invest in. But um we did break down some of the
numbers. So, based on the cube conference from last year, um, and just estimates from this year, it would cost about $3,000 for an individual to attend with flight and
hotel and conference. Um, that being said, we I'm just planning on if we do um send these two colleagues, it would be just two individuals, and we've sent more than that in the past.
Um, and that would be roughly half of our funding allotted for workshops and conferences. So, something and that's the early bird rate.
Yes. Something to consider. Um, some things that have been brought up when I'm talking with um in talking with colleagues about this conference is that it is the urban district conference and so there's value with that because we don't get a lot of
exposure where we are um to districts that are in our situation I guess or that have likeminded or similar needs similar demographic
and that that sort of thing. So if any I'm opening it up for discussion really right now before um I make that decision. Another thing another another thing to consider is the conferences that we usually attend um um has all participants completed the
the orientation um trainings that we've asked for? I think I think that we should make sure that that's done as well before we say, "Oh, well, we'll send you out of state, but you haven't done the ones that you can access within the state." So, I would encourage us to make sure that
that is being utilized. And then given the fee of um the the out ofstate conference, I'm wondering if and I don't know, it may make a difference whether it's instate or out of state. I don't know if it will, but um should we
because of the significant cut, should we maybe consider just one. I know it's tough. I mean, nobody wants to be there all alone, but I I think the education piece and the information that we get and the learning at that
conference in particular is dynamic. Um it's um very relevant for a district like ours. But I, you know, with our cost being um that significant, I'm wondering if if colleagues would be okay with one going. I I appreciate that
thought. I personally um had a really hard time even considering going down to two people for a conference because I find the most value. You know, when I went to Cube, there were four of us that went. You were with me, Kim. And I feel like it was the
conversations we had after attending different sessions that really made it impactful because we were able to bounce ideas and information off each other and talk about how we could bring that back to our district. And um I mean
we've had a lot of I would like to broaden this conversation in a future meeting if possible because I think there's a lot to be said about when we come back from a conference I think we could do a much better job of digging into that information and sharing that
information so that it carries yeah so that we utilize it you know so I guess that would be my input is what was it from last year's cube that we are implementing Now, what what was the benefit
that keeps us coming back? Great question to this. Okay. I think we need to do a better job of utilizing that information because I think those that have attended Cube have found value in it. Am I correct? So, I was going to say as a as a Cube
conference attender, um I I do think it was valuable information. Um, however, I also don't know if the information and the cost of like being in Las Vegas and all, you know, hotel, whatever, all that stuff necessarily out, you know, if if the information gained outweighs the
cost. Um, and I would like to have a conversation around how do we not just present this information, but implement it within our work as a board. Um, I would like to have that conversation before even considering uh more more travel. I mean, of course, the two that you mentioned like, yeah, you know, like
they've already been accounted for. Um but I do think we have to be a little more intentional with that. Um I mean and there are so many other things like we've gone to to state right uh conferences and such and there's also me and me and trustee Moreno just actually came back from Chicago from another
another conference that wasn't necessarily related you know I mean it was direct directly related to schoolboard but not through NSBA or MASB. Um but there are alternatives out there that are more cost effective. I think I think there's options and I think yeah just thinking about the
process of how we implement our learnings. Yeah. And just to support I I support that Jose and I I do think it's important like the budget if the district and and the decisions they've made for conferences are very different than the board. You know like just how we function is different. And so to have
cut our budget in half and still work within that, I think we should uh really just use our best um discernment to learn and to grow as much as we can. But I really want to support the idea of coming back with some uh things to share. Yeah, every conference should help us,
right? It should help us improve. So yeah, I'm not sure if I'm gaining much clarity. So I would say yes. Okay. to more than one person to really specific intentional decisions about where we learn. So, as board president, I feel like part
of what I'm charged with is determining who who goes to what conferences, right? But, um, I just wanted to get your impact input before I make this decision because it is half of our conference and workshop budget. Um,
are there any other upcoming conferences that you would even be considering? So, well, yeah. So, um, in the fall, in October, there's the conference in Traverse City. That's a lot a lot less costly, right?
Um, and then, yeah, I I mean, even if we do send Trusty Moreno and Trusty Wade, we still have um roughly $6,000 to spend on conferences and workshops. Mhm.
So, um that's a leadership conference up in Traverse City and then well conf we go to there's one in DC. Yeah. Equity that is the equity conference and the um advocacy equity and advocacy
that's in DC like January Februaryish I feel like. Yes. And then there's the um National School Board Association. mid 8. Yeah. Which is it usually the week of spring break.
Would you colleagues that have been to some of these conferences, would you value Cube over NASB? Yeah, absolutely. Yeah. So, it just so happens Cube is first in this calendar budget.
Um, so once we get to NASB, we could determine if there's monies left. But I do I get the impression that cube is a priority. Yeah. Have just a thought and this is something I was I don't know who I was discussing it with but have we
considered like you know giving every one of our board members like here's your a lotment for professional development and then kind of use it within your purview right and say okay you know we we hope that you um find a a
a reasonable right accommodations and such and and I'm sure Julie would help with that but I think just to kind of help um take control of maybe like oh this this is what I would like to do with professional development because I know it all doesn't necessarily fall like I like I mentioned me and Trusty
Moreno's conference um while we I think both of us got a scholarship for it um you know that could be something we choose to utilize it for for professional development instead of just like cube or masb just a suggestion I don't know I think I think it's something we've
never done that I think it's something we could talk about um I would some questions and concerns when it comes to that because then we're not deciding as a board which conferences are important. We're kind of just like who knows what individuals will be on
the board ever. You know, I I don't know. It's more of an individual preference. And I I like that we've narrowed down which conferences we feel are impactful, but I think we should obviously like we can have those
conversations and talk about that. just a thought. Yeah. Yeah. Okay. We don't have to vote on anything. I just wanted to bring that forward. Um, thank you for your input and if you think of anything in the next couple days, I will probably be having Julie
sign them up so we can get those early bird prices. So, just let me know ASAP if you think of something. Okay. Thank you. Um, moving on to our
non-aggenda item, public comment. Um, we do have quite a few public comment cards. Um, so I will reduce the time again for the two minutes.
Um, our first public comment does need a translator. interpreter. It says translator on the top. So, they specifically wrote that. Just trying to correct the verbiage for all of us. Okay. Ruby Garcia followed by D. Jones.
Okay. We're gonna give you four minutes. We'll start at 2 minutes. Ruby Garcia Elementary School. Good afternoon. My name is Ruby Garcia and I am a mother from a student at Sibli Mer.
I'm here to support Miss Meyer. [Music] As a principal, she was excellent. and I don't know why she is retiring as a director. She was as a principal. She was a privilege to have because she
knows both languages and I could communicate with her and approach her with confidence. I felt supported u with everything every time I greeted her at school. [Music]
I hope that the new uh director, the new principal would be as good or even better than her because of all the things that we were able to accomplish under her leadership. And I think that's all I have to say. And I'm very grateful because it wasn't
one year, it was very a lot of years. And I'm very uh appreciative as a mother and I see all the effort that not only her but all the rest of the teachers give at that school. Excellent job and very grateful as a
mother. D Jones followed by Shannon Tannis. How y'all doing? Uh I'm D. Jones again. Uh there's three handouts I was trying to pass out to the other people from the school board that didn't get the handouts. Uh the reason I was handing
those handouts to you guys right now I'm partnering with an organization called Party P A R T I if you looked at the actual thing I looked at uh I passed you guys out uh their COO handled a trillion dollar investment portfolios uh a trillion with a T for several different
governments and very rich elite uh uh people. Uh reason I'm trying to get you guys to uh see the vision for this is because the co that I'm working with continuously uh we're actually partner I connected that uh organization and streaming
platform to Ohio State University and Michigan State University. Uh Ohio State University is going to be using this streaming platform to actually credit students at Ohio State University so they can actually learn streaming from this platform. The reason why I'm trying to connect you guys for this because the
flyer that I've given you guys in the summer program that I'm partnering with you guys, I tried to use you guys' PCs to stream using the same platform here that I already have Michigan State University and Ohio State University going to be partnering with to utilize. So then students at these colleges will
be credited using the same platform here. And so to enrich our community, which is even cooler because they have something called party points where you actually from just streaming and getting on the platform and utilizing the platform, you earn party points which can be exchanged for cryptocurrency.
This is a free platform and they give you 99% of the revenue is free speech and they give you digital equity. So with this platform that I've already introduced you guys to that I couldn't use the PCs at Burton School because I couldn't get access to them. We could have educated our students on stream and
they could have earned points. Eventually when that token and coin and crypto was launched, they could have exchanged those points that they would be using for cryptocurrency that could be exchanged for actual value. So the next time I come to you guys, hopefully we can get those PCs going and those synergies going because there's huge
things that's developing for our district. Thank you. Shannon Tannis, followed by Levia Maroquin. Shannon Tannis. Hello, my name is Shannon Tannis and I realized I didn't uh really formally
introduce myself the last meeting at 5:30. I am a civil rights advocate. I have been um vetted and educated in civil rights by the Detroit director of fair housing. I've also been vetted for
an equal protection under the law of 40 title 42. I also am doing oversight with Michigan Civil Rights Department and their deficiency, HUD deficiency, Mr. deficiency, the attorney general deficiency of this state with many other
stakeholders. Um, I have already sent the letter of intent that I gave this body to the Michigan Civil Rights Department and also to the Office of Civil Rights of the Department of Education. I've also sent it to the Secretary of Deputy
Secretary of HUD. Um, just to give the audience more context, I'm calling for investigation into fraud, waste, and abuse of this body. Um, regarding also the two public uh school buildings that you're stating that you
own that actually the city of Grand Rapids owns. Um, there is taxation without proper representation going on when these buildings are sitting vacant and you're collecting tax money for them. Not to mention following this agenda. You guys are all over the place
hitting you're not going in concession of the agenda and there's items that are not publicly available which I recognized during your work session in June when you're presenting your financial bud budget. The transparency
just in those little things are very obvious. Not to mention you have the equipment to stream these meetings live to give more ADA accommodation. So, just to give you a preview of where I'm coming from and what's coming. Thank
you, Lesie Maroquin. Followed by Leticia Ibara. She needs a translator, too, right? Hud who does Lasia? Okay. Can we get a translator? Interpreter.
Interpreter. Thank you. My name is Lydia. I'm here to support Miss Maher. Miss Meyer. parents from 2000 since 2000. I've seen a lot of principles go by sibling,
but nothing like herindto. She supports everybody. She's not only a good person with the students, but with the teachers and everybody. So, she's very happy. She gives happiness, spreads happiness all over, all over, especially when she does the
Muppets. very original. She is who she is. We're going to miss her dearly. Yeah. Gracias. Thank you, Laticia Ibara. And followed by Elizabeth Burke.
Who's the next person? Leticia. My name is Leticia. I am a mother and I'm also a worker. [Applause] [Music] I'm very sad because uh six years ago So
she received me as her family. I'm working there because of her. I've never met a person with such a kind heart. I feel that the school is not going to be the same without her. And I do have the support of all the teachers,
but we're going to miss her. I hope that the new person coming in will be just like her and treated just the same. Nothing. I have no words. I don't [Applause]
Elizabeth Burke followed by Brooklyn Phillips. Elizabeth Burke, Brooklyn Phillips, followed by Sarah Scott. Don't know how I'm going to follow that up, but okay. Good evening. Um, my name
is Brooklyn Phillips and I'm a proud fifth grade teacher at Sibly Elementary. Our district slogan is GRPS, my choice. In fact, I even appear in a promotional video proudly stating that GRPS is my choice. But I must be honest, recent decisions made by this board and the district administration are making it
increasingly difficult to stand by that sentiment. We are losing phenomenal staff throughout the district. And it's not because of our students or our dedicated school level teams. The challenge lies in the broader culture and climate of the district. I have worked in GRPS for the past eight years. All of which have I have spent under the
leadership of principal Rose Charles Maher at Sibi. In that time, uh, she has guided our school to achieve the second highest achievement growth in the district in both math and reading. That success is not accidental. Yes, our teachers have worked incredibly hard, but none of it would have been possible
without the unwavering support of our administrative team, Principal Charles Maher and assistant principal Riley Sunday. They consistently put the growth and well-being of our students first and support their staff every step of the way. This past year alone, I watched as Rose and Riley absorbed the most difficult aspect of our work, dealing
directly with hostile and threatening parent interactions to shield teachers and allow us to stay focused on instruction. Both leaders endured verbal and physical threats, and yet the district's response to these serious incidents was min minimal. The lack of support is deeply disheartening. Couple that with a significant salary
discrepancies between GRPS and neighboring districts, and it is no surprise that we are now losing these two exceptional leaders. While their departure may now be unavoidable, the district still has an opportunity and an obligation to act quickly and ensure that Sibi remains the strong and thriving school it is. We need immediate
movement from human resources. The hiring process has been far too slow. The district has known about these vacancies since before the end of the school year. Yet, the assistant principal position was only posted two weeks ago. This kind of delay is unacceptable. simply deserves strong, qualified administrative candidates,
people who will care for our students the way Rose and Riley have, and you will support teachers the way we've come to depend on. Our students and staff deserve leadership that will protect, uplift, and fight for them. If GRPS is to be truly our choice, then GRPS needs to choose us back. Thank you,
Sarah Scott, followed by Sally Triant. Triant. Hello, my name is Sarah Scott. I work for Kent School Services Network, KSSN for short. My role is community school
coordinator at Sibi Elementary. I have worked at Sibi for the last six years. I'm currently the only non-eing staff member who speaks Spanish. I am also come here today as a parent to a GRPS student. Sibli is a gem in this district, a proud neighborhood-based
community school. We align with the strategic plan and lead the district for our literacy and math proficiency rates and for the exceptional school culture and belonging. District leadership highlighted us at the leadership convening with all instructional leadership teams in June. Sibly
Elementary is a community school. We started as a pilot school for KSSN in 2006. We have had a coordinator ever since. This next school year is our 20th year of implementing this strategy. one that involves the community, schools, teachers, families, and community
partners that strengthen and support the real authentic needs of the school. The community school strategy is working at Sibi not because of one person, but because of the team that works together. We are willing to have hard conversations with each other as a staff with families and our community
partners, businesses, nonprofits, and faith-based organizations. our families and staff and community partners to serve us say and who steps up to continue leading our school not just through surveys or Zoom meetings but embedded in the process. It is not only
fair but an equitable practice. In fact, I believe it should be best practice for our district. We do not need to reimagine this. It's already being done here. Take a look at CA Frost Elementary. Their principal search is being led with community sessions and school staff and parents are going to be
on the interview panel. However, this practice is now being done for all schools needing a new principal. At Sibi, we want an equitable, equitable, and inclusive practice for selecting for selection. As well, our families have just as much educational expertise and
deserve to be included. Siblings should have real input in selecting our next leaders. Our feedback isn't optional. It's a vital voice for decision-making, and I believe a collaborative process will increase the likelihood of success for Siblings's next leader. Thank you.
Sally Tri followed by Stephanie Nielsen Neielson. Hi. So, my name is Sally Triant and my business is Grow Wise Learning and for the past 5 years I've been a contract employee working to ensure equitable access to environmental and outdoor
education for every scholar in our district. In 2019, my role was created to serve two large grants in their outcomes. For the last two years, the district has absorbed the expense of my contract. And this commitment seemed to reflect the growing success of this work that engages a wide coalition of
community partners, dedicated teachers, and administrators in every quadrant and thousands of our scholars. I was informed mid June that my contract that was set to renew on July for 1st was ending due to budget constraints. I'm deeply concerned that the work this district has heavily invested in over
the last 5 years will now be lost. Um, I don't have time to highlight success, so I want to take a few moments to inform you of the ongoing work I'm asking you to support. The environmental education survey that went out in 2019 was just replicated this last spring, and the findings will need to be measured and
reported to determine the direction of this work moving forward. I presented the green schoolyard features inventory I created at the children and nature network conference in May. It was recognized there that we are rising to become national leaders in this work. They are actively funding a nature
everywhere grant right now to support GRPS the city and GR outside in efforts to take learning outside. Um they're hosting their annual conference in Grand Rapids here next year and they hold our district up as a model and our teachers, our schoolyards, and our
community partners deserve to be lifted up when they're here next year. Please help make this happen. Crucially, I need you to know that our GRPS green team built of administrators, educators, um and and scholars throughout the district have planned to begin a recycling and composting pilot this fall. Our district
is not recycling and could be composting. Schools modeling best practices presented to Philip Green and Alex Smart in March. Vendors have been established and meetings with facilities have been ongoing. Our district needs to serve as good stewards of our community and offer our scholars these basic
opportunities for civic engagement. I ask the time that you I ask that you please take the time to go on field trips with our scholars. Meet our teachers in their schoolyards who are succeeding in using their schoolyards daily as tools for learning. That's time. I know. And I've been so proud to hold
this torch and do this work as long as I have. I will miss working with each and every one of my teachers. I'm leaving you with a lot of documents. I ask if nothing else that you please read the environmental education report I submitted in 2024 and reach out to Jessica Vanderarch, our science
curriculum supervisor. Thank you, Stephanie Nielsen, followed by Scott Bloom. [Applause] Good evening board. Uh my name is Stephanie Nielsen. and I teach at Shamat Hills. The last time I was here to speak, I was presenting to you as
Michigan's region 3 teacher of the year for the 2324 school year. And tonight, I'm here because I want to publicly recognize and lift up Sally Triant, whose environmental educator consultant position um unfortunately was eliminated. Sally
was a key player in my success and ability to represent our district well throughout that year. My platform was placebased education which was introduced to me through Sally Triant and Jessica Vanderark's involvement in the district and Sally provided constant support to me throughout that year. This
model of teaching transformed my approach as a neighborhood school educator as I knew this was the type of learning best that engages scholars best um but wasn't always sure how to do that. Sally's ability to come alongside teachers without judgment to support
them as professionals and learners with constant love and passion and empathy for the teaching process was transformative. Sally has been a source of constant inspiration and resources and community partners and knowledge. She's contributed so much to my growth
as an educator and I'm incredibly grateful to have had the opportunity to learn from her. From lesson planning to data collecting to curriculum designing to compost and recycle research to gardening, I'm a
better educator for knowing her. As you consider how to invest in your PS, I strongly encourage you to invest in more Sally's. Those who work tirelessly for what's best for scholars and teachers who
sorry I can't see who aren't afraid to get their hands dirty, literally who step right alongside teachers and show genuine interest in our scholars, not only as learners, but as humans and our future leaders. Sally's work is so appreciated and her dedication and
commitment to the teachers and families and scholars of GRPS should really be celebrated. [Applause] Scott Bloom followed by Alexandra Sturk.
Hello, my name is Scott Bloom. I'm the executive director at The Other Way Ministries. uh we're a community development organization on the west side and we are strong partners of the sibli familia and uh especially in our youth
development work and I am here because Miss Maher asked me to be here like a lot of us and uh I drove an other way van and and brought some of our parents and neighbors here who didn't couldn't get here otherwise because Miss
Maher asked me to and uh I Just want you all to know that these this is one of the qualities of her. She is a great convenor. She is a fierce advocate. She's a good listener. She really believes in community partnerships. At
our organization, we strongly value when institutions in the same neighborhood can work together for that community. And we are really going to miss that. And uh can we just hear it from Miss Maher really quick?
[Applause] I want to celebrate her. And I think GRPS, you guys get your due too, right? Because somebody in leadership here saw these qualities in her and gave her this opportunity to make this difference and elevated her, gave her a degree of
support. So, I just want to encourage this continued effort to be bringing people on board who are strong community partners. And I also um want to briefly say with my 30 seconds that remain that um I really am so glad to see that we
are soliciting parent feedback in the selection process of all principles. I know surveys have gone out everywhere. I want to give a soft encouragement to go beyond that to do some messy community engagement. It's it can be messy but it's beautiful. And um I know there is
this pilot at Frost that does that. I hope that catches fire. I hope that gets to sibly. I hope that gets to all these different communities. So, uh, and that's the balance of my time. Thank you, Alexandra. Alexandra Sturk, followed by
Lisa Lee. Okay, make this be shorter. My name is Alexandra Sturk and this is the perspective of a teacher going into her fourth year at Sibi Elementary in GRPS. Let me be clear. I am absolutely
desperate to leave GRPS. My eyes have been drifting to other district postings since early spring when I feared what my job would look like if our incredible principal and assistant principal at Sibily might leave. And now that they have, I want to do everything I can to
follow. They along with our amazing staff are the only reasons I've made it through the last three years three years. They were the glue. Without their leadership and support, I know I wouldn't have lasted. I'm scared. I'm scared of what happens when strong building leadership is replaced by
silence. When there's no one to advocate for us at the school level, where teachers have no voice, no protection, and no support. That's what I'm afraid sibly will become. Meanwhile, during the school year, I work 12-hour days staying until 8 or even 9:00 at night. I spend
all day every Sunday planning because we lack resources, adequate prep time, and proper researchbased instruction like science of reading. That that's out the window, I guess. My paycheck has to be stretched over 9 months just to cover a one-bedroom apartment in Wyoming. I hate
that I can't be self-sufficient as a woman and professional in 2025. My husband has a music degree, but not a teaching certificate, and he earns more than I do, teaching private lessons while working half the hours I do and doing almost all of our household
responsibilities. We couldn't afford a wedding, and now we can't afford to start a family. I'm exhausted. I'm heartbroken. And I'm terrified of returning next year. And I love my students with all my heart. Yet, I'm watching this district weaponize our
love for students to justify double-digit raises for executives, some over 13%, while classroom teachers, the lowest paid in the county, are offered just 1.5%. We deserve better.
[Applause] Lisa Lee, [Music] followed by Sarah Rosema. Hi, Lisa Lee. I am an ECSE teacher at Buchanan Elementary and I just wanted to
continue to give voice to these students in our district who don't often get this voice, right? Um, we have seven ECSE classrooms which could be up to 168 students in self-contained. This doesn't
include our SEP severe speech and language impairment programs for early childhood and children who are in GSRP uh preschools under 1755 funding who have IEPs and services within the
building. Um I am advocating support and funding for ECSE classrooms. Um, I was watching and attending a conference about early childhood autistic learners today. And early childhood autistic
learners play, learn, processing sensory input, move their bodies, communicate, relate to the world, reach developmentally milestones differently, right? Different is not less and different is not deficient. At
this point, ECSE classrooms need the sports and funding. GSRP is a grant-based program and receives robust funding and support. Um, in my role as an ECSE, I received six sippy
cups for my classroom. That's it. Everything else came from my own pocket, which is thousands of dollars. Um, autistic learners also have deep interests a lot. Um, 75 to 95% of them do. Um, and that's the way they learn
and engage. Every kid is different. They need stuff. They need their things. For example, one of my kiddos had a deep um interest in fruits and vegetables. He'd come off the bus today every day with real or fake play um emotional support vegetables, ears of corn, tomatoes,
pablano peppers. This is the way I got him. So, I would be buying him food, fresh grapes every day. Um, and there's no line budget for these classrooms for supplies. So, I'm just asking you to consider um putting some more into this
step. I know I have time. Um, giving me some money. I know how to it spent, but um we have a real disappropriation of fundings for DSRP because it's grant based and ECS. Y
Sarah Sarah Rosema followed by Tammy Bosco. All right. Good evening. My name is Sarah Rosma and for nearly two decades, Sibi has been my home and my family. Sibly had an outstanding administrative team. Rose brought experience, passion,
and unwavering drive. Riley contributed creativity, organization, and follow-through. Together with the support of our incredible staff, they helped make Sibly the thriving school it is today. They trusted their staff to make decisions that were bust supporting of their students, even if that meant
going against the GRPS norm. These women were truly golden. Now, this leadership is being torn away. Both have resigned and are moving on to districts that will hopefully treat them with the respect and professionalism that they deserve. Then there's my hardworking friend Rachel. She stood
here and told you bravely that she can't even afford to live. This is not okay. Rachel is not the only one in this district having to work two or three jobs just to get by. Teaching is a full-time job. It demands mental, emotional, and physical energy.
Yet somehow, those furthest removed from the classrooms are earning six-f figureure salaries, while the educators and support staff on the front lines are barely scraping by. Sheena, Lorie, Maddie, and Maddie are four amazing ASD teachers in our building. They are passionate, tireless advocates for their
students, but they are constantly understaffed and underresourced. They cannot safely and effectively do their jobs without that proper support. These students require, as she said, specialized instruction, personal care, toileting, and behavior management. That takes trained and consistent staffing,
not just substitutes, not just bodies. Maybe ask those departments what they actually need instead of just assuming you know what they need. Lastly, there's my friend Bernice, who just retired with the district after 37 years. She held both a master's and a
specialist degree. Her test scores were consistently among the highest. She was a lead mentor and changed the lives of hundreds of students, families, and staff. Yet, despite her legacy, she never earned close to what those at Franklin campus make. Please show us you
care. Please pay us a living wage. Allocate your resources equitably. Please, please, please. Tammy Bosco, followed by Rosyn Charles Mah. Hello, my name is Tammy Bosco. I'm here
as a volunteer through Keystone Community Church, which has been a community partner of Sibly School for 25 years. Uh myself, I spend 15 to 20 hours at Sibi along with my partner in the back. And this past year, we've had 27
Keystone volunteers for a total of 65 hours a week. This summer, we are supporting a first grade classroom at Harrison Park. For the past eight years, I've watched Rose Maher, Riley Sunday, and Sarah Scott, the KSS
coordinator, build trust with the staff, students, and their families and p provide a sense of belonging for all of us. The loss of Miss Maher and Miss Sunday is heartbreaking for the sibly familia and the whole community and for Keystone Community Church. I think
everybody's brought up the reasons that people are leaving GRPS. Um, and I know MiveVE had an article last week that that showed that the GRPS teachers are the lowest paid and I find that really unacceptable. As a committed volunteer with a
long-standing community partner, Keystone, I urge you to include staff, families, and community partners in choosing the next principal for Sibly School. Sibly needs to maintain the growth and the stability that it's had
for the past eight plus years and it falls squarely on your shoulders. And please do the right thing for the children. Thank you [Applause] Charles May followed by Melissa Ready.
[Applause] All right. Good evening. At 51 years old, I have spent half my life with this district. I believe I have earned my time to speak. I have tried to get on the agenda twice this year and was told
unless it was a celebration, my voice must be through public comment. So, I come to you this evening for two things. To explain my exit and why the district should commit to Sibi Elementary by finding a leader.
Simply put, GRPS did not offer a competitive wage in a retirement for someone like me. Furthermore, what was difficult to understand is the salary schedules that were just released along with the narrative regarding experience steps. To see that someone was on leave
and elevated at least three steps in experience in two years was unclear to me. I have asked two different times within the last five years for a review of my salary based on 18 years of
teaching experience. Twice I was told no, your teaching experience is not part of that principle steps. Dr. Roi, I sent a vulnerable email to
you regarding my finances and asked for a position in the summer school program two years ago as it is almost impossible for me to get a teaching position because I am not GRE. Those positions are first filled with them.
I would have finished my career in this district had I been awarded a wage where three of my highest paid school years would have given me a livable retirement. As for Sibi, I leave a building whose trajectory
continues to disrupt. In 2019, our PD launch began with a collection of interviews I gathered from previous students from Ottawa, Central, and Union. Those interviews parallel par paralleled the research from the opportunity myth. Maybe you have heard
of it. Uh it's a 2018 study that proved that black and brown students nationwide were not given access to grade level material in their high school coursework and thus they were not college and career ready. When looking at our own
data from 23 24 and it's public, it's my school data. families. You can look this up. In the non-them high school here in GRPS, of the juniors tested, only 21% were
proficient in ELA. And of juniors tested in math, huh? No, please let me speak. 5%. Over the past two years, Sibli Elementary has led the district in the fall to spring growth in both reading
and math. When we were recognized in the school news network for that achievement, I celebrated publicly in a Facebook live because that's what leaders do when their students and staff work hard and succeed. Yet, instead of encouragement, I received an email, not
from you, Dr. Roby, from someone in the district telling me that my excitement and was wrong and premature. But isn't that what we want? Don't you want a school that disrupts inequities,
accelerates growth, and proving what's possible? That's time. Why don't you see Sibi? Dr. Watson saw our achievement, and for that, I am grateful to her and Matthew Kendall, two people who truly saw the tireless work of our staff.
My ask of you is this. Make sure the next principal understands that you've built here. Honor the solid foundation and familia energy that lifts this school. And to the board and district leadership, take down the
billboard that shouts achievement until you are willing to match it with action. Pay your hardest working people a live livable wage and show humility. Thank you. Melissa ready. [Applause]
Can I go after someone else, please? You You are the last. I'm just teasing. Sorry. Good evening, Dr. Roby, President Davis, and members of the board. My name is Melissa Ready, and I am a proud Sibly
parent. I would like to take a moment to thank you for sending out the community input survey for parents and caregivers. I appreciate families being able to help inform the interview process. The clearest memory I have from the
elementary school I attended was a banner that said, "It takes a village." I don't think I've ever seen a truer example of this in work than you can see at Sibi. The loss of both Miss Maher and Miss Sunday is tremendous.
But they alone are not what makes Sibi great. It's the community. The teachers and staff, the community partners and volunteers, and the families and scholars are what makes us great. It's the shared goals of everyone coming together to work and care for another,
the Sibly Familia. Of course, our teachers are excellent, but it's way more than that. There's staff at the door welcoming scholars by name. There's parents who give their bene who give their time to benefit their children's classrooms and the
whole school. There's volunteers to tutor scholars not just because some may be behind but because others are also ahead so scholars can have materials at their level. There's community partners to enrich the lives of the scholars and the families.
As a sibly parent, I hope that our next principal and assistant principal have some or all of the following qualities. bilingual, comfortable with the community school model, and have a can do attitude. While there are days that are flatout busy and hard, those aren't the currents
that run through Sibi, even on the bad days. Sibli's vibe is support. Staff supporting each other, community partners supporting the staff, everyone supporting the scholars. I'm here today to request that the assembly familia
walk with GRPS in the interview journey to find a new principal and assistant principal. Our familia is strong, wise, and dedicated. Thank you. I just want to I just want to clarify
that I recognize that Rose that you are important to this community and it's not that I call time because I don't want to hear your voice. I want to give it an equitable um for everybody should have the same amount of time, an equal amount of time.
We can't preference certain people. We're the community and we want to hear her. I understand that you want to hear her. That doesn't necessarily have to take place at our meeting. We are trying to we are trying to conduct a meeting and
we have policy in regards to public comment. Thank you. This is not a conversation. Thank you. You work for our community. You don't understand that like I'm going to have to homeschool myself. We are not engaging in a conversation right now.
So we can't ask questions. Not during a public not during our meeting a public meeting. We don't engage in conversation. Does anyone else know what happens? Moving on. You can move out into the hall and have that conversation.
Um, moving on to superintendent comments. Um, I don't have any additional comments. Okay. Board member comments. Um, do you have a order? We're going to have board member
comments first and then we'll move um Trustee Moreno. Um as uh Trusty Rodriguez shared uh we got to attend a conference last week. Oh
man, I am so bad at this. Uh attend a conference last week and I'm really excited to share during uh our next time together. Uh I do think it aligns with some of the goals I wanted to share uh during the retreat space that I wasn't able to attend. So uh yeah, I'm excited
for that conversation. Uh I think one of my biggest takeaways, I'm still processing a lot of different things. Um but uh we got to hear uh from one of the candidates in the mayoral race in New
York and that was really inspiring. I uh went to my room and honestly cried, had a little tear. Uh just kind of appreciating the solidarity conversation that he had shared in his uh presentation to us. Uh and it just makes me think of, you know, making some of
those like bold choices for ourselves. You know, what does that look like in uh this kind of political era? Uh where maybe we might not always agree uh but we have to kind of step into something that we might not be comfortable with u but need to kind of lean into those hard moments. So, I I'm I'm really grateful
and I know the uh gals already left, but I'm just appreciative of the three Latino women who were here uh especially uh speaking another language coming in front of us. I just I really am grateful for that those stories.
Trusty Melton, no comment. Trusty Rodriguez. Uh ditto to everything. Trusty Moreno said, um, and, uh, you know, I just appreciate us
being able to have robust discussion around a lot of things that, you know, are concerns for our community. Um, and I just want to say that I appreciate everyone being open and honest to, you know, what what our beliefs are on that
and being respectful of um, folks who may be staying in opposition, but uh, as Trusty Moreno said in that and it was uh, uh, Brad Lander. I'll name him, shout out Brad Lander, New York City controller. But, uh, I do agree with
that sentiment that sometimes progress takes folks being humble enough to say, "This isn't my race to win, but I'm going to support someone else who's who's putting in just as much work, if not more work." Um, and I think we have to just continue to uplift each other u in this political realm that we find
ourselves in because I mean honestly sometimes I just think of the future looking so bleak that I think man we we have no one but each other so that's how we have to move forward. Trusty Wade. Um I want to uplift the scholars that
were here earlier um and congratulate them um on a season, a debate season that was very successful. I want to give a shout out to our scholar Kyler who went to play
math hoops on behalf of the Detroit Pistons through the STEM greenhouse. He went to New York and he finished in third place, which is really uh dope. And um shout out to STEM Greenhouse for all the amazing work that they do. I saw
some of their youth in the crowd today. And um thank you for everyone who came and um had such vulnerable um comments and um I
appreciate public comments so much. It is it is a very hard thing to do. It's hard to get up there. It's hard to sit up here a lot of times and and even be vulnerable in front of audience. So, um I appreciate everyone that comes out and
um I I enjoy the support for our principal who is leaving the district and um I I hope the best for sibling. Thank you, Trusty Williamson. Um as we're aware, we don't yet have a
state education budget. Um so it's it's something that I mean we are aware of because we're in the space, but I don't think generally the public's aware of. So, I just want to uh highlight that and also like highlight that our delegation in Lancing, I think, is being firm advocates for, you know, GRPS and public
education in general. Um, but just recognizing like there are people there that do not want to fund public education and that's a real threat and I think whatever we can do in our capacity as board members and also the community in your capacity as citizens uh to advocate and you know support those
folks in Lancing who are defending public education, but also call the folks that uh don't seem to care about it and want to get rid of our funding to do other things. Um, and that's going to hurt our kids and it's going to hurt educators. So, I just want to uplift that for everybody's awareness. Um, that
this is probably the most important thing going on in the state right now. Um, it's going to affect, you know, every child across the state and, you know, our kids here in the district. So, just want to highlight that for everyone. Trusty Davis, I don't have anything to say that hasn't
been said. Thank you, Trusty Kilpatrick. Um, I don't know. I'm I'm sitting here in a human body feeling lots of feelings at the moment and I just want to um express with gratitude the heart that enters this space and what is shared
here. Um I do feel charge to um to act um on behalf of the voices we've heard tonight. Um, and I I guess I'm also just curious around
how this feeling, this energy can be better communicated with and um and I feel that that is a district responsibility. So um that's where I'm
sitting as we step into close session and I have no further comment. Um, so we will move into our close.