All right. Uh, call the meeting to order at 6 PM on April 8th, 2026, the planning board meeting. I'm Stephanie Slush. I am your chair. To my right, I have Jimmy Tar, alternate chair. Far end, I have Doug Finn. To my left, John Jeffris and
Lee Bell. And then I have Lori Bard here, our administrative assistant. Um, first item, as always on the agenda, is public forum. This is an opportunity for folks who are not on the agenda to speak. Um, we cannot really deliberate anything fully here if you're not on the
agenda, but you are here. There's someone here that would like to speak. >> Yes. Larry, 28 Street. I was here last month >> and I was asked to come back because I need a special permit >> for the for my addition I would like to
put on my property. All right. So, just so folks are aware of what happened between the last meeting and this meeting, um the what hap we had um him Mr. Liry come forward saying he wants to put a bay in
his gar in a garage. Um there was question um from there is like cuz your developer or whoever your contractor or whatever recommended coming to the board then it was a conversation of what he wanted to do if it was um because it's for the
business that is operating at or there's a business operating there. Um we had we looked into it on the back end the zoning enforcement and there hasn't been a like it's not it's not zoned for a business but because it's been operating
as the way it has it's pre-existing non-conforming but that means if there's any additions that need to be happened or any sort of supplemental thing it has to he'll be uh it's recommended that he apply for a special permit um potentially home
occupation for the home occupation bylaw. And so now you're here. >> Yes. >> It's just a garage. It's not a >> It's not any additional living space.
>> Yep. Understood. So with I'm curious who how did we who told you to come here? I'm just curious on that piece. Well, the the um >> town counselor >> the the u the contractor
>> y >> you know said moving forward to get the permit that I should reach out to the planning board which I did >> and then you know I came last month and and >> y >> they looked at my plans and >> they seemed like everything was fine >> and but there was some a question on to
how my property is listed because when I I put an addition on for my mom back in 0506 six. >> Mhm. >> And when I had the planning board meeting, then they the permit was issued as a a single family with an in-law
apartment >> with a special permit. So, I was told >> everything should be fine. That's the setbacks and all the that stuff is fine. The as long as it's a single family with an in-law apartment, you know, the way it was written up, it should conform to
the to the property offsets and everything. >> Mhm. So yeah, the thing the whole thing is the reason why it's special permit is because there's also a business operating on there. It's not zoned to have a business operating out of there. And so because you've been operating in there for the length that you have, it's
not grandfathered or pre-exist now a pre-existing non-conforming use. And so that means you have to go through the special permit process in order to in and for home occupation, I would say. And so you need to meet the criteria in our zoning bylaws for that. I think it's
called home occupation is the right language. And so that means that I'm just going to pull them up here. It has to meet certain criteria for the special permit and then the special to go through the special permit process. You notify the abuters. The butters will
come in um or have opportunity to come in and give input on the project as well. Um I'm just pulling up. Uh the home occupation means that the outwork manifestation such as noise, public service, and
utility demand is not unlike those of a dwelling unit in the neighborhood. No more than one person other than the family member residing on the premises shall be in no more than one person other than the family members residing on the premises shall be engaged in the occupation. the use of the dwelling unit for the home occupation shall be clearly
incidental and sub in insubordinate to its use for the residential purpose purposes by its occupants meaning that the home occupation shall not occupy more than 40% of the gross floor area of the dwelling unit. So that would be a question that I would have if you were to come forward with that on the
proposed garage bay piece. Um, there's should be no change in the outside appearance of the building or premises other than or other visible evidence of a conduct of a home occupation other than one non-illuminated sign not exceeding four square ft in area. No traffic shall be generated by such a
home occupation in greater volumes than be normally expected in a residential neighborhood or any need for parking generated by the conduct of such home occupation shall be off the street other than the other than in a required front yard. And then no equipment or process shall be used in such a home occupation
which generates noise, vibration, glare, fumes, odors or electrical interference detectable to the normal senses of the lot in the case of electrical interference. No, no equipment or process shall be used which creates visual or audible interference and any radio or television receivers off the premises or causes fluctuations in line
voltage off premises. It's funny how specific we are in some areas of that and others not. But anyway, so that is the piece that we'd have to apply for the special permit process and come back and give time to notify the butters and that kind of thing. How that process works is with a special permit there's a
public hearing in component and so that means we need to publish it in the gazette >> and in order to do that you need this is mass general law and that means that we have to post it in two consecutive weeks before the hearing. So that means you need to get all your special permit application
materials together at least two weeks before our our next meeting. So it's a complicated PL process in that regard, but that's mass general law. That's not up to us in that piece. And Lori can help with that. Um,
but that's the way forward for this >> and I and I know that we've had some people out and new, you know, so Bellish was is was supposed to be back today, but her travel got delayed and she can help support along with um
pointing you to the right the right stuff so that we can do this the right way. >> Okay. >> Can I >> Yeah. >> ask a question. If an any hypothetical applicant can wants to come in and they know what they want to do, but they're not sure what section of the zoning bylaw might regulate that particular
thing that they want to do. Can they simply apply for a special permit for the purpose of and then name the thing they want to do without citing a specific section of the zoning bylaw? >> I don't know. >> When I spoke to Andrew
a couple of weeks ago, he implied that that was the case that that all we all he needed to do was apply for a special permit. >> Yep. That's >> and and that that the hoops were very small to jump through. >> Yeah. So, we could do one or the other.
Yeah. I think that would be the Bella's recommendation. So, in in another hypothetical, if someone says, "I know I want to put in a and I'm making something up, an Olympic size swimming pool, and that's the thing I want to do, but they on their application, they put down the wetlands conservation section
of the zoning bylaw, then the response to the the on the planning board is going to be there's no way we can approve what you want to do using this section of the bylaw." It's a fair using a hammer to screw in a bolt. >> I think >> I've done that before. Doesn't work. Well, >> I would say it's a little bit of in between. It's like it shouldn't be our
job to make the argument. It should be the applicant's job to make the argument about how it fits in. So I don't think >> sure >> if someone said so that's a little bit of where >> I I just want to make sure that we don't get accidentally hamstrung by someone an applicant or someone advising an
applicant to use a certain section of the bylaw that results in no possible avenue for us to even consider the thing. Right. >> That's all. >> Are are you suggesting that perhaps this could have been streamlined prior? >> No. Um, I think that based on the
information that I've got so far, I don't have all all the facts. I think the mechanism of a special permit makes sense, possibly a special permit with site plan review, but I don't know that. Um, but I also don't know if I want to limit our
filter our examination of the question through one specific section of the bylaw. >> In this potential instance, you're saying the home occupation? >> Yes. >> Yeah. I'm I'm trying to avoid talking in specifics about the the potential application before we actually get it, but um indirectly suggesting if there's
a way for the applicant to just say, "I need a special permit. I know I need a special permit. Not sure what rules apply." >> Um >> um yeah, some of that work has happened already. So that's Yeah. >> Okay. >> But that is also Bella is supporting.
>> I would trust that Bella and our interim building >> commissioner might be the best to advise. Yep. >> So, >> and there's been some gaps of time off in the last couple of weeks for all that. >> Understood. >> Um, apologies. We can't do anything like for sure tonight and you know have
having the process in place to for the special permit and understanding how that works. >> Special is going to be put in right. >> Yeah. And then we can >> this will be reviewed two weeks from now, >> right? >> Publicly. So do >> gives your neighbors a chance to get >> I mean I can tell you all my I've
already asked told all my neighbors I was doing it. >> Good way to get ahead of it, >> right? >> Obviously work on all their cars. >> Yes. >> So it's it's not a problem. But >> just we're kind of you get handcuffed to it. That's the way we got it. >> So am I going to get paperwork that I
have to fill out and and do I have to do the abutters thing? You know like or is there like the does the town give me the list? >> Yeah. the town the town give me the list of the new club butters I need to know about >> you can go you can go on to the town website >> oh boy
>> or if you or if it's easy I can print it out >> you swim by the town it's easy to yeah it's easy to get there >> I don't really mind like printing stuff out so you're going to need to get the application you have to do it in duplicate needs to be filed at the town
clerk's office there is a fee I think special permits $300 so there's a fee for that you will go to the assessor 's office. That's Jenny. And she will give you the abutters list. And the there's instructions in the application of how all that works. But
>> and that that gets f that just go come in downstairs. >> Right. So once you have it all filled out and everything done, you go to the town clerk's office. You file it there. Then it comes to the planning office, which is Bella and I. >> Who's So Are you going to give me the paperwork that I need to bring to the town?
>> I can do that if you come by. I'm tomorrow. I'm in that office from 7:30 to 12:00 and Friday I'm there from 7:30 to noon. >> So if you want to get it this week, you can do that. Yep. >> Yep. >> Okay. >> And then I can give a little explaining
more and then you can be on your way to getting all the things you need to get together >> for next meeting >> for the next and the meeting the next meeting is May 6th. So >> the first >> if we >> and you would need to get all of that. >> Mhm. posting in the gazette, the mo the
all of that at least two weeks ahead of that. So yeah, in the next couple weeks you'd have some of that administrative work to do. And then Bella should be in tomorrow morning as well. >> Be in at some point tomorrow. I'm not sure. Probably >> saying you might overlap. It might be worth it if you're coming and see her as well to talk.
>> I don't I don't know if like maybe noon >> even, you know. Okay. >> Only cuz then >> I'm I'm pretty sure if she's going to be in that's about when she'll >> So a little bit before >> definitely be there. And that's in the for which which office downstairs. >> So >> except for Lori.
>> So if you go past the elevator on the second door on the left. >> Okay. >> Past the elevator. I'm the ne You'll see the bubbler. My door's the next door. >> Yes. >> Next to the bubbler. >> Next to the bubbler. Second door on the left. >> I had to move my hands a little. >> Okay. All right.
>> Thank you. Thank you everyone. >> Thanks Mark. >> You're welcome. >> Um I meant to do this at the top, but I feel like it's Um, also want to take a moment to acknowledge the passing of Kyle Scott, who was our, uh, building inspector and zoning enforcement
officer. Um, I, you know, this is horrible news to hear that he passed and dealing with the health challenges and, um, definitely appreciate what he's done for the town in the role and, uh, his accessessibility and ability to to
support. Um, and I don't know if anyone else wants to say anything. Just take this time to acknowledge acknowledge that >> I have also spoken to the new guy just to see, you know, what his story is
and uh his availability, his, you know, he's trying really hard to get up to speed on us in town >> and uh seems to be extremely qualified. That's great to hear. >> That's Walt. Wall-ally, right? >> Walter. Yeah. Walt.
>> His last name. >> Merrick. >> Walter. Merrick. >> Yeah. >> Wally. >> Merrick. >> And uh he's evidently been around the Western Mass neighborhood quite a bit. >> Yep. >> Great. >> I don't know if it's if there's precedent or not. I would be happy to
make a motion to set aside a page in the minutes in memory of Kyle Scott. >> I'd second it. Any other discussion? All in favor? >> I I >> All right. Thank you.
>> All right. Um approval of the minutes. We have our January 15th meeting minutes here. Looks like Lee, you weren't here, so you can't vote on that. >> Yes, ma'am. >> And John, maybe two. It looks like >> I will make a motion to approve as
presented. So >> that's the one pager. >> That's the special as the offsite meeting. Yeah. >> Second from Jenny. Um all in favor three of us. I >> All right. The January 15 minutes pass.
Uh the February 4th minutes. I was not at those so I can't vote. Um but it looks like y'all were there. >> No John again. No John. >> Did we miss John in that attendee list? Were you here? >> I'm not sure because I don't remember
any discussion about the Mike Bart. >> Weren't you remotely here for that meeting? >> I'm not sure. >> Jimmy was chairing the meeting. Were you ever here with Jimmy chairing a meeting? >> You were senior night. >> That's basketball. Yeah, I was senior night basketball. >> So, was it really just the three of us for that one?
>> Yeah. >> Yeah. I don't remember any discussion of the Barlet letter that you guys wrote. >> Okay. >> I make a motion that we accept the minutes as presented. I'll second. >> Any further discussion? All in favor? >> I I
>> All right. February meetings minutes passed. Thank you, Lori, for those. >> Thank you, Lori. >> Um, the one and only uh item on the agenda is the continuation, not continuation of the hearing because we've closed that, but continuation of the conversation on the zoning bylaw
amendment we would like to bring to town meeting this year related to the battery battery energy storage systems. You mean the zoning section >> bylaw? Yeah. You know, um so at our last meeting, we
um essentially approved with some minor edits s um what what Bella put together. She did a great job and great work on this. Um the approval was then the approval was based also to send to our at town attorney and his response back
was Bella. With apologies for the delay, I've attached my draft bylaw with my fairly modest proposed changes and comments. I became concern concerned about the establishment of new funds for mitigation and to secure decommissioning obligations. But under general law,
chapter 44, section 53K, we can have the select board approve the creation and application of these funds. As ever, feel free to call me. Please note that for the time being, I can only be reached on my cell, which is I'm not going to put the cell number out of our attorney. Thanks, Tom. Um, and Bella
went to a select board meeting to talk about this adding vote to do this, and they the select board seemed like they would be open to do this if that was the avenue that needed to happen. So I am now curious and I think I have to read 44 53k.
>> Mhm. >> We can have the select board approve the creation and application of these funds. If we don't have the ability, if if we get a large project in and we want to hire a consultant to help us review this project, >> then it needs to be a decision that we
make and we go right to the applicant and say we are invoking our right to request these funds for this review purpose. >> We don't want the select board weighing in. It's not their purview. It's not their responsibility. It's outside of their wheelhouse. Um likewise, if we
want the applicant to file a bond or have a policy to ensure decommissioning of a facility, it is not the select board's responsibility to step in and to advise or supervise or anything. I'm hoping what this language refers to is,
as I mentioned before the meeting started, adoption of that section. >> Mhm. uh local option adoption of that section which then enables it for us which that's the only outstanding concern I have. >> Yep. >> Um and if
>> so it seems that this should be our purview, not necessarily the select board or per perhaps anybody else. >> We clarify Tom's comment there. >> Yep. Um, and it's funny because he's like, I'm concerned that we can't establish the funds. And it's like, it
seems it's not a concern, >> but the state, it's the state's model bylaw suggested that we create that. So, I thought that was funny. >> So, where theoretically should the funds come from? >> Oh, no. We asked the applicant. >> Okay. Oh, the applicant pays it. >> Make that part of this law that you need to carry decommissioning funds. You
can't just abandon the thing in our town. We want to make it such that you have to bake into your installation decommissioning or even bonds for the construction. >> So, do we have the power to do that? And Tom says kind of yes or
>> he says yes, >> the select board can do it. >> He says yeah, the select board might need to just like approve that we can set up this fund because it has to do with money and that's what we don't we don't have authority over, >> right? So, my quick read of 4453K is essentially would only come into
being if we um if we asked for something to secure the decommissioning of the facility and the applicant chose to give us a check for $200,000 or whatever the amount was. in which case the town would then have
to create a fund, deposit that money, make sure it's getting interest, and then provide reports to the applicant to the operator and the owner of the facility until the facility is decommissioned at the end of end of its life. I've never heard of anybody saying, "Oh, sure. I'll be happy to give
you 200 grand to secure the Usually, it's an insurance policy. Usually, it's a bond. In some cases, it's been a an affidavit that gets recorded at the registry of deeds. um any one of which are are things which are actionable and enforceable by the town. So
on on the outside, yeah, um the 53k also applies to a case where uh like a host agreement for like a cannabis operator where they would be bringing in money and paying money for a specific purpose and that money has to be kept separate for police operations
or specific uses. We're not going to be asking for that. At least I don't think we would. It's basically authorizing select boards to create accounts >> just to establish >> portable accounts. >> Yes. Yeah. >> And Yeah. And they would only need to do that if we requested it. So, >> and the onus of responsibility is on the
applicant to create this account or >> Well, that's what we're trying to put in the bylaw. >> Yeah. Um Okay. I'm My concerns are met. I'm fine with that. >> Yeah. Yeah. And the rest of his um recommended changes were like
insubstantial to >> the >> y >> what we're recommending which is great. It means that one the state bylaw model is good and Bella did a really great job. >> Mhm. Absolutely. The only other comments I would like to make is is I took some time this
afternoon. Um I pulled all of the the changes, corrections, all the, you know, the alterations and I pulled all the blue boxes with the text that came from the state out of >> the document. Um did some reformatting, cleaned it up a little bit. I didn't
change any of the text, any of the language, but um I'm assuming this is going to go into the >> your copy. I'm just letting that's your copy with no gray here or like nothing here >> is the one that Doug cleaned up. >> Yeah, the I'm assuming this is going to
go into the section of the bylaw after section 7 >> B.0 or 7B.0 or something like that. Um so I just made some suggestions as to how we can work that in properly. >> Um and sort of re reorder things a
little bit. Yeah. >> Great. and knowing that the e-code 360 work that we're doing will hopefully shape share that up too. Cool. >> Right. >> Okay. >> That's the only thing I had to say. >> Thank you for doing that, Doug. >> Yeah. Um, >> anyone else any comments on this before
because the next step would be I guess us like officially approving it to be sent to the select board to be included in the town warrant which would then also go from a a final review with council like all of our warrant articles. So, are we trying to get this
at the town meeting? >> Yep. >> Okay. Okay. So, >> it would precipitate us to make all these things move quickly. >> Yeah. We have to basically approve tonight, >> right? We have a month, less than a month. >> Well, it's already we already did the hearing and everything. So, it's we just have to approve it so that it can then
be finalized with the town attorney. And then at our next meeting, I'd like to spend a little time um hopefully reviewing like a handout or something because town meeting is >> I think the week after or two weeks after our next meeting. So >> I move to approve this with these edits. Send it to the select.
>> I second that. >> Any further discussion? >> All in favor? >> I. >> Great. Approved. One step closer to town meeting. Um Bella is not here tonight. Uh so the other agenda item for her is
not here. However, I will just give one little update in her uh so one two two little updates. One, I had met with the finance committee between last meeting and this meeting around increasing our budget and increasing the scope of Bella's hours.
>> How do they like that? >> They seem amendable. Um although >> everybody's surprised. >> Although it was a 20% increase in our budget which is like but when our budget is like a tiny little slice of the overall
>> right yeah >> budget it was >> 20 20% in percentage seems you know significant in dollars it's >> insignificant >> right it was like less than $10,000 maybe um or around that. So yeah, the So
that is something that um we would vote on at town meeting. I'll have to see if it gets approved through that. It was promising based on my conversation. We'll see if it gets through and then that would be an increase in her hours. Um >> that would be good. >> Yep. >> Hopefully.
>> And do we have a plan to speak at the town meeting in support of that? >> Um it's lumped in with a bunch of other stuff. So, like I don't unless someone specifically called it out like I would, but you never know. You never know. I appreciate you asking the question.
>> I've been I've been to I have no problem standing up and basically, you know, extolling her virtues and and encouraging. Well, >> she does for years. >> The the value of a trained professional to any volunteer board is it I don't think it can be measured. Right. >> Well, and she's already paid for herself
in the amount of grants that she's gotten, which I would als that's my second agenda item is around the $96,000 we got from the state from the onetop for growth. >> Yep. >> Grant that allows us to get a consultant to start doing the work of suggesting
recommendations to our zoning bylaws in our map. >> Yeah. >> Finally getting that RFP out there this week. So, um that we have to use those funds by the end of 2027. And so it'll give like 18 monthsish probably for someone I think we're getting asking applications to come in by mid basically
giving a month. >> And who are we seeking applications from? >> There's some like portal that you you upload your RFPs to I guess in in >> the qualifications of what person are we >> we're looking for someone um like a version of the planning of the PBPC.
>> Okay. Yeah. >> Those types of folks. >> Okay. There are some private, you know, firms that do this. DBPC is like quasi, right? Like public and municipally owned. So, >> um, people have to apply to get these RFPs. Hopefully, we'll get more than
one. That's so we can >> hopefully we'll get one. >> I'll be interested to see it when it's put together. >> Okay. >> It's finalized. >> Yep. I can send you a draft. It's just going to get finalized from Bella before we put it out there, but I can definitely share. >> Hopefully, we get at least one.
>> Oh, come on. Not I no I >> the RFP delicious enough you'll get multiple >> I mean our municipal RFPs are not very delicious John but >> very intriguing reading >> but it's a $96,000 like that's pretty meaty for what we're asking someone to do. So I'm excited.
>> And would that be to pay for somebody that we're hiring? So we're not asking for somebody to come do this. We're looking to hire somebody to come do this. >> Correct. And there's going to be some like some of the funds will go towards like probably hosting a couple of events
to get community input. So some of the budget will go to that. Some of the budget will go to like printing maps probably. Like I'm just hypothetically coming. It's not all just going to a consultant but in like paying them for their time, but a lot of the money will be to them paying for them for their time. >> Um I do have one related thing before we
close if possible. Um and it's only I'm only bringing it up because of the time timing of it all. >> Yep. Um, I sent the email this afternoon and made the suggestion about changing some of the headings in the in the zoning bylaw. >> Um, specifically
>> the best one that we were just talking about. >> Yeah. Uh, section 7 in the zoning bylaw is a header. It's called storm water management, but section 7.1 is storm water management and all the subsections relate to storm water management. Then there's section 7A.0
medical marijuana. Then there's section 7B.0 zero marijuana establishments. Would this board support a request for a warrant article to simply renumber those things? So, it's section 7. Uh, what did
I actually call it? Um, >> special development regulations. >> So, are you asking for a completely different warrant article? Because I don't think that's too late. >> Yeah, it would be a separate warrant article. That I think might be too late cuz we had to give placeholders to ask if how many like what weren't articles like a couple months ago.
>> Really? >> Mhm. I know that's something simple. Maybe it's allowed, but I also also like we've gone this long for it. Eco3 is going to do it. >> Okay. >> It'll be fixed in a year as much as it might irritate you. >> Okay. Yeah. The the sort of like
>> the OCD part of me is just itching over here and just like shaking, you know? >> So, Poor just because you're the most organized person I know. So like >> I don't know about that. But uh you should see my garage. Uh the uh
>> we're talking about our lives. >> Yeah. Seven uh but I mean we are going to be submitting this as a new section 7.3. >> Mhm. >> Which fits in with that idea of renumbering those other sections. I feel like in the past too when we've submitted this like
>> we didn't know the number and just it got all shook out after the fact. So I don't know if we need to be >> Oh yeah. Well, if it gets shaken out after the facts and they're numbered after the fact, then we can number these without town meeting approval. If we can recodify, but I my understanding is that if it's printed in the zoning bylaw, you
can't change it without town meeting approval. So, I would rather suggest this as section 7.3, battery energy storage, and that's where it goes. >> And we'll figure the other things out later if we can. >> It'll all come out in the e-code 360. >> It'll all come out in the ecode.
>> Could that be part of anyway >> eventually once the eco 360 does? >> Are we moving all of section seven? No, I don't know. I feel like because they're two separate things, they probably need to be two separate ones. Well, >> we could squeeze it in. We could say to
see if town meeting will vote to approve a change to section 7, renaming it from this to this. A change from section 7.1 and well section 7.8.0, renaming it from this to this. Um, and further to adopt section 7.3 battery energy storage as
printed in the packet or whatever. I mean, maybe it gets really complicated and confusing. I'd rather just battery energy storage 73 and we'll figure out the rest later. >> Yeah. >> I mean, I guess you could do that and then if you want to send something, I
can run it by Andrew tomorrow. >> The last part is to keep it simple for >> Yeah, I'm Well, I'm happy to work up a separate um motion, draft motion to change those sections just to rename those sections. I'm fine with that and I can get it to you tomorrow.
>> And if Andrew >> Well, you guys have to kind of >> vote on that. vote on it now so that then you >> do we need a hearing though for like a public hearing to have a warrant article. It's too late. >> I'd like to make a motion to approve uh the order that Doug's about to write out
>> cuz he's going to do a damn fine job on it. or we let it get caught because e-code 360 is gonna be tons organiz like just yes just do that's one of the >> so we'll throw it in out of order and then let the order come because that's
what the eco 360 effort partially about right this this is >> fair >> too much duplication >> too much repetition >> bad segmentation y and we're too late at the >> we're contributing to the ball so or too late to the game so >> and I think that would also
>> completely confused people at the at the town meeting >> potentially. Yeah. Not everybody, but but there would be there would be people that are going to be confused by all this and how come I haven't heard about this before and where'd this come from?
You know, the the um 40 town meetings that I've gone to >> lead me to believe that somebody's going to have a question or an issue about virtually anything that isn't completely straightforward. >> Yeah. You have to like be prepared for the most offthe-wall campaign.
>> You abs. We absolutely do have to be prepared for that and prepared for somebody to say, "Why are you doing this? Why do you want to do this?" Not just what you're doing, but why do you want to do >> Why does marijuana and battery energy come together, >> right? Right. And and there will be somebody that steps up and says that
>> making big vape cartridges. No, I'm just kidding. Okay. Yeah. >> Um >> Okay. Tabled then on that or not tabled? >> Yeah. >> Withdrawn? >> I withdraw the request. Great. Okay. Anybody have anything else? Otherwise, our next scheduled meeting is May 6th. I
anticipate a couple of agenda items on there. Um, one potential being who was here at public foruming, but also potentially one related to >> have the other one. >> 12 to 18 Elm Street. It's been turned in. So, I'm working on all of that now. >> Okay.
>> That is that the uh the the house the big house that's notification that's not what um what this face uh Bartlett came with. No, no, >> Mike wants to put up apartments >> and that has to happen. Well, he's requesting funding for like that. Not
yet. He has a few steps to go, I think, before he comes before us. >> But yeah. >> Okay. I was wondering why >> it's no related to 12 or 18 Elm Street in the conification of the Ben that >> Benson property house. Okay. With that
>> motion to adjurnn. >> Second. >> Second. >> Any discussion? >> Go ahead. All in favor? >> I I >> All right. Meeting is adjourned at 6:34. Thanks y'all.