Good morning and welcome to the board. Good morning and welcome to the Board of Adjustments and Appeals Board regular meeting on Thursday, October 23rd, 2025 at 10:00 a.m. If everyone could kindly silence your cell phones and electronic
devices. Um, we're welcoming new members today. Rajie, who I'm ensured is on his way, Aurora, and Barry Donaldson. Nice nice to have you, Barry. >> Good to be here.
Uh, okay. We get to the agenda. If the town clerk clerk could please call roll. >> Okay. Member Donaldelsson here. >> Member Aurora isn't here yet. Member Gordon >> here.
>> Member Leansen. Member Weiss is absent. Uh, Secretary Rosen >> here. >> And Vice Chairperson Thornson >> here. >> Thank you. and town attorney Ruben. Thank you.
>> Okay, we could all rise, please, for the pledge of allegiance. indivisible with liberty and justice for all. >> Okay. Approval of the agenda. Are there any changes to the agenda? If not, is there a motion to approve the
agenda as presented? >> I make a motion to approve the agenda as presented. >> Second. Okay. All in favor say I. >> I. >> Any oppose say nay.
>> Okay. By the way, that is our newest member Rajiv Aurora just walking in. Hello Rajie. Okay. Swearing in of the public. For those giving testimony related to the application on this agenda, please stand and raise your right hand to be sworn
in. >> Okay. By the authority vested in me as a notary of the state authority, you swear affirm that testimony you're about to give the truth, the whole truth, and nothing but the truth. >> Thank you. >> Okay,
for those given Okay, we just did the uh the approval of the minutes. Are there any corrections to the minutes of November 12th, 2024? Okay, hearing none. May I have a motion to approve the minutes? >> Make a motion to approve the minute.
>> Okay. All in favor say I. >> I. >> I. >> Unfinished business. We says we have none. >> New business. There's a development order application number P2-25-31 Seagate of Highland Beach Condominiums,
Inc. >> Do I go on with the next part, Lenel? >> Yes. Yes. >> Consideration of application number PZ-25-31 by Jason R. board and PEOS engineers and architects for a variance to allow a
reduction in the front yard setback from 40 ft to 8t 7 in and to reduce the sideyard the south setback from 12 to 7 ft in order to construct a fire pump structure for the property located at
3224 South Ocean Boulevard. Do any board members have any exparte communications to disclose? >> Okay. >> Is everyone clear what those are? Some of you members. >> Okay. Just want to make sure. Thank you
so much. >> Right. >> At this time, I now open the public hearing. Town planner, please present your recommendations regarding the application. >> Good afternoon. Um, actually, I'm having a problem with the PowerPoint.
I did try to share my screen, but it's not. So, here's the PowerPoint. Yeah. Okay. Yeah, I did that. Yeah, sorry. PowerPoint's right there. >> Sorry, we're having some technical
difficulties. Um, I'll go ahead and start um for the record in Allen Town Planner. Um, I was going to start with the aerials. So, just to make sure you all have your bearings in terms of the subject property, which is the Seagate condominium. Um the aerials actually
start on page 19 of your packets. Uh you could see that the proposed uh fire pump structure is located on the southeast corner of the Seagate uh property. Um if you look at let's see the
um oh I think we might get the power powerpoint working okay I think we're good okay there we go okay I could show you the aerials Okay. So, as I said, the aerials and the photos that I'm going to show you, they're all in your packet. So, this is
a subject property and the proposed firep structure is proposed right here in the in the southeast corner. Uh you could see the four different buildings in the Seagate uh community. Here you have an aerial. This is looking northward. Um again the southeast corner
is where the structure is proposed. Obviously that's South Ocean Boulevard. Um here you have another view. This is looking eastward. Uh so the structure would be located in this area. And then I've with this one we're actually looking southward here. I've
actually gone ahead and put a little arrow here which shows the current uh bulk storage area. When we when I get to the survey of the property, which again is in your packet, you'll see that this area is currently bulk storage. Um it's as I said on the survey, uh the
applicant has indicated that they're going to obviously remove this. This is where the fireprompt structure is going to be located and that the community will no longer have a bulk storage area. I had asked the applicant whether they were going to relocate somewhere else and they indicated that they won't have it at all. So, just want to make that clear.
And here we have uh two photographs. This is the existing bulk area. Again, this is where the structure will be located in this vicinity. And there's the other picture as well. So, I just wanted to recap. Uh the request is again for a variance to allow a reduction in the front yard setback.
That's from 40t to 8' 7 in and to reduce the sideyard setback on the south side from 12 feet to 7 ft in order again to construct the fire pump structure. Uh the proposed firep structure measures 472 ft. It's a height of 10 ft.
Uh according to the applicant, the structure will house two new fire pumps which will service the four residential buildings of the community as well as the fire hose connections at the seaw wall and the dock area. Um the condo was built in 1970. That's according to the
Palm Beach County property appraiser. On page nine, I've gone ahead and provided you the code definition of what an accessory structure is. This is an accessory structure. So I'll uh have you look at that at your if you haven't reviewed it already. Um and let's go to the additional slides. So we have the
plans that the applicant has uh provided. So again this is a survey of the property as I mentioned earlier. This is the bulk storage area. This is where the structure is being proposed. Um this you have the conceptual site plan. I know it's really tiny down here.
Uh that's where the proposed structure is. Again, this is a tabular data that gives you the information about the structure. Uh they've gone ahead and done an enlarged plan. So the top here, this is the existing plan and this is what's proposed down here. You could see the diagram showing uh the uh fire pump
diagram here. And here you have the elevations. So um elevation A is the side view of the building and the elevation B is the front and the back. Here are the remaining uh elevations.
The applicant has also provided some renderings for you. So, this is an existing lift station that is adjacent to the property. Um you can see that they're not proposing to remove any of the landscaping here. So, we'll be um you won't be able to see the uh structure. Um this is from the parking
lot view. This is from the sidewalk view. This is the front elevation. So, you can see this is how the structure will look. And here you have the aerial view here. There's the structure right back here. Then you have across the street. Then you have walking down the sidewalk.
Again, all this landscaping will remain. And then you have a rendering from building B balcony. Uh I did want to add that the applicant indicated that they will uh not have any changes to the number of parking spaces at the property. Um now the board must
determine that the application is consistent with the variance criteria. um on page nine and on the top of page 10, I provided you those criteria according to our code. Uh the applicant has provided their responses to each criteria. That's on page 12 and 13 of
your packets. Um according to the applicant, the current fire pump rooms located in each of the four residential buildings are insufficient to meet the current National Fire Protection Agency code requirements. These requirements include an increased flow rate, which requires larger pumps and clearances for
repair and maintenance. Uh we do have the town fire chief here, uh the assistant fire chief, excuse me, and the fire marshal, Matt Wellaf. He's gone ahead and provided a letter of support which is on page 26 of your packets. And I'm sure Mr. Wilhalf will be glad to address any questions. Um according to
the code, uh the vote of at least four members of the board is necessary to grant the variance. Now if the board does approve the variance um which the the variance is based on these conceptual plans which I just put up on the slide uh their dates stamp received
by the building department on October 1st 2025. Uh the applicant will be required to go before the planning board and the town commission for consideration of a major modification. Uh four major modifications the planning board is the recommending board their advisory board.
They'll provide a recommendation to the town commission and the town commission has the final authority um is the final decision-making authority for major modifications if it applies to a multif family. If this was a single family, the planning board would have the final authority. Uh so with that said, I'll be
glad to address any questions. We do have the authorized agent here uh to address any questions as well. Yes. Good to see you, Ingred. Uh, one question. Uh, the height of the structure that that you noted was 10 ft,
but actually it's saying 4 feet above grade, correct? So, that would make it actually more a 14t structure. >> Well, uh, we have a definition of building height in our code. It's, um, in the zoning code, section 30-131. So, our height, building height is based
on, uh, finished floor elevation. So that's how we determine building height in the town. So it's from the finished floor elevation to a flat roof or if it's a pitch roof, it's you know to the pitch, but yeah. So basically it's it's based on finished floor elevation. >> Okay. Yeah. >> But for code reasons, but visually it's
a 14 or 14 foot building. >> Okay. >> That way, but again based on our definition, it's >> okay. Thank you. >> Yeah, I do have a question for the applicant. Do you need any approval from uh from the Seagate residents or because
this is a considered a necessity there's no approval required >> and if I I just make if I may just clarify the actual applicant when you look at their application on page 11 is the Seagate Highland Beach Condominium Homes. >> Good morning everyone. I'm Jason
structural engineer and director for ONS Associates. Uh we've been working very closely with the association. We've been engaged by the association and the projects moving forward with the association. >> I have a question. >> Sorry.
>> Unless you want to go. >> Okay. Uh looking at A200, the side view of the of the of the build proposed building. If I had a magnifying glass, I could read the dimensions, but uh so so I'll
I'll let you fill in the blanks. Uh it looks like uh the roof of the building is 18'6 off of finish grade. Is that uh I believe it should be 14'6. It's at elevation 18'6. So the grade elevation
in that area varies between plus 3.8 and plus 4.2. So, if we bring the foundation up to the required plus 8t and then we put the 10t structure on top of it, we're at elevation 18 or 18.5. >> Okay. Can can you address the the the
need to raise the uh finished floor so so high off the parking lot? So that's one of the reasons why the existing fire pump locations was unsuitable because the um current Highland Beach code requires that any uh essential services
for the building be elevated 1 ft above base flood elevation and the not the NFPA the um the GIS uh or FEMA I'm sorry the FEMA base flood elevation for this property
is plus 7.5 Or is it 7.0? >> 7.0. So >> the building the building is being raised uh to satisfy that uh requirement. >> The the the foundation or the floor is
being raised above that elevation to meet the requirements of the Highland Beach require uh code. >> Okay. Thank you. Yeah. Few other questions. Uh, so given your dual pump arrangement, I
understand the building's going to be 12t wide, 32t long, that doesn't surprise me. Uh, but if it were located somewhere else, that shape could change. And that leads me to my next question. >> Okay.
Uh there's a statement in the application that says there's only one location on the property that can accommodate the fire pump systems. Explain why the structure or multiple structures could not be added to the side of the existing stair towers at each building or why it is not possible
to construct the desired two pump structures on the grounds near the clubhouse well within the required setbacks. >> Okay. So the area adjacent to the stair towers that you mentioned doesn't have adequate clearance for the equipment be to be
installed so it can be serviced and the uh the parking can be maintained and access to the equipment can be maintained. Um the area inside the essentially courtyard space next to the clubhouse is essentially already assigned to other
functions and areas or um uses within the association. And part of the reason why this area was selected is because the homeowners have a certain expectation and um to not block their
their current views and line of sights and disrupt their their living space because they've been there. They've paid for that. That's one of the expectations that they have. It's not within the uh the grounds of the association to take that away from those residents. >> Okay. All right. But to be clear, I'm
talking about a freestanding structure, not something attached to the clubhouse within the range of assigned >> things. In other words, I'm not saying >> take a space in the clubhouse. I'm saying >> y adjacent. Yep. >> Um,
so, uh, also the application reference on page 12 references eight properties that have permanent structures within the 40oot setback in town. Do you know the nature of those eight structures? There was at least one security building. There are
um what we would consider ancillary or support buildings of the for those specific properties. We didn't go through and investigate each individual one to determine the nature of the building that was there, but we identified or flagged properties that had structures of some sort adjacent to
or within that 40ft setback. >> Okay. Uh and to circle back to the uh height of the structure and looking at the photographs we just saw, I noticed in here there was a statement that the landscaping adequate. It's going to screen it. When I looked at those
photographs though, it doesn't look like it's going to, but we don't have any proposal for enhanced landscaping. >> So from the sidewalk and A1A, >> yes, >> the existing landscaping will screen the structure from within the property
itself. There's no um landscaping proposed to screen the structure. What in our opinion the building that we're going to put there, the structure we're going to put there is more attractive than the uh the bulk storage that they currently have in that place. So it sounds seems counterintuitive to feel
that we needed landscaping for an improvement. >> Yeah. But my concern is strictly with the sidewalk side, not within your own property, of course. >> Uh let's see. So um I want to skip ahead. I I do have a question for the
assistant uh chief fire marshall. >> Okay. >> So the the letter >> Matt Well, assistant fire chief beach fire rescue. >> Thank you. >> Yes, sir. >> Thanks for being here. >> Yes, sir. >> Um so the letter in the package uh
mentions the use of natural gas to run the fire pumps with connections to a gas man that's on A1A. >> Mhm. >> Okay. um that would eliminate the need for an alternate power source. But here here's my concern, and you're
going to have to educate me a little bit on this. It's my understanding in NFPA 20 that NFPA 20 requires a dedicated on-site fuel source. So, if there are exceptions to that, I'm wondering if you
could tell us what are the exceptions and in your mind, are they going to be able to meet those exceptions? So that uh the fact that the onsource uh fuel source is uh FPU natural gas meets that requirement. We're not it's there
there's not an alternate power source requirement and that was why I suggested that they do this. >> So if you had a diesel fire pump for example Yeah. >> Um and they can uh the these types of pumps can run on dual fuel. So, if
that's uh a concern, um but you know, I would consider natural gas in that area to be a pretty reliable uh more more reliable than FPL >> as you guys have probably seen in the last few months. >> Yeah. Well, >> that we had a power outage yesterday as a matter of fact. So, yeah.
>> So, that was one of the suggestions. So, let me uh th this kind of the the location and everything for this particular project kind of came from me. We need a location that's accessible. um the infrastructure underground for the entire project of property is all being
replaced. Um when this when this was built and I can't answer as to why and I I can only tell you that in Highland Beach this isn't this isn't the only property that we have issues with when they originally built I don't know why they weren't built to code. Um now this
project was done uh under Deltrail fire prior to Palm Beach County being in charge. There's a, you know, just the the circumstances back. I grew up here, lived here my whole life. Been in the fire service for over 40 years. So, you know, I'm I'm the history of some of
these things I'm pretty well aware of. Um, the the locations of the pumps that are there, they can't handle where the panels are going to be. We're reducing the number of pumps down to two because they're allowed to use uh a single pump for two buildings. Uh, one of the pumps
is a 1000 gpm pump. the that that's for the uh the more newer buildings um with addition they have I believe they have three Rogers or four three so we're um we're improving the systems and bringing them into compliance all the uh like I
said all the infrastructure there we're adding a fire hydrant on property um our trucks have about 7800 ft of supply line uh to get to building A for example the closest hydrant just you know because you can't go the way the bird flies you got to zigzag through parking lot about
a 900 foot run. So, we're going to be under 200 feet to pretty much every building in there with connection. The state fire code is 100. So, I can't get, you know, I can't change a lot of things to be 100% compliant. This gets us in a
really good place. Um, it's not perfect. I get, you know, that there's some concerns about the location of the structure, but it works for the fire department, you know, and I I'm not, you know, I know there's aesthetics and all those things that come into play. Um, the the rooms where the pumps are, first
of all, don't meet the elevation requirement, which you guys already heard. Uh, the other problem is the control panels and all that won't work in the inside there anymore. The the the pumps requirements are different than they were when everything was installed. The system's going to have alarm an
alarm panel that's tied to it to notify us of pump failure, you know, pump run, um, a whole bunch of other, you know, tampers and flow switches that are attached to the system that doesn't have a location. So, we need a building to put that in. The building's not going to
have a an address necessary. It's going to be addressed to one of the structures, but we already know that, you know, if we have a a fire pump, where we need to go, we have a pump run. That's probably going to be the first place we're going to go. They're going to be updating the FDC, fire department connections to the buildings. So, this
is like a massive project these people are taking on and I appreciate it because it's going to make them safer and it's going to make us way more efficient. Um, you know, we've been right now, um, just so you know, in the urgency of this, you know, these are
15story buildings. Um, 10, what's it 10, but at any rate, the water pressure from street in in Highland Beach is roughly 40 to 50 PSI. Um, you know, you get up to the upper floors, there's not very much water pressure up there. So, we have to make
sure we have water supply and can charge the systems. You know, 40 PSI, you lose five you lose 5 psi every every 10 ft above grade. Um, you can do the math, you're about at zero around eight eight stors, right? So, this is this is
something that's critical. I can only, you know, ask that you kind of help it along. Um, we've been working on this for two years. I've been and you know like trying to get everybody in the right place and this is kind of one of the final hurdles and I I appreciate
what you guys do. I do I've been like I said I've been in this business for a long time retired from Bokeh. Ingred and I have worked together over there here. So um you know that's that's why I'm here just to you know if you have any other questions I'm c certainly happy to to answer.
>> Thank you. I I still have a problem with the fuel source, >> but >> I I mean f you know if you the the question is is it a reliable fuel source? Is any fuel source fully reliable under certain circumstances especially in a
hurricane? I've been deployed to Ian most recently Andrew back in '92. Katrina in uh you know when that went through up in Gport Belux um and I've seen all those areas. Yeah. >> Yeah. Sure.
>> Um I just wanted to clarify that uh right now the system that the association has specified and they're working with the installer to provide is a diesel-powered system with dedicated diesel fuel tanks within the structure. >> I thought it natural gas. No, the generator is tied to the natural gas,
>> but the >> Yeah, but so I don't know if that helps with your question, but they are intended to be diesel. >> It answers my question. Yes. Now, but except it raises another qu. What where is the actual pipe? Is it running off a generator and where is that located? How
how the the pumps themselves run directly off the diesel fuel? >> Yes. The pumps >> and the diesel fuel is contained within the structure. >> Yes. Which contributes to the overall size of the structure. >> Okay. Appreciate it. Thank you. Okay. Um I have I have a quick question. Um
I'm looking at the right after the elevations. There's some some pictures or some generated images and I'm looking at the two at the bottom here. Um it looks like is aesthetically speaking it's going to be almost blocked in by
shrubs or hedges on two sides or two elevations. it will be screened by the existing >> because I I see it in in one photo on the bottom right it looks like the the the hedges you know they they they almost go the they go the entire height
yet on the photo on the bottom left it certainly looks like it's a lot higher than the hedges and that is the front from the sidewalk you know it's going to be very visible from the sidewalk it looks like is what I'm saying >> okay the
the the landscaping on the sidewalk side is quite substantial. Um I don't have the exact number in front of me, but >> that would be some additional information that we can provide or how would we go about resolving that? >> Um well, we could add it maybe as part
of the building permit or >> I mean or it could be a condition that it be fully screened. >> Yeah. And I'm >> whatever that might take. >> Sorry. Um, are there any are there any similar structures this close for the sidewalk as well is what I'd like to
>> um I I've been here almost six years. We've not had uh another variance request for a fire pump structure. Yeah. >> So, I don't know what's out there. I mean, we didn't staff did not do an assessment of all the properties in the town. >> But, as far as another property coming
in for variance to do a similar type structure, as I said, in the six years I've been here, we haven't had anyone come in yet. >> That helps. Thank you. Any other questions? >> Is is the color of the structure uh going to be white as depicted in the
>> the red rings? >> Right now that matches the color of the buildings on property. >> Uh ultimately it will be determined by the uh the association and it will be a a structure that can be painted and you know adjusted as need be. Is there a
preference or recommendation from the >> Well, I'm wondering whether since the hedge around there may, you know, may have some issues uh from season to season and all, uh would you consider muting the the street side, the exposed side to the to the street, uh maybe a
little darker color or making it less obtrusive? >> That's certainly something that could be easily accommodated. >> Okay. Oh, any other questions? Okay. It says here that it's not time for the applicant to make the presentation, please.
>> Or have we? >> Yeah. Yeah. Unless they have anything else to say. >> Yeah. >> Like to add anything by all. >> Okay. Uh I don't have too much to add. I just >> you know, it's been a like uh Mr. Welloff said, it's been a long process and there's been a lot of moving parts
and there's a lot of things happening at the property. We appreciate uh you know your time being available and listening to what we have here and um you know like I said I'm happy to have answer any questions. >> Okay. >> Can I ask you this question?
>> Yeah. >> Oh, absolutely. Um, you mentioned, I think the the assistant fire chief mentioned or or somebody did, that there's many other buildings that have, you know, this this kind of problem
where there isn't enough pump availability for for cover for fire. Should we expect other follow suit once this is approved? Um, do we know? I I'll address that to to
the chief because he's gone out to different properties. We have a lot of older properties in the town as you all know. Again, this building's from 1970. I think you probably have seen now that we have our own fire department. I'll defer to Mr. Wallop, but I'm sure he can elaborate on that. >> I don't expect that. And the reason is
is that uh and the other build I I probably have roughly or we've had more than 15 fire pumps that are in need of replacement or have been re being been replaced. still have some outstanding issues in um in a lot of the uh
buildings. They have parking structures. They have areas that were dedicated to that purpose. Um and the and the areas within the buildings are big enough. So, it becomes a fire pump replacement. What we're running into is power issues because the the the as I said, the controller panel needs to be is required
to be within the area of the pump. Now, um in some of these buildings, they're in two different locations. meaning the shut off. Um that's there's just some changes that need to occur. Uh we're running into some of these problems internally. Um and you know
it's just a matter of building to building things are what they are. So they're not all the none of these none of these projects or properties were ever built in you know the same manner. Um so the problems that are inherent to each one are just at that building.
There's no place to put these pumps internally at that pro property. They just didn't because the the rooms that that were there are being uh have to be used for some other purposes and they weren't big enough regardless and they don't meet the height requirement for
>> I just wanted to make sure that we're not setting some kind of precedent where now there's like, you know, 15 other people going, hey, they got this variance now everybody else wants the same variance. and and to be I mean I went through before we ever got to where you guys with you all um you know we had a lot of discussion about we knew we
were going to probably land here um and it just we were looking for alternatives and this is kind of where we've ended up so uh you know that's why I say I I you know this um we we've done a lot of background work on this a couple other
issues you know with with regard to the water system itself you know we wanted to be closer to the main uh the main connections. We have a 10 and 14inch main off A1A. Um the water department would like us to be a lot closer to to those connections. Backflow preventers
are going to be right there. Um there's a lot of other things that are going to be, you know, be added to this system that really, you know, that aren't really that you guys don't really see. >> It's a it's a huge problem. Much very large. >> Thank you. Just to add to that, legally
every variance is considered on its own. So just because you grant a variance for one does not obligate you to grant a variance for another. >> Perfect. >> Uh just I don't know if it's helpful information, but just order of magnitude to some of the things that Mr. Welloff has mentioned. He mentioned that um the
existing pumps were undersized in the original construction. So what we found when we started working on this project is existing pumps were 250 gallons per minute. what's required by code and what they should have had when they originally were instructed were 750 gallon per minute for two buildings and a thousand gallon per minute for two
buildings. So that that's kind of the order of magnitude of change that we're trying to incorporate into the project we're doing here. Thank you Len. Sorry, I don't see here where we we we take the vote. Is that what we're
doing next? I'm assuming >> there's a motion. >> A motion. Yeah, a motion. Okay. >> Okay. Well, as Lenel has said, a motion to close the public hearing and a motion to approve the project. Um, all in favor
say I. >> There needs Somebody has to make a motion. Needs to be second. >> Oh, thank you. Thank you. >> You're welcome. >> I'll make the motion to close and I'll make the motion to approve. >> Okay. That's the only one you need to do. >> I think you needed two. A >> motion to approve the the variance
application. I will second. >> Member Aurora. >> Yes. >> Me. >> Uh, Vice Chairperson Thoren. >> Yes. >> And member Donaldelsson. >> No. >> No.
Member Leansen. >> Yes. >> Yes. Okay. And Secretary Harris? >> Yes. >> Member Gordon? >> Yes. Okay. Motion carries.
>> Motion approved. Public hearing closed. >> That will be 4 to one. >> Okay. The next one on our agenda is a nomination of the chairperson, vice
chair, chairperson, and secretary for the term ending October 23rd, 2026. Nomination of vice chairman. Are there any nominations? Actually, I'm going to go first. Are there any nominations for chairperson?
>> Well, I nominate Michael Thor as a chair person. >> Thank you. >> Second. >> You accept? >> I gratefully accept and I thank you all. I look forward to >> unless there are any other nominations.
Any other nominations? Um, are there any nominations for vice chairperson? Okay. Any any nominations for vice chairperson? I could recommend Rajie since he's new. He hasn't said anything. >> Okay.
>> All right. There you go. Okay, we need a tiebreaker, folks. >> A point of order. Uh, are new appointees eligible this year or do they have to wait a year? >> That's a good question. >> Okay. >> Okay. Thank you. But, uh, okay.
>> There's nobody >> here. If they don't accept the nomination, then we go to a new member. >> Okay. >> Okay. >> So, >> are there nominations?
>> Uh, are there any further nominations? >> Yeah. Any further nominations? Okay. So, we're still waiting on vice chairperson, >> right? So, pause there. Is there any more nominations for the vice chairperson? Okay. So, now you ask uh member Aurora,
do you accept I don't think they need to if he accepts. So I'd rather he accept. >> Well, then you can decline and Mr. Lson. >> All right, that makes it easy. >> He accept. >> Yeah, he accepts. >> Thank you.
>> Joel is now the I and I guess we say Joel is now the chairp vice chair. >> Vice chair. >> Okay. >> Then the secretary as well. >> No, no, no. Okay. Are there any nominations for secretary? So currently we have a secretary on the board, Mr.
Harris. >> So if you all choose to keep him, you can or you can nominate someone else. >> Okay. All in favor to keep the secretary as it is. I >> Okay. >> Great. So now we just need a motion to
approve all the nominations. You can make one motion. >> Okay. Motion to approve all the nominations. Say I. I. I need a motion and a second. You can make the motion. Someone second it. >> Thank you. >> Thank you. >> Motion carries. >> Thank you.
>> Okay. Um just a reminder, there's a food truck event at St. Lucy Catholic Church tonight, 5 to 8. Hope to see everybody there. And uh that's all we have. The meeting is now adjourned. Uh, thank