recording in progress start my recording all right uh this is the February 25th 2025 open meeting the hopkington Conservation Commission being conducted remotely consistent with an act extending certain covid-19 measures
adopted during the State of Emergency the new law authorizes all members of a public body to continue participating in meetings remotely the open meeting laws requirement that a quorum of the body and the chair be physically present at the meeting location remains suspended for this meeting the hopkington
Conservation Commission is convening by video conference via Zoom app is posted on the town's web meeting calendar and the Conservation Commission agenda identifying how the public may join Additionally the meeting may also be broadcast by H cam through one or many
of its channels or platforms please note that this meeting is being recorded and that some attendees are participating by video conference accordingly Please be aware that others may be able to see you and take take care not to screen share your computer anything that you broadcast may be captured by the
recording supporting materials that have been provided to members of the commission for this meeting are available on the town's website this meeting will feature public comment after commission members and staff have discussed each project application on the agenda the chair will open the discussion to public comment members of
the public who wish to speak are asked to identify their name and address 3 minutes will be afforded for each public comment each vote taken in this meeting will be be conducted via roll call of the members I will now confirm which
commission members are present Ed present Jim present Janine present Ted Ted is present Heather present Matt present and
myself Melissa we have a full house tonight um and I'll now confirmed staff that are present Judy present Anna present and Joe that was
present all right um all right so I guess first off I'll just go over we had quite a few um continuations on the agenda crossed off
hearings so I'll just point out to everyone on the call um our new hearing for 12 North Mill was continued March 11th um the 12 northmill continued hearing was also continued to March
11th um zero Wood Street was continued to March 11th and also the 30 West Main Street application was continued to March 11th so we won't be discussing um any of those hearings I will open the new hearing but we won't
discuss it tonight um with that being said we can go down to um we don't have any documents for review we do have minutes from November 26 2024 so does anyone on the commission
have any comments on those minutes or not have enough time to review them no all right doing that we will go ahead and ask for a motion to approve the November 26 happy to make that
motion all right can I get a second this is that I'll second all right then all in favor Ed I Jim I Janine I
Ted Ted is an i Heather I Matt hi and I am also an i all right so next up on our work session we have Heritage properties the trails Legacy
Farms um I don't know if I saw Vin or Peter coming to the call yet scrolling through right now I don't see them either Melissa
okay all right we'll skip over that one for now see if they show up fashionably late but hopefully not too late because we have a short agenda um and I will go up to the new hearing and I just have to read this and then
we're going to immediately continue it um so the hopkington Conservation Commission will hold a public hearing on Tuesday February 25th 2025 at 7 p.m. virtually online to hear all persons interested in a notice of intent filed by Lou Lewis petroy of Wall Street
development Corp to construct a new single family home driveway and Associated site work location is 12 North Mill Street assessors map r19 block 23 lot e um
can I get a motion to continue this out to the next hearing on March 11th so I'll make that motion and now
second all in favor Ed I Jim I Janine I Ted hi Heather hi Matt hi and I am also an i all
right speeding rate along um we'll go to 12 Maple Street extension notice of intent continuation for single family house um do we have someone from the audience to
present the changes made yep yep so good evening folks my name is Christoper aderi I'm a wetland scientist with Goddard Consulting um here on behalf of the D'Angelos for the construction of this single family house at 12 Maple Street extension um since the last time that we
had discussed at your meeting uh we've had a little bit of back and forth with Joe offline we submitted some revisions following the last hearing um notable changes include mve in the house entirely outside the 50ft buffer uh
We've included some vegetated p for a portion of the fire department turnaround we've reoriented the garage to be a frontload configuration uh Joe had issued some additional comments to hopefully kind of uh start to put a bow on this and we had
submitted some responses to those comments as of yesterday um so just to walk through um Joe's comments mostly all addressed at this point um he notes that you know the uh the
proposed dwelling is now located a little over 50 feet from the nearest Wetland resource area you can see that uh setback shown off of that top corner there we've also as I said adjusted to a frontload
garage um what we're doing as far as work within the 0 to 50 now as it stands um is that really just the driveway um so we have about 2600 square
feet of existing hard Pat gravel that for all intents and purposes is essentially impervious um that is coming out it's getting paved as we know and that amounts to about an 1100 square foot increase in impervious surface within
the 0 to 50 that is the only increase in impervious in the 0 to 50 at this point in the project um so we had provided you a a revised hopkington supplement uh just outlining those numbers
there we've also as Joe noted um paired down the planting area a little bit and that is as a result of pulling all of this work further away from Wetland resources as we've done so far um so
we've reduced the planting area from the previous iteration by a little over 600t or Square F feet um about 6 11 s ft to be precise and that was due to the reduction in the footprint of work within the 0 to 50 buffer zone so
previously the house as we know was in that was in that inner 50 ft and that was over 16600 Square F feet of impervious that we've been able to pull out of that 0 to 50 buffer um so in in doing so and reducing that footprint by
over 1,600 square ft um we've shrunken our planting area by about 600 square ft um there were a couple other more minor comments towards the end um Joe had asked for some additional information uh on some of the pool
equipment so the pool and pool deck it's going to be a typical inground pool um concrete pool deck surround the filtration system for that pool is going to be such that it does not require back washing like your typical sand filter um
there's some cartridge filters that require a little bit more maintenance but don't need to be backwashed so we can avoid having to worry about that um anytime that that water level needs to be drawn down it's going to be pumped off site via a tanker truck uh we are
not proposing any sort of discharge on the site of that pool water then lastly there was a note on the site plan that had mentioned the use of hay mulch for temporary stabilization that's been changed to um to address as
straw mulch so that is the gist of our changes um since the last time we had spoken we're still providing that um ration area we're converting lawn into naturalized area around the perimeter so hoping to protect the interests of the
Act and the bylaw in doing so um we've got those permanent movable barriers along that perimeter erosion controls surrounding the thing um St Iz construction entrance to further mitigate any concerns of erosion or sedimentation and we've also reduced
that uh impervious footprint by turning some of that turnaround uh into grasp pavers so uh happy to take any questions that there might be all right thank you for going over that
um and I think one of the questions we had last time was just about um the fire department is the fire department on board with what you're proposing here for the pavers and and everything shown on the plan yep so we
had been um Nick the the applicant had been coordinating with Tom porer from fire and his take on it essentially was that they prefer pavement but they understand the concerns and the grass pavers are an acceptable alternative we included a snippet of that email
conversation in our lest sub middle okay thank you um I'd like to go ahead and turn to Joe um and see what you have to say Joe regarding your your comments and how they're being addressed yeah I think uh
I think Chris touched on all the uh comments that I had in my second review memorandum um and with the revisions that have made been made to the most current plan that we see here I think all milstein and comments have been
addressed and I think at this point it's just a matter of the commission discussing um you know uh the the impacts and the mitigation and and if they're happy with what is been the and what's been
rised okay um I think one thing that um jumps out at me or that I wanted to ask about is along the Swale um the buffer zone that's that's being created there in
that width um to from the pib to the Swale um can you can you put a dimension on that and compare that to what we've required on the previous filings that we've had along this
sale yeah so that little strip along there I don't have an exact measurement offand it's it's a fairly narrow Corridor uh it's about probably 6 or8 feet off the property line uh if memory serves the comparison to the the project
just to the north of this site it's uh it's slightly less than that and I believe that was 15 in that instance again if memory serves okay um that's just something that jumps out at me I mean um from the
beginning I think we wanted to be consistent on that that buffer that we're trying to create around the Swale so um I appreciate very much the house being moved out of the uh the 50 um in this version but I would like
to see that 15t maintained like we've required at the other projects um I'll open up see if anyone else on the commission has any thoughts on that or anything else that's presented here for changes I would agree with that one
alsoa okay and I would agree go ahead I would agree with Melissa and Janine yeah yeah just same thing and I'd like to share that you know we definitely appreciate putting the effort Chris and working with the engineering
to get this thing out of the 50 Foot buffer and we knew we knew there were some options that would work and this this shows that is indeed the case so that's much appreciated yeah absolutely it's always just a matter of wiggling things around I think if if that planting strip is sort of the last
remaining concern here I think that we'd be we'd be happy to make that work okay um I'll open it up to the audience see if anyone from the public on the call has any that
they'd like to ask or share and I don't see any all right so at this point in time Joe were there there additional um because you you I for what your comment letter was dated are we need another round of
revisions on the plan in order to to vote on this or um were you able to look at this one and yeah no I I did uh send an email yesterday yeah saying that I um that all my comments had been addressed so I
think you know what we just brought up is the only outstanding item okay all right then Chris um do you think we can get that memorialized on the plan that that 15 ft um call sure thing we can do that I
think uh I I will definitely check with the applicant but I think we'll be amenable to that okay great and Melissa yes that will get back I think some of the mitigation that was removed because the house was moved out to me that was a I I'm happy the house was moved out of
the 50- foot buffer but it's disappointing that that was seen as a license to then do less other good if we expand along the sale there the um the plantings I think get some of that mitigation back as well yeah I think you're eight
10 yep the chair I do one quick question it's jumping out of me now the sump pump discharge Chris looks like it goes quite a ways into the backyard there and you're closer to the the resource areas right grade looks like it's relatively
flat any reason that doesn't get discharged a bit sooner so we've got some more I'm just or or just help me understand what's the distance we have from that discharge point to the resource yeah so we were trying to keep that discharge Point outside of the lawn
area of the yard and we figured that putting it into a planted area that we're going to be seeding and planting thoroughly would be a a reasonable way to kind of address that outfall there um that distance off of the resource there
I don't have it offand it looks to be about 20t to me okay it are you proposing any type of treatment at the end of that pipe like you got a little depressed Stone area or is this just you know pumped out to grade
and as yeah as of now the the design is just to pump it out of grade I mean I think at least from my perspective I think it would be beneficial given the proximity you know I don't think I'm overly concerned with it being 20 feet away but I think it
would be of value to have some type of stone there at the discharge point to make sure that we're not causing erosion and sediment discharge into the resource so I'm not talking nothing crazy here like you know just a little bit of a depressed area with some AR
Stone pieces of stone just so that initial velocity coming out of that pipe gets dissipated yeah I think that should be easy enough to add good catch Matt all right great well that being said can I get a motion to um the next
meeting is March 11th does that that work for you Chris absolutely yeah we we'd like to keep it moving along for sure okay um can I get a motion to continue this out and um to March 11th so
moved I'll second all right all in favor Ed I Jim I Janine I Ted hi Heather I and Matt hi all right and I'm also an
i thanks folks have a good night yep thank you all right next up we have hackington stone and garden 28 Lumber Street notice intent continuation um yeah good evening Scott
gard here Ryan rine from my office is ALS o here we have representative from new viiew as well who's the applicant and we do not have George Conor on U but I think we were pretty close to wrapping
this up at the last meeting the only remaining item was to give an opportunity for Joe from Lucas to review and comment on a couple of minor tweak adjustments that were requested to the invasive species management plan that
did happen and we got comments back from Joe that I believe represent that him and I are aligned on the content of the ismp so um perhaps he wants to comment on that but otherwise I don't believe we have
anything further to present to the board different than the substantive matters of the last hearing at this all right thanks Scott um Joe did you want to uh add anything uh not much to add I think uh SC uh St it accurately uh they did
revise the invasive fees management plan and I was satisfied the forties that were made I have no additional comments at this point okay great um all right so we got clean
letters from our two peer review Consultants um on this project um the other thing that we just asked did everyone get to review meeting minutes um in videos if they hadn't seen all of them everyone feel comfortable
who's here tonight vote voting on this application or if anyone doesn't speak now through the chair I'll still recuse myself there Melissa thanks yeah on set else okay does anyone have
any questions comments um anything there Melissa I do yep go ahead um and uh Scott if I misrepresent what you tried to tell me two weeks ago please correct me I just wanted to know
Joe if you can confirm for me that Scott and this is where I'm worried Scott I'm G to misrepresent what you said that Scott said that the change to um the Wetland area
here is oh my gosh Scott could you in like four sentences give your explan for why the purposes of the Wetland will still be served despite the changes you're proposing and then I just want to hear from Joe that he gives that a
thumbs up yeah I don't know if I can present many things in only four sentences and I just one right there so the I just don't want to misrepresent you Scott so we basically made the case that we did a functions and values
analysis and identified which functions are served by that portion of the Wetland largely flood control and we provided a restoration of those flood control features so that functionally we
were able to have a net Improvement to the overall values and functions of that particular Wetland thanks and Joe would you concur with that analysis is that part of your other concurrences I I I would concur
with that um certainly the Wetland provides other functions but I think flood control is probably the the primary function and I think they will be improving some of the other functions with the with the plantings improving habitat function um and maintaining U
the the flood control functions okay thank you Joe and thank you Scott that's all I have Melissa okay through the chair yes Heather I know I'm not voting on this but I did um have some notes from last meeting and it
looks like the invasives were addressed um did we address how the soil will be disposed there's like the soil replication area and there's some soil that needs to be removed just wanted to follow up on that was the question Heather regarding
the soil from where the when we do the excavation of the of the replication areas where that's that's right yeah that's right in regards to the invasives primarily or just in general
in general I think is what we had talked about last meeting yep I'm not sure we specified a need to treat that soil in any particular way a lot of it is is grally Rocky Stony fill material if
that's buried in the fill of the site we are elevating the front portion of the site and then Paving over it it's a it's an seemingly an appropriate use to repurpose it on site that's fair I just I know that Joe had asked about that and I just wanted to
follow up on it thanks Scott y who the chair this is Ed been one who's followed this from the GetGo um I won't say that I'm pleased but I'm very content with the changes in the work that you have done Scott thank you
you're welcome all right um any other comments or comments from anyone in the audience all right seeing none I think we can go ahead and vote on this
one um can I get a motion to approve um this notice of intent and also get signatures by Anna or Judy so moved I will second all right through
the chair uh yes can we just include that um like the special conditions Joe had mentioned in his memo you know standard replication area conditions um be included as part of your approval yes
thank you Anna for pointing that one out Ed would you like to amend your motion was that directed at me I didn't make a mo no I was directed at Ted since he made Oh I thought you said Ed I couldn't remember that I made the motion I am happy with that amendment I will second
with the amendment all in favor Ed I Jim hi Janine oh yeah Janine no Ted I
Matt hi Heather is recusing and I am and I um so you are all set thanks for working with us Scott thank you very much have a good night yep all right um next up nine Chamberlain Street
notice of intent continuation for addition pool all right so do we have someone on the call engineer the applicant yep Scott Hayes foresight
engineering engineer for the applicant hi Scott hi hi um so um this is a um buffer zone project for building additions of some building additions to a house and pool
um within kind of existing yard lawn area uh at a house at n Chamberlain Street we continued a couple weeks ago um there was a question about uh whether we needed a waiver for activity on the Z to
50 foot um got a small uh piece of grading adjacent to the garage Edition that's currently yard lawn area that was basically Excavating grading and restoring to its current state but it
does require um some grading in that area so we we had gotten feedback uh on that and rather than contest a waiver was required we've
requested a waiver to alter that area temporarily it's about 410 square feet and just restore it upon completion um there's a couple of other little things we did on the plan um there's a
burning bush by the shed um that we designated the area where or generally where that is and the method of disposal um of that and then we also
revised all the permanent immovable barriers along the limit of work which um they were proposing to put Boulders in and put placards on the boulders uh and
they pretty much follow the limit of the work along the existing Tree Line got 11 Boulders kind of work around the site and um to the exception of the area closest to the
street we proposing mitigation planting excuse me where we're planting planning 10 replacement trees for the trees were taken down on the buffer zone that area from that shed out to Chamberlain Street pretty much up the property line is
currently all lawn so that's the area we got really targeted to place uh the the tree planting replication or or mitigation for the other buffer zone tree removal and that was about all we've
done I did you have any questions um no I mean this this looks like it addressed what we what we talked about last time y it's Lilia Flores and I'm chamberling we have also mov with the medallions from the fence to the
boulders to be more specific to the area that is not to be disturbed so they'll be they'll be with adhesive onto the boulders on the boulders excellent thank you I think that'll make it more clear for sure
um Anna or Judy did you have anything um you wanted to point out on this version of the plan you're the chair yes I no I'm happy with the changes we've received um we have the waiver request form for work in
the 50 um and I think the revised pibs are a lot more consistent um reflect the the shape of the tree line um and look like they reflect the commission's comments from last meeting so I don't have any further comments okay and Joe
you have anything to add no I think there were several back and forths over the past week or so and I think all all of my comments have been adequately addressed I think maybe the only thing that wasn't mentioned was that the um uh flag labels on the plan
were revised to accurately um label the revised uh flags that was one one of the few changes that was also done on the plan okay um do anyone on the commission have any questions or comments on the revised
plan uh through the chair Melissa yes Ted I just want to confirm I'm reading the plan correctly I see five trees being removed within the 100 foot buffer and a replication of 10 so we're consistent with our two to one am I reading that correctly that's correct
perfect thank you that's I got okay and through the chair this is Ed yes Ed Ed the tree hugger you can't imagine buying a house and cutting down trees to put in a pool but that's all
I'm going to say um all right any anyone else anyone from the audience all right um with that being said uh can I get a
motion to approve this plan and the waiver request um I don't think we had any special conditions did we an our Judy Joe should be the standard pool conditions you know the backwash the
dryw like they showed vibs yeah okay um can I get that motion with uh signatures by Anna or Judy so moved and a second and all in favor
Ed I'm going to say yes because I have no grounds to say otherwise Jim hi Janine I Ted Ted isn't I
Heather Matt hi and I'm also an I so thank you all for for working with us on this and good luck thank you good luck with your projects thank you all good night all right so now we will jump back
down to work session items I did see Vin enter the call um um so we're going to go to Heritage properties the trails at Legacy Farms request to amend the January 7th commission decision for additional units to be released from the cease and
assist um so uh Vin um if you're here I'm going to open it up to you to just explain to us what you're requesting here then if you're talking it looks like you're muted must have stepped away how long do we wait to have them
come back all right well I sent him a a message on Zoom but not sure if he's not hearing you he probably won't see that okay I mean I think the gist of the request was just that he wanted to amend
the um we had initially approved for specific lot numbers um to be released and he was looking for that to be made General to just three lots not with specific
numbers but Alissa he looks unmuted oh Vin you here I am here sorry about that little technical difficulty that's okay you want to go ahead and uh okay us know what you're looking for sure um on January
7th we um the Comm approved uh three lots and we designated them by number 27 29 and 31 Waterville Lane um what I failed to do but I was consistent because I failed
in both towns because I need to um every time we we do a release I need to basically the release in both towns have to mirror each other um so this commission
and Ashland understood my request as being just those three specific units um I had assumed which uh was a mistake I had assumed that this would
work exactly the way the first 10 units were released back in July of 24 um and that was um we had I believe the
10 units even numbers starting with four through 202 we this uh this board approved that and approved it with the understanding that the builder at his discretion could
change but not exceed the 10 units that were being approved um so I I guess I assumed in January when it came back for the next group of three I assumed it was going to
be the same way where uh three units are approved but up to the Builder's discretion on where they would be located um so I had to go back to Ashland after they approved D um
basically the same three units as you approved on January 7th and had them CH amended I guess by saying that those three units could be at
locations at the discretion of the Builder so anyways I'm here tonight just to uh sort of clean that up and see if you could uh you know amend that request and make the three
units uh the locations of the three units at my discretion what I'm trying to do here is we're trying to um uh we're trying to respond to the market um we've got you know several
people in the mix many buyers many that are looking and um I I just need the flexibility as I had on the first 10 units to locate them basically based on sales um so this time around I I came in
with three and I I just need again the flexibility of being able to determine the locations because every weekend uh you know we have open houses and things change as far as what units uh are you
know are being requested by buyers to move forward and scheduling closing dates and all of that so um I I would like to uh ask that you um you amend so these three units
2729 and 31 Waterville can be located at my discretion and I understand that I can't go beyond that um and would come to the commission as I'm doing in Ashlin when I
want more than three units um so anyways I'm just looking for a little flexibility to for us to be able to do our business and respond to buyers so that's pretty much it okay
thanks for uh coming in and and and explaining that um I don't I don't see an issue with that I think um we have enough bumpers in place um with the plans and approval for the schedule and and
staging and bmps and erosion control measures and everything so um you know we certainly want to see the projects you know be constructed and and things to move forward smoothly as far as getting these houses built and the project uh schedule moving along so I
don't know if anyone else on the commission has another view or questions but as my thoughts hi Melissa through the chair yes Mr gatle I'm just curious what are the handwritten numbers on the plan we're looking at what do those
mean yeah those I I also with that um with this site plan that you're talking about I submitted a construction schedule to sort of lay out at that point in time how we saw the remainder
of the construction work being done and in that schedule um I referred to the found Foundation releases uh by a number 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
and they tie into the same corresponding numbers you're seeing on the site plan so again when I came in on the 7th of January I was asking for three you can see them uh numbered number three on
that site plan and that corresponds to the actual addresses 2729 31 so um again and I think I even made a comment at the a note at the bottom of the construction schedule that says that
the above dates and sequence of remaining work are subject to change based on based on sales and marketing um and again this is going to change this is sort of you know evolving
and um it'll change and I I will be in to request probably different units future units than what you see on this schedule but um again I'll I'll be in anytime things change and I'll submit a
u you know a revised construction schedule because that will also change as we change the actual units we want in the next release okay so great so what it means is if we approve your requests tonight
it also means you need to rework that schedule for us which you just mentioned so that we can see how that works out because that schedule is not going to make sense unless you choose to do units 2729 31 even if you have
flexibility is that true I think you could I think you could probably um when comes in for his next request he could resubmit this graphic here um with the buildings that are completed cuz we'll have three more completed wherever they are and then maybe take off the
numbers this you know the three four five the numbers on there um and it'll just be showing complete units versus those that are still remaining and so you can continue to have some flexibility moving forward I
mean we'll we'll I I think we would consider that depending how things are going when you come in for your next um found Foundation release request um but that that would be my suggestion I think I think that would clear it up even if the schedule has
those numbers on it um it's just sequentially numbering like release number 1 2 3 4 but if you don't have the numbers on this map right here then it's it it's just numerically counting out I think and I think that'll give you the
flexibility you need yeah that's that's very reasonable and very workable and I think as the way I see it each time I come back for new units that's when I would give you you know the uh the
latest construction schedule and if you like I'll give you the same sort of coded uh site plan referencing the units that we're we're talking about now stop mocking units that are complete or
previously requested and um you know just revise both the schedule and the site plan as I I come in I think that would be uhu a little more workable okay does that make sense
Ted sure okay okay I think all we're going to vote on right now is to amend the three so that they're not numbers they're just units we're not approving anything in these SCH change or this graphic the way I see it
anyway um anyone else have any thoughts questions I think that makes sense Melissa okay yeah all right can we get a motion then to approve the request to
amend um our January 7th decision for the additional units not numbered Lots but just be three three lots I'll make that
motion can I get a second second and all in favor Ed I Jim um I Janine I headed p is an i he
hi Matt hi and I am also an i great thank you very much yep thanks man okay have a good night byebye all right so that do we have any public forum requests
Judy no no okay all right that's everything on the agenda um does anyone have anything else since I don't want to hold people here longer than we have to but have a couple minutes if we want to
cover any any items so just a quick question regarding the farmers market are we do we have a table there for those dates or is it going to work yeah I sorry go
ahead oh and do we have stuff like a canopy or tables or I know it's early but yeah the organizer said we can pretty much tell them what dates we want um roughly once a month is what they
think is reasonable for one group um so you and Ed sounded flexible I might just see if anyone has specific dates that work and group you guys together but if not I'll just throw out some um and I am working
on finding or making a budget for any physical items that we need um so I believe we have a table seeing if we have a tablecloth um and a lot of like handouts and flyers and things like that an and I can make inh housee um so if
anyone has ideas um Melissa sent us along a tree graphic that we're looking to recreate so we can throw some stuff together um try to make a brochure and really just get y'all's faces out there in front of people talk about what you do um answer questions that sort of thing but yeah definitely can equip you
with some things to hand out all right we need a drone a drone yeah and maybe a couple couple of Sol game cameras that's what I think other thing I think we need Ed's got those you haven't heard about Ed's
cameras oh I've seen many pictures from Ed's cameras Judy maybe we want to go digital I think yeah forget the Flyers I'm thinking maybe if we just put a QR code or something I mean most people are gonna take a flyer and throw it away I
think that's a good point and we are the conservation that's what I'm thinking yeah it's a really good idea the I I just want to comment and thank Judy for thinking of this this is out of
the box thinking and it's a sort of thing that really appeals to me and I just want to make sure that she gets Co yeah know it's good stuff thanks Judy yeah yeah I think yeah I think for the dates Judy
since it's so far out um it might be worth just picking like the first the first Sunday of the month or the last Sunday whatever just go with one of them and put our name down and
then I think you know obviously we have a couple members who are really flexible and then other people can kind of jump in on dates that work um the chair this is Ed I just want to point out that nothing has been far out since the
60s thanks Ed chair yes did we get the Jeff Barn Sally the salamander costume back from the cleaners for Heather to wear I mean after Janine vomited in the thing was kind of rough but I think we were going
to get that clean I don't know I'll have to reach out to Jeff maybe he'll even come back J I don't even want to know that [Laughter] story out with that that costume too I think Judy would look fantastic on the
common in the Sal want to see it at the Farmers Market at the table that's funny uh Sal saler lives on what was the first date Judy on that
for the farmers market believe June 1st June 1 make sure yep Sunday June 1st all right yeah I can just sign us up for the first Sunday of the month and know
they'll be flexible and I can always jump in I'll be around okay good stuff all right great thanks yall and when when you guys are at MC I we got a couple Jim
in the Ed maybe if you see anything good um at the tables there you can kind of like maybe we can rip off rip off some ideas on on what people are are using for giveaways or oh good idea good idea good idea keep
your ey Ed will report back to you okay thanks Ed you just you can count on him all right okay well you all uh can we get a motion to adjourn oh I'll make that
motion and I'll second it all right all in favor Ed I Jim I Janine I Ted Ted is an i Heather hi Matt hi and I'm also an
i all right thank you everybody bye bye thanks good night good night e e e e e e
e e e e e e e