Lake City Council meeting for Tuesday, January 13th to order. Roll call, please. >> Councelor Jarvala >> here. >> Ecman here. >> Mat >> here. >> Mayor Scott here. >> Councelor Grahams is probably not going to make it. She's running behind. So, we
have a quorum. >> All right. Thank you. Please stand for the pledge of >> allegiance. I aliance to the flag of the United States of America and to the republic for which it stands, one nation under God, indivisible, with liberty and
justice for all. All righty, moving on to the consent agenda. Has everybody had a chance to read through that? Any comments or questions regarding anything in there?
Hearing nothing, I'll ask for a moten. >> So, motion from councelor Jarva. Is there a second? >> I'll make that motion. Second from councelor Mat. All those in favor? I >> I. >> Any opposed? Hearing? None. Motion
carried. Moving on to the guests and citizens forum. Is there anybody that wishes to say anything? Hearing nothing. We'll move on to reports from city staff. Uh, city administrator Wyberg. >> Uh, so right now we are getting pulled
into the audit season. So, we're pulling a lot of reports and Tammy is working from home this week as much as she can just FYI. And the budget, I got most of it loaded into Civic. So, uh the financials at the end of the month will have 2026 full year budget in it. So,
just an FYI. All right. Thank you. Moving on to library director Lambie. >> Thank you. The adult winter challenge has begun. Sign up at the library or download Beanstack from your app store.
Create an account and look for the White Lakes Library Challenge. The challenge runs until February 27th and all there are prizes available at the end. This Thursday from 6:30 to 9, we are excited to host our second annual mocktail
social. We'll have live entertainment, trivia with prizes, mocktails, and snacks. There is no need to register and there is no charge. Doors open at 6:15 and only 18 and older are admitted. Come
on down and see what it's all about at the Chapters and thirst bar. Tuesday Creations is January 20th at 11:00 a.m. We are making a tabletop winter sign. All supplies are provided. January 23rd
at 100 p.m. is the premiere of our new program called Echoes Beyond the Pit and it's a local history talk. And our first um person coming to talk is Mike Sturk and he's going to talk about the Eerie pre-tac plant and then there will be
some questions and answers um and we'll have pictures. January 26th at 2 p.m. we will have a craft class with Maryanne. All supplies are provided. We are going to make a snowman wall pocket that day. And then finally, um, someone had asked
during our budget meetings how many item checked out items were not returned. Um, and so we did a little checking at the end of the year and for 2025, we had 8,595 physical items checked out from the
library. 13 of those were not returned. Doesn't mean that they won't come back this year. and the cost of those items was $191. So, our patrons are pretty good about returning stuff. >> Thank you. >> Sounds good. Thank you. Um, moving on to
City Attorney Luiki. >> I'll try to get those things back to the library as soon as I can. So, uh, thank you, Mayor. I don't have any update at this time other than I'll note in the in the minutes from the last meeting, I announced that our firm was merging. That went really well. Uh, it's, uh,
it's been pretty successful so far. and uh glad to be here on a Tuesday evening. Maybe that's why we don't have as much of the public out this this evening, but hopefully next meeting we'll have more for sure. All right, thank you. Um moving on, nothing for old business, so
we'll move right into new business. Um first thing on the agenda for new business is resolution 2026. What's that? Oh, I did. Thank you for pointing that out. Uh, reports from elected officials.
That's important. Uh, so we will start with councelor Gramps who is absent. So, we'll move on to councelor Jarva. >> I don't have much tonight other than that the uh East Range Water Board meeting was changed from today to next week. This is the technical one uh
talking about the uh booster pump and whatnot. And they are also trying or willing I should say to set up a tour of the water treatment plant, the new building in Aurora if any of the council members want to attend and it's
scheduled for 10 o'clock next week at the Aurora City Hall. >> Um just so I have it right for myself. Um so next week they're having uh like a technical meeting. Usually >> it's on Tuesday and then the waterboard meeting is on the following day.
>> Okay. This is this is next week is the meeting that would have taken place today. >> Okay. Do you happen to know a time for that? >> I'll forward the invite. >> I'll do that. >> So yeah, if that could get forwarded along, that would be great. Um yeah, thanks um councelor J. Anything else?
Nope. Okay. Um moving on to councelor Ecman. Anything from you tonight? >> I actually have nothing. >> All right. So we will move on to councelor Mat. >> Uh I also have nothing tonight. >> All right. Moving on to me. I also have
nothing special to um report. So we will move right along. So again mentioned nothing for old business. Um so we'll move on to new business. Um so the first thing on that is resol res resolution 2026001 um to appoint boards committees uh and
commissions um official depository official newspaper um White Lakes EDA um council and then EDA um meeting dates and times. Um so the first thing in front of us is that resolution. Um have
seen this last year year before looks very similar. Um some of the names might not be the same but um we do this at the beginning of every year. Um I've been using Sabi Tribune as our newspaper for a while now. Um anything to add to any
of that? Um Dean? >> No. No I don't. This is the reorganizational res resolution for 2026. Um, yeah, same same as what you guys done in the past and staying with the Msabi Tribune. All right. Uh, anything to discuss or
questions that anybody has regarding any of that? Hearing nothing, I'll ask for a motion to approve resolution 2026001. I'll make that motion. >> Motion from councelor M or Mat, second from councelor Jarala. All those in
favor? I >> I. Any opposed? Hearing none. Motion carried. Moving on to 11.2 part-time administrative clerk advertising. Um we had spoken about this during um
discussing budgets and those different types of things. Um so it'd be looking at having a part-time um position within the clerk's office. um sounded like they had had this for um a few years. Becky Bur had mentioned at a council meeting that they had had it for some time and
it sounded like we've had this position in the past where it was um either a part-time or on call type person um within city hall just to help out with extra things. Um it sounded like the last one we had had was around 2020. Um, so kind of the reasoning around
this, um, just kind of there isn't really a backup plan in case, um, either Tammy or Betsy are out for an expend extended period of time. Um, so if either of them is sick for a long time or injured, um, for whatever reason, um, there would
just be one person in there. Um, and if that were to happen, um, they'd have to not be open as much as they have been. Um, so that's a piece of it. Um, looking at things maybe not being done if there's
just one person there. So things like billing, paying bills, um, paying employees, those different things might be delayed. Um, and we don't want that to happen. Um, so just yeah, quick summary. Um, we've had this position in the past stopped in 2020. Um, but we're
going to be looking at possibly um not having someone in there for um a period of time. So, we just want a backup plan um to help out to make sure that billing and um things like that are done. Um anything else to add to that, Dean?
>> No, I don't. I think you're at significant risk right now of um there's no cross training. So, currently nobody knows each other's jobs because they all land on the same AP and payroll like we discuss. and uh then we're seeing that that risk right now play out. So um no,
I have nothing more to add. >> Um any other comments or questions regarding this? Um so again, yeah, I'd be looking at a part-time um employee to come in and help out when
it's needed. Um help make sure get um things like billing and um payments and those different types of things done. Um, and right now, yeah, there's no sort of backup plan and we're already looking at an employee not being around as much as
they have been. Um, so we just want to make sure that all the duties are being done. >> Could point out that it's been budgeted in the past, not not filled. Um, we did put it in the budget this year. It is covered in the budget and um the position has been approved along with the budget. So, this is just approving
the the posting. Um, I know we had talked about, um, so the starting pay is listed as $20. Um, I know there's discussion on having, um, 20 to 25 with, um, that being kind of dependent on, um, experience and those
different types of things. Um, does the council have a specific way they're just want to keep it at 20 or they want to rephrase it as 20 to 25 depending on experience? >> I like the 20 to 25 depending on experience. Okay. Personally,
>> if you have someone that's like way experienced, I'd be willing to pay him 25 bucks an hour. >> Sure. >> Who's determining the experience >> by their the hiring board? >> Yeah. Yeah, that'll be the >> the hiring committee then. Okay. >> And it'll be based on the criteria, the
scoring criteria that we'll have to put together for it, you know, for the interview. >> I would be fine with it saying that also though. I mean, >> 20 to 25 dependent on experience. Um, yeah, I I wouldn't want that to be the hangup if there was someone with a
lot of experience and then they're like, "Oh, I want a few extra dollars and they feel that they should get that because they've had the schooling or whatever and are retired or whatever the the situation is." Um, I wouldn't want that $5 to to hold things up for them not applying. Um, but again, it's still that
range, so we have some flexibility, too. Um, so I guess yeah, I think that's a good way to to phrase it and list it. Um, councelor Jarva, do you have any preference either way? Okay. All right. Reading through um
kind of this top sheet and then um the job description. Is there anything else that folks have um any comments or questions on? Want things changed? Um, I had read through it and I think it covers um all the duties within city
hall pretty well um if they're needed to to fill um the accounting clerk's position or deputy clerk's position to help out with um bills and payments and those different types of things. Um and then also I like the piece where it um lists out like special projects and
those different types of things. So um they're not just pigeonholed to do certain things. they can um help out with other projects that we have um I need some help on. So I think on my end I think the job description and um the opening sheet looks good.
>> What's the projected hiring time on that date? >> Uh the post is the posting date on here. So we're going to post January 16th. We're going to publish it in the paper 17th through the 24th. We're still thought probably midFebruary before, you know. Okay.
>> So it's going to be a while. record the interviews for a week background. Yeah, it's going to be mid to end February at the earliest. Um so yeah, just with how things are going currently, I don't Yeah, I want to push this off. We want to make sure that um
with some staff looking at maybe not being um at city hall um due to some circumstances, I want to make sure we can fill it as soon as we can. So, um, is there a motion to, um, approve, um,
the posting for this part-time position? >> So, moved. >> So, we have a motion from councelor Jarville. Is there a second? >> I'll second. >> Second from councelor Ecman. All those in favor? I >> I. Any opposed? Hearing none. Motion carried. Moving on to 11.3 resolution uh
2026002 um setting part-time, temporary and seasonal employee wages um beginning January 14th, 2026. Um so we had already approved um the part-time um payment with within our um
employee um for budgeting purposes already. So we just need to um approve a resolution. Um, so again, we're not looking at any um raises for part-time employees next year. Um, so yeah, it's just approving the resolution tonight. Um, anything to add to that, Dean?
>> No, no, other than Yeah, you discuss it. You we did a raise wage freeze this for 2026 on our uh and there hasn't been any changes since um the last time you approved it. I guess I have one quick question. Would
the administrative clerk spot that's under seasonal, is that >> supposed to be under parttime? >> That wouldn't be a seasonal or temporary position, right? It' be down in the part-time. >> Um and then Joel, if we're listing um if we're posting it for for 20 to $25 based
on experience, um what should we be putting um within this resolution for under that position? Uh, what do you mean? What should you be putting in? >> So, currently it's just listed for the hourly wage is $20, but within our posting we're going to be listing it for
20 to $25. Um, is there a certain way it should be listed within this resolution? >> Yeah, I would uh I would in the resolution expand that to include the uh the wage that it would go up to.
>> Okay. So, >> potentially. >> Sure. Um, which I think that's the you're saying that's based on the applicant or based on >> education and experience. Yeah. >> Yeah. Yeah. So, uh, or I would put a
range 20 to 25 resolution >> and then like you noted, I I'll take it out of the seasonal temporary and move it down to the parttime. >> Okay. >> So, I I I think >> is it a long-term part-time or is it a temporary position? Longterm long term.
Okay. >> Uh, >> can you just put DOE on the on a note >> so you don't have to write out a full sentence or anything >> depending on experience. >> Oh, I'm sorry. >> Standard drawing. Um,
>> so I think within the resolution we could just do 20 to 25 and we don't have to put the the experience piece of it. So, with the the changes um looking at approving resolution 2026002 um with the changes of moving down that clerk position down into the part-time
section and then listing the hourly wage as 20 to $25. Um is there any other changes or things that folks have questions about or um anything they want to discuss? Hearing nothing, um I will ask for a motion to approve resolution 2026.
Motion still stands. >> Motion from councelor Jarvala. Is there a second? >> I'll second. >> Second from councelor Mat. Um all those in favor? >> I. >> Any opposed? Hearing none. Motion carried. Um and
then councelor Ecman and myself will abstain. Oh, because we are part-time employees. Sure. So, moving on to 11.4 um approval from the city of White Lakes
for the pay equity compliance report for 2026. Um I guess from my understanding, this is something that Tammy has been tracking and updating um throughout the year. Um I believe that it's a requirement through the state um some sort of analysis that cities do um just
to ensure that um males and females are getting paid similarly for um similar type of work done. Um is that kind of the same thing on your dean from your understanding? >> From my understanding it is right. So um it's just numbers that we supply supplied. They they do the analysis and
then send us the report back and there was no findings. Um any other things to discuss regarding this report or any questions that anybody has? Um hearing none. Um I'll ask for a
motion to um approve the city of H Lakes pay equity compliance report for 2026. >> I'll make a motion. >> Motion from councelor Ecman. Is there a second? >> Second from councelor Jarvala. All those in favor? >> I >> I. Any opposed? Hearing? None. Motion
carried. Moving on to 11.5 resolution 2026003 uh support for the um is that highway 100 uh railroad crossing? Not highway, but yeah. um for the railroad crossing grade
separation project um over in Aurora um kind of the main street. Um do you mind speaking to this Dean? >> I don't know. Well, what I do know about this is the county called and we went back and forth on some emails. Uh last
year you guys passed the exact same resolution, but they did not get the funding. But this is for the bridge over the railroad tracks in Aurora um by the A&W. It looks like it starts right at about the hive. The the the grade starts going up and then up and over the tracks
and back down just like it was in 1940 something except in a different location. But yeah, I don't know much about it at this time. But this is the exact same resolution you guys passed last year with or the council passed last year with date
change in support of this project >> um >> for Aurora. >> Yeah. Yeah. And essentially what this resolution does, it just allows the county to get funding um or a better chance at getting funding to complete the the project. Um so yeah, from what I
remember from last year, the city of Aurora was um was supportive of the project. Um and then the county itself um obviously them engineering it and planning it are are wanting this project to happen. Um, so yeah, this just kind
of helps them with accessing funding to do that. Um, >> in the additional information, I did copy the email that I received. So just for background information, if anybody wants to look at that. >> Um, so yeah, I don't know. I guess on my
end um I guess I'm neutral on the bridge piece of it, but I think with um us approving it would just kind of show Aurora and then the county that we kind of um support them and their project um and then if I guess on our end if we're ever needing a project done over here um
if we're supportive of their projects that they would be supportive of ours too. So, um I think that positions us well with um the city of Aurora and then um the county. Um yeah, any other things to discuss or
questions um regarding this? There is a photo in the entryway to the Aurora City Hall as you climb up that first set of stairs on the right hand side of the last railroad overpass being torn down. >> Oh, really?
>> When was that torn down? Do we know? >> I believe that was in the 60s. And I I voted no on the last resolution and I I will vote nay today because I think they're trying to solve a problem that doesn't exist and they're spending money
for something that I I don't think they should and it's going to cause problems for the A&W there for people getting in and out and I think the street by the hive is going to be cut off also. >> What is the reason for it? Do we know? I
mean it kind of >> it was stated because of the two deaths that had occurred and the fear of something happening and blocking that crossing and traffic couldn't ambulance, fire trucks, whatever couldn't get north
or south. They could put a temporary gated crossing farther west on the city and just open it up if there was something to happen there. kind of like they did when there was that construction where the crossing is now. They just kind of did the
>> I'm talking where 135 comes down from tower. If you follow and go straight down, the crossing could be down there as a gated except for emergency use. >> But like I said, the pictures in city hall of what it looked like when they
were tearing it down and now they want to go and spend money and put something back up again. That's where I stand. Right. And I think yeah, they're they're planning on doing this. So, this resolution just I mean allows them to access funding where um I guess if we
didn't they wouldn't get that funding. I guess maybe a concern was that they would want to do it and then pull from other funds to get it done. So, it sounds like this is their plan. This the resolution just would allow them >> to get funding. >> County. It's not
>> right. Yeah. The county. Yeah. Um, yeah. Anything else to discuss regarding this or any questions? Um, I guess, yeah, the county or if the city of Aurora is supportive of it and the county, um, is wanting to do this and
just needs some funds to get it done. Um, I guess I would be supportive of it. Um, not saying I have yet any feelings on whether the bridge is a good thing or not a good thing, but I think if they're needing some funding to get it done, um, us supporting it, um, we might get some
support in the future for other things. And the county has been good to work with with helping with the Bose school, um, and then redoing Kennedy Memorial and 665. So, um, is there a motion to, um, approve resolution 2026003? >> I'll make a motion. Motion from
councelor Ecman. Is there a second? >> I'll second it. >> Second from councelor Mat. All those in favor? >> I. >> Any opposed? >> Nay. >> We have an opposed or nay from councelor Jarvala. Um and three eyes's um for Mat,
Ecman, and Scott. Um so motion carried. Um moving on to 11.6 6 um 2026 Hoy Lakes clubhouse agreement. Um so Jenna had ran the um
clubhouse um this past year out at the golf course. Um so she provided us with um a little write up on kind of the things she um had done and what she was hoping for um in the future. Um yeah, checking
in with um with Bucky. It sounds like things went good out there um this year. Um yeah, talking with some other folks. Some like things went good. Um so we're
happy to hear that things went good out um at the golf course this year and then um that we had someone to to run the clubhouse. I think last year um Jenna was the only one to to put in for that. Um
anything to add, Dean? No. Uh she's asking she asked question that she can do a two-year contract out there versus one just so that she could, you know, keep things moving forward and instead of doing it a year over year, but that's up to you guys if you want to do a two or one. But I would like to,
you know, get this going and finish it up. The the one that's attached is 2024. She's not asking for any more money or anything like that. Just um something we have to we have to do every year. >> What kind of money profit does the city end up making for the year through the
golf course? >> Any idea? >> I'll have to get back with exact specifics on that. I'm just kind of curious what we make off of the >> I think there's like well obviously we don't make money on the golf course but
I think we took in about 130 spent about two >> comparable to years before >> actually well the revenue is up because golfing got more popular again um but the expenses were up last year too you know because we had Wade and Bucky you
know overlapping for quite a period of time and chemical rates went up a little bit but um you So, I don't have the specific net revenues. I can get it to you, you know, right after this meeting if we need to. >> Oh, okay. >> Like I said, just sheer curiosity. >> Yeah. Yeah. No, I haven't. It'll
actually include it in the financials for next next meeting. >> Um, so with with the years piece of it, do folks have a preference? I think um when Dan used to do it, I think we used to do it every year. Um, so I think historically we've usually just done it
for one year. Um, so I guess on my end I would prefer that even though things sounded like they went well. Um, I think um, just doing it every year um, doesn't hurt all that much. Um, sound like yeah, the first year went
pretty good. Um, and I'd want to make sure that the second year um, continue to go good. Um and then yeah, if things continue maybe for this upcoming year and the year after that, um things continue to go good, then maybe looking at a couple of years. Um so I think on
my end, maybe just doing just one year would be good. Um just kind of historically because we've done it that way. Um like when um Dan had done it um I think continuing to do it that way. I would prefer that a little bit more um just to continue to make sure that
things are are going good. Um, does anybody else have any preference with that piece of it? >> Rather see it a year at a time, too. >> Year at a time. Okay. Same with um, Councelor Matson and Eman. Do either of you have any preferences for that? >> Is this something that like we put out
every year for like other people to try to take it over like kind of like the campground? I mean, or is it just an agreement with one person that we know they're going to be there for years? But >> I think we did it last year. We did. >> Did you post it? the it was either last
year or the year before because we had one couple they had showed interest because I remember getting something within a packet kind of explaining their experience and whatever but then I think >> because Dan didn't want to do it but then it was >> that's what it was. Yeah. >> Pass or you know >> so knowing Dan was giving up or stopped
doing it. That's the only reason why it like gets posted. >> I think that's kind of how it went. >> I went back to the file and the only person I could find that's ever ran it at least in the file I looked at was Dan. >> Mhm. now Jim. >> So, >> so yeah, that was why we had posted it because Dan was not gonna do it.
>> He said he wasn't going to do it, but he kind of >> said, "Well, if somebody," cuz I don't think he was going to do it the year before either. But then he's like, "Well, nobody wants to take it, then I'll take it." >> So, it was something like that. >> She's his daughter, too. >> So, maybe approving Jenna for this
upcoming year. And then I don't know if maybe we do make it a habit of posting it every year. Um, I don't think that would be a bad idea just to see who who's out there and who's interested. Yeah, I guess that's not a bad idea. >> Well, I guess I wasn't pushing to do
that. I was just wondering if that's something that we did. >> Sure. >> Because I guess I also don't know if that's something that you if we have somebody that's in that position doing it, running it, and it's going well. Is that something that we would ch sit there and care to change every year? But I guess that's why I was just asking
about this. if like if if the city has never offered it to anybody else until the person currently active in that position steps down. I guess my thought is why why does it matter if we do it yearly or not? >> Sure. or like if the person that's doing
it is like, "Well, I I want to be here for the next 3 years and we've never my my concern would be if we offer it out every year and like put it out for anybody to take the position based on whatever, then this to me would be an absolute no." Well, no, we do year to
year because we offer it out. But I guess I don't if we're not offering it out, what's the difference if we give more than one year or not? >> Sure. >> That's just my opinion on it, I guess. So, >> if she's willing to run it for two more years, then yay. >> Right. That's kind of what I guess I'm I'm wondering.
>> I get it. >> Campground's five years. >> Campground host. When they take it, they take it for five years. >> I think so. >> That was three. >> Is it three? >> Maybe >> three to three to five. >> I mean, do we look at this at kind of the same thing as that or no? I mean, I
know they do their own like she's basically leasing part of the golf course from the city. So, we're just saying that we prefer just the leases to be a year long. Is that what we're I think Yeah. However you phrase the agreement, I think you could either have
it one year or um multiple just depending on how you update the agreement. Um, yeah. Do we advertise the um the campground every however years or do they just I
think you just with this recent one we just >> I don't know. I haven't been here for when that was renewed yet. >> I don't I don't >> I don't think it was posted again after the host >> right >> had it and then I think it I don't think it was posted again. It was just their contract was extended,
>> right? something like that. >> You know, it has been posted in years past, but I don't know how far back goes. >> But again, is that only ever posted when there's a change of >> somebody wants to give it up or
the council finds reason to make a change. >> And I guess I kind of feel like that might be the same here. if we don't see a reason to make a change and she's like, "Hey, I would love to know that I'm doing this for the next two years because then I'm going to put more into it." I guess I don't see an issue with
extending it more than just one year. But >> so the two years, you're okay with that? >> I would be fine with it. >> It was kind of a pain trying to find somebody. >> You're okay with two years, Council Eman? >> I am. >> Um I guess on my end, yeah, I mean,
yeah, bring up some good points. I guess I'm yeah kind of indifferent. Um and I mean if things aren't going the greatest there is a piece where we can end things if if needed but um I don't think that would need to be the case or >> Yeah. We can put something in the contract if you know it's not working
out you know. >> Yeah. It's towards the end it does say >> I mean because we weren't going to have anyone run the golf course because it was not easy to fill. >> Yeah. If she's willing to put in a couple years then we don't have then we have two years where we don't have to be concerned about it. Got a question on
number seven on this. Less C shall receive all profits from the sale of golf equipment and supplies and all food and beverage sales. Further, LE shall receive a minimum payment to LE of $15,000. I don't know if it's a wording that
confuses me or just doesn't make sense, but okay. So, I mean, yeah, it's I mean, how I I mean, I don't know exactly what went into writing it um in the past, but it sound it reads a little bit wordy than it needs to be. Um Joel, do you have any
thoughts on that? >> Well, she >> it's it's passive. It should say less sore agrees to pay less C $15,000. That's that's what it's trying to say. But right, it kind of means the same thing, but it doesn't say who's responsible for paying it. Um, it's
implied in the agreement. Uh, I don't know on the drafting of that original one either, but that's >> Oh, should it be worded? Because I could change. >> Well, less or agrees to pay less e. So, the city agrees to pay the >> the minimum of Yeah. >> Yeah.
So number seven in in the whole is basically saying she gets the profits from the sale of golf and supplies but also gets a salary of 15,000 to run the golf course. >> Why does it say minimum payment if
that's like the installments do we need? >> It's just not worded right. No, it is. It's >> I can I'll >> because she's getting 15,000 not minimum of it. >> Yeah, I see what you're saying. It's not a minimum payment. It is the payment.
>> And then they It's like base pay plus commissions really. >> Okay. So, updates because like you'd mentioned this isn't the current agreement. So, updating obviously the dates. Um, sounds
like everyone's okay with um, the 2-year at this point. Um, anything else that people saw in there that they think needs to be changed or um, added hearing? None. Um I think yeah we could
table this until you make those changes and then we can approve the the 20 what 2026 agreement um next council meeting. >> No big rush. I just wanted to get in front of you guys. >> Right. Okay. So yeah making yeah the updates on
obviously the when the changes to that number seven piece um and then making it a two-year um agreement. Um and then obviously if it's going to be on the next council agenda, if folks um read through it and think there needs to be things that need to be taken out,
changed or added, um they can um reach out to Dean and um provide those recommendations and then um at the next council meeting, we can look at reading through that updated version and then approving it at that time. So yeah, we can table that for now.
>> And I am updating it for two-year agreement. Yeah, it sounded like uh for the most part people >> vote on that or >> No, I think it'll we'll table table it but give Dean those recommendations for the updated agreement and then we'll have that 2026 agreement for um the next
council meeting um with those changes. Um but again, if it's on the next council agenda, um folks can reach out to Dean um if they see something else that needs to be um changed or added or taken out. So, um, yeah, for next council meeting, yeah, Dean, would you
be able to make those changes and have that 2026 agreement ready? >> Yes. Well, yeah, I'll be able to do that. >> Okay. >> There's not a whole lot of changes. >> Perfect. >> There's no fuzzy. >> Is that better? >> So, we will table 11.6. Um, and that is
everything on the agenda for tonight. So I will take a motion for adjournment. >> So moved. >> Motion from councelor Jarala. Is there a second? >> I'll second. >> Second from councelor Mat. All those in favor? >> I. Any opposed? Hearing none. Motion
carried. All right. Thank you.