i some or a close. Of those good evening and welcome to our public Works committee for JUNE. 26 2025. We will begin with introductions of counselors to my left. Thank you. MADAM Chair, Mike Deal District. 24. Thank you. MADAM Chair, Brian Mowery District. 25, thank MADAM Chair Councilor Jared Evans representing District 17. Thank you. MADAM Chair, McRoberts district 4. Thank you, CHAIRMAN. Anything else in District 14? Good evening, MADAM Chair, Chris, to currently no district, 11 West side. Thank you. CHAIRWOMAN Jessica McCormick District 16. Thank you. I'm Kristen John's representing District 18. First up this evening, we'll start with proposal. Number 109. With Sri appoints Cannon Beach to the Marion County Storm. Water Management Technical Advisory Committee, MR. If you'd like to come forward. And tell us a little
bit about yourself. So right there. Thank you so much, sir. MADAM Chair, thank you for the reconsideration for this post. Shannon, good afternoon. My name is Khan Beacham. Freshly engineer in the state of Indiana and a few other states surrounding I'm the owner of an environmental consulting firm here in Indianapolis and one of the areas of practice we have is in area of storm water drainage an oven for she and stuff that related to I was still want consent decree issues here in Marion County. Thank That's the direct correlation to the area of practice. I actually have to be certified in the Senate by profession euros and sediment control. So the match of keeping in our rivers and streams in the storm. So residents on is important to me personally has a
professional interest and this is my second term with the board with summed what technical advisory committee. I'm happy to do it simply because they read into whether means the road. Thank you. Any questions comments from counselors? Questions or comments for anyone in the public who wishes to proposal 109. And yes, MADAM I move that proposal. Number 1, 0, 9.25 Reporting 10 beach to the Marion County Storm. Water Management Technical Advisory Committee be sent to the full Council to do pass recommendation it has been moved and second into some proposal, 109, to the full council with the do pass recommendation. Others in favor say Aye. Aye opposed. Say nay. The ayes have it. Thank you, sir. And thank you for your service have a good
rest of your week. Thank you with consent. We will hear the presentations, a proposal. One, 47 through one. 55 1. 89 2025 together in Senate. Nathan Sheets is up. Thank you, Nathan. Thank you. Good evening. Nathan Sheets department public works and get 10 proposals before you this evening. All very similar to things that you guys have seen in the past. And start with proposal. Number one. 47, this proposal one. 47 2025. Authorizes the signal removal at the intersection of New York Street and Double Avenue. That's district 13. Proposal. One 48 2025 authorizes reduction to 40 miles per hour on Emerson Avenue from Victory. Drive to Thompson Road that falls within
district 20. And 24. Proposal, number one, 49 2025 authorizes restricted parking on the West Side of Orchard Avenue from 38 Street to Millersville Road that district 8. Proposal. Number one, 15, 2025 authorizes u turn restriction at Keele Avenue for eastbound 2 westbound traffic on 38 Street. That is just 5 proposal. Number one, 51 2025 authorizes us. He demurred action to 25 miles per hour in the Salem Creek in Berkshire subdivisions. That's district 17. Proposal. Number one, 52 2025. Authorizes the speed limit reduction of 25 miles per hour on Lakeside Drive from Lafayette Road to West 71st Street. That's district one. Proposal. One 53 2025 authorizes reduction of 25 miles per hour in the White River. Innovation District.
That is district 18. Proposal. One 54 2025 authorizes the speed production to 25 miles per hour on North Kenwood Avenue from 46 Street to Westfield Boulevard. That's district 7. And proposed rule one. 55 2025 authorizes the deletion of one-way designations on Michigan and New York streets from college to Emerson Avenue District. 13. Also at the one 89. Proposal. Number one, 89 2025. Minutes parking restrictions on 16th Street the Monon trail crossing and that is district 13. And if you have questions about 10 proposals before you this evening to try to answer. Any questions from counselors on this proposed is counselor to Nielsen. Thank you, CHAIRMAN. Thanks. Ton of so on proposal. One, 55 the to the one way conversion. The
two-way conversion. Excuse me. When because they an update on when that might be done when this might be in effect, as I know that I was just reading the actual proposal on doesn't look like certain day. So many. They spent a little bit more about where that? Good I do make a point to to drive the corridor at least once week just to kind of check on progress. And if you've driven recently, you've seen a lot of the pay the market rate going down. So that is that's actively working right now. What's in the critical path is csx has crossing improvements at that rail crossing both on Michigan in New York since previously was one way. There's some additional indications that they have to add as part of that they are have mobilized that saw them out yesterday at New York beginning to work. I think
that they are they indicated that they would be done the second week in JULY pending any kind weather event. And so really, it some cleanup work there. Some additional signal work we have to do. So stay tuned. I think we'll probably have some type of. A ribbon cutting. But yeah, super excited about that project. We've been talking about the conversion. We first started talking about it probably 10 years into my career. So it's really great to He's these one ways get converted and I that will have a positive impact to the neighborhood. Yeah, agree. Thanks. Made any of the looks great and just drove the way down on Michigan side. So I know I'm not. My district connects a district 14 and everyone's really excited about So thank you very much. Thank you, Thank you. We will
take proposal one. 47 at a time to vote on. Is there any questions for counselors on proposal in 47? Anyone who wishes to speak from the proposal in 47. And take condition for one pretty here I It has been moved and second into proposal, one, 47 to the full council with a do pass recommendation. All those in favor say Aye. Aye opposed, say nay. The ayes have it with consent. Who will vote on proposals. Number one, 48 and one. 51 through one. 54 together. Thank you. Are there lessons from counselors on those proposals? Anyone in that public who wishes to have any input on this proposals. CHAIRMAN Thank you, MADAM Chair. I'd like to take proposals one, 48 and won 51 through one. 54. All right. Make a motion to send proposals. One. 48 and won 51 through one. 54 to the full council with the pass
recommendation. Second. He's been moved and second into some proposals. Number one, 48 1. 51 one. 52 1 for the 3 months before to the full council with a do pass recommendation, all those in favor say Aye. Aye opposed, say nay. The ayes have it consent. We will vote on proposals. Number one, 49 1 number one, 89 together. One. 49 1.89 Together. Any questions or comments from counselors? Anyone public who wishes to speak on number one. 49 1.89 Forgive me, MADAM Chair, I move. We send proposals. One, 49 one 89 to the full Council. Past. Been it's been seconded to some proposal. One, 49 1 in night full council with the do pass recommendation. All those in favor say Aye. Aye opposed, say The ayes have it. Proposal. One 50 out the rise is a u-turn restriction at
Hill Avenue for eastbound to westbound traffic on 38th Street and the comments questions from counselors Any one of the public who wishes to speak on the proposal. One 50. MADAM Chair, I move recent proposal. One 50 2025 to the full Council. The do pass recommendation. Those in favor say I'm sorry, it has been moved and seconded to proposal. One. 52, the full council with a do pass recommendation. All those in favor say Aye. Opposed. Say nay. The ayes have it. Alright, next. And I think that that finishes has a fix up for that. It's I think no point when we have one 89, no. I'm sorry. We have one. We have one. 55, I'm sorry. That was in the group. He said That when my I'm so sorry, I apologize. I apologize to
everyone. And then we have one. 55, I'm so So we have one. 55 authorize the deletion of one-way street designation, cement, Michigan, a New York Street from College Avenue to Emerson Avenue. Anyone, any colleagues who wishes to speak on that. Anyone in the public who wishes to speak on proposal. One 55. Have a recommendation for that. Chair. The kind dissent has a one. 55 to full Council of the eu has recommendations. Second, has been moved and seconded to proposal. One, 55 to the full council with the do pass recommendation. All those in favor say aye. I oppose say nay. The ayes have it nave and now we're done. Thank you. Next up, we have before and I can said it's up to you. Whatever your most complicit with every most comfortable with proposal. One
88. Good evening, counselors or Stevenson dpw. So this is a transfer, totally 6.5 million between public works and the Parks Department. This is just moving the money to the cracked apartment to complete the projects that you all selected. So this is just an accounting procedure. Happy to give any updates or any question if there's questions. Thank you. Any counselors have any questions for proposal? One 88, Now any one of the public who wishes to proposal. One 88, yes, counselor. Thank So just to be clear. Is there a list of certain projects that are funded through this transfer? These are counts are selected. Projects of these are the 1 million projects that everyone selected into
that there is a list. 19 of them were dpw and 6 of them dpr. Yeah. So this is just moving 6.5 to dpw so that we have the full 19 to complete 19 profits over clarifying MADAM Thank you. Thank you. Yes, Council can help. Thank you, MADAM Chair. Just just to clarify How how is it 6.5 million. The original fiscal was 12. It was 25 12 and have split between the 2 evenly because the projects have been selected yet. So this is just reading up where the selection plan. Thank Thank you. In 8. Any other comments, questions. Thank you. I move that we sent proposal one 88 to the full council with a pass recommendation. Is the man to second and proposal, one 88 to the full council. If they do
pass recommendation, all those in favor say Aye. Aye opposed, say nay. The ayes have Thank you very much. Next, pose a one, 90 amends, various sections of the revised code concerning stormwater management to align with current practice, clarify requirements and align with regulations of the Indiana Department of Environmental Management. Shanahan. It's got to help us with this. Thank you very much. And so was thinking there's one present try. The pressure to remember my password put it It's little bit when technology works. Good evening, everyone. My name is Shannon Cole and I am the dpw stormwater administrator for engineering today. I am. And here to present some storm water code changes this is something that
the stormwater team has been working on for the last 18 months. Give you a little bit of background and also do a quick overview of the changes that are making it all so happy to answer any questions. You all they have or the public as well. So a little bit of timeline of where we are at today. So as you know, modifications were intro to the City County Council JUNE 9th. And we also had taking revisions to We are here today. Guess what? The Public Works Committee on JUNE. 26th. We also had companion updates with the regulations. So ordinance has delegated the authority for approval regulation for the regulations to the Board of Public Works. We took the proposed modifications to the Board of Public Works yesterday on JUNE, 25th at which the board approved it. One of the things that we think is really
important on the stormwater team public outreach and education on the upcoming changes. So we did to virtual sessions on MAY. 27th in MAY 30th where we went through the proposed regulation changes with the public. We had over 100 attendees attend in total between those 2 sessions. We had some good interaction with the public. We also I received some public comments for the public comment period as well as part of that identified some clerical errors that we were able to get addressed as well that we're really happy with that attendance as well in prior to making the changes to the regulations. We also that's up from public outreach so that we can understand as people use the manual has a look at the ordinance or other places of confusion that we can clarity occasion. Are they seeing best practices implemented elsewhere? That would be helpful for us in
Indianapolis to implement. So really trying to get feedback from those key stakeholders as they utilize our commodity Asians. So a little bit of background, the city of Indianapolis has and municipal separate storm sewer system permit. And that's for as we like to call There's a lot words that begin with the U.S. There from item. And this permit is good. Every 5 years we have to get a new permit. And so we had a new permit issued on FEBRUARY first of 2024, and there are new requirements within that permit. So it is our responsibility as the city to make updates to our code and regulations to make sure that we are incorporating those new permit responsibilities and that we have appropriate enforcement capabilities as well. And so item gives us 2
years to complete that. So those are due by FEBRUARY. First of 2026, we like to be ahead of time. Just there's anything that was no delay or timeline that we are still meeting that permit requirement. A little bit of high-level overview of our 4 permit. It regulates a lot of discharges and these have to be stormwater discharge is. And so that means we don't want like within it was a discharge. We don't want dob ways. We don't want sanitary flows. We don't want things that could harm our streams and rivers going into our storm water system. So as part of the city's responsibility to try and identify and remove any of those that are occurring from our system. The public at outreach and education. We look at our own facilities that could have the potential to police storm
water and make sure that we are implementing best management practices to keep any chemicals that we MAY use or that from entering our storm system as well. So a large number of things that are considered as part of our and U.S. 4 permit. All with the goal of keeping our started or rivers and streams as healthy as possible for both recreational purposes. And also, I'm just the environment in general. So a little bit of history going back. If you're recall in 2023, we were here previously. That was the result of item for sir. Yeah, 2023 item issued a construction stormwater general permit that also required updates to our ordinance Emanuel's. That was the last time that we came before this committee to get those code modifications updated. So now on to the actual changes that will be
implemented the first changes in section 2. 61 502. This is actually kind of good timing with can beach being appointed to the Marion County Storm? Water Management Advisory Committee. We realize interviewing the section of ordinance that when the committee was originally established. We had wastewater. We had other utilities that the city responsible for and doesn't. That is no longer the We are moved out references to combined sewer overflows as that's not the responsibility of the stormwater team. There's mentions of septic tanks, other things that just aren't are no longer the city's responsibility. So we wanted to make sure that those requirements and what they're advising us honor actually. Relevant to what we are currently utilizing today. Section 5.61 Is where the
majority of the changes took place within the ordinance a lot of that was we clarified expectations regarding regulated rains that we have within the county. That dpw has responsibility for. We identified through communication with the nsa and other individuals that there are some things like so many falls that if you read the letter of the code required a drainage prevent? Well, that's not really necessary removing that. Isn't it feeling the ground back? And so again, trying to streamline, do Is there really risk associated with that or not? And when the answer was no, let's just go ahead and make that change in here as well. One of the other things that we identified was that our dpw engineering projects. We have our own review process to make sure that we're complying with the stormwater manual. Then say a private project does. So we wanted to make sure that that
was clear to our regulators that we have these separate but parallel processes. Are they meet the same metrics as we go through those as well? And then a lot of it was just going through. We notice that we had some inconsistent terminology. So again, it's really important. Someone's looking for a definition are trying to understand what their regulations of the code state that we using consistent in intentional terminology throughout. We also looked at Section 5.75 Which exit environmental public nuisances it. So we updated that meeting of non stormwater discharge. That is a defined term within are ms 4 permit. So we thought that it was relevant that our storm water ordinance alliance with that definition, that item had already established. And then likewise in Section 6.76, 3 of 3 for the billing and collection related to
storm annual credits. We just updated the terminology there. So again, it matches with terminology that item uses. And that is you utilize in our permit. Looking ahead, we know that it's impossible to get all of our changes implemented at once. We have to create our plan of main purpose for implementing our changes and sometimes we're able to get some wish lists items incorporated as well. So one of the things that occurred while we are trying to wrap up our changes was the state passed House enrolled Act 10. 37, which had a no more stringent than the item. C s up requirement. We are not addressing those changes as part of this update. We need to go back through and relook that and make those changes as necessary. We also are looking at. And non stormwater
discharges to the ms for. So currently the city collects the storm water user fee. That's based off of your impervious area. Your heart service on your property that generates the storm water runoff when it rains. We are aware of other entities that are industrial users that have water. That's not contaminated, that they have a permit from item to connect into our storm system. So they are using our conveyance facilities, but they're not charge a fee for doing that. Whereas like was if they connected to the sanitary sewer, they would have to pay it. Charge for the disposal of that water. So that's one of the things that we want to be mindful of looking at, because that's a service that's being provided. It takes capacity away from our storm sewer during a storm event. So that's something that we don't have enough information on
yet. But we want to look into further so that we can both be aware of where those connections are occurring and what that impact is on our storm system as well. We also review a lot of variances. So if someone cannot meet the requirements of the manual, they can submit a variance and show how meeting the intent of the manual through various methods. That's a process right now that we don't have funding to cover all on dmd when it comes like variance for zone here that there's often a fee associated with requesting that variant. So we're looking at and the future potentially nearing that. And then just some other items, green infrastructure, we'd like to encourage that. That's a much more sustainable stormwater practice. So looking at what other communities have done too,
encourage the adoption of that infrastructure. We have a lot of animal kennels and dog parks that have their own storm, water, pollution considerations that are popping up. So we want to be mindful that keeping those from polluting our storm water as well. So could go on further. But we have our parking lot as we call it of the changes that we want to make in the future as well that we just didn't have the time to do in this round. So with that, I'm happy to answer any questions that the council MAY have. Thank you so much, Any questions or comments counselors? Shannon, thank you so much. This It's very technical. It's very complicated changes constantly. You know, with House enrolled Act 10. 37, I just want to commend you and the team for doing this technical work in attending to the task. I love when I get to
right. Dollar signs in my notes, too. I think there there are. There's definitely case for fees and that's always really, really good, especially as the city as a whole faces. Budget just really wanted to say this is really well done. Very technical. And I commend you and thank you for your work. Thank you. MADAM Questions, Concerts Council Gibson. Thank you, MADAM Chair. Appreciate the all the work you've done here. And I think it says a lot about what the city is trying to do in terms of making sure we are environmentally and tact for many years to come was a timeline for those items and the park. And I know that that they're critical items as well. Can you kind forecast within looks like next couple
years. So it's all depend on funding right? Well, it's a little bit of both its bow timing. So ag a 10 37 that had was an emergency declaration at the state level. So that's something that city departments are looking at very closely at how to implement that. The responsive to the concerns from our state legislatures while also making sure that we're continuing to protect city assets and then the local environment waterways here as well. So that one is the primary driver and probably be peeled off first from this list than the rest that we look at upcoming. We don't have any other regulatory drivers which have been we have the construction stormwater general permit that had a deadline that we had to meet rms for permit had a deadline that we had to meet. So probably step back and look
at these and say what are the most impactful to the community would have the greatest impacted either incentivizing green infrastructure or where the other pain points for the community that's responsible for utilizing our stormwater manual to make it easier. So that's I would anticipate that we'll do more public outreach to get more insight into what would be the greatest benefit to the community in the users that are doing this because we definitely don't want our manual to restrict development. We want to make sure that we're balancing that and it's a win for everyone. We're getting great development help drive I can on any within the city. We're also making sure that that development. Is it making impacting firms stormwater standpoint, our neighbors, our streams, cetera. So we want to try and find where that right balance is and work together
as a team to make sure that we have great, sustainable development within city you're welcome. CHAIRMAN, thank you. Thank you for the work. I have 2 questions, one of them. So we do that. Ms 4 permit every 5 years. The amount of changes that we're doing this time is that sort of a consistent like there's that many changes that we make every 5 years? So I've not this is the first ms 4 permit renewal I've been here for I think a lot of times it varies on what's happening, though, that the federal level. So a lot of the requirements start at federal level of what epa wants to see within the ms 4 permit and those come down to city as well. So Indianapolis has always had we consider an individual ms 4 permit. We are right now the only city in the
state that has that all the other communities that meet certain criteria are called the face to community and their permits. All look the same across the board. And so it's a lot of discussion and negotiation with item of what they need to see and what we think is feasible because if you think of a smaller community, they can go sample every out fall. We're tied. That's just not possible Indianapolis. So we've come up with other metrics help meet that same intent to make sure that we're monitoring the health of our waterways. So it just really varies of what the different pressures are at different levels. And we have a great team, a great ms for coordinator. He really has those conversations with item to make sure that word establishing regulations that are in necessarily in that we
can actually meet them. Okay. So I like that. There's that conversation between. So if there's something we can't me, there's nothing creation. Part of I was wondering, is there stuff that we would see on the horizon that we can sort of be proactive like and do it earlier averaged. But obviously the list is so long and keeps growing and selling moving things up is also difficult understand. So now I think to respond to that one of the things that we did look at. So we had our last permit and in the face to permit that I mentioned him out after ours. So we reviewed the changes that were what was a different face to prevent from our permit. And that was like, okay, we understand the intent of that. But that's not
feasible in Indianapolis. So again and another 3 or 4 years, the face to prevent will come you all before our next permit. So we can start to kind of get a little bit of insight into what MAY be coming and think of. What can Indianapolis do if we're not already doing something to me, that same intent? That is actually something that we can implement without spending insane amount of money to to not really achieve something greater than another available means. I love So we get to kind pull off of that one. That's earlier. Then my second I second-guess comment the fees for that than on stormwater discharges to the for they don't pay a fee. Is that something where maybe looking at putting a user fee n I think that in the long term makes sense. Look at our
user fee. We when the user fee was originally established in the 2015, 2016 time frame, there was a stormwater master plan that was created that was based off of the need. I think as we're looking at where we are today in 2025, our need is different than what it was there. We have. A lot more awareness of where other drainage projects are, where the need is. And one of the things that we we respond a lot too concerns that come in. My concern is are we going out and identifying problem areas for individuals don't know how to make their concern. Now. And so there's other indicators that we can look at to help try identify those neighborhoods and do a more comprehensive lot of where is the need and what is the need in our community and then utilize that data to help support we looking at what our storm water user fee needs to be so that we can continue to
maintain the infrastructure that we have. We 2 high hazard dams that were responsible for we have miles of levees and we have neighborhoods are under water after rains. So we have to find a solution set and fee structure that helps support. Improving drainage neighborhoods will also not having other existing infrastructure teary. And so that's something that the team is undertaking to to get an understanding of what does that look like so that we can come back to you all and do outreach to neighborhoods of what does the storm water user fee modification looks like. And I definitely think that and cities that have the ability. To pay to use our system to discharge their. A waste water because it's not of use to them any longer. It's something that should be
charged for. And I would agree. And I think we all know that we a couple years coming up with budget. And so I think growing the pie is always the biggest is the the best thing that we can do is we don't have to cut as much. And so I think supportive of looking at where we can grow without impeding and to a detriment of our residents right in communities. So there is that balance there. But I do think that's something that look at. Counsel Mary, thank you. MADAM Has had a question on the you talked about how we're trying to be mindful of. Developments coming in and then negatively affecting the residents around the development work out. Where make Mary MAY pop up. I've heard from a lot of constituents, especially in the afternoon area that they've had just that issue where there's been neighborhoods popping up
another yards or flooding their homes are flooding. What's the recourse at that point? I mean, the neighborhoods in. What we do as a city to make sure there are mitigating this issue because thus far, it seems like there hasn't been a lot done to help them get that relief. They need. Yeah, I think that's a good point. And one of the things that we trying to avoid, but it is not always affordable. And so I think looking at making sure that the plans that were approved for the drainage it for those implemented and everything installed correctly, because it's it's crazy. But you and I have all seen it driving on the street where you have that part water like That's streets plus But just that small difference impacts which way water goes. And so I think it's important that we're if when those complaints arise and a lot times, that's where the dpw team will get involved and go
out and do a triage to try to understand for the right things installed here. What is what is creating this? This ponding and sometimes it's things were installed correctly, but we're getting more intense rain events now than what we've had in that development. Seems news, though, is that the cause or is it something else? And so that's something that I don't know if in those particular patient's the dpw to use, but we have some some great team members. I go out and try and triage understand what's going on and what fixes can we implement or was something not done correctly, that he doubled the developer accountable to? Yeah. I think my concern, my big concern with the storm, water and everything with these new developments is the fact that it MAY look good as a plan or MAY forecast. Well, as on the plan, however, once we put it into actual implementation, it
doesn't work. And we've had these issues where that's it's flooding standing water. It's creating mosquitoes and health hazards. From that standpoint. So I just I would hope there's some way for us to go back that developer and have been fix it because all too often I hear that, you know, I never had this issue. We have this neighborhood pop pop up and now have all this flooding in my yard or you know, my and my property. So I'm hoping we can figure out a way you know, make that right by the neighbors that were there much before these neighborhoods. Are these developments because it seems like it's it's a common issue. Understand. And I think that's something that being a the permitting expecting about something that we can partner with to try and make sure that we're being really thoughtful as those plans are reviewed, that they
it's important check the boxes. That are needed, but also that we're looking through it through that technical and something, are we really getting something better? Cause? I likewise, if we can address it through those means then it goes on. Our list is the stormwater project that they were using our storm water user money. To pay for it because we want to have that for that quality of life. And so it's important that to me that whoever is doing the development changing the stormwater patterns is the one that's held accountable for making sure that that that's not having a negative impact on there. The joining Properties. Any other questions from counselors. Anyone in the public who wishes to speak on proposal. One 90 MR. V to to come up. Come on Can beach. I don't know Shannon oral ones aware
that on that parking lot. The first item in a parking lot is a very is one line on this piece of paper. But it's a significant the level of impact. So the city and the level of work to result that one item is it my estimation, significant relative to the 18 month to Shannon. They've already invested to finish the last update. The code. I think that the county doing. I don't know. Maybe if Shannon could speak a little bit to what order of magnitude. We think that's one line item might be too. The city. Liabilities that too. Yeah, I think so. That point my understanding again, dpw writes the code and the regulations and nsa's responsible for implementing
them in response this my understanding is that we are currently not issuing drainage permits for developments that impact that disturb lost acre. So any impacts that is not just serving a corrupt or is not currently required to get a dream that permit based off of the implementation of hb 807. Thank you. Thank coming Asked, what's the rationale for being less than acres that? So the cs up the construction stormwater general permit has. And was the case and that's return terminology. You have to obtain a construction stormwater general permit from the state. If you disturb one acre. So that is where that one acre threshold was established. Historically, we have permitted smaller Parcells than that because we understand that a smaller personal that goes from grass to a parking lot can
negatively impact. In joining properties. Okay. Thank you. Any other questions councilors? Okay, him. Thank you, MADAM Chair. I move that we send proposal one 92 the full council. They do pass recommendation. Second, he's been moved and second and proposal, one 92 full council. What they do pass recommendation. All those in favor say Aye. Opposed, say nay. The ayes have it. Thank you very much. Thank you for everyone showing up this evening and this hot. Summer nights and I hope you can enjoy the rest of your week we look forward to seeing you again next month. Thank you very much. And I'll take motion to be adjourned. Something think you.