All right, it is 7:04. If we could call this city council meeting to order and I'll rise for the pledge of allegiance to the flag of the United States of America and to the republic for which it stands. One nation under God, indivisible, with liberty and
justice for all. Doing roll call. All voting members are present. Uh at this time, we'll open up for public comment. If there's anybody that would like to speak on anything tonight, you're welcome to come forward to the microphone and state your name and address for the record.
Come on up. Good evening. My name is Leroy Johnson resident at 510 Main Street West here in Ietti and I'm representing a group of property owners that uh have land and
residency in the Brookfield Court edition with their properties abiding Madison Park. And so um I being the spokesman for them when the issue our topic of discussion is why do we
need a bridge across the creek in Noble Park in Madison Park. So you don't hear me. Okay. So on April 22nd, Chris
Carroll, who's the owner of the comm uh property there on the commons on Whiskey Road, uh introduced a request to build a bridge across a creek in Madson Park. And when we and the property owners in
this uh heard of this, it developed an objection to it. For the reason being that uh we feel that uh number one why is there a need
for such a uh for what's an installation as this bridge for this reason there is accessibility to the Madson Park using the sidewalk along Heritage Boulevard that runs all the way from the corner up on
Whiskey Road clear down to Fifth Avenue Northwest West that's accessible to the basketball courts, accessible to the tennis courts, accessible to the pickleball courts all along Heritage Boulevard.
Then when you get to the corner down on the corner there of Fifth Avenue Northwest and moving to the south, you got a large open area between the tennis courts and then down to the playground where the where the little kids play.
The large open area is used by the some of the older kids playing football, throwing football, various activities such as the older kids would would participate in. then accessibility the the other side using the sidewalks on
Whiskey Road to Main Street nor uh west all the way to the east down to the corner again of the park. So we've got accessibility and then all along Fifth Avenue
uh northwest all along there. So you've got accessibility on all sides of Madson Park without anything additional parking. He mentioned maybe a need for parking.
Those of us that live along Whiskey or along a uh in this complex, we we can see the activity that's going on in Madison Park from day after day after day. I have never yet seen a problem. The only one time, one
day out of a year will you experience parking and that's during Jubilee days and that's naturally congestion. One day out of that entire year. The rest of the time you can park along Fifth Avenue Northwest all along that whole
that whole distance there. You can do the same thing on Main Street West. You can park there as well. We don't have any parking problem facility at all. That park isn't used that heavily. So another thing to consider
here if that bridge was constructed to me is a number one issue is liability and I think this is a serious matter. I've seen times on that waterway that just it's it never overflowed the banks, but it's been up to the top of
the bank. And with that, you have a bridge embutment going over that that waterway and someone falls off or jumps off into that high water, there's going to be a problem there. And it's going to be a city problem because it could be a liability
that is uh not called for. So, we feel strongly about this. Strongly to the point that we've petitioned, we have formed a petition. 13 property owners along uh in the area
that I'm talking about that have property abuing the park. We've formed a petition. All have signed a petition in favor of voting no against this improvement with the exception one lady was unable to sign but she voted in
favor of the petition as well. So we have unanimous support. This thing of the the complex that Dave Clark developed there. When he completed that project, he deeded back that property went back to the city for
not for sale or to be future developing developed upon to be used for park conditions. What it was to be used for and that's what it is being used for. I watch the activity over in that park from day to day to day. That park is not
that heavily used on the part where the act where the playground activities and so forth that it's not that heavy. So I don't see no reason why we have anything additional. Now uh to me the only thing I can see is the purpose of that
bridge is for the benefit probably for the people that have the apartment complex. a new apartment complex, the commons on uh Whiskey Road, if that's the proper name. I think it is. Um,
now what I see there, that parcel or that apartment complex that was built, um, it's it's a very tight area and they probably I think it's a to me I would
consider it a de a developers problem. They didn't create anything for the amenities for the residents of that complex. So, some of the other apartments that are being s built in this town, one new
one I know of even has in a swimming pool, they have a fitness center, they have a library, they have a reading room, and various amenities such as this. Now I'm thinking that maybe the the ultimate motive here would be if we
have a bridge then eventually there may be able opportunity to put in some additional parking. There may be some opportunity to put in softball field. There might be some such things such as that other amenities that would be able
to be utilized by that complex. To me, that's not a taxpayers's responsibility because any amenities we start adding, any changes we put into these parks, these things have to be paid for by who? It has to be paid by the
taxpayers's dollar. Now, because they don't have that, I'm sorry that if they don't have it, that's not my problem. But I don't feel it's under my obligation nor the obligation of any of the residents that are living in that area should they be expected to
pay. So um I have some several of the representatives that are here tonight are property owners in that complex. Um they're welcome to speak. I would ask them to speak if they wish and I hope you give them the opportunity to
hear. So, as my conclusion of this, I did to take gather a little bit of additional information off of the internet. I can't say that it's 100% true. It's as true as the internet is. But you know, we have
the way I can gather we have about from 10 to 13 parks within the city of Iani. And uh this represents we have according what I can
see 179 acres of parkland in the city of Iani. Now according to the and we have 29 miles of hiking and water trails in the city as
well. What I can what I got the information I got from the NRPA which is the national wreck and park association which is a national organization that comes and recommendations to cities that are establishing uh park and recreational facilities. From what I can
gather, they feel that it should take um 10.6 acres per 1,000 residents of So with that, if I give Santi the credit of 8,000 residents, I
don't think it's quite that, but let's say it is. So based on those statistics, a thousand residents divided that into 8,000 gives you 8 and take it times 10.6 acres per thousand, you're
coming up with about 80 plus acres of resident of park within the city. From what I'm getting, I get from 179. we have sufficient park area within this
within this city and so um as far as density I think we've got plenty plenty of park facility here I think with the with the public works uh committee that we have in this in this
city I think they were granted I think they're underst staffed and I think they're probably under budgeted budgeted because of the all of the work that there's a lot of work to maintaining and keeping up the equipment on these parks
and I don't think we need to add to this because I think we're we're suffic we're sufficient in all ways here based upon the figures that I'm seeing for this reason I see no fe no reason none whatsoever the people that are occupying
these residents that own these residents and that you now presently have in front of you. They're retired people. We're retired for the most part. We enjoy looking out into that open space. We have wildlife out there. The deer are
there. Uh, two of our residents have ducks that are nesting in their bushes on the edge of their property. We have birds that are utilizing the reads in that in that waterway. It does not have to every inch of this city does not have
to be occupied with facilities such as they're talking about. So I feel we feel strongly about it. This is why we bought those properties because we enjoyed that openness and that
uh spaciousness and the you know just the fact that we're kind of got a nice open world out there that we can view from day to day. So, uh, for that reason, I don't see any reason why we need any park
whatsoever in Madison Park. Awesome. So, does any residents that are represented here tonight have a comment? I asked that you give them position to come up and and speak. And so, with that, I thank you for your time. Thank
you, Leroy. Uh, I'll just answer a couple potential questions in there. Um, this was not something that we planned to spend any taxpayer money on. It was a proposal that had come through from that property owner just with some ideas she wanted to help with the community and we
directed her to go to the park board to come up with ideas that made sense. Now, does a bridge make sense? I don't know. A parking lot, I don't think a parking lot makes sense. We I think we agreed there's things that do and don't make sense. Um, we decided to kick it to the park board because the park board, the
seven members on their park board have, you know, their finger on the pulse as far as that's their their duty is the park stuff. Um, I'm in agreeance. I don't think we should do much more development on parks at all. Um, and I think we're just considering the option because it was brought forward. Um, I don't think you guys have to be scared.
I' I've heard from four of the members of your community there and at this point I would vote against it personally. Um, but you know, it's it's one of those things you have to give the opportunity to go through the channels and, you know, try and do what you can. Now, there was I just do want to I want to point out that that apartment
building did contribute almost $100,000 of park dedication funds. Um, so with that in mind, those park dedication funds are supposed to be used to add amenities for residents to you enjoy the park. So, if you have that $100,000, you're not obligated by
statute to spend it on a park that helps those people, but at the same point, if you can come up with, you know, cost-effective means to use that money, like we're going to have a we're going to repave the tennis court there, and that's, you know, $30,000. So, they did contribute a fairly substantial amount to the park system. Um, so that's just
why, you know, I think it's right to hear them out on it. So, I appreciate your guys' support. Um, I love that you did the petition. you guys showed up and I've talked to uh some of y'all for a couple hours. So, I think it's I'm happy that you guys are involved. Yeah. I I I appreciate your passion and
I appreciate you coming up and addressing console. Um I've been on your side of what you're doing many times. Um the the only thing I would recommend
next time if anybody in the room wants to do something like this is try it's very easy to get put on the city agendas. So this would have been great to have as an agenda item so that we would have had more background and we could have talked to you more about it.
um public input. We try to keep to public input without maybe addressing such a complicated issue at times, but we're really open as a console, so we don't really have rules like old councils did. We'll we'll sit and listen to everybody,
but it'd be easier if it was put on the agenda. So, I I'll just add something. I did talk to one of the members on this about getting the park board's contact information so that they could get a hold of the park board. There was that's not public information on the website. So, we're working to get that
information to give to residents so they can call those people because the park board would be the first the first step. And I told them you could come into council or park board to talk about this during public comment. So, no. And I appreciate the heck of you out of you guys showing up. It goes through park. I really like your input and I totally get
it what you're saying. Makes sense. On my last comment, we realize that this is a this is a the discussion for planning. We know it's we know it's at that level. We know it request was made to the council. We know it's been referred to the planning and rec
committee. Sure. We're aware of that. But we want you to be aware of the fact how ser serious we feel uh about this about this particular project. This is why we put it in in form of a petition that we this is we strongly 100%
unanimously agree we do not want that facility to to be installed because that was going to you don't build a bridge just for the sake of building a bridge with with no purpose. So there's ought to be an ultimate reason for that bridge to be there and we don't need it and we
don't want it and we've endorsed it in the form of a petition and that's how strongly many times these things move on into in for discussion and all of a sudden they become reality without input and I'm taking advantage of the opportunity.
I am I'm thankful to hear the other side of the discussion because we haven't had it. So, no, I'm I'm glad you're in here having this discussion. And I'll encourage anybody else in the community, if you have a development or something you don't like, we need to hear about it. Otherwise, if we don't hear anything, we can only assume that people
are okay with it. So, I appreciate the heck out of you guys coming in and providing your input. I'll guarantee you you will hear a lot about this particular project. Thank you. Anybody else? You're welcome to come forward. Otherwise, I think we hear you loud and clear, too. So,
very well. Yes. Good. Great job, Leroy. You're always involved. I like that. Sure. Thank you for showing up and thank you for working on the petition and we hear you loud and clear. Thank you. You're welcome. All right. Is any any other
public comment tonight? You're welcome to come forward. Uh hearing none, we will move on to adopting the agenda. Are there any changes tonight, Miss Wood? No, mayor and council there are not. Motion to adopt. Second. Second. Motion to adopt by council member Lundine, second by
council member Heman. All in favor say I. Any opposed? Motion carries 5-0. The agenda is adopted. Uh next we have a proclamation. So I will read that off. This is for the class of 2025 recognizing graduates from the class of 2025. Whereas this time of year is cause
for celebration as Iani students are presented as graduating seniors and paving the way toward improving the quality of life for young people with a graduation diploma. And whereas the class of 2025 makes our citizens proud of their commitment to the responsible citizenship and support opportunities
for graduating seniors in our community that include higher education, housing, employment, and recre recreational activities. And whereas the class of 2025 will be our future leaders, pioneers, creators, motivators, and role models. Now, therefore, I, Luke Merrill, interim mayor of the city of Isani, do
hereby congratulate all Iani graduates of the class of 2025 for their dedication, hard work, and commitment. So, great job everybody. I'm excited to see what the class of 2025 has in store for the future of Isani. Uh, next we will move on to approving the city
council meeting minutes from May 6th, 2025. Motion second. Motion by council member Heman, second by council member Lundine. All in favor say I. I. Any opposed? Motion carries 5-0. Announcements. Uh city offices will
be closed Monday, May 26, 2025 in observance of Memorial Day. Uh park and ward meeting Tuesday, May 27th, 2025 at 6 p.m. which I suggest you all show up to. Give your public input on that um if you have any concerns about the park stuff. Uh, city council meeting Tuesday,
June 3rd, 2025 at 7 p.m. Economic Development Authority meeting Tuesday, June 3rd, 2025 immediately following the city council meeting. Are there any council committee reports? I have one. Have at it. Uh, so we had community education got rescheduled to
last night due to the uh, storm a few weeks back. So they listed off a lot of summer programs going on. They have a program for adults with disabilities. They have a middle school program that involves like a STEM type where they have a lot of hands-on experiences. Uh
there's a substantial cost to it, but it sounds like it's worth it. Runs for a couple weeks. Uh there was some questions on the 2021 referendum as far as how money was being spent. So, they put some more stuff out there which they posted to their
website. And then they talked about the adjustment to the preschool costs uh due to the state legislature having a mandate requiring lensure for preschool teachers. And I wasn't sure if she said that the current rate was 27 or $37 per
student, but they're expecting to go to $55 per student once that mandate takes effect. And they were able to get some state funds to offset some of that for this year, but it's only for this year. and uh ca the Cambridge representative
talked about that they are starting prep work for the uh road project they have their southern quick trip is going to be beginning soon and then they're going to expand their trail system to
Ian and that's it for that okay go ahead George oh you don't have one okay Jeff or Steve Um, so there was a BMX uh meeting was last last Monday. I was in Missouri,
so I did not attend, but uh I talked with the president of the BMX board and there might be discussions on some of their concessions um issues with their concessions. So he's going to fill out some paperwork and then so that might be a topic of discussion going forward. So
we'll see. We'll see when they turn in the paperwork. Sounds good. And I have uh something that's a little bit outside of committee uh council committee reports although it is related to Icicle which hasn't met in many years. Um that's somewhat regarding uh emergency management. Uh I had met
with uh Sheriff Cyberlick and Chief Myers and the emergency management uh individual as well as the chair of the county park board and we talked about emergency management and how to be more prepared um if something happens. Uh I would like to do something as a group to
learn more about what we can do to be prepared. Um we've had some good discussion on that. We just had some good discussion in cow and uh I just wanted to say that's a priority for us. Um public safety is a big concern. Uh so we're working on that and I'll come back with more on that whether we start
another committee for that or continue the icicle or however that works. Any other council committee reports hearing? None. We will move on to business item K1, resolution to consider authorizing ad for bid for the Heritage Boulevard intersection
improvement project. Jason, thank you, Mr. Mayor, members of the council. So, this is our roundabout project. We've made it to the stage of needing to be authorized to advertise to go out for bids. Um, plans are included in the in the agenda there for you to review. Um,
otherwise we're we're ready to get it uploaded and uh hopefully open bids in early June to uh to get the project rolling this year. Are you concerned at all about the lateness of this bid going into the construction season and maybe having
higher bids? So, so what I'm hearing in the industry is a lot of companies are light in the fall, which is when this would be able to be constructed. So, at the moment, no. Um, we are setting it up to be bid as completed this fall, not
giving the option to next year just to get the number and we'll see if the bids come in bad, we can consider, you know, rejecting them and and bidding again this winter for next season's construction season. But sure, you know,
with the with the what I'm hearing in the industry, I'm I'm certainly hoping we get the the bids that we would have hoped to get anytime we bid. Do you think adding the option to do it next year would lower the amount of bids we get or why did you remove that on there just to I mean it would be nice to have
a you know an idea say if it's going to cost a million dollars less next year hypothetically is does that option on there limit the amount of competitive bids we get or what was your thought process there? So, I guess two parts. Uh, the intent all along was to try and get this
project built this year. Um, I've been hesitant to commit to that while we were trying to get the land acquisition, but once that all squared away as quickly as it did, um, we have a legitimate time window to get this bid and still have time to get it constructed. Um, and so
trying to meet the goal of the schedule is one of them. Um, and to be honest, the the estimate right now is pretty close to what our grant fund is. And so any savings would just be unused grant fund. Okay. Sure. I mean, obviously
there's it's an estimate and we'll see if it comes in higher, but you know, it's it's reasonably close that with our cost split we have going on, it's not much of a concern to me. Okay. Thank you. Make a motion to approve. I got one
question quick. Um, do you foresee this project starting before rodeo and jubilee days? No. Okay. No, I think we even wrote it to it. First chance to start would be that following Monday or whatever. Okay. Because that is by far
our busiest time in the city. So, right. Um, you know, I guess and as we've kind of talked, you know, the intent is that to get this done in a three-month window, it would be a closure of the intersection with uh the county road
being detourred and local access routes to be kind of signed to keep everybody getting to the, you know, adjacent businesses. But that's that's the process to get this thing built in a you know in a three-month window instead of a six-month window in a in a reduced
cost. Any other questions or comments? I'll second the motion. Motion by Council Member Lundine, second by Council Member Holgren. All in favor say I. I. Any opposed? Motion carries 5-0. That's good progress on that. That's been 10 years in the making. So
that's true. What's your goal? Good job, Jason. Thank you. Uh item K2, resolution to consider approving a special event permit for VFW and Rum River BMX bike rodeo for kiddos. Good evening, mayor and council. A special event permit application was submitted by the VFW and the BMX for their bike rodeo for kiddos
event. The event will take place June 4th, 2025 from 6:00 p. p.m. to 7:30 for a one-day event and will occur at the BMX parking lot. The event is open to the public and will teach bike safety to the community. An estimate of 50 people will be in attendance. Um the applicant
is also requesting that the $100 cleanup fee be waved. And our applicants are here even though we tell them they don't have to come every time. So if you have any questions, so I did have a question. I remember growing up the uh VFW used to do like a
bike safety day and I assume just with the obvious, you know, partnership with the BMX was that just done just because it seems to make the most amount of sense and it bigger more space. Okay, sounds good. Awesome. I have a motion. I'll second. Motion by council
member Lundine, second by myself. All in favor say I. I. I. Any opposed? Motion carries 5. uh K3 resolution to consider amending the Rum River BMX lease agreement. Again, um as was directed by the city council in late 2024, um staff
has been working on updating the lease agreement with Rum River BMX to include the roof replacement warranty as well as update the contract to change the appointed city council member to their board from a voting member to an exeicio non- voting member. These changes have been discussed by the Rum River BMX um
and their board and all amendments to the lease agreement including formatting updates which there were quite a few um have been included in the packet. Um staff is requesting action on this item and again they're here for any questions you may have. Um our attorney did review these and so it's agreed on both ends.
So he said what he this is what he recommended. These were his recommendations. That that was my only question. Make a motion to approve it. I do have have a a comment or concern on this. Um I I'm still worried that the city won't have a voting member on that board
because we do have a vested interest as the city. Um is that something I assume that's very firm that they don't want on there or is there a more rationale for that or I guess for me I think we should still have a voting member on the board. Personally, I don't know how the council
feels. It was their request, the Remover BMX request for that. Yep. And I believe there's 12 people on that board. And so very rarely would the that vote from the city council member have any effect,
right? And I just don't we we have a we have a lease that should take care of all the issues with um the building and I just don't think as a government entity that we should have any say within the workings of their
nonprofit. So they're the building was built for them and they're paying that back. We have a lease. I just don't think that we need to have a voting member on their nonprofit. That's just my day-to-day business. Yeah, I think we all I think at that time when that
happened, we pretty much majority said the same thing when that was removed. I struggle with the same thought you had, but I think just having a member on the board being able to have some oversight and fill us in what's going on in a
day-by-day basis. And like you said, his his vote isn't going to count anyway at that point. And um it is a private entity and I like if the attorney approved it, I think I I'm good with it. And here's just another
note. The previous council member didn't show up for years and years and years. So if there was going to be shenanigans, they probably would have done it by now, right? So what was the justification for it being a voting member initially? It was originally when it was built. It
goes way back. The city invested in the building agreement. The city invested in the building. So, I'm sure the the lawyer city at the time thought that they should have a say in in what happens there to make sure that nothing went astray. It was done the same thing with the hockey arena until that note was paid off. Then
the city had nothing to do with it anymore. And as far as I can I um the information that I have, they haven't missed a payment in what 12 years. How long? 2015 10 years.
So, okay. Any other questions or comments? Did you make a motion to approve? I'll second. Motion by council member Lendine, second by Council Member Heman. All in favor say I. I. Any opposed?
Motion carries. 50K3 is approved. Uh, anybody have any questions on the consent agenda? I do have a couple. Nope. Go ahead. Go ahead. I had a couple uh with M1. I was wondering who's handling code enforcement with the res
resignation that we had of the code enforcement officer. Well, right now we're doing it as a one of our officers sat down with the jet just to get caught up to speed as far as one of
our day day cars and he's helping facilitate that piece, but we're handing it out to the other people that are actually working right now. So, we have one officer is kind of well, I don't want to say overseeing it, but picking up where Jed left off as far as the record management side of it. and then
whoever else is available on our officers are taking care of that. Okay. Thank you. I do have one other question with M3 uh the inspector report. I was wondering if we can also get any kind of stats as far as how often things are being caught
and not approved on first inspection because we had the issue back in March with the uh the resident who had complained about Rum River failing to catch some stuff. If that's a metric that we can have
sight of or track on this tracker to know how diligent or what the approval versus them requiring them to remedy something before they approve it. And I know usually they're very attentive um to even things outside of
what you're being inspected for. You miss almost like too much a lot of the time. So I that that situation I'm not really sure what happened there. I don't know. So you're proposing to have just more information. is that well in addition to what's being applied for I'd like to know what's being caught or what
something before is it's not our really our purview. So I'm wondering if that's information that's passed along that we can get any kind of metric on as far as what's being found or not found like trends. Yeah.
Okay. Is that something that we could do or is that something that they provide to us a year-end summary or a month summary or anything like that or is it a little too informal for that? I don't really get a report like that saying how many things they found. It was just permit by permit that we have access to
each property file as the notes are made. So, it's more on a granular level, but we don't have really they don't close out a permit. And if they find an infraction, they can't close the permit out until that infraction has been corrected. I understand that. So it it's
it doesn't matter what they're catching or not catching because the permit isn't closed. I understand that. What I'm concerned about is that the resident was saying that they're things are just being rubber stamped. So if we get some kind of validation or information, they're not just rubber stamping. So I don't know how you could do that with even if we had our own inspector. That's
that's virtually impossible to to say because one person can say it's being rubber stamped and one say it's not. And as myself, I deal with inspectors every single day. And I can say I do get, you know, some random complaints from them,
their oversight just as regular like, well, I got I'm being delayed for this. Why? So, I'll get calls like that, you know, once in a while. I've gotten them, too. So, I know it's happening frequent, you know, because I don't get everybody
doesn't call, but I do get regular calls from people asking why a permit didn't pass or what they need to do. We had one today, actually. So, I don't know if that help. It would be nice to know maybe they can give us a more of an informal report at the end of
the year or something if they might have that tracked. I'm not really sure. Maybe we ask and see what they I'm just asking like I think it's reasonable to ask. See if they have it. They might. So, any other questions? Otherwise, I got a couple. That's all I
have. Thank you. All right. So, item L2, um, the agreement with the community bulletin board at the liquor store. I did reach out to Keith and he hasn't had any issues. I don't know if city staff or any council members have heard any complaints about the advertising or the community billboard or bulletin board
there. I've heard that people like it. Perfect. No issues from city staff or complaints. Okay, great. Um and then on the resolution or L4 uh extending the agreement for banking services with Falcon National, you know, they they listed that um the interest rates on our
deposits are 3.8% below prime. Uh that's rather low. Um, that's that's actually very low and I don't know what sort of other options we get because I mean we have a lot of money in that account and I'm sure they would hate to lose our
money that they can use right now as you know liquid assets for mortgages or or lo loans. Um, do we have a very competitive bidding process for that? Because, you know, if right now I can actually get a higher yield on a personal bank account starting with 5,000 bucks, a high yield checking
account. If I have 5,000 bucks, I can go in and get a higher interest rate right now than what the city gets on our millions of dollars of deposits. Is there a competitive process there? And can we try again? Because if we're missing out on interest money, that's saving all these residents money. I think it's very important that we make
that about as competitive as it possibly can be. So, this extension is an extension that already occurred. Uh we did go out for an RFP. That RFP window did close. And the reason why I'm extending it with Falcon
is because I need more time to review. We got five proposals in and there just is not enough time for me to go through all of them to vet them all out by the time allotted. Plus, I was informed that the window that had previously been set
up, I think was maybe anticipated that maybe we wouldn't be changing banks. Uh there's not enough time in there if we were to change banks to make the conversion. So that's why I asked them this is the same terms that they had prior if they would continue that on for
just an additional length of time. Okay, great. I appreciate you taking that over. It's been a hard a hard deal with losing our finance director, so I understand the having to look through all that stuff. I just didn't think 3.8% below prime was a very good rate, especially in the in the investment market right now. Yeah, I didn't catch
that until I zoomed in on it. Is so the agreement's till August 31st 25. So, it's just a short-term agreement. Correct. The current extension goes until June. And so, I asked them to extend it two more months. Yeah. I am I'm good with that. I mean, we're without a finance manager right now to
be able to do everything. And then I Yeah. Okay. So, just that's a priority in my eyes, so I figured I'd bring that up. Any other questions on the consent agenda? Otherwise, I'll take a motion to approve. Motion to approve. Second. Motion to approve from Council Member
Lundine. Second from Council Member Peterson. All in favor say I. I I any opposed? Motion carries. Any other communications or questions from anybody? If not, I'll entertain a motion to adjurnn. Motion to adjurnn. Second. Motion to adjurnn from council member
Lundine. Second from council member Peterson. All in favor say I. I. Any opposed? Motion carries 5-0. Therefore, we are adjourned. Thank you. Thank you.