Okay, I'm making this announcement in compliance with the open public meetings act being chapter 231 public law 1975 laws of the state of New Jersey. The planning board secretary has prepared a schedule of the meeting of the planning board of the burrow of Kennallorth for the year 2025 and has posted a true copy
of this schedule on the bulletin board located at the front of entrance of the burrow hall and has mailed true copies of this schedule to the local source and the star ledger and is maintaining a copy of this schedule in Burough Hall. Accordingly, the notice of requirements of the open public meetings act have
been satisfied in regards to this meeting. Can we stand for the pledge of allegiance? I aliance to the flag of the United States of America and to the republic for which it stands. One nation under God, indivisible with liberty and
justice for all. Roll, please. >> Mayor Crawford >> here. >> Mr. Berno >> here. >> Mr. Scarif >> here. >> Mr. Davis >> here. >> Mr. Mazio here. >> Silowy >> here. >> Mr. Scaderi >> here. >> And Mr. Valdi >> here. Is there a motion for the approval
of the minutes of June 24th? >> Motion. >> Motion made by Mayor Kovich, second by Mr. Scader. All in favor? I. >> Okay. Uh Cath Kathy, any communications? >> Yes. Uh we received a request from Mr. Paparro for one-year extension on
application 23-03 uh Dunkin Donuts uh 705 to 717 Boulevard. Mr. Rego prepared a resolution for the same and it's on the agenda for this evening. >> Okay. >> Approving or disapproving the one-year.
>> Okay. >> So, we could discuss that when we get to the resolutions, right? >> Um, go ahead. >> Also, Mr. Rego responded to a letter from Lawrence Kelly regarding a complaint at 251 Monroe Avenue.
The issue there was the construction department had um discussed an issue regarding parking with Mr. Cali and the board was of the view that it wasn't in our Bailey Wick yet and that he should uh Mr. Cali and
his clan should work with the construction department and if needed for some future relief, we're here. But that's what I sent out. You should have a copy of the letter. We have a copy of the letter. >> I'm sorry. You're finished. The only thing I'm going to say about that, Mr.
Riggo, and and I as soon as I saw that come over, I asked Kathy to send you a letter that before any letters go out to that client or any client um that has uh context in which a letter like that is
written, I want to I would like to review the letter before it goes out. Got it. >> And then we can just get it out and we need that in a timely fashion so we can move it along. Go ahead. Got it. >> Okay. Next is resolution application 24-08 front fencing. Um Mr.
>> Yeah, this is for property located at 205 North 17th Street. The applicant is is here uh at our June 24th meeting. We heard and approved I think by 5 to 4 vote uh an issue regarding the um uh
fence in the front yard. The board heard it. They approved um relief requiring that the fence be moved front yard fence be moved out of the rightway and within a certain distance from the
um front porch. This was dimensional variance and there are normal normal conditions. I also had a condition that if the front yard fence is no longer needed uh or no longer necessary that it be
removed and that the board didn't want that front yard fence relief transferable. it was uh focusing on uh the applicant's wife regarding her condition and uh we felt that I think by
again a thin vote that relief was warranted but it should be focused on that on that situation that it that's so for clarity what we're saying here is that if the applicant sells that house the fence goes back to
the proper set the >> there is no fence in the front yard set back Yeah, they know is where the front yards at all. >> Right. >> Do we also have in here? >> How is that um >> I'm sorry. No, I was going to say how is that um um how is that that triggered?
How do we know how does a uh a future building official know that that the house was sold? Is it a deed restriction? >> Well, interesting. Usually, you know, if if if someone moves, eventually that information gets
transferred to your uh tax people, you know, the tax assessor, the change of deed. So, that will become public knowledge in the burrow um in in in the future. The more trickier issue is if
the applicant's wife no longer uh has a need for a front yard fence. How would we know that? I have no idea. >> Yeah, I think I think it's more relevant that if the house is so if the title's over transferred there's got to be a trigger at the capital. >> Yes,
we would know at some point. It may not be the day of we would know at some point. >> Yeah, but we're not going to know. >> Yeah, we're not going to be paying attention to policing that. >> Well, is that come under like Frank says a deed restriction? It could uh that's a little more cumbersome, but yeah, it
could be that the applicant would have to deed restrict the property, which would probably mean uh this gentleman would probably have to retain an attorney to prepare the appropriate deed restriction and record it at the county courthouse, you know, but so that way
anyone buying the property would see in the deed restriction that oh, we can't have that very nice rent in front, we have to remove that. That would be the ultimate when some when a potential buyer gets a title search, they would see that that's that's there. Um, a
little more cumbersome, but it's more >> Yeah. But it's necessary. What do we do tonight to put that in place? You could indicate that you would like me to um revise the uh revise the ordinance the conditions revise a resolution to
indicate in as a condition that there would be a deed restriction to that to that effect which I've done in many other resolutions. Uh so I you can you can adopt it with that modification. I will go ahead and put that in and get it to Cathy. >> Okay. >> Mr. Scary. So we do the deed
restriction, but who's still seeing that? So like when they transfer the deed, the people that are buying it will see that, >> right? >> But then if they don't comply, will they is anybody in the town that like when we when they transfer the deed, is there anybody in the town reading the deeds? >> The attorneys. >> So the attorneys would have to look at
that and say, >> the attorney doesn't read the >> right. But if they didn't do it, we wouldn't have I know there's just if if if we put a dealer restriction in, you buy that house, you know that you can't you can't keep that keep that there.
Maybe I can and shall you know new new buyer shall shall immediately advise the uh construction officials within the burrow of that. Yeah, something like that. If I may, if you have a a deep restriction and it's in place when you are listing that house, it goes with the
the washer, the dryer, the second floor. Also, part of being forthcoming and transparency, that front fence has to come down as part of the sale of the house. If they don't put that in there, then there is a problem with the seller. If I'm a new buyer, I don't want to
ruffle feathers within 5 minutes of buying a house. >> You don't want to, but many people don't. What he's saying is there's still not we're still not getting nobody's still saying it from the town to they're still out of Mr. Baldi. >> No, but the thing is it would be restricted. It takes some of the
pressure off the building department because then they have a piece of documents standing on and it's not just oh let me there's just so much we can do. Sure that we would sit out there on the front porch to make sure it happens. It would be listed as part of the sale of the house. It would have to be listed
that defense has to come down >> and give the building. >> Um, but the applicant would then have to prepare the We don't prepare the deed restrictions. That's >> No, but we would put that language into the resolution. >> Yes.
>> And that would be part of his resolution compliance. >> Yeah. Yes. Did you have an attorney when you bought their house? Obviously. >> You didn't have an attorney? No. >> Okay. and title company who reviewed who who who reviewed the documents and
>> who is the real estate agent? >> Ah, okay. Well, you're going to have probably have to get advice from that real estate agent about and and they'll see the language in the resolution when we finalize it and and then I'll put that we want to copy that >> tax assessor gets the resolution. So, he
doesn't make it just the tax >> the tax assessor does get the resolution. >> Oh, yeah. >> Yeah. And so he would have to read that through. >> Put it in this. >> They get a copy of >> they get the resolution. >> They get a copy. If you can maybe flag it, that'll in addition to putting in a deed restriction, you can flag it. So
when it comes across their desk, they can do something. But when there's a sale, >> yes, Kevin, the minutes reflect a discussion on the part of the board of the defense being moved 25 ft from the property line. That's not reflected in the resolution.
Perhaps it should. >> I have I have in here that it's it's um that's okay. So that was reordered my question before we went into deed restrictions because right now this resolution is going to
give the applicant the marching orders to go and do what he needs to do with the fence. And if that's not clearly spelled out, he has no idea what to do. >> We said two things. who said relocate the fence out of the front yard, set back and no less than 25 ft from the
front property line. So, we weren't, you know, you got to put it on this this inch of land. It was just push it back, but no no um no closer than um um no less than 25 ft from the front front property. So, there was probably some
leeway in there. I don't know how much they did. Go ahead, Mr. Gor. That's in the minutes, not in the res. No, it's in the res. Uh >> I'm wrong. I I didn't I didn't see it this morning. >> Yeah. Condition number one. That's it's a top condition. It It's
>> I thought we were leaving him a little bit of leeway. You push it back this way, but don't get closer to the front yard porch. And within that range, you can you can have your fence. Is is I I don't remember that. I don't I don't know how we can have a resolution with
giving someone the leeway to say, "Well, my leeway is eight more feet." We have to be defined in what we're what we wanted on this applicant. We wanted to get him out of the front yard setback. Yes. We we moved to the front yard fence, but we said it's too close to the
push it back out of the right, but don't go 2 in from your front porch cuz it's ridiculous. We, you know, we said no less than 25 ft from the front property line. So he had, >> so we don't use >> with respect, we can't use terminology
like he has some leeway. He doesn't he have 25 ft? >> Yeah. >> No less no less than 25 ft from the front property line. Okay. So he has to push off the property line by 25 ft. If he wants to do 24, knock knock knock himself out. Yeah, it it's it's one of
those unless we're out there with a with a surveying kit. I mean, what fuse? >> I don't think there's 25. >> Yeah, you mean 26? Yeah, you might 26, >> right? 26. >> No, you got to clean out the bottom. You can't be 25 ft from the porch. That
would be back. No, 25 from the front property of the front yard setback is a is 25 ft. Right. All right. Okay. So we basically said get out of the front yard set back >> at the end of the day. That's what we said get out of the front yard set back
cuz there was a discussion about it almost being on the um the front staircase at the bottom at the landing and we were like well that's that's too tight cuz then what do you do with that? Then you don't have and then and then we we backed off of that and I think our the way I remember is that we just we
just wanted to get it off the the uh >> Yeah. I mean that's why here's my concern, Michael. If the way this is written and the way this is worded right now, the applicant is sitting right here. Do you have any idea what we're talking about? >> No. I sent an email earlier this week
because I went to buildings to get license. I was confused. I never heard anything. >> Well, you can't really do anything until the resolution. So, that's why we're here tonight, but I'm trying to clean that up for you. Yes. Actually,
with the condition, he does have a stage direct that it has to be removed from the front yard setback requirement no less than 25 ft from the front property line. So, that's a definable measure 25 ft from the front yard
front property line. Front property that's a definable set. >> Okay. So that's the front [Music] property without Mr. Rodriguez on the on
the >> Yeah, that's what I was thinking. We can do that right now. Mr. Rodriguez, why don't you come on up here? Just just state your name. Sure. Quick Harrison and the applicant in this matter. Thank you. >> Uh, no problem. Thank you for having me.
Uh, so my question is if the front stop, let's say that's I don't know the numbers. Let's say it's 27 1/2 ft out. The leeway that gentleman was mentioning was if it's no less than 25, but the front door ends up being like 27 1/2.
That's the 2 1/2 ft I have of in terms of putting. That's the way the That's the way the uh resolution sounds right now. You're telling me it's either at least 25 but get off the front. That's and this is what I have to play with. It could be 6 in. I don't know. Let me hear
from Mr. I would say that whoever's his survey is for his property. He probably he may have stake down already. It's 25 ft from the front property line. If he wants to go beyond that closer to his
house, he may. But that's for him. the survey or the setback line. >> It is 25 ft des set back cuz if we say get out of the setback that means from the front from the property line you got to get out of 25 ft. I mean you can't be
within that. I don't know how much how much is left. I would look for Kevin to say that that's a setback. But my memory is that there's a 25 ft set back which is probably why you were that's what the board now if there's two or three feet
left probably ridiculous but but I don't know what else you wanted to add a setback to but that was that was always happen. I was looking for something more restrictive which I understood that didn't like and that was fine. What what I'm confused about is the
difference between the set back and the right of way cuz you're the set back is from a property line to the front of the house. >> The right of way is what I thought we were talking about. He's currently in the burrows right away with that fence. So, he's got to get out of the burrows right away for sure. And then from
there, he needs to be in his own, you know, in the setback within the front of his house. and then where he wants to put that if we can get there has to be within the setback or on the on the property line that's it there was a talk about
we were starting to get conversations about that's ridiculous it's going to see it's going to look like he walks out on I mean it's not exactly this is about 35 ft street dinner >> right so 10t right of way is the
barrow's rate of where a sidewalk was, you know, was supposed to go right. I said, "David, you're calling the right way from the curb 10 ft back from the from the set from the street." Yeah. From the street to wherever to 15 the property line. That's the burrows right
away, which again, I thought in the old days, rightways were put side for sidewalks. There is a sidewalk on the other side of the street, but not on this side of the street. So, we were saying you're in the burrows right away. You have to get that fence out because it is now. It's in the barrels right away. So, it's got to be moved in at a
minimum of 10 ft. And then at 10 ft, you're on his property line, right? Cuz it's 25 ft setback. And if he wants to make it 20, it sounds like we're revisiting the whole No, that's what we talked about. I
know you're the verb that you're using is not matching with what Mr. I don't know if that's right. Is what Mr. wrote was Mr. Brian has some details on the on Let's see if we could figure this out. >> Uh Christian, I have a survey in front
of us uh which shows the fence is uh 7.2 ft off the curve. It is maybe 7 or 8 ft forward of the property. Right. Throw right away. In
addition to that, the property line is 25 ft away from the front of the house, >> right? 5 yard set back. That's what I've been saying. >> So, a fence would go up to the front of the house at 25 ft. So I'm not sure if
that's the exact normally >> down perhaps 25 ft from the curb in which case it would be that's 15 maybe 33 then 25 have 7 or 8 ft in the
front >> or did did you 25 ft from the house which would put you at the right maybe we could reverse it. He can't go further from from this front porch. You can't go x number of feet out. That way if that's
within with that rather than saying let's start and mark it in, we can say from the front porch out that's a definitive. Can you can >> to a maximum of 25 >> a maximum of something 2500. That's the property line. >> Can you calculate give just give me one
second. Can you calculate can you do um a number be from the house to the curb? Is that 33? >> We did have exhibits that night, didn't we? I'm sorry. >> We have photos from the front of the house to the curb is approximately
39.2. >> Okay. >> From Yeah. From where the stops from the porch >> the porch >> to the curb is approximately 39 39. >> Where is the fence right now? 7 ft from
the property line approximately is basically in the middle of the curve and the right. How far is the fence from the house right now? >> Yeah, that's what I need to know. >> Is it 39? >> 25 here.
>> He's in the right way. It has to be 25 ft. >> 30 30 right now. It's 32 ft from the front of the house. Makes sense. >> Okay. So it's 32 ft. So if he moved that fence towards the house 7 ft, it's out of the right away,
>> right? >> And it'll be at on the house from the front porch to that point. >> 25. >> Okay. So we say maximum 25 ft from from you know from the front of the house. Yeah. >> Why can't you just refer to the
rightway? Just get it behind the rightway. You can put it wherever you want. >> Exactly. Right. As long as it's out. Our purpose was to get it out of the right way and not to not to go back and forth a foot over or you know cuz I know we have enough. Right.
>> He he may have some flexibility. Yeah. But so so the first so 10 ft in the front is sacros. Nothing goes there. >> Nothing goes there. Okay. So then he >> has to be moved 10 ft from the curve. >> If he moves 10 ft back
more than less than >> Yeah. No. Yeah. Yeah. You have to go with the rightway line. You can't use the curve because >> varies. Specify, >> right? Cuz it's more like 14 ft or something. >> Yeah. So, behind the rightway. So, if he measures from his house, not his porch, 25 ft out, he will be out of the
rightway. >> Yes. >> You need to be 6 in to the opposite side of that. >> Simple enough. That's how you have to write it up. You have to also do 24 maximum the measurement of the post
that's going in the ground. That's the front at the end of the front porch face of the front porch. A maximum of 24 ft toward the road. >> Yes, that's on the front of the house. >> As long as our back of the napkin math is right right now. >> Yeah. Yeah. doing is that you got 24 ft
from the front of your house within that range to put those fence. >> Well, yeah. I just remember last time the number was like 7 ft and change. So, we were saying that basically like one strand of fence to just move back. >> Exactly. That makes sense. So, >> right. >> Yeah. 24 25.
We're trying to give you a base point to measure from because when you go to a building, you're going to have a hard time because Kevin the garage from here it looks like it. Okay. So
that that's the one plane he measures from. >> Because I'll be telling some random spot and going the rest charts and then he's going to say he's right. Somebody's going to say he's wrong. >> I thought All right. Yeah, you might be
right. Okay, we clear. How are you going to word the um from from the front of the house, the front porch? No more than 25 ft out. 24 24 >> toward the for the rock and then you're
okay. You're you know you're not into the right. >> So if if you want to do 22 21 23 from the very front very end of the portion. >> Yeah. Not as far as
actual like >> and then does this resolution qualify for Kevin's compliance clause? So then you add that >> that's what I was going to ask on all three of these resolutions are going for time are we going to put the time frames
in as we were talking about I know Kevin mentioned it what language are you talking about Kevin specifically >> 6 months >> so what I do for so 6 months from the date of the do of the um resolutions
adopt was published 10 to 10 uh six months from the date of the adoption. I think in this in this situation being that it was a uh an a compliance issue, I think it should be faster. >> Yeah. >> Yeah. Agreed. >> Okay.
So, um we have here 24 ft. We have the deed restriction and we have a um how many how much time you getting right on this? Yeah.
By year end 3 months 90 days 90 days. 90 days. You got to have this done in 90 days. >> Yep. So getting So my question is so I have someone come in survey move everything properly get the permit with a legit mover take care from the yard.
um go to get consult to do your restriction and >> yeah that's important to go to your need some verification come and make sure that everything >> let's get emotion let's get emotion together
let's let's hear how you're going to do this so we can make a resolution uh approve this resolution with the Yes sir. Since the assessor is going to see the resolution, is the restriction still necessary? >> The assessor
note that he's got to focus in on it is a process. Well, I think we all want it. We all want the data restriction. Okay. >> Yeah, we all want it. >> Okay. Things go by the wayside. deed restriction language complies within 90
days from the adoption of the resolution and with regard to the front yard no more than 24 ft from the front of the house toward the road within that 24 ft he could put his fence up. Okay. >> Can we get the resolution the next day?
>> Yeah, I'll come in and sign it and we can give it to Quinton. >> The resolution yesterday. >> Yeah. If you get it right Yeah. get it to me right away and I'll do it. Um, so we could approve this resolution
>> as amended. >> As amended, right? Okay. >> Is there >> Yeah, I was going to say, but if we were memorializing tonight, only the people who voted in favor people voted in favor, >> right? No, I was saying I want to get that clarification. So, I'm not I'm not
going to be voting on this because I was one of the people who resisted. >> Kathy should have the five names that can vote. >> Okay. Okay. Based on what the attorney said to um approve this resolution,
we need a motion. I'll make a motion to approve it as amended. >> Mr. Mazio made a motion seconded by Mayor Carlo. >> Roll call. >> Yes. >> Uh Mayor Carovich. >> Yes. >> Mr. Perno. >> Yes. >> Mr. Scarice.
>> Yes. >> Mr. Matio. >> Yes. 24 >> and Mr. And that was it. Mr. Bise, he's not here. >> He's not here. If he voted in favor, he's not here to
>> Mr. Carlo voted in favor, too, but he's not here. >> What do we do? Yeah, you have enough votes to approve at the last meeting. Memorialize with one, right? Exactly. All right, you're all done. Go buy the That was easy.
Yeah. >> Okay. You just reminded me of Groucho Marks. I can't tell that joke, but Okay. Application 2402 Durham School Services. Mr. Rao. This was um
um a use variance approval with preliminary and final site plan dimensional variances for the property at 251 Monroe. As the coordinator recall when you heard this in May and there were some we had to tweak it a little
bit. Um the applicant was coming in to demolish certain buildings. outdoor areas of the property were going to be used for um uh outdoor storage. Also, bus and employee parking. There's there was going to be um parking for bus
spaces and um we heard this at length. We approve the use and um we we approve the application with number of conditions which are set forth
on page six through 8 six through about 19 conditions including how the site should operate and that's what we have here. So everybody okay? You've read the resolution. Everybody okay with the resolution always says is there a motion
to approve this resolution? Again, we're going to add that >> time restriction on this whether it's 6 months or you know there's a lot to do there. So I think 6 months is okay with me. >> Who is the attorney for this? Does anybody remember?
>> Steven Hale I believe. Stephen H. Okay. >> Sorry Natasha. Okay. You you guys comfortable with 6 months of this? Okay. Yeah, I don't know. I'll let it be us. >> If it's not enough, you can ask for more
time as the period approaches. Okay, you can do it by letter request. We got that. Who is making this motion? >> Motion made by Mr. Baldi, seconded by Mr. Scaderi. Roll call. >> Uh, Mr. Perno. >> Yes. >> Mr. Mr. Mazio.
>> Yes. >> Mr. Leowi. >> Yes. >> Mr. Scaderi. >> Yes. >> And Mr. Veraldi. >> Yes. Okay. That one signed. Next one is don't application 24006
North Holdings. Yes, this was um another application uh through Steve H's office. This was um uh involving property on 110 124 North 12 Street. We approved this in June. It
involved putting in or installing a number of new parking bays on the south side of the existing building. Um they were modifying parking. They were um uh adding parking to areas that were
currently grass and gravel and they were doing some other site work. I listed the variances that they were seeking. We approved it with again a number of modifications or another number of conditions. I believe there were 24. Uh
we did get or I I saw subsequent to this I saw u relatively recently a packet of documents that came in with the health. Okay. And and >> Yeah. Yeah. I don't know if the board saw that they had revised plans.
>> Yeah. And uh something from the traffic people from the health people. And if the board approves this, I can add that compliance also as well. Okay. Okay. Is there a motion to approve
I'm sorry, Mr. Grimaldi? Is there a motion to approve the um the application with the compliance for 6 months? Are you asking a question that resolution? >> Yes. Not the resolution. So made by Mr.
Gali, seconded by Second. >> Mayor Carovich. Roll call. >> Mayor Carovich. >> Yes. >> Mr. Bernuma. >> Yes. >> Mr. Scarice. >> Yes. >> Mr. David. >> Yes. >> Mr. Matthew. >> Yes. >> The Dowy. >> Yes. >> Mr. Grimaldi.
>> Yes. >> All right. The next one is 230003. Uh, the NATC donuts. Mr. Rego. Thank you. Uh, this was a a letter request to the board from Mr.
who who's here um as expected because of the uh impacts um county of union um has a hand in this there's a currently a fairly complex approval process the applicant requested an extension of the
minor subdivision approval to for a year May 23rd 2026 uh I I uh adopted a resol or I I drafted a resolution to to that effect. And if the board wants to hear anything further, Mr. Parro's here. If not, we
can just vote on it. Mr. Question. >> Yes. >> Excuse me. >> So, if you're saying you didn't give an extension, was that staff? They have to build sooner or >> No, they have more time. They have to build according to what we approved, but they have more time to do it. And that
happens sometimes. If there's financing issues, the applicant can't move ahead. In this case, I have to deal with the county, I have to deal with the state. They take forever for everything or uh back in CO there were issues with I can't get materials. So it they don't
they can build anytime within that. They don't have to wait a year. They can build any time, but they just need comfort time frame to to do what they want to do. But everything else is the same. >> Yeah, they have to comply with every >> No, no, no. This is why they're asking
for it for if Yeah. a minor subdivision if if you don't file within a certain time frame, it it it goes away. Um but this is their protection to to um at some time so they
don't get jammed up. So if we don't approve this, their approval disappears. They don't approve. If we don't no if they don't approve if we don't extend this the minor subdivision
will you have to file a minor subdivision de within a certain time frame and Joe if I'm off base please feel free you have to file within 190 days if you can't file it the law says that the minor subdivision cannot be received by he can't record which in
essence it that that goes away but the law provides that either before that time expires 190 days or after you can ask the board for an extension within which to file that subdivision deed and that's what the applicants asking for here. It's relatively common in this day
and age that developers just can't build within the time frame they think they can. And um and uh in this case, I mean, if if you want a more of a if you want a comfort level, I'm sure Joe can >> No, I mean, I guess my only question is
if this board didn't approve his extension, >> it'd be a problem. Go ahead. Would they have to come back and present their project once again? >> No. No. that they would they if if it wasn't approved if I were to go to court and get a judge to order it very quickly
we would have that problem on our motion approved by I mean the motion was made by Mr. Lady second by Mr. Mazio wrostain wasn't here for the application. This is for the extension but Mr.
>> This is just for this application. Yes. >> Mr. Perno, >> yes. >> Mr. Sc. >> Yes. >> Mr. David. Yes. >> Mr. Mio. Yes. >> Mr. Lei. Yes. >> Mr. Scary. >> Yes. >> And Mr. Baldi. >> Thank you. Thank you. Okay. Brilliant.
Great. I'm going to go back to dissecting the frog. >> Okay. Application number is 24009. And I guess we can't do them together, right?
>> Because no, [Music] I don't think we want to ask about 26 tonight. Are you prepared to do that? >> I don't think he is. >> He said no. He said he said no before. >> Okay. Okay. Um the ui
a near application for 720 Boulevard um it was brought to our attention that the applicant um for whatever reason just not going to move forward at this point in time. We we this this resolution is dismissing the application without prejudice,
meaning they're not prohibited from coming back to us for the same or similar project. Um, this leaves the door open if they want to come back. Okay. I just want to make a correction. I said application 2409.
You read 240 to 10. Am I correct? 720. >> I was following the agenda. I and so 10 and nine they're both the same. >> Yes. The next I just wanted to be action. Okay. So yeah. Did everybody get all that?
>> Mhm. >> Okay. Any questions? So we're doing nine first, right? 9 first. Okay. >> Okay. Same same my same comments. That's 7:30 Jefferson A. Okay. So 7:30
Jefferson A. You worry the resolution is exact almost exactly. >> They're the same except for the application numbers and the addresses. Yeah. >> Okay. Is there a motion to dismiss without prejudice? >> Motion. >> Motion made by Mayor Cage. Second.
>> Second by Mr. David. Roll call. >> Mayor Covich. >> Yes. >> Mr. Perno. >> Yes. >> Mr. Scr. >> Yes. >> Mr. Matthew. >> Yes. >> Mr. Dowy. >> Yes. >> Mr. Scaderi. >> Yes. >> And Mr.
Yeah. Okay. Uh, address 720240010. Mr. Rego, >> same the same issue. Um, we uh we don't want these things hanging around on the shelf and we uh uh same as the previous
resolution, we we're dismissing uh 720 Boulevard without prejudice. Again, leaves the door open for them to come back in when they're they're ready. Okay, any questions? None. Is there a
motion to have this dismissed? Motion. >> Motion made by Mayor Cage, second by um Mr. Screece. >> Um roll call. >> Mayor Covich. >> Yes. >> Mr. Perno. >> Yes. >> Mr. Screece. >> Yes.
>> Mr. David. >> Yes. >> Mr. Majio. >> Yes. >> Mr. Stadary. >> Yes. >> Mr. Valdi. >> Thank you everyone. First of all, what's in the hopper? >> Very dirty martini. Okay, let's see what else we have to go
get through to the board. Comments of the board. Anyone? Seeing none, motion to open the meeting to the public. Second. Motion made by Mr. David, second by Mr. Mag. All in favor? I. Anyone from the public wishing to speak? Seeing
none, I make a motion to close the meeting to the public. Motion made by Mr. David, second by Mr. Nazio. All in favor? I. Motion to adjourn. Motion made by Mr. David. Second by Mayor College. >> See you. Good job.
[Music] Heat. Heat. [Music]