I got you. So that's what I'm trying to get. What's the difference between what you're talking about and what if you get ready to go and you don't put the shovel in the ground or or but if you lose the approval then obviously you're not getting either construction in the ground. So the plan subdivision
have deadlines. Yeah. And if you don't do something within a certain date, your approval goes away. Now, variances are different. Variances will grow at the land. And a used variance.
That's probably where it's most important to have that because you don't want to use variance granted and have it hang out there because anybody could buy the property uh and hitch on to if we approve something and whoever we approved it for moves the property is
still subject to that relief and whoever comes in um can do that for better or for worse. Uh so use variances need to be on a tight tight leash. I think Mr.
With what you just said though, can you put a stipulation that this is for this use? Because sometimes we have issues with it may be a widget store, but we don't
want this type of widget store. We want, you know, we're only approving it cuz you're a widget store that only does this. Um, can you like put an expiration date? Well, well, first of all, if we approved what we approve from a you standpoint,
as you know, runs with the land. We don't give it to you. We give it to your your property. So, if you move out and someone incompetent moves in to do your business, we can't we can't say, you know, you're not you're not you can't incompetent. Yeah. Yeah. um for some but if something comes in
and it's I mean it's narrowly tailored like um uh something like that we have widgets from Ireland and they're for people who hammer with their left hand or something like that and if we made that specific
then yeah if someone comes in and has widgets from some other country and h right hand I'm a bit ridiculous but as long as it's not what we we want something specific So if the onus is upon us then to make sure those conditions are specific.
I I auditions already specifically. Yeah, we have specific condition. But if there's something truly unique and we want that and nothing else, even though it's close then not if we've had that yet, but someone comes in and they want
to brew a certain beer and that's what we want. on that beer, you know, with uh Kell logger and so we we focus in on that and um you were doing better with hammering that
ability to break something. So that exact grandfather because it's such a specific if if something specific um then yeah we we can we can tighten it cuz that's what we want that way. We
want the land if it's that use right and if it deviates the left hand out uh we're at 7:00 is good. If we do anything along those lines, it would have to be crafted very carefully
because our ordinance allows x number of uses and we have language that allows anything substantially similar. So if you got left-handed widgets from Ireland and somebody comes in with right-handed widgets from Italy, are
they substantially similar? Maybe not not to use another metaphor, but I think we're over dissecting something with this. Surely, you know, it's funny that this come up because I was going to bring this up in the meeting. Um,
I think that we should have compliance dates in the resolutions. We have three resolutions in front of us tonight and I would like to suggest that each of them be given compliance dates in the resolution itself to comply with the
resolution as in perhaps 6 months or some other number that the board may deem fair so that let's just say North the warehouse. Mhm. If you just leave it as a resolution compliance,
we don't know how long you're going to take. But if we have a deadline that's enforcable, that could move that along. And I think that will make more of an impact. I like that. I like that suggestion. That's that's that's a good win. We've got three like that. Okay.
Okay. So, I'm going to make a motion to adjourn the work session. Second. Motion made by Mr. D, seconded by Mayor Carish. All in favor? I. We're going to move right in. Any recess, guys? Any ladies? Okay. Okay. I'm making this announcement in
compliance with the open folks meetings act being chapter 231 public law 1975 laws of the state of New Jersey. The planning board secretary has prepared a schedule of the meeting of the planning board of the burrow of Kennallorth for the year 2025 and has posted a true copy
of this schedule in the bulletin board located at the front of entrance of the burrow hall and has mailed true copies of this schedule to the local source and the star ledger and is maintaining a copy of this schedule in Burough Hall. Accordingly, the notice of requirements of the open public meetings act have
been satisfied in regards to this meeting. Can we stand for the pledge of allegiance? I aliance to the flag of the United States of America and to the republic for which it stands. One nation under God, indivisible with liberty and
justice for all. Please Mayor Corin here. Mr. Berno here. Mr. Scarice here. Mr. Davis here. Mr. Mazio here. Mr. Ley here. Mr. Scaderi here. And Mr. Valdi here. Is there a motion for the approval
of the minutes of June 24th? Motion. Motion made by Mayor Collage, second by Mr. Scaderi. All in favor? I. Okay. Uh Cath Kathy, any communications? Yes. Uh we received a request from Mr. Paparro for one-year extension on
application 23-03, uh Dunkin Donuts, uh 705 to 717 Boulevard. Mr. Rego prepared a resolution for the same and it's on the agenda for this evening. Okay.
Approving or disapproving the one year. Okay. So, we could discuss that when we get to the resolutions, right? Um, go ahead. Also, Mr. Rego responded to a letter from Lawrence Tally regarding a
complaint at 251 Monroe Avenue. The issue there was the construction department had um discussed an issue regarding parking with Mr. Cali and the board was of the view that it wasn't in
our Bailey Wick yet and that he should uh Mr. Calli and his clan should work with the construction department and if needed for some future relief, we're here. But that's what I sent out. You should have a copy of the letter. We have a copy of the letter.
I'm sorry. You're finished. The only thing I'm going to say about that, Mr. Riggo, and I I as soon as I saw that come over, I asked Kathy to send you a letter that before any letters go out to that client or any client um that has uh
context in which a letter like that is written, I want to I would like to review the letter before it goes out. Got it. And then we can just get it out and we need that in a timely fashion so we can move it along. Got it. Got it. Okay. Next is resolution application 24-08
front fencing. Um Mr. Yeah. This is for property located at 205 North 17th Street. The applicant is is here uh at our June 24th meeting. We heard and approved I think by 5 to 4 vote. Uh an
issue regarding the um uh fence in the front yard. The board heard it. They approved u relief requiring that the fence be moved front yard fence be moved out of right away
and within a certain distance from the um front porch with dimensional variance and there are normal normal conditions. I also had a condition that if the front yard fence is no longer needed
um or no longer necessary that it be removed and that the board didn't want that front yard fence relief transferable. it was uh focusing on uh the applicant's wife regarding her
condition and uh we felt that I think by again a thin vote that relief was warranted but it should be focused on that on that situation. Is that it? That's it. So for clarity, what we're saying here is that if the applicant sells that house, the fence
goes back to the proper the front yard. Yeah, they know usually where the front yard at all, right? Do we also have that um I'm sorry, I was going to say, how is that um um how is that not triggered? How do
we know how does a uh a future building official know that that the house was sold? Is it a deed restriction? Well, interesting. Usually, you know, if if if someone moves, eventually that information gets
transferred to your uh tax people, you know, the tax assessor, the change of deed. So, that will become public knowledge in the burrow. Um, in in in the future, the more trickier issue is
if the applicant's wife no longer uh has a need for a front yard fence. How would we know that? I have no idea. Yeah, I I think it's more relevant that if the house is if the title's over transferred, there's got to be a trigger at the county.
Yes, we would know. We would know at some point. It may not be the day of, you would know at some point. Yeah, but we're not going to know. Yeah, we're not going to be paying attention to policing that. Well, does that come under like Frank says, a deed restriction? It could uh
that's a little more cumbersome, but yeah, it could be that the applicant would have to deed restrict the property, which would probably mean uh this gentleman would probably have to retain an attorney to prepare the appropriate deed restriction and record it at the county courthouse, you know,
but so that way anyone buying the property would see in the deed restriction that oh, we can't have that very nice rent fence in front. We have to remove that. That would be the ultimate when some when a potential buyer gets a title search, they would
see that that's that's there. Um, a little more cumbersome, but it's more Yeah, but it's necessary. What do we do tonight to put that in place? you could indicate that you would like me to um revise the uh revise the ordinance the
conditions revise a resolution to indicate in as a condition that there would be a deed restriction to that to that effect which I've done in many other resolutions. Uh so I you can you could adopt it with that modification. I
will go ahead and put that in and get it to Cathy. Okay, Mr. Scary. So we do the deed restriction, but who's still seeing that? So like when they transfer the deed, the people that are buying it will see that, right? But then if they don't comply with it, is anybody in the town that like when we when they transfer the deed, is there
anybody in the town read the deeds? The attorneys. So the attorneys would have to look at that and say, the attorney doesn't read the right. But if they didn't do it, we wouldn't have I know there's just if if if we put a deer restriction in, you buy that house, you know that you can't you
can't keep that keep that there. Maybe I can and shall you know new new buyer shall shall immediately advise the uh construction officials within the burrow of that. Yeah, something like that. If I may, if you have a a deed restriction and it's in place when you are listing
that house, it goes with the the washer, the dryer, the second floor. Also, part of being forthcoming and transparency, that front fence has to come down as part of the sale of the house. If they don't put that in there, then there is a
problem with the seller. If I'm a new buyer, I don't want to ruffle feathers within 5 minutes of buying a house. You don't want to, but many people don't. What you're saying is there's still not we're still not getting nobody's still saying it from the town to they're still out of Mr.
No, but the thing is if we're restricted, it takes some of the pressure off the building department because then they have a piece of document standing on and it's not just oh there's just so much we can do. Sure, it' be I sit out there on the front porch to make sure it happens. It would
have to be listed as part of the sale of the house. It would have to be listed that the fence has to come down and it gives a decent um but the applicant would then have to prepare the we don't prepare the deed restrictions.
No, but we would put that language into the resolution. Yes. And that would be part of this resolution compliance. Yeah. Yes. Did you have an attorney when you bought their house? Obviously. No. You didn't have an attorney?
Okay. Title company who reviewed who who who reviewed the documents and who is the resent? Ah, okay. Well, you're going to have probably have to get advice from that real estate agent about and and they'll see the language in the resolution when
we finalize it and and then I'll put that we want to copy that. Taxor gets the resolution. So, he doesn't make it just the tax. The tax assessor does get the resolution. Oh, yeah. Yeah. And so he would have to read that through. Put it in this. They get a copy of
they get the resolution. They get a copy. If you can maybe flag it, that'll in addition to putting in a deed restriction, you can flag it so when it comes across their desk, they can do something when there's a sale. Yes, Kevin. The minutes reflect a discussion on the
part of the board of the defense being moved 25 ft from the property line. That's not reflected in the resolution. Perhaps it should. I have I have in here that it's it's um Okay.
So, that was part of my question before we went into deed restrictions because right now this resolution is going to give the applicant the marching orders to go and do what he needs to do with the fence. And if that's not clearly spelled out, he has no idea what to do.
We said two things. who said relocate the fence out of the front yard, set back and no less than 25 ft from the front property line. So, we weren't, you know, you got to put it on this this inch of land. It was just push it back,
but no no um no closer than um um no less than 25 ft from the front front property. So, there was probably some leeway in there. I don't know how much. I don't think Go ahead, Mr. Gory. But that's in the minutes, not in the wrestle. No, it's in the res. Uh
I I'm wrong. I I didn't I didn't see it this morning. Yeah. Condition number one. That's it's it's a tough condition. It It's I thought we were leaving him a little bit of leeway. You push it back this way, but don't get closer to the front yard porch. And within that range, you
can you can have defense. Is is I I don't remember that. I don't I don't know how we can have a resolution with giving someone the leeway to say, "Well, my leeway is eight more." We have to be defined in what we're what we wanted on this applicant. We wanted to get him out
of the front yard set back. Yes. We we moved to the front yard fence. We say it's too close to the road. Push it back out of the right, but don't go 2 in from your front porch cuz it's ridiculous. We, you know, we said no less than 25 ft
from the front property line. So he had so don't use with respect. We can't use terminology like he has some leeway. He doesn't he have 25 ft? Yeah. No less no less than 25 ft from the front property line. Okay. So he has to
push it off the property line by 25 ft. If he wants to do 24, knock himself out. Yeah. It it it's it's one of those unless we're out there with a with a surveying kit. I mean, what fuse? I don't think there's 25. No, 2.4. Yeah, you mean 26. But then 26
26, right? 26. No, you got to clean out. You can't be 25 ft from the porch. That would be back. No, 25 from the front property on the front yard setback is a is 25 ft.
Right. All right. Okay. So we basically said get out of the front yard set back at the end of the day. That's what we said get out of the front yard setback cuz there was a discussion about it almost being on the um the front staircase at the bottom at the landing and we were like well that's that's too
tight cuz then what do you do with that and then you don't have and then and then we we backed off of that and I think our the way I remember is that we just we just wanted to get it off the the uh Yeah. And that's the most here's my concern. Michael, if the way this is written and the way this is worded right
now, the applicant is sitting right here. Do you have any idea what we're talking about? No. I sent an email earlier this week because I went to the department buildings to get license. Well, you can't really do anything to
kill the resolution. So that's why we're here tonight, but I'm trying to clean that up for you. Yes, the exact condition has he does have it stated correct that it has to be removed from the front yard setback requirement no
less than 25 ft from the front property line. So that's a definable measure 25 ft from the front yard front property line. Front property that's a definable set. Okay. So that's
enough [Music] property without Mr. Rodriguez on the on the Yeah, that's what I was thinking cuz we can do that right now. Mr. Rodriguez, why don't you come on up here and just just state your name Rodriguez Harrison and the applicant in
this matter. Thank you. No problem. Thank you for having me. So my question is if the front stop, let's say that's I don't know the numbers. Let's say it's 27 1/2 ft out. The leeway that gentleman was mentioning was if it's no less than 25 but the front yard
stop ends up being like 27 1/2. That's the 2 and 1/2 ft I have of leverage in terms of putting the fence. That's the way the that's the way the uh resolution sounds right now. You're telling me it's either at least 25 but get off the front. That's that and this is what I
have to play with. Could be 6 in. I don't know. Let me hear from Mr. I would say that whoever's his surveyor is for his property. He probably he may have a safe down already. It's 25 ft from the
front property line. If he wants to go beyond that closer to his house, he may. But that's is him and his survey or the setback line. It is 25 ft the setback cuz if we say get out of the setback that means from
the front from the property line you got to get out of 25 ft. I mean you can't be within that. I don't know how much how much is left. I would look for Kevin to say that that's the setback. But my memory is that there's a 25 setback
which is probably why you were that's what the words now if there's two or three feet left probably ridiculous but but I don't know what else you wanted to have a setback but that was that was what we had. I was looking for something more restrictive which I understood the board
didn't like and that's fine. What what I'm confused about is the difference between the setback and the right of way. You're the setback is from the property line to the front of the house. The right of way is what I thought we were talking about. He's currently in
the burrows right away with that fence. So, he's got to get out of the burrows right away for sure. And then from there, he needs to be in his own, you know, in the setback within the front of his house. and then where he wants to put that if we can get it has to be with
within the setback or on the on the property line. That's it. There was a talk about starting to get conversations about like that's ridiculous. It's just going to see it's going to look like he walks out
and just I mean it's not exact. This is about 35 ft street right? So 10t right of way is the burrow's right of way where a sidewalk was, you know, was supposed to go in front of the right. I said, "David, you're calling the right of way from the
curb. 10 ft back from the from the set from the street. Yeah. From the street to wherever 15 the property line that's the burrows right away, which again I thought in the old days rightways were put side for sidewalks. There is a sidewalk on the
other side of the street but not on this side of the street. So we were saying you're in the Barrows right away. You have to get that fence out of because it is now. It's in the barrels right away. So, it's got to be moved in at a minimum of 10 ft. And then at 10 ft, you're on
his property line, right? Cuz it's 25 ft setback. And if he wants to make it 20, it sounds like we're revisiting the whole No, that's what we talked about. I know, but the verbs that you're using is not matching with what Mr. I don't know
if that's right. is what wrote was Mr. O'Brien has some details on the on Let's see if we could figure this out. Christian, I have a survey in front of us uh which shows the fence is uh 7.2 ft
off the curb. It is maybe 7 or 8 ft forward of the property. Right. Throw right away. In addition to that, the property line is 25 ft away from the front of the house,
right? Front yard setback. That's what I've been saying. So, a fence would go up to the front of the house at 25 ft. So, I'm not sure if that's the exact normally down. No, that's perhaps 25 ft from the curb.
In which case it would be that's 15 maybe 33 then 25 he's have seven or eight ft in the front or did did you mean 25 ft from the house which would put you at the right maybe we could reverse it he can't go further from from
this front porch he can't go x number of feet out that way if that's within with that rather than saying let's start and mark it in we can say from the Front porch out. That's a definitive. Can you calculate to a maximum of 25?
Maximum of something. 2500. That's the property line. Can you calculate? Give just give me one second. Can you calculate? Can you do um a number beat from the house to the curb? Is that 33?
We did have exhibits that night, didn't we? I'm sorry. We have photos. the front of the house to the curb is approximately 39.2. Okay. So, front from Yeah. From where the porch and not including the steps from the
porch the porch to the curb is approximately 39 39. Where is the fence right now? 7 ft from the property line approximately is basically in the middle of the curb and the right.
How far is the fence from the house right now? Yeah, that's what I need to know. 2T is 39 25 here. If he's in the right way, it has to 25 ft.
30 30 right now. It's 32 ft from the front of the house. Makes sense. Okay. So, it's 32 ft. So, if you move that fence towards the house 7 ft, it's out of the right away, right? And it will be on Broadway at on
the house from the front porch to that point. 25. Okay. So we say I'm maxing 25 ft from from you know from the front of the house. Why can't you just refer to the rightway? Just get it behind the rightway. He could put it wherever he wants. Exactly.
Right. as long as it's out. Our purpose was to get it out of the right way and not to not to go back and forth a foot over or you know cuz I know we have right he he may have some flexibility but so so the first so 10 ft in the front
is sacrosan nothing goes there nothing goes there okay so then he has to be moved 10 ft from the curve if he moves 10 ft back yeah no yeah you have to go with the rightway line you can't use the curve because the curve varies That's unspecified,
right? Cuz it's more like 14 ft or so. Yeah. So, behind the rightway. So, if he measures from his house, not his porch, 25 ft out, he will be out of the rightway. Yes. You need to be 6 in to the opposite side of that.
Simple enough. That's how you have to write it up. You have to also do 24 maximum measurement of the post that's going in the ground. That's the front at the end of the front porch face of the front porch. A maximum of 24 ft toward the roof.
Yes, that's the front of the house. As long as our back of the napkin math is right right now. Yeah. Yeah. is that you got 24 ft from the front of your house within that range to put fence. Well, yeah. I just remember last time the number was like 7 ft and change. So,
we were saying basically like one strand of fence to just move that. Exactly. That makes sense. Clear it. So, right. Yeah. 24 25 exact. We're trying to give you a basic point to measure from because when you go in a building, you're going to have a hard time
because the porch in the garage from here it looks like it lines up. Okay. So that's the one plane he measures from because it's a random spot that goes under the breast. He's controls and then he's going to say he's
right. Somebody's gonna say he's wrong. I thought All right. Yeah, you might be right. Okay, we clear. How are you going to work the um from the front of the house, the front porch, no more than 25
ft out, 24 toward the rock, and then you're okay. You're, you know, you're not into the right. So if if you want to do 22 21 23 from the very front very end
and then does this resolution qualify for Kevin's compliance clause. So then you add that that's what I was going to ask. Are we on all three of these resolutions going for time? Are we going to put the time frames in as we were talking about?
I know Kevin mentioned it. What what language are you talking about Kevin specifically? 6 months. So what I do for so 6 months from the date of the do of the um resolutions adopted was published 10 to 10 uh six
months from the date of the I think in this in this situation being that it was a uh an a compliance issue I think it should be faster. Yeah. Agreed. Okay. So um
we have here 24 ft. We have the deed restriction and we have um how many how much time you getting right on this? Yeah, I was trying to consider the end of the year end.
Well, that's 3 months 90 days. 90 days. You got to have this done in 90 days. Yep. So getting so my question is so I have someone come and survey maneuver everything properly get the permit with
a legit mover take care from the yard um go to get council to do the restriction and yeah that's important to go to your need some verification like Kevin come and make sure that everything lined up so then
you do it before Let's get a motion. Let's get a motion together. Yeah. Okay. Let's let's hear how you're going to do this so we can make a resolution uh approve this resolution with the condition. Yes, sir. Since the assessor
is going to see the resolution, is the de restriction still necessary? have made the accessories not he's got to focus in on it is a process and it is
we all want it we all want the deed restriction okay yeah we all want it okay things go by the wayside de restriction language compliance within 90 days from the adoption of resolution and with regard to the front yard no more than 24 ft
from the front of the house toward the road within that 24 ft. He can put his fence up. Okay. Can we get the resolution? Uh I'll the next day. Yeah, I'll come in and sign it and we can give it to Quinton.
The resolution tomorrow. Yeah. If you get Yeah. Get it to me right away and I'll do it. Um so we could approve this resolution as amended. As amended, right? Okay. is there. You'll see.
Yeah, I was going to say, but we were memorializing tonight only the people who voted in favor. Five people voted in favor, right? No, that's what I'm saying. I want to get that clarification. So, I'm I'm not going to be voting on this because I was one of the people who
Kathy should have the five names that that could vote. Okay. Okay. Based on what the attorney said to u approve this resolution, we need a motion. I'll make a motion to approve it as amended.
Mr. Mazio made the motion seconded by Mayor Carlo. Roll call. Uh, Mayor Carovich. Yes. Mr. Pero. Yes. Mr. Scarice. Yes. Mr. Mazio. Yes. 1014.
And Mr. And that was it. Mr. Bise, he's not here. He's not here. If he voted in favor, he's not here to Mr. Carlo voted in favor, too, but he's not here. What do we do, sir? Yeah, you have
enough votes to memorialize at the last meeting. Memorialize one, right? All right, you're all done. That was easy. Yeah. Okay, you just reminded me of Groucho Marks.
Uh, I can't tell that joke. Okay. Application 2402 Durham School Services, Mr. Rego. This was um um a use variance approval with preliminary and final site plan
dimensional variances for the property at 251 Monroe. as the coordinator recall when he heard this in May and there were some we had to tweak it a little bit. Um the applicant was coming in to demolish certain buildings. Outdoor areas of the
property were going to be used for um uh outdoor storage. Also bus employee parking. There's there was going to be um parking for bus spaces. And um we heard this at length. We
approve the use and um we we approve the application with number of conditions which are set forth on page six through 8 six through about 19 conditions including how the site
should operate and that's what we have here. So everybody okay? You've read the resolution. Everybody okay with the resolution always says is there a motion to approve this resolution again? We're going to add that time restriction on this whether it's 6 months or you know
there's a lot to do there. So I guess 6 months is okay with me. Who is the attorney for this? Does anybody remember? Steven Hale I believe. Steven Hale. Okay. Sorry Natasha. Okay. You you guys comfortable with 6 months of this? Okay.
Yeah, I don't know if I'll let it be else. If it's not enough, you can ask for more time as the period approaches. Okay, you can do it by letter request. We got that. Who's making this motion? Motion made by Mr. Galdi, seconded by
Mr. Scaderi. Roll call. Uh, Mr. Pero. Yes. Mr. Mr. Mazio. Yes. Mr. Leawi? Yes. Mr. Scaderi? Yes. And Mr. Valdi? Yes. Okay. That was signed.
Next one is donuts. Application 24006 North Holdings. Yes, this was um another application uh through Steve H's office. This was um
uh involving property on 110 124 North 12 Street. We approved this in June. It involved putting in or installing a number of new parking bays on the south side of the existing building. Um they were modifying parking. They were um uh
adding parking to areas that were currently grass and gravel and they were doing some other site work. I listed the variances that they were seeking. We approved it with again a number of modifications or another number of
conditions. cuz I believe there were 24. Uh we did get or I I saw subsequent to this I saw relatively recently a packet of documents that came in with the health. Okay. And and
Yeah. Yeah. I don't know if the board saw that they had revised plans. That was Yeah. And uh something from the traffic people from the health people. And if the board approves this, I can add that compliance
also as well. Okay. Okay. Is there a motion to approve I'm sorry, Mr. Grimaldi? Is there a motion to approve the um the application with the compliance for 6
months? Are you asking the question that resolution? Yes. Resolution. So made by Mr. Gali seconded by second mayor Carloich roll call. Mayor Carlo yes
Mr. Berno yes Mr. Scarice yes Mr. Davis yes Mr. Matthew yes Dowy yes Mr. Galdi yes all right the next one is 230003
uh the NATC donuts Mr. Rego, thank you. Uh, this was a a letter request to the board from Mr. Paparo who's here. Um, as expected, because of the, uh, impacts, um, county of union um, has a hand in
this, there's a currently a fairly complex approval process. The applicant requested an extension of the Microsoft Division approval to for a year May 23rd, 2026. Uh I I uh adopted a resol or I I drafted
a resolution to that effect and if the board wants to hear anything further, Mr. Parro's here. If not, we can just vote on it. Mr. Question. Yes. Excuse me. Um so you didn't give an extension that they have to build sooner or
No, they have more time. They have to build according to what we approved, but they have more time to do it. And that happens sometimes if there's financing issues. the applicant can't move ahead. If in this case I have to deal with the county, I have to deal with the state. They take forever for everything or uh
back in co there were issues with I can't get materials. So it they don't they can build any time within that. They don't have to wait a year. They can build any time, but they just need a comfort time frame to to do what they want to do. But everything else is the same. Yeah, they have to comply with everything.
They're still going to build it. So don't go away. No, no, no. This is why they're asking for it for if Yeah. a minor subdivision if if you don't file within a certain time frame, it it it it goes away. Um but this is
their protection to to um add some time so they don't get jammed up. So if we don't approve this, their approval disappears. They don't approve it. We don't No, no.
If they don't approve, if we don't extend this, the minor subdivision will you have to file a minor subdivision D within a certain time frame. And Joe, if I'm off base, please feel free. You have to file within 190
days. If you can't file it, the law says that the minor subdivision cannot be received by you can't report, which in essence it that that goes away. But the law provides that either before that time expires 190 days or after you can
ask the board for an extension within which to file that subdivision deed. And that's what the applicants asking for here. It's relatively common in this day and age that developers just can't build within the time frame they think they can. And um and uh in this case, I mean,
if if you want a more of a if you want a comfort level, I'm sure Joe can. No, I mean, I guess my only question is if this board didn't approve as extension, it'd be a problem. Would they have to come back and present their projects to us again? No. No. They would they
if if it wasn't approved, if I were you, I'd go to court and get a judge to order it very quickly. So we would have problem approved by I mean the motion was made by Mr. Lady second by Mr. Mazio. Roll call.
Mayor Provage abstain wasn't here for the application. This is for the extension but Mr. Oh, this is just for state. Yes. Mr. Perno, yes. Mr. Sc. Yes. Mr. David. Yes. Mr. Mio. Yes. Mr. Lady. Yes.
Mr. Scary. Yes. And Mr. Baldi. Thank you. Okay. Brilliant. Great. I'm going to go back to dissecting the frog. Okay. application number is it 24009
and I guess we can't do them together right now because no [Music] I don't think we want to ask about 26 tonight I are you prepared to do that I don't think he is said no he said no he said no before
okay okay uh the the a neri a near application for 720 Boulevard. Um it was brought to our attention that to the applicant um for whatever reason just not going to move forward at this point in time. We we this this resolution is dismissing
the application without prejudice meaning they're not prohibited from coming back to us for the same or similar project. Um this leaves the door open if they want to come back. Okay. I just want to make a correction. I said
application 2409. You read 240 10. Am I correct? 720. I was following the agenda. I And so 10 and nine, they're both the same. Yes. The next one be action. Okay. So,
yeah. Did everybody get all that? Mhm. Okay. Any questions? So, we're doing nine first, right? Nine first. Okay. Okay. Same same my same comments at 7:30 Jefferson A.
Okay. So 7:30 Jefferson F. You already the resolution is exact almost exactly. They're the same except for the application numbers and the addresses. Yeah. Okay. Is there a motion to dismiss without prejudice? Motion.
Motion made by Mayor Covage. Second. Second by uh Mr. David. Roll call. Mayor Civic. Yes. Mr. Cerno, yes. Mr. Scarice, yes. Mr. David, yes. Mr. Matthew, yes. Mr. Dowy, yes. Mr. Scaderi, yes.
And Mr. Grimaldi. Yes. Okay. Uh, address 720 240010. Mr. Ra, same the same issue. Um, we uh we don't want these things hanging around on the shelf. And we uh uh same as the previous
resolution, we we're dismissing uh 720 Boulevard without prejudice. Again, leaves the door open for them. Come back in when you're they're ready. Okay. Any questions? None. Is there a motion to
have this dismissed? Motion. Motion made by Mayor Cage, second by um Mr. Scarice. Um roll. Mayor Kovich. Yes. Mr. Pero. Yes. Mr. Screece. Yes.
Mr. David. Yes. Mr. Mazio. Yes. Mr. Sperry. Yes. Mr. Thank you everyone. First offer. What's in that hopper? Dirty martini.
Okay. Let's see what else we have to go get to the board. Comments in the board. Anyone? Seeing none. Uh motion to open the meeting to the public. Second. Motion made by Mr. David, second by Mr. Maj. All in favor? I. Anyone from
the public wishing to speak? Seeing none, I make a motion to close the meeting to the public. Motion made by Mr. David, second by Mr. Naz. All in favor? I. Motion to adjourn. Motion made by Mr. David. Second by Mayor. See you. Good job, people. And you have
to [Music]