started I am making this announcement in compliance with the open public meetings act being chapter 231 Public Law 1975 laws of the state of New Jersey planning board secretaries prepare to schedule the meetings of the planning board of baral Kenworth for the year 2025 has posted a true copy of the schedule on the bulletin board located at the front
and of burl Hall has mailed true copies of scheduled to the local Source in the Star Ledger and maintains a copy of the schedule in barl Hall accordingly the notice requirements of the open public meeting acts meetings act have been satisfied in regard to this me can everyone stand for the Pledge of
Allegiance I pledge Al to the flag of the United States of America and to the Republic for which it stands one nation under God indivisible with liberty and justice for all okay roll call Mr David here Mr Dondo here Mr
kenti here Mr pantina here Mr Mao here Mr scary here Mr maldi here and Mr py here and Mr SC here okay we have requir to proceed first item is approval of the
minutes from our meeting on January 9th 2025 would someone like to make a motion to approve minutes I make a motion to approve the minutes January 9th motion made by Mr Clemen do I have a second second by Mr pantina all those in favor
say I I I anyone opposed okay minutes are approved Communications Madam Secretary no Vice chairman no communication okay we have no Communications which means we can move right into our applications uh first up is application
22-4 a minor subdivision 320 North 21st Street is the applicant here good evening chairman members of the board stepen H Herman at all appearing on behalf of the applicant we were here previously back
in December uh the majority of our application has gone in um we're coming back today because there was some issues uh that had been identified relative to the look Alik ordinance and the fact that we're doing two last subdivision the
workc uh and and confirm that the two proposed houss uh do not conform to the B like we here in um so without further Ado I'd like to introduce Christoper who is
the okay very good sir could you raise your right hand please with regard to this application can you swear the testimony you're about to give Shelby the truth could you state your name and spell your last name please Christopher Zander z h n d e r z
n h d z h n d e r right and your first name was with a SE thank you you want me swear in yeah why don't we do that in Kevin professionals gentlemen with regard to this case and the second case we have on this evening the where the testimony and
comments you may give shall be the truth I I do all right and for the record Kevin obrien and Christian quo engineer Lanner okay thank you you give the benefit of your educational and
professional yes uh I attended the Jersy Institute technology graduated in 2000 with a bachelor of architecture res registered in the state New Jersey uh through examination as an architect uh as well as approximately 11 other states
of this time um I have been practicing for over 20 years as a register architect and uh my license is over with standing uh you're also a liced professional planner I'm also a licensed professional planner and professional
engineer Al not testifying in just on arital trip credential very odd weird any questions on the board on the credentials I think we're good to go Manel to
carry happy to keep it light and Architectural with that all being said you uh you did do so artive thrs onject we did my office prepared the uh plans that you reviewed previous as well as the renderings uh that we
submitted for this hearing um they were prepared under my supervision so the reason I asked you to do professional yes so the reason I asked you professional you had to do some research of the ordinances look like yes
I looked at section 120-75 which is the building site design standards um all Point C which deals specifically with press that and in your preparation of these ringing which um can you explain um how these
two instru report to the certainly uh the goal of your look like coordinance in very brief summation is uh to create of individuality between adjacent homes uh to avoid the
appearance of large undifferentiated project uh each individual dwelling should have adequate inferior living space uh High aesthetically traffic material should be employed and there should be easy access to outdo space and
parking um as well as a safe well lit uh environment for you traffic congestion um some of those elements over site plan testify to previous I want you to hit the things that differentiate these two
models uh for your benefit tonight uh firstly between the two facades we have deferring Roots uh they're both Gables but one is a transverse and that it runs across the site plan um and creates a different massing um and then the other
is a nested gable roof which um creates a different effect where from the e Line the uh roof which suceeds and a more SWAT ning in terms of exterior finishes we use hard collate sting on both uh but
with the curing colors we have a lighter gray and a darker gray uh one of the homes also employs uh Field Stone um accents around the entry for the foundation um in terms of Windows we
have um individual 6 over six double H sash windows um on the one facade the other facad has a similar window style but we've clustered the windows we mold them together and traditionally you have a pocket waiting there they call that
Ming when join uh and they're more centralized to to break the penetration up a little bit uh in terms of the entry door the one entry door is a single craftsman style entry door with um two flanking uh Sid lights one Sid lights um
the other entry door is a pair of doors um in terms of the sches IED to before one of the color schemes is a light gray cloud siding with black accents at the East uh with standing steam metal uh
porch roof uh we have a water coursing uh that runs between the foundation and the C siding um at the entry in the garage doors and then we have a medium great Stone access on that house at the entry porch uh foundation with white
window frames and you also have white corner boards uh and cas uh the other house has a dark gray clab siding with Contracting white cables uh we have ball shingles on that roofe um
at the garage entry uh we have medium gr Stone accent of foundation only uh White window frames uh corner boards and we also have P railing ping uh trim on that one ultimately the goal was to uh use
materials that um we feel are appropriate and as your Orin requests high high quality there's no vinyl sighting on the house we have metal roof we have um so near um but also to differentiate them in terms of the
massing by changing the rooms up um and clustering penetration and windows and doors Andor CH as well okay add the inter one thing to make this
representation Know recogniz It Whatever C with us and talks about these typ of properties we make sure that they're aware of that and when we get are able to work on design we always allow to work on the design unfortunately but we are we make a quote to do that so uh my
client is here uh to answer any questions and uh the other representation I make to the board on be of the uh is that he is going to be the Builder he's not just subing this and then selling lots individually and
hoping that the people are going to come actually so it's a much different situation see a lot of the time yeah um Mr R has a question um in the event the board approves this I am assuming that
what you're saying is the homes that we're seeing that the board is seeing will be the homes that will be built these are not generalities this is that's that's that's the plan um you know as having represented Builders as long as Steve and I have we recognize
that the economy of things sometimes gets in the way so this is what our client's uh idea is right now um if for some reason uh he's approach by someone who doesn't want to build one of these two structures and they want to come in
and customize it themselves you're going to be told by us they got to come back to me okay the board proving these two my office has done a number of projects for this um applicant and our past
experiences are that he builds what we design we work with him in our office and yell at him and when we have to shakee something into a municipal a digestal municipal standard but we haven't had any experience where they're
going to build something else okay um before I open to the board to see if there's any questions our professional was Kevin or Christian anything you want to ask Mr O'Brien just to clarify that the architect of record um is I guess
Christopher Zender yes did I miss that on the title block um it's on the title block I I'm not sure you may have received these without the tile block okay does any board member have any question for the applicant I'm just
wondering in something like this you know we see the elevations the design do are we locking in in terms of building materials I know you mentioned say Hardy plank but you mentioned economies of scale are we bringing it to that level of um specification locked in like if
you had a Hardy plank signing planned and then decided to approach uh us with something similar with a with a um clapboard final sign well here's how I'm going to answer that resolution comp
issues that we have to address um of course will address them as we go along um if for some reason that there is going to be a change in any of the materials that are being represented to now we are going to to advise the board we're going to advise the building
department because we have to come in we have to get our building departments and we have to be accurate in what we're going to do so uh if there is going to be a change in the materials because the owner the potential owner doesn't like gray and he wants it to be yellow we
understand that that is not going to be an impossibility to change um but we respect the municipality and we have to work with the municipality so you guys are going to have an opportunity if you want for us to come back if the building department is not satisfied with what
we're presenting is in conformance what you guys have appr apologize that's the application that's in front of you are these drawings and the representations they have made so any substantial change to
that so this is what you're approving this is what they got to build they good see but but if we decide to go with a 4 in that's yeah I don't think that's substantial I just wanted
to okay any other questions from board members okay then I guess we're at the point where I'll entertain a motion to either approve or deny the application um one more time right Christi does have an
issue record could you state your name and spray your last name again please and again as Steve said you on the roof got go ahead Christian all right just a few things
um of my letter uh dated February 5th um for the d report just time record uh the proposed improvements will contain itum the difference between the and post uh drainage that's correct and um this is
not my letter but I want to have these um for there is no over for the back we either put some hes along the retaining walls or into the retaining wall just so that
in case there any pling it doesn't look back the owner hous blown out yeah my thought was in case large St would overflow back out through that uh French drain okay the wall yeah okay and um you
also provide a man that's okay can I just make a comment yes uh you you you Mr spot you've been here several times want count but we'll say several
times and I have to say that um the architect renderings and those Rings were are nice I know that's not you but I'm just saying is that the present design on the site plan you know without getting into the
stor management design and stuff like that looks a lot better than we started out with I mean with the trees and double war on the back and ask forg stones or some I don't know whatever egg Stones it looks really nice
um you know yeah I appreciate your guys yeah looks really nice apprciate appreciate you guys your comments process I think okay one last time anyone any other board member all right then I will entertain a
motion to open the hearing to the public do I have a motion motion made by Mr clementy do I have Mo second by Mr mazio all in favor I okay the this hearing is open to the public I'm sorry if there is anyone out there who would
like to speak um on the record regarding this application please step forward state your name and address for the record okay seeing no one can I have a motion to close the public portion of the
hearing have a motion by Mr scary second by Mr dundo all in favor I anyone opposed okay hearing is closed so I jumped the gun previously but now I'm ready to entertain a motion to either approve or deny the application and
someone like to make such a motion I see Mr make a motion to approve with whatever conditions were left on bl's list but again thank uh the applicant for working with us and changing the plan uh to be what it is today uh as Mr
bantin said it's a far stretch from what they first came in with and it looks much better and I think it also serve their neighbors well okay do we have a second I have a second by Mr maio all
right with that I'll entertain roll call Mr SC yes Mr David yes Mr Dondo yes Mr kti yes Mr pantina yes Mr Mao yes Mr scary yes Mr galii yes Mr
yes okay we we got enough all right the application has been approved so uh yeah I guess the resolution will be memorialized at next month's
meeting congrat thank you yeah thank you guys for working with the barrel to come up with yeah but now this is a big difference yeah looks different I know she had
access I've seen got those are nice ped to those designs yeah so I'm just saying access okay you ready for the next uh
Mr ready right so our next application is 25-2 onx minor subdivision address 2000 Gil ging Hill Road is representation here
evening um this is an application for1 one also known as 2000 Road um as the board probably aware in the town is where um the app owner has been working very D the town and the town has been
working as as well in terms of developing Redevelopment plan for this site um the site is currently vac with connection to buildings some of the land that's there revelop this campus have again um the municipality for the owner
the application though before you this evening is pretty straightforward is not it doesn't really deal with development the has of yet it's for a minor subdivision of the property so the property is currently one lot that's approximately 107 Acres very water site
um the goal is to just divide into two separate Parcels which is why it's only a minor subdivision despite the size of the property so the subdivision here will contain two lots the proposed lot a which you'll see which you see on the plan and a proposed Lot B so proposed
lot a consists of 35.9 mxim more T from the engineer and then proposed L is essentially the remainder of the campus which is approximately 71 Acres so that's that's what we're dividing this up into just two lines now let me just
see some context as to as to the purpose behind it and your planner and his letter um properly indicates you why are we doing this what's the purpose behind it so first and foremost it complies with the rment plan so the so the municipality adopt the rment plan for
this property and the subdivision completely complies with that plan in terms of the bul standards but the sub Vision so that's one reason that compli the second reason is that we have an occupant data center use that is going to occupy proposed lot a have agreement
is to use so on proposed lot a you'll have called the Bon parcel so the property closest to the road near the parkway is a bacon grassy area they have an agreement to occupy that area they also have an agreement to occupy
building K1 which is on the you see on the plan as well so the goal is essentially to break up for the campus so that they can utilize that piece 35 AC it makes it more financeable so that the owner along with his occupant can
Finance the property in order to develop it better for municipality develop it for themselves so that they can get it up up and go in addition to that there's a lot of internal call Community infrastructure on the property for the campus there's a CO generation plan and
a lot of other things so we want that to stay on the I'll call it the remainder parcel that the owner will deal with separate and apart from the data center VI so that's the purpose behind it and that's maybe why the shade alcohol is a little unique versus what the bo
typically see which is a perfect square rectangle with subdivision bet there is there is a method to the madness is what I wanted the board professionals to understand so with me evening I have one witness um our engineer from Mining and Engineering
to provide a testimony in connection with subdivision daniol so Council in we can get iif after that yes if you could raise your hand please with regard to this application do this do you swear the testimony you're about to give show
me the truth yes you state your name and spell your last name please Daniel mola m i o l a i want you qualify you just go through your educational background licenses heal and whether they're good standing and your
experience testifying as ail engineer in state Jersey um sure I have a a bachelor's degree in civil engineering from Villanova University a master's degree also in civil engineering from Stevens Institute of Technology um I've had a a PE license
New Jersey PE license for uh probably 15 years uh and my license is in good standing test very good yes I believe so right right so then why don't we get the
board oriented to existing conditions on the property so you have here identify that exibit and indicate it I just want to make one make sure one thing is clear from what I stated earlier um we has a lease agreement with respect to k 11 and and
an exclusive right to be B par make sure so this uh first exhibit I'll speak to uh I will Mark exhibit A1 A1 yeah whatever we don't have we Mark so this is A1 uh the drawing title is
aerial exhibit it's a it's an aial of the existing site um most people here I'm sure know this site it's the former M campus is 2000 Galloping H road is the address uh it is locked 181 lot 1.01 the
entire site is one lot as explained by our attorney Mr uh the site is 107 Acres just to orient everybody this exhibit uh the north arrow is actually facing to the left so ging Hill Road is uh one of the
the major Frontage on the site that's on this left side of the the exhibit the Garden State Parkway across the bottom is the the west side of the exhibit and uh South East First Street is along the the southern boundary of the
property as well um some other uh aspects of this campus uh that you may hear during our presentation tonight uh the bacon parcel along galing Hill Road on the left side of the cibit uh building K1 is is towards the middle um
as we building is getting coupled with the vacant parel and and subdivided off from the rest of the campus um some other aspects is the pro generation PL from Boiler House which is
just to the north of Building k 11 that is parel along with these uh additional uh former mer buildings such as k6 K1 K5 um
so uh the uses U on this strong to support mer laboratory and research use but they also with manufacturing here office use data center use as
well to the subdivision I'm speak so we'll mark this A2 this is the plan that the board has in terms of sub justor just for purp just PR easyas heads up I've on thank you so the
outer track line here is highlighted in yellow again it's 107 Acres um the the propos subdivision line here is highlighted in in BL within that as I explained earlier is building K1 some of the parking to the
east of K1 uh some of the Y area to the south of K1 uh as well as the what we called a bacon parcel to the north um remaining on the site uh in BO be the remaining 71 acres is is really
the rest of the site so we're we're subdividing off the um this Northern track as labeled on the subdivision plan we lab it as lot a is 35.9
Acres uh the remainder of the site we're labeling as Lot B and that 71.5 Acres we uh ultimately intend on getting official tax lot designations from the bur assess and just let's go through time so propos
la a foring with the correct correct the Redevelopment plan that dictates property uh has really One requirement uh from a lot size perspective and that set that any 7 lot
has to be 10 acres which is um which is that given that this lot that we're creating is about 36 ACR all the other V standards from the Redevelopment plan uh are to be implied to the track as a whole regardless of subdivision so
that's how that that zoning was WR okay so then as also and then you I know went my a little just context but just explain you know why why the sh is the way it is in
terms of makinging that sure uh this this is a uh a pretty busy site in terms of buildings utilities there's uh substations Co generation plants uh at
get Mark's needs and that's that's actually one of the the main values of this site um and and so in order to create this parcel to to lease to a tenant uh it was also important to to
keep some of those some of those major utility and and infrastructure elements of the site on the remainder parcel and so that's why you see this this blue line kind of carving out around the cor generation and boiler plan uh there are
other other major utilities throughout the study that are also staying within what we call the remainder CR parcel the 701 Acres um I will say that while we we did try to do that there utilities running uh through this site there's
access roads there's parking um that will Traverse across the subdivided parcel uh and in order to deal with that the owner will execute a reciprocal agreement between the owner of lot a and
the owner of Lot B in order to spell out the the terms and conditions associated with that common the common infrastructure elements yeah and Mr pointed out in his letter I just want to make sure that we we discuss it just the access from the main roadway there would
be reciprocal easements recorded on the final plat that you have marked on there that the that the board would be able to see and those easements will be plac the corre so so excuse me so what you just said that means that lot a will have
access to the Washington AV driveway even though even though the Washington avri drive way is part of the lot B parcel so exp correct this lot we're
creating will will have an access e to this the main entr the S off that'll be on the recorded version of the
subis um you have the chance to the consultant yes I can comply with the comments contain great and then I believe we we hit all Mr Ran's comments we had were
just explaining the shape of the property and also the easement if there were anything else that we need your letter I think the har letter more technical comments terms of confirming that certain things added plat in terms of technical comments is survey come us
I just want to make sure your comments mainly about know sh as as the appropriate both sites there a couple of other questions to um for instance going back to se for
Charlie um you're saying that there's going to be cross access for l a through b to get back too Road that's do that also apply to
the as as board member yes okay so while we are introducing sub Mind through the site and splitting this property into two uh we aren't changing
parking or building area or building uses and so the parking search it in theel plan toite look at on aack basis that that statistic is to
change so if I'm on block a um which includes paring that parking the ho in the donut of the subdivision then my paring
on is in that particular area correct that's why that that's why that those parking spaces in proposed lot a were included in lot a because they're part of the agreement with to have those spes
okay and then the building in the there La 14 that 14 or 14 K1 is the one Chris okay so the parking for
14 which stays within the v a will have its parking adjacent to a on L the part for team which is Generation plan
uh around generation structure so they have par needs aside from maintenance personnel and when they service this building they kind of drive up to to department is the
Cod um to stay at this point I believe it is we have been told the last year that certain utilities to the site needed to be replaced updated
Reed I don't know I get answer offline how will the how will utilties get to K1 so it's the same way that would be today but just we have easements with with the two properties that be noted on the subdivision PL in the event that
that was required okay obviously the owner wants it tenant you to Ure that they have the proper utility so there's no issue but yeah it's a good point we'll have it on the pl as well and we'll see it the review okay I me ask what are the current uses on the
property it's just if you want to go through that I think actually said yes office research laboratory uh dat Center and we manuf as well yeah just just you're aware those
are there in terms of in concept the buildings are there's nobody occupying build okay I'll bring my comments of build vacant okay and you talk about
a data center for a right that's the proposed Cho at some point in the future that's correct obviously s plan I would come AC this board have a chance to review okay you Chris you have anything no
everything was relas just myvision my role was just to make sure that all the distances were corre yeah think by okay all right any board members have
any questions U Mr pantina okay so uh thank you chairman um so most of my comments were raised by our other professionals um but just again just I like to repeat
things all buildings are big so I guess it's the owner opportunity to subard it now and deal with that later um just not now I guess get get that ten right I mean so I as the
question you know whenever I get why doing this um because it's not like B just paring out homes or anything like thatal right and it was a very common sense answer the way that the client explained it to me so proposal a
they have a proposed tenant hopefully start you know being profitable so that's financeable by itself if you didn't do the division the rest of the property since it's bacon is is basically a loss they're losing money so you can't Finance the loss you have to
carve out what's going to be income generating in order to get financing for that and then hopefully they start tning the other as so so that was my my concern my second concern uh you answered with the cross ements that are
going to be on a about the Washington Avenue access and I had several concerns on that one is because a going to get it two is if it's not from my past experience and I'm not
talking for the board I'm just talking for myself but from my past experience I don't think torth or the county needs another Traffic Light Between the Parkway and Washington Avenue to get access to lot day I know this isn't a site plan it's
just a minor subdivision but I don't know what your on the data senator's intentions are but um the fact that you have e across eement to Washington driveway um uh that should be enough for
now s plan comes comes in and also good dat very which is always good and well and so they'll have cross easement on to from Washington Avenue exit the
light there will they also have crement will there be anybody coming in from um 31st you have you have secur entrance back there you have guard there right
down so there will that'll be on the plat as well yes okay um good Mr basically what
saying my only with this is that you're putting l in the position to have its own separate access and none of us would appreciate that um they're separating it because of financial reasons for paperwork and you're you're
referencing so there's a different owner for lot a and Lot B no no same owner different okay it's just a to the eement giving them to ourselves so that you know it's so that it's Pap the access to need will work and as you
said before the Redevelopment plan maintain that allart had to be shared and and and obiously increasing buildings as part of this so the parking stays the same obviously if a building comes on site we'll have to do a parking
table and demonstrate that the ark still and the Tenant for the front yeah are they going to occupy the existing building or are they the the right to 11 and
the to possibly occupy the so just the question this this is test which they publicized and this is what that site's looking like so when any of this the rest of
this happens obviously will be my guess is you will see either me or somebody representing another OCC of get this you know back and none of that nothing that we're
seeing on this what on this is only beneficial to the yes okay you just clarify to be e site because I know I've seen plans where most of this parking
disar anything else so the parking is is um is dealt with as a whole for the Redevelopment plan in terms of the number you're ask tell WR is whether or not they would be parking there parking these that people can park in different
areas if if that's required we'll do that but the area looking at a the parking for the most that so you're going to lose most that you are correct uh
that filed there is a fair amount of equipment going that parking lot um there'll be we will have to deal with the parking requirement for this building uh as part of that site plan um but the plan is
actually additional spaces to the we'll no nothing will physically change but the point a lot of people were making just we anticipated we have to have directly e on the plat for Access parking utilities whatever is necessary
which we will on your professionals before get okay CHR any issues Auto version of the finalized uh plan so that we can add to our tax it'll be easier for us to add to
our the one subdivision stat that get to provide a copy of everything year so yes I'm tax assess any other questions from board
members Kev the question sure andr anything that we're doing here you can't see anything that's backing us into position for any type of the further development any type of further develop eventually the rest of the site is going
to be developed that's why they're doing this um is there thing that is putting us in a position we may not want to be in by the nature of this separation I mean we' talked about access uh I know it's not in front of us now but there's
signage to the entrance there's randomly to it there's but those all things are going to come but is anything you see here looking at what we hope will be these next steps that you want to tweak or anything now
we don't we don't know where we're going U but nothing stands out here um I feel sorry for theor engineer
to but other than that I nothing stands out that would talk about health and safety or would has a significant impact on future development uh fol
to that's say they' got a plan um apparently this fits with what they got in mind and if they were will to do something that would harm themselves I don't think they can do it the
other we're here to represent the bur the interest of the bur and it people and when this comes back to us should it in the future for for a s plan revie and we will give it full review we do every
other application so the only other thing with that I think it's time that then we would do this not now but know there used to be a sidewall on a majority in this area in there those type of public improvements s plan it's
not for now pure s plan okay that's well all right anybody else okay seeing no one then guess we're I'll entertain a motion to open the hearing to the public have a motion
motion made by Mr maio second by Mr Clen all in favor I anyone opposed okay the meeting is the hearing is now open to the public if there's anyone out there would like to make comment on this application please step forward state your name and address for the
record okay seeing no one I'll entertain a motion to close the public hearing I see a motion made by Mr galy second by Mr CL all in favor anyone opposed okay all right gentlemen at this I don't think I for this just to
say first ining this campus and we really appreciate the town's diligence in working with us you know when we come here you see kind of like the end product sometimes there been just a lot of work that's been involved in terms of
property app yeah and we appreciate what you're doing um okay so I will entertain a motion to approve or deny these uh applications I'll make a motion pleas tonight's testimony to uh approve the uh application for minor subdivision okay
were there any conditions cross the EAS stuffff that to well um the the the reports uh I think the cross accidents easements and parking easements and utility easements
would probably come up in site plan I would assume no no excuse me sorry no the the cross ACC as eement have to come up here it's part of Pur to just to be clear we will do before we
file that math I will provide to your professionals my name will have show notes on the fin indicate where those will be assuming then they'll sign off on the plat
they all right so the parking consult reports the easements per per A2 and you're going to provide some more detail on that uh we would want the 190 day time frame and obviously um I think our
professionals would want to uh we would want to look at before any any subdivision Deeds are recorded or EAS are recorded we want to look at it and make sure they're okay all be on the pl just I know I know Christian had uh a
number of comments regarding meets and Bounds meets and Bounds yeah those were all acceptable and other than that it's fairly fairly straightforward okay all right so Mr naio made a motion and we have a second by Mr
pantina uh take a roll call Mr SES yes Mr David yes Mr Clen yes Mr pantina yes Mr Maia yes Mr scary yes Mr Dondo yes Mr raldi yes Mr
yes granted all right thank you thank you I will have to do that we're going to have to um in conferring with the um chairman we want to handle this application like we do
every other have a hearing decision I do a resolution shortly there after that way we have all the uh all the conditions and anything else that needs to go in it that isn't covered I know there was a resolution provided but the
board is not comfortable with no doing that we'll have it done next possible opportunity demoralization would be at our next public meeting which is a second proceed obviously you You' been
around your own risk and go for it we'll start exactly time consideration affecting your request to consider this than usual yeah there some
deines that's problem board you know the board does on occasion work with an applicant that has you know um a time commitment to have a meet you know we have to have a special meeting or something like that we can
entertain something along those lines so you once month we need yes so our next regular meeting would be the second Thursday of March so basically a month from now I me if there is a pressing issue I can reach out to Mr for you which but we would definitely
be willing to try you people to people for meeting and we can memorialize with less than that but I that's very much appreciated if you think you may that
perhaps set a date this evening here you have you have to 48 hour no if we carry it it's March 13th would be a month from now well no that's well did you carry you didn't have to
notice this meeting we don't have to carry anything still the op for special meeting yes the only on the agenda would be the resolution on the 17 on the 13 we had to make a fence a
fence thing yeah like for example next Thursday or the Thursday after that that could be done I knowa have Council meetings and other um Thursdays are are
not so today is the 13th so 2 27th okay board members is there enough of us that can make the 27 very much appr and that also gives us
time to I your one Pap a your second paper new week local source with you problem on February 27th at 7 p.m. want to get
over 6:30 time was it's up to you it's up to the board members not to me make it yeah well again we have to make sure we have a quum I can you know what
time 6 let 6:30 that's our noral work okay just do that we'll just do the rest 27 6:30 6:30 p.m. in these Chambers will
be a speci heing on the resolution yes that will be provided to any updates that you guys need to make on the you know on the maps or whatever you have time to get that done
we'll start that that be we'll get started on that thank you so much you thank have a good night these guys are L all right so we're done with that application so we can move to comments
for the good of the board does anybody have any comments for the good of the board okay I don't see any so next item is to open the meeting to the public would someone like to make a motion to open the meeting to the public a motion made by Mr Clemy second by Mr dundo all
in favor I okay this meeting is now open to the public if there's anyone in the audience who would like to make comment please step forward and state your name and address for the record seeing no one can I have a motion to close the public portion of the meeting okay I have a motion by Mr scary
second by Mr dandoo all those in favor say I I anyone opposed okay we have a motion to adjourn by Mr mazio is there a second second by Mr dundo all in favor I all right meeting is adjourned thank you
gentlemen I was going to say sh