##VIDEO ID:E298LRJjYmU## [Music] welcome to the Thursday December 12th 2024 meeting of the Lille planning board it is 7:02 p.m. and we are meeting at the Lakeville police station at 323 Bedford Street uh we have Lake cam recording this evening is anyone else recording hearing none uh we also have a quorum um all except David lodger present and agenda item number one is a public hearing for 100 60 Bedford Street request for a special permit under section 270-7434 at 700 p.m. in the Lakeville police station 323 Bedford Street upon the petition of JH Taylor realy Corp a special permit is requested under Section 4 number 12 to allow a commercial parking facility the property site is 160 Bedford Street and is located in the business district the application and assorted documents can be viewed in the planning department By Appointment would someone like to make a motion to open the hearing I'll make a motion to open the hearing for 160 bford Street second we have a motion in a second all in favor I I I all right the hearing is open if you would like to come up and sure state your name and for the record good evening um my name is John wson I'm an attorney for the uh applicant JH Taylor realy Corp um they're the owner of the parcel on 160 Bedford Street and they filed this a petition for the permit for a parking lot it's not necessarily a facility they don't want them to build a structure on there so want to clear that up right from the start that this is a parking lot um that they uh been using it's the front portion of the land so it's 1.6 acres there's also a back portion which is not part of the parking lot that's 4.2 Acres it's two separate Parcels so this parking lot would be for the front P portion on Bedford Street um about a year and a half ago they reached out to the uh zoning commissioner rather he might have reached out to them uh regarding some parking at this location um and he gave them the temporary permission for the last year year and a half to uh Park Vehicles there and that's that's what they've been doing uh so they're coming to you now to get a permit for this uh parking that's been going on there with the uh permission of zoning um to park Vehicles there and what they do is they have uh other businesses who don't have sufficient parking they park at this location um there's been numerous plans submitted to you by Prime engineering the parking plan is there it shows uh the number of parking uh spaces the existing number is 86 and that's going to drop down to 81 and the the primary difference would be on Bedford Street they're removing the all the spaces um that come right up to the roadway and they're filling that in with uh looks like soil and seed and they're also widening the entrance uh onto Bedford Street the it's going to be as wide as 24 ft possibly wider uh for Access and egress uh onto Bedford Street as the chair said this is in a business district um and it also buts the uh industrial district as well uh in that area this particular lot has no Butters in a residential district everyone is in the business district uh there is one house uh next to it but it's still in the business district I don't know how that works with the house being there but it's clearly surrounded uh by the business district so um as far as the permit is concerned uh looking at the criteria of of the Town bylaw 277.49 um and keeps cars off the road uh where this particular business has been parking uh it gives them a place to uh to park um there's no real detrimental effects to the neighborhood as I said it's the business district um and that certainly fits within the character of that uh neighborhood there's no similarly there's no environmental concerns um and the alternative use of the of the uh land it's minimal in terms of what they're doing here they're allowing cars to park primarily during the day there's a handful of of U box trucks that Park overnight and then um the uh tenant has his own private uh parking spots over by the trailer that's there that the uh that the tenant uses and then the owner Parks a couple of vehicles there so um I took a look at your section 12 uh it really seems like there's nothing additional there other than the entrance way and as I said that's going to be broadened uh to 24 ft as Ade adequate uh Provisions shall be made for Access and that's covered in the plan as well so I don't know if anyone has any questions about the proposal to allow the permit for the parking lot are there handicap spaces I'm sorry are there any handicap spaces um I have to check the plan itself it's not a public parking um lot this is going to be it for uh the whoever they lease it to I don't see that designated on the plan but I can certainly look into that so um I did notice well so first of all we we have a memo from the Board of Health and the Board of Health had no comments um we had an email from the fire chief um and he said you know if it's a parking lot he doesn't have much Authority if it's defined as a salvage yard there's a significant code requirement um but you're saying that it's just a parking lot correct and and again I think the Restriction the distinction here is we're talking about the front lot uh the questions about the salvage yard and unregistered vehicles and all that stuff is in the back lot the 4.5 Acres this application is restricted to the to the 1.6 acre lot in the front and we also had a memo from the Conservation Commission saying the property owner is currently working under an enforcement order before the commission can proceed with the notice of intent filed on 7624 for grading and drainage design for parking lot the applicant has outstanding items to be addressed which will be discussed at our Tuesday 1210 24 meeting yes they did and that that uh the conservation uh issues have to do with that bark back section the 4.5 acres and I believe primate submitted one of their plans shows the test pits uh that they did I believe there was five test pits and they had an issue with one so that's what they're following up with on conservation um but the area that conservation is is focused on is in the back there there are wetlands so conservation would need to sign off on this um and that's what will happen through the process but conservation's focus is on that 4.5 acre lot so I'm not sure if they're aware that this application is for the lot in the front not the lot in the back okay um and now so your your plans uh show the owner name is the JH Taylor but then I saw there was Andrews Andrews he's the owner of the company oh okay so he's the company owner for the parking lot he owns all the shares of JH Taylor okay so it is a he the company um are you proposing using the reclaimed asphalt yes they they weren't going to bring in uh new pavement for that um the existing gravel is what they were going to continue to use for the parking it's really not going to be much in terms of changes there other than to eliminate the parking close to Bedford Street and and reconfigure it so it's within the the uh away from the buffer zones for Wetlands okay so I mean I do have just looking at the plans right off the bat I there's a number of things I don't see shown on the plans as far as you know we can't we can allow a parking lot via special permit that's not paved um first of all and then you know we need to see lighting landscape um you're not showing any uh facilities so if people are parking here where are they going to be using a toilet you know um that needs to be shown I I think um you know you have to show your sign signage um I think what we what we should do is probably go for a peer review of you know because those are just the items right off the top of my head and knowing that there is a lot of wetlands here I just don't want to I want to make sure that the wetlands are properly protected so I think um I'd like to see um a peir review done at least um so I'd say environmental partners for for peer review and if conservation is working on something still as well um do you I'm thinking that we should send a memo back to them and just say we're we'd like to have a peer review maybe specify that you know we're we're focusing on this front lot and did um is there something that they want to work out as far as peer review um if they're you pursuing peer review on their on their own as well um I have a few questions just in general um starting first with uh so I was looking at the plans um says proposed parkings 81 spaces um the existing right now is 86 so that's towards the front you're proposing taking away those five parking spaces for drainage yeah if you're looking at the parking it's right on Beford Street you can see where it's been eliminated I think they reference in the notes the soil coming in and grass okay so the existing parking right now it's a little bit ambiguous cuz you're saying that there's 8 sorry 81 spaces that will be there so are we thinking this is just regular cars are we thinking track the trailer trucks box trucks anything else that's going to be parking in this uh lot itself it's so far it's it's been me six or seven box trucks are in the back towards the back lot um and then the main part of the lot there employees of Northeast alternative that's the tenant uh and they've got their own parking issues and and they shuttle their employees from that lot to their location so that's what it's done as cars and some will these vehicles be parked during the day at night um 24 the employees are during the day um and the box trucks are overnight okay so the box trucks come in the morning they Park their car there they get in their box Tru and go do their their Roots come back and grab their cars I'm sorry come back and grab their cars employees are there they get shuttled to uh Northeast Alternatives they work their shift and come back and leave like I just came from the site there's no cars there there's seven or so box trucks up you don't propose it there be any traffic issues no they did widen the entrance there um there's a stop light not far from there at the at the intersection I don't have I think 79 and 18 right there um so I don't I don't think there'll be any traffic concern um okay so that being said I mean this is somewhat unusual in terms of this proposal but um what I'm seeing here is a proposed septic that's being involved it looks like on the east side of the property um yeah that's where that existing structure is where the existing structure is yeah there the structure over there it's it's like a trailer size building oh the portable trailer you're talking about yeah it's on that um looks like the south east side it's labeled on the parking plan as a existing something trailer portable trailer yeah portable trailer so I guess I cuz I know that this property's been in discussion several other board meetings and and so forth and being brought here and I am assuming that this is just going to be a temporary situation temporary lot I mean in terms of what the outcome of this plan is I mean we're using you know recycled asphalt which I mean for a parking lot isn't really typical of a parking lot especially with drainage I mean recyc asphalt is not really the way to go um when putting together a project like this I mean so I'm I'm just trying to see what the I I guess what the end goal is for this because you know recycled asphalt isn't really something that's used typically um drainage will probably be a concern again this goes with conservation and everything else but I was just trying to get a sense as to what the possible end goal is and how long this will be that we think as far as we know from the existing tenant they don't have any other solution uh as far as unless they were to okay no longer use their space or or outgrow their space uh and either leave Lakeville or find another place um U so it provides that solution to them um and that's why we're here to start the permanent process like I said the the uh zoning commissioner did come to us to uh agree to do this as a way of getting those cars off the street now we're getting into the winter months for snow plowing things like that uh it provides that solution in that location okay but it's not a like I said it's not a public parking lot um that's going to be open and charge to the public these are okay so so there is um I had a couple things so there there is proposed drainage obviously we need to see details on that because I thought Prime had submitted a drainage plan so I have a parking plan and I have an existing conditions plan I don't know if we got a drainage Wetland oh wait that's a grading and drainage plan is there any kind of a wetlands area that would be uh yes and that's why it's got to go through conservation two locations and the the existing plan Prime has it outside of the the buffer zone for the parking areas yes this a stone TR detail but yeah I guess peer reviews today I mean I I can't read on this but it's yeah it's just this little one that we got yeah so is everyone in agreement that we should get the peir review done on mhm this um an offer to conservation they want to you know I don't know piggy back off the STM water um see what they say and um this is a public hearing anyone from the audience I am come up and uh state your name for the record and address I'm sh bir and I'm at 132 rhod Island Ro and I just was hearing a lot about the property um I don't I don't want it to be used as a junkyard either um because I don't want my value to go down M so the good thing is this is a special permit so they have to prove I didn't realize it was two separate things so so because it's a special permit they do have to show it's not going to be noxious or harmful and we can condition um to ensure that you know there's no repairs being done or certain things being done on that that area but unfortunately it is just that front lot that we're looking at not the back okay so the back is going to be something separate that's going to happen is yes so it's just not before us for your information the select board's got it on their agenda for Monday the back lot but I my guess would be it'll get pushed out to another date but it's on their agenda for Monday so select board is handling that backlog uh in conjunction with conservation and what they're doing um okay all right thank you sure thank you thank you all right um so we'll work on getting some peer review clotes and continue to I don't want to continue to our next meeting but probably our first meeting in January if that works for you I am G until January 6 so is it that following Thursday it would be the second Thursday in January do that perfect 11 it's our agenda January January 9th January 9th so would someone like to make that motion to continue to January 9th make a motion to continue the 160 Bedford Street till January 9th second have a motion in a second all in favor I I I well thank Youk still got prove those I know okay all right our second item on the agenda is Bella way discussion with Jamie Bisset from Zenith Consulting Engineers good evening Jamie biset Zena consultant Engineers um I think this will be pretty quick we're coming in uh to just kind of give the board an update and talk about kind of finalizing the project um I do know that at least one of butter has come in and had concerns we understand that um this hopefully will put the concerns at at Bay um I did a site visit today uh I've spoken with Mr paluchi who was the developer um essentially we agree that the fence needs to be installed and will be installed we also agree that trees need to be planted and they will be planted it's in the Covenant and the uh approval and it'll be done um the silt fence that still is is up and I understand that's it doesn't look great um I obtained permission from the biologist that fence is up more as a turtle barrier than it is for erosion production so we did get the blessing to remove that because the site is stabilized so we will start taking that out and that will clean up and look really nice um the other things that I noticed in this uh certificate of approval is that I need to write a letter certifying that this stuff is done once it is done I'll write that letter um but the letter also encompassed uh a inspection and I guess thumbs up from HML Associates or if not them another engineering firm so I'd like to at some point talk about that I'd like to get the fence in first and get the trees planted and the silt fence removed first and we expect to start on that in the next few weeks um and then I'd like to come back in talk to you guys about getting maybe that overview inspection done by the peer review and kind of wrapping this up I know Mr paluchi has I believe $1,000 in bond um so we would like to petition at that point that that is done to get that released and also um get a release of Covenant when all that is done as well try to wrap this up so that okay the board's done with it so so basically tonight was just an update it was a friend visit to just let you know what we're planning on doing and um see if there was any issues or questions um you that's that's the major issues that were brought to our attention um there was also mention of the strip along the road that the HOA is supposed to be responsible for mowing but they are and it looks like it's mowed but I don't know who mowed it so I think that might be a conversation Mr plute you'll have to have with the property owners um there is a homeowners association they're going to have to figure out who's GNA maintain you know as far as hiring a landscape company or somebody just wants to mow that you know bring that mower down it's a it's not a big area but I I have seen it with the grass tall I do understand what the neighbors concern are and uh they do have to keep it down low to maintain that drainage well so that will be discussed with the homeowners great um and then um I know there was a trailer but that's been Nate addressed that that was a zoning issue that was addressed that was not Bobs that was one of the property owners that has been rectified great um so for the As far as the peer review do you want us to start getting quotes yet for it can't hurt okay you know it can't hurt to at least reach out um the way that it was written is pretty simplistic it just it looks like they're requiring a site visit and a nod from them um I'm happy to meet peer review if you want out there whatever you need just um in reading it it was it was pretty simple I know it's a private way so Al so as as soon as you're ready I guess let the office know Y and then Kathy if you if you want to maybe if you have time to work on getting that peer review okay estimate so we have that ready to go and then um hopefully next time we see you we can be tying it all up yeah it again it might take a little bit of time I don't know about the trees being planted this time of year that's my one of my questions was that plant them and then they're they're dead coming that's that's my concern and there evergreen trees that need to be planted so we may get the fence in and the sil fence removed and may do the Evergreens in the spring um if that's the case I'll let Kathy know so she can update you I I wouldn't I won't need to take up more of your time on that at a meeting but I'll keep you posted okay so that was it excellent thank you Jamie for coming in you guys have a great night thank all right uh agenda item number three public hearing site plan review for 43 Main Street which is continued to this evening upon the application for site plan review and approval submitted by John O for the proposed development of Windgate residences it will include 120 units of assisted living and memory care and 70 units of independent living with Associated site improvements parking area landscape improvements and storm water infrastructure possible vote and are we going to do you want to discuss both at the same should I open both of these or you want to do them separate open both both okay y um agenda item number four public hearing 7M site plan review 43 Main Street which was continued to this evening upon the application for a site plan review and approval submitted by John O Larry for the proposed development of the Fox Estates 55 plus age qualified Cottage Home Development it will include 68 units across 26 Cottages 10 duplexes 16 triplex in a plus or minus 5,000 ft Clubhouse and a 2,000 plus or minus foot wastewater treatment plant which will serve the entire master plan Redevelopment of the former State Hospital site also proposed is a community amenity space Associated site improvements new roadway parking area landscape improvements and storm water infrastructure possible vote good evening for the record John Al uh with Rino Capital project proponent um so we're here this evening I think we were last in front of you in about a month ago um since that time we've continu the process back and forth with the um peer reviewer uh and feel that we are substantially complete with that effort um since then we've also shared with the board um a draft decision um with 18 or so conditions um obviously there's some reference to plan dates in there that that are subject to change um but this evening Our Hope and our goal was really to to discuss that conditions document obviously happy to answer any further questions that you guys might have regarding the plan or any real component of the project um but our you know hope was was to to discuss that decision document um understanding you guys have only had it for for a few days and I apologize the Thanksgiving holiday and there delayed us slightly but um I hope you've had some time to review it and and you know we figured this to be an open Forum to discuss that and and see where it leads us excellent um I just I'd like to invite perer riew up um there are a couple things that maybe we want to incorporate uh from their comments into the conditions so if you want to just State your names for the record as well yep uh my name is lizis I am the uh professional engineer responsible for the Civil site peer review of this my name is Steve Shakari uh I did the traffic review of the project thank you all right we also had a uh Memo from the fire chief and um he said that the Amendments made in the latest submitt satisfy the previous concerns expressed by the fire department leadership please keep the department aware of any changes that will develop um all right so I know you are still reviewing I think you're doing a final review of the latest it is in our internal internal qaqc process right now uh we have reviewed all items and the applicant has adequately addressed them in our opinion okay yes but it we haven't issued the letter at this time because it's in our internal qaqc process gotcha it will be issued shortly okay but you do feel that they have adequately addressed everything excellent um there there were just three um items that I kind of jotted down it was called comment 12 18 and 20 um on the traffic talking about the site triangles um and uh bhb's response was the the last sentence the proponent will work closely with both Mast doot and the town to identify areas of clearing necessary to provide adequate site distance at Rhode Island Road Site driveway so I was thinking we could incorporate something along those lines as a condition just to address that um that item just if we could on that one if it's just Authority having jurisdiction because I know Fox Estates it's DPW it's not a mass do roadway in the back on Rhode Island Road so if it's just we could just make that reference that it's not just Mass do I don't know which and and really yeah our conditions aren't really going to I mean it would be more working with the town if it's 79 that was the issue area right I I I I don't know if that common is is in reference to the Fox Estates or if that's in reference to the so it does talk about the Rhode Island Road Site driveway um yeah the way I'm reading it is for the Rhode Island Road that yes the the comment that was open that was for the Road Island we we had requested that they provide a revised uh figure and they they provided that um when we close to col they have no problem with okay so do you think it's necessary to include that condition about the site triangles or well they they stated that they they they remain committed to uh maintaining and you know removing clearing those obstructions so um yes I think it it wouldn't hurt okay yeah okay so we'll um we'll include a condition um that the proponent will work closely with the town to identify areas of clearing yep okay uh to provide adequate site distance at the Rhode Island Road Site driveway um comment number 18 uh this was in regards to a transportation demand management plan um the board should also consider this was environmental Partners response was um the board should also consider the implementation of a formal TDM Transportation demand management plan as a condition of any approval that may be issued so um is there a condition that you would suggest based on that no only you know more details be provided and be formalized U the the plan that they have outlined in there um and their report was you know Broad in in general it was an outline uh we only recommended that um your request for a more detailed plan um formalized plan more formalized plan yes like for example um it's uh you know one of the bullet points says um so so develop Transportation related marketing and education materials um like it could be further explain what those materials are you know thinking further down the line and and formalizing it so that's what we were thinking if you think that would be necessary H Amy do you have any input on the um I think that they can provide well first of all I think that um there's also kind of a second compon component of this condition which is that um the town stay involved through the meepa process so um we would just put a condition that they have to um that they have to copy the town on any of their meepa filings which they usually do anyway um it might even be required by meepa that they have to but we'll put that as a condition and then also I think we could just say that um they have to submit a formal TDM plan okay is that yeah I'm fine doing that can we put a can we put a timeline on when a TDM would be required like would that be prior to certificate of occupancy it'd be preferable for us to do it prior to a certificate of occupancy rather than a building permit because it's significantly earlier in the process right um yes yeah Nate usually doesn't like us withholding a a occupancy permit but would um well they can't do it before they wouldn't be able to do it before the of the building permit mhm yeah um um so would it make sense in this case what about um yeah it would have I guess it has to be before the building permit building permit mhm yeah is that something you can work with would it would it be a part of a the access permit would would have finalized TDM be part of an access Prem not necessarily not typically yeah I mean it would it would be helpful for the record Britney guest said line here with BB um I think it would be helpful closer to occupancy because you're gearing up for operations you have you know facility managers hired and we're working with an operations team rather than you know building permit you're gearing up for construction and focused on construction rather than operations TDM is focused on operations um so it would really behoove the applicant to not wait until the week before requesting an occupancy to deal with this you know it would be on us to try to deal with it a bit earlier so Nate's not in that situation where we're holding up um an occupancy but it just it relates more to operations and so I think that's what John's trying to get at is it's when we're trying to figure out how we're going to operate the property in that you can you can work with whoever is going to be the building manager and and you know the facilities that wind is going to put in place um it's just a little bit more natural in the process um we could make it part of we could have a assurity tied to it okay cuz that work and you're going to require assurity anyway yeah yeah so and then why don't you say um why don't you have it filed 6 months before occupancy before you before you apply for an occupancy permit no well if if it was going to be tied to the occupancy permit I'd prefer it just to be tied to the occupancy permit not the shity so no we're not going to tie it to an occupancy permit okay so then just tie it to charity and and not not reference an occupancy permit in that's okay reference all right um the next number was perit 20 um and this is also about U Transportation monitoring program board should also consider the implementation of a formal monitoring plan uh program as a condition of any approval that may be issued um did you have a suggestion um again well some some measurable um thresholds for example uh they they stated that they will monitor but you know whether it's found that the traffic will be higher the generated traffic will be higher or lower or what it it wasn't outlined like what would be the commitment if it turns out to generate higher traffic that it wasn't anticipated for example so we wanted you know a little bit of U further um detail on what those thresholds would be and what you know outline the level of commitment and all of that okay as if I if I may um we have committed to a five-year traffic monitoring program with mass doot as part of our um as part of our approval with with um their department so you know we can share with you all the the letter that we received from Mass doot as part of our me profiling which is also a public document in there it discusses what the requirements are their proponent will additionally undertake comprehensive traffic monitoring program for 5 years beginning 6 months after initial occupancy of the site so we have that committed to so obviously we're happy to continue to keep that uh Amy is that something we could tie into that as well so is it is it too late I guess my question would be is it too late for um the planning board to so the so the this says um I'm sorry it says we re we recommend the town stay involved throughout the meeper process and continue to work with mass do and the applicant to provide input regarding the traffic monitoring program but it sounds like you've already done that you've already done that program that you've already established that with meepa through the meepa process yes okay um so I mean I guess it's it's already it's something that's already um it's already been proposed to meepa has I mean mea hasn't approved it right no we we have our third and final filing with meepa scheduled for the end of this calendar year expect 2024 correct um there's really no way to even put get input into that in time um well there will be a one one once we file with meepa there will be a 30-day comment period subsequent to that in which the town and and and the public is um available to provide further comments to be included in our um certificate so there there the window still is is open see this kind of this is kind of tied to I think it's 12 about no it's tied to um 18 where we are going to have a condition that they have to submit all of their mea filings to the to the planning board okay so that should cover this should cover that to do anyway y okay actually you're going to submit them to the planning board not the town okay we can yeah we can make sure y if you could y great um that was all I had from going through both of these sets of review comments um if we're going to look at um and even like you know the landscape just everything seemed to have been address very well um if we're going to go through the decision Amy have you had a chance to look at these yet I have I I I read them I haven't had a chance to comment on them okay um I mean look looking through it does look like Bob did his homework and and compared it to you know conditions that we've been we've issued recently there were a couple things that I noticed like we have been uh looking for a performance guarantee um for the 13 Main Street it was uh $20,000 and then for other site plan reviews it's been 10,000 per acre of disturbance um and then also uh the $5,000 um for the inspection fees um we had also I'm just comparing it to 13 Main Street because they have the uh 55 plus component similar to the Fox Estates um and we did ask for a draft of lease agreement just to review make sure that that 55 plus component's in there uh the 55 plus is a for sale product so oh okay no associated with that okay so that that shouldn't be necessary then um how long do you think it would take you to review Amy the conditions for the um I can have them for your next meeting okay CU I mean oh I'm not here at your next meeting it's on the 26th isn't it yeah and we were going to just focus on that osid so probably the 1 in January is that the 9th the one that the last yeah I can do that that's no problem okay um cuz other other than that I didn't see anything that's stuck out that was missing um besides the shity and the uh inspection fees Kathy did you you're more familiar you you write these up all the time were there a few things that did you notice want out I no I didn't notice I kind of had just read through it real quick and I knew was going to review it so okay I was kind of looking for her expertise on this so um does it work for you to we can wait till Town Council has a chance to review it and we'll get yeah ABS apologize we couldn't get in earlier um if if we are able to get just a couple of days ahead of that meeting so that we can come prepared to speak to anything um I'm sure we can think on the Fly um as needed it at that January 9th hearing mhm um but U that would be my only request okay if that's at all possible so yeah I can I'll definitely get him to Bob okay yep that'd be helpful no problem and then we can have a very productive conversation hopefully drive towards a decision on that on that absolutely great all right so um someone like to make a motion to continue both of these public hearings till January 9th make a motion to continue the to do both of them at the same time yeah yeah continue both 43 Main Street project till January 9th we have a motion second and a second all in favor I I thank you we will see you then thank you it up oh you were what's this say all right agenda item number five approve the September 12th 2024 and September 26 2024 meeting minutes has everyone had a chance to review those M yes all right any comments edits questions um just a very minor edit to the September 12th one um page two under site plan review 2 and4 Bedford Street it was just more so of a fix the comma and put a period at the end of um the vote was unanimous for okay um other than that that that's all I add for that you got that yes a commor and a period all right just want to make sure it's good before it gets posted anything on the Thursday September 26 else all right someone want to make a motion to approve did you have I know I wasn't at the 12th so I'm going to be do them separate okay so does someone want to make a motion to approve the September 12th minutes um I make a motion to approve the uh meeting minutes for Thursday September 12 2024 motion and second second very good we have motion and a second all in favor I motion Carri Jack I okay everybody all okay now I have to abstain the 26 so I'll make a motion to approve the Thursday September 26 2024 meeting minutes second motion second all in favor hi hi do oh sorry agenda item number six administrative update possible vote approv 2025 meeting dates um I looked through them looks all pretty standard second and fourth Thursdays except for Thanksgiving and Christmas and Christmas um sounds great do you want to take a vote on these or yeah are we good with it Kathy that's it to D just have to deal with them huh da just have to deal with them yeah it is what it is yeah go ahead Jack the motion to approve the 2025 planning board meeting schedule second motion and second all in favor I uh we have Jillian Drive release performance bond so this is a memo from Kathy the applicant has requested the planning board vote to release the balance of the performance B bond that was being held to secure the completion of the roadway Jillian Drive These funds were to be held until the town accepted the roadway the town voted to accept the roadway at the fall town meeting held on November 12th 2024 this amount has been confirmed by The treasur Collector Jillian drive for $1,629 71 all right seems straightforward mhm would someone like to make a motion to release that performance bond make a motion to release the performance bond for Jillian [Music] Drive second we have a motion and second all in favor I I I and we have 13 Main Street lease review lease and possible revisions so this was a lease that we received from 13 Main Street it was forwarded to Town Council for review she has reviewed she sent back um her comments on it um there were basically two right your um your uh your decision um impacted the lease with regard to over 55 mhm and so what they did um they put the over 55 requirement in an addendum in addendum a but addendum a isn't really um it's not really referred to in the lease in addendum a it says that addendum a shall be made part of the lease but in the actual lease the body of the lease it's not there's no reference to it um so I am suggesting that it it be put um in the the over 55 be put in the body of the lease and then also that they um they also so add it to the section with regard to assigning and um assignments and subletting so that each time the T tendency turns over it's assured that there's a 55 and over okay all right so we'll send those comments back to 13 Main Street um I'm going to take a vote on this to officially send these comments back and ask that they review re their lease agreement to include these two changes I'll make a motion to send the comments to the owners of 13 Main Street to revise their lease for review second good a motion in a second all in favor I I I did you have something else all right you're good um our next meeting will be December 26 2024 the Lakeville police station um yeah do we have any other business we have what's that well do you want a motion tojn yeah I'll make a motion to adjourn good we have a motion in a second all in favor motion carries meeting is adjourned