WEBVTT

METADATA
Video-Count: 1
Video-1: youtube.com/watch?v=mNz237fZdLg

NOTE
MEETING SECTIONS:

Part 1 (Video ID: mNz237fZdLg):
- 00:04:40: Meeting Called to Order; Pledge and Moment Silence
- 00:06:50: Select Board Announcements: Vacancies, Census, and Meetings
- 00:09:32: Fiscal Year 2027 Budget Recommendations: Revenue & Expenses
- 00:15:56: Discussion: Town Planner, Assessor, Debt Obligations
- 00:22:11: Assessor vs. Planner Positions: Board Preferences
- 00:28:00: Reallocating Salary Funds; Planner vs. Consultants
- 00:34:38: Planning Consultant Line Item; Budget Flexibility
- 00:41:50: Select Board Motion; Public Comment Opportunity
- 00:42:04: Post Public Comment - Assessors and Revenue
- 00:45:08: Public Comment - Laremer: Undervalued Properties
- 00:51:34: Public Comment - Laremer: Town Planner Concerns
- 00:52:55: Finance Committee Approval; Budget Issue Identified
- 00:54:52: Public Comment - Laremer: Regional School District
- 00:56:17: Regional School Assessment: State Aid and Intermediate School
- 01:02:19: Regional School Assessment: Debt Exclusion Errors
- 01:04:30: Correcting the Assessment: Invoice or Demand Letter
- 01:05:55: Internal Investigation and Review of Processes Needed
- 01:13:03: Revoting; Re-evaluating True Dollar Value for Intermediate
- 01:17:38: Future Finance Meeting Discussion of School Budgeting
- 01:20:52: Town Administrator and Management Analyst Update
- 01:23:26: Approving Meeting Minutes of April 7th, 2026
- 01:24:15: Special Town Meeting Warrant Article: Gateway Health
- 01:28:59: Annual Town Meeting Warrant: Articles 1 & 2 (Budgets)
- 01:30:34: Annual Town Meeting Warrant: Articles 3 & 4 (Parks, Capital)
- 01:32:27: Annual Town Meeting Warrant: Articles 5-7 (CPF, School Recall)
- 01:33:49: Annual Town Meeting Warrant: Articles 8-10 (Absences, Ballots, Tax)
- 01:36:11: Annual Town Meeting Warrant: Articles 11-12 (Water, Earth Removal)
- 01:38:38: Annual Town Meeting Warrant: Articles 13-15 (Cryptocurrency, Delinquency)
- 01:40:03: Annual Town Meeting Warrant: Article 16 (Data Centers Overlay)
- 01:41:58: Data Centers: Combining with Marijuana, Clarity Concerns
- 01:47:39: Annual Town Meeting Warrant: Articles 17-18 (Clean Energy, Wetlands)
- 01:51:48: Amending Hosted Community Agreement: Bountiful Farms
- 01:54:03: Bountiful Farms: Research Revenue Impact Questioned
- 01:56:14: Adjournment; Executive Session for Real Estate Discussion


Part: 1

1
00:04:40.639 --> 00:04:56.639
Well, good evening. We have a forum present here at the select board. So, I'd like to call the select board and wage and personnel uh board together uh to order on Tuesday, May 12th at 5:45 p.m. here at the Lakeville Council on

2
00:04:56.639 --> 00:05:16.080
Aging. Lake Cam is recording our meeting. Is there anybody else here recording? Seeing none, if we could please rise for a pledge of allegiance. >> I pledge allegiance to the flag of the

3
00:05:16.080 --> 00:05:37.039
United States of America and to the republic for it stands one nation under God, indivisible, with liberty and justice for all. Before we get started with our regular business tonight, I would like us all to just

4
00:05:37.039 --> 00:05:53.759
take a moment. Um, we've lost a another member in town. Um, this has been a a long-standing um, active volunteer in our community for many, many years. Um, some of you may have had the the privilege of of

5
00:05:53.759 --> 00:06:10.080
meeting Brian Reynolds. So, he has recently passed. Um, and yeah, it was a it was a hard one to to hear, too. So, um, if we could all just take a a moment of silence in me memory

6
00:06:10.080 --> 00:06:50.560
of Brian Thank you very much. Okay. Select board announcements. Mr. Planka. >> Thank you. Good evening. Current committee commission vacancies include a member for the board of registars, two

7
00:06:50.560 --> 00:07:06.080
vacancies, and one at large member for the cable TV advisory committee and one atlarge member for the zoning bylaw review advisory committee. Details on these positions can be found on the town's Facebook page or the website lakevillemma.org

8
00:07:06.080 --> 00:07:21.199
under news. Reminders from the town clerk's office. Please return your 2026 town census. Uh let's see. The town's operational override election is scheduled for Tuesday, May 19th at Lon Pond Lodge. Deadline for voter registration for the

9
00:07:21.199 --> 00:07:36.400
Old Colony building project override vote is June 9 by 5:00 p.m. The Old Colony building project override vote is scheduled for June 20th from 12:00 p.m. to 8:00 p.m. That is on a Saturday. And

10
00:07:36.400 --> 00:07:52.720
the location, please note, is at Asaw Gym. It is not at Lon Pond Lodge. I think I got ahead of myself. Uh the reason for the location change is due to an an event being previously scheduled at Lun Pond Lodge.

11
00:07:52.720 --> 00:08:10.879
Uh on June 8th at 6:30 p.m. the town will hold its special town meeting at Panuk Regional High School Auditorium. A quorum of 100 voters is required to conduct town business. The annual town meeting will begin at 7 PM. Uh and again

12
00:08:10.879 --> 00:08:27.120
a quorum of 100 voters is also required for that meeting. So that the special town meeting followed by the annual town meeting. And the final overright outreach meeting is scheduled for tomorrow. Uh yes, tomorrow Wednesday at the library from 6:00 to 700 p.m. I believe that's all mad.

13
00:08:27.120 --> 00:08:44.959
>> No, there's one other item right here. >> It's on the other side of your >> That's all right. I've got it right here. >> Thank you. Ah, yes. Uh, the annual Memorial Day observance will be on Monday, Memorial Day May 25, starting at 10:30 a.m. Uh,

14
00:08:44.959 --> 00:09:00.160
we will start at the Veterans Memorial at the fire station, and we will continue up to the World War I Dick Rand Duran Square. Um, crossing up, yeah, which includes the honor roll and the flag pole, ending with a veterans exhibit and refreshments at the historic

15
00:09:00.160 --> 00:09:16.480
1856 townhouse town hall. And in case of inclement weather, uh, we will meet at the historic townhouse at two precinct rink at the intersections of Route 105 and Route 18 at 10:30 a.m. >> Okay. >> I believe so. >> Okay.

16
00:09:16.480 --> 00:09:32.399
>> Any other select board members have anything to add for announcements? >> Okay. Finance Committee, would you like to >> Yes. I will call the Lakeville Finance Committee meeting on May 12th to order at 5:50 p.m.

17
00:09:32.399 --> 00:09:47.200
>> Tiniti present. Wright present. >> Manovsky present. >> Be present. >> Okay. So, thank you again for um joining us this evening. Um so this I'm going to turn this over to um Andrew and Mike

18
00:09:47.200 --> 00:10:03.920
Ellis. So this is for the fiscal year um 2027 budget recommendations. Um and I believe there's some handouts that um were provided in front of you this evening, too. So, all right, Andrew, take it away. >> Thank you. Um so, in your packets, um

19
00:10:03.920 --> 00:10:20.320
supplemental packets, we have a an article 1A, which is this kind of shows revenues and expenses front and back. And then we also included um the amendments, which you can find behind you on the screen as well. Um so, last week we went over the 1B budget,

20
00:10:20.320 --> 00:10:38.240
which is the non-override budget. we found some savings and revenue. Um we adjusted a little bit. Now that's going to be true for the 1A budget as well. Um so this kind of lays out where we see those. Um and then we kind of got listed

21
00:10:38.240 --> 00:10:54.560
out some things that were cut out of 1A even if an override passed and we listed those out. Um for example, we have the principal assessor, the town planner, and a part-time floater. um those we tried to show you what it

22
00:10:54.560 --> 00:11:09.760
would look like if you brought those back and the amounts. And then we also showed some recommendations um which were to kind of increase the employee benefits line specifically health insurance by 70 grand. Um we

23
00:11:09.760 --> 00:11:27.040
would pay for the asawset um payment not because originally we were going to use it out of capital stabilization. we would use it within the operating budget and then local receipts. Um Mike can get into where that 12,000 is going to go.

24
00:11:27.040 --> 00:11:44.240
Um but we thought it was good to limit those. Mike, do you want to explain where we put those? >> Yeah. So, it's really just going to offset the 20,000 on top. So, what this would do is, as I've mentioned during the budget season, we've kind of maxed out our local receipts. We're very, very

25
00:11:44.240 --> 00:12:01.760
high uh close to prior year actuals. So, even though we're recommending up top to increase local receipts 20,000, I wanted to mimic what you saw last week, but really the net difference would be um the $7,12. So, um I just wanted to visualize it so

26
00:12:01.760 --> 00:12:18.480
you would see that we would have some savings there and we wouldn't have to increase that receipt as much for the 1A budget. Um so, like last week, um it's up to both boards to kind of say or show what they want to see. Um, for example, if you

27
00:12:18.480 --> 00:12:34.639
don't want to bring back the town assessor to full-time, you don't have to. Um, but we wanted to show what that is and if that's a priority for the board, we can bring that back. Um, open to recommendations, suggestions from the boards, what they think. >> Madam Chair, may I ask a question?

28
00:12:34.639 --> 00:12:50.480
>> Of course. >> Um, line item health insurance increase of 70,000. So, are you saying if we don't adjust that, we're underfunding health insurance or where's that 70,000 going? Um, so generally the practice we've done in in years past is to kind of overfund health insurance a little

29
00:12:50.480 --> 00:13:06.720
bit just in case someone comes on health insurance. Um, with this current budget that we have, we it's marginally overfunded 50 I think 50,000 of a cushion just in case someone comes on. A family plan is pretty expensive. That pretty much would eat up that quickly.

30
00:13:06.720 --> 00:13:37.600
So we wanted to put a little bit more into that line just in case anything happens. Okay. >> Of course, if there's anything outside of this, that's that's fair game as well. Um, for example, if you think it

31
00:13:37.600 --> 00:13:57.040
is underfunded, that could be something we maybe fund how the board likes to see it. Um, it's entirely up to the board. >> Madam Chair, >> yes. >> Uh, do we do we know did Bob provide the

32
00:13:57.040 --> 00:14:12.320
detail? I haven't seen it on what was being reduced for his services >> um like up there. Um, so he he went from 116 down to 70. That was because he thought um he had to pay for like a

33
00:14:12.320 --> 00:14:28.240
subscription or a license this year. >> It's actually next year. >> So, we saw that savings this year. >> Okay, >> Madam Chair. >> Yes. >> Where do we stand with the town planner

34
00:14:28.240 --> 00:14:45.680
right now? >> Right now, we don't have a town planner. Um we're not paying anyone to to do any of those services. So, there isn't a line item in the 2026 budget. >> There is. >> There is. >> There is a there's a line item in the current fiscal 26 budget

35
00:14:45.680 --> 00:15:04.720
>> for $89,64. >> Okay. So, um can we restore the planner? >> Yeah. So, we actually we show that as an option to do that. >> 89 is the full full-time salary, right?

36
00:15:04.720 --> 00:15:24.959
Correct. Correct. I think that the the part-time floater um is very important to the office. Um I know that that was something we implemented quite a few years ago. Um because most of our departments are only

37
00:15:24.959 --> 00:15:40.800
two people deep. So, if there's somebody out, I know um that part-time flo was uh beneficial um to getting a lot of, you know, work moving along as well. So, um personally,

38
00:15:40.800 --> 00:15:56.320
I would like to see that position back because this is outside the override, right? >> This is an addition. So, this is the override budget. Yeah. >> Um correct. >> Okay. >> Yep.

39
00:15:56.320 --> 00:16:14.160
Okay. My recommendation would be um to restore the planet position. I think me Fabian would would agree with that uh the full time. We we all know we have significant development challenges coming down the road and

40
00:16:14.160 --> 00:16:35.519
a qualified plan. It will definitely help add significant value. So that would be my one of my recommendations. I know the assessor um position as well and I know you were having difficulty identifying candidates for that for that

41
00:16:35.519 --> 00:16:54.000
particular role but um you know I mean we even talked about halftime right part-time >> yeah correct >> still nothing right even if we had somebody that was retired that >> could work within >> Yeah I haven't haven't had any luck.

42
00:16:54.000 --> 00:17:17.199
I've reached out to the association a couple times and they say they reach out to people and they just no interest. >> No, no interest. It's part-time. >> Parttime full time. >> Oh, either way. >> Yep. It's been a challenge for quite

43
00:17:17.199 --> 00:17:35.760
some time. the debt service um down at the bottom under ANS. Is that aset? >> That's correct. >> And that's the windows. We're paying um interest only on that right now. >> Yeah. And um Mike can go into a little bit more of the mechanics of that, but

44
00:17:35.760 --> 00:17:52.320
we've been paying it this year and last year um out of capital stabilization. >> Okay. >> Yes. So, it's a it's a mandatory principal payment. We haven't permanently borrowed on that project yet. Um, we didn't get the final audit from MSBA until after we renewed the ban. And I had to renew the ban in order

45
00:17:52.320 --> 00:18:08.640
to close the books and not have it affect our free cash. So, the 167188 is $67,188 of a mandatory principal payment and we're paying down an additional 100,000 even on the ban um, which will be that much less we would have to permanently

46
00:18:08.640 --> 00:18:25.039
borrow when that time comes. Would we be able to get a full list of the debt obligations we have coming around the corner? I always forget about one. Like I know I think of something and I

47
00:18:25.039 --> 00:18:40.559
think oh these are all the ones and then I forget we have one more. So it would be nice to have an ongoing list of which I mean you guys know right which >> what our debts are. >> It should be in your uh budget book under debt service. >> Okay. Um, now that won't include Well, it will have the fire station on there,

48
00:18:40.559 --> 00:18:57.360
but just as an interest payment, interest payment, >> but are you looking specifically for like um debt schedules >> more to like when they're going to drop off? >> Okay. >> Whether they're because I didn't I guess I didn't realize this one was

49
00:18:57.360 --> 00:19:12.880
>> uh interest only, >> but they're here. If they're right here, >> yeah, we can provide debt schedules. I think the police station falls off 20 36. >> Yeah, about there. I I do have a long-term debt schedule. I'd be happy to share.

50
00:19:12.880 --> 00:19:34.080
>> Okay. Y don't want to add any work only. You already have just Yeah, that's great. Thank you, >> man. Question. >> Sure. Uh Andrew the um the revenue adjustments cherry sheet education that's smart

51
00:19:34.080 --> 00:19:50.320
growth >> that is the smart growth from the governor's budget to the house budget that's not the house budget to the senate budget >> right yeah so it stands today based off of the house it's at 432

52
00:19:50.320 --> 00:20:06.240
>> yep that doesn't include the extra 285,000 that is on the senate budget >> right potentially coming right You mentioned that, right? We may not know that for another month, >> month, month and a half. >> Yeah, >> that's that's a a big enough number that I'm not certain on. I don't want to wait that.

53
00:20:06.240 --> 00:20:20.720
>> You noted that last week and it's potential that we could do something with that at a fall town meeting. >> Correct. >> Okay. >> And those cherry sheet numbers are identical. Last week's 1B, we voted in 1A. They have no bearing on the

54
00:20:20.720 --> 00:20:44.400
override. So, Yep. Can you just explain the U local receipts adjustment for 12988? >> Uh, basically we listed all the items that the board and finance committee may want to bring back and we ended up with

55
00:20:44.400 --> 00:21:00.880
a $12,988 deficit. So since we have been extending ourselves in our local receipts and we've been trying to look at the overall financial health, not just the appropriation side, Andrew and I thought, for lack of a better term, we could just

56
00:21:00.880 --> 00:21:16.400
reduce investment income. So we had up top we said we could increase it comfortably 20,000, but since we didn't need the full thousand, I just plugged that $ 12,988 and said we would just reduce it by the $7,12. Um, but as I said earlier, I just kind

57
00:21:16.400 --> 00:21:36.720
of wanted to show the visual of we could go as high as 20. Uh, but we have the luxury of putting 129 back in. So, >> and um, Andrew, what would be your recommendation to the select board and the finance committee?

58
00:21:36.720 --> 00:22:11.600
I would um recommend um adopting as shown under recommendations and then also um bring back the salary reductions. If there was one thing I maybe wouldn't

59
00:22:11.600 --> 00:22:27.679
add is the assessor to full-time. I've had a tough time finding a full-time. We could leave that at 50,000. But that's a it's a big decision. I don't know if the select board wants to see a full-time assessor.

60
00:22:27.679 --> 00:22:45.240
I know the board of assessors is open to either way, >> right? Yeah, they had been all along too, >> Madam Chair. >> Yes. >> Question for member Fabian. Your recommend you've you have accessessor experience. Your recommendation

61
00:22:45.679 --> 00:23:00.720
>> um to go along with what Andrew said, it's hard to find a principal assessor. There's just not anyone saying I want to be an assessor when I grow up. So, um I'm not even sure that that salary would

62
00:23:00.720 --> 00:23:18.000
attract someone to come. >> The feedback I've gotten from some seasons is that they don't want to come here unless it's 115,000 or greater, >> right? It's like they have to pass four, five, six towns to get here that are all paying more. So,

63
00:23:18.000 --> 00:23:35.919
>> maybe not these days coming up. Yeah. All right. I mean, a full-time assessor would give you more counter time in the office. Um, they certainly could find work to do.

64
00:23:35.919 --> 00:23:53.039
There's work, plenty of work to do. But >> if we can't find a full-time get that salary, what's the probability of getting a part-time even slimmer? >> There are some retire semi-retirey people that are interested M

65
00:23:53.039 --> 00:24:07.679
>> um last year when I reached out to people, they say there's fleeting interest to come. They can do abatements. They don't want to do like a tax classification. >> So, it's kind of a hodgepodge of people that are there's no one that would do everything.

66
00:24:07.679 --> 00:24:23.440
>> So, that can be tough to find. >> Are we leaving revenue on the table without having that professional support to make sure we are properly assessed? >> Um do we know last time the boat excise tax was done? Does anyone know that

67
00:24:23.440 --> 00:24:39.360
>> there's some old receivables? >> So, probably not in about four or five years since the last time it was done. >> Possibly even longer. And I think they grand total less than $400. It's not a very >> So, there is work that mean like the boat size tax, but

68
00:24:39.360 --> 00:24:59.440
>> it's not going to offset the salary by 50 grand is what I'm wondering. >> No. >> No. >> Okay. um you know the personal property stuff. I don't know if we had a full-time person if they would, you know, go through it with a fine tooth comb. Um

69
00:24:59.440 --> 00:25:15.279
I can see maybe a little sitting there, but >> but not $50,000 worth. >> No, because those are all done by like the you know, you get the form, you fill it out, it's like the honor. Mhm. >> I don't remember the last time anyone

70
00:25:15.279 --> 00:25:32.640
ever, maybe the assessors do, but I don't think anyone's ever checked those personal property. >> Well, we did have a um we had a property I think around town where there was a it came out of a a chapter and it was the assessment was never done and that is

71
00:25:32.640 --> 00:25:49.279
money on the table. So, are we leaving money? I guess that's the kind of the question that I'm asking about, you know, are there bigger problems that maybe we haven't thought about? Would a cons can a consultant fill this job for any period of time? >> That's who's doing it now, right?

72
00:25:49.279 --> 00:26:05.760
>> Yeah. We we we have ROG, the one that's historically done the last 10 years doing it. >> Um I always kind of feel that we kind of react. We're not like a proactive >> assess department. Yeah. >> That's us as a town, isn't it?

73
00:26:05.760 --> 00:26:21.520
It is. >> So, if the question was, do I would I prefer a full-time one? Yeah. But if it's not feasible to get, then um a part-time one is just as good. >> At least, you know, that >> Yeah. I mean, part of the work is

74
00:26:21.520 --> 00:26:36.960
getting done. >> And somebody that's seasoned. I mean, I think that that's key um to make sure that, you know, they're looking out for the best interests of the town. and somebody that is seasoned will have experience in what to look for.

75
00:26:36.960 --> 00:26:52.480
>> Okay. >> I think that that's key. And the same thing with the planning position. Um I know that there had been discussion about, you know, a tier, you know, somebody coming right out of school versus, you know, somebody that has

76
00:26:52.480 --> 00:27:08.320
experience. and we don't you know I didn't realize that we were a teaching hospital but um for me because of these projects because of the financial landscape that we are we're facing right now and going forward with economic development

77
00:27:08.320 --> 00:27:23.039
uh that we're we're focusing on. I would want to make sure that we have somebody you know in that position that could actually lead us >> and not somebody that's waiting for direction. Mhm. >> So I think that that is absolutely key

78
00:27:23.039 --> 00:27:39.600
and I know that again the salary is not you know always you know very attractive but you know some people might find the benefit of being living closer by Lakeville in the convenience of Lakeville being here and the excitement

79
00:27:39.600 --> 00:27:54.880
of you know developing you know some projects for us. So, um, I just want to make sure that we're not just hiring people to fill the positions to fill a seat. I want to make sure that

80
00:27:54.880 --> 00:28:10.080
it's, you know, individuals that are going to be here for the benefit of of Lakeville for what we're trying to accomplish. >> Madam Chair, can I ask a question? Um, back to the town planner salary. So, what would the a competitive salary be for that? You said it's 115 for an

81
00:28:10.080 --> 00:28:26.480
assessor. What about a planner? >> Not that far off. So, is it possible that we just reallocate some of that money that we were going to if we're only going to go with a part-time assessor because that's all we can find minimum, can we take some of that 39,000 and allocate it towards the town planner

82
00:28:26.480 --> 00:28:43.279
since we think that's a a more realistic position and a very important position for the town and just bump up that salary so that we can maybe attract some qualified candidates. >> There's some considerations for that. Um, one that comes to mind immediately is that that person would probably be the second

83
00:28:43.279 --> 00:28:59.840
highest paid in town. We'd have to do some adjustment on the salary charts, >> but it's not a bad >> Well, unfortunately, that's just realistic, right? To get people to come in. Yeah. >> Usually, the next person in the door is going to be one of the highest paid. So, >> yeah. Right. And then maybe it's a

84
00:28:59.840 --> 00:29:16.000
chance to redo the position, make it a a dual economic development planner, >> something else. I I'm just, you know, I've been beating the drum about a planner for ever and ever and ever. And, you know, I'm just going to restate the

85
00:29:16.000 --> 00:29:32.480
things I've said before, which are, you know, this town is a very complicated landscape. We This is not a simple, you know, somebody's going to come in and know how to do one, two, three things. This is somebody who has to have played poker and they know how to play and they know what they're doing. And I don't

86
00:29:32.480 --> 00:29:48.080
know that we're going to ever find that in a one one person, one full-time person. Um, Middleboro struck gold when they found I think it's her name's Leanne over there. But certainly she's got a much more complicated situation happening. Um, I do feel strongly that

87
00:29:48.080 --> 00:30:03.919
we would be well served at least for a short term to be using consultants instead of a full-time employee because we don't know what we need at this time. We think we know what we need, but I don't think we do know what we need. I think when and I was on planning board and I'd sit across from the attorneys

88
00:30:03.919 --> 00:30:18.960
that I know very well and listen to them talk and think we're we're just we're just out of our league. We don't know what's going on. So, it would be nice, I think, to reconsider the possibility of allocating some of those funds, whatever that number may be. Um, and the other thing I just want to mention is that

89
00:30:18.960 --> 00:30:34.640
I'm, you know, uh, last week both Leah and Lorraine con expressed significant concerns about not giving raises to the people that are here. And I've had conversations with people and I I feel very strongly that both of you are very

90
00:30:34.640 --> 00:30:51.360
important to this town and we want to make sure that we retain that good quality help. So, you know, when I'm looking at all of these things here, none of these are as much of a priority as they are to make sure that you get the raise that you're entitled to, which we had hoped we would be able to accomplish sometime this fall

91
00:30:51.360 --> 00:31:07.360
retroactively, but I'd like to figure out how that piece would would play in here. So we don't have to worry about it for this 1A budget. This is for the override passes. >> Remember this. The override passes, >> right? >> So the the salary increases are >> are built in for that. >> Built in for that.

92
00:31:07.360 --> 00:31:24.480
>> Okay. Yeah, >> Madam Chair >> through you. Um do we know planning companies? I know that you had mentioned that a couple years back. >> Yeah, they are out there. They're out there. And um you know I think that we

93
00:31:24.480 --> 00:31:41.360
we just have not made the collective decision that that's the right that that's the right move. I think we've talked to those people. Um but you know when I look at plans and I you know I look at things that are happening in other towns for comparison east and I think oh my gosh like I was on planning

94
00:31:41.360 --> 00:31:57.679
board. I was a volunteer. I did not know what I did not know. Look at what these people are doing as it relates to storm water as it relates to natural plantings and the requirements that they have on them. Never mind the fees that are being, you know, potentially raised in an environment like that which they're

95
00:31:57.679 --> 00:32:14.799
then using to offset other costs. Um, yeah, there's there there are consultants out there that doing a lot of different things. >> And I know that the planning board did and I think we put out an RFI um or at some point um and I think two

96
00:32:14.799 --> 00:32:31.519
or three at least two came back with their fee structure. Um, one was very expensive. um you know and it was you know per hour or you know per project. Um, so yes, there is, you know, an option for that, but you'd have to be very clear

97
00:32:31.519 --> 00:32:47.279
>> on what you want, right? Because there's projects that are ongoing, >> we have um and then there's, you know, maybe some shorter term projects, but so it's a tough one. I know that I feel

98
00:32:47.279 --> 00:33:03.039
like for the, you know, the past four years, we've been having this discussion, you know, >> or longer >> or longer. So, Madam Chair, if we do what like Darren suggests, um, it would be in a planner line. We

99
00:33:03.039 --> 00:33:19.919
could use that for a person or >> consultant. >> A consultant, right? We could do that or do we have to separate it out? >> You if you're going to do both, you'd have to separate them out. One would be a uh expense line and one would be a

100
00:33:19.919 --> 00:33:38.399
salary. >> Salary line. >> Yeah. Does the planner role include um administrative services for ZBA or planning board? >> Um at this time we have an administrative assistant um that does the administrative stuff. Colleen is now

101
00:33:38.399 --> 00:33:53.760
the ZBA. >> Okay. >> Um assistant for that. So we have assistants like administrative assistants in the office. >> It's just we don't have anyone high level technical >> um where >> the planner role. Right. the plan. We don't we so I mean a consultant can fill that void.

102
00:33:53.760 --> 00:34:09.359
>> Yeah. >> I think so. >> We have a lot of smart volunteers too. I think if the consultant said these are the 20 things you need to do, you're going to send the army out to work and come back and I think we'd accomplish a

103
00:34:09.359 --> 00:34:38.000
lot. What's the flavor? I I would support this as is, but to Barbara's point, is this now the time to reallocate some funding to a planning

104
00:34:38.000 --> 00:34:54.879
consultant line item? >> Yeah, you could do that. Um, >> yeah, you could do that. that I mean one thing one option you could do is have a planner line have a consultant line and then you don't have to make the decision tonight on whether whatever you have but

105
00:34:54.879 --> 00:35:10.800
whenever you do make that decision >> you can move those funds around between those different lines >> yeah I wouldn't advocate one way or the other I we got to get planning board input obviously but I think to give us a flexibility brings up a great point that's we've

106
00:35:10.800 --> 00:35:29.760
you know we could take you know the uh the 40k stuff. >> Did you say 39? >> Yeah, 39 some change from that and add that to a consultant line item. >> Kind of high, but

107
00:35:29.760 --> 00:35:43.520
>> I would I would probably only recommend 10 or 20. Yeah. >> As opposed to the full amount. >> Okay. Madam Chair, through you, why if we have $39,000 that we're willing to spend, why wouldn't we take $9,000 of that boost

108
00:35:43.520 --> 00:36:00.240
the plan of salary up to closer to 98 $99,000 to make it a little more >> attractive to people and then keep uh that the balance of that set aside for the consultant.

109
00:36:00.240 --> 00:36:15.200
>> It's a good way to look at it. >> It's an option to as well. Um, I I I'm still leerary though and I understand the the level of the the position, but it's always difficult to bring in

110
00:36:15.200 --> 00:36:31.200
higher salary um when we haven't really done a lot of work to reclassify those that may need to be class reclassified. >> Well, plus this is we wouldn't do both,

111
00:36:31.200 --> 00:36:46.400
right? Right. We would have be one or the other situation. Is that how you're envisioning it? No. >> No. >> Personally, no. >> Okay. >> I think you get what you pay for. >> And if you're going to if you want someone very qualified to come in and

112
00:36:46.400 --> 00:37:02.079
focus on Lakeville, you have to pay for it. >> And and to Darren's point, you're going to alienate people no matter what. having been the guy brought in that's paid more than the guy that's already there. >> You know, you're going to alienate

113
00:37:02.079 --> 00:37:18.160
people. Sorry. >> Still don't have to like it. >> Yeah. Yeah. No, I I understand that. But it it's a it's an expense that we need to undertake. We've we lost the last planner, right? Not in pretty short

114
00:37:18.160 --> 00:37:34.079
order. >> Mhm. >> Uh have been unable to fill that position. It's sitting. We have some major things coming up in the town. >> Well, it's an investment. >> So, >> that's how I look at it. And and to uh

115
00:37:34.079 --> 00:37:48.320
Barbara's point, you know, this is somebody that what they do day in and day out and not and not to dismiss any of our volunteers or any of the boards, but when you have when you have somebody that that's their livelihood, is to make

116
00:37:48.320 --> 00:38:06.480
those decisions and give that input. You know, it's important, especially if they're doing it on a day-to-day basis and not meeting every other week, to talk about something and then maybe talk about it a little bit more >> and and then a month or two or in the

117
00:38:06.480 --> 00:38:23.040
case of Lakeville, four years goes by uh and nothing gets done. Madam Chair, yes. >> I also see Vim and Vigor in the economic development committee and wouldn't it be nice for them to really have like a staff member that they can

118
00:38:23.040 --> 00:38:41.680
help, you know, that can really guide them and >> No, it's because we're we're definitely off to a a big start here. >> Yep. Madam Chair, if I could offer um that

119
00:38:41.680 --> 00:38:59.359
Maybe if we took some of that full-time assessor money as as folks have already said, but just make the town planner salary full-time for $100,000 and um and off well and use that some of

120
00:38:59.359 --> 00:39:17.720
those funds to offset that position because that would get closer to market. Um, and then even if if we had a full-time person, then we could still leverage the volunteers that you mentioned as well.

121
00:39:18.320 --> 00:39:34.720
>> Also, just because it's budgeted doesn't mean you have to pay him that amount. So, >> right, this could be a range. >> Yeah. >> Based on experience >> and and this is the 1A budget if the passes anyway. So, we could be right >> talking about a move here,

122
00:39:34.720 --> 00:39:48.560
>> but if I remember correctly, didn't we start out at when when I came on this board, were we at like $70,000 was the salary? We upped it. Yep. >> And we've upped it and upped it and upped it and >> still nobody's bit. And so, we're

123
00:39:48.560 --> 00:40:05.200
already more than a year behind on this again. >> Okay. So, if we were to pursue what we have just been discussing, so if we move the $9,604

124
00:40:05.200 --> 00:40:24.400
off of the assessor um and put it onto the town planner salary, we're looking at 99208 and then we'd have 30 let me see 31. >> So, we'd have 80,000 um for the the

125
00:40:24.400 --> 00:40:38.800
assessor. Correct. You with me? >> Yes. And then if we were to move 10,000 of that 89 or 8 80,000

126
00:40:38.800 --> 00:41:00.960
to a consultant line >> and I would put planning department consultant I guess it as a label because I know most of the other consultants are under the select board's budget. Isn't that correct? >> Uh planning What was the question? I apologize.

127
00:41:00.960 --> 00:41:18.160
>> Oh no, you were typing too. Um, most all the other consultant the consultant line is under the border of selectment is select board. Isn't that correct? >> That's correct. Yeah. >> Okay. So, this would kind of be an anomaly having this. >> Yeah. I would use reference of myself

128
00:41:18.160 --> 00:41:34.000
and Todd. So, Todd had his own line in the accounting department as an expense line because he was a 1099 contractor non-s salary. So it would kind of look very similar to how accounting did. >> Yeah. >> The planning department is also under a select board. >> So it's not like the planning board

129
00:41:34.000 --> 00:41:50.079
makes the call on where that funds go. We would still control it if that's the concern. >> Okay. >> Or we'd make the decision in coordination with the planning board, I should say. >> Okay. Right. Okay. Bill, that makes perfect sense then. >> Okay. Did everybody get the math? >> Mhm.

130
00:41:50.079 --> 00:42:04.400
>> Okay. >> So we still have 20K. What are you going to do with that 20K? We're going to keep We're going to keep that 50K for the assessor. Correct. >> No, that was the original proposed. This is what it would be now for full-time.

131
00:42:04.400 --> 00:42:20.720
>> So, it's seven it would be 70,000 sitting in that line. >> 70 for >> correct >> full which we're not going to get. >> Yeah. I mean, that 20 grand it's just kind of sitting there, right? We've already said that like the 89 wasn't going to get it done. So, taking it

132
00:42:20.720 --> 00:42:39.200
away, might as well do something with this 20 as opposed to Even if it's just a I don't know >> keep the assessor part time at 50 figure out but the other 20k >> I would lean towards the 20k going to receipts myself just to make sure the

133
00:42:39.200 --> 00:42:54.000
the structure of the budget is >> more in tune. >> Okay. You want to So you want to bump up the local receipts number >> um >> for the Yeah. >> For the revenue revenue, sorry. >> I'd like to pay that towards towards

134
00:42:54.000 --> 00:43:13.200
principal on windows as as interest only payments make my skin crawl. >> But just listening to the math and and Mr. Ellis, if you can correct me on this. Um, that would bring it down to 70

135
00:43:13.200 --> 00:43:29.359
or 60. >> Which one? The assessor. >> Correct. >> Keep it 50. Keep it right. Might be easier to >> Okay. >> See right behind >> because we put the 10 in the planning consultant. >> Correct. Okay. I just wanted to make sure that we were all clear on the math. >> Yep.

136
00:43:29.359 --> 00:43:50.079
>> Okay. >> Okay. So, the 20k is going to go where? >> Receipts. >> It went to revenue. Yeah. we have now. >> Okay. Okay. Any further discussion on any of this? All right. Well, I will certainly

137
00:43:50.079 --> 00:44:04.960
entertain a motion from the select board. >> So move. >> Second. >> All right. And just for clarity purposes, um, as presented and discussed, >> I got it.

138
00:44:04.960 --> 00:44:20.400
>> Do we want the full, um, budgeted amount? We did that last last week. >> M, can can we vote on this and then this separately? >> That's what I >> But Andrew, you're asking to combine it. >> No, I'm just saying eventually I'd like to vote the final,

139
00:44:20.400 --> 00:44:36.000
>> right? So, he's actually going to have to move this over, I think. Right. >> Okay. All right. So, we have a motion and a second. Any further discussion from the select board hearing? None. Roll, please. >> I. >> Any discussion, please?

140
00:44:36.000 --> 00:44:52.319
>> Carbon. I Howard I. >> Any discussion on the motion? >> We Nobody had discussion. >> I'm saying the audience going to have a chance to ask questions. >> Um, I wasn't planning on it because it was our dis discussion, but would you

141
00:44:52.319 --> 00:45:08.960
like to comment after? Well, you getting like the school committee there to let people talk. >> No. Um, that's not it at all. Um, but we did have a motion in a second. So, um, did you want to finish? I would like >> Phoebe and I

142
00:45:08.960 --> 00:45:24.720
>> Mr. Lameron, would you like to comment, please? >> Yeah. On the two I think we're talking about the two issues here having to do with the planning planner and the U assessor, whatever that person is called, principal assessor. Um, first thing is on a

143
00:45:24.720 --> 00:45:40.720
principal assessor, I don't know if you uh watch this the sales of the properties in town and you look at what they're being sold for and what the assessments are. The assessments are way undervalued on what's in what's in the system. That needs to be addressed.

144
00:45:40.720 --> 00:45:55.680
Actually, Le and I complained about that two years ago and it hasn't changed at all. So that is a significant impact on certain properties that are affected by other individuals and that's just not right. You mentioned the

145
00:45:55.680 --> 00:46:12.160
personal property taxes. The personal property taxes for commercial properties is way undervalued and that whole thing needs to be looked at because the commercial properties especially for the uh the marijuana facilities and Le's going to veer me out on this. Oh

146
00:46:12.160 --> 00:46:27.440
>> yeah. that they're they're way undervalued. And so this this is really important. So I think Leo was mentioning that we hire somebody to do that, but that person doesn't do a thorough job. I mean, I can tell you there's hundreds of thousands of dollars in personal

147
00:46:27.440 --> 00:46:44.079
property that taxes that we can collect that can help us in our budgets is not being addressed right now. >> Are you applying for the role, >> are you applying for the role? >> Absolutely not. >> Oh, see this is the trouble that we're having. But no, I think I think your point is very well taken.

148
00:46:44.079 --> 00:46:59.520
>> So I think it over there, you know, said that, you know, this is a valuable position that, you know, we're relying on a third party to do it >> and we all know and we backed that up. We had trouble with this third party, too. We let that third party go. Now we

149
00:46:59.520 --> 00:47:16.400
hired him back, you know, to do the the the uh task again. So I think that whole thing needs to be looked at and you keep pushing it aside. And I think that's not right. That's my opinion on the principal censor. >> Um just go ahead.

150
00:47:16.400 --> 00:47:32.800
>> Um just through you ma u madam chair. >> That was exactly what you know when Barbara asked if there was money being left on the table >> on the personal property tax. So each resident or business is responsible for filling out their own form. The assessors typically take the form and

151
00:47:32.800 --> 00:47:49.359
they just run with it. But we don't, at least to my knowledge, have someone looking at these forms and literally going and doing some inspections on some of the commercial properties. And there could be a lot of money sitting on the

152
00:47:49.359 --> 00:48:05.119
table in these on the personal property stuff. So, >> I mean, mayor, you and I looked at it a couple of years ago and all the all the marijuana facilities, personal property taxes, were way undervalued. >> Yeah. And there's a lot of money sitting there, you know, that needs to be

153
00:48:05.119 --> 00:48:19.839
addressed. And >> yeah, >> I don't say the assessors have ignored it, but the company that they hired to do this isn't doing it right. >> Right. And there is one company in the just in the state that's kind of that

154
00:48:19.839 --> 00:48:34.960
does it. >> So, >> well, the biggest source of revenue is not personal property at this time. It's real estate for our town, right? And the state mandates every 3 years. I believe we have to have

155
00:48:34.960 --> 00:48:50.880
review. Correct. And a lot of that is done electronically. I'm sure it has to be. Is there enough money? I guess that's the question I posed to Leah. Rich. Is there enough money in the excess tax

156
00:48:50.880 --> 00:49:08.240
revenue we could be generating by having a more thorough assessor than it would cost for us to increase that salary to attract that type of talent? So, I think the number I threw up was 35,000. >> I really I really think there is Barbara, but I don't know like I haven't

157
00:49:08.240 --> 00:49:23.520
seen a personal property tax bill for any of the commercial businesses. I mean, so residential. Okay. you own your primary home, you don't pay personal property tax. When you own a secondary home, no matter where it is, if I own a

158
00:49:23.520 --> 00:49:38.480
house down the Cape or I own two houses in Lakeville, that secondary residence, you pay personal property tax, which is the contents. There's only one type of business corporation that is exempt from personal

159
00:49:38.480 --> 00:49:54.480
property tax and I don't believe any of our at least last time I checked which was a couple years ago are that type of corporation. So every conveyor, every everything they have, every piece of

160
00:49:54.480 --> 00:50:10.319
equipment manufact especially manufacturing falls under personal property tax. And I don't know that anyone is >> I'll give you a perfect example. >> You know the Jets building, >> you know, that was that was taken over by um

161
00:50:10.319 --> 00:50:25.920
>> idolist. Yep. >> Right. >> They completely gutted the building everything out of that building that was in that building. They brought in all new equipment, all new conveyors and so forth and so on. I don't think that's been taxed as personal property taxes. That's just

162
00:50:25.920 --> 00:50:43.359
>> we would have to definitely check to see what their >> what is our current >> and that's new growth by the way, Barbara, so you know >> that's new growth, >> you know, personal property taxes. >> Okay. Well, I think that this is, you know, I don't know what the assessors have um, you know, for their

163
00:50:43.359 --> 00:51:00.880
projected goals, um, you know, for FY27 or 28, but this is definitely a conversation >> to be had with the assessors. Um because maybe there are ways that we can tackle these topics individually like we

164
00:51:00.880 --> 00:51:16.720
could focus on you know personal property tax and or focus on um you know squaring away something else. Um but I think that that you know obviously it's got to come with them. But you know if we put a plan of attack in place to try to make sure that

165
00:51:16.720 --> 00:51:34.800
everything is uh brought current. >> Yeah. It's definitely a conversation that we should have. >> So, good point. Thank you. >> Is having to do with the town planner. >> Now, we've gone through two town planners in the last year. One of them was here maybe six months and the second

166
00:51:34.800 --> 00:51:50.480
one was here four or five weeks and then left and we lost our administrative staff member who had been in the town working for the town for 20 years. Somebody should ask the question, why? Why are we losing these? Why are these

167
00:51:50.480 --> 00:52:06.480
people leaving right away? Why did we lose a staff member that's been here 20 years? She's okay. She wasn't great, but she did her job. >> We're not going to do that. >> I'm sorry. >> Not perform. I I would rather you not

168
00:52:06.480 --> 00:52:21.440
address performance, >> but that needs to be addressed before you go and hire a new planner. I'll tell you right now. No, >> because there's something wrong there. >> Um, >> you agree, Andrew? It's a concern of mine that we don't have a planner. >> Yeah. Okay.

169
00:52:21.440 --> 00:52:37.599
>> Yeah. Yeah. It's um Yeah. It's been a frustration the first 18 months not be able to keep a planner. >> We have a very very very complicated situation from a development perspective. It's a very complicated situation and I guess I'll leave it there. But I do think it's experience is

170
00:52:37.599 --> 00:52:55.920
going to show us that we don't know what we've got right now. >> Okay. Finance committee. All right. I will make the same motion that the revised uh budget 1A uh I guess 1A uh changes are made.

171
00:52:55.920 --> 00:53:12.480
>> I'll second. >> Tenin I. Right. I >> Manovsky I >> Okay. Thank you. Now um the budget number. So everything that we talked about this evening um that we just voted on is

172
00:53:12.480 --> 00:53:40.880
included on the second page here. >> That's correct. So it would be under the general fund operating budget $40,71,69. >> It's at the Wait a minute. I'm not following it. >> So it's 4701

173
00:53:40.880 --> 00:54:03.040
609. Flip the page around. Huh? >> Third sub total up >> so you can see it. >> Oh, and then art. I'm sorry. I was looking at the >> when you go to bottom line, you actually go to the bottom line. >> Justin, I'm sure you're right on top of

174
00:54:03.040 --> 00:54:20.720
this because you do this on a regular basis. Okay. So it was um 40,716 609. Correct. >> Correct. >> Okay. So I'll entertain a motion um for the

175
00:54:20.720 --> 00:54:38.240
proposed um town administrators um budget for 20 2027 um for 1A article for 40,7001 609,000. So moved

176
00:54:38.240 --> 00:54:52.880
>> second >> discussion. >> Uh madam chair. So I I will uh um restate my um issue with the um the free the um the regional school district

177
00:54:52.880 --> 00:55:08.800
uh assessment increase 1.7 million 9.65%. Um I can't uh support that. I think everybody knows my position on that. I expressed that last week uh considering

178
00:55:08.800 --> 00:55:24.000
multiple factors including declining enrollments and so forth. I won't get into all that. So again, I'm just publicly stating my opposition to that line item. I support all other line items, but I do not support that line item. >> Noted.

179
00:55:24.000 --> 00:55:42.480
Okay. Any other discussion? Hearing none. Roll, please. >> I plunka. No. >> Carbon I. >> Howard. I they be and I >> we need to vote on it. >> Okay. Um I will make a motion that the

180
00:55:42.480 --> 00:56:05.359
uh operating budget of $40,71,69,000. >> Seconded. >> Second. Tanini I >> Right. ISKI. >> Be's eye. >> Okay. So these will be rolled into

181
00:56:05.359 --> 00:56:26.359
>> Yes. >> What what is the uh the assessment for the read into the budget please? >> It's up on the uh screen. It's on this page if you want to follow along. It is 1,73,284,000.

182
00:56:30.880 --> 00:56:48.160
>> 1,7 what? >> Three. >> 284. >> 284. >> So there's been a reduction uh in the assessment for what reason? I >> believe it's tied to state aid

183
00:56:48.160 --> 00:57:04.240
increases. >> Yeah. and then special education which was mentioned at the budget hearing. >> So they reduced the budget by $250,000 then you said a minute ago. >> Yeah, but it would uh it's split off

184
00:57:04.240 --> 00:57:21.760
between us and Freetown a little bit differently. >> No, no, I understand that. >> Yes. >> So it's the state aid the difference in the state aid number which they got I don't know what the exact number was. Maybe Mike can explain that. Um, so I I have a question. Um, and I know

185
00:57:21.760 --> 00:57:38.720
Mike is not going to like this, but um, the intermediate school, they put the they put the uh, debt schedule in the into the budget right now and that intermediate school has been paid off. >> So that's $135,000

186
00:57:38.720 --> 00:57:56.880
that this should be reduced by. Is that correct, Mike? Yeah. So, um, we voted a debt exclusion. Um, I can't remember the year. 2005, possibly. >> It was 20 years ago. >> 20 years ago. Yeah. Um, long story

187
00:57:56.880 --> 00:58:13.920
short, we were raising this on our tax rate. I can draw your attention to the screen. um you'd see that we raised the 135 debt exclusion for the school here and then we would appropriate it on behalf of the school's uh debt payment

188
00:58:13.920 --> 00:58:29.280
which is appropriated in their budget. Um sorry I went a little too far which is right here. Um like all debt exclusions they do fall off. This fell off in fiscal 26. So, as you can see, 27

189
00:58:29.280 --> 00:58:46.160
no longer requires a payment. Um, what Freelick was doing was taking the total prior year assessment, including that debt payment, and adding on what they needed for the subsequent year. Obviously, this stuck out this year because we made our last uh debt

190
00:58:46.160 --> 00:59:01.920
payment. So, when we spoke with Mr. Higgins and Dr. Starky. Um, they offset it with reductions to special education. Um, and Mr. Leamemer, I understand you're asking why we didn't see the full

191
00:59:01.920 --> 00:59:19.359
dollar value. Um, something that town administrator Sorth and I have inquired about. Um, we can certainly get back to you on an answer. Um, >> no, but you're looking to save money. Here's $135,000 sitting on the table. >> Yep. that you know is available for the budget that they used in their budget

192
00:59:19.359 --> 00:59:36.240
that they won't reduce even though the debt schedule has been paid and free time share is $55,000 so you know and I'm sure they're going to be all over there too. Yeah, you're you're 100% correct and that's why Andrew and I had a had a meeting with the schools uh probably about a month ago because we

193
00:59:36.240 --> 00:59:52.880
knew that this 135 should not have been included as part of the bottom line. It should have been subtracted every year over the 20-year life of this note. So, when they said we need a million dollars on prior year's assessment, they should have deducted that debt payment um for for two decades. Yep. But obviously,

194
00:59:52.880 --> 01:00:07.839
it's uh it comes to your attention right away this year because it's no longer needed. The the note is paid off. So, >> so uh there's $135,000, Paul, if you want to increase the salary for whatever.

195
01:00:07.839 --> 01:00:24.480
>> Thank you. You're welcome. Madam Chair, >> you um Andrew Mc you met with the administration a month ago. You discussed this with them and their response was they um had a well they just they

196
01:00:24.480 --> 01:00:42.480
disagree with how we do the math essentially. Um they thought they could basically take the prior year number with the data exclusion number and just kind of add on. We got a difference of opinion on that. Mhm. Um, pretty bad, I think. But, um, they essentially went

197
01:00:42.480 --> 01:01:00.160
back like the next couple days, the special education thing happened and they they came back with a new amount, but I don't know if it could be tied necessarily to that 135,000. So, um, we probably I mean, I don't know.

198
01:01:00.160 --> 01:01:15.440
It's tough to they can kind of set their own budget and give us the assessment, but we don't have to give it to them obviously. >> Yeah. And the assessment the the budget the school budget has a line item specific for Lakeville's portion of this and it was zeroed out going to the

199
01:01:15.440 --> 01:01:32.400
budget season. However, the full amount of the ask, this example, the 1,700 was added on to the grand total of the 17645 and the prior year debt payment. So dollar for dollar we should see a savings of 135480.

200
01:01:32.400 --> 01:01:47.280
Um by not taking this off and including it in the total year after year after year and then not allowing it to fall off like we have done on the town side basically turns it into a quasi override. It never goes away. A debt exclusion is supposed to go away. But if

201
01:01:47.280 --> 01:02:03.920
you're taking both subtotals and adding on instead of subtracting, it's a permanent increase. So, um, we should see a reduction of 135480. >> Madam Chair, >> yes. >> If they don't correct it, can we send them a bill?

202
01:02:03.920 --> 01:02:19.839
>> Um, I suppose we could when we get the assessment from the schools. Um, I have FY26's assessment. I can pull it up if I can disconnect for a moment, but it subtotals. So, when I pay the bill every month to the schools, it's

203
01:02:19.839 --> 01:02:35.440
17,645 divided by 12. It's 12 installments of that number. And then there's a second subtotal for the capital debt exclusion. So how this was caught was when I started here, I started to separate the assessment from the capital. And then as I mentioned, it

204
01:02:35.440 --> 01:02:50.319
stuck out because we paid our last payment. So theoretically, we're sending them two checks. One for their debt exclusion and one for their assessment. So by including the grand total, it's it's high. >> Can someone tell me again how long has

205
01:02:50.319 --> 01:03:07.359
this been going on? I think since the beginning 200 >> but the but the debt's just falling off. So it's not we really truly didn't miss. >> We have not overpaid. >> No, I think we have >> sounds like 20 years

206
01:03:07.359 --> 01:03:23.359
>> double payment. If you I can try to pull it up. >> Well, I can't. >> So, Madam Chair, question um for the accountant. I'm sorry to put you on the spot, but >> if the school committee would stop ignoring a request for an audit, would

207
01:03:23.359 --> 01:03:40.240
something like this be picked up? >> That was exactly my question. >> Um, it's it's hard to answer that question. I mean, I I don't know what the auditors are looking at. Um, >> could we ask? >> We could we could define that in our scope if we we can we have the

208
01:03:40.240 --> 01:03:58.799
flexibility to do that. >> Yes. Madam Chair, the problem you're going to have is the free time knows about this as well. And so, you know, they're going to vote their share and they're going to vote our share as match our share that's going to be voted on tonight, you know,

209
01:03:58.799 --> 01:04:13.599
for their for their budget. >> Mhm. >> And u so you're going to have 135 and 55, you know, in that budget that's out of balance. And that means that, you know, that's not a good thing to do. >> Right. Right. So, it needs to be it

210
01:04:13.599 --> 01:04:30.720
needs to be fixed. >> It wouldn't be the first time that we've had to send an invoice or demand letter um for something that was identified. So,

211
01:04:30.720 --> 01:04:46.960
>> um but I think that we absolutely now that you've brought this to our attention, we need to address this. Um yeah, I mean I'm showing on the screen now the revenue portion, right? So because the last payment was made, we

212
01:04:46.960 --> 01:05:04.319
lose the ability to raise this, right? Exactly. So now by the school including it, we lose the revenue source, spreading it on the tax bills, >> but it's still being included as part of the expense side in the school budget. So um yeah, and and Freetown voted their

213
01:05:04.319 --> 01:05:21.400
own method of paying for it. I'm not quite sure if theirs was a debt exclusion or operational debt, but uh to Mr. Leamemer's point, this shouldn't be split 60/40. This should be $135,480 coming back to the town of Lakeville. So, >> correct.

214
01:05:22.079 --> 01:05:39.039
>> So, it looks like there's got to be some >> Yeah, it's in it's we're working on it. It's in progress. Yeah. So, um, but it's, um, >> Madame Chair, >> yes, >> I'm I'm having a lot of big feelings again, and Larry's not here to calm me

215
01:05:39.039 --> 01:05:55.119
down. >> Um, you guys brought this up a month ago >> approximately. >> Approximately. >> Okay. So, this has been knowledge that's been out there for a month. I mean,

216
01:05:55.119 --> 01:06:12.559
what was you guys are just not seeing eye to eye on? Essentially the first um defense I guess if lack of better term is that it was past practice. This is how they've been doing it for 20 years. >> And in their defense they've had a lot of change, right? This is what turnover produces mistakes and errors, right? So

217
01:06:12.559 --> 01:06:28.400
we have >> Well, we haven't caught it though either. >> And we haven't caught it either. And it's, you know, we've also had a lot of changeovers and all these I mean I I I want resolution to this before I'm even willing like I'm this is blows my mind.

218
01:06:28.400 --> 01:06:44.160
That blows my mind because this is the the that that portion of it if it's if we've been if this has been going on for years and years. I mean what other mistakes are there that we don't know about? That's I mean

219
01:06:44.160 --> 01:07:00.000
>> well hence the reason why how many times has this board said they would like to see some kind of an audit >> and we voted twice for the record. Well, I'm not I'm just I know maybe my feelings will calm down in a little

220
01:07:00.000 --> 01:07:15.119
while, but I feel like why should we approve why should we even allocate a budget if that's not going to be agreed to? Because this is a massive problem. I can't believe I didn't know about this last year. It's just and I I just so people understand this is really the the

221
01:07:15.119 --> 01:07:30.079
school committee budgeting is so complicated and I applaud you that I mean I know you've served on those committees and you guys know a lot more about this than I do and how these things are all figured out but the majority of our money is not happening here at the municipal level. The spending is happening at the school

222
01:07:30.079 --> 01:07:46.480
level. >> Madam Chair, so if we want to take charge of this we could decrease our assessment by 135 and just we take control of it, right? We just don't pay them at 135. If we feel strongly that we're in we're in the right position

223
01:07:46.480 --> 01:08:04.000
>> and that way you don't you don't have to deal with them. >> It is, you know, >> and agree to an audit >> to make sure mistake doesn't happen, >> right? Which we have. So that Mr. Blanca is pursuing um that through the regional fincom. Um but I I like what you said.

224
01:08:04.000 --> 01:08:26.560
So we could re obviously revote um minus that that amount. >> Mhm. >> Um and that would reduce our assessment by that amount as well. And that's what and that's okay. If 1a passes,

225
01:08:26.560 --> 01:08:42.159
>> if 1a passes and I don't think we can go back and recalculate for the last 20 years, but at least for this year, >> we would >> right to get this moving along, but at least knowing what happened. >> That's why you do the >> we need to make sure that we see where

226
01:08:42.159 --> 01:08:58.000
>> it's fallen off >> because I think that we need to be educated in that respect. So, all right. So we would um what was the total was 135 134 what? 135 480

227
01:08:58.000 --> 01:09:13.440
>> 480 135 480 >> 1354 480 Right. >> Yeah. And Mike can kind of >> So if you could reduce our proposed budget by that amount.

228
01:09:13.440 --> 01:09:28.960
>> Sure. >> And can we do that whether it's 1 A or 1B, >> whether the override passes or not? >> Mhm. Yeah. I feel I think we should >> I agree with that.

229
01:09:28.960 --> 01:09:45.679
>> We could we could um what we're giving them in the 1B is not very much. >> It's 350,000. >> 350,000. Um we'd have to recalculate and do all sorts of stuff before we um advertise the town meeting warrant,

230
01:09:45.679 --> 01:10:05.679
which we're doing tonight as well. Um we can try to do that math quickly. mic looks stressed. >> No, I I just want I found the sheet in case anybody's interested. I don't know if you can see the bottom, but this is kind of how I you know, well, we caught

231
01:10:05.679 --> 01:10:21.520
the problem. So, when I started here and they said we needed a million dollars on last year's assessment, I put the million dollars on this number here, 17,645, because this to me is the assessment. This is the debt payment down here, the 135480.

232
01:10:21.520 --> 01:10:37.199
But what was actually happening when they said we need a million dollars on the prior year assessment, it was going on this number down here >> for 20 years. So, uh, just to kind of put a visual with the, uh, >> makes it a little easier to understand. >> Yeah. Yeah. I apologize for not having that, uh,

233
01:10:37.199 --> 01:10:52.960
>> now another defense, um, from the schools, what they kind of said. Michael kind of laugh at this. It's a coincidence. So like he they kind of say like we we give you a number um and that's what you kind of go with like they give us an assessment sheet

234
01:10:52.960 --> 01:11:10.320
that's like more illustrative >> but this is like the end all be all and he they kind of said well that's the number and Mike was kind of like that's a funny coincidence. It's it's off by the same 135 >> 480 >> 480. Um so

235
01:11:10.320 --> 01:11:25.760
I mean that it's it's as much of as it's not really a true defense. I mean they they give us an amount. What goes into that amount we don't really have a say on. So but at the same time the fact that it was off 135,480 was

236
01:11:25.760 --> 01:11:40.239
>> not ideal. >> Yeah. We know we know where >> where it came from. >> Mhm. >> That's kind of how we first >> Yeah. >> first saw it because what the number they had I think advertised and they gave to us >> was off by that exact amount. So we said

237
01:11:40.239 --> 01:11:57.199
what the what the heck's going on? And we we and me and Mike know the 135 480 number because we do the budget so y >> so close. So that's where we kind of went down the rabbit hole to decide how this happened and then we found out it's been going on for 20 years. So um

238
01:11:57.199 --> 01:12:12.880
>> and in that time when you're setting up the school budget and I know there's been turnover in the schools but you know that this subtotal up here the 17 six that's operational. That's what you need to operate. And then this should be immediately your mark for your for your mortgage payment, right? Like this this goes right to the mortgage.

239
01:12:12.880 --> 01:12:31.040
>> So now that the mortgage is paid off, your operational cost is the lesser amount. So >> um so as I said going into 27 budget season, it stuck out like a sore thumb. So >> well, the school always said they were looking for new revenue streams.

240
01:12:31.040 --> 01:12:46.080
>> Is that is that a similar number like year over year like the prior year's budgets? Are they basically baking in like a 0.075% increase like >> Well, it's so 135 that was the last year. Mike knows the numbers better than me. I think maybe two years ago was like 400.

241
01:12:46.080 --> 01:13:03.280
>> Yeah. So, uh again, I you know, related to like a 30-year mortgage, right? You're paying a ton of interest up front um in principal. So, yeah, the payment's gone down, but there was a time where this was probably in the neighborhood of half a million dollars. >> So, it's way worse. >> Oh, yeah. Yeah. So, I do have the debt

242
01:13:03.280 --> 01:13:19.360
schedule. Um, >> so like >> so we ask like how the school budget's gone up so much like year-over-year like for the past 10 years or whatever like this could be a huge portion of it. >> We need to have a meeting with school committee. That's just

243
01:13:19.360 --> 01:13:37.320
>> because they need to be part of the discussion. >> All right. So are we looking to revote our >> 1A >> 1A um minus the 135 480? Yes. So I come up with um 3,934,689

244
01:13:38.159 --> 01:13:56.640
39. >> No, but we already filed it. >> We already took a vote on it. >> So we voted >> we voted originally 40,71609 and correct taken 135480 off that. I get an operational budget of 40 million

245
01:13:56.640 --> 01:14:15.600
566129. >> Um maybe my All right. I'm using an antiquated. Okay. I'd rather go with your number. Could you say that again, please? >> Yes, ma'am. Uh 40,566129. >> 129. >> That's correct. Madam >> chair. >> Yes.

246
01:14:15.600 --> 01:14:34.400
>> I think we should officially vote that last vote out and then do another. >> That's fine with me. >> Does that work for everyone? >> Make the motion. >> Um >> resend. >> Yep. Um motion to resend the motion that

247
01:14:34.400 --> 01:14:51.040
was made by member Howard and seconded by me I think >> in the amount of 40,7001,609. >> Yes. >> Second motion to second discussion hearing none. Roll please. >> I plug eye.

248
01:14:51.040 --> 01:15:07.760
>> Carboni. I >> Howard I AB and I. >> Okay. >> All right. I also uh make a motion that we resin the budget uh that we voted on of $40,71,69. >> Second. >> Tenini. I

249
01:15:07.760 --> 01:15:24.920
>> Right. I >> Manovsky. I >> Bill's eye. >> I'll entertain a new motion. >> It's right here. >> I'm ready. Motion. I motion um for the bud budgeted amount to be $40,566,129.

250
01:15:26.640 --> 01:15:44.800
Second motion in a second discussion >> reflecting the deduction of $135,480. Correct? >> Yes. >> Yes. Okay. >> We can include that in the motion. Is that okay? Yes. >> Perfect. >> I say it again.

251
01:15:44.800 --> 01:15:59.280
>> No. Okay. mention again a step in the right direction but I still remain opposed to the total amount being allocated. So >> roll please. >> Hunt I >> Wanelli. >> Carbon. I Howard I

252
01:15:59.280 --> 01:16:17.840
>> Baby I >> like to make a motion uh to approve the uh operating budget of 40,566129. >> Second. Any discussion? Okay. Tenini I. >> Right. I >> Manovsky I

253
01:16:17.840 --> 01:16:34.560
>> Okay. And then not to put on too far on the back burner, but let's at least let's get a picture of exactly what the true dollar value is for the >> Mhm. >> that intermediate. >> I just had a quick question as well.

254
01:16:34.560 --> 01:16:49.920
What would the board like to do with that? >> Yeah, that 135 I guess >> reduce that assessment. >> Okay, reduce assessment. Okay. All right. Sorry. I'm just >> Do we need to vote on that? >> My wheels are turning too fast. I think

255
01:16:49.920 --> 01:17:06.000
>> we need to vote on reducing because we gave a bottom number and this was a projected um or proposed for the town administrator. Y >> so they'll just reduce that um 1703 284. >> Oh, the 1B budget.

256
01:17:06.000 --> 01:17:22.239
>> Well, that's the other question. What do we do about that? That was brought up. Nothing. >> And you said that um something about the >> Well, the increase for that one isn't tied to that 135 number. Um it's just a number I

257
01:17:22.239 --> 01:17:38.560
brought like kind of conceptualized with Mike. So >> Okay. >> I don't think that needs to be changed. >> Okay. All right, >> Madam Chair. >> Yes. >> Um I don't disagree with member Plan that something needs to be done about the

258
01:17:38.560 --> 01:17:56.239
school budget. Um, but I also feel like something needs to be done about the understanding of the budget for the folks who actually vote for that budget. >> Right. So, I'd like to at some point on

259
01:17:56.239 --> 01:18:11.040
a future agenda put a discussion about having a uh like a finance meeting with and including our Freetown folks too so that everyone can understand how the cherry

260
01:18:11.040 --> 01:18:26.000
sheets done and you know so for future reference. Nope. I think it's great and I I am very hopeful that um with the regional finance committee understanding their role and what it was designed um

261
01:18:26.000 --> 01:18:42.640
to do where the two towns come together um with the school and they actually have a discussion about where the towns lie and with where the school is looking to assess

262
01:18:42.640 --> 01:18:58.080
and coming through an agreement with the recommendation back to the to the school committee. >> Madam Chair, it it should be note I'd like to remind everyone that we have attempted to do

263
01:18:58.080 --> 01:19:13.280
those types of meetings for three years now. Uh and we did have a joint regional uh sorry we had a joint select board meeting and fin meeting >> with Freetown and the school committee way back at the beginning of the year

264
01:19:13.280 --> 01:19:30.719
where we expressed uh uh our financial difficulties and no uncertain terms to the school committee and the administration. uh my opinion they did not fully um recognize those

265
01:19:30.719 --> 01:19:46.640
uh difficulties. Um, but to me Fman's point, we we I think we need to do something a little different because what we've been doing for the past two of the years >> is not working and they are not getting the message in my opinion. >> And I don't want to take too much time on this, but I literally think that, you

266
01:19:46.640 --> 01:20:02.640
know, we can take a page out of the assessor's 101, which discusses exactly how the cherry sheets done and how taxation is done, and literally invite our make it instructional. We have some super smart people here that can, you

267
01:20:02.640 --> 01:20:18.880
know, I'm sure they can combine efforts with some folks in Freetown that can expose to all of us, to everybody. I mean, I've sat for hours and hours and hours of how the taxation stuff is done. I don't think anyone else, you know, it's super interesting if you're into

268
01:20:18.880 --> 01:20:35.360
it, but you you you get a sense of how finite the amount of money is that the town can raise. And you know we need to help anyone who wants to try to understand that. So >> um so I'll ask um our administration if

269
01:20:35.360 --> 01:20:52.480
you can just make a note and then I'll circle back and see what we can put together for for that discussion. Okay. Uh moving on. what does the town administrator have to

270
01:20:52.480 --> 01:21:08.960
say and what does our management analyst have to share with us? >> So, I I mentioned that during this discussion um with the Senate um budget, proposed budget, we're looking at um potentially 300,000 more in state aid. 285,000 of that is smart growth

271
01:21:08.960 --> 01:21:26.800
reimbursement. 18,000 is VBS, which is veterans um not veterans, veterans benefits, blind. And there's another one. Um that went up 18,000. It's a reimbursement program with the assessors. Um so 300,000 is quite a good amount. Um but

272
01:21:26.800 --> 01:21:42.159
it's not a final. Um and I don't want to appropriate that until it is because that's that's a it's a big it's a volatile amount. Um the last override roundt discussion is tomorrow night at the library from 6:00

273
01:21:42.159 --> 01:22:00.320
to 7. Um it'll just be the town at in attendance. The schools have a school committee meeting and won't be there. Um and then that's all I had. Emily, >> um so at the last uh energy advisory committee meeting, they opted to put in

274
01:22:00.320 --> 01:22:16.800
an application or recommend that they put an application for the municipal energy technical assistance grant. Um we're going to be creating an application and submitting that. It will be going in front of the board at the beginning of June for approval for submission, but we're going to be

275
01:22:16.800 --> 01:22:33.040
looking at getting some energy audits for the public library council on aging so that we are able to apply for future green communities grants. And then second, I just have an update on the website. So, I was having a discussion with the town clerk the other

276
01:22:33.040 --> 01:22:49.120
day and she brought up a good point that we have two elections coming up within the next month and a half. We have a lot of outreach materials intertwined with uh you know website links and documents. So, we're looking at pushing back the

277
01:22:49.120 --> 01:23:05.760
release of the website to the end of June, beginning of July. Um we're still receiving feedback from people on the website setup. Member Planka sent some uh good suggestions the other day and we've had two new members here as well that uh I'd like probably to get your

278
01:23:05.760 --> 01:23:26.719
feedback on the website. So we're looking at about a July 1 release date on the website. Sounds good. Okay. Anybody have any questions? Well, thank you very much. We have a set of minutes um in front of

279
01:23:26.719 --> 01:23:43.920
the select board for April 7th, 2026. Has everybody had a moment to review? I'll entertain a motion to approve the select board mage personnel meeting minutes of April 7th, 2026. >> So move second >> discussion.

280
01:23:43.920 --> 01:23:59.600
U just on the B bottom of page two. >> Yep. >> Um it looks like it was a a dual entry. >> Me too. Correct. We'll take a look at that. >> And other than that, I have nothing else. Um, >> roll please. >> Hunt. I >> plug eye.

281
01:23:59.600 --> 01:24:15.040
>> Carbon. I Howard I. >> Baby and I. >> And Madam Chair, just just a couple minor. >> You can email me. >> Okay. Okay. >> Fine. >> Or if you have them, you can just hand them. >> Oh, yeah. I'll I'll circle. Yeah, I'll circle them. I'll hand them to you.

282
01:24:15.040 --> 01:24:30.800
Simple. >> Okay. >> Oh, I just said either way. >> Either way. Okay. Um, next we're going to discuss and review the special town meeting and the annual town meeting warrant articles. Um, and get ready for

283
01:24:30.800 --> 01:24:48.400
advertisement. So, Andrew, would you like to Yes. Um, so we can go over the special town meeting warrant first. It's just one article. I I got rid of the unpaid bills article as we don't have any at the moment. Um so the first one

284
01:24:48.400 --> 01:25:05.360
is the Gateway Health Group. Um lack of a better term it's a buyout. Um the claims um we're responsible for our claims at the end of the year. Gateway as everyone knows is dissolving. We're joining a new group. Um there's been some issues with

285
01:25:05.360 --> 01:25:21.760
the broker recommended fiscal 26 premium amount that was wolffully inaccurate. Um they recommended 8% which we we put in the budget was more like 25%. So um essentially our budget amount

286
01:25:21.760 --> 01:25:37.840
was inadequate across the entire Gateway Health Group which is ourselves, the town of Carver and then Old Rochester Regional um high school. And so we are responsible for paying our claims. our

287
01:25:37.840 --> 01:25:54.159
claims have gone up over the last year. Um, just based off healthc care being what it is. Uh, I'm going to mess this up. GP1 >> was a big a big one that kind of hit in 26. Um, we've had a couple of big health

288
01:25:54.159 --> 01:26:13.320
claims um recently. Um, and so our rough deficit is going to be about a million dollar and we are proposing using 800,000 in free cash at the special to help pay for that deficit.

289
01:26:14.560 --> 01:26:31.040
For reference, um, Marian at they're a part of old Rochester had to pay 684,000. Matapoet had to pay 734,000. Rochester 716,000 for a total amount of 2.1 million and

290
01:26:31.040 --> 01:26:47.360
then Carver their projected deficit was north of four million. >> So um Carver has gotten Talian approval. Marian and Matapo have all gotten approval. Rochester I believe is next week and we're the last one in the

291
01:26:47.360 --> 01:27:05.360
group. So we're June 8th. Um, we were hoping this amount would be a little bit lower, but we've had a few different health uh claims recently, so we've kind of had a uptick from what I thought it was going to be. >> Madam Chair,

292
01:27:05.360 --> 01:27:22.080
>> so I know we've had a fair number of discussions around. I'm sure I understand it fully. We when we come to the end when we're leaving we don't you know we have to obviously cover those claims and you you might try to project what that number is going to be and the number was more than

293
01:27:22.080 --> 01:27:37.120
what we projected for >> and part do the GLP >> that's part of it um it was also based on past claims the broker at the time I don't believe they did a proper analysis >> of what um we should have kind of put into that

294
01:27:37.120 --> 01:27:53.280
>> so they said 8% is good to go but then I don't think they quite realize what the claims are going to look like in that in this current year. >> Not easy to predict. >> It's not easy, but I there's been some discussions about whether there's been some liability should be on

295
01:27:53.280 --> 01:28:09.280
the broker. We we removed the broker maybe a few months ago. We have a new one, but there's some contention still. >> And I'm curious too, is that under the new plan GOP? Is that >> won't be covered? >> Okay. Uh, I think GOP1 is basically off

296
01:28:09.280 --> 01:28:26.880
the table on all health plans. >> My uh GIC Mayflower that's pretty it's it's on there if you have diabetes for the for the original intended purpose. Right. Okay. Thank you. >> And I think it's the same way in the

297
01:28:26.880 --> 01:28:42.560
public private sector. >> I think a lot of that. Correct. Thank you. >> Y All right. Well, I'll entertain a motion from the select board to approve the special town meeting um warrant article. Um as presented move

298
01:28:42.560 --> 01:28:59.280
>> second discussion hearing none. Roll >> I plug eye. >> Carbon I board I baby and I okay so special's good to go. Um I know this is more for advertisement.

299
01:28:59.280 --> 01:29:19.840
Okay, moving on to the annual. >> Okay, so the annual 18 articles in total. The first one is the non override budget. If the override is not to pass, this is what it would look like. So, um, we chose to list out this year a

300
01:29:19.840 --> 01:29:35.679
not to exceed amount of the number that was approved last week by both the finance committee and select board. Um and we kind of list out some of the other amounts. This was at the uh guidance of town council. So

301
01:29:35.679 --> 01:29:53.040
>> article one is 1B, >> correct? >> And article two is 1A. >> Correct. Um obviously the election's next Tuesday. This is June 8th. What would likely occur is under article two if it

302
01:29:53.040 --> 01:30:12.560
were to fail at the election we would probably make a motion to table. So just for consider just for knowledge. >> Okay. >> All right. >> Any questions on one or two? I

303
01:30:12.560 --> 01:30:34.000
>> think we're good. >> Okay. Um article three is the standard park department enterprise budget. Article four is the capital plan omnibus plan. >> Sorry, madam chair. Article three, the pox commission

304
01:30:34.000 --> 01:30:50.320
budget. I don't have it in front of me. Well, that will change if dependent on the override. >> No, >> it's okay. It's not dependent. Okay. >> No, we have a indirect for 15,000 on 1 A and 1 B. Oh, >> it's expenses. Yeah. Okay. Got it. B. Okay. No impact. Okay. Thank you. >> Yep.

305
01:30:50.320 --> 01:31:06.800
>> Um, article four, the capital plan omnibus. We made three changes to this. Um, this was due to the special town meeting, uh, free cash being so high that we made three changes. Um, that's not to say that they won't occur. It's just they'll probably be

306
01:31:06.800 --> 01:31:23.719
funded in the fall if anything. Um, those are the Asalam Elementary School roof projects. That is the fire department capital operating amount. And then that is also the

307
01:31:24.400 --> 01:31:44.560
bud removal material permit. So >> those were all reduced. >> All reduced. Eliminated. Yep. >> Yep. >> So what we're seeing is not the eliminated one. >> Correct. I took all took all three of those out. This is the remainder.

308
01:31:44.560 --> 01:31:59.760
Okay. Because I'm showing bud permit material. Am I looking at the wrong >> Yeah, we passed out a supplemental that would have taken that out. >> Okay. >> Yeah, there. Yeah, >> that would be another change you asked about. >> Okay. Thank you.

309
01:31:59.760 --> 01:32:27.360
>> So, the total capital plan would be 510 512,000 >> and that's down from 1,342,000. >> That's correct. Any questions on that? >> No. >> Okay.

310
01:32:27.360 --> 01:32:45.520
Okay. Article five is the capital uh preservation fund annual revenues. It's a standard article every annual town meeting. Article six is the one community preservation fund project which is

311
01:32:45.520 --> 01:33:05.280
gravestone repairs at Thompson Hill Cemetery for $15,000 being paid out of the reserve for historic resources. Um article seven is the school free lake school committee recall provision.

312
01:33:05.280 --> 01:33:25.199
This it will be the exact same article um as Freetown. Freetown has this on their annual town meeting on June 1st. >> Who's proposing this one? >> I don't see that listed here. >> Oh,

313
01:33:25.199 --> 01:33:49.679
that would be by the select board. >> Okay. Going to make sure we add that Okay, article eight is the compensated absences. This is another change we made. We originally had it at 50,000. It's now at 25,000.

314
01:33:49.679 --> 01:34:05.920
This is for retirements and uh resignations to pay out their uh acred uh time whether it's sick, vacation, personal, whatever is relevant to them. um because ordinarily this comes out of the budget.

315
01:34:05.920 --> 01:34:23.360
So we did this the last year as well. >> Um article 9 is to accept section 18B of chapter 53 of the mass general laws. This is for local ballot questions including proposition 2 and a half tax overrides and debt exclusion. It's

316
01:34:23.360 --> 01:34:40.080
essentially the local option for a red book. Um state sends one home for ballot questions. This gives us the the local option to do it ourselves to explain overrides, explain debt exclusion projects, kind of the pros and cons, and just project details.

317
01:34:40.080 --> 01:34:56.480
>> No cost to the town. >> It will be cost to mail out, but we don't have that there. There's not going to be an election in the next year, I don't think. So, um I don't think it'll be very expensive to do what

318
01:34:56.480 --> 01:35:12.239
we have to do for that. >> Okay. Um, >> but I think it would be a good point to make when we are preparing our >> It's the number one uh I guess negative feedback I've gotten with the override is people don't know about it is and

319
01:35:12.239 --> 01:35:29.199
then like people the old school way of getting information is the mail. Um, everyone has a mailbox of some kind that they would get this in. I know I read the red book when it comes in. >> So, I mean, if I got this as a resident, I'd be ecstatic. um because you could have all the information from the town

320
01:35:29.199 --> 01:35:49.280
in one spot. They don't have to go on Facebook or the website to see links and everything. I think this would be a good way of community outreach myself. Um the next one is article 10. This is the meals tax and it would take effect

321
01:35:49.280 --> 01:36:11.360
on October 1st, 2026. Article 11 is to appropriate 25,000 out of the sale of water tower account funds. This is to use for intermunicipal water agreement negotiations, water studies, um stuff of

322
01:36:11.360 --> 01:36:33.840
that nature. Um article 12 is to amend the earth removal bylaw. The changes that were made is that I changed um the number of cubic yards that can be removed in a single calendar year. I took that from 2,00 to 1,00.

323
01:36:33.840 --> 01:36:50.320
>> Why did we reduce that? >> We thought the amount was too high. So, a lot of projects didn't need to get earth that are pretty sufficient. >> Okay. Um, we took out I guess the loophole of incidental. Um, because some projects

324
01:36:50.320 --> 01:37:06.320
they say they're incidental to the constru to the construction of a building. So they basically would say that they don't need to do a north removal, get a permit from the select board because they it's incidental to the construction. Don't need to do it. Um, we had I not under me necessarily,

325
01:37:06.320 --> 01:37:22.800
but I guess that's been done the last couple years. um some big big projects, hundreds of trucks didn't have to do one. So >> incidental, it's a relative term. >> Exactly. I know that was >> to be argued by lawyers. >> It was mentioned, if everyone remembers

326
01:37:22.800 --> 01:37:39.199
during the earth removal discussion with the big one at the pig farm, >> they were kind of intimating that their project might be incidental >> and that was like 7 8 million cubic yards. >> So um >> soil has value. It's just going to be sold. Why should we just permit that our

327
01:37:39.199 --> 01:37:54.960
top soil beach be stripped? I just I I disagree with it. I think we should charge for it. >> So we we do >> we but be supervised also. It's tough. >> Yeah, >> there's some there's some opportunities there. >> Yeah, we so we did increase increase the fees from what was it 10 to 25 cents

328
01:37:54.960 --> 01:38:11.840
>> or 15 to 25. >> Um and then the last one is I changed the enforcement from the town's building commissioner to the select board or the designate. Um, so depending on the project that could change. Could be the DPW director,

329
01:38:11.840 --> 01:38:38.239
could be me, could be could be the building commissioner. >> We need to add that this was proposed by the select board on this as well. >> Okay. Article 13 is the revolving fund >> that that is the annual we have to set

330
01:38:38.239 --> 01:38:54.800
the limit by which they can spend. >> Article 14 is the prohibition on cryptocurrency automated teller machines. We don't have any in town but these are the kind of machines that get put in convenience stores like that. Um they've been used for fraud fraudulent

331
01:38:54.800 --> 01:39:12.239
activities. I saw where the town of Midbar was doing the same article. >> Um, article 15 is to change the demand notices for delinquency payments tied to excise tax. Right now, if you pay late,

332
01:39:12.239 --> 01:39:30.000
it's a $20 fee that gets tacked on to your bill. We are allowed by state law to change that to $30. And that would bring in about 25 to $30,000 annually. This is just if you pay a bill late only.

333
01:39:30.000 --> 01:39:48.159
Um article 16 is data centers. This would add data centers to the existing um let's see >> marijuana >> marijuana overlay districts. So it would

334
01:39:48.159 --> 01:40:03.840
now be the marijuana and data center overlay district. This was submitted by the planning board and it kind of goes into the definition and then it would go into um special permits kind of regulated activity and

335
01:40:03.840 --> 01:40:20.560
then this would also change section 2707.3 the plan special purpose district regulations. So um there's a map at the back. I'm sure there's probably some questions on this. >> Yeah. Did you um what did town council

336
01:40:20.560 --> 01:40:36.960
say when you talked to them about um combining these two? Um >> Sorry. >> Go ahead. >> Um they said it was allowed. We could they could do it as it was written. >> Okay. So um I know that they're having

337
01:40:36.960 --> 01:40:53.400
their hearing on uh the planning board's having their hearing on this on Thursday. Uh and I I just have some concerns. Barbara, I know you were were on the planning board, so maybe you'll understand >> because there are two different um

338
01:40:54.080 --> 01:41:09.679
say uses. >> Um so you've got your marijuana overlay district um that is special permit by ZBA >> and then you have the data center which is going to be special permit by the planning board.

339
01:41:09.679 --> 01:41:27.760
All of this is getting interwined into this one bylaw. Um I also kind of went back to our current um bylaw with what we had written for the marijuana overlay district and so I was able to to see where the changes were going to occur.

340
01:41:27.760 --> 01:41:42.480
However, I did see that there was language still included under the marijuana overlay district that still is going would reference marijuana overlay district

341
01:41:42.480 --> 01:41:58.560
post this adoption. Like that language wasn't included in here to be changed. >> Okay. Uh >> so I'm not sure where to go with this. I when it comes to zoning, and I know I've

342
01:41:58.560 --> 01:42:16.239
I've stated this before, um it can be very confusing. You know, you've looked through your bylaw, it's very confusing. >> Mhm. >> Um I absolutely 100,000% support the data center overlay district. I'm just concerned

343
01:42:16.239 --> 01:42:33.920
that it's going to be confusing. Well, the one of the biggest questions about data centers is their energy and water use, right? The use of the resources. And I don't believe that our our marijuana overlay district has any restrictions on energy

344
01:42:33.920 --> 01:42:50.880
or water usage. Um, my son happens to work in this field. So, it's an interesting uh consideration and we need to have the controls in place, but I don't know that it shouldn't be its own overlay, right? or how that it shouldn't be separated out because the marijuana

345
01:42:50.880 --> 01:43:09.119
use is a very different um type of land use and energy consumption than you would have with a data center. And you know, a lot of people may not realize that many of our neighbors are paying outrageous numbers for their utilities.

346
01:43:09.119 --> 01:43:24.800
And God forbid Middle Gas and Electric be obligated to provide any sort of power resources here that would increase our power costs. I'm not I'm not willing to pay for anything for a data center. That's where I stand on that. So, how do we work out the energy and resources

347
01:43:24.800 --> 01:43:41.280
>> so that you know marijuana facility which is not having those sorts of draws could be allowed to do what they do and then a data center would have deeper controls under special permit. I think they're going to look back to that bylaw and that's pretty much what's going to guide it. Mhm.

348
01:43:41.280 --> 01:43:56.639
>> So maybe we need something on the books because we got to get something on the books, but we've got to hurry up and >> No, no. I'm I'm right there with you. I'm just >> I mean there's a lot of times that we've had to go back and back and back because we've made mistakes, made mistakes, mistakes. So

349
01:43:56.639 --> 01:44:13.679
that's why I know how important this was um with the discussion at the the level of the planning board, >> which I know has funneled through other um boards, committees, and commissions. We absolutely 100% need something there. That's why I wanted to make sure that we

350
01:44:13.679 --> 01:44:29.440
were actually asking the question because we could use the same overlay. >> Yep. >> You know, meet mess and bounds just have a different color. >> And that's what the question is. What is the color? And they'll be deciding that tomorrow night. >> No, they're they're combining the

351
01:44:29.440 --> 01:44:45.520
marijuana overlay district. >> I haven't seen any of the language. Is there any reference to utility >> controls? It says says the planning board may impose conditions necessary to ensure compliance with this section including but not limited to electrical load water usage.

352
01:44:45.520 --> 01:45:03.040
>> That's too big. It's too big. It's my opinion. We we it that's subjective. So you have a board of people like I was and didn't know the first thing about what I was doing and I sat on the board and I made mistakes that we'll have to live with. But the costs for utilities and and and all of

353
01:45:03.040 --> 01:45:18.239
that stuff is not something we can mess around with. planting trees. I'll live with that mistake. Not, you know, we're going to commit to providing water or electricity for an outside company. >> I will say that the G& does require like

354
01:45:18.239 --> 01:45:34.400
an out output study before any project goes in town. Um, so they have a pretty good say in what they'll approve. Um, in terms of water, we barely have any water allocation as it is. data centers use I think upwards to a million even small

355
01:45:34.400 --> 01:45:50.960
ones per day. I don't so I don't see a world where we could ever have a data center in Lake >> the new ones are not running that way >> really. >> Yeah. >> Yeah. I would say maybe today but you're right eventually it's they're not going to need as much water. Hopefully not as as much electricity as well but yeah if I was a data center today I wouldn't

356
01:45:50.960 --> 01:46:07.119
come to Lakeville. >> Yeah. It'd be difficult for sure. Yeah. So, I just I wanted to make sure that the liability um you know, if somebody were to misinterpret the bylaw because of confusion and who to go for, you know, special permit or

357
01:46:07.119 --> 01:46:22.159
whatever. But >> I did send this all to town council and I said there was a lot of questions on it and they they took a look at it, both of them, and they said it was fine. >> Okay. Um >> is this a case for a a consultant to take a look at it for us? >> It's possible. Yeah, it's possible. Um I

358
01:46:22.159 --> 01:46:38.080
don't want to hold it up. So I mean I to I mean all the language is in here for the data center. Um >> and it's obviously it's on the map here too as outlined. Um but I just I don't want to confuse anything any further. We've been down

359
01:46:38.080 --> 01:46:53.600
that road where people have interpreted our >> bylaw. Um, and this is important and I believe that there's language missed for correction if this were to to pass. So,

360
01:46:53.600 --> 01:47:10.480
I'm not sure what where we go with that. >> Madam Chair, what is the harm in delaying this particular article? >> Because it's it's somebody could come in tomorrow. >> Okay. So in the past we what we've done is

361
01:47:10.480 --> 01:47:26.880
we've said okay look it's not perfect but we'd rather get something and then we'll correct it at the next town meeting >> but it can become that iterative response is problematic. People don't remember what what it is we're changing and why and and that sort of thing. But

362
01:47:26.880 --> 01:47:42.639
this is a new thing that's happening all over the place. So we can't be expected to know everything that's going to happen. >> To that point through you madam chair. This is the third time we're voting on this earth removal bylaw. Third change.

363
01:47:42.639 --> 01:48:01.480
>> Oh, no. We're on data center now. >> No, I mean, I think it's been at three at least three changes since we originally >> Yeah. >> All right. Thank you.

364
01:48:01.920 --> 01:48:17.840
>> I'll let Emily take uh 17. >> Sure. So 17 uh is a non-binding uh municipal decarbonization resolution. This one is recommended to be included on the warrant by the energy advisory committee. Um they're currently

365
01:48:17.840 --> 01:48:33.840
exploring um the process of transitioning the town from green communities to climate leaders. There's five criteria you have to meet for that. And that the first one is to adopt a non-binding resolution

366
01:48:33.840 --> 01:48:54.400
showing that there's community support for becoming a climate leader community and reducing fossil fuel usage. So that's what this article is. And then the last one um is the citizens petition to have a

367
01:48:54.400 --> 01:49:11.440
wetland protection bylaw. That's important. >> So, um I think this was maybe voted on or tabled back in 2017 if everyone remembers that. I think it's I think I was told it was written the

368
01:49:11.440 --> 01:49:27.920
exact same way. So, man kit it any to you memorab you folks were onboard. Any reason why it was tabled? Did anybody know? Um you I think

369
01:49:27.920 --> 01:49:43.520
>> back then it was voted on and I don't think it passed. >> Oh town meeting it failed it town meeting >> back in 2017. >> Yeah it's very restrictive. >> What is it? What is the saying? Um >> 25 ft within a vernal pool.

370
01:49:43.520 --> 01:49:59.440
>> No but um pro >> the intentional use. Yeah, the the intention is to protect the the water quality um and not have development encroach too closely upon the wetlands because those wetlands are like the sponges that clean everything out. So,

371
01:49:59.440 --> 01:50:18.159
>> understand that, but the state is got pretty this is go this is above and beyond I'm assuming what the state says. >> Yes, >> there's what is that saying where you're a homeowner with less you know without having >> governmental restrictions. It's it will

372
01:50:18.159 --> 01:50:39.440
or I forget that what it's called >> which which would be you right which it's the it's the water quality issue. Yeah. >> So >> okay >> and then that that is it. >> So I guess I'll entertain a motion to

373
01:50:39.440 --> 01:50:57.840
place all the articles on the warrant. >> Say what? >> Place all the articles on the warrant. Yes. So moved. Second discussion hearing none. Roll

374
01:50:57.840 --> 01:51:13.600
>> I >> harbony I. >> Howard I baby and I and then in the next subsequent follow on next meeting we'll vote on every article. >> We have a we're going to have a want

375
01:51:13.600 --> 01:51:29.840
review. Okay. um where we get to hang out with the fincom again um and then we will they'll make their vote um to recommend and we will do the same and we will also at that time >> ask who would like to read the article.

376
01:51:29.840 --> 01:51:48.000
>> Right. That's what I thought. Okay. Thank you. >> Okay. All right. >> Volunteer for none. >> What's that? Volunteer for none. Not now that we have five, we have to divvy it up a little more. >> Okay. Um, did you have any would you like to stay for the rest of the meeting

377
01:51:48.000 --> 01:52:08.400
or did you want to adjourn? >> I think they're >> I think we're good. >> Make a motion to adjurnn. >> Second. >> Tini. Right. I >> I thank you for Thank you. Thanks for having us. >> So, we actually did one and two on that.

378
01:52:08.400 --> 01:52:25.679
>> So, we're good. Okay, I'm good. >> Um, next we have um up for discussion. Is our uh we have a a a request for amending a hosted community agreement

379
01:52:25.679 --> 01:52:42.239
for Bountiful Farms which is located at 200 Kenneth Welch Drive. They're looking to add research facility use um to their current post community agreement. Um they would need the vote of this board

380
01:52:42.239 --> 01:52:57.360
um so they can pursue getting the the license. Is that correct? >> Yes, that is correct. And actually for this item um the CEO of Bountwell Farms would like to attend the meeting to discuss this further with you all. Uh he

381
01:52:57.360 --> 01:53:13.360
does live about an hour away. So I would request that the board table this item so he can attend the next meeting on um June 2nd which he confirmed he is available to do just to explain it further. It's not urgent.

382
01:53:13.360 --> 01:53:29.440
Okay madam chair. >> Yes. Before we table it, I I did want to point something out in the original agreement should um the it talks about the company uh shall not be responsible for community impact fees in excess of

383
01:53:29.440 --> 01:53:47.280
3% of the company's annual gross sales. Mhm. >> I'm focusing on sales because if they are receiving funds from the research then that is revenue

384
01:53:47.280 --> 01:54:03.840
but it's not sales. So I don't know if we want to clarify that. >> Sure. I can ask them uh or let them know that that will be a question. I can say though that um for the 3% that's typically retail sales is that that I think is referring to the retail tax and

385
01:54:03.840 --> 01:54:18.880
this would not be a retail use. It would just be for research purposes, but I'll let them know that that question came up and then they can address it when they come. >> Sure. I wasn't sure what the original intent of adding that um um

386
01:54:18.880 --> 01:54:35.360
section inative >> and so I just wanted to point out that sales is different from revenue and so if we were looking to gain our own revenue from that >> then we may want to change that language from revenue or from sales to revenue.

387
01:54:35.360 --> 01:54:52.880
So, >> Madam Chair, >> yes. >> Uh, just another information. What is marijuana research exactly? >> Well, that's a good question. Um, so we actually it is part of our bylaw as an

388
01:54:52.880 --> 01:55:10.239
as a marijuana establishment. So, I went and looked at that today. Um so research um I'm assuming on for medical purposes different presentation >> but m Mr. Barton will be here on June

389
01:55:10.239 --> 01:55:27.119
2nd and he will I'm sure eloquently explain that in very basic terms. So, but yes. Um, but I did want to make sure that that was part of establishment.

390
01:55:27.119 --> 01:55:42.800
>> So, has um council >> looked at this at all? >> Yes, they have a um draft amendment to it. Okay. So, we'll send that uh for the second so you all can review it. >> Okay. Because we did a lot of work to get to here.

391
01:55:42.800 --> 01:56:00.719
>> Okay. All right. So, that's tabled. Um, we do not have any appointments or licences tonight. Um, is there any new business that came to the board before after the posting? I don't believe so. Um, any old business

392
01:56:00.719 --> 01:56:14.480
other than a lot of messiness over here. Um, next select board meeting is June 2nd, 2026, 5:45 at the police station. As mentioned, um, no correspondence this

393
01:56:14.480 --> 01:56:31.199
evening. Um, and I will entertain a motion to enter executive session pursuant to Mass General Law, chapter 30A, section 21A6, to consider the purchase, exchange, lease, or value of real estate if the

394
01:56:31.199 --> 01:56:47.679
chair declares that an open meeting may have detrimental effect on the negotiation position of the public body, Lakeville Country Club, and not to return into open session at 7:38 p.m. So moved. >> Second. >> Roll please.

395
01:56:47.679 --> 01:56:57.239
>> Plug eye. >> Carbon. I >> Howard I. >> Fabian I. >> Excellent. Okay.