the magic over okay um we're here for the planning board meeting um of April 3rd 2025 uh let's stand and
uh opening i pledge allegiance to the flag of the United States of America and to the republic for which it stands one nation under God indivisible with liberty and justice for all thank you
um first item on our proposed agenda is um minutes uh March 13th minutes does anyone have any comments have they been These are posted yes
if there are no comments can we have a motion to approve them make a motion to approve the minutes of 13th second second all in favor i okay next item bills do we have any bills um yes we do
have three bills um let's see one is reimbursement to uh Cooper for uh signing up for the online version of the national planning conference um bill from the Lowel Sun for advertising for the zoning bylaw amendments that are
coming up at the May town meeting and then the U reimbursement of the refund no refund of the remaining peer review account for um 550 New Town Road
okay um we'll pass that that around uh the next item is Dean Lane uh as we understand it um I don't know what the actual status is but the intention is for the developers of Cooper Farm to
donate the site of the remaining affordable unit to Habitat for Humanity and our this is outside of our
um well it's not outside of our purview but we're not where whatever agreement is outside of our um input however uh I would like to see and the town council would like to see
uh a vote of support for this um and uh I'm going to ask well Darl you're the four of us who are not Daryl are are very um cognizant of this situation and it's
been very I guess it's really simple will this bring to closure the issue of the affordable unit and frankly closure has been really difficult and uh this particular closure I what a couple years ago this was brought up and we were sort of
despairing of it ever going forward so the fact that it is going forward uh is a good thing uh is it appropriate for me to make the motion um if nobody else does okay i do have a
couple questions sure so uh have we so it looks like uh the fields have been worked directly with Habitat is that correct to be able to determine whatever their terms of agreement are yes do we have any sense
of what that I think it's uh what does town council say about that i mean I have no information on conversations between um the developer and Habitat i did speak with Habitat and they are
would be happy to accept the property okay and and move forward with building um an affordable unit there their timing would um follow uh development of the duplex at Tahadawan Road and they would like to um do that one do Dean Lane
immediately after that one okay that's all I know okay all right um would it be possible to be able to get whatever i think we should get a communication from the um
since this to in in what manner is this going through town council in in terms of what is the um what is it because we had the pending litigation lawsuit or whatever yeah just
my question to town council is does is the planning board do the planning board does the planning board need to do anything to move this forward and he recommended a vote well we can we can um we can do a non-specific
um vote of support for the conveyance of the remaining Dean Lane lot to Habitat for Humanity okay um part of the reason why I ask is um slightly different hat affordable
housing trust i just think because we kind of monitor that to be able to see affordable housing units in the town it would be good to just be able to keep apprised of what constitutes this agreement and as Maren said you you've had the preliminary talk with Habitat
and and it would be after the Tahadawan Road but it's always good to have things in writing just so there's no So could we cl Is this a ZVA issued uh special permit or is it a planning board permit it there's no permit involved it's Well I'm just saying because it sounds like
they're negotiating with the ZVA on this not us or I'm just wondering why this says the Z okay um it was initially a planning board special permit for the entire development um issue went to zoning board of appeals when the
um uh building permit was um not issued for that last unit and it turns through that process it turned out that the last unit is supposed to be affordable and so if uh Habitat for example goes to pull a
building permit on that last lot and it's an affordable unit then that building permit can issue for an affordable unit yeah it's basically clarifying who's got the final decision on this so ZBA will release the final final decision is is building commissioner at this point so who
directs the building commissioner to uh to release the lot then i'm just it's a process question i'm I don't want to get wrapped up in it right um it's it's his authority to do that no no direction from either so it was on his authority that he denied them the final Right it
was actually the previous building right yes and um it was a so I think to cover our basis we should if something h we should remind the new building inspector that there's a we he knows okay so just so that covers it he
knows that no permit should be issued with this affordable unit yeah and it's marked as such in our permitting software so Okay okay we have permitting software we do um so yeah and I only say that because it would be a real shame if
somehow one day we realize oh there's a house that's going to be built there and it's a market rate house and you know we just don't want any confusion about that we've been to enough with this you couldn't get a building permit for that all right um
so um I'll make a motion that we uh endorse the plan to uh convey it to fields to convey lots 19 and well it's 20 I think isn't it it's it's one parcel yeah just say the
remaining parcel to Habitat Humanity for the construction of affordable unit right okay second second second darl i I I I I
And I just want to thank Marin and Cooper for their hard work to keep this bar this was this has been going on for a while i And when Maren called me it was funny because I was thinking just the week before like how are we going to push this along because we sort of got
to the end of our rope in in um sort of compelling them to do this uh and we had some angry confrontations in this room with the developers about
it anyway okay next any member input [Music] anything going on in the town newsletter regarding our efforts um yes so the newsletter did include a
quick update on the marijuana bylaw and the um flood plane bylaw moving forward um there's also an announcement of a public information session on April 9th uh in the multi-purpose room about the two um town meeting warrant articles for
the disposition of um this building okay um the uh the last item on board business is public input uh for those of I don't know if any of you are here for that purpose uh but it will last for no
more than 10 minutes and speakers are allowed to speak for no longer than two minutes is anyone here for the public input part i just had a couple of questions sure carolyn Mueller 8 East Roxbury Drive um first of all I was wondering on the the
um town scenic road bylaw if that's has if there's any is that under the planning board so I know in Foster Street I think I talked to you Jeeoff about that would be under Highway to talk to Highway about the um stone walls
that they've kind of they've torn up but the rocks are still there so I'm hopeful that they're going to put them back afterwards okay yes the construction plan is to replace those okay great um and then I noticed that the Gly property at 195 had one road i know that that
project has completely changed i think they're just bu maybe a private builder's building a couple of um homes there but in front of the where the cornfield used to be to the left of the glazy house there's a lot of trees that are are tagged right now and so there's
um a stone wall there too that I'm sure they'll have to take some of it down just to make access but I was wondering what what who would oversee that if it's a private person building there it's a good question is that building
commissioner so as part of the building permit application um I have the opportunity to review those or um Cooper and I have the opportunity to review those and if it's on a scenic roadway and it doesn't yet have a scenic roadway permit and we flag that and ask the
building commissioner to have them come in with an with an application so it would happen before because I know sometimes it happens after we see it happen after but it should be before if all things work well okay I'll take that
and if it is does happen to be after then you have to work with it did um the previous developer um do scenic roadway for the for the cuts when they did this the subdivision i believe that was part
of their initial application so they might be using the existing that's already been approved from the Yeah I think they are actually anyway okay thank you we can at least look into it okay and then um you just mentioned
the the hearing for this building if if everything all goes through and that's going to go through as affordable housing what what does this board have to do with that like do you have permits and things or is that separate from the planning board when it
gets to that stage um that would depend on the um permitting process that the developer decides to go through uh my current guess is that it would be a um friendly friendly 40B application to the
zoning board of appeals but that would likely also include a site plan review uh for the planning board okay all right thank you thank you yeah under that process there is a lot of leeway for
design review so and I should mention that Carolyn is um on the historic commission society society but there is a group who are anxious about the
historic aspect of this building okay thank you um six we've passed 640 uh the agenda item is 31 Shadic Street ANR this is the
building that uh is next to the the new uh senior center which was bought by the town for the purposes of that project and is now uh been re the prop the
property has been reconfigured and um uh anyway Maron why don't you describe why don't you comment on the ANR okay so um what I've done is I pulled up the
partial site plan um from the new senior center shadic center they had anticipating doing a new lot line that looked something like this but as they're reviewing the site on this slope from the backyard down to uh the side of
the um senior center um is something that not that should be under the control of of the town um so they would like to do a new lot line that skirts the top of that slope and that'll allow the town to install a fence along there
makes for a much safer backyard um for this home and then they would square off the front so because the existing frontage it's already pre-existing non-conforming so it will need both planning board signature and um zoning
board of appeals dimensional variance but none of that can happen until they get through land court because it's also land court property so eventually there will be an ANR application to planning board on this um so there's nothing we
can do until we get right to actually is there a time frame for this um it they would like to have it done yesterday um it all depends on uh their land court uh time frame land court hearing um has been set they kind of
docket these try to give applicants a timeline for when they'll get a response what is a land court issue land basically 495 isn't wasn't put where yeah it's probably registered land that's why it's land right so
um where very old deeds reference certain stone walls or fences that have since long since been moved it's the legal process to establish exactly where the uh boundaries are um it's okay i
just had no idea um another quick question related to um to this property about 6 months ago maybe we sent a letter to the select board asking whether or not they would consider um deed restricting this house um did we
ever get a response from the select board on that we have not received a written response um [Music] the budget process um through the budget process I heard that the town intends um to use the proceeds from the sale of
this uh property uh to help pay down uh the town's u sewer uh debt okay 6:45 has been reached item uh agenda item number three uh is the continued public hearing
um the water resource district special permit site plan amendment and storm water review 55 Russell Street which are the new tennis courts uh which is grouped in with the updated baseball field at Littleton
Middle School and Russell Street School and uh we hope to vote on that tonight uh the last meeting we ended with um a uh sort of wanting to
uh know the peer review for the drainage of that site that was uh the issue uh so could we um have a well we have the two we have the
uh activas is that it uh who has designed the tennis courts and we have our town uh peer reviewer green international here so so as you saw we provided response to the comments so I guess if you want to start um or how do
you want to provided most of the the comments on the peer review were just asking for additional notes on plans which we will add those to the plans um and then I think in terms of
um the baseball field we do need to provide um an additional um narrative and calculations to show the design for the storm water for the baseball field when we came for you um last time uh we were of the opinion
that no additional BMPs needed to be put in there just due to the minimal and um added impervious to get just ADA access to all the different places um but peer reviewer indicated that he wanted to see calculations as far as that um we've started to work on those calculations
and have found that the um added impervious will cause a bit of a curve number change and will cause a little bit more runoff um from the site so we're actually proposing to switch that um asphalt material to a porous asphalt material to allow things to infiltrate
and then we will provide the the calculations and the in addition to the report um to show how that that will meet the storm water standards okay peer review in action um so yeah I guess one of the other
comments I I mean I look I read through all the responses and it looks like you're addressing everything there's only two comments that looked like you kind of pushed back on um one was the um um so the project is within a zone
two which is like which is a wellhead protection area u which means it's above an aquifer um so you're supposed to provide 44% TSS removal for pre-treatment which is basically you
either have two pre-treatment devices or you use like a proprietary device i understand you know it's a tennis court and a baseball field so you know that might be excessive um for this but it is one of the rules in the you know part of
the uh storm water standards so um I did want to you know alert the board about that um that they weren't providing well they weren't providing any pre-treatment actually um in the initial so are you planning on providing a pre-treatment so
I can I can address that so that standard is written for roadways um the storm water standards don't have guidance for uses like this where it is um strictly pedestrian um so by just restricting the use um to pedestrian use
no cars very limited cars involved it might be a truck maybe once a year to come on and maintain it but it won't be parked on those um and the new walkways that are there um are accessing only the only the courts and only the baseball
field so those don't need to be treated in winter with sand or salt so just by nature of the use it's not creating TSS so just by nature of restricting the use that way um we don't need to provide that that water quality because it's already being that standard is already
being met just by um limiting the use to just pedestrian so TSS is total suspended solids okay so this is for salt stuff that falls off vehicles typically possibly oil like a
grease trap or something yeah sediment like you know um bird droppings you know like anything you know um you know leaves like anything that kind of degrades um the thing is the storm water standards don't
specifically say that is just for roadways you know it says you have to treat roof runoff too you know nobody's walking on the roof um and so for roof runoff you don't have to provide any pre-treatment because there is less TSS
on roof um but you still have to provide treatment and that's kind of where we're kind of differentiating on our interpretation of the rule so is there no treatment now so the infiltration basin just by nature will treat um we
just didn't provide the calculations to prove that it was meeting the water quality volume of 1 in however I do think that if we went back and did the calculations it would likely be be meeting that um so yeah I just want to see the calculations it should have used the 1
okay so um and that is it for this final goound right yeah it seems everything else um they're going to
address so I mean I haven't seen the revised plans or revised calculations but everything else they they agree with our comments and they're going to address so it was just the water quality we just wanted to see the pre-treatment and some sort of pre-treatment and that they're meeting the 1 in for water
quality so um the key thing is some sort of pre-treatment i think that um most of us probably could get our heads around not requiring two you know the dual treatment um so
comments now I I should preface this we would like to vote today and if we you know when we do vote if and when we do vote we can apply conditions to the decision
any comments my only comment is about the use of it last time we left it open that the school department didn't want to use during the day and I felt that was um unacceptable that it should be available for all the residents in the town of Littleton
um to be used even if there's people in the school i mean it's not going to affect students that are in a building and I don't really know people playing so Mark I went back and uh clarified that in our pre-construction meeting
when uh we were meeting with all of the um the larger group that was uh that was something that was brought up at the time by the principal um at the time you know being concerned that there wasn't going to be the grass space there was going to be the tennis and things like that so um in my conversations to follow
up uh since our last meeting um you know obviously the other facilities are you know usable and everything else and this one be we've we've all come to the conclusion this one would be no different people might have a park at Alumni Field and walk over but Yep that'll be available okay that's all yeah the only uh the only thing back and
forth was just for you know the school kids use and everything if they were utilizing that for PE classes that you know we would we would yield way to that kind of activity anyone else can I hear a motion i'll make the
motion that we Oh we have to close the hearing first uh make a motion to close the hearing thank you thank you all in favor i Now can we have a motion to
um approve uh the water resource district special permit site plan amendment and storm roer review for the 50 tennis new tennis courts and baseball field at 55 Russell Street
uh and with the condition that well we want to call it that the I'm actually and I'm making this I I shouldn't be making the the motion but
um basically um we have discussed um that our peer reviewer is satisfied with the calculations that you will supply them uh and we are specifically um only requiring a the the
pre I don't know the technical term but the pre-treat not not the not the super pre-treatment but the pre-treatment so yeah basically if you could put like a four bed um on the basin I think that would probably be good enough
is that okay like we can be agreeable to putting some sort of pre-treatment in there i don't I just don't want to promise that it'll be a foray because I don't know that we have the space over there to do that but we will we can provide pre-treatment okay so it needs to be conditioned upon yes getting resolved yeah um so um there
is was a draft decision prepared um and it does reference um peer review comments from green dated 321 we can clarify with these um last few issues um to include pre-treatment um that's the only update I've heard um
and that that condition actually says that those um have to be resolved um to the planning board's reasonable satisfaction prior to issuance of a building permit so there's some time to work through th those details okay so moved excellent can I hear a
second second uh all in favor daryl i anna i bartlett i and I'm an I okay so continue working together all of you guys thank you for bringing this forward thank you very much thanks
okay the ne the the the last item is I have a question are you going to open up to the public about 55 Russell or No well we closed the hearing well it's in our backyard so you didn't ask yeah I
didn't know when we jump i apologize we're Yeah we're we're just we we mainly have the discussion of the drainage on the site at the last meeting there were comments about fencing were you part of
that okay um and that's an issue for the school committee uh to provide such fencing as I recall our discussion do you recall the
discussion about that so the discussion was around so it is school property yeah yeah so um as far as the project goes um one of the things uh that we did have approved was we did have school committee sign off on the construction plans when they were
submitted um any work that's done is obviously under their purview um as far as the actual fence was not part of the original uh plan uh there has not been a fence out there in the history of that
field um with the addition of the tennis courts and the uh minimizing that field down to a 77 field uh the usages even as it is now will theoretically go down uh most of the users will be inside that
tennis court um it'll no longer be big enough to have the girls lacrosse team which has been out there currently uh the girls middle school team which has been playing out there so um the uses will most likely be vi PE class as well as whomever is using the tennis courts
and possibly our our smaller user groups like U6 soccer which is pop-up nets and some stuff like that uh on top of that uh as far as the budget for this project goes it's razor thin uh we have a couple adder alternates that we had built in that were things that we had pulled out
of the original um wishes of the project as far as when the project was first put put forth uh we pulled all a million dollars worth of stuff out of the project so at this time uh that just was not something that was um being considered for the project the tennis
courts will be fenced themselves 100% 360° fencing there'll be uh correct me if I'm wrong it's uh 8t along the Abberati line and the uh parking lot and they'll be cut down to 4T on the uh baselines so that uh for viewing purposes so there won't be a fence at
the line so that's not the issue and so as the history of that field goes the history of that field ran the long way now it's directly facing my yard so when shooting on the goals they were shooting towards Russell Street and towards the woods now they'll be directed right at
my yard my concern is when Aaron B like as it is now like I get where we live is like we're the ones in the photos like it's that field is directly abuting my yard now so I don't know if you have a
photo of it anywhere um it's now the field turned completely 90° so now it there's kids in our yard once in a while anyway like balls come through at recess like again I work for the for my city like I get I'm very
involved in the town it's I understand that it's the you know it it's just pro it's like moving forwards it's it is what it is but now it's directly facing my yard so what's keeping kids and balls and stuff out of
my yard who's liable for that when they come into my yard like it it's it's not the same feel as it was before just with tennis courts in this field is now turned completely towards my yard so and if you look at photos that I've seen the
corner of that field is cut off behind it to to the Aravide line which is directly feet from my house oh there it is and it looks like it's 20 ft from the arborite but it's a fence there's an 8ft high fence there correct that's on the
tennis courts the field the field is on the other side of the tennis court it's behind the tennis court it normally the fields where these kids play lacrosse soccer and everything run the same way that the long way of that tennis court is yeah but now it's going to be as you put it it's going to be too small you're
not going to really have anything but little pee-wee kids it's not going to be used like it was before there's hardly anyone that's going to be able to use that field maybe gym classes at in the afternoon i don't think you have to worry about that they're going to be a teacher out there and everything else it's not going to have anywhere near the
use that glasses are out there now as it is like and when the nature of kids when when they kick a ball or throw a ball like I have 50 lacrosse balls in my yard all the time stuff comes into my yard
kids and everything and that was when it was oriented the other way my concern is now that whether it's small or big or whatever it's it's pointed it's not 20 ft you're looking at the tennis courts and that's tennis court i see what you're talking about yeah I'm talking about the corner of the picture that
this isn't the photo the last photo I had had that I saw the space in the photo that we have the space behind the net is cut off on that angle there and it's directly in front of the albite one with the nets
drawn on it right there so any shot or anything that misses the net and especially if you're talking about little kids they're probably not as accurate as bigger kids that ball those things are coming into my yard so would it be more helpful to have this color
photo up so we Yeah if there we have a color photo that was um that was on the town website that we're talking about and you can see our house in the photo we're just concerned and and we were actually told that the tennis courts were only going to be used
for the high school students and that people are going to have to sign up to be able to use them so now they're just open to the public all day and all all night well there's no light there's no lights it won't be all night well I just Well there's no way that was a vote okay
this this I I think our at the at the last hearing this technically isn't part of the tennis court project um this is a school committee
issue and I understand you using this to come in and and and give your concerns but um um so we're our whole thing is is that we had no idea this was even in the works
until we were told that the town was forced to send something for us to know what was going on it's not forced it's part of the process any a butter gets a certified letter it's just every project yeah it's just not drawn the the field
isn't drawn on that photo but that's my house the one that's angled Yeah towards like that is the closest to exactly where that field is ending right at the Arab line i I can't safetywise for my family and for and for
the kids the that drawing is if you go up right to those trees that is where that field yeah like so this is the I don't know if you have that anywhere but you can see the blue quartz yes no
so it actually doesn't have it in there so this is a photo that I have from the from the website from the town it has the soccer fields and it has the tennis courts and where the goal is is literally feet away from where the path through is from our yard into the middle
school like again it it's more of a I every budget's razor thin like I like I said I work for the city i completely That picture there shows the goals going this way that's not it that Well that's how it is now but in the photo I mean can
you show like I don't know i don't know i It's on the town this is really school department is Can you show that photo to Marin and see if she can find it please thank you it's this one so it shows the soccer field is that part of this application your application includes
the tennis courts and the baseball field not the orientation of a soccer you know is there even going to be a soccer field out there isn't it just going to be a a field so there's not going to be lines or anything like this this is the picture that I So I can't speak to whether they're going to line it in the
future there is the ability to fit a full size 77 field which is what that was meant to show I think when that original um drawing was made uh currently that is a green space and we are in working on the tennis courts and
that will remain a green space used to be determined in the future so you're not proposing a field out there no the the question was asked when we were going through the preliminary construction stuff is what size field would fit there the answer is a 77 field
um which that that drawn specifically just represents i will say that with our U6s in that space they use they typically run the other direction because there's a little black fence that keeps the balls from going into the retaining pond
so um yeah currently we don't actually have soccer goals on that field there's only field hockey goals so well I mean obviously that'd be a concern also if they if they have to change the orientation of the
field field hockey balls lacrosse balls i'm more worried about people coming into my yard now if things are aimed at my yard we have thing kids and again it doesn't bother me when kids come in to get a ball i've done it you know my whole life myself when we've been growing up but now like we are getting
people in our yard when it's when it's going that way now that it would be facing my yard obviously there's nothing stopping a soccer ball a kid a baseball you know field hockey ball anything from just naturally coming into the
yard which to me it seems simply you could fix with a 4ft fence i agree with you thank you but that's not part of our remit here we're here to approve the tennis courts so why don't we send a letter back to the to to the school
department that in the course of our deliberation that it's been suggested that at the very least a 4ft field 4ft fence should be installed to at least m mitigate i I it it and it's really that one property
because our neighbors next to us the ones in the front so there's two but it's not the entire property line where the arbit is it's just where the field would be it's mainly where the Yeah like it's where like you know the tennis court one an
8ft fence if that's what he said it was going to be yeah then nothing's my dog would love an Aaron tennis ball coming over those 8ft fence i can promise you that no one's getting concerned about We're just concerned about the right side of the bill but but that butts up into like right and send
that back yeah we'll send it yeah I I I agree a letter to the school committee like I stated originally i mean the intention is that this will this green space is really going to be used by the PE classes and possibly the little littlest soccer players that we have which are the popup how about if we do it this way how about if we send a
letter back that we know it's going to be green space as it is now if at some at a later date you decide to put an actual field out there you should consider current balls and putting a t a fence up if you're going to put a field out there I think that's fair i mean the whole point of this project was to try
to move most of the usages to the high school space anyway so okay i think I think that's I appreciate that so yeah because if as as what explained this whole project is they reorganized the high school field so that all the
soccer field hockey etc goes there and then the softball and baseball goes to the Russell Street things so um anyway I appreciate you coming in i apolog I apologize i should have asked i I didn't
know what to do okay that's okay no I'm It's my fault so anyway I appreciate you and thank you for offering that up we appreciate it thank you okay um so our next item is item number four anything
any name you want by the way just in case we haven't gotten there yet all right just Just wondering we have the what yes i just want to know if they were going to name the field why is that Mark no no reason um thank you thank you Mark yep our next
item and the last item last item is discuss May 6th annual town meeting we have a zoning by bylaw amendment uh to amend adult use marijuana establishments to preclude the
cultivation of adult use marijuana in town we attended a uh select board meeting where they voted to approve uh putting this on the town on the
ballot we have a zoning bylaw amendment as part of this to clarify air quality special permit requirements for medical marijuana treatment centers and this is to bring the treatment uh the HVAC treatment in these uh facilities up
to our uh I think a really positive standard and then uh zoning bylaw amendment to amend wetlands and flood plane
bylaws to uh this uh to conform with FEMA requirements and state requirements which will allow people who do make use of flood insurance
uh to maintain their flood insurance um do you want to do we have um Yeah I I can jump in so I put together a couple of charts to overview the changes for the uh marijuana use and
uh staff have uh made them much more uh presentable than what I had here but I tried to just basically keep it simple try to just review you know what the actual changes are a little bit about the process the first chart was the process make sure people understood it
was two 2/3 town meeting vote and simple majority at the ballot so they'd see it in two parts next one was just an overview of what's currently allowed and what will be prohibited uh there with a note that the existing cultivator is would continue until they uh give up
their license and then the last chart is just basically what the red line changes are and um even I I think the other thing to to mention because even in the with the selectmen one of the comments made me
think that they're not focused enough on that this is simply a cultivation i I think I was going to clarify that that this doesn't affect retail sales or anything like that which I think there is probably support for that i think it's
the cultivators that is the piece there um one comment that um I probably need to technically look at people with um I intentionally didn't use red in my thing there for people that have red um color blindness they can't see the changes so I was just thinking we got to make sure
that um we're sensitive to making sure that the we address the disabilities that some people have uh there but I think I think they're all strike through changes so those will show up even even if you are color impaired uh
there any comments i just thought it was really helpful in its simplicity thank you it has to be simple yes okay uh and this we're lucky because we did the hard work last fall and now we uh
can do just something we just cruise by well I would never assume that 2/3 is 2/3 no 2/3 is is a pretty rigid standard uh and there will be um you know people commenting and I think the big thing we again mention it
is this is nothing about the sales it's only the cultivators right um anyone here to comment on this um so we've come to the end of our agenda you got you got a whole you got a quick
little presentation on article 38 which is the um again that just follows the same thing and and just to let you know the article numbers have changed and we'll update accordingly so um it's kind of the format that I was just thinking of how we'd walk people
through tell them what the purpose of this was administrative corrections uh and then uh what the process is and then the next chart just has um what the changes are adds the words or MTC to two other things there just to emphasize that it's
a basically an administrative clerical correction that got missed in the original one there um and if you'd like I could probably put together some charge for I mean I don't want to also the issue but the whole MTC thing comes about because we have a marijuana
medical marijuana cultivator and they will not allow us to eliminate the MTC cultivator yeah right it was so that one has to remain states
i mean if that comes up in a question actually we do did start some slides start for the for yeah actually the state's website has a lot of good information that okay borrowed yeah I think the uh toughest part on
just presenting this one is is it's not really up for debate this is what the flood plane is and we're just adopting it not there's no debate on it um be careful not to say that because it wors people off but it basically this is you
know if we don't vote for it there's negative consequences so everybody in the flood plane so Marin has told me that there are known to be 11 properties that maintain flood insurance through this program can we get any more info on that yeah that's the number is that the
number so good to mention that there are 11 properties that take advantage of this flood insurance and then there was a request to approve the wording the slight wording change so yep okay so um if the board would vote to add the
um last phrase um that was missing from inadvertently missing from the prior versions uh and a placement of modular not modular wasn't it manufactur manufactured
right it's on the Oh it's on the first page of the cover page so this is an example of the state review actually picked up something we missed well I mean something pretty it wasn't a major thing but I
mean I guess they go literally word for word to the FEMA yeah and then this was after working with with her for um since in detail since January and it's like one final review caught that which was a good
thing to catch it now rather than having to go back so if the board um could vote to add that um yeah so so in the chart it would have to say the map panels and whatever the additional changes that the warrant um will be printed with that in
it okay okay so explain to me the action we need that one manufactured homes can I have a motion to add placement of
manufactured homes yes I'll make that motion i'll second hi hi hi sure hi um thank you on that note can I have a motion to
adjourn motion tojourn we're done right second all in favor i okay we're done thank you