PMBC meeting of uh Wednesday, June 25th. First order of business is uh reviewing and approving the warrants. I will uh bring up the first warrant, which is the police station.
I'll let uh Eric talk to this. Let me share the screen. Yeah. So, um, LOB and the waterproofing company conducted the testing on the exterior of 550 King
Street. And the test results were a little bit conclusive, but not as much as we would expect. Um, and it doesn't seem to be a rain or exterior water intrusion
problem. It seems to be more of a humidity andor, you know, humidity transfer between the windows. Um, so the report came through. We're going to have um all the consultants and everyone
review it and see what we want to do because essentially the deluge of water that came onto the windows never got into the windows except for one little spot on the window. So the belief of the whole
crew is that it's a humidity differential issue between the exterior and the interior and somehow it is getting between the brick in the friction fit window. That's just a summary of the report. But
the report also suggests that there's no um flashing on the sills of the windows or not the proper flashing on the sills of the windows that could possibly contribute to that. But from all our experience, we did not see any
um water infiltration that was indicative of it happening in the past. It it was only because of spraying the building with water for a half an hour. You know what I mean? And that was uh that was the same result over at the
multi-purpose room. So, the multi-purpose room was actually the better of the two windows, and that was the one that the water came through the panes. And the one where the trim was most effective, no water came through whatsoever,
which is the worst thing you want to find when you're doing a study. Eric, how much force was the water? Um, it was a a decent spray. So, they set up uh I can send you pictures. It's like a a PVC
pipe tree like this with spray nozzles on it and they literally delused the window with water and it took 30 minutes for the first window to leak and that was the only one that leaked and that was the one with the least significant
damage. Something you'd normally you wouldn't normally get in a regular rainstorm though. Never. I don't think the building has ever seen that and will never see that. It is literally being sprayed by a hose on the window for 30 minutes and it leaked. But if it's a
wooden window and it leaked before, you would see some type of damage indicative of water and there was no evidence that it happened before. So we caused that leak the first time by del using it for a half an hour.
Interesting. So anyway, the uh invoices for $9,340 to uh perform this uh test. Um Eric, I'm relying on you to uh you know confirm that this is a reasonable amount
and make a and we'll then we'll make a motion to uh approve it. Yep. So it was done in two stages. They came the first day to evaluate and what the plan was going to be and then the second stage they came set everything up and conducted the water test for the whole
day. So, it's good to good to pay. Um, we're just going to have to talk about what we're going to do based on the report. Motion to approve. Is there a second? I'll second it. But I have a a question. if if if it's not leaking and you're talking about
humidity differentials, that sounds to me like condensation inside the wall and that's that's an air sealing question. Um and an insulation question and um I mean I think we should pay this for the test, but I I I don't think the
building's issues are solved. I don't either. So um we agree. We have Brian Fors in here, so I think we can Okay. So, the original the original facade project did not remove the windows. Uh, it was a
repair of um pretty much the facade above the water band that was around the perimeter of the building. Uh, re-roofing and what was done around the windows was the flashing on the headers as well as
filling in uh the jams and uh adding extra insulation onto those jams. But uh the windows themselves uh due to budget constraints were not replaced uh or removed as part of the project. So that that could be part of the air
the um air leakage that you're seeing with condensation. So one thing it wasn't just budget constraints. It was uh um uh supply chain issues if I remember.
Okay. Yeah. I I have the files as well. I can I can look that up. the for the actual decision making on not pursuing the the windows. Yeah. So, just so everyone's aware, the windows in the masonry were not replaced with the prior project
when everything was done with the masonry and the parapit and the the lintils and the headers and everything on the windows. The old windows were put back in and they were friction fit into place and not shimmed and sealed and flashed on the bottom.
So, the windows were not removed or touched at all. The casings inside the windows were removed and replaced. Yep. Correct. So, so the windows are the
original windows. Yep. Okay. So, anyway, uh there's a motion to uh approve the $9340. Is there a second? Yeah, I seconded it. Okay, thanks. Bartlet, roll call vote.
Bob Bob Romley, yes. Uh, Bartlett. Bartlett. Yes. Sean. Sean. Yes. Mike. Mike Scadudo. Yes. And Steve Moore. Yes. And Jim Dugen. Yes. Thanks, Jim.
Um, next uh warrant is for Hang on. Senior center. This was sent out uh Can you guys see this? Yep. This guys,
this was sent out prior to the uh meeting. if uh there are any questions on it. Uh comments. Brian, do you want to talk to this? Uh
this is uh mainly uh a lot of owner vendors on here. Um, for example, we have Advantage Sports, which is the uh exercise equipment, which I know I do see Michelle on here. Um, there's a
request. Some of that is coming out of donation funds, some of that of that is coming out of the project funds. WSP is our commissioning agent as they're closing out the project. Keycode Media was the AV consultant uh who was uh billing out for some of the remainder of their of their work. uh Keycode Media
again, which was a two-part. There was a part A and a part B in which they're we had held money when they originally invoiced to make sure that they had satisfied their contract. Um if you could scroll up just a little bit, Steve, uh another key code media that is also
associated with part B, which had to do with the projector and the screen in the multi-purpose room, Commodore Builders for the $260,000. uh that is mainly uh most of the divisions billing out the majority of their work. There are also selective divisions throughout there uh to which
they have reduced some of their retainage. We only reduced retainage on subs that have been uh clearing away from the project and wrapped up as well as completed their closeout um obligations. So for uh subcontractors such as your concrete sub uh excavation
things like that that uh they've been completed their work for over a year as well as uh satisfied their close we've we've recommended payment for that. Um and then the LLB architects uh as they're billing out their remainder of their construction administration. Same
goes for the Vert.Ex companies billing out as our closeout and WBM Mason uh who is billing for some additional furniture um as they close out their purchase order as well. Uh we are still waiting uh to be build uh for exterior furniture
as well as a couple other miscellaneous items on their PO. As you can see the balance of theirs. WB Mason one says 36 King Street. Is we got something that shouldn't been there? Yeah. So, there was a couple um items that had to be changed out and in order
to get the vendor to uh it was a third party vendor other than WB Mason. And so, in order to get the vendor to come back out again and do the changes, we had to make another PO for that. But
um I believe the ones that we're looking at have all been completed over at 36 King. They were there today. No, I think I think this is just referencing the wrong um purchase order number.
This is actually part of the Oh, this is prior. Yeah. Yeah. This is part of the senior center furniture. This was a partial billing for some couches, I think. That's correct. So, that came today. Yes. Yep. Just the wrong address then. Yep. Sorry.
Wrong address. I'll get that fixed, but the amount is is correct. I comment, but I know it was delivered today. Is there a motion to approve?
So moved. Second. Second. So that's a motion to approve $343,775.84 the senior center moved in a seconded um roll call vote. We'll do Bob Bob Rley. Yes. Uh Bartlett.
Bartlett. Yes. Sean. Sean. Yes. Uh Mike. Mike. Yes. And Steve Moore. Yes. moving over to uh 36 King Street. Let's see. Okay, I'll leave this up to uh Brian and
Michelle to discuss. Can you see Can you guys Oh, you can't see it. Can you guys see this? Yep. Yes. So, and Michelle, please interrupt me. Um, and I and I'll explain uh as I see it or
as I know it right now. Um, as we get towards the end of this project, Class of Construction, as you can see, is building for $378,121.7 that is made up between two separate requisitions. uh one is on the main portion of the project and another is also a reduction
of retainage uh amongst um selective divisions throughout the project. In in that requisition uh they are billing against a change order which is called OCO number seven which is the final change order for the project. As we've
gone through this entire construction of the project, we've been in contact with um well, at the time it was Ryan who was our our direct contact uh forecasting the contingency as we talked about at the very beginning of construction that this is going to be very tight.
At this point, we have exhausted our contingency and outside of the project budget and we have set forth an OCO or owner owner's change order number seven which is compiled amongst all of the remaining
change orders to date that have that we have been tracking throughout the project and negotiated some down uh and have a final number for that. And so the process that we had done previously for OCO number six, and Steve correct me if
I'm wrong, is that if it was outside of the project budget that it was not really the purview of PMDC at that point for for approval at that point, right? And so I believe that this invoice cannot be voted and approved on until
OCO number seven is complete and signed off on and and so that had been submitted to the town. And I know that there had been some questions and we were trying to work our way through that. So that I believe that the the approval of this amount for
classic construction would be contingent upon the final approval and signatures that we've sent to the town for recommendation for OCO number seven. So Jim, do you want to uh comment on that?
So yeah, I mean, so the the the PO balance. So Michelle, where are we planning on um are we taking the funds from the the
culmination of all the different projects over the years that there was a that there was a balance there was a balance to? Yes. So let me just take a step back. There was also an invoice for 114,000 that was sent for classic
and um so I couldn't put that one into this even though it's it's really coming from the other capital articles for building needs. Um because I the change order is not signed.
So, Michelle, the the change order 7 is not included in this warrant. I I don't uh I I didn't even get a chance to look at, you know, what is the 378,000 composed of? Is Is it composed of some
of the the change order number seven? Because that wasn't in this package that I got. It came separately. Sorry, it's a little sideways this time. No, understood. What you have in this package here, Michelle, would probably be just the cover sheet of the
requisition. And I have that I actually have it on my computer and can send it to you to show you the the all the schedule of values. It's about 20some pages. Um that that corresponds to what that number is. Um yeah, this one actually is the the vertex invoice, so
it would probably be towards the top. Steve, probably page um two or three. Oh no, I apologize. It might be five or six then. Um so um what I had been looking for was
really if we could get some just some details around those PCOs that change order number seven. Yes. And you know, I really just uh wanted to go over that with Jim, but yes, that would all
110,000 would all be coming from capital articles kind of sitting on our books. I I would say as well, Michelle, um and maybe this is something that you and I can sit down with in our vendor invoice packet that we sent out for the month as well,
there's a a budget status report that kind of shows the overruns that we've had in certain areas with contingency. There are also other buckets that we had budgeted for that we don't plan on using at the end which help offset some of this from an overall appropriation of
the project. Um for example, we did not exhaust all of our furniture budget um some of our security budget. While they're not huge or large sums of money, there are other funds and pockets that we have in our overall budget that may
help help with that overrun. Right. Of the 2 something million, it's all in covered purchase orders. Michelle, are you saying there's another um $114,000
that you have a receipt for or slip for rather? Yes. Yes. but it I couldn't add it in because I don't have enough in the purchase order. And so in order to move that piece forward, which would be coming from our building, not from the project funds anyway,
that it would be coming from um our old capital article that we have. So as far as this warrant is concerned, are we saying that there are sufficient funds to approve 370,000
because we still have a balance of 39,000? Yep. So we can approve this invoice? Yes. Okay. Based on available funds. Yep. Okay.
Any other questions? No. Is there a motion? Thank you, Michelle. Steve, one more question. How much more do we owe on this project? Does anybody know? Yes. I I think the budget sheet is further down in this package.
Well, the only thing that I saw is a vertex. What's this thing? I can I can I can share it. But Bob, according to our invoice packet, there's just north of $200,000 remaining, right? All together and the the 114,000
114,000 and then retainage. Correct. And then the balances for like LLB and vertex and I can send um a list of outstanding items um from my side that what we have
encumbered etc to the that'd be very helpful and then I can also supply you uh all of the backup with uh I can even do a cover letter on each of the PCOS that make up that OCO7. for example, the
uh 40,000 that we had kind of separated out and had our own conversation about that. Um that is part of that OCO7. So is there any can I just ask is there any um sort of documented conversation between say
you and Ryan for those PCOS? Yes. So, this is something that um about midway through construction, we we began holding um bi-weekly PCO review of everything that has been submitted to make decisions on this. Um because there
were large ticket items um I would say towards halfway to beginning of the project where we knew that was going to become an issue from uh a contingency and construction standpoint. And I can I can pull those up and and just for for
example with those um there was a bathroom that was installed down in the basement that was you know 47,000. We added an EV uh an electric vehicle charger uh at the request for 12. School department wanted lighting fixtures throughout the entire second floor uh to
be redone that was at $65,000. And then there were some other items that we needed to address whether or not that this was going to become burden of the project from a deferred maintenance perspective. Um that had to do with uh bathroom fixtures that were not part of the project that were replaced for
29,000. We had some window repair that needed to be done that while we had someone on site, they opted to do that now for 3,000. We uncovered a a sanitary pipe uh sewer pipe exterior of the building that had a
blockage or a a hump in it that in order to get the correct flows, we needed to do in some investigation. Uh and we wanted to do that now for around 7,000. So, um I do have that all uh broken down in detail. Um and I can find
any other correspondence that I have with with Ryan previously about the the decisions that were made for those. just I know that like you know it's probably all fine but we should have the historical acknowledgements of yes proceed with these so you know lessons
learned from a project that we should you know have all the documentation saved down on our end I think that's all stuff that we voted on though isn't it the um the bathroom and the fixtures and stuff that's all
stuff that was approved by the board. Correct. It was Yeah. At the Well, you know, we we did, but we we didn't have the funds to approve it. So, it's kind of a a gray area. I I do agree that we
uh discussed it and we agreed to move forward with the uh the work, but uh any um any work outside the budget is outside of the PMBC purview.
And to answer your question, Bob, uh, at at certain times of the project, we did bring forth those change orders as there was still contingency that could accommodate those changes at the time. So the decision to have the
bathroom for 50 $47,000 could be accommodated by the by the contingencies in the budget that we had at the time as we were keeping a log knowing that forecasting that if we came across some unforeseen conditions or additional asks that that might exhaust
at that point later on. Seems like we were robbing Peted of PayPal. Well, we um we're going to be paying for this out of a different uh pot of money. So, for
this invoice, uh we have sufficient funds to pay for it. So, is there a motion to approve uh a rem remittance to uh well per this uh warrant for
$385,645.32? So moved. Second. Okay. Roll call vote. Bob Bob Rama. Yes. Barlet Barllet Harvey. Yes. Sean. Sean. Yes. Mike. Mike. Yes. And Steve Moore.
Yes. Okay, that passes. So, moving on to the next order of business is uh Shaker Lane School feasibility study. Uh tomorrow the uh OPM is going to be submitting the schematic design
to uh MSBA and u more to come. So uh senior center update Brian. Yep. Um, as an update from our last meeting, uh, we are making very good progress with
the closeout documentation that should be ready to be handed over from the contractor uh, within within the next month uh, as we financially close this out. So, we're trying to hold on to as much retainage as possible, making sure that all the
uh, eyes are dotted and tees are crossed. Uh from our perspective, we're also downloading uh all of the documentation throughout the entire project off of Procore. I have a I have an intern working on that to take care of that to package up uh is also to turn
that over to the town. Uh the one recommendation that we're bringing today, um if Steve, do do you mind if I share my screen? Yeah, go ahead. Um this would be the first I know I tried to bring this up last last meeting. Um I was having some computer issues. I've since gotten a new one, so
hopefully this works better. Um, this is change order number 11 from Commodore Builders, which will be the first of a few credits back as we uh analyze all of the allowances and the holds and the contingencies in the guaranteed maximum price for Commodore.
Uh, as we go through them, uh, we felt confident and we're approving these and we're bringing these ones forward, uh, to the committee. Uh this owner change order is made up of um eight line items um which are all credits. They're either
credits or zero cost change. Um we can provide any of the further backup with this. Some of them were results of architectural supplementary instructions or requests from information from the contractor in which some details were changed and therefore resulted in a
credit. We also throughout construction and looking at uh some of the details, there were level five finishes that were called out throughout the building. We identified a majority of the of the building that was either receiving
artwork or was in a nonpublic area that did not need that level five finish. um we found the schedule of uh schedule of values and the line item and we took back that credit uh with with agreement from the project team. So that resulted
in a $90,000 change order uh back to the town. We also have the the zeroing out of a few allowances, one of which was a uh structural steel framing or openings. Um this was during the negotiation of their
guaranteed maximum price. They wanted to hold $20,000 in their in their bid uh in the event that any structural members needed to be uh corded or penetrated through. Um happy to say that the coordination effort was good on this. We did not have to do any of that. So we
are uh taking that money back for the town. And then also um with the GMP, we know we needed to hold some money for painting the exterior as this the fiber cement siding that came was coming unfinished. So we held some money uh and
awarded a a change order to the filed subbid painter. Uh and our and our number was was very close. I believe we were holding um around $70,000 for that. the cost came in just over 69,000 um for that for the
paint uh throughout the throughout the exterior of the building. So, we're taking uh the remaining funds from that allowance back. So, this results in a uh credit change order for $112,916. I anticipate at either the next PMBC or
the following that we will be having another larger credit change order coming back as we zero out their contingencies and a few other allowances that we're working through right now. Brian, the um the site work, the save for the uh getting rid of the soil, is
that reflected in any of these already or So, what we did when we made the guaranteed maximum price is that I held the allowance on the owner's side for the soil removal. And so, that is in my budget for $100,000 that was never touched. And so, that um while it's in
our budget, it was not under contract with Commodore or any of the subcontractors. So that will be something that ultimately will just will remain as uh unused funds at this point. Ultimately the goal would be is that we we receive all of the credits that we
need back from Commodore. We close out all of our contracts and purchase orders with any other vendors. And then at that point we'll be able to look at all of the buckets and remaining contingencies so that we can have a final number on what the project cost. Ultimately, I anticipate us being around
750 uh to $850,000 under our original budget. And that includes uh contractor and owner contingency, correct? That's that's pretty good. Good money.
Very good. Yeah. Maybe maybe uh I was talking to Michelle earlier today and she said the acoustics in the senior center uh are uh you know annoying. You can hear people
playing pool throughout the uh facility. So I guess uh I talked to Liz. I guess she's getting some more sound attenuation material for the uh interior of the building and we can reach out to her too if it's
something that it's to a level that we need someone to come look at this and provide uh an opinion with it while we still have open contracts. Um we're more than happy to help. Yeah, we're going to be looking into that, too. Okay. Uh, anything else on the senior
center? Uh, 36 King Street. I think we've talked about that enough, but anything else? No, just uh, Brian, if you could get me that the the PCOS that back up that change order number seven. Yes. to start
with and then I guess eventually we should have something for for all the change orders that happened and kind of a summary that would be helpful but not urgent on the other ones. Yes, absolutely. So the uh final keying was supposed to
be done today. They ran into a little bit of trouble and they had to get one more lock and they didn't want to exch or change the keys on the exterior without exchanging keys with me. So, we're going to be doing that tomorrow at 9:00 and I'll be exchanging keys with
parks and wreck school department and the fire department to put in the Knox box. So, that'll be happening tomorrow. Right. Can I just ask um Eric, did you get an
answer on the the two different quotes if we're paying for two quotes for them or just the new one? It's very confusing. Yes, I will verify that. I believe he said that we're only going to
pay one quote because they had to modify the first quote to add a little bit or subtract the tax or whatever it was. So, I think we're only on the hook for five grand. I will let you know that tomorrow morning after 9 a.m. All right. Thank
you. You're welcome. All right. Uh, next item is the police station. Are there any more questions or comments? Just that Eric, since you've been part of the project now, I'm going to forward you before the original project of the
masonry repair, there was an even more original investigative study that was done by Vert.Ex back in I believe 2019. And I had spoken with that project manager and I have that report. I want to send that to you so that you have you
can have original documents. Well, I think the original documents are are physical paper from um the Carell Group and G&R Construction that was built back in 2000. And then we have the investigative report from Vert.Ex in 2019. And then you have the report and
construction documents from CBI consulting who performed the bid documents for the masonry repair. And then the latest report which is from Bees and LLB. So kind of a holistic where we started and and how we got here.
Yeah. Just so everyone else is aware the um Chief Pinard is going to be going away on vacation. So we decided to do a controlled test in his office which is one of one of the offices that has the problem. So, we're going to shut his
door, lock his door, put the AC on 70, and see what the what the differential is between the humidity inside and outside, and if we have any water intrusion. Yeah. Usually, when he comes back, there's black mold all over the
wind window sills. Yep. So, this will be an internal test. So, we'll see. So, Brian, what are we looking at now? having a consultant come in and tell us how we get rid of this condensation or well as part of the report and I went through their um the scope of services
that you engage the purchase order with LLB and bees. They not only owe the work that was performed, they owe a report with recommendations in it as well as well as a meeting if we want to hold that to them to either come to an attend a PMBC
meeting and and share their findings and their recommendations. um which I think which I would suggest or recommend not I would as well because there was a lot of you know is it this is it that we don't know you
know the testing was a little bit inconclusive but it also did did show us some findings so I guess the fact that it didn't leak from the water test shows us that it's more likely humidity
than rain. Correct. But did they did they focus the deluge at the windows or did they focus it above the uh windows at the uh So we bullnose. We focused two deluses on the
front of the one in the front of the building and one on the side of the building on the two most concerning windows. And we did 30 minutes at the lower level, 30 minutes at the header of the window, and 30 minutes above the top of the window at the bullnose, which you
can see there in the picture of that apparatus they sit up. And then we, George and I took all the trim off the inside so we could see what was inside. And part of the um brick was removed
along the sill by the mason. But it looks like that deluge is below the bullnose. It's all that was just one picture and then they lifted it up above that for another 30 minute test. So they were there all day. They did 30 minutes on the window then took the plastic off
the window. Okay. spray it on the window, which you see in this picture coming across now with no plastic on and the drips of water that came through the window came through the window where there was no indication that water had
ever come before. Right? So, I don't think the building has ever seen 30 minutes of water straight on the window ever. And it didn't it didn't like show out when we pulled
the trim off. There was no mold behind there. There was no, you know, it didn't look like a a window that had been soaked with rain. It looked like a window that had moisture issues going through it. So, they first taped off the window you see here and sprayed it to
see the actual masonry. Then they removed the tape on the window and sprayed the window for 30 minutes, lifted it up to the lintil, sprayed that for 30 minutes, and then pulled it up to the bullnose trim ring and ran that for 30 minutes. And nothing leaked except
one window at the pain, which you see right there. So Steve, I suggest that we have these people come in for a meeting with us. See, you see this picture with the rope? They kept pulling the rope up from the
roof. Got it. That every 30 minutes they would go up another section. Okay. Oh, yeah. There it is. So, the the front they did the staging on so they can cut the bricks out and do that testing. And then on the side, this
the window that you're seeing now is the administrator. And the window to the left is the chief. And the administrator window is the worst condition in all of the windows. It's bowed. It's, you know,
it's literally almost probably 5/8 to almost an inch behind or off of the sheetrock. You can put your fingers behind the window in the trim. You can just slide your finger in. just separated, pushed it right in. And so there's them cutting out the uh
test piece, which they did water intrusion on. And then they took out a couple of bricks on the corner as well to see how the weepholes worked cuz the top of that the white lintil on the top
of the window has wee poles that allow water to come out in the bottom. There's nothing at the bottom of the window sill. The wee poles are below on that other gray masonry at the base. Okay.
So, we pulled that off. There was no water behind that after the deluge. They've removed the bricks on the corner and the the part of the sill. No moisture at all behind there, but there was no flashing. So, they said
if you know if we're going to do something, we should flash it. But I don't know if that's going to help cuz we're not going to have a fire hose spraying on the front of the window. You all said, Eric, or is there anything else you wanted to Nope, that's all that I mean, yeah, it's basically in the
report, but that's that's my summary of it from being on site. That's good. Thanks, Eric. Yep. Any other comments or uh questions on police station?
Uh, next is member input. Bob. Yeah. Steve, do we want to bring somebody in on that now or? I think Eric's uh kind of in charge of that, isn't he? Yeah. I mean, I don't know where the PMBC would like
to go from here. if you want to replace the windows. I mean, the windows were friction fit and they're not properly installed, but I don't know if that's going to fix the problem. Do you want to replace the the windows aren't leaking? No, the windows
aren't the problem. It's a It's a humidity issue. So we we we were we always questioned the humidity inside the building and also the differential between the window
that's friction fit and not sealed around the window and the humidity outside. So if it's 90° and 90% humidity outside and inside it's 50 and or 50% humidity
and 70° there's going to be transfer of moisture through that gap. So aren't they thermopane windows? The windows are but around the windows is a gap. They they were never actually sealed around the windows because the
original windows were put back in and friction fit into the the new masonry. The windows were never taken out. Um Eric Yeah, the windows are original. Yeah. Well, I think I think uh you know
Brian's suggestion that we have uh the engineer come and give us their findings and recommendations is what we're looking for. Okay. Mhm. That that might come in at another cost, but it'll be, you know, worth it. I think
it'll be after July. I thought that was part of the uh Brian, wasn't that part of the uh scope? Part of their original purchase order includes having a meeting with findings with that. So, yeah. Well, let's uh move forward with that. Okay. Sounds well
said, Steve. Any other questions, comments? Oh, we're in member input. Uh, Bob, anything else? No, I'm all set. Uh, Barl, no, I think I'm all set. I'm I'm
really puzzled by this moisture in the walls and, you know, where that humidity is coming from and but I'm, you know, other than that, I'm all set. Yeah. As well. Yeah. They they put a um a test
onto that bullnose. It's a basically a vial and they molded clay around the bullnose and the vial just sucked the water right into the bullnose. So they said that's kind of typical and
that's why there's weep holes behind the masonry on the front. So they don't think that's the issue. Yeah, there is flashing behind there. Yeah, we we spent the whole entire day there. actually a day and a half cuz the first day was the original like setup
meeting and what we're going to do and then we did the 8 hours of testing and then cut the the masonry out and we did every possible thing we could. George and I took the trim off the inside. They cut the bricks out the outside. We
delused from three different points all the way up and no water came in except for one window after 30 minutes. One P or two panes in the window. But you if it had ever come in before you would see
like you know damage on the wood. It's a wooden window with the wooden panes and there was no damage. So it it looked like it was the first time water ever came through. Okay. Anything else? Uh,
uh, Harvey Harland, I'm all set up. Uh, Mike, I'm good. Thanks. Uh, Sean, I'm good, too. And I'm good. Uh, next meeting is July 9th. Um,
Brian, maybe you can uh let us know if the uh designer or the uh consultant can give us a report on the police station. Then we'll reach out to them. Um, is there a motion to adjourn? So
moved. Seconded. Roll call vote. Bob. Bob Rley. Yes. Bartlet. Bartlett Harvey. Yes. Sean. Sean. Yes. Uh Mike Mike, yes. Steve Moore, yes. And uh motion passes. Thanks for your time tonight and we'll
see you in a couple of weeks.