Okay, we're on the air. >> Okay. I hereby declare the zoning board of adjustment for the Long Hill Township uh to order uh at 7:30 two uh the meeting of February 17, 2026.
Call to order and statement of compliance. Adequate notice of this meeting/hering has been provided by posting a copy of the public meeting hearing dates on the municipal bulletin board by sending a copy to the echo sentinel and by filing a copy with the municipal clerk. Standard board
procedures. Any meeting/haring conducted by the board is a quasi judicial proceeding. Any questions or comments must be limited to issues that are relevant to what the board may legally consider in reaching a decision. and decorum appropriate to judicial proceeding must be maintained at all
times. Meeting cutoff announcement is made that is a matter of procedure. It is the intention of the zoning board of adjustment not to continue any matter past 10:30 p.m. in any regular or special meeting of the board unless a motion is passed by the members then
present to extend the meeting/hering to a later specified cutoff time. electronic devices. Uh it is encouraged and uh uh pro um really uh asked that all in attendance to mute their cell
phones or any other electronic devices as not inter interrupt the proceedings. Uh pledge of allegiance. Sean, would you plead us please? I pledge allegiance to the flag of the United States of America and to the
republic for which it stands. One nation under God, indivisible, with liberty and justice for all. >> Thank you. >> Roll call. >> Absolutely. Mr. Aronio >> here. >> Mr. Geianakus is currently absent. Uh he
I don't think he told I he might have told me he was absent but >> I didn't see anything but >> I don't remember either. Anyway, okay. Uh Mr. Rosenberg is currently absent. Mr. Watts is excused this evening. Mr. Zadzy >> here. >> Mr. White >> here. >> Mr. Zorke >> here. >> Vice Chairman Groskoff
>> present. >> Chairman correct >> present. >> Chairman we have a quorum. >> Oh, we have another one coming here. >> Mr. Geianis >> start already. >> Yeah. Well, we we wanted to get done with the uh formalities. >> No, we haven't heard anything yet, so don't worry about it.
>> Um okay, >> um just want to let everybody everybody know that the we're we're implementing a new procedure to cost to be cost cutting measures. As you can see, our normal seats over there do not have the
engineer nor the planner sitting there. for the benefit of the applicant. We are they are not charging you for their time tonight because these applications were not deemed to be of any uh uh of that complicated nature to warrant their participation. So you are now saving
some money on this. So which is good. Uh we're going to try to implement that as often as we can. Uh sometimes we need their applica their need their opinion, sometimes we don't. In this case, neither one of your applications warranted it. So we have the first application. It's a bulk variance block
10901, lot 59, zone R4, 12 Norwood Drive, application number 25-21Z. Richard Casey, you can come up here and take a seat. Applicant proposes replacing a dilapidated
detached garage in the rear of the property, obviously, with a new one, right? Um, okay. So, uh, who is, uh, who's who? Would you >> Richard Casey? >> This is Nick. Nick Sarak on the contract. >> Okay. Could, uh, you swear the name,
please? >> Yes. You please raise your right hand. >> Um, do you swear that the testimony you're about to give with regard to this application will be the truth. So, help you, God. >> Yeah, I do. >> And just for the record, state your name and spell it. >> Spell your last name. >> C A S E Y. >> Talk into the mic as much as you can.
>> Sorry. Richard Casey. C A S E Y. Nick Sorco, C I R A C O. >> Thank you. Thank you. And and feel free to pick up the mic if you need to. Um Okay. Now, I see your application involves property at uh uh 12 New Drive
in Gillette, correct? >> Yes. >> And you were the owner of that property? >> Yes. >> Okay. Um I guess uh your contractor is here to explain exactly what is going to be physically done on the property.
So, okay. Well, can go ahead and tell us. having. >> Okay. >> I'm sorry. What's that word you're using? You said it twice and I'm not sure what >> R A C K E D. >> Okay. Got it. Okay. Thank you.
>> Meaning leaning or tilted, right? Like >> um you got to use little words, you know. or the microphone. >> Or the microphone. Either one. Yeah, he's he's a financial guy. He's not a >> um >> going back.
>> So professional with our chair. >> Setbacks because of Well, the existing one didn't meet the setbacks either, right? Is it being put on the same footprint? Yes, we actually I mean slightly increased the sideyard
and the rear yard what it was slightly. >> You mean decrease the set back >> or increased the setback? >> Actually increased a little bit. Oh, >> we rounded it up. It was four and we went to five and >> Oh, okay. All right. >> So, increased a little bit just >> Okay. So, made it more a little more
compliant is what you're saying. Okay. >> And then we did make it a little bit larger >> forward. >> Original was 18t deep. >> Okay. This is 24. >> But by increasing the garage, you decrease the u the black top removing
black top. >> Okay. >> Okay. Um and the uh size length was to accommodate the more modern vehicles. >> How about the height? Is that about the same or different? >> Yeah, it should be the same.
We're not doing any kind of storage. >> Oh, okay. So, the height of the garage >> question you said something about the previous one. What was what were you referring to? The previous what? >> The previous garage. >> Okay. >> Okay. Thank you. >> When you purchased the property, what
condition was it in? Same. >> Okay. How long have you had the property? >> Oh, okay. So, you're relatively new purchaser. Okay. Um, so that was something that was on your on your list to do.
>> Well, originally the list was just >> Okay. >> Yeah. Have a garage. It's always nice to have a garage, >> right? So, um, any other questions from the board members of, uh, either the
applicant or his, uh, engineer or his contractor? I mean, >> um, so you mentioned that I think you said you're going to store an SUV in there or RV in there or something like that. >> Oh, my >> vehicle. Your SUV. It's a regular car. >> Yeah.
>> Okay. Um, and then any other storage? Will there be >> yard tools, lawnmowers, anything else? Well, that that's kind of where I'm going. It seems Look, I'm not designing your garage. You and your contractor did that. But I would say if you want
something like that and it can be done to do that now, if you have a lawn mower or snowblower, those sort of things, where do you store those or where do you intend to store those? >> Okay. >> You don't ever envision using that equipment or anything else you'll need storage for?
>> Okay. >> Smart man. >> Sure. I just don't want you to have to come back in a year and say now I need a shed and I need to get another variance and spend more money and all that whole thing. >> Uh Mr. Aronio is is well well intentioned to say that because we've had uh other applications where we've
had them uh think twice about something and and go for a different approach because of what we we say on the board. And that was a good point that he brought up. >> Sure. >> Because sometimes applicants don't think of these things until we mention it. >> But you obviously have thought of that.
my son next door. >> There you go. >> How convenient. >> How convenient. Uh, so are there any other questions from board members? >> Does your next door neighbor have a problem with you doing this? >> That's one way to get them on your side,
right? Uh, how about on the other side of you? Is there a neighbor on the other side? >> No, it's the witnesses involved. >> Oh. Oh. Oh, okay. Obviously, they don't seem to have any problems. They're not here. uh you were notified them, right? They got notified. Okay. Uh seeing uh I
this is the part of the uh proceeding where I have to say are there any questions from the applicant of the applicant by anyone in the uh in the audience. Okay. Seeing no one in the audience, I'm going to close it to the audience. Okay. So now it's closed to the audience. Any other board members
have a comment or questions? No. Okay. Um do you have anything else you want to tell us about this? >> Okay. Uh, I do have a question. What kind of sighting is going to be on this building? Is it going to match the house? >> Yes. >> Okay. And the color is going to be
matching the house. >> Okay. It's going to be stick built, not like a cement wall or anything like that? >> Yes. >> Okay. So, it's going to look like a uh a garage, a traditional stick built garage. >> Okay. >> Uh just just to make sure, you know, you got to ask these questions because a lot
of times we don't know the aesthetics of it. We want it to match and not stick out. So I think to match home is on the plan just it's already on the just so you know that it's on the plan >> but I want to ask it but on the record >> just I understand >> but nicer
to >> right right okay um all right um does everybody feel comfortable with deliberating at this point >> okay >> all right Paul you can start >> okay um I'll vote in favor for this I
meanvious I feel like therevious obviously upgrading it. It was dilapidated. It was falling apart. Was your house just redone not too long ago? You're right across from the liquor store, right? >> I remember that whole house was redone. So, you did a lot. >> Yeah. Right. Right. Good. Good. Well, absolutely. We got to have a new garage though with the new house that's all
refurbished. Uh I'm in favor of it and um you know, I wish these guys luck and I'm sure it'll be better than what was there. >> Okay, TJ. >> Uh yeah, I'm definitely in favor of this. I remember the house. You did a great job. Looks looks great. I pass it all the time from Valley Road and uh I think the garage will be a great
addition to it. >> Jerry, >> I have nothing to add. I agree. It's uh it's going to be a great addition. You need a garage. You have to have one and you're actually improving the setback. You're making you're making the site better. You're improving the site. I don't see anything any harm to your
neighbors or the township or any of our zone planner ordinances. So, I think you're good, >> Gary. >> Uh I agree with my colleagues. I appreciate you guys coming and doing going through the steps to kind of do this properly. >> Yeah, thank you for that.
>> Uh Alex, >> yes. A good citizen doing his doing his things the right way. Appreciate that. And nothing but an improvement to the property. So would support it. >> I wrote down the pros and the cons. Long list,
>> cons, none. Uh pros, safe, sightly, beautiful. I I concur with my the rest of my board and uh I uh am glad to see that people come in to do this because it improves the look of the neighborhood and improves the safety of it and the usability. You couldn't use this
building. So, it's nice they have someplace you could use and some things is going to match the the nice thing that you did to the house. So, I would be in favor of it. >> Do you hear a resolution? >> No conditions. So, >> any conditions? >> Well, the board hasn't indicated any
conditions. No, no, we haven't had it. No. >> Other other than the standard conditions that you have to now go through the permit process with the township in order to build. >> Yeah, you have to get your building permits, right? >> So, okay. Do I hear >> what >> it's worth, Mr. Chairman? I see no other need for any other conditions that
aren't part of our our building code or standard. >> I I don't I do not either. Um Okay. Do I hear a motion to approve it? >> So moved. Do >> I hear a second? >> Second. >> Roll call. Vice Chairman Groskoff. >> Yes. >> Mr. White, >> yes.
>> Mr. Aronio, >> yes. >> Mr. Giannakis, >> yes. >> Mr. Znney, >> yes. >> Mr. Zorke, >> yes. >> Chairman, correct? >> Yes. >> Motion carries. >> Thank you. >> Congratulations. >> That was painless. >> Thank you very much for coming. Good
luck with both of you. Good >> luck with it. >> You can just see me. Yep. >> Just see the lady uh at the desk. >> Yep. Whenever you're ready. Do you take do you take Venbo COO? No. >> House, right. >> Exactly.
>> And I'll have the resolution ready for the next meeting for adoption. So, you know, they can just move on and do what they need to do when we >> um Okay. The next one is a bulk variance also. It's block 11503, lot 23, zone R4. It's at 211 Essex
Street in Sterling. Application number 25-25Z. Diane Federer, F- A D E R. The applicant proposes to construct a sun room over an existing deck in the rear of the property. And I see that the applicants have seated themselves. Good. Could you
state your name and spell it please for us? >> Uh, talk right into the mic, please. >> Is that mic? Hit it. Uh, that's green. >> It is working. >> Oh, maybe those aren't on.
>> I don't know. >> Your tax dollar is hard at work. >> Yeah, that that one's >> No, it's actually >> No, it's actually not working. >> I I I know that we've been complaining. Don't electrocute yourself. >> Kidding. It's been eight years with this
much. >> No, you're not you. I'm talking about Jerry fooling around with the box over there. >> Don't joke. >> Okay, now it's working. Okay. Would you repeat your names and spell them into the mic, please? >> Diane Feder, F A D E R. >> Perfect.
>> Uh, Steven Federer, F- A D E R. >> Thank you. >> If you could please raise your right hands, >> do you swear that the testimony you're about to give with regard to this application will be the truth so help you God? >> I do. >> I do. Thank you. >> Okay. Now, um, as to either of these
applications, there was adequate notice. >> Yes. >> Okay. >> Yes. >> Uh, I know I didn't ask you that before. notice was provided and it was correct for both applications. >> The uh I see here from your application that the only setback that we have a problem with is the rear yard setback.
Correct. >> Correct. >> Okay. And what is this? What is the existing um to your knowledge you existing setback of the deck that you're going over? Is it going to change or is it the same? >> No, it's not going to change. >> Oh, so it's basically the same as what's
there. You're just >> enclosed. Correct. And um the um sun room is being put in by uh New York, New Jersey Sun Rooms and Additions. >> Correct. >> The company. Okay. >> And
how does that change the um foundation or anything? Do you have to change what the deck is? It just going to be able to sit on the deck or do you have to change anything footing or anything? >> Um >> no. There should be no change to the footings or anything. It should sit right on top of the deck. >> Oh, so it's strong enough. what's there
to to support. Okay. So, you're just putting a structure on top of what is not there. Okay. >> Uh what is there now? I see there's a little bit of a Is that a tent or something you have up there? >> Uh that's a canopy. >> Oh, so it's going to be like where that canopy is going to be >> pretty much. Yes.
>> About a permanent structure. >> Okay. >> Uh anybody any other questions from the board? >> I have a question. Is it really a followup from your question? Um, you made a determination that uh no other structural support is required for to hold the load of the new uh the new
structure that you're putting on top of your deck. Um, who made that determination? >> You have to talk verbally into the mic. >> Um, I can't honestly say that they're not going to put additional footings on there. Um, I would it was in my plans.
Unfortunately, I didn't take a copy of my plans. But that was was that discussed or is that part of the uh area of your contractor is going to handle that? >> Correct. >> And then also for my attorney here. >> Um is that also our building code will also cover that. Right. They'll when they they apply for the building in uh
permit that'll come up. >> Yes. >> Okay. So we're not responsible for that. >> No, you're not. The only thing that the board is looking at is any impact that this uh variance may have. >> Thank you to everybody. >> Thank you. But there's no impervious coverage change from what I can tell. So
still the same correct >> deck, right? >> Correct. This is a pre-existing non-conformity. >> Thank you. >> You have 18 ft. >> Well, how are decks measured? Because if decks have slats in them, are they impervious or impervious? I always >> No, they're considered impervious. >> Impervious excepting if the slats are wide.
>> 38 of an inch. >> This is built a while ago. >> Something like that. Okay. >> What's under the deck? dirt or cement or what's under the deck? >> Uh pavers are under the deck right now. >> So it is impervious basically. >> It is right.
>> So if there's pavers and you have a it's going to be you're getting less water down below. Are you going to be screening the lower section as well? >> No, >> it should. >> That's to be debatable yet. >> You mean for the lattice work or something like that? Is that what you're talking about? >> Oh, no. I meant like to keep bugs out.
They have like another usable room down there and it's dry now because the roof up there. >> There was originally one there when we bought the house, but it was falling apart, but yeah, there was a screened in. >> Oh, yeah. Around the around the post to the deck. Yeah. >> Well, there was no deck yet, but they had it screened in the back porch.
>> Was the deck built with permits and everything? Okay, good. >> How old is the deck with the footings there? >> Probably about >> five to seven years, I would say. >> It's been through a few storms, so it's lasted. >> Yeah, it's fairly new. Yeah, it's good shape. >> And you have no flooding issues with
your neighbors or you guys any water problems over there in Essex? No. >> Well, not by us. >> Your house. Your house. Is your house causing hell? >> Hill. So, just a little >> You're a little higher up. >> Floods floods on both sides. >> Yeah. >> There you go. >> And this won't cause any problems to
your neighbors water-wise. >> No. >> No. >> Okay. Great. >> Shouldn't change anything. >> Um >> satisfied. You looking to make this more like a year round usage? >> Yeah. So in the winter, what are you going to do for heating and everything out in the >> Going to be installed heating and air conditioning. >> So you're adding heating and air
conditioning in the enclosed section. It's going to be a four season. >> Okay. So it's like it's going to be bigger than that canopy we see in the pictures. It's going to be the whole deck. >> Yeah, I think section 3 ft of the deck still, I think. >> Right. There's still going to be >> stairs coming up, >> right? So you have to walk.
>> So there'll be a landing, correct? And then there'll be a door. >> Okay. So, it's it's a little bit different, but not drastically different. And and and the decking is there anyway. >> Yes. >> Okay. >> And it's going to look nicer than the canopy. >> Yeah. >> And not blow over. >> Cost a little more, too. But, you know,
>> um >> So, um any other questions from the board? >> Well, >> any questions from the audience? >> Oh, I've got one more question. >> No audience. >> Who doesn't love a sun room? >> Go ahead. What? >> That's my question. >> What was that? >> Do you love a sun room? You like sun rooms?
>> I like sun room. >> I think that would really that might talk about our opinions on sun rooms. I don't know. >> I like this as well. >> My opinion about a sun room has something to do with this. >> Um it's better than a dark room, I guess. Uh anyway, uh any other
questions, legitimate questions of the applicant here? >> Okay. Um do you have anything else to tell us about it? >> Okay. Um, has everybody had a chance to review their application and look at the photographs?
>> Yes. Okay. >> All right. Um, Jerry, you want to start the deliberation? >> Sure. I think it's um an easy application. You're there's you're not compounding or I'm sorry. You have an existing non-conforming use, but you're not compounding that in any way that I
can see. Your your setback is the same as it was. Your lot coverage is the same as it was. you're not causing a water issue for your neighbors since you already have impervious coverage. All you're doing is closing your deck in. Um, structurally, it looks sound. I can't I I have no knowledge in that
department. Our building code will examine that. Your contractor will examine that. So, I'm totally comfortable with this application. >> Thank you, >> Gary. >> I've already indicated that I like this indicate uh this this uh application.
you you're improving what you have there now. >> Yeah. >> And I hope that you enjoy it. >> Yeah. Clearly an improvement. Again, my only concern is with with respect to the heating and and everything that goes in there. I assume that the the code enforcement and the building inspectors will >> Well, everything we do is
>> Yeah, they they would have to get their permits and and the building inspector and all that would have to approve that and and the fire in whatever inspector has to look at it. >> Okay. Uh Paul, >> uh I'm in favor of it and I pretty much go along with what the board has already
said. Uh uh you're improving the uh deck area and there's no not going to be any problems with flooding or water to your neighbors. So I'm in favor of it. >> GJ, >> uh yeah, I agree with the rest of the board members. I live right down the road from you guys. I think it's going to be a great addition to the house,
>> but outside the 200 ft, right? >> Yeah, outside the 200 ft. >> Yep. >> Just making sure. Tom, >> I wrote down two words, safe and sightly, and they apply to you, too. >> Uh, I feel the same way. I think this is a great improvement. It'll look not
nicer, a lot more useful to you than a canopy up there, basically. Uh, and it's not changing the setback. It's not changing anything else. It's just making the space more usable, correct, >> and more accommodating all year round. So, I would be in favor of it.
>> So, uh, do I hear a motion to approve it? So move >> second. Okay. >> And and again like with the other application, there are no conditions except for the usual conditions that you have to follow um the township code.
>> They get the proper inspections. >> Yes. Correct. >> So it was Mr. Zadraznney and Mr. Aron. Correct. Yes. >> Okay. >> Mr. Zadznney. >> Yes. >> Mr. Aronia. >> Yes. >> Mr. Ganakus. >> Yes. >> Mr. Oh, wait. Hold on. Hold on. Mr.
White, >> yes. >> Mr. Zwart, >> yes. >> Vice Chairman Groskoff, >> yes. >> Chairman Gre, >> yes. >> Motion carries. >> Congratulations. >> Good luck. Spread the good news that it was fast, quick, and and easy. >> And less expensive. >> And less expensive. We want to get a good reputation.
>> We may have to do a drive-thru. This is a good point. >> It's our local. >> Yeah, that's an operator. Drive through zoning. >> Thank you. >> Be in touch. >> Drive-th through zoning or justarmacies and >> All right. Before we adjourn, would you
kindly run us down on some of the things that are going to be happening in the next couple of months? >> Uh, so, uh, March 3rd, we have three applications. >> Do you think they're all going to stay on? >> I Yeah, because, um, the, uh, based on
the engineering review, there was the for two of them. Oh, I'm sorry. I'm talking faster than my brains working. Anyway, >> uh, all three applications are represented by an attorney. >> Okay. happens to be the same attorney >> who >> Fred Zelli. >> Okay. >> So, it makes it easier. >> Okay.
>> Um all three applications um have been sent to the board professionals. Um and as chairman and vice chairman are aware um there's really no need for extensive reviews on these applications. They're very similar what we saw tonight existing non-conforming conditions. So,
uh three and then Verizon is coming back on the 17th. >> And what's in April? >> What's in April? >> April on the 7th. So far we have Dunkin Donuts and another uh residential application. >> Where does Duncan want to move into? >> Duncan wants the corner of Maine and
Valley. >> Chase. The Chase. >> The old Chase Bank. Okay. >> You want a drive? That's good. >> They want the drive-thru. Correct. >> I didn't know if they wanted that bank or the other one because there's two banks. >> Oh, there's two. Okay. Yeah. But so Duncan wants that space.
>> So they will be starting um on the 7th. >> Did you tell them that coffee and donuts are expected? I did not cuz that's unethical. So >> only teasing. >> Please redact that from the record. No bribery is accepted. >> Only teasing.
>> No, I didn't consider it bribery. It's common courtesy. >> I will say that this location is some of the best I've ever had on the eastern seabboard. I'm just saying. >> Yeah. But they they do need a they do want drivers. >> Everybody wants to drive. Absolutely. >> That's where they do most of their business. >> People don't even go want to go in anymore. It's
>> unbelievable. Well, and and it's funny because like this location where they currently are for years, they've been going back and forth to try to figure out if they can actually add a drive-through. They could because of that with the engineering issues. >> Well, that big drainage ditches they can't do it. >> They actually asked the Burger King guy if they can actually put a drive-thru
going out through. Yeah. Right. >> They've been Yeah. They've been looking for a location for a while. So, this is good. >> Yeah. Good for them. It's good. >> Um, so that so far and honestly for April, it's we're going to wait to see what happens with the Verizon application. >> Okay. Right. >> Because the second meeting in April if it carries
>> you want to leave that open. I >> thought Verizon was for St. Patty's Day. >> It is. >> It is. That's so because we have two do two dates in the month of you know in the month of April. I have to leave one open >> just just in case. Yeah. >> And then there's um I there's several residential that I can put in that are
coming up. We are not lacking for applications. Good boys. >> Good. Job security. >> Correct. >> Okay. We should all ask for a raise >> and hats. >> The rules and regs for the board. Have those been adopted? >> Yes, they were adopted last year. Yes. >> So, I would uh >> we just wanted you to review them to see
if there's any uh >> So, I'll send those to you this week. >> Okay. >> Uh, additionally, for next agenda, we will have the resolution for the newspaper. >> The new regulations for the newspaper. >> Oh, yes. Right. For the notice. >> Yes. Yes. Okay. >> So, I'll put three these two resolutions
and that and that one because >> one for the next because I was unable. >> But the next one will be Verizon. >> No, no, it's March. >> Oh, right. that I'm sorry the next one is >> March applications my mistakes same attorney >> and we'll have a lot of meeting minutes because we need to get caught up in the
meeting and I thought that I would have that resolution for this meeting but I still haven't been able to determine >> whether the >> echo >> the echoes or the other uh newspaper that was designated >> as the as a newspaper of record whether
or not they comply with the statute >> right >> I still have to >> well you and I will have to talk a little more of that I can help you do some research now too. I mean for until then basically the applicants have all been noticing in the echoes as usual >> and obviously
>> but that ends on on March 1st and the difficulty that many towns are having right now is >> how to comply >> ensuring that the newspaper gets as many hits I guess or has the the um the reach that it's supposed to have pursuant to
the statute. How about Tik Tok? >> That probably has more. >> No, the problem is if we designate a newspaper that doesn't have the statutory reach, >> is that notice good? >> Right. Yeah, we might be jeopardizing the whole application >> and I don't want to do that.
>> He's right. If we use social media, it would hit everybody real quick. >> You would probably have long hell for him. >> Everybody, no one really signs on. >> By the way, everything's that long on there or no on social media? All right. So, thank you for giving us
the rundown for the next few months. >> Now, I do have one more question for the board. The planning board in has asked that we put together a list of our top priorities of ordinances that they would like us to look for. So, would the board like to do that in a discussion in
public or should each individual send me just some? >> I'd like to do it in public. >> Okay. just because that way we feed off each other and give each other ideas. >> But we'll have to limit it to >> applications that the board has seen. >> Yeah. >> Based on the annual report. >> Based on the annual report.
>> Based on the annual report. Yeah. I'd rather have a group discussion on that because I think it it stimulates us to think. >> We haven't done that in a while, but that used to be an annual exercise that we do. >> Yes. >> Well, I will for our next then when we discuss it, I'll put together all the applications 2025. >> Yes. >> So we can go over that and
>> start for the annual report. So, would that be a night that we wouldn't have any applicants or how would that work? >> I mean, >> maybe a quick one like tonight. >> Yeah, that's right. >> Well, it's early. >> That'll be in June. >> Yeah. Yeah. I mean, it'll definitely be It can't be on a Verizon night >> and it can't be on a three uh one.
>> Yeah. It can't really put on a commercial night. So, it'll The earliest will be is probably April 21st. So, you know, basically I could have a draft of the annual report done at that point. >> Fine. Okay. Yeah. >> And then we can go over >> I want to give us enough time to do it. So, absolutely. >> All right. >> Okay. Great. Do I have a motion to
adjurnn? >> Motion to adjurnn. >> Do I have a second? >> Second. >> All in favor? I >> Okay, we're journed at >> Wow, that's unbelievable. >> Record time.