Are you coming someday or? >> Let me know if you are. We'll save you. We'll try to save you a spot. One of the tables. Call this meeting to order. 7:02 p.m. Uh, stand for pledge of allegiance. I
>> aliance to the flag of the United States of America and to the republic for which it stands, one nation under God, indivisible, with liberty and justice for all. >> All right,
roll call. >> Mike Conu here. >> Mayor Berg >> here. Mike Harding >> here, >> council member Ovka >> here, >> and Mr. Tim Cash >> here. >> Thank you. >> All right. And uh approval of agenda. The agenda we have for today is just uh
one piece. It's 10A. Um motion to approve. Anybody have any changes or anything that they want to put on this? Any additions? No. Okay. Motion to approve. Move. >> Mike Con. Second.
Second. >> Second by Jamie. And all those in favor? >> I. >> All opposed. Motion passes. >> Uh, no approval of a minutes. No public hearings. Um, presentation of citizen petitions
and comments. Anybody want to make any comments? Moving on. Um, moving down to 10A, new business, review, discuss, and consider approval of land use application 2026-01
preview concept plan. >> Uh, thank you, Mr. Chair, and good evening, and I appreciate everybody's attendance tonight at this special meeting. Uh, the applicant, SML Holdings LLC, is proposing to construct a Prairie View single family housing development
on the 30.8 8 acres of the vacant property formerly known as the Bixby property at parcel ID 1 92620002. The proposed concept plan will consist of 100 residential lots ranging from 42
ft to 52 ft to 62 ft wide. The current parcel is zoned R1 single family detached and proposed as a future planned unit development with the following setbacks. Uh, as you can see in your staff report, minimum lot size 4,800 square feet. The minimum lot
width, as I just stated, uh, 42 uh, feet. Minimum lot depth 120 uh, ft. Front back from the rideway, 25 ft. Sideyard setback 20 ft from the rideway.
Uh sideyard uh 10 ft combined total uh for the 42 5 ft on each side for the 42 uh ft lots. Sideyard setback 12T combined total uh 5 foot uh for the 52 and 62 lots. Rear setback uh uh 20 ft
set back from the county road uh 25 ft. Uh building pad depth 60 ft. Wetland buffet buffer 20 ft. Rightway width 50T, street width 28T back to back right away
and the culde-sac 60 ft radius and then the culde-sac 45 ft radius. So we received this land use application from Scott Lumis. Uh Scott has been a major builder in town for the last 10 15 years. 10 years and we received
this land land use application. Uh he he uh uh dropped off his uh his um check for the site plan review and staff uh conducted an internal concept review. After the staff conducted this uh internal review, we're like, "Hey, we
want to meet with Scott." We set up a team's meeting and we went through the points that uh that were brought up during our staff meeting. And Scott, these are all the same points that we brought up at at our meeting. >> Yeah. >> So, uh the first one that we where staff
was addressing is this is simple housekeeping stuff. The first few of them update Prairie View concept plan 4 section 4 section proposed lot requirements and uh to uh from 40 ft to 40 42 feet. Uh the parcel line boundary to the south extends to the Highway 19
rightway. The applicant has confirmed the existing boundary does cross Highway 19. Uh and a proposed rideway line has been added to the north side of Highway 19. Uh include all wetlands and storm water basins and outlots. Uh the
applicant Scott updated that right away. Uh confirm that access is provided to each storm water basin. Staff has requested the applicant for access to the storm water basins to be provided through easements and does not need to include within the city-owned outlet
outlot. Individual access to each basin is preferred and no internal access connection between the two basins is required. Uh provide access to sewer mainline and water main in the souththeast corner of the development. Staff is recommending
for the applicant to directional bore through the wetland to the 4th Avenue Northwest water connection. And then based upon the city of Lawndale transportation plan, there is no street no street parking with the proposed street width. The developer will be
submitting a parking proposal for the city's consideration. And the last bullet point that we talked to Scott about was to provide a 10-ft public trail running parallel along the south side of County Road 96. the length of the the development to Third Avenue
Northwest. Uh the applicant has uh acknowledged the request from the park board and willing to work with the city to accommodate a a connection. So members of the uh planning commission, uh this is Scott Lumis. Scott Lumis, do you want to come
up and do you want to add anything to the staff report >> that we just covered? >> Scott Lumis here, uh developer here. Have any questions? Here to answer. I don't have any further comments at this point. Okay. >> Anybody have any questions for Scott?
>> Uh Corey, I got a question for you. Um where did you say that trail was going? Uh the length of the development. Uh so the length of the development and then we also recommended that to connect
to Third Avenue. How is that going to work with Berina? And we'll have to work within the county right of way. >> Then this 70th Street will just stay a county road. Okay. >> From here on out. I mean, it is currently right now. Correct. >> That is correct. And they don't they
they don't have no input on you know the traffic >> any turn lanes or anything like that. >> Uh they will and Scott will have to work with them to >> Yeah, we're still plum. >> Okay. So you're still working with the county for if because of the traffic coming in out of there same on the on
the same street and stuff. So okay. Um >> uh future connectivity as far as >> um another access point coming into the development >> off of the county road or
>> uh potentially fourth or or u you know going from third in >> um >> well there's not one one proposed right now. Um, I think there's that
I guess I'm not sure what the delineation came up with as far as down in this area. Um, if if fourth was extended to the north, you'd be looking at >> Okay. >> purchasing some credits, some wetland credits or bank and >> that's all muck out there, too. So, that's
>> off of fourth. >> Yeah. That's all wet land and everything. That's a really bad uh access. So that's why we're looking at boring it versus uh trenching it in for the sewer main. >> Sure. >> Um the city does have the right of way
to a third northwest. Um it just really depends on the appetite of the the planning commission and the council how much they want to push the connectivity into an existing subdivision. I think you're looking at close to if not 20 ft
in grade change from kind of that fourth the city's fourth avenue rightway up to uh third northwest Elm wouldn't be bad but Roger your precious storage sheds partially in Elm
looking at the aerial photos >> still the reason for permit Just kidding. >> We're not going back to that one. >> We're not. >> So, Tom, you're saying to to run 4th Avenue straight north in addition to this development. Is Is that what you're
getting at? >> Uh doing something creative. I mean, I I see that uh the wetland area is not really fun. I know I drive drove by it yesterday, thought about it, but also
trying to get through potentially uh Third Avenue Northwest to connect up to this development. Reason why I kind of like it is because it just um gives you another way of flowing
traffic out there and say if they do do fig in a mill and overlay um you got access coming out but I'm asking the question to potentially be proposed as um say if we go into the
plat application that we have something there because this is a multi-year thing and if we at least plan it, we have it there where we can review it. >> Yeah. I mean, we've got the I believe
the with the exception of Elm 66T right ofways I believe. >> Sure. And then um Scott, do you want to go through uh how this is going to be a phased approach? >> So we haven't uh broken up the phases, but it looked like a four um development
phase. So roughly about 30 to 40 lots in the first phase. We haven't unless you broken up till we have the utilities all designed, but the first addition would be coming, you know, by the lift station and whatnot to get the sewage, you know, sewer line and water main hooked and everything. So be about a 30 to 35ish
lot we're thinking for the first phase. So that's the challenge too with it where you want to connect to fourth street. You know that's where our lift station goes. Um and we'd have to lose lots and it's already on a tight budget by losing
uh we lost six lots total because of the uh wetland um determination was larger than it was previously. So, uh, that didn't favor us here. So, sure. Now, I notice you have like three
holding ponds here. Um, and I understand if we're holding pond, I mean, is it that wet there that we need three holding ponds on here or or what? Yeah, because we have to meet the Atlas 13 um uh regulations and rules. So, that's what we're preliminary
thinking for ponding size. And this is a um treating the water from the north here as well coming through this property. So, it definitely needing to make sure we don't have issues. So, >> Okay. All right. >> Yeah. So, it looks like I mean if we if
we would like to try to figure something out, it would be dogwood, cottonwood off a third. Um potentially would cut into two lots. Oh, you're seeing access from Third Avenue West.
>> Is there enough rightway on that house there? Uh the the current house isn't that Brian's house. Um >> or it could cut across cotton wood on
elm. >> Brian's neighbors Roger. >> Rogers on Elm. >> I'd hate to see those houses out of it, too. >> Yeah. Um the crossing at Cottonwood Street, Northwest Straight. Now we mow that
currently. Um that used to be my grand crap and grandma's house. And that garage is right on the line on the aerial. It looks like it's over it, but I think it's just the angle of the satellite shot.
How big of a drop offs back there? >> It's substantial. Like Joel said it's I'd say I mean just looking at the contour map it's like 18 20 ft. But um if you look where
>> like where the original lot lines end >> that's where the drop kind of goes. It goes for a long ways, too. >> Yeah. >> There it up. >> Yeah, it's a long serious money to fix that.
Joe, what do you got to say about the street widths? How is your snow plow guys going to handle that? Or >> I think the smaller streets, I mean, they're not ideal, right? >> Um, if parking is enforced in the winter, we
can make it. Um, it still doesn't solve emergency vehicles if there's parking on both sides of the street. Um, I guess my recommendation would be for the council to consider the no parking from April F or from November 1st to
April 31st citywide if if we got to that point. Um, parking on one side of the street. I we'll work around it, but it's it's not ideal for if cars are parked on the
street really in any neighborhood. >> Longterm, the city's maintenance costs would be less. >> Then, Jason, you got to enforce it. >> What's that? >> You get to enforce the no parking on the streets. >> Yeah, that's what it is.
is here. >> So, we do have a detail from the state that they have that uh we'd widen the road about a foot and that allow for one side parking that uh we're working through that we'll be submitting for >> all right preliminary. So, this is still you know concept level here.
I guess my only concern is that street parking and stuff because um with these smaller houses up front there, >> you know, they're going to have a graduation party or there's going to be cars everywhere. >> Um and you're not going to, you know, get by them in case it's emergency
vehicle and stuff. So, do we have any 28 foot curb to curbs that you're aware of in Wanza? >> No. When we looked, what was the was the third Do we come up with a 30? >> Smallest street to my knowledge is Elm
Street Northwest. Just a few blocks over to the east. >> Yeah. And then I think >> but we have no parking on one side on that street I believe. >> Yeah. That was changed a couple years ago at the request of
>> those neighbors not being able to figure it out. Mhm. >> But yeah, then Birch Northwest too, >> which is one side >> is it? >> And no parking by the Legion at all. >> I know. Do they park
>> on that? Yes, on that side. >> They park on the sidewalk instead. Drives me crazy. I mean, we could bring cottonwood over >> and then parks. How does it determine, you know, which development gets a park? Is it just when the developer comes in
here, he decides something? >> So, yep. So, we have a a park and open space plan >> and on one of the maps kind of showed like park search areas >> and um part of that was trails as well. And there was a park location area
identified on the um Skozach's property to the north of this. >> Um but there was a trail identified uh for uh 96. >> Okay. So that's kind of like our park type improvement down here. >> Correct. >> Okay. >> And then it um parkland or I'm sorry
cash in lil of parkland has been accounted for. >> Okay. All right. And with that roundabout being constructed, they are like all the roundabouts in the middle of corn fields. They all have the ADA ped ramps and um sidewalks or or trails
already pre-constructed. So, you know, longterm that may be something that the, >> you know, when the county reconstructs this or um getting a trail to I mean, ultimately be nice to get one from Main Street to Highway 19.
>> Right. >> And then with that roundabout, you could get to 10th Avenue and have another >> Yeah. >> connection for Deer Ridge and >> Right. Right. because really the only access they really have is coming all the way down to what to get on the seventh or your
railway. >> And then are you going to have any association on on this at all? This is just no covenants. >> Uh >> no covenants either. Yeah. >> Okay. No covenants on here and stuff. So, um, cuz I know I can think of what some
people are going to complain about will be them small lots up front. Um, I could see some people making a fuss about it. Um, and I'm assuming it's just single uh, patio homes,
>> correct? Like a slab on grade product, not a two store, not a detached town home or something like that. Well, some slap a great two stories too as well. >> Yeah. >> Put in there and stuff. So, >> I mean, yeah, that's my only thing I could think of is on there with the association,
you know, cuz I've seen some of these. Some of them are good. Some of them can get kind of busy, you know, in different towns I've saw in stuff. um you know that's way if it's an association again they kind of keep track of it and
take care of it and it's it looks nice neatly on there. So that's the only thing I could think of there. So >> I would like to find a way to do uh to connect that. Um, I don't believe that,
um, Scott, you have to fund the whole thing either. Um, I think it's something that we can definitely work on, try to figure out a solution. Um, I just would like the plan right there. And the reason why I stated
is because we talked about Rolling Ridge Marketplace last year and how it's platted to go through into that residential and then we haven't discussed it again and I
don't want to do that whole thing again because we I mean we stubbed ourselves or stubbed ourselves off over there and I I just do not want to start ourselves off again when we have an opportunity right now to kind of work with Scott
Lumless here and a developer and try to hit it off right the first time. So I I really think that we should think about it at least get it platted just figure out a good way to put it in there. I think it's going to help public
works out a lot. Um, I think it's going to help the residents out a lot. That's kind of where I'm at. I I know that this site's not an easy site to do. Uh, costs a lot of money to do this.
>> So, uh, we need to make sure that we're working together. Absolutely. You thinking cotton wood or dog wood? >> Well, you give me the council meeting, I'll I'll have an answer. >> So, you're saying run the road run a
road in from the east side >> is what you're looking at? >> Yeah. >> Yeah. But not try to cut out a whole bunch of houses in the in the process of doing that. >> Right. >> That's the tricky part. Oh, if you're looking at Dogwood, then you're looking at that Southern the lot that has 25 on
it. >> Yeah. >> Mhm. >> I I would say financially speaking, Dogwood probably makes the most sense just for the soils, the wetland. Scott, how much fluctuation do you have with
that storm water basin? If dogwood would go across, I mean, can you shift it around and shift your lots to save them? That's all that's wetland area back there. So that's really challenging to go that you're talking >> between 25 and one,
>> right? >> Basically just right next to the station >> just kind of, you know what I mean? Shift lot one a little bit and shift lot 25 a little bit. >> I'd have to talk to my engineer and how to accommodate that cuz I see what you're saying to run a through street there. But that is a quite a drop there.
It >> it is. >> Yeah. It's probably like you said 18 ft. Yep. >> Yeah. Um, it's it's it's an important thing for me, too. Just so you I mean, it's not just snow plowing, it's street sweeping. It's it's all of it and it's
forever. >> Mhm. When do you plan on I mean >> just for our sake >> we were to approve this concept plan well plan is only I don't get a vote um >> it's my plan
>> and then say council when are you going to go start planning is it right after the preliminary and final Also, >> yeah, we're already working on our plummetary right now. So, as soon as we get final plat approved and everything, so by the time final plat approved, uh, you know, it'll be, you know, spring summertime. So, time starts. So, so I'm
anticipating to have lots ready by September this year, >> if everything moves right. That's really my only thing. Uh that's my only suggestion, you know. Um I don't think a developer would put a
bunch of work into designing these lots and designing these houses if they weren't going to sell. So has some you guys built some great houses in town. I hear about it all the time. So, um
other than the street the street size connectivity in there um what else do you guys have street? >> Uh one thing I guess I'd like to tell the planning commission. Um, it was my
understanding it was the planning commission's recommendation to outlot the storm water basins and the access points between those ponds on the interior of the development. Um, my recommendation is to let Scott
extend his lot lines down and give us an easement over our infrastructure. um still gives us access to those ponds and it's a little bit bigger lot for the residents and we don't have to mow it. >> I'm for that.
>> Yeah. >> Yeah. >> So, I just wanted to let you guys know that's where that recommendation comes from. >> But the ponds themselves would be >> the ponds themselves would still be out. I'm okay with that.
>> And then one last thing, that piece, you know, that low ground right off the 70th, that's just going to stay. Are they going to dig that out or that's going to stay green? Is that going to be the cities out lot then? I imagine. So, we're still working through all
storm water. So, that it's probably going to be um an outlaw to the city where we're going to drop it for storm capac. We're is still real preliminary. We haven't done our um storm water calcs fully yet. So, it's still preliminary, but we don't intend on um keeping that,
you know, so that' be like city outlot there. >> Okay. Okay. you know, basically the there's a covert that is going to flow to store water there that'll flow between the ponds to um release the water. You know, just a
process to handle all the storm water there. So, but that's still very preliminary on how we're going to go about that, but we have a few ideas that'll work pretty well, right? And as far as the layout, I think it's pretty straightforward.
Um, you know, and I'll be honest with you, you know, running from the side from Third Avenue, um, you start running them streets or you get a few people howling coming to these meetings and stuff. So, >> you know, this way you keep all the
traffic on 70th Street, you know, it's away from everything and it's negative effect like, you know, imagine these people down Fourth Avenue here. they would, you know, bunch of traffic coming down, you know, this way keeps it away from them. So, I guess my only concern
is the street width, you know, good size locks. Anybody else have any more questions or >> I'm good. >> Jimmy, >> I'm good. >> All right.
I guess we don't have any more questions for you, Scott. Thank you. >> Thank you. >> Yes. Thank you. >> All right. So, as far as a motion goes, so is the planning uh and zoning commission making a motion or uh supporting a motion to consider approval
of the um land use application 2026-01 prairie view concept plan. >> Yep. I'll consider a motion to approve. >> Motion to approve. >> Hang on. Sorry. >> Yeah. No, I was just going to address any of the concerns that were brought up or
>> Well, I know you wanted to wait till tomorrow to talk about the street, right? You wanted to kind of get an idea of what what you're thinking of. >> Yeah. >> Push it back first or >> what's that? >> So they can so they can do that. >> I hear what Tim's saying. I absolutely hear what Tim's saying.
>> The street with I mean I think I bet there's some developments in Farmington that got the narrower street. You can feel it as you're coming through there. You know, um if there's any way we can make it to, you know, what is it? At least park on one side or something.
give us some more width on it. >> Uh Tim's referring to the last attachment in your packet, the lawn sale transportation uh street. >> Oh, your handout. >> See, I don't know if my tape measures off, but I wouldn't measure mine's from current back to back. Mine said 33. So,
I I don't know. Maybe it is. But >> honestly, I would put either no parking or at least one side street. >> At least one side parking, you know, cuz I you know, for it's just residential. This ain't going to be a business area. I don't see no need to make it two sides parking.
Um, and ours is 33 and and neighbors got cars parked and we got cars parked and there's still room plenty to get through. So, I would think, you know, for my part, I'd like to see it at at least parking one side, you know, make these a little wider. >> It'll most likely be
easier on city works, too. So, Yeah, it sounds like the they're working on that to >> Yeah. Accomodate. >> That's my only thing I think I don't know how you >> we have >> take care of this or do it. >> Um different measurement for that for the state recommendation on the state uh engineering cutout that uh my engineer
has that we're going to be submitting here. So, okay, >> this is still like preliminary right now. This is all concept. So, we're not approving the preliminary plat where that sets the the width of the uh street here. Okay. >> Yeah. >> Okay. >> Okay. Um, it was the street and there
was one other thing. What was the other one? >> Joe, you're okay with these for you guys for your stuff for the street? >> Is the easement okay? >> Yeah, easement is fine. Yeah. >> Yep. >> Uh, can you repeat that, Tim? I just No, I'm just for street wise, you know, uh
uh whips and culde-sacs, you know, those are good enough for you guys to get around there with your plows and everything. >> Yeah. Again, the concern is just if there's cars on the street, but his concern with every street, if there's cars on the street, >> um if there are cars on the street, we
would >> not be able to make a pass with all the equipment down. Um, >> but to Joel's point, future maintenance is less. There's a lot of things that would be less
>> um with the smaller street width. >> So, if you go on uh parking on one side, would the city have to consistently go out and stripe the one side that's parking? that you would just sign it. Um, no
parking the side of the street. >> My recommendation would be to sign it as well. Um, curb paint is every year you're looking at5 to $700 probably. >> Plus, it only works in the summer.
>> Sure does. >> Can't see it in the time that goes into it. Sign it. >> Yeah. They just sign it like you did down the street. Yeah, we want at least marking one side. >> And otherwise, I mean, for my thinking,
I'm thinking the the access from 70th is it's going to cause the least disruption in the neighborhoods um to the east and to the south. And I don't know if you guys want to get into that battle with the the neighbors there or not.
I know I would. I don't know. What do you guys think? >> I know it's a big drop off once you get up on that end. >> Yeah. And from fourth going north, that's a long ways. >> And some of those people have been there quite a while with the assumption that
there would never be a road there >> at this point in time. You want Blanch coming calling you? >> Yeah, that's what I'm worried about. >> Yeah, we all are. >> I don't want that fight.
>> I'll tell her it was your suggestion. >> So, we don't expect to see you again at the next meeting. No, >> I guess my my biggest concern is the connectivity for just for maintenance for snow plowing, jetting, street sweeping,
just just all of it. Um, it's a substantially smoother operation when you can wrap blocks and move through a neighborhood and move through the city only turning right. I know it's kind of a hard thing to understand, but
>> that's kind of how it works. >> Um, >> with that said, um, >> you know, we're public works. We're launch public works. If this is what we have, this is what we'll do. >> I just think that my opinion is it's a better product with more connectivity to the city.
>> So, you're look, you want it to be connected. >> I want I would prefer it to be connected >> somewhere down there. So, so you're from a fourth or what are the sites? Three, Dogwood or whatever it is. Um Tom, if you want to pass that down. I just kind of threw a black marker on all of our
rightway and then the one to the west is where a possibility of it could go through. I'm not saying we have to do all of it, but it's I mean that's just our right ofway lines. >> You don't want a one-way street on Elm?
>> No. That last >> No. Elm right now. I mean, to be honest with you guys, that is one pass with the snow plow. >> And that's that's tight. >> Yeah. >> That's dog wood.
>> Yeah, I know. I I parked my smoker in Ryan's garage. It's tight getting in and out of there. >> Those narrow roads, you can't really swing at all. >> Zero. >> Yeah, cuz you you end up hitting the other curb pretty quick. >> So then we're going to run fourth. You'd
like the fourth ran all the way up to >> No. So I just I just highlighted right away. >> I was always wondering why never ran. >> So they're talking third across from here. Okay.
>> But you just outlined all the steep right away. >> And if you go on the north side of the road, it used to be a township road right there. >> Where's that? You said there were township roads. There used to be a township road right there. They abandoned it. Um
that's where I grew up. >> Yeah. Yeah. >> Yeah. I don't know. I mean, I guess I you got to talk to the developer. He's the one forking the money over >> and and absolutely. It's just I'm we're at this phase and I just feel that it's
important to me to to get it out there that it's a thing I believe would be greater for the city of Bonsdale. >> Um and it was something that was brought up uh when we originally had it as BSBY's
concept plan too was some people were bringing it up only access on FIG, you know, you're on an island by yourself. Do you think Scott, do you think your engineering could kind of put a little time in and just kind of see how that
would work a little bit? >> I I can talk to him tomorrow. He's been out of town, too. So, I'll give him a call here tomorrow. >> I think we should take an honest try at it and see. That's the biggest hang up right now. >> Works. >> Yeah. >> I'll see what he says and kind of where
um pans out from there. So, >> yeah, I'd appreciate that a lot. >> You want it back? >> Do you have a pre do we have a preference on which one to kind of provide some some guidance? Are we looking at >> dog wood makes dog wood make the most
sense >> wood's going to run right into that wetland >> and the holding pond >> be just north of the pond that'd be >> I I think street connectivity is is uh at first it was um if you ran fourth all
the way up and connected over somehow to the west to just dive into that development our infrastructure would become covered by a street. Um, I understand the challenges and the wetland and everything else. Um, but I would agree with you. I would think
Scott's probably going to look at this and say probably the only option is dogwood if if if at all. >> Mhm. >> Cuz Elmond run you right into somebody's backyard. >> Correct. Birch is way too far south.
just cut up through because that's just access there, right between 1 and 25 there by the retaining pond. Um, yes, that would be the lift station where that goes. Um, so it looks like that's just that would be city outlawed
would be my guess. Um, I would assume we would sit down with Scott and devise some sort of access similar to our lift station that we have now. Um, >> okay. Well, I guess anything else on that or just going to
>> So, what I'm gathering is is that to consider approval of the land use uh application and to uh and to address the street width and then uh street connectivity from Dogwood to the development those two aspects.
>> Yeah. >> Is that uh safe to uh >> Yeah. All right. >> You use that, right? >> Oh, yeah. >> Yep. Plots. >> Extending the plots. >> Oh, we've addressed that already. >> Handle that.
>> 10 foot. >> 10 foot easement. >> Um. >> Oh, you mean as far as the trail connectivity goes? >> No, no, the easement over our infrastructure on the Yeah, probably at 20. >> I thought it was 20. >> 10 and 10.
>> Okay. >> I think it'll give every everybody's 10 more feet yard. >> Well, they'd be happy about that. >> Yeah, >> I'll take 10 more feet in my yard. >> Candy. >> Yeah, we did.
Okay. So, um, we in agreement, everything set for now? >> Yeah, those two issues. >> Okay. So, we're going to consider approval and address the two issues, street width and
>> street access. >> Dogwood street access. >> Mhm. >> All right. Um, can I get a motion to approve? >> I'll make a motion. >> 10 minute motion. Second. >> Second by Mike.
All those in favor? I >> I. >> All those opposed? Motion passes. All right. Uh, that's all the business we have today. Um, motion to close. Move >> to close. Motion
>> closed by Mike, second by Jimmy. Meeting is closed at 7:45