Welcome everyone to the February 25th, 2026 Township of Low Pacon Plan and Board Meeting. Um, can everyone please join me in a moment of silence followed by the pledge of allegiance.
>> Pledge allegiance to the flag of the United States of America and to the republic for which it stands. One nation under God, indivisible, with liberty and justice for all. Adequate notice of this meeting has been provided indicating the time and place
of the meeting in accordance with chapter 231 of the public laws of 1975 by advertising a notice in the star ledger the express times Lehi Valley Live uh the township website
also by posting a copy on the bulletin board in the municipal building. Do you want to swear amend before we do the roll call? >> Yes. >> Mr. Waller, raise your right hand. Do you swear or affirm that you will support the Constitution of the United
States and the Constitution of the State of the New Jersey? that you will bear true faith and allegiance to the same and to the governments established in the United States and in this state under the authority of the people and that you will faithfully impart and justly perform all the duties of the
office as a class 2 planning board member for Lacat Township according to the best of your ability. >> I do. >> Congratulations once more. I'm just going to have you sign that and get it back. Members Coyle >> here,
>> George Hardy >> here, >> here. >> Gucci >> here, >> Leo >> here, >> weeks >> here, >> chairwoman >> here and chairman >> here. Okay, old business.
Um, is there anyone who did not receive the email with the minutes uh from the January 28th meeting? Anybody who did not? Okay. Anybody have any questions, comments, revisions? Okay, hearing none. We'll accept the
motion this time uh to approve the minutes. >> So moved. >> Second. Members Coyle, >> yes. >> Hardy, >> yes. >> Waller, >> abstain. >> Muchi, >> yes. >> Leo, >> yes.
>> Vice Chairwoman Deo, >> yes. >> Chairman Samson, >> yes. >> All right. Next up, we have the ordinance for the digital signage. don't have a uh we have a number for this.
>> It's not I think this isn't on a referral. >> No, it's just discussion with this board. It hasn't been sent to governing body yet. Okay. So this was just our first uh attempt at an ordinance just for the purposes of discussion with the
board and see if we're you know heading in the right direction and then we'll draft you know if it needs some tweaking or whatever we can and then we can send it over to the governing body. So what we we added and then I think the idea was to allow for digital messaging signs to be incorporated into
freestanding signs. Um, so we've added some language that allows that with certain conditions. Um, so the first one talked about requiring a sensor that automatically adjusts the sign's brightness. I know we mentioned that at
the last meeting. Uh, so when it's when it's light outside, you have a brighter sign. When it's dark outside, the the brightness comes down so it's not so bright um for motorists. So that's something that we would require to be done.
We have another one for the hours of operation. So, what we suggested was that it be cut off at 9:00 p.m. and not to be turned on again until 7:00 a.m. Um, or or the normal business hours uh of of the business, whichever is more permissive. So, if a business is open
past 9:00 p.m., they could keep it on until they close and then they have to shut it off. The next one talks about um the illumination levels of the signage and um I think we pulled this from another
municipality's ordinance. It might need to be tweaked and fine-tuned, but these were the distances that they had in where you measure the foot candles of light coming off of the sign at these distances and how big the sign can be. Um
the next one is how often the the uh sign image can change. So this is something especially DOT regulates on billboards the the digital billboards. It can't be an animation. You can change it. It just
goes from one still picture to another still picture and it has to be instantaneous. There's no animations. There's no sliding or fading or moving. um it just changes from one to the other. So that's what we want to see. That's so it's less distracting. You can change the message, but it just has to
change and it's not uh a moving image. And then the last one just talks about um not having white backgrounds and needing it to be screened from residents. The white the white background gives it a lot of brightness. So if you have darker like a black background with a little bit of color,
it's not so bright. So those were were the items that we had come up with that could be uh incorporated in the ordinance. Um you know, if the board has any questions on those, we can talk about it. Um that's where we we ended up. I would just
suggest including there uh that these freestanding signs will not have offsite advertising. >> No off-site advertising then turn into a billboard.
>> Yes. Well, what about like, you know, what our old um EMS building if we want to use that to advertise for community day or anything that the either the school or the town was running. >> That's a more of a public service message.
You know, I don't want, you know, you don't want, let's say, I've come up with a user that has one of these saying, you know, eat here and then go get your your, >> you know, alcohol at John's, you know, go see John.
>> Okay. >> It's like that, >> right? >> It's it's for that particular facility. >> Yes. Yes. >> Anybody else have any questions? The only thing I would say is like the 9:00 p.m. to 7:00 a.m. normal business hours. So like bars and restaurants are open
till 2. Can I be like specific and there to be like time for that as well? >> I can add to that. My point was um what if one of the locations we approve a quick check? >> Yeah. >> Near a resident. And the other thing was
how is there going to be distancing? I know the illumination factor, but the big thing with zoning is a lot of complaints from the um was it the firehouse >> architect? >> Architects and that was a big >> Well, I'm just saying they asked about
the firehouse right away. The illumination, but I'm not against that. But the the big thing was architects was just that how near it was to the residential area. or something you may want to consider putting it in distance-wise beyond the elimination and
then my other big question was um are we going is this I know the ordinance is once it's there but the problem then is any of these other signs that are already there if they change them to illumination signs and create a problem that wasn't there prior to the
signs not being illuminated >> is that discriminating is that you know is that discriminatory towards them because they had if they have a zoning or you if they're approved to have a sign there and now they say well oh now you're not letting us illuminate it but the illumination for that sign may impede upon a neighbor or right that's
the only thing I'm wondering like this ordinance is going forward for new signs but then someone says hey I got a sign and now I want it illuminated >> well then it comes a new sign if they're changing from a non-illuminated to an illuminated sign with the message >> yeah but is there a legal is there a legal problem then because they say
listen I've got the sign that a prime example this is um and it's not an issue right now because there's no residence there. But a prime example, this is Mory's acres. They got formulas for two signs there. >> Just have to put language in if that says >> that's what I'm considered a, you know,
if you want to illuminate it, it's considered a new sign. >> It's a change sign. Yeah. It's not like just changing a sign panel where you're changing one tenant from another. You're changing it from a fixed panel to a digital message panel. >> You're installing a LED screen on
>> I'm thinking it from the aspect of people coming in. And that's the first thing I know they're going to say about, "Oh, well, the sign was already existing. Why can't I illuminate it now?" And then they'll say, "The neighbor down the road has a sign up and they got LEDs." >> I guess if they're coming to you, then you would have to enact the current ordinance. It's a modified sign to the
new ordinance. >> Is is this something that the board would want to see and and approve in all cases where it's not not just a sign permit, you you want to see a site plan or what are the sign details? Are you allowed to word it based on the fact
that any signs from this date forward with illumination or like I don't know the legality of that? >> Yes, we could we could put in here that any sign that is uh >> retrofit to a digital sign. >> Well, any yeah, any any digital sign
whether it's a retrofit of an existing sign or a new sign would uh apply to this restrict these regulations and would need to get approval from the planning board. >> Okay. The only thing I would say is >> cuz there's limits to the sign, but the
600 foot is quite a large sign. >> So, it should be some approval or bigger limitation cuz, you know, 600 square ft is >> to that point. The the ordinance already limits to 100 square feet. So, I mean
that doesn't really make sense to have those different numbers in there. you know, sight distance to consider, you know, like you say from where you're going to place it, you know. >> Yeah. Do you put an order place distance from a resident,
>> right? Yeah, that's a good suggestion. And we do have in there that that needs to be screened from residential, but having a distance would also be another uh >> you put one down here at this business right here. They're they're 30 ft away from that sign. I see you home. It's not
a lot difference. So >> I see his point. He in the ordinance up top you say 100 square feet and then in C number one or two you're me you're giving a reference to a 350 to 600 square foot sign when we're already >> I think those were pulled maybe from
billboard standards. So we need we need to fine-tune that a little bit. >> Yeah. >> Take those out. >> Yeah. >> Yeah. That makes it a little confusing. >> Yep. >> All right. >> I agree. I definitely would agree that should come up with an idea from because
architect's a good example. You're not even cross street >> 30 ft from the property line. It's right there. There should be probably a greater distance from a front door of a residence. It's a matter of coming up with what
think is an adequate. >> Whatever we would create here would just prohibit architects from having that sign. But now they would be grandfathered in. >> Correct. >> Right. >> But you could never have that again. >> Correct. >> All right. Anybody have anything else?
>> Question. If you do 0 to 350 and you say 100 ft from the source minimum 150T you do 0 to one. >> Yeah. I think we would just say uh at measured at 150 ft. It should not exceed.3 foot handles and just leave it
at that. >> Feels better. >> Yeah. Okay. All right. So, you'll put something together then and for the next meeting, Dan. >> Yes. Uh would the board like us to do
another version, bring it back here for discussion before sending it to governing body? >> Okay. >> Yep. We'll do that then. >> Sounds good. >> Okay. The data centers. >> So this is just like a consistency review
for data centers. No, we're just talking about data. So there's more sort of spitballing ideas almost to talk about what potential um you know restrictions could be implemented. I put some couple notes together that we can talk about.
Certainly if Jim or Dan because I I don't know about you guys, but I don't know very much about them. I guess they take a lot of water to cool them off. They're a little noisy. >> Yeah. depending I've been around a few data
centers not particularly noisy except for each other >> I think they used to historically be another road not anymore >> where they're done is not really an issue >> yeah I I recently visited a data center
in East Windsor and I got a tour of the facility I I met with the operational team and I think there's a lot of uh misunderstanding about what what happens in these data centers the uh and there's two different types of technology for
the actual um system computer systems there's air cooled and there's liquid cooled and both of those do not require much water at all the liquid cooled really doesn't use water it's a sealed system um it's
kind of like antifreeze in your car it's not it's not pulling water the chillers for the building the same as any other warehouse or large building that uses fresh water, but it's not anywhere near what >> isn't it? Isn't Aren't they putting off a lot of heat though in those buildings?
>> They they put off heat like the liquid cooled and the air cooled systems and those are pulled out and vented out um from the the HVAC system and then they have the chillers to help cool down the building that uses water. Um otherwise
the actual >> computer system doesn't climate control for center that we do work for they it's just like a computer room >> inside of that room is you know you need you need HVAC and everything else to keep it cool and know with the HVAC you
don't normally do track you do chillers or something else so >> right it's so big >> is there is there is there a difference between the size of the power or whatever What is there are there certain sizes like the the centers
are they and I don't know in your I don't I only know the one we go to but is there certain sizes that they always are look for for the usage of power or the or whatever they're doing in there like is there say you know it's all these centers normally have to be say a million square ft or are they certain
size or you're unaware of that? >> No it's it varies widely from my understanding it could be 50,000 square feet it could be 2 million square feet. really depends on what they're designing it for and what's available um what the power supply available is because they
need to tie into the grid and then they have to have generator backup. So you know these facilities it's not like you're just plopping down a 10,000 square foot building or or a million square foot building. It varies based on who the builder is, what their
intentions are and what's available. >> Most of these buildings are built for that purpose. Correct. >> They're not just built and built up and then data center moves in, >> right? >> The new phase is not the old phase. The new phase is to create their own energy.
>> They're not doing it by generators. They're not doing it by stuff. They're going to, you know, supposedly all right have their own generating system in place like >> at a smaller level. >> All right. So, you're not going to hear you're not going to hear all this. You're not going to hear all that unless
we allow that. >> All right. It's going to be a power plant on their property mentality. So, the world's changing a little bit in that fashion. All right. So, if they're not going to introduce and pull off our grid, it doesn't affect our power. If they if they use like you're saying, you
know, or recycle that water. All right. I mean, you've done system. I thought it goes all the way down to the ground. I did well for it goes all the way down to the ground. It's 52° down there, right? Comes back up, it's 52°. The same water rotates. All right. So there's ways of
that we can put in place that lock them to say this is it can't be this no more. It has to be at this level or they can't move in. Yeah. You know what I mean? >> But I would just say to that you know you talking there's concern over usage
of water and electricity. But if you have property that's zoned for say the ROM that we have and you have between a warehouse or data center, what's the less environmentally, you know,
use of it where then you have tractor trailers coming and going uh all day long? That's the same adding to the pollution you could say from track of trailers from a data center which isn't really affecting the community as a
whole I'd say for air pollution and such. >> Well, that's just >> and all the other things that come with the truck. >> Correct. Yeah. Correct. But the stories you hear, right, about the sort of the worst case data centers where they run these multi-banks of turbine gas turbine generators to generate enough juice to
power a million or 2 million square foot facility. So that would be the main concern. So maybe if we're talking about the potential of a conditional use, establishing a conditional use because right now we have data centers listed as I wrote down computer and data
processing centers is in the ordinance but there's no conditions beyond the normal ROM performance standards. So and we know that you know Dan mentioned you know 20 50,000 to 2 million million plus square feet. So a facility like that is
going to pull a lot of juice um and also have a lot of demand. So I went through and I sort of you know put together some ideas on like um the potential so mitigating some of these concerns about electrical and Brian mentioned like you
know additional load to the to the grid that would then I mean it's cumulative obviously all the rateayers pay higher rates but sort of addressing the concerns about permanent fossil fuel-based power generation not permitting that uh
incorporating renewable energy production. So either like a solar field or other, you know, or using like like Brian mentioned, like a geothermal cooling system, so you're not pulling as much fresh water to cool the facility. Um, you know, addressing noise concerns,
which again, we're we're sort of trading truck traffic on the roads to the potential for air pollution or, you know, noise generation on the site. So sort of creating some sort of standards for backup power facilities, you know, that they would be fully screened
contained within the building or an accessory structure for that use. So you don't have just, you know, I don't know, 15 gigantic generators there. If the power goes down, they got to run all those 24 hours a day until the power goes back. So sort of um addressing that
in terms of uh also water supply is making sure that that's all provided from the water utility and not from them drilling you know water supply wells on site to pull water or using again I wrote down here as well geothermal recirculation
um you know depending on you know and of course we don't have someone in front of us telling us us how it's going to work um and as as Dan mentioned I figured it was all closed loop cooling But if you have to use fresh water, try to minimize that so you're not uh
using 2 million gallons a day. You know, you see all these news reports and whether or not they're true or they're sens sensationalized that they're using so much water that we're not going to have any water to drink, I don't think that's true. You know, agriculture uses way more water than a data center, you know, and
certainly >> the other question would be with the water is, you know, if you are going to take it on site, what are you going to do with it then? Right. Yeah. >> Put some kind of uh >> a lot of I've read a lot of the water evaporates in some of these facilities like the it's evaporative cooling. So
like you use the water to cool the facility and then eventually that water goes in either into a cooling pond or something some sort of loop system and then some of that water evaporates and then you have to you know bring in makeup water and then you're pulling water off the off the water manes. I
I've seen them go into like detention ponds, not you know retention ponds like all right is the atmosphere and then they come back through around >> right you recycle the water that's a closed system if you want to call it that but that's you know I mean so you're not you're not constantly pulling off our our water grid
>> you know what I mean and and uh different things so I would look at building it from a perspective of not like locking it in to the point that this is what we want I would lock it into we have the rights and if it's
legal I don't know you have to tell me that side of it to look at everything as the future progresses what's best for this community. Well I I think that that becomes difficult in certain respects because
if you're a developer you're going to want to know what you're allowed to do and what are the conditions applicable to it. Right. >> So, you know, it's it's difficult to say. You can't just say, "Well, we you know, >> they would say that you're discriminating." Well, discriminate, but
I would say that's what I'm saying. You have to find the right wording. >> Yeah. And I think in that same library, I think that um Adam is creating language, I guess, that can be put into a conditional use standard >> that will address those issues.
>> So, that they have to satisfy those. >> Yes. This whole thing got started because the county is on anywhere in the county. Correct. Everybody >> Yeah. The county >> put out a model ordinance and suggested that municipalities adopt it prohibiting
data centers in the entire municipality. >> Yeah. Right. >> So that's why the discussion came up. Data centers are already permitted in in >> that or you get a warehouse, >> right? Big fan warehouse. >> Can I hear them? It's already permitted use here in the township. >> That's correct. I don't like big brother
coming in and telling us what we should do. It's kind of a strong run tactic as far as I'm concerned. We almost had a data center here about 20 years ago. Um former mayor Steinhart was we were this close. It would have cut our tax rate in half. So I don't know whether we want to shut ourselves out to that kind of a tax
rate just to go along with >> everybody else. I've kind of always marched to my own drummer. I just don't like >> I don't think anybody else has been >> agreed to block. >> I think Bo Hat has. What happened? >> I don't quote me on that, but I thought I >> was considering it. I saw that in the
paper. >> I think I just don't think we should lock ourselves out. >> I don't think anybody >> or they were conditioning it. Yeah. >> Yeah. >> That's why we thought the uh conditional use was a better way to go to make sure
that we mitigate any impacts, but we don't shut them out completely. So, I don't know if you want to throw them some conditional uses and >> draft like some conditional use standards and circulate it. >> Circulate it >> and then we could see if that's something we want to advance to the
township council. >> Definitely. >> Okay. >> Yeah. Cuz rain can come in without any >> right without any conditions. >> I think for the generators >> issue like that. >> Yeah. Yeah. Like no permanent power generation on site.
>> Correct. Yeah. Anybody else have anything about the data center? All right, new business. Cubes, US 22, SUB1 LLC preliminary final major site plan approval. Lock 102, lots 901, 903. request for one-year
extension. >> Good evening. >> Uh Christopher Costa representing the cubes at US22. It's nice to see all of you that I saw at the last round. Um so, uh this project has been progressing over the last couple years. We had to go
through a number of other um approvals um different townships and uh the two townships and then the county and DOT. Um at this point we're moving towards scheduling the meeting of the engineers to do the site work. Um and then we
expect to pull permits um by basically late summer of this fall. So that's kind of the schedule at this point. Um our deadline for the two years um comes up on the 28th. So, we're seeking the one-year extension so that we have it until the next year and we should have
broken ground by then, which will make it so we don't need to seek more extensions. So, that is our that is our request this evening and available for any questions. >> Yeah. And for the board, this is I'm I'm going to say it's generally a routine
type of nature matter. Um, as long as the boards that the developers can uh continue to to obtain necessary approvals from outside agencies aside from this agency that they were delayed
for that uh getting those um despite their best efforts, it's appropriate to give them an extension of time. >> Anybody have any questions? >> No. >> Sell it in the meantime. There's nothing
that prohibits anybody from alienating property. The the whatever bonds or other issues would continue with the land that Oh, okay. It'll continue with the land. >> Yep. >> So, the extension, we went through this last time. It puts
a hold on any zoning changes. >> Yeah, that's it. It insulates the developer from any type of zoning changes that would occur in the it maintains the rights that they've been given for their safety. make a motion one year extension.
>> Yep. And then there'd be a resolution next month just to >> Okay. Would somebody care to make a motion to uh approve the one-year extension for the cubes? >> A second. >> Members Coyle, >> yes. >> Hardy,
>> yes. Yes. >> Gucci. >> Yes. >> Yes. >> Yes. >> Chairwoman Deo. >> Yes. Chairman Stans. >> Yes. >> Thank you very much. >> You're welcome. Have a good night. >> Chairman, I'm going to ask you to take the next thing out of the order and
actually do the amended fourth round housing first. I think that's a good suggestion. >> Yeah. >> Resolution. >> Could you walk right? >> Yeah.
Okay. So, on tonight's agenda is the board's consideration of an amended fourth round housing element fair share plan. This is um uh an element of affordable housing compliance within the state of New
Jersey in this quote unquote fourth round. Uh board may be uh familiar with recently adopting a housing fair share plan. It was probably back in June or May, May or June, uh to be consistent at
that time with um the new law that came out. It was always intended that once that housing melon fair share plan was published and put out, it was going to be subject to amendment because there are interveners in the litigation of
affordable housing, including fair share housing center that require changes to the housing element and fair share plan as a result of negotiations. Municipal attorney's been pretty much running with the ball on that because
it's basically municipal I guess council's job really to see it gets done. The planning board kind of takes a I don't want to say unimportant back seat, but an important back seat to that um and provide support. We do have
to in that context adopt certain planning policies that support affordable housing. So we're at this point now where there's a March 16th deadline to have not only the finalized housing element fair share thing done but also implementation of
required ordinances uh for compliance of constitutional affordable housing. So before the board tonight is amendments to that affordable uh I'm sorry to the housing element fairly and
can certainly go through them and what they entail. I can just tell you that they were as a result of negotiations uh during the course of the litigation that resulted >> in an acceptable plan moving forward for both uh the catch and interested
parties. um that file objections within that litigation. So it will be a public hearing. So after Dan gives his um his insights as to the amendments, it would be appropriate then to actually
open it up for public comment um and afterwards take action to adopt the housing affair share plan and I believe there's a resolution there memorializing it as well. Right.
So, uh, we did this this exact same process last May in 2025. I I explained the process to the board. This is a a element of the master plan. The master plan is the jurisdiction of the planning board. Planning board is the only one
who can adopt the master plan, the only uh entity. Um, so we presented the housing element fair share plan at that time. Um and what we had done in that uh housing plan was what's known as a
vacant land adjustment based on the Highlands buildout uh analysis that we did. We followed through the Highlands procedures for doing the buildout. Um we came up with a realistic development potential of three units based on the amount of vacant land available in the
Highland Center. um lands outside of the center were considered not suitable for affordable housing. So they were excluded and we the board adopted that uh report. When that was then submitted to the courts um the fair share housing
center submitted a challenge not not only to La Pacong but every single municipality that submitted to the court got a challenge from the fair share housing center. So all 400 and whatever municipalities had actually submitted uh
got a challenge and essentially the fair share housing center took issue with using the Highlands buildout and they they did this in a number of municipalities. They don't like the Highlands buildout process. They don't think it's consistent with the COA
regulations as far as vacant land adjustment. Uh so in order to come to a negotiation ne negotiated settlement with fair share housing center we said okay we're not going to do a vacant land adjustment we don't need it we have enough existing credits in the developments that are
already existing in low pac to meet the obligation so that's what we did we even though we could and we we have the legal ability to request a vacant land adjustment we're deciding not to do that at this time we will comply with the uh
obligations for the prior round, the third round, and the fourth round, all using existing credits and existing bonus credits available to the town through uh through the fourth round of those existing units. So, um the report
basically says that we've not added any new projects, we've not changed anything else other than how we're allocating those credits. uh we're no longer seeking a vacant land adjustment or a realistic development potential. There's no more unmet need. It's just we meet
our obligation. This is how we're doing it. And I can go through those uh credits with the board if you're interested, but essentially there's really no change. It's just we're changing how we're doing it. I'm not changing what we're doing. >> Did the number change for our 81?
>> The 81 has not changed. >> Right. So the 81 for the fourth round has not changed. We're meeting that obligation for the fourth round with 67 existing credits along with 16 bonus credits. And that's how we get to our 83. We have 83. So we even have extra
excess credits more than what we need. >> We're good on that. >> And Fair Share Housing Center has agreed to this, right? >> Fair share has agreed to it. So once the board adopts this as an amendment to the report um it will then go to the governing body for endorsement along with the ordinance which we're going to
talk about in a minute. Um and that will satisfy our um conditions of compliance and then we would be then granted uh a JR a judgment of repose and granted immunity from any builder's remedy
lawsuits for the next 10 years nine and a half years at this point. Any questions? >> Other comments? >> No. Okay. All right. So, we're going to um Yeah.
on the dis I believe Beth has released a resolution um adopting the fair share plan and has a prepared by Mr. Block and incorporating the conclusions and recommend recommendations as provided
therein. >> So this will just be an amendment >> correct. It's it's basically adopting an an amended report. All right. Motion to approve. >> Motion. >> Second.
>> Members, >> yes. >> Yes. >> Yes. >> Yes. >> Yes. >> Okay. Ordinance number 26-02
uh referred by council for consistency review amend the code township below pack chapter 67 affordable housing and chapter 243 zoning and land use article 20 administration enforcement
adopt resolution uh finding consistent with the master plan >> and just as it was indicated before that before that March 16th deadline. Uh the municipality not only has to adopt the master plan housing only share plan, but
it has to adopt implementing ordinances. This is one of those ordinances. A lot of this ordinance is actually I'm going to say provided by the state and dictated by state form. Uh there's not a lot of deviation permitted in it. Um they basically say this is the ordinance
that you have to adopt and they give it to you. We say you have to put this into your code for you know conformity uh with state affordable housing regulations. It is part of the zoning code. So it does come before this board. Make sure
that it is actually consistent with the master plan. Um, and as you guys just determined, the housing element fair share plan was adopted. And I'll go out on a limb to say that these ordinances are consistent
with that policy that you just adopted. So, it's for you to determine that it is consistent. That's all you need to do at this point in time. There is a resolution that's there. I think Beth was going to tweak it up a little bit uh just fine for the board determining that
the ordinance is consistent with the master plan. And that's just a simple vote. It's not a public hearing. It's up to you guys what they're about. You believe it's consistent with the master plan. >> Questions? >> And if if I could add on to to Jim's and
that was a very good explanation. The town has already adopted an affordable housing ordinance as part of the third round. This version just updates a lot of the references and requirements to con comply with the updated law for the fourth round. Essentially, it's it it's
just how the affordable housing is administered. It's uh how the uh affordable housing liaison is appointed, the administrative agent and the rules and regarding renting or purchasing, who can buy, who qualifies. It's really
administrative. Even though technically it's a land use ordinance, it's really how you administer affordable housing and it's pretty much exactly the same as what you're already doing. Yeah. Gotcha. >> All right. Would somebody care to make a motion to uh
>> adopt the resolution ordinance >> 262 >> consistent? Yeah. Y >> I'll make that motion. member. >> Yes. >> Yes. >> Waller, >> yes. >> Yes. >> Yes.
>> Yes. >> Vice Chair Deo, >> yes. Chairman Samson, >> yes. >> All right, I think that's it. Someone care to make a motion to adjurnn? >> Motion to second it.
>> All in favor? All right. >> Breaking. I got to get out of here. >> Breaking a sweat. Is it?