Good afternoon. I'd like to call this August 5th meeting of the special programs and centers committee to order. My name is Dr. Samara Rashid and I am the chair of this committee. We appreciate your presence here today. The purpose of today's meeting is to approve the minutes. We wanna take action on policy 50 95, and we do have two information items that's charter school, annual technical and support services agreements, and review a policy 54 10 for charter schools. But before we proceed, we value public input. And as far as I know, I don't think anyone signed up for public comment.
Am I correct? No one. Okay. That's correct. Alright, great, Ray. Thank you. Thank you. All right. So, um, so we'll go ahead and move on to approving the minutes from our last June 3rd meeting. Has everyone had a chance to review the minutes? Are there any corrections, um, or additions? If there's no corrections or additions or edits, I entertain a motion to approve the minutes from June 3rd. I move to book. I think it's behind Hiding. I move to accept the minutes from approve, the minutes from June 3rd. Okay. Thank you Ms. LaBelle. So moved. Um, and I, I second.
All those in favor say aye. Aye. Aye, Aye. Okay. And all those opposed say nay. And the minutes are approved. Okay, so let's go ahead and begin the reviewing the agenda. I kind of did already, but, um, again, we have one action item for policy 50 95 participation, um, in the Thomas Jefferson High School for Science and Technology, and two information items. Charter school, annual technical support services agreement, and review of policy 54 10 for charter schools. Any adjustments or additions to the agenda? Ms. Bel?
If so, raise your hand. Okay. None. Nope. Okay. Alright, so then we'll go ahead and go ahead and move on to our first agenda item, which is the action item, uh, 4.01, policy 50 95. I will, I'll go ahead and turn it over. I guess Mr. Sum is not here. I'll turn it over to Ms. Catherine Clark for just a brief summary. Thank you, Ms. Clark. Good afternoon. Thanks for having us. Um, we came, I think it was in June, maybe even in May, um, to talk about the TJ policy 1595. Uh, we did put it out for public comment
and you can see those comments in board docs. There were 12 of them, mostly about the changes in updates to Section C Transportation. Um, so we are recommending that the specialized programs and centers committee approve proposed changes to policy 50 95 and forward it to the full school board for adoption. Thank you, Ms. Clark. Okay. Um, any questions before we go ahead and turn it over to a vote? So, Bella, any questions if you have any? Thank you. You're welcome. Um, I was still thinking, I wanna know, if not, it's okay. How, how do the students get from their home areas to tj?
Do, do we do it like a, they, they go from their schools? Are we doing like a center thing this year? Has any of that changed? The bus and the transportation. We have, um, hubs, so the students go to the hub and to catch the bus, uh, to TJ in the morning, and then similar in the afternoon. Okay. Is this different from last year? No, It's the same. Okay. Thank you. Okay. Thank you Ms. LaBelle. Um, if there's no other further questions, Dr. Rasheed? Yes, ma'am. I just wanna make sure that you, the committee has seen the, um, feedback, the public feedback that was posted in board docs.
I saw it. Dr. Ellis. I saw it online. Okay. Ms. Ong had sent it, but I wanna make sure, Ms. Bel, you had seen some of the feedback that, uh, was presented. You wanna share with me in general? You just, I'm happy to. So it's a lot. I Mean, I'm happy to share with you in general, um, and Ms. Clark may be, will speak better to it. Um, but there were several comments from, um, LCPS parents. Uh, one comment from lef, one comment from M SAC and, um, another from the equity committee. Most of the comments did, um, focus on lines 17
through 21 around transportation. There were concerns about the language being ambiguous and concerns about transportation. Um, it not being clear to families if transportation were gonna be offered each year, which would then cause problems for families, um, for planning in the future. So I, I believe, um, Ms. Clark, correct me if I'm wrong, but each, each of the comments was about the transportation in lines 18 through 21. Yes, That's correct. It was all focused on those changes to that transportation section.
And I noticed that in the feedback, um, there was a, I think a one or two or maybe even more, one or two comments about on 11 line 17 to 18 to keep it 'cause they, they appreciated the vagueness of it, or, or it was more, I guess, general. So that was more, um, kind of like stating that transportation will be provided and that's it. The, the, I think we, correct me if I'm not saying the same thing that you just said, but my understanding from reading the reading the feedback is that they were concerned about the proposed changes
because it was no longer clear that transportation would be guaranteed. And that was a concern for families. Yes. So in line 17, yes. Um, you know, um, I wanted to say this before the vote, I mean after the vote, but I think that the policy feedback in the agenda item reflects the community concerns that the updates completely remove transportation from Loudoun County to tj. I just wanted to make it clear that the updated LCPS policy for TJ does not stop LCPS from providing transportation
for current and, uh, for current or for future students. So if, if, if this vote does come through, this committee's not recommending that the full school board vote to eliminate the TJ transportation at this time. So the updates proposed by this committee are meant to highlight transportation logistics and costs during review of the annual contract between LCPS and FCPS. I just want to ensure that we put close eyes on it on an annual basis at least. So, for example, in recent past LCPS has had to create bell schedules that were less than ideal in order
to make sure that all bus routes were covered. Should we again, be faced with transportation challenges like that? I just want to be sure that we pay close attention and efforts to provide, uh, the reasonable route coverage for loudoun's own schools along with TJ students. So Loudoun has to review the overall TJ contract with Fairfax each year. So therefore, policy 50 95 guides this annual process. Uh, my intention is to help LCPS to best use, re our resources so that students can take advantage of every opportunity, including to the extent transportation is provided by LCPS to TJ as a policy update update state.
So this is what this SPCC will recommend as part of the vote by the full school board. Of course, it, it does have to go to them, but I just wanted to say that for the record. But, um, any other discussion or, Well, I do, I'm sitting here looking at Thank you. I I do have some things I want to talk about. Um, what it says is, to the extent transportation is provided by LCPS, the terms of transportation will be outlined in the contract that we have with Fairfax. It doesn't say what the transportation is. And I can see why people are then confused thinking.
It depends on what Fairfax says. I don't know. Well, traditionally, well, traditionally, um, Ms. Clark, if you can enlighten us traditionally, what is the transportation that's provided? Um, not normally. So in our contract with Fairfax County Public Schools, they do, they would not provide the transportation for our students. That is all the responsibility of the sending school district. So we have to provide that, um, through LCPS if we're gonna provide that.
But that's, we Discuss, we're talking about the hubs, which is what I asked for. Yes, Yes. We are on hub stop for all of our program placements. I, I think we need to say something about that. I think that the, um, statement about Fairfax County School Board is confusing to them. I think they're looking at that and then they're not seeing a complete statement about what LCPS is providing for them other than, oh, well, we'll provide something. And I think we need to clarify that a little bit. Um, I thought the transportation was like, may, it could vary based on the number of students
that go from LCPS to tj. So I know that like, if we have less enrollment, obviously the less, the less the amount of buses that would take our students to tj. And that's, that's always, But are they picking up from schools? Are they picking up at hubs? Are they taking them from their bus stops? I think that's the part that needs to be clarified. Um, I mean, we could go in there and say, take out the part of that Fairfax County School board and say that that Laden county school board, uh, or Laden County public schools will be providing hub
transportation as it has in the past or something to that extent. And that would clarify and probably settle a couple of mines there. Do I smell an amendment? Are you gonna second it? Because there's nobody else? No, no, I know That's true. I mean, really, um, uh, I, I think i, I move that we add in that we remove the statement about Fairfax County School Board and just have it say that the Ladin County School Board will provide transportation as,
uh, in the hub format that we have used previously or continue to provide transportation in the hub format that we have used previously. I'm gonna just, uh, defer to Mr. West, uh, counsel, uh, just to see your thoughts on adding that in line. I think it's 20 in line. 20, yeah. In the red line copy somewhere we could add, actually It starts On 19. The Yeah. Starts on 19th, the hub stop, um, term, just to add for clarity.
Thank you Dr. Rashid. Thank you. Um, that's within this committee's, uh, purview to do the consideration, uh, for this committee and the board would be that that would be very instructive. Um, but that's certainly within this committee or the board's will to, to put that specificity. Um, you just wouldn't have flexibility if, if unforeseen, um, circumstances occur. And the, that kind of, uh, approach with the hub stops is no longer feasible, If I'm correct. So, uh, the more specific we are, the more
The less control We Yeah. So I see it as it does allow flexibility. Yes. If you don't add hub stops within it. Right. Because then we can't, 'cause then what if there's a problem with the hub stop hub stops, then what are we going to, What are we, well, what if, what if we just say LCPS will continue to provide transportation as in the past? Does that cover it? But that just negates the entire, how, how would that, if you could show me how that would read. Let's see. To the extent transportation or we just need to say transportation will be
provided by LCPS as provided previously. Yeah. But previously it was, there was no annual ba so then we, we don't need, we don't need an edit at all between 17 and 21. No, Really, but then we don't want an annual basis. Then Kara Transportation needs will be reviewed annually and put that In there. But that's the same thing as saying from lines 18 to 21. That's the same thing that you just said. I think they need to know that the transportation comes through Loudoun County, that they don't have to worry about Fairfax providing any sort of transportation
or getting their child to someplace where Fairfax is picking their kids up inside Fairfax ca I think that's what the concern is that they're are having. It's not really clear to them From the feedback I that I, that I read, which Dr. Ellis, you can let me know about the feedback that I read. Sure. They, they actually liked the original, what the original phrase showed, which was, lemme find the whole thing again. Uh, which was Loudoun County public LCPS will provide transportation to LCPS students attending tj, that's it.
Okay. So I just wanted to make sure, as we discussed in the last meeting in June, um, I just wanted to, I don't wanna go through my whole speech again. I can, I can read the lovely speech again if you wanted to, but, um, And I thought this was gonna be a short meeting. Um, Well, I didn't have an amendment. I just, I just, okay. I know we discussed it last time. Well, we need to say that LCPS is providing the transportation To a certain extent. So it says to the extent transportation is provided by LCPS, the terms of transportation will be outlined.
Do Or does it say will be outlined? Oh, it's, it's, um, line 19 red copy. I'm looking at the red copy Line 19. Okay. If you think that's clear for them, I will rescind my motion. I mean, we could say other things, like we could say to the extent transportation is provided by LCPS, the terms of transportation will be reviewed each year in line with the annual contract renewal with FCPS. That works Better for me. And then we can say logistics and number of buses may change, like we can add all that may change. Yeah. Yeah. May change that works with changes in Loudon students' enrollment in TJ and LCPS will provide families with as much notice
as possible to any changes in transportation logistics. That would work. Okay. I just wanna, um, I just wanna make sure, I just wanted to hear any thoughts from Anyone? From anybody. It came outta nowhere so I could kind of send it to Yeah, It came out of your mouth, but it hasn't been paper yet. Got it. And that's all that matters, right? That's Right. Okay. All right. You get outlined annually. Yeah. What I could do is, let me send this to you As well. Uh, Ms. LaBelle, um, I can find you here.
Am I lost? Are you on teams? Oh, I didn't get on teams, but, okay. I can, where's teams? All right. I'm being ignorant. Where's teams on this? It's like, it's the purple, uh, Dr. Rasheed, could you read your absolutely sentence again? Go For it. Absolutely. I apologize for this. No, that's okay. I'll just Listen to Yeah, yeah, sure, sure. That's okay. So, to the extent transportation is provided by LCPS, the terms of transportation will be reviewed each year in line with the annual contract renewal with FCPS. Logistics and number of buses may change
with changes in loudoun. Students enrollment in TJ and LCPS will provide families with as much notice as possible to any changes in transportation logistics. I, I think that makes sense. Okay. I It's important. It's important. I will say for the record, I'm not sure it addresses some of the concerns that parents have, but I do think it's clear what you're, what you're aiming to do. Um, and, and just for conversation purpose or rather to just make sure everyone's fee, you know, worries are alleviated. Is there, is there a timeline for this, for this?
Does this have to be, um, voted on today? Can this be delayed or is there a concern with timeline or deadlines? I, I don't think that there's concern about deadlines. And I will, uh, you, as you know, the board will also have a chance to see this Oh. As an information item That's, and discuss and, and have a final vote. That's right. That's, that's, I forgot about that. I keep thinking it's here. It's fine. Thank you Dr. Ellis. And then, um, just wanted to ask for any thoughts. Everybody's okay? Okay. Yes. Alright. Okay.
Alright. So I will move on in saying I'll entertain a motion to approve. One moment To approve. Is this an amendment? Did I just make an amendment? Yes. Okay. You did. Sorry To approve the amendment as stated for The, okay. Um, I'd like to make a motion to approve the amendment for as stated just now for item 4.01. Review a policy 50 95 to the red line. Copy. Um, do I have a motion? No, you made the motion.
Oh, I made the motion. You have a second. Do you have a second? I second. So it's second. Um, I'll Tell you what, it's always entertaining when we're here together. It is. Um, alright. So then it has been approved. That motion passes. Okay. And this will now move on to the full board. Vote On it. I just second to Do. Okay. It's been a while. Okay. It has been, um, it's been a while. Okay. So we entertained a motion to amend, I mean, for the amendment. So I'd like to, it has
Been moved and seconded. It's been moved and seconded. So all, all in favor say aye. Aye. Aye. All those opposed say nay. Okay. And so that amendment approves. Do we have to vote for the hold? Pause. Okay. So now I'd like to make a motion to approve policy 50 95 as amended. Uh, do I hear a second? Second. Okay, second. Great. And I was seconded by Ms. LaBelle. And all those in favor of policy 50 95 as amended, say aye. Aye. Aye. All those say nay And that go, that passes to go
to as an information item to the full school board. Okay. Alright. Thank you so much. All right. So now we'll turn it over or rather we'll move on to our next agenda item, which is 5.01, uh, charter school annual technical and support services agreements. I'll turn it over to Ms. Lehman, if that's Okay. Thank you, Dr. Ish. Thank You Ms. Leman. Um, you see before you that you have the, um, HCA and MCCS technical agreement and support services agreements. These are annual agreements renewed annually. Um, our current agreements expired June 30th,
but, so the, uh, agreements remain in place for, um, 90 days if we are in the process that we're in right now. But I'm going to, um, invite division council to speak about some of the changes that are recommended within these four agreements. Thank you, Ms. Leman. Um, generally what you have before, you are four agreements. Uh, two for each of the charter schools. Uh, they are the support services agreement and then the technology agreement. You'll note that each of them have a header, um, that's, uh, at least for the technology agreement that, um,
has been redlined to read Support agreement. Support agreement as opposed to support services agreement. Um, that's a new change this year. I admittedly think it's confusing. So it's within your purview to, uh, of course, uh, deny that, um, uh, amendment. But specifically there, the thought was pursuant to the Virginia Code section with respect to charter schools, it, it provides that school boards can enter into support agreements to provide services. And so that gets us within the square corners
of the plain language, but it hasn't presented to be an issue. And it's provided greater clarity to have support services versus technology. But that's why you see, um, the first red line as to the, the titles there. Uh, as a general matter, these agreements have all been updated to bring them into compliance with current contract standards. And they were reorganized to harmonize them and bring them into alignment with each other. There were distinct nuances that, um, were more, um, semantics than anything. But this way there is, they're all treated uniformly.
Um, with respect to both agreements and with respect to both charter schools. Happy to walk through, um, the first one with you. Bear with me to bring that up. So I don't see that they are redlined necessarily for the HCA tech. The track Changes is the red line copy. Am I correct? Correct. Okay. Yep. So the, the first one that I see on board docs is the HCA technology agreement. Track changes, and you'll note here, which is the, the year is updated to the 25 26.
Um, as Ms. Layman present, um, presents earlier. The current iteration allows for up to three months from the expiration date. So while the last iteration and the, the current, um, governing agreement technically expired June 30th, 2020, 25, it does allow for a three month grace period for the school board to, uh, approve these. You'll see there's been an insertion of, um, language that reads for the term the school board invokes its demand for possession under the renewal leases hold over provision.
That just clarifies that, um, beyond the term, uh, that that's another, um, um, allowance for the term to, to expire. If the school board does invoke its demand for possession, um, based on a hold over provision, Uh, under section four technology services, um, you'll just see, uh, changes, uh, after consulting with DDI, what's provided for, um, and bringing that current up to date, say, um,
those per proposed changes were socialized with Aaron Smith and Justin Donovan. Uh, one note from Mr. Smith is that both schools have a lot of computers, equipment that's no longer supportable. Um, per this contract, they're responsible for replacing their equipment. So that should, uh, happen or come up at some point this year. Uh, and, uh, we wanted to be transparent, uh, about that with, with the committee and the full board to the extent, um, it's, it's up for duration and I believe that is really all there is with respect
to substantive changes. But I'm happy to entertain any questions with respect to the HCA technology agreement. Thank you Mr. Allen. Um, okay. I'll open the floor to, for discussion members of the committee. Do you have any questions or comments about this item? Yes. Uh, specifically where does it say that they are responsible for replacing their computers as they are no longer, when they become no longer supportable? What section? Just bear with me. Ms. LaBelle. Mm-hmm. I believe it's under, uh, I'm told that it's Section four a
i I, which is on page, uh, it's two crossed out at the bottom. Let's see, page three of 10, uh, which reads to The Other one? Repairs of computer desktops, laptops, or other computer devices including printers and the school. Um, there is also no obligation to refresh that is replaced the computers, laptops, or other computer devices on a pre-planned schedule. I am sitting here in the red line copy. Is that where we're looking? Uh,
Yes. So four technology service. Okay. And go down to two eyes. That's says repairs. And then the following sentence, uh, which begins, there is also no obligation, No obligation to ref reflect. Okay. I see it now. Thank you Ms. Bel. Did you have a question, uh, about this item? Well, there's some things I'm not happy about, but that's not a question. Okay. Do you want a discussion? Well, did we give them the original computers? That's, that's a question. How's that? The computers they're using, we're giving, we're given to them by LCPS? Yes or no? No, they purchased them. Okay, then that,
that takes away my objection. Thank you. Okay. Any other questions or discussion for this 5.01 item? No. Thank you. Ms. LaBelle. Okay. Yes. Yes, Dr. Ellis, please. Sorry. Uh, so the, I I do want to point out that these contracts expired June 30th. However, uh, they do extend for, I believe, uh, Mr. Allen, correct me if I'm wrong, three months beyond the expiration date.
Uh, so you may consider suspending the rules to move them to the full board to expedite their approval or renewal rather. Um, and given that they do extend three months beyond, it's, it's not necessary. So just throwing that out there. Thank you, Dr. Ellis. So I believe, can the chair make that motion to suspend the rules? Okay. I make a motion to suspend the rules and have item 5.01 move to the full board. Uh, due to time limitations due to time limitations. Um, that is my motion to suspend the rules.
And if you can correct me if I'm wrong, do I need a second? And, Okay. We have to have two thirds of us at least vote. 60%. I believe it was. Okay, So do we have a second? Second. So seconded by Ms. LaBelle and all those in FA will take a vote. All those in favor for moving 5.01 to the full board? Say aye. Aye. Aye. Those opposed say nay. Okay. So that passes. It goes ahead and moves on to the full board 5.01. Okay, great. Alright, we'll now move on to the next item. Yes? Yes, Mr. Allen? Uh, yes, Dr. Rashid. As a a point of clarification, did this committee, um,
want to keep the title as technology agreement or it, it's currently presented in the red line, I think a support, uh, services contract. And I didn't know if if what you all are about to pass, you just suspended the rules so you haven't adopted this. So maybe there's time for discussion before you adopt this, um, support services contract to, to clarify about the title. So we make an amendment for the, oh dear Lord. Okay. Um, okay. Yeah. Alright. Okay. So do I do that before suspension? Can I go back and go back in time or
You're, you're fine. You, I, what I think I heard is you suspended the rules to consider this as an action item rather than an information item before you all today I am suspended the rules to make it go to the full board. That's what I said. So it's currently on for an information item. Is that before this committee? That is correct. That is correct. So I can still go ahead and make a motion to amend the title i, I Guess, uh, correct before you su Okay. Okay. So you suspended the rules, but you haven't done the actual voting to move it to the full board yet. Okay. So it's now before you as an action item. Okay, great. Great. Alright.
So I'd like to make a motion to, I make, I'd like to make a motion for an amendment to, lemme go back to the policy. Yeah. The policy number, but to item 5.01 charter school annual technical and support services agreement. So that, um, so well I'm gonna speak to my amendment, but title, so that the title re supports services, contract technology. Does that sound, does that sound so right to you? Ms. LaBelle, Uh, In parentheses put technology
but support services contract and in parentheses book technology. Is there any reason why we can't just call it the technology services contract? Um, No. Okay. That'd be acceptable, Ms. LaBelle, that Make it simple, That's fine. Yes. Okay. Okay. Alright. So, um, you made the amendment. Okay, So Ms. LaBelle made the amendment, so, um, she made a motion for amendment i, I, i second that motion. And then, um, all those in favor of amending
that say aye. Aye. Aye. All those in, not in favor say nay. Okay. So that title of that agreement has been amended. Okay. So now we vote to send this off to the full board. So I'd like to make a motion to send this agreement as amended to the full board. Um, I'd like to make a motion I second. Okay. Um, and that was seconded by Ms. LaBelle. I'll go ahead and, uh, we'll take a vote to send it to the full board, say aye aye, aye. And those that oppose say nay. Okay. And that, that item then goes on as amended
to the full board Okay. For the process. Okay, thank you. All right, so now we can go to the, now we can go to the next item and that's 5.02. Alright, so review of policy 54 10 and that is, uh, charter schools. So I will, I will send it over to Ms. Lehman to present if if possible, or Ms. Mitchell. That's fine, thank you. Thank you Ms. Mitchell. Good afternoon. So updates to policy 54 10. Were done in a collaborative manner to, um, involve multiple departments. Changes include naming the policy establishment
of charter schools to clearly specify the facility being used for charter school. And it outlines the school board's role in approving or denying a charter application and facilities operations. So these substantive changes are found, um, on page six, starting with number 36, um, under facilities that outlines the plan for acquisition of a facility, should it be used for charter school. Um, part G that, um, states how the school board operates with approval or denial of the charter school.
And then part K, which is the facilities operations. Um, so those three sections are the substantive changes for this policy, along with adding the phrase establishment of, um, to the title of the policy. Thank you Ms. Mitchell. I'll open the floor for discussion for this, uh, policy 54 10. Ms. Abell, do you have any questions or would you like to discuss this item any further? I'm just kind of looking over it very quickly. Um, it doesn't tell us in this
how students will be cho chosen for the charter school. Correct. Good. Just the establishment of the school almost there. Yeah, Sure. That struck out on K. Okay. Thank you. No questions. Thank you so much. Okay. Alright, so since there's no further comments or questions, and that is our last agenda item, we will now I think that will now then go to the full board. Yes, yes. No, we gotta vote on that first. Well, it's information item today. Oh. So this is an information item and it's a policy revision. So it'll go through our normal policy review process.
It'll be posted on the website for public review, and then we'll return with the, um, red line version and any po any feedback that we've received from our stakeholder groups and, um, the public. And then also, so you'll see this again as an, as an action item. As an action item. Great. Um, also, we did only review one of four documents on the, um, contracts. There's a, there's a tech services contract for middleburg, and then there's a support services contract for each school. So if we could go back and just make sure that, um, it,
it sounded like the motion was to only move the, the one contract forward. So we just wanna make sure that, um, Mr. Allen has an opportunity to highlight any significant changes and that you send all four documents together to the full board. The four documents of 54 10, uh, like on this item, Uh, no, sorry, going back to 5.0100 The Har, there are four separate ingredient. Okay. Yeah. So I have to revisit that again. Okay. So, uh, what did I, what did I approve of it going forward? Because I used it as a whole item 5.01, but I will, So perhaps if you did, if you did vote
to move all four documents forward, maybe uh, Mr. Allen can just highlight any changes and make sure you don't have any additional questions. Okay. Thank you Dr. Rashid. And this is more so for clarity of the record, um, as it goes forward. So with regard to MCC s's, uh, technology support agreement, um, no, no additional changes that we haven't already discussed. But with respect to the support services contract, um, just wanted to, uh, confirm that we had a discussion with Don Trainor who provided, um, his blessing on, on this.
These items, both, uh, support services agreement for MCCS and HCA and the, the last page of each agreement. There's an exhibit that sets forth the rates of services offered by LCPS support services, um, various labor rates for facilities, building management, uh, recycling trash, snow removal, those auxiliary services. Um, they've been updated for the current rates. And so at this time you, you could enter, obtain a motion to uh, uh, um, suspend the rules
to consider these information items as action items along with the, the HCA technology support services agreement that, um, you all have approved, um, to go to the board. Okay. Thank you Mr. Allen. Thank you Dr. Ellis. Um, I'd like to make a motion to suspend the rules and send the MCCS technology agreement, um, agreement, um, as, as amended, um, uh, MCCS support services agreement, the HCA tech, um, technology agreement and the HCA support service agreement.
Um, yeah, I'd like to suspend the rules for all four documents, um, for that to move on to the full board due to timeline time limitations. And, uh, do so I'm, that's my motion to suspend the rules. Do I have a second? Second. All those in favor to suspend the rules and, uh, suspend the rules and send this off to the suspend the rules. Say aye. Aye. Aye. Okay. All those that Jose Nay. Okay. So the rules have been suspended. Now I'd like to make a motion to send all four documents.
Do I have to read each one? Like okay. To send all of the four documents mentioned to the full board as an information item? Um, as an information item. Do I have a second? Second. All those in favor say aye. Aye. Aye. All those opposed that say nay. And that all four documents. Now move forward to the full board as an information item. Okay. Now we will move on to 5.02. Um, and I think we finished that. Okay? Yep. And we finished the discussion for that. Mm-hmm. And that's great. Okay, so since there's no discussion
and no questions on item 5.02, um, I just wanted to say our next meeting is scheduled for September 2nd, three 30. Mark your calendars. And you know, it'd be funny if somebody just now like open their microphone and said you need to go back to item 5.01 and do something else because three's a charm. But no, that's okay. But, um, if there's no further business, I entertain a motion to adjourn the meeting. I move that we adjourn the meeting And I second, um, all those in favor of adjourning say aye. Aye. Aye. All those that say nay, that don't want it. Okay. And the meeting has been adjourned.
Thanks for coming out. Thank you. Okay. What Time.